HomeMy WebLinkAbout~Master - Ames Park and Recreation Commission Meeting 05/19/2016AMES PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
DATE: May 19, 2016
COMMISSION
PRESENT: Julie Johnston, Sarah Litwiller, Allen Bierbaum, Vikki Feilmeyer, Melissa Rowan,
Ed Moran
ABSENT: Jason Schaben
STAFF: Keith Abraham, Kellee Omlid, Joshua Thompson
CALL TO ORDER: 4:01 PM
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Moved by Feilmeyer, seconded by Bierbaum to approve the April 21, 2016, meeting minutes.
No discussion. No opposition. Motion Approved
PUBLIC FORUM
No Public Forum
DIRECTOR’S REPORT
a. Commission Action Form: All Inclusive Playground and Miracle League Field
Abraham gave a presentation regarding the potential All Inclusive Playground and
Miracle League Field. Abraham also went over the comments from the April 18, 2016
public input meeting.
The Commission then discussed locations in various Parks as shown in the
presentation.
Larry Ebbers (224 24th St.)
Ebbers stated that he is representing the neighborhood and spoke against the project.
Though they applaud the effort to include amenities for persons with disabilities,
however they do not want to include these amenities in Inis Grove Park, the
neighborhood or by their homes. They are concerned about traffic, parking, and
lowering property values if this facility is built in Inis Grove.
Abraham stated that the Commission could ask for no parking along 24 th street to ease
the congestion shown in Ebbers’ presentation. Ebbers stated the neighborhood did not
want it to be no parking as they have guests that want to park on 24th. Bierbaum asked
what the neighborhood wanted the parking to look like. Ebbers feels that parking on
one side only would work, however the neighbors did not want to make any
recommendations.
Ebbers concluded that the neighborhood feels the Ames Parks and Recreation Staff
has not fully researched this project including locating this facility outside of Ames.
Pamela Riney-Kehrberg (204 24th St.)
Riney-Kehrberg spoke against the project stating her opinion that Moore Memorial Park
and McCarthy Lee Park are safer options. She feels that Inis Grove is not a safe place
and represents danger.
Mary Anne Russell (3314 Polaris Dr.)
Russell spoke in favor of the project stating she feels this park is a great idea for people
with disabilities like her. A park where people in the community can “see us for what we
can do not what we can’t do.” From her perspective Emma McCarthy is not safe with
the river and big hills.
Warren Frank (2219 Broadmoor)
He said he echoes the presentation against the project given by Ebbers. He is also
concerned about light pollution. He expressed his belief that Emma McCarthy is a
better place. It would be a destination where you would go to play.
Clyde Wolter (132 Broadmoor Cr.)
Spoke against the project. He stated that Broadmoor Circle is very tight and difficult to
park on.
Drew Kamp (304 Main St.)
Kamp spoke in favor of the project stating he is a part of the Steering Committee.
Priorities for this project are safe areas to drop off and pick up participants, properly built
restrooms and accessible by CyRide. Miracle League does recommend that the
playground and the field be together as they serve many of the same people. Kamp
stated that safety is very important. He feels that parking concerns could be addressed
by the City Council. The disabled and their families need to have good access to this
facility. The lighting would be controlled and not detract from a night sky. The Steering
Committee would like to resolve the location issue and continue to move forward.
Martin Edelson (2417 Duff)
Edelson stated his concerns about safety with travel on Duff. He would like more
information regarding loud speakers, noise pollution and future expansion. Edelson
states that the project is pitting the committee against the neighbors of the park. His
hope is that the Commission favors the residents of the neighborhood.
Shelly Jaspering (823 Duff Ave)
Jaspering spoke in favor of and is excited for this project. She has been a wheelchair
user for 10 years and has wanted to play softball. She likes the central location. She
states that wheelchair vans cost around $60,000 and that she knows she is lucky to
have a van but many do not. HERTA and CyRide won’t go to some parks. Jaspering
stated if someone in a wheelchair was dropped off at the top of the hill at McCarthy Lee
she did not know how they could get to the park. Moore Memorial and McCarthy Lee
both have hills where you can’t use a wheelchair and she has had to ask strangers to
help her.
Libby Franke (2219 Broadmoor)
She is disappointed that things they were assured in past meetings would be addressed
have not been addressed. Franke stated her opinion that sand volleyball was placed
there because they were less vocal. Now this has been described as a destination.
She feels like it is going to start looking like a theme park and we should be charging
admission. There have been a lot of contradictions and unanswered questions. She
asked if this is what we want for our city.
Jim Mason (2016 Amherst Dr.)
Mason stated that the Steering Committee was not formed to build a Miracle Field at
Inis Grove Park. The people on this committee wanted to provide an opportunity for an
underserved part of our community. Inis Grove Park is where the Committee feels is the
best location. Delays are impacting the community the Committee is trying to serve.
Feilmeyer asked Mason what considerations were given to other locations. Feilmeyer
agrees serving the underserved is a goal. For her, what works for the community is
another goal.
Mason continued top priorities are how can we reduce the cost and make this happen.
We feel confident we can raise the money to do this project in Inis Grove. The
Committee has looked into Nevada, and other parks in Story County. At this point Inis
Grove is our favorite place. He stated the Committee is not out to ruin somebody’s
park, they are out to add to it.
Barb Ebbers (224 24th St)
States she can see both sides but feels the people who are proposing this (Miracle Field
and All Inclusive Playground) don’t live there and asked the Commission “Do we have
to destroy the park?”
Elizabeth Baird (2207 Duff Ave)
Baird would like the Commission consider locating the two items in separate locations.
Bierbaum feels like the project is admirable but he is torn because it sounds like if it is
not in Inis Grove it won’t happen. Bierbaum also agrees that the traffic near Inis Grove
is a problem. Bierbaum is not ready to state that he does not want this in Inis Grove.
Rowan feels that the traffic piece is not our responsibility but maybe we could help this
situation.
Rowan asked what the next step would be. Abraham stated that if the Commission
would approve this location it would then go the Council and ask to release funds for the
design. Could get some conceptual plans and then go back to the neighborhood to find
something that works and then ask the design firm to get some conceptual drawings,
plans and specs. That would help the committee to know how much to fundraise.
Rowan asked how much longer the two step process would take. Abraham stated Staff
would need more direction from the Commission regarding what they would want to see
as to one location, multiple locations etc.
Feilmeyer stated that she senses that there is some discomfort with option #1 and that
she is very supportive of the playground. For her, adding on the field is what is causing
discomfort. She is not convinced that all locations for the Miracle Field have been ruled
out.
Bierbaum has been trying to figure the location out and the only option he can see
finding out if it is feasible is to raise some area at North River Valley.
Rowan feels that we need this in our community but still thinks there is some work to be
done.
Bierbaum still feels that the playground should go in Inis Grove.
Feilmeyer understands wanting to move things moving along, but feels that it is
premature to say this is it and spend $25-30,000 on figuring out where it is going to be
in Inis Grove.
Moran feels like this project deserves the right spot and shows our need for more space
as our community grows.
Abraham stated that the Parks Master Plan was done in house and goes through 2018.
Staff would like to bring someone in to do a really comprehensive plan which would take
into consideration where the community is growing.
Johnston said that it does feel like it came on rather quickly. Her belief, based on her
history with Staff, is that that due diligence has been done. Johnston was disappointed
that she did not hear from anyone say that they support a Miracle League or that they
support an All-Inclusive Playground.
Riney-Kehrberg alleged from the floor that no one had approached ChildServe. She
accused the Committee of not thinking about speaking with ChildServe even though
they work with every disabled youngster in the area.
Abraham stated that on the Committee there are representatives of The ARC of Story
County, The Friendship ARC Homes and Mainstream Living who all deal with
individuals with disabilities...
Riney-Kehrber interrupted Abraham to say “adults”
Abraham continued that the Committee members have had conversation with
ChildServe and that they are supportive of the project. Riney-Kehrber stated that those
are adult serving organizations. Abraham explained that she stated that the Committee
did not think to speak to ChildServe and he is informing her that the Committee had
spoken to ChildServe and they were supportive of the project.
Larry Ebbers wanted to state from the floor that the neighborhood did not object to the
project.
Litwiller is of the opinion that if the Commission keeps pushing this back, continuing to
research and research and research the community could lose out on an amazing
opportunity for Ames.
Rowan believes that the accessibility part of this is really important. Rowan feels that it
needs to be in Ames for the accessibility and transportation. .
Ebbers from the floor again feels like you can raise money with conceptual ideas.
Rowan feels that there are no conceptual ideas created at this time because there is no
location and that is the problem.
Jay Lettow (8401 Waybridge, Johnston).
Lettow stated that he has worked in Ames for 15 years, first as the Executive Director
for the Arc of Story County and now at the Iowa State Foundation. He understands how
hard it is for the Commission when there is a very passionate group from the
neighborhood that is opposed to the project. He feels that they cannot be successful if
they separate the projects. If they stick with the criteria including nothing in the flood
plain and other considerations that Inis Grove is the only place to put this feature. He
reminded the Commission members that they are representing the entire city and have
to make this decision for the whole community.
Shelly Jaspering from the floor feels that it could be neutral colors. She has a new
Habitat house built in the historic district which shows that something new can come
into the neighborhood and fit in.
Matin Edelson from the floor stated his opinion that this is going to be more successful
than anyone expects. He feels the people in the neighborhood deserve some respect
and deserved to be listened too.
Barb Ebbers from the floor pointed out that there was a sentence in the beginning of
their presentation indicating that they were advocates for this project and it was not that
they didn’t want the project; they don’t want the ball field (which is part of the project) in
their neighborhood.
Moved by Bierbaum, seconded by Rowan directing Staff to work with the City Manager
and other City Staff to addressing parking/traffic issues on 24th Street and on
Broadmoor Avenue. No discussion. No opposition. Motion Approved.
Moved by Feilmeyer to direct staff to put together a conceptual plan with an initial focus
on Inis Grove Park, but not ruling out any other locations for the proposed All Inclusive
Playground and Miracle League Field. Such plan shall take into consideration the
concerns of and include the Inis Grove neighborhood, Parks and Recreation Staff and
the Steering Committee and not ruling out the use of a consultant during this phase.
Seconded by Rowan. Discussion: Bierbaum asked if the motion gives Staff what they
need. Abraham stated that he had a pretty good idea of what the Commission was
looking for. Litwiller inquired regarding cost of this phase. Abraham stated that he did
not know. No Opposition. Motion Approved.
b) Commission Action Form: Mobile Concession Units
Keith went over the Commission Action Form regarding mobile concession units. Staff
recommends Alternative #1. Moved by Rowan, seconded by Bierbaum to approve
Alternative #1. No discussion. No opposition. Motion Approved.
c) Commission Action Form: JAX Request for Boat Rentals at Ada Hayden Heritage
Park and Waiver of 10% of Gross Sales
Abraham went over the Commission Action for stating that this is a great partnership.
Staff recommends Alternative #1. Moved by Bierbaum, seconded by Rowan to approve
Alternative #1. No discussion. No opposition. Motion Approved.
d) Naming Policy Update
Abraham explained that the changes gave flexibility to the Commission and Council.
Corporate names can now be considered. There will be no waiting period and parks,
facilities and amenities can be named for living individuals.
e) Healthy Life Center Update
Abraham reported that enthusiasm for this project continues to grow. This center would
cover physical activity, social, health, nutrition, education and research. June 13 the
City Council and the Ames School Board will hold a joint meeting and the pool will be
one of the topics of conversation. If the District says they do not want to be part of the
proposed center, then we as a City have to decide which has the greater benefit to the
citizens.
f) Project Update
g) Correspondence
MONTHLY REPORT
Johnston asked about the pond in Moore Memorial Park. Abraham informed the Commission that he
has spoken with John Joiner, Director of Public Works, about it and are discussing options.
COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
Litwiller stated that she has attended some of the cycling classes and that the bikes were user
friendly, awesome and worth the investment.
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Bierbaum to adjourn. The meeting concluded at 7:40 PM.
Next Meeting: Thursday, June 16 at 4:00 PM