HomeMy WebLinkAbout~Master - Packet of Communications to Council dated February 20, 2026
City Manager’s Office 515.239.5105 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
515.239.5142 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jeramy Neefus, Principal Clerk
Date: February 20, 2026
Subject: Packet of Communications to Council
Listed below are the communications to the City Council known to staff as of February
20, 2026:
1. Mimi Wagner, Ames Resident – February 16, 2026
RE: Request Related to Handicapped Parking Regulations
2. Valerie Bohlen, Ames Resident – February 18, 2026
RE: Request from Ironwood Homeowners Association for City of Ames to
Apply for Iowa Department of Transportation Highway Planting Grant
3. Brooke and Dave Elliston, Ames Residents – February 20, 2026
RE: Safety Concerns at the Intersection of Lincoln Way & South Russell Ave.
4. Damion Pregitzer, Traffic Engineering Manager – February 20, 2026
RE: Mortensen Road Corridor Traffic Concerns from Bonnie Alley & Ryan Park
5. Damion Pregitzer, Traffic Engineering Manager – February 20, 2026
RE: Oakland Street Parking & Speed Concerns from Brad Trinkle
6. Damion Pregitzer, Traffic Engineering Manager – February 20, 2026
RE: Ross Road Parking Regulations Concerns from Brent Dunn
7. Damion Pregitzer, Traffic Engineering Manager – February 20, 2026
RE: Lincoln Way & S Dakota Ave. Intersection Concerns from Grant Olsen
8. Damion Pregitzer, Traffic Engineering Manager – February 20, 2026
RE: College Creek Trail Crossing at Thackeray Ave. Suggestions from Grant
Olsen
9. Kelly Diekmann, Planning & Housing Director, and Sara Van Meeteren, Building
Official – February 20, 2026
RE: Complaint Regarding Game Day Parking and Trash at 1325 S. 4 th Street
1
Hall, Renee
From:Mimi Wagner <wagner.mimila@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, February 16, 2026 11:59 AM
To:City Clerk's Office
Subject:HC Parking near library
[External Email]
Hello,
I am writing about the location in quantity of handicap parking stalls in downtown names. I had surgery
and have physical mobility limitations for several months afterwards.
I am attaching a parking ticket that I received related to handicap parking stalls for reference. I am seeing
that there are only four HC stalls in the proximity of the library entrance, two on the east side and two
immediately across the street to the north. When I arrived at the library that morning, all four stalls were
occupied. I parked in the closest open space next to the HC parking stalls and posted my handicap tag. I
had hoped that I would be not required to pay the parking meter because there were not enough stalls.
But I was ticketed.
I understand that this is probably the city’s policy and I will pay this ticket. However, during these few
months of being physically disabled, I am noticing that there are frequently not enough parking stalls in
the downtown area for people with handicap stickers. Other cities, such as Rochester, Minnesota allow
anyone with a handicap tag to park at any meter downtown at no charge, regardless, if it is marked as
restricted for handicapped. I am writing to request the city consider this change in policy. As more and
more residents and visitors meet the requirements for handicap parking tags, I believe this would
promote the friendliness and accommodation that the city is known for in other areas. It would also not
require any new handicap stalls.
Thank you very much for your consideration. Please reach out with any questions.
Mimi Wagner
Mimi Wagner, ASLA
Ames Iowa 50010
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Mimi Wagner <wagner.mimila@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 10:18 AM
Subject:
To: Mimi Wagner <wagner.mimila@gmail.com>
2
1
Hall, Renee
From:Valerie Bohlen <vbohlen@hotmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, February 18, 2026 4:37 PM
To:City Council and Mayor
Cc:Kom, Don; Allison.Smyth@iowdot.us; Rachel.Harris@iowadot.us
Subject:Grant for Ironwood Homeowners Association
Attachments:img-260216073221.pdf
[External Email]
Dear Mayor Haila:
The Ironwood Homeowners Association, along with affected neighbors, request that the Ames City Council
direct staff to make application to sponsor a highway planting using DOT/DNR funding.
The following paragraph prepared by Rachel Harris, DOT Chief Landscape Architect, describes the grant:
"Applicants for funding must be tax levying bodies. Thus, a city, county or school district must be the one
to receive the grant. In this case, the HOA would have to work with the City of Ames, and the city would
sign the agreement. That commits them (the city) to the plan and maintenance thereafter. This is a
reimbursement grant up to $100,000 for planning, material, labor, establishment maintenance of
vegetation only. Any hardscape materials or other sculpture/lighting/hardscape is not eligible for funds."
DOT, through senior staff communication has encouraged the Ironwood HOA to pursue the seeking of this
grant. We believe this signals a real willingness on DOT's part to work with the city to restore the
Ironwood woodlot. The grant application and planting proposal will need to be approved by DOT Roadside
and District staff. Along with that the city will need to apply for a work in the ROW to complete the
planting.
The need for this funding results from the removal of this woodlot in the process of the Ames Electric
utility replacing a major power line in the Ironwood neighborhood. The location of the power line is on the
boundary between Ironwood Homeowner Association residents and the DOT Highway 30 right-of-way. The
woodlot has provided both a visual and audio barrier to Highway 30 for the neighborhood residents for
many years The removal of this woodlot has drastically changed our environment and probably affected
our property values. We have been in contact with both city and DOT officials and are delighted that DOT
has given the City of Ames the opportunity to apply for this grant.
Attached is a map of the affected area outlined in yellow. The trees except for a few have virtually been
removed on the level area before the grade drops off severely to the road below. It is in this area that we
believe major restoration should take place. Of course under the power line the vegetation that is to be
replanted must be such that its mature height would not impair the power line. Beyond that it would be
desirable to include taller trees and hopefully many evergreen tree types to give the homeowners year
around protection. According to Luke Gran, Consulting Forester for the HOA, if nothing is done the result
will become a mixture of invasive species that will not provide protection to the homeowners and will likely
grow up into the power line and require continued maintenance by the city.
The destruction of this woodlot, although it looks like a disaster now, has really presented the city, the
DOT and the HOA with an opportunity to make a difference for everyone. Never again will this area be
laid bare and ripe for a meaningful reforestation project. One thing to note is that the area has not been
totally cleaned. If this project is to be successful, all remaining vegetation should be removed either as
part of the powerline project or through the grant application.
2
In closing we, the Ironwood Homeowners Association and affected neighbors, would like to encourage the
Ames City Council to direct staff to make application to sponsor a highway planting project in this area,
using DOT/DNR funding.
Thank you.
Valerie Bohlen
President Ironwood Estates Home AssociationDear Mayor Haila:
1
Hall, Renee
From:brooke mallonexcavating.com <brooke@mallonexcavating.com>
Sent:Friday, February 20, 2026 8:46 AM
To:City Council and Mayor
Subject:Urgent Safety Concerns at Lincoln Way & South Russell
[External Email]
Dear Members of the Ames City Council,
We are writing to you as concerned neighbors and longtime residents who live at the corner of Lincoln
Way and South Russell—the site of the recent tragic pedestrian and motorcycle accident that claimed
Margaret’s life.
We have been heartsick over this loss, and we have also been carrying a heavy sense of guilt that it took a
tragedy for us to formally voice concerns we have had for years.
As a young family, we attempt to cross Lincoln Way nearly every day during the warmer months. We live
next to the eastbound bus stop, and crossing the street safely is part of our regular routine. There have
been multiple close calls for us personally. Because of speeding traffic and frequent drag racing between
the University/Lincoln Way light and the Hazel/Lincoln Way light, we have strict rules that our children
may not play in our own front yard.
Five years ago, a vehicle involved in drag racing left the roadway and crashed into our front yard—coming
within inches of our front door. Had it not struck the fire hydrant, it would have entered our living room.
That experience has stayed with us.
We have also repeatedly witnessed Margaret and others struggle to cross Lincoln Way safely to reach the
bus stop. On several occasions, we saw her narrowly avoid being hit. In addition, we regularly observe
young families from North Russell, neighbors from South Russell, tailgaters during football games,
basketball fans, and college students attempting to cross Lincoln Way with significant difficulty and
danger.
We respectfully request that the Council consider installing a pedestrian-activated flashing crosswalk
similar to the one located just south of our neighborhood between Stadium View Apartments and the
nearby bus stop. A Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) or similar treatment would significantly
increase driver awareness and yield compliance. We also urge consideration of additional traffic-
calming measures, such as a reduced speed zone, increased enforcement, or other proven safety
interventions.
Lincoln Way is not just a commuter corridor—it runs through a residential, walkable neighborhood filled
with families, students, and community members who rely on safe pedestrian access. We are asking for
your help to preserve the safety and walkability of our neighborhood and to prevent any further loss of
life.
Please hear our concerns and take meaningful action to improve safety at this intersection.
2
Thank you for your time, service, and consideration.
Sincerely,
Brooke and Dave Elliston
1228 Lincoln Way
Ames, Iowa
Brooke Elliston
Office Manager
brooke@mallonexcavating.com
515.290.9973
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Damion Pregitzer, P.E. PTOE, Traffic Engineering Manager
Date: February 24, 2026
Subject: Mortensen Road Corridor – Follow-Up on Traffic Concerns made
by Bonnie Alley and Ryan Park
BACKGROUND
At the January 13, 2026 City Council meeting, City Council referred to staff traffic
concerns raised by Ms. Alley regarding the Mortensen Road corridor west of South
Dakota Avenue, as well as the related request from Mr. Park regarding the West Towne
Apartments exit.
STOP CONTROL AT PRIVATE ACCESS POINTS
Locations identified in the request were along Mortensen Road where private access
points intersect Mortensen Road without stop control (stop signs). Installation and
maintenance of stop control from private access points are the responsibility of those
adjacent private property owners. Where appropriate, Staff will contact the identified
property owners to provide guidance and assist them in installing and maintaining stop
signs in accordance with the appropriate standards. This should improve consistency and
predictability for turning and entering vehicles along the corridor.
SPEED AND SAFETY HISTORY
Speed data collected in May 2025 indicate that the corridor is generally operating within
the posted 40 MPH speed limit. Approximately 88 percent of vehicles traveled at or below
the posted speed, with an 85th-percentile speed of approximately 40 MPH, which is
consistent with the current posted limit. A small share of vehicles (approximately 0.7
percent) where found to be excessively speeding. At this level of excessive speeding,
Staff typically recommends enforcement as the appropriate safety countermeasure.
Crash data for Mortensen Road west of South Dakota Avenue over the 2015–2026 (most
currently available) period show 38 total crashes, with no fatal or suspected serious injury
crashes. Most crashes were property-damage-only and were primarily associated with
turning movements, failure-to-yield conditions, and access-related conflicts, rather than
excessive speed. Based on this information, the available speed and crash data do not
indicate a pattern that would support a change to the posted speed limit. Staff will continue
to monitor speed, crash, and operational data and reassess if conditions change, or new
trends emerge.
RECENT STREET MODIFICATIONS
Following the collection of speed data in summer 2025, Public Works completed multi-
modal street modifications along Mortensen Road. These improvements included a curb
extension at the northwest corner of Mortensen Road and Dickinson Avenue, and a
midblock pedestrian refuge island intended to reduce weaving and racing behavior,
improve the CyRide stop crossing, and contribute to overall traffic calming.
PARKING AND SIGHT DISTANCE AT WILDER BOULEVARD
Ames Municipal Code allows for the designation of no-parking areas near intersections
to maintain visibility and safe operations. Section 18.1 authorizes the use of yellow curb
to designate no-parking zones, and Section 18.17 establishes parking prohibitions within
and near intersections and traffic control devices. As seasonal pavement marking
activities begin, Staff can evaluate sight distance conditions at the Mortensen Road and
Wilder Boulevard intersection and determine whether additional yellow curb markings
may be appropriate to improve visibility and turning movements.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff will continue to monitor the corridor and coordinate with adjacent property owners
as appropriate to address safety and operational concerns.
City of Ames
COUNCIL ACTION SUMMARY
January 13, 2026
AGENDA ITEM: Dispositions
SUBJECT: Traffic concerns including a request from Bonnie Alley regarding Mortensen
Road Corridor; two requests from Grant Olsen, one regarding the
intersection of Lincoln Way and North Dakota Avenue and the other
regarding Thackeray Trail Crossing; and a request from Ryan Park
regarding the West Towne Apartments’ exit
ACTION TAKEN: Moved to refer the four traffic related items to staff for a memo
MOTION BY: Gartin
SECOND BY: Beatty-Hansen
VOTING AYE: Beatty-Hansen, Betcher, Corrieri, Gartin, Junck, Rollins
VOTING NAY: None
ABSENT: None
SENT FROM: Taylor Swanson, Deputy City Clerk
SENT TO: Justin Clausen, Director of Public Works
1
Hall, Renee
From:Hall, Renee
Sent:Monday, January 5, 2026 10:27 AM
To:Hall, Renee
Subject:FW: Mortensen Road Corridor Safety Considerations
From: Bonnie Alley <bonnie.alley@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 1, 2026 3:16 PM
To: Haila, John <john.haila@cityofames.org>; Beatty-Hansen, Bronwyn <bronwyn.beattyhansen@amescitycouncil.org>;
Gartin, Tim <tim.gartin@amescitycouncil.org>; Betcher, Gloria <gloria.betcher@amescitycouncil.org>; Junck, Rachel
<rachel.junck@amescitycouncil.org>; Rollins, Anita <anita.rollins@amescitycouncil.org>; Corrieri, Amber
<amber.corrieri@amescitycouncil.org>; Boland, Emily <emily.boland@amescitycouncil.org>; Schainker, Steve
<steve.schainker@cityofames.org>
Subject: Mortensen Road Corridor Safety Considerations
[External Email]
Mortensen Road Corridor Safety Considerations.pdf
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I am writing to share a brief overview and attached presentation regarding ongoing safety concerns
along the Mortensen Road corridor west of South Dakota Avenue and the surrounding West Ames
neighborhood.
Over time, residents have observed increasing speed inconsistency, challenging turning movements,
and confusion related to stop control and parking conditions. This area includes higher residential
density, schools, transit activity, and significant visitor traffic, all of which make clear and consistent
traffic control especially important for safety and predictability.
The attached presentation is intended to provide visual context and highlight several targeted,
actionable opportunities to improve safety, visibility, and traffic flow. It also includes considerations
for speed alignment, stop sign consistency, parking management on Wilder Boulevard, and winter
operations coordination.
My goal in sharing this information is to support a thoughtful review and conversation around how
the current roadway conditions align with how this corridor is being used today, and to explore
potential improvements that enhance safety for residents, visitors, and the broader community. I
would welcome the opportunity to address the City Council and discuss these observations and
considerations at a future City Council meeting, if helpful.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I appreciate your continued service to our community
and your attention to neighborhood safety concerns.
Bonnie Alley
" There is a powerful driving force inside every human being that, once unleashed, can make any
vision, dream, or desire a reality"
Creating a Safer Mortensen Road Corridor
and
Surrounding West Ames Community
Existing
East of South Dakota Ave:
30 MPH
Apartments with visitor traffic
Middle school
Speed Consistency on Mortensen Road
South Dakota Ave
Mortenson Rd
Exisiting
West of South Dakota Ave:
40 MPH
Higher residential density with vistor traffic
6 city blocks uninterupted speed
Elementary school
Businesses Area
South Dakota Ave
Mortenson Rd
The Issue
Speed limits are misaligned with surrounding land use and activity
Excessive speeding by apartment residents and visitors
Dangerous driving behaviors observed, including:
Multi-lane, side-by-side driving at high speeds
Passing vehicles using the center turn lane
Passing CyRide buses while the bus is in motion
Motorcycle racing activity
Documented firsthand safety concerns, including:
accidents
A motorcycle crash involving loss of control, with the rider sliding approximately half a block
Lack of police presence at this side of town to help reduce the speeding and racing
Immediate Request
Lower the speed limit to 30 MPH on Mortensen Road west of South Dakota Avenue to align with land use, density, and safety
expectations
If unable to see the immediate need for speed reduction I would request a formal traffic and speed study for the Mortensen Road
corridor west of South Dakota Avenue
Include:
Speed data
Crash history
Pedestrian and transit activity
School proximity
Why This Matters
Clear, consistent traffic control is essential for predictable driver behavior
In areas with high residential density, schools, and transit activity, missing or inconsistent stop control increases risk
What These Maps Show
Locations along Mortensen Road and adjacent intersections where:
Stop signs are missing or unclear
Traffic control is inconsistent from one intersection to the next
Observed gaps between intended traffic flow and what drivers experience on the roadway
Purpose of Sharing This Information
To provide visual context for the safety concerns discussed earlier
To support a data-informed review of stop sign placement and traffic control
To identify opportunities for improvement
Stop Sign & Traffic Control Consistency
Location: Mortensen Rd and Poe Ave
Currently: Poe Ave has a stop sign
Issue: There is no stop sign present at the exit or enter across from Poe Ave. at the Westtown
entrance. Businesses and residence vehicles are able to enter Mortensen Road without stop
control at higher-speed through traffic
The following locations demonstrate a pattern of inconsistent traffic control along the Mortensen corridor.
Requested Improvement:
Stop sign added to the south side of Mortensen Rd on the Westtown Entrance/Exit
Location: Mortensen & second entrance / exit to Mortensen Heights Apartment Complex
Issue: There is no stop sign present at the exit or enter from these apartments. Residence
vehicles are able to enter Mortensen Road without stop control at higher-speed through traffic
Requested Improvement: Stop sign added to the south side of Mortensen (the second
Mortensen Heights apartment complex entrance/exit)
Location: Mortensen Rd and Wilder Blvd.
Currently: Wilder has a stop sign entering Mortensen Rd
Issue: There is no stop sign present at the exit or enter across from Wilder Blvd. Residence
vehicles are able to enter Mortensen Road without stop control at higher-speed through traffic
Requested Improvement: Stop sign added to the south side of Mortensen Rd on the
second Mortensen Heights apartment complex.
Location: Mortensen Rd and Lawrence Ave
Currently: Lawrence Ave has a stop sign entering Mortensen Rd
Issue: There is no stop sign present at the exit or enter across from Lawrence Ave,. Rsidence
vehicles are able to enter Mortensen Road without stop control at higher-speed through traffic
Requested Improvement: Stop sign added to the south side of Mortensen Rd across
from Lawrence Ave - the third Mortensen Heights apartment complex.
Additional Requests & Considerations for Wilder Blvd.
Wilder Blvd is no parking on east side. And no parking on west side on block entering Mortensen Rd
Current Conditions
Parking is not permitted on the east side of Wilder Boulevard nor the west side within the block turning out south on Mortensen Rd.
There is one - No Parking sign - but it too far North on Wilder
Apartment residents and visitors are parking on the east side due to lack of visible restriction
Observed Impacts
Parked vehicles reduce visibility and maneuverability
Turning from Mortensen Drive onto Wilder Boulevard is significantly more difficult
Increased risk for:
Conflicts between turning vehicles and parked cars
Delays and hesitation that affect overall traffic flow
Considerations & Requests
Install an additional No Parking signage on the east side of Wilder Boulevard
Evaluate whether additional:
Pavement markings
Curb markings
The west side of Wilder (Bradbury side) was painted yellow which has made a significant improvement to parking issues.
Winter Parking Coordination – Mortensen Heights
During winter months, Mortensen Heights currently directs tenants to park along Wilder Boulevard to accommodate internal snow
removal
This practice:
Contributes to congestion and reduced visibility
Creates challenges for City snow plowing operations
As a result, a temporary operational solution for one property is creating broader public right-of-way impacts
Consideration
Request that Mortensen Heights explore alternative winter parking solutions that do not rely on on-street parking along Wilder
Boulevard
Requested Actions & Follow-Up Considerations
Speed & Corridor Review
Reduce the speed limit on Mortensen Road west of South Dakota Avenue to 30 MPH to align with surrounding land use, density, schools, and
transit activity
OR
Conduct a formal traffic and speed study for the Mortensen Road corridor west of South Dakota Avenue, including:
Speed data
Crash history
Pedestrian and transit activity
School proximity
Stop Sign & Traffic Control Improvements
Install stop signs on the south side of Mortensen Road at the following locations to create consistent and predictable traffic control:
Westtown entrance/exit at Mortensen Rd and Poe Ave
Second entrance/exit to the Mortensen Heights apartment complex
Mortensen Rd and Wilder Blvd (south side, across from existing stop)
Mortensen Rd and Lawrence Ave (south side, across from existing stop)
Wilder Boulevard Parking & Visibility
Install additional No Parking signage on the east side of Wilder Boulevard closer to Mortensen Road
Evaluate the need for:
Pavement markings
Curb markings
Maintain and consider extending yellow curb treatments where they have proven effective
Winter Parking Coordination
Request that Mortensen Heights explore alternative winter parking solutions that do not rely on on-street parking along Wilder Boulevard
Align private snow removal practices with:
City plowing needs
Public right-of-way safety
Visibility and turning movement requirements
City of Ames
COUNCIL ACTION SUMMARY
January 13, 2026
AGENDA ITEM: Dispositions
SUBJECT: Traffic concerns including a request from Bonnie Alley regarding Mortensen
Road Corridor; two requests from Grant Olsen, one regarding the
intersection of Lincoln Way and North Dakota Avenue and the other
regarding Thackeray Trail Crossing; and a request from Ryan Park
regarding the West Towne Apartments’ exit
ACTION TAKEN: Moved to refer the four traffic related items to staff for a memo
MOTION BY: Gartin
SECOND BY: Beatty-Hansen
VOTING AYE: Beatty-Hansen, Betcher, Corrieri, Gartin, Junck, Rollins
VOTING NAY: None
ABSENT: None
SENT FROM: Taylor Swanson, Deputy City Clerk
SENT TO: Justin Clausen, Director of Public Works
1
Hall, Renee
From:Betcher, Gloria
Sent:Wednesday, January 7, 2026 8:45 AM
To:Ryan Park
Cc:Schainker, Steve; Hall, Renee
Subject:Re: Stop Sign at West Towne Apts
Thanks for your message, Ryan. One of your neighbors has already contacted us about a variety of traffic
issues on Mortensen, so the City Manager is aware of concerns in the area.
Council meets January 13 and your email, along with the other one, will be considered by Council at that time
to determine if we want to study the entire area for upgrades or if this is something that can be handled easily
by staff. I’m cc:ing the City Manager and City Clerk on your message to be sure it gets into our Council
communication packet and considered alongside the previous message.
All best,
Gloria
Gloria J Betcher
Ward 3 Representative
Ames City Council
531 Hayward Avenue
Ames, IA 50014
(515) 292-5177
> On Jan 7, 2026, at 8:30 AM, Ryan Park <parklrya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [External Email]
>
>
> Good Morning Gloria,
>
> With the addition of a cross walk and turning lane made along Mortensen Road west of South Dakota Ave,
what would it take to get a stop sign at the exit for the West Towne Apts at the end of Poe Avenue? This is a
very busy exit for the apartments and with traffic having to stop to exit off Poe Avenue this causes problems as
typically the apartment vehicles do not yield to someone already waiting at the stop. I’ve been living on Poe for
over 6 years and the problem has only gotten worse.
>
> Thank You,
>
> Ryan Park
> Ames Resident
> Sent from my iPhone
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Damion Pregitzer, P.E. PTOE, Traffic Engineering Manager
Date: February 24, 2026
Subject: Request from Brad Trinkle Regarding Parking and Speed
Concerns on Oakland Street
BACKGROUND:
On September 23, 2025, the City Council referred to Staff a request from Brad Trinkle
regarding parking and speeding concerns on Oakland Street. Mr. Trinkle requested 1)
extension of the existing yellow no-parking marking across from his driveway and 2)
installation of speed humps to address speeding traffic.
NO PARKING REGULATIONS:
The City’s long-standing practice is not to spot-apply parking restrictions in response to
individual driveway concerns, as doing so would create inconsistencies in parking
standards across the community.
Existing Municipal Code provisions prohibit parking in a manner that obstructs a public
or private driveway. On-street parking on the opposite side of driveways has never been
deemed to be a driveway obstruction, and prohibition of such parking would lead to a
significant decrease in available on-street parking. Vehicles that do encroach into
driveways or otherwise violate Municipal Code standards may be addressed through
enforcement. Staff will continue to ensure that enforcement of existing regulations
occurs as needed.
SPEED CONCERNS:
Based on field observations, Staff’s assessment is that a significant portion of the
reported speeding concerns is attributable to temporary traffic pattern changes and
driver behavior associated with the ongoing Hyland Avenue and Oakland Street
reconstruction projects.
Until the Hyland project is complete and traffic volumes and patterns stabilize, Staff can
coordinate targeted enforcement with the Police Department to address speeding
concerns.
The City does not utilize speed bumps or speed humps as a routine traffic-calming
measure due to maintenance and operational considerations. Such treatments are
typically considered only where there is documented evidence of a safety issue that
cannot be effectively addressed through other means.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
In regards to parking regulations, Staff does not recommend additional parking
restrictions at this location at this time. As to speeding concerns, Staff will continue to
monitor conditions on Oakland Street. If concerns persist after completion of the Hyland
reconstruction project and traffic patterns normalize, Staff can conduct a more detailed
evaluation of speeds, volumes, and crash history to determine whether additional
measures are warranted.
Staff communicated similar information with Mr. Trinkle during the fall of 2025 when he
made similar requests directly to staff during the Oakland Street reconstruction.
City of Ames
COUNCIL ACTION SUMMARY
September 23, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Dispositions
SUBJECT: Concerns regarding Oakland Street
ACTION TAKEN: Moved to refer the item to staff for a memo
MOTION BY: Gartin
SECOND BY: Rollins
VOTING AYE: Beatty-Hansen, Betcher, Corrieri, Gartin, Junck, Rollins
VOTING NAY: None
ABSENT: None
SENT FROM: Carly M. Watson, Deputy City Clerk
SENT TO: Justin Clausen, Director of Public Works
1
Hall, Renee
From:Brad Trinkle <brad.trinkle@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, September 18, 2025 5:30 PM
To:City Council and Mayor
[External Email]
Council,
I live at 3421 Oakland Street in Ames and am a homeowner. I am requesting two things that are safety
concerns on Oakland Street
1. I request that the no parking yellow stripe that is on the South side of the street across from my
driveway be extended all the way across from my driveway to the light pole. Cars often park
across from my driveway and with the road being so narrow, it is a safety hazard trying to get out of
our driveway. When a car is parked there, we often have to pull forward and backward a couple of
times in order to exit our driveway, which is dangerous with the speeding traffic and there has
already been an accident.
2. The most serious safety issue is the speeding on Oakland Street. There are many small children
that live on this street and in this neighborhood and the speeding traffic is very dangerous. They
don't even slow down when they could easily see the children. My request and that of many of my
neighbors is that two speed humps be put on Oakland Street. This would be easily done now, as
the road is in the process of being paved.
Thank you,
Brad Trinkle
515-509-1947
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Damion Pregitzer, P.E. PTOE, Traffic Engineering Manager
Date: February 24, 2026
Subject: Request to Change Parking Regulations on Ross Road
BACKGROUND:
At the November 18th City Council meeting, City Council referred to staff parking concerns
raised by Mr. Dunn along Ross Road between Arizona Avenue and North Dakota Avenue.
Ross Road has long-standing overnight parking restrictions that were installed many
years ago (Ord. No. 2980, Sec. 1, 6-30-87; Ord. No. 3513, Sec. 1, 1-26-99). These
restrictions include no parking from 12 AM to 6 AM. Based on current records, Staff has
received only this one recent inquiry regarding these restrictions. No additional
comments or requests have been received from other residents along this corridor.
CONSIDERATIONS FOR PARKING CHANGES:
Changes to established on-street parking regulations can impact daily routines, parking
availability, and neighborhood expectations. When a request involves a documented
safety or operational concern, Staff would typically initiate the process of evaluating
and modifying an ordinance.
However, when those criteria are not present, City policy is to ask the requesting party to
first demonstrate that there is broad support from the households directly affected.
This approach helps ensure that the issue reflects a shared neighborhood interest, any
change is consistent with how most residents use the street, and adjustments do not
unintentionally introduce new challenges for others who rely on the existing regulation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The parking regulation on this street is unique in the City, because no parking is allowed
between 12:00 a.m. to 6:00; a.m. on either side of the street. If residents on Ross Road
would like the City to consider a modification to the existing overnight parking restriction,
Staff recommends gathering a petition of support from at least a majority of the
affected households. This threshold is consistent with past practice for neighborhood-
initiated parking changes and helps confirm that a proposed adjustment aligns with the
broader needs of the street.
Once a petition meeting this level of support is submitted, Public Works will evaluate the
request in detail and prepare a recommendation for City Council’s consideration.
City of Ames
COUNCIL ACTION SUMMARY
November 18, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Dispositions
SUBJECT: Parking regulations on Ross Road
ACTION TAKEN: Moved to request a memo from staff
MOTION BY: Junck
SECOND BY: Gartin
VOTING AYE: Beatty-Hansen, Betcher, Gartin, Junck, Rollins
VOTING NAY: None
ABSENT: Corrieri
SENT FROM: Carly M. Watson, Deputy City Clerk
SENT TO: Justin Clausen, Director of Public Works
1
Hall, Renee
From:Junck, Rachel
Sent:Thursday, October 30, 2025 12:11 PM
To:City Council and Mayor; Hall, Renee
Subject:Fw: Parking Regulations Ross Rd
Forwarding to all of council. Could we please include this in the next disposition of communications to
council?
Thank you,
Rachel
From: Brent Dunn <badunn182@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2025 12:08:52 PM
To: Junck, Rachel <rachel.junck@amescitycouncil.org>
Subject: Parking Regulations Ross Rd
[External Email]
Good morning, Rachel.
My name is Brent Dunn. I live over on the west end of Ross Road, just south of Sawyer. I'm writing to you
this morning to ask if something could be done regarding the parking ordinance on the stretch of Ross I
live on. I had a conversation with Sheri, the police parking coordinator on the phone yesterday and she
suggested I reach out to the city council. She also commented that she could see no issue with these
specific signs going away and that they were likely implemented many years ago. I believe a neighbor of
mine reached out to her as well.
I'll try to explain briefly. The issue is that on both sides of the street there is signage stating that there is
to be no parking between the hours of 12:00 AM and 6:00 AM. This presents a fairly large inconvenience
to those of us who may have younger, active families with more than one vehicle. Most of the driveways
are single-car, so you could imagine the headache caused by needing to shuffle vehicles at least once
per day (or night) to accommodate this. Additionally, it's only been within the past four weeks or so that
the rule has begun to be enforced.
For four and a half years, I was able to park on the street in front of my home. Even if the signs were to be
removed from one side only(North덞덛덟덜덝), that would help. I have been unable to find another stretch of any
side road in my neighborhood with similar signage on both sides.
I appreciate your time. Hope to hear a reply soon.
Thank you!
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Damion Pregitzer, P.E. PTOE, Traffic Engineering Manager
Date: February 24, 2026
Subject: Request from Grant Olsen - Lincoln Way and South Dakota Avenue
– Staff Review and Recommendation
BACKGROUND:
At the January 13, 2026 City Council meeting, City Council referred to staff a request
regarding the northbound right turn-only lane at the intersection of Lincoln Way and South
Dakota Avenue. The request proposed installing flexible delineator posts to discourage
through movements from the turn-only lane and support the existing lane designation
signage.
SAFETY HISTORY:
Based on a review of available crash data, there is no apparent crash pattern indicating
that this intersection is currently experiencing a safety deficiency related to northbound
through movements at the intersection from the outside lane (right-turn only). The concern
appears to be primarily related to driver convenience and compliance, rather than an
identified safety issue.
STAFF EVALUATION:
Staff identified several concerns with the proposed treatment. Ongoing maintenance of
flexible delineator posts under all weather conditions would present operational
challenges, especially during the winter. The proposed configuration would not fully
prevent improper through movements and may introduce vehicle weaving, which would
increase the risk of sideswipe accidents. As a result, Staff does not see a need at this
time to assume the risks associated with implementing a temporary or experimental traffic
control treatment.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff does not recommend proceeding with the installation of flexible delineator posts or
other temporary or experimental traffic control treatments at this location at this time. The
review did not identify a demonstrated safety deficiency that would warrant assuming the
operational and maintenance risks associated with such measures.
Staff will continue to consider intersection operations and safety as part of future corridor-
level planning and design efforts.
City of Ames
COUNCIL ACTION SUMMARY
January 13, 2026
AGENDA ITEM: Dispositions
SUBJECT: Traffic concerns including a request from Bonnie Alley regarding Mortensen
Road Corridor; two requests from Grant Olsen, one regarding the
intersection of Lincoln Way and North Dakota Avenue and the other
regarding Thackeray Trail Crossing; and a request from Ryan Park
regarding the West Towne Apartments’ exit
ACTION TAKEN: Moved to refer the four traffic related items to staff for a memo
MOTION BY: Gartin
SECOND BY: Beatty-Hansen
VOTING AYE: Beatty-Hansen, Betcher, Corrieri, Gartin, Junck, Rollins
VOTING NAY: None
ABSENT: None
SENT FROM: Taylor Swanson, Deputy City Clerk
SENT TO: Justin Clausen, Director of Public Works
1
Hall, Renee
From:Grant Olsen <radioemergency@gmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, January 7, 2026 10:19 AM
To:City Council and Mayor
Subject:Lincoln Way and Dakota safety proposal
Attachments:lincoln dakota turn only lane.pdf
[External Email]
Dear Council Members,
Attached is a proposal regarding the intersection of Lincoln Way and Dakota Avenue.
Grant Olsen
Ames resident
This is a proposal to improve
the performance of a turn-only
lane at the intersection of
Lincoln Way and South Dakota
Avenue.
I have observed multiple
instances of northbound
drivers going straight from a
turn-only lane because it can
be done without consequence.
Drivers who wait at a red light
to go straight from the turn-
only lane hold back drivers
who could turn right on red.
Page 1 of 2
Proposed Treatment
Install 3-4 yellow flex posts
in line with the median of
the east leg of the
intersection
Bonus Benefit
The position of these flex posts
offers greater protection for
pedestrians because of the new
angle for south-to-east drivers
(down-to-right).
The posts also direct a west-to-
south (left-to-down) driver
further into the intersection,
increasing the chances that the
driver will travel on the correct
side of the median in the south
leg of the intersection.
Page 2 of 2
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Damion Pregitzer, P.E. PTOE, Traffic Engineering Manager
Date: February 24, 2026
Subject: Request from Grant Olsen - Thackeray Avenue / College Creek
Trail Crossing – Staff Review and Recommendation
BACKGROUND:
At the January 13, 2026 City Council meeting, City Council referred to staff a request
regarding low-cost safety improvements at the mid-block pedestrian and bicycle
crossing of Thackeray Avenue at the College Creek Trail, located between Schubert
Street and Emerson Drive.
The request from Mr. Olsen identifies concerns related to driver speed perception,
visibility limitations caused by on-street parking near the crossing, and the skewed
angle between the roadway and trail crossing. The proposed approach emphasizes a
low-cost, quick-build treatment intended to function as a pilot installation.
POLICY AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONTEXT:
The City recently finalized the Walk Bike Roll Ames Plan, which establishes the policy
guidance and funding priorities for bicycle and pedestrian improvements. The plan
includes community-selected performance measures and identifies improvements
across the city including sidewalk gaps, bikeway upgrades, and potential crossing
upgrades. The improvements are prioritized to maximize the available funding and
impacts to the active transportation network.
The Walk Bike Roll Ames public engagement and technical analysis process did not
identify the Thackeray Avenue crossing as a priority location for improvement. As a
result, no project at this location is currently programmed or prioritized within the Walk
Bike Roll Ames plan or the current Capital Improvements Plan.
SAFETY HISTORY:
Staff reviewed reported crash data for this segment of Thackeray Avenue between
Schubert Street and Emerson Drive. The review found no reported crashes involving
vehicles, pedestrians, or bicyclists at this location from 2015 to the present. While the
absence of crashes does not eliminate all safety concerns, it is a key factor considered
when prioritizing improvements across the City. In addition, staff is not aware of any
prior complaints or documented concerns from residents in the surrounding
neighborhood regarding the safety or operations at this crossing.
STAFF EVALUATION:
Staff notes that the proposed temporary crossing treatment is not a standard or widely
recognized traffic control application within the City, nor is it a treatment contemplated
by the Walk Bike Roll Ames Plan. Such installations tend to create confusion for
roadway users unfamiliar with the treatment. For that reason, experimental or non-
standard treatments are generally most appropriate for specific and challenging, high-
priority locations where a standard solution does not exist.
In addition, temporary materials such as flexible delineators, curb paint, and non-
standard striping typically require ongoing maintenance, replacement, and monitoring to
remain effective. Over time, this can result in higher long-term costs relative to the initial
installation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Given the lack of documented crash history, neighborhood concerns, and plan-level
prioritization, staff does not recommend moving forward with a temporary crossing
treatment at Thackeray Avenue and the College Creek Trail at this time. Staff will review
the current signage and pavement markings for consistency with current City practices
and modify the crossing treatments as appropriate.
Memo
Department of Planning & Housing
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kelly Diekmann, Planning & Housing Director, Sara Van Meeteren, Building Official
DATE: February 20, 2026
SUBJECT: Complaint regarding Game Day Parking and Trash at 1325 S. 4th Street
City Council received an email, see attached, on December 17th from Dan Batha asking for code
enforcement regarding trash and refuse related to gameday parking that occurred on a vacant
lot at 1325 S. 4th Street. City Council referred the request to staff for more information.
The Inspection Division has received three complaints regarding garbage since November of
2024. At two of the inspections, a small amount of garbage/litter was found on the property. The
third inspection was determined to be unfounded as there were no violations at the time. There
are currently no garbage violations at the site.
The issue of allowing for gameday parking was also brought up as part of the letter. The property
is currently under the ownership of the Randall Corporation and has been in some form of
business or family association ownership since 1991.
The site is an unimproved vacant lot with Agricultural Zoning. It appears that the property has
been zoned agricultural since the time of its purchase. Agricultural Zoning does not permit
commercial parking as an allowable use. Staff researched the permit history for the site and did
not identify any previously approved permits, such as variances or other types of permits that
could have permitted gameday parking on the site. However, this property has been used for
gameday parking for many years. Staff has not contacted the property owner to see if they have
some record of prior permission for gameday parking.
With the complaint about the gameday parking use of the site, the next step for enforcement
would be to notify the owner of the limitation on using the site for parking. The owner would then
need to comply with the limitation of use, apply for a use variance, or request City Council
consider a zoning text amendment to allow for the use in some fashion on the site.
Across the street from this site is the former Haunted Forest site owned by the Ballard family.
Last year the City Council considered a request from the Lynn and Lee Ballard to allow for
establishment of RV storage and expansion of gameday parking options for their site. Ultimately,
City Council did not choose to modify zoning standards to allow for any additional gameday
related activities at the Ballard property beyond what was already approved as gameday vehicle
parking with a variance in the early 2000s. The Ballard family then applied for a variance to allow
for additional parking uses which was denied by the Zoning Board of Adjustment in the summer
of 2025.
Staff Comment:
The issues of trash does not rise to a level that staff believes warrant additional enforcement
measures at this time. The issue of parking is the central issue of the complaint and is not
currently an allowable use on the site.
City Council could elect to begin a zoning standards change to permit gameday parking
permits on unimproved areas if it believes that the use is beneficial and compatible with the
area. If City Council does not take such an initiative, staff will notify the property owner of the
use limitation restricting parking.
City of Ames
COUNCIL ACTION SUMMARY
December 16, 2025
AGENDA ITEM: Dispositions
SUBJECT: Request regarding the zoning and enforcement regulations for a
property located on South 4th Street bordering the pedestrian trail in
Stuart Smith Park from Dan Batha
ACTION TAKEN: Moved to request a memo from staff
MOTION BY: Beatty-Hansen
SECOND BY: Corrieri
VOTING AYE: Beatty-Hansen, Betcher, Corrieri, Gartin, Junck, Rollins
VOTING NAY: None
ABSENT: None
SENT FROM: Taylor Swanson, Deputy City Clerk
SENT TO: Kelly Diekmann, Planning and Housing Director
Sara Van Meeteren, Building Official
1
Neefus, Jeramy
From:Hall, Renee
Sent:Wednesday, December 17, 2025 8:55 AM
To:Neefus, Jeramy
Subject:FW: Code compliance/property usage and zoning
Attachments:IMG_2563.jpeg; IMG_2565.jpeg; IMG_2564.jpeg; IMG_2561.jpeg; IMG_2562.jpeg
From: Daniel Batha <db449@nau.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 3:29 PM
To: City Council and Mayor <mayorcouncil@amescitycouncil.org>
Subject: Code compliance/property usage and zoning
[External Email]
Hello,
I wanted to draw the council’s attention to an ongoing issue in my neighborhood. I’ve attempted to
resolve it by contacting the code enforcement office multiple times. It happened again this past weekend
and it is clear the property owner does not care to fix the issue.
This is regarding the property located on south 4th street next to ioway creek and bordering the
pedestrian trail in Stuart Smith park. It’s across the street from stadium view apartments and near the
old haunted forest area. The property is solely used for parking vehicles during ISU home football games
at $50 per car. The area holds over a hundred vehicles, possibly more. There is nearly always trash left by
folks tailgating in the lot, and it is not picked up. Animals and the wind then spread it into the park next to
it where I routinely walk my dogs.
I am inquiring about what steps can be taken to force the property owner to clean up the area after
parking vehicles? Clearly what has been done in the past has not worked. It is disgraceful that someone
making thousands of dollars for a single day parking cars cannot pay someone to properly clean up
afterwards.
That brings me to my next question-how is that property zoned and is the owner paying taxes on this
income? Does the owner have permission/permits to use the public trail north of their lot to allow
vehicles to exit after the game? This causes issues with my safe usage of the trail and also causes traffic
issues in front of my house on south Russell Ave.
Thank you for hearing my concerns and I look forward to receiving information regarding this issue.
Dan Batha
301 south Russell Ave