HomeMy WebLinkAboutA026 - Modifications to Municipal Code Chapters 4 and 19 to address Personal Transportation DevicesITEM #:28
DATE:12-09-25
DEPT:CMO
SUBJECT:MODIFICATIONS TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTERS 4: BICYCLES AND 19:
PARKS AND RECREATION TO ADDRESS PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION
DEVICES
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
In October 2024, City Council directed staff to develop a micromobility ordinance for Council
consideration. On March 11, 2025, a staff report was provided and presented to Council,
which included 1) presenting research findings on micromobility ordinances in other
communities and 2) outlining ordinance components being proposed, and seeking Council
direction on various components.
Specifically, at the March 11, 2025, meeting, City Council directed staff to:
maintain current rules governing where bicycles are allowed and not allowed to operate
and extend those guidelines to other mobility devices.
exclude City parks and refer considerations of micromobility in parks to the Parks and
Recreation Commission (Commission).
direct staff to proceed with a 20 mph speed limit for non-roadway uses, except in City
parks.
include staff recommendations of exceptions for parades and ADA devices.
request staff include signage concepts with the future draft ordinance on micromobility.
Important Note: While the term "micromobility" had been commonly used to describe using
transportation devices such as scooters, e-scooters, e-bikes, etc., staff is recommending that
the City use a more accurate term, "personal transportation devices". The definition being
proposed is a slight modification of what the Des Moines Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization uses. A personal transportation device, therefore, is a "mobility device, which
may be equipped with an electric motor for assistance or sole propulsion, designed for
conveying the operator, with speeds of less than 20 miles per hour, but excluding a bicycle or
low-speed electric bicycle”.
Examples include: Any small, lightweight, electric-powered vehicle designed for
single/tandem- passenger use, such as scooters, electric scooters, electric skateboards, one-
wheelers, and similar devices. Any gas-powered device or higher-powered device than a 750
watt engine is already prohibited on sidewalks and shared-used paths.
PUBLIC OUTREACH:
After the March meeting, staff developed an online survey to gather public feedback on the
1
use of bicycles and personal transportation devices. The Personal Transportation Survey was
open from May 1 – May 16, 2025, and 257 responses were received. The purpose of this
survey was to gather public feedback around bicycles and personal transportation uses and to
use the input to inform any updates to City ordinances around the use of these devices. Staff
has analyzed the survey results (see Attachment A - PTD Survey Analysis).
Notably from the feedback,
73.7% (approximately 180 people) of respondents felt somewhat safe or very safe using
a bicycle or personal transportation device; 67.9% (approximately 166 people) felt
somewhat safe or very safe being around these devices on the sidewalk; and 78.2%
(191) felt somewhat safe or very safe being around these devices on a park path or trail.
79% of respondents felt most comfortable riding a personal transportation device in
parks and trail, 51% were comfortable riding on bike lanes, 61.7% felt uncomfortable
riding on a roadway (street), and about half of respondents felt comfortable riding on
sidewalks.
A majority of survey respondents (58.37%) supported no size restrictions on bicycles
and personal transportation devices.
Opinions were split on whether to have a speed limit or not, however, the primary area
for support for speed limit restrictions were in areas with heavy pedestrian traffic, like
shared-use trails or sidewalks, although there was no clear consensus on what that
speed limit ought to be (e.g., 10 mph, 15 mph). As such, the proposed ordinance
suggests 20-mph everywhere except on road where other speeds are posted and Parks,
since it was referred to the Park and Recreation Commission.
When asked if survey takers have experienced or witnessed any issues with personal
transportation uses, the most common issues observed were unsafe riding (50% or
130/257) and collisions or close calls with vehicles (49% or 126/257) and pedestrians
(40% or 103/257).
When asked what other safety concerns there are, the most common themes from
responses related to 1) speed and users going too fast, especially on trails 2) pedestrian
conflicts and the lack of warnings when passing 3) drivers not yielding and unsafe
intersections 4) riders ignoring traffic laws and 5) lack of helmets or poor lighting,
possible distracted riders.
Other notable themes through the survey responses included 1) a desire for more safety
and education learning opportunities 2) continue investing in dedicated infrastructure.
The Parks and Recreation Commission has discussed personal transportation device uses on
City parks and trails at its meetings, and conducted a "Parks Rules" survey to get input from
community members on a potential speed limit for these types of devices in City parks. The
Commission recommends a 10 mph speed limit for bicycles and personal transportation
devices in City parks. This new speed limit is included in the Parks Rule, which the
Commission is authorized to set. Other proposed ordinance modifications to the Chapter 19:
Parks and Recreation are before Council at this meeting as well to ensure any changes to
Municipal Code Chapter 4 and Municipal Code Chapter 19 are complimentary.
2
In addition to the public survey conducted, Staff outlined possible changes to Municipal Code
Chapters 4 and 19 and provided it directly to several local bicyclists and biking advocates who
also shared it with their connections. Their feedback has been considered and many of their
suggestions have been incorporated into the proposed changes attached.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 4; BICYCLES:
The primary changes to Municipal Code Chapter 4 consists of updating existing language to
be clearer on the intent of what was already there and adding "personal transportation device".
Significant changes include:
1. Adding Section 4.5 Definitions for bicycle and personal transportation devices;
2. Adding clarity on speeds not to exceed for roadways and non-roadway uses outside of
parks (Section 4.9);
3. Adding an exception for riding on sidewalks for person(s) with a disability who uses a
wheelchair or mobility device (Section 4.13);
4. Modification of lamps and reflectors required (Section 4.16);
5. Clarity on brakes required (Section 4.17); and,
6. New sections that address:
a. Sirens, whistles and horns prohibited (Section 4.18)
b. Parking (Section 4.19)
c. Impoundment (Section 4.20) and
d. Responsible Riding (Section 4.21)
The changes to Municipal Code Chapter 19 updates Section 19.9 creating an exemption
for mobility device use for individuals with disabilities and updates language to
address personal transportation device uses in parks.
The Parks and Recreation Department has already began designing the appropriate signs for
installation in the parks. Signs will encourage appropriate speeds for multi-modal use on
shared-use paths. See Attachment B and C for signs that will be installed at Ada Hayden
Heritage Park.
Additionally, once the ordinance is fully in effect after final ordinance adoption, staff will work
on educational opportunities to share the new rules with the community. This will include
social media posts, emails to notification subscribers, and other educational materials.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve on first reading of the attached ordinance regarding Ames Municipal Code
Chapters 4 and 19 to take effect immediately after final ordinance adoption.
2. Direct staff to modify the proposed ordinance and bring it back to a future City Council
meeting for City Council consideration.
3
3. Do not approve first reading of the ordinance.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Updating Municipal Code Chapters 4 and 19 will improve public safety and the use of
bicycles and personal transportation devices. Modifying the ordinances provides clarity
around requirements when operating such devices. Therefore, it is the recommendation of
the City Manager that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1, as described above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
DRAFT Ordinance Amending Chapters 4 and 19.pdf
Attachment A - PTD Survey Analysis .docx
Attachment B: Share The Path 24x18.pdf
Attachment C: Speed Limit 24x18.pdf
4
ORDINANCE NO. _________
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF
THE CITY OF AMES, IOWA, BY AMENDING CHAPTERS 4
AND 19 THEREOF, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ESTABLISHING USE OF BICYCLES AND PERSONAL
TRANSPORTATION DEVICES; REPEALING ANY AND
ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT;
PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND ESTABLISHING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ENACTED, by the City Council for the City of Ames, Iowa, that:
Section One. The Municipal Code of the City of Ames, Iowa shall be and the
same is hereby amended by amending Chapters 4 and 19 as follows:
“CHAPTER 4
BICYCLES AND PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION DEVICES
* * *
Sec. 4.5 DEFINITIONS
(1) Bicycle. Bicycle means either:
(a) a device having up to four (4) wheels and having at least one saddle or seat
for the use of a rider which is propelled by human power, or
(b) a device having up to four (4) wheels with fully operable pedals and the
assistance of an electric motor of less than 750 watts.
(2) Personal Transportation Device. Personal Transportation Device means a
mobility device which may be equipped with an electric motor for assistance or sole
propulsion, designed for conveying the operator, with speeds of less than 20 miles per
hour, but excluding a bicycle or low-speed electric bicycle.
Sec. 4.6. APPLICABILITY OF TRAFFIC LAWS.
Every person riding a bicycle, tricycle or unicycle upon a roadway is granted all
rights and is subject to all the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle by the laws of
this state declaring rules of the road applicable to vehicles or by the traffic ordinances of
this city applicable to the driver of a vehicle, except as to special regulations in this
chapter and except as to those provisions of laws and ordinances which by their nature
can have no application.
Every person riding or operating a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, skateboard,
longboard, inline or quad skates, or other personal transportation device upon a
roadway is granted all rights and subject to all duties applicable to the driver of a
vehicle, except as otherwise provided by this chapter or where the nature of the device
renders specific provisions inapplicable.
5
Sec. 4.7. NUMBER OF PASSENGERS.
No bicycle, tricycle, or unicycle or personal transportation device shall be used to
carry more than one person unless equipped with a seat for each person carried.
Sec. 4.8. RIDING ON ROADWAYS, SIDEWALKS, BICYCLE PATHS.
(1) Every person operating a bicycle, tricycle, or unicycle or personal
transportation devices upon a roadway shall ride as near to the right-hand side of the
roadway as practicable and safe, exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle
or one proceeding in the same direction.
(2) Persons riding bicycles, tricycles, or unicycles or personal transportation
devices upon a roadway shall not ride more than two (2) abreast except on paths or
parts of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles. Single file when traffic is
heavy.
(3) Persons riding bicycles, tricycles, or unicycles or personal transportation device
upon a bicycle path not affixed to a roadway shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicular
traffic traveling on the public roadways which intersect with the bicycle path. Persons
riding bicycles or personal transportation devices upon a bicycle path which is a
designated lane or part of a roadway shall obey the instructions of official traffic-control
signals, signs, and other control devices applicable to vehicles.
(4) No person shall operate any motor vehicle, including a motorcycle, motor
scooter, 'mo-ped' or motorized bicycle, when under power, upon any sidewalk or bike
path separated from the roadway, except that golf carts may be operated on the
following described portions of bike paths:
(a) The bike path along South Sixteenth Street commencing at the South
Riverside Drive intersection and going north to University Boulevard, across University
Boulevard Elwood Drive and continuing north along the east side of Jack Trice Stadium
to South Fourth Street, across South Fourth Street, and then north to Center Drive;
(b) The bike path along Beach Avenue from South Fourth Street north to
Lincoln Way, across Lincoln Way then north along Wallace Road to its intersection with
Union Drive, then south on Union Drive to Welch Avenue, then along Welch Avenue to
Lincoln Way;
(c) The bike path along Center Drive from University Boulevard Elwood Drive
to Beach Avenue; and
(d) The bike path along University Boulevard Elwood Drive from Center Drive
to South Fourth Street.
This exception to Sec. 4.8(4) shall be in effect from July 23, 1999 through July 29,
1999.
(e) Exception in cases of parades or special events authorized by the City.
See also Section 19.14.
Sec. 4.9. SPEED, OPERATION TO BE REASONABLE AND PRUDENT.
No person shall operate a bicycle, tricycle or unicycle at a speed greater than, or in
a manner other than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.
If a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, or personal transportation device is being used on
6
the roadway, it must adhere to the speed of the roadway and be operated in a manner
that is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.
If a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle or personal transportation device is being used
anywhere other than a roadway, it must not be operated at a speed greater than 20
miles per hour if no other speed limit is posted or applicable, and it must be operated in
a manner that is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.
Sec. 4.10. EMERGING FROM ALLEY, DRIVEWAY, BUILDING.
The operator of a bicycle, tricycle or unicycle or personal transportation device
emerging from an alley, driveway or building shall, upon approaching a sidewalk or the
sidewalk area extending across any alleyway, yield the right-of-way to all pedestrians
approaching on said sidewalk or sidewalk area, and upon entering the roadway shall
yield the right-of-way to all vehicles approaching on said roadway.
Sec. 4.11. CLINGING TO VEHICLES.
No person riding upon any bicycle, tricycle, or unicycle or personal transportation
device shall attach the same or themself to any vehicle or be in any manner towed upon
a roadway, sidewalk, or trail.
Sec. 4.12. CARRYING ARTICLES.
No person operating a bicycle, tricycle, or unicycle or personal transportation
device shall carry any package, bundle, or article which prevents the rider from keeping
at least one hand upon the handlebars, when handlebars are provided.
Sec. 4.13. RIDING ON SIDEWALKS.
It is unlawful for any person to operate a bicycle, tricycle, or unicycles or personal
transportation device upon any sidewalk on the following streets:
Main Street from Duff Avenue to Clark Avenue.
Lincoln Way on the south side thereof from Stanton Avenue to Hayward Avenue.
Hayward Avenue on the east side thereof from Lincoln Way to Hunt Street.
Welch Avenue from Lincoln Way to Knapp Street.
Exception: A person with a disability who uses a wheelchair or other mobility device is
permitted to use such a device on the sidewalks and areas listed above.
See also Section 19.14.
Sec. 4.14. RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PEDESTRIANS ON SIDEWALKS AND SHARED-
USE PATH; SIGNAL REQUIRED.
Whenever any person is riding a bicycle, tricycle, or unicycle or personal
transportation device upon a sidewalk, such person shall yield the right-of-way to any
pedestrian and shall give audible signal before overtaking and passing any such
pedestrian operate in a careful and prudent manner that is safe, respectful, and
responsive to conditions and others using the sidewalk and shared-use path.
Every person operating a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle or personal transportation
device upon a sidewalk and share-use path, shall yield the right-of-way when
7
approaching a pedestrian and shall give an audible signal, such as a voice call and bell,
before overtaking and passing.
Sec. 4.15. BICYCLES, TRICYCLES, UNICYCLES AND PERSONAL
TRANSPORTATION DEVICES PROHIBITED ON GRAND AVENUE.
The riding of bicycles, tricycles, or unicycles or personal transportation devices on
the roadway of Grand Avenue in the City of Ames, Iowa, is prohibited. Any person who
shall rides a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, or personal transportation device on the traveled
portion of the roadway of Grand Avenue between Lincoln Way and 30th Street in the
City of Ames will be in violation of this section.
See also Section 19.14.
Sec. 4.16. LAMPS, REFLECTORS REQUIRED.
Every bicycle, tricycle or unicycle when in use during the hours from sunset to
sunrise shall be equipped with a lamp on the front which shall emit a white light visible
from a distance of at least five hundred (500) feet to the front and with a red reflector or
lamp on the rear which shall be visible three hundred (300) feet to the rear when directly
in front of lawful upper beams of headlamps on a motor vehicle.
Every bicycle, tricycle, unicycle or personal transportation device ridden at any time
from sunset to sunrise and at such other times when conditions such as fog, snow,
sleet, or rain provide insufficient lighting to render clearly discernible persons and
vehicles on the highway at a distance of three hundred feet ahead must be equipped
with a lamp on the front exhibiting a white light visible from a distance of at least three
hundred feet to the front.
Every bicycle, tricycle, unicycle or personal transportation device ridden at any time
from sunset to sunrise and at such other times when conditions such as fog, snow,
sleet, or rain provide insufficient lighting to render clearly discernible persons and
vehicles on the highway at a distance of three hundred feet ahead must be equipped
with a lamp on the rear exhibiting a red light visible from a distance of three hundred
feet to the rear; except that a red reflector may be used in lieu of a rear light.
Equivalent equipment such as headlamps and red-light attachments to the head,
back, are, or leg may be used in lieu of a lamp on the front and a red light on the rear of
the bicycle.
A peace officer riding a police bicycle is not required to use either front or rear lamps if
duty so requires.
Sec. 4.17. BRAKE REQUIRED.
Every bicycle shall be equipped with a brake which will enable the operator to make
the braked wheel skid on dry, level, clean pavement.
Every bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, or personal transportation device operated within
the City boundaries must be able to come to a complete stop within a safe distance.
Sec. 4.18. SIRENS, WHISTLES AND HORNS PROHIBITED.
A bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, or personal transportation device shall not be equipped
8
with, and a person shall not use upon a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, or personal
transportation device any siren, whistle, and horn. This section does not apply to
bicycles, tricycles, unicycles, or personal transportation devices ridden by peace officers
in the line of duty.
Sec. 4.19. PARKING.
No person shall park a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle or personal transportation device
upon a sidewalk, street, or alley in such a manner that provides no adequate path for
pedestrian or motor vehicle travel, or a curb ramp, building entrance, or fire hydrant.
Sec. 4.20. IMPOUNDMENT.
The Police Department may impound the bicycle, tricycle, unicycle or personal
transportation device that is used by any person who creates a hazardous condition
while violating this chapter. If impounded, the bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, or personal
transportation device will be released by the Police Department to the owner if proof of
ownership is shown and any associated fees and charges are paid.
Sec. 4.21. RESPONSIBLE RIDING.
(1) A person must operate a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, or personal
transportation device in a manner that is safe, respectful, and responsive to conditions
of roadways, shared-use paths, sidewalks, and city parks.
(2) A person operating a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, or personal transportation
device must keep it under control at all times.
(3) A person must not operate a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, or personal
transportation device while using a phone or another device which prevents the rider
from keeping at least one hand upon the handlebars, when handlebars are provided.
(4) A person must not operate a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, or personal
transportation device in a manner so as to disregard the safety of the operator, others,
or property.
Sec. 4.22 4.18. PENALTIES FOR OFFENSES PERTAINING TO BICYCLES.
(1) A violation of any provision of Chapter 4, Bicycles and Personal Transportation
Devices, shall be a municipal infraction punishable by a penalty of $50.00 for a person’s
first violation thereof, and a penalty of $100.00 for each repeat violation.
(2) Alternatively, a violation of Chapter 4 can be charged by a peace officer of the
City as a simple misdemeanor.
* * *
9
CHAPTER 19
PARKS AND RECREATION
* * *
Sec. 19.9. UNLAWFUL TO OPERATE A MOTOR VEHICLE IN CITY PARK;
EXCEPTIONS.
It is unlawful for any person, other than authorized personnel, to operate a motor
vehicle as defined in the laws of the state in any public park or pleasure ground
greenway of the city, except upon the streets and parking lots therein which are
specifically designated for motor vehicle travel.
Exception: This section does not apply to manual or powered mobility devices
used by individuals with a disability. Use of Other Power-Drive Mobility Devices
(OPDMDs) by individuals with mobility disabilities are subject to a case-by-case
assessment based on official factors (i.e., device characteristics, park characteristics,
safety requirements, environmental factors, and/or land management).
* * *
Sec. 19.12. BIKE RIDING PROHIBITED IN CERTAIN PARKS.
Bike riding is Riding of bicycles, tricycles, unicycles, and personal transportation
devices, (i.e., manual, electric, etc.) are prohibited in Munn Woods; East River Valley
Park; and in Brookside Park on the Audubon Trail.
See also 19.14.
* * *
Sec. 19.14. PROHIBITED USE OF GEORGIE TSUSHIMA MEMORIAL SKATE
PARK.
(1) No person shall use or have in or on the City Skate Park Georgie Tsushima
Memorial Skate Park any type of bicycle, scooter, coaster, unicycle, sled, vehicle or
other device scooter, coaster, sled, bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, personal transportation
device or vehicle, except for skateboards and in-line roller skates.
(2) Violation of this section shall be a municipal infraction punishable by a penalty
of $50.00 for a first offense, $100 for a second offense, and $200 for each subsequent
offense.
* * * ”
Section Two. Violation of the provisions of this ordinance shall constitute a
municipal infraction punishable as set out by law.
Section Three. All ordinances, or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, if any.
10
Section Four. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication as required by law.
Passed this day of , .
______________________________ _____________________________
John A. Haila, Mayor
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
Passed on:
I, Renee Hall, City Clerk of the City of Ames, Iowa, hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. ______________, passed by the
City Council of said City at the meeting held on ______________________and signed
by the Mayor on ___________________________, and published in the Ames Tribune
on ___________________________.
________________________________
Renee Hall, City Clerk
11
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 1
City of Ames Personal Transportation Survey Results
May 1 – May 16, 2025 | 257 responses
The City of Ames Personal Transportation Survey was open from May 1 – May 16, 2025. The
purpose of this survey was to gather public feedback around bicycles and personal transportation
uses and to use the input to inform any updates to City ordinances around the use of these devices.
Below is a summary of the results from the survey. It is important to note, that ChatGPT was used to
help summarize the results, however, staff has verified that the results of ChatGPT are aligned with
the survey results. There were a few questions with comment boxes where survey respondents could
provide input. The raw results for those are included in Appendix A at the end of this report.
Summary of Key Findings:
1. "Do you live, work or play in Ames? (Check all that apply)"
o The vast majority of respondents (96.34%) live in Ames, indicating the survey captured
opinions primarily from the local community. A high percentage also play (82.93%) and
work (71.14%) in Ames, suggesting a strong connection to the city.
2. "Please select your top three forms of transportation:"
o Traditional transportation methods like Car/vehicle (93.09%) and Walking (84.55%) are
overwhelmingly the most selected.
o Bicycle (52.03%) is also a significant mode of transportation.
o Electric bikes (E-bike: 10.16%) and scooters (E-scooter: 0.81%) were selected as top
forms of transportation by a smaller, but notable, percentage of respondents.
3. "Which of the following do you own and use, or do you see most often used by others?
(Check all that apply)"
o Bicycles, unicycles, or tricycles are widely owned/used or seen by others (69.11%
personally own/use, 26.42% see others use).
o Electric-bikes, electric-unicycles, or electric-tricycles are frequently observed
(64.23% see others use), with a smaller percentage owning/using them (10.98%).
o Electric Scooters are also commonly observed (59.35% see others use), but rarely
personally owned/used (1.63%).
This suggests that while traditional bicycles are very popular, electric -assisted
devices, particularly e-bikes and e-scooters, are a noticeable presence in the
community, often seen rather than owned by respondents.
4. "If applicable, how often do you use the following transportation methods?"
o Cars/vehicles (75.20% Daily) and Walking (62.20% Daily) are used most frequently.
12
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 2
o While bicycles are selected as a top transportation method by many, their daily use
(13.41% for Bicycle, unicycle or tricycle) is lower than cars/walking.
o Electric-assisted devices like electric scooters and other electric-assisted personal
transportation devices are "Never" used or "Do not own/use" by a significant majority,
reinforcing the observation that they are mostly seen rather than personally used by
survey respondents.
5. How safe do you feel about bicycle or personal transportation devices (e-bikes, e-
scooters, electric skateboard, etc.) in your community?
Below is summary of the survey responses about safety perceptions regarding bicycles or
personal transport devices:
o Using these devices
Somewhat safe: 126 (51.6%) | Very safe: 54 (22.1%) | Unsafe: 22 (9%)
Very unsafe: 15 (6.1%) | Do not use / no opinion: 27 (11%)
o Being around these devices on the sidewalk
Somewhat safe: 116 (47.5%) | Very safe: 50 (20.4%) | Unsafe: 51 (20.9%)
Very unsafe: 23 (9%) | Do not use / no opinion: 4 (1.6%)
o Being around these devices on a park path or trail
Somewhat safe: 109 (44.6%) | Very safe: 82 (33.6%) | Unsafe: 27 (11%)
Very unsafe: 18 (7.3%) | Do not use / no opinion: 8 (3.2%)
Overall, people generally feel “somewhat safe” both using and being around these devices,
with more confidence on park paths/trails than sidewalks.
There was a comment box available for this question where respondents could provide
additional comments on comfortability of riding personal transportation devices. Here’s a short
summary of the comments analyzed by ChatGPT. The raw data is included in Appendix A.
Main Concerns
Speed & Silence: E-bikes/scooters move too fast and quietly, startling pedestrians.
Unsafe Sidewalk Use: Many want motorized devices banned from sidewalks —too
narrow and dangerous.
Reckless Behavior: Riders often ignore traffic rules, don’t announce themselves, and
show little courtesy.
Poor Infrastructure: Roads feel unsafe; there’s a strong need for more and better bike
lanes and trail connections.
Driver Danger: Cars are still the biggest threat to cyclists and micromobility users.
Support & Suggestions
Many support micromobility for affordability and sustainability.
Safety depends more on operator behavior and infrastructure than the device.
13
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 3
Suggestions include: speed limits, banning high-powered devices from sidewalks, better
signage, and rider education.
6. "What would your level of comfort be with riding a personal transportation device (ex. e -
scooter, e-bike) on each of the following types of bike facilities?"
o Parks and trails (53.66% Very comfortable, 26.02% Somewhat comfortable) are the
most comfortable places to ride.
o City bike lanes show mixed comfort (28.05% Somewhat comfortable, 23.17% Very
comfortable, but also 20.73% Very uncomfortable, 22.36% Somewhat uncomfortable).
14
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 4
o Roadway (on the street) is largely uncomfortable (41.06% Very uncomfortable,
20.73% Somewhat uncomfortable).
o Sidewalks are also a concern, with a nearly even split between comfortable (31.71%
Somewhat, 21.54% Very) and uncomfortable (19.51% Somewhat, 21.54% Very). This
indicates strong conflicting views on sidewalk usage.
There was a comment box available for this question where respondents could provide
additional comments on comfortability of riding personal transportation devices. Here’s a short
summary of the comments analyzed by ChatGPT. The raw data is included in Appendix A.
Safety concerns: Many riders feel unsafe on busy streets with heavy traffic, especially
where bike lanes are narrow, unprotected, or poorly maintained. Intersect ions and
crossings increase risk. Distracted or aggressive drivers and debris in bike lanes add to
discomfort.
Bike lane design: Numerous comments call for physically separated bike lanes with
barriers to protect riders from cars, rather than just painted lines. Current bike lanes are
often seen as inadequate, unsafe, or wasted resources.
Sidewalk use: Most agree sidewalks are primarily for pedestrians and feel uncomfortable
or unsafe biking on them. Shared use of sidewalks or multi-use paths can cause conflicts
due to speed differences and unpredictability of pedestrians and pets.
Rider skill and etiquette: Comfort varies with rider ability, courtesy, and adherence to
laws. Poor etiquette and inconsistent behavior among riders and drivers contribute to
conflicts and discomfort.
Infrastructure needs: There is a desire for more and better bike lanes and multi-use trails
that are wide, well-maintained, and separated from traffic. Some users prefer multi-use
paths with fewer pedestrians over busy streets.
Vehicle interaction: Many express distrust of drivers’ awareness of bikers and lack of
consistent rules on how to share the road or trails safely.
E-bikes and personal devices: Concerns about the safety and appropriateness of e-bikes
and e-scooters on sidewalks and trails, both for riders and pedestrians.
Variability in comfort: Comfort levels depend heavily on location, infrastructure quality,
and traffic conditions. Some roads and trails are considered much safer or more enjoyable
than others.
Desire for education and clarity: Some users want clearer guidelines on how to navigate
bike lanes, multi-use paths, and shared spaces safely.
General sentiment: Riders want safer, more separated, and better-maintained facilities to
feel comfortable biking or using PTDs in the city.
7. "Should there be a size restriction (dimensions and/or weight) on the size of the
personal transportation devices allowed to operate in the city?"
o A majority (58.37%) responded "No" to size restrictions, while 41.63% supported them.
15
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 5
There was a comment box available for this question where respondents could provide
additional comments on size restrictions. Here’s a short summary of the comments analyzed
by ChatGPT. The raw data is included in Appendix A.
General Sentiment
Mixed opinions: Some support size restrictions, others are against them or unsure;
however, the majority of respondents who provided comments agree that size and
weight restrictions on personal electric transportation devices (PTDs) should be
considered to ensure pedestrian safety and comfort, especially on sidewalks and
shared-use trails.
Many think speed and behavior are more important safety factors than size alone.
Support for Restrictions
Devices should not be too wide or heavy to safely share sidewalks or trails.
Large, vehicle-like devices (e.g. golf carts, four-wheelers, electric motorcycles)
should not be allowed on multi-use paths or sidewalks.
Suggestions include setting limits based on width, weight, or speed.
Concerns About Restrictions
Could limit access for people with disabilities or lower-income users.
Hard to enforce fairly, especially with custom or ADA mobility devices.
Risk of overregulation discouraging non-car transportation.
Key Suggestions
Restrict by speed and function, not just size.
Make exceptions for ADA devices and special needs.
Create guidance based on where devices are used (e.g., streets vs. trails).
8. "Should there be a speed limit to how fast users (human-powered and/or electric-
assisted personal transportation users) can ride on:"
o City bike lanes: Opinions are split, with a significant portion suggesting "No speed limit"
(39.84%), but also suggestions for 15 mph (17.48%), 20 mph (11.38%), and 10 mph
(8.13%).
o Sidewalk: There is strong support for "Less than 10 mph" (41.46%) and "10 mph"
(19.92%), indicating a clear preference for lower speeds or restrictions on sidewalks.
"No speed limit" on sidewalks has very low support (8.13%).
o Specific area(s) of the City: "No speed limit" (24.39%) and "Less than 10 mph"
(12.60%) or "10 mph" (11.79%) are common suggestions.
16
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 6
There was a comment box available for this question where respondents could provide
additional comments on speed. Here’s a short summary of the comments analyzed by
ChatGPT. The raw data is included in Appendix A.
Most respondents support speed limits for e-bikes and other personal transport devices
(PTDs), particularly in areas with heavy pedestrian traffic like downtown, campus, parks, and
shared-use trails. Many emphasize:
Context-based limits: Speed should depend on area type (e.g., lower in busy pedestrian
zones, higher on open trails or protected bike lanes).
Safety concerns: High speeds on sidewalks and trails can endanger pedestrians.
Enforcement challenges: Many devices lack speedometers, making enforcement difficult.
Common sense and etiquette: Some feel formal limits aren't needed if users act
responsibly and courteously.
Separate infrastructure: Some suggest designated lanes or signage to separate fast -
moving PTDs from pedestrians.
A few believe speed isn’t the main issue—rule-following and behavior are more important.
9. Have you experienced or witnessed any issues with the personal transportation use?
Most common concerns
Unsafe riding: 130
Collisions or close calls with vehicles: 126
Collisions or close calls with pedestrians: 103
Underaged or inexperienced riders: 80
Devices lacking safety measures (lighting, braking, etc.): 79
Sidewalk cluttering: 76
Collisions or close calls with other bikes/devices: 60
Less common concerns
Riders carrying too many things: 33
Miscellaneous/other issues (reported once each):
o Cell phone use, ignoring rules, running stop signs/lights
o Poor infrastructure (cracked sidewalks/roads)
o Riding in prohibited areas (e.g., trails in East River Valley Park)
o Reference to homelessness
Overall, the top concerns are unsafe riding and conflicts with vehicles and pedestrians,
followed by inexperienced riders and inadequate device safety features.
10. Are there other safety concerns that you have about these use of personal
transportation devices?
17
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 7
This was an open-ended question with a comment box. Here’s are some summary results
analyzed by ChatGPT. The raw data is included in Appendix A.
Here is a short summary of responses:
Top Safety Concerns with E-bikes, Scooters, etc.
Speed & Recklessness: Going too fast, especially on sidewalks/trails.
Pedestrian Conflicts: Quiet, sudden approaches; lack of warnings when passing.
Cars & Roads: Drivers not yielding, unsafe intersections, poor bike lanes.
Rules & Etiquette: Riders ignoring traffic laws; little knowledge of etiquette.
Gear & Visibility: Few helmets, poor lighting, distracted riders.
Infrastructure Issues: Sidewalk clutter, need for protected lanes/crossings.
Overall: Main worries are speed, lack of etiquette, and unsafe interactions with both
pedestrians and cars, worsened by weak infrastructure.
Here is a longer summary of the feedback:
Key Themes
1. Speed & Recklessness
o Going too fast on sidewalks, trails, and bike paths.
o Riders weaving unpredictably, passing too close, or riding side by side.
o Inexperienced or young riders operating devices unsafely.
2. Pedestrian Safety
o Conflicts on sidewalks and crowded areas, especially near campus.
o Riders startling pedestrians because devices are quiet and approach
suddenly.
o Lack of warning (bells, verbal signals) when passing.
3. Car & Road Interactions
o Drivers not yielding to bikes/scooters at crossings or stop signs.
o Right turns on red creating hazards.
o Bike lanes too narrow, inconsistent, or nonexistent.
o Overall street design prioritizing cars over bikes/scooters.
4. Rules, Etiquette & Enforcement
o Riders ignoring traffic signals, stop signs, or right-of-way rules.
o Lack of knowledge of trail etiquette and city laws.
o Calls for education, licensing, or training.
o Difficulty enforcing speed limits.
5. Protective Gear & Visibility
18
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 8
o Lack of helmets.
o Poor lighting or no reflectors at night.
o Riders distracted by phones or headphones.
6. Infrastructure & Policy
o Concern about scooter rental programs causing sidewalk clutter.
o Desire for separated bike lanes, protected crossings, and better trail design.
o Some suggesting “no turn on red” rules or traffic calming measures.
o Calls for overpasses/underpasses at busy crossings.
7. Mixed Views
o Some feel personal transportation devices are not a major concern compared
to cars.
o Others believe they should not be on sidewalks at all (except ADA devices).
o A few said they’ve had no problems personally.
In short: The top concerns are speed, lack of rider etiquette, and unsafe interactions with both
pedestrians and cars—made worse by limited bike infrastructure.
11. "What other things should the City consider as it relates to regulating bicycle and
personal transportation device use in the City of Ames?"
This was an open-ended question with a comment box. Here’s are some summary results
analyzed by ChatGPT. The raw data is included in Appendix A.
1. Consistent and clear regulations:
Same rules for bikes, e-bikes, personal devices, LSVs
Licensing and fines for violations
Age restrictions and supervision for young users
2. Safety equipment requirements:
Helmets, lights, reflectors, braking gear
3. Speed limits and enforcement:
Reasonable speed limits for devices (e.g., 10–25 mph)
Enforcement of traffic laws for all users (bikers, motorists, scooter riders)
Ticketing motorists and riders who break rules
4. Infrastructure improvements:
More and better-connected bike lanes and trails
Protected/separated bike lanes with physical barriers
Safer, clearer intersections and crossings
Maintenance of trails and sidewalks (repair, debris removal)
Designated bike/pedestrian lanes with clear markings and wayfinding
19
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 9
5. Encouragement of alternative transportation:
Promote use of bikes and personal devices over cars
Avoid over-regulation that discourages ridership
Provide education and maintenance workshops
Consider commuter trails to workplaces and ISU
6. Separation of transportation modes:
Avoid mixing fast and slow users on same paths or roads
Encourage secondary routes for bikes and devices instead of busy streets
7. User behavior and education:
Training or safety courses, especially for e-bike users
Promote etiquette like slower traffic keep right, signaling, yielding
Address distracted riding and driving
8. Focus on motor vehicle regulation:
Greater enforcement and awareness of motorists ’ responsibilities toward cyclists and
pedestrians
Emphasize that cars pose the biggest danger
9. Accessibility and inclusivity:
Consider ADA issues and safety for disabled users
Ensure regulations do not disproportionately limit alternative transportation
10. Community involvement and enforcement:
Citizen patrols or involvement in problem areas
Coordination with ISU and enforcement across jurisdictions
11. Additional concerns:
Address clutter from rental bikes/scooters
Improve safety at specific problematic intersections
Consider noise and pollution from gas-powered bikes
Recommendations for Ordinances:
Based on these findings, here are recommendations for ordinances to enhance the safety of riders
and pedestrians:
1. Designated Usage Areas & Restrictions:
o Prioritize Parks and Trails for Personal Transportation Devices: Given the high
comfort levels, encourage the use of personal transportation devices on parks and
trails.
20
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 10
o Restrict or Prohibit Personal Transportation Devices on Sidewalks, Especially for
Faster Devices: The data strongly suggests discomfort and calls for low speed limits on
sidewalks. Ordinances should explicitly define where devices are allowed. Consider
prohibiting e-scooters and e-bikes on sidewalks, or limiting their speed to walking pace
(e.g., 5-8 mph) where allowed. This directly addresses p edestrian safety concerns.
o Clarify Rules for City Bike Lanes: While there's mixed comfort, city bike lanes are a
primary intended space. Ordinances could clearly state speed limits and etiquette for
sharing these lanes between different types of users (e.g., traditional bikes and faster e-
devices).
o Discourage Roadway (on the street) Use for Less Visible/Slower Devices: Due to
high discomfort with riding on roadways, ordinances should emphasize proper visibility
and road rules for devices permitted on streets.
2. Speed Limits:
o Implement Low Speed Limits on Sidewalks: This is the most crucial speed-related
ordinance for pedestrian safety. A limit of 10 mph or less (e.g., 5-8 mph) is strongly
supported and aligns with pedestrian comfort.
o Consider Differentiated Speed Limits for Bike Lanes: While "No speed limit" was
popular, a significant portion suggested limits. The city could consider a reasonable
speed limit for bike lanes (e.g., 15-20 mph) that balances efficiency for riders with safety
for all users.
o Define Speed Limits for Specific Areas (e.g., Downtown, High-Traffic Zones):
Based on the "Specific area(s)" responses, identifying areas where lower speeds are
necessary could enhance safety.
3. Education and Enforcement:
o Safety Education: Consider implementing mandatory online safety courses or
information dissemination for riders, especially for those operating higher -speed or
rental devices, aligning with community suggestions.
o Rules of the Road and Pedestrian Etiquette: Ordinances should clearly outline rules
for passing, yielding, and respecting pedestrian space, particularly on shared paths.
o Enhanced Enforcement: Address concerns about reckless behavior and non-
compliance with existing traffic laws. Clear signage and consistent enforcement of new
ordinances will be vital.
4. Infrastructure Improvements (Beyond Ordinances but Related):
o Continue Investing in Dedicated Infrastructure: The high comfort levels on parks and
trails suggest that dedicated paths are effective. Continued investment in separated
bike lanes and multi-use trails can encourage safer usage patterns and reduce conflicts.
21
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 11
o Improve Intersections: Address concerns about car interactions at stop signs and
intersections through infrastructure design and public a wareness campaigns.
By implementing ordinances that are informed by these community perspectives, Ames can create a
safer environment for both personal transportation device riders and pedestrians.
22
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 12
Demographics of Survey Respondents
What is your age group?
Count % of Total
No response 8 3.25%
0-18 1 0.41%
19-30 52 21.14%
31-40 32 13.01%
41-50 29 11.79%
50-65 61 24.80%
65+ 63 25.61%
Total 246 100.00%
What Zip Code do you live in?
Count % of Total
No response 8 3.25%
50010 160 65.04%
50012 1 0.41%
50014 72 29.27%
Other: 50023 1 0.41%
Other: 50105 1 0.41%
Other: 50223 1 0.41%
Other: 50278 1 0.41%
Other: 55020 1 0.41%
Total 246 100.00%
Do you identify as someone with a disability?
Count % of Total
No response 10 4.07%
No 221 89.84%
Yes 15 6.10%
Total 246 100.00%
What is your annual household income?
Row Labels Count % of Total
No response 8 3.25%
$100,000–$149,999 45 18.29%
$150,000+ 45 18.29%
$25,000–$49,999 20 8.13%
$50,000–$74,999 31 12.60%
$75,000–$99,999 39 15.85%
Prefer not to say 40 16.26%
Under $25,000 18 7.32%
Grand Total 246 100.00%
23
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 13
Appendix A: Raw Data from Survey Fields where an
Open Comment Box was Available
Question 5: Comments on Device Safety
1 When walking on a large street with marked bike lanes, occasionally a biker comes up behind
me on the sidewalk without any notice to me to be aware.
2 Just as with cars, safety depends on the operator.
3 Ban these on sidewalks and streets
4 I notice a lack of communication and safety from people who bike occasionally.
5 I don’t always hear other bicyclists coming behind me. Electric bikes especially come up
quickly
6 Transportation such as E-bikes, e-scooters are an excellent form of transportation. They are
economical and much more efficient than using a car. Many people can't afford cars.
7
Although I always watch out and yield to pedestrians, many students on campus will zoom by
and it scares me that they might run into me on my bike. I feel comfortable around these
devices until someone decides that they don't care about anyone else zooms by. Most of the
time they seem to not watch out for others, look around the corner, or look before crossing a
pedestrian intersection. I feel comfortable when there is plenty of space on the path but it gets
concerning when they're trying to do this during a passing period. Throughout Ames, I feel very
comfortable biking, I have very few issues with the exception of intersections on Lincoln Way.
Bikes are not thought about in any way or form and makes it difficult as a bicyclist when
intersections aren't designed for you. Pedestrians don't want you on the sidewalk and cars
aren't looking for you. Cars don't want you on the road and I don't want to be there when most
are going 40 in a 35, or 30 in a 25. Lincoln is designed for cars. I have had several issues with
Lincoln and South Dakota, crossing west from the south east side. I've been hit once and
almost hit on several other occasions. As someone who takes this route on a daily basis, cars
aren't looking out for bikes or pedestrians. I've gotten to the point that even when I have the
right of way, I wait there for a minute to ensure that the cars there will look at me,
acknowledging that I'm there. I also have to watch for cars turning left from the east and cars
turning right from the west. The answer may be that I go slower, but cars still manage to start
turning, stop in the intersection, and slam on there breaks. It's also not a visibility issue
because I have several reflectors and keep a bike light on both front and back of my bike. I
would love a no turn on red here because throughout this entire year, it has been consistent.
8 Problem is car not yielding at pedestrian crossings
9 More congestion ==> less safe
10 The speed of electric PTDs is incompatible with pedestrians and with vehicles.
11 Concerned with distracted drivers at intersections
12 Many people do not use trail etiquette or follow traffic laws
13 Speed and operator behavior (just like autos) are the driving issues re safety
14 My walking on trails in Brookside Park and Ada Hayden stopped because of bikes whizzing by
me, causing fear and distress. Bikers do not properly announce themselves, nor take any care
for how they ride on roadways; they weave in and out of traffic, which is scary.
15 Many users of these devices do not know or do not care to follow laws or safety practices.
16 Depends on the operator
17 Given sufficient warning and awareness, I feel very safe around these devices. I also feel that
requiring users to carry a bell/alerting device is problematic, and would like to see more
outreach and education instead.
18 I want better bike lanes. Ones with a disconnection to the road.
24
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 14
19 Hard to say as I don’t feel I encounter that many
20 Never know if they should be in the road like a car or on the sidewalk or trail.
21 Not any more or less safe then regular bikes
22 Car drivers don’t care, see, or know about pedestrians/bicyclists rights/traffic laws in Ames.
People should use more reflectors and bicycles lights when dark.
23 Ok at Hayden where the path is wide enough to pass and there are no intersections to cross.
Most bike paths around town are very unsafe
24 excessive speeds create safety concerns
25 I do NOT feel safe in the roads or on bike lanes, no matter what I use. Drivers are not safe,
caring, or provide enough distance to feel safe.
26 Great on trails that are wide enough to accommodate, otherwise, they don't mix well with
walking.
27 Overall I don’t have a problem with people using them.
28 Most of my safety issues are due to the operator of these devices. Some do not show
courtsey to others of the sidewalks or paths.
29 Cars are always the greatest danger. Physical barriers between cars and pedestrians/cyclists
is the best solution. Bollards and curbs. Bikes that have throttles should not be considered
bicycles and should not be on sidewalks. If the bike does not have pedals and cranks as the
main source of propulsion, it is a motorcycle and should be banned from sidewalks and paths.
30 Condition and upkeep of mix-used paths and trails is a concern
31 It all depends on everyone following the same courtesy in sharing and using spaces.
32 Lack of safety is due to poor infrastructure, not the devices themselves. Safety varies widely at
different locations.
33 Not all users of these devices stay on the road. and they are reckless on the sidewalks. And
many users run the STOP SIGNS not everyone has safety in mind
34 Can't always hear when such a device is approaching from the rear.
35 As long as used with respect for others
36 Crash force is determined by speed, regardless of whether the device has propulsion
assistance. There is no reason to exclude a certain e -bicycle category.
37 We need a bike trail that connects to the High Trestle Trail. This would reduce bike traffic at
Ada Hayden.
38 Mixing speeds creates risk. Adding power to devices adds risk. Mixing power/no power and
speeds is tricky to navigate.
39 Add ordinances to Keep all of these PTDs off sidewalks!
40 I don't feel safe sharing a road with a car when on a bicycle. (bicycle lane). Due to cell phones
and car entertainment.
41 Primary bike paths should NEVER be adjacent to a high traffic street. Offset bikes to side
streets to increase the level of safety for both bikers and autos.
42 I see students in/around ISU zooming on those stand up electric scooters. way too fast and
shooting thru lights and crosswalks all the time
43 Many cyclists do not understand the “shared” aspect of shared use paths. I’ve never seen an
e-scooter rider slow or yield right of way. They are too fast and too small to be visible on a city
street.
44 My biggest concern for safety is related to vehicular traffic (speed, distracted drivers, rude and
reckless, etc.)
45 Don’t trust drivers to pay attention to road (many are distracted drivers), so feel have to ride
defensively
46 No one follows any rules as no one knows rules of the road
25
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 15
47 Questions unclear about the perspective of safety. Is it personal safety or the safety of the
individuals on these devices. Disappointed in the lack of precision in this survey. Questions
poorly worded and unclear.
48 Didn't ask me about safety when they're on the roadway. The unpredictability of these
operators makes them very unsafe on the roadway.
49 More bike lanes would be great and safer!
50 i feel safer when the “rules” are clearly communicated to car drivers. any unsafe conditions i’ve
met are the result of angry cars.
51 Sometimes they can get in the way on the sidewalks or seemingly come out of no where
52 I feel like the people using them don't pay attention and i almost always get ran over by them
or they almost always seem to cause accidents or traffic issues
53 Many EBike riders are inexperienced riding at the speed these devices travel.
54 I generally feel safe when I ride my bike on trails and multi-use paths, but feel more unsafe on
the road and feel that there is a lot of uncertainty around expectations of use.
55 I would rather see more dedicated multimodal lanes (bike lanes) and keep t hese vehicles off
the sidewalk, especially if they are motorized.
56 I feel safe using them. I wish sidewalks were wider. During peak busy times it gets quite
crowed and I'm afriad I'm going to get hit.
57 Wearing a helmet is important.
58 A truck ran into me on my bike while I was on the bike path on S. 4th St. The alleyway opened
on on the bike path. As I began rolling away after falling off the bike, luckily the pickup driver
stopped after hearing the bike drag under his truck with less than 2 feet from his passenger
side front tire rolling over my chest. Clutered alleyways should nor open up onto a bike path!
59 Wheels and walking don’t mix
60 Speed and refusal of some to announce their presence (on your left) are my pet peeves
61 Ames needs more bike trails and they need to connect to each other. I don’t feel safe riding on
streets, even with bike lanes as drivers are too distracted.
62 The paths at Ada Hayden do not feel as safe now for walking.
63 It would be nice if they would obey the traffic laws and stop at stop lights signs.
64 It’s not sp much the presence of these devices but the speed at which they operate and the
silent running of the electric one. This is dangerous to all walkers at all times when the speeds
are too high.
65 These types of electric personal transportation are too fast on sidewalks and park paths.
66 Cars don’t know how to drive around bikes. The problem is not bikes….
67 I am/was expert bicyclist, I have been on e-cycle, have never tried others, but respect those
who can use them. I might be a safety hazard if I was on some of them, but the young folks I
see using them are good at it, though I have seen a cut corners, etc.They are much better than
everyone trying to use automobile for short trips.
68 Biggest concerns are electric scooters used on sidewalks and cars that are not attentive to
bicycles.
69 Some of the mixed use paths can feel a bit unsafe if there is high traffic and mixed of regular
and electric bike/scooter.. Some of the roads that are bike routes do not feel as safe as they
could.
70 Around Ames, most people on bikes are courteous enough to navigate around me as I'm
walking on the sidewalk. On campus, people are never courteous about anything.
71 electric powered devices are fast and quiet and are dangours to those walking with small
children or anyone with difficult walking. They should be banned from all sidewalks and paths,
unless speed restricted and automated bells installed to alert others.
72 definitely safer than the silly enormous trucks people drive
26
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 16
73 bicycles should not be on the roads unless there is a designated bike lane, especially roads
without a shoulder.
74 In my experience, individuals on e-bikes and e-scooters fall into two categories: those who
have mobility impairment and those who are looking for fast and novel transportation. I love
seeing e-vehicles improve the lives of individuals who otherwise may not be able to get out and
enjoy cycling or scooting. On the other hand, I have personally witnessed, young, capable
riders behaving recklessly on e-vehicles. They do not respect pedestrians, perform dangerous
maneuvers, do not wear helmets or other protective gear, do not follow bike/scooter rules, and
are all together a dangerous nuisance. I know it's a challenge to police this, but e-vehicles
require some level of basic intelligence to ride in public.
75 If I didn't have a commute to get to Ames I would consider using one of these devices.
76 Ebike riders go way to fast and drive like idiots on the walking / biking trails. Cost me $100 for
a new bike wheel.
77 Users of these devices can be reckless on sidewalks and trails when passing pedestrians.
78 With regards to using: there are some locations, mostly busy streets with high vehicle traffic
where I do not feel completely safe. I have no issue being around these devices on a path/trail
that is wide enough, provided the users are being responsible, but a standard sidewalk is
generally to narrow to allow these modes and walking to mix comfortably.
79 E-assist only. No fully electric should be on sidewalks or paths
80 our car got hit by a scooter on the road that was performing tricks and lost control
81 I think there is nuance here. Someone using an electric assist bike to take a ride on trails is
different than someone using a fully powered electric bike or scooter on trails at higher speeds.
I don't believe fully motorized vehicles that travel at high speeds belong on s idewalks and bike
paths.
82 To many residentially challenged people/homeless. They are unpredictable and can be
dangerous at times. They don’t move off of sidewalks; are in the way loitering.
83 Sidewalks are for walkers, strollers , dog walkers, and small young children learning to play on
wheeled toys
84 Walkers need to listen more for when a cyclist says "On Your Left". Most times they have
earbuds in and never hear me.
Question XXXXX: Comments on Comfortability
1 Some bike lanes are placed on heavily used streets with heavy traffic ... buses, trucks.
2 Auto drivers don’t always respect bike lanes or riders.
3 I don't want to bike on sidewalks
4
Cars are extremely dangerous. Bike lanes should have physical barriers to protect against
cars.
5 Sidewalks for walking
6 Being focused and aware to conditions and surroundings.
7 I do not own an electric bike
8 Most bikers get hurt or worse when they are on a road or street.
9 intersections ==> greater risk
10
PTDs on sidewalks and trails make pedestrians uncomfortable. I also can’t picture a PTD user
feeling comfortable in a bike lane or on the street.
11
Riders vary in ability and their willingness to follow protocol, I.e. “Hi, I’m on your left”. Makes a
huge difference when walking on paved trails and sidewalks.
27
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 17
12
I own a bicycle and could commute with it from my home to my job, but feel uncomfortable
being around vehicle traffic in Ames (due to lack of bike lanes, my own lack of knowledge
about how to bike with vehicle traffic around, and bicyclists/drivers not being on the same
page)
13 Many use conflicts due to varying speeds and lack of etiquette or following lawd
14
Proximity to traffic (incl other PTD/peds) and speed differentials are fundamental issues, Re
sidewalk use, driveway cuts are an additional problem
15
Honestly, the street provides more space to be SEEN and to maneuver while riding a bike. The
bike trails are too narrow and compete with walkers, that can suddenly fling their arms out or
move to the other side suddenly as you are coming up fast behind them bc they can't hear you.
16
Car drivers are often distracted and either drift into bike lanes or turn across them without
looking. Device users still need to follow laws and safety practices.
17
The more separate and spacious the route, the more comfortable. If the route has to be
shared, I’d much rather with pedestrians than motor vehicles.
18 Please give us better bike lanes with a disconnection from the road.
19 It’s more comfortable to bike on the sidewalk, but ultimately not a good idea for a city to allow
20 do people understand the city bike lanes?
21 Entirely depends on the operator's skill and courtesy
22
Sidewalks are for pedestrians and too narrow to accommodate faster devices meeting or
passing. Bikes and cars don't mix safely! Ames streets are too congested and drivers don't
always see bikes (or walkers or motorcycles for that matter)
23 excessive speeds and cellphone distractions
24
Bike lanes are narrow and cars passing can be tenuous and dangerous. Better to be in the
road instead, or some other wider trail (preferred).
25
Sidewalks are the safest. Hearing that certain sidewalk areas are not for riding makes me drive
more often.
26
The sidewalks and paths can be dangerous when the operators do not follow common sense
and traffic laws
27 Availability and suitability of designated bike lanes is a concern
28
WHen on my e-bike, I do not trust car drives to see me, especially car drivers who are
distracted drivers with cellphones.
29 Comfort varies widely depending on location.
30
on North Duff, I have had cars pass me on the right, using the bike lane north of the Miracle
Park. any bike or Parked car could be hit.
31 Need more bike trails and lanes. Bikes don’t belong on sidewalks.
32
Paint stripes for street PDT lanes are FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY. Add curbs to separate
cars and busses.
33
Bikes and autos (including trucks and semis) should never occupy the same piece of roadway
or share lanes.
34
bike lanes are a waste of money. and I am a regular bike rider. people do not ride their bikes
on roads because there is a bike lane there
35 Crossing busy streets is scary
36 Sidewalks are for pedestrians, so feel awkward riding bike on sidewalks
37 Don' t trust others on the road
38
Sidewalks are for pedestrians, the very young, and the very old. Wheeled vehicles should be
on the street with the slowest to the farthest right..
39
I don’t feel safe riding my bike on roads in Ames. I live on South Duff and it is impossible to get
anywhere without biking on the road. Sidewalks on duff are in bad condition, too narrow, or just
nonexistent.
28
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 18
40 More bike lanes would mean less sidewalk congestion without hindering vehicle traffic.
41
more comfortable/safe with wide multi use paved sidewalks than narrower residential
sidewalks
42
Not comfortable at all riding on busy streets which have a bike lane. Southbound Duff is better
because there is a mostly unoccupied parking lane. Northbound Duff is dangerous in my
opinion and the multi-use trail ends at Inis Grove. Then, you either have to cross Duff and get
on the sidewalk or get in a bike lane which is uneven and full of weeds and debris. 24th Street
is nice and wide, with parking allowed, it is good.
43 I have noticed bike lanes occasionally have debris in them most commonly broken glass
44
Ames bike lanes are unusable and unsafe. I do not and will not ride them on a bike and
wouldn't on an EBike either. Poor design and waste of space.
45
I wish wide sidewalk so that pedestrian and bike can share comfortably. I don't like to ride the
bike on the bile lanes that is part of the street.
46
I feel most comfortable on multi-use paths that don't have many pedestrians. However, it
becomes unclear at intersections who has the right of way, and regardless of being on the road
or a trail, drivers are unsure whether to treat bikers as pedestrians or vehicles. Generally, any
kind of riding on roads where vehicles are at a much faster speed can feel unsafe and I prefer
multi-use paths for that reason. Similarly, I'm unsure of etiquette on paths that have
pedestrians, but are clearly wide enough to have a cyclist pass without any change from
walkers.
47
I really don't like riding on the sidewalks, I always fear a walker will move unexpectedly, I'll be
attacked by a startled dog, etc.
48
I only worry about spaces when it gets very busy. I don't want to hit any pedrestrains and I
don't want to get hit by a car.
49 Keep Ada Hayden walking only; let the other bike trails in city have bikes etc
50 Some of the bike paths are really narrow.
51 I don't feel e-scooters & e-bikes are safe on sidewalks or walking trails.
52
I would be uncomfortable on the trails or sidewalks because I think I could be a danger to
pedestrians.
53 I do not have experience on these, but think, with some quick training, I could handle most
54
On street bike lanes are uneven and unsafe to ride on both from a surface and traffic proximity
standpoint.
55
bikes are not supposed to be used on sidewalks, right? I am very comfortable with bike or e -
bike on less busy streets.
56 I try not to bike on the sidewalk since I know you're not supposed to.
57 bikes lanes are useless without physical barriers to stop motor vehicles from enter them
58 devices with electric motors that go faster than a walk should be used in the street.
59
I don't expect drivers to know how to treat bikes on the roadway. Also lots of debris that is bad
for tires.
60
bicycles should not be on the roads unless there is a designated bike lane, especially roads
without a shoulder.
61
Not knowing always what is ahead on narrow and curving sidewalks and trails, I would feel
unsafe moving on an e-vehicle in these areas. Especially considering areas where families
walk with young children and unpredictable pets on and off leash.
62 I don't ride them but if I did I would ride responsibly.
63
City bike lanes are mostly unprotected, are sparse, and some people drive their cars in them.
Bus stops also cross them and I don't think that's safe. I don't feel comfortable biking in the
street with cars behind me. Sidewalks are ok, but can be a bit too narrow for comfort.
29
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 19
64
Bike lanes are out of control in this community. We 16th & Duff northbound just backs up
traffic. Waste of taxpayer funds to make a bike land there.
65
Bike lanes: depends on the level and speed of the traffic; sidewalks: uncomfortable if there is
any pedestrian traffic.
66 Some of the paths could use some TLC.
67
I do not feel comfortable on a bike lane that is on an HMA street with curb and gutter. The joint
down the middle of the lane is dangerous
68 Sidewalks are for walkers, strollers, dog walkers, small children
69 Depends on the road, some roads are uncomfortable to ride on
70
Absolutely love the paved and singletrack bike trails. Would love a long paved bike trail on the
outskirts of Ames you could ride without having to stop for roads so often like in the heart of
Ames.
Question 7: Comments on size restrictions:
1 I would own a low speed EV if the city allowed them.
2 Not sure about this
3 E-bikes and E-scooters are the perfect size for personal transportation.
4
Size and weight should be resticted such that it would not be an increased danger or
inconvenience to pedestrians compared to normal bikes.
5
I don’t know exactly what devices this question refers to, however, it makes sense on shared
use trails to have enough room for safety and comfort.
6
Size doesn't matter, they say, but larger PTDs (beyond a bike with a child carrier trailer) should
use the streets
7 I am unaware of oversized/overpowered devices of this kind being an issue in Ames.
8 But not totally sure about larger golf cart type vehicles for safety
9
something like a bike is fine, but something like an electric four wheeler is way to big. Two
people passing on the pathway should be the thing considered.
10 Are you talking about on streets (no) or on bike paths, trails? (then yes)
11
Too many shapes and sizes of personal electric vehicle for size to be restricted, More weight
usually just means more battery/distance for a PEV.
12
I do not see this being a problem. Instead, it would be more beneficial to have size restrictions
on vehicles for parking in places like Downtown / Main Street, as big trucks and hitches often
jut into the roadway.
13
Not so much physical size, but there should be a limit to total weight. Speed is a bigger
concern for me, however.
14
This couldn't be enforced without adding more to the budget for manpower and equipment.
Even then it probably wouldn't be enforced and turn into another waste of taxpayer money.
15
I feel that if the electric scooter/bike/etc. is allowed on bike path/ sidewalks there should be
restrictions to avoid problems with others using the path.
16
It's difficult to share the sidewalks and paths when coming upon groups who do not show
courtsey to others of the same path. Without a size restriction this will only make it more
difficult.
17 Bicycles should not weight more that 100 lbs.
18
Not sure there needs to be a size restriction, but guidance as to where various sizes of
personal transportation devices can be allowed to operate. Certainly want a person's needs to
be accommodated; but also being mindful of the safety in mixed traffic.
30
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 20
19
Where do you begin to draw the line on this? (My e-bike weighs 60-lbs, and it cannot exceed
19.9 mph because it is equipped with a governor.)
20
I can imagine inappropriately sized devices, but the question is too broad to agree with
outright.
21
Large people who are trying to lose weight should not be ostracized by pedestrians. Larger
people required larger equipment
22
When considering size restrictions, keep in mind that there are people who use four -wheeled
mobility scooters. These scooters can weigh up to 300 pounds.
23
I think there should be power and power sharing restrictions. Fully or mostly fully power "bikes"
are electric motorcycles, like electric cars and should not be on multi use. 4 wheeled electric
vehicles (Gator type or gold cart type) are vehicles and shouldn't be in multi use paths or lanes
paths
24
I don't see these devices as being a major issue to safety or comfort unless they travel too fast,
reckless, or are in the way. But that's no different than other foot or bike traffic.
25 It makes sense or who know what people will drive
26 We should be encouraging non-gasoline travel.
27
Absolutely not, restrictions would limit access for people. And those who need these devices
most are of low socioeconomic status. So if their bike is restricted, they can’t afford a new one.
28 Not sure, if they’re necessary for mobility I think they should always be allowed
29 But how do you regulate/monitor this?
30 Suron bikes are cool.
31
I think limiting e-bikes that reach into the range of being more like motorcycles or mopeds in
terms of weight is smart. Some e-bikes are over 75 pounds.
32
I don't know exact details but there should be regulation so that mopeds and motorcycles
aren't on sidewalks.
33
Nothing allowed that is wider than a person; with the exception of a tricycle for kiddos, those
with special needs, and the elderly.
34 Shouldn't be large enough that another (non-car) user can't use the facility at the same time
35 If not allowed on roadway should be a limit on size and speed for trails and sidewalks
36 No heavier than a small child can lift.
37 unsure
38
Any restrictions need to accommodate devices required for ADA access which will likely be
larger than most other ptds
39 Really don’t know
40 I don't see this as a problem but I suppose it could be if devices get larger.
41
I trust the city decisionmakers to make this decision, with all the facts and information they
have. I'm not personally aware of what the potential dangers are with electric -assisted devices.
42 No electric on sidewalks and designated trails but no restrict ions from the city
43
Should not be unreasonably large as to make navigation on the sidewalk with pedestrians
difficult.
44
the restrictions should be based on speed and safety devices installed to alert others - faster
than walking means ride in the street. No bells or similar that alert others to their presece that
ring/sound during operation - not allowed on sidewalks or other shared paths.
45
There should be both a size restriction and a speed restriction. I have seen e -bikes going no
less than 20 mph on city trails and sidewalks. As a cyclist myself, and often a pedestrian, I feel
it is reckless to not limit speed as well as access to narrow and winding trails.
46 maybe restricting certain sizes to roads and off sidewalks
47
it will be difficult to cap, especially with devices like electric wheelchairs being custom made for
each person
31
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 21
48 I don't have enough knowledge in this area to give a valid opinion.
49
In general, no. Especially where these devices are using streets they will be much smaller than
cars. On anything narrower than a shared use path, some sort of width restriction could make
sense, but would be difficult to enforce. Plus I have not encountered and operators of wider
devices (i.e. recumbent tricycle bikes) who wanted to use these narrower paths anyway. The
only consideration is, again, proper separation from slower moving pedestrians, which is a
matter of capability, not physical size.
50 Yes if size is related to fully electric
51
Large motorized vehicles should be prohibited. I imagine they already are, but large electric
bikes may not be.
52
If there is a size restriction, it should err on the larger size, taking into consideration not just the
average size of common devices, but the maximum size of them.
Question # 8: Comments on speed limits:
1 I'm really not sure how fast e-bikes can go!
2 Down town
3 Common sense and being aware of changing conditions.
4 I agree that there should be a few limits on sidewalk use for bikes. For example in the
downtown shopping area. The bike lanes should have the same speed limits as any car or
motorcycle that uses the road. I think bikers should be polite when people are walking on
them. Mostly, I notice kids on our city sidewalks and few adults.
5 Specific area: Campus sidewalks If you place a speed limit on sidewalks, does this include
trails?
6 Speeds should be limited where there are more likely to be pedestrian conflicts.
7 Do not allow electric PTDs on same path as pedestrians.
8 I’m not qualified to answer.
9 Iowa code section 321 clearly gives bicycles the legal right to the use of city streets (unless
otherwise signed). As such, when cycling on the street, the traffic speed limits should apply.
10 I don’t know
11 Walking paths should not have bicycles or electric trans potato
12 Shared use paths and trails.
13 Speed limit should accommodate the slowest, least protected user using a route.
14 Heavy use trails, downtown area or campus
15 Specific areas = Crowded areas. Bike lanes should follow the vehicle speed limit. Sidewalk
should probably be 25 or something.
16 Park Trails
17 Yes, there should be limits.
18 Bikes on city bike lanes should have same speed limit as vehicles on same street.
19 excessive speeds are prevalent all over Ames, all vehicles
20 I think speed limits on sidewalks that are low would drive riders into the road. Also, there are
city sidewalks that are small and residential and larger, wider sidewalks that may be part of a
trail or bike system, so speed limits should be higher on those. Also, I personally ride carefully
to the conditions: if there is nobody around, one should be able to go faster. If pedestrians are
present, slow down.
21 I could see places with more pedestrian traffic having speed limits, like downtown sidewalks, or
on campus. But if the sidewalks are not pedestrian heavy, I do not see speed being as much of
an issue.
32
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 22
22 Speeds should be limited on sidewalks, but not specifically restricted on design ated shared
use paths.
23 Common sense??? This couldn't be enforced without adding more to the budget for manpower
and equipment. Even then it probably wouldn't be enforced and turn into another waste of
taxpayer money.
24 No speed limit on the last one because I have no option on specific areas of the city.
25 I'm not sure exactly what this refers to, but I would hope the operator of the vehicle would take
the area into consideration and adjust their speed or find another area to be in.
26 that vast majority of e-bikes are limited to 20 or 28mph. Build laws around those numbers and
it will be far easier for people to know where their bikes can go.
27 Electric-assisted devices should take priority on the need for speed re strictions
28 I do not trust car drivers on city bike lanes. As for speed limits, how many bikes of any kind are
equipped with speedometers? I do think that under 20 mph on bike paths is safe, but sidewalk
travel should be much slower in business/downtown areas, but not necessarily on wide-open
sidewalks where pedestrians are easily seen from a distance.
29 I agree with speed limits but don’t feel knowledge enough to give exact mph recommendations.
30 Park trails
31 E-bikes are too fast for sidewalks and mixed trails.
32 Downtown sidewalks
33 The phrase City bike lanes is vague. Are you referring to on -street lanes that have no physical
protection?
34 Human powered is already limited by power source. Others need speed limits and/or power
limits.
35 Nothing should be on sidewalks!
36 I think most people are conscientious about their use of ptd’s.
37 Shared use paths should have a speed limit of no more than 10 mph, especially in parks. Bikes
should not be on sidewalks at all.
38 I would be most concerned about time of day. If someone wants to speed like a bat out of hell
at 5am around Ada Hayden (a common time I run), I don't see a major issue if they are
considerate, but I don't think anyone needs to be weaving around traffic around school times.
39 In residential areas
40 Hmmmm for city bike lanes, the limit should be the same as for cars/trucks
41 Congested areas need low speed to reduce potential accidents
42 Specific area of pedestrian zones like Main Street and Welch Ave.
43 Trails in parks (e.g. Ada Hayden)
44 On street bike lanes should follow the posted speed limits. Heavy pedestrian use areas
(Downtown, Campustown, ISU Campus, Brookside Park, Ada Hayden Park) should have a
10mph speed limit
45 Rec paths
46 Most of these devices do not have speedometers. Unless the city plans to provide
speedometers to people, a speed limit does not make sense.
47 it’s complicated. i think in heavily used parks (ada hayden, some parts of brookside) the
speeds should be lower- there’s more people&animals walking. other parks/trail systems
(north/east river valley) are less utilized & can be faster.
48 It's very difficult for me to tell how fast my human -powered bike is going. Also, I cannot go that
fast, lol!
49 if not in bike lane I feel that 20 mph is a good cap
33
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 23
50 I don't think they should be on sidewalks where people are walking because its a danger when
a person is driving as fast as a car can on the sidewalk where p eople are walking. if it has
wheels it should be on the street or a bike path.
51 Cyclists speed needs to be dictated by the congestion of the trail, not the trail itself. This
leaves it to human nature and trail etiquette. Limits won't be as effective as a trail etiquette
campaign.
52 I think speed limits should depend on size of sidewalks. Wide, multi-use paths can have higher
speeds, but a sidewalk that is only 3 feet wide probably shouldn't have a bike on it at all (at
least not a heavy e-bike).
53 Near schools it should be lower and also have lower speed limits when it narrow and very busy
areas.
54 Speeds on roads/streets like Mortensen and University could accommodate speeds 20 mph +.
55 Limits should be applied where other (non-car) traffic is sharing the facility
56 Doesn't need to be a speed limit they just need to take like a driving class to be out in the
streets or trails. Bikes often do whatever they want in the city streets and dont know how to
properly communicate with driving traffic
57 Speed limits should be "reasonable and prudent" with liability restrictions
58 Campus
59 No personal transportation device should be allowed on sidewalks that operate at more than 5
mph. On narrow sidewalks, they should not be ridden at all. The speeds limits for cars in
residential areas are already pedestrian unfriendly.
60 when there are also pedestrians, I think it's most safe to keep bicycles at 15 mph tops. I've
been on my bike and had pedestrians not looking for bicycles at all
61 I don't think speed is so much an issue, but when mixing with pedestrians, there is need for
basic procedural courtesies, keep to right except when passing, warn people when over-taking
from behind, etc.
62 I really don't think its necessary
63 Bikes should not be on sidewalk. It is actually safer for a bike to go faster on streets. You did
not ask about bike paths and multi-use paths - I think max 20 but of course if pedestrians or
other devices are around you have to go more like 10 mph.
64 I trust the city decisionmakers to make this decision, with all the facts and information they
have. I'm not personally aware of what the potential dangers are with electric -assisted devices.
65 no speed limit on streets - proper lighting (front white light and rear red lights) should be
required.
66 Shared Use Paths and Trails
67 There should be a minimum speed requirement for bicycles to be on the road, even with a bike
lane. But especially on county roads with no shoulder.
68 I have been to college campuses that have e-bike/e-scooter designated pathways and
wayfinding. These paths are marked with clear signage throughout the area and limit many
sidewalks to pedestrians only. I think Ames could benefit from this type of wayfinding. Not only
would it help e-vehicles move more efficiently---because the paths have been prioritized for
them---but it will keep pedestrians and pets safe as well.
69 respecting the speed limits other forms of traffic have to follow as well as other traffic devices
i.e. stop signs
70 Just drive reasonably and don't ride side by side and take up the whole trail without visibility
ahead.
71 bike trails
72 Cyclists should follow vehicle speed limits.
73 Speed limits should be based upon conditions and the rider's skills.
34
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 24
74 People self regulate
75 speed limits are not the issue, the issue is bike riders do not stop for stop signs & do not follow
the rules of the road. If they cannot follow rules of the road, they need to be on a separate
sidewalk. Not narrowing the streets to accomodate them.
76 City bike lanes: No separate limit for devices, the existing speed limit of the street shall apply.
Since a bike lane is part of the street I believe riding a bike there already triggers the
requirement that the user obey all applicable vehicle laws - the same should apply to other
devices. Given how narrow a standard sidewalk is I would support a rule that says these
devices must maintain a slow speed there - ESPICALLY when near pedestrians. On shared
use paths I believe 15 mph is a good limit generally, and would support a reduction to 10 in
parks or other areas of high pedestrian traffic either generally or when actually near
pedestrians. On separated/protected bike lanes - which are separate from pedestrian facilities -
I would support a higher limit of at least 20.
77 Not lower than 15mph in general.
78 on streets
79 Depends on area. On public trails such as Ada Hayden, I think there should be limits
80 Electric devices don’t belong on sidewalks
81 Parks, multi user trails, 10 - 12 mph
82 Parks and multiuser trails 10-12 mph
83 If sidewalks are wide enough to safely have pedestrians and bikers on them I think having
higher speed limits would be okay
84 In more busy areas of Ames on the bike trails e-bikers need to not ride so fast especially when
passing other cyclists and walkers and need to say 'on your left'
Are there other safety concerns that you have about the use of personal transportation
devices (e-bikes, e-scooters, electric skateboards, etc.)?
1 Everyone needs to abide by the same rules of the road.
2 I do think scooter clutter with the rental programs can be overwhelming in other cities. Worried
a bit about this in proximity to campus.
3 The lack of attention for those around them.
4 speed on sidewalks and bike lanes
5 Personal transportation devices aren't the problem... if you force people off the sidewalks and
on to the streets you will have more accidents. Just think about how hard it is to see
motorcycles.
6 Although I always watch out and yield to pedestrians, many students on campus will zoom by
and it scares me that they might run into me on my bike. I feel comfortable around these
devices until someone decides that they don't care about anyone else zooms by. Most of the
time they seem to not watch out for others, look around the corner, or look before crossing a
pedestrian intersection. I feel comfortable when there is plenty of space on the path but it gets
concerning when they're trying to do this during a passing period. Throughout Ames, I feel very
comfortable biking, I have very few issues with the exception of intersections on Lincoln Way.
Bikes are not thought about in any way or form and makes it difficult as a bicyclist when
intersections aren't designed for you. Pedestrians don't want you on the sidewalk and cars
aren't looking for you. Cars don't want you on the road and I don't want to be there when most
are going 40 in a 35, or 30 in a 25. Lincoln is designed for cars. I have had several issues with
Lincoln and South Dakota, crossing west from the south east side. I've been hit once and
almost hit on several other occasions. As someone who takes this route on a daily basis, cars
35
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 25
aren't looking out for bikes or pedestrians. I've gotten to the point that even when I have the
right of way, I wait there for a minute to ensure that the cars there will look at me,
acknowledging that I'm there. I also have to watch for cars turning left from the east and cars
turning right from the west. The answer may be that I go slower, but cars still manage to start
turning, stop in the intersection, and slam on there breaks. It's also not a visibility issue
because I have several reflectors and keep a bike light on both front and back of my bike. I
would love a no turn on red here because throughout this entire year, it has been consistent.
7 Cars not yielding at pedestrian crossing
8 Been around a long time on bike -- experience just about everything including bike-vehicle
collision (I was on the bike).
9 My main concern would be inattentive car operators.
10 Monitoring of each is important.
11 They do not observe right of way for pedestrians or motorists
12 Lack of knowledge and practice of trail etiquette and city laws
13 Lack of helmets on road and high speeds
14 CyRide should be used more often
15 Hate to know what the riders/users are going to do, hard to anticipate
16 People on e devices that don’t use common sense risk their own safety and the safety of
others. Speed limits would be difficult to enforce.
17 I am not concerned with the use of personal transportation devices.
18 Please give us disconnect from road.
19 My safety concerns are usually related to car drivers. Because of that I never ride on a busier
road, like Lincoln Way or Duff. I only ride on side streets.
20 they are so quiet that they sometimes surprise me on the road.
21 People looking at their phones while riding or walking. Can't anyone ever put their phone away
and just enjoy the journey?!!
22 excessive speeds
23 I have seen hazardous driving of bikes and PEVs, mostly from t eenage or younger riders. I
would be in favor of safety measures for younger riders. I am over 50, and take appropriate
care when riding.
24 Use on sidewalks creates more opportunities for unsafe encounters, particularly conflicts with
vehicles and pedestrians.
25 Only concern would be someone being too reckless and hitting a pedestrian causing injury. Or
not being observant/ noticed in a bike lane and getting hit by a motor vehicle. I have not
witnessed these things personally , but they are concern that I have in terms of safety for
pedestrians, electric bike/scooter operators, and motorists alike.
26 Not at this time, but I may have some later.
27 Only cars/trucks should be used on roads. Bikes should be on sidewalks or bike lanes unless
crossing an intersection.
28 The greatest safety concern/hazard that we have encountered is (mostly) pedestrians who are
wearing headphones or ear pods; they cannot hear our warning bells or cries of "Passing on
your left! Two bikes!"
29 I have experienced or witnessed more issues with motor vehicle drivers not respecting
personal transportation devices than issues with the riders of the devices. Underaged
(including unsupervised children) riders have been the main sources of safety concerns in my
experience.
30 car drivers running stop signs constantly
31 Skateboards shouldn’t be on streets or sidewalks.
36
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 26
32 Paint stripes for street PDT lanes are FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY. Add curbs to separate
cars and busses.
33 Regardless of type, should be required to have a bike license equivalent for road use..
34 stand up scooters that go 15-20 mph are just too fast for the area they are used in
35 Risk with any form of transportation is unavoidable. We're doing fine with bike/scooter facilities
in /Ames as they are.
36 SLOW DOWN ON PATHS!!!
37 I see them no different than bikes but vehicles are way more of a conce rn to safety than e stuff.
38 I have seen these in other communities so concern if these become more popular in Ames
39 I would like to see police ticket car drivers who don't yield to pedestrians in crosswalks.
40 Bike lanes are not wide enough or consistent. There is not a through bike route in town.
41 At Ada Hayden many bikers go WAY too fast and do not announce their presence. They use it
like a race track, or for training, and I really don’t like that.
42 Right turn on red is hazardous to pedestrians and cyclists. Automobile drivers are looking to
their left, getting ready to go as soon as traffic clears and they aren't looking at the pedestrian
crossing. Lower the speed limit and install a traffic control device on 13th near Stagecoach,
where the bike path goes north from River Valley Park. That street carries a high volume of
traffic which goes at high speed and visibility can be obstructed by the bridge. Ankeny has
done a great job of making High Trestle Trail crossings more cyclist friendly in town, there are
either stop lights or flashing yellow lights which help cyclists to cross in a manner that is more
safe. I see too many cyclists wearing headphones and no helmet--better education about the
effects of TBI. Etiquette training for folks on ebikes. Very few bother to give an alert when they
pass.
43 Right turn on red is not usually good for pedestrians and bikers as drivers tend to pay attention
to the left and just go when they have an opening not payin g attention to the right where a
pedestrian/cyclist may be.
44 Just in terms of being safe around other people on sidewalks.
45 Most are able to travel faster than the supposed limit of the device. Ames should NEVER
allow a scooter rental program, unless guarantees are put in place that they won't be cluttering
our sidewalks and trails.
46 Many drivers do not yield to bies on the street even wh en the bikes have the right of way, such
as bike crossing stree with green lights on for pedestrian etc.
47 We live near Ada Hayden so see a number of devices go up and down our hill.
48 I live near a lot of student housing on west Lincoln Way and the si dewalks are quite scary to
walk on. e-bikes and e-scooters absolutely FLY by. I actively avoid the sidewalks in this area
for that reason. I really wish they had a dedicated bike lane or similar.
49 I think helmets should be worn for all bikes.
50 Require HELMETS, SHOES, AND SHIRTS! ;-}
51 Density is a potential issue. Single or groups of 2 -3 are not concerning
52 They need to better understand how to communicate with vehicles and walkers! Having a
standard of a class they could take to learn the ways to communicate with other forms of
transportation would be Amazing. And that's for e -transportation and bikes
53 Coming up on pedestrian too fast on bicycles with no warning
54 People need to make sure their lights are on!
55 Definitely.
56 Accept in the case of. ADA needed devices these e-bikes, e-scooters, electric skate boards
DO NOT belong on public sidewalks.
57 That drivers can be real dicks to bicyclists.
37
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 27
58 visibility is a major issue, for many of the ptds; non -users need to be educated on what to
expect;
59 Riders in the middle of the road.
60 Scooter riders want to be vehicles and abide by those rules when it suits them. However, they
also want to be co didered as pedestrians when THAT suits them. Can’t have it both ways!
61 the riders have no sense how 'out of nowhere' they can appear to those walking. The speed of
these devices and their 'stealth' make them at best startaling and at worse a terrible accedent
waiting to happen. Ask the City Concil who would like to be hit by a e-scooter at 30 miles an
hour as they take a walk in thier neighborhood.
62 The idiots go too fast riding side by side taking up the whole trail going around blind curves and
low visibility areas.
63 Ignoring traffic signs such as stop signs, stop lights, etc.
64 no training for users, people learn as they go and might not familiarize themselves with City
rules
65 They pass pedestrians too quickly and suddenly without alerting them.
66 My bike broke down and I haven't replaced it, as much as I love riding and keeping one less
car on the road, because I feel very unsafe riding my bike in this town. Vehicles do a terrible
job of sharing the road in Ames, and there are no protected bike paths in town! There also
aren't bike paths on the major town arteries that I would use to get from A to B, in lieu of
driving. The only type of biking that feels like it's encouraged in Ames is purely recreational,
which is a shame. There also aren't always places to park a bike when you're going to, for
example, the grocery store. Furthermore, with the incessant gutting of city streets that goes on
for literally seasons on end, it makes it really difficult for cyclists to feel safe/like they have a
place to ride (unless they are sharing the sidewalks with pedestrians).
67 It would be nice if bike riders would follow the rules of the road. Too many blowing through stop
signs or not following general road procedures.
68 It’s safest when traffic on same roadway goes same speed
69 Most of the above issues I have only encountered on ISU's campus (a very person, device,
and vehicle dense environment) at times of high traffic. Obviously, this is outside the
jurisdiction of the city, but it underscores to me that most of the issues will occur when we have
high volumes of multiple modes in close proximity. I would also say that the unsafe
operation/near misses I have observerd are more a human problem than a bike/device
problem - I have observed the exact same behaviors from the drivers of cars, which is an order
of magnitude worse given the greater potential of damage and injury from a heavier/faster
vehicle.
70 Yes. Too fast - e-skateboards can go over 25mph! No fully electric on paths / sidewalks. Pedal
assist or disability devices ok.
71 On trails such as Ada Hayden, e-bike users go too fast.
72 The biggest issue with the electric devices is the speed. Honestly if these things were driven
with care it would be less of an issue on bike paths.
73 Moving too fast by inexperienced operators
74 Nearly all of the e-users that I see lack the knowledge and skill to be using their device
anywhere but in a very controlled, low traffic space
75 I haven't personally had issues with any of these
76 I know it's expensive but I would love to have road crossings go over or under the road so to
avoid car crossings.
77 Lights
38
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 28
What other things should the City consider as it relates to regulating bicycle and
personal transportation device use in the City of Ames?
1 Required licensing and if not properly license have a $1,000 fine
2
Would be good to have same rules for all users of bikes, devices, LSVs, etc. Age restriction
or supervision of young kids should be considered with devices and LSVs, considering the
crazy way kids ride bikes on sidewalks!
3
Bicycle, personal transportation device, and really anything else should be encouraged over
car usage.
4
Don't mix vehicles, bikes, or other modes of transportation on the busiest streets.
Encourage the use of secondary routes for alternative modes of transportation.
5 Helmets
6 bicycles and PTD are different - don't lump them together for regulations
7
We should be encouraging people to use smaller, cheaper and more efficient forms of
transportation. What statistics does Ames have to suggest this should even be addressed?
We should be more concerned about the ISU students crossing the streets without looking up
from their phones.
8 Write some tickets to motorists
9 Statistical safety data (urban environments) -- What are the safest practices.
10 If anything needs more regulation to improve transportation safety its cars not bikes.
11
I was told in my bicycle collision with a truck that bicycles should not be ridden accross an
intersection. I had stopped on my bicycle and waited for left hand turning auto traffic to finish
turning in front of me and then proceeded to ride my bike across the intersection with plenty
time left on the timer. The truck making a right hand turn on red saw me stopped and waiting
and proceeded to do the right hand turn without rechecking me. I had started to ride across
since the left turners were cleared out and the truck hit me. The officer never asked me what
happened but came into the emergency room and told me since I was riding my bike across
the intersection it was my fault as I should have walked it. If I had walked it I am quite sure by
the way my bike was hit..I would have been killed. When I am driving, I see bikes almost
always ridden across intersections. Is that really the law that bikers must walk bikes across
intersections?
12 Width of trails and sidewalks, enforcement of laws, rules, etiquette
13
These devices are going to continue to be used, to evolve in sophistication and, presumably,
capacity both in terms of power/speed and hauling. The City should be encouraging non-auto
traffic with infrastructure and significantly increased enforcement of existing laws on auto as
well as non-auto operators.
14 Required safety gear and required light reflective materials
15
Bikers don't even use the bike lanes, like on North Duff. The lanes are too narrow and they
still ride in the street. Also, those bike lanes are confusing, it seems, especially for elderly
drivers. They drive in the bike lane as though it were the right -most lane for traffic and right
turns.
16 Leaving rental bikes or e-scooters in inappropriate places.
17 The ADA ramps with bumps are hazardous to people on some of these devices
39
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 29
18
Regulating personal transportation use would discourage the use multimodal transportation.
It also would show a lack of understanding of what is most dangerous form of transportation
to all Ames residents and guests, which is clearly motor vehicles.
19
Barriers between the roads and bike lanes would make me feel safer riding my bike in the
bike lane.
20
If adding bike lanes on roads, consider putting a small barrier between the bike lane and road
(like a median).
21 Encourage (don’t require) registration and safety/ maintenance workshops
22 The more you restrict e-bikes, the more people will go back to cars
23
I don't think that they need to be regulated. The only regulation I would be okay with would be
a speed limit. Something like 25 mph would regulate against someone blasting down the bike
path on a modified e-bike at 40 mph, but allow a biker to train at a reasonable speed.
24
Traffic light cycles that protects people crossing streets. Sometimes waiting times are long.
People use South Duff bridge narrow side sidewalk also by bicycles, it is very na rrow, low
safety rails, and unsafe bumpy edges when entering.
25
Some paths are SO rough (i.e. along airport road), gaps in bike trails where one must go in
street (i.e. skunk river path to connect to Hayden trails) and others have to cross so many
intersections. It's very difficult to find a nice long safe path to ride around Ames. We mostly
ride for exercise and the enjoyment of bike riding, and can't do so without driving our bikes to
a safe bike path, in Ames we usually just ride around Hayden.
26 excessive speeding should be policed better
27
I think personal electric vehicle travel is one of the modes of transportation that will get safer
and more used in the future. It is convenient, less polluting and less costly than many other
modes of transportation. In my view, Ames should plan for commuter bicycle, PEV trails to all
major employers in Ames, especially the university.
28
If we truly want to work towards using vehicles less, and finding alternate transportation, I
think it is important to consider that every regulation added will likely lessen how much people
are willing to try alternate forms of transportation. If it gets too complicated, it is often easier to
use a car.
29
The crossing at 13th and Clark is very confusing to drivers wh o get stopped on 13th. I find
that intersection safer to cross by waiting for a gap in traffic, rather than using the light and
making traffic stop.
30
The amount of distracted driving anywhere in the city (both drivers as well as riders) should
dictate that bikes and other personal transportation devices should not share the same space
with motor vehicles.
31
If the electric scooter/bikeis capable of going 20mph or higher, I would suggest a safety
course for the operators to avoid potential injury to themselves or others if they want to use
bike paths.
32
Has there been complaints about large groups taking up too much space on the roadways,
paths and sidewalks?
33
If you make new rules, how/who will enforce new rules? Will there be fines for violations? Will
ISU follow the same rules?
34
Bikes should have to follow road rules, stop signs, ect. They should NOT be on roads. Only to
cross intersections and they should follow rules, lights ect. Police should be ticketing bikers.
35
Expand the network of available paths and trails throughout the city, and work to upkeep /
maintain them in good condition
36
I hope the city will endeavor to actively promote and encourage bicycle and personal
transportation devices while considering aspects of safety. We should be striving to be as
bicycle friendly as possible. I sorely miss the bicycle culture I have experienced in some
40
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 30
European and Asian cities. Electronic assisted bicycles and devices have added
complications, but please strive to find solutions that do not inhibit the growth of non -motor
vehicle transportation overall.
37
If all users are educated in the use of the equipment and the use. ex: If on the sidewalk, I
assume they are treated like a pedestrian ( look both ways when crossing the street, and if on
the road, they should follow the RULES of the road. follow the signage etc. I've been "flipped
off" because they run the stop sign or redlight when I had the right of way.
38 More bike trails and lanes needed.
39 Possible citizen patrols on trouble areas
40
While it is prudent to consider the safety risks that personal transportation devices pose to
pedestrians, the greater threat to pedestrians is from drivers of vehicles. The injury risk for a
pedestrian walking on a sidewalk on Duff at the hospital (zero horizontal separation) is
greater than walking on a trail. Focus your safety efforts there.
41
More trails - Ames city streets are generally not safe due to narrow, poorly maintained bike
lanes. Note: some are very good - such as north Duff. The road by north wal mart has
cracks and other conditions.
42 Short leach laws for pets
43
Have the University give money so students have a dedicated bicycle path to Trestle Trail.
This could be a selling point to students and parents. Safe activity to relieve school stress.
44 Start ticketing bikers that do not follow the rules of the road.
45 More dedicated lanes so people don’t have to ride on side walk or feel unsafe riding in traffic
46
I anticipate that the City is about to clamp down with a bunch of restrictions and regulations
which will increase enforcement issues, take the freedom and joy out of a healthy
transportation system already in place when, to my knowledge, there is almost no problem at
present. That will be too bad.
47 Must have lighting and braking equipment at all times.
48
It’s on road bike lanes are haphazard and do not connect. Painting lines on a road isn’t a very
good bike lane. Please study successfully carried out separated bike lanes. The city has
touted complete streets but has never implemented it. 24th street was just redone and it still
lacks a side walk on the North side of the road by Somerset. Also why hasn’t George
Washington Carver ever had its sidewalk infrastructure put in. The list could go on and on.
This survey was pretty poorly put together. Pretty disappointed in the questions, especially
asking about specific speeds. Come on. The only reference that most people have to
calibrate to those speeds are cars and it is very difficult to compare driving a car at those
speeds to going those speeds on a bike or other device. Asking about overall s afety and then
changing to comfort level of use is also an odd choice. The data you receive from this will be
suspect because of your poor survey design.
49
Motorists need to be aware at traffic lights where the cyclist has the walk light. I was blocked
once by someone so eager to turn right on red that I couldn't cross with the walk light!
50
It is frustrating when there are expensive facilities (paid for by taxes of one form or another)
provided for bikes and other devices, and yet the operators still ride in the middle of the
roadway, causing both delays and safety risks.
51
Regulating car drivers so they know they don't own the roads. Actually policing the rights of
way. I've had the right of way while riding my bicycle and had cars cut me off or run stop
signs in front of me.
52
Sidewalks and trails are preferable for biking because vehicle drivers do not pay attention to
bikers on the road. There is not a good trail/sidewalk system in this town. There are also not
many bike repair stations (ie bike pumps, wrenches, etc.)- I only know of one at Wheatsfield.
So maybe they just aren’t advertised.
41
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 31
53
Many of the city’s moves regarding bike lanes have made the roads less safe for cyclists,
rather than their intended goal to promote safety. N Duff before it turns to 30th St. comes to
mind, as well as 24th St, 3rd Ave near Target and Clark Ave @ Lincoln W ay…simply adding
bike lanes doesn’t always make things better.
54
Idk what to do about it, but when I’m out running I’m concerned about the number of cars that
don’t completely stop at stop signs and/or simply do not notice me. I’ve almost been hit a
couple times that way.
55
Please organize the bike trails into some sort of coherency which does not involve riding on
streets with automobile traffic. Bike paths seem to start/end randomly and merge with streets.
It doesn't matter who is right and who is wrong if a cyclist is hit by a car--the cyclist loses. If
there are bike lanes and parking, some communities arrange parking so that the parking lane
is closest to traffic and cyclists are buffered from automobile traffic. Why do some of the
pedestrian lights take so loooooong to give the go -ahead to the pedestrian? (Thinking
specifically of Grand.) Thank you for providing this survey! We love to bike and would
appreciate more safe opportunities within/near Ames. Currently, we drive 20+ miles for that
sort of cycling opportunity. Ada Hayden is nice, but gets a lot of use and it's difficult to see
what is coming around curves when the grass is tall.
56
Crossing at Carr park and 13th needs a pedestrian/bike crossing flashing yellow light. 13th
and grand need a left turn arrow as well as the sidewalks a mess when it comes to getting
across on a bike timer for crossing also takes a very, very long time.
57 Being more strict about where they're allowed and not allowed.
58 More road bike lanes or signs stating a speed limit on sidewalks
59
Trails or side streets designated as trails, that are one block over from major thoroughfares
are far better than bike trails on the side of the thoroughfare. No one wants to ride right next
to Grand, Duff, or Lincoln Way, but if you move these lanes a bl ock over, bike and ebike use
will see significant increases.
60
Give more space and make road more bicycle friendly. Widen the sidewalk to allow bike to
share with pedestrian more comfortably.
61
I think it's important to promote the use of these devices while keeping everybody safe. I
consider the way that I use my e-bike to be relatively safe (commuting on low-pedestrian wide
paths and sometimes on roads), but I'm unsure how others feel.
62
keeping paths clear of debris if people are going to go so fast. The rock that runs onto the
path near us (Dawes & Adams) from traffic and rain is a hazard to many on wheeled devices
and makes it more difficult for the blind to use the guides in the walkway.
63
I think regulation here is a losing battle (especially in a college town), the best ways to focus
are on education and infrastructure.
64
I think it would be beneficial for people to take a class if they have violations. It doesn't have
to be long but just something like kids have to take when they get a moped.
65 Carve out some, "No Car" areas/days in town to resemble the 4th of July Parade route.
66
I prefer off road facilities for non car and small electric transportation. Current Bike lanes are
not well designed and/or maintained.
67
It would be Amazing if more cyclists would move to the side of the street when a car is behind
them on a side street like clark ave. I drive that rode every day and often bikes dont move to
the side so I can pass them and we can both get on with our day and mode of transportation.
I shouldn't have to go 5mph for a block until they turn on a different street. It's all about
understanding how to be courteous to others on the road regardless of your mode of
transportation.
68 Repair trails. Especially utility cuts.
69 Safety of the rider and those around them.
42
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 32
70
Consider better connections to city trails so that riders can avoid traffic and have a separate
space to ride.
71
Ames lacks well managed sidewalks, especially in winter, making it difficult for disabled
people in assisted devices or citizens trying to use a public street to be able to go where they
need to, and the streets are unsafe for pedestrians and bikers alike, given the utterly
atrocious driving displayed by Ames residents.
72
Actually, quit using so many surveys and have the city council do their job, as well as city
staff. Present evidence to the council and have them vote.
73 The times I've felt unsafe on my bike are in south ames during a football game day
74
Maybe put better infrastructure in place for bicyclists. Better bike paths that don’t just drop
into a street. I’m more concerned with cars than bikes…
75
training on procedural aspects: keep to right when not passing, verbal warning when over -
taking from behind, etc. As a former skilled bicyclist, I would totally oppose treating all ptd -
users as if they were unskilled beginners.
76
On street riding, or bike line riding is incredibly unsafe both from accidental and deliberate
vehicle traffic. Vehicle users frequently attempt to assault cyclists in the streets. MUPs are
safer by far for all involved but they don't go everywhere that users need to go. If th e MUPs
were guided to have cyclists use the left side so they meet pedestrians head on it would be
less reactionary for all involved since they would see each other well in advance rather than
needing to be within audible distance. Especially given the amount of pedestrians that use
headphones that block out external alerts of approaching wheeled traffic.
77
Extend multi-use path along Skunk River from Lincoln Way to Soccer/Softball complex, and
extend the newer path along Ioway Creek that ends in a cornfield to connect with the (new)
path along the river!
78
Regulate cars and other vehicles more first. Bikes are not the enemy, cars are way more
dangerous for pedestrians than bicycles are.
79 I don’t see bicycles as a problem. scooters disobey most traffic regulations.
80
Many of the painted bike route/lane signs on roads are barely visible (6th street and
University avenue near the railroad track, for instance.) I have had some encounters wi th
vehicles where they honked or yelled at me to get out of the way, not realizing that the road is
a shared route.
81
focus on building protected bike-only lanes that actually go places that folks might ride to -
home to work, home to a park, work to store. they don't have to be straight lines, if they
provide greater safely.
82 apply the principle of slower traffic to the right on trails/sidewalks
83
Bicycles should not be on the roads unless there is a designated bike lane, especially roads
without a shoulder.
84
Please consider investing in signage and wayfinding for regulating bicycle and e -vehicles.
Hire experts who design safe pathways, don't rely on City officials to know what is best.
Consider dual lane design, where bikes have a dedicated sidewalk and pedestrians have a
dedicated walkway. Place symbols on these paths to clearly mark mode of travel (bi ke
symbol and pedestrian symbol) as well as direction of travel marked by arrows. These
dedicated pathways have been proven effective in cities across the country. Look for
examples, talk with those city departments and learn how to do most effectively emp loy this
design! This has the opportunity to enrich Ames beyond measure.
85 Don't ride like you are the only one on the trail or everyone should get out of your way.
86 enforce no bicycles allowed on trails in East River Valley Park
43
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 33
87
No matter what the City does when it comes to regulating bicycle and personal transportation
device use, it should always be done in a way that encourages their use. It's awkward to do
because they're typically too fast for sidewalk use and too slow for road use, but the y're so
beneficial in reducing vehicular traffic, emissions, and road wear that we need to encourage
their use as much as we can.
88 offering education session
89 Loud gas-powered bicycles are annoying on trails.
90
Just as bicycles are asked to obey traffic laws, much the same as vehicles do, there needs to
be more emphasis on the other modes of transportation to also follow traffic laws.
91 Do not over regulate!
92 Night visibility, but only promote and educate.
93
We've already gone way too far for the small biking community. I used to bike or ride CyRide
to work for over a decade, so I watch when riders don't follow the rules of the road. Very
disappointed that my tax $$ are paying for road narrowing for vehicles and adding bike lanes
that are empty or those few on the lanes don't follow rules.
94
Don’t mix different transportation modes on same paths/roadways as varying speeds and
conventions makes it unsafe
95
Most of the issues that we are seeking to address through these regulations concern ensuring
the safety of all road users when multiple modes (a.k.a. users of different speeds) are mixing
together. To that end, speed restrictions for bikes and other devices make sense when they
are mixing with more vulnerable/slower moving pedestrians. However, it is in the city's best
interest to encourage people to shift their mode of travel to bikes and devices and away from
cars whenever possible: fewer cars on the road leads to lower emissions, less traffic
congestion, and fewer collisions, just to name a few benefits. These are in keeping with
Ames' existing climate action and pedestrian safety goals, among others. To THAT end it
would behoove us to not *overly* burden bikes/devises with regulations that might discourage
their use - such as too slow city-wide speed limits that apply even in places that don't warrant
it or too many "slow zones" along primary cycle routes. Slow zones are fine in parks and
other recreational areas which few people are using to actually get from A to B, but along
major arterial roads, not so much. In the latter areas when there are high amounts of
pedestrian and/or cycle/device traffic, the city should strongly consider that the best option
may be to provide separate facilities for cycles (medium speed users) and pedestrians (slow
speed users).
96
All future roads should have bike lanes or right of ways. Bike trails need to be connected.
Dead ends on a few in weird places (Skunk River and the Ioway under Duff. Also no way to
safely access certain areas on a bicycle. South Duff. Lincoln Way, Ada Hayd en (path by mall
is dangerous with cars turning and not giving cyclists right of way).. Not enough bike racks
anywhere in town.
97 safety sessions
98 Not enough bike trails to popular areas such as downtown.
99
Placing speed restrictions on fully electric personal transportation devices. You may need to
evaluate what kind of electric bikes and scooters you really want on the bike paths and
sidewalks.
100 Address the hopeless/mental health population issue
101
Automobile operators need to be more aware of bikers, walkers, runners, & others using an
alternative form of transportation
102
I think the speed limit question is interesting and important, And we should be very
conservative in our selection of a speed limit. E devices are bringing a lot of users onto the
sidewalks roads and paths which is good, however, nearly without exception they don't have
44
Personal Transportation Device Survey Responses – 257 total responses 34
the skills or knowledge for the devices they are using. So they are a hazard for other users
and themselves and they don't even know it. 10 -12 mph Is a completely reasonable limit to
be encouraging for e-device users.
103
I think Ames is pretty good for biking, but I am all for more development (bike lanes, widening
sidewalks, etc...) to make biking easier/safer in town.
104
Ames is fairly big and there are plenty of neighborhoods that don't have services in walkable
distance. It's about a mile, up/down a very steep hill to the nearest store for me to buy
anything at. Encouraging safe use of transportation like ebikes can help bridge the gap
between needing a car and wanting a more eco-friendly way to het around.
Key Takeaways from Public Comments on Bicycles & Personal Transportation Devices (PTDs)
1. Support for Alternative Transportation
o Strong public support for biking, e-bikes, and scooters as eco-friendly, affordable
alternatives to cars.
o Many warn against over-regulation, which could discourage use.
2. Infrastructure Improvements Needed
o High demand for more and better-connected bike lanes and trails.
o Calls for safer, separated paths away from traffic and better road maintenance.
3. Safety & Regulation
o Mixed views: some want minimal regulation, others suggest speed limits, helmet
requirements, and rules for sidewalks vs. roads.
o Emphasis on education and etiquette over heavy enforcement.
4. Motor Vehicles are the Bigger Concern
o Many feel cars are the greatest safety threat.
o Requests for more driver enforcement and education on sharing the road.
5. Shared Path Conflicts
o Frustration with fast-moving PTDs on pedestrian paths.
o Suggestions for clearer signage, dual-use lanes, and speed separation.
6. Other Issues
o Complaints about poorly designed or confusing intersections.
o Desire for better trail signage, bike repair stations, and lighting.
45
SHARE THE PATH
WALK/RUN
Stay to the lake side of path
RIDE/ROLL
Stay to the non-lake side of path
Speed Limit 10 mph
www.AmesParkRec.org
46
SHARE THE PATH
RIDE/ROLL
Stay to the non-lake side of path
WALK/RUN
Stay to the lake side of path
www.AmesParkRec.org
Speed Limit 10 mph
47
www.AmesParkRec.org
but we can still be friends
WALK/RUN
Stay to the lake side of path
RIDE/ROLL
Stay to the non-lake side of path
STAY ON YOUR SIDE
Speed Limit 10 mph
48
www.AmesParkRec.org
but we can still be friends
RIDE/ROLL
Stay to the non-lake side of path
WALK/RUN
Stay to the lake side of path
STAY ON YOUR SIDE
Speed Limit 10 mph
49
www.AmesParkRec.org
Be respectful of others Please announce your presence!
ADA HAYDENHERITAGE PARK PATH
SPEED LIMIT10
50