Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA001 - April 28, 2026, Regular Meeting of the Ames City Council Extended Minutes1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL AMES, IOWA APRIL 28, 2026 The Regular Meeting of the Ames City Council was called to order by Mayor John Haila at 6:03 p.m. on the 28th day of April, 2026, in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, 515 Clark Avenue, pursuant to law. Present were Council Members Bronwyn Beatty-Hansen, Gloria Betcher, Amber Corrieri, Tim Gartin, Rachel Junck, and Anita Rollins. PROCLAMATION FOR "ARBOR DAY," APRIL 24, 2026: Mayor Haila proclaimed April 24, 2026, as “Arbor Day,” noting that this year marked the 42nd consecutive year the City had received Tree City USA recognition. City Forester Gabby Edwards, alongside Parks Maintenance Worker Matt Rochford and Parks and Recreation Director Keith Abraham, accepted the proclamation. City Forester Edwards noted that a volunteer tree planting event was held the prior Saturday, with approximately 45 volunteers planting 70 trees in a north Ames neighborhood. She also announced an upcoming community planting event on Saturday, May 16, along Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, and Idaho Avenues north of Ontario Street, where 35 additional trees would be planted. She encouraged those in the community that were interested to attend and volunteer. PROCLAMATION FOR "NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH," MAY 2026: May 2026 was proclaimed “National Historic Preservation Month” by Mayor Haila. Historic Preservation (HPC) Chair Dévon Lewis accepted the proclamation, alongside Commissioners Melissa Goodwin and James McCormick, and Planning and Housing Director Kelly Diekmann. Director Diekmann acknowledged the HPC for its volunteer work and service to the community, including promoting historic events and reviewing design requirements in historic districts. PRESENTATION OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION AWARDS: Mayor Haila shared that the HPC annually recognizes preservation activities within Ames to highlight, honor, and promote preservation efforts. The first 2026 Keeping the Past Alive award was presented to Pastor Betsy Thompson, representing Ames United Church of Christ, for the historic presentation of the building at 217 6th Street. The second was presented to Kathy Svec and Dorian Stripling, for historic preservation of their single-family home at 603 Grand Avenue. The Crown Jewel of Ames award was then presented to Mimi Wagner, for the restoration of her single-family home at 723 9th Street. CONSENT AGENDA: Council Member Rollins requested to pull Item Nos. 23 and 27. Moved by Junck, seconded by Betcher, to approve the Consent Agenda less Item Nos. 23 and 27. 4. Motion approving payment of claims 5. Motion approving Report of Change Orders for period of April 1-15, 2026 6. Motion approving Summary of Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting on 2 April 14, 2026, and Special City Council Meeting on April 21, 2026 7. Motion approving Ownership Update for Class E Retail Alcohol License - Sam's Club #6568, 305 Airport Road 8. Motion approving new 5-Day (April 30-May 4, 2026) Special Class C Retail Alcohol License - Gateway Market, 531 Bissell Road Room 1320 9. Motion approving new 8-Month Class C Retail Alcohol License with Outdoor Service - La Casa Maya, 631 Lincoln Way 10. Motion approving the renewal of the following Alcohol Licenses: a. Bar la Tosca, 303 Welch Avenue Ste 101, Class C Retail Alcohol License with Outdoor Service, Pending Dramshop Review b. El Jefe Mexican Cuisine LLC, 524 Lincoln Way, Class C Retail Alcohol License with Catering Privilege c. Great Plains Sauce & Dough Co., 129 Main Street, Special Class C Retail Alcohol License, Pending Dramshop Review d. Hy-Vee Ames Fast and Fresh 1, 4018 Lincoln Way, Class E Retail Alcohol License e. Jeff's Pizza Shop, 2402 Lincoln Way, Special Class C Retail Alcohol License f. Mother's Pub, 2900 West Street, Class C Retail Alcohol License with Catering Privilege and Outdoor Service g. Walgreens #12108, 2719 Grand Avenue, Class E Retail Alcohol License 11. Motion accepting the Fitch Family Indoor Aquatic Center Monthly Report 12. Requests for Ames on the Half Shell: a. RESOLUTION NO. 26-242 approving waiver of enforcement of Municipal Code Section 17.17 related to alcohol consumption in City parks with respect only to Bandshell Park from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Fridays May 29 - June 26 b. Motion approving 5-Day License - Special Class C Retail Alcohol License with Outdoor Service - Ames on the Half Shell, Bandshell Park, for: i. May 29 - June 02, 2026 ii. June 04 - June 08, 2026 iii. June 11 - June 15, 2026 iv. June 18 - June 22, 2026 v. June 25 - June 29, 2026 13. Requests from Ames Pride for Pridefest on October 10, 2026: a. Motion approving blanket Temporary Obstruction Permit and blanket Vending License b. RESOLUTION NO. 26-243 approving closure of Douglas Avenue from Main Street to 6th Street and 5th Street between Kellogg Avenue and the alley east of Adams Family Funeral Home from 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. c. RESOLUTION NO. 26-244 approving waiver of parking meter fees and enforcement d. RESOLUTION NO. 26-245 approving waiver of fee for blanket Vending License 14. RESOLUTION NO. 26-246 approving request from Good Neighbor Emergency Assistance to close Clark Avenue between 6th and 7th Streets from 1:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. on Sunday, May 17, 2026, for its Annual Block Party Celebration 3 15. RESOLUTION NO. 26-247 approving request to modify the City's FY 2025/26 ASSET contract with ChildServe 16. RESOLUTION NO. 26-248 approving request to modify the City's FY 2025/26 ASSET contract with Heartland of Story County 17. RESOLUTION NO. 26-249 approving contract renewal with Earth Services & Abatement for Asbestos Remediation and Related Services and Supply Contract at the Power Plant for the one-year period from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, in an amount not-to-exceed $200,000 18. RESOLUTION NO. 26-250 approving contract renewal with Wulfekuhle Injection & Pumping, of Peosta, IA, for Cell Maintenance Services for Electric Services (RDF Ash), for the one-year period from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, in an amount not-to-exceed $200,000 19. RESOLUTION NO. 26-251 approving contract renewal with HTH Companies, Inc., of Union, MO, for Specialized Wet Dry Vacuum, Hydro Blast, and Related Cleaning Services for the Power Plant for the one-year period from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, in an amount not-to-exceed $140,000 20. RESOLUTION NO. 26-252 approving Professional Service Agreement with Bolton & Menk, Inc., of Ames, IA, for Preliminary Design and Traffic Safety Improvement Program Grant Application Preparation for G.W. Carver and Cameron School Road Roundabout in an amount not to exceed $60,728 21. FY 2026/27 Airport Facility Improvements Program (Fuel Farm Replacement – AvGas project): a. RESOLUTION NO. 26-253 approving submission of the State of Iowa Airport Improvement Program grant application b. RESOLUTION NO. 26-254 authorizing $133,333 in local matching funds for the project, including the $100,000 in previously issued G.O. Bonds and $33,333 from the Airport Improvements Fund, to fully fund the project and maximize available grant funding 22. RESOLUTION NO. 26-255 approving amendment to 28E agreement with Iowa Communications Network to add Furman Aquatics Center to the City's network 23. RESOLUTION NO. 26-256 expressing continuing City Council support for the construction of the new thermal generation plant for Electric Services, and authorizing staff to continue the plant development, given the new cost estimate for the project 24. RESOLUTION NO. 26-257 approving preliminary plans and specifications for the 69kV Transmission Line Reconstruction from Top O Hollow Substation to Ames Plant Substation project, setting May 27, 2026, as the bid due date, and June 9, 2026, as the date of Public Hearing 25. RESOLUTION NO. 26-258 approving preliminary plans and specifications for the 2025/26 Water System Improvements Program (Barr Drive, Douglas Avenue – 16th Street to O'Neil Drive, and 17th Street - Douglas Avenue to dead end) project, setting May 20, 2026, as the bid due date and May 26, 2026, as the date of Public Hearing 26. RESOLUTION NO. 26-259 setting May 12, 2026, as the date of Public Hearing on the proposition of entering into a Prairieview Industrial Substation Line Tap Construction Agreement and a Transmission Facility Joint Ownership Agreement 4 with ITC Midwest, LLC and entering into a Transmission Interconnection Agreement by and among ITC Midwest, LLC, the City of Ames and Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc 27. RESOLUTION NO. 26-260 setting May 12, 2026, as the date of Public Hearing on a Revocable Lease Option with Ames Greenfield Development, LLC to develop, install, and operate solar facilities on approximately 165 acres located on portions of the following properties at the Ames Municipal Airport: a. 405 Airport Road b. 600 Airport Road c. 623 Airport Road d. 698 Airport Road e. 816 Airport Road f. 2540 Airport Drive g. 3115 South Duff Avenue Rear h. 3300 South Riverside Drive i. 3800 South Riverside Drive j. 3800 South Riverside Drive Rear k. 4200 South Riverside Drive l. 4200 South Riverside Drive Rear m. 4600 South Riverside Drive n. 4600 South Riverside Drive Rear o. 4900 South Riverside Drive p. 5000 South Riverside Drive 28. RESOLUTION NO. 26-261 approving Change Order No. 2 with Heritage Petroleum of Evansville, IN, in the amount of $28,000 to increase the oil and lubricants contract for CyRide to $77,300 29. RESOLUTION NO. 26-262 approving contract amendment with On Track Construction, LLC, of Nevada, IA, for Emergency 30-Inch Raw Water Line Repair in the amount of $93,018 for a total contract of $114,588 30. Resource Recovery and Recycling Campus: a. RESOLUTION NO. 26-263 approving Change Order No. 2 with RRT Design & Construction of Melville, NY, for Bid Package 40-1 - Millwright/Process Integration Work, a deduct in the amount of $120,550 b. RESOLUTION NO. 26-264 approving Change Order No. 2 with Jensen Builders, Ltd., of Des Moines, IA, for Bid Package 03-1 – Concrete and Steel Work, in the amount of $82,916.03 c. RESOLUTION NO. 26-265 modifying Change Order No. 1 with Con-Struct, Inc, of Ames, IA, for Bid Package 31-1 – Site Demolition & Earthwork, a deduct in the amount of $30,000 for a revised Change Order No. 1 amount of $57,717 d. RESOLUTION NO. 26-266 modifying Change Order No. 1 with RRT Design & Construction of Melville, NY, for Bid Package 40-1 - Millwright/Process Integration Work, a deduct in the amount of $56 for a revised Change Order No. 1, a deduct in the amount of $1,134,376 31. RESOLUTION NO. 26-267 to waive enforcement of Section 19.9 of Municipal Code on Wednesday, September 16, 2026 (9:00 am - 8:00 pm) and Thursday, 5 September 17, 2026 (9:00 am - 4:00 pm) at Ada Hayden Heritage Park to allow the Friends of Ada Hayden Heritage Park to provide golf cart tours to mobility impaired individuals 32. RESOLUTION NO. 26-268 approving use of the single-source negotiation provisions of the City's Purchasing Policy and awarding three -year contract to Ziegler Power Systems, Ankeny, IA, for the Water Treatment Plant emergency generator service maintenance agreement in the amount of $50,508.81 33. RESOLUTION NO. 26-269 awarding contract to Stew Hansen Dodge of Urbandale, Iowa, for the purchase of one RAM 5500 cab and chassis for Public Works Street Maintenance in the amount of $64,512 34. RESOLUTION NO. 26-270 approving contract and bond for the 2025/26 Right-of- Way Restoration Program with Steven's Erosion Control of Des Moines, IA, in the amount of $166,264.49 35. RESOLUTION NO. 26-271 approving contract and bond for the Freel Drive Paving Program with Con-Struct, Inc., of Ames, IA, in the amount of $1,012,310 36. RESOLUTION NO. 26-272 accepting the 2023/24 Pavement Restoration - Slurry Seal Program as completed by Fort Dodge Asphalt Company of Fort Dodge, IA, in the amount of $179,147.62 37. RESOLUTION NO. 26-273 accepting the 2024/25 Pavement Restoration - Slurry Seal Program as completed by Fort Dodge Asphalt Company of Fort Dodge, IA, in the amount of $219,179.42 Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motions/Resolutions declared carried/adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes. CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW THERMAL GENERATION PLANT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICES; SETTING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A REVOCABLE LEASE OPTION WITH AMES GREENFIELD DEVELOPMENT, LLC TO DEVELOP, INSTALL, AND OPERATE SOLAR FACILITIES ON PROPERTIES AT THE AMES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT: Council Member Rollins noted that Item Nos. 23 and 27 had been discussed in depth at the City Council workshop the previous week, with Item No. 23 relating to continued support for the new thermal generation plant and Item No. 27 relating to setting a Public Hearing date for a potential solar project at the Ames Municipal Airport . She encouraged those interested in learning more to view the video recording of the workshop. Moved by Rollins, seconded by Junck, to adopt: 23.RESOLUTION NO. 26-256 expressing continuing City Council support for the construction of the new thermal generation plant for Electric Services, and authorizing staff to continue the plant development, given the new cost estimate for the project 27. RESOLUTION NO. 26-260 setting May 12, 2026, as the date of Public Hearing on a Revocable Lease Option with Ames Greenfield Development, LLC to develop, install, and operate solar facilities on approximately165 acres located on portions of the following properties at the Ames Municipal Airport: a. 405 Airport Road b. 600 Airport Road c. 623 Airport Road 6 d. 698 Airport Road e. 816 Airport Road f. 2540 Airport Drive g. 3115 South Duff Avenue Rear h. 3300 South Riverside Drive i. 3800 South Riverside Drive j. 3800 South Riverside Drive Rear k. 4200 South Riverside Drive l. 4200 South Riverside Drive Rear m. 4600 South Riverside Drive n. 4600 South Riverside Drive Rear o. 4900 South Riverside Drive p. 5000 South Riverside Drive Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolutions declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes. PUBLIC FORUM: The Public Forum was opened by Mayor Haila. Brooke Elliston, representing the Oak/Riverside neighborhood, spoke regarding the pedestrian crossing at South Russell Avenue and Lincoln Way, Item No. 3 in Dispositions of Communications to Council. She expressed the disagreement of the neighborhood with the staff conclusion that no immediate action was warranted and urged the City Council to add the item to a future agenda. Lee Anne Willson and Bill Gutowski both spoke in support of the proposed solar development at the Ames Municipal Airport, citing climate action goals and the long -term cost stability of locally sourced renewable energy. Hector Arbuckle raised a pedestrian safety concern at the intersection of Sheldon Avenue, Oakland Street, and Hyland Avenue, noting inadequate signage and a lack of sidewalk connectivity near the CyRide bus stop. He also shared his support of the airport solar project. Mayor Haila closed the Public Forum when no one else came forward to speak. IRONS SUBDIVISION SEWER EXTENSION ALTERNATIVES: Director Diekmann presented two sewer extension alternatives for the Irons Subdivision. The subdivision was originally created as a rural development under an agreement by the developer and the Ames Golf and Country Club (AGCC), with covenants that required future connection to the City-owned sanitary sewer system. These recorded covenants were placed as a condition of the original approval of the property by the City Council. The Greenbriar Development neighboring the area would have to extend infrastructure before any sewer connection could proceed in the Irons Subdivision. An easement had been created to allow for one method of the sewer main extension, which caused residents 7 of the subdivision to raise questions and concerns regarding the timing and costs for the project. The City Council had then directed staff to make a conceptual design for the area with cost estimates included. Director Diekmann displayed drawings of the site while detailing the options. Rather than the central alignment that had originally been proposed, Option 1 involved a new rear alignment that would require the agreement of the homeowners to establish the proper easement for this to occur. This option would consist of multiple sewer mains, including a main extending along the east side of Irons Court and along GW Carver Avenue, avoiding significant pavement disruption and lowering project costs. Option 2 followed the original easement alignment through the front yards of Irons Court homes. It was noted that the cost estimates of both options did not include private service line connection expenses, which would remain the responsibility of each homeowner. Director Diekmann explained that staff was not recommending any one particular option. He furthered that actual construction of either alignment could be done privately by a contractor hired by the property owners, subject to City review and inspection. Alternatively, the owners could approach the City and ask for the it to take on the project as a special assessment project. The special assessment process would allocate the full costs proportionally to each property and include a schedule for payment collected with property taxes, typically over 10 to 15 years. Staff believed that any future proposal for a special assessment and allocation of costs should come from the property owners so the City Council would know the level of support before initiation of the project. Council Member Betcher asked if there were advantages for the homeowners if the City were to take on the project through the special assessment process. Director Diekmann responded that the cost would likely be higher due to public bidding requirements under state law, including bonding and adherence to City project specifications. However, he noted that the benefit to homeowners would lie in the City acting as a bank, spreading out the repayment over time, which meant homeowners would not need immediate cash or loans to cover initial costs. Mayor Haila opened the Public Input. Dr. Randy Braden highlighted the financial hardship the project would impose on retirees like himself, emphasizing the absence of any new services that would justify the annexation-related cost increase. He noted that his abstract was not made available until closing and expressed disappointment over the lack of transparency from the realtors. Lee Huey stressed the potential economic impact on residents and proposed that the septic systems be left intact, questioning the need to replace them with a City sewer connection given their current effectiveness. Tim Hansen shared his concerns about the high financial costs associated with 8 infrastructure connectivity and the proposed sewer line placement. He noted that the existing septic systems function effectively and questioned the need for City intervention. Darryl Vegge objected to the proposed sewer plan, questioning its financial viability for residents on fixed incomes and suggesting the City avoid annexation to spare homeowners substantial expenses. The Public Input was closed by Mayor Haila when no one else came forward to speak. Council Member Gartin acknowledged the diligent and creative work of staff and noted that Option 1 presented significant savings over the original design. He also reiterated that the development was proposed by the developer and AGCC, and that the restrictive covenants were recorded as a condition of the original approval. He observed that the frustration of the residents, while legitimate, should be directed to the developer and AGCC rather than City staff. No action was taken on this item, however, Council Member Beatty-Hansen asked Director Diekmann to describe the anticipated timeline. Director Diekmann confirmed that the sewer extension could not physically proceed until infrastructure was extended through the adjacent Greenbrier Development, with construction unlikely before 2028 or 2029. He further noted that annexation proceedings could begin as early as summer 2026 and would take four to six months to complete through the state process. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE AUBURN TRAIL SUBDIVISION: Planner Amelia Schoeneman presented the preliminary plat for Auburn Trail Subdivision, a conservation subdivision within the Ada Hayden Watershed located along Hyde Avenue. The subdivision included mini roundabouts at Denali and Glacier Drives, a private pocket park of approximately half an acre on Outlot B, and stormwater management practices meeting low-impact development standards. Two blocks exceeded the 660-foot maximum length standard and required approval of an alternative design. Staff was recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat and alternative design requests with some specific conditions outlined in the Council Action Form. Council Member Gartin inquired whether the covenants for the subdivision would include limitations on lawn chemicals that could adversely affect the watershed. Planner Schoeneman confirmed that standards for conservation design included limitations through covenants to protect the watershed. The Public Input was opened by Mayor Haila. Diane McCauley, Bloomington Courtyard Association President, expressed her concerns regarding the lack of a dedicated trail connection to Ada Hayden Heritage Park. She noted that the absence of this connection in the current plan, a change made by the developer after consultation with City staff, would likely lead Auburn Trail residents to traverse through the private Homeowners Association (HOA) streets, causing additional maintenance and potential liability challenges. She also voiced concerns regarding the large field on the east 9 side of Hyde that was planned to be seeded in natural grasses. She questioned the ability of the developer to establish and maintain the plantings and asked what oversight would be provided by the City. Justin Dodge, Hunziker Companies, explained that the trail connection was removed in order to consolidate to a single pedestrian crossing point on Hyde Avenue. Regarding the maintenance of native plantings in conservation areas, he indicated that the devel oper would remain involved with the Auburn Trail Subdivision until build -out to ensure that the native grasses and other plantings were established and maintained appropriately. Melanie Cornwell, Bloomington Townhomes Association President, shared similar apprehensions regarding the removal of the trail connection from the plan. She emphasized the burdens that increased pedestrian traffic would place on community resources and the potential risks it posed for liability given the private nature of the HOA streets. She also highlighted the problem of thistles proliferating in areas disturbed by development and requested assistance in controlling this invasive plant to prevent it from overwhelming their property. Chris Gleason, member of the Bloomington Courtyard Association, expressed concerns about the lack of a sidewalk connection along Hyde Avenue leading to Ada Hayden Park. She questioned whether a sidewalk would be installed on the west side of Hyde Avenue to provide access to the park, reducing pedestrian traffic through the private HOA streets. Mayor Haila closed the Public Input when no one else came forward to speak. At the request of the City Council, Director Diekmann provided some additional explanation of the paths on the map. He explained that staff had preferred removing the proposed trail connection to Ada Hayden Park to consolidate pedestrian crossings and focus on the west side crossing as part of the City's future multi-use trail implementation along Hyde Avenue. This approach was advised to enhance safety and manage the project more effectively within the planned infrastructure. After discussions with staff, the developer proceeded with removing that portion of the trail from future plans. Council Member Gartin inquired about the presence of a public easement on the private sidewalk and whether the HOA could erect a fence to limit access. Director Diekmann stated that staff had done an initial search and not found any record of an easement. A standard four-foot fence with gates would be allowable by the HOA to control access. Council Member Gartin also raised questions about plant maintenance standards for native plantings within Outlot G and what oversight would be provided. Director Diekmann explained that conservation management plans, which covered planting details, maintenance, and mowing schedules, were required under the City’s low impact conservation subdivision standards. He noted that the type of grass proposed was tall prairie grass, which was not the typical HOA lawn, and indicated that he would need to gather more information regarding specific maintenance. However, the developer would have the responsibility of establishing the grass before the responsibility was released. 10 Once established, ongoing maintenance would be governed by the City’s property maintenance code. Mayor Haila questioned the presence of thistles and the mechanisms in place for reporting them. Director Diekmann advised that property owners should report a property maintenance code violation regarding thistles to the Inspections Division, which would then contact the property owner to rectify the issue. Council Member Gartin inquired about the pros and cons of not having the north piece of the trail that had previously been removed from plans, acknowledging concerns that this could place the burden of increased traffic on the subdivision to the south . In response, Director Diekmann articulated that reinstating the trail could enhance connectivity, offering direct access from the development to Ada Hayden Park, which could potentially reduce pedestrian traffic through the private HOA streets thus alleviating maintenance and liability concerns previously voiced by residents. However, he noted challenges as well. For instance, the installation of a crossing would require additional infrastructure, such as a pedestrian beacon, to ensure safety given the speed limits and visibility issues on Hyde Avenue. He also highlighted that Parks and Recreation staff had advised against the path due to gradient and erosion concerns. Council Member Gartin commented that the crossing and trail seemed to be small accommodations and noted the allure of access to Ada Hayden Park for future Auburn Trail Subdivision residents. Director Diekmann clarified that staff was evaluating the burden to the public for an amenity of a private project, explaining that ongoing maintenance was a concern as it was proposed by the developer, not the City, nor was it in any City trail plan. It could be accommodated, but the City had not planned for the necessary investments or ongoing costs that would be incurred. Council Member Gartin expressed further concern that Hyde Avenue was not designed to be an arterial street, contributing to ongoing traffic issues. In response, Director Diekmann noted that a traffic calming study for the Hyde Avenue corridor was included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), aimed at managing speed and improving safety, although it would not change the car volume. Moved by Rollins, seconded by Gartin, to approve Alternative No. 1: Adopt RESOLUTION 26-274 approving the Preliminary Plat for the Auburn Trail Subdivision located at 4605 Hyde Avenue and 4514 Hyde Avenue and adjacent properties to the north with the alternative design request for block lengths and the following conditions: a. Erosion and sediment control plans for construction phasing shall be submitted for approval by the Municipal Engineer prior to any grading work on the site. b. Private park improvements and required elements shall be proposed for City approval as part of final platting of the 2nd Addition. c. Additional native landscaping such as perennial beds shall be added at entrance points to open space areas or mid-block crossings as part of the landscape plans proposed with final platting of each phase. 11 d. The final street tree, streetlight, landscaping, and conservation management plan approvals shall be deferred until final plat approval for each phase. e. An easement and or agreement with the City of Ames to allow for a sanitary sewer service line to be located on City property extending from Lot 178 and Outlot G to connect to the existing sanitary sewer main located with Ada Hayden Park shall be submitted by the applicant for approval by the City of Ames prior to approval the final plat that includes Lot 178. Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes. Mayor Haila inquired about the next steps for the project. Director Diekmann explained that once the preliminary plat was approved, the developer would be able to start grading on the site and working towards installing public improvements. Once these were in place, the project would advance to the final plat stage, which would return to the City Council for verification of the improvements. SELECTION OF A PROPOSAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF SINGLE-FAMILY MARKET-RATE LOTS IN THE BAKER SUBDIVISION: Housing Coordinator Vanessa Baker-Latimer presented the results of a Request for Proposals (RFP) process for the sale of up to six market-rate lots in the Baker Subdivision. These lots, originally planned to be sold in 2027, were aimed at generating program income for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The RFP was designed to allow prospective developers or individual purchasers to select up to six of nine market -rate lots, each carrying owner-occupancy covenants enforceable by the City. Coordinator Baker-Latimer reported that that RFP was issued on March 9, 2026. On March 31, two proposals were received, one from Genesis Homes and another from Keystone Equity Group. A review committee comprised of Planning and Housing, Public Works, and Inspections staff evaluated both proposals based on criteria including lot pricing and the residential design quality manifested in each submission. Director Diekmann reported that both Genisis Homes and Keystone Equity Group were interested in purchasing six of the lots and neither were interested in purchasing any fewer than six. The proposal from Keystone Equity Group scored higher, primarily due to its alignment with the RFP structure. It featured lot-by-lot pricing that met or exceeded the minimum set by estimates and provided multiple floor plans and elevations for evaluation. Genesis Homes submitted a lump-sum package approach, which fell short of the minimum per-lot pricing thresholds on several lots. However, both developers ensured home prices in approximately the $400,000 range or below. It was noted that the two proposals overlapped on three of the lots. Genesis Homes placed an offer on three of the larger lots but did not increase its offer in relation to the lot sizes. Keystone Equity Group intentionally selected smaller lots so it could stay within its preferred price point. Director Diekmann noted that staff recommended a condition be included in the agreement 12 to ensure that the developer constructed a house matching what was presented in the proposal. This would be the expectation for either proposal that was selected. He summarized that overall, the lot price was the biggest differential, due to Genesis Homes’ proposal being a lump sum offer regardless of the lot size, compared to the RFP which used a lot-by-lot comparison. If Council Members found the proposal of Keystone Equity Group, which had the higher bid, to have homes that met the intent of the RFP, then that proposal would be preferred because it had the best price offer and the homes had desirable features compatible with the neighborhood. However, if City Council found that the homes proposed by Genesis Homes were more desirable, the pricing difference would need to be weighed against the design of the homes proposed. During discussion, Council Member Gartin inquired about the presence of covenants requiring homes to be owner-occupied and sought clarification on enforcement. Director Diekmann confirmed that such covenants had been recorded on the property, and the enforcement would fall under the City's purview. Consequently, the City would not issue rental permits for these lots, ensuring compliance with the owner-occupancy requirement. Council Member Betcher asked about any requirements under the CDBG program for how much revenue must be generated from the sale of the lots, considering whether failing to meet set estimate amounts could compel the City Council to favor Keystone Equity Group. Coordinator Baker-Latimer explained that from communications with HUD, while there was often a requirement that repurposed properties be sold at market rates, these lots were always intended for market rate sale. Thus, the CDBG program was not imposing a specific minimum income requirement for this transaction, provided the income was returned as program income. The Public Input was opened by Mayor Haila. Justin Dodge, of Hunziker Companies, shared that while he was unfamiliar with Keystone Equity Group, he had positive past experiences working with Genesis Homes, which had consistently provided homes at fair prices in Ames. He emphasized the known quality and market awareness Genesis Homes brought to projects, suggesting his preference for working with a familiar entity. He also noted the closeness in the scores of the two proposals. Mayor Haila closed the Public Input when no one else came forward to speak. In response to the comments made by Mr. Dodge, Director Diekmann followed up by clarifying that Keystone Equity Group had been selected by the City for the Harrison Road infill project, highlighting its presence and active role in Ames. Council Member Rollins inquired if both Keystone Equity Group and Genesis Homes proceeded through the RFP process in line with the expectations. Director Diekmann responded that Genesis Homes did not fully align with the intent of the RFP regarding pricing, as it submitted a lump-sum package rather than itemizing lot offers as outlined. Conversely, Keystone Equity Group addressed each lot with specific proposals, meeting 13 or exceeding minimum prices established by the estimates. Council Member Betcher asked for clarification on the estimated cost for the homes. Director Diekmann reported that Genesis planned to price homes between $365,000 and $405,000, while Keystone estimated pricing under $375,000, depending on final specifications and market conditions. He noted that each developer had a similar approach, proposing multiple floor plans and elevations, with unfinished basements featuring stubbed plumbing to allow for future finishing by the homeowner or as part of the construction process. Timing did vary, with Keystone Equity Group proposing to close by October 1, 2026, which was consistent with the RFP, to allow for time to seek workforce housing tax credits. Genesis Homes was not asking for tax credits, preferring to close on three of the homes in July and the remaining three in October. Moved by Junck, seconded by Rollins, to approve Alternative No. 1 and adopt: • RESOLUTION 26-275 approving the proposal for the sale of six (6) market-rate lots available within the Baker Subdivision to Keystone Equity Group • RESOLUTION 26-276 setting May 26, 2026, as the date of Public Hearing Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolutions declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes. Director Diekmann added that a request for a letter of support for a workforce housing tax credit application by Keystone Equity Group would accompany the purchase agreement when it was revisited by the City Council on May 26. He noted that this would not impose an additional financial ask from the City, given that the owner-occupied tax abatement was already in place. SOUTH CAMPUS REDIRECTION AREA: Planner Benjamin Campbell discussed the South Campus Redirection Area, a mixed -use neighborhood south of Lincoln Way and Iowa State University (ISU) Campus identified in Ames Plan 2040 as anticipated to redevelop within the next 20 years. The majority of the area was zoned residential high- density, with a mix of multi-family properties and single-family homes. Planner Campbell explained that the area included two overlay districts, the West University and the East University Impacted Overlays. Both overlays added additional parking requirements beyond the base requirements for the rest of the City for multifamily properties and included certain design standards. The East University Impacted Overlay also included additional design standards and specific regulations for fraternities and sororities, impacting development in the area. Staff had reached out to owners of properties in the area seeking input. A wide variety of opinions were received. Some concerns were expressed that the minimum parking requirement was excessive, while others highlighted the need to preserve historic multifamily buildings in the area. Some saw the area as a potential extension of Campustown, whereas others wished for the neighborhood to be accessible to more than just ISU students. Planner Campbell also noted the new townhome rules recently approved by the City 14 Council, which allowed for reduced parking requirements and setbacks in exchange for higher design standards, potentially facilitating more diverse and well -designed development in the area. There were five options proposed by staff in the report. Option 1 involved reducing the overlay parking requirement to match the rest of the City. Option 2 included the reduction in parking requirements from Option 1 and added allowances for reduced setbacks and increased density. Option 3 built on the first two options by further reducing setbacks, eliminating the four-story height requirement, and permitting parking reductions beyond what was required elsewhere in the City for residential high-density zoning. Option 4 suggested targeting changes geographically to specific blocks or properties. Option 5 was to make no changes. Council Member Gartin questioned the overall goal of these efforts and the rationale behind the chosen boundary lines for the redirection area. Planner Campbell explained that the area was identified in Ames Plan 2040 as anticipated to redevelop within the next 20 years due to many of the properties reaching the end of their useful lives. The goal was to guide the redevelopment of the area with a vision that ensured coherent urban development. Director Diekmann added that RDG Planning & Design, during the comprehensive plan process, had highlighted certain opportunity sites based on aging infrastructure and potential for redevelopment. The current zoning allowed for change, and the question for the City Council was whether existing standards were adequate for desired development or if new regulations could facilitate faster redevelopment. Council Member Gartin asked what the residual impact of potential redevelopment might be on the surrounding neighborhoods. Director Diekmann explained that the comprehensive plan envisioned by RDG Planning & Design primarily aimed for an increase in density estimated to be between 100 to 150 additional units, leaning towards moderate developments rather than high-rise constructions, to ensure a balance between urban renewal and compatibility with existing neighborhoods. This approach would be in line with Option 1 or 2. The City Council Members engaged in discussion regarding the prioritization of the redirection area as well as how the project aligned with the Planning Division work plan and the importance of opportunities for public input from property -owners, with Council Member Beatty-Hansen expressing support for Option 2 or 3. Mayor Haila inquired about the impact on the work plan if Option 2 or 3 were moved, to which Director Diekmann responded that no specific schedule was attached to the decision being made by the City Council tonight. He noted that selecting an option would guide staff to spend more time defining the scope of work and propose a feasible timeline upon revisiting the work plan. He further explained that the City Council would determine the timing based on the overall priorities but emphasized that choosing an option would not mandate an immediate launch or imply prioritization before other ongoing commitments. Additionally, Director Diekmann mentioned that if the recommended changes were extensive, it might be more feasible to address them as part of the Unified Development 15 Code update. This approach would allow the City Council to consider incorporating changes within a broader review of development regulations, reducing potential incremental adjustments and ensuring strategic alignment with long-term City planning efforts. Council Member Junck asked whether the Ames Plan 2040 excerpt with the Staff Report aligned more with Option 2 or 3. Director Diekmann clarified that the excerpt aligned more closely with Option 2, or between 2 and 3, as the envisioned buildings were four or fewer stories and provided more moderate housing density increases. Option 3 would likely involve five story buildings, a podium for parking, and more substantial changes to accommodate higher density. Council Member Junck expressed interest in Option 2 or 3. For the section in the west end of the area along Hunt Street, she proposed the higher density option, but lower density toward the east end near the single-family houses by Knapp Street. Council Member Betcher warned against suggesting height increases of over four stories across the entire area, emphasizing the potential anxiety this could instill in current residents, and referencing similar concerns received during the Campustown redevelopment process. Expressing support for Option 2, she referred to the inclination in the RDG redirection area report towards four-story developments and its transitional intent between Campustown high rises and nearby single -family homes. Mayor Haila opened the Public Input. Hector Arbuckle spoke in support of Option No. 3, or a blend of Options 2 and 3, noting the challenge of finding affordable student housing close to campus and suggesting that denser, student-focused development would relieve pressure on nearby neighborhoods . The Public Input was closed by Mayor Haila when no one else came forward to speak. Council Member Beatty-Hansen expressed that while she was mostly in favor of Option 2 or 3 to spur development, she thought that starting with Option 3 would offer room for negotiation, granting the ability to potentially fall back to Option 2 if concerns from the community necessitated adjustment. This approach would allow the City Council to ensure community feedback was considered before final adoption and implementation. In response, Council Member Betcher raised concerns by referencing the construction of the Union and the resulting community opposition, contrasting it with the acceptance of the Haverkamp and Stritz Apartments, which integrated well and blended with the surrounding neighborhood. She emphasized that proposing to allow greater height allowances over four-stories could feel like a “bait and switch” for those who initially supported the redirection area plan and expected developments consistent with existing neighborhood characteristics. Further discussion focused on the possibility of blending the options, with Director Diekmann suggesting this was feasible to address specific concerns, allowing for 16 flexibility in guiding future development in the redirection area. He implied that while Option 3 built on the first two options, aspects from Option 3 could be pulled back into Option 2 to better fit the development goals of the area. Moved by Beatty-Hansen, seconded by Junck, to consider Option No. 3 with the exception of height, keeping height within the realm of Option No. 2 in the area east of Hayward Avenue. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. 2025/26 ASPHALT STREET PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS - SIDEWALK INFILL ALONG DELAWARE AVENUE: Public Works Director Justin Clausen presented four options for completing sidewalk connectivity along Delaware Avenue as part of the 2025/26 Asphalt Street Pavement Improvements project, in accordance with the City's Complete Streets Plan. The plan aimed to ensure connectivity on at least one side of the street to accommodate pedestrians safely. All proposed sidewalk would be within the public right-of-way and no costs would be assessed to adjacent properties. Director Clausen displayed a map of the area and summarized the four options detailed in the staff report. Option 1 was to take no action to address the sidewalk gaps along Delaware Avenue. Option 2 involved completing the gap on the west side of Delaware Avenue and included a pedestrian crossing at Dover Drive on the east side. Option 3 suggested routing the sidewalk partially along the east side, utilizing City-owned property, before returning to the west side. Option 4 explored the possibility of completing the sidewalk along the entire east side of Delaware Avenue, extending from North Dakota Avenue to Ontario Road, which would incur a significantly higher cost and had not yet been discussed with affected property owners. Council Member Gartin requested that Director Clausen review the past approach taken by the City Council to similar sidewalk projects. Director Clausen clarified that following the adoption of the Complete Streets Plan in 2018, the City aimed to ensure sidewalk connectivity on at least one side of the street. Initially, sidewalks were installed without property owner input, which led to challenges, prompting a shift towards seeking consent from affected property owners for sidewalk installation within the public right-of-way. City Council involvement was typically requested when consensus was lacking, as it was for the current decision on Delaware Avenue. Council Member Gartin asked whether there were any obstructions to installing the sidewalk on the west side of Delaware Avenue. Director Clausen acknowledged that there would be pruning needed for at least one ornamental tree, as well as adjustments for the slope of the property away from the street. Mayor Haila inquired about the specific location where the sidewalk would be placed and whether there would be green space between the sidewalk and the curb. Director Clausen explained that there would be minimal greenspace, likely about two feet, due to the limited space available, with plans accommodating both the grass slope and tree pruning requirements. 17 Council Member Betcher asked about the safety of the proposed crossing at Dover Drive in Option 3. Director Clausen responded by acknowledging that while crossings at intersections were generally more controlled than mid-block crossings, Dover Drive did not have stop control on Delaware Avenue, which could pose challenges. However, he noted that, although not ideal, the intersection represented a safer crossing alternative compared to mid-block options, given the layout and traffic patterns of the area. During discussion, Council Member Betcher suggested that the City-owned properties on the east side be considered for future sidewalk infill to connect existing orphaned sidewalk segments near the community gardens. She noted, however, that this would not create complete connectivity to North Dakota Avenue and so would need to be considered in conjunction with the aforementioned crossing at Dover Drive. Council Member Junck voiced support for Option 2, infilling sidewalk to close the gap on the west side of Delaware Avenue. She also expressed interest in pursuing sidewalk connectivity on the City-owned properties on the east side, either in conjunction with this project or with upcoming substation improvements. The Public Input was opened by Mayor Haila. Pete Matthews, 4606 Dover Drive, spoke in support of Option 3, sidewalk infill on the east side of Delaware Avenue, noting concerns about tree impacts, slope of the property, and the burden of snow clearing if the sidewalk were to be infilled on the west side. Mayor Haila closed the Public Input when no one else came forward to speak. Council Member Beatty-Hansen acknowledged Mr. Matthews' concerns but expressed strong support for Option 2, highlighting the dangers of mid -block pedestrian crossings and the ongoing commitment of the City Council to pedestrian safety. Council Member Gartin asked if the level of pedestrian traffic should be a factor in the decision-making process, mentioning that the running community tended to use North Dakota Avenue and suggesting that pedestrian traffic on Delaware Avenue might be less frequent. Director Clausen affirmed that although Delaware Avenue might not engage as much traffic as North Dakota Avenue, consistent pedestrian movement was still observed, indicating a potential increase in foot traffic if continuous sidewalk connections were established. Council Member Betcher suggested completing the sidewalk on the east side from North Dakota by utilizing the City-owned properties and proposed a crossing at Utah Drive instead of Dover Avenue, considering it might offer a safer alternative as drivers would not be coming around a corner when approaching. Director Clausen agreed that crossing at Utah Drive would be safer compared to Dover Avenue due to better visibility from both directions. Council Member Beatty-Hansen pointed out that this would be safer than a mid-block crossing, but not safer than a crossing at Delaware Avenue. 18 Moved by Junck, seconded by Beatty -Hansen, to approve Option No. 2: West Side Sidewalk Infill. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. Moved by Betcher, seconded by Junck, to direct staff to continue consideration of installing sidewalk on the east side of Delaware Avenue at the City-owned properties, including the properties in between, in conjunction with other projects in the future to establish better connectivity. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. HEARING ON XENIA RURAL WATER DISTRICT FOR THE SALE OF POTABLE WATER: Water and Pollution Control Director John Dunn presented Amendment No. 2 to the 1996 agreement with Xenia Rural Water District, which governed the sale of drinking water from the City to Xenia. Key terms of the amended agreement included: increasing the maximum daily water sale from 250,000 to 500,000 gallons per day, a one-time capacity payment by Xenia of $1,464,500, a non-peaking industrial customer rate for the first five years while Xenia built out its infrastructure, automatic rate adjustments consistent with City rate changes, a minimum take provision of 200,000 gallons per day after the five-year build- out period, and Xenia's willingness to reduce service territory transfer costs for the Hayden's Preserve and Auburn Trail developments. A minor change to paragraph 15 of the contract was recommended by staff to clarify that either party may cancel the agreement with 48 months' notice after the 40-year initial term expires. This language was not included in the agreement in the Council Packet but was agreed upon by both parties and was scheduled for Xenia's board approval the following day. Director Dunn explained that the Public Hearing was necessary as advised by the City Attorney, due to the provision in the agreement allowing Xenia to build a pump station on City property which constituted a long-term lease and required a Public Hearing to meet legal requirements. The Public Hearing was opened and closed by Mayor Haila when no one came forward to speak. Council Member Gartin noted a history of difficult negotiations with Xenia but expressed support for the agreement based on the recommendations from staff and the improved terms. Director Dunn confirmed that Xenia's new general manager had facilitated a more constructive negotiating relationship thus far. He also added that Xenia would be an attractive customer due to its intent to consistently use a uniform demand load of 500,000 gallons per day throughout the year, maximizing the City's investment while providing a stable source of revenue. In response to a question from Mayor Haila about whether these terms would remedy other expensive buyouts, Assistant City Manager Brian Phillips explained that a previous 19 agreement addressed the buyout terms for the territories Xenia was and was not willing to relinquish in the future, ensuring a structured resolution to previous disputes over service territories. The current agreement being presented specifically addressed two pending developments, Hayden's Preserve and Auburn Trail. Moved by Gartin, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to approve Alternative No. 1, with the proposed change to paragraph 15, and adopt: • RESOLUTION 26-277 approving the disposal of an interest in real property located at 900 S 500th Avenue • RESOLUTION 26-278 approving Amendment No. 2 for contract with Xenia Rural Water District Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolutions declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 28 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE WATER RATES BY 3.5% AND SECTION 28.304 TO INCREASE SANITARY SEWER RATES BY 5.5% FOR CHARGES TO BE BILLED ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2026: Director Dunn was present to answer questions. Mayor Haila opened and closed Public Input when no one came forward to speak. Moved by Betcher, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to pass on first reading an ordinance amending Chapter 28 of the Municipal Code to increase water rates by 3.5% and Section 28.304 to increase sanitary sewer rates by 5.5% for charges to be billed on or after July 1, 2026. Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. REZONING WITH MASTER PLAN FOR 4605 AND 4510 HYDE AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH (AUBURN TRAIL DEVELOPMENT): Moved by Betcher, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to adopt RESOLUTION 26-279 approving the Rezoning Agreement for 4605 and 4510 Hyde Avenue and adjacent properties to the North (Auburn Trail Development). Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes. Moved by Rollins, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to pass on third reading and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 4593 Rezoning and Master Plan for 4605 and 4510 Hyde Avenue and adjacent properties to the North (Auburn Trail Development). Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. THIRD READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 4594 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT CREATING A NEW ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT (WEST UNIVERSITY PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENT DISTRICT) RELATED TO DENSITY, PARKING, AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS TO BE APPLIED BETWEEN SHELDON AND HYLAND AND LINCOLN WAY AND OAKLAND: Moved by Betcher, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to pass on third reading and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 4594 relating to a Zoning Text Amendment creating a new zoning overlay district (West University 20 Pedestrian Enhancement District) related to Density, Parking, and Design Requirements to be applied between Sheldon and Hyland and Lincoln Way and Oakland. Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. DISPOSITION OF COMMUNICATIONS TO COUNCIL: Mayor Haila noted that there were seven items for consideration. The first item was from Claire E. Hosch regarding pedestrian and driver safety concerns at the Gray Avenue and Sunset Drive intersection. Moved by Junck, seconded by Betcher, to refer to staff for a memo. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. A proposal from Jacquie Frick for a community food pantry on public property was the second item. Moved by Beatty-Hansen, seconded by Junck, to inform the requestor that the City Council was supportive of the idea, but would prefer that the pantry be placed on private property. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. The third item was a memo regarding a pedestrian crossing evaluation for Lincoln Way at South Russell from Traffic Engineering Manager Damion Pregitzer. Moved by Junck, seconded by Betcher, to place the item on a future agenda and to evaluate CyRide stops in the area that might contribute to additional pedestrian crossings. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. Concerns from Rhonda Frerichs regarding the proposed Ontario Workforce Housing Development was the fourth item. Moved by Beatty-Hansen, seconded by Rollins, to direct staff to respond to the requester and answer their questions. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. The fifth item was from Paul and Cindy Larson regarding the Iron s Way Annexation. No action was taken on the item. A memo from Director Diekmann regarding a request to initiate zoning ordinance changes and incentives for apartment development at 608 Burnett was the sixth item. Moved by Betcher, seconded by Junck, to place the item on a future agenda. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. The final item was from Director Diekmann in response to a request from Ames Silversmithing for site plan changes for Parking to Rear of the Building. 21 Moved by Betcher, seconded by Junck, to place the item on a future agenda, if necessary. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. REPORT OF GOVERNING BODY: On behalf of Discover Ames, Council Member Gartin reported a recent routine meeting with positive hotel and restaurant impacts . Council Member Betcher added that Discover Ames was considering moving partner dues to a fiscal year cycle. She noted upcoming events including a stadium concert featuring Post Malone and Jelly Roll in July. Council Members Rollins and Beatty-Hansen reported that Ames Regional Economic Alliance would be meeting later in the week. Mayor Haila reported no updates for Story County Emergency Management. Council Member Junck gave an update for Ames Transit Agency Board of Trustees, noting the recent review of the Heart of Iowa Regional Transit Agency (HIRTA) contract and annual customer survey, as well as the approval of public transportation infrastructure grant applications for FY 2027. COUNCIL COMMENTS: Mayor Haila introduced Trey Andersen, a freshman in political science and international studies at ISU, who was appointed by ISU Student Government as the incoming ex officio representative. Trey Anderson expressed his enthusiasm for the position, highlighting his interest in leadership and political science, and shared his future aspirations to engage with community work. His formal appointment was anticipated in the next Regular Meeting of the City Council. Council Member Gartin noted the success of the Stash the Trash event and reiterated his ongoing concern about the lack of sidewalk on Ross Road. Council Member Beatty-Hansen announced the Mayor and City Council Bike Ride on Saturday, May 9, and the Bike to Work Week kickoff breakfast at City Hall on Monday, May 11, from 7:00 to 9:00 a.m. Council Member Gartin added that the Ontario Park open house would be held on Saturday, May 9, from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. Council Member Betcher reported that delegates from the City of Newton had met with the Mayor, two Council Members, and City staff at the Inis Grove Miracle Park earlier in the day. Parks and Recreation staff had the opportunity to showcase the facilities available at the park and share various ideas and features with the City of Newton. She also shared that the Story County and Ames Juneteenth Celebration would be held Saturday, June 13, at Bandshell Park from 12:30 to 5:00 p.m., and encouraged the City Council Members and the community to volunteer. ADJOURNMENT: Moved by Betcher, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to adjourn the 22 meeting at 8:57 p.m. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously. ______________________________ ______________________________ Taylor Swanson, Deputy City Clerk John A. Haila, Mayor ______________________________ Renee Hall, City Clerk