HomeMy WebLinkAboutA036 - 2025/26 Multi-modal roadway improvements (Wilder Blvd - Mini Roundabout Corridor Improvement)ITEM #:39
DATE:05-26-26
DEPT:PW
SUBJECT:2025/26 MULTI-MODAL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (WILDER
BOULEVARD - MINI ROUNDABOUT CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT)
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The Multi-Modal Roadway Improvements Program is intended to improve safety and
operations for multiple roadway users, including motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The
Wilder Boulevard Mini-Roundabout Corridor project was programmed in the CIP to
accomplish traffic calming improvements between Lincoln Way and Mortensen Road.
The Wilder Boulevard corridor has been the subject of traffic calming discussions for
several years following the extension of Mortensen Road and the connection of Wilder
Boulevard. While the corridor has not experienced a significant crash history (seven
total crashes since 2016), concerns raised by residents and observed by staff have
included excessive vehicle speeds, cut-through traffic, inconsistent compliance with
stop controls, and pedestrian safety along a corridor with significant neighborhood
walking activity, including access to Edwards Elementary School and Daley Park.
To better understand corridor conditions, a speed study was completed in 2022, utilizing data
collected in 2020 and 2021. The study reviewed average vehicle speeds, 85th percentile
speeds, pace speeds, and the percentage of vehicles traveling 10 MPH or more above the
posted speed limit. The study identified notable levels of excessive speeding at multiple
locations along the corridor, particularly on the northern portion of Wilder Boulevard.
Based on those findings, all-way stop control was implemented at selected
intersections as an interim traffic calming measure in 2023 while longer-term
improvements continued to be evaluated through the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)
process.
MINI ROUNDABOUT DESIGN DEVELOPMENT:
At its October 14, 2025 meeting, City Council approved a professional services agreement
with Strand Associates, Inc. of Ames, Iowa, to complete the design of the project, including
public engagement activities and at least one public information meeting. Strand has been
involved in the successful deployment of mini-roundabout designs elsewhere in the Midwest.
The proposed improvements were intended to:
Reduce excessive speeds through physical traffic calming;
Improve consistency of driver behavior compared to stop-control noncompliance;
Reduce conflict points at intersections*;
Maintain traffic flow while slowing vehicle movements; and
1
Improve overall corridor function as the surrounding area continues to develop.
*[FHWA-RD-00-067; Chapter 5] A conventional four-legged intersection has 32 vehicle
conflict points and 24 pedestrian conflict points. By comparison, a single-lane roundabout has
only 8 vehicle conflict points and 8 pedestrian conflict points. This is a 75% reduction in
potential crash locations.
Following implementation of the all-way stop controls in 2023, staff continued to
receive comments regarding speeding, stop sign compliance, pedestrian safety, and
increasing traffic volumes associated with continued area development and future
amenities such as the Daley Park splash pad.
PUBLIC OUTREACH:
Following the development of preliminary layouts and visual exhibits for the proposed
improvements, a public information meeting was held on April 16, 2026 at Edwards
Elementary School. Invitations for the meeting were mailed to 156 addresses using a
minimum notification distance of approximately 400 feet, while also expanding the mailing
area to include properties that require travel through one of the three proposed intersections.
Social media posts and dynamic message boards displaying meeting information were also
utilized prior to the meeting.
Approximately 79 attendees signed in, with estimated actual attendance around 100 people.
Written comments and emails submitted before, during, and after the meeting reflected a wide
range of opinions regarding both the need for improvements and the proposed use of mini-
roundabouts (see attachments).
PUBLIC FEEDBACK SUMMARY:
Public feedback received generally fell into one of three categories:
Residents opposed to mini-roundabouts or opposed to corridor changes altogether;
Residents supportive of the proposed mini-roundabouts;
Residents supportive of addressing traffic and safety concerns, but uncertain whether
mini-roundabouts were the preferred solution.
A summary prepared following the public meeting categorized comments as approximately:
50% opposed to mini-roundabouts,
21% supportive, and
29% seeking additional information or alternative approaches.
While opinions differed significantly regarding the proposed solution, several themes
consistently emerged during discussions and written comments:
CONTINUED CORRIDOR SAFETY CONCERNS:
Even among some residents opposed to mini-roundabouts, there was acknowledgment that
issues exist along the corridor, including:
Vehicles speeding between stop-controlled intersections
2
Drivers failing to fully stop at all-way stop intersections
Increasing cut-through traffic associated with west Ames development, and
Concern regarding pedestrian crossings, particularly for children accessing Edwards
Elementary School and Daley Park.
CONCERNS REGARDING MINI-ROUNDABOUTS:
The most common concern expressed at the meeting and in written comments related to
pedestrian safety at crosswalks associated with mini-roundabouts. Many residents expressed
concern that drivers may fail to yield to pedestrians because vehicles would no longer be
required to stop at intersections.
Staff notes that this concern is commonly expressed during public engagement processes for
roundabout projects nationally, particularly in areas where residents have limited familiarity
with mini-roundabouts. Discussions with peer agencies and traffic engineering professionals
indicate that concerns regarding pedestrian yielding are frequently raised prior to
implementation, but do not generally manifest at the level anticipated once roundabouts are
operational.
ADDITIONAL CONCERNS:
Residents also expressed concerns regarding:
Construction impacts and neighborhood access
Potential loss of parking
Accommodation of school buses, snowplows, and emergency vehicles
Project cost, and
Whether three roundabouts were necessary versus one or two locations.
Staff recognizes that the construction process brings challenges and inconveniences.
However, these are typically short lived while construction activities are occurring. Staff would
work with impacted residents in a manner similar to all CIP projects to minimize those impacts
during construction. Additionally, the mini-roundabouts are designed to accommodate and
work with larger vehicles including buses, snowplows, and emergency response vehicles. The
designs may require that trailing axles of larger vehicles utilize the sloped curb in the middle of
the mini-roundabout. Those areas are intentionally designed to withstand vehicular loads
when necessary.
OUTREACH CONCERNS:
An additional topic at the public meeting was concern regarding the extent of mailed
notification for the project. While staff mailed notices to properties directly adjacent to Wilder
Boulevard, side streets requiring travel through the impacted intersections, and an area
greater than 400 feet from the corridor; several residents felt a broader area should have been
included in the mailing.
At the same time, staff observed that neighborhood word-of-mouth communication, social
media, and the use of dynamic message boards proved highly effective, resulting in
substantially higher meeting attendance than is typical for similar neighborhood infrastructure
projects.
3
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Conduct additional neighborhood outreach or survey efforts to a designated area.
Council could direct staff to perform additional outreach efforts, such as an online survey
distributed to a larger neighborhood area or a greater selected buffer distance
determined by Council. This outreach would provide an additional opportunity to better
understand broader neighborhood perspectives regarding the proposed use of mini-
roundabouts within this corridor area prior to determining whether to proceed with, delay,
or modify the project.
The purpose of the additional outreach would be to gauge broader community comfort,
familiarity, and acceptance regarding the proposed traffic calming approach and corridor
improvements, rather than to conduct a public selection process for specific engineering
treatments or traffic control measures. Engineering evaluation, safety analysis,
operational considerations, and final improvement recommendations would continue to
be developed by staff utilizing established traffic engineering practices, applicable
guidance, and corridor-specific conditions.
2. Delay the project to allow additional community familiarity with mini-roundabouts
through implementation at other locations in Ames, and reprogram the funds for
other multi-modal improvements.
Council could direct staff to delay the project and revisit the corridor in the future after
mini-roundabouts have been implemented at other locations within Ames. This option
would allow residents time to gain additional familiarity with mini-roundabouts before
reconsidering their use along Wilder Boulevard, while maintaining the current all-way
stop controls in the interim. If this option is selected, future reevaluation of the corridor
could occur if:
Speeding concerns increase
Stop sign compliance significantly deteriorates, or
Additional corridor development changes traffic conditions.
Staff notes that if the corridor is revisited in the future due to stop sign compliance
concerns, mini-roundabouts would likely remain a leading traffic calming solution
because of their operational and safety benefits compared to continued all-way stop
control.
3. Proceed with all or part of the proposed mini-roundabout project.
Council could direct staff to proceed with final design and construction of all three
proposed mini-roundabouts, or selected portions of the project. This option would
continue implementation of the originally proposed traffic calming strategy intended to
address speeding, stop sign compliance, and pedestrian safety concerns along the
corridor.
4. Pursue an alternative approach as directed by Council.
Council could direct staff to pursue alternative traffic calming measures or operational
4
changes, including but not limited to:
Raised crosswalks (engineered speed hump with sidewalk integration)
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) pedestrian crossings
Dynamic speed feedback signs
Additional enforcement
Modifications to existing stop controls, or
Reevaluation of all-way stop warrants.
Staff notes that while there were several comments related to increasing enforcement of
speed and stop-controlled intersections along Wilder Boulevard, police resources need
to be considered before relying on sustained enforcement efforts as the primary method
to maintain corridor operations and compliance. Additionally, staff believes alternatives
heavily reliant on continued enforcement activities may not represent the most
sustainable long-term corridor solution.
Many of the alternative traffic calming measures identified in this option can be
effective when applied in appropriate roadway contexts; however, their
effectiveness varies depending on corridor conditions and the specific
operational concerns being addressed.
Several measures, such as raised crosswalks and RRFB pedestrian crossings, are
generally most effective at midblock pedestrian crossing locations rather than at, or in
close proximity to, all-way stop-controlled intersections where vehicles are already
expected to slow or stop. Additionally, treatments intended to introduce or reinforce
motorist yielding behavior are generally not compatible with stop-controlled intersection
approaches under applicable State and Federal traffic control guidance and standards.
Implementation of traffic calming measures in locations where they are not
optimally suited may result in diminished long-term effectiveness while still
requiring ongoing maintenance and operational costs. Based on the combination
of observed speeding patterns, cut-through traffic, inconsistent stop-control
compliance, and pedestrian activity along the corridor, the mini-roundabout
concept was identified through the engineering evaluation process as the most
comprehensive approach for addressing the corridor ’s multiple operational and
safety concerns.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The current all-way stop controls along Wilder Boulevard were originally implemented as an
interim measure intended to reduce speeds and aid in corridor transition as development
expanded in west Ames. Public feedback received during this process indicates
neighborhood support for maintaining the existing stop controls at this time.
Staff acknowledges that all-way stop compliance may continue to decline over time due to
relatively low side-street traffic volumes at several intersections. Reduced compliance with
stop-controlled intersections is a known operational issue in corridors where drivers perceive
low conflicting traffic demand. Several meeting attendees specifically acknowledged that
rolling stops and stop sign violations already occur today.
5
Mini-roundabouts were selected for evaluation because they provide continuous physical
traffic calming and reduce the ability for vehicles to accelerate aggressively between
intersections, while also reducing the number and severity of vehicle conflict points compared
to traditional intersections.
However, based on the public feedback received, staff believes there may be value in
allowing residents additional time to become familiar with mini-roundabouts through
implementation in other areas of the community before reconsidering their use on
Wilder Boulevard. Staff notes that the design work completed through this project has
already resulted in mini-roundabout templates that are being incorporated into other
developments currently under design within Ames, including new proposed Auburn
Trail Development west of Ada Hayden Park. Additionally, FY 2030/31 of the current CIP
also includes a mini-roundabout corridor project along Hyde Avenue to help with
similar traffic calming through the local neighborhood.
Staff also recognizes that additional outreach could be conducted if directed by
Council. However, staff believes much of the current public concern is associated with
limited local familiarity with mini-roundabouts, which may change as additional
examples are constructed elsewhere within the community.
If this project is delayed, staff would recommend that the available funds for this project
be reallocated to make multi-modal improvements in coordination with other active
improvement projects. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City
Council adopt Alternative No. 2, as noted above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Wilder Crash Report.pdf
Speed Study Summary.pdf
Wilder Mailing Map.pdf
Wilder Blvd Meeting Comment Summary.pdf
Wilder Public Emails_05112026.pdf
Received Letters.pdf
Mini Roundabout Exhibits.pdf
6
Crash Severity
Fatal Crash 0
Suspected Serious Injury Crash 0
Suspected Minor Injury Crash 0
Possible/Unknown Injury Crash 0
Property Damage Only 7
7 Injury Status Summary
Fatalities 0
Suspected serious/incapacitating 0
Suspected minor/non-incapacitating 0
Possible (complaint of pain/injury)0
Uninjured 0
Unknown 0
Not Reported 1
1
Property Damage Total (dollars):48,175.00
Average (per crash dollars):6,882.14
Total Vehicles:12.00
Average (per crash):1.71
Total Occupants:35.00
Average (per crash):5.00
Property/Vehicles/Occupants
Fatalities/Fatal Crash:0.00
Fatalities/Crash:0.00
Injuries/Crash:0.00
Major Injuries/Crash:0.00
Minor Injuries/Crash:0.00
Possible/Unknown Injuries/Crash:0.00
Average Severity
05/18/2026 1 of 7
Iowa Crash Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2016-2026
7
Major Cause
Animal 0
Ran stop sign 0
FTYROW: At uncontrolled intersection 1
FTYROW: From stop sign 1
FTYROW: Making left turn 0
FTYROW: From parked position 0
FTYROW: Other 0
Disregarded RR Signal 0
Crossed median (divided)0
Aggressive driving/road rage 0
Exceeded authorized speed 0
Operating vehicle in an reckless/erratic/care...0
Passing: On wrong side 0
Passing: With insufficient distance/inadequa...0
Passing: Other passing 0
Driver Distraction: Manual operation of an e...0
Driver Distraction: Talking on a hands free ...0
Driver Distraction: Other electronic device ...0
Driver Distraction: Unrestrained animal 0
Driver Distraction: Inattentive/lost in thou...0
Driver Distraction: Exterior distraction 0
Ran off road - straight 0
Lost control 1
Over correcting/over steering 0
Failure to signal intentions 0
Vehicle stopped on railroad tracks 0
Other: Improper operation 0
Other: Disregarded signs/road markings 0
Downhill runaway 0
Towing improperly 0
Equipment failure 0
Other: Getting off/out of vehicle 0
Improper backing 0
Illegally parked/unattended 0
Operator inexperience 0
Unknown 0
Other: No improper action 0
Ran traffic signal 0
Failed to yield to emergency vehicle 0
FTYROW: Making right turn on red signal 0
FTYROW: From yield sign 2
FTYROW: From driveway 0
FTYROW: To pedestrian 0
Drove around RR grade crossing gates 0
Crossed centerline (undivided)0
Traveling wrong way or on wrong side of road 0
Driving too fast for conditions 0
Improper or erratic lane changing 0
Followed too close 0
Passing: Where prohibited by signs/markings 0
Passing: Through/around barrier 0
Made improper turn 0
Driver Distraction: Talking on a hand-held d...0
Driver Distraction: Adjusting devices (radio...0
Driver Distraction: Passenger 0
Driver Distraction: Reaching for object(s)/f...0
Driver Distraction: Other interior distracti...1
Ran off road - right 0
Ran off road - left 0
Swerving/Evasive Action 0
Failed to keep in proper lane 0
Traveling on prohibited traffic way 0
Other: Vision obstructed 1
Other: Disregarded warning sign 0
Other: Illegal off-road driving 0
Separation of units 0
Cargo/equipment loss or shift 0
Oversized load/vehicle 0
Failure to dim lights/have lights on 0
Improper starting 0
Driving less than the posted speed limit 0
Other 0
Not reported 0
7
05/18/2026 2 of 7
Iowa Crash Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2016-2026
8
Time of Day/Day of Week
Day of Week
12 AM
to
2 AM
2 AM
to 4
AM
4 AM
to 6
AM
6 AM
to 8
AM
8 AM
to
10 AM
10 AM
to
Noon
Noon
to 2
PM
2 PM
to 4
PM
4 PM
to 6
PM
6 PM
to 8
PM
8 PM
to
10 PM
10 PM
to
12 AM
Not
reporte
d Total
Sunday 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Monday 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Tuesday 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wednesday 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
Thursday 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Friday 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Saturday 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 7
Manner of Crash Collision
Non-collision (single vehicle)2
Head-on (front to front)0
Rear-end (front to rear)1
Angle (oncoming left turn)0
Broadside (front to side)4
Sideswipe (same direction)0
Sideswipe (opposite direction)0
Rear to rear 0
Rear to side 0
Not reported 0
Other 0
Unknown 0
7 Surface Conditions
Dry 7
Wet 0
Ice/frost 0
Snow 0
Slush 0
Mud/dirt 0
Water (standing or moving)0
Sand 0
Oil 0
Gravel 0
Not reported 0
Other 0
Unknown 0
7
Fixed Object Struck
Bridge overhead structure 0
Bridge/bridge rail parapet 0
Ditch 0
Ground 0
Guardrail - face 0
Concrete traffic barrier (median or right sid...0
Cable barrier 0
Utility pole/light support 1
Traffic signal support 0
Fire hydrant 0
Tree 0
Snow bank 0
Wall 0
Other fixed object 0
Bridge pier or support 0
Curb/island/raised median 0
Embankment 0
Culvert/pipe opening 0
Guardrail - end 0
Other traffic barrier 0
Impact attenuator/crash cushion 0
Traffic sign support 0
Other post/pole/support 0
Mailbox 1
Landscape/shrubbery 0
Fence 0
Building 0
None (no fixed object struck)10
12
05/18/2026 3 of 7
Iowa Crash Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2016-2026
9
Driver Age/Driver Gender
Driver Age - 5 year
Bins Female Male
Not
reported Unknown Total
< 14 0 0 0 0 0
= 14 0 0 0 0 0
= 15 0 0 0 0 0
= 16 0 1 0 0 1
= 17 0 0 0 0 0
= 18 0 1 0 0 1
= 19 0 0 0 0 0
= 20 0 1 0 0 1
>= 21 and <= 24 1 1 0 0 2
>= 25 and <= 29 0 0 0 0 0
>= 30 and <= 34 0 0 0 0 0
>= 35 and <= 39 0 0 0 0 0
>= 40 and <= 44 0 1 0 0 1
>= 45 and <= 49 1 1 0 0 2
>= 50 and <= 54 1 1 0 0 2
>= 55 and <= 59 0 0 0 0 0
>= 60 and <= 64 0 0 0 0 0
>= 65 and <= 69 0 1 0 0 1
>= 70 and <= 74 0 0 0 0 0
>= 75 and <= 79 0 0 0 0 0
>= 80 and <= 84 0 0 0 0 0
>= 85 and <= 89 0 0 0 0 0
>= 90 and <= 94 0 0 0 0 0
>= 95 0 0 0 0 0
Not reported 0 0 0 0 0
Unknown 0 0 1 0 1
Total 3 8 1 0 12
Alcohol Test Given
None 11
Blood 0
Urine 0
Breath 0
Vitreous 0
Refused 0
Not reported 1
12
Drug Test Given
None 11
Blood 0
Urine 0
Breath 0
Vitreous 0
Refused 0
Not reported 1
12
Drug Test Result
Negative 0
Cannabis 0
Central Nervous System depressants 0
Central Nervous System stimulants 0
Hallucinogens 0
Inhalants 0
Narcotic Analgesics 0
Dissociative Anesthetic (PCP)0
Prescription Drug 0
Not reported 12
Other 0
12
Drug/Alcohol Related
Drug 0
Alcohol (< Statutory)0
Alcohol (Statutory)0
Drug and Alcohol (< Statutory)0
Drug and Alcohol (Statutory)0
Refused 0
Under Influence of Alcohol/Drugs/Medications 1
None Indicated 6
7
05/18/2026 4 of 7
Iowa Crash Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2016-2026
10
Crash Severity - Annual
Crash Year Fatal Crash
Suspected Serious
Injury Crash
Suspected Minor
Injury Crash
Possible/Unknown
Injury Crash
Property Damage
Only Total
2016 0 0 0 0 1 1
2017 0 0 0 0 0 0
2018 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019 0 0 0 0 1 1
2020 0 0 0 0 3 3
2021 0 0 0 0 1 1
2022 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024 0 0 0 0 1 1
2025 0 0 0 0 0 0
2026 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 7 7
Severity/Year
05/18/2026 5 of 7
Iowa Crash Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2016-2026
11
Injury Status - Annual
Crash Year Fatalities
Suspected
serious/incapac
itating
Suspected
minor/non-
incapacitating
Possible
(complaint of
pain/injury)Uninjured Unknown Not Reported Total
2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2024 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2026 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Injury Status/Year
05/18/2026 6 of 7
Iowa Crash Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2016-2026
12
Jurisdiction: Statewide
Year: 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026
Map Selection: Yes
Filter: None
Meeting the following criteria
Analyst Information
05/18/2026 7 of 7
Iowa Crash Analysis Tool
Quick Report
2016-2026
13
Summary
Staff reviewed speed data from several detectors placed along the corridor. This data was
collected from primarily radar detectors in late June/early July 2020. However, one location
(Wilder & Clemens – Location #4) utilized data from a Gridsmart video detection system
which collected data in mid-April 2021. The map below summarizes the detector locations.
Staff calculated various speed metrics from the dataset at each location for both
directions of travel which included: the average speed, the 85th percentile speed (the speed
at which 85% of vehicles travel at or below), the pace (the 10 MPH range at which the most
vehicles are traveling at), and the excessive speeding percentage (the percentage of
vehicles travel at or above 10 MPH over the posted speed limit). The table below
14
summarizes these metrics for all the locations. Metrics highlighted in orange or red are a
key indicator that a notable level of excessive speeding is occurring at the given location.
*NB = Northbound traffic, SB = Southbound traffic
The above results indicate that notable levels of excessive speeding are occurring at
several locations along the corridor, particularly on the northern half of the corridor. The
City is already planning to install new stop signs at several intersections along this corridor
(including all-way stop control at the intersections of Wilder Blvd & Frost Dr and Wilder
Blvd & Clemens Blvd) per the attached map. These new stop signs will likely be installed
within the next couple months. This new traffic control will likely have significant impacts
to vehicle speeds along the corridor, due to Wilder Blvd traffic now having to stop at two
intersections, Frost Dr at Daley Park and Clemens Blvd. Therefore, staff will monitor the
changes in observed vehicle speeds after the implementation of the proposed traffic
control along the corridor to determine whether excessive speeding is still occurring.
Thanks,
Kyle Thompson
Transportation Planner
Ames Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Ames City Hall, 515 Clark Ave. | Ames, IA 50010
515.239.5169 direct
515.239.5160 main
515.239.5404 fax
kyle.thompson@cityofames.org
15
16
DRAFT
Initials\S:\MAD\4400--4499\4429\021\Designs-Studies-Reports\Public Meetings\Meeting Summaries\Comment Sheets\Wilder Blvd Comment Summary.docx
April 23, 2026
Mark Gansen, P.E.
City of Ames
515 Clark Avenue
Ames, IA 50010
Re: Wilder Boulevard Mini-Roundabouts Public Involvement Comments
Dear Mark
The following is a summary of the public information meeting held on April 16, 2026 from 4:30 PM to
6:30 PM at Edwards Elementary School. At the meeting we provided preliminary drawings of the three
intersections, information on the roadway typical section, and a general overview of the area with the
three mini roundabouts. We will summarize the attendees, general comment themes, and alternative
ideas that were proposed by various attendees.
Seventy nine people signed in for the meeting and the general consensus was total attendance was
around 100 people. We received a total of 32 written comment sheets at the meeting and also received
ten additional comments via email before or directly after the meeting.
From reading the comments received there are three main groups of residents. The first are firmly
against any type of roundabout improvement and several of these people are also no to any
improvements as they see no problem in the area. There is also a group that are firmly in support of the
proposed mini roundabouts. The third group support something to be done but have concerns with the
proposed alternative or would like more information and consideration of other ideas. Below is a
breakdown of the percentage of these groups:
The following are some of the common themes that were expressed in the comments from each group
1.Comments against mini-roundabouts
Concern for pedestrian (particularly children) safety, sight lines, and fear drivers will not
yield to pedestrians.
Traffic volumes on Wilder Boulevard are too low to warrant adding mini-roundabouts.
Stop signs work fine.
Speeding is not an issue on the corridor.
Concern about property impacts during of after the construction.
Costs of improvements will be too high.
Large vehicles (busses, snow plows, garbage trucks) will have problems with the
intersection.
Will cause loss of street parking near the intersections.
17
City of Ames
Mark Gansen, P.E.
Page 2
DRAFT
Initials\S:\MAD\4400--4499\4429\021\Designs-Studies-Reports\Public Meetings\Meeting Summaries\Comment Sheets\Wilder Blvd Comment Summary.docx
We performed a futher review of the dissenting comments to determine if they did acknowledge
that there were issues along the corridor. 43 percent of the dissenting comments did acknowledge
that there are issues with the Wilder Boulevard corridor. These issues were referenced in their
comments:
Vehicles not stopping at stop signs.
Vehicle speeds have increased on the roadway.
General corridor safety.
Increase in cut-through traffic with surrounding development.
2.Comments for mini-roundabouts
Speeding and cut through traffic would typically be reduced. Believe there will be a
traffic calming effect.
Provide a more reliable function of the intersections and the potential for increased
pedestrian safety.
Support the ability to control the intersections while not impeding traffic flow like the
all-way stop control does.
General support for roundabouts as they have seen them work in other countries or
communities.
Requested similar treatments to other roadways in the area.
3.Comments looking for more information or revisions to planned project
Support roundabouts, but three are too many. Would like to see one or two rather than
all three.
Support roundabouts but would like additional or alternative pedestrian focused
improvements to be considered.
Requested additional data/information on the speed or intersection issues that show
justification for the project.
How long will the construction process take?
Neutral towards roundabouts, but provided other ideas for improvements to consider.
(Summarized in next section)
As indicated in Item 3 above, several of the comment sheets requested alternative treatments be
considered. Below is a list of treatments that were suggested:
Install raised crosswalks at one or more of the intersections.
Install warning lights on the existing stop signs and maintain stop control.
Paint lane lines on the corridor and add speed limit signs with flags.
Paint crosswalks so they show brighter.
Add speed bumps along Wilder Boulevard.
Put in flashing crosswalk signs.
Connect Mortenson to Y Avenue.
Install speed cameras.
Increase police enforcement.
18
City of Ames
Mark Gansen, P.E.
Page 3
DRAFT
Initials\S:\MAD\4400--4499\4429\021\Designs-Studies-Reports\Public Meetings\Meeting Summaries\Comment Sheets\Wilder Blvd Comment Summary.docx
19
City of Ames
Mark Gansen, P.E.
Page 4
DRAFT
Initials\S:\MAD\4400--4499\4429\021\Designs-Studies-Reports\Public Meetings\Meeting Summaries\Comment Sheets\Wilder Blvd Comment Summary.docx
If there are any questions or comments please let us know and we can update the summary.
Sincerely,
STRAND ASSOCIATES, INC.®
Kyle R. Henderson, P.E. (WI)Mitch Holtz, P.E.
20
1
Gansen, Mark
From:Andrea Hrbek <andreahrbek146@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 11, 2026 8:32 AM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:Council about Wilder Blvd
[External Email]
Please include this correspondence for the
May 26 meeting I cannot attend.
I went to the meeting in April to get public opinion for the proposed changes. Talking to my neighbors at the meeting the neighborhood is
against these changes. It is unnecessary and seems to be a waste of money not based on any injuries or concrete history of excessive
speed on this street. There are many other ways to create another main thoroughfare and to leave this nice quiet street alone! Speed
bumps were dismissed as it would impede emergency vehicles but 3 mini roundabouts wouldn’t? No good answers why Mortensen isn’t
extended and the NS gravel road made into a connecting street. Told they tried (not how) and no success.
The staff at that meeting most were ill informed and couldn’t answer questions. They stood there and when I asked questions were silent
not properly informed.
Please leave this nice quiet street alone there are many other problem areas in the city.
Wilder Blvd is not a problem!
Thanks
Andrea Hrbek
306 Wilder Blvd, Ames,
At this residence 14 years. I’ve been a walker runner, dog walker in this neighborhood no issues w traffic problems
21
2
Gansen, Mark
From:Paula Higgs <pm.givens46@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, April 28, 2026 5:55 PM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:Wilder roundabout
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
[External Email]
We do not think it would be necessary to have this in our residential area. The safety of the children, bicyclist, pedestrians and pets would
be at risk when crossing over to the park. If you think people aren't stopping at the stop sign they surely aren't going to stop where the
pedestrians cross. We do not have that much traffic on our street. I have not seen many people running the stop sign- if anything a small
minority of motorists slow down at the stop sign and dont come to a complete stop. Most of the motorists stop and obey the traffic laws.
22
3
Gansen, Mark
From:PAUL Green <pandlgreen@msn.com>
Sent:Tuesday, April 28, 2026 3:37 PM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:Proposed Wilder Roundabout Project
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
[External Email]
Hello Mark
I am writing to you regarding the proposed project that would build roundabouts on Wilder Boulevard. I would like to state first that I am 100%
against this. I do not see a need for something like this in a purely residential neighborhood. Many of the roads that will be affected are dead ends
or cul-de-sacs, and there is no flow of traffic that needs calming. Which brings me to another concern. During construction of the roundabouts the
roads would most likely be closed, which means people living on those side roads would not be able to get to their homes for an extended period
since there is only one way in or out. That is not acceptable. This project would be very disruptive to everyone in the area. There is also a safety
concern with having roundabouts, particularly near a park. There is an abundance of pedestrian traffic that has to cross Wilder at all of these
intersections. I believe it would be better to have vehicles come to a stop in order to avoid anyone getting hit. Overall, I think this project is
completely unnecessary and the money it would take could be much better spent somewhere else.
Sincerely,
Paul Green
23
4
Gansen, Mark
From:Jeannette Joh <jvmfbook@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, April 27, 2026 10:03 AM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:Wilder Blvd project
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
[External Email]
Dear Mr Gansen,
First, I’d like to thank the engineers who attended the meeting and listened to and responded to our questions and concerns. (I am
assuming they were City of Ames employees, as they did not wear any name tags or Ames-branded apparel.) While we do not live on or
close to Wilder, we do walk in both Hillside and Bentwood neighborhoods. Our biggest concern about this proposed project is pedestrian
safety. There are lots of kids, especially in Daley Park, as well as walkers, dogs, and cyclists. My husband and I came away from the
presentation thinking these islands could potentially slow traffic, but we’re concerned about pedestrian crossings that are no longer
marked by a stop sign. At a stop sign, you should look both ways, and notice anyone hoping to cross. When a car enters a roundabout, the
driver’s immediate concern is yielding to traffic coming from the left. With crosswalks immediately to the right, is there enough distance for
a driver to notice a pedestrian in the crosswalk? For example, traveling west on Clemens to turn north on Wilder, a driver looks left, enters
the roundabout, and THEN meets a crosswalk. Has such a visibility issue been tested/addressed?
This is our first concern with this project, and we hope this situation will be addressed before any construction begins. Thank you,
Andreas and Jeannette Johannsen
4708 Hemingway Drive
Sent from my iPhone
24
5
Gansen, Mark
From:Sly Upah <upah.sly@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, April 24, 2026 10:35 AM
To:Gansen, Mark
Cc:kyle.henderson@strand.com
Subject:comments on Wilder Boulevard corridor improvements
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
[External Email]
My wife and I live at 5242 Thackeray Drive. We would like to provide some feedback regarding the three mini-roundabouts.
1) One concern is how the installation of the roundabouts will impact parking. Currently, overflow parking for Daley Park is usually along the
west side of Wilder and doesn't really impact the residential neighborhoods that much (but occasionally they do utilize Thackeray). We are
concerned overflow parking will now be a regular occurrence in front of our house, especially with the addition of the splash pad being
installed at Daley Park (among other activities people reserve the shelter for at Daley Park). Overflow parking is a concern if street parking on
Wilder is eliminated.
2) Will snow removal be impacted by the roundabouts? It already piles up on our streets quite a bit.
3) How will the school bus stops on Wilder be redirected?
4) Why three roundabouts? We can possibly understand the rationale for the one at Frost, and maybe Clemens, but three in a row, and that
close together, just seems to be excessive.
5) We don't know what data prompted or complaints initiated this project. However, in living here for the last 8 years and going on many
walks over the years, we have not heard, seen, or witnessed any pedestrian or vehicle accidents. I know there are occasionally speeders on
Wilder as the warmer weather approaches, but nothing unlike the rest of Ames (especially on Bloomington!).
Karen Upah, and
Sylvester (Sly) Upah Jr., PhD.
25
6
Gansen, Mark
From:Ben Drout <bdrout@gmail.com>
Sent:Sunday, April 19, 2026 2:24 PM
To:Gansen, Mark; kyle.henderson@strand.com
Subject:Wilder Blvd Comments
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
[External Email]
Mark & Kyle,
Thank you again for coming out on Thursday to discuss the proposed mini-roundabouts on Wilder Blvd. Since moving back to Ames a few
years ago I have had multiple chances to be impressed with the willingness of Public Works staff and their associates to engage with the
community and respond directly to resident questions and comments. I am also encouraged that we are actively looking for ways to make
our streets work well, and safely, for all users, not just those in vehicles.
I mentioned much of my comments to Damion, but since I wasn't able to fill out a comment sheet I just wanted to say for the record that I
am enthusiastic about seeing this project move forward. I am a fan of roundabouts in general given what I have seen regarding their
positive effect on crash rates and severity and I think installing compact versions within the existing right of way will be a great fit for this
neighborhood.
When it comes to pedestrian safety at the intersections themselves I can understand those who are concerned that drivers will no longer be
required to stop and must look for pedestrians at a crosswalk before the intersection proper. However, I suspect most of the issues leading
to complaints along this corridor are being caused by drivers who are already not stopping at the stop signs - those willing to ignore signs
and paint. For the drivers conscientious enough to be stopping at the existing stop signs, I don't expect systemic problems with properly
yielding to pedestrians and vehicles already in the intersection- and this will be made easier due to the reduced points of conflict in a
roundabout. For the drivers who already ARE speeding through the corridor and running the signs the physical barrier of an obstacle to be
avoided will be much more effective than the all-way stops currently installed. It will also be much more COST effective than increased
enforcement since the roundabout is there 24/7. I assume it would be cost-prohibitive for the city to have a traffic enforcement officer
present often enough to raise the chances of being caught running a stop sign to anything close to that!
Lastly, I think another benefit of the roundabouts is how annoying they may be to drivers just trying to get through the area. No doubt many
of the reported speeding concerns on Wilder involve drivers using the corridor as a cut through between Lincoln Way and Mortensen to
avoid having to go all the way to South Dakota. While the street does form that connection, my understanding is that its primary purpose as
a collector is to efficiently move traffic between the local streets and those arterials. For those whose origin or destination is within the
neighborhood, going through one or two roundabouts is unlikely to be overly burdensome, especially as they are unlikely to be speeding
through. The benefit may be that those who are just trying to get through as quickly as possible, possibly some of the worst "trouble
makers", will be incentivized to avoid the corridor entirely and remove themselves as a problem. To that end, I think three roundabouts is the
right number as with only one or two those drivers may decide it is still worth it to cut through the neighborhood.
It is possible that much of these goals could be accomplished by raised crosswalks combined with the all-way stops instead, especially
across Wilder Blvd. That is worth exploring and it would be interesting to see a cost comparison between the mini-roundabout and
associated elements and four raised crosswalks. Even if the latter is favorable, the raised crosswalks would still not reduce the points of
conflict however, which must be considered.
No doubt there are other streets in Ames that could see safety benefits from mini-roundabouts, perhaps some even more significantly than
on Wilder. My hope is that we are able to proceed with a project similar to what was presented and, if it proves effective, deploy similar
treatments to those other areas in the future.
Thanks again for your time (and how long this email turned out!)
-Ben Drout
Ames Resident
26
7
Gansen, Mark
From:Andrea Hrbek <azhrbek@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, April 17, 2026 6:41 AM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:Wilder
[External Email]
i live on Wilder have for 13 yrs. I am upset about these proposed changes for no good reason. There is no excessive speed no accidents no
deaths. Why not ask the people how they think? We should vote on it. Waste of money and ruin a nice neighborhood for no good reason.
I vote NO!!!
A Hrbek
27
8
Gansen, Mark
From:sara kellogg <sara.s.kellogg@gmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, April 15, 2026 7:06 AM
To:Gansen, Mark; kyle.henderson@strand.com
Cc:sara kellogg
Subject:Wilder Boulevard Traffic Calming Project – Data and Design Rationale Clarification
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
[External Email]
Dear Mr. Gansen and Mr. Henderson,
I have lived on Cervantes Drive, just off Wilder Boulevard, for 20 years. We raised our three children in this neighborhood and travel this
corridor daily. We received a letter regarding this proposal, and are unable to attend the April 16 public meeting. However, I have reviewed
the information shared regarding the "traffic calming project," and have some questions and concerns.
From the description, it appears the primary goal is to slow traffic and improve safety by installing mini-roundabouts at Clemens and at the
adjacent intersections of Thackeray and Frost. I understand the general purpose of traffic calming, but am struggling to see how this
particular solution aligns with the actual conditions on this corridor.
In my experience, Wilder does not carry particularly high traffic volumes, and while there has been some increase with development west of
Wilder off Mortensen, it still does not function as a major through route. Given that, installing three mini-roundabouts in close succession
feels disproportionate to the level of traffic and activity.
To better understand the rationale, could you share:
• Traffic volume data (AADT) for this segment of Wilder
• Any recent speed studies conducted along the corridor
• Crash history data for the intersections at Clemens, Thackeray, and Frost
• The criteria used to determine that three mini-roundabouts were the appropriate solution, rather than more limited, intersection-
specific changes that could address concerns without the construction to redesign multiple intersections.
I would also be interested in understanding whether alternative configurations were considered, such as focusing improvements at higher-
volume intersections (e.g., Wilder/Mortensen or Clemens alone) rather than distributing multiple installations along a relatively low-volume
residential corridor.
Additionally, because this project appears to involve physical reconstruction of the intersections, I would appreciate clarification on how it
is being classified from a funding standpoint. Specifically, will any portion of the cost be assessed to adjacent property owners, or is it being
fully funded through citywide sources?
Thank you for the opportunity for public input. I would appreciate any additional information you can provide to help residents better
understand how this proposal reflects actual safety needs and priorities.
Thank you for your time,
Sara Kellogg
28
9
Gansen, Mark
From:Gretchen Meyer <meyergl50@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, April 14, 2026 12:07 PM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:Wilder Blvd mini roundabouts
[External Email]
Hi,
I live on Frost Drive and can't be at the public meeting this Thursday. I lost the letter we received so I'm not sure if there is a better email
address.
I think it's a good idea to deal with increased traffic on Wilder but I'm not sure how this fixes things. I have a few concerns. There is already
an awful lot of foot traffic on both sides of Wilder Blvd and with the new splash pad at Daley Park I assume that will increase. I understand
how the improvements address traffic flow but I am concerned about pedestrian safety trying to cross the street when cars don't stop. From
the maps sent out, it looks like crossings will be placed right where cars start to pick up speed as they leave the roundabout.
I'm wondering if safety for pedestrians crossing Lincoln Way has been or will be considered at any point? There are parks on both sides of
Lincoln Way within easy walking distance of each other, with sidewalks leading right up to Lincoln Way but there is no safe way to cross.
Traffic is running at least 45 mph and often considerably faster and there is a blind spot to the west where a car can hide in a dip just before
the intersection. It's scary and dangerous, but people cross there all the time.
One more thing, I'd like to know how access to the side streets will be maintained during construction. Frost is about 1 1/2 blocks long and I
live at the very end. If we have to park on Wilder, that's a long trek with groceries, or if you're sick, or in bad weather. I hope that will be taken
into consideration.
Please forward this to the correct person if need be. Thank you!
Gretchen Meyer
5465 Frost Drive
29
10
Gansen, Mark
From:Lisa Kuehl <lkkuehl@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, April 14, 2026 11:04 AM
To:Gansen, Mark; kyle.henderson@strand.com
Subject:Thoughts for you on the Wilder Blvd. roundabouts...
[External Email]
Dear Mark and Kyle -
Thank you for the upcoming public meeting regarding the proposed Wilder Boulevard roundabout project. I live at the northeast corner of
Wilder and Cervantes Drive, so I have a very good vantage point from which to observe driver behaviors on this stretch of residential street. I
plan to attend your presentation but wanted to send these notes in advance.
Several years ago, I was able to work with Damion P. at Traffic and he was able to add two four-way stop signs for
enhancing pedestrian safety along Wilder. These are located at the intersection of Wilder and Clemens and at the entrance to Daley Park.
Prior to these stop signs being installed, I saw a lot of aggressive driving and accompanying noise coming from speeding vehicles. The stop
signs have helped, but what I currently observe is many incomplete stops, some drivers still running the stop signs and drivers speeding in-
between stop signs.
I have several questions regarding the new roundabout project and how they will improve traffic calming along Wilder Boulevard.
1. What will be the maximum speed within the roundabout in order to safely drive through it? Because drivers do not actually have to
stop, my concern is that this will be a similar situation to doing a rolling stop through a stop sign, allowing for more rapid acceleration upon
leaving the intersection.
2. What will be the anticipated distance required from the start of the roundabout to begin deceleration from the current 25 mph
posted speed limit? Will this distance prevent drivers from being able to easily accelerate in-between the roundabouts to speeds above
the posted 25 mph?
3. Will the City be performing an updated traffic and speed study in advance of this project? I'd like to know these statistics to have a
better idea of what the biggest speed concerns might currently be.
4. Can you address which other traffic calming options are being considered,
as well as cost-comparisons to the roundabout construction? I already see many of these in use in other parts of Ames:
-adding more speed limit signs with visibility enhancements, such as red flags or solar flashing lights and reminders,
-adding more stop signs, also with visibility enhancements,
-adding speed humps or rumble strips,
-adding signage requesting NO SEMIS or LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY as a way to reduce excess cut-through traffic coming from west Lincolnway
going to the US 30 area and reverse and make Wilder Boulevard less appealing as a perceived time-saver for non-local traffic.
Thank you again for considering public input on this project. With the development of the Daley Park splash pad, the addition of more new
homes in Sunset Ridge and the new Hope Church and pending Ontario Park, I expect much more traffic on Wilder Boulevard that is not local
in nature. Hopefully, drivers will be respectful of residents living in this area and will learn to mind the speed limits to keep everyone safe
and to reduce excess vehicle noise.
Lisa K. Kuehl
5225 Cervantes Drive
Ames, IA 50014-6919
(515) 451-1039 cell & text / (515) 450-5551 landline
"FaceTime" me with your Apple device at lkkuehl@gmail.com
"You can find excuses...or, you can find a way."
30
11
Gansen, Mark
From:Joshua Przybyszewski <josh.prezby@gmail.com>
Sent:Saturday, April 11, 2026 9:06 AM
To:Gansen, Mark; Kyle.henderson@strand.com
Subject:Resident near Wilder Blvd
Attachments:PXL_20260227_204443190.jpg
[External Email]
Hey Mark and Kyle,
I saw the news about the proposed changes to Wilder, and got your info from this website. I'm traveling out-of-town for work this week, so I
cannot be at the meeting scheduled for Thursday. I'd love the chance to get to hear from you directly about the plans and intentions behind
it, and get the chance to ask my questions in person. However, since I can't make it to that event in person, I'd like to write you a brief note
over email to hear about how I should be thinking about this.
First off, I'd just like to say that I'm so thankful you're making improvements to Wilder. I love living in a city that's prioritizing caring for roads
and neighborhoods where a lot of people live. I've lived on Norris St for 5 years, and it's been nice to see the care that has been taken in our
neighborhood.
Second, I'd like to acknowledge that I'm a resident and a software engineer -- not a civil engineer or an expert in city design.
I'm a runner and a father of two toddlers. I train for half marathons starting from my house on Norris St, and I often use Wilder as a running
route to head east on Mortensen. My wife (and/or I) also often (at least once a week, sometimes daily) take our toddlers (walking or in
strollers) through the neighborhood, and Wilder is a primarily path to Daley park and to Edwards elementary.
With that biographical context, I'd like to say that my preference is that our intersections be safer and easier for pedestrians rather than
prioritizing throughput of vehicle traffic.
I'm not an expert in roundabout designs, or the pros/cons tradeoffs when swapping a four-way stop for a roundabout. Could you help me
understand how this particular roundabout design would be safer and easier for pedestrians than the current layout?
Thanks for all you do. If there's another chance to meet (in person, over phone, or another way) that you'd prefer, I'd love the chance to
connect and learn from you!
Josh Przybyszewski
Runner of long distances
Father of energetic toddlers
Software Engineer at Workiva
Fellow Ames Resident
515.229.6766
5315 Norris St
31
12
Gansen, Mark
From:Daphne Burgason <burgasond@yahoo.com>
Sent:Thursday, April 9, 2026 6:10 PM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:Wilder Roundabouts
[External Email]
Good Evening Mr. Gansen,
My name is Daphne Burgason, and we live on Norris Street just off of Wilder. We travel via Wilder and Mortensen nearly daily. I do not
think the traffic on this road necessitates the inclusion of roundabouts. In my opinion, this costly change would be a misuse of public
funds as it seems to be more of an esthetic change rather than a traffic issue. Additionally, it would cause more of a traffic headache
having to close portions of Wilder while the roundabouts would be installed. Please do not install these. The stop signs are enough.
Installation of these would be foolish.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Daphne Burgason
Burgasond@yahoo.com
(515)528-3122
Sent from my iPhone
32
13
Gansen, Mark
From:Judy Snyder <judy.snyder@me.com>
Sent:Thursday, April 9, 2026 1:08 PM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:Roundabouts on Wilder
[External Email]
I’ve lived in this area before “Wilder Blvd was born”. I also walk that area at least once a day and have seen no issues with anyone
almost getting hit, speeding or at least no more than any other street in Ames.
There appears to be one house constantly complaining. The city finally puts in stop signs. Then she’s still unhappy and wants speed
bumps or roundabouts or maybe mobile speed signs or a bigger police presence.
It’s endless the things she complains about and yet the problem is never good enough.
These are not busy streets and feel it will confuse kids even more. Drivers don’t stop at roundabouts and kids are taught to stop at the
corner and wait for traffic. I don’t like riding my bike or cross roundabouts as a pedestrian It’s unsettling trying to figure out who is going
to stop.
It’ll make people go even faster with the sheer challenge to see how fast they can go.
The stop signs seem to work well. Probably a cheaper solution to add the crosswalks with the flashing lights. My grandkids live on
Wilder so I am very familiar with the area and see no difference with other streets except for someone constantly complaining and
never happy with any solution so far and making more out of it than need be and always using “ all the children in the area as an
excuse”. She doesn’t even have any children.
312 Schubert Cir
33
14
Gansen, Mark
From:K.Fischer <stepbrat1@yahoo.com>
Sent:Sunday, April 5, 2026 7:26 AM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:Roundabouts on Wilder
[External Email]
I FIRMLY believe that building roundabouts at these intersections is a huge mistake.
We live in the Hillside subdivision and have since 2007. Since building the apartment at the end of Mortensen, yes Mortensen has more
traffic. I also acknowledge that Wilder’s traffic has increased. HOWEVER, I think the same results could be accomplished by the following:
1. A traffic light at the corner of Mortensen and Wilder. This is the only place I would even consider a roundabout..
2. Stop signs at Thackeray and Frost, and Clemens there is already a 4 way stop
3. And definitely a traffic light at Wlder and Lincoln Way, especially now that they have built the large Luthern Church on Lincoln
4. Speed bumps could be installed for a fraction of the cost of the roundabouts which would slow down traffic.
I believe the mini traffic circles are dangerous. They do not accommodate large vehicles, cars with trailers, or Motor homes pulling cars well
There is also the factor of homes that have been here for many years losing part of their property.
I sincerely hope you reconsider!
Karen
34
15
Gansen, Mark
From:Bonnie Alley <bonnie.alley@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, April 2, 2026 12:54 PM
To:Betcher, Gloria
Cc:Gansen, Mark; Kyle R. Henderson; Clausen, Justin; Phillips, Brian; Schainker, Steve
Subject:Re: Wilder Boulevard Corridor Improvments
[External Email]
Thank you. I am not aware of any email lists that are out there. I think if you have this one, and then a second, before putting final
decisions in place, it will give those that attended the first to discuss among their networks.
Has the school been notified? I would think that the administration would want to know of any construction that could potentially
impact the traffic on that street.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 7:15 AM Betcher, Gloria <gloria.betcher@amescitycouncil.org> wrote:
Thank you, Bonnie, for your detailed questions and input, and Mark for your thorough response!
Outreach is always a question for these projects: how much to do, what radius to cover. How to arrive at the best outcomes. I’m glad to
hear that additional publication of meetings is planned in addition to the direct mailings.
Bonnie, do you know of any neighborhood email lists or word of mouth means to reach more of the folks living in your area? If you do,
please share those suggestions with staff. We want to get the word out to as many impacted residents as possible so they are aware of the
project and can provide input.
Best,
Gloria
Gloria J Betcher
Ward 3 Representative
Ames City Council
531 Hayward Avenue
Ames, IA 50014
(515) 460-2512
On Mar 31, 2026, at 4:18 PM, Gansen, Mark <Mark.Gansen@cityofames.org> wrote:
Hi Bonnie,
Thank you for your thoughtful email and for taking the time to share your perspective. We appreciate your interest in the
proposed Wilder Boulevard improvements and your desire to stay engaged in the process.
Regarding the mailed notices, each project is unique in terms of how far its impacts extend and how notifications are
distributed. For this project, mailings were sent to properties directly adjacent to Wilder Boulevard (between Rowling Drive
and Norris Street), properties directly adjacent to Clemens Blvd and Thackeray Avenue (from Wilder Blvd to Smiley Ave), as
well as to properties that require travel through the impacted intersections, including Frost Drive, Thackeray Drive, Cervantes
Drive, and Clemens Boulevard. This approach ended up reaching out between 400’ to 1,000’ from the impacted intersections
and identified a total of 156 properties. That said, we recognize that Wilder serves a broader area, and we are supplementing
those mailings with additional outreach, including social media and other communications, to help ensure that interested
residents are aware of the project and the upcoming meeting.
You’ve raised a number of good questions regarding project background, design considerations, cost, construction, and
neighborhood impacts. These are exactly the types of topics we are preparing information on and plan to cover in more
detail at the public information meeting. The intent of that meeting is not only to share information, but also to hear
feedback from residents and incorporate that input as the project moves forward.
We appreciate your suggestion to broaden outreach and will continue to look for ways to ensure residents who use and
are affected by Wilder Boulevard have opportunities to stay informed and engaged.
We look forward to your participation in the upcoming meeting and to continuing the conversation.
35
16
Thanks,
Mark Gansen, P.E.
Civil Engineer II
Public Works | City of Ames
515.239.5291
From: Bonnie Alley <bonnie.alley@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:35 AM
To: Gansen, Mark <Mark.Gansen@cityofames.org>; Kyle.henderson@strand.com; Betcher, Gloria <gloria.betcher@amescitycouncil.org>
Subject: Wilder Boulevard Corridor Improvments
[External Email]
Dear Gloria, Mark, and Kyle,
I hope you are all doing well.
A fellow neighbor shared their notification regarding the proposed Wilder Boulevard corridor improvements. I appreciate the
opportunity for community input and the effort to enhance safety and traffic flow in our area.
First, I am curious who received this notification. After speaking with several neighbors and others who frequently use Wilder
Boulevard, it appears that many in the surrounding community were not aware of the proposed project, did not receive the
mailed notice, and were not invited to the public forum.
While I am not opposed to the project, this lack of awareness raises concerns about transparency in how information has
been shared. It limits the community’s ability to ask questions, engage in the process, and provide meaningful feedback.
Given how heavily this corridor is used, I would strongly encourage expanding outreach to include a broader group of
residents who are impacted by and rely on this roadway daily.
In addition, I believe homeowners on the streets east of Wilder Boulevard should be included in future communications. Any
changes to traffic flow have the potential to shift traffic into adjacent neighborhoods, which could impact residential streets
through increased volume, as well as additional street parking pressures.
As I learn more about the proposal, I would appreciate insight on several items:
Project Background & Planning
• Why was this project proposed?
• What data or concerns led to this recommendation?
• Have you received any feedback or input from residents thus far?
• Will community questions and concerns meaningfully influence the project, or is the public forum informational in
nature?
Cost & Previous Investments
• What is the estimated cost of this proposed project?
• I am also interested in how much was previously invested in ADA-compliant sidewalks in this area that may now need
to be removed or reworked.
Timeline & Construction Impact
• How long is the project expected to take?
• Will construction occur all at once, or will it be phased?
• What will traffic rerouting look like during construction?
36
17
• How will traffic be managed to avoid shifting congestion to streets like Miller, especially with school traffic and
children in the area?
Neighborhood & Access Impacts
• How will this affect streets to the west that currently function as dead-end roads?
• How will bus stops be impacted during and after construction?
• How will snow removal be handled with the new design?
Safety & Daily Use
• How will pedestrian crossings be impacted, particularly given the number of individuals and families who walk in this
area?
• Are there examples of similar roundabouts in high residential areas like ours, and what has been the outcome?
• How have other roundabouts in Ames affected speed, safety, and travel flow?
I am supportive of thoughtful improvements that enhance safety and overall livability. My goal is simply to ensure that all
impacted residents are informed, considered, and have an opportunity to provide meaningful input.
Thank you for your time and for the work you are doing on this project. I look forward to learning more and participating in the
upcoming public meeting.
Bonnie Alley
" There is a powerful driving force inside every human being that, once unleashed, can make any vision, dream, or desire
a reality"
--
--
Bonnie Alley
" There is a powerful driving force inside every human being that, once unleashed, can make any vision, dream, or desire a reality"
37
18
Gansen, Mark
From:Bonnie Alley <bonnie.alley@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:35 AM
To:Gansen, Mark; Kyle.henderson@strand.com; Betcher, Gloria
Subject:Wilder Boulevard Corridor Improvments
[External Email]
Dear Gloria, Mark, and Kyle,
I hope you are all doing well.
A fellow neighbor shared their notification regarding the proposed Wilder Boulevard corridor improvements. I appreciate the opportunity for
community input and the effort to enhance safety and traffic flow in our area.
First, I am curious who received this notification. After speaking with several neighbors and others who frequently use Wilder Boulevard, it
appears that many in the surrounding community were not aware of the proposed project, did not receive the mailed notice, and were not
invited to the public forum.
While I am not opposed to the project, this lack of awareness raises concerns about transparency in how information has been shared. It
limits the community’s ability to ask questions, engage in the process, and provide meaningful feedback. Given how heavily this corridor is
used, I would strongly encourage expanding outreach to include a broader group of residents who are impacted by and rely on this roadway
daily.
In addition, I believe homeowners on the streets east of Wilder Boulevard should be included in future communications. Any changes to
traffic flow have the potential to shift traffic into adjacent neighborhoods, which could impact residential streets through increased volume,
as well as additional street parking pressures.
As I learn more about the proposal, I would appreciate insight on several items:
Project Background & Planning
• Why was this project proposed?
• What data or concerns led to this recommendation?
• Have you received any feedback or input from residents thus far?
• Will community questions and concerns meaningfully influence the project, or is the public forum informational in nature?
Cost & Previous Investments
• What is the estimated cost of this proposed project?
• I am also interested in how much was previously invested in ADA-compliant sidewalks in this area that may now need to be removed
or reworked.
Timeline & Construction Impact
• How long is the project expected to take?
• Will construction occur all at once, or will it be phased?
• What will traffic rerouting look like during construction?
• How will traffic be managed to avoid shifting congestion to streets like Miller, especially with school traffic and children in the area?
Neighborhood & Access Impacts
• How will this affect streets to the west that currently function as dead-end roads?
• How will bus stops be impacted during and after construction?
• How will snow removal be handled with the new design?
Safety & Daily Use
• How will pedestrian crossings be impacted, particularly given the number of individuals and families who walk in this area?
• Are there examples of similar roundabouts in high residential areas like ours, and what has been the outcome?
• How have other roundabouts in Ames affected speed, safety, and travel flow?
I am supportive of thoughtful improvements that enhance safety and overall livability. My goal is simply to ensure that all impacted
residents are informed, considered, and have an opportunity to provide meaningful input.
Thank you for your time and for the work you are doing on this project. I look forward to learning more and participating in the upcoming
public meeting.
38
19
Bonnie Alley
" There is a powerful driving force inside every human being that, once unleashed, can make any vision, dream, or desire a reality"
39
20
Gansen, Mark
From:Andrea Hrbek <andreahrbek146@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, March 31, 2026 9:11 AM
To:Gansen, Mark; Kyle.henderson@strand.com
Subject:Wilder Blvd changes
[External Email]
I am writing to complain about the proposed mini roundabouts.
I live at 306 Wilder Blvd. I have now for 14 years. These changes would ruin this nice neighborhood. There is no problem with traffic on this
street. If one person has complained it isn’t accurate. If there needed to be changes
3 roundabouts is too extreme in addition to the adding of a splash park.
What about speed bumps if the complaint is the speed? It is worrisome enough that I’m considering moving out of the neighborhood.
I hope you reconsider this proposed plan.
Andrea Hrbek
306 Wilder Blvd
Ames Iowa 50014
40
21
Gansen, Mark
From:andrew smalley <pappasmallz@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, March 30, 2026 9:31 AM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:Re: PIM for proposed Wilder roundabouts
[External Email]
Mark,
Thanks for the information. I am curious as to what precipitated this proposal, I am unaware of any traffic flow concerns, or high incidents of
crashes, which are what roundabouts are usually prescribed to help abate. Also each of these intersections has very recently had curb work
done, including Frost that was only completed this past fall, that will now need to be torn out.
thank you
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 9:21 AM Gansen, Mark <Mark.Gansen@cityofames.org> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Each project is unique in terms of how far its impacts extend and how notifications are distributed. For this project, mailings were sent to
properties directly adjacent to Wilder Boulevard (between Rowling Drive and Norris Street), as well as to properties that require travel
through the impacted intersections, including Frost Drive, Thackeray Drive, Cervantes Drive, and Clemens Boulevard.
In addition to the mailed notices, we will be sharing information about the meeting through a series of social media posts to help broaden
public awareness. We also recognize that word of mouth is an effective way to reach neighbors, and we appreciate your willingness to help
share the information within your community.
Please feel free to reach out if you have any additional questions or concerns.
Thanks!
Mark Gansen, P.E.
Civil Engineer II
City of Ames, Iowa
515.239.5291
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Smalley <pappasmallz@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2026 6:36 PM
To: Gansen, Mark <Mark.Gansen@cityofames.org>
Subject: PIM for proposed Wilder roundabouts
[External Email]
Mark,
I have been shown a letter your office sent out about a public information meeting concerning proposed “mini roundabouts” to be built on
Wilder Blvd between Mortenson and Lincoln Way.
As a property owner on Rowling Drive I am curious as to who these letters were sent to and the reasoning behind seeming to limit them to
only those directly on Wilder Blvd.
Many of my neighbors are interested in attending the meeting, I only hope we can alert as many of them as possible.
Andrew Smalley
5441 Rowling Drive
Sent from my iPhone
41
22
Gansen, Mark
From:Andrew Smalley <pappasmallz@gmail.com>
Sent:Sunday, March 29, 2026 6:36 PM
To:Gansen, Mark
Subject:PIM for proposed Wilder roundabouts
[External Email]
Mark,
I have been shown a letter your office sent out about a public information meeting concerning proposed “mini roundabouts” to be built
on Wilder Blvd between Mortenson and Lincoln Way.
As a property owner on Rowling Drive I am curious as to who these letters were sent to and the reasoning behind seeming to limit them
to only those directly on Wilder Blvd.
Many of my neighbors are interested in attending the meeting, I only hope we can alert as many of them as possible.
Andrew Smalley
5441 Rowling Drive
Sent from my iPhone
42
23
Gansen, Mark
From:Joe Charbonnet <joecharbonnet@gmail.com>
Sent:Sunday, March 22, 2026 3:55 PM
To:Gansen, Mark; kyle.henderson@strand.com
Subject:Wilder Boulevard Roundabouts
[External Email]
Dear Mark and Kyle,
I'm writing to express my strong support for the proposed mini-roundabouts on the Wilder Boulevard corridor between Mortensen Rd and
Lincoln Way. Traffic--and particular traffic speed--are a major concern for us living on this street. Through traffic between the residential
developments on Mortensen Rd and Lincoln Way often moves at excessive speeds down Wilder Blvd. This hazard is a major concern for our
family and limits the ability of our young children to enjoy our neighborhood.
The proposed roundabouts could help to address this issue in a meaningful way.
Thanks and best,
Joe Charbonnet
43
44
45
----
LEGEND
CLW6
DCY6
CHW10
W18-2
\ \
\ \ \ \ \
\----->------•
El
..,.,,.-:---
.,.A' • ----
--in .. ...-<--f C' t r"i.> \ \ -- \ -'-� .. ;..\ .i. \
CROSSWALK LINE (6-IN, WHITE)
DOUBLE CENTERLINE (6-IN, YELLOW)
CHANNELIZING LINE (10-IN, WHITE)
\
YIELD LINE (18-IN, 2-FT SEGMENTS, 2-FT GAPS, WHITE) \ \
\ \ \
\i
9
t '!,
•
\ N
_________ J-J--_. ,-, I ii ii I I
--9
cc<,-Jl'-1'> �c'JO
e --�----�----
�'} '
I " �
\ ;, -\ \ \ \
J
\
"'" :! � C II Iii"'"iliz :IE ::l � .. u
!; I z :, ; C ! s .... a o = � ili -.. u
JOB NO.
Ames
SHEET 1
46
\ \ \ \
LEGEND
CLW6
DCY6
CHW10
W18-2
\ \ \ \ \
CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6-INCH (TYP)
CLW6 (TYP)
•
CROSSWALK LINE (6-IN, WHITE)
DOUBLE CENTERLINE (6-IN, YELLOW)
CHANNELIZING LINE (10-IN, WHITE)
YIELD LINE (18-IN, 2-FT SEGMENTS, 2-FT GAPS, WHITE)
\ \
C,
N
t
JOB NO •
(ITY 0� Ames
47