Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA047 - Motion approving Draft FFY 2027-2030 TIP and setting July 14, 2026 as date of Public HearingITEM #:3 DATE:05-26-26 DEPT:AAMPO SUBJECT:DRAFT FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE ACTION FORM BACKGROUND: To be eligible for federal transportation funding, projects within the Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) planning area must be included in the AAMPO’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP is a fiscally constrained, four-year programming document that is updated annually. It includes federal funding for: Roadway improvement projects Public transit investments Multi-modal improvement projects Transportation planning activities The Draft FFY 2027-2030 TIP (see attached) was prepared in accordance with Iowa Department of Transportation guidelines and demonstrates fiscal constraint based on current federal funding estimates. It also includes all projects which were awarded Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) by the AAMPO this year. Click here to view the committee action form from March 24, 2026, for more information regarding those projects. A map and full list of projects are included in the Draft TIP: FHWA-funded (roadway/trail) projects: pages 21-24 FTA-funded (transit) projects: pages 25-33 Next steps for the TIP after draft approval include: May 27 – June 30, 2026: Public comment period & state/federal review July 14, 2026: Public hearing and final approval ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the Draft FFY 2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program and set July 14, 2026, as date of public hearing. 2. Approve the Draft FFY 2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program, with modifications by the Transportation Policy Committee, and set July 14, 2026, as date of 1 public hearing. MPO DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Draft FFY 2027–2030 TIP was developed by staff in accordance with all applicable state and federal guidelines. All included projects are consistent with Ames Connect 2050 and regional funding targets. Additionally, the Transportation Technical Committee unanimously recommended its approval. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the MPO Director that the Transportation Policy Committee adopt Alternative No. 1. ATTACHMENT(S): FFY27-30 TIP Draft.pdf 2 1 | P a g e The Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization prepared this report with funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, and in part through local matching funds of the City of Ames. These contents are the responsibility of the Ames Area MPO. The U.S. government and its agencies assume no liability for the contents of this report or for the use of its contents. The Ames Area MPO approved this document on July 14, 2026. Please call (515) 239-5160 to obtain permission to use. DRAFT FFY 2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program 3 2 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO CONTENTS 1 - Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Document Overview .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 AAMPO Overview and Planning Area ............................................................................................... 4 1.3 Transportation Policy Committee ..................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Transportation Technical Committee ............................................................................................... 6 2 - Public Participation ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Website ............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Outreach ............................................................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Public Involvement Opportunities .................................................................................................... 7 3 - Performance-Based Planning ................................................................................................................ 8 3.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Safety (PM1) ...................................................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Pavement and Bridge (PM2) ............................................................................................................. 8 3.4 System and Freight Reliability (PM3) ................................................................................................ 9 3.5 Transit Asset Management ............................................................................................................. 10 3.6 Transit Safety ................................................................................................................................... 11 3.7 Regional Transportation Goals ........................................................................................................ 12 3.8 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................................ 12 4 - Project Selection .................................................................................................................................. 13 4.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Application Process (STBG, TAP, & CRP) ......................................................................................... 13 4.3 Applications Received (STBG, TAP, & CRP) ..................................................................................... 14 4.4 Requests for Project Modifications ................................................................................................. 14 4.5 Transit Projects ................................................................................................................................ 15 5 - FFY 2026 FHWA Project Status Report ................................................................................................ 16 6 - Financial Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 17 6.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 17 6.2 Iowa DOT O&M Estimated Expenditures and Funding ................................................................... 17 6.3 Fiscal Tables ..................................................................................................................................... 18 7 - FHWA Program (FFY 2027 – 2030)....................................................................................................... 21 4 3 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 7.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 21 7.2 Programmed Highway Projects ....................................................................................................... 22 8 - FTA Program (FFY 2027-2030) ............................................................................................................. 25 8.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 25 8.2 Programmed Transit Projects.......................................................................................................... 26 8.3 FFY 2027 Transit Project Justifications ............................................................................................ 32 9 – TIP Revision Procedures ...................................................................................................................... 34 9.1 Amendments ................................................................................................................................... 34 9.2 Administrative Modifications .......................................................................................................... 34 Appendix A – Resolution of Adoption ....................................................................................................... 35 Appendix B – Self-Certification of Planning Activities .............................................................................. 36 Appendix C – List of Federal and State Funding Programs ....................................................................... 37 Appendix D – Requests for Project Modifications .................................................................................... 43 Appendix E – Public Comments ................................................................................................................ 46 5 4 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 1 - Introduction 1.1 Document Overview The Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2027 - 2030 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is the short-range implementation program for federally funded and regionally significant transportation projects. The TIP is a requirement of 23 CFR 450.326 for metropolitan planning organizations to develop a program, covering at least four years, which reflects the investment priorities established in the metropolitan transportation plan. The Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) develops a n ew TIP annually in coordination with the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the City of Ames, the City of Gilbert, Story County, Boone County, Ames Transit Agency (CyRide), other local agencies and stakeholders, as well as the public. The AAMPO’s TIP is included in the Iowa DOT’s Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). 1.2 AAMPO Overview and Planning Area AAMPO was officially designated the MPO of the Ames urbanized area by the Governor of Iowa in March 2003. This designation was the result of the Ames urbanized area having a population greater than 50,000 in the 2000 Census. As a result of the 2010 Census, the urbanized areas of Ames and Gilbert were combined into one urbanized area, therefore requiring the Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary be expanded to encompass this area in its entirety. The current boundary, a result of the 2020 Census and urban area adjustment, was adopted by the AAMPO on January 23, 2024 (shown in Figure 1). Figure 1: AAMPO Boundary (Adopted Jan 23, 2024) 6 5 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO The AAMPO provides and coordinates various transportation planning and improvement efforts throughout the Ames urban area and consists of two standing committees: The Transportation Policy Committee and the Transportation Technical Committee. 1.3 Transportation Policy Committee The Transportation Policy Committee (TPC) is the governing body of the AAMPO, and its membership consists of representatives from AAMPO member agencies. Currently, the TPC membership includes the City of Ames, City of Gilbert, Ames Transit Agency (CyRide), Boone County, and Story County. The Iowa Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, and Iowa State University have advisory, non-voting, representatives. Transportation Policy Committee Membership Representative Agency Member Representative Agency Role City of Ames (Chair) John Haila Mayor City of Ames Gloria Betcher Council Member City of Ames Tim Gartin Council Member City of Ames Anita Rollins Council Member City of Ames Rachel Junck Council Member City of Ames Bronwyn Beatty-Hansen Council Member City of Ames Amber Corrieri Council Member Boone County Scott Longhorn Board of Supervisors Story County Eric Kretzinger Board of Supervisors Ames Transit Agency (CyRide) Emily Boland CyRide Board Member City of Gilbert Jonathan Popp Mayor Iowa Dept. of Transportation ‡ Shelby Ebel District 1 Transportation Planner Federal Highway Administration ‡ Sean Litteral Planning & Development Team Leader Federal Transit Administration ‡ Gerri Doyle Region 7 Community Planner Iowa State University ‡ Brandi Latterell Director for Planning Services ‡ Non-voting 7 6 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 1.4 Transportation Technical Committee The Transportation Technical Committee (TTC) serves as the primary advisory body to the TPC, and its membership consists of technical personnel from various regional agencies involved in transportation planning efforts and transportation project programming w ithin the AAMPO planning area. Currently, the TTC membership includes the City of Ames, City of Gilbert, Ames Transit Agency (CyRide), Boone County, Story County, Iowa State University, Ames Community School District, Gilbert Community School District, and the Ames Economic Development Commission. The Iowa Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, and the Federal Transit Administration have advisory, non-voting, representatives. ‡ Non-voting Transportation Technical Committee Membership Representative Agency Member Representative Agency Role City of Ames (Chair) Damion Pregitzer Traffic Engineer City of Ames (Vice-Chair) Justin Moore Planner City of Ames Kelly Diekmann Director of Planning & Housing City of Ames Mindy Bryngelson Municipal Engineer City of Ames Brad Becker Operations Manager City of Ames Mark Gansen Civil Engineer II City of Ames Joshua Thompson Parks & Facilities Superintendent City of Gilbert Mitch Holtz City Engineer (Consultant) Ames Transit Agency (CyRide) Barbara Neal Transit Director Iowa State University Sarah Lawrence Campus Planner Iowa State University Angie Solberg Facilities Project Manager Boone County Jonathan Bullock County Engineer Story County Darren Moon County Engineer Ames Community School Dist. Robert Addy Facilities Director Gilbert Community School Dist. Trent Becker Transportation Manager Ames Economic Development Commission Greg Piklapp Director Econ. Outreach & Gov. Relations Iowa Dept. of Transportation ‡ Shelby Ebel District 1 Transportation Planner Federal Highway Administration ‡ Sean Litteral Planning & Development Team Leader Federal Transit Administration ‡ Gerri Doyle Region 7 Community Planner 8 7 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 2 - Public Participation This document was developed in coordination with AAMPO member agencies, regional stakeholders, and members of the public using the process described in the AAMPO’s Public Participation Plan. This process includes strategies to disseminate information about the project selection process and provides opportunities for interested parties to provide information to the policy committee. 2.1 Website The AAMPO utilizes its website at www.aampo.org to make documents, maps, and other materials accessible anytime of any day in a format that is adaptable to mobile devices and website text which can be translated into any language available through translation services. There is a subpage of the website dedicated to the Transportation Improvement Program. Here, both current and past versions of Transportation Improvement Programs can be found, and public meetings and comment opportunities are posted. 2.2 Outreach The AAMPO uses its newsletter to notify everyone who has signed up to receive updates from the MPO on TIP-related public meetings, public comment periods, and documents. Additionally, the AAMPO utilizes local publications, such as the Ames Tribune, to publicize public input opportunities and public hearing dates. 2.3 Public Involvement Opportunities There were two primary opportunities for public involvement and feedback including: • Public Comment Period: A public comment period was made available from May 27, 2026, to June 30, 2026. The draft TIP document was made available online and members of the public could submit their comments on the draft document or listed projects via email or via mail. Public comments received by staff are shown in Appendix E. • Public Hearing: During the July 14, 2026, Transportation Policy Committee meeting, a public hearing was held prior to final adoption of this TIP. This hearing provided time for anyone to address the committee prior to consideration and adoption of the TIP. Transportation Policy Committee meetings are currently livestreamed on YouTube. 9 8 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 3 - Performance-Based Planning 3.1 Overview With the passage of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), states and MPOs continue to be required to use performance-based transportation planning practices. MPO TIPs are required to document compliance with each of the following performance-based planning target categories: roadway safety (PM1), pavement and bridge (PM2), system and freight reliability (PM3), transit asset management, and transit safety. 3.2 Safety (PM1) Rather than setting its own safety targets, the Ames Area MPO has chosen to support the Iowa DOT’s safety targets as published in the most recent Iowa Highway Safety Improvement Program Annual Report (see Table 1). The MPO supports those targets by reviewing and programming all Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) projects within the MPO boundary that are included in the DOT’s Transportation Improvement Program. Any Iowa DOT sponsored HSIP projects within the MPO area were selected based on the strategies included in the Strategic Highway Safety Plan and safety performance measures and were approved by the Iowa Transportation Commission. The Iowa DOT coordinated with the Ames Area MPO, as part of its target setting process. Working in partnership with local agencies, Iowa DOT safety investments were identified and programmed which will construct effective countermeasures to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries. The Iowa DOT projects chosen for HSIP investment are based on crash history, roadway characteristics, and the existence of infrastructure countermeasure that can address the types of crashes present. The Iowa DOT continues to utilize a systemic safety improvement process rather than relying on “hot spot” safety improvements. Table 1: Safety (PM1) Targets (adopted by the AAMPO on 09/23/25) Performance Measure Five Year Rolling Averages 2020-2024 Baseline 2022-2026 Target Number of Fatalities 354.0 364.6 Fatality Rate – per 100 million VMT 1.077 1.092 Number of Serious Injuries 1,382.8 1,385.3 Serious Injury Rate – per 100 million VMT 4.207 4.126 Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 147.4 149.8 *Rates are per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT) 3.3 Pavement and Bridge (PM2) Rather than setting its own pavement and bridge targets, the Ames Area MPO has chosen to support the Iowa DOT’s pavement and bridge targets as submitted in the most recent performance report (see Table 2). The MPO supports those targets by reviewing and programming all Interstate and National 10 9 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO Highway System projects within the MPO boundary that are included in the DOT’s Transportation Improvement Program. Any Iowa DOT sponsored pavement and bridge projects within the MPO area were determined in alignment with the Iowa Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) and the pavement and bridge performance measures. The TAMP connects the State Long-Range Transportation Plan and system/modal plans to Iowa DOT’s Five-Year Program and the STIP. The long-range plan defines a vision for the transportation system over the next 20 years, while the Five-Year Program and STIP identify specific investments over the next four to five years. The TAMP has a 10-year planning horizon and helps ensure that investments in the Five-Year Program and STIP are consistent with Iowa DOT’s longer-term vision. The Iowa DOT coordinated with the Ames Area MPO as part of its target setting process. The methodology used to set targets used current and historical data on condition and funding to forecast future condition. Asset management focuses on performing the right treatment at the right time to optimize investments and outcomes. Management systems are utilized to predict bridge and pavement needs and help determine the amount of funding needed for stewardship of the system. The TAMP discusses the major investment categories that the Commission allocates funding through. Once the Commission approves the funding for these categories, Iowa DOT recommends the allocation of the funds to specific projects using the processes described in the TAMP. Pavement and br idge projects are programmed to help meet the desired program outcomes documented in the TAMP. Table 2: Pavement and Bridge (PM2) Targets (adopted by AAMPO on 03/25/25) Performance Measure 2021 Baseline 2-Year Target 4 Year Target Pavement Interstate % Good Condition 58.8% 55.0% 53.0% Interstate % Poor Condition 0.4% 3.0% 3.0% Non-Interstate NHS % Good Condition 37.9% 35.0% 30.0% Non-Interstate NHS % Poor Condition 3.7% 6.0% 6.0% Bridge NHS % Good Condition 48.6% 52.5% 48.0% NHS % Poor Condition 2.4% 5.0% 6.6% 3.4 System and Freight Reliability (PM3) Rather than setting its own system and freight reliability targets, the Ames Area MPO has chosen to support the Iowa DOT’s system and freight reliability targets as submitted in the most recent performance report. The MPO supports those targets by reviewing and programming all Interstate and National Highway System projects within the MPO boundary that are included in the DOT’s Transportation Improvement Program. The Iowa DOT coordinated with the Ames Area MPO, as part of its target setting process. Historical performance was reviewed to set targets. In addition to projects utilizing Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) strategies, projects focused on improving pavement and bridge condition also often help improve system reliability and freight movement. Additional projects 11 10 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO focused specifically on improving these areas of system performance are developed in alignment with the target-setting process for related performance measures, as well as the freight improvement strategies and freight investment plan included in the State Freight Plan. This plan includes a detailed analysis and prioritization of freight bottlenecks, which are locations that should be considered for further study and possibly for future improvements. State projects identified in the freight investment plan and programmed in the STIP were highly ranked freight bottlenecks. Table 3: System and Freight Reliability (PM3) Targets (adopted by AAMPO on 01/24/23) Performance Measure 2021 Baseline 2-Year Target 4 Year Target Reliability Interstate % Reliable 99.9% 99.9% 98.0% Non-Interstate NHS % Reliable 96.5% 96.7% 94.0% Freight Interstate Truck Travel Time Reliability 1.13 1.13 1.25 3.5 Transit Asset Management Public transit capital projects included in the STIP align with the transit asset management (TAM) planning and target setting processes undertaken by the Iowa DOT, transit agencies, and MPOs. The Iowa DOT establishes a group TAM plan and group targets for all small urban and rural providers while large urban providers establish their own TAM plans and targets. Investments are made in alignment with TAM plans with the intent of keeping the state’s public transit vehicles and facilities in a state of good repair and meeting transit asset management targets. The Iowa DOT allocates funding for transit rollingstock in accordance with the Public Transit Management System process. In addition, the Iowa DOT awards public transit infrastructure grants in accordance with the project priorities established in Iowa Code chapter 924. Additional state and federal funding sources that can be used by transit agencies for vehicle and facility improvements are outlined in the funding chapter of the Transit Manager’s Handbook. Individual transit agencies determine the use of these sources for capital and operating expenses based on their local needs. The Ames Area MPO chose to support the Ames Transit Agency’s (CyRide’s) TAM targets (see Table 4). CyRide’s TAM Plan establishes their target setting methodology and establishes the TAM targets. 12 11 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO Table 4: Transit Asset Management Targets (adopted by AAMPO on 01/13/26) TAM Performance Measure Class Performance Target 2025 Target 2025 Year-End Results 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Rolling Stock 40'-60' Buses % of fleet exceeds CyRide's ULB of 15 yrs. 43% 42% 31% 39% 33% 27% 27% Rolling Stock Cutaways % of fleet exceeds FTA ULB of 8 yrs. 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Equipment Shop Trucks % of fleet exceeds CyRide’s ULB of 10 yrs. 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Facilities Admin./Maint. Facility % of facilities rated under 3.0 on TERM scale 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Facilities Ames Intermodal Facility % of facilities rated under 3.0 on TERM scale 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3.6 Transit Safety Public transit projects included in the STIP align with the transit safety planning and target setting processes undertaken by the transit agencies and MPOs. While the Iowa DOT provided assistance with the development of initial Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans (PTASPs), each large urban transit provider is responsible for implementing its PTASP, which includes transit safety targets. Investments are made in alignment with PTASPs with the intent of keeping the state’s public transit operations, vehicles, and facilities safe and meeting transit safety targets. State and federal funding sources that can be used by transit agencies for operations, vehicles, and facility improvements are outlined in the funding chapter of the Transit Manager’s Handbook. Individual transit agencies determine the use of these sources for capital and operating expenses based on their local needs. The Ames Area MPO choses to support the Ames Transit Agency’s (CyRide’s) transit safety targets (see Table 5). CyRide’s PTASP establishes their target setting methodology and establishes the transit safety targets. Table 5: Transit Safety Targets (adopted by AAMPO on 09/23/25) Mode of Transit Service Major Events Major Events (per 100 thousand VRM) Collisions (per 100 thousand VRM) Pedestrian Collisions (per 100 thousand VRM) Vehicular Collisions (per 100 thousand VRM) Fatalities Fatalities (per 100 thousand VRM) Fixed Route Bus 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 Paratransit 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 *Table continues on next page. 13 12 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO Mode of Transit Service Transit Worker Fatalities (per 100 thousand VRM) Injuries Injuries (per 100 thousand VRM) Transit Worker Injuries (per 100 thousand VRM) Assaults on Transit Workers Assaults on Transit Workers (per 100 thousand VRM) System Reliability (VRM/Failures) Fixed Route Bus 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 30,703.09 Paratransit 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 317,045 3.7 Regional Transportation Goals In AAMPO’s latest Metropolitan Transportation Plan, Ames Connect 2050, a performance-based transportation planning approach was utilized by tying in the regional vision of the transportation system with the aforementioned federally required metrics and federally required planning processes. The six primary region-specific goals, identified from public input, were accessibility & connectivity, safety, substantiality, efficiency & reliability, and placemaking/quality of life. The Ames Connect 2050 document provides a detailed explanation of the regional goals and objectives as well as the performance-based planning approach utilized in the identification, selection, and prioritization of projects. 3.8 Air Quality The Clean Air Act requires the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set limits on how much of a particular pollutant can be in the air anywhere in the United States. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) are the pollutant limits set by the Environmental Protection Agency; they define the allowable concentration of pollution in the air for six different pollutants: Carbon Monoxide, Lead, Nitrogen Dioxide, Particulate Matter, Ozone, and Sulfur Dioxide. The Clean Air Act specifies how areas within the country are designated as either “attainment” or “non-attainment” of an air quality standard and provides the EPA the authority to define the boundaries of nonattainment areas. For areas designated as non -attainment for one or more National Ambient Air Quality Standards, the Clean Air Act defines a specific timetable to attain the standard and requires that non-attainment areas demonstrate reasonable and steady progress in reducing air pollution emissions until such time that an area can demonstrate attainment. No part of the Ames Area is within nonattainment; therefore, it is not subject to air quality conformity requirements. However, the Ames Area MPO will perform activities to monitor and promote air quality issues in the region. The State of Iowa provides grant opportunities through the Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program (ICAAP) to promote clean air in Iowa’s transportation system. 14 13 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 4 - Project Selection 4.1 Overview This Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) serves as a list of federal-aid eligible transportation improvements within the Ames region from the federal fiscal years 2027 to 2030. Projects in the AAMPO’s TIP must be consistent with the latest regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan, Ames Connect 2050. The final AAMPO TIP, approved by the AAMPO Transportation Policy Committee, will be consolidated into the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) along with the programs from the other planning agencies in the State of Iowa. Projected identified in this TIP leverage several different sources of federal funding. While AAMPO is responsible for the regional selection of projects eligible for Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG), Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), and Carbon Reduction Program (CRP) funding, which the undermentioned selection procedure discussions will focus on, there are several other Federal and State funding programs which are listed and described in Appendix C. 4.2 Application Process (STBG, TAP, & CRP) AAMPO manages application and selection processes for three primary regional transportation funding programs: Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG), Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), and Carbon Reduction Program (CRP). These programs are described as follows: • The STBG program’s primary purpose is promoting flexibility in state and local transportation decisions and providing funding to best address state and local transportation needs. STBG funds are typically awarded to projects which improve or maintain the roadway network through construction, reconstruction, and rehabilitation. Transit capital projects are also eligible for STBG funds. • The TAP is a set-aside from the STBG program. It provides funding and investment opportunities for non-motorized transportation projects. TAP funds are typically awarded to multi-modal type projects such as: bicycle-pedestrian projects, trails, shared-use paths, bike lanes, pedestrian/bicycle signals, and Safe Routes to School (SRTS) projects. • The CRP provides funding for projects designed to reduce transportation emissions. CRP funds are typically awarded to projects such as intelligent transportation system (ITS) projects (traffic monitoring, management, traffic adaptive control, etc.) and multi-modal projects (such as the bicycle-pedestrian projects, trails, and shared-used paths also eligible under the TAP program). For projects to be eligible for these program applications, they must conform with Ames Connect 2050. The joint notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) and associated applications for these funding programs are made available on the AAMPO website on the funding programs page. A notification email is also sent out to contacts from all AAMPO regional member agencies that are eligible to apply. For all three programs, applications are typically made annually available starting in December and are due around mid-February. 15 14 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO The applications received in this application cycle were first reviewed by AAMPO staff (and Iowa DOT staff for TAP applications) to ensure eligibility. AAMPO staff then evaluated and gave a score to all eligible projects on a scale of 0 and 100 based on the evaluation criteria stated in the NOFO. Top-ranking projects recommended for funding from their respective funding program(s) were then presented to the AAMPO Transportation Technical Committee on March 12, 2026, and the AAMPO Transportation Policy Committee on March 24, 2026, for official award of funding. Sponsors awarded funding receive an award letter from the AAMPO. Sponsors not selected for funding receive a letter from the AAMPO detailing why their project was not selected. All projects which were awarded funding are programmed within this TIP. 4.3 Applications Received (STBG, TAP, & CRP) During this year’s application cycle, AAMPO received 4 STBG project applications. No applications were received for TAP funding. Applications were not accepted for the CRP this cycle as AAMPO is awaiting the status of the CRP in the next federal infrastructure bill . Table 6 provides a summary of all received applications as well as their score (based upon the aforementioned evaluation criteria) and status regarding awarding of funds and inclusion in the TIP. Table 6: Project Summary for Current Application Cycle Sponsor Description Program FFY Federal-Aid Amount Score Funds Awarded? CyRide Purchase 40’ Heavy-Duty Transit Bus STBG 2030 $400,000 89 Yes City of Ames E 13th St EB (Between I-35 Ramps) & Lincoln Way/Dayton Ave Intersection Reconstruction STBG 2028 $864,000 88 Yes City of Ames E 13th St (McCormick Ave to Dayton Ave) Reconstruction STBG 2030 $995,000 84 Yes City of Ames Duff Ave (6th St to 13th St) Mill & Overlay STBG 2028 $840,000 81 Yes 4.4 Requests for Project Modifications During the application cycle for new projects, sponsors of projects currently programmed in the TIP can also provide the AAMPO notice of any major or minor changes to their projects. If the changes being requested to the project are major (as defined in 9.1 Amendments), the AAMPO will typically require the sponsor to submit a new project application. However, if the project changes are minor (as defined in 9.2 Administrative Modifications), sponsors can simply submit a letter to the AAMPO that outlines their desired changes. Letters received from the AAMPO during this year’s application cycle can be seen in Appendix D. 16 15 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 4.5 Transit Projects In addition to FHWA program projects, the TIP includes all projects which Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding may be utilized. A portion of Federal fuel tax revenue is placed in the mass transit account of the Federal Highway Trust Fund for this use. These funds, along with General Fund appropriations, are reserved for transit purposes and are administered by the Federal Transit Administration. The transit portion of the TIP was developed in close coordination with CyRide, the urban transit operator in the AAMPO planning area. The transit projects identified in the FFY 20 27- 2030 TIP were included within the Passenger Transportation Plan (PTP), meeting the requirement to have the Enhanced Mobility for Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities formulized Federal funding within an approved PTP prior to TIP approval. Please refer to section 8 for a list of transit projects programmed for FFY 2027-2030 along with justifications for all projects programmed in FFY 2027. 17 16 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 5 - FFY 2026 FHWA Project Status Report It is required to provide a status report for all federal -aid highway projects included in the first fiscal year of the previous TIP. This status report indicates whether the project was authorized/let, is being rolled over to the current TIP, or if the project is being removed from programming. This status report is useful for monitoring the progress being made in implementing the AAMPO’s transportation program. See Table 7 for the project status report for FFY 2026. Table 7: FFY 2026 Project Status Summary Funding Source TPMS ID Project Description Federal-Aid Total Cost Sponsor Status PL 34214 Trans Planning $133,541 $166,926 AAMPO Authorized STBG 52480 CyRide: Vehicle Replacement $377,050 $908,960 AAMPO Authorized STBG 52481 Bloomington Rd (George Washington Carver Ave to 500’ W of Eisenhower Ave) $700,000 $1,000,000 City of Ames Let on 2/17/26 NHPP 48634 US 30 (Duff Ave to S Dayton Ave) $9,609,600 $12,137,000 Iowa DOT Authorized STBG 57984 MPO Planning Activities: 2050 MTP, TSMO Plan, Duff Ave Study $321,262 $401,578 AAMPO Authorized TAP 52482 S Dayton Ave Trail (Isaac Newton Dr to E Lincoln Way) $520,000 $650,000 City of Ames Roll-Over to FFY 2027 NEVI 58122 NEVI Program Implementation (I-35 Exit 113) $578,160 $803,000 Iowa DOT Authorized NHPP 58816 I-35 SB (N of 315th St to 0.5 N of 260th St) $26,339,450 $32,067,000 Iowa DOT Authorized 18 17 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 6 - Financial Analysis 6.1 Overview Projects programmed in the current TIP must demonstrate fiscal constraint. This section focuses on demonstrating that the program is fiscally constrained as well as documents nonfederal-aid revenues and expected operations and maintenance costs on the federal-aid system. All project costs are adjusted into year of expenditure dollars using an assumed annual inflation rat e of 4 percent. This same inflation rate is used to project revenues and operations and maintenance costs. PL funds are shown to remain constant through the 4-year period and are based on the first fiscal year’s target. The Iowa DOT provides the AAMPO with STBG, TAP, and CRP funding targets for each of the four years in this program. The Iowa DOT also provides information from their five-year program including estimated statewide revenues/allocations and funds available for right-of-way and construction. Lastly, Iowa DOT provides forecasted non-federal-aid revenues as well as operations and maintenance data for the federal-aid system. See the following section for more detail on the Iowa DOT’s programming process regarding expenditures and funding. The Ames City Council has programmed city sponsored projects in the City of Ames 202 6-2031 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for the local funding allocation. These funds are generated from the City of Ames annual Road Use Tax Fund (RUTF) distribution, Local Option Sales Tax, and General Obligation (GO) bonds. The transit program does not have targets; therefore, the requests involve significant costs in anticipation of maximizing the amounts received either through formula or discretionary funding. 6.2 Iowa DOT O&M Estimated Expenditures and Funding Each year prior to development of the Iowa DOT’s Five‐Year Program and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program both state and federal revenue forecasts are completed to estimate the amount of funding available for programming. These forecasts are a critical component in the development of the Five‐Year Program and as such are reviewed with the Iowa Transportation Commission. The primary sources of state funding to the DOT are the Primary Road Fund and TIME‐21 Fund. These state funds are used for the operation, maintenance, and construction of the Primary Road System. The amount of funding available for operations and maintenance is determined by legislative appropriations. Additional funding is set aside for statewide activities including engineerin g costs. The remaining funding is available for right of way and construction activities associated with the highway program. Along with state funds, the highway program utilizes a portion of the federal funds that are allocated to the state. A federal funding forecast is prepared each year based on the latest apportionment information available. This forecast includes the variou s federal programs and identifies which funds are allocated to the Iowa DOT for programming and which funds are directed to locals through the MPO/RPA planning process, bridge programs, and other various grant programs. 19 18 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO The following webpage provides additional insight into the DOT’s programming process and can be found at https://iowadot.gov/program_management/Five-Year-Program. 6.3 Fiscal Tables The following describes each of the six fiscal tables presented in this document: Table 8: Table 8 summarizes the total project costs and associated federal-aid amounts by funding program. Tables 9-11: These tables demonstrate fiscal constraint for their respective funding programs. Table 9 summarizes the STBG program; Table 10 summarizes the TAP program; and Table 11 summarizes the CRP Program. This incorporates the programmed project costs from Table 8 as well as the funding targets provided by the Iowa DOT. Tables 12-13: These tables summarize projections based on 2023 operations and maintenance data provided by the Iowa DOT. This includes forecasted operations and maintenance data on the federal- aid system (Table 12) and forecasted non-federal-aid revenues (Table 13). The base year for the data was 2025. The shown projections utilize an assumed annual inflation rate of 4 percent. Table 14: Table 14 shows the Iowa DOT’s Five-Year Program funding amounts including statewide revenues, allocations, and funds available for right-of-way and construction. Table 8: Summary of Costs and Federal-Aid 2027 2028 2029 2030 PROGRAM Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid Total Cost Federal Aid CMAQ $2,692,200 $1,213,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CRP $2,692,200 $940,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 HBP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NHPP $8,963,000 $7,170,400 $0 $0 $13,310,000 $10,528,000 $24,795,000 $22,315,500 PL $166,926 $133,541 $166,926 $133,541 $166,926 $133,541 $166,926 $133,541 PRF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 STBG $4,982,183 $3,513,814 $3,683,222 $2,264,000 $4,167,319 $2,660,000 $2,817,319 $1,535,000 TAP $960,000 $676,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Table 9: STBG Fiscal Constraint 2027 2028 2029 2030 UNOBLIGATED BALANCE (CARRYOVER) $1,645,752 $433,672 $471,406 $113,140 STBG TARGET $2,301,734 $2,301,734 $2,301,734 $2,301,734 SUBTOTAL $3,947,486 $2,735,406 $2,773,140 $2,414,874 PROGRAM FUNDS $3,513,814 $2,264,050 $2,660,000 $1,535,000 BALANCE $433,672 $471,406 $113,140 $879,874 20 19 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO Table 10: TAP Fiscal Constraint 2027 2028 2029 2030 UNOBLIGATED BALANCE (CARRYOVER) $684,857 $233,085 $457,313 $681,541 TAP TARGET $224,228 $224,228 $224,228 $224,228 SUBTOTAL $909,085 $457,313 $681,541 $905,769 PROGRAM FUNDS $676,000 $0 $0 $0 BALANCE $233,085 $457,313 $681,541 $905,769 Table 11: CRP Fiscal Constraint 2027 2028 2029 2030 UNOBLIGATED BALANCE (CARRYOVER) $749,361 $9,596 $209,831 $410,066 CRP TARGET $200,235 $200,235 $200,235 $200,235 SUBTOTAL $949,596 $209,831 $410,066 $610,301 PROGRAM FUNDS $940,000 $0 $0 $0 BALANCE $9,596 $209,831 $410,066 $610,301 Table 12: Forecasted Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs on the Federal-Aid System 2027 2028 2029 2030 CITY OF AMES TOTAL OPERATIONS $2,700,452 $2,808,470 $2,920,809 $3,037,642 CITY OF AMES TOTAL MAINTENANCE $1,914,300 $1,990,872 $2,070,507 $2,153,327 CITY OF GILBERT TOTAL OPERATIONS $34,294 $35,666 $37,093 $38,576 CITY OF GILBERT TOTAL MAINTENANCE $142,400 $148,096 $154,020 $160,181 IOWA DOT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE $1,014,243 $1,036,482 $1,082,380 $1,111,953 TOTAL O&M $5,805,690 $6,019,587 $6,264,809 $6,501,679 Table 13: Forecasted Non-Federal-Aid Revenue 2027 2028 2029 2030 CITY OF AMES – GENREAL FUND (001) $980,135 $1,019,341 $1,060,114 $1,102,519 CITY OF AMES – ROAD USE (110) $10,207,881 $10,616,196 $11,040,844 $11,482,478 CITY OF AMES – OTHER (LOST, BENEFITS, TIF, ETC.) $439,746 $457,336 $475,629 $494,655 CITY OF AMES – SERVICE DEBT (200) $9,172,816 $9,539,729 $9,921,318 $10,318,170 CITY OF AMES – CAPITAL PROJECTS (300) $1,939,048 $2,016,610 $2,097,274 $2,181,165 CITY OF AMES – UTILITIES (600 & UP) $2,514,108 $2,614,672 $2,719,259 $2,828,029 CITY OF GILBERT – GENREAL FUND (001) $0 $0 $0 $0 CITY OF GILBERT – ROAD USE (110) $186,165 $193,612 $201,356 $209,410 CITY OF GILBERT – OTHER (LOST, BENEFITS, TIF, ETC.) $0 $0 $0 $0 CITY OF GILBERT – SERVICE DEBT (200) $257,200 $267,488 $278,188 $289,315 CITY OF GILBERT – CAPITAL PROJECTS (300) $0 $0 $0 $0 CITY OF GILBERT – UTILITIES (600 & UP) $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL NON-FEDERAL-AID ROAD FUND RECEIPTS $25,697,100 $26,724,983 $27,793,983 $28,905,742 21 20 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO Table 14: Iowa DOT Five-Year Program Funding ($ MILLIONS) REVENUES 2027 2028 2029 2030 PRIMARY ROAD FUND $899.9 $835.7 $852.2 $855.2 TIME-21 $135.0 $135.0 $135.0 $135.0 MISCELLANEOUS $25.0 $25.0 $25.0 $25.0 FEDERAL AID $524.0 $513.5 $513.3 $515.3 TOTAL $1,583.9 $1,511.0 $1,527.5 $1,530.5 STATEWIDE ALLOCATIONS 2027 2028 2029 2030 OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE (PRF) $428.7 $438.1 $457.5 $470.0 BACK OF PROGRAM LINE ITEMS & RAIL HWY. $248.1 $252.9 $253.5 $254.1 TOTAL $676.8 $691.0 $711.0 $724.1 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR ROW/CONSTRUCTION 2027 2028 2029 2030 TOTAL $907.1 $820.0 $816.5 $806.4 22 21 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 7 - FHWA Program (FFY 2027 – 2030) 7.1 Overview The following pages contain a complete list of location-based projects utilizing FHWA-based funds programmed for FFY 2027 through FFY 2030. Regional projects are shown on a map in Figure 2. Figure 2: Project Locations (by Project ID) 23 22 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 7.2 Programmed Highway Projects 24 23 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 25 24 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 26 25 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 8 - FTA Program (FFY 2027-2030) 8.1 Overview The following pages contain a complete list of projects utilizing FTA-based funds programmed for FFY 2027 through FFY 2030. The justification for all FFY 2027 transit projects is also provided. 27 26 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 8.2 Programmed Transit Projects 28 27 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 29 28 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 30 29 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 31 30 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 32 31 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 33 32 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 8.3 FFY 2027 Transit Project Justifications General Operations (5307/STA) This funding supports the day-to-day transit operations of the Ames Transit Authority from Ames’ urbanized area formula apportionment, Small Transit Intensive Cities (STIC), and State Transit Assistance (STA) funding. Infotainment Signage for Annunciators (5310) Bus drivers must comply with the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) laws by announcing major transit bus stops along transit corridors as well as any specific stops requested. In 2019, CyRide integrated automated vehicle annunciator (AVA) system synced with voice annunciators (audible announcements only) to help keep all passengers, disability or not, better informed of where the bus is located along the bus route(s) while also complying with the ADA bus stop announcement regulation. This system was in response to a request from Iowa State University’s Alliance for Disability Awareness group which communicated their desire to have more bus stops announced throughout the Ames community. By automating this process, additional announcements could be accommodated. CyRide then added visual LED signage within each bus mirroring the LED audible stop announcements. The larger infotainment signage for annunciation allows more information to be displayed on this visual display while also allowing advertising opportunities for CyRide on these vehicles. This project, which is over and beyond ADA, will be implemented over a multiyear period until the fleet is fully equipped with this signage. Annunciator Annual Service Fees (5310) CyRide plans to utilize portions of its elderly & disabled funding towards its annual service fees for the automatic annunciator system including automatic vehicle location base system to ensure compliance with its ADA announcement requirements. This project will allow compliance with the ADA law and improve awareness of where the bus is within the community for passenger’s knowledge. Contracted Paratransit Service (5310) According to Federal regulations, public transit agencies providing fixed -route transit service in their community must also provide door-to-door transportation services within a ¾ mile area of that fixed- route service. Therefore, CyRide purchases transportation service for its Dial-A-Ride service operation in order to meet this American Disability Act (ADA) requirement. This service has been expanded to provide services beyond ADA to include the entire Ames city limits. Bus Shelters (5310) The CyRide Bus Stop Plan recommends bus stop shelters or other amenities (benches, trash cans, etc.) along the fixed-route system route corridors where high transit demand is required. From the prioritization of recommended stop improvements, CyRide will systematically replace its brown 34 33 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO colored bus shelters throughout the system with an updated designed solar powered bus shelter to improve the accessibility for patrons and improve CyRide’s image throughout the Ames community. Heavy Duty Forty-Foot Bus Replacement (5339) Twenty large forty-foot buses have exceeded FTA guidelines for useful life. Buses are identified as: 00504, 00186, 00187, 00188, 00189, 00126, 00127, 00128, 00418, 00419, 00420, 00421, 00422, 00424, 00425, 00429, 00430, 00431, 00432, 00188. If these buses rank high enough within the state’s PTMS process throughout the year, they will be replaced with 40’ heavy-duty low-floor buses. The state received a $27.8 million award last year which has not been formally allocated yet but CyRide assumes that some of these buses might be considered. If funded, these replacement vehicles will all be ADA accessible. Heavy Duty Forty-Foot Battery Electric Bus Replacement (STBG, 5339) CyRide’s goal is to integrate 17 battery-electric buses (BEBs) total within its fleet operating throughout its system. It currently has seven BEBs operating in revenue service. CyRide was awarded 2027 Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funding for $225,000 in the AAMPO’s 2024’s STBG application process to upgrade a 40-foot standard heavy-duty bus replacement to a 40-foot BEB. Two years ago, CyRide requested this funding to be increased to $337,050 due to dramatic bus price increases in order to complete a future procurement estimated at $1,585,773. In 2027, the forty-foot bus specifically identified to be replaced and upgraded to a BEB is 00188 - a 2008 Gillig that is 19 years old. The base portion of this bus should be awarded within the next yea r with discretionary funding. The Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization has approved STBG funding at $337,050 federal for FY2027 for this BEB upgrade to procure CyRide’s eighth BEB in its fleet. This replacement BEB vehicle will be ADA accessible. Roof/HVAC Replacement with Skylight Fall Protection (PTIG) CyRide is requesting funding to replace its 2008 Administration Building roof and 2005 Bus Storage Garage (lanes 1 & 2) roof as well as HVAC equipment serving those two bus lanes which are past their useful life of 15 years old. These areas are 18 and 21 years of age respectively. Water leaks inside the facility due are becoming more frequent and troublesome in the technology closet, board meeting room, office spaces, hallways and bus lanes. Additionally, CyRide is planning to add fall protection skylight safety screens to all 38 roof skylights and install a perimeter fall protection railing on the south wall edge of the facility to enhance employee safety during roof maintenance periods. 35 34 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 9 – TIP Revision Procedures The process for programming a project for funding in the TIP/STIP begins with a project being selected for inclusion, followed by a demonstration of fiscal constraint. After full funding has been ensured and approval is received, revisions may occur. Revisions to the TIP and STIP can be common given the frequent changes in engineering design, environmental issues, contracting issues, project readiness, and other factors that may require adjustments to schedules and budgets. Minor revisions may be made through administrative modification, while major revisions require an amendment. 9.1 Amendments Amendments to federal-aid projects include the addition or deletion of a project or a major change in design concept or scope. Changes that meet any of the following criteria are considered amendments. • Schedule Changes: Increase federal aid by more than 30 percent or increase total federal aid by more than $2 million from the original amount. • Schedule Changes: Federal-aid projects added or deleted from the TIP. • Funding Source: Adding an additional federal funding source. • Scope Changes: Changing the project termini, project alignment, the amount of through traffic lanes, type of work from an overlay to reconstruction, or a change to include widening of the roadway. Amendments must follow the procedure outlined in the AAMPO’s Public Participation Plan. This includes being reviewed by the Transportation Technical Committee (TTC) and the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC). A minimum of a 10-day public comment period then must occur. Finally, a public hearing and final approval of the amendment must occur at a second Transportation Policy Committee meeting. 9.2 Administrative Modifications An administrative modification can include minor changes to project costs and project/project phase initiation dates. Any proposed changes that meet any of the following criteria are considered administrative modifications. • Project Cost: Projects in which the recalculated federal aid increases by less than 30 percent or do not increase total federal aid by more than $2 million from the original amount. • Schedule Changes: Changes in schedules to federal-aid projects included in the first four years of the TIP. • Funding Source: Changing funding from one source to another. • Scope Changes: All changes increasing a federal aid project’s scope (project termini) require an amendment. Administrative modifications are processed internally and are shared with the Transportation Technical and Policy Committees, the public, and AAMPO stakeholders as informational items. 36 35 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO Appendix A – Resolution of Adoption [Placeholder for Resolution of Adoption] 37 36 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO Appendix B – Self-Certification of Planning Activities 450.336 38 37 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO Appendix C – List of Federal and State Funding Programs Federal Funding Sources Projects identified in TIPs utilize, or are based upon, several different sources of federal funding. The primary sources of FHWA funding in Iowa include: • Bridge Formula Program (BFP). The BFP provides funding for highway bridge replacement, rehabilitation, preservation, protection, and construction projects on public roads. BFP funds are apportioned to states on a formula basis. A significant portion of Iowa’s BFP funds will be utilized to implement bridge construction projects in Iowa’s cities and counties through the DOT’s City Bridge Program and by directly targeting BFP funds to Iowa’s 99 counties. • Carbon Reduction Program (CRP). CRP provides funding for projects designed to reduce transportation emissions, defined as carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from on- road highway sources. CRP funds are apportioned to states on a formula basis. A portion of this funding is allocated to MPOs. • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ). CMAQ provides flexible funding for transportation projects and programs to help meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. These projects can include those that reduce congestion and improve air quality. CMAQ funds are apportioned to states on a formula basis. • Discretionary Grants (GRNT). The FHWA administers discretionary grant programs through various offices representing special funding categories. Examples of discretionary grant awards include awards from programs including Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE), Nationally Significant Multimodal Freight and Highway Projects (INFRA), National Infrastructure Project Assistance Program (MEGA), Rural Surface Transportation Grant Program, Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation (PROTECT), and Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A), among many others. Discretionary funds are awarded to applicants based on the merits of the proposed project(s), that is, project sponsors compete for these monies with no guarantee of success. • Earmark (ERMK). Projects with funding identified directly in federal Authorization or Appropriations bills are considered earmark funds. The projects are funded with money set aside for Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending and awarded by members of Congress. 39 38 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO • Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) and Tribal Transportation Program (TTP). The FLAP Program provides funding for projects that improve transportation facilities that provide access to or are located within federal lands. The FLAP funding will be distributed through a grant process where a group of FHWA, Iowa DOT, and local government representatives will solicit, rank, and select projects to receive funding. The TTP provides safe and adequate transportation and public road access to and within Indian reservations and Indian lands. Funds are allocated among the Tribes through a statutory formula based on tribal population, road mileage, and average tribal shares under the SAFETEA-LU Indian Reservation Road program. • Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). is a core federal-aid program that funds projects with the goal of achieving a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on tribal land. A portion of this funding is targeted for use on local high-risk roads and railway-highway crossings. • Metropolitan Planning Program (PL). BIL directs FHWA to apportion funding as a lump sum for each State then each State’s PL apportionment is calculated based on a ratio specified in law. The State DOT is then required to make the PL funds available to MPOs in accordance with a formula developed by the State DOT and approved by the FHWA. PL funds are available for MPOs to carry out the metropolitan transportation planning process required by 23 U.S.C. 134, including development of metropolitan area transportation plans and transportation improvement programs. For programming purposes MPOs should program only the new PL target provided by the Systems Planning Bureau. Any carryover funds identified by Systems Planning need not be added to, or subtracted from, the PL target. • National Highway Freight Program (NHFP). NHFP funds are distributed to states via a formula process and are targeted towards transportation projects that contribute to the efficient movement of freight on the National Highway Freight Network. Ten percent of NHFP funds will be targeted towards non -DOT sponsored projects. • National Highway Performance Program (NHPP). NHPP funds are available to be used on projects that improve the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), including some state and U.S. highways and interstates. • State Planning and Research (SPR). SPR funds are available to fund statewide planning and research activities. A portion of SPR funds are provided to RPAs to support transportation planning efforts. • Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG). This program is designed to address specific issues identified by Congress and provides flexible funding for projects to preserve or improve the condition/performance of transportation facilities, including any federal-aid highway or public road bridge. STBG funding may 40 39 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO be utilized on: o Roadway projects on federal-aid routes o Bridge projects on any public road o Transit capital improvements o TA Set-Aside eligible activities o Planning activities Iowa targets STBG funding to each of its 27 MPOs and RPAs on an annual basis for programming based on regional priorities. RPA STBG funds awarded to cities are eligible to be swapped for state Primary Road Funds. • Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside Program (TAP). This program is a set-aside from the STBG program. The TA Set-Aside provides funding for a variety of generally smaller-scale transportation projects such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities; construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas; community improvements such as historic preservation and vegetation management; environmental mitigation related to stormwater and habitat connectivity; recreational trails; safe routes to school projects; and vulnerable road user safety assessments. Iowa targets TA Set-Aside funding to each of its 27 MPOs and RPAs on an annual basis for programming based on regional priorities. All projects programmed with TA Set - Aside funds are required to be verified by the Systems Planning Bureau to ensure compatibility with TA Set-Aside eligibility. Iowa DOT-Administered Grant Program Funding Sources In addition to the funding sources listed above, the Iowa DOT administers several grant programs that are funded, in part, with the federal sources identified above. Projects awarded grant funding must be documented in the region’s TIP. These grant awards are distributed through an application process. State administered grant programs include: • City Bridge Program. A portion of STBG funding dedicated to local bridge projects is set aside for the funding of replacement or rehabilitation of city-owned bridges that have been classified by an engineering inspection as poor. Projects are rated and prioritized by the Local Systems Bureau with awards based upon criteria identified in the application process. Projects awarded grant funding are subject to a federal -aid obligation limitation of $1,500,000. For more information on the city bridge program, please contact the Local Systems Bureau, 800 Lincoln Way, Ames, Iowa 50010 or by telephone at 515-239-1291. • Highway Safety Improvement Program – Local (HSIP-Local). This program is funded using a portion of Iowa’s Highway Safety Improvement Program apportionment and 41 40 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO funds county and city low-cost to medium-cost systemic safety improvements. Federal HSIP funding targeted towards these local projects is swapped for Primary Road Fund dollars. For more information on the HSIP-Local program, please contact the Traffic and Safety Bureau, 800 Lincoln Way, Ames, Iowa 50010 or by telephone at 515-239-1557. • Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program (ICAAP). The ICAAP funds projects with the highest potential for reducing transportation-related congestion and air pollution that improve motor vehicle traffic flow, reduce traffic congestion and vehicle-miles of travel, and reduce single-occupant vehicle travel. This program utilizes $4 million of Iowa’s CMAQ apportionment annually. For more information on the ICAAP program, please contact the Systems Planning Bureau, 800 Lincoln Way, Ames, Iowa 50010 or by telephone at 515-239-1664. • Recreational Trails Program. This program provides federal funding for both motorized and nonmotorized trails and trail-related projects and is funded through a takedown from Iowa’s TA Set-Aside funding. The decision to participate in this program is made annually by the Iowa Transportation Commission. For more information on the Recreational Trails Program, please contact the Systems Planning Bureau, 800 Lincoln Way, Ames, Iowa 50010 or by telephone at 515 -239-1664. • Statewide Transportation Alternatives Set-Aside Program. This program makes available federal TA Set-Aside funds to locally sponsored projects that emphasize the expansion of the multi-modal trail network through the completion of trail linkages, safe routes to school projects, and projects located immediately adjacent to a state- designated Iowa Byway. For more information on the Statewide Transportation Alternatives Program, please contact the Systems Planning Bureau, 800 Lincoln Way, Ames, Iowa 50010 or by telephone at 515-239-1664. Federal and State Transit Funding Programs Like the FHWA programs listed above, the transit funding authorized by the BIL is managed in several ways. The largest amount is distributed, by formula, to states and large metropolitan areas. Other program funds are discretionary, and some are earmarked for specific projects. Program funds include: • Metropolitan Transportation Planning program (Section 5303 and 5305). FTA provides funding for this program to the state based on its urbanized area populations. The funds are dedicated to support transportation planning projects in 42 41 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO urbanized areas with more than 50,000 persons. • Statewide Transportation Planning program (Section 5304 and 5305). These funds come to the state based on population and are used to support transportation planning projects in nonurbanized areas. They are combined with the Section 5311 funds and allocated among Iowa’s RPAs. • Urbanized Area Formula Grants program (Section 5307). FTA provides transit operating, planning and capital assistance funds directly to local recipients in urbanized areas with populations over 50,000. Assistance amounts are based on population and density figures and transit performance factors for larger areas. For urbanized areas between 50,000 to 199,999 in population, transit agencies are eligible to receive additional Small Transit Intensive Cities (STIC) funds stipends if the transit service meets or exceeds any of the six STIC performance criteria. Local recipients must apply directly to the FTA. • Bus and Bus Facilities Program (Section 5339). This funding source is split into three categories: formula, discretionary, and low or no emission vehicle projects. The formula program provides federal assistance for major capital needs, such as fleet replacement and construction of transit facilities. All transit systems in the state are eligible for this program and projects are selected through the PTMS process. The discretionary bus and bus facilities grant program, or 5339(b), is a competitive grant program. Iowa DOT typically submits a statewide application on behalf of Iowa public transit agencies and uses the vehicle replacement list generated by the PTMS rankings as the basis for the project submitted. The low or no mission vehicle program, 5339(c), provides funding for alternative power or fuel vehicles and/or facilities. Iowa DOT will submit an application for transit agencies interested in those technologies. For the 5339(b) and 5339(c) programs, larger public transit agencies serving populations over 50,000 can apply directly to FTA if they desire. • Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program (Section 5310). Funding is provided through this program to increase mobility for the elderly and persons with disabilities. Part of the funding is administered along with the nonurbanized funding with the remaining funds allocated among urbanized transit systems in areas with a population of less than 200,000. Urbanized areas with more than 200,000 in population receive a direct allocation. • Formula Grants for Rural Areas (Section 5311). This program provides capital and operating assistance for rural and small urban transit systems. Fifteen percent of these funds are allocated to intercity bus projects. A portion of the funding is also allocated to support rural transit planning. The remaining funds are combined with the rural portion of Section 5310 funds and allocated among regional and small urban transit systems based on their relative performance in the prior year. Note, CyRide is 43 42 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO not eligible for this funding. • Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP) (Section 5311(b)(3)). This funding is used for statewide training events and to support transit funding fellowships for regional and small urban transit staff or planners. Note, CyRide is not eligible for this funding. • FHWA Flexible funds. Certain Title 23 funds may be used for transit purposes. Transit capital assistance is an eligible use of STBG funds. Transit capital and startup operating assistance is an eligible use of CMAQ/ICAAP funds. When CMAQ/ICAAP and STBG funds are programmed for transit projects, they are transferred to the FTA. The CMAQ/ICAAP funds are administered by the Iowa DOT’s Public Transit team. STBG funds for small urban and regional transit systems are also administered the Public Transit team. • State Transit Assistance (STA). All public transit systems are eligible for funding. These funds can be used by the public transit system for operating, capital, or planning expenses related to the provision of open-to-the-public passenger transportation. The majority of the funds received in a fiscal year are distributed to individual transit systems on the basis of a formula using performance statistics from the most recent available year. o STA Fellowship Program. Each year $175,000 is set aside from the total STA funds to provide large urban transit systems not eligible for RTAP funding with fellowships to attend transit training conferences and seminars or to purchase transit-related training materials. o STA Special Projects. The Iowa DOT sets aside approximately $196,900 annually from the State Transit Assistance (STA) fund for Special Projects. Special Projects are extraordinary, emergency, or innovative in nature. Grants can include projects which support transit services developed in conjunction with human service agencies or local community partners or statewide projects to improve public transit in Iowa. Projects are intended to assist with start-up of new services that have been identified as needs by health, employment or human service agencies or other community partners. Statewide projects may be used on transit marketing and projects exploring new transit technologies. Applications are available to public transit agencies through the BlackCat software. • Public Transit Infrastructure Grant Fund (PTIG). This is a state program that can fund transit facility projects that involve new construction, reconstruction, or remodeling. To qualify, projects must include a vertical component. Project applications are typically due the first business day of May each year through BlackCat software. 44 43 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO Appendix D – Requests for Project Modifications The AAMPO received two requests from the City of Ames (request letters shown on the following pages) to make project adjustments as follows: • TPMS #55532 (FFY 2028 – Duff Ave (6th St – 13th St) & E 13th St (Dayton Ave to McCormick Ave)) o Two new project applications were submitted this application cycle which intend to cover the original intent of this project: ▪ Duff Ave (6th St – 13th St) Mill & Overlay Project • TPMS #55532 (retained original project TPMS ID) in FFY 2028 ▪ E 13th St (Dayton Ave to McCormick Ave) PCC Reconstruction Project • TPMS #59067 in FFY 2030 • TPMS #52482 (FFY 2027 – S Dayton Ave Trail (Isaac Newton Dr to E Lincoln Way)) o Increase project funding amounts to cover funding shortfall identified by preliminary design & opinion of probable cost (OPC) as follows: ▪ Total Construction: $650,000 to $960,000 ▪ TAP Funding: $520,000 to $676,000 (30% increase) 45 44 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 46 45 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO 47 46 | P a g e FFY 2027-2030 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | AAMPO Appendix E – Public Comments No public comments were received on the Draft AAMPO FFY 2027-2030 Transportation Improvement Program. 48