HomeMy WebLinkAbout~Master - November 18, 2025, Regular Meeting of the Ames City Council Packet1.2024 Ames Human Relations Commission Annual Report
2.Discussion on modifications to Municipal Code Chapter 14: Human Relations
a. Motion directing staff to update ordinance based on recommendations from Ames
Human Relations Commission
1.Proclamation for "National Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week," November 16-
22, 2025
2.Motion approving payment of claims
3.Motion approving Report of Change Orders for period of October 16-31, 2025
4.Motion approving Summary of Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting on October
28, 2025
5.Motion approving Civil Service Candidates
6.Motion approving the renewal of the following Beer Permits, Wine Permits & Liquor
Licenses:
a. Chocolaterie Stam, 230 Main Street, Special Class B Native Wine Permit
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 18, 2025
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: The Mayor and City Council welcome comments
from the public during discussion. The Standards of Decorum, posted at the
door and available on the City website, define respectful conduct for public
participation. If you wish to speak, please fill out the form on the tablet outside
the door to the Council Chambers or scan the QR Code to the right to fill out
the same form on a personal device. When your name is called, please step to
the microphone, state your name for the record, and keep your comments brief so that others
may have the opportunity to speak.
CALL TO ORDER : 6:00 p.m.
JOINT MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL AND
AMES HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
PRESENTATION:
DISCUSSION:
COMMISION COMMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT:
REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL*
*The Regular Meeting of the Ames City Council will immediately follow the Joint Meeting of the
Ames City Council and Ames Human Relations Commission.
PROCLAMATIONS:
CONSENT AGENDA : All items listed under the Consent Agenda will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a request is made prior to
the time the Council members vote on the motion.
1
b. Radisson Hotel Ames, 2609 University Boulevard, Class C Retail Alcohol License
c. Time Out Ames, 120 Kellogg Avenue, Class C Retail Alcohol License with Outdoor
Service
7.Requests from Ames Main Street for Winter Sidewalk Sales on January 8-11, 2026:
a. Motion approving Blanket Temporary Obstruction Permit
b. Resolution approving suspension of parking regulations and enforcement for the
Downtown from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday, January 10
c. Resolution approving/motion denying waiver of parking meter fees and enforcement
d. Resolution approving request from Ames Main Street for Saturday, January 10, to
transfer $1,370.25 from the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund to the Parking Fund
8.Annual 2025 Urban Renewal Report:
a. Resolution approving 2025 Urban Renewal Report
b. Resolution approving certification of TIF Debt and appropriating payment of a
rebate of incremental taxes for the Barilla TIF District
c. Resolution approving certification of TIF Debt and appropriating payment of a
rebate of incremental taxes for the North Dayton Industrial Park TIF District
9.Resolution amending Council's Standards of Decorum to require persons speaking to
identify themselves
10.Resolution relating to financing of a project to be undertaken by the City of Ames, Iowa;
establishing compliance with reimbursement bond regulations under the Internal
Revenue Code (Power Plant New Thermal Generation Project)
11.Resolution Issuing a Notice to Bidders for FY 2023/24 Story County Edge of Field Project,
setting January 7, 2026, as the bid due date and January 13, 2026, as the date of public
hearing and award
12.Resolution approving Memorandum of Agreement with Mary Greeley Medical Center for
Alternative Response to Community Health Calls for Service
13.Resolution waiving the City's Purchasing Policy requirement for competitive bidding and
awarding a three-year contract for Computerized Maintenance Management Software to
Limble CMMS LLC, Lehi, UT, in the amount of $94,374 (inclusive of Iowa sales tax)
14.Resolution waiving the City's Purchasing Policy requirement for competitive bidding and
awarding a contract to CentralSquare Technologies, LLC, a CentralSquare Company, of
Lake Mary, FL, in the amount of $161,442.50
15.Resolution awarding contract to GovernmentJobs.com, Inc. (d/b/a NEOGOV) of El
Segundo, CA, for a Human Resources Management Software package in an amount not
to exceed $93,330.10 for year one of a potential five-year contract
16.Resolution approving contract and bond for the CyRide 2025 Battery Electric Bus Facility
Improvement Project with NAI Electrical Contractors, of Ames, IA, in the amount of
$77,300
17.Resolution approving contract and bond for the 2025/26 Traffic Signal Program with Iowa
Signal Inc. of Grimes, IA, in the amount of $75,423.95
18.Resolution approving Change Order No. 1 with TEI Construction Services Inc., of
Duncan, SC, for Boiler Maintenance Services Contract for Power Plant in the amount of
$200,000
19.2023/24 Asphalt Street Pavement Improvements Program #2 (E 7th St, N Riverside Dr):
a. Resolution approving Change Order No. 2 with Con-Struct, Inc., of Ames, IA, for the
2023/24 Asphalt Street Pavement Improvements Program #2 (E 7th St, N Riverside
Dr) in the amount of $42,128.41
b. Resolution accepting 2023/24 Asphalt Street Pavement Improvements Program #2
(E 7th St, N Riverside Dr) as completed by Con-Struct, Inc, of Ames, IA, in the
amount of $788,082.61
2
20.Resolution approving the financial security covering one year of the 4 Year Stormwater
Management Maintenance requirements on file for Wyffels Hybrids, Phase 1 (220 S
Teller Avenue) be reduced to $18,750
21.Resolution approving the financial security covering two years of the 4 Year Stormwater
Management Maintenance requirements on file for Pivot Bio (2600 South Loop Drive) be
reduced to $6,000
22.Resolution approving partial completion of public improvements and reducing financial
security on file for Ansley Subdivision 3rd Addition to $89,403.50
23.Resolution approving the financial security covering the Stormwater Management
Maintenance requirements on file for Northcrest Retirement Community be released in
full
24.Resolution approving the financial security on file for Bricktowne Stormwater Installation
be released in full
25.Resolution approving the financial security on file for Iowa Dermatology (1429 Boston
Avenue) be released in full
26.Resolution accepting Roof Replacement at the Power Plant project as completed by
Central States Roofing, of Ames, IA, in the amount of $1,724,540 (inclusive of Iowa sales
tax)
27.Resolution accepting 2023/24 Concrete Street Pavement Improvements as completed by
Con-Struct, Inc, of Ames, IA, in the amount of $1,191,940.12
28.Resolution accepting 2023/24 Ames Plan 2040 Sanitary Sewer Utility Infrastructure
(265th Street Extension) project as completed by S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc., of
Jordan, MN, in the amount of $2,173,215.06
29.Resolution approving Plat of Survey (Boundary Line Adjustment) for 5300 Hickory Hills
Drive
30.Plat of Survey (Boundary Line Adjustment) for Properties Generally Located at the
Intersection of County Line Road and Lincoln Highway, including 632 and 634 N 500th
and 5507 and 5815 Lincoln Highway
a. Resolution approving the acceptance of right-of-way dedication at 5815 Lincoln
Highway
b. Resolution waiving Minor Subdivision Final Plat requirement to allow for a Plat of
Survey
31.Residential Curbside Recycling Program:
a. Motion directing staff to proceed with Request for Proposal
b. Resolution allocating up to $20,000 from Council Priorities Sustainability fund for
recycling pilot project
32.Roosevelt Avenue Parking Ordinance Update
a. Motion directing staff to prepare ordinance
33.Discussion on modifications to Municipal Code Chapter 19: Parks and Recreation
a. Motion directing staff to update ordinance based on recommendations from Parks &
Recreation Commission
PUBLIC FORUM: This is a time set aside for comments from the public on topics of City
business other than those listed on this agenda. Please understand that the Council will not
take any action on your comments at this meeting due to requirements of the Open Meetings
Law, but may do so at a future meeting.
PUBLIC WORKS:
PARKS & RECREATION:
3
34.Resolution approving Preliminary Plat with PUD Amendment for 3300 University
Boulevard, known as Discovery Place, 1st Addition
35.Engagement Coordinator Annual Update
36.FY 2025/26 Analysis of Social Services Evaluation Team (ASSET) Contract with NAMI
Central Iowa
a. Resolution approving sequestering the remaining balance to NAMI for FY 2025/26
37.Resolution authorizing staff to enter into natural gas supply contract for Power Plant
38.Resolution approving updates to Smart Energy Rebate Program
39.Homewood Golf Course Hole Nine Crossing Improvement Project:
a. Motion accepting report of bids
b. Resolution approving final plans and specifications and awarding a contract to Con-
Struct Inc., of Ames, IA, in the amount of $213,410
40.Hearing on Load Center Replacement at the Power Plant:
a. Motion rejecting bids and directing staff to modify the project
41.Hearing on Rezoning Property at 220-400 Freel Drive from General Industrial (GI) to
Government/Airport District (S-GA):
a. First reading of ordinance
42.Hearing on Lease of City Property located East of 731 Billy Sunday Road now known as
Lot 3 of Billy Sunday Subdivision to Lamar Advertising Company
a. Motion to continue Public Hearing to November 25, 2025
43.Hearing to transfer Vacated Alley located at 325 Ash Avenue to Alpha Iota Association of
Phi Gamma Delta
a. Resolution approving vacating alley for no additional consideration by Quit Claim
deed
44.Hearing to consider vacation of an existing electric easement at 1411 S Grand Avenue
a. Resolution approving vacation of electric easement at 1411 S Grand Avenue
45.Second reading on Zoning Text Amendment to amend material standards for off-street
parking areas and driveways for agricultural equipment in the Research Park Innovation
District
46.Participation with agencies, boards and commissions:
a. Discover Ames (ACVB)
b. Ames Regional Economic Alliance (AREA)
c. Story County Emergency Management Agency (SCEMA)
d. Ames Transit Agency Board of Trustees
PLANNING AND HOUSING:
ADMINISTRATION:
ELECTRIC:
HEARINGS:
ORDINANCES:
DISPOSITION OF COMMUNICATIONS TO COUNCIL :
REPORT OF GOVERNING BODY:
COUNCIL COMMENTS :
ADJOURNMENT:
4
Please note that this agenda may be changed up to 24 hours before the meeting time as
provided by Section 21.4(2), Code of Iowa.
5
To:Mayor and City Council
From:Casandra Eames, Staff Liaison to the Ames Human Relations
Commission
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:2024 Ames Human Relations Commission Report
Item No. 1
MEMO
Please see the attached 2024 Annual Report, which was approved by the Ames
Human Relations Commission at its meeting on October 23, 2025.
ATTACHMENT(S):
2024 AHRC Annual Report.pdf
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
6
2024 ANNUAL
REPORT
AMES HUMAN
RELATIONS COMMISSION
7
AMES HUMAN
RELATIONS COMMISSION
The Ames Human Relations Commission's (AHRC) mission is
to connect and support all communities in Ames by:
• providing opportunities for growth and engagement,
• focusing on building trust, respect, and shared goals for
the future,
• bridging gaps, celebrating differences, and building
unity, and
• championing equity and accessibility
through hosting, attending, and supporting local events.
CITY OF AMES MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 14:
The purpose of this chapter is to implement the provision of
the Iowa Civil Rights Act and to further provide for the general
welfare of persons in the City of Ames, Iowa, by prohibiting
certain discriminatory practices, and to establish a for the
investigation of complaints of discrimination; and, to undertake
projects of education to prevent discrimination; and, to
establish procedures for the conciliation of such complaints;
and to enforce the provisions hereof.
At an August 2018 City Council workshop, Council members
directed AHRC to not adjudicate cases and instead refer all
cases to the Iowa Office of Civil Rights (IOCR). At this
workshop, City Council directed AHRC to review data
available, interact with community partners, and recommend
action items and changes to the ordinance.
2024 AHRC COMMISSIONERS:
• Chunhui Chen, Chair
• Wayne Clinton
• Marty Martinez
• Angie DeWaard (January – March 2024)
• Brennan Sorkin, Vice Chair (April – November 2024)
• Annabella Marquez (appointed April 2024)
• Pablo Suarez Beltran (appointed April 2024)
• Shawn Kenny (appointed April 2024)
• Casandra Eames, City of Ames Staff Liaison
CONTENTS
Ames Human Relations
Commission (AHRC)
Introduction & Purpose
................................page 1
2024 Activity Highlights
.........................pages 2-3
Ames Civil Rights
Complaints 2024
...........................page 4
2023-25 Strategic Plan
.........................pages 5-7
8
ACTIVITY HIGHLIGHTS:
In addition to adding two new members in 2024, AHRC pursued a wider range of
outreach efforts, finding ways to do the meaningful work set forth by the City Council.
JANUARY 2024
• At the Ames/Story County Martin Luther King Day Celebration at the Ames City
Auditorium on January 15, Wayne Clinton presented the Humanitarian Award to
Cari McPartland. He also served on the organizing committee for the event.
• Began brainstorming for the 50th Anniversary of AHRC in October.
FEBRUARY 2024
• The Quarterly Meet & Greet was held at Wheatsfield Cooperative on February
25. The Commissioners in attendance conversed with 20+ individuals.
MARCH 2024
• Completed development of a “Trailblazers” coloring book featuring significant
individuals in Ames history. The project was spearheaded by Angie DeWaard,
and AHRC planned to distribute copies at community outreach efforts.
• Planned significant revisions to the A Home for Everyone Award nomination
form.
APRIL 2024
• AHRC membership increased from five to seven members. After welcoming new
members, AHRC elected Chunhui Chen as Chair and Brennan Sorkin as Vice
Chair.
• On April 25, AHRC volunteered at the Kate Mitchell Elementary School
Multicultural Night, distributing copies of the coloring book along with crayons.
• Participated in Fair Housing Month activities, including receiving a Mayoral
Proclamation recognizing Fair Housing Month and attending a luncheon on the
topic of fair housing organized by the Iowa Board of Realtors.
MAY 2024
• Published a Call for Artists for the 50th Anniversary T-Shirt Design Contest.
• Sponsored the 3rd Annual AAPI Heritage Month Celebration on May 11. Chunhui
Chen served on the organizing committee.
JUNE 2024
• Joint Meeting with the City Council on June 11 to present the 2023 Annual
Report
• Sponsored and participated in the 3rd Annual Juneteenth Celebration on June 15.
• At the June 27 meeting, IOCR Director Kristin Stiffler gave a virtual presentation
explaining the role and function of the IOCR.
• Held a Strategic Planning Retreat with ISU Extension facilitator on June 29,
discussing AHRC values and goals with an eye toward Strategic Plan revisions.
2
9
JULY 2024
• Selected T-Shirt Design Contest winners Sarah Balvanz and Caitlin Chellew and
ordered t-shirts to be unveiled at the 50th Anniversary Celebration.
AUGUST 2024
• Participated in National Night Out at the Ames Middle School on August 6.
• Held a Quarterly Meet & Greet at the Ames Public Library on August 13 in
conjunction with the Free Summer Meals for Kids and Teens program.
• Finalized plans for the 50th Anniversary Celebration in October, including a
memorial tree planting ceremony.
SEPTEMBER 2024
• Made revisions to the Humanitarian Award nomination form prior to soliciting
nominations.
• At the September meeting, Legal Aid of Story County provided a training on
tenant and landlord rights.
• Sponsored and participated in Pridefest on September 14.
OCTOBER 2024
• Celebrated the 50th Anniversary of AHRC with an event at Moore Memorial Park
on October 20. Commissioners shared remarks, ceremonially completed a tree
planting, and recognized the winners of the t-shirt design contest while unveiling
the final product.
• Began discussing revisions to the AHRC mission statement and ordinance.
NOVEMBER 2024
• Participated again in the Kate Mitchell Elementary School Multicultural Night on
November 12, helping as volunteers and distributing coloring books and t -shirts.
DECEMBER 2024
• Sponsored and attended the Building Inclusion Breakfast (formerly Symposium
on Building Inclusive Organizations) at Reiman Gardens on December 13.
• Elected Annabella Marquez as Vice Chair to replace Brennan Sorkin, who had
resigned from AHRC.
• Selected Latifah Faisal as the recipient of the 2025 Humanitarian Award.
3
10
AMES CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINTS
TO THE IOWA OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS 2024
Residents can initiate complaints to the City via the City Manager’s Office or make
them directly to the Iowa Office of Civil Rights (IOCR). As a matter of procedure,
reports made to the City are sent to the IOCR for investigation and are tracked by the
IOCR. Reports are also made to IOCR involving Ames of which the Ames Human
Relations Commission is not notified. The Commission requested aggregate
summaries of the Ames complaints made to the IOCR to understand the areas of
complaints and concerns identified. Despite repeated efforts on the part of staff to
follow up on this routine request, the IOCR has refused to provide the data and has
not provided a clear reason for its refusal. If the data is released in the future, the
Commission will share the data with the City Council at that time.
4
11
AMES HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
2023-25 STRATEGIC PLAN
Strategic Goal A – Advocacy
The Ames Human Relations Commission (AHRC) values a diverse and inclusive
community and will function as an advocacy group for the citizens of the City of
Ames. The Commission will undertake activities to discover, conduct analysis on,
and circumvent instances that may lead to prohibited discrimination so that the
community can be educated and assisted in preventing it. Commission members
will be active participants in the city and will develop and follow a protocol to handle
discriminatory incidents in the Ames community and will report and make
recommendations directly to the City Council to ensure all voices are heard.
Strategic Goal B – Information & Analysis
The Ames Human Relations Commission (AHRC) will study the existence,
character, causes and extent of discriminatory practices in the community while
using resources to gain information and work with community partners, leaders, and
report directly to the City Council.
OBJECTIVE 1: AHRC will maintain objective knowledge related to claims of
discrimination.
• AHRC will work directly with the Iowa Civil Right Commission and will
collaborate annually with a representative to better understand the complaint
process.
• AHRC will obtain and review reports from the Iowa Civil Rights Commission
on claims of discrimination in relation to types and probable cause.
• AHRC will obtain and review reports from the City on types of claims made
locally in writing, or on the website and report of Discriminatory Claims to the
City, and any concerns expressed through AHRC@cityofames.org.
• AHRC will obtain and review formal and informal reports that will be used to
determine priority areas of focus and will share with City Council and
community stakeholders annually and as needed.
OBJECTIVE 2: AHRC will partner with the City and community members to learn
about discrimination and how to decrease the risk.
• AHRC will partner with community employers and human resource specialists
to identify concerns and opportunities for non-discriminatory workplace
cultures as needed.
• AHRC will summarize and share qualitative and quantitative findings with City
Council relating to claims of discrimination.
5
12
• AHRC will work with the City to identify public reporting related to inclusion
and anti-discriminatory practices.
OBJECTIVE 3: AHRC will identify opportunities for obtaining information related to
community member perceptions and experiences in relation to housing,
employment, public accommodation, race and ethnicity, gender identity, religion,
age, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, or familial status.
• AHRC will reach out to community partners or populations to identify
concerns or successes in the areas mentioned above.
• AHRC will collect and summarize findings to be used for future planning, i.e.,
Community Demographics, CyRide or City Surveys.
OBJECTIVE 4: AHRC will be an active presence in providing community education
and deterring discrimination.
• AHRC will increase engagement and community interactions.
• AHRC will monitor and report contacts or participation in relation to social
media and public engagement activities.
Strategic Goal C – Public Awareness & Effective Communication
AHRC strives to be a central location for the citizens of the City of Ames to advocate
for, build awareness of, and communicate with. Commission members will connect
with their community through public awareness and effective communication.
OBJECTIVE 1: Help improve communication effectiveness with the general public
through media outlets and active presence in the Ames community. The following
are examples of possible actions:
• Provide materials for educational press releases or social media on topics
related to diversity, housing, employment, public accommodations, or
services, etc.
• Co-sponsor and have commissioners attend community events with aligned
organizations and individuals throughout the City, such as but not limited to
the annual awarding of the Humanitarian award (January-Dr. Martin Luther
King Jr. Day Holiday), Fair Housing Award (April at City Council), AAPI
Heritage Month Celebration event (May), Juneteenth (June).
• Help provide information on community events for Ames City’s online event
calendar and have commissioners attend the events.
Strategic Goal D – Management Excellence
AHRC will work towards this strategic plan for the betterment of our community in
an ethical and fiscally responsible way.
6
13
OBJECTIVE 1: AHRC will strive to keep this strategic plan at the forefront of all its
decisions and activities and within our areas of focus and expertise.
• Commission Members will work with community partners who specialize in
areas of expertise.
• Commission Members will represent AHRC with respect, recognize and
celebrate the strength of the City of Ames’ greatest asset, the value of all
people, via diversity and inclusion. They will be respectful of opinions,
customs, and individual preferences to help build strong relationships.
OBJECTIVE 2: AHRC will manage the annual budget in a fiscally responsible
manner.
• AHRC will strive to effectively spend the budgeted monies from the Ames City
Council responsibly. Monies allocated for the Commission should only be
used in ways that advance these strategic goals.
• AHRC will describe the ways in which its monies were used and in what ways
its use advanced the goals described above in the annual report.
7
14
ITEM #:2
DEPT:CMO
November 18, 2025
Staff Report
DISCUSSION ON MODIFICATIONS TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 14: HUMAN
RELATIONS
BACKGROUND:
In 2019, the Ames Human Relations Commission (AHRC) stopped investigating civil rights
complaints and switched to contracting with the Iowa Office of Civil Rights (IOCR) to
investigate such claims. Since that significant shift in its function, AHRC has been exploring its
evolving mission and priorities.
The AHRC would like the Council to consider several changes to Municipal Code Chapter 14:
Human Relations to better align the code with its current activities and objectives.
Chapter 14 was most recently amended in 2024, when the City Council increased AHRC from
five to seven members. This change was prompted by AHRC's increased outreach activities in
the community. In June 2024, a strategic planning retreat was held with the expanded
membership. The discussion initially focused on updates to the strategic plan. However, the
conversation shifted as commissioners identified a lack of alignment between Chapter
14's description of AHRC's powers and duties and the role AHRC has shifted towards
as it increases outreach and presence in the community.
Over the past year, AHRC has researched examples of language from the codes of peer
cities in Iowa, discussing desired elements to emulate. The Commission has worked on
proposed revisions that it would like Council to consider.
A summary of the changes the Commission would like to see include:
1. Sec. 14.1, "Purpose of Chapter"
Clarify that discriminatory practices are prohibited.
Correct a typographical error by adding a missing word.
Update the Iowa Civil Rights Commission to reflect its recent renaming as the Iowa
Office of Civil Rights.
2. Sec. 14.5, "Powers and Duties"
Revise the description of Commission's powers and duties to use more accessible language
and to emphasize the focus on community outreach and engagement.
The revision proposed by the Commission, but not yet reviewed by City Attorney, would read
as:
"The Commission shall have the following powers and duties:
15
1. To facilitate coordination and connection among community groups to amplify the impact
of their efforts toward ending discrimination and reducing inequality in the community.
2. To collaborate with organizations and individuals in the community to plan and
participate in events that connect various populations through celebration of culture and
inclusion.
3. To listen to community members and provide access to resources that may help resolve
discrimination complaints, including connecting residents with the Iowa Office of Civil
Rights when enforcement action may be needed.
4. To gather information and provide an annual report to the City Council about the status
of human rights in the community and the commission’s activities promoting belonging
among various populations recognized in the community.
5. To recommend policies and programs that promote human rights of persons and groups
in the community to the mayor and City Council.
6. To manage any city funds, donations, or grants given to the commission for promoting
the purposes of this chapter."
OPTIONS:
If the Council is supportive of considering the Commission's recommendations, it
would be appropriate for the Council to make a motion directing the City Attorney to
draft proposed modifications to Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code.
STAFF COMMENTS:
City Staff agrees with the Commission that modifications would be appropriate and
beneficial to align the Municipal Code language with the Commission's current
activities.
ATTACHMENT(S):
16
To:Mayor & City Council
From:Renee Hall, City Clerk
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Report of Contract Change Orders
Item No. 3
MEMO
The Report of Change Orders for the period of October 16-31, 2025, is attached
for the City Council's review and consideration.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Change Order Report - October 16-31, 2025.docx
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
17
REPORT OF
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS
Department
General Description
of Contract
Contract
Change
No.
Original Contract
Amount Contractor/ Vendor
Total of Prior
Change Orders
Amount this
Change Order
Change
Approved By
Purchasing
Contact
(Buyer)
Parks &
Recreation
Parks & Recreation
Maintenance Building
2 $1,344,075.00 King Knutson Construction
Inc.
$1,449.75 $(1,525.00) J. Thompson AM
Parks &
Recreation
Parks & Recreation
Maintenance Building
3 $1,344,075.00 King Knutson Construction
Inc.
$(75.24) $1,897.50 J. Thompson AM
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $
Period: 1st – 15th
16th – End of Month
Month & Year: October 2025
For City Council Date: November 18, 2025
18
To:Mayor & City Council
From:City Clerk's Office
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Approval of Minutes
Item No. 4
MEMO
Attached are the minutes from the Regular City Council Meeting on October 28,
2025.
ATTACHMENT(S):
C25-1028 Summary.pdf
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
19
1
SUMMARY OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL
AMES, IOWA OCTOBER 28, 2025
The Regular Meeting of the Ames City Council was called to order by Mayor John Haila at 5:59
p.m. on the 28th day of October, 2025, in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, 515 Clark
Avenue, pursuant to law. Present were Council Members Gloria Betcher, Amber Corrieri, Tim
Gartin, Rachel Junck, and Anita Rollins. Ex officio Emily Boland was also present. Council
Member Bronwyn Beatty-Hansen joined the meeting electronically.
PROCLAMATION FOR “NATIONAL COMMUNITY PLANNING MONTH,” OCTOBER 2025:
Mayor Haila proclaimed October 2025 as “National Community Planning Month” and Planning
and Housing Director Kelly Diekmann accepted the proclamation.
CONSENT AGENDA: Moved by Corrieri, seconded by Betcher, to approve the consent agenda.
2. Motion approving payment of claims
3. Motion approving Report of Change Orders for period of October 1-15, 2025
4. Motion approving Summary of Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting on October
14, 2025, and the Special City Council Meeting on October 21, 2025
5. Motion approving a new 5-Day (November 13-17, 2025) Class C Retail Alcohol License
- Sports Bowl, 2321 North Loop Drive
6. RESOLUTION NO. 25-533 approving encroachment permit for The Coop sign at 2420
Lincoln Way Suite 103
7. RESOLUTION NO. 25-534 approving request from Story County Auditor for parking
waiver(s) for election day related parking on November 4, 2025
8. RESOLUTION NO. 25-535 waiving the City's Purchasing Policy requirements for
competitive bidding and awarding a contract to Sentry Aquatic Innovations, of
Woodward, IA, for the Furman Aquatic Center Pool Basin Heater Replacement Project
in the amount of $297,600.30
9. RESOLUTION NO. 25-536 awarding contract to Logan Contractor Supply of Grimes, IA,
for the purchase of a 2025 CrafCo SS125D Trailer Mounted Sealant Melter -Applicator
with Toolbox for the Public Works Street Maintenance Division in the amount of
$56,360.62
10. RESOLUTION NO. 25-537 approving Change Order No. 1 with Petrotech Inc., of New
Orleans, LA, for Combustion Turbine Controls Upgrade in an amount of $174,300.86
11. RESOLUTION NO. 25-538 approving Change Order No. 8 with Tallgrass Land
Stewardship Co., of Waukee, IA, for the 2021/22 Stormwater Detention/Retention
Maintenance Program - (Northridge Heights Pond) in the amount of $23,843.50
12. RESOLUTION NO. 25-539 setting November 18, 2025, as date of Public Hearing to
consider vacation of the existing electric easement at 1411 S Grand Avenue
13. RESOLUTION NO. 25-540 setting November 18, 2025, as date of Public Hearing to
transfer Vacated Alley to Alpha Iota Association of Phi Gamma Delta (325 Ash Avenue)
14. RESOLUTION NO. 25-541 certifying Annexation Area Populations to State Treasurer
15. RESOLUTION NO. 25-542 approving Major Final Plat for South Fourth Commons
Subdivision at 400 South 4th Street
ADDITIONAL ITEM: RESOLUTION NO. 25-543 approving Agreement between Ames
Human Relations Commission and Iowa Office of Civil Rights regarding intake and
investigation of Civil Rights Complaints
20
2
ADDITIONAL ITEM: Motion for the Mayor to sign the Acknowledgement of Covenants in
conjunction with the Townhomes of Creekside, LLP, to receive its LIHTC Award for the
construction of 38 units in the Baker Subdivision as part of the City HOME program
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motions/Resolutions declared carried/adopted unanimously, signed by the
Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes.
PUBLIC FORUM: The Public Forum was opened by Mayor Haila.
Delaney Graef, Iowa State University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Senator, shared
concerns regarding the implementation of the Ioway Creek Stabilization Project in Brookside
City Park including the use of heavy machinery and the degradation of the land. Graef urged the
City Council to prioritize preserving the woodlands and minimiz ing pollution into the College
Creek waterway during the Fire Station No. 2 Relocation project.
The Public Forum was closed by Mayor Haila when no one else came forward to speak.
FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PET LICENSING PROGRAM: Police
Chief Geoff Huff presented an overview of the proposed pet licensing program (PLP) for cats and
dogs, highlighting that it would help to provide faster reunification of lost pets with their owners,
ensure rabies vaccine compliance and microchip accuracy, reduce reclamation fees of lost pets,
and encourage responsible pet ownership. Chief Huff reviewed start-up costs and noted that the
proposed annual fee structure of $12 for altered pets and $24 for unaltered pets would enable the
program to be self-supporting and would help to support the new animal shelter.
Mayor Haila opened the Public Input.
Briar Ott, Kara Stone, Shawn, an anonymous Ames resident, and JZ Conrad spoke in opposition
to the proposed PLP.
Mayor Haila closed the Public Input when no one else came forward to speak.
Moved by Junck, seconded by Rollins, to approve Alternative No. 2: direct staff to bring the
proposed ordinance back to the City Council for final decision regarding the proposed program
at a later date, and in the meantime ask staff to implement a public information campaign to
inform residents of the new proposed Pet Licensing Program that is under consideration and
gather feedback.
Roll Call Vote: 4-2, Corrieri and Gartin dissenting. Motion declared carried.
BUILDING ENERGY AUDIT REPORT: Alongside Director of Fleet Services Corey Mellies,
Sustainability Coordinator Nolan Sagan introduced the Building Energy Audit Report and gave a
brief overview. Resource Consulting Engineers Project Manager Corey Metzger presented the
findings from energy audits of 16 City buildings, which established energy use baselines and
identified opportunities for energy, greenhouse gas, and cost savings.
Moved by Gartin, seconded by Corrieri, to accept the Building Energy Audit Report.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
FITCH FAMILY INDOOR AQUATIC CENTER MONTHLY UPDATE: Parks and Recreation
Director Keith Abraham, Story Construction Project Manager Troy Turner, and RDG Planning &
Design Architect Brad Rodenberg presented the monthly update on the Fitch Family Indoor
21
3
Aquatic Center. The presentation highlighted a concern with discoloration on the south-facing
precast wall, which was expected to be addressed by mid-December. Director Abraham indicated
that the project was on track for substantial completion by January 20, 2026, with a public opening
tentatively planned for March 2026.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Gartin, to accept the Fitch Family Indoor Aquatic Center Monthly
Update.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
MAJOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITHIN A PUD OVERLAY FOR 3200 UNIVERSITY
BOULEVARD (ISU RESEARCH PARK): Planner Benjamin Campbell presented the Major Site
Development Plan for 3200 University Boulevard, which included 74 residential units on a 6-
acre site with four apartment buildings and seven duplexes.
Mayor Haila opened the Public Input.
Hunziker Development Coordinator Justin Dodge shared the intended ownership mix and
explained the partnership with Story County Conservation on shared entrance signage and
integrated landscaping.
The Public Input was closed by Mayor Haila when no one else came forward to speak.
Moved by Gartin, seconded by Betcher, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 25-544 approving Major Site
Development Plan within a PUD Overlay for 3200 University Boulevard (ISU Research Park).
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 3200 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT: Planner Campbell reviewed the preliminary plat and how it would subdivide
the property into individual units.
Mayor Haila opened and closed Public Input when no one came forward to speak.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Gartin, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 25-545 approving
Residential Preliminary Plat for 3200 University Boulevard Planned Unit Development.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
RESIDENT SATISFACTION SURVEY 2025: Communications and Outreach Manager Susan
Gwiasda presented the results of the 43rd Annual Resident Satisfaction Survey, which was
conducted with assistance from Iowa State University’s Institute for Design Research and Outreach.
The survey received 464 responses, with 28 completed online. Satisfaction with City services
remained high.
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL UPDATE: Finance Director Corey
Goodenow introduced the first quarterly financial report. The purpose of the report was to improve
transparency and enable proactive decision-making by City Council. Budget Manager Nancy
Masteller explained the report format, which included beginning fund balances, year-to-date
revenues and expenses, and ending fund balances as of September 30, 2025.
22
4
QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2025:
Treasurer Roger Wisecup reviewed the City's investment program, which followed priorities
outlined in Code of Iowa Chapter 12B: safety, liquidity, and yield. Finance Director Goodenow
presented the current rate of return, which was approximately 4%, with interest earnings trending
with Federal Reserve rates.
Moved by Junck, seconded by Gartin, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 25-546 approving Quarterly
Investment Report for Period Ending September 30, 2025.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE BOARD OF REGENTS, STATE OF IOWA FOR
UNIVERSITY PROPERTY LOCATED ON STATE AVENUE FOR THE RELOCATION OF
AMES FIRE STATION NO. 2: Fire Chief Rich Higgins presented the lease agreement between
the City of Ames and Iowa State University for property located at 601 State Avenue to relocate
Fire Station No. 2. The relocation was pending based on the outcome of the November 4, 2025,
bond referendum. The 52-year lease, two years for construction and 50 years for operation with
option to renew, would come at no cost to the City. In return, the City would be responsible for
constructing the fire station, implementing any traffic control measures on State Avenue, and
maintaining the property.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Junck, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 25-547 approving lease
agreement with the Board of Regents, State of Iowa for University property located on State
Avenue for the relocation of Ames Fire Station No. 2.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 28 OF THE AMES
MUNICIPAL CODE ADJUSTING ELECTRIC RATES BY 1.5%: Moved by Betcher, seconded
by Rollins, to pass on second reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 28 of the Ames
Municipal Code adjusting electric rates by 1.5%.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Rollins, to suspend the rules and pass on third reading of
an ordinance amending Chapter 28 of the Ames Municipal Code adjusting electric rates by
1.5%.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Junck, seconded by Rollins, to pass on third reading and adopt of ORDINANCE NO.
4575 amending Chapter 28 of the Ames Municipal Code adjusting electric rates by 1.5%.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
THIRD READING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT
OF NONRESIDENT SANITARY SEWER RATES AND CERTAIN WATER & POLLUTION
CONTROL FEES: Moved by Betcher, seconded by Rollins, to pass on third reading and adopt
ORDINANCE NO. 4574 regarding Establishment of Nonresident Sanitary Sewer Rates and
certain Water & Pollution Control fees.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
23
5
HEARING ON LEASE OF CITY PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF 731 BILLY SUNDAY ROAD
NOW KNOWN AS LOT 3 OF BILLY SUNDAY SUBDIVISION TO LAMAR ADVERTISING
COMPANY: Moved by Betcher, seconded by Rollins, to continue the Public Hearing to
November 18, 2025.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
HEARING ON ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT TO AMEND MATERIAL STANDARDS FOR
OFF-STREET PARKING AREAS AND DRIVEWAYS FOR AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENT IN
THE RESEARCH PARK INNOVATION DISTRICT ZONE: Director Kelly Diekman explained that
the text amendment applied specifically to the Research Park, must be accessory to a principal use
behind a building, and would not impact the surrounding area.
The Public Hearing was opened and closed by Mayor Haila when no one came forward to
speak.
Moved by Rollins, seconded by Betcher, to pass on first reading of an ordinance amending
material standards for off-street parking areas and driveways for agricultural equipment in the
Research Park Innovation District Zone.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
HEARING ON 2025/26 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROGRAM: Mayor Haila opened and closed the
Public Hearing when no one came forward to speak.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Rollins to accept the report of bids.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Rollins, to adopt RESOLUTION 25-548 approving final plans
and specifications and awarding a contract to Iowa Signal Inc., of Grimes, IA, in the amount of
$75,423.95.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared carried unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
HEARING ON 2024/2025 CDBG CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
(CAPER): Housing Coordinator Vanessa Baker-Latimer presented the 2024/2025 CDBG
Consolidated Annual Performance Report (CAPER). The report outlined the use of approximately
$600,000 in CDBG funds, aimed primarily at rental affordability, and $1,900,000 in HOME program
funds for constructing 38 units in the Baker Subdivision's Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)
project.
The Public Hearing was opened and closed by Mayor Haila when no one came forward to
speak.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Rollins, to adopt RESOLUTION 25-549 approving the submittal
of the City's 2024/25 CAPER.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared carried unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
DISPOSITION OF COMMUNICATIONS TO COUNCIL: Mayor Haila noted that there were four
items for consideration. The first was a request for immediate stormwater management
24
6
improvements at the southeast corner of Hoover Avenue and Adams Street from Ames Resident
Martha Atkins.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Rollins, to refer to Public Works staff for a memo.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
A request for “No Bicycles” signs on 6th Street sidewalks from Ames Resident Martin Laird was
the second item.
Moved by Beatty-Hansen, seconded by Junck, to have staff respond to the sender, thank them
for their input, and inform them that the City Council would wait until 6th Street construction was
complete to assess if this was an issue.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
The third item was a request for a Zoning Text Amendment for a stairway enclosure from Ames
Resident Tim Ashley.
Moved by Gartin, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to refer to Planning and Housing staff for a
memo.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
A response from Planning and Housing Director Kelly Diekmann to JT Logistics regarding a
warehouse landscaping request was the fourth item.
Moved by Gartin, seconded by Rollins, to direct Planning and Housing staff to work with the
applicant using the existing 20 percent flexibility rule for landscaping requirements.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
REPORT OF GOVERNING BODY: The Members of the City Council and Mayor provided
highlights from their attendance at various board and commission meetings.
COUNCIL COMMENTS: The Mayor and City Council Members reported on various events
attended, upcoming meetings, community events, and items of interest.
CLOSED SESSION: Mayor Haila asked City Attorney Mark Lambert if there was a legal reason
to go into Closed Session. Attorney Lambert replied in the affirmative, citing Section 20.17(3),
Code of Iowa, regarding discussion of collective bargaining strategy.
Moved by Gartin, seconded by Betcher, to go into Closed Session at 9:33 p.m.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
The City Council reconvened in Regular Session at 9:43 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT: Moved by Corrieri, seconded by Gartin, to adjourn the meeting at 9:43 p.m.
Vote on Motion 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Taylor Swanson, Deputy City Clerk John A. Haila, Mayor
25
7
_______________________________
Renee Hall, City Clerk
26
To:Mayor & City Council
From:City Clerk's Office
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Approval of Civil Service Candidates
Item No. 5
MEMO
Attached are the minutes for the Regular Meeting of the Civil Service
Commission held on October 23, 2025
ATTACHMENT(S):
October 23 2025 Civil Service Minutes.pdf
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
27
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
AMES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
AMES, IOWA OCTOBER 23, 2025
The Regular Meeting of the Ames Civil Service Commission met in regular session in Council Chambers
of City Hall, 515 Clark Avenue, with Commission Members, Harold Pike, Co-Chair and Larry Conley
present. Kim Linduska, Commission Chair was absent. Also in attendance Commission Clerk, Vicki
Hillock. Human Resources Director, Bethany Ballou, was brought in telephonically.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2025: Moved by Conley, seconded by Pike, to
approve the Minutes of the September 25, 2025, Regular Service Commission meeting. Vote on Motion: 2-
0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
CERTIFICATION OF ENTRY-LEVEL APPLICANTS: Moved by Pike, seconded by Conley, to certify
the following individuals to the Ames City Council as Entry-Level Applicants:
Aquatics Coordinator Lily Erkkila 88
Seth Moore 77
Tucker Pease 75
Assistant Building Official Scott McCambridge 82
Civil Design Technician William Crystal 85
Dillon Sanders 70
Maintenance Worker – Parks & Rec Sublist Samuel Hilsabeck 77
* Includes preference points
** Indicates carryover from prior certified list
Vote on Motion: 2-0. Motion declared carried.
REQUEST TO REMOVE NAME FROM RECREATION MANAGER LIST: Moved by Conley,
seconded by Pike, to remove name from Recreation Manager entry level certified list.
COMMENTS: The next Regular Meeting will be held in-person on Thursday, November 20, 2025 at 8:15
am in Council Chambers of City Hall.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:18 AM.
__________________________________ _______________________________________
Kim Linduska, Chairperson Vicki Hillock, Commission Clerk
28
To:Mayor John Haila and Ames City Council Members
From:Major Dan Walter, Ames Police Department
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Beer Permits & Liquor License Renewal
Item No. 6
MEMO
The following licenses are eligible for renewal:
a. Chocolaterie Stam, 230 Main Street, Special Class B Native Wine Permit
b. Radisson Hotel Ames, 2609 University Boulevard, Class C Retail Alcohol
License
c. Time Out - Ames, 120 Kellogg Avenue, Class C Retail Alcohol License with
Outdoor Service
A review of police records for the past 12 months found no liquor law violations
for the above locations. The Ames Police Department recommends the license
renewal for the above businesses.
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
29
ITEM #:7
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:ADMIN
SUBJECT:REQUESTS FROM AMES MAIN STREET FOR WINTER SIDEWALK SALES
ON JANUARY 8-11, 2026
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
Ames Main Street is again hosting Winter Sidewalk Sales from January 8-11, 2026. At this
event, downtown businesses display merchandise on the sidewalks for pedestrians to
browse.
To facilitate this event, organizers are requesting suspension of parking regulations and
enforcement for the Downtown from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday, January 10
($1,370.25 estimated loss to the Parking Fund). A blanket Temporary Obstruction Permit has
also been requested for Saturday, January 10, 2026.
In February 2020, the City Council adopted the following policy regarding metered parking
waivers:
Metered parking fees will not be waived for special events. Any event organizers
intending to provide free parking or to close metered parking spaces must reimburse
the City’s Parking Fund for the lost revenue. The City Council may consider waivers to
this policy on a case-by-case basis for parking spaces that are obstructed by the event
area (not for area-wide free parking).
The adopted FY 2025/26 City budget contains $10,000 in funding in the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund
to reimburse the Parking Fund for lost meter revenue associated with special events. With
City Council approval, a transfer in the amount of $1,370.25 will be made from the
Hotel/Motel Tax Fund to the Parking Fund to cover the lost revenue.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the requests for Winter Sidewalk Sales as requested by Ames Main Street,
including the waiver of fees for parking and vending, and transfer $1,370.25 from the
Hotel/Motel Tax Fund to the Parking Fund.
2. Approve the requests for Sidewalk Sales, but require reimbursement for lost parking
meter revenue.
3. Deny the requests.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Winter Sidewalk Sales is a successful event for the Downtown that attracts people to
the Downtown and promotes shopping locally. These requests further the City
Council’s goal to strengthen Downtown. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City
30
Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, as described above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Downtown Winter Sidewalk Sales Application.pdf
31
Travis Toliver, IOM
Executive Director
travis@amesalliance.com
304 Main Street, Ames, IA 50010 |515.233.3472 |DowntownAmes.org
Ames Main Street advances and promotes Downtown Ames as the heart of the Ames community.
October 30, 2025
Mayor and City Councill
City of Ames
515 Clark Ave
Ames, IA 50010
Dear Mayor Haila and Members of the Ames City Council,
Ames Main Street is planning to hold the annual Winter Sidewalk Sales event from January 8
through January 11, 2026.
Specific information about the event can be found on the included Special Event Application.
Additionally, we request a Temporary Obstruction Permit and a waiver of fees for free
parking in City of Ames meters throughout the Downtown Ames District on Saturday, January
10, 2026.
By bringing residents to Downtown Ames for attractions such as this, Ames Main Street is
able to fulfill its mission as a Main Street Iowa community and create an economically vibrant
downtown with unique living, dining, and entertainment experiences.
Thank you for your consideration of this request and continued support of Ames Main Street.
We look forward to seeing you shopping in Downtown Ames!
Sincerely,
Travis Toliver
Executive Director
Ames Main Street
32
1
For Office Use Only
Documents Received
Date: ____________________
___ Completed Application
___ Fireworks Application
($25 fee)
___ Insurance Certificate
___ Public Safety & Event
Management Plan
___ Site Plan/Route Map
($25 fee) (Road Race)
___ Vendor List
($50 fee/each)
___ Parking fees
Special Events Meeting
Date ____________________
Time ____________________
Room ___________________
Documents Sent:
___ Alcohol License
ABD ________________
___ Fireworks Permit
___ Road Race Permit
___ TOP
___sĞŶĚŝŶŐ Permit
___ Other ________________
Departments Included
___ City Manager: Brian
Phillips and Tasheik Kerr
___ CyRide: Jenny Bethurem
or Rob Holm
___ Electric: Mark Imhoff
___ Fire: Jason Ziph or Rich
Higgins
___ Parks & Rec: Craig
Kaufman or Joshua
Thompson
___ Public Works: Brad Becker
or Dave Cole
___ Police:dŽŵ^ŚĞůƚŽŶ or
DŝŬĞƌŬŽǀŝĐŚ
___ Water:,ĞŝĚŝ WĞƚĞƌƐĞŶ
___ Risk Management: Bill
Walton
CAA:^ĂƌĂŚǀŽƌƐŬLJ
D^:^ĂƌĂŚǀŽƌƐŬLJ
ISU: Events
Authorization Committee
City Council Meeting
Date _____________________
___ Added to Agenda with CAF
Approved Y N
Reminder Date ____________
SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION
Applications received less than thirty (30) days before the event may not be processed by
the City in time for the event and will automatically be denied. Each application is viewed
as a new event regardless of previous occasions.
Event Name
Location/Address
Region (Select one or more)
$PHVMain Street (Downtown)
Campustown District
Iowa State University Property
City Parks
Other (please explain)
Please note that events occurring in the Downtown, Campustown, in City parks, or on ISU property
require prior approvals. A letter of support will be required from CAA if the event occurs in
Campustown or from $PHV0DLQ6WUHHW if the event occurs in Downtown. Please contact the
appropriate office well in advance:
Downtown -$PHV0DLQ6WUHHW: (515) 23-
&ustown Action Association: (515)-
ISU - Events Authorization Committee: (515) 294-1437
GLUHFWRU@amesdowntown.org
VDUDKG#DPHVFKDPEHUFRP
eventauthorization@iastate.edu
TIMELINE
Detailed Description of Event Activities (written overview of event and what’s going to happen)
Event Ends Date Time M T W R F Sa Su
Teardown
Complete Date Time M T W R F Sa Su
Event Category
Concert/Performance
Farmer/Outdoor Market
Other (please explain)
Athletic/Recreation
Exhibits/Misc.
Festival/Celebration
Parade/Procession/March
Rain Date Rain Location
Yes No
Is this an annual event? If yes, how many years?
Setup Date Time M T W R F Sa Su
Event Starts Date Time M T W R F Sa Su
Žƌ<ĞǀŝŶ'ƌŝĞƐ
Downtown Ames Winter Sidewalk Sales
Downtown Ames
✔
1/8/2026
1/11/2026
Downtown Ames Winter Sidewalk Sales is a semi-annual event during
which businesses will offer sales, promotions, and discounts on the
sidewalk immediately in front of their place of business. Shoppers should
also be drawn to the free parking in all Downtown Ames on Saturday!
✔
33
2
CONTACTS
State Zip Code
Cell Phone
Cell Phone
Sponsor/Applicant Name
Address
City
Daytime Phone
E-mail
Alternate Contact Name
Daytime Phone
E-mail
ATTENDANCE
Anticipated Daily Attendance
Yes No
Is this event open to the public?
Is your event being held in conjunction with another event (e.g.Farmers' Market, 4th of July,
etc.)? If yes, please list:
ORGANIZATION STATUS/PROCEEDS
For-Profit
Bona Fide Tax Exempt
Nonprofit
Yes No
Are patron admission, entry, or participant fees required? If yes, please describe and provide
amounts:
Are vendor or other fees required? If yes, please provide amounts:
Percentage of net proceeds going towards fundraising %
Percentage of net proceeds going towards for-profit entity %
SECURITY
Ames Police Department 24 hour non-emergency phone number: 515-239-5133
Please complete the course at https://www.crowdmanagers.com/training for crowd management training.
Yes No
Have you hired a professional security company to develop and manage your event’s security plan?
If yes, please fill out the following information:
Security Organization
State Zip Phone
Address
City
Email
Travis Toliver, Downtown Ames
304 Main Street
Ames Iowa 50010
515-232-2310 701-200-3871
travis@amesalliance.com
Sarah Hurley
515-232-2310 319-930-2276
Sarah@amesalliance.com
1,000
✔
34
35
ITEM #:8
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:FIN
SUBJECT:TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) RESOLUTIONS FOR ANNUAL URBAN
RENEWAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION AND ANNUAL
APPROPRIATION OF NORTH DAYTON AND BARILLA TIF REBATE
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The 2012 Iowa Urban Renewal and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Reform Bill included
provisions for reporting, including an Annual Urban Renewal Report. The Urban
Renewal Report must be approved by the governing board and provided to the Iowa
Department of Management to be made available to the public on an internet site.
This report includes uploading documents related to the urban renewal districts, such as the
plan document and City Council action establishing the district, as well as financial information
regarding TIF funds related to urban renewal district.
The due date for the report filing is December 1 of each year. The penalty for non-compliance
is withholding certification of tax levies.
This report includes financial information for the South Bell, ISU Research Park District 1, ISU
Research Park District 2, Barilla, Campustown (Kingland), and North Dayton Industrial Park
TIF districts. The attached Annual Urban Renewal Report is for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2025. No information is included for the Downtown Reinvestment TIF District, as no
incremental improvements were made in that district prior to January 1, 2024.
In addition to the state reporting, the City is required to certify TIF debt with the County
Auditor for the upcoming fiscal year. The ISU Research Park Districts 1 and 2 are both
General Obligation bonds approved by Council when issued, so no additional action is
required. The Barilla TIF and North Dayton districts involves a rebate of incremental property
taxes subject to annual appropriation by the City Council.
SUMMARY AND CURRENT STATUS OF TIF DEBT:
South Bell Avenue TIF
The South Bell TIF debt was issued for infrastructure improvements to expand development
along South Bell. The debt, with a principal amount of $1,152,000, was issued in 2009. The
final bond payment was made in FY 2020/21. Given the debt obligations have been repaid,
the TIF area was fully released to general taxation beginning in FY 2023/24.
Campustown TIF (Kingland)
The Campustown TIF debt was an annually appropriated rebate of property taxes to Kingland
as an economic development incentive for improvements in the Campustown area. The
maximum amount of the rebate is $2,064,530 or a term of 10 years, whichever comes first.
The City made its first incentive payment in FY 2016/17 and fulfilled the maximum
36
rebate obligation during FY 2023/24, meaning the TIF area was fully released to general
taxation beginning in FY 2024/25.
Ames ISU Research Park District 1 & 2
The Ames ISU Research Park (ISURP) TIF debt was issued for infrastructure improvements
to expand development in the ISU Research Park. The debt, with a principal amount of
$2,725,000, was issued in 2015. A second TIF district was established within the same Urban
Renewal Area (URA), and bonds with a principal amount of $290,000 were issued in 2019.
The TIF district was generating positive cash flow by FY 2017/18, and the TIF balance
accumulation was able to fully pay off the debt for Districts 1 and 2 at the end of FY
2022/23. The full value of property within the URA was released to general taxation in
FY 2023/24. While the TIF bonds will not be fully retired until FY 2030/31, the City will
spend down the accumulated TIF balance as it makes future bond payments.
Barilla TIF
The Barilla TIF debt is an annually appropriated rebate of property taxes to Barilla as an
economic development incentive for the expansion of its facility. The maximum amount of the
rebate is $2,487,805 or a term of 10 years, whichever comes first. The rebates began in FY
2020/21. The FY 2026/27 payment is a partial payment and fulfills the City's total incentive
obligations for the project. The full value will be released in FY 2027/28. Since this TIF debt
is subject to annual appropriation, the Council is required to approve the debt (rebate)
each year until the terms of the agreement are met.
North Dayton TIF
The North Dayton TIF is an annual appropriated rebate of property taxes to Dayton Avenue
Development LLC as an economic development incentive for a new 10-lot industrial
subdivision off of North Dayton Avenue. The purpose of the agreement was to rebate the
developer for the costs of installing public infrastructure for industrial lots of less than 3 acres
in size. The maximum amount of the rebate is $2,968,264 for the period ending
December 1, 2035, whichever occurs first. Since this TIF debt is subject to annual
appropriation, the Council is required to approve the debt (rebate) each year until the
terms of the agreement are met.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the City’s annual 2025 Urban Renewal Report and resolutions appropriating the
payment of a rebate of incremental taxes for the Barilla TIF and North Dayton TIF
districts.
2. Do not approve the report and resolution and refer back to staff.
37
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
In order for the City to comply with mandated reporting requirements and fulfill
requirements under the development agreement with Barilla and North Dayton Avenue
LLC, it is necessary to submit this report to the Iowa Department of Management by
December 1 of this year and approve the appropriation of the tax increment rebates.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative
No. 1, as described above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
TIF-85G811-2023_11-04-2025.pdf
Barilla_Annual_Certification_2025.doc
NorthDayton_Annual_Certification_2025.doc
38
Levy Authority Summary
Local Government Name: AMES
Local Government Number: 85G811
Active Urban Renewal Areas U.R.
#
# of Tif Taxing
Districts
AMES SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL 85021 2
AMES CAMPUSTOWN URBAN RENEWAL 85023 1
AMES ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL 85024 4
AMES BARILLA URBAN RENEWAL 85026 1
TIF Debt Outstanding: 1,033,500
TIF Sp. Rev. Fund Cash Balance
as of 07-01-2024: -1,184 0
Amount of 07-01-2024 Cash Balance
Restricted for LMI
TIF Revenue: 347,950
TIF Sp. Revenue Fund Interest: 0
Property Tax Replacement Claims 0
Asset Sales & Loan Repayments: 0
Total Revenue: 347,950
Rebate Expenditures: 347,950
Non-Rebate Expenditures: 0
Returned to County Treasurer: 0
Total Expenditures: 347,950
TIF Sp. Rev. Fund Cash Balance
as of 06-30-2025: -1,184 0
Amount of 06-30-2025 Cash Balance
Restricted for LMI
Year-End Outstanding TIF
Obligations, Net of TIF Special
Revenue Fund Balance: 686,734
Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
39
Urban Renewal Area Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL
UR Area Number: 85021
UR Area Creation Date: 01/2009
UR Area Purpose:
To expand the available inventory
of fully serviced industrial land
within Ames.
Tax Districts within this Urban Renewal Area Base
No.
Increment
No.
Increment
Value
Used
AMES CITY/AMES SCH/SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWL TIF INCREM 850586 850186 0
AMES CITY AG/AMES SCH/SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL TIF INCREM 850587 850187 0
Urban Renewal Area Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taxable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestead Credits 0
TIF Sp. Rev. Fund Cash Balance
as of 07-01-2024: 0 0
Amount of 07-01-2024 Cash Balance
Restricted for LMI
TIF Revenue: 0
TIF Sp. Revenue Fund Interest: 0
Property Tax Replacement Claims 0
Asset Sales & Loan Repayments: 0
Total Revenue: 0
Rebate Expenditures: 0
Non-Rebate Expenditures: 0
Returned to County Treasurer: 0
Total Expenditures: 0
TIF Sp. Rev. Fund Cash Balance
as of 06-30-2025: 0 0
Amount of 06-30-2025 Cash Balance
Restricted for LMI
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
40
Projects For AMES SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL
South Bell Infrastructure
Description:Public Infrastructure for South Bell Area
Classification:Roads, Bridges & Utilities
Physically Complete:Yes
Payments Complete:No
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
41
Debts/Obligations For AMES SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL
2009B GO Bonds
Debt/Obligation Type:Gen. Obligation Bonds/Notes
Principal:0
Interest:0
Total:0
Annual Appropriation?:No
Date Incurred:10/29/2009
FY of Last Payment:2021
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
42
Tied To Debt:
Tied To Project:
Non-Rebates For AMES SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL
TIF Expenditure Amount:0
2009B GO Bonds
South Bell Infrastructure
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
43
Outstanding TIF backed GO bonds will be retired in FY 2021, however the TIF
revenues were not able to cover the debt service over the term of the bonds
resulting a negative balance. TIF revenues will be claimed through FY 23 to fund
the debt service.
256 Characters Left
Sum of Private Investment Made Within This Urban Renewal Area
during FY 2025
0
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
44
TIF Taxing District Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL (85021)
TIF Taxing District Name: AMES CITY/AMES SCH/SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWL TIF INCREM
TIF Taxing District Inc. Number: 850186
TIF Taxing District Base Year: 2008
FY TIF Revenue First Received: 2010
Subject to a Statutory end date? Yes
Fiscal year this TIF Taxing District
statutorily ends: 2030
UR Designation
Slum No
Blighted No
Economic Development 01/2009
TIF Taxing District Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taxable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestead Credits 0
Frozen Base Value Max Increment Value Increment Used Increment Not Used Increment Revenue Not Used
Fiscal Year 2025 14,312 0 0 0 0
FY 2025 TIF Revenue Received: 0
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
TIF Taxing District Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL (85021)
TIF Taxing District Name: AMES CITY AG/AMES SCH/SOUTH BELL AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL TIF
INCREM
TIF Taxing District Inc. Number: 850187
TIF Taxing District Base Year: 2008
FY TIF Revenue First Received: 2011
Subject to a Statutory end date? Yes
Fiscal year this TIF Taxing District
statutorily ends: 2031
UR Designation
Slum No
Blighted No
Economic Development 01/2009
TIF Taxing District Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taxable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestead Credits 0
Frozen Base Value Max Increment Value Increment Used Increment Not Used Increment Revenue Not Used
Fiscal Year 2025 218 0 0 0 0
FY 2025 TIF Revenue Received: 0
45
Urban Renewal Area Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES CAMPUSTOWN URBAN RENEWAL
UR Area Number: 85023
UR Area Creation Date: 11/2014
UR Area Purpose:
To promote economic development
in the Campustown area through
the expansion of office and retail
space.
Tax Districts within this Urban Renewal Area Base
No.
Increment
No.
Increment
Value
Used
AMES CITY/AMES SCH/CAMPUSTOWN URBAN RENEWAL TIF INCREM 850630 850230 0
Urban Renewal Area Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taxable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestead Credits 0
TIF Sp. Rev. Fund Cash Balance
as of 07-01-2024: 0 0
Amount of 07-01-2024 Cash Balance
Restricted for LMI
TIF Revenue: 0
TIF Sp. Revenue Fund Interest: 0
Property Tax Replacement Claims 0
Asset Sales & Loan Repayments: 0
Total Revenue: 0
Rebate Expenditures: 0
Non-Rebate Expenditures: 0
Returned to County Treasurer: 0
Total Expenditures: 0
TIF Sp. Rev. Fund Cash Balance
as of 06-30-2025: 0 0
Amount of 06-30-2025 Cash Balance
Restricted for LMI
♦ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
46
Projects For AMES CAMPUSTOWN URBAN RENEWAL
Campustown Kingland Building
Description:Office and Retail Development
Classification:Commercial - office properties
Physically Complete:Yes
Payments Complete:Yes
♦ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
47
Debts/Obligations For AMES CAMPUSTOWN URBAN RENEWAL
Campustown Urban Renewal
Debt/Obligation Type:Rebates
Principal:0
Interest:0
Total:0
Annual Appropriation?:Yes
Date Incurred:11/10/2015
FY of Last Payment:2023
♦ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
48
Rebate Paid To:
Tied To Debt:
Tied To Project:
Projected Final FY of Rebate:
Rebates For AMES CAMPUSTOWN URBAN RENEWAL
Kingland Systems
TIF Expenditure Amount:0
Kingland Systems
Campustown Urban Renewal
Campustown Kingland Building
2024
♦ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
49
Urban renewal area for Campustown Redevelopment. Rebate of TIF to Kingland Campus
Properties per development agreement provides a total of $2,064,530 in tax rebate
or a period of 10 years, whichever comes first. Subject to annual appropriation.
256 Characters Left
Sum of Private Investment Made Within This Urban Renewal Area
during FY 2025
0
♦ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
50
TIF Taxing District Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES CAMPUSTOWN URBAN RENEWAL (85023)
TIF Taxing District Name: AMES CITY/AMES SCH/CAMPUSTOWN URBAN RENEWAL TIF INCREM
TIF Taxing District Inc. Number: 850230
TIF Taxing District Base Year: 2014
FY TIF Revenue First Received: 2017
Subject to a Statutory end date? Yes
Fiscal year this TIF Taxing District
statutorily ends: 2037
UR Designation
Slum No
Blighted No
Economic Development 11/2013
TIF Taxing District Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taxable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestead Credits 0
Frozen Base Value Max Increment Value Increment Used Increment Not Used Increment Revenue Not Used
Fiscal Year 2025 3,467,200 0 0 0 0
FY 2025 TIF Revenue Received: 0
♦ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
51
Urban Renewal Area Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL
UR Area Number: 85024
UR Area Creation Date: 11/2013
UR Area Purpose:
To promote economic development
for Iowa State University Research
Park by extending public
infrastructure.
Tax Districts within this Urban Renewal Area Base
No.
Increment
No.
Increment
Value
Used
AMES CITY/AMES SCH/ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL TIF INCREM 850628 850228 0
AMES CITY AG/AMES SCH/ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL TIF INCREM 850629 850229 0
AMES CITY/AMES SCH/ISU RESEARCH PARK DISTRICT 2 UR TIF INCREMENT 850658 850659 0
AMES CITY AG/AMES SCH/ISU RESEARCH PARK DISTRICT 2 UR TIF INCREMENT 850660 850661 0
Urban Renewal Area Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taxable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestead Credits 0
TIF Sp. Rev. Fund Cash Balance
as of 07-01-2024: 0 0
Amount of 07-01-2024 Cash Balance
Restricted for LMI
TIF Revenue: 0
TIF Sp. Revenue Fund Interest: 0
Property Tax Replacement Claims 0
Asset Sales & Loan Repayments: 0
Total Revenue: 0
Rebate Expenditures: 0
Non-Rebate Expenditures: 0
Returned to County Treasurer: 0
Total Expenditures: 0
TIF Sp. Rev. Fund Cash Balance
as of 06-30-2025: 0 0
Amount of 06-30-2025 Cash Balance
Restricted for LMI
▲ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
52
Projects For AMES ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL
ISURP Infrastructure Extension
Description:Extension of public infrastructure to serve ISURP
Classification:Roads, Bridges & Utilities
Physically Complete:Yes
Payments Complete:Yes
▲ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
53
Debts/Obligations For AMES ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL
General Obligation Series 2015A
Debt/Obligation Type:Gen. Obligation Bonds/Notes
Principal:0
Interest:0
Total:0
Annual Appropriation?:No
Date Incurred:11/13/2015
FY of Last Payment:2027
General Obligation Series 2019A
Debt/Obligation Type:Gen. Obligation Bonds/Notes
Principal:0
Interest:0
Total:0
Annual Appropriation?:No
Date Incurred:09/12/2019
FY of Last Payment:2031
▲ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
54
Tied To Debt:
Tied To Project:
Tied To Debt:
Tied To Project:
Non-Rebates For AMES ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL
TIF Expenditure Amount:0
General Obligation Series 2015A
ISURP Infrastructure Extension
TIF Expenditure Amount:0
General Obligation Series 2019A
ISURP Infrastructure Extension
▲ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
55
TIF Ord. amended 11.12.2019
256 Characters Left
Sum of Private Investment Made Within This Urban Renewal Area
during FY 2025
0
▲ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
56
TIF Taxing District Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL (85024)
TIF Taxing District Name: AMES CITY/AMES SCH/ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL TIF INCREM
TIF Taxing District Inc. Number: 850228
TIF Taxing District Base Year: 2014
FY TIF Revenue First Received: 2017
Subject to a Statutory end date? Yes
Fiscal year this TIF Taxing District
statutorily ends: 2037
UR Designation
Slum No
Blighted No
Economic Development 11/2013
TIF Taxing District Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taxable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestead Credits 0
Frozen Base Value Max Increment Value Increment Used Increment Not Used Increment Revenue Not Used
Fiscal Year 2025 149,100 0 0 0 0
FY 2025 TIF Revenue Received: 0
▲ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
TIF Taxing District Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL (85024)
TIF Taxing District Name: AMES CITY AG/AMES SCH/ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL TIF
INCREM
TIF Taxing District Inc. Number: 850229
TIF Taxing District Base Year: 2014
FY TIF Revenue First Received:
Subject to a Statutory end date? No
UR Designation
Slum No
Blighted No
Economic Development No
TIF Taxing District Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taxable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestead Credits 0
Frozen Base Value Max Increment Value Increment Used Increment Not Used Increment Revenue Not Used
Fiscal Year 2025 394,222 0 0 0 0
FY 2025 TIF Revenue Received: 0
57
TIF Taxing District Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL (85024)
TIF Taxing District Name: AMES CITY/AMES SCH/ISU RESEARCH PARK DISTRICT 2 UR TIF INCREMENT
TIF Taxing District Inc. Number: 850659
TIF Taxing District Base Year: 2018
FY TIF Revenue First Received:
Subject to a Statutory end date? No
UR Designation
Slum No
Blighted No
Economic Development No
TIF Taxing District Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taxable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestead Credits 0
Frozen Base Value Max Increment Value Increment Used Increment Not Used Increment Revenue Not Used
Fiscal Year 2025 9,561 0 0 0 0
FY 2025 TIF Revenue Received: 0
▲ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
TIF Taxing District Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES ISU RESEARCH PARK URBAN RENEWAL (85024)
TIF Taxing District Name: AMES CITY AG/AMES SCH/ISU RESEARCH PARK DISTRICT 2 UR TIF
INCREMENT
TIF Taxing District Inc. Number: 850661
TIF Taxing District Base Year: 2018
FY TIF Revenue First Received:
Subject to a Statutory end date? No
UR Designation
Slum No
Blighted No
Economic Development No
TIF Taxing District Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Taxable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestead Credits 0
Frozen Base Value Max Increment Value Increment Used Increment Not Used Increment Revenue Not Used
Fiscal Year 2025 82,210 0 0 0 0
FY 2025 TIF Revenue Received: 0
58
Urban Renewal Area Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES BARILLA URBAN RENEWAL
UR Area Number: 85026
UR Area Creation Date: 07/2017
UR Area Purpose:
This urban renewal area was
created to facilitate the expansion
of the Barilla manufacturing
facility at 3303 and 3311 East
Lincoln Way.
Tax Districts within this Urban Renewal Area Base
No.
Increment
No.
Increment
Value
Used
AMES CITY/AMES SCH/BARILLA URBAN RENEWAL TIF INCREM 850638 850238 16,426,500
Urban Renewal Area Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 55,239,500 0 0 55,239,500 0 55,239,500
Taxable 0 0 0 49,650,064 0 0 49,650,064 0 49,650,064
Homestead Credits 0
TIF Sp. Rev. Fund Cash Balance
as of 07-01-2024: -1,184 0
Amount of 07-01-2024 Cash Balance
Restricted for LMI
TIF Revenue: 347,950
TIF Sp. Revenue Fund Interest: 0
Property Tax Replacement Claims 0
Asset Sales & Loan Repayments: 0
Total Revenue: 347,950
Rebate Expenditures: 347,950
Non-Rebate Expenditures: 0
Returned to County Treasurer: 0
Total Expenditures: 347,950
TIF Sp. Rev. Fund Cash Balance
as of 06-30-2025: -1,184 0
Amount of 06-30-2025 Cash Balance
Restricted for LMI
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
59
Projects For AMES BARILLA URBAN RENEWAL
Barilla Expansion
Description:
Expansion of pasta production and transportation facilities
at Barilla America Inc.
Classification:Industrial/manufacturing property
Physically Complete:Yes
Payments Complete:Yes
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
60
Debts/Obligations For AMES BARILLA URBAN RENEWAL
Barilla TIF Rebate
Debt/Obligation Type:Rebates
Principal:1,033,500
Interest:0
Total:1,033,500
Annual Appropriation?:Yes
Date Incurred:11/13/2018
FY of Last Payment:2024
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
61
Rebate Paid To:
Tied To Debt:
Tied To Project:
Projected Final FY of Rebate:
Rebates For AMES BARILLA URBAN RENEWAL
Ames Barilla
TIF Expenditure Amount:347,950
Ames Barilla
Barilla TIF Rebate
Barilla Expansion
2027
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
62
Jobs For AMES BARILLA URBAN RENEWAL
Project:Barilla Expansion
Company Name:Barilla America Inc
Date Agreement Began:11/13/2018
Date Agreement Ends:11/13/2023
Number of Jobs Created or Retained:41
Total Annual Wages of Required Jobs:2,039,897
Total Estimated Private Capital Investment:64,000,000
Total Estimated Cost of Public Infrastructure:0
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
63
Entered development agreement in November 2018. Beginning in FY 2019/20 incremental
taxes will be rebated to Barilla for a period of 10 years or a total of $3,000,000.
256 Characters Left
Sum of Private Investment Made Within This Urban Renewal Area
during FY 2025
0
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
64
TIF Taxing District Data Collection
Local Government Name: AMES (85G811)
Urban Renewal Area: AMES BARILLA URBAN RENEWAL (85026)
TIF Taxing District Name: AMES CITY/AMES SCH/BARILLA URBAN RENEWAL TIF INCREM
TIF Taxing District Inc. Number: 850238
TIF Taxing District Base Year: 2017
FY TIF Revenue First Received: 2021
Subject to a Statutory end date? No
UR Designation
Slum No
Blighted No
Economic Development No
TIF Taxing District Value by Class - 1/1/2023 for FY 2025
Agricultural Residential Commercial Industrial Other Military Total Gas/Electric Utility Total
Assessed 0 0 0 55,239,500 0 0 55,239,500 0 55,239,500
Taxable 0 0 0 49,650,064 0 0 49,650,064 0 49,650,064
Homestead Credits 0
Frozen Base Value Max Increment Value Increment Used Increment Not Used Increment Revenue Not Used
Fiscal Year 2025 38,813,000 16,426,500 16,426,500 0 0
FY 2025 TIF Revenue Received: 347,950
♣ Annual Urban Renewal Report, Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025
65
RESOLUTION_____
Obligating funds from City of Ames Barilla Urban Renewal Area Urban Renewal
Tax Revenue Fund for appropriation to the payment of annual appropriation tax
increment rebate payments due to be paid in the next succeeding fiscal year
WHEREAS, the City of Ames, Iowa (the “City”), pursuant to and in strict compliance
with all laws applicable to the City, and in particular the provisions of Chapter 403 of the Code
of Iowa, has adopted an Urban Renewal Plan for the Barilla Urban Renewal Area (the “Urban
Renewal Area”); and
WHEREAS, this Council has adopted an ordinance providing for the division of taxes
levied on taxable property in the Urban Renewal Area pursuant to Section 403.19 of the Code of
Iowa and establishing the fund referred to in Subsection 2 of Section 403.19 of the Code of Iowa
(the “Barilla Urban Renewal Tax Revenue Fund”), which fund and the portion of taxes referred
to in that subsection may be irrevocably pledged by the City for the payment of the principal and
interest on indebtedness incurred under the authority of Section 403.9 of the Code of Iowa to
finance or refinance in whole or in part projects in the Urban Renewal Area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City’s Development Agreement (the “Agreement”) with
Barilla America, Inc. (the “Company”), approved by resolution of the City Council on November
13, 2018, the City agreed to make economic development tax increment payments to the
Company, subject to annual appropriation by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, payments under the Agreement are scheduled to be made from the Barilla
Urban Renewal Tax Revenue Fund during the fiscal year that will begin July 1, 2026, in a total
amount equal to 100% of the incremental property tax payments made by the Company in that
fiscal year (the “Payments”); and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary for the City Council to obligate for appropriation to the
Payments, funds anticipated to be received in the Barilla Urban Renewal Tax Revenue Fund in
the fiscal year that will begin July 1, 2026;
NOW, THEREFORE, It Is Resolved by the City Council of the City of Ames, Iowa, as
follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby obligates for appropriation from the Barilla
Urban Renewal Tax Revenue Fund the amount of $345,000, which is estimated to be an amount
equal to 100% of the incremental property tax revenues that are expected to be received by the
City in such fund from the Story County Treasurer in the fiscal year that will begin July 1, 2026.
66
Section 2. The City Clerk and Finance Director are hereby authorized and directed to
certify to the Story County Auditor the amount obligated for appropriation in Section 1 above as
part of the City’s 2025 certification of debt payable from the Barilla Urban Renewal Tax
Revenue Fund and to reflect such estimated amount in the City’s budget for the fiscal year that
will begin July 1, 2026.
Section 3. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed.
Passed and approved November 18, 2025.
Mayor
Attest:
__________________________
City Clerk
67
RESOLUTION_____
Obligating funds from City of Ames North Dayton Industrial Park Urban
Renewal Area Urban Renewal Tax Revenue Fund for appropriation to the
payment of annual appropriation tax increment rebate payments due to be paid in
the next succeeding fiscal year
WHEREAS, the City of Ames, Iowa (the “City”), pursuant to and in strict compliance
with all laws applicable to the City, and in particular the provisions of Chapter 403 of the Code
of Iowa, has adopted an Urban Renewal Plan for the North Dayton Industrial Park Urban
Renewal Area (the “Urban Renewal Area”); and
WHEREAS, this Council has adopted an ordinance providing for the division of taxes
levied on taxable property in the Urban Renewal Area pursuant to Section 403.19 of the Code of
Iowa and establishing the fund referred to in Subsection 2 of Section 403.19 of the Code of Iowa
(the “North Dayton ”), which fund and the portion of taxes referred to in that subsection may be
irrevocably pledged by the City for the payment of the indebtedness incurred under the authority
of Section 403.9 of the Code of Iowa to finance or refinance in whole or in part projects in the
Urban Renewal Area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City’s Development Agreement (the “Agreement”) with
Dayton Avenue Development LLC, Inc. (the “Company”), approved by resolution of the City
Council on October 11, 2022, the City agreed to make economic development tax increment
payments to the Company, subject to annual appropriation by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, payments under the Agreement are scheduled to be made from the North
Dayton Industrial Park Urban Renewal Tax Revenue Fund during the fiscal year that will begin
July 1, 2026, in a total amount equal to 100% of the incremental property tax payments made by
the Company in that fiscal year (the “Payments”); and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary for the City Council to obligate for appropriation to the
Payments, funds anticipated to be received in the North Dayton Industrial Park Urban Renewal
Tax Revenue Fund in the fiscal year that will begin July 1, 2026;
NOW, THEREFORE, It Is Resolved by the City Council of the City of Ames, Iowa, as
follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby obligates for appropriation from the North
Dayton Industrial Park Urban Renewal Tax Revenue Fund the amount of $450,000 which is
estimated to be an amount equal to 100% of the incremental property tax revenues that are
expected to be received by the City in such fund from the Story County Treasurer in the fiscal
year that will begin July 1, 2026.
68
Section 2. The City Clerk and Finance Director are hereby authorized and directed to
certify to the Story County Auditor the amount obligated for appropriation in Section 1 above as
part of the City’s 2025 certification of debt payable from the North Dayton Industrial Park Urban
Renewal Tax Revenue Fund and to reflect such estimated amount in the City’s budget for the
fiscal year that will begin July 1, 2026.
Section 3. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed.
Passed and approved November 18, 2025.
Mayor
Attest:
__________________________
City Clerk
69
To:Mayor and City Council
From:Mark O. Lambert, City Attorney
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Amendment to Council's Standards of Decorum
Item No. 9
MEMO
At a recent City Council meeting, a person speaking on an agenda item refused
to give his name. The Mayor allowed him to speak without identifying who he is.
Afterwards, Mayor Haila asked me if we can require that people give their names
and not allow them to speak if they refuse to identify themselves.
My reply was that legally we could tell the person they could not speak, but I
would feel better about that if we had it in our Standards of Decorum for Council
meetings, so that residents would be informed in advance of this requirement.
Upon checking with other city attorneys around Iowa, I discovered that several
cities have policies that require members of the public speaking to the Council to
identify themselves, and do not allow the person to speak if they refuse to do so.
A City Council meeting (or other City board or commission meeting) is a public
event. In order for the Council to hear concerns from a community member, it is
important that the person identify themselves so that follow-up assistance can be
provided if necessary. Doing so can also provide greater context for the
individual’s relation to the City (e.g., resident, business owner, etc.). Anonymity of
speakers does not foster community engagement and communication.
The City of Ames Standards of Decorum, adopted by the Council, addresses
expectations regarding behavioral issues at Council meetings, so this is where
the City should state this requirement. The Standards of Decorum can be found
here: Standards of Decorum - City of Ames, Iowa
It is recommended that the following language be added as a new Number
3 on the list (while renumbering the rest of the paragraphs):
“Persons offering comments at a public meeting must state their name; any
person refusing to identify themselves will not be allowed to offer
comments.”
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
70
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution adding a
requirement to the Standards of Decorum that persons speaking to the
Council (or at City board/commission meetings) must identify themselves
prior to being allowed to give comments.
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
71
ITEM #:10
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:FIN
SUBJECT:DECLARATION OF INTENT TO REIMBURSE EXPENSES RELATED TO
CONSTRUCTION OF NEW GENERATION FOR ELECTRIC UTILITY
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
A reimbursement resolution is a formal declaration by a municipality stating its intent
to use future bond proceeds to reimburse itself for project-related expenditures
incurred before the bonds are issued. This approach ensures compliance with IRS
regulations while providing financial flexibility for large-scale capital projects.
As directed by the Council, the City plans to finance the construction of the new generation for
the City's Electric Utility through a combination of bond proceeds and available cash reserves.
To maximize financial flexibility as the project progresses, staff recommends that the
Council approve the attached reimbursement resolution, authorizing a maximum
principal amount of $95,000,000.
THE REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION PROCESS:
If approved, the following process would be utilized to fund the project:
Declaration of Intent: Before issuing revenue bonds, the municipality adopts a resolution
affirming its intent to reimburse itself for eligible project expenditures (this action).
Project Expenditures: The City begins covering costs such as design, engineering, and early
construction using available cash or short-term financing.
Bond Issuance: Once key approvals are secured and the project is ready for bidding, the City
issues revenue bonds to finance construction.
Reimbursement Allocation: After the bonds are issued, proceeds are used to reimburse the
City for initial expenditures, ensuring accurate accounting and IRS compliance.
Documentation & Compliance: The reimbursement process must be formally documented
in the City's records. Bond proceeds can only be used for eligible expenses, and
reimbursement must occur within 18 months of the expenditure or project completion, as per
IRS rules.
By approving this reimbursement resolution, the City ensures maximum financial
flexibility to advance this critical project without delay, allowing the City to secure cost-
effective financing while maintaining compliance with federal tax regulations.
72
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the resolution allowing the City to incur expenses with the potential for future
reimbursement through a revenue bond issuance.
2. Do not approve the resolution and direct staff to proceed with a bond issuance to support
the funding necessary to construct new generation for the City's Electric Utility.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The proposed resolution enables the City to cover expenses for the new generation for
the City's Electric Utility while maintaining compliance with federal reimbursement
regulations. Additionally, it provides the greatest amount of financial flexibility, which is
important given the project's preliminary/developmental stage. Therefore, it is the
recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1, as
described above.
73
ITEM #:11
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:W&PC
SUBJECT:FY 2023/24 STORY COUNTY EDGE OF FIELD PROJECT
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The Water Pollution Control (WPC) Facility is being converted to implement nutrient removal
treatment technology over a period of 20 years. Separate from the work occurring at the
treatment plant, watershed-based improvements performed by the City can be
“banked” as credit toward any future, more stringent nutrient reduction regulations
imposed on the WPC Facility. On February 24, 2021, staff executed a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources to allow these off-site
nutrient reductions to be registered and banked through the Iowa Nutrient Reduction
Exchange.
Over the past several years, staff has developed a partnership with multiple entities to bundle
several Edge-of-Field (EOF) practices into a single bid package. The FY 2023/24 project will
construct EOF practices across Story County, consisting of seven saturated buffers
and twelve bioreactors that will intercept and treat 22 agricultural tile outlets. These
practices promote the natural removal of nitrogen from subsurface drainage before it
enters streams and other surface waters. Additional background information about these
practices is shown in the attachment.
In addition to the nutrient reduction benefits, these practices also provide a modest degree of
resilience to droughts and floods by holding water on the landscape for longer durations.
On March 28, 2023 and July 8, 2025, City Council approved two separate agreements that
outlined the funding arrangements and project management duties for the EOF project. The
City of Ames is acting as the fiscal agent for the project, and the Iowa Department of
Agricultural and Land Stewardship (IDALS) and Story County/Story County Conservation are
acting as funding partners. Project funding consists of 75% from IDALS and a 25% local
match that is split equally between the City and Story County. The City’s share will be
funded from the $100,000 budgeted annually in the Watershed Based Nutrient
Reduction capital improvements project.
The final design is complete, and all participating landowners have submitted the
necessary documentation. Staff is now prepared to issue a Notice to Bidders for the
EOF project. The engineer ’s estimate of probable construction costs is $354,337, with
the City’s estimated contribution being $44,295.
74
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the preliminary plans and specifications and issue a Notice to Bidders for the
FY 2023/24 Story County Edge of Field Project, and establish January 7, 2026 as the bid
due date and January 13, 2026, as the date of public hearing and award.
2. Do not approve the plans and specifications and Notice to Bidders, thereby delaying the
completion of this project.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Ames Water Pollution Control Facility will be converted to a nutrient removal
treatment technology over a period of 20 years. To mitigate future investment beyond
what is already planned for, watershed-based projects can be performed, and the
resulting nutrient reduction credits can be banked. Following project completion, the
City will register each of these practices and receive annual nutrient reduction credit for
the lifespan of each practice. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that
the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, as described above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
About_Saturated_Buffers_and_Nitrifying_Bioreactors.pdf
75
About Saturated Buffers and Nitrifying Bioreactors
Saturated Buffers
A saturated buffer is an area of perennial vegetation between agricultural
fields and waterways where tile outlets drain. Tile lines connect to a
control structure, which distributes water laterally along the buffer. As
water drains into the buffer, the living roots of perennial vegetation
absorb water and nutrients, like nitrogen. According to the Iowa Nutrient
Reduction Strategy, a saturated buffer has the potential to remove 50%
of nitrogen from water that is diverted through the buffer.
Bioreactors
A bioreactor is a buried trench on the edge of a farm field that is
traditionally filled with woodchips. Drainage tiles outlet into the
woodchips where bacteria convert nitrogen in tile water into nitrogen gas.
According to the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy, a bioreactor, on
average, removes 43% of nitrogen from water diverted through it.
76
ITEM #:12
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:POLICE
SUBJECT:APPROVAL OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH MARY GREELEY
MEDICAL CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY
HEALTH CALLS FOR SERVICE
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
In spring 2025, through the budget process, the City Council approved supporting the City's
partnership with Mary Greeley Medical Center (MGMC) by funding the Alternative Response
for Community Health (ARCH) program in the amount of $132,000 for fiscal year 2025/26.
This amount was a $30,000 increase compared to FY 2024/25.
ARCH is a team employed by Mary Greeley Medical Center comprised of a social worker and
a medical professional who respond to calls with a mental health component. The team is
dispatched through the City's Communications Center. When a call for service comes into the
Communications Center, it is triaged and the appropriate responder is dispatched, whether
that be a police officer, fire personnel, ARCH, EMS, or a combination.
The goal of ARCH is to provide high quality services while freeing up other first responders
and diverting Emergency Room visits. ARCH also works with the Police Department's Mental
Health Advocate and the Homelessness Outreach Support Team (HOST) to conduct follow-
ups on calls for service.
Although ARCH has continued to provide services and City Council has already
appropriated $132,000 for FY 2025/26, an updated agreement has not been fully
executed. The attached agreement, therefore, is effective July 1, 2025 and will remain in
effect for a period of five years.
The service agreement outlines the scope of the ARCH program, responsibilities of MGMC
and the City, the budget and financial support from the City for ARCH, and performance data
e x p e ctati o n s. T h e City’s commitment to financially support ARCH service past FY
2025/2026, is dependent on future appropriation of funds by the City Council.
In addition, on October 28, 2025 the Council approved up to $10,000 of previously
undesignated Analysis of Social Services Evaluation Team (ASSET) funding to HOST to be
used for homelessness outreach. The HOST team is made up of MCMC-ARCH staff, the
City's Mental Health Advocate, and a staff member at The Salvation Army. This agreement
allows MGMC-ARCH to become the fiscal agent of the outreach funds.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the Memorandum of Agreement between Mary Greeley Medical Center and the
City of Ames, Iowa for an Alternative Response to Community Health Calls for Service.
77
2. Do not approve the Memorandum of Agreement between Mary Greeley Medical Center
and the City of Ames, Iowa for an Alternative Response to Community Health Calls for
Service.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The partnership with Mary Greeley Medical Center for the ARCH program provides
quality and effective services to address crisis situations while freeing up other first
responders and diverting expensive visits to the Emergency Room. The model of
dispatching the team through the City's Emergency Communication Center has proven
to be beneficial to all involved. The attached agreement allows this partnership to
continue. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1, as described above.
This action to approve the joint agreement will have no effect on the FY 2025/26 budget
since the funding obligations highlighted for the current fiscal year have already been
appropriated in the budget.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Service_Agreement_ARCH FINAL.pdf
ARCH annual report 2024.pdf
78
Memorandum of Agreement between Mary Greeley Medical
Center and the City of Ames, Iowa for an Alternative Response
to Community Health Calls for Service
This Memorandum of Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between Mary
Greeley Medical Center (“MGMC”) and the City of Ames (“City”), collectively referred to
as the “Parties.”
1. Purpose
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish the terms and conditions under which
MGMC and City will collaborate in providing the Alternative Response to Community
Health (ARCH) program, a specialized service designed to respond to 911 calls with a
focus on mental health crisis stabilization, de-escalation, and connection to community
resources.
2. Term
This Agreement shall become effective on July 1, 2025, and remain in effect for a period
of five (5) years, unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 8 of this Agreement.
3. Scope of Service – ARCH Program
Mary Greeley Medical Center (MGMC) will provide the ARCH service with a specialized
911 response unit staffed by professionals trained in mental health and crisis stabilization,
including Emergency Medical Services (EMS) staff.
The ARCH unit will:
• Provide 60 hours of service per week. Service calls are to be staffed by two-person
teams.
• Respond to 911 calls deemed appropriate for the ARCH service by the Public
Safety Dispatch Communications Center.
• Focus on de-escalating situations involving individuals in crisis.
• Assist with connecting individuals to available community resources for ongoing
support and care.
4. Responsibilities of Mary Greeley Medical Center
MGMC agrees to:
• Provide trained and qualified personnel for the ARCH unit.
• Maintain licensure, supervision, and compliance with applicable health care
standards.
• Submit required documentation and performance data as outlined in Sections 6
and 7.
79
5. Responsibilities of Ames Police Department
City agrees to:
• Collaborate with MGMC to ensure effective dispatch and response of the ARCH
unit.
• Maintain operational oversight for police-related functions.
• Provide coordination with the Public Safety Dispatch Communications Center.
6. Budget and Financial Support
To accomplish the scope of service described in Section 3, the total cost of providing the
ARCH service is $308,005 per year.
The City of Ames agrees to pay Mary Greeley Medical Center (MGMC) up to $132,000 as
its share of the financial support for the ARCH service for fiscal year 2025/2026. This
financial obligation shall be satisfied by monthly payments of up to $11,000 from the City
to MGMC. The monthly payment of up to $11,000 is dependent on MGMC meeting the
responsibilities listed in section 4. The City’s financial support of the ARCH service past
fiscal year 2025/2026 is dependent on appropriation of funds by Ames City Council.
MGMC shall submit to the City Director of Finance documentation of hours actually worked
each month by the ARCH responders. The required documentation shall be submitted by
the 15th of the following month. By the last day of the following month, the City will issue
payment to MGMC in the amount specified above.
In addition to financial support for the ARCH service, the City will make a one-time
contribution of up to $10,000 to ARCH for use by the Homeless Outreach and Support
Team (HOST). The City’s contribution must be used by HOST to purchase bus
tickets/passes, mobile phone minutes/cards, pay application fees for apartments or
identifying documents, or purchase clothing items for unhoused residents of the City of
Ames. At the end of twelve months, or when the City’s entire contribution has been spent,
HOST must provide an accounting to the City regarding HOST’s expenditure of said
contribution.
7. Performance Data and Reporting
MGMC shall collect and provide performance data related to the ARCH service. At a
minimum, this data shall include:
• Number of welfare checks conducted
• Number of positive outcomes achieved
• Number of emergency room visits avoided
• Number of ambulance calls avoided
• Number of police responses avoided
• Number of police department responses with early release
• Number of ARCH transports completed
• Number of ambulance transfers completed
80
MGMC shall submit performance data to the City of Ames on at least a quarterly basis, or
more frequently if requested by either Party. The Parties agree to review this data jointly
to evaluate program effectiveness, identify opportunities for improvement, and ensure
accountability for the services provided.
8. Termination
This Agreement may be terminated by either Party, with or without cause, by providing
thirty (90) days’ written notice to the other Party.
9. Amendment
This Agreement may only be amended in writing and signed by both Parties.
10. Notices
Notices shall be given in writing and deemed to have been given: (i) upon hand delivery;
(ii) the next business day after sending by a nationally recognized overnight carrier with
written confirmation of receipt or (iii) if sent by email, when the recipient acknowledges
having received the email.
11. Entire Agreement
This document constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties and supersedes any
prior oral or written agreements.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the dates
shown below.
Mary Greeley Medical Center
By:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Ames Police Department
By:
Name: Geoff Huff
Title: Chief of Police
Date:
81
2024 Annual Report
82
Rev 1/1/24
The past year saw growth and change within ARCH. During a short period from August to mid -October we were
without a social worker and were unable to be in service as much as usual. We also began to focus in community
outreach in addition to our 911 response, hoping to mitigate crisis earlier. ARCH saw an overall increase in call volume
and involvement in community affairs. In October we participated in a roundtable discussion with notable community
partners to address the issue of homelessness within Ames. This roundtable resulted in further discussions with the
City and the Bridgehome in an effort to reduce the unhoused population in Ames.
*The information provided below are estimates based on data collected 1/1/24 – 12/31/24.
39 mins
2024 ARCH Annual Report
Ca
l
l
T
y
p
e
Number of calls
involving an
ACSD or ISU
student/employee
(that ARCH was aware of) 59 32
Resources Saved
*Other includes medical, domestic/conflict/disorderly, DOA
(dead on arrival), missing person, transportation assist,
someone calling wanting info. on community resources.
calls were addressed with an
ARCH ONLY response; freeing up
other emergency service resources
that would have otherwise possibly
had to respond if ARCH was not in
service
244
Days in service
552
Number of calls the
ARCH team responded to
220
Missed calls are due to ARCH not in
service at the time of call and are tracked
by dispatchers making a note that ARCH
was not in service in the call notes.
Number of “missed” calls
Average time on calls
358
83
Rev 1/1/24
14
25
57
42
36
40
48
42
34
55
32 31 30
22
18
10
2 5 5 1 1 2 5 3
9
13
19 17 19
8 10
16
7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00
ARCH Dispatch Start Times
Number of Calls
Missed
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
CALLS BY DAY OF THE WEEK
2024 2023
84
Rev 1/1/24
Interagency Collaboration
The ARCH Program was developed and launched through a collaborative effort among several
agencies in Ames, including Mary Greeley Medical Center, the City of Ames and Ames Police
Department and Iowa State University Police. ARCH is an innovative program offering an alternative
response to certain 911 calls and relies heavily on interagency collaboration with Police, Fire, EMS,
Hospital and Emergency Dispatch Center. This type of collaboration is unique in that it requires
accommodating several agencies’ distinct regulations, policies, procedures, organizational cultures and
leadership structures.
ARCH Response
Only, 363, 50%
ARCH w/ Police
Response, 167,
23%
Arch w/
Ambulance
Response, 69, 9%
Arch w/ Fire
Response, 45, 6%
ED Visit, 86, 12%
ARCH w/ Mobile
Crisis Response, 1,
0%
Interagency Collaborations
ARCH Response Only ARCH w/ Police Response Arch w/ Ambulance Response
Arch w/ Fire Response ED Visit ARCH w/ Mobile Crisis Response
85
Rev 1/1/24
Resources Saved
Resources Saved
Utilizing ARCH allows other emergency response agencies to remain available for calls that require
their specific training, tools/equipment and experience. Resources saved were based on the ARCH
Team’s evaluation of what the call was for, and which response agency would have potentially been
utilized/dispatched in the situation had ARCH not been in service.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Police Response Avoided Ambulance Response
Avoided
Fire Response Avoided ED Visit Avoided (had
ARCH not been involved,
outcome of call would
have likely been contact
having to go to ED)
327
223
264
51
Resources Saved
86
Rev 1/1/24
Conclusion
ARCH worked through growing pains this year. We identified key areas needed for continued growth
in the community. We have become engaged in some consistent outreach time which includes 1-2
hours/week at the Ames Public Library accompanied by Susan Moore, Social worker from MGMC.
We spend time interacting with many of the unhoused who utilize the library during the day to avoid
the elements. By initiating contact with them prior to end of business day, we have a better chance to
plug them into services they need before they close for the day.
We also welcomed a new Social Worker, Becky Lundy who took over the full time social work position
in Mid-October. Becky brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the team and has already
been an asset to our growth and development.
Increased call volume is worth noting throughout the year. Outside of August and September when
we operated with limited staffing, we have seen trends in a positive direction. Larger call volumes
show that ARCH can be used to reduce call volumes in all traditional areas of Emergency Services.
2024 ARCH Team Members
Becky Lundy, Social Worker Lindsey Smith, Social Worker
April Chavira, Mental Health Professional Rod Jones, Paramedic
Nick Toornstra, Paramedic
Steve Flugrad, Paramedic
Questions or comments regarding this report can be directed to ARCH@MGMC.COM
87
ITEM #:13
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:ELEC
SUBJECT:COMPUTERIZED MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR
POWER PLANT
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The Power Plant uses a Computerized Maintenance Management Software (CMMS) system
which tracks asset health, maintenance records, work orders, and inventory. It is crucial to
have an up-to-date system to assure power plant reliability and efficiency. Limble Solutions
LLC is currently the provider for the cloud-based CMMS that the Power Plant uses.
In 2019, City staff sought proposals from companies for both software-as-a-service (SAAS)
and purchased software solutions to replace the existing system. On August 27, 2019, City
Council awarded a three-year agreement to Limble CMMS, Lehi, Utah. This product has
allowed all plant employees to have easy, mobile access to all inventory, parts, work requests,
and preventative maintenance tasks. The cloud-based system also allows software updates to
be administered automatically, meaning the Power Plant continues to have the most up-to-
date version. Besides access to the software, the annual price covers set up, maintenance
fees, data backup, and instant customer support. The Limble system has proven to have good
inventory management, work order capabilities, plant status quick view, usability, and
scheduling abilities.
On October 25, 2022, City Council awarded another three-year agreement to Limble CMMS,
Lehi, Utah. This agreement expired on October 31, 2025.
Plant staff performed extensive research before implementing Limble CMMS, finding it was the
best CMMS to use at the Power Plant considering price and performance. Staff went through
a considerable amount of effort changing from the previous CMMS to the Limble system and
while the data format is now in a state that makes it easier to move to another platform,
changing to a different CMMS platform would still be very time consuming and difficult if the
decision was made to separate from Limble and go with another provider.
Limble has agreed to another three-year contract with a 0% increase in cost. This
includes a preferred Partner Discount of 20% and a discount of 10% because the
contract is for three years. The City will pay $94,374 from the FY 2025/26 budget to
receive the discount. This one-time payment covers all three years of service. $100,000
is available in the FY 2025/26 Power Plant Operations account for software services.
City Council is being asked to waive the City’s purchasing policies requiring formal competitive
bids and award another three-year agreement to Limble CMMS, Lehi, Utah in the amount of
$94,374 (inclusive of Iowa sales tax).
88
ALTERNATIVES:
1. a. Waive the City's Purchasing Policy requirement for competitive bids.
b. Award a three-year contract for Computerized Maintenance Management Software to
Limble CMMS, Lehi, Utah in the amount of $94,374 (inclusive of Iowa sales tax).
2. Do not approve the contract and adopt a “pay as you go” approach for these needed
services.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Limble CMMS has proven itself as an essential tool in the Power Plant’s maintenance
program. Pricing for the proposed three-year contract will stay the same as the
previous three-year contract. The continuation of Limble CMMS assures the use of a
versatile product that assists plant staff in maintaining the facility and equipment to
achieve reliability and efficiency. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager
that the City Council adopt Alternative No.1 as stated above.
89
ITEM #:14
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:FIN
SUBJECT:FINANCIAL SOFTWARE AGREEMENT WITH CENTRALSQUARE
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
CentralSquare Technologies, LLC is the City's software vendor for integrated financial, payroll,
and utility billing services. For the past two decades, the City has contracted with the vendor
for software licenses and support.
In December 2021, the City completed its migration to a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)
agreement with Central Square. The original contract provided for a two-year initial term and a
one-year renewal. In November 2024, the City Council approved another one-year renewal.
Staff has received a proposal for a renewal of SaaS services for Central Square software in
the amount of $161,442.50. The renewal period is for a single year, December 6, 2025, to
December 5, 2026. This proposed contract is an increase of $8,596.63 (5.6%) over the
expiring contract amount. The operating budget for Information Technology for FY 2025/26
allocates $161,443 for this renewal of Central Square software.
CentralSquare Technologies, LLC is the sole provider of the Central Square NaviLine
software. Transitioning to a different software provider would result in a significant cost
i nc re a se . Therefore, staff is requesting that the City Council waive the Purchasing
Policies and Procedures requirement for competitive bids and award a contract directly
to CentralSquare Technologies, LLC for this service.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Waive the requirement to solicit formal bids and award a contract to CentralSquare
Technologies, LLC, a CentralSquare Company of Lake Mary, FL, in the amount of
$161,442.50 for CentralSquare NaviLine software.
2. Do not approve the contract and refer this item back to staff for further information.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
CentralSquare is the sole provider for the integrated financial, payroll, and utility billing
software used by the City. The City’s experience within this contract has been positive
and mission-critical accounting processes continue to be completed. Therefore, it is the
recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, as stated
above
90
ITEM #:15
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:HR
SUBJECT:HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The City has been operating with a variety of methods to carry out Human Resources and
Payroll functions, including hiring employees, maintaining employee records, recording
employee schedules and time records, and managing employee performance. These various
methods often do not interact with each other and over time have caused the creation of a
number of separate systems.
Some records are maintained in the City's payroll system, while others are maintained on
department-specific software that does not integrate with other City systems, and still other
records are maintained using other software platforms. Staff believes there is significant
benefit to having all employee data stored in one system that can be integrated with its
existing financial and payroll system. A suite of Human Resources Management tools will
allow for efficient data management and improvements to the user experience.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL:
On March 18, 2025, a Request for Proposal (RFP) was issued for the procurement of a
Human Resources Management System (HRMS) software package. The RFP was viewed by
21 vendors, and 11 vendors submitted proposals by the closing date of April 16, 2025.
The evaluation process was conducted in two phases. The first phase involved a proposal
review by the Evaluation Committee, which included representatives from Human Resources,
Finance, Information Technology, Parks and Recreation, Police, Fire, CyRide, and Electric.
The team evaluated proposals based on the following criteria:
Usability
Software Solution (alignment with the City’s needs and goals)
Implementation Plan
Experience and References
Cost
Following the initial evaluation, GovernmentJobs.com, Inc. (dba NEOGOV) and UKG Kronos
Systems, LLC were invited to participate in the demonstration phase. In the demonstration
phase, both vendors were asked to provide detailed presentations of their HRMS software,
focusing on Usability, Functionality, Adaptability, and Integration with the City’s existing
systems and HR processes. Demonstrations emphasized key operational areas such as Time
and Attendance, Scheduling, and Applicant Tracking.
Following the demonstrations and subsequent evaluation, NEOGOV emerged as the top-
ranked vendor. The Evaluation Committee determined that NEOGOV’s proposed solution
provided a stronger overall alignment with the City’s operational needs and long-term HR
goals. Specifically, NEOGOV’s Time and Attendance and Scheduling modules offered better
91
flexibility to accommodate the unique scheduling requirements of departments such as Fire,
Police, and Electric. A detailed breakdown of the evaluation scores and final rankings is
included as Attachment 1.
Following completion of the evaluation and demonstration phases, staff entered into final
negotiations with GovernmentJobs.com, Inc. (dba NEOGOV) for the purchase,
implementation, and support of a new Human Resources Management System (HRMS) for
the City.
The evaluation and final ranking include modules that, upon careful review, staff determined
are beyond the City’s current financial capacity. As a result, staff selected the following
Modules for inclusion in the agreement:
CoreHR: Serves as a centralized system for managing all employee data, including job
titles, work rules, and personal information, while automating HR workflows.
Time and Attendance : Enables accurate tracking of employee time, leave balances,
accruals, and absences using flexible rule configurations and self-service tools,
enhancing payroll accuracy and operational efficiency.
Schedule: Tracks and manages schedule building, rotating schedules, daily shift
changes, staffing levels, and approvals for leave and overtime, giving departments real-
time scheduling visibility.
Perform: Automates performance reviews and employee goal tracking and check-ins
with standardized workflows and dashboards that support continuous development and
compliance with regulatory requirements.
Onboard: Centralizes all new-hire paperwork, tasks, and resources in a customizable
digital portal, enabling the City to reduce manual processing, and improve regulatory
compliance
The proposed contract with NEOGOV includes annual renewals with up to four
additional 12-month renewal periods. The total five-year cost of the system is estimated
at $566,712.40, which includes software licensing, hardware, implementation services,
and ongoing support. A detailed funding breakdown is included in the attached spreadsheet
as Attachment 2.
The agreement is scheduled to begin on November 19, 2025, with an estimated
implementation period of 4–6 months, culminating in the system’s go-live date in early to mid-
2026. Implementation will include data migration, system configuration, training, and
integration with the City’s existing payroll and financial software.
As part of the project, the City will also upgrade its Central Square Naviline ERP system to
support integration between HRMS and the City’s financial data. The Central Square Fusion
API add-on will enable automated data exchange between the two systems. The Information
Technology Division estimates related costs at $2,160 for setup fees and $12,000 in annual
fees. The Fusion API add-on can also be used for future software projects that require Central
Square integration, potentially resulting in future cost savings.
92
In addition, several departments require physical time-tracking devices for clock-in/clock-out
functionality. Up to 10 touchscreen devices (e.g., iPads) will be purchased at an estimated
$350 each to support this need.
Costs for the Year One of the contract, including all annual software costs, Central Square
add-on software, and one-time setup costs, total $93,330.10. The ongoing annual software
licensing and support costs will be included in future operating budgets.
FUNDING:
For the past several years, the City has carried forward one-time funding of $112,300 intended
for the purchase of an HRIS system. In addition, the HR operating budget has included
$50,000 annually to support recurring system costs.
Because the proposed agreement with NEOGOV includes escalating fees over the five-year
term, staff recommends applying the $112,300 in one-time funding unevenly across the first
five years. This approach allows the City to smooth out the year-to-year cost increases, rather
than absorbing large jumps in any single budget year.
By strategically allocating a larger portion of the one-time funds in the years with steeper cost
escalation, and less in the later years, staff can maintain a more predictable and manageable
annual increase. As a result, the HR operating budget impact is expected to average
increases of $15,482 per year over the initial five-year contract period, improving long-term
budgeting and reducing the spikes in future budgets.
The following table reflects the five year cost of the software to the City:
Total Cost One-time
Funding Cost Current
Allocation
Cost Less
Current
Allocation
Increase
Year 1 Cost 93,330 33,330 60,000 50,000 10,000 10,000
Year 2 Cost 91,921 19,921 72,000 50,000 22,000 12,000
Year 3 Cost 115,872 26,872 89,000 50,000 39,000 17,000
Year 4 Cost 127,847 21,847 106,000 50,000 56,000 17,000
Year 5 Cost 137,742 10,330 127,412 50,000 77,412 21,411
Totals:$566,712 $112,300 $454,412 $250,000 $204,412 $77,412
Additionally, the system is anticipated to replace multiple standalone software products
currently used across various departments, which will partially offset a portion of the system
costs. The contract includes an annual appropriation clause should the City choose to
discontinue the use of the software.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Award a contract with GovernmentJobs.com, Inc. (dba NEOGOV) for a Human
Resources Management System (HRMS) software package in an amount not to exceed
$93,330.10 for the first year of the contract.
93
2. Direct staff to negotiate a contract a Human Resources Management System (HRMS)
software package with one of the other companies that submitted a proposal to the City.
3. Do not award a Human Resources Management System (HRMS) software package.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
GovernmentJobs.com, Inc. (dba NEOGOV)’s proposal provides the City with the best
value to implement a modern, integrated HRMS solution. The system will consolidate
multiple HR and departmental processes into a single platform, improving efficiency,
consistency, and data accuracy across the organization. Therefore, it is the
recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council approve Alternative No. 1, as
described above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment 1.xlsx
Attachment 2.xlsx
94
Vendor - HRMS Software Platform Proposal
Evaluation
5-Year Projected
Costs*
Governmentjobs.com, Inc. (dba
NEOGOV)
El Segundo, CA
NEOGOV
2 933,630.83$
UKG Kronos Systems, LLC
Lowell, MA
UKG
1 735,075.00$
Precision Task Group, Inc.
Houston, TX
Workday
3 2,150,657.00$
AVAAP U.S.A, LLC
Columbus, OH
Workday
4 2,139,636.00$
The Groove Public Services
Mclean, VA
Workday
5 1,739,246.00$
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Yarmouth, ME
Tyler HCM
6 976,330.00$
Dayforce, Inc.
Minneapolis, MN
Dayforce
7 1,071,153.20$
Empxtrack, Inc.
Hauppauge, NY
Empxtrack
8 192,449.00$
MERP Systems, Inc.
Herndon, VA
MERP
9 1,631,505.86$
PeopleGuru, Inc.
Tampa, FL
PeopleGuru HCM
10 647,275.00$
Bamboo HR, LLC
Lindon, UT
Bamboo HR
11 **Not Provided**
EVALUATION
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NO. 2025-118
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
* Projected costs reflect the full software suite as requested in the RFP, including optional modules not included in the awarded package
95
Demonstration
Ranking
Final Score Overall Ranking
1 6015 1
2 5980 2
2872 3
2862 4
2831 5
2580 6
2481 7
2280 8
1981 9
1867 10
Non-Responsive 11
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NO. 2025-118
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
* Projected costs reflect the full software suite as requested in the RFP, including optional modules not included in the awarded package
96
Modules Setup Fees Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Single Sign On 3,150.00$ 537.90$ 1,255.10$ 1,613.70$
CoreHR 10,000.00$ 5,362.00$12,512.50$16,087.50$
Time & Attendance 10,000.00$ 9,336.00$21,784.00$28,008.00$
Schedule 13,650.00$ 8,970.00$20,930.00$26,910.00$
Perform 4,079.00$ 4,899.60$14,698.80$19,598.40$
Onboard 2,772.00$ 2,913.60$8,740.80$ 11,654.40$
Total One-Time Setup
Costs 43,651.00$
Estimated Hardware
Costs 3,500.00$
Year 1 Software Cost 32,019.10$
Year 2 Software Cost 79,921.20$
Year Software 3 Cost 103,872.00$
Year Software 4 Cost 115,847.40$
Year Software 5 Cost 125,741.70$
Central Square Integration
Setup 2,160.00$
Central Square Integration
Annual Costs 12,000.00$
Total 5-Year Costs 566,712.40$
NeoGov Software Package Cost Breakdown
97
Year 4 Year 5
1,793.00$ 1,882.65$
17,875.00$18,768.75$
31,120.00$32,676.00$
29,900.00$31,395.00$
22,048.20$25,722.90$
13,111.20$15,296.40$
NeoGov Software Package Cost Breakdown
98
To:Mayor and City Council
From:Carly M. Watson, Deputy City Clerk
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Contract and Bond Approval
Item No. 16
MEMO
There is no Council Action Form for the CyRide 2025 Battery Electric Bus
Facility Improvement Project with NAI Electrical Contractors, of Ames, IA,
in the amount of $77,300. City Council approval of the contract and bond for the
project is simply fulfilling a State Code requirement.
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
99
To:Mayor and City Council
From:Carly M. Watson, Deputy City Clerk
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Contract and Bond Approval
Item No. 17
MEMO
There is no Council Action Form for the 2025/26 Traffic Signal Program
with Iowa Signal Inc. of Grimes, IA, in the amount of $75,423.95. City Council
approval of the contract and bond for the project is simply fulfilling a State
Code requirement.
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
100
ITEM #:18
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:ELEC
SUBJECT:BOILER MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT FOR POWER PLANT -
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
This contract consists of a variety of boiler and pressure vessel maintenance, including
structural steel and pressure vessel repair at the Power Plant. The contractor provides
emergency service as well as regularly planned repairs and services during scheduled
outages.
On April 8, 2025, Council awarded a contract renewal to TEI Construction Services, Inc.,
Duncan, SC, for the Boiler Maintenance Services Contract at the Power Plant. This was the
third renewal out of four possible renewal periods.
The total budgeted amount of $350,000 for FY 2025/26 was allocated for emergency tube
repairs and weld overlay services for Units 7 and 8. These funds have been utilized as
intended, with $50,000 remaining to cover any additional emergency repair needs that may
arise during the current fiscal year.
THIS ACTION:
During a routine inspection of the superheat tubes in Unit 8 this summer, it was discovered
that 18 tubes have experienced degradation of up to 10 linear feet of their Inconel overlay.
Given the extreme temperatures, pressures, and highly corrosive environment, any tube
lacking Inconel overlay is highly susceptible to quick failure.
To address this issue, each affected tube will be fully removed and replaced with new tubes to
ensure all compromised sections are eliminated. In addition, TEI will perform weld overlay on
other portions in the boiler that were found to have wall thicknesses below minimum. The weld
overlay will increase the wall thickness of the weak wall tube sections, ensuring greater
reliability of the boiler.
Similar replacement work is also required on the Unit 7 superheat tubes after an inspection of
its tubes revealed tubes with overlay degradation in the weld joints. These compromised weld
areas will be removed and replaced with new, Inconel overlayed tube sections.
To complete the work on both Unit 8 and Unit 7 boilers, an additional $200,000 in funding to
the current repair contract is required. This will increase the total contract amount to $550,000.
Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $200,000, is necessary for the replacement of
specialized Inconel overlaid tubes in both boilers and for weld overlay in Unit 8 boiler to repair
existing boiler wall tubes.
101
Funding for this change order is available from the Unit 7 & Unit 8 maintenance
accounts where there is $50,000 available in the Unit 7 boiler account and $150,000
available in the Unit 8 boiler account. Invoices will be based on contract rates for time
and materials for services actually received and accepted by the City.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Change Order No. 1 with TEI Construction Services Inc., of Duncan, SC, for
Boiler Maintenance Services Contract for Power Plant in the amount of $200,000.
2. Reject the change order and instruct staff to seek competitive bids, delaying the repairs.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
These tube repairs need to be performed to ensure the reliable operation of each boiler.
It is also important to have a highly skilled company perform these maintenance
services on the City’s power plant boilers. These boilers operate at very high
temperatures and pressures. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that
the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1 as stated above.
102
ITEM #:19
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:PW
SUBJECT:2023/24 ASPHALT STREET PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM #2
(E 7TH ST, N RIVERSIDE DR)
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
This project was located on North Riverside Drive (Lincoln Way to North 3rd Street) and East
7th Street (Crawford Avenue to the east end). The scope included new concrete pavement for
North Riverside Drive and a full pavement reconstruction of East 7th Street, which involved
sewer structure work and spot repairs of existing sewer pipe.
On January 23, 2024, the City Council awarded the 2023/24 Asphalt Street Pavement
Improvements Program No. 2 (East 7th Street, North Riverside Drive) project to Con-Struct,
Inc., of Ames, Iowa, in the amount of $706,554.20.
One change order was previously approved in accordance with purchasing policy:
Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $39,400, was approved by the City Manager's
Office. This change order covered additional sanitary pipe and service connections due
to deteriorated conditions after excavations on the east end of East 7th Street. A storm
sewer structure also required additional modification due to existing water main conflicts.
Change Order No. 2 (this Council action) is in the amount of $42,128.41. This change
reflects the final field measurements of the project, as well as sewer structure
modifications resulting from conflicts with the City's raw water line and gas mains in the
intersection of East 7th Street and Crawford Avenue.
Construction was completed in the amount of $788,082.61. Engineering and contract
administration expenses were $11 6 ,0 0 0 , bringing the overall project cost to $904,082.61.
Revenue and expenses associated with this project are as follows:
Funding Source Revenue Expenses
2023-24 Asphalt Street
Program $900,000
Sanitary Sewer Funds 27,000
Original Contract $706,554.20
Change Order 1 39,400.00
Change Order 2 (this action) 42,128.41
Final Contract Amount $788,082.61
Engineering/Administration 116,000.00
Total $927,000 $904,082.61
Remaining funding will be transferred to an unobligated account and utilized for future street
program improvements.
103
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the following:
a. Approve Change Order No. 2 to Con-Struct, Inc., of Ames, Iowa, for the 2023/24
Asphalt Street Pavement Improvements Program #2 (E 7th St, N Riverside Dr) in the
amount of $42,128.41.
b. Accept the 2023/24 Asphalt Street Pavement Improvements Program #2 (E 7th St, N
Riverside Dr) as completed by Con-Struct, Inc, of Ames, IA, in the amount of
$788,082.61.
2. Direct staff to pursue modifications to the project.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council
adopt Alternative No. 1 a-b, as noted above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Certification Letter 23-24 Asphalt St Pavement Improvements ( E 7th - N Riverside).pdf
104
Smart Choice
Public Works Department 515.239.5160 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
515.239.5404 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
November 12, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Ames
Ames, Iowa 50010
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I hereby certify the 2023/24 Asphalt Street Pavement Improvements (E 7th Street, N
Riverside Drive) project was completed in an acceptable manner by Con-Struct Inc., of Ames,
Iowa, in the amount of $788,082.61 and was inspected by the Public Works Department of the
City of Ames, Iowa.
Sincerely,
Justin A. Clausen, PE, CPWP-M
Public Works Director
JAC/lbc
cc: City Clerk, Finance, Contractor, Administrative Services, Project File
105
To:Mayor & City Council
From:Mindy Bryngelson, P.E., Municipal Engineer
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Wyffels Hybrids, Phase 1 - 220 S Teller Ave Financial Security
Reduction
Item No. 20
MEMO
Please see attached documentation for partial release of financial security on file
with the City.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Wyffels 220 S Teller -First year reduction letter.pdf
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
106
Public Works Department 515.239.5160 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Engineering 515.239.5404 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
Public Works Department
515 Clark Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50010
Phone 515-239-5160 ♦ Fax 515-239-5404
October 24, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Ames
Ames, Iowa 50010
RE: Wyffels Hybrids, Phase 1 220 S Teller Ave
Financial 5B Security Reduction #1
Mayor and Council Members:
I hereby certify that portion of the Financial Security covering 1 year of the 4 Year Stormwater
Management Maintenance requirements as per the Post Construction Stormwater
Management (Chapter 5B) for Wyffels Hybrids , 220 S Teller Ave, have been completed in an
acceptable manner. The stormwater management practices have been inspected by the
Engineering Division of the Public Works Department of the City of Ames, Iowa, and found to
meet City specifications and standards.
As a result of this certification, it is recommended that the financial security on file with the City
be reduced to $18,750.00. The remaining work covered by this financial security includes three
(3) years of inspection of the stormwater management practices.
Sincerely,
Mindy Bryngelson, P.E.
Municipal Engineer
Items pending to complete and accept Unit Quantity
4 -Year Maintenance year 3
107
To:Mayor & City Council
From:Mindy Bryngelson, P.E., Municipal Engineer
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Pivot Bio - 2600 South Loop Drive Financial Security Reduction
Item No. 21
MEMO
Please see attached documentation for partial release of financial security on file
with the City.
ATTACHMENT(S):
2600 S Loop Dr-Pivot Bio- 2 year reduction letter.pdf
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
108
Public Works Department 515.239.5160 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Engineering 515.239.5404 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
Public Works Department
515 Clark Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50010
Phone 515-239-5160 ♦ Fax 515-239-5404
October 24, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Ames
Ames, Iowa 50010
RE: Pivot Bio – 2600 South Loop Drive Financial Security Reduction
Mayor and Council Members:
I hereby certify that portion of the Financial Security covering 2 years of the 4 Year Stormwater
Management Maintenance requirements as per the Post Construction Stormwater
Management (Chapter 5B) for Pivot Bio located at 2600 South Loop Drive have been completed
in an acceptable manner. The stormwater management practices have been inspected by the
Engineering Division of the Public Works Department of the City of Ames, Iowa, and found to
meet City specifications and standards.
As a result of this certification, it is recommended that the financial security on file with the City
be reduced to $6,000.00. The remaining work covered by this financial security includes two (2)
years of inspection and maintenance of the stormwater management practices.
Sincerely,
Mindy Bryngelson, P.E.
Municipal Engineer
Items pending to complete and accept Unit Quantity
4 -Year Maintenance year 2
109
To:Mayor & City Council
From:Justin Clausen, P.E., CPWP-M, Public Works Director
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Ansley Subdivision 3rd Addition Financial Security Partial Release No.
4
Item No. 22
MEMO
Please see attached documentation for partial release of financial security on file
with the City.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Ansley 3rd Addition LOC Reduction 4.docx
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
110
Smart Choice
Public Works Department 515.239.5160 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Engineering 515.239.5404 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
Public Works Department
515 Clark Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50010
Phone 515-239-5160 Fax 515-239-5404
November 10, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Ames
Ames, Iowa 50010
RE: Ansley 3rd Addition Subdivision Letter of Credit Reduction No. 4
Mayor and Council Members:
I hereby certify that public improvements including partial completion of the painted pavement
markings required as a condition for approval of the final plat of Ansley 3rd Addition, have been
completed in an acceptable manner by Various Contractors. The above-mentioned
improvements have been inspected by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department
of the City of Ames, Iowa and found to meet City specifications and standards. Improvements
outstanding to be completed at this time include surface pavement, COSESCO (erosion control),
sidewalk, pedestrian ramps, pavement markings, street trees, street lights, seeding.
As a result of this certification, it is recommended that the financial security for public
improvements on file with the City for this subdivision be reduced to $89,403.50.
Sincerely,
Justin Clausen, P.E, CPWP-M
Public Works Director
JC/MB
cc: Finance, Developer, Planning & Housing, Subdivision file
111
Ansley 3rd Addition
November 10, 2025
Items completed as part of this reduction of financial security for Ansley 3rd Addition Subdivision.
Release partial funds of lump sum for painted pavement markings.
Items remaining as part of this reduction of financial security for Ansley 3rd Addition Subdivision.
ITEM UNIT Qty
PAVEMENT, PCC, 6 INCH - PRIVATE SY 1476
PAVEMENT, HMA, 4 INCH SURFACE SY 1821
SIDEWALK, PCC, 5 INCH (FUTURE
HOMEOWNER) SY 795
SIDEWALK, PCC, 5 INCH SY 115
SIDEWALK, PCC, 6 INCH SY 64
DETECTABLE WARNING SF 80
PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
SOLVENT/WATERBORNE LS 1
EROSION CONTROL - COSESCO AC 4.78
STREET TREES EA 24
STREET LIGHTS EA 5
112
To:Mayor & City Council
From:Mindy Bryngelson, P.E., Municipal Engineer
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Northcrest Retirement Community - Financial Security Release
Item No. 23
MEMO
Please see attached documentation for release of financial security on file with
the City.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Northcrest 5b Maintenance Final reduction.pdf
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
113
Public Works Department 515.239.5160 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Engineering 515.239.5404 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
Public Works Department
515 Clark Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50010
Phone 515-239-5160 ♦ Fax 515-239-5404
October 23, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Ames
Ames, Iowa 50010
RE: Northcrest Retirement Community
4th Year (Final) stormwater maintenance security release
Mayor and Council Members:
I hereby certify that a portion of the Financial Security covering the fourth year of the four year
Stormwater Management Maintenance requirements as per the Post Construction Stormwater
Management (Chapter 5B) for Northcrest Retirement Community has been completed in an
acceptable manner. The stormwater management practices have been inspected by the
Engineering Division of the Public Works Department of the City of Ames, Iowa, and found to
meet City specifications and standards.
As a result of this certification, it is recommended that the financial security on file with the City
be reduced to $ 0.00.
Sincerely,
Mindy Bryngelson, P.E.
Municipal Engineer
MB/lc
114
To:Mayor & City Council
From:Mindy Bryngelson, P.E., Municipal Engineer
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Bricktowne - Financial Security Release
Item No. 24
MEMO
Please see attached documentation for release of financial security on file with
the City.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Bricktowne 5B installation release letter.pdf
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
115
Public Works Department 515.239.5160 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Engineering 515.239.5404 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
Public Works Department
515 Clark Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50010
Phone 515-239-5160 ♦ Fax 515-239-5404
October 23, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Ames
Ames, Iowa 50010
Re: Bricktowne Stormwater Installation Security (Bond) Release
Mayor and Council Members:
I hereby acknowledge that the installation of stormwater management practices as required by
Chapter 5B of the Ames Municipal Code for the development of the Bricktowne Apartments in
the amount of $ 1,636,034.30 has been completed in an acceptable manner and verified with
the submission of certified as-built plans and the filing of a maintenance agreement.
Therefore it is recommended that the financial security on file with the City for the installation
of the storm water management practices for this development be released in full.
Respectfully,
Mindy Bryngelson, P.E.
Municipal Engineer
MB/lc
116
To:Mayor & City Council
From:Mindy Bryngelson, P.E., Municipal Engineer
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Iowa Dermatology 1429 Boston Avenue - Financial Security Release
Item No. 25
MEMO
Please see attached documentation for release of financial security on file with
the City.
ATTACHMENT(S):
1429 Boston- HPC Iowa Dermatology 5b main release.pdf
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
117
Public Works Department 515.239.5160 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Engineering 515.239.5404 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
Public Works Department
515 Clark Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50010
Phone 515-239-5160 ♦ Fax 515-239-5404
October 24, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Ames
Ames, Iowa 50010
RE: 1429 Boston Ave- Iowa Dermatology- HPC
4 year Stormwater maintenance security release
Mayor and Council Members:
I hereby certify that the stormwater facilities at Iowa Dermatology, 1429 Boston Ave have been
inspected by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department of the City of Ames, Iowa,
and are found to meet City specifications for establishment and maintenance in accordance with
the Post Construction Stormwater Management (Chapter 5B).
As a result of this certification, it is recommended that the four year maintenance security on
file with the City be released in full.
Sincerely,
Mindy Bryngelson, P.E.
Municipal Engineer
MB/lc
118
ITEM #:26
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:ELEC
SUBJECT:ROOF REPLACEMENT AT THE ELECTRIC POWER PLANT
PROJECT COMPLETION
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The Power Plant contains several separate roof sections. Several of the Power Plant roofs
were previously identified by a consultant as needing to be replaced. Leaking roofs have the
potential to create safety hazards and cause issues with operations.
This project replaced approximately 18,840 sq. ft. of existing built-up roofing on three
separate roof areas and levels, which is approximately half of the total roof square
footage at the Power Plant. New roof drains and portions of metal decking were also
replaced. The new roof system is designed to provide an effective service life of at least
20 years.
On February 27, 2024, City Council awarded a contract to Central States Roofing of Ames, IA,
for the Roof Replacement at the Power Plant. The bid included a unit price to replace any
additional deteriorated decking discovered when performing the original scope. The original
amount of the contract was $1,591,000. There were three change orders during the project:
Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $20,000, was approved by staff to address
additional failed decking found shortly after replacement work began.
Change Order No. 2, in the amount of $100,000, was approved by City Council on May
14, 2024 to continue replacing deteriorated decking material that was encountered.
Change Order No. 3, in the amount of $13,540, was approved by staff to replace wall
damage identified during the project, bringing the final contractual amount to $1,724,540.
Total budgeted funds for this project equaled $2,091,247.
The project has now been completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications. The project engineer has issued a certificate of completion.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Roofing Replacement at the Power Plant as completed by Central States
Roofing, of Ames, IA, in the amount of $1,724,540 (inclusive of sales tax) and release
retainage.
2. Delay the completion of the project and hold the retainage.
119
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The project has now been completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications. The project engineer has issued a certificate of completion. Therefore, it
is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, as
described above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Project completion PP roof.pdf
120
Engineer’s Statement of Completion
Project: Power Plant Roof Replacement Date of Contract: March 26, 2024
Owner: City of Ames Power Plant Contract No.: 2024-090
Engineer: City of Ames Electric Services Contractor: Central States Roofing
I hereby state that the Power Plant Roof Replacement project has been satisfactorily
completed in general compliance with the terms, specifications, and stipulations of said
contract.
The work was completed on September 30, 2025.
I further state that the retainage may be released in accordance with the contract documents.
Date_11/6/2025_____________
Kris Evans, PE
Power Plant Engineer
City of Ames Electric Services
121
ITEM #:27
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:PW
SUBJECT:2023/24 CONCRETE STREET PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
This project was located on Prairie View West and Prairie View East. The scope of the
project included street reconstruction and street rehabilitation as well as utility
structure improvements.
On March 12, 2024, the City Council awarded the 2023/24 Concrete Street Pavement
Improvements project to Con-Struct, Inc, of Ames, IA, in the amount of $1,015,443.00. Three
change orders were processed as described below:
Change Order No. 1, in the deduct amount of $26,991.68, was approved by the City
Manager and included modifications to the amount of asphalt needed due to reduction in
the asphalt overlay area and adding a contract item for Geogrid to improve subbase
stabilization.
Change Order No. 2, in the amount of $230,500, was approved by City Council on July
22, 2025. This change order included modifying a section of Prairie View East from a
mill and overlay construction to full depth replacement with rock subbase due to
unsuitable subgrade conditions found during construction.
Change Order No. 3, in the deduct amount of $27,011.20, was approved by the City
Manager and reflects the final measured quantities in the field at the end of construction.
Construction was completed in the amount of $1,191,940.12. Engineering and contract
administration expenses were $170,000 bringing the overall project cost
to$1,361,940.12. Revenue and expenses associated with this project are as follows:
Funding Source Revenues Expenses
2023-24 Concrete Street Program $950,000
2023-24 Asphalt Street Program 545,412
Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund 58,000
Original Contract Amount $1,015,443
Change Order 1 (26,991.68)
Change Order 2 230,500
Change Order 3 (27,011.20)
Final Contract Amount $1,191,940.12
Engineering/Administration 170,000.00
Total $1,553,412 $1,361,940.12
Remaining funding will be transferred to an unobligated account and utilized for future street
122
program improvements.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Accept the 2023/24 Concrete Pavement Improvements as completed by Con-Struct, Inc,
of Ames, IA, in the amount of $1,191,940.12.
2. Direct staff to pursue modifications to the project.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council
adopt Alternative No. 1, as noted above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Certification Letter 23-24 Concrete St Pavement Improvements (Prairie View).pdf
123
Smart Choice
Public Works Department 515.239.5160 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
515.239.5404 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
November 12, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Ames
Ames, Iowa 50010
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I hereby certify the 2023/24 Concrete Street Pavement Improvements (Prairie View) project
was completed in an acceptable manner by Con-Struct Inc., of Ames, Iowa, in the amount of
$1,191,940.12 and was inspected by the Public Works Department of the City of Ames, Iowa.
Sincerely,
Justin A. Clausen, PE, CPWP-M
Public Works Director
JAC/lbc
cc: City Clerk, Finance, Contractor, Administrative Services, Project File
124
ITEM #:28
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:PW
SUBJECT:2023/24 AMES PLAN 2040 SANITARY SEWER UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE
(265TH STREET EXTENSION)
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
This project involved installation of public sanitary sewer infrastructure into a priority growth
tier shown in Ames Plan 2040, which proactively opens the ability to develop land in those
adopted growth tiers. This project included extending a new sanitary sewer along Ken
Maril Road, and along 550th Avenue from Ken Maril Road to 265th Street in southeast
Ames.
On December 10, 2024, City Council awarded a contract to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc. of
Jordan, Minnesota in the amount of $2,036,000. Two change orders were approved as part of
the project. Change Order No. 1 was approved by City Council in the amount of $167,994 for
removal and replacement of frozen soil. Change Order No. 2 (balancing) was administratively
approved by staff and included a deduction in the amount of $30,778.94. The balancing
change order reflects the actual measured quantities completed during construction.
Construction was completed in the amount of $2,173,215.06.
Revenue and expenses associated with this program are estimated as follows:
Funding Source Available
Revenue
Estimated
Expenses
American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA)$2,281,000
Sewer Utility Fund 200,000
Construction Cost (as bid) $2,036,000.00
Change Order No. 1 167,994.00
Change Order No. 2
(balancing) (30,778.94)
Final Construction Cost 2,173,215.06
Engineering/Administration 290,000.00
Total $2,481,000 $2,463,215.06
Remaining funding will be utilized for other ARPA eligible projects.
125
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Accept the 2023/24 Ames Plan 2040 Sanitary Sewer Utility Infrastructure (265th Street
Extension) project as completed by S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc., of Jordan, MN, in the
amount of $2,173,215.06.
2. Direct staff to pursue changes to the project.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications. This project extends public sanitary sewer infrastructure into priority
tiers shown in Ames Plan 2040. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager
that the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, as described above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Ames 2040 Plan Overview.pdf
Certification Letter 2023-24 Ames Plan 2040 Sanitary Sewer (265th St).pdf
126
0
HORIZ.
500500 1000
12
7
Smart Choice
Public Works Department 515.239.5160 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
515.239.5404 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
November 12, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Ames
Ames, Iowa 50010
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I hereby certify the 2023/24 Ames Plan 2040 Sanitary Sewer Utility Infrastructure (265th
Street Extension) project was completed in an acceptable manner by S.M, Hentges and Sons,
Inc., of Jordan, Minnesota, in the amount of $2,173,215.06 and was inspected by the Public
Works Department of the City of Ames, Iowa.
Sincerely,
Justin A. Clausen, PE, CPWP-M
Public Works Director
JAC/lbc
cc: City Clerk, Finance, Contractor, Administrative Services, Project File
128
ITEM #:29
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:P&H
SUBJECT:PLAT OF SURVEY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR 5300 HICKORY
HILLS DR
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The subdivision regulations in Chapter 23 of the Ames Municipal Code include the process for
creating or modifying property boundaries and for determining if any improvements are
required in conjunction with the platting of property. The City has extra-territorial review of
subdivisions, including plats of survey, within two miles of the City.
The proposed plat of survey is for two existing rural properties located at 5300 Hickory Hills
Drive (see attached location map). The subject properties are within two miles of the City and
designated as Rural Character by Ames Plan 2040 (see attached Future Land Use Map
excerpt). This designation anticipates only the limited development of existing lots or minor
subdivisions of existing lots will occur.
The existing parcel at 5300 Hickory Hills Drive includes a dwelling and accessory structures.
The other lot is open space but considered buildable for a dwelling. The proposal modifies
the common boundary to enlarge the parcel containing the dwelling. The vacant parcel
is still developable under county regulations. The proposal does not create any new
developable lots, which is consistent with the Ames Plan 2040 designation.
As a boundary line adjustment, there are no infrastructure standards that apply to the
proposal. Therefore, no waivers of subdivision authority and accompanying covenants are
included with the plat of survey.
Approval of this plat of survey will allow the applicant to prepare the official plat of survey and
submit it to the Planning and Housing Director for review. The Director will sign the plat of
survey confirming that it fully conforms to all conditions of approval. The prepared plat of
survey may then be signed by the surveyor, who will submit it for recording in the Office of the
Story County Recorder.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the proposed plat of survey.
2. Deny the proposed plat of survey on the basis that the City Council finds that the
requirements for plats of survey as described in Section 23.309 have not been satisfied.
3. Refer this request back to staff and/or the owner for additional information.
129
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The proposed boundary line adjustment does not trigger any additional infrastructure
improvements per City requirements. Staff finds that the proposed plat of survey
complies with Ames Plan 2040, as no new development parcels are being created.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative
No. 1.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Location Map.pdf
Future Land Use Map.pdf
Plat of Survey.PDF
130
TE
L
L
E
R
A
V
E
220TH ST
58
0
T
H
A
V
E
Location Map
0 0.07 0.130.03
Miles
¯Legend
PARCELS
Subject Property
22085 580th
22171 580th
131
OS
HA
R
V
E
S
T
R
D
C AMERON SCHOOL RD
WINDROSE
LN
H
I
CKORY
HILLS
DR
OAK LN
Future Land Use Map
0 0.04 0.070.02
Miles
IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
3
5
LINCOLN
24TH
13THONTARIO
INTERSTATE
35
D
A
Y
T
O
N
ST
A
N
G
E
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
16TH
GEORGEW CARVER
SO
U
T
H
DA
K
O
T
A
AIRPORTHY
L
A
N
D
LINCOLN
WAY
¯Legend
Parcels
Subject Property
Ames Plan 2040 Future
Land Use Designations
Natural Areas
Rural Character
Story County Urban Reserve
Open Space
5300 Hickory
Hills Dr
132
13
3
13
4
ITEM #:30
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:P & H
SUBJECT:BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT AT 632 AND 634 N 500TH, 5507 LINCOLN
HIGHWAY, AND 5815 LINCOLN HIGHWAY WITH ADJACENT
UNADDRESSED LAND
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
This Plat of Survey (see attached) is for a boundary line adjustment involving parcels
zoned Agricultural in the Crestview Acres Subdivision, northeast of the intersection of
Lincoln Way and N 500th Avenue (see attached Location Map).
The proposed Plat of Survey is subject to a Story County Auditor review process and
the City’s Subdivision Code in Chapter 23 of the Ames Municipal Code, which includes
a process for creating or modifying property boundaries. Under the County process, the
adjustment of multiple lots would require a Final Plat, even though the City's Code would allow
for a plat of survey process. However, the County will accept a Plat of Survey, if the local
jurisdiction waives the Final Plat requirement, as is proposed with this project.
This area was annexed in 2021. The Crestview Acres Subdivision is an old Auditor's
Plat of a mostly undeveloped rural subdivision. The addendum to this report contains
further discussion regarding these original lots. The intent of the plat is to combine the
properties owned by Flummerfelt Quail Ridge into one large parcel for future
subdivision and development once the site is rezoned.
Additionally, the project modifies the boundaries of property owned by John Crane
along County Line Road with multiple properties owned by Flummerfelt Quail Ridge
LLC. The changes to the Crane properties result in two parcels that meet minimum lot
size requirements for a single-family dwelling in the Agricultural zone.
The Ad ams property at the southeast corner of the plat is increased by 16 feet to create
a conforming setback. Both the Adams and the Crane properties remain non-conforming in
other aspects, including multiple dwellings on a lot (Crane) and minimum lot size (Adams).
See addendum for more information regarding the current land use of these and the other
subject properties.
The proposed plat does not include three other Crestview Acres properties separately owned
by Lemer Land Holdings/Brant Lemer, including one land locked parcel that is surrounded
entirely by the Flummerfelt property.
The Plat of Survey includes a proposed cross access easement between this
landlocked parcel and one of the other Lemer parcels to allow for access to the
landlocked parcel. As understood by staff, the private property issue of Lemer's property
access across Flummerfelt property is complicated by the lack of an existing formal easement
and only the historic use and access of the properties from the time when it was primarily
utilized for the now defunct Crestview Mobile Home Park.
135
The proposed Plat of Survey does not create any future development rights nor does it alter
any other private access rights that may exist between the Lemer and Flummerfelt properties.
Lemer would need to ascertain his legal access rights prior to any future development of his
own land.
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AND APPROVAL PROCESS:
The Flummerfelt property at 5815 Lincoln Highway property lacks right-of-way dedication
along County Line Road. Dedication of right-of-way is a standard of Chapter 23 that has been
applied to this plat of survey as would of have been required if it had been processed as a
Minor Subdivision Final Plat.
The City Council is being asked to accept dedication of approximately 7,500 square feet
of missing right-of-way along N 500th (see attached Acquisition Plat for graphical
representation and legal description--the area is shown as Tract A on the survey). A
deed conveying the right-of-way to the City of Ames is also included as an attachment.
The dedication of right-of-way requires acceptance by the City Council. Council is not
acting on the Plat of Survey, but only the acceptance of the right-of-way.
Acceptance will allow the applicant to prepare the official Plat of Survey and submit it to the
Planning and Housing Director for review. The Director will sign the Plat of Survey confirming
that it fully conforms to all conditions of approval. The prepared Plat of Survey may then be
signed by the surveyor, who will submit it, the executed Warranty Deed, and certified
resolutions accepting the right-of-way for recording in the office of the Story County Recorder.
The applicant shall provide a copy of the recorded Warranty Deed, Plat of Survey, and
certified resolutions to the City Clerk.
WAIVER OF FINAL PLAT REQUIREMENT PROCESS:
The Story County Auditor requires a waiver from the City Council to avoid Minor
Subdivision Final Plat procedure. The Story County Auditor considers the Boundary Line
Adjustment to be a subdivision under State Code due to the number of parcels involved. In lieu
of a subdivision plat, they indicated they would accept a waiver.
Section 23.301 of the Ames Municipal Code indicates that a division is a Boundary Line
Adjustment if "no more than the same number of lots, or fewer number of lots, exist after the
adjustment" and as such is excepted from Minor and Major Subdivision requirements. Section
23.103 further permits City Council to waive requirements of the subdivision regulations, as
long as the intent and purpose are not nullified. The Boundary Line Adjustment still provides a
clear and accurate description of the land, upholding the purpose of Chapter 23 Subdivisions
and no additional parcels are being created.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve a resolution accepting the right-of-way dedication with the attached warranty
deed and a resolution to waive the subdivision final plat requirement, thereby authorizing
the Planning and Housing Director to approve the final Plat of Survey subject to receipt
of the cross access easement and complying with Chapter 23 plat of survey
requirements.
136
2. Deny the acceptance of the right-of-way on the basis that the City Council finds that the
requirements for plats of survey, right-of-way dedication, and waiver of Minor
Subdivision requirements as described in Section 23.308, 23.309, and 23.103 have not
been satisfied.
3. Refer this request back to staff and/or the owner for additional information.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Plat of Survey will conso lidate multiple Crestview Acres Subdivision lots i nto four
parcels. It will facilitate future development and dedicate missing right-of-way along N
500th Avenue to ensure consistency of right-of-way in terms of ownership.
The Plat of Survey does not address Pre-annexation agreement requirements related to
utility and street extensions. These requirements will be met through a future
subdivision plat.
Staff has determined that the proposed Plat of Survey and dedication satisfies all
Subdivision Code requirements and the resulting parcels conform to zoning and
subdivision standards. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City
Council adopt Alternative No. 1.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Location Map.pdf
Plat of Survey
Acquisition Plat for ROW Dedication
Warranty Deed (Dedication)
Addendum.pdf
137
E
L
L
S
T
O
N
AV
E
LINCOLN
WAY
S
50
0
T
H
AVE
ALLERTON DR
L I N C OLN H I G H WAY
N
5
0
0
T
H
A
V
E
Location Map
0 0.04 0.070.02
Miles
IN
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
3
5
LINCOLN
24TH
13THONTARIO
INTERSTATE
35
D
A
Y
T
O
N
ST
A
N
G
E
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
Y
16TH
GEORGEW CARVER
SO
U
T
H
DA
K
O
T
A
AIRPORTHY
L
A
N
D
LINCOLN
WAY
¯Legend
Parcels
Subject Properties
5815 Lincoln
Highway 5507 Lincoln
Highway
632/634 N
500th
Excepted
Excepted
Excepted
ROW to be Dedicated
138
LOCATION:
PROPRIETOR:
REQUESTED BY:
PREPARED BY
PLAT OF SURVEY
& RETURN TO:
PT. CRESTVIEW ACRES, SW1/4, SW1/4 SEC. 6-83-24
CITY OF AMES, STORY COUNTY, IOWA
JOHN R. CRANE
BRIAN M. ADAMS
CHUCK WINKLEBLACK
R. BRADLEY STUMBO, PLS #17161
STRAND ASSOCIATES, INC.
AMES, IA 50010
515-233-0000
FLUMMERFELT QUAIL RIDGE, LLC
JOB#DATE:FIELDWORK COMPLETED:PAGE OF7081.013 10/22/25 6/14/24 1 2
Phone: (515) 233-0000
414 South 17th Street, Suite 107
Strand Associates, Inc.
Ames, Iowa 50010
FAX: (515) 233-0103
Survey Description-Parcel A:
Lots 43 and 44, except the West 27 feet thereof, Lots 45-48 and that part of Lot D abutting the east line of said Lots 45-48, all in Crestview Acres Subdivision in
the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 83 North, Range 24 West of the 5th P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, and all
together being all more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest Corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence
N89°19'23"E, 60.01 feet along the north line thereof to its intersection with the east line of N. 500th Avenue and the point of beginning; thence continuing
N89°19'23"E, 307.84 feet to the Northeast Corner of said Lot D; thence S00°03'10"E, 292.09 feet along the east line thereof to its intersection with the easterly
extension of the south line of said Lot 48; thence S89°08'10”W, 185.97 feet along said line to the Southwest Corner of said Lot 48; thence N00°03'02”W, 150.22
feet to the Northwest Corner of said Lot 47; thence S89°08'24”W, 122.77 feet along the south line of said Lot 43 to the east line of N. 500th Avenue; thence
N00°18'17"E, 142.88 feet along said line to the point of beginning, containing 1.65 acres.
Survey Description-Parcel B:
Lots 40-42 and the North Half of Lot 39, all except the West 27 feet thereof, Lot 49 and the North Half of Lot 50, and that part of Lot D abutting the east line of
said Lots 49 and the North Half of Lot 50, all in Crestview Acres Subdivision in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 83
North, Range 24 West of the 5th P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, and all together being all more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the
Northwest Corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence N89°19'23"E, 367.85 feet along the north line thereof to the Northeast Corner of
said Lot D; thence S00°03'10"E, 292.09 feet along the east line thereof to its intersection with the easterly extension of the north line of said Lot 49, and the
point of beginning; thence continuing S00°03'10”E, 112.30 feet; thence S89°06'50”W, 310.38 feet along the south line of the North Half of said Lots 50 and 39
to the east line of N. 500th Avenue; thence N00°18'17”E, 262.68 feet along said line to the north line of said Lot 42; thence N89°08'24”E, 122.77 feet to the
Northeast Corner thereof; thence S00°03'02”E, 150.22 feet to the Northwest Corner of said Lot 49; thence N89°08'10"E, 185.97 feet to the point of beginning,
containing 1.22 acres.
Survey Description - Parcel C:
Lot 136, except the South 20 feet thereof, Lot 137, and the South 16.00 feet of Lot 138, all in Crestview Acres Subdivision in the Southwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 83 North, Range 24 West of the 5th P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, and all together being more particularly
described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the east line of said Lot 136 with the north line of Lincoln Highway; thence S89°07'56"W, 135.99 feet to
the west line of said Lot 136; thence N00°02'05"W, 220.89 feet along the west line of said Lots 136-138; thence N89°08'07"E, 135.99 feet along a line running
parallel with and 16.00 feet North of the south line of said Lot 138 to the east line thereof; thence S00°02'10"E, 220.89 feet to the point of beginning, containing
0.69 acres.
Survey Description-Parcel D:
Lot 1, Lots 28-31, all except the South 20 feet thereof and except the West 27 feet of said Lot 31, and Lots B and C, all except the South 20 feet thereof, and
Lot A, except the South 90 feet thereof, Lot D, except the South 20 feet thereof and except that part lying within Parcels A and B; the South Half of Lot 50, Lots
32-38 and the South Half of Lot 39, all except the West 27 feet thereof, Lots 51-58, 60-81, 83, 87-106, 112-135, Lot 138, except the South 16.00 feet thereof,
and 139-151, all in Crestview Acres Subdivision in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 83 North, Range 24 West of the 5th
P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, all together being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest Corner of said Southwest
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence N89°19'23"E, 367.85 feet along the north line thereof to the Northeast Corner of said Lot D and the point of
beginning; thence continuing N89°19'23"E, 1127.70 feet to the Northeast Corner of said Lot 151; thence S00°02'10”E, 1018.33 feet to the Northeast Corner of
the South 16.00 feet said Lot 138; thence S89°08'07"W, 135.99 feet to the Northwest Corner of said South 16.00 feet; thence S00°02'05”E, 150.89 feet along
the east line of said Lot A; thence S89°07'56"W, 50.01 to the east line of said Lot 1; thence S00°02'05"E, 70.00 feet along said line to the north line of Lincoln
Highway; thence S89°07'56"W, 133.00 feet along said line to the west line of said Lot 1; thence N00°02'36"W, 427.75 feet along the west line of said Lots 1,
135 and 134 to the Northwest Corner of said Lot 134; thence S89°13'05"W, 136.82 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Lot 112; thence S00°01'17"E, 427.96
feet along the east line of said Lot B to the north line of Lincoln Highway; thence S89°07'56"W, 50.02 feet to the west line of said Lot B; thence N00°01'25"W,
501.69 feet along said line to the Southeast Corner of said Lot 106; thence S89°08'31"W, 299.89 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Lot 87; thence
S00°01'44"E, 501.74 feet along the east line of said Lot C to the north line of Lincoln Highway; thence S89°07'56"W, 637.15 feet along said line to the east line
of N. 500th Avenue; thence N00°18'17”E, 838.57 feet to the north line of the South Half of said Lot 39 and 50; thence N89°06'50"E, 310.38 feet along said line
and the extension thereof to the east line of said Lot D; thence N00°03'10”W, 404.39 feet to the point of beginning, containing 32.12 acres; Excepting therefrom
Lots 59 and 82, which are located within this description but not included in the parcel acreage.
Survey Description - Access Easement:
A strip of land 16.00 feet in width across Parcel B in Crestview Acres Subdivision in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 83
North, Range 24 West of the 5th P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, being situated 8.00 feet on each side of the following centerline: Beginning at a point
on the west line of said Parcel B which is 35.19 feet South of the Northwest Corner thereof; thence S87°46'20"E, 53.58 feet; thence S72°59'53"E, 72.64 feet to
the east line of said Parcel A, and there terminating.
Survey Description - Septic System Easement:
That part of Parcel A in Crestview Acres Subdivision in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 83 North, Range 24 West of
the 5th P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest Corner of said Parcel A; thence N00°03'02"W, 21.00 feet
along the west line thereof; thence N89°08'10"E, 28.00 feet; thence S00°03'02"E, 21.00 feet to the south line of said Parcel A; thence S89°08'10"W, 28.00 feet
to the point of beginning.
Survey Description - Septic System Easement:
That part of Parcel B in Crestview Acres Subdivision in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 83 North, Range 24 West of
the 5th P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest Corner of Parcel A in said Crestview Acres; thence
N89°08'10"E, 5.00 along the south line thereof to the point of beginning; thence continuing N89°08'10"E, 53.00 feet; thence S00°51'50"E, 57.00 feet; thence
S89°08'10"W, 53.00 feet; thence N00°51'50"W, 57.00 feet to the point of beginning.
Survey Description - Access Easement
A strip of land 20.00 feet in width across Lot C in Crestview Acres Subdivision in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 83
North, Range 24 West of the 5th P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, being situated 10.00 feet on each side of the following centerline: Beginning at a point
on the east line of Lot 82 in said Crestview Acres Subdivision which is 10.09 feet South of the Northeast Corner thereof; thence N82°20'08"E, 50.45 feet to the
west line of Lot 85 in said Crestview Acres Subdivision, and there terminating.
Survey Description - Right of Way Acquisition Area:
The West 27.00 feet of Lot 31, except the South 20.00 feet thereof, in Crestview Acres Subdivision in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 6, Township 83 North, Range 24 West of the 5th P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, containing 0.17 acres.
The Ames City Council approved this plat of survey on ________________, 2025, with Resolution No. _________. I certify that it conforms to all conditions of approval.
___________________________
Planning & Housing Director
139
S89°07'56"W 1503.43'
70' ROW LINE
LINCOLN HIGHWAY
N.
5
0
0
T
H
A
V
E
N
U
E
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
1
135
134
133
132
131
130
129
128
127
126
125
124
123
2
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
345678
9 10 11 12 13 14
1617181920
21 22 23 24 25
E
G
27
109
108
107
106
105
104
103
100
99
98
97
84
86
87
88
89
90
93
94
95
96
83
82
81
80
79
78
77
76
75
74
73
72
71
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
57
54
53
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
32
33
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
28293031 F
ABC
D
34
56
55
91
92
CRES
T
V
I
E
W
A
C
R
E
S
S
U
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
= FOUND 1/2" PIPE W/ YELLOW CAP #12971
= FOUND 1/2" REBAR
= FOUND T-BAR W/ ALUM. CAP #5543
= FOUND T-BAR W/ ALUM. CAP #13644
= FOUND 1/2" REBAR IN CONCRETE
= SET 1/2" REBAR W/ YELLOW CAP #17161
60
'
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
W
A
Y
L
I
N
E
N0
0
°
1
8
'
1
7
"
E
1
3
1
4
.
3
5
'
N89°19'23"E
60.01'
15
26
SW CORNER
SEC. 6-83-24
FOUND MAG
NAIL
SE CORNER
SW1/4, SW1/4
SEC. 6-83-24
SET MAG NAIL
S89°08'10"W 185.97'
S89°08'24"W
122.77'
NW CORNER
SW1/4, SW1/4
SEC. 6-83-24
FOUND 'X' CUT
IN CONCRETE
SUNSET
R
I
D
G
E
6TH AD
D
N
SUNSET
R
I
D
G
E
5TH AD
D
N
SUNSET
R
I
D
G
E
3RD AD
D
N
SUNSET
R
I
D
G
E
3RD AD
D
N
SUNSET
R
I
D
G
E
7TH AD
D
N
SUNSET
R
I
D
G
E
10TH AD
D
NSUNSET
R
I
D
G
E
11TH AD
D
N
NE CORNER LOT D
NW CORNER LOT 70
NE CORNER
SW1/4, SW1/4
SEC. 6-83-24
FOUND 1/2"
REBAR
85
SW CORNER
LOT 67
SW CORNER
LOT 48
NW CORNER
LOT 47
NW CORNER
LOT 134
SW CORNER
LOT 112
(N89°08'10"E)
(N89°08'24"E)
N0
0
°
0
3
'
1
0
"
W
4
0
4
.
3
9
'
(N89°06'50"E)
N0
0
°
0
3
'
0
2
"
W
15
0
.
2
2
'
(S
0
0
°
0
3
'
0
2
"
E
)
SE CORNER
LOT 106
S00°02'10"E
70.01'
S89°08'07"W
N00°02'05"W
220.89'
16'
101
102
EXC
E
P
T
I
O
N
PARCEL D
1399085.04 S.F.
32.12 ACRES
PARCEL B
53343.83 S.F.
1.22 ACRES
PARCEL C
30035.92 S.F.
0.69 ACRES
PARCEL A
71821.42 S.F.
1.65 ACRES
N89°07'00"E 271.71'
S89°08'15"W 271.68'
N00°03'10"W
73.88'
S00°01'44"E
73.97'
NE COR. LOT 82
FALLS IN TREE
SW CORNER
LOT 87
S89°07'56"W 637.15'
N0
0
°
1
8
'
1
7
"
E
8
3
8
.
5
7
'
S0
0
°
0
1
'
4
4
"
E
5
0
1
.
7
4
'
N0
0
°
0
1
'
2
5
"
W
5
0
1
.
6
9
'
S0
0
°
0
1
'
1
7
"
E
4
2
7
.
9
6
'
N0
0
°
0
2
'
3
6
"
W
4
2
7
.
7
5
'
S0
0
°
0
2
'
1
0
"
E
1
0
1
8
.
3
3
'
S0
0
°
0
2
'
1
0
"
E
2
2
0
.
8
9
'
S89°08'31"W 299.89'
N0
0
°
1
8
'
1
7
"
E
2
6
2
.
6
8
'
N89°19'23"E 307.84'N89°19'23"E 1127.70'
S0
0
°
0
3
'
1
0
"
E
2
9
2
.
0
9
'
S89°06'50"W 310.38'
N0
0
°
1
8
'
1
7
"
E
14
2
.
8
8
'
S0
0
°
0
3
'
1
0
"
E
11
2
.
3
0
'
S89°13'05"W
136.82'
N89°08'07"E
135.99'
S89°07'56"W
133.00'
S89°07'56"W
135.99'
S89°07'56"W
50.02'
S89°07'56"W
50.01'
S00°02'05"E
70.00'
15
0
.
8
9
'
70
.
0
0
'
S0
0
°
0
2
'
0
5
"
E
N82°20'08"E
50.45'
10.09'
20' WIDE
ACCESS
EASEMENT
S00°18'16"W
35.19'
S87°46'20"E
53.58'
S72°59'23"E
72.64'
NW CORNER
PARCEL B PARCEL
A
PARCEL
B
16' ACCESS
EASEMENT
(8' EA. SIDE)
5.00'
53.00'
N00°51'50"W
57.00'
S89°08'10"W
53.00'
S00°51'50"E
57.00'
S00°03'02"E
21.00'
N89°08'10"E
28.00'
SEPTIC SYSTEM
EASEMENT
21.00'
SEPTIC SYSTEM
EASEMENT
28.00'
SW CORNER
PARCEL A
Phone: (515) 233-0000
414 South 17th Street, Suite 107
Strand Associates, Inc.
Ames, Iowa 50010
FAX: (515) 233-0103
00 150'300'
JOB # 7081.013
PAGE 2 OF 2
EASEMENT DETAIL
This plat has been prepared to adjust the boundary lines
between numerous existing tax parcels in Crestview Acres.
New deeds are required to be filed for the new parcels.
14
0
141
142
143
144
145
ADDENDUM
Description of Parcels and Land Use
Flummerfelt Parcels
The Flummerfelt parcels are currently undeveloped. 5815 Lincoln Highway previously
contained a commercial building that was an auto dealership in unincorporated Story
County. 5521 Lincoln Way also previously contained a dwelling. These were demolished
after Flummerfelt purchased the land.
As 5815 Lincoln Highway, containing the auto dealership, has historically been under
separate ownership than the other now-Flummerfelt owned parcels, the right-of-way
along County Line Road (N 500th Avenue) was never fully dedicated. Dedication is
proposed prior to approval of the Plat of Survey.
As a result of the Plat of Survey boundary line adjustment, the Flummerfelt parcels will
become one 32.12-acre parcel of land (Parcel D).
Crane Parcels
The Crane parcels at 632 and 634 N 500th contain three dwellings. Two dwellings are
located on the 0.82-acre parcel (632 N 500th), and one on a 2.21-acre parcel (634 N
500th).
The boundary line adjustment for these parcels results in one 1.22-acre parcel with two
dwellings (Parcel B, 632 N 500th), and one 1.65-acre parcel with one dwelling (Parcel A,
634 N 500th).
While boundary line adjustment brings the lots into conformance with minimum lot size
in the Agricultural zone, without removal of the dwellings, new dwellings could not be
constructed on the parcels. Per Section 29.401(5) of the Ames Municipal Code, only
one single-family dwelling is permitted per lot. The dwellings at 632 N 500th are
considered nonconforming structures. Restoration of either dwelling would be limited by
the provisions for nonconforming structures if damaged.
The dwelling on Parcel A will conform with all setback requirements as a result of the
boundary line adjustment. The southern dwelling on Parcel B will come into
conformance with side setback requirements. It will otherwise continue to have
nonconforming rear and front setbacks. The northern dwelling on Parcel B will continue
to have nonconforming side and rear setbacks. These nonconforming setbacks are
permitted to continue with the Plat of Survey as these property boundaries are not
proposed to change. Again, restoration and ability to rebuild at these setbacks would be
limited by the provisions for nonconforming structures if damaged.
146
Given the proximity of the dwellings to the shared boundaries of Parcels A and B, the
septic systems for homes on Parcel A encroach on Parcel B, and vice versa .
Easements are provided.
A shared access easement is also provided between the parcels as no additional curb
cuts will be granted on N 500th for separate access.
Adams Parcel
The Adams parcel contains a dwelling at 5507 Lincoln Highway. The parcel boundary
will be enlarged to the north 16 feet so that the dwelling meets the required side setback
in the Agricultural zone. The resulting parcel (Parcel C) will be 0.69 acres and wi ll
continue to be nonconforming in terms of minimum lot size and front setbacks.
While this parcel has frontage on Lincoln Highway, its access is from a driveway on the
adjacent Flummerfelt parcel.
Crestview Acres Subdivision History
The Crestview Acres Subdivision is an Auditor’s Plat of the 40-acre area northeast of
the intersection of Lincoln Highway and County Line Road (N 500th). It was platted in
unincorporated Story County in 1958, before the County adopted zoning.
An Auditor's Plat is a subdivision plat required by the County Auditor when a parcel of
land has been subdivided in violation of Iowa Code requirements for divisions of land
(e.g. without a survey).
With an Auditor’s Plat, there is no infrastructure or dedications that take place. It is
solely intended to ensure there are accurate legal descriptions for the divided parcel (s)
through a survey process.
The subdivision contains 151 lots, ranging in size from 1,000 square feet to one acre.
The majority of the lots are 10,000 square feet and were never developed after the
Auditor’s Plat. These have been historically deeded together.
The acre-sized lots along the Lincoln Highway frontage developed with three single -
family homes and an auto dealership. Two of these homes remain. Three homes were
also constructed at 632 and 634 N 500th on parcels made up of several lots deeded
together.
The main developed portion of the site was the Crestview Mobile Home Park at 5615
Lincoln Highway, which utilized the smallest lots in the subdivision and adjacent
property. This use ceased in 2017 and this area is not part of the Plat of Survey.
Pre-Annexation Agreement and Future Development
147
The properties were annexed in 2021. A preannexation agreement addresses
infrastructure and other matters related to the properties' initial creation through a rural
subdivision and future development. The preannexation agreement required the
properties to be replatted prior to seeking any building and zoning permits. This was
intended to limit individual development of the original Crestview Acres Subdivision lots.
While these lots were combined through deeds, this did not eliminate the original lot
lines.
The proposed Plat of Survey does not constitute a replat of the properties as it is not
creating lots.
Future rezoning and platting through a final plat process is anticipated prior to any
development. Other provisions of the annexation agreement including for a traffic study,
extension of streets from Sunset Ridge, and other infrastructure extensions will apply at
the time of rezoning and platting. Review for oth er needed frontage improvements such
as sidewalks will occur with future platting.
148
ITEM #:31
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:PW
SUBJECT:RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
O n August 12, 2025, staff presented a report to the City Council outlining the need for a
residential curbside recycling program in Ames. This followed the June 24, 2025 report to City
Council detailing conceptual design and financial modeling for a Resource Recovery and
Recycling Campus (R3C). The R3C represents a new approach for the disposal of municipal
solid waste (MSW) and is intended to receive solid waste, recyclables, and yard waste. Staff
continues to work with HDR Engineering and Story Construction Co. on design development
services with a goal to begin construction in spring 2026 and begin operating the facility in the
first half of 2027.
Robust recycling efforts are important to the community's future waste disposal
operations from both an environmental and financial standpoint. Increased recycling
aligns with the community's Climate Action Plan goals. Recycling requires less energy to
create products as compared to creating products from new raw materials.
In addition, recycling is a less costly alternative to landfilling in multiple ways. First, the
Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR) charges landfills a fee for the disposal of MSW
on a per-ton basis. Under the City's agreement with Carroll County Landfill, any such fees
charged on the City's waste will be the City's responsibility to pay. The fee varies based on the
amount of waste that is diverted from the landfill. The more landfill diversion occurs, the lower
the per-ton fee.
Historically, Ames has accomplished significant landfill diversion through the waste-to-
energy process and recycling that occurs at the Resource Recovery Plant. As the City
transitions away from waste-to-energy, the City's waste diversion obligations must be
met through recycling.
The second manner in which recycling is less financially costly as compared to
landfilling relates to the lower cost to transport and tip recyclable materials at facilities
in Des Moines (~60 miles roundtrip) than to transport and tip those materials at the
Carroll County Landfill (~150 miles roundtrip). It also reduces the number of miles
driven and greenhouse gas emissions.
At the August 12, 2025 City Council meeting, staff was directed to obtain additional
public input regarding residential curbside recycling. Staff conducted a Curbside
Recycling Survey from September 2–30, 2025. The survey received 1,543 responses,
providing valuable insights into resident preferences, barriers, and expectations for a future
curbside recycling program.
A detailed report of survey results is provided in Attachment A: Curbside Recycling Survey
Results. Key findings from the survey include:
149
Strong support for curbside recycling, with 92% indicating they would participate in the
program.
Cost concerns were the most frequently cited barrier (20% of respondents), alongside
space for bins (15%), and uncertainty about what can be recycled (8%).
Bin size and storage are practical concerns, with many (49%) requesting smaller cart
options.
Support for maintaining a central drop-off site for recyclables (74% support) and
community cardboard sites (71% support).
The August 12, 2025 staff report introduced the high level concepts of a residential curbside
recycling program. The report included four topics that would require Council direction.
Each topic is listed below with options and staff recommendations. A fifth topic, cart
size, has been added based on the survey results.
1. Level of Access
2. Provider
3. Cart Ownership
4. Frequency of Service
5. Cart Size
Issue1. Level of Access
Recycling participation rates vary significantly depending on the level of access, community
education and outreach efforts, and cultural factors. Nationwide averages are presented
below, based on data from studies conducted by the Recycling Partnership and the
Sustainable Packaging Coalition. The studies state that 75% of Iowans currently have access
to recycling, 44% through curbside and 31% through drop-off only. The figures below should
be used as rough, order-of-magnitude averages and not exact projections.
Level of
Access Description
Average
Participation
Rate
(households)
Average
Diversion Rate
(waste
tonnage)
a)
Curbside
universal
access
All eligible residents are charged for the service
and receive a recycling cart. This would result in
the highest diversion and participation rates.
However, this model presents the highest risk of
contamination due to the likelihood of some trash
being placed in the carts.
75%30%+
150
b)
Curbside
universal
charge,
must opt-
in to
receive a
cart
All eligible residents are charged for the service
but must opt in to receive a cart. This model
would reduce contamination risks but also
reduce participation and diversion rates. While
many residents would opt in to receive a cart,
many residents would pay for a service they are
not using. This model also adds complexity in
coordinating cart delivery only to those who opt
in.
30% - 40%~10%
c)
Curbside
opt-in
Only residents who opt in will be charged for the
service and receive a cart. This would further
lower participation and waste diversion tonnage,
but only charge residents who sign up for the
service. Fees would increase relative to options
a and b, as costs would be spread among a
smaller rate base
20% - 30%~5%
d) Drop-off
site(s) only
Currently in place. Offering and managing
collection from drop-off locations would be the
only direct involvement from the City in recycling.
10%< 5%
Issue 1 Staff Recommendation: To achieve meaningful diversion of material from the
landfill, staff believes that drop-off only recycling (Option D) must be supplemented by a
broader recycling effort. Opt-in or v oluntary-only curbside collection programs (Options B and
C) are not expected to have a significant impact on the diversion of materials. In addition, most
similar-sized cities in Iowa provide universal access to curbside recycling (Option A) (see
Attachment B for more information about other recycling programs in Iowa). Therefore, staff
recommends Option A (universal access with all households provided a cart) to
achieve the community’s diversion goals.
Issue 2. Provider
For curbside residential collection, there are two alternatives for how a provider will deliver the
service:
a. City-wide contract with one provider. This approach would involve the City assuming
responsibility for coordinating curbside recycling. Residents would be charged a fee on
their Ames utilities bill. Only one contractor would provide service, minimizing truck traffic
and offering city-wide consistency. However, this approach would also eliminate the
ability to choose a service provider.
In this approach, fees per household for this service would likely be lower compared to
private contracting due to efficiencies gained by the scale of the program. This approach
also enables consistent education and messaging, coordinated by the City in partnership
with the selected contractor. A contract would require timely reporting and provide full
transparency into diversion and participation. The City would also require that all
recyclables be hauled to the R3C, ensuring full utilization of the facility.
Contractor services would not include any processing or final disposal of recyclables.
City staff would direct the contractor to deliver the material to the R3C (or other facility as
appropriate), and the disposal fees would be paid by the City and charged back to
151
residents through the monthly billing charge.
b. Require existing haulers to offer curbside recycling as a service. There are nine
existing licensed haulers of MSW in Ames. Two of the haulers currently offer residential
curbside recycling. This approach requires less involvement from the City to establish
and manage the services, instead relying on the private market to handle recycling.
However, this approach would result in a higher volume of truck traffic, varying services,
and little ability for the City to track diversion rates. It may also result in pushback from
those haulers who do not have the resources to offer curbside recycling service.
Additionally, because recycling is not regulated in the same manner as solid waste,
haulers may choose not to utilize the R3C and directly haul recyclables to the Des
Moines area material recovery facilities. This could make it difficult for staff to accurately
measure the community's waste diversion efforts, and may result in residents
experiencing different rules for disposal depending on which hauler (and disposal
facility) ultimately handles their recycling.
Issue 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that proposals be solicited for a
City-wide contract with a single provider. This approach should result in lower fees,
consistent service and education messaging, minimizing truck traffic, diversion reporting, and
control over drop-off location.
Issue 3. Cart Ownership
Three models of cart ownership were identified to procure, finance, and maintain the
approximately 14,500 carts that would be needed for community-wide curbside recycling:
a. City-owned, contractor-procured: The contractor would furnish City-branded carts,
which are amortized over five years; after this period, the City assumes ownership.
Delivery, maintenance, and repair services are carried out by the contractor. This would
result in approximately $1 added cost per month, per household, for the contract term,
likely five years. Carts are expected to last 15-20 years. If the City engaged a new
contractor in the future, the carts would remain in place and be serviced by the new
contractor, making the potential transition to a new contractor quicker and less
disruptive.
b. City-owned, city-procured: The City would independently procure bins and deploy
them for the contractor to service. The cost of the carts would be financed through debt
service or a similar mechanism, costing approximately $900,000 in capital. Fees would
need to be calculated to repay the City for the investment in carts. Under this method,
the costs could be spread over up to ten years to align with the warranty, resulting in a
lower, but longer-lasting, monthly customer fee of approximately $0.50.
c. Contractor-owned: The contractor would deliver and retain ownership of all carts. This
approach results in the lowest up-front costs to launch the service, as the cost of carts
would not need to be financed by the customer charges. If the City switched contractors
in the future, significant costs and disruptions to service could occur during the transition
as carts are swapped with those of the new contractor. Additionally, with assets in place,
the existing contractor would hold an advantage in subsequent bids.
152
Issue 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the City-owned, contractor-
procured option to obtain the carts. While there may be some benefit in terms of cost to
the City to obtaining the carts, there are added benefits for the City not needing to coordinate
between delivery of carts and ensuring that the carts are of the correct industry standard that
will work with the contractor's equipment. Additionally, this will allow the contractor to leverage
their industry contacts and ensure that the carts will be delivered and work on day one when
the program begins.
Issue 4. Frequency of Service
Curbside recycling programs typically operate weekly or every other week service. In an
every-other-week program, if customers generate excess recyclables, they could request an
additional bin (for a charge), and weekly pickup would not be available as an option.
a. Every other week service results in higher program efficiency through fuller bins and
fewer trips. According to the EPA, collection costs for every-other-week service are 20%-
40% lower than weekly collection. Many communities that have transitioned from weekly
to every other week schedules have not seen significant decreases in participation or
diversion rates. Larger carts (e.g., 96-gallon) would be necessary to accommodate the
longer time between pickups.
b. Weekly service could result in slightly higher diversion rates but would also mean
higher operational costs and increased truck traffic.
Issue 4 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends every other week service. 72% of
survey respondents said every other week service would meet their needs, with 8% preferring
more frequent and 11% preferring less frequent service. Every other week service would meet
the community's need for recycling while keeping fees lower compared to weekly service.
Issue 5. Cart Size
This issue has been added for Council direction based on survey results. 63% of respondents
agreed that a 96-gallon cart would be adequate. A notable portion (34%) indicated that the
cart would be too large. In a separate question, 49% of survey respondents said they would
prefer an option for a smaller recycling cart.
a. A uniform, large cart size (96 gallons) would simplify cart procurement and inventory,
and may result in operational efficiencies depending on the automated collection
equipment of the selected hauler. With the added space and ability to fit larger items like
cardboard, large bins may also encourage more recycling and prepare the program to
accept more materials in the future. However, for smaller households that generate
minimal waste, a 96-gallon cart could be larger than necessary.
b. Different cart size options would allow residents to select the cart size that best fits
their needs based on waste generation. This could also lead to greater participation if
people feel more satisfied with a flexible program. The customer charge for different cart
sizes would be the same. However, it would result in a higher cost and administrative
burden to purchase, stock, deliver, and maintain different cart sizes.
153
Cart size comparison
Size (gal)Width x
Depth Height
64 27" x 27"41"
96 29" x 33"45"
Issue 5 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends a uniform cart size of 96 gallons.
Providing all households universal access has the highest potential for diversion. Staff
believes that a uniform cart size at the outset of the program helps set the program up for
success by removing the administrative and operational burden of multiple cart size options.
Once the program is up and running, staff can evaluate if additional cart sizes are still desired
at that point and look for ways to accommodate those requests.
ESTIMATED COSTS:
The costs of a curbside recycling program consist of the cost of the equipment (carts), the cost
of a collection contract (fuel, trucks, labor), the cost of disposal (the per-ton tipping fee), and
administrative costs (billing, public information, etc.).
The equipment and collection contract costs will not be known until a request for proposals
(RFP) has been solicited. Staff anticipates that the first year of the collection contract will be
higher in cost than subsequent years because the hauler will be required to haul materials
directly to Des Moines until the R3C facility is open and can provide a shorter travel distance.
The cost for carts is expected to be amortized over a 5-10 year period.
In comparing to similar programs in other communities, staff estimates that a monthly
household fee is likely to be between $6 and $8. A more specific financial analysis can be
presented to the City Council at the time a hauler contract is presented to the City Council for
consideration.
NEXT STEPS:
Given Council direction regarding the five policy issues shown above, staff will prepare
a Request For Proposal (RFP) to which prospective vendors could respond. This RFP
would outline expectations around recycling pick up, notification to customers, customer
service regarding missed pickup or contaminated recyclable materials, and other standards to
ensure the program's success.
It is anticipated that the recycling program could start 6 to 9 months after the RFP is issued
(ideally around July 1). Throughout this time, staff will develop and implement a
comprehensive public education and outreach campaign to engage residents and inform them
about the program.
Staff anticipates gaining an understanding of expected curbside recycling fees and R3C
tipping fees by February 2026. As the information becomes available, staff will actively seek to
educate all stakeholders on costs, acceptable materials, schedule, size of carts, and
expectations for program participation. An ordinance would ultimately need to be
considered to establish the program, establish the recycling standards, and adopt the
fee for the program.
154
This RFP will also include options for each of the partner agencies in the existing Resource
Recovery System. Staff has had conversations with most of the partner agencies about the
need for further waste diversion at the new R3C. Any of the partner agencies may choose
to utilize the vendor selected by the City of Ames, or they may choose to use a solution
that best fits the needs of their individual community. This could include a separate
contract for curbside recycling or a centralized recycling collection drop off (e.g., a roll-
off container).
MULTIFAMILY RECYCLING PILOT:
Separate from the residential curbside program, staff believes it would also be valuable to
seek out partners to advance understanding of multifamily recycling. The partnership would
involve a financial incentive in the form of a cost share program to one or more interested
multifamily properties to pilot recycling. The goals of the pilot program would be to identify
challenges and best practices around multifamily recycling, including:
Infrastructure and space
Contamination
Awareness and education
Costs
The results of this pilot would be used to further engage with and expand multifamily recycling
in Ames. Staff is seeking approval to allocate up to $20,000 from sustainability funding
in the Council Priorities Fund for the pilot program. If granted, the balance of the fund
would be $907,400.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Direct staff to:
a. Proceed with a Request for Proposals (RFP) based on staff's recommendations
indicated above for each issue (Level of Access, Provider, Cart Ownership, Frequency
of Service, Cart Size).
b. Allocate up to $20,000 from the Council Priorities Sustainability fund for the multifamily
recycling pilot project.
2. Direct staff to proceed with a Request for Proposals (RFP) process with different
direction than staff's recommendations and approve allocating up to $20,000 for the
multifamily recycling pilot project.
3. Direct staff to proceed with a Request for Proposals (RFP) process with different
direction than staff's recommendations. Do n o t approve allocating up to $20,000 for the
multifamily recycling pilot project.
4. Refer this item back to staff for further information.
155
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The City is obligated to implement landfill diversion due to DNR landfill fees and the
transition away from waste-to-energy. Curbside recycling is the most cost-effective
potential approach to accomplish landfill diversion and keep cost increases for
landfilling to a minimum. Increased recycling also aligns with Climate Action Plan
goals.
Universal access to curbside recycling best aligns with these goals, will result in
greater diversion than other options, and is supported by the survey results. A uniform
container size will reduce the administrative burden and costs for managing the
program.
Continued in-depth education and outreach will be essential to keeping the public
informed and setting the program up for success. Policy recommendations and the
multifamily pilot project are based on recycling industry best practices tailored to the
Ames community. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City
Council adopt Alternative No. 1 a & b, as described above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment A - Curbside Recycling Survey Results.pdf
Attachment B - Iowa Recycling Programs.pdf
Residential Curbside Recycling Program Presentation_11-18-25.pptx
156
1
City of Ames Curbside Recycling Survey Results
September 2 - 30, 2025 | 1,543 responses
The City of Ames Curbside Recycling Survey was open from September 2 – September 30,
2025 and received 1,543 responses. The purpose of this survey was to gather public feedback
around recycling and to use the input to inform the development of a City curbside recycling
program. Staff promoted the survey to residents through various means including at events and
through digital media such as press releases, social media, and newsletters.
Below is a summary of the results from the survey. It is important to note that generative AI
(ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot) was used to help summarize the results, however, staff has
verified the accuracy of this summary. There were a few questions with comment boxes where
survey respondents could provide input. The raw results for those are included in Appendix A at
the end of this report.
First are high-level findings based on the responses, followed by a breakdown of the structured
questions (yes/no, multiple choice) and descriptive questions (open-ended).
Contents
High-Level Findings and Recommendations .............................................................................. 2
Structured Questions ................................................................................................................. 3
Descriptive Questions ................................................................................................................ 5
Appendix A: List of descriptive (open-ended) responses. ........................................................... 7
8. Please share any barriers you may have to recycling materials included
in question 7 (cans, cardboard, plastics #1 and #2, mixed paper, glass). ....................... 7
14. What other comments or ideas do you have about residential curbside
recycling? (no character limit) ........................................................................................29
15. What barriers may your household have to curbside recycling? (no
character limit) ...............................................................................................................72
157
2
Back to Top
High-Level Findings and Recommendations
Findings:
• Residency & Housing:
o Most respondents are Ames residents living in single-family homes.
• Current Recycling Habits:
o Drop-off recycling at the Resource Recovery Center and glass/cardboard self-
service sites are popular.
• Curbside Recycling Preferences:
o Majority believe a 96-gallon cart picked up bi-weekly would meet their needs.
o Many prefer the standard size, though some find it too large.
• Material Confidence:
o High confidence in recycling all recyclable materials.
• Barriers Identified:
o Cost, space for bins, and uncertainty about what can be recycled.
Based on the survey results, the following actions are recommended:
• Transparent pricing:
o Clearly communicate costs to residents as information becomes available.
• Education & Clarity:
o Provide visual guides (e.g., fridge magnets, bin stickers) on what can be recycled
and how to prepare items, especially plastics.
o Address myths and skepticism with facts about recycling outcomes.
• Bin Design & Flexibility:
o Consider offering smaller bin options.
• Accessibility Support:
o Offer community drop-off alternatives for those unable to manage curbside bins.
o Consider providing assistance for seniors and those with mobility challenges.
• Expanded Recycling Options:
o Consider including plastics #3–#7.
o Consider future management of organics (food waste, yard waste).
158
3
Back to Top
Structured Questions
Yes 1504 97%
No 39 3%
Single Family Residence 1342 87%
Multi-Family Residence (four units or less) 74 5%
Multi-Family Complex (five units or more)119 8%
Curbside recycling through a private hauler 266 17%
Drop-off recycling at Resource Recovery 606 39%
Glass/cardboard self-service sites around the community 761 49%
None but I am interested 267 17%
None 130 8%
Other 65 4%
Yes, I think this will meet my household needs 1092 72%
No, I think pick up should happen more frequently (weekly)116 8%
No, I think pick up should happen less frequently (monthly)159 11%
Does not apply, I live in a large multi-family housing 82 5%
I don't know 58 4%
Much too small 4 0%
A little too small 35 3%
About right size 864 63%
A little too large 307 23%
Much too large 154 11%
Yes 755 49%
No 785 51%
Cans 1327 86%
Cardboard 1399 91%
Plastics 1352 88%
Mixed Paper 1218 79%
Glass 1402 91%
None 85 6%
2. What best describes your home?
1. Are you an Ames resident?
3. What recycling services do you currently use? (check all that apply)
4. Most cities similar in size to Ames or larger offer 96-gallon recycling
carts that are picked up every other week for curbside recycling. Do you
think this frequency would meet your household needs?
Over 70% of respondents agreed that
bi-weekly pickup would meet their
needs. A notable portion preferred
monthly or weekly pickup.
There are 81 unique response
combinations, indicating a wide variety
of recycling habits and service usage
across respondents. 504 respondents,
about 1/3, use more than one
recycling service.
5. If you live in a single family residential property, would a 96-gallon
recycling cart (simliar size to a typical wheeled trash container) be
adequate?
63% of respondents agreed that a 96-
gallon cart would be adequate. A
notable portion (34%) indicated that
the cart would be too large.
6. If a smaller recycling cart option was offered, would you prefer that
option?
Respondents were almost equally split
on this question, with almost half
(49%) indicating they would prefer the
option of a smaller cart.
7. Which of the following items do you feel confident you would recycle in
a curbside program?
The large majority of respondents
(79%+) indicated they feel confident
recycling each of the listed materials.
Mixed paper was slightly lower than
other materials.
159
4
Back to Top
Regularly 1260 82%
Sometimes 163 11%
Not at all 120 8%
Not important 278 18%
Slightly important 296 19%
Moderately important 300 19%
Important 293 19%
Very important 224 14%
I don't know/unsure 179 11%
Not important 436 28%
Slightly important 333 22%
Moderately important 230 15%
Important 235 15%
Very important 156 10%
I don't know/unsure 146 10%
Not important 242 16%
Slightly important 272 18%
Moderately important 271 18%
Important 320 21%
Very important 276 18%
I don't know/unsure 158 10%
Drop off at Resource Recovery and Recycling Campus 73 22%
Recycling container on property 129 39%
Try to recycle with any options made available 95 29%
I would not recycle 31 9%
Not applicable- I don't live in a multi-family unit 737 -
Cityside Newsletter in Utility Bills 1029 67%
City Website/Social Medias 899 58%
Mail 811 53%
Door Hangers 391 25%
E-notifications from City of Ames Website 665 43%
Newspaper 187 12%
10. If cardboard is included in curbside pickup, how important is it to
maintain community cardboard drop-off sites?
71% of respondents indicated that
maintaining community cardboard
drop-off sites was slightly to very
important. 18% indicated it was not
important, and 11% were unsure.
The large majority of respondents,
92%, indicated they would participate
in curbside recycling, with 82%
indicating they would regularly
participate. 8% said they would not
participate.
11. If glass is included in curbside pickup, how important is it to maintain
community glass drop-off sites?
62% of respondents indicated that
maintaining community glass drop-off
sites was slightly to very important.
28% indicated it was not important,
and 10% were unsure. Results
indicate slightly more support for
cardboard drop-off sites than for glass.
9. How often would you use curbside recycling?
12. If curbside recycling is available, how important is it to continue free,
separated recyclable drop-off containers at the new Resource Recovery
and Recycling Campus?
74% of respondents indicated that
maintaining community cardboard
pickup sites was slightly to very
important. 16% indicated it was not
important, and 10% were unsure.
13. If you live in a multi-family unit (five units or more), would you be willing
to (check all that apply):
16. What are the best ways to be notified about the program
implementation and schedule?
Respondents living in multi-family units
are almost twice as willing to
participate in recycling if there is a
designated container on property.
160
5
Back to Top
Descriptive Questions
8. Please share any barriers you may have to
recycling materials included in question 7 (cans,
cardboard, plastics #1 and #2, mixed paper, glass).
25% of respondents reported experiencing barriers,
with a clear leading barrier being types of plastic. Key
takeaways:
1. Plastic confusion is the most cited barrier -
residents are unsure about which types are
accepted.
2. Cleanliness expectations (e.g., rinsing,
removing labels) are a significant concern.
3. Storage space for bins and bin size are
practical issues for many.
14. What other comments or ideas do you have about residential curbside recycling?
42% of responses included comments or ideas about curbside recycling. Key takeaways:
• Cost Concerns:
o Many respondents emphasized affordability.
o Requests for opt-out options, senior discounts, and fee transparency.
o Some fear mandatory charges on utility bills.
• Container Size & Frequency:
o Requests for smaller bins.
o Suggestions for weekly or monthly pickups.
o Concerns about storage space and truck traffic.
Theme Number of
Responses Representative Quote
Cost Concerns 151 “concerned about the fees. I'd much prefer to use free drop
off sites”
Container
Size/Frequency 87 “Put a sticker on my recycling bin telling me what dates are
pickup dates”
Drop-Off Site
Preferences 58 “multi-location free drop-offs will be awesome”
Expanded
Recycling
Options
57 “Will food waste composting still be available?”
Education
Needs 38
“It would be appreciated if there was a label on the can that
showed what items are acceptable and what items cannot
be recycled with a description of how they can be properly
disposed of”
Environmental
Motivation 20 “Thank you for helping the environment”
161
6
Back to Top
• Drop-Off Sites:
o Strong support for maintaining existing drop-off locations, especially for:
▪ Large cardboard
▪ Residents in multi-family housing
• Expanded Recycling Options:
o Requests to include plastics #3–#7, food waste, yard waste, and electronics.
o Interest in composting programs and seasonal pickups.
• Education & Clarity:
o Need for clear guidelines on what can be recycled.
o Suggestions for fridge magnets, QR codes, and visual aids.
o Desire for community outreach, especially targeting youth and students.
• Environmental Motivation:
o Many respondents expressed excitement and support for the initiative.
o Some referenced successful programs in other cities (e.g., Des Moines, Ankeny,
Iowa City).
15. What barriers may your household have to
curbside recycling?
Two-thirds of respondents (66%) reported some
sort of barrier to curbside recycling. Key
takeaways and a word cloud of responses are
included below.
1. Cost is the most frequently cited barrier,
with concerns about affordability, added
fees, and lack of transparency.
2. Space and bin issues are practical
concerns, especially for those with limited
garage or yard space.
3. Knowledge gaps persist around what can
be recycled and how to prepare items.
4. Skepticism about whether recycling is
effective or trustworthy is notable.
5. Mobility and accessibility concerns are
especially relevant for seniors and those
with disabilities.
162
7
Back to Top
Appendix A. List of descriptive (open-ended) responses.
ID# 8. Please share any barriers you may have to recycling materials included in
question 7 (cans, cardboard, plastics #1 and #2, mixed paper, glass).
2 NA
4 Don’t know what else to recycle
5 Test
17 Cans still have a redemption value
18 Just not knowing how they would need to be prepared. For example, where my
parents live, the recycling company requires all labels be peeled off, the containers
need to be completely washed, they cannot be brown glass, etc. I would just need to
know what the requirements are.
19 DEPENDS ON FEE, not sure how many more FEES we can afford. The possibility of
several future bond issues loom.
24 None
29 None.
30 I would love to see more plastic types be accepted but know that is challenging.
31 If the can is 96 gallons, it may be hard to store inside. Will storage of the can outside
be acceptable
34 How clean do the cans and glass need to be?
42 Cannot afford to pay for any recycling
44 None
47 I am all about recycling and this would save me driving around town!
52 Ability to sort and safe storage space at all times
53 I don’t have a bin.
59 For me what goes in what can would be helpful with that like a reminder on the car?
63 I'd like an option for recycling plastic bags
64 N/a
163
8
Back to Top
69 I take my pop cans to obtain money and most of the plastic is used packaging that
was used for food
71 How separated?Am disabled, cart to curb may be difficult.
72 I currently recycle as much as I can, and I'm shocked at how much plastic we can
recycle. However, I'm on a fixed income, and money just disappears. Concerned
about yet another expense - how much longer can I afford to keep my home.
74 I don't mind using the free recycling drop-off at the RRP.
79 None
83 Senior with physical issues my garbage is picked up at my garage door. Would you
offer that to those who need it?
86 Garage space for the cart
101 Definitely think that #5 plastics should be included as well due to the amount of use.
105 Cans are redeemed for getting my deposit back, so those wouldn't be recycled. The
amount of cardboard (and size of cardboard) varies.
112 May not recycle redeemable cans, glass, or plastic, in order to continue redeeming at
Ames Bottle & Can
114 Well, I feel like it would be a giant pain to have to separate all the trash, other than our
limited glass, into a separate bin every time one of the 4 people in our household goes
to throw something away.
115 recycling containers picked up every other week become sticky smelly rodent and
insect magnets. Recycling has been proven to largely be a scam/racket. Hard pass on
this whole idea. Option to opt out please.
117 It should be free. We will not recycle if it means paying extra.
118 None
122 Employ people to separate the trash. You are wasting our time you idiots.
134 Where do I keep another large container
144 Cardboard is too bulky prefer to drop off at dite
149 Cost
153 Mixed paper - ensure that any confidential material is shredded beyond identification.
Some plastics are hard to tell of they are acceptable or not.
164
9
Back to Top
158 Except for glass & cardboard, recycling plastic and metal cans is a time consuming
P.I.A. since the State of Iowa no longer requires stores to maintain recycling
concessions, such as Walmart & Hy-Vee. A major problem with glass recycling bins at
Hy-Vee is that the parking areas are covered with broken glass - no one takes
responsibility for keeping the area clear - not a big fan of broken glass in my car tires
or athletic shoe soles.
170 None
171 I do not like to separate trash!
177 Have this option for laverene Apartments as cant always take directly to the plant
178 I'm against a single, city wide provider for garbage services. And having an added fee
even if I don't use it.
179 Multifamily Housing does not allow for it. However once I live in a house in Ames I
would be all for it!
180 The Women’s’ Club demanded that we burn our garbage. I already paid.
183 Wish to remain with my current sanitation provider. It’s unknown how this will be
implemented and the effect on smaller garbage companies.
184 Space to keep the container
187 It is easier it just put everything in the trash
190 Having to separate and clean the items, purchasing a separate refuse container and
making room for it in my kitchen to put recycling in and then having to take it to the
larger recycling can out by the garage when currently, I only need one kitchen trash
can and only need to take my one trash bag to the larger trash can.
192 I don’t want this program
194 How clean do the items need to be? I live in Ames but cannot get a private company
to pick up recycle due to distance. Will I still receive service?
196 I don't see any barriers for my family, but just be ad clear as possible regarding what is
acceptable for recycling.
204 None
206 Why no #5 plastics? I visit friends in the twin cities and #5 is accepted it here.
208 I have no interest in sorting garbage
209 None
165
10
Back to Top
228 Must be sensitive to retired couple who supports recycling but does not generate
much volume. Our trash can is filled at 25% of capacity currently. I would be
concerned of expense associated with frequent pickup.
229 I just need signs to help me identify the right plastics
230 none
245 Cost
250 Separating items is a nuisance. Just extra work!
255 None
258 Remembering when is pickup
265 Would plastics and cardboard need to be clean?
269 rinsing materials
268 I'm leery of plastics and often forget about paper and cardboard
270 storage of the containers More junk on the side of everyone's garage.
272 Ready availability for plastics and mixed paper recycling.
273 I dont believe that much of any of it will actually get recycled
275 None
276 Ames experiences strong winds every spring. These winds can make it difficult to
keep recycling bins stable and may cause lightweight materials, such as paper or
cardboard, to blow away. This issue should be considered when implementing the
program.
277 We generate a lot of cardboard waste
279 I don't throw away many items at all.
281 Due to glass breakage Iowa City stopped picking up glass in recycling. Most likely
Ames will have the same fate.
283 Dirty
286 Would need to know how recyclables need to be prepared - thoroughly cleaned?
Labels removed? Would also want clear instructions on when not to include these
materials - eg if they contain any food residue
287 None
166
11
Back to Top
291 None
293 No barriers
299 I will continue to return my cans with a deposit to ABC, but I also have other non-
deposit cans to recycle
304 Cost has to be reasonable
305 ensuring only #1 and #2 plastics are put in the recycling and no others
306 can redemption instead to receive funds
311 There are many #1 plastics without screw on like (blueberry containers)
314 I thought our previous system of turning things into energy was far better for the
environment, and I'd like to know why it has to stop. It will be difficult to adjust,
especially with paper items.
320 I would continue to donate or redeem cans
325 Barriers is the location of recycling. If it was curbside, or closer options, I'd likely
recycle more. (I did when I lived in a single family house on the east side).
330 Another fee
332 Are any of these materials going to be processed in Iowa? Who is buying or using the
material? I have heard that it just gets shipped far away and out of the state, which
seems counterintuitive to recycling.
338 I prefer to drop off as I do now every recyclable
341 I would like to have clear instructions about recycle ability of items and how to prepare
them for pick up
344 None.
352 Lack of education, encouragement, and easy access
357 If items need to be sorted individually
358 Sometimes confused by what plastic is allowed and not allowed
363 What to do with other plastics
364 Price.
367 None
167
12
Back to Top
369 Broken glass mixed in other recyclables
371 I personally would have no problem but there are always issues, see #14 / 15.
373 I don't like the automatic cost being added to utilities. Our taxes are already too high.
376 None
380 Specifics on which plastics can be recycled. Specifics on what paper products, cans
and glass care recyclable.
384 Would still take in redeemable bottles and cans as long as that program continues
389 I live in multifamily housing. People would have to clean their cans, glass containers or
we would have bugs and critters within a day. And I dont want to see every yard in
town with multiple containers/carts.
395 Sometimes it's hard to tell what number plastic it is, or it would be more work to
remove label, wash, and dry before putting in recycling.
397 Hassle of sorting. I like the current way ames handles it by burning
15 None
412 I would prefer can redemption as it is currently offered across town, since there is
small financial reimbursement with that method
414 I would need to learn more about what plastics are recycleable
417 Plastics are too complicated.
419 Education on food residue and how much is too much to be recycled
425 My understanding is that there's not really many items that can truly be recycled in an
effective and cost efficient manner.
427 If I move to an applicable residence cost. It is already beyond expensive to live in
Ames and people cannot afford one more "thing" while important, this should be a
choice for people not a mandate
436 I am concerned that there is no mention of what the cost would be. I think the survey
should include an estimate of the cost to make a truly informed decision.
439 lack of room in the garage for a recycling cart
441 None! It would be more convenient to have a curbside option vs the current drop-off
option.
444 none
168
13
Back to Top
445 Knowing which plastics will be accepted. Cost may also be a factor.
446 None
451 I already have a Trash Cart and a Yard Waste Cart I don't know where I would put a
3rd one.
454 None. My family already recycle all these materials
455 None
457 The lack of convenience, having to travel to recycle. This would be incredibly helpful!
461 I never know what to do with pizza boxes or other food cardboard, and plastics aren't
always labeled
464 Hard to break down big boxes
465 No barriers
472 I'm a little concerned about liquids from cans destroying the paper and cardboard.
474 Clear rules about odd ends, like tape on cardboard or glue on plastics/glass etc.
482 Recycling efforts are complete waste of time and is not cost effective. We put these
sort of things in place so we can pat ourselves on the back and say "we're saving
environment" while we buy our electric vehicles whose cobalt and lithium are mined by
children and and processed in smog cities far away from here so we don't have to
acknowledge it. Provide a localize drop off spot like you do now that so people that
want to can participate and don't force the rest of us to be charged for an ineffective
and unnecessary system.
490 I am just curious why we need twist-off lids with plastics?
499 Which plastics can be recycled
500 More could be included.
501 Storage of recycling carts and smell
511 Cardboard takes up a lot of room, but may still drop that off
516 None
524 my age
535 I only recycle cans because anything else is such a hassle to 1) store and 2) haul to
the appropriate place. To have 1 bin I can put those things in that gets hauled away
every other week would be amazing.
169
14
Back to Top
536 The deposit for cans and bottles may be a barrier to people wanting to recycle those
items. I recommend speaking with Metro Waste Authority about how they redeem
cans after being recovered from their MRF.
537 None
538 I don’t have room in my house for additional bins to place recycled itema and
realistically we are too lazy to take it out to the recycling bin every time we are needing
to dispose or something, so either it will pile up inside or just get thrown in the trash
90% of the time.
540 None
543 Aluminum cans will be redeemed. Tin cans will be recycled.
546 Please provide clear instructions as to what in acceptable items and what are
definitely prohibited for recycling.
547 Limited indoor storage space for a recycling cart & HOA covenants that prevent
outdoor storage.
553 Knowing what should and should not go into reccling bin.
555 I'm in a condo. Multi family residences
556 what are Plastics #1 and #2
562 It would be nice if more plastics could be included :)
563 having recycling forced on people is not the route to make it work
565 None.
566 I can’t drive to take it to be recycled and I really can’t afford another monthly bill
570 I have zero confidence that plastic is actually recycled therefore I do not buy things in
plastic
571 Clear instructions needed on washing items etc. We don't want to produce
unrecyclable materials.
573 I would love to be able to recycle more types of plastics (yogurt containers, cool whip
containers, etc)
576 possibly the cost
577 None
578 How clean do they need to be in order to be recycled?
170
15
Back to Top
581 I'd be unsure which cardboards/papers could be included
585 Cost of curbside pickup.
588 We redeem cans and bottles for the 5c refund ourselves.
592 Cost of recycling
594 Do they need to be thoroughly cleaned first? Especially cans and glass. Labels
removed, etc?
609 Can returns yield 5 cents per
612 NO tax increase or additional fees!!!
619 Never know which plastic is recyclable
621 We would lose our bottle deposit.
622 None.
627 Does it all have to be washed or just rinsed?
631 Distinguishing plastics that can be recycled.
644 I never remember what can and can not be recycled.
645 none
656 Only issue for me is where to store the cart, which I'll figure out
663 1) occasional more cardboard; 2) storage for the recycling container
665 Mixed paper would need good explanation and definition.
667 we do not know if the monthly fee would be too high in regard to how relatively little
recycling we might have
669 If information was provided that includes examples of mixed paper and plastics, then I
would feel more confident with recycling!
676 cleaning plastic containers & identifying # on plastics
685 Ability to store the container, cost to recycle, need to sort the materials
686 Just having a place to put this extra large bin at our house.
687 I need to know they are being actually recycled. I know that some of the local offerings
in Ames were going straight to the dump.
171
16
Back to Top
689 Are the other types of plastic meant to be routed to trash?
691 Extra work. Kids, me putting stuff in the wrong place
693 Do not have room in the townhome garage for another container.
697 None
698 None, we love it
710 Uncertainty around how clean items need to be (absolutely no food product on cans
vs rinsed well) and if labels have to be taken off cans and bottles
715 None
720 The cost of this added to our bill. What about household batteries?
731 Finding a place for the bin
732 Knowledge! In my last town they had a sticker on the cans of what could and could not
be recycled at it was very helpful!
738 I don't agree that glass should go in there. It's much too dangerous. In other cities
we've lived, glass was separately contained in a smaller bin and picked up at the
same time as other recyclables. I've lived in Cedar Rapids, IA and in Boulder, CO.
743 I would rather not have to pay extra for the service but continue to take it to the
recovery center. WHY DOES AMES HAVE TO CHANGE FROM BURNING TRASH?
THAT SHOULD BE MAKE PUBLIC
752 Mixed paper might get messy, not sure with all of the different food packaging.
756 Accessibility
757 I am sometimes unsure on how products that have touched food get recycled. Lack
the education to do it confidently
766 Why can't we continue with the genius system we have? Sounds like replacing the
nice asphalt trails that are better for joints with cement at Ada Hayden, who is
benefiting from these changes?.
768 Space in house for more than one garbage can in the kitchen which is where most of
this recycling would come from
772 None
776 None
782 No barriers
172
17
Back to Top
783 Knowing how clean they have to be before they can be recycled.
785 None
787 None
788 None, already recycle all of the above and separate for drop off. Curbside would just
make that easier and save monthly trips to the drop off site.
793 Would do curb side! I currently, get sick of the pulling up and driving them to drop offs
so often throw in trash. :(
796 N/A
800 non
802 I’d like to see additional plastic recycling, like yogurt containers
804 Will soiled paper (used paper towels and paper plates and meat wrapping paper, etc.)
or shredded paper be included? Will loose items in plastic bags be included.? Will
glass containers and cans have be clean? How about pop tops or metal bottle caps?
805 how would they be separated????
806 Have to get more familiar with Plastic #s; has been a little confusing in the past, but
we would get familiar with it.
809 Im always unsure how clean things need to be to be recycled. Like can a greasy,
cheesy pizza box still go in cardboard recycling?
814 Confidence in what would actually be accepted. So much can't actually be recycled. A
detailed pamphlet when the program starts would be helpful.
817 I already wash out glass jars but I imagine some people would struggle with needing
to clean cans, jars, and plastic containers.
825 As "green" as Ames claims to be, now we're adding more vehicles less on the road to
haul waste...jeez.
853 Questions about cardboard that can be recycled or not, and plastics.
855 Currently have to take it somewhere special which isn’t practical
857 I would really prefer to opt out of curbside recycling for a lower utility bill, and continue
to take everything to the resource recovery plant drop site.
173
18
Back to Top
858 Place weather proof sticker on top of recycling lid reminding residents which items are
accepted and which are not and are hazardous (ie batteries, paint cans) Visual aids
are best reminders.
859 Money, driving
869 Dragging a large bin from behind the house is a challenge for me. In the snow, it's
even worse.
870 Understanding EXACTLY what is recyclable and what isn’t
872 NA
877 long drive to access
881 911 for recycling!!!
882 cost!
888 none if we get the option
889 should be paid for through city taxes. all could participate.
890 taking light bulbs and glass to drop off site
892 I live in a duplex and rent it from the owner who owns the 2 duplexes and a house.
898 If containers had to be prepped in any way
901 Storage of a 2nd rolling cart
902 Not understanding what types of plastics can be recycled. Not knowing how clean
items need to be before getting recycled (ie glass food containers)
904 unclear how clean glass, plastic would need to be (of food waste)
907 education on which items are recyclable or not
912 I hope the glass won’t break during the collection so that it won’t be difficult for people
who sort them. Iowa city does not correct glasses, wish they do but they can be
dangerous.
913 I would like to see more plastic being able to be recycled. #4, #5, etc.
914 Washing before disposal. Sorting
916 The cost
921 Apartment community supporting it
174
19
Back to Top
922 The cost associated with this service. City bill is too high already.
923 Not interested in an additional fee on my city bill
924 Cleaning items. Space to collect in home
925 I believe recyclable materials could be separated by machine centrally much more
effective than for 75000residents to be doing it poorly.
928 I have nowhere to store another trash cart. would prefer a tote that doesn't take so
much room. Also, I don't want to pay for recycling as our garbage bill is high enough.
930 Cleaning, breaking down, and separation of materials
939 This would make recycling so much easier, no barriers.
942 I don't want to drive somewhere to recycle
943 Food containers need to be cleaned or picked up more frequently.
945 I have a small house, I don't have room for more bins in my cramped kitchen for my
pets to get into. I'm on a shoestring budget and I'm not interested in being forced to
pay for a program I won't use. It should be optional.
952 Wet garbage option/compostsble?
954 I think charging everyone is ridiculous. The only people that should be charged for the
service are those that opt in for the recycling cart. If someone doesn't want the extra
bin they shouldn't have to pay for everyone else.
961 live in multifamily residence
962 I don't want another large refuse container I have to store
963 Products with food in them after time will start to stink so picking up 1x a week would
help this issue.
968 Confusion on which plastics are acceptable
969 Do these items need to be clean?
970 Space in the house for storage prior to going into outside can. The city should provide
some containers at the start of this program. Education. I do not know what mixed
paper is. Plastics are also confusing.
975 Keeping cardboard and paper dry/not blowing away
976 Plastic is difficult to find 1 and 2 labels.
175
20
Back to Top
982 Green Hills collec a lot of these materials.
984 Live in an apartment style condo
987 If there are too many "exceptions" to what can go in the container or not being able to
speak with a live person about questions / concerns.
988 Pickup and delivery
990 Recycling is not acceptable
994 I live in a senior residence community
1001 I live I. A retirement community, which would present a different set of choices
1005 Ensuring it’s the right type of plastic
1010 Cans smell and would rather toss them with regular garbage
1011 Increased cost
1012 Only if the cart is too small
1015 Can currently recycle plastics thru 5
1016 Figuring out which plastics are acceptable for recycling.
1017 Difficult to figure out which plastics are used
1028 Increased utilities
1034 Cost
1035 I will still do the re-cycling myself if availible rather than paying a fee
1045 Just in locating the markings on plastic items to know which are recyclable and which
are not
1046 Where would you keep a recycling container in a town house situation? For a
comparison visit with the city of Columbia, in Missouri
1047 I would take them all to the free recycling. I don't want to pay
1048 Glass could end up broken at the curb or on the street
1051 teaching my household members how to thoroughly wash out items
176
21
Back to Top
1053 No room to add another large trash bin in our garage. Will need larger than 96 gallons
if paper towels considered mixed paper. Currently fill a cart larger than r that on a
weekly basis.
1054 NONE
1061 None
1064 We have very little trash in general, most weeks less than one 13 gallon kitchen trash
bag. We already separate glass and put in bins at grocery store. I would not want to
pay much for this extra can pick-up.
1073 If hauler misses dumping the glass, could add extra glass shards to the end of the
driveway which could puncture tires, especially on bicycles
1081 I don't generate enough recyclables to justify this
1093 Provide clear detailed guidance regarding what is acceptable, specifically for plastic
and mixed paper.
1094 I avoid plastic. There’s no barrier.
1095 Limited room in our garage for any size can
1104 Space in the cart for cardboard.
1108 How much, if any, sorting required; cost
1111 Would paper be soiled by the other recycled products?
1123 Will pizza boxes be included with the cardboard? I only drink bottled water, we go
through a lot of plastic water bottles.
1127 Need more info on what is mixed paper and plastics #1 and #2
1128 Washing cans and bottles out, the place to store another large trash can in my garage
1131 Green hills
1133 None
1141 None
1145 The effort to sort them out from general trash and uncertainty about what exactly can
be recycled and what can't (eg cardboard but with food remnants, types of plastic, etc)
1146 Rinsed cans without lids attached? Rinsed glass?
177
22
Back to Top
1158 Not all containers with twist off lids are recyclable, cardboard (like pizza boxes) is
often dirty or oily and therefore not recyclable, cans and bottles actually make money
if you save them and take them to somewhere that gives you the deposit back.
1161 Knowing exactly what I can recycle
1162 Reconsider glass in the mixed recycling. Many cities have removed from mixed
recycling because of the breakage and contamination.
1164 Cardboard boxes must be broken and flattened for recycling. Now, people just put
them in a dumpster.
1170 I don't have a response for question 7. But regarding question 10, I did not know
there were community cardboard drop-off sites.
1171 None
1173 None
1179 Depends on where the recycle receptacle would live - I probably don’t have space
inside for it but if it was outside by my garbage can then I would easily make trips to
add recycle to it. If I have to keep things inside for 2 weeks, that would be a problem.
1182 None
1183 Plastics are confusing, can't remember the rules.
1189 None
1191 washing the trash before throwing it away is not worth it, especially since recycling is a
scam anyway. it just gets sorted and then shipped elsewhere to be thrown away
anyway. The triangle is REDUCE, REUSE, with recycle as the last resort. I'm unwilling
to pay for this "service" and will opt out and continue with the glass that I recycle now.
the system we have is the best of a bad situation of waste that is generated. moving
off of this is a step in the wrong direction. I'm not going to pay for people to pretend to
be "green”
1196 Do they need to be rinsed clean or can there be food reaidue
1199 I'm a creature of habit. I haven't thought about separating more since it all gets
ground up currently.
1201 Inconvenient
1203 I live just outside Ames.
1205 Wondering about the cost of them picking it up here for a Windsor Oaks 28 apartment
complex
178
23
Back to Top
1208 Lack of space for multiple containers
1221 Space for storage of another container
1232 Storing another container
1237 Defining twist-off lids. Example: prescription medication sort of twists off
1241 None but what about grass and branches?
1243 Transportation and locations that take recycling
1247 Not as easy as the MRF now. % recycling in the community will go down
1250 Don’t understand what mixed paper is; how clean do items need to be, all cardboard
even if have staples?
1252 N/A
1255 None
1257 Just questions on rinsing, cross contamination, etc
1258 None
1259 Storage space
1263 Would labels need removed from glass
1265 It feels confusing still. Need instructions so easy a 4th grader can understand.
1269 I have to figure where to store the bin. I have a 96 gallon yard waste bin on the side of
the house, and a 65 gallon bin for garbage in the garage. I would prefer a 65 gallon
recycle bin; we would never fill a 96) gallon one. And the 65 would be easier to stir
and handle.
1287 I don't really want to pay for this service.Nor do I want to have another can
1288 Figuring out which plastics are ok.
1289 Time
1294 Cost
1295 At this time I throw way to many recyclables in with waste.
1298 We don’t need a recycling bin.
1299 multi-family residence
179
24
Back to Top
1300 Additional cost to homeowners
1304 In the past when I’ve lived in cities with recycling programs having a poster or handout
with what’s allowed and not has been helpful
1307 I cannot manage a pickup container. I will handle my own recycling.
1308 Added cost
1311 Unclear about rules - do containers need to be washed/rinsed and then recycled?
1313 The only thing is it becomes difficult to store the container in the garage
1314 Knowledge of what is recyclable
1315 None
1322 Is paperboard (cereal box type) included in cardboard? Would like more plastic
options
1324 I don’t think I should have to pay more for recycling
1063 Sometimes the mixed paper recycling bins are so full, it is hard to add stuff but I guess
that is a good thing!
1329 I might forget pick up day sometimes but I am so excited about this service!
1332 Already recycle. No barrier.
1335 Cost - always about the money
1340 habit of throwing in trash, will take time to get used to putting in a different container.
1349 I lived in Iowa city during college and we had recycling. I remember it being very
annoying. I think because there were so many materials to sort and requirements to
clean certain containers before recycling.
1351 How fast it fills up with cardboard
1355 A place to put additional containers
1358 Not sure what to recyle
1370 Are these items all mixed in the same container?oner?
1374 Not knowing where to takeitems
1376 Landlords
180
25
Back to Top
1380 I don't want to have to wash the containers (glass, cans) and clean them before I put
them in the bin
1384 It takes more time and more space, neither of which I have
1390 Cost
1400 This will be difficult for Ames residents to get used to after so many years of throwing
everything into one can.
1404 There are a lot of plastics, we need more definitions.
1409 what about plastics #3 - #7?
1410 Just learning to change habits
1412 No barriers
1414 N/A
1424 We'll still drop off cardboard as it is difficult to place in a cart (takes up a lot of space).
1426 things have to be cleaned and separated so insufficient time and motivation
1429 Have to go to the rr plant. Having a bin at home would be greatly helpful and used
diligently.
1434 Maintaining the recycling bin only for recycling due to housemates and staff with
potential malign or negligent intent
1435 It might be time-consuming to peel off paper from cans and broken glass around bin
may be a problem.
1437 Make it clear what is a 1 and 2 plastic.
1440 Food waste
1447 None
1448 Changing habits
1449 Cleaning first? Lids?
1450 Cleaning out cans and all glass
1452 If items like cardboard do not fit in the bin, will the servicer pick up items outside the
bin?
1456 Not clear how this would be implemented
181
26
Back to Top
1457 Time
1459 Too high of fee compared to private companies
1462 Would need examples so we don’t accidentally put the wrong things in
1465 Rinsing containers out first
1469 None! We’ve wanted this service for years!
1471 Needs to be easy to drop off , drive thu is best
1472 Uncertainty on what to recycle, and how clean
1474 Clear rules on what is and is not allowable
1478 Time required to clean or rinse recyclables. Uncertainty about which items are
recyclables especially what kind of paper and plastic
1479 I would not recycle cans or bottles with you because then I wouldn't get my bottle
deposit back.
1480 What about yogurt containers and others like that with dairy?
1491 What about other plastic items?
1492 N/A
1494 I don't want to pay for a recycling service.
1495 Cost, reputation of recycling in general
1497 I live in an apartment
1499 I don’t want to be forced to pay money for recycling.
1509 Cleanliness requirements related to food & drink recyclables
1512 none, but good education is needed about how clean things need to be; restrictions on
types of paper and other products.
1513 I would need to take some larger cardboard to a site with bigger containers, and would
be very willing to do that
1514 None
1515 None already using
1516 No room in garage for a second bin
182
27
Back to Top
1517 Needing to wash out items before recycling takes up extra space
1520 Space in my house to store and sort. Cleaning jars if necessary
1529 how many carts will be available? how much more would my garbage charge?
1534 Knowing which plastics are okay yo recycle and how to properly clean them.
1535 Storage space for more bins and separate bins inside.
1536 None
1542 Cleaning cans may be hard. Knowing what is proper #1 & #2 not simple
1543 Nonsense
1544 Just need to be educated on what can all be recycled since haven’t had to worry about
it since being in Ames and was previously all used as energy.
1546 Why? They just combine the recycling containers into the same vehicle and landfill
everything.
1560 None.
1562 Multiple bins will be helpful to sort them separately for city to reduce the cost of
operation.
1563 Realistically, plastic is hard - it is why I try to avoid stuff in plastic without driving
myself nuts about it. Checking to see if it is the right kind is a pain.
1564 Not enough kinds of plastic are included in the plan
1566 Whats the incentive to wash off organic and dry moisture?
1572 I would love to have a city option for recycling
1573 Size of cardboard may not always fit in bin
1574 I worry that having these bins standing around might be dangerous in high winds!
Remember. not everyone has a garage!
1575 We live in multi-family housing and would love for there to be more recycling options,
even if those are additional drop-off sites in other neighborhoods (we live in North
Ames).
1576 None!
1577 I can't think of any
183
28
Back to Top
1578 Would likely take cans to redemption center to support local charities
1579 None
1581 None
184
29
Back to Top
ID# 14. What other comments or ideas do you have about residential curbside
recycling? (no character limit)
2 multi-location free drop-offs will be awesome
4 Put a sticker on my recycling bin telling me what dates are pickup dates
5 Test
9 Single stream
11 Expand to Nevada
14 Glad to see the city exploring this. I use glass and cardboard drop offs now. My only
concern is the proposed container size. I live alone and don't produce a significant
amount of recyclable materials.
17 This is exciting, we are currently spending $700 a year extra to work with a trash
company that also offers recycling.
18 I would be really excited to have this as an option. We often dread having to take our
cardboard to a community drop off location -- it's just another thing to do.
19 concerned about the fees. I'd much prefer to use free drop off sites
20 It is not clear whether separating materials would be required
22 For me, it would depend on cost. I currently take my recycling to the RRC. If the fee
is nominal for curbside recycling I would consider it. If it's above what I would pay,
then I will continue to take it to the RRC. I live alone, so I don't need it picked up
very often.
24 Interesting idea. What would the can center do? Close?
27 Would everyone be charged if you use it or not
30 Please do pursue this option! I have been hoping for this for ages
31 It would be appreciated if there was a label on the can that showed what items are
acceptable and what items cannot be recycled with a description of how they can be
properly disposed of
33 I cant afford a raise in my bill. When i lived in des moines trash was on water bill and
we had recycle and it was awesome. But raising pricing would concern me as we live
paycheck to paycheck as it is.
185
30
Back to Top
34 It is very important to maintain drop-off sites if there won't be recycling options for
multifamily housing since like half of the Ames population is in multifamily housing.
37 This is a great idea! Would be totally for it.
38 I think this is a great idea and look forward to more information. Has a proposed fee
structure been developed yet?
40 Keep the system as easy and economical as possible, to encourage use
41 We applaud the city's efforts to encourage recycling and have made use of all of the
drop-off containers currently offered. Our BIGGEST concern with single-stream
recycling is that we will pay to have our bin picked up and most/all of it will end up in
a landfill. We make sure things we recycle are rinsed, but what happens if our mixed-
paper gets contaminated in the truck? That would mean our efforts are wasted and
we're paying extra to have our recycled items sent to the landfill. Please don't go to a
single-stream service.
42 Curbside recycling should, at best, be only a voluntary option; the cost not
automatically added to a utility bill
43 Please add it!!
44 I’m surprised this hasn’t been done before
49 Will food waste composting still be available?
47 I think this is an awesome idea and support this. I say moderately important in case
not everyone is willing to do the curbside recycling.
51 It would be nice to also pick up food waste.
52 If need recycled items separated a container that separates
53 This is needed in Ames
54 Bi-weekly would work most of the time. The drop-off sites would be needed when the
recyclables are extreme, like during holidays.
56 When we lived in military housing, they offered separate containers for the different
types of recycling such as glass, cans, plastic & paper/cardboard. The bins were
smaller for each type. The cost savings to have recycling separated prior to pick up
paid off for the utility. The trucks that came around were divided into the different
types of recyclables as well.
59 None
62 I'm also intersted in a city-sponsored yard waste curbside pickup program.
186
31
Back to Top
63 Plastic bag recycling
64 Great idea Ames
70 I just moved her from Des Moines. We have had curbside recycling for years. they
used th 96 gallon container and pickup every two weeks. My bin was typically two
thirds full at the end of the two weeks, and more around holidays.
72 Love the idea of making recycling easier. Most people I know in surrounding cities
already have two bins. In my particular situation I'm concerned about another
expense. Consider a senior discount? If the cost is a problem for me, then I would
ask that you still have free drop off sites b/c I would continue to recycle.
74 Where is the new R3C going ot be located?
76 For 14 years, I lived in a city that supplied separate, smaller recycling containers to
each household for glass, cans, plastic and paper. Rach redodent put these blue
containers put on the street on recycling day. However, we were not charged fees. It
was simple and easy.
79 None
80 “A monthly fee for service will be added to every resident’s utility bill.“ Residents
should not be required to pay if they want to use the self-serve drop off sites instead
of curb-side pickup.
81 Who separates all the stuff in one bin? How does the glass not break?
82 Since Ames residents are not in the habit of recycling, there will be a learning curve.
I think it will be important for the city to produce materials and media that promote
recycling and make it clear how much we have been diverting from landfills and why
that is important. I think students should be engaged - they can help to encourage
their families and others.
83 I am a senior citizen on a fixed income. Cost is always a concern.
84 Will there still be composting?
89 The other options need to still be available for those who don’t have the means to pay
for an additional service
90 as a single elderly widow I tend to separate glass, cans, plastics, paper and
cardboard in the trash, can't always go to drop off. It takes a while to accumulate
enough for every other week.
94 I would appreciate more information about why the current system will no longer her
a sustainable option
187
32
Back to Top
98 We sometimes fill the 96-gallon faster than every two weeks, so that's when it's good
to be able to drop off at the resource recovery and recycling
99 Try to keep rates down everyone will participate— even those on fixed income
105 I appreciate curbside recycling, but know people also abuse it. Some don't
understand recycling standards. Others use it for trash.
108 need adequate cart size for yard waste in addition to the usual garbage, glass, cans,
etc.
109 I am concerned about what the cost of this will be
110 Community outreach to educate on importance of recycling. Kids between the age of
5-18 are key as they are the future. Use social media, youtube, events at multiple
locations to get people togehter where this issue can be discussed. keep it informal.
use visuals, videos as necessary. find volunteers who can work with the city (young
folks) to engage with the community. Goal is to make the City of Ames a leader in
recycling in Iowa and the nation. Happy to assist. bdas@iastate.edu
112 Redemption would be a big thing. I know many people just trash these items anyway
for now, but I would still plan to redeem my items. Would this affect ABC’s ability to
operate?
115 Just allow me to opt out of the "service" and the charge/expense. As long as that's an
option. knock yourselves out separating trash before it ends up in a landfill anyway.
116 Would be nice to be able to recycle more than just 1 and 2 recycling plastics
118 Summer visitors were shocked to learn that Ames had no curb side recycling pick up.
Other communities here and abroad have a rigorous
122 Employ people to separate trash
123 I'm excited for Ames to have this -- other places I've lived have had this for decades
126 Please make this happen!!
129 Very concerned about cost added to utility bills. Cost MUST be kept low!! I can see it
getting out of hand.
130 Will it be mandatory? If so, is there a penalty for not doing it? It would have to fairly
economical or we would probably continue to recycle free at the drop off points.
132 I’ve been using Ames drive up recycling as long as it’s existed. As soon as drive up
food waste recycling was offered, I’ve used it weekly. The recycle cart proposal and
subject of this survey excludes food waste. So, if I had a cart for recycling everything
else, I would still have to drive to the recycling center to dispose of food waste. That
188
33
Back to Top
makes your proposal very unattractive to me. Plus, even if the cart was smaller, I’d
still have to store it somewhere. They are ugly and take up way too much space. I
would be opposed to a city-wide recycling charge for all residents whether they use a
recycling cart or not.
136 Voluntary food composting information
139 Looking forward to curbside recycling!
145 Having larger containers that get picked up once a month would help reduce the
amount of transportation emissions compared to a weekly or bi-weekly pick up.
148 None
152 Cost and convenience are the biggest factors as to whether I would utilize recycling
services.
153 I do not like the idea of it just being charged on my City of Ames bill. I am a single
person household I do not need that much or require that much. I also am unsure
how this would work for those that need payment assistance. It becomes strange
when you try to put non-essential add ons onto a bill that you by law cannot
disconnect for half of the year. The bills are already going up over inflation people
want to do the right thing but adding more costs during a time people are struggling
seems unempathic to your citizens.
157 The cost should be less than third party providers if this is a requirement of living in
Ames.
161 Concerned that this will add yet another garbage truck traveling on our roadways.
We already have a different company on every single weekday. Would very much like
to have this consolidated. Could this be part of the transition to the new plant? Many
folks would very much like to have fewer days of loud bulky machines outside their
homes.
162 Keeping some current community alternatives is important for those who can't afford
or don't have access to the residential program.
164 Loved the system that Ankeny established!!!!! Please emulate!! Please.
165 Great idea!!
170 None
171 None
172 Please educate us as to why only #1 and #2 plastics, I currently recycle curbside with
a private hauler who takes anything with a triangle.
189
34
Back to Top
173 What works best in other communities
175 We currently have curbside recycling with our trash company and are able to recycle
#1, #2 and #5 plastics. There are many plastics that cannot be recycled and to avoid
the wrong plastics ending up in recycling containers there will need to be a
considerable amount of information and education provided to residents.
177 I believe if made these assessable that people would use them
178 The downside of having the city choose who we can use for our garbage service will
allow prices that many would have difficulty affording and take away free choice. This
would be wrong on so many levels.
179 The City will want to engage ISU in this decision making process.
180 Make the Womens’ Club pay for recycling.
181 I believe curb-side recycling is long overdue for Ames.
185 Please recycle more plastics than just ones with twist off lids ! Yogurt and dairy
containers as well as individual portioned foods like applesauce and fruit cups.
186 Is this just up for discussion? The questions make it sound like it’s decided. The city
doesn’t have regular garbage pickup and now they are moving direct to recycling?
187 I think a separate food waste would be great for some sort of compost type process.
Also recycling building materials.
188 Do glass and plastic containers need to be rinsed and dried? Do lids need to stay on
plastic containers?
190 It should be free, and maintained by the city- the ames utility bills are already high for
electric, water and sewer charges along with the recent increase in rates.
192 Don’t do this program, or make it optional. I’m not paying for other liberals to recycle
crap that makes 0 actual impact. Stop shoving the onus of change on us and do
something about local corporate polluters.
193 My current garbage company has a contract for recycling, will the city pay for me to
get out?
194 I would love it!! I wish you accepted plastic without necks.
196 I would LOVE to see this implemented!
197 Grocery bags are something that we accumulate; is there any room for single use
plastics like this to be considered in this initiative?
190
35
Back to Top
198 This is a great idea and about time. Frankly, I am tired of having to load my recycling
into my car and take it somewhere.
200 The cost needs to be very low. Garbage pickup is already high. This is adding to
costs.
201 I am a single homeowner who regularly recycles at the City site. My main concern is
whether people would actually sort recycling out of trash. Any change will involve a
commitment to provide a lot of education.
202 I think that is a wonderful service to offer.
203 Would definitely use the service if the fee is comparable to what I am paying a private
service
206 I think this is good. I wish Ames had a policy that all garbage in a ‘hood would be
picked up on the same day. We have garbage trucks going down our street everyday
of the week due to different contractors. This will add another one. In my mothers
town, all garbage recycling and yard waste are picked up on the same day,
depending on what neighborhood you are (one area one day, another area-Another)
this is better than garbage cans on the street everyday day. trucks and
208 None
214 Provide smaller bins, our garage space is very limited, no storing regular trash cans
outside so we would have to find space for additional bin
215 I think this is long overdue!
225 Need to reduce the cost as much as possible! I don’t recycle right now because of the
cost and I trust what they are doing at the resource recovery plant.
228 Concern is flat free regardless of volume generated by resident.
229 Thrilled to have it. Now how about municipal trash? ;)
232 It’s about time! Shocking that no curbside recycling
233 If the cart provided is smaller than 96 gallons, pickup should occur at least once
every two weeks.
235 I would love to have a recycling program. Would need to educate the public about
what is acceptable to recycle (no greasy boxes, washed containers, certain plastics,
etc)
238 Seriously consider including additional plastics. Several communities the size of
Ames accepts #1-7. I realize MRF capability is critical but updates to sorting equip
has made significant progress. Markets exist. Waste Commission of Scott County
191
36
Back to Top
has experience with expanded plastics. I am guessing they have been one of many
Iowa solid waste agency discussions. 65 gallon carts are likely sufficient. DNR has a
program called the Solid Waste Alternatives Program (SWAP) offering forgivable, 0%
and 3% loans for all things leading to landfill diversion including carts, equip,
construction, public awareness. This program assisted many other Iowa communities
for very similar projects. Maintaining drop off is critical for MFUs and rural residents.
And finally, food waste curbside collection needs to be addressed while this process
proceeds. Sharing an anaerobic digester is an opportunity to generate electricity,
reduce hazardous air emissions, and educate students and citizens.
239 Availability to all of county
244 We would like to see more composting in addition to the recycling.
245 Thank you for helping the environment
246 Recycling is crucial to our future. This is such an important asset to our community!!
247 find recycling for more plastic types
248 I would absolutely love to have this service available.
249 LOVE THIS IDEA
254 This is a great idea and we would definitely participate
259 How much willThis cost? All recyclables go on on cart; does this mean they will be
separated at another location?
260 Should be free.
264 It would be nice if the cost added to utility bills is the same or less than what residents
currently pay for private hauler service. Hopefully a city contract would provide better
per household rates than individually contracting does.
270 Do it for the young folks in the apartment buildings. Leave residential alone.
271 It is long overdue!
273 I think it's nonsense and not at all an intelligent or efficient use of city man power or
funds. It's a 0/10 idea.
275 I think it is a great idea!
276 The residential curbside recycling program in Ames is a good initiative and could
improve recycling rates. However, the program does not accept certain types of
plastic waste, and it would not reduce my household costs compared to my current
192
37
Back to Top
private garbage service ($23/month). Because of this, I would not support the
program unless it could handle all household plastics and provide a clear cost benefit.
278 Having a curbside pickup seems expensive. In European cities they have community
recycling points. It's similar to what we have now, but many more sites. They were
dumpsters arranged around a hard surface. Maybe these could be at grocery stores?
279 This should be an optional program
281 Please keep everything as as.
282 We are ready for curbside recycling!
285 If there is no curbsite recycling offered for multifamily (more then 5 residences)),
please DO NOT add a monthly fee for people living in the multifamily units (over 6
families in a building). That would NOT be fair to those of us who are not receiving
curbsite pickup!
286 I currently have curbside recycling through WM. It comes every other week, and I
have a terrible time remembering if it’s an on week or off week. Not sure if there’s a
better way to schedule. Also, I would want clear instruction on what can be included
in the bins. I know sometimes if a bin has things that are dirty, wet, or can’t be
recycled, the whole bin goes to the landfill.
287 Continuing the service at the recovery plant may help people outside of Ames
301 Is it possible to have an electronics drop off site too?
306 Need to still have drop-off containers because of the transient community (increased
need during move out times) and increase cardboard/paper waste during holidays.
310 Concerned about added cost. Why not make it free or low cost like $5/month? Not
everyone who would be willing to recycle will do it if cost prohibitive.
311 opt out would be good for small volume generators
314 we are being forced to now pay extra to do the "normal" type of recycling when we
were told for years what Ames was doing in the past was better for the environment,
and was free? This news is very depressing.
316 If the City makes a profit from selling recyclable items, then don't charge us!
320 Is my recycling actually being recycled?
323 It's so wild that there's not municipal trash and recycling in Ames! Economies of
scale, wear and tear on the roads, noise pollution...
324 I prefer current burning of trash for power generation
193
38
Back to Top
332 Please find a way to work with landlords to properly recycle on the property. If it's a
dumpster that anyone can access, a lot of trash will go in it, defeating the purpose of
recycling. Otherwise, find a way to increase walking distance receptacles/bins. For
example, a drop off bin at the somerset business area by greater iowa bank.
334 Great idea! We used that successfully in the city in which we previously lived.
338 Even though I prefer to drop off recyclables if more people would recycle with
curbside I am happy
339 I would like to know the price added to utilities before deciding.
340 I'd really like recycling options for apartment complexes. It's a hassle to have to drive
across town to dump my recycling every couple of weeks. I do it, but it's a pain!
344 One person household. Prefer smaller tote pick up twice monthly. Options of tote
sizes for smaller and larger households would be good. One major concern I have
now is the number and frequency of trucks in my neighborhood for yard waste and
trash pick ups. At least four companies for trash and large Aspen yard waste trucks -
lots of noise, fumes, and wear and tear on the streets. I used to live in Clive where
they contracted different parts of town for a single company, so only one truck pass
per week for trash and one for recycling, rather than multiple. I actively participated in
recycling then and do now. I am retired and do like the idea of curbside recycling pick
up as I think more homes would participate. I started taking my recycling to the RRC
in the last 6 months (have separated glass for multiple years), but would appreciate
the ease of curbside. Those who work full time and drive a small car would be likely
to appreciate it too. Thank you for exploring this.
345 Urbandale Iowa has a week of Spring Clean-up. So many items are reused or
picked up for scrap metal by individuals. This keeps a lot of items from going to the
landfill. When I lived in Urbandale hardly anything was left for the city to pick up.
349 Have transparent and sustainable recycling options. Share city work with residents
351 Concerned about price increase
352 I need to know more about the cost by before expressing much interest in this
project. Recycling is important, but with free options available I need to know the
financial impact on my family.
353 Would residents be charged for this service?
354 I have large amounts of e-waste, mostly old PCBs and pc components, I don't want
to throw them away in the trash so urbandale is usually the best option right now.
355 City should leave the service to the private vendors. I don't want to pay for a service I
can currently do at no cost.
194
39
Back to Top
357 This would be a great addition.
358 Please do it!!!
361 cost, cost, cost, always more to citizens
364 So looking forward to this service so long that price is reasonable.
366 We are very excited for the prospect of residential recycling and hope there can also
be yard waste collection.
371 Making it easy has always been the focus on recycling, hence single containers.
Sorting out the mixed materials has always been a problem when relying on single
containers; allowing cross contamination which then has to be handled at a facility is
costly and degrades recycling materials. Commercial recycling, while different, would
also need to be incorporated into the system. Organic waste would still need to be
captured, separately. As usual, there would have to be a not insignificant
commitment to education ahead, and in the early phase(s), of such a program.
Changing to curbside would, or at least should, be an opportunity for Ames to sort out
the unnecessarily messy, noisy, and costly confusion of multiple haulers with large,
heavy vehicles coming through neighborhoods on various pickup days.
372 Any type of offering is better than none
373 I don't want to pay more for a regular pickup. There should be a way to opt out of the
extra cost and not participate.
376 None
384 My only concern is re-education. People need to know when the trash begins going
to landfills (and should have been notified when it has happened previously) as many
of them have been trained to throw everything together and think it will get sorted.
Batteries are a good example of this. I am constantly teaching the community about
our current trash and recycling programs.
385 Recycling pickup should be free to encourage more regular usage of recycling in the
community.
389 Think about older people who cant physically manage all this and dont drive to take
items to a drop off location. Consider also the apartment buildings that would have
overflowing carts and cans. You're right to take a survey - if every
390 Yes please!
395 It would be great to hear the data behind the amount of recycling Ames is doing (to
celebrate). Or maybe set a goal each year? Facts and figures on how recycling is
helping the planet?
195
40
Back to Top
403 I think having the drop-off sites is so very helpful because there are times where you
just don't have enough space in the can. Especially for the cardboard
405 Would be very useful for senior citizens
407 Could I still take batteries and light bulbs to the Resource Recovery Center?
408 I would love to this option pair with a municipal trash service as well. There are trash
pick-ups in my neighborhood at least four days a week, sometimes as early as 5:45
am.
15 None
412 I work in a factory that recycles its different paper types and I think one method of
sorting that we have benefited from is having a designated container for the sorted
paper from the start. Maybe a simple container provided to households that choose to
participate would help get the ball rolling on habit forming with actually sorting out
products that can be recycled with this program.
414 Similar to discussions happening regarding garbage hauling, I would love to one day
see this as a city owned utility service
417 I pay enough for trash pickup, probably not interested in paying more.
421 I think options in the size of container and frequency of pickup are very important
when considering how much cost households are willing to take on. However, I think
this is a great idea. I hope there will be a viable solution soon for all the apartment
complexes/large multi-family residences.
425 This is a program that sounds wonderful but I question in reality what real difference it
would actually make and in fact might even add environmental risk due to more trash
truck traffic.
426 I currently don't bother with recycling because there is no curbside option.
427 See above needs to be a choice to participate and not a mandate and as cheap as
possible if not free
436 I am concerned about cost. There is no estimate of cost and I anticipate a monopoly
where the cost will be very limiting.
438 I would love to be able to start recycling more without having to drive to do it!
439 I am concerned about the additional cost.
443 A fantastic idea. This will spur the non-recyling people to become a more
environmentally responsible person by being "forced into" recycling.
196
41
Back to Top
444 Lived in Iowa City, they would not take curb side glass pick-up because of safety
issues for their workers. Somethin you should think about.
445 Make sure it is effective. All materials should be recycled, not trashed. Offer
residents who can’t afford cost other options.
446 None
451 This isn't about curbside, but please take a look at the Cedar Falls recycling center.
It is a convenient drive up facility, easy to use with stations for each recyclable and is
free of charge.
454 Education! It is so important to educate about the impact of recycling
457 I think this is a GREAT idea!! I’m very supportive
460 Contamination is a main concern. Would composting still be available?
463 This should be more affordable than the current private options (e.g. Waste
Management).
464 Standard cart size is 64 gal—make it too big and people won’t have a way to store
them
468 Will this be free?
471 I am very much in favor and hopefully it will be a smidge cheaper then paying for it
through my garbage provider.
472 We would want the option to take large cardboard pieces to the recovery plant if they
are hard to get into the bin.
474 Keep it accessible for people who care but can't afford service by keeping drop off
sites open if possible.
478 I love the idea of residential curbside recylcing through the city. We recycle everyday
and would love to have this as an option.
482 I don't need it and I don't want it
483 Our other plastics besides one and two not recyclable? Why are those not included.
484 Excited for this change! Much needed!
485 Curbside recycling would be terrific and worth the additional cost
490 I think this is a great idea! I would also be interested in one-off recycling days for
electronics, car-seats, tires, batteries, and more.
197
42
Back to Top
492 I don’t think it would be as needed if residents were more aware of the resource
recovery drop off. It took over a year for me to discover that I can recycle if I just drop
it all off there. It was also a large hassle though and there is not a space in west
Ames for this. The rrc is on the far opposite side of town from where I used to live.
495 We need to make sure we don't add to the already too large number of heavy trucks
that come along residential streets to pick up garbage. At an estimated 40-60 percent
of wear and tear these mean streets need to be repaired 1.5 times more often, thus
1.5 times more cost to the city. That's huge!
496 Including the pricing in our land taxes so I don't have to b pay the city of Ames every
month, twice. (Water/Electricity)
497 This would be such an improvement from loading it all up in the car! I think the
convenience would out weigh the cost/fees.
498 Current understanding is this doesn't happen because of the incinerator/power
generation. An article about what that will look like would be nice. ALSO Cityside as a
direct email instead of a link at the bottom of the bill would be more likely to be read
by paperless customers.
499 I am interested in curbside recycling
500 Is cost pushed to all residents on all utility bills, or rather only those who use? How
would this be tracked?
501 I don’t like curb side recycling
503 I lived in a rural community in the 90's that had mandatory recycling. This is great. I
still see so many that do zero recycling. In that community, if your recycling was put
in the regular garbage, it wasn't picked up and fines were implemented
508 I would love if we had recycling in Ames! I always feel awful for throwing away
recycling things.
509 N/a
511 Would love some insight into cost. Could there be a bundle discount if purchasing
garbage and recycling together
512 None
516 I've been waiting a long time for curbside recycling. I hope this doesn't get put on the
back burner!
519 look forward to curbside recycling
198
43
Back to Top
523 Fees should not exceed those currently offered by private haulers Keep or expand
drop off sites for those in multi family to participate. Require businesses to participate
also.
527 It would be great to have a place near campus for students to bring their recycling.
Many people do not have cars
530 I’d like it if we could fin a solution for other plastic types that include more than just #1
and 2 plastics.
533 Lots of education of public before starting.
537 None
543 I think significant education is needed on what should be recycled and how to
prepare it properly. It must be obvious and continuous.
546 Please clarify the related “fee” associated with the recycling. Is this fee assessed to
all residents, or just those with a recycling container? How much is this fee? What is
the basis for this fee? What will be basis for fee changes?
547 With rising electricity and other utility prices, I’m concerned about the cost. It’s very
important to continue free drop off sites for those who can’t afford/don’t want
residential pick up. I’ve been faithfully recycling since learning about the drop off bins
at Resource Recovery and generate a significant amount of recyclable trash. If
people can’t afford residential pick up and trash isn’t used to generate power
anymore, the amount of trash going to the landfill will increase.
548 I feel very positive about the plans you have developed. Thank you.
550 I answered as I did for question #12 because we use Resource Recovery for
old/broken electrical appliances and solvents. Where would they go otherwise?
555 Thanks for moving forward with re-cycling initiatives!
556 As long as fees are not prohibitive I think it's a great idea.
559 Keeping the glass containers and other drop off containers would be important for
other community clean up efforts that fall outside private households.
560 Will there be a cost for this? We already have 2 bins (garbage and yard waste), three
bins is a lot to fit on the curb on one day. Would pickup be the same day as our other
bins?
562 I think that public drop-off areas will still be beneficial for those people who don't pay
for curbside recycling, or for larger jobs. I would absolutely LOVE to pay the city for
curbside trash and recycling!!!
199
44
Back to Top
563 We have been using natural gas at the power plant for about 10 years. From the get
go there were issues recognized burning with RDF. why does the city wait that long
to come up with a plan to keep the power plant sustainable and knee jerk reaction to
recycling. There was ample time to save money and justify a solution other than just
driving 70+ miles one way to put it into a hole in the ground and preach how "green"
we are being
565 The amount of cardboard we have from deliveries will require weekly pick up for a
drop off.
566 Recycling is so important. I really liked the old system where all the trash and
recyclables were burned and used for energy.
568 I would recycle if the benefits outweigh the costs.
569 Love the pickup option - I know our family would be more likely to us that then a drop
place
570 Curbside recycling allows people to fill a bin and forget about it. They won’t think
much about where stuff goes. That’s why the drop off options must be maintained
571 I think this is an amazing idea and a long time coming. I hope we do the same for
yard waste and move garbage service to be more energy efficient by having zones
(but only if I can keep my recycling and yard waste pickup I have now in some form
with city or carrier)
572 Consolidate Haulers, particularly during construction on arterial roads, Grand and
Duff
573 I have been hoping for something like this since moving to Ames. Driving to the
recycling center is not always convenient, especially when it’s cold and there are lots
of people there at the same time
575 What if I want to opt out? Can I use the self service option?
576 Has consideration been given to curbside composting?
584 It's a shame that the waste-to-energy model has to go away; I'm not psyched about
the idea of a landfill. But if landfill is the only option, then I'd like the city to pursue the
most comprehensive recycling program it can reasonably afford. Also--I live in a
house with an alley and I hope the city will maintain the alley as the location for our
"curbside" pickup--it's far preferable to the street-side curb.
585 What would the cost be for this service and would it be optional?
586 I like the idea of pick up
200
45
Back to Top
587 I think it's great the city is looking into this as an option - I have no context for how the
"business" end is affected in all of this, but recycling technology is severely
underutilized in this country and Ames could really be a driving force over the next 5-
10 years.
588 This needs to be an opt-in program. We do not want the extra charge for curbside
recycling. The current disposal sites work just fine.
589 Curious if there will still be a food waste diversion program/place to drop off food
waste
592 I have concerns about the cost of recycling and it being a mandatory fee if this is
implemented. At my last address the town offered free recycling pickup every other
week. Garbage was paid but optional. I don't believe I should have to pay for both
garbage and recycling if I don't wish to do so.
593 My spouse would be so happy to not have the recycling collecting in the house until I
have time to take it to the Resource Center
595 Great initiative, we use a 96 gallon trash every other week and it works great for
recycling
596 I would also be interested in yard waste through the city as well
597 I think there need to be a trial period to determine size and frequency of containers.
We have had the Resource Recovery taking care of our recycling for 50 years, so a
new program will require an extensive education effort.
604 Cost would have to be very low to make curbside recycling preferable to the current
drop off system.
605 The curbside aspect will be extremely important for the success of this program.
606 I do not want increased traffic on our roadways related to curbside recycling.
610 My household would be very enthusiastic about curbside recycling and use it
regularly
611 This is an excellent idea, and it sets a precedence and important example to future
generations.
612 Do NOT increase my city taxes or fees.
613 Need to be clear what could go in this recycle program
616 Could plastic bags be included?
201
46
Back to Top
621 It seems ironic that the city is suddenly interested in a recycling program because
trash will cost extra to haul rather than any of the environmental or social
consequences. Right action, wrong motivation.
622 It will be important to have bins accessible for students, multifamily residences,
businesses, and residences outside the Ames pick-up area. I currently pick up
recyclables from my church. Can businesses participate request a bin also ?
624 I enjoy recycling, but I notice many of my neighbors don’t recycle. Hopefully this
initiative would encourage more widespread recycling practices.
626 Why does the current system need to end?
628 I miss having it after living in other places that had it.
629 Excellent, long overdue
631 Placing recycling cans in places easy to access and free flowing traffic.
637 It would be nice to have the option to recycle other plastics in addition to plastics #1
and #2. Might also be nice to have an optional curbside compost program.
639 I am a single person and don't need a big cart and DO NOT NEED more charges on
utility bill when once a month I can and do go to the recycling site monthly!
640 We need this. It should be a top priority.
641 I think this service is long overdue; I do think it will be a learning process and
changes could be made if needed
643 None
644 Long overdue!
648 I'm excited about the potential program. I used to have a program like this back in WI
but haven't been as good about recycling since moving to Ames because of the
additional work and cost involved with the current system.
650 Great idea
651 Not exactly sure I understand what qualifies as mixed paper.
653 I think this is a great idea
654 I would absolutely love this!!! Please start this as soon as possible! I’m tired of driving
letting my recycling build up and drive it to the center.
655 I lived in a community where the City managed both refuse and recycling collections
(no private haulers). Residents paid for services along with water and and sewer and
202
47
Back to Top
the City provided trash receptacles and two small bins/totes for recycling (one for
metal/glass, one for paper and cardboard). Collections were weekly.
656 Honestly I wish it would be a "free" service covered by the cost of our property taxes.
We pay plenty in taxes, and you'd have a LOT more compliance if people didn't have
to pay to participate. I grew up in new england in a town where both trash removal
and recycling pickup are municipal services included as pay of the taxes people pay.
Never have understood why Ames doesn't work the same.
658 Just make sure it is easy and convenient
662 Do it! Great idea.
663 Occasional greater/larger cardboard needs to be disposed of, so having an off-site
location to take that would be great.
665 Yes, we need curbside recycling! Find more ways to encourage less food waste and
home composting of kitchen and yard wastes.
667 this is a great idea, unless the fee is too high. Gainesville, Fl had curbside recycling,
and it was included in our taxes
670 No monthly fee added to utility bill.
672 Curbside recycling is great, but I’d also love to have more than one drop off site for
recycling
675 Answers to maintaining dropoff facilities is due to multi-family housing, not for use of
single family homes
676 Encourage large MFH unit tenants to recycle on their own.
679 I think this a great idea. It would be great to also educate the public that the recycled
items have to be clean.
681 What would we do with plastics labeled 3-7?
685 What's wrong with the city doing the sorting
686 Would there be a separate container for glass and plastics? Would it have handles?
Could the bins be a different color like yellow (as we have garbage can in a variety of
colors now -green, reds maybe blue.
693 Recycling has been previously attempted, with limited success. Is any Ames resident
other than City staff 'exited' about this? Why are you planning a new facility that will
be inadequate in a few years? Has there historically been a market for recyclables?
What happens to 'recyclables' when there is no market?
203
48
Back to Top
696 Questioning why other plastics (butter tubs, etc.) cannot be recycled here as they
were in a smaller community where we lived before
697 Education about what is acceptable versus not acceptable is going to be key if this
goes into effect
698 Can we add composting buckets as well
702 Probably wouldn't participate, lack of space to have another can
709 I think having drop off sites will be important because depending on price I may elect
not to do curbside
710 A short guide with tips and FAQs that I can put on my fridge (magnet?) or near my in-
home collection spot. Don't expect people to always go to the website everything they
have a question about recycling a can or bottle, and few people will print something
themselves. I'm typically against producing more waste, but this is a case where the
benefits can definitely support increased recycling. Something small with a QR code
might do the trick, but a postcard size with the basics would be great.
712 I think this is a good idea while phasing out of the previous Resource Recovery
facility processes. I would much prefer recycling over landfilling.
715 Looking forward to participating.
718 I am SO excited about this possibility! Less "errands" for me to run to drop off
recycling!
720 Would recycling include fabric items?
722 We feel recycling is very important but have a lot of trouble getting out to the
community drop off stations so recycling piles up. Home pick up would be life-
changing.
725 It would have been helpful to have an estimated cost that residents will have to pay.
We don't have a lot of items that would be recycled so if the cost is quite high, we
would continue using the drop-off sites.
732 I would love to see curbside recycling here! I actually use recycling more than trash
so this would be amazing! People don't realize much they can recycle until it's easy
and convenient!
734 I love this idea. We have 2 busy kids so it is sometimes hard for us to make it to the
resource recovery plant to drop off recyclables so I have found myself throwing tings
in the trash sometimes.
738 As stated above, please separate glass. Additionally, what are we supposed to do
with plastics #3-7? I also want to know more about what happens to the garbage and
204
49
Back to Top
recycling after they're picked up. And why would we still have to pay for garbage pick
up separately? The amount of carbon emissions and inefficient waste contributed by
all the trash hauling companies is a big concern for me! It's gotten so much worse in
the last 15 years that we've lived here. Why are other cities more conservation-
minded than Ames?
744 I would like more information as to why the current process is changing.
749 Any curbside recycling service should allow more than just #1 and #2 plastics. The
majority of food containers (like yogurt containers) are made of #5 plastic. I think it is
critical to allow curbside recycling of #5 plastic. Our current provider, Aspen Waste,
allows us to recycle plastics #1 through #7. There is a company called PureCycle
which recycles #5 plastics; perhaps the city could partner with them. If a curbside
provider won't take them, then please make sure that bins are available for self-
service recycling of #5 plastics. I'm confident that Ames residents would gladly
recycle #5 plastic to keep it out of the landfill, if they had a place to recycle it.
750 I think it would be great to have a recycling bin/dumpster like container for recyclables
outside my apartment building, even now with the current system. It is very
inconvenient to go to drop off sites for items like glass that should not be put into the
trash. I am happy to clean and separate my glass, metal, paper, or whatever, but it is
very inconvenient to go somewhere else to recycle it. I know very few people who
actually utilize these drop off site for their recyclables. Lastly, I feel that a curbside
recycling system for large multi-family housing should be prioritized since the volume
of recyclables from these building will be higher.
752 I think it should be made very clear what can and cannot be included. Diagrams sent
out via mail, posted on social media, etc.
753 Moved 1 year ago from community that had recycling bins that we used regularly.
Found it odd Ames did not have this program as it was around other community for
20+ years. Glad to see Ames is getting with the times!
756 Would also like to see seasonal - Spring and Fall - pick up of brush and yard waste
for composting. Also Christmas tree pick up
757 How would it apply to the college campus and those residents in apartments.
764 Cost needs to be reasonable (or have an opt-out option) since the city would pretty
much have a monopoly on this so there isn't an option to find a cheaper company,
and I'm already paying for trash service. I also live alone and wouldn't fill a container
nearly as fast as a multiple-person household, so maybe having a less expensive
option that only picks up every couple weeks rather than every week
766 Separate containers for different things?
205
50
Back to Top
767 Please look at a better system for yard waste or more frequent free days. I live in a
strict HOA that requires constant weeding and I have nowhere to dispose of the
waste. I can’t afford to pay to get rid of it all the time, so I have bags and bags
stashed in my garage. It’s not ideal.
771 I hope we get it to European standards! Multi recycling in all public spaces and lots of
education on PROPER recycling!!
772 I love that you are exploring this!
774 Education to the public is important on what can properly be recycled. Also
information on whether the items are actually getting recycled or sent overseas to be
disposed of. Recycling is a great option and I use it, but it cannot replace reducing
consumption for environmental benefits. Educating people is key
776 Please implement curbside recycling, I think it’s very important. We moved here from
Ankeny where we had curbside recycling and it was very seamless and the monthly
charge included tree and branch days, clean up days, dumpsters for fall leaf drop off
all at no extra charge.
777 The cost to homeowners
778 So excited!
780 Very glad to hear this is being proposed- have wished the city would offer this
service. I hope this leads towards a unified city approach to garbage pickup too- don’t
understand having so many companies in one city. I wish more plastics were
accepted for recycling
782 What about food waste?
783 Needs to be opt in, not required.
785 I would love residential curbside recycling!!
788 I fully support the program even if I personally will not bennift right away. it will be
essential to recycle as we shift away from RDF and organized collection is infinitly
preferable to everyone making the trip out to the R3C in East Ames (even assuming
everyone would, which is unlikely).
789 Just an idea - Offer a separated container for soda cans etc with deposit. More of a
hassle to return to the store than the few bucks you get back so we just currently toss
them. We would be just include them with recycling if curbside comes. Simply not
worth the mess and hassle for normal can redemption anymore.
791 Keeping the cardboard drop off option is a great idea for those times big packages
come - nice to keep that option open
206
51
Back to Top
796 N/A
797 Too many garbage trucks each week —can we consolidate
798 Many Ames residents have been wanting a curbside program for sometime. This
helps share the responsibility across town and makes it easier for everyone to
participate.
799 Good idea if it’s not too expensive
802 I’d like to see curbside food pickup for composting.
803 dedication to the program by the community
805 better EDUCATION of HOW to do it . Such as how to separate 3 kinds in ONE
garbage can
806 Would be nice to offer a full-size option (similar to most garbage bins) and something
1/2 or 3/4 that size, as it can be difficult to find space for all the big containers
(including yard waste)..
807 Will there be any options for handling food waste, to be composted? Any new plans
for yard waste disposal? Guidance will be needed regarding exactly what and how
items should be recycled (eg, remove caps from bottles or plastic jars? Wash empty
cans and jars? Flatten cans?)
809 We need curbside compost too! Iowa City has a great curbside compost program.
Compostables would significantly reduce waste volumes (I’ve heard it can be 40% of
the waste stream), and as far as I understand, I think it’s more reliably and more
easily repurposed. Like, recycling requires lots of processes nd energy to actually get
the materials back into a new product. But all the compostables quickly break down
into good compost that can be used locally. Maybe sell the finished compost cheaply
to the community or offer it for free, like the woodchips. And if there’s not enough
interest in the finished compost, it could be spread on fields along with the residual
solids from the wastewater treatment plant.
811 I wouldn't want much of an increase in my utility bill. I currently pay 20 monthly for
weekly garbage pickup. I would gladly opt in to bi-weekly pickup if there's a cheaper
option than weekly. Would not be willing to spend more than $5-10 extra for recycling
when I drop mine off for free now.
814 Education will be extremely important. As a lifelong resident, the Resource Recovery
Plant essentially made me ignorant to recycling rules. Definitely a huge change, but
we want to reduce waste. Please also push more info on community composting.
Overall I'm very discouraged by the fact we will be going to the landfill and would like
to do what we can to not contribute to that issue.
207
52
Back to Top
817 I think it's going to take a lot of community education after so many years of not
having the option.
819 not fully related - but would love composting services (food scraps, yard waste)
820 Multiple options needed. Not all of us live in Ames or have regular trash pickup.
823 It will be a big culture change for people and will require an education campaign
825 Quite disappointing the current Center concept can't be expanded...it is a far better
solution. This new idea adds additional costs in more ways than one, you're forcing
an added (unwanted) service to residents, while eliminating a source of power
creation...all I see are inept ideas that will raise my expeneses.
827 Optical sort thru python scripting with yolo software
830 Additional drop off locations for food waste, especially in north Ames.
846 Glad to see this in development. It’s much needed.
847 I would appreciate curbside recycling!
852 Yard waste pickup
853 Without truck it’s hard to move yard waste easily. A can for that, or the option to throw
it in a regular can would be helpful in spring and fall.
855 I support the city doing curbside recycling collection. Also support city doing the trash
too. Would reduce number and trucks and trips and fuel usage and emissions
857 We already recycle all the glass, paper, cardboard, plastic, metal, and food waste
that we can. We canceled our trash service because the two of us only produce
about 1/3 of a bag of trash per month. Curbside recycling sounds nice, but I don't
want to pay for it. If the cost can be covered by what it currently takes to maintain the
drop containers at the plant, then sure, sign me up.
858 Clearly label how to recycle (rinse containers etc) and then what can be recycled and
what cannot be. (create picture checklist with words). Don't make the recycling
program cost a lot, or let the county cover the cost to encourage residents to sort
their garbage properly. Americans use a lot of plastic and most are very unaware how
to recycle, and the the majority will not bother to if it costs them money or takes too
much work. Create incentives, clear guidance.
859 Will you actually recycle or are you just green washing
863 We only have 1 earth, so reducing barriers to recycling is essential to get people on
board. Thanks for taking up this initiative and providing openly for Ames residents to
208
53
Back to Top
recycle and compost. (Separately, I’d LOVE more compost bins around town - one at
every grocery store???)
865 If that service is not free, I would prefer to drop them in the drop-off sites
868 I try to reuse in any way that i can. recycling things would be a GREAT move for
ames.
870 Keep free and accessible places around the community. Make sure to have pictures
and examples of items that are recyclable.
871 I think this is a great idea and it's about time Ames offered residential curbside
recycling.
872 I believe it should be a free service. You should definitely maintain the containers at
Resource Recovery if you're going to charge for this service.
877 education in schools?
882 it's a great idea. also include compost.
888 I live in Nevada and I would love to have curbside recycling!
889 pay with taxes
890 smaller bins are better for short people
891 a fridge magnet with recycling tips would be helpful - do i take the paper off tin cans?
do you keep the twist off cap with the bottle?
892 Why isn't composting included?
893 Should also pick up trash, there are so many different trash trucks going down my
street I can’t imagine a less efficient way to do this.
894 is it cost effective for the city to have a recycling program?
897 Information on where recycing goes, i.e., customer assurance that the items are
actually recycled
898 Great idea
901 I am the only person in my household and a 96 gallon is way too big for my use. I
recycle now and I barely have 1 bag a week for regular trash pick-up.
902 A very clear graphic to help understand what can be recycled.
904 Required monthly service fee - how is this established? No option to go avoid fee by
going with private service? Is the private contractor reputable, is this material going to
209
54
Back to Top
be effectively recycled, and is there transparency to ensure the contractor is fulfilling
that obligation?
905 No fee
907 options for difference size bins once this process starts and a household gets a better
feel for how large or small their containers need to be
909 It can't cost more than the private companies charge
912 I wonder how dangerous to mix glasses in the recycling materials for sorters. Do they
break when collecting in the trucks? Then is it better to have free recycling drop offs
at grocery parking lots or people visits often.
914 Charge more for non-recycled trash than for recycled trash to encourage residents to
participate.
919 Check out Plastics Recycling in Iowa Falls, Iowa as a model or possible company to
contract with.
922 Not a good idea. It's just a "feeling good" project for the city for appearance
purposes.
923 I don't think this should be mandatory.
924 Will this be offered to story co? Eg Nevada
925 Perhaps focusing on developing/implementing/encouraging better ( less wasteful)
packaging (partner with ISU?) or better central processing/separating) would lead to
real progress in reducing waste. Curbside recycling will deliver minimal reduction in
landfill waste
927 Make it optional. Some families can’t afford the extra cost.
930 Sizing of the carts and how often they will need to be picked up will very quite a bit if
you consider the family size. Offering once a week or once every two weeks as an
option would fit different household sizes needs. By keeping the option of containers
to be used at the plant it would give options to one person properties but a small one
time fee could be charged for the containers.
932 I'm glad this will be an option.
933 All good stuff
935 Live in Webster City, own a house in Ames - this should have happened a long time
ago in Ames. We fill our bin in Webster City weekly. I hate having to throw away
recycles when in Ames.
210
55
Back to Top
939 Think this is a great idea.
943 Would prefer modest size containers and maintain community drop off for less
frequent larger amounts
945 It is unfair to force residents to pay for a program they won't use. It should be
optional.
950 It is not clear currently if this is an optional service that will be charged only if used
952 Compostable wet gsrbagecrecycling
954 Paying for recycling should be optional not mandatory
956 So excited to have it available
959 Please also explore trash pickup as a city utility. It is so silly to have numerous trucks
down our street every week. Curbside yard waste would also be great.
961 Before I moved to Ames, curbside recycling was available and I used it. I currently
take things to the resource recovery, but I am getting older and don't know how much
longer I will be able to drive. I would like the option to continue to recycle
962 If this is offered community-wide, it should be on an opt-in basis only, and at no
additional monthly cost.
963 We need to offer this as garbage is out of control.
967 We currently use Ahrens Sanitation as our garbage service, and they provide
constant reliable service. And I wish to continue using a local company after having
multiple issues with another nation wide company. ( While handling my mother’s
estate this other company could not be contacted easily, and it was very difficult to
get service terminated and the billing issues corrected.)
968 How about food waste? Will that be picked up, too? If I still have to go drop it off, I'd
rather bring all my recyclables with me and avoid the extra fee.
969 Looking for reassurance recycling is happening. Have seen recycling trucks dumping
at landfill in past. Also wanted to mention we had experience with a biweekly
recycling service. Even as family of 3 we would have it full each week. It was also
challenging to keep track of which week was recycling day. I’d also want more
information about expected cost and if we have ability to opt out of the program if it
doesn’t work for us.
970 This is a huge change. I am sad it is necessary. You need to change your language
around fees. This isn't optional right? People should have a 'fee' if they do not
recycle. I should pay less if i can avoid lots of garbage going to the landfill.
Recycling is going to add work even to those of us already doing the easiest things
211
56
Back to Top
like glass and cardboard. I am wondering what will happen with the food drop off
(compost) component? Will yard waste handling remain the same? What about
household oils?
974 No suggestions because team is already doing best as per my knowledge.
975 So many apartments in Ames - please find a way to include them for curbside pickup
976 Recycling bin MUST have a lid.
977 PLEASE bring curbside recycling to Ames! I am an avid recycler and it is difficult to
carry it to my car, not have it spill out and then bring to the right place. Other
neighbors won’t bother- too much effort.
980 I also live in another community and very seldom use the recycle bin but do use the
glass drop off sites located in the comunnity.
985 I don’t recycle because there’s only one of me at my house.. .. and I want to choose
my own garbage person.
987 Make it easy to use. Everything in one recycling container seems like a good idea.
988 We will still need drop off locations for recyclable materials that are out and about in
the community for various reasons. Such as cleaning out estates for example or
community services that come upon these items for different reasons.
989 Assume we would still be required to have private garbage collection
990 No recycling
995 It’s ridiculous a community as progressive and large as Ames can’t figure out
curbside recycling for all residents including multi family units.
996 I really don't like the added mandatory cost, and so far in survey no questions about
the cost. I wonder if existing haulers could compete for recycling as well and keep
costs down. Not all households can afford an extra $10-20/mo(?) on top of trash
service. I worry the city signing a contract with a single hauler will create a monopoly.
999 I am concerned about additional fees. Could the city negotiate with local haulers to
lower other garbage charges. Since much will be recycled, actual garbage will be
less. Less pick up necessary.
1006 Separate bins for household recycling, paper, and yard waste. This is what Des
Moines does.
1008 I have my recycling picked up every two weeks and I use two 96 containers (those
delivery boxes and packaging boxes add up!). Have an option to double up on
212
57
Back to Top
containers. Also, if it costs me more than using my current garbage service, I will not
use Ames services. Why can't Ames offer garbage pick up as well??
1009 There are already recycling areas around town. We don't want our prices increased
for a service we won't use.
1010 Cities are implementing things to kick the little haulers out of town.
1012 Please do not increase our utility bill. People on fixed income cannot afford it. Taxes
are high enough.
1014 I’d like to know more about the “reputable” companies the city will work with to
process the recycling after it’s picked up and also more about “industry standards”.
1015 Make it easy to discontinue service thru private hauler
1016 Recycling is important. I hope there will be a way to include the apartment units of
60+ Communities in any curb-side program.
1018 I live in Green Hills Retirement Community. Would you pick up here?
1019 Why don’t you buy land and create your own landfill?
1020 I live at the Green Hills Retirement Community and we have on-site bins for glass
and cardboard. We are disappointed that the Kiwani's no longr collect newspapers.
Residents are confused about not recycling paper. I'm not sure how food waste will
be handled. I bring food waste to the current recycling bin. Residents at all levels
need education in the importance of recycling.
1022 This is BS
1024 Composting
1033 I really wish the city would consider keeping the burn for energy verse more landfill
1034 Limiting pickup in the city would be great! We have garbage trucks in our
neighborhood everyday and it is too much big traffic.
1036 Instead of costing more to recycle, it would be great if we could get a credit (even as
little as $2 a month) to encourage participation.
1040 It would be nice to be able to recycle other plastics as well as 1 & 2
1041 Please do this and switch to a city contract garbage pickup provider.
1042 I think it'd be important to keep the cost of the reasonable. There should also be a
way to opt out of recycling for those who do not want it or it cost is to high for them.
Keeping cardboard drop-off would be key for larger prices that could not fit in the bin.
213
58
Back to Top
1044 Will be good to have a neighborhood(not every house holder) container for glass,
paper and garden waste.
1046 Visit the sanitation department in Columbia, MO. They had an excellent recycling
sustem.
1047 keep the free areas
1048 I prefer weekly and secure containers
1051 The more often it is picked up, the better. I hope we see enough demand to move to
weekly. At least while it is biweekly and maybe longer, it would be great to maintain
the drop-off sites.
1053 I detest forced curbside recycling. Why are you not able to continue with the existing
system? That has not been explained. Many communities tried the approach you are
describing and abandoned it because it was not workable long term for residents..
1054 I think it is great to recycle all of this.
1061 The sooner the better. We need to recycle
1062 This is a great idea!
1064 Yet another big truck coming around the neighborhoods in addition to all the garbage
pick up trucks?! No thank you.
1070 I prefer the current system. Sorry to see it end.
1073 Options to opt in to select recycling, or have a once every so often pickup for
categories that are already maintained at the resource recovery plant could be
beneficial. Options such as textiles, food waste, and other areas.
1075 It’s about time!
1081 Curbside recycling is already an option with trash service. It would be better if the city
handled trash collection with neighborhoods following the same collection schedules
1092 Will it increas the number of trucks going by all the time? Already too many from too
many different companies(like 6+ a morning now, even saw 2 different companies
follw each other down the alley)
1093 Clear guidelines about what items are acceptable are imperative to make this
program work.
1094 It is about time. We have very little garbage and most of what we have is recyclable.
1096 You should accept more plastics.
214
59
Back to Top
1100 The drop-off site is not working as well as it could be because the city dies not
properly maintain ut and dies nit remive full containers in a timely manner. I think
curbside revycling would be a step forward, but I am not crazy about giving even
more of my money to the city.
1102 What will the cost be for single family residence?
1104 Our house generates at least 3x more recycling than trash. Make it an opt out
program with a free alternative. Incentives to recycle. Simply making it cost the
homeowner and minimizing costs for the city is not incentivizing. Keep and maintain
drop off sites.
1107 Can we get trash pick up also?
1109 This is fantastic, but needs to be cost affective. I would advise to keep the drop off
sites open until you see how effective the individual use is. Access again after a year
to see if they are needed.
1110 Keep the waste to energy program
1111 Would neighborhood drop off sites be feasible?
1114 What about yard waste?
1117 It's crucial that you provide constant educational/reminder information to all
participants about the importance of the guidelines for recycling. I have personally
participated in a recycling program in another community where residents put
contaminated items in their recycle bin which then spoils an entire load, i.e. pizza
boxes, food in jars, etc. For some its lack of awareness and understanding, for others
they just don't care.
1118 For senior citizens on a tight budget, a "required fee" could be a challenge. Please
consider that a senior citizen will recycle significantly less recyclables than a family of
5.
1119 Cost, there should be options to size and cost of containers. Not all households have
the same amount of waste.
1121 We are all for it
1123 Our household uses a lot of diapers. We also have an amazing amount of food
waste.
1125 It’s about time!
1126 I believe the free recycling drop off points ought to remain as not everyone will be
able to afford the “bin” service!
215
60
Back to Top
1127 Interested in how much this is going to cost. Would my garbage costs go down if we
aren’t using them as often?
1128 Want to maintain my current garbage provider
1130 Has to be picked up exactly where our garbage is picked up. Ours is in the alley
behind our house where our garage is. We WILL NOT PARTICIPATE if we have to
haul anything to the front curb.
1132 If this is optional we probably would not do it if we have to get it out to the curb. We
would continue to take ouy glass to the public bins.
1133 Need a yard waste option
1137 This should be a free service.
1140 Wondering if we'll be separating each class of items.
1141 None at this time.
1142 Very happy to have this under consideration. I currently use the drop off center but at
76 yo I would welcome curbside recycling if available!
1143 Please offer it
1145 The city should also consider taking over trash pickup in a similar fashion to the
proposed recycling pickup.
1146 Where is plastic bags included in this?
1147 Thank you for making a pick up program. Time and hauling my own materials are
current barriers to my household recycling
1148 I think it’s interesting there would be a fee. Iowa city has done this for years with no
added fees.
1149 I recycle regularly at the drop off sight. The compost bin is huge for me, so I would
take recycling with me. I have also seen how stupid people are and more plastic will
end up in the can that is not accepted. Maybe this will benefit the elderly, but could
they afford?
1150 Why isn't composting being considered to reduce waste?
1157 How many containers? What needs to be separated. Card board v paper.
1158 Realize that Ames has a fairly large homeless population so if you really want to “go
green” then free options are a necessity. And others like myself don’t always even
have $10 left at the end of the month to pay for the new recycling bin
216
61
Back to Top
1161 Knowing exactly what I can recycle
1164 Getting people to sort properly.
1170 maybe neighbors could share a recycling bin to save money and reduce the number
of bins on the street.
1171 I lived in a city that had this. It was really good. I filled that container almost every
time. I think this will be a good idea for ames.
1173 I would need to be educated about the types of plastics that could be recycled.
1177 If I use the containers down at City Hall, will I still have to pay for a recycling tote?
1180 We did something similar in the late 90s and it was great. Glass was the problem.
Too many were putting the wrong kinds of glass and that became a mess. When we
lived in Des. Moines we really like the Waste Management recycling container.
1182 Should have happened earlier!
1184 I would not like to have more traffic of the pick up. To have curbside side cost is
prohibiting to my budget. I presently drop my own recycling off monthly to self sever
locations.
1188 This is wonderful- thank you for this work!
1189 It would be a great convenience and therefore more people would recycle
1191 the idea is great if we were going to recycle, but as I said above recycling is a scam.
REDUCE, REUSE (our current resource recovery is a great example of this), and if
you can't do the better things, try to recycle (it won't happen -- it's going to get
shipped all over and generate MORE carbon and still get put in the landfill because
most material can't actually be recycled -- especially plastic) You could try
composting paper, for example, and glass can be sanitized and refilled (used to be
what was done before plastic bottles)
1192 Would there still be organic recycling of compost.
1203 I would like the drop-off sites to remain because ai use it a lot as a Story County
resident and no one in the area offers recycling.
1205 Vandalism of teens, etc., coming and make a mess or breaking glass, etc. waiting for
the items to be picked up
1209 The cost of recycling services was a major concern for us in the past. We stopped
our recycling services to save money. It seems everyone in Ames will be charged for
217
62
Back to Top
recycling under the proposed plan. If this is the case, please make it cost effective for
homeowners.
1213 It should be optional
1216 If I choose to not participate in the curbside recycling program am I still charged the
fee?
1217 With the proposed cart size, my household would only need it picked up once a
month. Could that frequency be available?
1222 Make the recycling container pleasing to the eye. We have lots of ugly ones already.
1224 Please consider adding styrofoam as an accepted material. City of Cedar Falls has a
model that could be replicated
1227 It would be helpful to have details about what can and can’t be recycled, on the can
itself to prevent wish cycling of things like food contaminated paper (pizza boxes) or
non-recyclable plastics like food wrap.
1228 It is important to keep the cost affordable.
1229 Will this be free of charge?
1230 Let’s go for composting too!!!
1232 What will this cost
1241 Pls pick up leaves, grass, branches. This is the s8ngle greatest thing we have.
1243 I am incredibly sad that the resource recovery plant will no longer be available in
2027. I would like to see that continued or renewed instead of resorting to a landfill.
1245 It would nice to have a curbside food waste option. I understand that isn't likely, so I
think it is important to keep a dropoff site.
1247 Upgrade the MRF, separate organics and paper and use enzymes and make an
anaerobic difeter to make natural gas for power plant
1248 Provide a list of dos and donts for recycling to make sure what i recycle is correct
1249 Program should include more plastic classes, like 1-7 and not just 1-2
1254 Would composting still be available at new RRC?
1258 This is something that has been needed for a long time
1263 Not sure if we have room for another container
218
63
Back to Top
1265 I think the fee is going to piss a lot of people off. I needs to feel like a discount in
some way. Like garbage will be going up this much and equals to getting a recycling
bin.
1267 I currently can recycle 1, 2, and 5 plastics. So I'm reading this as plastic recycling
would be more limited.
1269 If the City stops free recycling at the Plant, would they consider recycling containers
near large apartment complexes?
1270 While I do not currently live in a multi-family unit I have lived in many in Ames. I would
have preferred bringing my recyclables to a designated container on the property if
made available.
1275 Why is it not viable in 2027? Thought we have a model system that other cities
should have, maybe what/why it is happening could be better explained. Is there two
garbage pick up days? Regular and recycle? Do we get discount from Chitty or other
contractor if someone else picks up trash that they would have picked up?
1283 I would be curious about cost as it currently is about $11/mo which seems
reasonable, but #1-7 are accepted.
1284 None
1287 I do not want to pay for this service.
1288 The city we used to live in collected far more recyclable items in the bins, things like
plastic bags and wires even. The more items that can be included, along with weekly
pickups significantly increases recycling participation.
1289 Not in favor of curbside recycling
1292 Just another cost pushed to residents. Also another trash can to be setting around
properties.
1293 I will need a $400 city of Ames grant to enlarge infrastructure for additional poly-carts
1294 Is there an explanation why bringing recyclables to ARR is no longer an option. It is
unclear to me if metal- other than cans- will be able to be put in a recycling cart
1298 This is not fair to make this a mandatory requirement and charge. We are not in favor
of this.
1300 Cost should be minimal. I would rather take Recyclables to a drop off than pay a
pickup fee
1301 I am not looking forward to having another bin to deal with.
219
64
Back to Top
1305 I'm glad to see this being considered - I have been hoping for a program like this for a
long time!
1307 No mandatory fee for those who choose not to use.
1310 What about garbage??
1311 If there is curbside recycling, would people be more respectful of what can and
cannot be recycled? It is disappointing to see items that get dumped off at a recycling
site (microwave, for example). Would residents follow the rules? I hope so!
1314 It will take too much room to store the bins - if the city maintains the citywide drop off
sites for persons having an event that generates a lot - then I could utilize a smaller
regular bin
1315 None
1322 Paperboard needs to be included
1063 Very much looking forward to easier ways to keep more things out of the landfill.
1326 I would love to have curbside recycling
1327 I had the understanding that our refuse to fuel was better than recycling as so much
of recycling ends up in landfills. I would appreciate education (email is fine) on why
that will not be pursued in the future and why its not considered superior.
1328 I like having cardboard recycling sites available. When I have a large amount of
cardboard, I don't want to store it until recycling day. I want to get rid of it asap.
1329 Is it optional? What about people that cannot afford the added fee?
1331 Also consider yard waste / food compost pickup. A number of cities do this in addition
to recycling.
1332 None
1335 Cost
1339 Previously lived in Cazenovia, NY where recycling was mandatory. Residents were
required to use clear bags for garbage. If recyclables appeared in clear bags, pickup
did not occur until following week.
1340 smaller recycling bin than my regular trash can so it takes up less room and a
different color so easy know which one is for recycling. Also it would be great if Ames
had one or two companies that we had to use for regular trash pick up so not so
many different large trucks on the residential roads in town.
220
65
Back to Top
1342 I like that we currently burn trash for energy. What will become of the curbside
recycled items and what will the cost be to homeowners? Unless everyone
participates, you will still need free drop off locations. I don’t have a good spot for
another trash container so would rather take my recycling to free drop off locations.
1343 Food waste drop off needs to continue
1349 We live in Gilbert and our trash goes to Boone. If drop off recycling is still available
we could continue to use those services. I also always liked that Ames burned their
trash so these changes will be interesting for the community.
1354 Make it affordable to all households so they adopt it
1356 smaller more separate recycling containers is also good (glass, metal, cardboard, ...)
1357 I don’t want to pay for the curbside recycling service if I can continue using the free
self service containers.
1358 Extra fee for us with already high price trash removal
1359 I would like households to get a bin for organic - leaves, weeds, plant debris, kitchen
compost
1363 I'm excited about it! I hope others are too.
1370 Will we still have garbage service from a private provider? How do you handle items
not considered recyclable?
1374 I appreciate the convenience
1376 Apartments having recycling
1380 Don't charge for it
1381 The monthly charge should be based on someone’s income. Too many people are
charged too much for services when there are more than enough well off people to
help carry extra weight.
1384 Assuming this will be an additional cost to each resident? One of the reasons I used
to love Ames is because we didn't have to recycle (traditionally) since our garbage
was burned for fuel. This is what happens when we trade coal for gas.
1386 We moved from a city that offered curbside recycling which we utilized. Would be
very excited to see this happen in Ames!
1391 Been nice the last 17yrs I’ve lost ved in Story Ciry to not have to go through the
trouble of separating recyclables.
221
66
Back to Top
1395 This needs to be a free service. I won’t recycle if I have to pay for it.
1398 Check with Webster City….we moved here from there and they had this type of
system.
1400 I wish we could stay with the current system
1403 I would LOVE a single stream recycling program.
1404 This seems like another way for the city to tax us.
1405 Need more options for plastic recycling (besides #1 and #2)
1411 You should not force a recycling fee on residents that already pay high taxes
1413 Need weekly pickup!
1414 I moved here from another city, state who offed this for free and saw it utilized by our
community.
1424 What about plastics that are labeled #1 or #2 that aren't twist off lid containers?
1426 Price will be critical, we already pay $20 per month for trash removal and hardly fill
0.25 of the container why pay more for two almost empty containers
1427 Don’t really want it
1428 I am concerned about things actually getting recycled. Lots of reports discuss things
just getting dumped in landfills in the end. I would still like to continue the resource
recovery center.
1429 A pamphlet that describes what can and cannot be recycled will be helpful for people
less experienced. Be sure to explain why some items cannot be recycled for
motivation.
1430 Do we know that the recyclable items would actually be recycled, or would they
ultimately end up in the trash? Also if cost was a barrier to residents using curbside
recycling, it would be nice to have the option for free drop-off
1431 Limiting plastics to only screw cap bottles, 1 and 2, is way to restrictive. Recycling
needs to be able to process plastic tubs in other numbers. That is a huge portion of
residential plastic trash.
1433 Keep pick up every other week. We use Aspen currently
1435 Please, please allow the residents of Ames to keep our current trash company and
not force us to go with just one company.
222
67
Back to Top
1436 The program is similar to what we did when we moved to Ames in 2011. Then we
were told that everything just went to the resource recovery center, so we separated
glass and cardboard and sent the rest.
1437 Make it easy for private trash companies to pick up the recycling bins so we can keep
all of our trash and recycling with one entity. Continue to allow residents to choose
their trash company.
1438 You should add weekly curbside composting as well for additional trash reduction.
More people would compost if you had that.
1439 We don’t want to leave the waste to energy program. This was something we deeply
love about our community.
1442 I could make it work but prefer using drop off
1443 We’ve never recycled so it’s hard to think we’d have yet another bill when things are
already very expensive
1445 I'd be very glad to have it. usually it all just goes in the trash except glass sometimes
1448 I’m very excited. I think education is importantly and to be sure to provide materials
that support public buy-in for this program to be a success.
1449 My large cans sit outside. Maybe there could be an option for a smaller kitchen.
Garbage size can to add recycling and then that can be dumped in the large can on a
less frequent basis. It would be challenging to walk outside with a specific piece of
recycling multiple times a day, especially during bad weather. I know some newer
kitchen remodels have options for two trash cans in a pullout drawer. But most
homes and Ames barely have space for one normal trashcan in the kitchen so I could
see that being a barrier.
1456 Hate to see streets lined with garbage cans
1457 A waste food a bio mass digestion system that could add energy back to the power
plant and reduce that waste that can't be recycled
1458 I want to make sure the recycling actually goes into sustainable recycling and not just
sold off into landfills as a end spot
1460 This would be amazing!!
1463 I feel it's sad that politics were allowed to influence the path of what was a great
resource for trash disposal and energy production. Reinvesting in the original process
with coal or gasification is the fiscal and environmentally responsible choice
Transporting our trash to other locations will cost more and have a negative
environmental impact. A transparent investigation should be conducted.
223
68
Back to Top
1469 Please start this service!
1474 Please have a clear printed/printable graphic of allowable items
1479 Get rid of can and bottle deposit. In Illinois we recycled almost as much as trash on a
weekly basis! I didn't have to worry about getting my money back from deposits ams
finding a place to turn in my cans and bottles.
1480 Another community I lived in also did composting. Is that on the horizon as well to
remove food waste from the dump?
1483 I LOVE the idea of having a municipal recycling program in Ames! This is a very
important service for the community, and also for the health/sustainability of our
planet. I would think that local drop off sites for glass would not be needed, but some
limited local cardboard drop off, especially for bulk events (think moving boxes) would
still be helpful.
1485 The biggest question I have had about the current recycling initiative is why only
twist-off plastics are able to be recycled and not other plastics. I usually end up
separating my plastics and taking my non twist off plastics to my mother in law in a
different community so she can recycle them. The other thing I would like to see
would be for the City to provide a LOT of education to residents about how to
appropriately recycle. For example, do labels have to be off containers, how clean do
they have to be, etc. I always hear that a lot of recycled material ends up getting
landfilled anyway because it wasn't recycled "appropriately", so would love to see
education on this.
1490 I have a bunch of questions that should be answered in your communications
strategy for this change: Some waste management companies already offer curbside
recycling. Would the city's recycling fee be competitive with waste management
companies? If we preferred to contract with our current waste management company,
would we still be obligated to pay the city utility fee anyway? Is it required to
participate in the city's recycling program, or can residents opt out?
1492 Some way to collect the "other" plastics not considered recyclable (fast food plastic,
plastc lids, straws, & cups)
1494 I really wish you would still burn trash, this makes me so sad.
1495 Recycling enters (both independent and publicly run) have a notoriously awful
reputation everywhere. Unless the City were to include a verifiable and consiatent
compliance audit of any and all recycling organizations involved, I would not be
interested and do not believe it to be worth the cost.
1497 Apartment dwellers need more options. We're left out of most initiatives in Ames.
224
69
Back to Top
1499 Instead of forcing people to recycle try adding incentives. Maybe work with trash
companies to lower prices for those who recycle or utility costs go down for those that
recycle. But trying to force people to recycle is damaging to or freedom of choice and
will make people think twice before moving to Ames.
1501 Recycling bin for our multi-family residence.
1508 I prefer to not sort recyclables so a container for all recyclables is a great idea.
1509 Would like to see additional items like batteries and yard waste offered
1510 I would be more interested in curb side recycling that was sorted as I understand
single container recycling is not always effective.
1512 don't want this to increase waste truck traffic on residential streets. concerned,
unmentioned in survey -- how we will handle organic waste???? literally a messy
issue, but huge consideration for waste and water. maybe neighborhood drop-offs
can be established? maybe the city could offer rebates for rotate-able compost bins?
the goal overall should be to reduce the volume of waste.
1513 I live within a mile of Ames but have no idea if Ames will be willing to take my
recyclables even if I pay.
1514 Must be cost neutral
1522 Lived in Austin, TX for many years and this is how we did it. Had a container/curbside
designated for recyclables.
1526 We have too many we have too many trash trucks on the road.
1529 my carrier will charge more
1530 Curb side Yard waste pick up needs to happen.the lack of options is ridiculous.
1534 Before this starts, maybe send out information about how to recycle plastics.
1535 Cardboard bundling should be an option somehow.
1536 None. Do it!
1538 Mor likely to recycle
1539 We regularly make trips to the drop-off site at the Resource Recovery Plant,
occasionally making a special trip or driving out-of-the way otherwise. Excited to not
have to do this, both to save time and gas. Would like to see carriers separated by
street as we have 2-3 different carriers serving our small circle. I've always been
proud of Ames cutting edge, but agree that it is time for something better. Be bold.
225
70
Back to Top
1542 Sections of city handled by different contract haulers for competitive advantage. Like
each voting district with a different hauler.
1543 No to this idea
1544 Should have recycling options downtown and in campus and tailgating.
1546 Why? They just combine the recycling containers into the same vehicle and landfill
everything.
1548 Would the private contractor for the pick ups be paying the city for recyclables?
Would that offset the cost passed on to residents for the recycling? I think charging
residents for the service would "force" more people to recycle since they would be
paying for it anyway.
1552 I love this idea!
1557 I hope we don't have multiple recycling companies driving around Ames like we do
trash pick up. One company per neighborhood works fine.
1560 What recycling options are there for plastics not #1 or #2? Why can't they be recycled
or why can't manufacturers use #1 and #2 instead? ALSO, the City and ISU need to
do a much better job of educating and encouraging residents to stop throwing usable
items into the trash. It's epidemic and shameful in Ames. No excuses when we have
so many outlets for used items. I appreciate all that ISU and Ames are trying to do,
but public education (and public caring) are unfortunately still too low.
1561 Thank you for pursuing this
1562 Please establish Ames as an example city for recycling. We can do this and this is
important to our community, city, state, and the planet.
1563 What we need is something like Cycles Recycling. I loved them so much! My HoA
didn't have a leg to stand on whining about "too many heavy trucks on the roads"
because it was bikes. I was able to have my recycling, and they came to my door,
used small containers that was all I needed every month. It was so great and I was
very sad when the closed doors. To add, there's reason why the order of the
sustainability mantra is REDUCE, reuse, recycle. What does reduce and reuse look
like for our community?
1564 Find a processor that can take all numbers of plastic. Would you still bill people who
do not have a container for pickup? Could there be neighborhood containers so not
everyone has to have one?
1565 The sooner this happens, the better!
1566 Lower frequency - incentivized by self-drop off - encourages breaking down
cardboard and washing off organics, in my opinion. Taking advantage of this, I would
226
71
Back to Top
support a fee per pick-up and a schedulable pick-up as it encourages households to
cache as much as possible (which has the advantage of fewer pick ups, broken down
cardboard, and less organics). I feel compelled to ask why plastic recycling is
included. It has the least recycle value and is hardest to break down, increasing costs
of the program.
1570 What about metal?
1573 Compost?
1574 It would raise our rates exponentially! Being on a fixed income, I can't afford that!
1575 We do have concerns about increased truck traffic on our streets (due to emissions
and street damage). We're so glad that Ames is implementing a curbside recycling
program, and we hope that there are considerations to avoid the issues we are
currently facing with trash pick-up, where everyone has different providers on the
same street, which increases emissions and street damage and decreases efficiency.
We answered "very important" to questions 10-12 because the proposed program
says it won't include larger multi-family housing (and there are a lot of apartment and
condo complexes in Ames). If curbside recycling is available for larger multi-family
housing as well, then we don't think the cardboard and glass pick-up sites are as
important. But if curbside will not be available, it's very important to have that option
for students and others, like us, who live in larger multi-family housing.
1576 This would be great!
1577 I'm pleased it's going to happen in Ames
1579 Please consider allowing #5 plastics to be recycled seeing as those are most fruit and
salad containers which make up a majority of our plastic waste.
1581 I recycle through Aspen and I regularly have 4-5 times or more recycling volume than
trash. It's amazing how much is recycling
227
72
Back to Top
ID# 15. What barriers may your household have to curbside recycling? (no character
limit)
2 Containers to separate and bring them to recycling center
4 None
5 Test
14 My only barrier would be whether or not I produce enough recyclable materials to
warrant the cost to me. But I do support the city going in this direction.
16 Space to put a large recycling container, or ways to filter containers so it doesn’t
contain non recyclable materials
17 Cost. $20 a month or less seems reasonable to try and keep recyclables out of the
trash stream.
18 Cost - if it's too expensive we won't do it.
19 fees
22 Cost
24 Bin storage maybe
27 Some weeks heavier than other
29 People are less likely to use it.
30 Cost is obviously a factor but otherwise we are on board!
33 Just raise in billing.
34 I don't have access to it because my landlord does not provide that service.
38 None
40 We travel often. Would we have to pay when we are not using the service?
42 Cannot afford to pay for curbside recycling. Should not be mandatory.
43 None! I’ll even sort it if needed!
44 None
48 Similar to recycling in ISU dorms, multi-family units with a single recycling location
may collect more contamination with the use of trash bags. Not everyone understands
how to recycle (especially students.) Ensuring that it is clearly marked recycling is
important!
228
73
Back to Top
47 No barriers at all
52 Time to sort and developing habits to sort trash items
53 None. I need this
56 remembering to put the bins out to the curb
57 No barriers! Ames is behind the times in not having this in place. Let’s do this!
59 Living in apartment and having the necessary big enough things for everyone true
cycle with
64 None
69 I think it is costly to do have recycling each week.
70 None
71 Single disabled person. Cant always get cart to curb. Would collectors get & return
cart if designated as disabled?
72 additional expense.
76 I don't like the idea of paying an additionL fee in addition to what I pay now for trash
removal.
79 None
80 Cost.
81 Too high of a cost
83 Getting it out to the end of my driveway.
86 difficult to remember every other week pick up, make it the same for everyone so
easier to remember when you see neighbors carts at the curbside
88 Cost
89 Potentially cost, room for another bin, remembering to wheel it out and to start
separating recycling
93 none - we had it before and miss it
98 Just make sure to give clear instructions or a visual guide on the container about pre-
cleaning, and what is/isn't recyclable so we don't accidentally "wish-cycle" the wrong
things. Like, are k-cups okay if grounds are emptied, etc.?
229
74
Back to Top
105 None
107 The biggest barrier would be if cost for this service is too high. We would be eager to
participate if cost was not too high.
109 cost of service
114 Money!!! The last thing I want to do is find more money somewhere, that I don’t have,
for some kind of new fee that will be added to a city bill. There is ZERO indication in
the other online story/news post, about how much this could be. The other
barrier…just throwing trash out. Now 4 people in our household can’t just throw stuff in
our kitchen trash can? We have to be thinking about separating. I have NO space for a
second trash can in my kitchen. And I don’t want to walk outside every time to throw a
specific recycling item away. No attached garage so no option to have the recycle bin
in a useful location.
115 recycling containers picked up every other week become sticky smelly rodent and
insect magnets. Recycling has been proven to largely be a scam/raquet. Hard pass on
this whole idea. Option to opt out please.
117 We currently recycle glass mostly because it does not cost as any extra fees even
though it takes time to wash jars. You are asking us to continue recycling but now we
will be charged for it. It does not make sense.
118 One that I can forseeu.
119 I feel like cost depending on amount would be the biggest factor for me
122 No room for containers. Make neighborhood look like junk yard.
123 None!
126 None
129 Space to have another container in the garage besides our garbage can.
132 I have a long driveway that is half gravel and half paved. My current refuse collector
walks up the gravel portion to collect my trash. On many occasions in the winter
months, I would not be able to roll a recycling cart over the gravel portion to the curb.
As noted in no. 14, there is no provision in your current plan for food waste recycling. I
would still have to continue driving to the recycling plant to divert my food waste. This
omission makes the proposed program not very practical for me.
134 Prefer to have smaller container picked up more frequent
138 Would be easier for us than using the current dropoff
230
75
Back to Top
139 None
148 None
149 Cost
150 Cost
152 Before living in Ames, I always recycled because it was so convenient. I lived in a
small rural town and we had to buy city-specific garbage bags, but that allowed for
curb-side recycling - was super convenient and easy and also was a short drive to the
recyling containers. The primary reason I haven't recylced since moving to Ames is
the cost to do so, as well as living in a rental, space is already quite limited, so to hold
on to recycleables until I have time to drop them off is not feasible. I end up throwing
everything (including soda cans since can redemption is also no longer convenient),
but figured was okay since Ames used the energy from burning waste, figured that
was a good alternative.
153 Costs. I also do not notice any solutions to yard and limb waste. That is more needed
in my opinion. Currently the only people that can utilize the yard waste days are
people with trucks that can wait in line half a day to get rid of sticks.
158 None
170 None
171 Like it!
172 When I travel for enjoyment or to help family, I need to find someone to manage my
bin.
174 Cost
177 Weather
178 There are no barriers currently. With free choice of what garbage service we use in
Ames there are no barriers.
179 Multifamily housing complex
180 Already paid according to Womens’ Club demands.
181 None
184 Space in garage to keep the container
188 Cost may be too high.
231
76
Back to Top
189 Potential cost
190 The time and inconvenience of having to separate and clean glass, plastic and cans
from regular trash, keeping another bin in the house to do so, keeping 2 large cans
outside.
192 I’m not paying for it.
193 Can we have a choice is choosing private hauler?
194 Getting the can to the curb, ensuring things are clean if that is a requirement
198 None
200 Cost. Finding a place for a third large containter (we already have garbage and yard
waste)
201 For me, I favor any recycling efforts. Only barrier I see is learning which type of
plastics can be recycled. Now I have figured out #2 plastic…will need to learn about
#1 plastic.
206 None!
208 None
215 Remembering to put out the container
223 Room to store the cart in our garage. The HOA prohibits keeping the van outside.
224 Cost of service
225 Cost of service
233 We want assurance that the recycling process truly takes place. In our previous
community, we recycled rigorously for years, only to later discover that the materials
were ultimately mixed with trash at the end. It was deeply disheartening. Transparency
about what happens to recycled items after collection is essential to build trust with
citizens and ensure successful participation in the program.
235 It seems people at my complex still haven't figured out how to throw away trash
properly, let alone recycle properly
238 None
239 Rural resident
244 Adding another big truck to our already busy garbage truck schedule would be
unpleasant.
232
77
Back to Top
245 Cost
260 No barriers.
270 All the unsightly containers at homes and on the curb
275 None
276 My household currently uses a monthly private garbage service ($23/month). The
curbside recycling program does not accept some plastics, and using it would not
allow us to cancel our existing service, so there is no cost savings. In addition, strong
winds can tip over bins, large bins take up space, and cleaning recyclables adds extra
effort. Unless the program can accept all plastics and offer a clear reduction in
household expenses, the personal effort and cost outweigh the benefits.
278 I am concerned about cost. I am also concerned if recycling works.
281 Knowledge that most "recycled" plastic does not get recycled and goes to landfill. Do
your research people!!!
283 Storing a second bin. Old habits.
284 Monthly cost
285 We live in a multi-family building (over 6 residences)
286 Remembering when it goes out!
287 None
301 None
305 none, we already do this with a different company
310 Not keen on having a 3rd 96 gallon container to store along with regular trash and
yard waste...
314 Not sure where we will put the container. We have a nice (expensive) garbage can
enclosure outside that hides the view from others, but it only fits our one garbage can
328 We live on a cul-de-sac. No place to store the Cart
331 Cost
332 In multifamily areas, such as apartments, if the landlord doesn't take it seriously,
residents wont, potentially leading to "contaminated" or trash on recycle bins.
334 must be able to combine all items, i.e., no need to separate
233
78
Back to Top
336 No room to store the cart!
338 None except cost
340 Apparently, living in a large apartment complex.
344 I don’t have any, but could see options helpful to those with smaller garages or who
(like my mother) are not strong enough to handle a large tote - especially in winter.
345 I'm not sure what to do with different light bulbs and batteries. Are all types of light
bulbs considered glass? Can I throw used batteries in the garbage?
352 The cost of living is very high right now. Imagining my utilities going up any higher
makes me anxious.
353 Would food garbage still be available?
355 Increased city bill
357 Cost
358 None
363 What to do with Other misc recyclable materials
368 Cost for pickup
371 My household would have no problems but would not need a large container; single
family hshlds with kids would probably need large containers. Multi-family locations
would need multiple large containers.
373 Cost
376 None
380 separating recyclables before putting into the cans
389 Senior community where the majority could not physically manage it.
395 N/A
399 Hopefully not over priced.
405 None
15 None
234
79
Back to Top
412 Since I live in a multi family complex, and we have limited space in our parking lot, it
may take some work with management to find the best location for a recycling bin
between pick-up dates.
414 We would definitely need to adjust our habits after 10+ years of living in Ames and
throwing out everything but cans and glass! Perhaps a fridge magnet or similar
showing what can/cannot be recycled would be helpful for households?
417 Not interested in anything that add to any costs.
423 None
425 We just don't believe the cost, procedures, rules, etc. of a program like this are truly
worth it. In the end it just makes people feel good more than actually help the
environment.
427 Cost
431 Cost
433 Added cost
436 I am concerned about cost. There is no estimate of cost and I anticipate a monopoly
where the cost will be very limiting.
437 None
439 As mentioned above, no room in a single garage for an additional container.
443 none
444 none
445 None
446 Cost for this service.
451 Location
454 Money. It depends on the cost, but I already go to the recovery center
455 None
460 Cost.
463 None
474 None here.
235
80
Back to Top
476 Not understanding recyclable products need to be cleaned prior to their disposal.
484 None
485 None
490 None. We do it already.
492 The cost. What would the fee be added to our utility bill? With no clear answer on that,
it’s hard to be okay with this as the cost is a big factor for many residents. Would I be
able to opt out of this if I’d rather just drop off for free?
495 We might choose to take things to RR some of the time since sorting-at-source is a bit
more effective. However there will be times when we would appreciate the
convenience of just accumulating things in a bin.
497 Depending on the fee, that could impact some people.
498 Monthly cost
499 Does it actually get recycled? I have heard so many stories that recycling just ends up
in landfill, and I don’t want to pay extra for that.
500 A large metal container would take one of 15 parking spots.
501 Makes neighborhoods look bad with cans/ containers everywhere, smell, issues with
things blowing around from storms and storage of containers
502 The cost for something I already do independently and free of charge (dropping off at
RR). Also, storage of another container in my garage is not ideal and I do not want to
store outside.
503 None
505 Cost. Where to store the bin.
509 N/a
511 None
512 None
516 None
518 Limited space to put recycling container. I already have a garage can and yard waste
can.
519 none
236
81
Back to Top
527 Space
537 None
538 The cost should be part of the fees that our property taxes pay, shouldn’t be an
additional fee if everyone is required to do it.
539 I am 83 and it is getting harder and harder to even get my garbage can to the curb -
especially in the winter months when the drive is wet or slick. I am also not able to
haul it to the resource recovery and load and unload it from my car.
543 Space in the the recycling cart - rarely will be an issue if 96 gal.
546 Place to keep an additional container. We’ll figure out something to make it work.
547 Paying for it. I’m an older adult on a fixed income.
555 Condo association logistics.
556 NA
559 N/A
562 None, would LOVE to pay the city for this service instead of a private provider! We
would love for the trash to be streamlined also, as we currently have several garbage
trucks come down our street every day, and if that could be reduce to one it would be
amazing!!! We have been very proud of our waste-to-energy here in Ames and are
incredibly sad to see it go :(
563 Knee jerk reaction is never the way to make a decision and this is all that this decision
is
565 It needs to be an bin with a lid, as it will need to stay outside as we do not have a
garage.
566 Cost…hopefully it won’t be too much.
568 Additional fees.
569 Cost
570 Price
576 Simply the cost. If the cost is reasonable, we're 100% on board
580 The price
581 Unsure what items could be included.
237
82
Back to Top
584 N/A
585 Cost.
586 None-we use the drop off site at least every other week
588 I don’t want “can collectors” (homeless or otherwise) coming on our property and
digging through our recycling looking for cans and bottles to redeem at ABC.
592 Cost of service
595 None
596 None. I would love for Ames to offer recycling
597 not sure
610 None
611 None, please please please offer this! It's long overdue in a city like Ames.
612 My age and lack of interest.
616 The expense
619 Recycling needs to be convenient otherwise people won't do it
621 Not cost effective for the amount of recyclables our household produces when the
drop-off locations are free
622 None. I currently separate and recycle all these items and drop the at the Resource
Recovery Plant. Can i opt out of the curbside pick-up and continue what i am currently
doing ?
626 None
628 Lack of wind protection.
631 Not filling it up fast enough
639 NO place to store the cart!! Living on a fixed income I don't need another $5.00 on my
utility bill. How many days of the week does a garbage truck go my house with this
program another truck will be on our city streets................. Also I look out a window
and see neighbor's garbage carts at the curb EVERY DAY! NO one wants to see
another cart on out their window!
641 I don't have an issue; but older people might need help if they need to get these to the
curb as well
238
83
Back to Top
643 None
648 My biggest concern would be cost of the program. We would likely be fine with the
monthly bill increase, but I worry about how it may strain finances of other families if it
exceeds around 10 dollars per month.
650 None
654 None
656 Besides where to put the cart, none for me. I can imagine the added expense will
deter many from electing to participate though
658 None
662 cost
663 Having a place to store the containers may be an issue.
665 Room and containers inside the house to store materials for recycling before they are
taken to the outside bin(s).
667 if fee is too high for our small household
669 My question would be with college students, and what options they would have for
recycling. Would you require apartment buildings to have a recycling only bin?
675 out of town, older household
679 Space in garage for another bin. But I would make this work.
680 No barriers.
686 Having the space to put the extra recycle bin outside of the house as to not make the
neighborhoods look trashy when people leave them out at the end of the driveway
more than a week! what fines would be put in place to make sure people are using
the possibly new program? Older adults in the community who aren't able to move
one let alone two trash bins. Is it possible for their to be a bin that can handle all the
recycling with a flip lid to put glass/plastic in one side then paper/cardboard on the
other side.
691 Extra work
693 No room for another container in the townhome garage. Completely opposed to a
mandatory recycling program.
697 None noted
239
84
Back to Top
698 None? We love it
701 Fixed income
702 Don't want another can in garage
709 Price
710 Curbside with everything accepted in one receptacle takes care of the main barriers.
After that the uncertainty around doing things correctly is next.
712 None
720 Cost
722 The fee for pick up would need to be reasonable, which is a reason we did not utilize
Waste Management for trash which did offer recycling for an additional (expensive)
fee.
725 Can't think of any
727 The cost would really be the largest factor. If it was more than $10/month, I would
likely pass on participating. It would be ideal if it was free, it was in my previous
community and we rarely had more than 1 regular bag of trash a week.
731 Cleaning and sorting recyclables
732 I currently pay for Aspen for trash + recycling ($80 a month total) and live in West
Ames. For me to purchase a different company/use Ames, it would have to be similar
in price. It would also be cool if you could pay for the recycling on it's own so
neighbors can share resources easier (like one pays for trash and the other recycling).
738 You don't describe that the recycling should be clean. It's this no longer necessary?
743 NONE
744 Going from no cost to the cost is a barrier.
746 My garage is small and I’m sure the hoa will not allow a container outside.
750 Nothing, but maybe guidance/education on recycling and rules may be helpful for
some people and may help the system be more successful.
751 Cost
752 If all of this recycling can be done via one container, the barriers are very low.
753 Cost and if no options to do 1 time a month pick up .
240
85
Back to Top
756 Cost
757 Another fee and another thing to remember to do.
764 Finding a place to store a second big outdoor bin
766 We want to keep system we have that is better for environment, landfills are a horrible
option, should only be used if absolutely necessary
771 We have 3 kids and 2 foster kids- cost is the barrier we haven’t done it yet
772 None
776 None
777 the cost
782 None
783 Remembering the pick up schedule.
785 Understanding proper identification of recyclable materials
788 Only that we currently live in a larger multi-famiky residence.
793 Forgetting to roll ot to the curb.
794 Remembering the pick-up day.
796 N/A
797 None
803 none at this time
804 It will depend on what the final rules are! What are the options if we do not sign up?
What will the cost be? Will we have to pay a fee even if we do not sign up? We are
all for this potential program depending on cost, but cannot commit at this time due to
the vagueness of this survey and the lack of information on rules at this time.
805 WHO does the separation . NEED much more education of ALL CITIZENS
806 How fully cleaned it needs to be first. Getting into the habit. The worst is if it's
confusing (e.g., some kinds of paper but not others).
807 None
808 storage space for container
241
86
Back to Top
809 We’re frugal… how much will it cost? Would it be viable to just give everyone a
recycling and compost bin and „charge“ us for it through taxes? Personally, I would
feel better about it that way. The cost per person would be dramatically reduced if
everyone was forced to participate (or pay whether they participate or not) and the
system would be more efficient that way. Also, does this mean that there will no longer
be so many waste haulers driving around town? It’s always bugged me the amount of
traffic and duplicative emissions from having numerous different providers coming
through each neighborhood. (I think Iowa City’s compost program is socialized like
this. Maybe look at their model?)
813 Room to store another receptacle/bin
814 Definitely cost. This needs to be a very affordable program otherwise many families
won't or will not be able to utilize it.
817 Story County residents will need a *very* easy way to drop off recycling. Maybe
containers in each community if you aren't going to do curbside pick up?
820 I do not have garbage pickup service.
827 General laziness
851 Cost
852 None. It would make our lives so much easier.
853 None
855 Have to take it someone currently which isn’t realistic
858 None, other than more and more items are becoming recyclable and staying updated
would be needed. There are a lot of students in Ames, no one wants more fees.
Figure out how to implement city money to encourage and motivate residents to
recycle.
859 Cost, space
863 None. I love recycling!!
868 we live in an apartment, but would be willing to walk to a recycle bin
869 For me, following a schedule for pick-up is more of a challenge than dropping it off at
the resource plant as needed.
870 Not me, but some of my neighbors have trouble lifting heavy items. People with
disabilities may need help accessing these things.
871 None.
242
87
Back to Top
872 The cost
882 cost. I can't afford it. I am willing to wash out cans and jars if it is free.
889 theft
892 none
893 Nine
898 None
900 None. This is a fantastic service!
902 Lack of knowledge on if this is truly the most sustainable way to handle waste. Is it just
getting shipped to China??
906 Large number of large cardboard don't fit well in bin. Need to keep drop off site.
907 space to store another bin
910 None!
913 I would like to see recycling picked up each week. Make recycling required. It's not
that hard!
914 When I lived in Germany, there were different color bags available for the different
types of recycled/trash - diapers went into black, hazardous medical waste was red,
non hazardous medical waste was blue, general household waste was yellow, etc.
This made sorting the items easier/safer for all. With everything going into one bin
without can liners, things would get messy and people would stop trying.
919 Space to sort the recycling from the trash
922 Mainly cost passed to the residents. Also the time it takes to sort the recyclables.
Mainly the increased expense for the service.
923 The additional cost.
925 Time, space, odors, additional truck traffic, low confidence that curbside recycling
really reduces landfill waste
930 Same as #8, cost considering your garbage pick up is an entire fee alone. Storage
area for another large container.
932 I don't forsee any barriers. We have been recycling for many years.
933 Kids
243
88
Back to Top
935 Zero.
936 Don’t want to pay for it
939 None, takes away barriers.
940 Price, if it too costly I won’t like it. If it costs $10 per month when I’m paying $0 now
that won’t work.
941 Not enough space in containers for multi-family units
945 Space and income
952 Six unit apartment complex w/o specified recycling container oresently
954 Cost, can't trust the City of Ames. You all will make excuses to charge residents more
money with no justification
961 I live in multifamily setting
962 Cost. Storage of another large plastic refuse container.
963 Just containers with food is all.
968 None
969 Remembering the day to put it out on
970 Again, this is a big change. Years of habits need to be changed. Two biggest barriers
are education and space. It would be nice to have well done, displayable, cute
reminders to put near trash cans or cute containers to seperate in to prior to going
outside.
974 Old broken furniture and small household machines
976 Cost
977 None
988 Fees
990 No recycling
995 None
996 Cost
1006 Fees
244
89
Back to Top
1012 None
1014 cost associated with the fee that will be automatically added to utility bill
1016 I live in a 60+ community
1018 No pickup at GH.
1020 No barriers for me. Living in a retirement community requires 'buy in' into the benefits
of this program.
1024 N/A
1027 Getting it to the curb. The small hill of my driveway qay is difficult for me already.
1032 None
1034 I’m concerned about cost as that is why o don’t recycle now…
1036 None
1037 Having another large smelly container on property
1038 Nowhere to put additional can
1040 None...very excited to see this program
1047 cost
1048 Broken glass… I have observed broken glass by the yellow dumpsters around town
1051 washing out and otherwise preparing items to be recycled
1053 Inadequate room for another garbage container. You are forcing residents to do all the
work and then you have the nerve to charge us a fee for your program!
1054 NONE
1061 None
1062 We live in a multi family complex so individual bins may not be practical.
1064 We have very little trash as is. It would take months to fill a 96 gallon can and that
size would take up too much space in our garage.
1065 I love in Gilbert but gave not had recycling because of the waste to energy program in
ames. What options will we have?
1081 Cost
245
90
Back to Top
1089 I worry about the cost. Is this opt in? Is the fee minimal?
1090 No space for recycling bin
1094 None
1095 Very little space available in our garage for an additional garbage can
1102 None.
1108 Cost
1109 None.
1110 Cost
1112 Studio apartment (small size bien preferred)
1117 None for us at this time but appreciate that this question is included in the survey.
1118 Cost.
1119 This isn't a barrier, but how will these mixed recyclables get sorted?
1121 No barriers except MAYBE space in the garage for the bin—but we would figure that
out
1123 Some days it's difficult for me or my husband to get the the garbage can to the curb,
would help be available?
1126 None
1127 Costs. Paying for 2 services for garbage/recycling pickup. How many different
containers would be used. Since this would be new it will be a huge learning curve
about what goes where.
1128 Place to store in my garage
1130 We do not have a driveway at the front of our house. WE ARE NOT HAULING
ANYTHING ACROSS THE YARD OR THROUGH DRIFTS OF SNOW TO
PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROGRAM. H
1131 I would have trouble with weight of items and being outside in bad weather.
1132 Disability. Our current hauler comes into our back yard and picks up our trash.
1140 No barriers, just complete attitude change. Adjustment period may take a while.
1143 None
246
91
Back to Top
1145 Hassle of separating out recyclable items, uncertainty about what can be recycled
1147 Knowing exactly what to recycle
1149 I would use the drop off because I compost food waste.
1154 Our HOA doesn't allow bins out except on collection day. We don't have room in our 1
car garage for 2 bins (regular and recycling).
1157 Depends on number and size of containers.
1158 Financial, knowing what actually can be recycled, vision
1161 Knowing exactly what I can recycle
1162 Finding space to store an additional container
1164 Senior housing, limited mobility for most.
1170 I personally don't see any barriers.
1171 None
1177 None
1179 Noted above.
1182 None
1189 Cost
1191 not going to pay for this
1196 Weekly pickup would be better ,easier to remember
1197 We have a trash and a yard waste bin and not much more space for a third bin, so a
smaller bin would probably be best for our two-person household. We compost and
use the city drop offs already
1198 Storing the extra container
1200 The fee
1203 I would like the drop-off sites to remain because ai use it a lot as a Story Coun
1205 Our janitor handle this for the art building complex
1213 No room to store the cart!
247
92
Back to Top
1216 It would be preferable to have recycling and garbage picked up the same day to
reduce the number of trips required.
1217 Cost
1222 None
1223 I have the hardest time remembering what can be recycled and what can't
1227 None
1228 Storage space for cart
1232 Storing another container
1241 None
1243 Transportation
1247 Just another thing to do, to separate out. Easier just to throw everything in one bag
and have machines do the sorting like the mrf does
1248 If it costs too much money
1254 space for another trash container - we live in a townhome and share a driveway
1255 None
1257 Space to store the container
1258 None. Just do it already
1260 Cost over free drop sites
1261 Cost for some residents. (Not an issue for our household.)
1263 Cost of the fee on utility bill..
1265 Very confused as to what can and can't go in. How clean certain things need to be etc
1269 Storage of a bin. There should be an option for bin size each household wants.
1275 Paying for what is currently free? What if i rarely use the service, is there still a fee? I
hear stories about how people take the time to separate recycles and then they all get
thrown together and burned or buried.waste of peoples time and money.
1284 None
1287 I don't want to have another canI don't want to have another can.
248
93
Back to Top
1288 Understanding what plastics might not be accepted, and running out of room in the
cart if pickup is not weekly.
1289 Not in favor of curbside recycling
1290 Additional space that is needed to a bin
1293 I would need a city grant to enlarge my 3 sided trashcan hiding fence. The current one
is only large enough for one (1) poly cart. I am guessing a $400 grant would help me
hire someone to build the new fence to hide the new poly cart.
1294 The recurring cost. I’d consider not recycling if it costs more.
1295 None
1296 Service cost
1298 We are working extremely hard to reduce expenses and this adds an expense that we
have no control of.
1300 Cost
1303 Training residents to recycle
1305 None.
1307 Cannot manage container.
1308 Cost
1310 I am 83 and it is especially hard for me to get down the drivewaywhen we have ice or
snow on the ground. Many times I have to wait for a better day.
1311 I am in a multi-family housing arrangement with senior citizens. It will be exciting to
see what options become available down the road! A barrier to senior citizens is
change. And learning new tricks!
1314 The big bin - handling it in winter
1315 None
1324 Cost
1063 None that I can think of now.
1326 None
1329 None
249
94
Back to Top
1331 None
1332 None
1340 Remembering what can go in the recycling and what shouldn't. A magnet or flyer
would be great that could be put on my fridge as a reminder would be helpful.
1349 Sorting trash, space to store recycling before pick up, any requirements related to
cleaning before recycling
1351 We Live in the country. I imagine this would add an extra trip to the already stressed
collection companies. Do they have the staff to support? How much will it cost?
1354 None- excited for the opportunity to recycle and hope it doesn't end up hauled
off/dumped in waters/oceans
1356 moving the container to the front - currently use the alley for garbage pick-up
1357 Financial issues could arise if we’re forced to pay for services we won’t use when
they’re already free to use the self service containers.
1358 What to recycle, need list
1363 None
1370 Snow and ice condition in winter. Odor and insects, possible attracting mice for any
time over one to two days.
1376 Having no vehicle
1380 Cost of yet another monthly service fee
1384 time, space and cost
1385 Space for container.
1395 Paying for it. The cost of living is already high enough. I don’t need another bill.
1400 None
1402 Cost
1404 Storing another trash can
1414 None
1417 Curbside would be a waste of resources. Our family of 4 would take 2 months to fill a
96 gallon receptacle, and I believe we would be the norm. Consequently, you’d have
trucks burning fuel driving all over town picking up mostly empty containers.
Additionally, I don’t want to have to store another large container in the garage. I
250
95
Back to Top
would prefer if the current system were expanded with more drop off points around
town.
1424 Cost
1426 Half of my waste is organic matter from litterbox cleaning
1431 None. We currently use curb side recycling and would like the city to provide the
service.
1433 None
1434 Training ourselves on how to separate trash and recycling.
1435 I'm concerned about having broken glass on our property from when the recycling
company comes to get the recycled materials. Also, the time it may take to take off
paper around metal cans.
1436 Just remembered which week is the one to set out the container.
1437 Cost
1439 We would probably stick with our private hauler?
1442 I prefer to use the resource recovery station location for recycling so that I can dispose
of recycling on my own schedule.
1443 Cost
1445 none i can think of
1448 Not sure yet.
1449 Explained above. I probably open my trashcan for a small family of 350 times a day. I
think 50% of that would probably qualify as recycling. I’m not going to walk through my
house and out of back slider to access my large curbside trash cans every time I need
to throw one piece away. I wonder if the city could supply small kitchen cans that are
labeled for recycling
1451 Additional Cost
1454 None
1456 Old
1457 None
1460 None! We would use this option to its fullest capabilities
251
96
Back to Top
1462 Forget to use, as we are so used to not recycling things, if it becomes difficult to do, or
it costs a lot, then it could be a barrier
1465 It would be tedious and annoying
1471 Ease of cars to drive through
1478 Knowing what to do to prepare and collect recyclables. Written directions with photos
could be helpful to show what can be recycled .
1479 If I paid a bottle deposit on something I would not recycle it because I would need to
get my deposit money back. Everything else i would recycle.
1481 I live in a 30 unit multi family building. Without available bins, we don’t have room to
collect recyclables. Our condo is on the smaller side.
1483 Making sure I have the right list of things to deposit. I've seen bins deployed with signs
on them to avoid "Wishcycling" incorrect items that have to be sorted out. Definitely
prefer single stream and no bags.
1484 Remembering what materials (which plastics) are recyclable and which are not.
1485 No barriers besides education around what is and isn't acceptable!
1492 N/A
1494 We live on a really tight budget and most times I have declined the recycling programs
because of the fees.
1495 See previous answer.
1497 Inclement weather may move the recycling bin if it's too light, and drunk people may
puke or urinate in it.
1498 It would be better to accept more types of plastic but #1 & #2 is better than nothing
and good place to start.
1499 I don’t want to be forced to pay money to recycle.
1508 Storage and space for container.
1509 Low desire to find space for yet another container of that size, also separating waste
streams can be a hassle
1512 I'd like $ incentive/reward for reduced volumes of waste and recycle. I pay now for
full trash service /week that I simply don't need.
252
97
Back to Top
1513 Please see #14. I am very careful about sorting and cleaning recyclables, but for all I
know, Ames will no longer allow me to drop off my recyclables or my garbage even if I
am willing to pay more than I do now to be able to do so.
1514 None
1515 Cost compared to our current provider
1516 Storing recycling bin
1520 Concerns about increased cost.
1522 Not having a bin and pickup services.
1524 We live in a 55+ retirement community with 28 units. Many residents seem to be
interested in recycling. I would think if we had 2or3 of the 96gal. carts they would
probably need to be emptied once a week.
1528 I remember years ago we a yellow buckets with glass to recycle. We put ours out to be
picked up. But someone came by and dumped the bucket and broke most of the
glass. I had to try and clean all the glass off my lawn. So I'm concerned that could
happen again.
1529 cost. timely pickup
1535 Storage of bins and separate bins indoors
1536 None. Do it!
1539 None!
1540 Cost
1542 Cart has to be kept outside. I don't have a garage. Bins after football games would be
full of recycling too often.
1544 Just need education on it. Didn’t recycle before because used for energy. Would be
nice option to have available.
1546 Why? They just combine the recycling containers into the same vehicle and landfill
everything.
1548 None
1555 In my experience 96 gallon containers are very hard to maneuver. Smaller containers
should be available for senior citizens, single family housing, and for anyone with
limited mobility.
253
98
Back to Top
1560 None.
1562 None
1563 HoA (homeowner's association). Because of them I have no trash pick up and no
recycling now. They will probably continue to be an obstacle. I don't think they will
allow any curbside recycling.
1564 Knowing precisely what things can be recycled and how
1565 Need information to understand how to identify that the items are the correct
recyclable items.
1573 None
1574 Not requiring folks to separate their recyclables is pretty bad. Even at the present
recycling place, people don't separate appropriately, and there is no oversight!
1576 None!
1577 I can't think of any
1578 Sometimes out of town and may miss collection day. Therefore important to still have
drop off containers
1579 None
1581 None
254
Attachment B - Iowa Recycling Programs
*Ames & Ankeny: Free market for trash, pricing varies. Ames is also free market for recycling, the rate provided is an
average of the two haulers who offer recycling.
**Cedar Falls: Free market for recycling, $20 is the rate charged by the only hauler who offers weekly curbside recycling.
***Cedar Rapids: Only offers a 35-gallon trash cart.
$17.86 $17.50 $14.00 $14.65
$20.00
$5.02 $8.50 $4.85
$11.00
$4.58
$37.86
$22.52 $22.50
$19.50
$23.50
$16.81
$23.16
$20.00
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
$40
Ames*Ankeny*Cedar
Falls**
Cedar
Rapids***
Iowa City North
Liberty
Coralville Des
Moines
Dubuque Waukee
Monthly Fees
Trash (65 gal)Recycling Trash (65 gal) & Recycling Combined
255
Trash Recycling Trash &
Recycling
Recycling
Access
Recycling
Cart Size
(gal)
Recycling
Pickup
Frequency
Recycling
Cart
Ownership
Recycling
Collection
Operated By
Ames Free market $11.00 - Drop-off
only - - Free market Free market
Ankeny Free market $4.58 - Universal 48 - 96 Biweekly Waste
Authority Contractor
Cedar Falls $9.46 -
$27.84 $20.00 $29.46 -
$47.84
Drop-off
only - - Free market Free market
Cedar
Rapids $17.50 $5.02 $22.52 Universal 65 Weekly City City
Coralville - - $20.67 -
$23.50 Universal 65 Weekly City City
Des Moines - - $16.81 -
$17.91 Universal 96 Biweekly City City
Dubuque - - $17.25 -
$32.53 Universal 18 - 96 Weekly City City
Iowa City $14.00 $8.50 $22.50 Universal 65 Weekly City City
North
Liberty
$7.65 -
$14.65 $4.85 $12.50 -
$19.50 Universal 65 - 96 Weekly Contractor Contractor
Waukee - - $20.00 Universal 65 - 96 Weekly Contractor Contractor
256
Residential Curbside Recycling Program
Tuesday, November 18, 2025
257
Background
•Seeking Council direction on five key topics
1.Level of Access
2.Provider
3.Cart Ownership
4.Frequency of Service
5.Cart Size
•Direction will be incorporated into a
Request For Proposals (RFP)
•Resource Recovery and Recycling Campus (R3C)
•Increased recycling will be necessary due to:
•Ending waste-to-energy approach
•Desire to minimize tonnage of waste hauled to
Carroll County
•Iowa DNR fee – incentive to divert
•Alignment with Climate Action Plan
258
Survey Results
September 2 - 30, 2025
1,543 responses
•92% indicated they would participate in curbside
recycling
•72% agreed that every other week pickup would
be sufficient
•70%+ support for maintaining drop-off sites
•49% requesting smaller cart options
•79%+ feel confident recycling all material types
•Respondents were most uncertain about
plastic types
Top 3 Barriers
Identified
% of
Respondents
Cost 20%
Space for carts 15%
Material uncertainty 8%
259
1. Level of Access
Staff Recommendation:
A.Universal access with
all households
provided a cart
Level of Access Description
Estimated
Participation
Rate
(households)
Estimated
Diversion
Rate
(waste
tonnage)
OPTION D:
Drop-off site(s) only
Current approach. Lowest level of waste
diversion. 10%< 5%
OPTION C:
Curbside opt-in
Only residents who opt in will be charged for the
service and receive a cart. Higher fees likely, as
costs would be spread among a smaller rate
base.
20% - 30%~5%
OPTION B:
Curbside universal
charge, must opt-in to
receive a cart
All eligible residents are charged for the service
but must opt in to receive a cart. More complex
cart delivery logistics.
30% - 40%~10%
OPTION A:
Curbside universal
access
All eligible residents are charged for the service
and receive a recycling cart. Some increased
risk of contamination.
75%30%+
260
2. Provider
a)City-wide contract with one provider
•All participants charged a fee on their utilities bill
•Lower fees likely, consistent service and rules city-wide, full
transparency into diversion and participation, reduced truck traffic
•However, eliminates ability to choose a service provider
b)Require existing haulers to offer curbside recycling as a service
•Residents continue to coordinate services directly with haulers
•Two of seven existing haulers currently offer curbside recycling
•Less involvement from the City to establish and manage the services
•However, higher volume of truck traffic, varying services and
recycling rules, and little ability to track diversion rates
Staff Recommendation:
a)Solicit proposals for a City-
wide contract with a single
provider.
261
3. Cart Ownership
Approximately 14,500 carts would be needed. Under each option, the contractor would
handle cart delivery, maintenance, and repair services.
a)City-owned, contractor-procured:
•Contractor furnishes and maintains City-branded carts, which are amortized
over the contract; after this period, City assumes ownership.
•$1 added cost per month, per household, for five years.
•Carts are expected to last 15-20 years.
b)City-owned, city-procured:
•City independently procures carts for approximately $900,000 in capital.
Customer fees would repay the City for this investment.
•$0.50 cost per month, per household, for ten years (maintenance not included).
c)Contractor-owned:
•Contractor delivers and owns all carts.
•If the City switches contractors in the future, significant costs and disruptions
to service could occur during the transition.
Staff Recommendation:
a)City-owned,
contractor-procured
262
4. Frequency of Service
a)Every other week service
•Higher efficiency: fuller bins and fewer trips
•~20%-40% lower operational costs than
weekly collection
b)Weekly service
•Could result in slightly higher diversion rates
•Higher operational costs and increased truck
traffic
Staff Recommendation:
a)Every other week service
Image: https://www.rawpixel.com/image/9658286/image-public-domain-2022-work
263
5. Cart Size
a)Uniform, large cart size
•96 gallons
•Simplifies operations
•Space for more recyclables
•May be larger than necessary for
some
b)Different cart size options
•Could lead to higher satisfaction
•Higher cost and administrative
burden
Staff Recommendation:
a)Uniform, large cart size
Image: https://athensservices.com/residential-services/azusa/
264
Next Steps
•Multifamily Recycling Pilot
•Also seeking approval to carry out a
multifamily recycling pilot project using
up to $20,000 in sustainability funds
•Would involve technical assistance and
an incentive to help cover initial capital
costs.
•Timeline
•Targeting summer 2026 start of service
•Comprehensive education and outreach
campaign
•Story County
•Resource Recovery System partners will
also need new methods to divert
meaningful quantities of material from
the landfill.
•Option to tag along with Ames curbside
recycling contract, develop their own, or
pursue drop-off recycling.
265
ITEM #:32
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:PW
SUBJECT:ROOSEVELT AVENUE PARKING ORDINANCE UPDATE
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
In November 2024, following reconstruction of Roosevelt Avenue between 13th and 16th
Street, City Council considered concerns from residents regarding the pavement
improvements and on-street parking configuration. The project design reduced the roadway
width from 31 feet to 27 feet to align with SUDAS specifications for local streets and
surrounding neighborhood standards. The previous 31-foot width had been designed to
accommodate a former CyRide transit route, which has since been discontinued.
The new 27-foot width meets the 2018 International Fire Code (IFC) for minimum clear
width with parking on one side of the street, but it does not safely support parking on
both sides. The previous 31-foot width did not meet the IFC standard for safely supporting
parking on both sides. Moreover, the roadway would have needed to be widened to the
SUDAS standard width of 37 feet in order to meet IFC standards for two-sided parking.
During and following construction, residents expressed concerns about reduced roadway
width, impacts to on-street parking, and communication of changes. On November 26, 2024,
City Council directed staff to retain two-sided parking along this section of Roosevelt Avenue
and conduct a survey to gauge public sentiment regarding parking restrictions. Staff is now
returning to the City Council with survey results and seeking direction regarding
parking regulations along Roosevelt Avenue.
Throughout 2025, several complaints were received regarding the two-sided parking
configuration. A survey distributed in September / October 2025 received 32 responses, of
which approximately 97% were from residents living along Roosevelt Avenue between 13th
and 16th Streets. Results showed:
Over 40% of respondents park daily on the street. 32% park at least occasionally.
59.4% of respondents indicated that they approve or strongly approve of
prohibiting parking on one side of Roosevelt Avenue.
31.3% of respondents indicated that they oppose or strongly oppose prohibiting
parking on one side of Roosevelt Avenue.
Residents’ comments cited improved safety, visibility, and vehicle passage as key benefits of
one-sided parking, particularly during winter months and near driveways. Concerns remained
about convenience and parking availability for multi-vehicle households.
Fire hydrants are located on the east side of Roosevelt Avenue. When feasible, staff typically
recommends prohibiting parking on the same side as fire hydrants to maintain clear
emergency access and improve visibility for approaching vehicles. In the neighborhood
survey, preferences for which side of the street should prohibit parking were closely divided,
w i t h 40.6% favoring prohibition on the east side, 37.5% favoring prohibition on the west
side, and 21.9% having no preference.
266
Based upon the survey information and the desire to align parking regulations with the
street design standards, Staff is recommending prohibiting parking along the east side
of Roosevelt Avenue from 13th to 16th Street. The residents on the street were sent
mailed notices in late October indicating that the City Council would consider this item
on November 18.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Direct the City Attorney to draft an ordinance prohibiting parking along the east side of
Roosevelt Avenue from 13th Street to 16th Street.
2. Maintain parking on both sides of Roosevelt Avenue from 13th Street to 16th Street.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Prohibiting parking on the east side of Roosevelt Avenue will provide safe operations
for emergency vehicles and winter maintenance equipment. One-sided parking will also
be consistent with other roadways in the area. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the
City Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, as noted above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Final Results- Roosevelt Avenue Parking Changes Survey.pdf
267
! "
#$%
&'
()*(+
,-./0
1$2$3-/45.6$%4-47$$8
9:;$4-47$$8
<$%%45=-:4':;$4-47$$8
&$2$3
>)*>+
?@*?+
A>*(+
BCDEDFGHIBJKLIMN OPPQRSRTUIVSRWXRIMYZ[\W]I^_YW]RQI`XZSRa
_UUbQJDDcPdQe]PP]TRedPfDgPZfQDcDBWgTF[fYhiCjklETmENgn`mo`pNSlWnqrSLsjtuqCi`sDS\RvYWYTaU\dQ BDE268
! " # $ %
&
'
(&
('
)*+,-./01
2*+/.301 2*+/.301
)*+,-./01
-,*+2).401
56789:;<6
=>789:;<6
?@9AB6C6B6DE6,-./02).40
3F.G0
HIJKJLMNOHPQROST UVVWXYXZ[O\YX]^XOS_`ab]cOde_]cXWOf^`YXg
e[[hWPJJiVjWkcVVcZXkjVlJmV`lWJiJH]mZLal_noIpqrKZsKTmtfsufvTYr]twxYRypz{wIofyJYbX|_]_Zg[bjW LJK269
!" #
$
%
&
'
"()
*
+
, !"
-
'
!.'
%
.
#
%
-
".
%
%
%
/
-
0 %
(
/
1 +
!"!!,
1
%
+
'
2
34565789:3;<=:>? @AABCDCEF:GDCHIC:>JKLMHN:OPJHNCB:QIKDCR
PFFSB;55TAUBVNAANECVUAW5XAKWB5T53HXE7LWJYZ4[\]6E^6?X_Q^`Qa?D]H_bcD=d[efb4ZQd5DMCgJHJERFMUB <56270
!
"
#
!
! $
$
%
%
&
'
!
!(
)
%
! !
%
*
%
*
(
*
!
!
!
+
! ,
$!
*
%
!
-
*
%
.
/0
*
%
*
%
*
!
! !
!
%
1
!
!
!
-
!
!
!
!
%
!
2
!
!
!
.
!
*
!
34565789:3;<=:>? @AABCDCEF:GDCHIC:>JKLMHN:OPJHNCB:QIKDCR
PFFSB;55TAUBVNAANECVUAW5XAKWB5T53HXE7LWJYZ4[\]6E^6?X_Q^`Qa?D]H_bcD=d[efb4ZQd5DMCgJHJERFMUB h56271
!
"
#
$
%!
&
'
'
(
)
*
+(
,
(-($
.
/01213456/7896:; <==>?@?AB6C@?DE?6:FGHIDJ6KLFDJ?>6MEG@?N
LBBO>711P=Q>RJ==JA?RQ=S1T=GS>1P1/DTA3HSFUV0WXY2AZ2;T[MZ\M];@YD[^_@9`Wab^0VM`1@I?cFDFANBIQ> 412272
!"##"$%$! %$&'()*+ %, +- . *,/0
1(23/' 14 " 5273
!"##"$%$! %$&'()*+ %, +- . *,/0
1(23/' 14 " 274
ITEM #:33
DEPT:P&R
November 18, 2025
Staff Report
DISCUSSION ON MODIFICATIONS TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 19:
PARKS AND RECREATION
BACKGROUND:
At the March 11, 2025 City Council meeting, City staff presented on the topic of micromobility
uses in the City of Ames. As part of that presentation, City Council referred the micromobility
uses in parks to the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Shortly afterwards, at the March 27, 2025 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, City
staff presented on the topic of micromobility. A lengthy discussion occurred (see Attachment
A), and the Commission proceeded to review Chapter 19 to see how it might address
micromobility use in the parks.
Upon reviewing Chapter 19, the Commission realized there were other sections of Chapter 19
and the Park Rules that could use some updates to reflect current practices and/or to provide
clarity on expectations of park use.
As such, the Commission engaged the public and sought feedback regarding Chapter 19 and
the Park Rules. An in-person public input session was held on April 2, 2025 (see Attachment
B) and a public survey was made available (see Attachment C). There were also additional
email correspondences with community members on these topics (see Attachment D).
Having received public feedback, the Commission has proposed updates to its Park Rules
(see Attachment E) and is proposing changes to Chapter 19 (see Attachment F). Notably, as
it relates to micromobility and personal transportation device uses, the Parks
Commission is recommending a 10 mph speed limit on park trails and paths. The main
concerns heard involved multi-modal uses on park trails and paths, and the need to institute a
speed limit for safety purposes. This will be discussed more in depth when a formal ordinance
update is being considered by Council.
In addition to the micromobility issue, the City Council is being asked to consider other
changes to Chapter 19, highlighted in red in Attachment F.
If the Council is supportive of considering the Commission's recommendations to
modify Chapter 19 of the Municipal Code, it would be appropriate for the Council to
make a motion directing the City Attorney to draft an updated ordinance for Chapter 19.
275
OPTIONS:
Option 1 - Direct the City Attorney's Office to draft a modified ordinance for Chapter 19.
Option 2 - Do not direct the City Attorney's Office to draft a modified ordinance for Chapter 19
except for any references to micromobility.
Option 3 - Do not modify Chapter 19 at this time.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff agrees with the Commission that modifications to Chapter 19 and Park Rules
would be appropriate in order to reflect current practices and desired expectations as
presented in Attachments E and F. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Council
approve Option 1 which is to direct the City Attorney's Office to draft a modified
ordinance for the Council's approval at a future date.
Please note that the responsibility of updating the Park Rules is a function of the Parks and
Recreation Commission and Council need not take any action regarding Park Rules.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment A: Parks Commission March 27 2025 Minutes.pdf
Attachment B: Park Policies - Public Input 4-2-25.pdf
Attachment C: Parks Policy Survey Results.pdf
Attachment D: Park Policies - Email Correspondence.pdf
Attachment E: Park Policies Draft.pdf
Attachment F: Chapter 19 - Parks and Recreation 2018-3 (Revised - Staff Mark-up).pdf
276
CITY OF AMES
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
DATE March 27, 2025
COMMISSION
PRESENT
ABSENT Jeff White
STAFF Keith Abraham, Joshua Thompson
1. CALL TO ORDER: 4:01 PM
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION: (Reeves/Iles) to approve the February 20, 2025, meeting minutes.
MOTION PASSED: (5-0)
3. PUBLIC FORUM
None
4. MOTION APPROVING THE JAYCEES REQUEST TO:
Ames Jaycees’ request to use Bandshell Park for the 2025 Ames on the Half Shell event is like
previous requests, Abraham reported. Rental fee options were discussed when staff met with
Ames Jaycees representatives in late 2024. Staff could not justify further fee reductions.
Reeves asked if fee concerns might suggest Ames Jaycees will consider relocating the event to
the CYTown “Cylo” amphitheater. Abraham indicated that has not been communicated to City
staff. Bandshell Park is a great venue for the event, and similar attendance numbers at CYTown
would not fill the venue. Abraham pointed out the existing arrangement with Ames Jaycees is
mutually agreeable, and the concert proceeds are returned to the community in various ways.
MOTION: (Iles/Rathe) to recommend Alternative 1, which states:
Approve the Jaycees’ request to:
a. Sponsor “Ames on the Half Shell” utilizing Bandshell Park on five Fridays
between May 30 and June 27, with the band playing from 5:00 PM to 8:00 PM,
ending no later than 8:30 PM, and teardown by 9:30 PM; and
b. Recommend City Council approve alcohol sales at Bandshell Park on five
Fridays between May 30 and June 27, between 5:00 PM and 8:00 PM,
consumed at ground level within a fenced-in area, with the area cleared no later
than 9:00 PM or the fence removal, whichever comes first, and City Council
require the Jaycees to obtain a State liquor license to comply with local and State
liquor laws; and
c. Waive the Jaycees payment of $1.00 per ticket sold and 10% of gross food and
beverage sales.
MOTION PASSED: (5-0)
277
2
5. MOTION RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVE NAMING RIGHTS OF THE MINI-
PITCH PROJECT AT LLOYD KURTZ PARK
At its November 12, 2024, meeting, City Council directed staff to secure funding to reduce the
City’s commitment for a mini-pitch installation at Lloyd Kurtz Park. Following contract awarding
at the December 10, 2024, City Council meeting, staff successfully solicited donor funds,
Abraham reported, with Central Iowa Bank, Draintech, and Greater Iowa Credit Union each
responding with $1,500 bench donation commitments. Kurt and Sindy Friedrich pledged
$50,000 for rights to name the mini-pitch amenity “The Friedrich Pitch.” This donation
represents 14 percent of the project cost. Staff believes the request fits with the Parks and
Recreation Naming Policy, Friedrich Realty is a reputable company, and the Friedrich family are
outstanding citizens with daughters who grew up playing soccer in Ames.
MOTION: (Rathe/Iles) to recommend Alternative 1, which states:
Recommend City Council approve the request to name the Mini-Pitch located in Lloyd Kurtz
Park ”The Friedrich Pitch.”
MOTION PASSED: (5-0)
6. MOTION APPROVING THE YOUTH VOLLEYBALL CAMPS AGREEMENT WITH AMES
HIGH SCHOOL VOLLEYBALL PROGRAM FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2025
This agreement with Ames High School Volleyball (AHSVB) regarding indoor and sand
volleyball camps is brought to the Commission annually. Abraham explained AHSVB provides
instruction and retains 70 percent of program fees, while the City retains 30 percent of paid fees
for assisting with promotion, registrations, and payments. Abraham described the agreement as
a win-win for two organizations that reach more people by partnering.
MOTION: (Tapp/Iles) to recommend Alternative 1, which states:
Approve the Youth Volleyball Campus Agreement with Ames High School Volleyball program
for calendar year 2025.
MOTION PASSED: (5-0)
7. MICROMOBILITY UPDATE
Abraham summarized City Council micromobility discussions spanning several years. Last
October, City Council instructed staff to develop a micromobility ordinance. Staff was looking for
direction from City Council and topics for consideration were discussed at the meeting held
March 11, 2025. Concerns arose about park-specific issues, with Council making
recommendations for a micromobility ordinance including streets, sidewalks – i.e., all but parks.
Council directed the Parks and Recreation Commission to include micromobility in any
Commission consideration of park rules and ordinance changes. Abraham reviewed the
standard e-bicycle classification system. He referenced comments made at the March 11 City
Council meeting by Ronn Ritz, owner of Skunk River Cycles. Ritz stresses how fast the user
should go, not how fast the device can go. Staff recommends a 10 MPH limit within parks,
maybe less in certain areas with safety being the key consideration.
Abraham reviewed micromobility definitions and Ames Municipal Code Chapter 4: Bicycles
ordinance, noting it does not currently include personal transportation devices. Also reviewed:
where to allow devices; speed limits; State of Iowa code; code from other Iowa communities, as
well as out-of-state examples; and various exceptions.
278
3
Abraham noted two upcoming public meetings, one to educate the public on the Ada Hayden
Heritage Park trail widening project (April 1) and another to gather public input on park rules and
ordinance changes (April 2). Staff will also develop a survey to gather a more representative
community response. Abraham indicated staff will return with recommendations but also seeks
Commission feedback on park rule and/or ordinance updates regarding personal transportation
devices in parks. A draft updated ordinance will be brought to City Council soon.
8. PARK RULES AND ORDINANCES DISCUSSION
Iles asked how the City would enforce micromobility ordinances. Abraham acknowledged it
would be difficult and would require self-enforcement, or perhaps installation of radar speed
signs in some areas. Staff struggles with the idea of implementing an ordinance it knows will not
be enforced.
Cady stated a ban of e-bikes or e-scooters in parks would be short-sighted. Users should be
mindful when encountering other traffic on shared use paths. She stressed the importance of
educating community members about general trail and roadway safety, and noted new
technology is sometimes abused. More separated infrastructure and/or wider paths would help.
[Shimanek joined the meeting at 4:42 PM.]
Reeves and Cady discussed e-bicycle and performance/speed variations.
Abraham observed e-bikes may enable individuals to get out and enjoy the outdoors, something
they may not be able to do without it. Cady related personal experiences following a car
accident and how her e-bike provided valuable assistance.
Reeves asked if it would be possible to create rules for specific personal transportation devices.
Abraham said the Commission may examine any situation and make specific recommendations
about problems and solutions to ensure public safety within the park system.
Shimanek stated enforcing speed on trails is impossible. He agreed with the focus on prioritizing
safety and commented something going 30 MPH next to someone walking is not safe.
Tam Lorenz, 311 S Maple AVE, spoke about concerns with Brookside Park. Her presence there
has decreased in recent years not because of her ability but because it is “more of a stressor
than a pleasure to be there.” She urged the Commission to recommend to City Council reducing
the allowed distance between trainers and a dog from 90 feet to 12 feet. Cady asked if requiring
leashes when on a trail should be a consideration. Lorenz spoke about well-trained service
animals versus untrained dogs. Her other source of stress is cyclists dominating shared use
paths by speeding, making walking on paths sometimes frightening, especially when it may be
hard to hear bikes coming. She asked the Commission to set a speed limit of 5 to 10 MPH and
to require brakes, pointing out it is not just as issue of how fast one can go but how fast one can
stop. Lorenz suggested additional speed limit signage, widening paths to provide separation
from pedestrians, and further education to develop etiquette to make parks safer for all users.
9. ADA HAYDEN BOAT RENTALS MEMO
For 20 years, JAX Outdoor Gear provided weekend boat rentals at Ada Hayden Heritage Park.
This year, Abraham reported, JAX Outdoor Gear does not have adequate staff to support these
rentals but will continue to rent boats from its store. Abraham thanked JAX Outdoor Gear for a
wonderful partnership spanning many years.
279
4
Staff researched self-serve rental options, however the required capital outlay is not budgeted. If
this were pursued and funded, Abraham indicated self-serve rentals could commence in 2026
and be available daily and for more of the year than the weekends-only from Memorial Day
weekend to Labor Day rental schedule used by JAX Outdoor Gear.
Cady asked if it would be possible to continue the partnership if the City purchased equipment
needed for storage and checkout, with JAX Outdoor Gear maintaining the watercraft. Abraham
indicated that would duplicate some of what JAX Outdoor Gear already does, and would also
require City capital, storage, and additional City staffing. The self-serve rental option would
include maintenance by the rental company. Abraham pointed out it is possible JAX Outdoor
Gear may wish to resume weekend boat rentals in the future.
[Abraham requested moving Agenda Items 11 and 12 ahead of Agenda Item 10.]
11. PROJECT UPDATES
a. Fitch Family Indoor Aquatic Center
Abraham summarized construction progress, noting: walls and steel up, roofs
almost complete, some electrical conduit and ductwork up, pool basin digging
beginning soon, and plans underway for work on non-natatorium areas. Change
orders are minimal. The substantial completion and facility opening dates moved
to January and March 2026, respectively. Story Construction and RDG Planning
& Design staff will explain the substantial completion date change at an in-person
City Council update scheduled for April 2025.
b. Steven L. Schainker Plaza
Everything Ice and Trane recently tested chiller equipment used to produce ice
for the plaza skating ribbon feature. Concerns arose about the consistency of the
ice, with some ice being brittle and other areas soft. Additional tests are planned.
Abraham indicated the ice-skating surface remains a big concern. Staff asked
Henkel Construction to provide an updated punch list and timeline for completion
of other construction and landscaping items. Next week Fountain Tech will test
the spray pad. When all necessary information is available, City Council will
decide about opening the rest of the plaza if the ice ribbon is not done. Iles asked
if there is a warranty for the plant materials. Thompson said one year.
c. Agility Course at Carr Park
Dirt is being moved, Abraham said, and the site is being prepared for equipment
installation. Thompson indicated the project will be completed by the end of May.
d. Daley Park Splash Pad
Abraham indicated staff plans to get a request for proposals for equipment and
installation out within the next week. On April 22, plans and specifications for the
rest of the project will be brought to City Council for consideration.
e. Park Maintenance Facility Expansion Project
This project includes renovations to the existing maintenance building along with
construction of additional cold storage. Plans and specifications for this project
will also go to City Council on April 22. Abraham reported the cost opinion for this
project exceeds available funding, while costs for the Daley Park Splash Pad are
less than available funding. Staff anticipates these cost savings will be available
to cover the funding shortfall for the maintenance building project.
280
5
f. Parks and Recreation Administration Office Renovation
Building improvements completed during the past eight months include structural
changes to repurpose space, painting, and restroom renovations. Abraham said
visitors notice the improvements. New furniture will arrive by early June.
12. MONTHLY REPORT
Thompson reported the following:
A Conservation Corps of Iowa/Minnesota crew and City staff removed woody vegetation at
Ada Hayden Heritage Park. This work was funded by Friends of Ada Hayden Heritage Park,
Abraham added.
Fish habitat was installed in the north lake of Ada Hayden Heritage Park by Ames Anglers,
volunteers, and the Iowa DNR and City staff. This was the second habitat installation.
10. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FOR 2025/26
a. New Members
Commissioners Isles and Rathe were reappointed, both to serve three-year terms.
Hannah Sappenfield joins the Commission in April 2025 and will serve a one-year term.
b. Sarah Cady
Cady concluded eight years on the Commission. Abraham thanked her for serving and
contributing and presented thank-you gifts. Cady narrated a presentation highlighting
projects, ribbon cuttings, and milestones from years she served. Cady expressed pride
in project accomplishments and thanked staff and commissioners for a great experience.
13. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
Reeves thanked Cady for her commitment to public service, steady presence, and for being an
advocate for the Parks and Recreation Commission, the community, and for parks.
14. NEXT MEETING: Thursday, April 17, 2025, 4:00 PM (Regular Meeting)
15. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION (Reeves) to adjourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 5:37 PM.
281
ATTACHMENT B
Park Policies
Public Input
April 2, 2025
Notes
Presentation:
Keith Abraham, Parks and Recreation Director, explained that staff has been directed by the Parks and
Recreation Commision and City Council to review park policies which includes both ordinances and
rules. Ordinances are approved by City Council, are a municipal infraction, and enforceable by the
Police Department. Rules on the other hand, are set by the Parks and Recreation Commission, are not
a municipal infraction, and not enforceable by the Police Department unless an individual continues to
not follow a rule.
Abraham also reviewed some of the issues and/or problems staff experience within the park system
and asked attendees for input and/or comments related to these issues or other concerns they may
have related to park policies. Comments and questions received have been categorized by issue below.
If a question was asked, a staff response is shown in green.
A survey will also be developed and distributed in a variety of ways for residents and park users to
provide additional input. All of this information will then be shared with the Parks and Recreation
Commission and City Council prior to any proposed changes being approved
Personal Transportation Devices:
• Technology is changing rapidly (i.e. e-bikes, etc.) and policies can become outdated or not
address new transportation devices.
o Speed limits would help cover as technology evolves.
• Has the City contacted bicycle clubs, groups, and organizations (i.e. VELO, ABC, etc.) to let
them know that Ada Hayden is not a racetrack?
o Staff has not done this but will reach out to different groups.
• Some form of a bike lane would help separate bikers and pedestrians.
• What is the existing bike lane width on R38 and could that width be used at Ada Hayden?
o One-way bike lanes must be a minimum of 4’ wide.
• Could you use speed cameras or effective safe speed bumps to control speed?
o Speed cameras will take additional resource and be hard to enforce. Speed bumps are
not practical as they create barriers for the mobility impaired. Since trails are used all year
round, speed bumps would make plowing very difficult.
• We ride our E-bikes at Ada Hayden 4-5 times per week and travel at a speed of 8-14 miles per
hour (mph). There seems to be a lot of negativity about E-bikes. We offer the following
comments:
o Suggest higher speed limits than 10 mph
o Always ring the bell, common courtesy
o We need to be kind to one another
o Disappointed if E-bikes were prohibited
• I own E-Bike Iowa and offer the following comments:
o E-bikes help clients to be more active
282
o Ames is amazing to commute through and parks are a big component of commuter routes
o In favor of speed limit
o Is the speed limit on path/trails 20 mph?
The current ordinance has a speed limit of 20 mph on streets and trails. City
Council has directed staff to consider keeping 20 mph for streets. Council asked
the Parks and Recreation Commission to include speed limits within the park
system as part of its park policy review.
• Having lines separating wheeled devices from pedestrians and speed limists are great
• I work with immigration services and most clients are unable to obtain a license. Their mode of
transportation is oftentimes bicycles. Do not limit individuals from being able to go to work without
utilizing trails within the park system.
• Not comfortable using bike lanes on streets but do feel comfortable riding in parks
• People use bikes to conduct wildlife surveys
• County park speed limit within campground at Hickory Grove is 10 mph. Other areas are 20 mph
• People need to announce when you’re passing
• Speed limit could change based on how busy the park is
• E-bikes help older people enjoy the parks and Parks and Recreation should consider the
following:
o Slow down on your bike when going around people
o 13th Street shared us path (SUP) by Haber Road is not safe for bicyclists
o Car drivers are not courteous to bicyclists
o Want to continue to bike through Brookside
o Consider the Idaho stop (if no vehicles are around, roll through a stop sign)
o Need a public education campaign
Park Hours:
• Why do parks close at 10:30 p.m.?
o Many of the parks are adjacent neighborhoods and Parks and Recreation want to be good
neighbors so the parks close at 10:30 p.m. It also limits noisy and/or illegal activities from
taking place in the park after hours.
Unhoused:
• How much money is being spent on stopping camping (i.e. moving campers along, clean-up,
etc.)? Could this money be redirect to fix the real problems (i.e. substance abuse, mental health,
and lack of housing)?
o Staff does not know the cost of addressing unhoused issues within the park system.
• Post a list of resources in the restrooms
• Promote good behavior
• Have a mobile response to provide responses and support
o Through Mary Greeley Medical Center, an ARCH unit does address some of these
issues. There are also other organizations that provide support to the unhoused.
• There is the potential for an increase in the unhoused population only exacerbating the problem
• Need to accommodate the anti-social population
• Are showers mandated at the spray/splashpad?
o Both the spraypad and splash pad will have a recirculation system which is similar to a
swimming pool. Because of this system, showers are mandated by the state of Iowa.
• The Romero House offers a shower in a private setting (educate people about this)
283
• Way back, County homes were available which provided housing and oftentimes a job. These
homes addressed a need. Is this a possible solution?
o Staff would need to research, however, funding will most likely be a barrier.
• Is the concrete surface of the Schainker Plaza Ice Skating Ribbon resolved?
o The City and the Contractor are continuing to discuss potential solutions.
Damaging Plants, Foraging, Etc.:
• What about cutting invasives (i.e., garlic mustard)?
o Currently the ordinance doesn’t allow individuals from removing invasives unless it is part
of a managed event. Staff will review.
• What is the major issue with foraging?
o Nothing, other than it is not currently allowed. The ordinance will need to be revised.
• Pro-foraging
Safety:
• Fireworks not allowed in the park system is not on the park rules sheet.
o There is a City ordinance but staff will review and consider putting it on the rules sheet.
• Concerned about real versus perceived threats. How many assaults are taking place in the
parks?
o Staff is not aware of many assaults that take place in the parks but believe one is too
many. Perception is reality for many people and if people perceive an area is unsafe, they
will stop using it. Staff want to ensure as best we can, a safe environment for all users.
• Are individuals not carrying weapons to protect themselves?
o Don’t know how to answer this one besides some most likely do and some don’t.
• If parents/guardians were responsible for the actions of their children, would parents be levied
fines?
o When researching park policies from other communities, some policies included a section
on Parental Responsibility. Consequences included fines and restitution.
Trash:
• There is always a lot of trash on South Duff. Can you make businesses responsible for clean-
up?
o Don’t know.
• Are developers responsible for trash they generate?
o They should be cleaning up their trash but that doesn't always happen.
• There are a lot of stickers on posts, signs, etc. on South Duff. Can businesses, groups, or
organizations be responsible for clean up if there stickers are found on items they should not be
on?
o Don’t know.
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
Appendix A
(Q3) Do you or anyone in your household utilize City of Ames Parks? If not, why? – 14
responses
1. Age
2. Don’t know
3. handicapped; too hard to walk distances. i have enjoyed FREE GOLF CART
TOURS OF ADA HAYDEN THAT "THEY" PUT ON IN FALL. IN MY YOUNGER YEARS
WHEN SINGLE, WE WOULD GO TO BROOKSIDE PARK AND BBQ SUPPER THERE. I
USED TO PLAY WOMEN'S LEAGUE SOFTBALL FOR MANY YEARS until my knee
injuries from HS took its toll on my body and made me quit. my knee went out
more than i personally went out! lol.
4. have no reason to use it
5. I had to purchase an early bird pass at Furman Aquatic Center just to coach my kids.
I don’t get to utilize the pass I was forced to purchase to keep my kids safe, yet I
6. I only work in Ames, so I do not spend much time outside of work other places.
7. Just moving to the area and haven’t had an opportunity to do so
8. Limited free time.
9. Mostly do indoor activities
N/A
11. Not able to be out in the sun or hot weather
12.
13. Only lived in Ames a year so not familiar with parks in Ames
14. We just do not go to parks. I don’t walk very well anymore, so we don’t take hikes.
(Q6) If you are unsure about what you can or cannot do within the park system, how do
r? Other (please specify) – 44 responses
1. Behave like an adult and assume this is okay
2.
3. Check city code
4. Check signage or brochures at the Park for information (e.g. hours)
5. Don’t ask
6. Don’t ask
7. Don't know
8. google
9. Google
google
319
Appendix A
11. Google, AI answer
12. I abide by social contract and don’t be an asshole
13. I don’t normally do things that would likely be problematic
14. I don't do it
15. I just do whatever I was planning to do and stop if I’m asked to
16. Just keep doing it until I get in trouble
17. Like a majority of other people I'd apologize rather than ask permission.
18. Look at the sign with rules next to the entrance
19. Look for a sign in the park
Look for park signage
21. Look for physical signs at the park
22. Look for signage
23. Look for signage
24. Look for signage at the applicable park
25. Look for signs
26. Look for signs
27. Look for signs in the area
28. Mostly I just check for signs
29. NA
Nothing
31. Nothing, just not be an idiot
32. read posted signs
33. Read signage at parks
34. Read signage at the park
35. read signs
36. Rules posted sometimes
37.
38. Use common sense
39. Use common sense
Use common sense
41. Use common sense and reason
42. Use common sense.
43. wait see what happens
44.
(Q7) Do you or anyone in your household own any of the following? Other (please
specify) – 77 responses
320
Appendix A
1. Autos
2. Boat
3. Car
4. Dogs
5. Dogs
6. E trike
7. electric unicycle
8. Feet... We walk
9. Golf cart
Hoverboard
11. Hoverboards (w/ go-kart attachment)
12. I own a bicycle, but at this time, I am no longer use it. planning to donate
13. Inline skates
14. inline skates, SUP, kayak
15. kayak, SUP
16. Kayaking
17. Kids’ tricycles
18. Kyak
19. L
Mountain Bike
21. No, none, none of the above, nothing (17 total)
22. Paddle board
23. Paddle board, kayak
24. recumbent tadpole bike
25. Rollar skates
26. Roller blades
27. Roller blades
28. roller blades
29. Roller blades
Roller blades
31. Roller skates
32. Roller skates
33. Roller skates
34. Roller Skates
35. roller skates (quads)
36. Rollerblade
37. Rollerblades
38. Rollerblades
321
Appendix A
39. Rollerblades
Rollerblades
41. Rollerblades
42. Rollerblades
43. Rollerblades and roller-skates.
44. Rollerblades/rollerskates
45. run/jog/walk
46. Single and double strollers, bike trailers
47. Stroller
48. Stroller
49. Stroller
Stroller
51. Stroller
52.
tax payers. This is a waste of tax payers money.
53. Wagon
54. Wagon to carry kids in
55. Walk
56. Walk
57. Walk
58. Walking
59. Walking
Walking only
61. We walk.
(Q8) Do you or anyone in your household use any of the following within the park
system? Other (please specify) – 117 responses
1.
funds.
2. Biking to the parks
3. Boat
4. Car
5. do not use within the parks
6. Dog park
7. Dogs
8. Dogs
9. don't use bikes in park
322
Appendix A
E trike
11. electric unicycle
12. Feet
13. Feet, we walk
14. Fishing pole
15. Golf course
16. Homewood Golf Course
17. I
18. i don't use any in the parks
19. Inline skates
inline skates, SUP, kayak
21. just walk
22. Kayaks
23. kayay, SUP
24. Kyak
25. Loaned to younger relative currently
26. Maybe bike? I'm not the one in the household with the bike
27. My feet
28. No, None, None of the above (49 total)
29. Paddle board
Paddle board, kayak
31. Playground and parhways
32. recumbent tadpole bike
33. Roller Blades
34. Roller blades
35. roller blades
36. Roller blades
37. Roller skates
38. Roller skates
39. Roller skates
roller skates (quads)
41. Rollerblade
42. Rollerblades
43. Rollerblades
44. Rollerblades
45. Rollerblades
46. Rollerblades
47. rollerblades and roller-skates.
323
Appendix A
48. Single and double strollers, bike trailers
49. Stroller
Stroller
51. Stroller
52. Stroller
53. Stroller
54. Stroller
55. Stroller
56. Unicycle, pogo stick, piano on wheels
57. Wagon
58. Wagon to carry kids in
59. Walk
Walk
61. Walk
62. Walk!
63. Walking
64. Walking
65. Walking
66. We do not use any of these in the parks.
67. We mostly run/walk, no wheels
68. We walk
69. We walk.
(Q9) Please select your top three forms of transportation within the park system.
(Maximum of three) Other (please specify) – 48 responses
1. Biking/e-biking are both with stroller trailer
2. Boat
3. Car
4. City board members should be ashamed of stealing tax payer money for an animal
shelter and saying it is from the city counsel.
5. Cross-country skis
6. Do not run
7. Dog walking; taking photos
8. Driving in a car.
9. E trike
electric unicycle
11. Just
324
Appendix A
12. Just the other 2
13. Kayak
14. Kayak
15. Kayak
16. Kayaking
17.
18. Kayaks
19. Na
None
21. Paddle board
22. Pickleball
23. Playground
24. Playground
25. Playgrounds
26. recumbent tadpole bike
27. Roller Blades
28. Roller blading
29. roller skates
Roller skates
31. roller skates (quads)
32. Rollerblade
33. Rollerblades
34. Rollerblades; Kayak
35. Rollerblading
36. Stroller
37. Stroller
38. Stroller
39. Stroller
Stroller
41. Stroller
42. Stroller
43. Stroller
44. Swimming
45. Swimming
46. wagon to carry kids in
47. Walker
48. walking with stroller
325
Appendix A
(Q10) What form of transportation do you use most often within the park system?
Other (please specify) – 17 responses
1. Boat
2. Car
3. Driving car
4. E trike
5. Golf course
6. Just walking and biking
7. Kayak
8. Kayaking
9. Kayaking
Playground
11. recumbent tadpole bike
12. roller skates (quads)
13. Stroller
14. Stroller
15. SUP
16.
17. With a bike trailer
(Q11) Which park(s) do you regularly visit? – 1,095 responses
Park Name Mentions (approx.)
Brookside
Inis Grove / Inis Grove Park
Ada Hayden Heritage Park
Moore Memorial Park
Miracle Park
Emma McCarthy Lee Park
Bandshell Park
Roosevelt Park
326
Appendix A
Park Name Mentions (approx.)
Stuart Smith Park
Daley Park
Tedesco Environmental Learning Corridor
Carr Park
River Valley Park
Harrison Park
Hira Park
Homewood Park
Moore Park
McFarland Park
Miracle Playground
O’Neil Park
Patio Homes West Park
Roosevelt
(Q16) Have you experienced or witnessed any of the following issues regarding
personal transportation devices within the park system? (Select all that apply) Other
(please specify) – 225 responses
1.
2. golf carts
3. 4 ppl walking next to one another and bikes go into grass, headphone users just as
bad.
4. Ada Hayden is probably the worst place to go. Not because of transportation
devices, but there is frankly just too many people/overcrowded.
5. All of the above. I use a park daily. People don't announce etc.
327
Appendix A
6. Ames Iowa city counsel likes to waste tax payer money on their own personal pet
projects.
7. Bikers need to use bells, not just shout.
8.
9. Discriminatory questions. Your intent is to ban bikes.
Dog leash tripping hazard.
11. Dog owners not hsving dogs on leashes ehich then jump up pn people.
12. Dog walkers let there dogs on a long leash and they suddenly react to something
and if on a bike, you can’t react fast enough to it
13. Dog walkers not paying attention to where their dog is on the trail.
14. Dogs not on leash
15. Don’t usually see wheeled transportation in the parks
16. Drunks
17. Earbuds on, impeding safety
18. even walkers and joggers can be disrespectful of other users (i.e. taking up the
whole path, not moving over for others, not paying attention, etc.)
19. folks on foot have the right of way. Speed wheel people dont seen to care or even
know that sometimes
Folks typically announce themselves to others or slow down
21. have not experience any of these
22. Have not experienced any of these when I have been at the parks.
23. Have not had any problems
24. Have not personally witnessed any of the above.
25. Have not witnessed
26. Haven't experienced issues
27. Haven't seen any
28.
29. Headphone use while biking/skateboarding
Headphone users curse even if you announce your bike presence
31. Homeless people interactions
32. I am most bothered by people wearing headphones, whether on for it in wheels, and
unaware of their surroundings. Even for those of us who do call out, I have had close
calls coming up behind a pedestrian while I am on a bicycle
33. I feel at Ada Hayden especially, they go too fast, zig and zag through people, not
announce themselves properly and are dangerous to dogs.
34. I have no problem with any of this. I have a problem with people smoking in miracle
Park, the signs are not very large saying that it’s not allowed. It also happens around
the library entrance.
328
Appendix A
35. I have not witnessed any of these events.(10 total)
36. I have witnessed most of these but that doesn't necessarily mean there should a
total revamping of policy. There will always be outliers.
37. I haven't experienced anything. Read the below answer.
38. I rarely see the above. Most often it is due to one person not paying attention. Then
one or more people are rude to each other.
39. It seems most people are considerate.
Joggers/walkers ignoring people on mobile vehicles and being in the middle of the
path refusing to move
41. Loud music coming from bicycles
42. loud sound of combustion-assisted bicycle
43. Maybe just some hiccups between people sharing the trails.
44. Mostly experience joggers that enter crosswalks that do not even care that a car is
about to turn
45.
46. N/A, no, no issues, none, none of the above, nothing, not really, nope (136 total)
47. No, I actually don't feel that they are being used enough!
48. none-mostly I witness people in automobiles being oblivous to pedestrians and
cyclists
49. Not all parks have bathroom/potopottys, this is a major issue.
Not enough lighting in parks or none at all.
51. on their phone while operating - should be same as road and banned
52. Only had positive experiences
53. People being inconsiderate and entitled pricks. People walking 3-4 wide in a trails is
nonsense. Those a probably the same people complaining and whining about how
unsafe a one wheel is.
54. People seem generally polite and aware of the need to share the trails.
55. People using both sides of the trail and not always staying to the right.
56. People walking dogs on retractable leashes are by far the biggest hazards on the
trails.
57.
58. Reckless kids
59.
attacks.
riding bikes where it is prohibited
61.
329
Appendix A
62. The e bikes/scooters think they have right away and walkers and joggers should yield
to them. Don’t belong on the walking/bike paths
63. The problem I see are people walking /riding with their ear buds and bikers/ walking
with music too loud. There is no common curtesory. Walkers walk 3 abreast on
paths. I ride an e-bike and when I ring my bell or say on your left people don't move
over. I always slow down when passing. Other bike riders pass me all the time and I
am on an e-
respectful. Some Dog walkers are letting their animals run back and forth and don't
pick up the poop.
64. There are speed concerns, being Startled when a fast approaching bike says they
are approaching, especially if you are also keeping a pet in control. Possibly there
work, play or are
able to get to a park with their schedule?!?!?! Also it could be hard to enforce.
Possibly some parks could be for people & some for vehicles, but then if a person
guring this
out?!!!
65. There have been many instances of being forced to jump out of the way of a bike
rider who has not used common bike courtesy.
66. This is required, so I have to answer, but people on wheeled transportation seem
very respectful.
67. Too fast bicycles on walking trails
68. Unleashed dogs
69. Unnecessary 48 hour parking ticket notices and unnecessary issued reverse park
parking tickets.
Use of motorbikes on the trails at Moore park
71. Walkers / dogs take up too much width (3 across or leashes). Paved paths could
have dirt / crushed gravel shoulders for running / walking. Better on the knees than
concrete anyway and would ease congestion
72. Walkers and joggers are also rude, inconsiderate, and disrespectful of other park
users who are on foot or using personal transportation devices.
73. Walkers in groups taking entire pathway. People not staying to the right when
walking.
74. Walkers not responding to communication because of personal listening devices.
75. Walkers wear earphones and become unaware of their environment. It makes it
impossible to let them know that a bike is passing them.
76. walkers wearing listening devices such as Air Pods and not staying to the left cannot
hear bicycle riders when they try to pass.
330
Appendix A
77. Walkers with earbuds in, not paying attention to bike bell or "on your left" when
passing on a bicycle
78. We're fairly new to Ames and only rarely encounter transportation devices on our
walks
79. What I most frequently witness is that walkers use headphones or earbuds
(presumably to listen to music, podcasts, phonecalls). As a cyclist, I announce
myself to walkers but they cannot hear me because they are using headphones or
earbuds. I'm sure some cyclists or wheeled-device users don't announce
themselves properly. But I'd like some blame on walkers who shut themselves out of
reality/nature/others by constantly being obsessed with listening devices.
when approaching walkers while on my bike I announce where I am and often do
receive a response so I don't know if they heard me or if they have ear buds in. If you
announce and then ding your bell it seems to irritate some people. It would be
helpful if walkers would acknowledge the announcement
81. When bicycling often people walking have devices in their ears and walk in the
middle of the trail and don't hear me when I warn them of my approach
(Q17) Are there other safety concerns you have about the use of personal
transportation devices within the park system? – 344 responses
1. I just think they should be banned altogether for the safety of those who wak or sit
quietly in the park Seniors especially are at risk from all those transportation devices.
They are dangerous enough on the roads!
2. 1) Inconsistent use of R side of shared paths, perhaps because of lack of understanding
of standard protocol. Maybe paint intermittent direction arrows directly on path
(especially at Ada Hayden). 2) People walking pets on leashes (esp at Ada Hayden) with
humans on one side of path and pets on the other, so leashes cross path and create
hazard for others on wheels. 3) People, often in groups, using the full width of shared
paths (especially at Ada Hayden) without paying attention to others and condensing to
the R side when others approach from in front or from behind. Additional note: Parks
are some of the only safe places for young kids to practice on bikes and such. I wouldn’t
want to lose that.
3. a few cyclists go much too fast at Ada Hayden, riding more like it's a bike track
4. A friend recently lost her sister to an e-bike accident. Going too fast and hit culvert.
5. A universal speed limit doesn't make sense. Some trails are clearly suited to higher
speed limits.
6. Ada Hayden is the park where I have most experienced bicycles traveling at speeds
incompatible with pedestrians on the paths.
331
Appendix A
7.
dogs on leashes and
as they attempt to set speed records and get around the lake as quickly as possible. We
have bike lanes in our town for a reason.
8. Ada Hayden needs clearer signs telling cyclists to announce their presence as they
approach and go around pedestrians
9. All the options above also apply to all sidewalks, shared trails, etc outside of the parks.
It's extremely frightening. As a walker, I HAVE to walk in the streets to avoid being ran
over.
Although I have not personally witnessed it in the past, my main concern would be with
users of these devices traveling too fast in the presence of slower pedestrians and
when the trails are congested. I do not believe that excluding people on these devices is
the answer. Many people use them (especially e-bikes) not to travel fast, but to
extended their stamina and ability to get outdoors to the parks at all. I think speed limits
on all trails in parks make perfect sense - they make it clear that while these devices are
welcome, giving them a place to go fast is NOT the function of the park trails and this is
a space that must be shared in a neighborly way with users at a range of speeds.
11.
human powered devices, and a narrow path that winds through a neighborhood Park.
I'm also concerned about E-Bikes and similar that are much heavier than traditional
there, yet riding one of these quickly doesn't demand the same level of discipline and
practice as traditional cycling.
12. Anything but man powered devices have no business within a park. This is a no brainer.
13. As a cyclist, the use of headphones/earbuds by walkers and joggers also presents
challenges for those using a personal transportation device. So in response to device
users not announcing their presence, at times this does nothing due to walkers and
joggers being unable to hear what is going on in their surroundings. Personal
transportation devices do present safety issues but inattentive walkers and joggers do
as well.
14. as park users we need to be careful and I like it when I see police on bikes in the parks
15. As someone who loves her E bike, I try to be very considerate and announce my
presence when passing people. I’ve had fellow bicycles past me, and I don’t have a clue
they’re there unless I see them in my rearview mirror. Bikes go way too fast out at Ada
Hayden, and they seem to think it’s their personal training ground for whatever race
they’re entering next. I know Ada Hayden was never designed for that, and I’m a strong
believer in putting in speed bumps or limiting the speed or bikers only go one way and
332
Appendix A
walkers go the other. There are really serious accidents just waiting to happen out there.
As usual, a few ruin it for us who are just out on our bike and enjoying the beauty of that
park.
16. At Ada Hayden, bikers often come up behind walkers/dogs and pass without any
warning.
17. Bicycles go too fast at Ada Hayden where people are walking with kids and dogs
18.
19. Bikers going to fast and not letting walkers know they are passing.
Bikes etc should be allowed as long as they slow down near walkers/runners and
announce they are there
21. Bikes never stop at stop signs but cars have to?
22. Blocked views around corners, particularly Ada Hayden and bikers coming fast at small
kids.
23. Bridge to path unevenness. Valleys in the paths where the asphalt has cracked and
sank over time.
24. Camping
25. Carr woods trails need to have no wheeled vehicles more clearly marked. As an
ambulatory person in the park system I have never had a safe or respectful encounter
with a motorized vehicle on the paths. They all go as fast as they can and fail to
announce themselves
26. Cars are the problem, not bikes or skateboards.
27. Children on golf carts
28. Children’s motorized cars and jeeps tearing up the turf and destroying green space.
The option ‘only when dark’ makes no sense in response to the questions about “Do you
feel safe.”
29. Class 3 ebikes should be banned from park trails
Communication issue such as some walkers don't understand, "on your left"
sometimes they step left in front of the bicyclist
31. Connect Ames Bike Trail network to High Trestle Trail. R38 is a busy highway and not
safe for most cyclists. If Ames would connect to High Trestle Trail network, that would
connect us to a huge network and bring cycling tourism to Ames.
32. Dead wood, falling branches, trees.
33. Distracted individuals seemingly unaware of others using the park path
34. Dogs along side a biker, sometimes leashed and sometimes not.
35. Dogs and their humans are also issues for both walkers and bicyclists. Dogs are often
-leash. Some dogs on leashes are poorly controlled by the human and given too
much rope, allowing them to run out in front of others.
333
Appendix A
36.
owner. It's not safe.
37.
38. E bikes often travel too fast
39.
already. "use at your own risk" is a good policy. Schainker park is a joke -why didn't you
send a survey for that so common sense could come into play for it. No one will use
that park except the homeless. PLUS stop naming parks for people like this -give him a
cheap gold watch & send him on his way. I won't use that park just because it is named
as such.
E-bikes at Ada Hayden go so very fast and they are often used by older individuals
where the control, stability and reaction time is quite delayed. I have seen many
examples of close calls with myself and others and an E-bike rider.
41. E-bikes can go so fast without experience level to be considerate to other trail users.
Not always the case most are good but some bad apples.
42. E-bikes should be pedal assist with limited speeds on paths. High speed e-bikes, e-
scooters, and e-skateboards should be limited to 15 mph max or limited to roads.
43.
44. Especially at ada Hayden I’ve noticed bikers and others using transportation devices do
NOT announce their presence and go SO fast. Personally, it’s one of my least favorite
things about this park and I usually avoid this park now because of it. I know this is a
good place to ride bikes too, but wish the path was larger and motorists would
announce their presence better and slow down!
45. Flooding
46.
47. Generally people are very careful and respectful. I don’t know if any additional oversight
48. GET RID OF BIKES
49. Given the centrality of many parks and the wide paths through them, I think that it
would be UNSAFE to ban using personal transportation through the parks. This would
push more of those devices to interact with cars at higher speeds. Negative outcomes
within the park are generally at low speeds and have limited negative impacts.
Good luck enforcing this.
51. Had some kids riding around the park last month in a golf cart, had no clue what they
were doing so I called the cops.
52. Homeless individuals using vehicles to transport personal belongings.
53. Homeless population on or near many trail systems
54. Homelessness
334
Appendix A
55. Honestly I feel everyone on Ames park trails is very respectful and safe. I’ve never had
any issues!
56. How in the world would a speed limit be enforced? Ridiculous idea!
57. I am concerned about someone colliding with my young child or my stroller
58. I appreciate bikes being able to be used on trails (we use them as well to pull our tag
along bikes for young daughters), I think that a few bad apples have messed things up
for those that are being safe and sharing the space
59. I bike ride on trails early in the morning only at brookside and AH and there rarely have
been riders who are going too fast in my opinion, but they do call out, and I’m assuming
they are training. I’m always more concerned w walkers with headphones or speakers,
who can’t hear me calling out “bike on your left”, but I also am riding casually and in no
hurry. Also those w dogs on a long leash wandering all over side to side, I don’t mind
slowing up, but talking with your speaker on loud as you’re walking and not paying
startled, is not the bikers fault. Also I’ve heard of people yelling at bikers and not
wanting them at AH, but I’ve not had that experience between 6-7 am, and I’ve been
walkers and riders. I would imagine there could be safety concerns with bikers vs
walkers during busy afternoons or weekends, and if it’s crowded, I for one would never
choose to bike in a crowd, but my early morning rides are quiet and peaceful, and I have
never experienced any walker who seemed angry at me.
I don’t think electric bikes or anything electric should be allowed because they go too
fast and these places are too short in distance for people to be riding these on there.
They need to go somewhere like the HTT where they can go a far distance because they
cover it in such a short amount of time because of how fast they go. These places were
never built to be for that, rather mainly for walking and maybe running or just
meandering.
61. I feel most people when they are at the parks are already in a happy mood. The only
thing I would suggest is that we get more biking trails from park to park.
62.
are oncoming, and announce themselves (try not to startle) and ride slowly when
passing in same direction. If no pedestrians in site, then they can speed up all they
want, as long as they do not risk hitting wildlife.
63.
electric devices on these trails.
64. I feel that the parks are for everyone. Walkers and joggers should not have priority over
other modes. You can legislate all you want, but how do you propose to actually
335
Appendix A
vancouver and Anchorage. They have trail systems designed for multi use (mainly
walking, jogging, bikes, horses as they aren't paved in many cases). Signage is
available to help with educating about etiquette. I saw no interaction issues there.
They were extremely heavily used ama yet everyone was polite.
65. I have concerns over “lane usage” - I think encouraging Ames to be a walkable and bike-
an integral to community needs as safe roads, housing and water. However, most of
the public is uneducated on what the “rules” are as most of the US has moved away
from such life breathing city-scape. How do we continue to educate those operating
these path vehicles while also teaching joggers walkers the proper etiquette as well?
66. I have frequently noticed that people have not picked up after their pets despite the
clear signage and free bags.
67. I have not encountered anything unsafe on park trails
68. I have not witnessed any safety concerns as a pedestrian in the park systems. I often
wish there were more designated trails for bikes. Sometimes Ada Hayden has a lot of
people out and about and I am worried a dog will jump out on the path when I am on my
bike, even after announcing my presence (Bicycle on your left please)
69. I have noticed there are some dogs that get very anxious with personal transportation
devices. A dog on a leash and an e-bike almost got tangled up recently.
I haven’t experienced any problems & I think most people have common sense about
safe use of their mobility devices
71. I haven't had any issues as a walker, jogger or bike rider
72. I haven't witnessed anything mentioned above, so maybe my answers are not fully
informed (and I am also rethinking the speed limit I mentioned on the previous page). I
could see how there could be concerns and safety issues if someone or a group was
using electric modes of transportation at higher rates of speed and/or recklessly. I think
they should be permitted if used appropriately and safely while being aware of those
around them.
73. I love seeing wildlife, however the deer and I have spooked each other and appeared too
close to each other on occasion
74. I mostly use Country Gables and haven't had any problems in this small park.
75. I see the biggest problem with the large, heavy and quite fast E-Bikes. These are
essentially electric motorcycles. If ridden responsibly, none of these devices would be
a problem. But too many folks ride at or near the limit of their machines and not
sensibly based on the other path users.
76. i think bicycles and other similar wheeled devices are safer on the sidewalk then the
road. A bicycle is faster then a walker but closer in weight to a walker then to a car.
336
Appendix A
77. I think generally all park users are very considerate. It helps to have alternatives for
wheeled transportation so if riders want to get a good workout or get from point a to b
78. I think it should be shared use, but have a riding lane that walkers do not walk in
79. I think it's important to make more nuanced distinctions between parks, trails within
various parks and perhaps zones within parks. The questions so far have been blanket
questions that suggest a policy would apply to an entire park system, or to the entire
Ames city park system. But I think safety issues, crowding or other issues really
for instance, on the dirt and grass trails, I think it's appropriate to restrict wheeled
devices there for a few reasons. One, because of the surface -- and that it's prone to
erosion in spots. Two, to respect the area as a home for wildlife as well. Too many
vehicles whizzing about would be a nuisance to people walking and jogging, and to
other animals living in the woods. And three, because the trails are narrower in spots
and could present crowding problems -- not to mention causing damage to the trail
surfaces. However, on *paved* trails -- such as the paved Carr Park trail -- the path is
wider and can accommodate more people and potentially more wheeled devices.
While I prefer parks to be a little more wild, and would not want to see noisy E-bikes and
E-scooters becoming noise and speed hazards, I think people who prefer to use those
transportation devices should have some spaces within the park system where they'd
be allowed to do so. But thinking about courtesy and multiuse aspects (so that
pedestrians don't feel intimidated, or parents with young kids, etc.) is also important.
As is considering wildlife, natural aesthetic values and trail type.
I think there is absolutely a place for e-bikes and scooters—especially if it gets
someone out that couldn’t otherwise. It just seems like the riders are often times not
that and those in that “other” category treat them like trail mopeds and have zero trail
etiquette. My kid has crashed on a pedal bike more than once as an e-bike ripped
around her. They need governors.
81.
bicycles (even those with power assist) and electric bikes/scooters. I’ve found regular
bicycles/scooters/ skateboards to be generally more cautious than electric users.
82. I walk daily of the multi-use paths and on several occasions in the past year I've been
passed at very high speed, without warning from the rider, by an e-bike. In each case
-25 mph and totally unsafe in conditions with pedestrians on
the path.
83. I want people to have a place to bike, but I am always concerned about safety,
especially when the people are going very fast. My kids would love to ride their bikes
ay
337
Appendix A
least for the paved paths at the parks. Or, make more bike paths so that they don't
Ames and how few bike paths. My kids live less than 2 miles from the Gilbert HS and 2
miles for Lloyd Kurtz, and they can't ride their bikes to either without being on the road.
drive
between the deer and the bikers with no side walk and no shoulder or path for a large
length of road. I would say focus less on policing the parks and more on creating safe
places for people to use these transportation methods outside of the parks.
84. I wish there was a cooldown area for nervous/aggressive dogs to go to and be semi-
isolated.
85. I would like completely separate trails for walkers and bicyclists because the bicyclists
come up on walkers too fast and they are going so fast, even when they announce they
are already on you. ESPECIALLY AT ADA HAYDEN!!!!!
86. I wouldn’t mind having bikes on the trails/paths if the riders would treat the paths as
“shared” and not just bike paths and would slow down near walkers and dogs and
announce their presence. More than 5 mph in the parks is too fast.
87. I'd be concerned about restricting the use of E--
abled populations. I believe the use of these devices increases park and recreational
accessibility immensely. The only other safety concerns I have pertain to reckless
individuals within the parks, not their modes of transportation. I don't believe increased
policies will prevent disrespectful behavior.
88. If there are a lot of walkers around, some people need to slow way down.
89. If there are walkers coming from both directions and a bike races up at a high rate of
speed, they expect us to rush into the grass to get out of their way. It’s not a race track
and shouldn’t be used for training. It’s a walking path not a race track.
If they are traveling at near road speeds they need to be on the roads.
91.
but I feel uncomfortable next to the device without brakes, such as monowheel or e-
skateboard
92. IMO the rude bicyclists are the riders training or wanting to go fast. These are adults and
not kids
93. In general, all are not announcing when when passing. People walking/riding (roller
blades) while looking at their phone the entire time. Pedestrians wearing headphones
and unable to hear bikers announce. Lack of helmets. I get this is a personal
preference, I just wish there would be more young riders getting used to wearing head
issues--we often drive elsewhere to have an enjoyable bike ride. There needs to be
338
Appendix A
some sort of crossing signal at 13th/River Valley Park near the river bridge if/when the
bike paths are expanded (I didn't see one on the plan). This is a safety concern because
of the 45mph speed limit up to River Valley Park, with cars exceeding the limit and
with poor visibility around corners due to the height of summer vegetation. I am a dog
owner and loved walking my dogs on trails, but it is important to be aware of what is
going on around you in terms of other pedestrians and cyclists of any kind. I am
supportive of inexperienced riders--there is nothing which warms my heart more than
seeing a parent teaching their child to safely enjoy cycling and teaching them about trail
etiquette. Yay! Education would help with a lot of these issues.
94. inadequate evening/night lighting; surfaces that are not well maintained
95. it depends on the park
96. it helps when paths have a pedestrian section and a wheeled section marked. like,
pedestrians can walk in the wheeled section, but it helps people know when and how to
pass. I've appreciated it on the Swamp Rabbit Trail in Greenville SC
97. It is interesting that the survey ask about device users announcing their presence. The
biggest issue is that pedestrians/runners are generally using noise-cancelling
headphones and are not aware of their environment. Another concern, whether I am
the one walking or biking is dogs that are unleashed or on a long leash
98. It seems like there are probably some inexperienced riders, and a couple of jerks. I
bad experiences. I have regularly used the parks for 15 years (less now, my kids are
older and I’m the one on a bike going around strollers) and this has not been a
persistent problem
99. It’s a challenge to walk with young kids and a stroller at Ada Hayden. We have had close
calls with adult riders who don’t announce themselves or slow down around children. I
have not experienced this at the other parks we visit in Ames.
-leash dogs in North River Valley Park / Carr Park, and
that is a huge safety concern.
Just announce more and people need to not wear headphones when walking
Just speed and consideration of others, which combined can cause injuries.
Just that bikers need to announce themselves!
Keeping paths clean from branches, debri and plants going wild
Many of the paths through our more established parks have narrow sidewalks instead of
paths. This makes sharing the walkways feel more dangerous. Some of them, like Stuart
Smith, the bridge entrance in Daley Park, and the paths out of Christopher Gartner Park
339
Appendix A
have tight or blind corners that make me feel less safe when riding my bike or running
those paths. Unleashed dogs or dogs on long/retractable leashes make me nervous as
well as dogs don't feel under control. I have also noticed more people walking, running,
walking dogs, and using personal transportation devices while wearing headphones or
ear buds, often leaving them less aware of their surroundings. When I call out and ring
my bell while riding my bike, they often don't hear me. Lane striping on paths to remind
groups of people to keep right may also be helpful on routes more frequently used for
moving around the city.
many parks are not accessible for all, the city has invested in new equipment for parks
and are now surveying about devices used within the parks system but are not
addressing the bigger issue regarding the lack of accessible parks in our town by
eliminating the use of rocks or woodchips. Inis grove continues to be the most heavily
used park because it is accessible to ALL! Please consider budgeting and investing
more in the rubber surfaces for parks and more accessible equipment at various
locations. I often cannot take my disabled child to inis grove because there is no
parking/crowding issues. Give the town more options that are accessible!
Many people use bikes through city parks because roads are not as safe.
maybe this is where or when I use the trails, but I rarely see ebikes aside from older
adults chilling on rides together.
111. McFarland Park the trails are narrow and can’t always see bikes around curves (but
maybe not in city)?
112. Mobility for handicap individuals as sometimes the trails do not easily link up to the
parking lot.
113. More sidewalks for wheelchairs and strollers
114. More with dogs than transportation devices
115. Most incidents I have witnessed involve minors on electric scooters. Most states have
age limits for these but Iowa does not. Could the city institute an age limit?
116. Most individuals use common sense and are considerate. However, we need rules and
accountability.
117. Most people have been very respectfull.
118. Mostly concerned about the speed of some devices.
119. My biggest safety concern is the speed of bicycles at Ada Hayden.
N/A, no, none, not at this time (117 total)
121. No - the devices that are electric just need a reasonable speed limit.
122. No - the trail system is operating well and doesn't seem to need major changes. I
bicycle almost daily and have had no problems I can recall.
123. No concerning safety issues. The park system should be available to all users.
340
Appendix A
124. No I think the park system should be available to use for all forms of personal
transportation
125. NO MOTORS!!
126. No- policing of bikes and skateboards is not necessary
127. No, but I do feel we need to create more paths that focus on those using personal
transportation devices than more walking trails. A dedicated pumptrack or mtb
jumplines like the FourMile MTB in des moines would be a great addition for bikers in
ames.
128. No, but I wanted to explain my answer to 14. There will always be inexperienced users in
any situation. I think the parks are a great place to gain experience and to learn to work
together.
129.
building a new one.
No. Parks are a great safe place for less experienced riders to learn how to ride safely.
I've seen plenty of kids and less experienced bikers that likely don't feel safe riding on
the road that are outdoors exercising in our parks. I've never had an issue with them
being disrespectful or disruptive and I'm happy to share the trail so that they also have a
safe place for recreation.
131. No. I think all people whether on foot or wheels should be allowed to use all parts of the
parks.
132.
slow down for safe passing.
133. none - no speed limit on non motorized devices
134. Not announcing approach for when walking dogs.
135. Not having dogs on leashes Having dogs leashed and running beside bikes
136. Not really. Would like to see a dedicated area in all of our parks for skateboards,
unicycles, etc.
137. Not sure if there is anything that can be done about it but teens using profanity (very
loudly) or destroying property
138. not unless the trails become a lot more crowded than I've seen so far
139. Not usually I am cautious at Ada Hayden because of fast bikes around blind curves
as keep right and not walking abreast and blocking trail or path
141. nuisance for walkers
142. of trail riders are very bad
143. Often pedestrians walk 4 across on shared use paths. We should have lanes marked on
the shared use paths and add signage that tells pedestrians how to share the path. We
also shouldn't allow bikes/etc on sidewalks, only on the wider paths in parks.
341
Appendix A
144. Older mobility chair users with leashed dogs. They take up the entire trail, can't hear my
bike bell, and then create back ups. Sometimes sitting stationary around a corner and
causing many near collisions. Sand on the northern part of the Brookside path, making
it less safe for bikes.
145. One wheeled users have often been going too fast and inconsiderate.
146. Only concern that if bicycles aren’t allowed, it forces them onto streets which is unsafe.
147.
148. Parents NOT watching children!
149. Pavement repair
People are often wearing headphones or on their phones and unaware of their
surroundings. I don’t think you should limit park use, people just need to be
considerate and aware of their surroundings.
151. People going too fast…. Bike riders already zoom by on crowded trails while walking our
dog without announcing their presence. Allowing more devices = more safety risk
152.
153. People use small motorcycles on pathways and it is not good.
154. People using both sides of the trail and not always staying to the right. This is by far the
biggest safety concern I see in the parks and on the trails.
155. People using cell phones and not paying attention
156. People using cell phones on bikes and scooters. This is dangerous.
157. People walking are unaware of cyclist due to head phones
158. People wearing headphones so that they are unaware
159. Perhaps restricting e-bikes to only assisted pedaling and not continuous electric motor
powering the bike. We experienced this restriction in Acadia National Park.
161. Present trails not designed for high speeds. Those desiring fast riding of any kind need
to go elsewhere.
162. Question rewuired an answer but had no option for " none of the above* which seems
prejudicial against people using transportation devices
163. Require bells or horns to warn others
164. Riding with pets on leashes causing or risking entanglement with pedestrians or
objects.
165. Runners with dogs
166. see above
167. Seems like a non issue
168. Seems like there should be a separate lane for bicycles on the loops at Ada Hayden
Lake, but if not possible, it is hard to manage "speed limit". Also, most people use ear
342
Appendix A
169. Separate or divided paths are needed to accommodate the various needs, not
restrictions
Sharing the paths.
171.
172. Should be speed limits near playgrounds and shelters, can go faster on trails away from
crowds
173. Small children moving suddenly.
174. Some fast moving devices (electric? motorized?) are very dangerous at intersections
175. Some of the parks lack lighting. This can cause issues with people not being seen if they
don’t have lights.
176. Some parks need more lighting in the area for we can utilize bike trails in reverting
177.
ect for wheelchairs
178. Some people seem not to know to ride/walk on the right. Pass on the left.
179. Speed bikes on Ada Hayden. Such a popular place for walkers, joggers, dogs on leash,
and even families on bikes. But the people that train for speed are putting everyone at
risk; even themselves. Even a well-. And
elderly people walkers that don't have enough time to react to a fast moving bike.
Speed is biggest concern when powered by motor (or downhill at Moore Memorial).
Also, at Brookside it seems like there is one much wider trail that is more conducive to
bikes.
181. Speed is more of an issue at ADA Hayden. I think making it clear it is a multi use path is
important. Educating people about two way paths, announcing themselves if coming
upon slower users, and reminding walkers to not walk so many abreast that others can’t
get around them/that they too need to yield and not expect bikers to ride on the grass,
182. Speed limits on wheeled devices is overdue. Publicize or post clear guidelines for trail
-speed,passing, announce, etc
183. Speed limits, who will enforce. Bike and wheeled transportation in parks will create
unsafe and dangerous. Makes parks uncool and un-hip!
184. Speed on electric powered transportation
185. Speeds hv increased to such a degree that it is unsafe to walk dogs andcthat makes it
186. Spraying Chemicals by Park and Rec.
187. That everyone slows down in the park area
343
Appendix A
188. The "bike lanes" in Ames are absolutely awful (poorly maintained, not generally
street, and/or not wide enough to get around the storm drains that cover the entire
width of the bike lane). Combined with the huge distracted driving issue in Ames, the
current road setup is absolutely not safe even though there is a line painted on the
ground that's supposed to keep the cars away from the bikes. I've almost been hit
several times while riding in the bike lanes on the road, and many others I know who
ride bikes in Ames have similar experiences. While I understand the need to consider
safety of shared routes, it would be very frustrating if bikes were entirely banned (or
given an unreasonable speed limit like 5mph) within parks because this would take
away what is literally the only safe option to ride a bike in Ames. This could be
-road bike paths
like many other cities have. As it stands right now, though, the options to ride a bike in
Ames are either to bike within a park or take an unnecessarily high risk of being hit by a
car. I would support putting speed limits on motorized bikes/scooters, etc. since they
can very clearly see and control how fast they're going. In comparison, the average
person can't just get on a bike and reach/maintain speeds of 15-
while this can be done easily by someone with little to no actual biking experience on
an e-bike. If someone on a road bike is maintaining those high speeds, they would have
to be fairly serious about the sport and would know enough to be cautious on shared-
on a real
-bike which creates the issue of riding at high
speeds while also distracted by conversation, headphones, etc. and not paying
attention to what's around them. I would also argue that the average bystander would
have no idea how to guess a bike's current speed by watching it go by, but putting a
bunch of new rules in place is going to result in bikers being unfairly targeted and
harassed by people who "just feel like that biker is going too fast." Since real bikes don't
have speedometers, there's no way to prove that they were actually going a reasonable
speed and it's likely that the city will side with the person complaining whether or not
it's warranted. One thing I feel absolutely should be addressed is the use of things like
headphones and cell phones while on a bike/skateboard. This is inherently unsafe
anyways, but also reduces bikers' awareness of what's going on around them when they
need to be paying attention. I would propose splitting the shared paths (with an actual
line) to have a biking side and a walking/running side. While not a perfect solution, this
could at least help to keep some separation to avoid accidents. Finally, there is a very
vocal minority within Ames with strong animosity towards biking in general (which I'm
assuming is, in large part, who's probably behind the fact that you're even considering
completely banning bikes in the parks). While bike riders absolutely have responsibility
344
Appendix A
to be safe on shared paths, it's also important to acknowledge that walkers play a part
in this as well. People on bikes aren't intentionally swerving way out of the way to run
into people who are walking, and there needs to be some education on how to be safe
as a walker/runner. As a biker, I always announce myself when passing someone on
foot, but they often have headphones in and can't hear me. Small children are often
running around unsupervised while parents are on their phones not paying attention.
-leash dogs are absolutely everywhere in Ames, and I can't even count how many
times I've been chased and lunged at by people's uncontrolled animals. There are many
everything on bikers when that simply isn't the case. A quick scroll on the Ames People
Facebook page will show you that there are already several Ames residents who take
pride in their decisions to not even move over a little for bikers who are in the bike lanes
and will even go out of their way to drive closer to a biker to make them feel unsafe on
the roads. Many others also argue that anything at all that would make Ames a more
bikeable town (even just painting a line on the street for a bike lane!) is a waste of
riders cause all the problems and will continue to go out of their way to make Ames an
actively unsafe environment for biking. Ames claims to be "extremely bike friendly" on
several of its websites. While my experience actually living in Ames has shown this
statement to be dishonest anyways (as Ames is, without question, the worst city I have
bikes in parks would take
this one step further. There are already very few safe places to ride a bike in Ames, so I
would beg you to consider not taking away the very few safe options that we even have
189. The age of the individual using motorized devices
like they can throw it out the window while driving down the road.
191. The city might consider disallowing e-bikes with a throttle. I have an e-bike that helps
me bike with kids on the back, but it requires pedaling like a regular bike. My maximum
speed is comparable to a regular cyclist. This is not the same as a more powerful e-bike
with a throttle and higher speeds.
192. The downhill trail at McCarthy Lee is very unsafe. People go much too fast on the trail
and parking lot.
193. the e-bikes go very fast sometimes and not safe with walkers at times. also many bikes
don't have lights and I've seen them at night.
194. The hill to the bottom of McCarthy Lee is regularly taken at high speed. Have seen a
near collision with a car and people by bikes
345
Appendix A
195. The only park that I can think of that should allow mobile transportation is Ada Hayden
and bike trails throughout town as there is a hard surface trail - Don't really think any
wheeled vehicles should be other parks as they are not practical. Go to fast and not
paying attention to those walking.
196. The parks should not be a "wild west" of transportation. They are now, and it needs to
stop.
197. The paths should be wider. Maybe a separate bike lane could be put in. I believe the
trails should be for all to enjoy and use proper etiquette .
198. The presence of other people makes me feel safer in the parks, so a policy change that
decreased overall usage of the park trails could inadvertently make me feel less safe
199. The safety of walkers and children who enjoy the park is it steak when individuals abuse
the speed of their E or motorized vehicles.
the sidewalks and trails should be maintained, so we dont trip and fall
The speed and inconsiderate behavior of riders on e-powered devices.
The speed of bicycles in Ada Hayden is crazy almost taking out my slower riding kids
multiple times
The speed of e-devices, lack of safety knowledge/practices
The true concern is not the transportation is coming up to a man when there is no one
else around and not much visibility
There are some areas on trails that are quite remote and I always feel uneasy in those
places if I come across someone else on the trail and I am by myself
There is currently almost no courtesy announcements given for blind/visually impaired
people that are using a white cane to navigate. Everyone should know what a white
startle them.
There needs to be clear signage as to who has right of way. OR pave some newer trails
for bicycles only.
There seems to be a general lack of respect for others from "E" riders of all types.
Entitled might be a word I'd use....
There should be separate trails for safety, there is no way to “police” this otherwise
These questions are all valid, but I think that no matter what policies are implemented,
there will always be rude/disrespectful park users. Banning bikes/skateboards/etc
won't necessarily solve anything.
211. These questions cause me a lot of concern. There are inconsiderate users of all things
in society, I hope we are not intending to let a few bad apples limit the use of our trail
would
want to use a trail only in the dark.
346
Appendix A
212. They should announce their presence earlier based on speed so walkers don’t need to
be hyper vigilant looking behind
213. Too many weirdos seem to lurk about as a woman I will not go without my husband due
to this.
214. Trail lighting for safety
215. Triathletes training at Ada Haden are dangerous and rude.
216. Unleashed dogs are a problem
217. Use of headphones while moving and thus not aware of surroundings.
218. Vehicles that cross near trails or along bike lanes on streets. The residential areas are
intersections and stop signs.
219. Walkers/joggers need to have spatial awareness as well as personal transportation
device users. Everyone shares the responsibility for safety.
We don't need more rules, just more respectful users that have common sense.
221. We just need to have people announce their presence and slow down when passing
222.
was built? Parkers on Hyde have no option for parking. And it is even more congested
nty of
land to built a parking lot there.
223. yes as i mentioned. right of way and slow down. I get the fun part but not on a shared
walking path—speed
224. Yes, please see previous comments!! It is Startling when keeping a nice pet, in control
& then hearing a bell or “on your left”, Almost after the bike is past you!! This does
happen even if your pet is safely controlled on your “right” side near the edge of the trail.
Also it’s important for the pet owner to be mindful that a faster bike/etc could arrive at
any time!!! Also park users should use good manners at all times & watch for possible
negative interactions with children, pets elderly, trikes/toys in the way or anything that
could cause an accident!!! Thanks for having this survey!!
225. Yes, walkers, runners/joggers, as well as bikers and skateboarders should not have
earbuds or headphones on (particularly in both ears). It's a safety hazard to be unable
to communicate. Particularly walkers who are lost in whatever it is they are listening to
and not paying attention to their surroundings.
226. Yes, when they are on unmotorized bike walking paths.
227. You could build a park made for people that want to do more than just walk and ride
road bikes. Maybe build a MTB park that could have jumps, pump tracks, drops, ect…
you tailor everything to walkers and road bikes but nothing to all of the young people
you have in this city.
347
Appendix A
228. Young, unsupervised device users
(Q19) Are there other safety concerns you have about the use of personal
transportation devices within the park system? – 379 responses
1. ?
2. 1. The quality of the trail surfaces. There are numerous places where the trail surface
needs to be repaired. 2. Connect the trails together. Getting onto the streets to go
es safe.
3. accessibility, trash management, hot equipment due to lack of shade
4. Ada Hayden vehicle break ins
5. Ada Hayden—holy smokes MUCH improved. I didn’t realize how socked in I felt running
there—until it wasn’t! Most revolve for me around sight lines: I also appreciate all the
work on sight lines in the Carr woods area.
6. Add more benches on paths for those with limited walking ability
7. Additional lighting
8. Additional lighting. During the winter months, it's more encouraging to be outdoors if
there is additional lighting when it gets darker earlier
9. Adequate lighting at night
Agitated transient/homeless interactions
11. Alcohol consumption and discarded beverage containers/trash, cigarettes/smoking,
nicotine pouches, etc.
12. All the above seem like the most common issues, especially at Ada.
13. Ames does a great job.
14. Anything you can do to have parks well lit… I’m concerned with assault, but I did not
have any bad experiences or close calls while in Ames
15.
16. As a friend of many people in the homeless/unhoused/transient population of Ames, I
understand and accept that public parks are a wonderful place for them to relax and
stay safe for the day. The public nature of parks makes it hard for bad things to happen. I
don't want to ban or prevent the impoverished from enjoying free goods and services!
behavior from obviously strung out/substance abusing/mentally ill individuals in parks.
I've seen drug use happen in park bathrooms and drug deals happen in park bathrooms
and parking lots. I've also seen obviously atypical behavior (shouting, obscenities,
erratic movements, inappropriate dressing [not talking about Richard here. he was
clearly put together according to his desires], and other boundary violations) and felt
348
Appendix A
like my only recourse was to leave the space. Posted guides about how to approach
those types of encounters would be helpful! and having more obviously delineated
spaces that draw attention to inappropriate behavior, especially around children, would
be helpful. For example, the Inis Grove park has like barriers and walkways. If a
homeless adult goes in there, it's easy to say, "hey, thanks for enjoying the city. this
space is for kids. Would you mind sitting on those benches made for the general adult
popu
kids on the playground are relatively boundaried against individuals loitering in the
shelters and around the bathrooms.
17. Bathroom availability
18. Bathrooms are not locked at night/early morning and gives opportunity for sexual and
drug activity.
19.
Be sure to keep homeless vagrants from sleeping or camping to ensure park trails
especially through the woods remain safe
21. Beside the bikes riding too fast, there’s a safety issue with the weeds growing between
the sidewalk and the lake at Ada Hayden. It’s better this year since volunteers took out a
lot of the willow trees, but it would be safer if people on the lake, or on the walking trail
occasions, there were people hiding that couldn’t be seen till you were right beside
them. I felt very unsafe.
22. Besides regular maintenance of facilities, and regular patrol by the Ames PD, Not
really...
23. Better signage at Ada Hayden instructing cyclists to announce their presence, the
current signs are not well placed and there aren't enough of them
24. bicycles at unsafe speeds
25. Bicycles going too fast around walkers. People oblivious to others using the path. Wake
up, it's not all about you!
26. Bicyclists at Ada Hayden very frequently create dangerous and borderline deadly
situations.
27. big brittle trees with brunches hanging above walking and grass areas
28. Bike and skate board speed.
29. BIKE RIDERS GO TO FAST
Bikers addressing their presence to walkers
31. Bikes coming up from behind at unsafe speeds and failing to announce themselves.
32. Brookeside homeless people sleeping
349
Appendix A
33. Brookside dirt paths need to be maintained better, foliage cut back some, a tree has
been blocking a path for weeks. I like to ride my bike as well as walk on Brookside trails.
They are not very good to ride in their current condition.
34.
understand the schedule - I've had close calls with deer when running in the morning
because I couldn't see them until I was right next to them.
35. Bushes in Franklin Patk
36. Camping in the park is a concern when I use the parks early in the morning
37. Careless users of grills.
38. Change lighting to motion sensitive- safer for pedestrians and better for birds and
pollinators
39. Chemical
City vehicles on shared use paths feel unsafe to us sometimes. People often bike in the
woods at Carr Park, and that feels unsafe.
41. Clean up picnic debris in and around shelters.
42. Cleanliness of parks and playgrounds especially after a rental has happened
43. Cleanliness. There should not be litter. As for dog poop, people are quite good at picking
up their pets’ poop.
44. Closing bathrooms during the night to avoid possible damage.
45. Common courtesy on shared use trails would would result in fewer problems. Wheeled
transportation should slow down and warn walkers. Walkers should stay to the right
and not have their earbuds up so high.
46. Concerns about homeless in the woods, groups of teens in woods
47. Continue the brush management- honeysuckle, other understory, cocklebur
48. Cracks in sidewalks
49. Dead or dying trees need to be removed before someone get hit with a falling tree or
branch.
dead trees need to be removed for safety
51. Do more about invasive noxious weeds
52. dog owners who do not have their dog on a leash
53. Dog poop
54. Dog rules need to be enforced for everyone’s safety.
55. Dogs not leashed or leash extended so far that owners don’t have safe control of dogs
or leash is trip hazard when it’s across the pathway and oncoming users have to stop to
not trip across it.
56. Dogs not on leashes
57.
350
Appendix A
58.use at band shell and brookside - I watched a man use trash to
kid’s class found an unconscious person in the bathroom.
59.
-
owners rude
61. Dogs that are not on leash. Pedestrians and dog walkers that use Homewood Golf
course during play as though it were a park.
62. DOGS.
63. Down trees on trails remove promptly
64. drug transactions-but that goes on all around Ames and no one seems to care until
someone gets shot because Ames pretends that we don't have this problem
65. Ensure there are no encampments in the more obscure parts of the park.
66. Ensuring foliage and trees at "blind turns" are maintained and cut back as necessary to
reduce risk of collision.
67. Excessive use of mosquito spraying and other herbicide/pesticide usages - I would also
appreciate park postage’s on when sprays have been done and will be done if they
continue to do so.
68. Feels unsafe to enter wooded areas due to common presence of homeless. We never
let our children use public restrooms because of homeless and/or dangerous persons
camping in bathrooms, or the risk of dangerous objects in the bathrooms (glass,
needles, etc). We leave the park and travel home for bathroom usage. We used to use
so. Some bathrooms just seem very dangerous and dark, with twists and turns where
people could be hiding, examples include Emma McCarthy Lee, North River Valley,
Bandshell. Whenever we have to enter a restroom in a park it feels unsafe, plus kind of
rundown or dingy. Nothing compared to the bathroom facilities in Polk County parks,
Ankeny, West Des Moines, etc which are always brightly lit, brightly colored, and clean.
69. Fire works being used in the park and the lack of police response. Cars in the park after
hours spinning donuts on pavement and the grass areas. Cars speeding around the
park.
Fireworks
71. Franklin Park - have witnessed multiple times cars driving on the trail through the park,
go by me. I believe people think it is a street as it appears that way. Maybe put signage
up at Franlin Street prohibiting cars if it is just to be a trail.
72. Gaps between concrete sections can make bike riding more challenging to navigate and
can bumb the bike rider up and cause control issues. And
351
Appendix A
73. Gateway Hills and other parks that have recreational disc golf should have clear signs
and give guidance to park sharing rules.
74. Generally, I think the City of Ames does a great job keeping our park system safe!
75.
med. People will brush it while going by
76. Golf carts
77. Good to see the concerns with E scooters/skater boards/etc not only in the parks but
through out the city. These users tend to jump from street to sidewalk at higher rates of
speed with very little regard to any rules. It is hard to know what they will be doing
78. Handicap accessibility
79. Have not experienced any I assume
Having access to bathrooms as year round as possible.
81. Having more bike repair stations and water fountains would be good, wider trails as well
- they should all be double wide.
82.
83. Homeless
84. Homeless
85. Homeless
86. Homeless
87. Homeless camping in parks and drug use
88.
89. Homeless encampments
Homeless in bathrooms or near bathrooms
91. Homeless loitering
92. Homeless people
93. Homeless people camping under brides and making make shift homes on river banks
94. homeless people have frequented some parks so it feels unsafe with kids
95. Homeless persons spending the night in parks.
96. Homeless population
97. Homeless presence at Bandshell Park.
98. Homeless sleeping in parks overnight
99. Homeless sleeping on benches and tables
homeless sleeping on picnic tables. I do not feel safe
Homeless tents (Brookside, North River Valley), Drug Sales in the back parking lot
the sidewalks, hot cigarette butts on sidewalks.
Homelessness
352
Appendix A
Homelessness
Homelessness and safety
Homelessness and trash, and trail maintenance. When the trails(through forested
areas) are maintained/mowed, there seems to be less of a trash issue. Homeless
people have also been camping in brookeside park the last few weeks.
Homelessness, and lack of facilities for them, resulting in increased use of park areas.
Homelessness, poison ivy, burrs
I am not aware of any.
I am not sure.
Walking in wooded areas alone, as a woman, occassionaly brings some angst as
darkness comes.
111. I don't know
112. I don't think so - they are as safe as anyplace in Ames
113. I don't want a police state but I rarely see any police presence in the park. Although I'm
a white male and consider myself non-threatening, I can see how some females
walking alone in the park might consider me a threat.
114. I fear that if you take away the option to use e-bikes or e-scooters, you will lose
segments of the population. Older people often enjoy riding e-bikes through the parks
for exercise. Many of the e-
engaging in other outdoor activities. We WANT them outside!! Speed limits in higher
115. I feel like at Ada Hayden since they have allowed so much brush to grow along the
shoreline visibility is reduced at curves so that individuals using the path cannot
116. I feel safe when I am using the parks. I am not in the parks late at night so not sure of
issues then. More lighting or signage is always helpful.
117. I feel very safe in the parks. They are well cared for!
118. I generally feel safe in the parks I frequent. It never hurts to have periodic oversight by
law enforcement just to keep people on their toes. For example, the little free library is
sometimes vandalized in parks. I do NOT want to have to remove them.
119. I have not always felt safe while using paths, especially when they go under bridges and
in tunnels. Lower visibility and public visibility are concerning. I also think there is
overcrowding at certain parks because they have more of what people are looking for,
like Ada Hayden and Brookside. If there was another option like Ada Hayden, I think
many people would use the space and it would provide another option for less
crowding.
353
Appendix A
loud/confrontational with the homeless Unsanitary cleaning practices in bathrooms
121. I have personally felt very safe in the parks.
122. I listed some in the earlier text box.
123. I seldom walk the trails, although I would love to. I feel uneasy being alone on a trail. I
am elderly and know of numerous instances around the country where someone has
been accosted in the woods. The one trail where I feel comfortable is at Daley Park,
because it goes past so many residential dwellings. That said, I am in favor of keeping
wooded areas natural, because they provide habitat for wild animals, birds, etc, and of
d
areas in Ames.
124. I was at McFarland Park over the weekend and noticed a lot of fallen branches in the
pathways, so having more routine path clearing.
125. I wonder about homeless people sometimes. And also with picking fruit and
mushrooms—where it’s safe to do so. I feel like people could easily pick the wrong thing
and get sick.
126. I’d love to see more equipment for toddlers! Many of the playgrounds are full of tall drop
127. If foraging is allowed, safety and information signs about what to look for and what
could be harmful should also be in the area.
128. In Daley Park it would be nice to have some lighting along our trail. That would be
especially useful in the late Fall and Winter when it is dark so much longer in the day. It
would make you feel safer when you walk through there at that time and would allow for
more walking or running opportunities later in the day or early morning.
129. invasive, pain causing plants
Is there a policy to address possible indigent camping due to the number of unsheltered
in our city?
131.
peaceful ride (prime example is connecting Ada Hayden to the river trail). Road
crossings and cars are always a bigger concern than other trail users in my opinion.
132. I've addressed it in the previous comment box.
133. I've heard some people have had their cars broken into in the parking lot but I have not
experienced that.
134. I've heard some worry about child safety, especially at miracle playground, regarding
"unsafe" people. But I personally have never seen any or had any issues. Perhaps a
concern with homeless people around Carr Park. I wouldn't walk there at night. Though
it's been a while since evidence of any there.
354
Appendix A
135. I've seen a huge uptick recently with unleashed dogs that have me genuinely worried,
both for my own safety and the safety of the dogs
136. just homeless people
137.
Ada Hayden. Other trails (High Trestle etc) people are very good about it.
138.
139. keep lighting updated
Keeping dogs on leashes. People using Carroll Marty Disc Golf Course as a dog park.
141. Lack of adequate lighting in parking areas, number of cars entering parks late at night
142. Lazy dog owners who ignore their dog’s poop, or pick it up and throw it in the
grass/weeds rather than carry it to a trash can.
143. Lightening in some areas
144. Lighting
145. Lighting
146. Lighting
147. Lighting at Ada Hayden would be nice in the Spring and Fall busy hours.
148. Lighting at community gardens, especially at the Ioway Creek Park. There are vehicles
suspicious activity there as well.
149. Lighting should be plentiful and maintained
Lights
151. Lights
152. Lights should not remain on whole night, so that wild animals can rest.
153.
the alley with driveways. Lights keep it safe. Less reason for people to damage items.
154. lights. path maintenance, toilet and shelter maintenance, chaining down tables so not
moved all over the park
155. Limiting herbicide/pesticide spraying in public areas. Also, fogging while parks are open
- was sprayed twice by fogging truck being at the skatepark during open hours. Gross
and not responsible.
156. Littering
157.
areas.
158. Lloyd Kurtz Park has a serious safety issue with parents and kids having to cross Hyde to
get to the park due to the lack of parking on the same side of the street as the park. Kids
and parents haphazardly dart across the street. Car doors are opening int
have enough room to miss a car door or child. This is an accident waiting to happen.
355
Appendix A
Cars back up on Hyde in this block because they can't safely pass. A parking lot would
better serve this park and increase its safety.
159.
restrictions on them.
Maintain regular police patrol in parks. There have been some unsafe situations in the
past
161. Maintenance of playground equipment should be improved.
162. Making sure paths are safe for wheelchair mobility devices use.
163. Making sure there is adequate lighting in parking lots and around restrooms. Maybe
having cameras to monitor the parks, parking lots, and bathrooms?
164. Making sure trails for walking and jogging are properly lit at night.
165.
166. Maybe add educational signage at these designated areas that show what things are
edible and what is poisonous
167. maybe some people sleeping under the bridges. Just don't want anything bad to happen
to someone walking especially at night.
168. Mo
169. Monitoring of people taking up temporary residence in parks, especially those with
playgrounds.
More infrastructure related, but the cracks in some of the trails could be hazardous
171. More lighting after dark especially going through brookside from 13th St.
172.
neighborhood park - Patio Homes West.
173. Motion sensitive lighting
174. Motorized vehicles on pathways
175. Mountain
176. My biggest concern right now are e-vehicles, especially the one wheeled thingies. They
always seem like they're going extremely fast. Roller bladers are another tricky one I
have noticed going quite fast at Ada Hayden. Since it's more of a loop/circuit, I think
some folks see it as a race track :)
177. N/A, no, none, not that I am aware of, etc (73 total)
178. need lights added to brookside tennis courts
179. No lighting in the trails when dark
No smoking, especially around children’s play equipment!!!!
181. No spraying if foraging is allowed
182. Not really. I'm in them constantly. Most people are very polite and interact safely and
kindly. I actually have seen more rudeness from walkers than from any other group.
356
Appendix A
183.
184. Occasionally homeless people
185. Occasionally I’ve seen needles or other evidence of misuse at Carr Park and Bandshell
Park. Also signs of someone camping out at Carr Park and Brookside.
186. Of course. The City has been irresponsible in its management of the trails. They are
unsafe because of allowing devices at irresponsible speeds. Ames is both
embarrassing and danger.
187.
188.
189.-way to S. 16th along
-leash dogs
191.-leash dogs in Carr Park (and over the bridge) and North River Valley Park. People will
the river, posing a safety risk, especially with a new playground in the works. I have
never seen leash laws enforced.
192. Old broken structures and that are rusting. Climbing structures with missing or broken
climbing stones.
193. Older kids being too rough or inappropriate, teenagers hanging out on the playgrounds.
Some parks have no bathroom
194. Only the above matter of personal transportation devices.
195. Our parks feel quite safe to me!
196. Over run with deer. Deer population needs to be addressed ASAP. DEER MANAGEMENT
program doesn't work. Deer are disease carriers and parasites.
197. Overall, mostly I feel safe within our city parks. There have been a few instances where
there have been people who have made me uncomfortable on the trail that runs from
Carr Park to the back of Inis Grove. I will ride there when I have my riding partner along,
otherwise I ride somewhere else. Tedesco trail is nice!
198. Overgrown areas
199. Parents should be watching their children and dog owners taking proper care of their
animals.
Parking (esp. @ Lloyd Kurtz Park). Need dedicated parking lot here, not church parking
park (especially from north).
paths in remote areas should be lit
Patio Homes needs a touch up on the playground area. The equipment is starting to
warp and crack.
357
Appendix A
playground. Miracle Park also has a high volume of unsupervised children
People camping underneath the bridges
People let their dogs in the water
People need to leave the animals alone and there needs to be less light pollution.
People pooping on slides.
People riding bikes with earbuds in; illegal drug use
Perhaps bicycle on Unpaved trails
211.
212. Please install good lightings around the McCarthy Lee park with Pickleball and Tennis
courts, its the most frequently used ones. Sidewalk, trails and lights need to be given
extra attention. its so dark out there, lets say people withoput a vehicle wants to go to
the park in the evening, and there arent any street lights, its so dangerous to do so.
213. Plenty of lights along paved parhd
214. Poison hemlock and wild parsnip are quite abundant. Many folks still don't know the
phototoxicity danger of touching those plants, nor the overall lethal toxicity of hemlock.
Munn Woods' Hickory Drive access stairs are in pretty serious disrepair with damage to
both steps and railings, with exposed sharp nails in at least one point along the railing.
215. Potential violence resulting from illegal.
216. powered speed, common sense. Cant be regulated i guess
217. Presence of homeless addicts and encampments.
218. Proper lighting and sidewalks in Franklin Park
219. Restrooms at Bandshell…lots of debris from adults/young adults who maybe stay in the
Hayden
Rules make inconsiderate users and encourage rude behaviors. Parks are quite safe
now.
221. safety after dark
222. Safety for individual park users (especially women).
223. Separate or divided paths are needed to accommodate the various needs, not
restrictions
224. Should be
225. Should have access to hydration stations and benches.
226. Sidewalk gaps and uneven surfaces
227. Signage is inadequate.
228. Signs listing the rules of the parks seem to be lacking at some of the parks.
229. Signs telling rule of bike use: need to announce passing walkers.
358
Appendix A
Since overnight parking and camping is not allowed in the parks, there is a need for a
designated space to accommodate unhoused people to park cars, camp or sleep safely
at night within the city and with restroom facilities available.
231. Sleeping in the parks has become a noticeable concern. With the growth of a homeless
population in Ames, we have people living and sleeping in the parks (Bandshell is most
obvious). As a female, I do not feel safe anymore walking in the parks alone.
232. Smoking cigarettes, vapers and pot that smells like a skunk
233. Some dog walkers release their dogs in the parks or let the reels out on retractable
leashes, blocking the trail for others. In Moore park, there has been occasion of people
driving their cars into the park for "photo opportunities."
234.
joggers, biking
235. Some of the trails are rough and can be dangerous for some bikers or walkers. The
236.
mostly the dogs seem well behaved but that’s not an appropriate use of space and my
dog can be leash reactive so I often avoid those places so I don’t have dogs running up
to us.
237. Some trails have become bumpy due to tree root growth underneath.
238. Some walking/riding paths are too narrow.
239. Someone picks the wrong mushroom, gets sick, sues. City then has to treat all parks for
mushrooms. Bid dent in the budget.
Speed and un leashed dogs
241. Spraying of herbicides while kids/adults are playing/using the park.
242. Squatters/homeless
243.sone of the gravel inside the
stairs comes out over time and can lead to tripping hazards for those working their way
downhill.
244. Stairs lacking handrails. As in Brookside park
245. Strange men alone who do not seem to be walkers, bikers etc.
246. Tbh the bike and scooter riders are not the problem. Homeless people/campers who
are drunk/impaired have been involved in most of the issues I’ve witnessed at the parks.
I understand that they don’t want to be disturbed but the parks are for everyone to use,
not just them.
247. The bandshell park got a new playground but I do not feel safe taking my children there
especially not by myself. ACPC took a child to the restroom where they found an
unconscious person in the stall and had to contact police. I have witnessed other
359
Appendix A
situations there that have made me uncomfortable. I have grown up in this town and I
have rarely felt nervous and uncomfortable like I do there.
248. The baseball area at Brookside park needs more attention. It’s looking very shabby. Not
mowed/trimmed good.
249. The bathrooms need more frequent cleaning
The college golfer that was killed by the city allowing homeless people to live in areas
along the trails is VERY dangerous.
251.
252. The greenbelt is very uneven and needs to be repaved.
253. The homeless people sleeping at Bandshell and Brookside feels unsafe to me with
younger kids. Also at Old Town park there was/is a sharp piece of metal on the
254. The new mini soccer pitch was build oddly close to Bloomington Rd, a pretty busy and
fairly fast traveled road. I have already witnessed many balls being kicked outside the
pitch fencing and small children retrieving them. A better backstop should now be
considered since it was decided to put it there.
255. The only unsafe users I’ve found have been young children/adolescents speeding rather
than teens/college students
256. The parks are very well maintained, thank you!
257. The paths at Ada Hayden are cracked and lumpy and sprouting grass and weeds
258. The play structures are being built only for older children (6 and up). Toddler and
preschool aged children can't even go to a few of the well visited parks because the play
structures are not safe for them.
259. The speed of some people on e-bikes or racing bicycles
The unevenness of the trails is an issue with the asphalt. I do like the give of asphalt
over concrete though.
261. The unleashed dogs
262. There are also walkers that are fairly unaware of their surroundings and sometimes
taking the full width of paths.
263. There are areas with poison ivy
264.
at Lloyd Kutz park. Maybe a net behind the street side could be put up.
265. There are quite a few people living in the parks (e.g., tents set up in the woods in
Brookside or under the 13th Street bridge), especially in late Spring and Summer
months.
266. There could always be more lighting on trails (I run early in the morning), but this isn't a
major issue.
360
Appendix A
267.
268. There seems to be quite a bit of poison ivy near the paths and the interior of the park at
Brookside.
269. There should be designated cross country ski trails where walkers are not allowed with
clear signage. Bike trails should link together and connect various parks with clear
signage. Thank you.
271. Transients soliciting or congregating around public facilities (restrooms at Brookside,
outside library)
272. Troublemakers drug abuse after hours is a bigger problem than ebijes/foraging.
273. Unaware
274. Unclean toilets, no water in the faucets of the toilets, really unclean water fountains.
275. Unhoused population sleeping in parks
276. Unleashed animals are still common in spite of current policy. The same owners who
let their dogs roam tend to have untrained pets, which is even a more severe safety
issues for anyone walking a leashed pet
277. Unleashed dogs
278. Unleashed dogs (in parks where that isn’t allowed) make me feel unsafe when I am with
my anxious, leashed dog.
279. Unleashed dogs (OK if well-behaved, controlled/kept in sight of owners)
stop to it!
281. Unleashed dogs in the open areas rushing at leashed dogs and humans. This issue has
cut down on my use of Brookside Park. Many times I’ve had to pick up my dog and hold
her high to avoid an unleashed dog near me. I’ve yet to encounter the owner of such a
dog to be apologetic or even civil.
282. Unleashed dogs. Especially during the evening
283. Unlit areas, overgrown areas preventing deer or riders from view.
284. Unlit walking paths and lack of emergency boxes
285. Unsure
286. Vagrants
287. Water quality testing
288. We feel safe in our parks. Thank you for continuous, thoughtful improvements.
289. weapons at Ada Hayden, drug trade in rear parking lot at Miracle park
What to do about large groups of older kids (like 13-16) who roam around in groups
looking for things to do. They like to climb up on top of park shelter roofs and do dumb
291. Wheeled transport on walking trails
361
Appendix A
292. When the grass is being treated, can you guys announce that before hand and also put
up a bigger sign since kids and pets and not supposed to touch the grass after it has
been treated?
293. While Ames has a leash law, there needs to be a lot more done to actually enforce it
(both within the parks and just in general). My dog loves walking at Ada Hayden, but I've
-leash dogs so many
times and the park layout leaves few options for getting away as you're being chased. I
would also encourage reviewing what is considered an acceptably-controlled animal
within the leash law. On multiple recent occasions, I've seen large dogs who are on a
leash but being walked by literal toddlers (with their parents walking multiple blocks
behind them) who would have absolutely no ability to control the dog if it were to start
running. I would really like to be able to walk my dog in the parks again, but until I trust
that there's someone actually paying attention and enforcing leash laws this
unfortunately isn't a good option.
294.
was built? Parkers on Hyde have no option for parking. And it is even more congested
nty of
land to built a parking lot there.
295. Wide, clean, lighted paths
296.
Hickory Shelter at Inis Grove
297. Yes - homeless people camping in our parks - I don't believe this should be allowed. I've
seen tents in our parks along the river. These can be somewhat remote and areas of
town. Walking alone with my dog is not as safe as in years past. It's a bit unnerving to
see people camping
298. yes dog should be leashed at all times and picked up after
299. Yes- monitoring for safety and vandalism
Yes, open carryon guns, tasers and pepper spray should be allowed for self protection
especially at odd hours when there is little use.
people are using a tree as a bathroom and exposing themselves. This park needs a
bathroom or portable toilet.
Yes. The usual: disruptive people, drugs & those already known, like trail use.
neighborhood watch.
Yes. More emergency phones and ESPECIALLY more legend maps! Anna Munn Woods
362
Appendix A
of Ontario/13th st. to the North. I can't recall the name of the woods right now but it has
many trails all throughout.
Yes. The space between the bottom of the slides and the top of the wood chips at
Bandshell Park is dangerous. The bottom of the slides reach my two year old's armpits.
The surface needs several more inches of wood chips. The height of the new climbing
structure at Bandshell is also not appropriate for toddlers and preschool age children.
They cannot climb most of the equipment structures safely. They would fall 8-
Yes. There are sharps left around in the bathrooms at Bandshell. And at Brookeside
because of the large homeless population we have witnessed a big burly man in a thong
exit the women's bathroom and go back to the homeless campground. I understand
they need a safe place to camp. However, I have 3 young children that should not have
to see a grown adult in lingerie. I will never again go back to that park. I felt unsafe the
entire time we were there the last time we went. I should have called the Ames PD for
public exposure but I was so shocked and disoriented trying to keep my kids focused
elsewhere that I didn't think to do anything else.
park use.
(Q20) Are there any other issues needing to be addressed regarding park rules and
policies? – 323 responses
1. (I need to review the park rules and policies before making any comments.)
2. ?
3. ?
4. 6th street by the train overpass - should place a railing so that you are prevented from
going over the concrete edge
5. A central smaller Ames dog park is needed- Brookside Park is an ideal area for this.
6. Accessibility
7. Adults shouldn't be on (or playing in) kids playground equipment such as swings, slides,
etc.
8. Agitated transient/homeless interactions
9. All public parks should have bathrooms.
allow camping
11. Allowing more urban deer management zones
12. Although there are times that bicycles go crazy fast around Ada Hayden, I do not know
that "a speed limit" is a good use to city resources and time. Maybe a general sign "this
is a multi use trail, please be considerate of others and avoid excessive speed when
363
Appendix A
around others" type sign would be a happy medium. Nobody is going to enforce a
"speed limit".
13. Ames as a whole has a general issue with distribution of information to citizens. It
sounds like there is opportunity to better inform riders on devices, walkers, and joggers
of path sharing courtesy expectations.
14. B
15. Bathrooms/porta potties at all parks, even during winter
16. Bicycles should be allowed to use the dirt path in Emma McCarty Lea park. There is very
limited opportunity for mtn biking in Ames and that trail would provide a perfect route.
17. Bikers announcing their presence - etiquette would say to say “biker” and/or the
didn’t alert their presence
18. bring back carr park! haha just kidding
19. camping in parks and city property
camping/sleeping
21. Can you also post when the big lawn mowers will be cutting the grass? It’s dangerous
for small children to be let out in the park when those are present and as a parent I
22. Can't think of anything
23.
overboard and create such a strict and overbearing rules that it becomes oppressive.
24. clean the restrooms more often
25. clean up after animals
26. Closing: “Nothing good happens after midnight!”
27. Concerning foraging. Only forage what you can eat on the trail. When 1persin picks up
all the. Worries or mushrooms for their personal use, this is hording. Leave some for
others to enjoy.
28.
when in Brookside Park and Munn Woods and they have just say mind your own
business and the other time said call the cops. Frustrating.
29.
the dog under voice control. Aside from all of the people and other dogs that an
bag feces let behind from their dog who relieves itself at that distance. That is left for
the rest of us to discover on the bottom of our shoes.
31. Display the rules and policies clearly throughout the park. Most people miss the signs
as they enter the park.
364
Appendix A
32. Do not kill park usage with rules.
33. Do police still ride bikes through the City parks? they did in prior years, but haven't seen
them this year
34. Dog leash laws should be enforced at Roosevelt Park. Many nights there are several
the park district have guidelines for when fencing would be erected in neighborhoods
parks? Roosevelt Park should have one since many people ignore the signs notifying
park goers of the fact that the school grounds are private property.
35. Dog walkers seem to be the biggest issue I see. Idiots who shouldn't own dogs and
don't know how to reign in their leashes and the dog(s) lunge at walkers or bikers
passing by.
36. Dog waste bags are great-maybe some at the water tower green space on Delaware?
37. Dogs at Bandshell Park during municipal band concerts. Not all dogs are well-behaved
and being barked or snarled at when walking past a dog is not a pleasant experience.
38. Dogs not always leashed.
39.
Dogs on leash at all times.
41. -Dogs on leashes -Less restrictive alcohol policies in certain parks? Sure would be nice
to (legally!) have a can of wine at a Roosevelt summer concert ;)
42. Dogs on retractable leashes! I was concussed due to one crashing me and have had so
to a half so everyone else can just live in their world!
43. Dogs unleashed
44.
45. Don't ban Motorized bikes, etc. just because of a very few who abuse the system. Not
fair to us riders who are considerate of others.
46. Drinking in parkings like Brookside near playgrounds is troublesome. Hard to police, I
afternoon.
47. Drone warfare games
48.
college students are in town.
49. Encourage drivers parking in boat trailer slots to park where there are already other cars
in the slot so that some trailer slots can remain open. This is particularly a problem at
Ada Hayden north parking -boat launch area
365
Appendix A
51.
it up. Signage between private property and park is useless; people ignore the
boundary.
52.
Fishers not picking up bait containers and discarded tackle.
53. Enforcement of speed limits
54. Even though the sign is up regarding picking up after your dog I regularly see dog waste
either right by the trail by the grassy area by the creek or within the green space of the
park itself. I am not sure how that can be better enforced. Maybe putting a dog waste
bag stand at the entrance of the park as well as keeping the one that is about in the
middle of the park along the trail. We currently have only one in our park.
55. Excessive lighting at night.
56. Fishermen need to clean up after themselves!
57.
not allowed, before the city is sued.
58. Groups of people should stay to 1 side of a trail rather than take up the entire path.
59. Ha, see above. I love our parks!
Hard to address - when users don't clean up after using a shelter house.
61. Hard to say, I don’t know the rules?
62. Have had incidents where I suspected substance use or sexual acts were occurring in
cars in the parking lots at dusk.
63. Have more camping spaces in the parks
64. Homeless or vagrants who sleep in or on playground items for children; within park
hours
65. Homeless people, smoking, leaving trash
66. Homelessness
67.
working.
68. I appreciate that you are concerned about the parks. The only concern I have when
walking in the parks is running across homeless people.
69. I appreciate the care and convenience of our park system. Thank you for the opportunity
to provide input.
I appreciate the dog bags provided for those who have forgotten
71. I believe Brookside is sometimes used for drug drops. I’ll see random items left on a
bench (rose, bottle of shampoo, bright t-shirt) or in the port-a-johns.
72. I can't think of any
366
Appendix A
73. I didn't see anything in the survey about pets which I expected to see. However, I also
don't have any issues of concern about pets. Once in a while some folks don't pick up
after their animal and I wish they would but it is not a major problem.
74.
mornings before kids get there.
75. I don’t want the trails in Ada Hayden to get wider. This would disrupt the prairie more
and is quite unnecessary. All park users I’ve talked to have never had a problem with
trail width.
76. I enjoy xc skiing at the Carr park trails on those few days when there is snow and
groomed tracks. There are many people who walk on the groomed ski trails and just
reck them immediately after it snows. Same with dogs, often unleashed, and there is
one small print sign that lets people know they should not be doing that. I literally
scramble to get in as much skiing as soon as I can before the walkers and dogs wreck
the trail. More signage and some enforcement would help a lot.
77. I feel the parks should be open for quiet use 24/7
78.
use. A large group of (typically older) pickleball players can be intimidating to younger
people wanting to go out and play.
79.
items should be addressed. Also, using the parking lot to change your oil and dumping
it in the prairie should be against the rules. I don't know if that has been addressed.
do this. Ames parks have lost so much character since I was a kid growing up here, and
that truck brings out so much imagination. Kids play on it constantly and love to pretend
to drive it. It would be a shame to get rid of something so unique and personal to Ames.
81. I love Ames parks and appreciate how well maintained and safe they are. I recently
good working order. Thank you.
82. I think it would be a shame if all electric powered conveyances had restrictions/bans on
the trails as there aren’t any other places to use them in Ames and moving them to
roads seems dangerous for everyone.
83. I think it would be great if we could rent the use of paddleboats at Ada Hayden!
84. I think it's appropriate to allow alcohol permits for certain events.
85. I think some thought needs to be put into night time hours. The current policies are a bit
vague and not well posted. I also think they're too restrictive. There are a lot of
legitimate reasons to use parks at night: stargazing and bike path commuting, for
example, or being out in the cool temperatures before Dawn in the summer. A lot of
367
Appendix A
disadvantaged in other ways (minority, etc), are probably less comfortable doing this.
We should strive to make the positive impact of the parks as wide as possible by making
them as accessible as possible.
86. I think speed limits would be a great addition to the city's park system. 5mph feels safe
to me as people always seem to go 5–
speed limits depending on the primary function of the paths and how high the level of
mixed-use is. Ada Hayden would be really unsafe on a busy day with a speed limit over
5mph.
87.
Give young adults a safe place to play sports in the summer and stay out of trouble
88. I think we have plenty of RULES......but are they all followed?!
89. I truly think a speed limit would be great or a designated fast lane.
I would just point out that it might be hard to enforce a speed limit in the parks system,
seeing as bikes don't have speedometers. Phones and GPS gear make it easier, but
they're still imprecise.
91. I would like there to be no dogs in parks
92. I would like to see a yellow strip down middle of path at Ada Hayden. Ideally our parks
would have a separate path for wheeled vehicles and walkers. Minneapolis has done
that around Chain of Lakes to great success. Maybe a one way for wheeled vehicles
would help at Ada Hayden, counter-clockwise for instance. I am torn about electric
bikes, electric scooters and one wheels having access to park trails. It’s too easy for
them to go too fast. However, I’m sure it’s a blast to ride them through the park. If I had
one, I would want access. Maybe limit e-vehicles to certain trails. Of course all of this
requires enforcement.
93. I would love to see camping by permit allowed especially for youth groups.
94. I would truly consider riding lanes that state no walking. I do not feel it is equitable to
state the riders are banned. This may be as simple as a dashed line to the right side of
the path.
95. I wouldn't condone this but if you are really wanting to make a change I think that there
most people want to do is to go up to someone smoking and tell them to stop (just en
example).
96. I’m guessing there are rules about having your dog on a leash that people aren’t
following
97. I’m sure there are but imposing more rules just to make it harder to have fun in the parks
will make it worse. The world is not just walkers and road bikers.
368
Appendix A
98. I'd love to see enough leash law enforcement to deter people from letting their dogs
loose.
99. If foraging is allowed (which I think it should be) some volunteer run safe and
responsible foraging classes would be a great idea!
I'm not sure if this is a park rule/policy, but you should consider fencing in more park
playgrounds. For families with small children, it is much more safe for the playgrounds
to be fenced in. Otherwise, constant high alert is required when taking small children to
playgrounds to make sure they do not run away.
adjacent to residential areas should consider an earlier closing time.
in regards to #16, intentional planting of edibles should be highly considered (fruit trees,
berry bushes, etc) - we do have people in our community who are struggling with food
insecurities and homelessness!
In regards to foraging- the best case would be to base the decision on science. For
example- all you can take of mustard garlic or other invasives, not allowed for species
that are too rare- similar to how hunting limits are set.
Inis Grove lights for sand volleyball courts need to be left on longer. Many of us would
Is there a policy regarding the use of drones? I’d personally prefer that they not be
allowed, especially at a park like Ada Hayden.
It might be nice if wood stoves were
It would be helpful to have more single trails around and also to have the existing trails
).
It would be nice if there were more drinking fountains but I understand that would cost a
lot.
It would be nice to have trail maps or indication of which paths are part of the
transportation system. I can see e-bikes etc using those for commuting and casual
walkers would be aware of the presence higher speed vehicles also some rules or
etiquette posted.
It's not happening yet to my knowledge but want to avoid public parks from being a
place for homeless camps like other cities I have visited.
111. I've never had an issue.
112. Keep grumpy people out, lol!
113. Keep homeless out! No camping!
114. Kick the homeless out.
115. Late night parties and loudness and litter the following day is not appreciated by those
of us who live near these parks.
116. Leaving bathrooms a mess.
369
Appendix A
117. Lights
118. Liter
119. Litter
Litter
121. Maintenance of the parks
122. Manage the Prairie organically and Never use chemicals as Park and Rec. have done.
123. Modest repairs to benches and picnic tables on a more regular basis would be helpful.
124. More art showing we value a diverse community and we are all interconnected and
responsible to help make our community strong.
125. More bathrooms open
126. More common sense and self regulation. Less government oversight
127. More signage for bikers to share the path safely.
128. Mountain bike paths should be made and encouraged. The city missing a major
exercise opportunity for youth. Too much emphasis on walkers. Mountain bikers are
notorious for maintaining trails really well for all people where I lived before moving to
Ames. The fear of sharing paths with them was way overstated.
129. Music being played at loud volumes
N/A, no, none, none that I know of, etc. (89 total)
131. Need bathrooms at Tedesco buildings not always open
132. No Bikes in Carr park, this is already posted but needs better signage, people rip up the
dirt trails they are not maintained for bikes.
133. No illegal drugs in the parks
134. No Smoking or vaping signs. no alcohol signs. regular police drive bys.
135. No. If the goal of this survey is to establish speed limits for bikers, please do thorough
research
park trails, please make connecting Ames to the Heart of Iowa Nature Trail and High
Trestle Trail a priority. It is not safe to ride on the Slater black top.
136. No. So grateful for so many beautiful and well equipped spaces!!!
137. Not about policies, but the growth at Ada Hayden has already come back, making it
138.
139.
well!
Ok - I use various parks daily, to get my steps in. I don't know why but CARR Park trails,
are loaded with "dog excrement" and people do not pick up. Do we need a sign? Even
my hiking friend said, I don't know what it is about this park, but instead of looking up at
beautiful trees, I have to look at the ground continually to not step in something. We
have personally gone there more than once to do park clean up on our own.
370
Appendix A
141. Open restrooms before Memorial Day
142. Over run with deer. Deer population needs to be addressed ASAP. DEER MANAGEMENT
program doesn't work. Deer are disease carriers and parasites.
143. Overnight accommodations.
144. Park rules should be listed in the city newsletter, at least during Spring, Summer and
Fall. Also, dog leashes need to be used exclusively in all parks.
145. Parks should not be "closed". Only "Quiet Hours" policies. Hours are already extensive,
but a growing city should allow night owls or very early morning birds access to the
parks without trespassing.
146. Parkview (and other neighborhood green-spaces) should prohibit children’s motorized
cars.
147. People not having their dogs on a leash
148. People play cricket at Inis Grove Park. Errant balls are a danger to people on the tennis
courts and to cars in the parking lot. They also smoke.
149. People using parks after posted hours. No one ever seems to patrol the park near me. I
cannot keep windows open at night due to noise.
enforcement of dog policies on park property
151. People who don't pick up after their dogs
152. Perhaps more signage instructing trail users to stay to the right would be helpful to
everyone.
153. Perhaps this is already happening - I don't know. It would be good to see regular police
patrols both when parks are open and closed.
154. Perhaps trash bins for dog poop
155. Pet owners are frequently not picking up after pets.
156. Pet policies need enforcement
157. Peterson Pits lacks an accurate website. There are no hours, (clear) safety guidelines, or
any guidance on the shore/beach. There should be a social media like FaceBook.
158.
159. Picking up dog BM
Plant more berry and fruit foraging opportunities.
161. Please allow biking on Carr park dirt trails
162.-7am until the homeless crisis is solved
163. Please enforce (if possible) removal of bagged dog waste. I'd rather see free 'bathroom'
-trail) than bagged waste left on the ground. This is common especially in East
River Valley
164.
371
Appendix A
165. Please let the guy that was mowing Brookside Park mountain bike trails keep mowing,
he was a volunteer, but he created riding trails for so many people! Either that or Ames
166. Please plant more fruit trees so the people of Ames can use the fruit for free.
167. Please post dog leash rules and reminder to pickup waste
168. Please stop cutting down trees - they are the heart of a healthy ecosystem!
169. Please STOP using weed killers on playgrounds and places human utilize. The
accumulation of all the weed killers that we use in this country is toxic and harmful to
all life. Please plant more perennial grasses, native plants, animal habitat and stop with
all the deforestation and weed killers. The things that are good for wildlife are also good
for humans. Our city got it right with Tedesco Learning Corridor. Lets do more to protect
our environment-our waters are toxic and polluted and unsafe- and stop contributing to
the decline of our environment please!!!!!
Policies addressing park hours need to be posted more prominently and enforced. We
also need enforceable policies about playing loud music, especially for evening hours.
171. Post no wheeled transportation signs for the wooded trails especially Munn Woods.
172. Post the rules so people can see them clearly
173. Prioritize bikers, joggers, and walkers- not drivers.
174. protect the landscape, no breaking branches or fruit bushes, no taking rocks/mulch out
of designated area
175. Public notices
176. Question 11 needs editing. :)
177. re foraging - I know people informally forage and I do not see a problem with this, but
allowing foraging opens the door to organized groups and i have witnessed A LOT of
forage adjacent people mis-ial
liability
178. Regular bike patrol would be nice if not already done. It can get kind of scary further
back on the trails.
179. Restroom need to be open
Restroom safety
181. Restrooms should be open year round.
182. Riding bikes should be allowed. I don’t feel comfortable riding one on the road, but
prefer riding on side walk given I am respectful to the people around me. Slow way
down when near people (not that I am going fast) and announce I am around.
183. Rules for motorized vehicles on park
184. Same as above
185. See comment above re: parking @ Lloyd Kurtz Park.
186. Shade, Roosevelt playground park is unusable with the heat in the summer.
372
Appendix A
187. Shelter areas should be kept cleaned for people that rent the facitilites
188. Sign placement re: no swimming seems to be inadequate. If the sign was directly on the
access to the water, it might make people more aware.
189. Signage on Hyde to let people know to park at Stonebrook Church, if using Lloyd Kurtz
Park. It isn't a neighborhood park anymore. It is a destination park
Signs are small saying no smoking. People are rude when you ask them not to…Signs
191.
leash.
192. Some of the rules at the playgrounds seem excessively restrictive to free play for
children. The rules for the playground at Lloyd Kurtz park, for example.
193. Some people are smoking and leaving the butts on the ground
194. Some people walk their pets in parks and do not keep a safe distance between them
and others.
195. some playground structures are old, outdated, unsafe to use
196. Sometimes dog walkers don't have their pet leashed, or don't pick up their poop. Very
annoying! Needs to be enforced better.
197. Stop the policy of naming public places after people. The Schainker park is a joke. I
consider it one of the biggest disasters Ames has thought of. No one will use it-except
maybe the homeless.
198. Surveillance cameras put up near bathrooms in case they are damaged by individuals.
No-e-bikes e-skate boards, on park trails!!
199. Thank you for the great job Ames is doing on maintaining and improving upon the
current park system and recreational opportunities. I love seeing that the inclusive
playground at Inis Grove is popular and gets lots of use. Even though my family is grown,
I feel this was a good investment for the community.
The biggest issue is that pedestrians/runners are generally using noise-cancelling
headphones and are not aware of their environment. Another concern, whether I am
the one walking or biking is dogs that are unleashed or on a long leash
The city has created a monster in Inis Grove Park. It has become so popular that
families with young and disabled children are unable to use it because of crowding.
The enforcement of the leash law.
The fact that foraging a public park is even being discussed as not being allowed is
shameful. People really care that much about people getting natural foods from public
land??
The only issue I have with the park system is the lack of an easy trail system for bikers,
etc. Create trails that link clearly and code them so people can easily use them for a
373
Appendix A
certain length of workout or to get somewhere on the trail without a lot of road
involvement. A color coded map online with distances marked would be really helpful.
The parks in Ames are a wonderful resource and chance to explore the outdoors year
round. The recent signage in and around the parks is helpful for people who are new to
the community. We take advantage of these places a lot and support the maintenance
and care that goes into these spaces. Thank you!!!
The parks should stay open later.
The policies don't do much if they aren't enforced, but it's hard to tell if people in parks
after hours are causing trouble in some way, or behaving responsibly, so it's tough.
posted park maps would be nice! Color coded areas, too, that say like "alcoholic
beverages allowed here!" or "no open containers here!" or whatever. Also, if there were
a way to show real-time updates and reservations of shelters and shelter use rules on-
site for people who make last minute reservations or need a lot of visual reminders to
follow through on expectations.
The use of personal mobility devices in parks may be regulated on a case by case basis,
Hayden, and this could be regulated by asking bikes to travel in one direction, and
reminding walkers that loud music in headphones makes them unaware of their
surroundings.
The widening of the trail at Ada Hayden may be able to improve safety concerns. We
also like the idea of a center line on the trail. All users just need to be considerate of
others and be kind.
211. There need to be porta potties at every park when the bathrooms are closed for the
season. Inis Grove is the most toddler friendly park and that group is potty training - they
absolutely need to have potties accessible there year round.
212. There needs to be enforcement mechanisms for park rules. Dog leash rules are already
rules useless.
213. Too many people don't keep dogs on leashes. Some dog owners don't understand that
not everyone loves dogs. I used to walk my dog in the parks and he did not want to be
greeted by other people or their dogs!
214. Uknown
215. Unsure
216. Users cleaning up after themselves.
217. users need to pick up their trash
218. Vehicles should use lights after dark -
219.
374
Appendix A
We are lucky to have a beautiful park system, proactive approaches on speed and
homelessness/safety are greatly needed to keep Ames people going outside regularly to
stay healthy.
221. We need to be respectful of unhoused folks.
222.
owner will reassure us that they "are friendly" but this is not safe when they charge at us
or jump on us or for young children who might be afraid of dogs, regardless of how
"friendly" they are!
223. When city workers empty trash cans at Roosevelt Park, they drive the heavy trucks into
the park, partially on the sidewalk and partially on the grass. Both trash cans are so
hat brief
distance instead of driving onto park spaces that are not designed for heavy vehicles.
224. While I support the idea of foraging in general, and letting people connect that way with
nature, I worry about over-foraging -- and the impact this could have on sustainability
and on those resources being available for our wild neighbors. There's a real risk of
"loving the parks to death," so to speak .... where people overharvest and don't observe
respectful principles of foraging. I think if foraging is allowed in the park system, the
city needs to set more strict limits on how much each person can forage, and perhaps
-limits areas to ensure people aren't taking so many ramps (for
example) that the population can't sustain itself. The city should also put up signs in
the parks educating people about the rules and about ethical, respectful foraging so
people don't engage in greedy, destructive behavior that could damage plants (that are
trampled, for instance, in the process of hunting for forageable foods) or populations, or
mean less food for wildlife. We need to ensure we're leaving plenty for them ... it's hard
enough for wildlife as it as as humans keep paving over, developing on and further
diminishing quality, healthy habitat.
225. Who do you call if you need to post a complaint
226.
227. Would like more access to water and bathrooms outside of Memorial Day to Labor Day.
228. Yes please wait to block the boat ramp Till close to ice up which is mid December at
the earliest.
229. Yes, athletic swimming should be allowed at Ada Hayden as it is allowed at State Parks.
Yes, either force homeless people inside a shelter (not an animal shelter, but a human
shelter) or tell them they are not allowed in the city limits and have the cops enforce the
laws.
231. Yes, enforcement of parking policies needs to be more lax and less enforced.
232. Yes, I think it makes sense to have an exemption at Roosevelt for the concerts. It's crazy
that they allow drinking at Bandshell concerts but not at Roosevelt concerts. Just
375
Appendix A
Roosevelt.
233. Yes, no smoking anywhere in parks needs to be posted and enforced; There should be
better signage about what to do with garbage, recycling, hot coals, and we should have
some personal device music/sound limits. Concerts are ok, but boom boxes are not
very considerate of others.
234. Yes. We may need new leadership at the department as well as more informed and
participatory commission members. Our city's management if its trail system is a joke,
and a bad one at that.
235. You need to mow East River Valley
376
ATTACHMENT A
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
PARK POLICIES CORRESPONDENCE
Hello,
I just want to mention some issues I have seen while I walk at Ada Hayden. Now that I am retired I
will be out there more.
People are not picking up after their dogs. There have been dogs not on leashes and are allowing
dogs in the water. (Summer)
Also, some bikers are not announcing themselves when they come across someone walking. They
go pretty fast too.
I can see cigarette butts dropped near the benches and swings. It's sad people leave trash too.
Thank you,
Diane
_____________________________________________________________________
Hello Keith,
Last night, I listened to the City Council’s discussion of a possible micro-mobility device ordinance. In
that context, I was especially interested in your remarks about the Parks and Recreation
Commission’s review of park rules.
I don’t know the scope of your Commission’s rules review, but I have repeatedly experienced two
issues that have discouraged or diminished my use of the wonderful Brookside Park.
Briefly, the areas of unpleasant conflict for me are: dog owners who do not leash their dogs and
cyclists dominating shared use paths.
(1) People who do not leash their dogs and allow them to run free through the Park.
This phenomenon creates a scenario for dangerous physical conflict between dogs. My dog and I
have experienced this frightening situation more than once, despite being watchful and taking evasive
measures. Further, owners who are more than 30 feet away from their untethered defecating dog,
rarely will be able to find and bag their dog’s output, even if they want to do so. Unfortunately, other
park users may inadvertently locate the output on the soles of their shoes.
Currently, there may be an exception to the leash law in parks if the owner claims the dog is off leash
for training purposes. I think this loophole should be deleted for anywhere in a park, other than areas
designated for this purpose.
I think more and clearer signage about the leash requirement and associated fines might help. I
realize enforcement is difficult.
Park users are out there on their own. Animal Control Officers and Police are responsive to a
call. However, due to the transient nature of unleashed dogs and their owners, this kind of call can
easily result in an unable to locate (UTL) code in the daily press log.
377
(2) Cyclists who dominate so-called shared use paths to the detriment and disadvantage of
pedestrians.
I’ve had so many close calls with cyclists, that my walks with my dog on Brookside paths require me
to repeatedly look over my shoulder to see whether a cyclist is speeding toward us. As a result, I try
to walk my dog on the grass, but only as weather and mud permit.
My information is the City plans to remove the section of the North-South shared use path closest to
the West end of the pedestrian bridge. Currently, I use this section of the bifurcated path to avoid
cyclists. However, when that section is removed, all pedestrian and bike traffic in that crowded
section of the Park will be forced to use the same stretch of path.
Please widen the shared use paths in Brookside, impose slow speed limits for cyclists or other
wheeled modes of transport and add signage along the paths telling all to slow down and share the
path with slower moving users.
When and how will residents be able to comment on any Park rules revisions?
Thank you for speaking up for pedestrian safety on shared use paths in our parks!
In addition, I ask that the speed of bikes or other wheeled transport in Ames Parks be no more than
10 miles per hour and require such transport to have brakes that provide an immediate stop. Safety
of all park users should be the number one consideration for those on shared use paths.
Thank you,
Tam Lorenz
Hi, Keith,
As a daily Ada Hayden trail walker, I’d love to see e-bikes banned there. They’re motorized vehicles,
which are prohibited to begin with, and people ride them way too fast. If somebody loses control of a
50-lb. bike going 25 mph, there will be serious injuries.
Sincerely,
Leigh Rigby-Adcock
I am unable to attend the public input meeting regarding rules and policies. I do have comments
concerning the use of the Homewood Golf Course by the public. Homewood Golf Course is a Golf
course, and people pay to use the Golf course, as a Golf course. Allowing walkers and bicycles on
the golf course during Golf course open hours not only is dangerous to the public, it also causes
paying golfers issues as we wait for walkers too clear the areas, or puts golfers at issues as they may
be liable if they hit a walker with a Golf ball. This is a serious issue that needs to be addressed by the
city.
Thank you.
Kay Thede-Hughes
378
I dont believe you should discriminate against people using an electronic scooter or power wheelchair
on the paved city park trails. Im a senior citizen who uses an electronic scooter in the
parks. Although I can walk, I do so very slowly having balance, knee and breathing issues. My 3-
wheel mobility scooter allows me to enjoy all the city parks - and to take my dog for a walk in the
parks. People use an electric scooter usually because of medical, mobility and/or disability
issues. By federal law the U.S. has the "People with Disabilities " act. I don't think people with
disabilities can be excluded from city, state or national parks because of scooter use. In the past
years our parks have been made more "user friendly " for handicapped/disabled citizens- that
includes senior citizens with mobility issues. This city ordinance that's being contemplated for
electronic scooters seems like a step backwards for disabled people who wish to be in and enjoy a
city park.
An issue I believe to be much more important in the parks is people speeding on bikes on paved park
trails. These people ride bikes at a very high speed on a multi-use trail. Also, electronic bikes can
travel at a very high speed- almost colliding with people walking on the trails. All the electronic
scooters i'm familiar with travel at a very low speed- similar to a fast walking speed.
Please consider all the above issues I've mentioned concerning use of city parks.
Thank you.
Marilyn Booth
Thank you for your comments!
The electronic scooter you are referring to is not the type of scooter we are discussing. Below is a picture of
the type of scooter we have problems with.
We will not ban devices for the mobility impaired as that is against the law as you stated.
I hope this helps clarify what type of scooter we are discussing. Let me know if you have any
additional questions.
Have a good night!
Keith Abraham
Thank you for the clarification.
Marilyn
379
Hello,
I'm a downtown Ames resident who commutes to work in central Ames via bike several times a
week. As The City of Ames reviews it's policies and preferences regarding bicycles, if encourage you
to keep international students in mind.
Many of them arrive in Iowa without a car or license, expecting excellent public transportation,
which we do provide in CyRide. But CyRide is sometimes not adequate for their specific needs with
regard to late hours or frequency of buses on their route. Lots of these, often working adult graduate
students turn to hikes as their solution. Ames benefits a lot from allowing traditional, electric and
trailered bikes to have the space and respect they deserve on roads and trails.
Victoria Mason
Dear Keith, I am afraid I cannot attend the public input meeting on April 2. But i do want to tell you
that I do not think you should allow any bicycles, scooters etc. or any personal transportation system
within any of the city's parks. I think people should be allowed to enjoy the parks in peace and not be
constantly looking over their shoulder to see if someone is coming up behind them on a bike or
scooter or an electric skate board. There is also the matter of additional noise and pollution with many
of these devices. Paths should be kept for pedestrians - and those who attend the parks should be
able to sit or play with their children or walk their dogs (suitably leashed of course ) in peace.
Just think of the Ta Hira Park in West Ames. There is one nicely paved path - which allows enough
room for walking - and nothing else.
Thank you for your consideration when this subject comes up next Wednesday.
Dear Keith, I remembered a point I wanted to make about the parks rules and personal transportation
vehicles. It is particularly difficult for seniors to enjoy the parks if they have to be worrying about bikes,
electric scooters etc. They can't get out of the way very quickly if there is any vehicle suddenly
coming up behind them or trying to pass.
Thank you for considering this aspect of the matter,
Best regards,
Rhoda Mansbach
Hello,
Thank you for letting me share my concerns about park safety at your meeting last week.
I’ve been thinking more about my request that the Commission recommend to Council a significant
reduction in the distance between trainee dog and trainer. I’d suggested 12 feet /3 yards as a
possible distance, instead of the current 90 feet/ 30 yards as provided in Municipal Code section
3.102(1)(d). I just took a stab at what might seem like a reasonable unleashed distance for trainee
dogs only.
Before (and if) you make such a recommendation to Council, I suggest you solicit input from Ron
Edwards of the Ames Animal Shelter and possibly experienced dog trainers, specifically those who
train service dogs. I am unfamiliar with your procedures, so if this kind of targeted information
gathering is already part of the normal process, please excuse my redundancy.
380
Again, thank you for the opportunity to speak with you last week.
Tam Lorenz
Mr. Abraham:
Because my neighborhood is not protected by a camping ban, I am concerned that enforcement of
park closing times will shift homeless sleeping and camping to my neighborhood. Please be mindful
of the effects and consequences of park ordinances and enforcement. I would encourage you to
postpone decisions until after the City's homelessness study is completed.
Respectfully,
Debbie Carter
Mr. Abraham,
I hope you are doing well! I saw that you all will be discussing the use of the bike trails tonight. It
sounds like some electric assist bikes, scooters etc might be restricted in the future.
I live near Stuart Smith Park. My only concern is that I use the trails with my kids. When it is nice out,
we take their power wheels car and let them drive it to the playground in Stuart Smith. It is battery
powered, but has a very low speed, around 5 MPH max. I am hoping that this type of vehicle will not
be included in language if a ban is enacted by city council in the future.
Thank you for your work keeping the bike trails safe. I hope there is a productive conversation
tonight!
Paul Attema
Like to have at least part of the trail (Ada Hayden) with a rubberized path for cushioning.
Requesting No electric bikes on the trails.
Dick Kruse
Hello,
My name is David Mason, I live at 318 7th St. I'm curious what changes are being proposed to
mobility devices in the parks, and would like to give my public comments, should any changes or
regulations be proposed.
I am an avid bicyclist (and pedestrian) with 2 young children. It depends on the day, but sometimes
we are pulling a wagon in the park with the kids, taking a walk, riding an analog bike, or an e-assist
bike. It's important to me that the paths through the parks remain multi-modal, and accessible to both
analog and electric bikes, and I am in favor of keeping them open to other modes of electric-assist
transportation as well. I think we should be encouraging people to get outside and into our parks, and
381
if they decide to use e-assist mobility options, these are sustainable options that reduce our
communities carbon footprint and take cars off our streets.
If rules or regulations restricting e-bikes are to be put in place, I think a sensible approach would be to
limit park paths to Class 2 e-bikes.
My wife and I both ride e-bikes to take our kids to and from pre-school, and she rides to commute to
and from work. She has a history of chronic pain, and thus an e-bike is a great solution for her. Our
routes take us through a park on nice wide paths, with plenty of passing room. When we ride our e-
bikes, we are directly taking a vehicle or two off the roads during peak traffic time.
I think we should also consider how further regulations might affect people whose only practical
option is an electric assist device, such as people with medical conditions.
When riding through parks, I ride slowly and carefully, most often with a fully disengaged motor to be
quiet, and politely ding a bell when approaching pedestrians to alert them to my presence. As a
pedestrian and cyclist, I have not personally observed any problematic behavior (going too fast,
cutting close to pedestrians, etc.) by other people on bikes, e-bikes, electric scooters, or other
electric-assist devices.
Many of the parks provide a safe and efficient way to travel through portions of the city. Riding in non-
protected bike lanes is unfortunately not a very safe option, as can be easily discerned by how many
cyclists (or similar) are seen riding on the sidewalk or through parks, versus using bike lanes where
life and limb can be severely endangered by one distracted driver.
Thank you for considering my input,
David Mason
I read the announcement of the reconstruction of the path around Ada Hayden.
As a frequent walker on this path I would like to point out my concerns about your plan and why I
think it would be a fruitless effort and an incredible waste of the tax dollars of the serious dog walkers,
exercise runners, and nature lovers (e.g. bird watchers).
The bicycle traffic has increased exponentially in each of the years I have been walking there. (Since
2015). If given two more feet and a smooth concrete path it will only increase more.
Bicyclists, ebikers, etc. are not there for the same reasons as the walkers. They are not using the
path to raaace each other, but they are biking to see how efficiently they can get X number of miles
ridden as part of their exercise plan. They may “announce” themselves behind walkers to their own
satisfaction, but because of wind, distractions such as chatting with your partner or admiring the view
AND the number of people with ear buds in their ears, these announcements very seldom reach the
people for whom they are intended.
Bicycles and hikers do not fit on a 10’ or 12’ path!. Ada Hayden does not have room for a double
path around the lake.
Please Consider another plan.!. You could build a completely separate bike path that enters from the
City sidewalk on Harrison, runs north across the drainage ditch berm, around the flat ground
paralleling the trail up to Jensen Pond, cross the Ada Hayden path and continue east on that
service road site and make a big loop north and west around the hillside on the east side of Jensen
Pond back to the crossing Ada Hayden and back the way it came.
382
They would get a good two miles in each trip they made on the trail and only have to look out for the
occasional dog. Or hiker at the junction where the paths crossed.
The other and even cheaper solution would be to ban bicycles and scooters and skate boards from
the park on Weekends and between the hours of3:30 - 6:30 on weekdays.
Those are everybody’s favorite hours on nice days — but they are darn dangerous for everyone —
bikers included.
I do wish you would think about it. Bikers and walkers need to be separated.
Margot Eness
Stone Brooke
383
City of Ames Parks and Recreation
Policies
Park Hours:
• 6:00 AM – 10:30 PM Daily (Sec. 19.11. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Alcoholic Beverage Use:
• Keg Beer is prohibited in all parks (Sec. 17.17. City of Ames Municipal Code)
• Beer and wine are only allowed in Brookside, Gateway Hills, Inis Grove, Emma
McCarthy Lee, North & South River Valley, and Moore Memorial Parks. (Sec.
17.17. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Bicycles (manual, electric, etc.):
• Prohibited from exceeding 10 miles per hour on park trails.
• Not allowed in Munn Woods, East River Valley, Audubon Trail in Brookside Park,
and Skate Park (Sec. 19.12. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Damaging Plants:
• It is unlawful to willfully cut, rake, damage, destroy, or interfere with any trees,
shrubs, flowers, bush or other planting, or building, structure of other facilityor
amenity within thein any public park or recreational facility.
• Foraging of edible plants, fruits, and nuts are allowe d within the park
system.Interfering with park structures or facilities is specifically defined to include
persons being on top of park shelters; placing picnic tables in water, using them
as sleds, or placing them on top of shelter; and jumping or diving off pedestrian
bridges. (Sec. 19.8. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Feeding of Deer:
• No person may place any salt, mineral, grain, fruit, or vegetable material outdoors
on any public or private property within the City limits for the purpose of feeding
deer. (Sec. 3.7. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Fires:
• Allowed in grills only
Firearms
• Firearms are not allowed in parks, greenways, and recreational facilities. (Can we
do this?)
• It is unlawful for any person to have in their possession or under their control in
any public park, pleasure groundgreenway, or recreational facility and/or space or
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 24 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt, Bold
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Font: Not Bold
Formatted: List Paragraph, Justified, Bulleted + Level: 1
+ Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
384
of the city a any BB gun, pellet gun, bow and arrow, sling shot, or any other device
for throwing a projectile of any kind. (Sec. 19.10. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Fishing:
• State of Iowa Fishing Regulations apply
• Use of any boat motor, other than an electric motor, is prohibited at Ada Hayden
Heritage Park. No person shall have any boat motor fueled by gasoline on the
premises of that park. Exception is emergency watercraft as approved in
advance.No gas boat motors on the lake or on the premises at Ada Hayden
Heritage Park (Sec. 19.19. City of Ames Municipal Code)
• Anglers assume sole responsibility for their safety related to ice fishing
• Any equipment/tool powered by petroleum (augers, generators, etc.) is not
allowedprohibited.
• Equipment/tool powered by liquid propane is allowed.
• Ice fishing huts may not be left in the park overnight
• Fishing from bridge at Ada Hayden Heritage Park is prohibitedNo person shall
engage in fishing from any bridge within the park system (Sec. 19.20. City of
Ames Municipal Code)
• No person shall dump live fish bait into the water of the any lake, pond, river, or
stream at Ada Hayden Heritage Park (Sec. 19.18. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Horses:
• Not Allowed
Hunting:
• Not allowed unless approved through the Urban Deer Hunting Program (Sec. 3.6.
City of Ames Municipal Code)
Motorized Vehicles:
• Limited to roadways and parking lots (Sec. 19.9 City of Ames Municipal Code)
• Vehicles shall be parked on hard surfaces only
• Overnight parking is prohibited in all parks
Park Structures/Bridges/Equipment:
• It is unlawful to utilize Utilizing any structure, and equipment, or facility for any
purposes or in any manner other than for its intended use is prohibited
Pets:
• Pets must always be on a leash unless at the City of Ames Dog Park (Sec. 3.103.
City of Ames Municipal Code)
• Pet owners are responsible and are required to clean up after their pets (Sec.
3.119. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Formatted: Justified, No widow/orphan control, Tab
stops: -1", Left + -0.5", Left + 0", Left + 0.5", Left +
0.75", Left + 1.5", Left + 2", Left + 2.5", Left + 3", Left
+ 3.5", Left + 4", Left + 4.5", Left + 5", Left + 5.5",
Left + 6", Left + 6.5", Left + 7", Left + 7.5", Left + 8",
Left + 8.5", Left + 9", Left + 9.5", Left + 10", Left +
10.5", Left + 11", Left + 11.5", Left + 12", Left + 12.5",
Left + 13", Left
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt, Not Bold
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
385
• No person shall walk a dog or dogs or in any way bring a dog onto the Homewood
Golf Course while the course is open to play. The Course shall be deemed open
to play when the flag poles are in the cups on the greens. This section shall not
prohibit officially documented service animals from coming onto Homewood Golf
Course. Dogs are prohibited at Homewood Golf Course while the course is open
for play (Sec. 19.13. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Georgie Tsushima Memorial Skatepark:
• No person shall use or have in or on the City Skate Park any type of bicycle,
scooter, coaster, unicycle, sled, vehicle or other device except for skateboards and
in-line roller skates (Sec. 19.14. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Skating/Skateboarding/Bike Riding/Scooters:
• Not allowed on tennis and pickleballhard surface courts (i.e. tennis, pickleball,
basketball, mini-pitch)
Snowmobiles:
• Not allowed (Sec. 17.29. City of Ames Municipal Code)
Swimming
• No person shall swim in any body of water on City owned property.
Tobacco and Electronic Smoking Devices
• Parks are tobacco and vape free.
Trapping/Hunting:
• Not allowed unless approved through the Urban Deer Hunting Program Not allowed
with exceptions (Sec. 3.4 City of Ames Municipal Code)
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt, Not Italic
Formatted: List Paragraph, Justified, Bulleted + Level: 1
+ Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5"
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt, Not Bold
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
Formatted: Justified
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 12 pt
386
Sup 2021-3 19-1 Rev. 07-01-21
CHAPTER 19
PARKS AND RECREATION
Sec. 19.1. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY CREATED; TITLE.
There is created hereby an administrative agency to be known as the parks and recreation commission of the
City of Ames, Iowa.
(Ord. No. 2507, Sec. 2, 5-6-75) [State Law Ref. Iowa Code Sec. 392.1]
Sec. 19.2. APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS, TERM OF OFFICE.
The Parks and Recreation Commission shall consist of seven (7) persons appointed by the Mayor with the
approval of the City Council. The term of office shall be three (3) years for six of the members, and one (1) of the
members shall serve a special 1one- year term. All terms shall run from April 1 of the year in which the appointment
is made. The one year special term shall be applied to a position first becoming vacant after the date of this
ordinance.
(Ord. No. 2507, Sec. 2, 5-6-75; Ord. No. 2772, Sec. 1, 3-24-81; Ord. No. 3821, 3-08-05; Ord. No. 3944, 2-19-08)
Sec. 19.3. QUALIFICATIONS.
No one shall be a member of the parks and recreation commission who is not a resident of the City of Ames,
nor shall anyone who is an employee or elected official of the City of Ames be a member. No member who has
served two (2) full consecutive terms is eligible for reappointment.
(Ord. No. 2507, Sec. 2, 5-6-75; Ord. No. 2639, Sec. 1, 2-28-78; Ord. No. 2843, Sec. 1, 2-22-83; Ord. No. 3944, 2-
19-08)
Sec. 19.4. COMPENSATION.
Members of the commission shall serve without compensation but may receive reimbursement for any
expenditure of personal funds in furtherance of commission business in accordance with such procedures as shall be
prescribed by the city finance director.
(Ord. No. 2507, Sec. 1, 5-6-75)
Sec. 19.5. FILLING OF VACANCIES.
Vacancies shall be filled for any unexpired term in the same manner as original appointments. In the event a
vacancy on the commission shall occur because of resignation, disqualification or death of any incumbent, the
mayor shall appoint, subject to the approval of the city council, a person to serve out the unexpired term.
(Ord. No. 2507, Sec. 2, 5-6-75; Ord. No. 3944, 2-19-08)
Sec. 19.6. GENERAL POWERS AND DUTIES.
The parks and recreation commission shall have such powers and duties as are expressed in this chapter relative
to developing and overseeing the implementation of plans, policies, procedures and programs for city parks,
swimming pools, and other recreational facilities and activities undertaken by or on behalf of the City of Ames.
(Ord. No. 2507, Sec. 2, 5-6-75)
Sec. 19.7. SPECIFIC POWERS AND DUTIES.
The parks and recreation commission shall have the following powers and duties:
(1) Rulemaking. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, the commission shall have
rulemaking authority, andauthority and shall prescribe and promulgate communicate all needed rules and regulations
for use of or participation in the city parks, swimming pools, and other recreational facilities, programs and
activities.
(2) Planning. Prepare, and revise at least once every five (5) years, a plan for the development and
continuation of a system of city parks, pleasure groundsgreenways, swimming pools, and other recreational
facilities.
387
Sup 2018-3 19-2 Rev. 07-01-18
(3) Gifts. May solicit, on behalf of the City of Ames, gifts of money or property for parks and recreation
purposes.
(4) Rates Fees and charges. Whenever, and only so long as there are no revenue bonds or pledge orders
outstanding which are payable therefrom, the commission shall have the power and authority to establish fees , rates
and charges for the use of a city park, pleasure ground, swimming pool, or other recreational facility, or for
participation in a recreational program or activity. However, the city council shall at all times retain and have power
and authority to establish, impose, adjust and provide for the collection of rates fees and charges when such action is
necessary to produce gross revenues at least sufficient to pay the expenses of operation and maintenance of a certain
park, pleasure groundgreenway, swimming pool, or other recreational facility, or to pay the principal and interest of
any revenue bonds and pledge orders as they come due.
(5) Joint projects. Subject to the approval of the city council, the commission may take action jointly with
other public or private agencies as provided in Chapter 28E, Code of Iowa , 1977.
[State Law Ref. Iowa Code Sec. 392.4]
(6) Contracts. The commission shall have power to authorize and execute on behalf of the City of Ames,
without action of the city council, contracts with public or private entities for service relative to recreational
programs and activities. Such contracts shall be evidenced by a written document approved as to form by the city
attorney and certified consistent with the current budget by the director of finance .
[State Law Ref. Iowa Code Sec. 392.3]
(7) Leasing to organizations. The commission shall have authority to lease, under reasonable rules and
requirements, a particular park or portion thereof, as follows:
(a) For a period not in excess of ten (10) days to charitable, fraternal and patriotic organizations, for
the purpose of permitting such organizations to conduct celebrations, anniversaries and entertainments.
(b) For a period not to exceed six (6) months, as the commission shall deem proper , for the purpose of
permitting the playing of amateur or professional baseball or other athletic games.
(Ord. No. 2507, Sec. 2, 5-6-75)
Sec. 19.8. DAMAGING PLANTS, PROPERTY IN PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES.
(1) It is unlawful for any person to willfully cut, rake, damage, destroy or interfere with any
trees, shrubs, flowers, bush or other planting, or building, structure or other facility amenity in any public park or
recreational facility.
(2) Foraging of edible plants, fruit, and nuts are allowed within the park system.
(1)(3) Interfering with park structures or facilities is specifically defined to include persons
being on top of park shelters; placing picnic tables in water , using them as sleds, or placing them on top of shelters;
and jumping or diving off pedestrian bridgesUtilizing any structure, equipment, or facility for any purpose or in any
manner other than for its intended use is prohibited.
(Ord. No. 2507, Sec. 2, 5-6-75, Ord. No. 3459, Sec. 1, 9-9-97)
Sec. 19.9. UNLAWFUL TO OPERATE A MOTOR VEHICLE IN CITY PARK; EXCEPTIONS.
It is unlawful for any person, other than authorized personnel, to operate a motor vehicle as defined in the
laws of the state in any public park or pleasure groundgreenway of the city, except upon the streets and parking lots
therein which are specifically designated for motor vehicle travel. Exception: This does not apply to manual or
powered mobility devices used by individuals with a disability. Use of Other Power-Driven Mobility Devices
(OPDMD) by individuals with mobility disability’s are subject to a case-by-case assessment based on official factors
(i.e. device characteristics, park characteristics, safety requirements, environmental factors, and/or land
management).
(Ord. No. 2507, Sec. 2, 5-6-75)
Sec. 19.10. FIREARMS PROHIBITED; EXCEPTIONS.
Except for police officers, while in the performance of duty, and as otherwise specifically authorized by the
commission, it It is unlawful for any person to carry or have in their possession or under their control in any public
park, pleasure groundgreenway or recreational facility and/or space of the city any firearm of any kind whatsoever,
BB gun, pellet gun, bow and arrow, sling shot, or any other device for shooting or throwing a projectile of any kind.
(Ord. No. 2507, Sec. 2, 5-6-75)
388
Sup 2021-3 19-3 Rev. 07-01-21
Sec. 19.11. PARK HOURS.
All city parks are open to the public from 6:00 a.m. to 10:30 p.m. Only Parks & Recreation department
employees or emergency personnel, including fire, police and utility workers, are authorized to be in the parks
between the hours of 10:30 p.m. until 6:00 a.m., unless advance written permissionapproval has been obtained from
the Parks and Recreation Commission.
(Ord. No. 3459, Sec. 1, 9-9-97)
Sec. 19.12. BIKE RIDING PROHIBITED IN CERTAIN PARKS.
Bike ridingRiding bikes of all types (i.e. manual, electric, etc.) is prohibited in Munn Woods; East River
Valley Park; and in Brookside Park on the Audubon Trail.
See also 19.14.
(Ord. No. 3439, Sec. 1, 9-9-97; Ord. No. 4359, 6-12-18)
Sec. 19.13. DOGS AT HOMEWOOD GOLF COURSE.
No person shall walk a dog or dogs or in any way bring a dog onto the Homewood Golf Course while the
course is open to play. The Course shall be deemed open to play when the flag poles are in the cups on the greens.
This section shall not prohibit a blind personofficially documented service animals from coming onto Homewood
Golf Course with the aid of the blind persons’s seeing-eye dog.
(Ord. No. 3583, 9-12-00)
Sec. 19.14. PROHIBITED USE OF GEORGIE TSUSHIMA MEMORIAL SKATE PARK.
(1) No person shall use or have in or on the City Skate Park any type of bicycle, scooter, coaster, unicycle,
sled, vehicle or other device except for skateboards and in-line roller skates.
(2) Violation of this section shall be a municipal infraction punishable by a penalty of $50.00 for a first
offense, $100 for a second offense, and $200 for each subsequent offense.
(Ord. No. 3679, 8-27-02)
Sec. 19.15. ReservedSWIMMING PROHIBITED.
(Ord. No. 3996, 7-14-09)No person shall swim in any body of water on City owned property.
Sec. 19.16. Reserved.
(Ord. No. 3996, 7-14-09)
Sec. 19.17. Reserved.
(Ord. No. 3996, 7-14-09)
Sec. 19.18. BAIT DUMPING PROHIBITED.
No person shall dump live fish bait into the water of the any lake, pond, river, or stream at Ada Hayden
Heritage Park.
(Ord. No. 3756, 2-10-04)
Sec. 19.19. BOAT MOTORS.
Use of any boat motor, other than an electric motor, is prohibited at Ada Hayden Heritage Park. No person
shall have any boat motor fueled by gasoline on the premises of that park. Exception is emergency watercraft as
approved in advance.
(Ord. No. 3756, 2-10-04)
Sec. 19.20. FISHING FROM THE BRIDGE PROHIBITED.
No person shall engage in fishing from the any bridge within the park systemat Ada Hayden Heritage Park.
(Ord. No. 3756, 2-10-04)
Sec. 19.21. PENALTIES.
389
Sup 2018-3 19-4 Rev. 07-01-18
a) Violation of sections 19.8 through 19.20 shall be a municipal infraction punishable by a penalty of $30
for a first violation; $100 for the first repeat violation; and, $200 for each and every subsequent repeat violation.
b) Alternatively, violations of sections 19.15 through 19.20 can be charged by a peace officer as a simple
misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $500, or by imprisonment for a period not to exceed thirty days.
(Ord. No. 3756, 2-10-04)
390
ITEM #:34
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:P&H
SUBJECT:PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH PUD AMENDMENT FOR 3300 UNIVERSITY
BOULEVARD (DISCOVERY PLACE) 1ST ADDITION
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
3300 University Boulevard (Attachment A), is a 2.06-acre property owned by Hunziker
Construction Services, Inc. On December 17, 2024, Council approved a rezoning of this
property and the nearby 3200 University Boulevard from Research Park Innovation (RI) to
Floating Suburban – Residential Medium Density (FS-RM) with a Planned Unit Development
Overlay (O-PUD) (Attachment B).
Along with the rezoning on November 26, 2024, Council also approved a Major Site
Development Plan for this property. The site plan called for two apartment buildings, each with
eight units, and three sets of triplex apartment buildings for a total unit count of 25 apartments.
Development on this property has begun and buildings are currently in the process of being
constructed.
The proposed Preliminary Plat (Attachment C) subdivides the approved Major Site
Development Plan by creating a separate lot for each apartment building and a separate
lot for each triplex unit, making them single family attached units. The Preliminary Plat
has 11 lots and one outlot that contains a garage building for the apartment buildings,
driveway, and parking. The Preliminary Plat includes details for the proposed lot lines, private
street, and utilities.
Overall the site access and site layout are unchanged with the platting. Although the
individual lots and the outlot with garages do not meet typical FS-RM zoning standards,
the PUD Overlay allows for their approval as an amendment addressing individual lot
configurations and building requirements.
ORIGINAL SITE PLAN DEVIATIONS:
Standard FS-RM Standard 3300 University Boulevard
Front Setback 20 feet, 25 feet to garage 10 feet
Side Setback 6 or 8 feet (depending on height)10 feet
Rear Setback 20 feet 15 feet
DEVIATIONS WITH PRELIMINARY PLAT:
The PUD permits certain design flexibility. The site at 3300 University Boulevard will have the
following deviations with this Preliminary Plat:
There will be lots with private street access.
The internal lots for the individual triplexes and apartment buildings do not have frontage
391
on a public street.
The required parking for the apartment buildings is located off-site, on the outlot.
The outlot between the apartment buildings will be used for accessory garage structures
to the individual apartment buildings.
The single-family attached building setbacks for interior lot lines:
Lot 1: 2 feet to the north
Lots 3 & 4: 5 feet from each building to the shared lot line
Lots 6 & 7: 5 feet from each building to the shared lot line
Lot 9: 2 feet to the south
The setbacks around the apartment lots are at least 10 feet. The rear setback for the triplexes
is 20 feet. The front setback for the single family attached units is also 20 feet, which
incorporates the driveway so that all single-family attached units have parking located on each
individual lot.
The platting of the triplex units into single family attached housing does not change the layout
of the buildings. However, the lots lines for these units were adjusted to create lots that
include the driveways to the units. This allows each property to fully control their driveway and
access to the garage and it does not overlap with the private street improvements.
Along with the final plat, the applicant will need to submit covenants related to: 1) how the
garages will be allocated and 2) maintenance of communal property.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Notice for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting followed code requirements with
mailed notice to owners within 400 feet and placement of a sign along University Boulevard.
No notice is required for City Council review of a preliminary plat.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION:
The Preliminary Plat was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission on November 5,
2025. At that meeting the Commission voted (6-0-0) to recommend that City Council approve
the Preliminary Plat. No members of the public were present.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the PUD Overlay Amendments and the Preliminary Plat for Discovery Place, 1st
Addition.
2. Approve the Preliminary Plat with conditions for Discovery Place, 1st Addition.
3. Defer action on this request and refer it back to City staff and/or the applicant for
additional information.
392
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff has reviewed the Preliminary Plat for Discovery Place, 1st Addition. The design
and proposed improvements have been found to meet the City’s design standards in
Chapter 23, Subdivisions. Staff finds the additional changes amending the PUD
Approval to be keeping with the original findings of approval of the project and are only
necessary to create the proposed ownership pattern and for common area with a
garage structure. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City
Council adopt Alternative #1, as described above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Addendum.pdf
Attachment A - Location Map.pdf
Attachment B - Existing Zoning.pdf
Attachment C - Preliminary Plat.pdf
Attachment D - Approved Site Plan.pdf
Attachment E - Applicable Subdivision Law.pdf
393
ADDENDUM
Project Location.
The site is 2.06 acres located on an existing platted lot at 3300 University Boulevard. The
lot is adjacent to the Tedesco Environmental Learning Corridor on the north, east, and
south and by the University Boulevard right-of-way west. The land was undeveloped prior
to the residential buildings currently under construction.
Major Site Development Plan Compliance.
The Preliminary Plat for this development is in conformance with a Major Site
Development Plan that was approved in November of 2024 along with the rezoning to
FS-RM with a PUD Overlay. The Major Site Development Plan regulates the general
arrangement of uses, layout of development, planned vehicular movements, pedestrian
connections, and developable areas.
The site will be residential in use with each lot containing either one third of a triplex or an
apartment building with eight units.
The site plan itself will not be altered. No changes will be made to the layout, unit
count, impervious coverage, vehicular access, etc.
Traffic and Street Connections.
The site shares access to University Boulevard with 3200 University Boulevard, the
companion project to the north. This property just had its Major Site Development Plan
approved at the October 28, 2025, Council Meeting. The vehicular entrance will come off
the east side of the traffic circle at University Boulevard and Cottonwood Road. The
vehicle entrance will also intersect with the trail into the Tedesco Environmental Learning
Corridor.
Private Driveway/Street.
The shared driveway from the University Boulevard traffic circle turns to the north to serve
3200 and to the south to serve 3300 (the subject property). The main drive aisle is 25 feet
wide.
The three triplexes are lined up along the east side of the property. All units have two -car
garages with driveways in front with space for two additional cars.
The apartment buildings are along the western side of the property with a garage building
and surface parking lot spaces in-between. Each apartment eight-unit apartment building
will be on its own lot.
Shared-Use Paths, Sidewalks, and Trails.
To the north of 3300 is the Tedesco Environmental Learning Corridor, which has a trail
394
coming in from University Boulevard. This trail connection leads farther into the park.
Internal sidewalks connect the apartment buildings and triplexes to one another, to
University Boulevard, and to the trail into Tedesco Park.
With the site plan, the developer was required to extend a short, existing sidewalk south
along University Boulevard to where it meets the sidewalk in front of the McFarland Clinic
property. The sidewalk was built in front of both 3300 and Tedesco Environm ental
Learning Corridor property.
Stormwater Management.
A stormwater facility is being constructed in the south of the property according to the
Major Site Development Plan. The on-site pond connects in with the stream to the south
in Tedesco Environmental Learning Corridor.
Utilities and Easements.
The property is within the Alliant Energy territory. (The sister development at 3200 is in
Ames Electric territory.)
City water and sewer access will come from University Boulevard. The water line will be
8 inches in diameter and will loop through the site; the sewer line will be 8 inches.
395
Attachment A
Location Map
396
Attachment B
Existing Zoning
397
Attachment C
Preliminary Plat
398
399
400
Attachment D
Approved Major Site Development Plan – Excerpt
401
402
Attachment E
Applicable Subdivision Law
The laws applicable to this Preliminary Plat Subdivision include, but are not limited to, the
following: (verbatim language is shown in italics, other references are paraphrased):
Code of Iowa Chapter 354, Section 8 requires that the governing body shall determine
whether the subdivision conforms to its Land Use Policy Plan.
Ames Municipal Code Chapter 23, Subdivisions, Division I, outlines the general
provisions for subdivisions within the City limits and within two miles of the City limits of
Ames.
Ames Municipal Code Section 23.302(3):
(3) Planning and Zoning Commission Review:
(a) The Planning and Zoning Commission shall examine the Preliminary Plat, any
comments, recommendations or reports assembled or made by the
Department of Planning and Housing, and such other information as it deems
necessary or desirable to consider.
(b) Based upon such examination, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
ascertain whether the Preliminary Plat conforms to relevant and applicable
design and improvement standards in these Regulations, to other City
ordinances and standards, to the City’s Land Use Policy Plan, and to the City’s
other duly adopted Plans.
Ames Municipal Code Section 23.302(4):
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: Following such examination and
within 30 days of the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission at which a
complete Application is first formally received for consideration, the Planning and Zoning
Commission shall forward a report including its recommendation to the City Council. The
Planning and Zoning Commission shall set forth its reasons for any recommendation to
disapprove or to modify any Preliminary Plat in its report to the City Council and shall
provide a written copy of such reasons to the developer.
403
To:Mayor and City Council
From:Casandra Eames, Engagement Coordinator
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Engagement Coordinator Annual Update
Item No. 35
MEMO
Attached please find the annual update from the Engagement Coordinator.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Engagement Update 24-25.pptx
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
404
Community
Engagement
2024-2025
Annual Update
Casandra Eames
405
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
(1)
Completed credits to become a certified ADA
Coordinator
•Anticipated testing in Winter 2025
Completed ADA walkthrough of the City’s
public buildings
•Developing the Transition Plan is the next
step
Continue addressing complaints from the
public
ADA training conducted by an external
facilitator for staff on new digital requirements
New website created and continuing to work
on accessibility
•Reached out to community organizations
for feedback
2
406
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (2)
The City of Ames will need to meet new digital
accessibility requirements from the U.S. Department
of Justice (DOJ) by April 2026.
An internal staff Task Force has been created, with
representation from all departments, to provide
feedback and assist with compliance.
A training for City staff on this new rule will be
rolled out to management in January 2026.
3
407
FEDERAL REPORTING
Affirmative Action
Reviewing the Affirmative Action reports from
City contractors.
Equal Employment Opportunity Reporting
4
408
STAYING CONNECTED IN THE
COMMUNITY
Assisted in organizing the Building Inclusion
Breakfast and Roundtable Discussion
Participates in the Iowa Equity & Inclusion Officers
virtual meetings
Attends Story County Immigrant and Refugee
Coalition meetings
Assists with Spanish translation to departments
Hosted Leadership Ames in a day of local
government
Assisted with the HOST Exhibit at the Library
Participate on the Discover Ames Grant Committee
Completed the Applied Suicide Intervention Skills
Training (ASIST)
409
STAFF LIAISON TO AHRC
The AHRC continues to host Meet and Greet
events to connect and support all communities in
Ames
Annual events the commission sponsors:
MLK Jr. Celebration
Fair Housing Month
AAPI Celebration
National Night Out
Ames Pridefest
Building Inclusion Breakfast
6
410
AHRC CONTINUED
Coloring Book- free for the
community
700 coloring books printed and
given away at community
events
Currently working on Volume II
Take phone calls regarding
discrimination complaints from the
community
411
AHRC CONTINUED
Celebrated the AHRC 50th
Anniversary
Tree planting
Community Event
New T-shirt design revealed
AHRC hosted Iowa Commissions
for a gathering to network and
share goals and activities
Annual Report Iowa Civil Rights
Commission
AHRC participated in local bus
tour of Civil War/Civil Rights
AHRC participated and
sponsored the Fair Housing
screening of the movie “Divisible”
412
MUNICIPAL EQUALITY INDEX
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN
The MEI examines how inclusive municipal laws,
policies, and services are of LGBTQ+ people who live
and work there. Cities are rated based on non-
discrimination laws, the municipality as an employer,
municipal services, law enforcement and leadership
on LGBTQ+ equality
Coordinate the City’s response which is used to
assign us a score
November 2024 the City of Ames final MEI score was
96
In October 2025, the City submitted its response and
is awaiting our score
9
413
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS
Friendship Ark
Veterans Affairs
Elks Lodge
Dog Eared Books
Ames School District
ISU Multicultural Student
Services
YSS Mental Health &
Education
The Arc of Story County
Food Insecurity Task Force
HOST
Library Board
Hope in Christ
Vocational Rehab
Iowa Board of Realtors
SBDC
Sleep in Heavenly Peace
The Well
10
414
TRAINING FOR EMPLOYEES
De-escalation methods
Neurodiversity in the workplace
How to emotionally support
employees in Public Service
Working on a partnership with AHM to
present the History of Ames
ADA Digital Standards
11
415
“BELONGING IN
AMES”
Highlilghted organizations
and programs through this
video series
Belonging in Ames is on
season two, with a total
of 20 episodes recorded
Find the episodes here
Belonging in Ames
416
“UP CLOSE”
The purpose of this podcast is to listen
to stories of Ames’ residents, and discover
more about our friends, neighbors and
community members.
Three individual podcasts each week
The fourth week we bring back all
three guests to have a conversation
together and make connections
Find the podcast here Up Close
Up to now 30 Ames residents have
participated and made new connections 13
417
CAREER PATHWAYS
ACADEMY
An Iowa 4-H program offered in
Story County for the first time to
students from 6-11 grade
Students participated in six Spark
Workshops exploring careers while
developing skills
Students also participated in six
career exploration experiences
with local businesses to recognize
opportunities
Mayor, Council, Ames Police, and
Fire participated and presented on
their roles
14
418
ISU AND THE CITY
The goal is to connect ISU students, faculty, staff, and parents to the
City, so everyone has a sense of connection and belonging
Have met with :
ISU IDEA Committee
ISU Student Clubs
ISU Extension and Outreach
ISU Dean of Students Office
Sloss Center
International Students and Scholars Office
Extension and Outreach
ISU Business
ISU Student Affairs
ISU Daily
ISU Learning Communities
419
ISU STUDENT
CLUBS
16
420
“CONNECTING WITH ISU”
Participated in the ISU joint meeting with the Council
Attended student club meetings
Participated in Business Communication 302 class
Creating opportunities to collaborate with learning
communities
Presented to the Business in Organizations class
LAS students at City Hall to meet with Council and
staff
WelcomeFest
Volunteer Fest
Presented at "We Lead" Conference
17
421
BELONGING IN AMES SURVEY
A survey was created to ask students if they feel
they belong in Ames and to gather their thoughts on
what they like best about Ames, what their biggest
challenges are in Ames, and whether they think Ames
is welcoming.
Overall, the answers show that students
Feel they belong and the City of Ames is
welcoming
Want more cultural events
Want to be connected beyond ISU
Are happy CYride is free for student to use and
accessible
Love all the parks and would like more
information on trails
18
422
WHAT’S NEXT?
LOOKING AHEAD FY26
Building relationships and partnerships with faith-
based organizations
Collaborate with Cyclone Civics and Gerdin Leaders
Academy
Assist with staff outreach efforts on major projects
and create new ways to engage with the public
Continue to serve as a resource for City departments,
organizations, and the community
Continue training employees to meet digital ADA
guidelines
19
423
WHAT’S NEXT?
LOOKING AHEAD FY26
Promote and manage the Neighborhood Improvement
Grant Program
Host "Meet your neighbors" City-sponsored events
Reinvigorate new ways to establish neighborhood
connections
Serve as a neighborhood laision promoting
communication and connections between Ames
residents and city government
Educating community members about key intitatives
20
424
QUESTIONS?
21
425
ITEM #:36
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:ADMIN
SUBJECT:FY 2025/26 ASSET CONTRACT WITH NAMI CENTRAL IOWA
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The City currently has an FY 2025/26 Analysis of Social Services Evaluation Team (ASSET)
Contract with NAMI Central Iowa (see attachments A1 and A2) in the amount of $27,550. Two
other ASSET Funders - United Way of Story County and ISU Student Government - have
additional contracts for FY 2025/26 with NAMI for a total $36,792. Story County does not fund
mental health services through ASSET.
ASSET policies require agencies with an annual budget of $250,000 or more to undergo
a financial audit and provide it to the ASSET Funders. NAMI's annual budget exceeds
this $250,000 threshold and therefore is subject to this requirement.
Section XI. D of the ASSET Polices and Procedures, adopted by all ASSET Funders, states:
D. Agencies with an annual budget of $250,000 or more must submit an electronic copy of
their full comparative audit and an electronic copy of their IRS Form 990 to the ASSET
Administrative Assistant.
Additionally, Division IV 8b of the ASSET Reference Manual states:
b. Agencies with an annual budget of $250,000 or more must submit an electronic copy of
their full comparative audit, IRS Form 990, and a balance sheet prepared externally and
independently. (ABF-6)"
Over the last two years, ASSET funder staff have repeatedly communicated to NAMI
that an independent financial audit is required and that it has not been received for the
last few years. ASSET has not received NAMI's audits for FY 2022/23 or 2023/24, and a
2024/25 audit will be due by December 2025.
All other ASSET agencies that are required to furnish an audit have submitted it as necessary.
City staff is concerned that a significant amount of time has passed, and no audit has been
produced despite being assured by NAMI that it is being worked on. A recent email exchange
with NAMI is attached (see Attachment B). In August 2025, United Way of Story County Board
decided to pause its ASSET agreement with NAMI until an audit is received.
City staff is requesting that the City sequester NAMI's funds until the necessary audits,
or at minimum the most recent audit, is received and reviewed.
426
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve sequestering the remaining balance to NAMI for FY 2025/26 until an audit is
received.
2. Allow reimbursement claims for NAMI to be processed for FY 2025/26 without an audit.
3. Refer to back to staff.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
ASSET agencies are obligated to produce an audit if their annual budget is $250,000 or more.
The information provided in the audit allows ASSET Funders the opportunity to perform their
due diligence to assess that an agency receiving financial support is being fiscally responsible.
All active ASSET agencies that are required to produce an audit have done so, except
NAMI. Staff has provided ample time for NAMI to provide past audits. However, they are
all still outstanding. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City
Council approve Alternative No. 1 above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment A1: FY 2025/26 ASSET Agreement - NAMI.pdf
Attachment A2: FY 2025/26 ASSET Agreement NAMI - First Amendment.pdf
Attachment B: Email with NAMI.pdf
427
42
8
42
9
43
0
43
1
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT FOR HUMAN SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF AMES AND NAMI CENTRAL IOWA
WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2025, the City of Ames and NAMI Central Iowa entered into an
agreement for funding for social services to be provided by NAMI Central Iowa through the
City’s ASSET program; and,
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the agreement by the City around the cost of services,
THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend their FY2025/26 prior agreement as follows:
1. Under Section II, “SCOPE OF SERVICES,” pertaining to the cost of services, the
following unit rates will be:
SERVICE COST PER UNIT UNITS AMOUNT
Activity and Resource Center $422.21 29 $12,400
Advocacy for Social Development for
Family and Peer Support
$283.14 1 $550
Public Education and Awareness $62.81 213 $13,400
Advocacy for Social Development:
Family and Peer Education
$359.46 3 $1,200
2. All other provisions of the original agreement remain in full force and effect.
IT WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have, by their authorized representatives, set their
hand and seal:
CITY OF AMES, IOWA ATTEST:
BY: __________________________ ____________________________
John A. Haila, Mayor Renee Hall, City Clerk
Date signed:___________________
[Continued on next page]
432
Page 2
Amendment to agreement between City
of Ames and NAMI Central Iowa
NAMI Central Iowa (AGENCY) Organization Address (please print):
BY:_____ Roxanne Petersen, President/ CEO___
424 5th St. Ames, IA 50010
Phone Number: 515-292-9400
Date signed:____9/17/2025______
433
1
Goldbeck, Pa
From:RPetersen <RPetersen@namicentraliowa.org>
Sent:Saturday, October 25, 2025 8:37 AM
To:Goldbeck, Pa; Billing Specialist; City Manager - ASSET
Subject:Re: Billing for September
[External Email]
Pa-
I have copied the email I sent over to Ashely.
Our auditors are working on 22/23 and 23/24 . I spoke with them recently and they are sending out an updated
document regarding what else is needed for 22/23 to complete that audit, along with a timeline in which the 22/23
audit will be completed. We are close. They/we have also been working on the 23/24 audit and will be sending
out a similar list of what is still needed. We have been working diligently on getting this resolved.
Just to recap on the timeline of this audit journey.
I became a staff member at the end of October 2022 and once myself and the board identified the gaps that
needed attention, we swiftly addressed those to the best of our ability.
We started the 22/23 audit process with Housten & Seamen on December 28 , 2022, we then worked with them
until December 4th 2024 when we received a letter stating they would no longer provide audit services due to
compacity issues on their end. We then were positioned to seek out another auditor that fit in with our budget. We
then reached out to Ashely at UW for support and she promptly provided us with guidance and once that took
place, we established our partnership with Trust point, LLC in May of 2025.
Please keep in mind the timeline may show gaps in focus on audit; however, I have also been managing all
contracts, providing services and overseeing all of the day today operations. I share this information to offer a
better understanding of our journey here.
Our priority is to always serve our community
PAUSED FUNDING: ASSET paused funding has caused significant financial strain on our organization that now
has positioned us to re-evaluate our financial position, and how to navigate moving forward.
I truly value this partnership and would ask that the paused funding be considered to be reinstated.
BILLING: I will work on getting this corrected, our billing specialist is no longer with us as she has stepped down to
focus on her nurse practitioner schooling and family.
Warm Regards,
Roxanne Petersen
President & CEO
NAMI Central Iowa
424 5th St
434
ITEM #:37
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:ELEC
SUBJECT:JANUARY - JUNE 2026 NATURAL GAS SUPPLY FOR ELECTRIC
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The two boilers at the Power Plant are primarily fired by natural gas. The natural gas, along
with refuse-derived fuel (RDF), are combusted to generate electricity. When in operation, Unit
#7 typically combusts 8,000 MMBtu of natural gas per day, while Unit #8 typically combusts
12,000 MMBtu of natural gas per day.
On October 15, 2015, Macquarie Energy LLC was awarded a 5-year fixed price contract for
the purchase of 12,000 MMBtu/day of natural gas for Electric Services. Subsequently, a 3-
year extension was approved, followed by two 1-year extensions, which brought contract
period through December 31, 2025. The contract has created efficiency, flexibility, and
affordability in the purchase of a valuable commodity, ensuring that the City has reliable
service while creating stable generation costs.
With the current contract expiring on December 31, 2025, City staff must secure a price and
add additional supply to the existing contract in the next few months. There are several
aspects of a natural gas contract extension which need to be explained further. These include
the price volatility, impact on electric rates, and impacts to the Resource Recovery utility.
The challenge in arranging a contract extension or soliciting bids for a new gas
contract is determining the price at which to commit. In the natural gas market, quoted
prices expire within a 24-hour period, which is less time than is necessary to provide
notice of a City Council meeting and approve the contract.
When staff negotiated the original contract, the process was handled similarly to the sale of
the City's bonds. The Council Action Form did not have prices, nor did it identify the preferred
supplier. Bidders faxed their prices to staff hours before the City Council meeting and a
summary report was handed out during the Council meeting where a decision was made.
Although this approach provides competitive pricing between several suppliers at a single
point in time, it may lock the City into a price that would have been much lower if solicited at a
different time of the year. For the remainder of the 2025/26 fiscal year, staff is proposing to
repeat the method used in 2023 and 2024, which allowed the Director of Electric Services to
obligate the City to purchase natural gas at or below the previously Council-authorized cap.
The current contract has a fixed price for natural gas set at $3 .57 per MMBtu. At the time of
this writing, price estimates for calendar year 2026 show natural gas futures in the $4.29
MMBtu range. The prices are higher than the current contract for a variety of reasons:
customer demand, supply constraints, production cost increases, the uncertainty related to the
Russia-Ukraine war, weather forecasts, and other factors.
As these prices fluctuate between Council meetings, staff is requesting the authority to
commit the City to extensions as short as a month, at fixed prices and fill in small
incremental needs with daily spot-priced purchases. The goal is to avoid energy cost
435
increases to electric customers due to high natural gas prices, but continue to
purchase gas to burn refuse derived fuel. At current natural gas contract prices,
keeping cost contained is dependent on the length of the contract, market timing, and
the amount of gas purchased.
It is important to note that the daily gas allotment, if unused by the Electric utility due to
scheduled or unscheduled outages, can be sold back to the market at spot prices. At times
when the gas can be sold back and spot prices are high, this can be advantageous to the
Electric utility. However, if the spot prices are very low, then the gas must be sold by the
Electric utility to the market at a loss.
IMPACT TO ELECTRIC CUSTOMER BILLS:
The natural gas purchased by Electric represents more than 20% of the overall Electric utility
budget. These natural gas fuel purchases (and sales, if they occur), along with the cost of
purchased power from the market (and sales to the market) are summed monthly on a rolling
12-month basis and are used to develop an Energy Cost Adjustment (ECA). The ECA can be
either positive or negative and is an adjustment to the electric rates adopted by the City
Council, applied to customers' bills each month. The more the utility pays for natural gas, the
higher the cost for electricity becomes.
The approved FY 2025/26 operating budget includes $17,600,000 for the purchase of natural
gas, transportation, gas management and related services to operate the Power Plant. The
existing gas contract through calendar year 2025 plus yearly transportation costs $10,600,000.
This leaves roughly $7,000,000 to cover the remaining natural gas purchases needed from
January 2026 to June 2026. If staff is able to procure natural gas for less than $7,000,000 the
savings is passed back to the electric customers through the Energy Cost Adjustment.
Likewise, if natural gas costs more than $7,000,000, electric customers will pay more on their
energy bill.
Also under consideration is the long-term life of Units #7 and #8. The continued burning of
today's RDF with high plastic concentration is quickly destroying the boilers. Staff believes that
by 2027, Unit #7 will have little life remaining. The City's generation resource plan assumes
that Unit #8 will have 10+ years of life remaining after RDF is discontinued. To create a higher
level of success, Unit #7 has become the primary unit for burning RDF. It may be possible to
return burning RDF in Unit #8 in calendar year 2026 if plastics can be removed from the
waste stream used to create RDF. With plans for curbside recycling starting by summer 2026,
this may be possible. It is worth noting that burning any RDF in Unit #8 going forward will
decrease the life of the boiler and cause increased maintenance costs. If either unit is
prematurely retired due to the deterioration caused by burning RDF, the utility is
subject to significant financial penalties for lacking available generating capacity until
the replacement capacity can be constructed and brought online.
IMPACT TO RESOURCE RECOVERY/HAULERS/BOONE COUNTY LANDFILL:
The 12,000 MMBtu of natural gas per day that is currently procured during the non-winter
months is sufficient to operate the Power Plant's Unit #8. This larger unit can consume
approximately 30,000 tons of RDF per year if RDF is available and the unit is operating
continually. Unit #7 consumes up to 8,000 MMBtu/day which would consume approximately
436
24,000 tons/year of RDF.
Historically, Unit #8 is relied upon to operate during the non-winter months because it is able
to dispose of RDF at a faster pace than Unit #7. If Unit #7 is operating, the volume of RDF
produced oftentimes outpaces the ability to burn it all, resulting in periods where Resource
Recovery is unable to process all of the MSW which would result in additional material being
diverted to the Boone County Landfill (BCL). Typically, this diversion is handled by instructing
the haulers to transport MSW directly to the Boone County Landfill.
If haulers are diverted, there are a variety of impacts: First, although haulers save $5.50/ton on
tipping fee costs at the Boone County Landfill compared to Resource Recovery, they must
drive longer distances, resulting in higher labor and fuel costs. Second, the additional material
being sent to the Boone County Landfill places additional pressure on the landfill operation
(both in terms of using available capacity and the additional staffing the landfill needs to
arrange to handle the influx of Story County garbage trucks). Third, recyclable material is not
being removed from the solid waste through processing before it is landfilled.
Additionally, hauler diversions result in losses of revenue for the Resource Recovery operation
since tipping fees are not being collected, and recyclable materials are not being sold. There is
no change in revenue from RDF sales, as Electric pays a flat fee regardless of the tonnage of
RDF produced. Although there is less expense for Resource Recovery since it is not
processing (less electricity and maintenance expenses), the fixed costs remain for the
operation, and therefore the overall impact to the Resource Recovery utility can be significant.
ALTERNATIVES:
There are several alternative strategies that could be pursued to purchase the natural gas,
each of which has different advantages and disadvantages. Under Alternatives 1, 2, and 4, the
City Council would authorize staff to approve amendments to the contract with Macquarie
Energy LLC, Houston, TX, to extend the existing natural gas supply contract for a term of not
more than six months in monthly or seasonal increments, for the gas quantities described in
each alternative. Alternative 3 is a blend of Alternative 1 and 2 which relies on purchasing both
firm and spot priced gas.
If staff is authorized to approve such amendments, staff would then report back to the City
Council after each amendment has been agreed to by staff. The report would include staff's
estimates of cost impacts to the Electric customers and Resource Recovery Utility. The
alternatives are:
ALT E R NATI V E # 1: Purchase 8,000 MMBtu/day and divert haulers directly to Boone
County Landfill approximately 2 days/week
In this option, enough gas would be purchased to guarantee the continual operation of Unit
#7. This would allow approximately 24,000 tons of RDF to be consumed by the Power Plant,
at a minimum. This reduction in RDF throughput is approximately 30 tons per day during the
months of April - June. The additional tons not consumed would result in garbage haulers
being diverted to the landfill when the tipping floor and/or storage bin become full. These
diversions would have the negative impacts to the haulers, Boone County Landfill, and the
Resource Recovery operation as described earlier in this report.
If the 8,000 MMBtu/day could be secured at the anticipated average price of $4.25/MMBtu, the
437
Electric Fuels budget for natural gas would have approximately $800,000 remaining. This
funding could be held in reserve and used in one of two ways:
To purchase additional gas on the spot market when the pricing is favorable (most likely
in summer months), increasing the amount of RDF that could be consumed from time to
time. The result would be consumption of some greater amount of RDF and reduce the
days haulers need to divert.
Alternatively, if the long-term contract pricing for natural gas was to drop considerably,
the $800,000 could be used to purchase an additional supply of up to 4,000 MMBtu/day
for the April-June time period. However, staff does not have confidence that such a
dramatic price drop is likely to occur.
This option results in the least potential for electric bill increases, but results in a greater
amount of material being sent to the landfill, impacting the haulers, Resource Recovery, and
Boone County.
ALTERNATIVE# 2: Purchase gas only on the spot market (no secure gas contract) and
divert haulers directly to Boone County Landfill approximately 2 days/weekly
This option would eliminate the use of a secure contract and would require the daily gas
needs to be purchased on the spot gas market. The Electric Utility would be subject to
considerable volatility in gas prices, particularly in the winter months when demand for
gas is the highest. It is not possible to project the potential cost to customers for this
alternative.
Because of the time required to startup and shutdown the Electric boilers and Resource
Recovery operation, it would not likely be feasible to plan for purchasing electricity on the
market when electric grid prices are low and burning RDF only when electric grid prices are
h i g h . Therefore, this option exposes the City to extreme volatility with little potential
benefit. The only real benefit that can be seen today is that spot gas prices have
remained below $3/MMBtu for the vast majority of days since early February 2023. To
"cap this risk", staff would set a ceiling price (suggesting $6/MMBtu), where if the spot
price was exceeded, gas would not be purchased for that day, and haulers would be
diverted.
If the 8,000 MMBtu/day could be secured on the spot market at an anticipated blended price
of $3.25/MMBtu, the Electric Fuels budget for natural gas would have approximately
$2,250,000 remaining. This funding could be held in reserve and used in one of two ways:
1. To purchase additional gas on the spot market when the pricing is favorable (most likely
in summer months), increasing the amount of RDF that could be consumed from time to
time. The result would be consumption of some greater amount of RDF and reduce the
days haulers need to divert during those months.
2. Alternatively, if the long-term contract pricing for natural gas was to drop considerably,
the $2,250,000 could be used to purchase an additional supply of up to 4,000
MMBtu/day for the April-June time period. However, staff does not have confidence that
such a dramatic price drop is likely to occur.
With some increased risk, this option results in the greatest potential for stable electric bills
438
but results in a greater amount of material being sent to the landfill, impacting the haulers,
Resource Recovery, and Boone County when spot gas exceeds $6/MMBtu.
ALTERNATIVE# 3: Blend Alternatives #1 and #2; securing enough firm gas to burn
some RDF every day and increase burning when spot gas is more cost effective.
The purchasing strategy under this alternative would be to purchase 6,000 - 8,000 MMBtus on
a firm basis in the winter. As spring and summer approach, the amount of firm gas that is
purchased would be 4,000 MMBtu. Regardless of the season, if spot market pricing is
favorable, additional gas could be purchased to increase the RDF consumption. This
approach lowers the amount of firm gas the utility would have to sell in the event of an
unplanned outage compared to the amount of firm gas purchased in the expiring contract.
Lowering the amount of firm gas purchased minimizes the potential for selling unused gas at a
loss during the seasons when spot gas is likely to be least costly.
ALTERNATIVE # 4: Purchase 8,000 MMBtu/day for January through March, and 12,000
MMBtu/day for April through June and divert haulers directly to Boone County Landfill
approximately 2 days/week in winter months.
This option allows the seasonal differences in gas prices to be "smoothed out" or blended to
arrive at a consistent price per MMBtu. This option could allow RDF to be burned at full
capacity for April through June, and at reduced capacity for January through March. This is a
similar approach to the expiring contract's structure.
The remaining amount in the natural gas fuels budget would allow for this gas to be purchased
for the remainder of FY 2025/26 only if the price is at or below $3.87/MMBtu, which is
considerably lower than contract prices available today. It is unlikely that prices will decrease
to this level. At a current price of $4.25/MMBtu, the fuels budget would need to be
increased by $700,000 to lock in this quantity of natural gas. These costs would be
passed to Ames electric customers through the energy cost adjustment, and in this
example would represent a 1.5% increase in electric bills.
If Council wishes to select this option, the Electric Services Director would request an
updated cost, and Council would need to authorize an increase in the adjusted fuels
budget (staff would propose authorizing staff to commit up to an additional $1,000,000
of spending without requiring further approval by the City Council).
With insufficient gas to consume all the RDF generated during January-March 2026 under this
alternative, there are economic impacts to the Resource Recovery Utility with lost revenue
from tipping fees during the winter months.
Since this alternative is the same as was adopted for calendar year 2025, Resource Recovery
assumed this same alternative would be adopted for the next fiscal year and budgeted
accordingly. If haulers are not allowed to tip their MSW approximately two days per week
during the reduced-throughput winter months because of the high price of gas, the Resource
Recovery utility would not incur a budget impact in FY 2025/26. However, haulers and the
Boone County Landfill will continue to be impacted as a result of drive times to the landfill and
increased material quantities disposed of there, respectively.
439
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Over the past several years, the City has benefited from extremely advantageous guaranteed
natural gas prices through the expiring long-term contract. Natural gas futures pricing is
considerably higher than the expiring terms. Staff is concerned that the window for prices to
drop is closing, and prices will again begin rising as winter weather and market uncertainty
approach. There does not appear to be a risk-free option available to the City Council since
the strategy with the least impact to electric customers, also has the highest impact to
Resource Recovery System, and vice versa.
Staff believes the best strategy is Alternative No. 3 , which calls for a blended cost, and
secures enough natural gas on contract to burn the majority of the RDF that could be
consumed in a typical year. Under this alternative staff will continue to pursue options for
reducing the volume of waste received through recycling and other waste diversion programs.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 3, thereby authorizing the Electric Director to approve an amendment to the
contract with Macquerie Energy LLC, Houston, TX, to extend the existing natural gas supply
contract for a term of not more than 6 months at prices to achieve a total cost of not more
than $7,000,000.
440
ITEM #:38
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:ELEC
SUBJECT:UPDATES TO SMART ENERGY REBATE PROGRAM
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
Electric Demand Response programs have limited lifetimes and should be reviewed and
adjusted as the available technology and markets for energy-efficient technology change. Staff
reviewed the utility's current demand response programs, benchmarked with other local
electric utilities, and drafted recommended changes for review by EUORAB at their October
2025 meeting.
After reviewing these proposed changes, EUORAB is recommending the following
changes to the Demand Response program:
Retire the Custom Rebate Program - Staff proposes retiring the custom rebate
program effective January 1, 2026, because the program has largely been used for LED
upgrades. The LED Lighting rebate program was retired in 2020 due to the technology
becoming widely available. Custom rebates often rely heavily on an independent
analysis of energy savings conducted by a third-party engineering firm to validate
savings that offset the payback to the utility.
Increase the minimum efficiency for Air Conditioner rebate to 17.2 Seasonal
Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER2) - Currently, air conditioners of 15.2+ SEER2 are
eligible under the rebate program. Staff proposes to increase the minimum SEER2
rating to 17.2, as a SEER2 rating between 15.2 – 17.1 is no longer considered
above standard efficiency. The incentive for these units will be capped at $200. Other
utilities, including Midland and federal tax incentive programs, have recently increased
their minimum SEER2 ratings to 17 as well.
Remove rebates for freezers, small refrigerators, dehumidifiers, and dishwashers -
Energy Star-rated appliances have become widely adopted by manufacturers. Electric
staff believes that the decision to purchase these products is no longer dependent
on the rebate offered from the department. Surrounding utilities have retired similar
appliance rebate programs, and staff believes that following suit will allow the Smart
Energy rebate program to put more resources where needed.
Increase Heat Pump and Heat Pump Water Heater Rebate Program to support the
City's Climate Action Plan - Staff proposes increasing the air source heat pump,
geothermal heat pump, and heat pump water heater rebates to increase adoption. This
also better align Ames' programs with neighboring utilities. The changes will keep the
existing rebate structure. For air source heat pumps, units between 15.2 - 17.1 SEER2
will qualify for a $600 rebate. Air source heat pump units with SEER2 values greater
than 17.2 will qualify for a $1,200 rebate. A different measure is used for geothermal
heat pumps. Installed units that are Energy Star rated will be eligible for $1,000/ton.
Units that are not Energy Star rated are eligible for $800/ton. These technologies are
441
alternative heating and cooling systems to natural gas by transferring heat rather than
generating it. This increases their efficiency and reduces the home's carbon
footprint. Increasing the rebate tied to these products achieves both Smart Energy
and Climate Action Plan goals.
Create a Rebate for Attic Insulation to Help Customers Reduce Energy
Consumption - Attic insulation is one of the most cost-effective ways to increase energy
efficiency in your home. The EPA estimates that homeowners in our region can save an
average of 16% on heating and cooling costs annually by properly air sealing their
homes. As many older homes undergo retrofits, addressing insulation is critical to
strengthening the home's building envelope and ensuring long-term savings. Staff
believes this incentive will encourage weatherization improvements that will lower
energy consumption for City of Ames Electric customers. Table 1: Costs of
equipment and rebate amounts.
Rebate Current
Amount
Proposed
Amount
Estimated
Equipment
Costs
Neighboring Utilities'
Rebate
Geothermal
Heat Pump
$400/$500 per
ton
$800/$1,000
per ton
$15,000 -
$20,000 $800-1,500 per ton
Air Source
Heat Pump $500/$1000 $600/$1200 $8,000 $600-$1,500
Air Source
Heat Pump
Water Heater
$400 $500 $2,500-$3,000 $500-$600
Central Air
Conditioner $200/$400 $0/$200 $3,000 - $5,000 $0 - $400
Attic
Insulation N/A
50% of the
project cost up
to $250
$2,000 - $3,000 $500
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the changes to Smart Energy Rebate Program as proposed above by the staff
and recommended by EUORAB.
2. Approve selected changes to the Smart Energy Rebate Program.
3. Do not approve changes to the Smart Energy Rebate Program and refer it back to
EUORAB for additional study.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Reviewing rebate offerings is a best practice for utilities. As such, staff and EUORAB
have re-evaluated its rebate offerings and are proposing changes that better incentivize
climate action strategies. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the
City Council approve Alternative No. 1.
442
ITEM #:39
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:P&R
SUBJECT:HOMEWOOD GOLF COURSE HOLE NINE CROSSING IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The ninth hole at Homewood Golf Course contains a ravine that separates the tee box from
the green. Over the last few years, staff had questioned the stability of the ravine bank at this
hole. Additionally, there is a walking bridge across the ravine that connects the tee to the
green, which is not rated to handle golf carts and needs to be replaced. There is also a safety
concern for golf cart users as they need to travel along hole number eight in order to get to
number nine green, oftentimes as golfers are hitting balls on those holes.
On May 13, 2025, City Council awarded a contract to WHKS, Inc., Ames, Iowa, to develop
plans and specifications for the project, which included select tree clearing from the ravine;
demolishing the bridge and path leading up to it; installing a culvert at the bottom of the ravine;
creating a crossing over the culvert; installing a new path; and seeding the area.
On October 14, 2025, City Council approved the plans and specifications for the Homewood
Golf Course Hole Nine Crossing Improvements. An Invitation to Bid was advertised on the
Current Bid Opportunities section of the Purchasing webpage and a Legal Notice was
published on the websites of a contractor plan room service with statewide circulation.
On November 12, 2025, eight bids were received as shown below.
Contractor Cost
Con-Struct, Ames, Iowa $213,410.00
Iowa Earth Works, Huxley, Iowa $250,540.00
TK Concrete, Pella, Iowa $270,385.00
Jet Drain, Ames, Iowa $274,165.00
On Track Construction, LLC, Nevada, Iowa $274,895.00
Brothers Concrete, Des Moines, Iowa $279,015.00
Graphite Construction Group, Inc., Des
Moines, Iowa $305,091.94
Petersen Construction, Reinbeck, Iowa $361,205.00
Staff has reviewed all bids and has found the bid from Con-struct to be the low responsible
bid.
PROJECT COST AND FUNDING:
The table below outlines the total estimated costs of the project.
443
Item Cost
Engineering and Design Fees $ 81,050
Construction Testing 10,000
Construction Cost 213,410
Contingency (5%) of Construction
Costs 10,671
TOTAL COSTS $315,131
Total available funding for the project is $350,000. Local Option Sales Tax accounts for
$275,000, with the remaining $75,000 coming from the Homewood Operational Fund
Balance.
ACCESS:
It should be noted that the construction access will follow the most western drive in
and out of the golf course onto 20th Street. With the large quantity of soil that will be
moved to the site for the project, there is potential that the asphalt drive may be
degraded through the project.
Specifications require protection of all pavements, and the work is planned for the
winter months which will help alleviate path degradation. However, if the path needs
replaced it could cost upwards of $200,000. Staff will monitor the project and will make
changes accordingly if the asphalt drive is in jeopardy. If repairs to the drive are needed
to be made, funds from the Homewood Golf Course Operational Fund Balance could be
used.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Accept the Report of Bids and award a contract to Con-Struct, Ames, Iowa, in the
amount of $213,410, for the Homewood Golf Course Hole Nine Crossing Improvement
Project.
2. Accept the Report of Bids and award a contract to one of the other bidders for the
Homewood Golf Course Hole Nine Crossing Improvement Project.
3. Accept the Report of Bids but do not award a contract at this time.
4. Refer this item back to staff.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
With the increase in erosion along the banks of the ravine, remediation is needed to
preserve the property on both sides. It is also necessary for stormwater protection.
Additionally, the pedestrian bridge that connects the tee on hole nine to the green is
getting to the end of its useful life and is not rated for golf carts. The safety concern for
golf cart users is also diminished when this project is complete. Constructing a new
crossing along the with bank stabilization remediation is a win-win for the course and
444
golfers. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1, as noted above.
445
ITEM #:40
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:ELEC
SUBJECT:LOAD CENTER REPLACEMENT AT THE POWER PLANT
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
There are six load centers that take power off the generator bus bar and distribute it out to the
different equipment in the Power Plant. The current load centers are built for old, obsolete
breakers which makes it difficult to find replacement parts and maintain a reliable electric
source. The load centers also do not have up-to-date equipment with features that would allow
them to more easily be operated safely.
On October 24, 2023, City Council awarded a contract to Farris Engineering, of Omaha,
Nebraska to design the replacement load centers at the Power Plant. An Invitation to Bid was
advertised on the Current Bid Opportunities section of the Purchasing webpage and a Legal
Notice was published on the websites of a contractor plan room service with statewide
circulation.
On November 12, 2025, two bids were received as shown below.
VENDOR BID AMOUNT
Van Maanen Electric Inc.
Newton, IA $4,673,207
Tri-City Electric Company of Iowa
Davenport, IA $5,004,573
Funding for the Load Center Replacement project will come from the FY 2025/26 CIP account,
where there is a current balance of $1,301,130. The engineer's estimate for this project is
$560,000.
Staff plans to build new generation that will replace the capacity of Unit 7 in 2028. Once
this occurs, Unit 7 will be shut down and no longer operated. Staff would like to reject
the Load Center bids and work with the engineer to reduce the scope of the project to
only include load centers that affect Unit 8, update the engineer's estimate, and then
rebid.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the following:
a. Reject the bids for the Load Center Replacement Project.
b. Direct staff to modify the project scope to address only the load centers related to Unit
8.
2. Award a contract to the apparent low bidder and direct staff to identify additional funds to
complete the project.
446
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
While it is important that the load center equipment be replaced, the costs for
replacement are much higher than originally anticipated. Staff and the consultant will
review the project and narrow the scope to only include Unit 8 affected equipment to
reduce the cost. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City
Council adopt Alternative No. 1 a-b as stated above.
447
ITEM #:41
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:P&H
SUBJECT:REZONING OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 220, 306, 312, 318, AND 400
FREEL DRIVE FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) TO
GOVERNMENT/AIRPORT DISTRICT (S-GA)
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The City of Ames is requesting to rezone the 9.53 acres of property located at 220, 306, 312,
318, and 400 Freel Drive from General Industrial (GI) to Special Purpose - Government/Airport
District (S-GA) (Attachments A & B).
The City recently purchased the subject properties to establish a new Resource Recovery and
Recycling Campus to accept municipal solid waste, recyclable materials, and yard waste from
residents and commercial haulers. The materials would then be transferred offsite for disposal
or recycling.
Once the site is rezoned, the City will make further decisions about the design, timing, and
construction of the facility. Development and use of the property will be subject to
administrative staff review with a Minor Site Development Plan.
Ames Plan 2040 designates the property as "Employment" (Emp) (Attachment C). Standard
zoning categories listed for Employment include General Industrial (GI), Research Park
Industrial (RI), and Intensive Industrial (II). The S-GA District is exclusively reserved for
properties used for or owned by government (federal, state, county, school district, or
municipal). Any future land use designation can have land use that is zoned S-GA.
Development within S-GA is guided by the planned land use, which in this case would be
industrial standards. One of the goals of the Employment land use designation is to
accommodate a wide range of industrial types of uses. GI zoning, which is typically applied to
Employment designated land, allows for a wide range of indoor and outdoor uses.
A transfer station facility is similar to allowed uses in GI and will be compatible with industrial
uses planned for this area. If the rezoning was not approved, waste processing would be
allowed within the current GI zoning subject to approval of a Special Use Permit.
Utilities are accessible from the Freel Drive right-of-way. Vehicle access will be from Freel
Drive. The City is planning a Freel Drive street improvement project that will pave Freel Drive
from Lincoln Way to SE 5th Street.
The property is located within the 100-year floodway fringe which will require flood protection
improvements consistent with Chapter 9 of the Ames Municipal Code. Therefore, the
proposed S-GA zoning does not alter flood protection requirements compared to the
current GI zoning.
448
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
On November 5, 2025, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the rezoning
request. A representative of a property owner for a house located north of the site was
concerned about increased industrial use in relation to their residence and asked if the use
was allowed in GI zoning. The Commission discussed the use and flood protection
requirements. The Commission voted 5-0-1 to recommend approval.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Public Works staff sent a letter to all property owners adjacent to this site in October . The
letter described the City's intent for use of the property and to contact staff with questions.
Planning and Housing staff provided mailed notice to all property owners within 400 feet of the
subject property and posted a sign on the site prior to the November 5 Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting. Notice for the City Council hearing was mailed to property owners within
400 feet, published in the Ames Tribune, and a sign was posted on the site.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve first reading of an ordinance to rezone the properties at 220, 306, 312, 318, and
400 Freel Drive from General Industrial (GI) to Special Purpose - Government/Airport
District (S-GA).
2. Deny the request to rezone the properties at 220, 306, 312, 318, and 400 Freel Drive.
3. Refer this item back to staff for more information.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The request for rezoning will allow for Government use of the site as defined by the
City Council. Use of the site will be similar to industrial uses that are consistent with
the adopted Ames Plan 2040 as described in the addendum. There are no projected
impacts to infrastructure and City services for this parcel. Although no defined plans
are available for the site at this time, the City Council will review and approve the
design of the transfer station at the time the project is issued for bid. Therefore, it is the
recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative 1, as described
above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
220-400 Freel Drive Rezoning Addendum.pdf
Attachments A, B, & C.pdf
220-400 Freel Drive - Rezoning.docx
449
ADDENDUM
REZONING BACKGROUND:
Ames Plan 2040. The Future Land Use Map designates the land proposed for rezoning
as “Employment” (Emp) which is consistent with the proposed “S-GA”
(Government/Airport) District zoning (see Attachment B – Future Land Use Map).The
proposed use as a Resource Recovery and Recycling Campus Transfer Station that
accepts municipal solid waste, recyclable material, and yard waste for the City of Ames
is consistent with the goals and development guidelines for the “Emp” land use
designation. The new facility is located in an industrial neighborhood and will mi nimize
the impact and external effects on city neighborhoods, which is a stated goal for the “Emp”
future land use category.
Proposed Zoning. The applicant proposes rezoning from “GI” (General Industrial) to “S-
GA” (Government/Airport) District. The “S-GA” zone is a Special Purpose District in the
adopted zoning regulations of Chapter 29 in the Municipal Code. It is reserved exclusively
for structures and uses related to or owned by federal, state, county, school districts, or
municipal government authorities. Such structures and uses include property of the City
of Ames for administration and services. Although such governmental structures and uses
enjoy a legal exemption from local zoning requirements, with the exception of height
limitations in the vicinity of an airport, it is expected that such authorities will cooperate
with the Department of Planning and Housing to encourage the development of standards
which will be applicable to and compatible with the general character of the ar ea in which
this District is situated.
Development of the site will incorporate unique features of government use for the
processing of waste, storage, and fueling (see attached description). These activities are
permitted to occur within GI zoning, but S-GA zoning is the preferred zoning for
government owned and operated sites to accommodate, if needed, unique characteristi cs
of the government uses.
Existing Uses of Land. Land uses that occupy the subject property and other
surrounding properties are described in the following table.
Direction from Subject
Property
Existing Primary Land Uses
Subject Property Vacant Open Space
North Industrial Service and Outdoor Storage
East Industrial Service and Outdoor Storage
South Industrial Service
West Vacant, Industrial, and Outdoor Storage
450
Infrastructure. Public utilities serving this parcel are in the Freel Drive right-of-way along
the west boundary of the site. The street is paved from the intersection of Lincoln Way
south to 220 Freel Drive. Freel Drive will require paving improvements for the length of
the proposed development site, which will extend south to 400 Freel Dr. The City is
planning paving of Freel from the north to the intersection with SE 5 th.
Findings of Fact. Based upon an analysis of the proposed rezoning and laws pertinent
to the proposed map amendment, staff makes the following findings of fact:
1. The subject properties are owned by the City of Ames. A map of the boundaries for
the subject properties is included as Attachment E – Property Survey & Legal
Description.
2. The stated purpose of the S-GA zoning designation is, in part, to be reserved
exclusively for structures and uses related to or owned by federal, state, county,
school districts, or municipal government authorities.
3. The proposed rezoning with the intended use is consistent with other General
Industrial uses and the designation of “Employment” (Emp) identified on the Ames
Plan 2040 Future Land Use Map.
4. Site Development will be subject to approval of a Minor Site Development Plan to
ensure that such development and intensity of the use provide a safe, functional,
efficient, and environmentally sound operation.
5. Infrastructure and City services for this parcel are consistent with what is already
anticipated for the area with the planned Freel Drive paving improvements.
Public Notice. The City provided mailed notice to all property owners within 400 feet of
the subject property prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in accordance
with the notification requirements of Chapter 29.
451
ATTACHMENT A
Location Map
452
ATTACHMENT B
Zoning Map
453
ATTACHMENT C
Ames Plan 2040 Future Land Use Map
454
DO NOT WRITE IN THE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE, RESERVED FOR RECORDER
Prepared by: City Clerk’s Office, 515 Clark Avenue, Ames, IA 50010 Phone: 515-239-5105
Return to: Ames City Clerk, P.O. Box 811, Ames, IA 50010
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE
CITY OF AMES, IOWA, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 29.301 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF AMES, IOWA, BY CHANGING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED AND SHOWN ON
SAID MAP AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 29.1507 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE OF THE CITY OF AMES, IOWA; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES
AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Ames, Iowa;
Section 1: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ames, Iowa, as provided for in Section
29.301 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ames, Iowa, is amended by changing the boundaries
of the districts established and shown on said Map in the manner authorized by Section 29.1507
of the Municipal Code of the City of Ames, Iowa, as follows: That the real estate, generally located
at 220-400 Freel Drive is rezoned from General Industrial (GI) to Government/Airport District (S-
GA)
Real Estate Description:
306, 312, 318 Freel, legal description as follows: Lot Twelve (12), Thirteen (13) and
Fourteen (14) in Woodland Acres, Plat 2, Ames, Iowa, Story County, Iowa
220 Freel, legal description as follows: Lot Three (3), Pete Cooper Subdivision, Ames,
Iowa, Story County, Iowa
400 Freel, legal description as follows: Lot Nine (9), Ten (10), and Eleven (11), Woodland
Acres, Plat 2, Ames, Iowa, Story County, Iowa
Section 2: All other ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict.
455
Section 3: This ordinance is in full force and effect from and after its adoption and
publication as provided by law.
ADOPTED THIS day of , .
Renee Hall, City Clerk John A Haila, Mayor
456
To:Mayor and City Council
From:Kelly Diekmann, Director of Planning and Housing
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Continue Hearing on Lease of City Property located East of 731 Billy
Sunday Road now known as Lot 3 of Billy Sunday Subdivision
Item No. 42
MEMO
The City Council set a date of Public Hearing for the lease of City Property
located East of 731 Billy Sunday Road now known as Lot 3 of Billy Sunday
Subdivision to Lamar Advertising Company for a digital billboard on City property.
City staff is working through final language for the lease agreement and requests
this hearing be continued to November 25, 2025.
KD/cmw
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
457
ITEM #:43
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:PW
SUBJECT:HEARING TO TRANSFER VACATED ALLEY LOCATED AT 325 ASH
AVENUE TO ALPHA IOTA ASSOCIATION OF PHI GAMMA DELTA
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
In 1917, the Ames City Council passed Ordinance No. 294, which vacated a north-south alley
located within Lot 4 of Parker ’s Addition to Ames. The ordinance annulled the City’s interest in
the alley, but did not result in the formal transfer of the vacated land to the adjoining property
owners. As a result, the vacated alley remained in the City’s name and is still carried as public
property on the Story County records. The property surrounding this vacated alley, now legally
described as Parcel “F”, is entirely owned by the Alpha Iota Association of Phi Gamma Delta,
including: Lot 4 in Little’s Subdivision Lot 6 and the South 20 feet of Lot 7 in Gray & Cessna’s
Subdivision.
A Plat of Survey recorded on February 12, 2025 (Instrument No. 25-00967) shows the subject
alley as part of Parcel “F” with an electric easement accommodating the overhead electric in
the area. However, no quit claim deed has been executed to formally transfer title of the
vacated alley to the Alpha Iota Association of Phi Gamma Delta. A recent title opinion dated
April 24, 2025, confirms that the City of Ames is still listed as the legal titleholder and
recommends finalizing the transfer pursuant to Iowa Code Section 364.7.
To address this, staff proposes transferring the vacated alley to the adjoining property owner
by quit claim deed, consistent with previous actions for similar alley segments. Other
examples include:
A 1993 transfer to First Baptist Church (Instrument No. 13108),
A 2006 transfer to Iowa Beta Chapter of Phi Kappa Psi (Instrument No. 2006-0003922),
and
A 2011 transfer to the Iowa Farm House Association (Resolution No. 11-440).
Per City policy, the value of vacated right-of-way is based on the average assessed value of
the adjoining properties, reduced by 10% for the use of a quit claim deed and 15% for
retaining public utility easements. Based on this formula, the estimated value of the vacated
alley parcel is $92,742. However, staff recommends that this transfer be completed at no
cost to the property owner, as the Alpha Iota Association of Phi Gamma Delta has
maintained the alley area for many years at no cost to the City and paid property taxes
on the vacated alleyway since at least 1948, despite the City retaining legal title since
the 1917 vacation. The City will retain all necessary public utility easements as documented
in the recorded Plat of Survey or as otherwise required.
458
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the conveyance of the vacated alley located within Lot 4 of Parker ’s Addition to
the Alpha Iota Association of Phi Gamma Delta at no cost, and authorize execution of
the Quit Claim Deed.
2. Do not approve the conveyance and retain title to the vacated alley in the City’s name.
3. Refer the item back to staff for further information.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The alley has been vacated for over 100 years and is fully encompassed by property
under a single ownership. Conveyance of the City’s remaining interest will formalize
the title and follow past practices for similar alley vacations. Therefore, it is the
recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, as noted
above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Vacation_of_Alley_1917.pdf
325_Ash_Ave_Plat_of_Survey.pdf
459
OED1N.1 ().
An ordinance vacating the
heretofore plotted in lot four
aile
(•1)
Parker's addition to the city o.
Ames, Iowa.
Be it ordained by the-city council
of the city of Anics, Iowa.
Section 1.' Tlct the alley hereto
fore platted and dedicated to the city
of Ames, Iowa, in lot four .(4), Par
ker’s addition to the city of Anics, be,
and the same is hereby declared va-
cated and the city’s interest therein
"annulled. X
Section 2. This ordinance is to
take effect and be in full force from
and after its passage and publication
as provided by law.
G. E. BAKER,
A. B. MAXWELL,Mayor.
City Auditor and Clerk.
1
an i
lh
l
P
RECD MAR
t
aP: : ■ '..
2.
P • ■
u.................... I
/917
Inf'll II
460
461
ITEM #:44
DATE:11-18-25
DEPT:PW
SUBJECT:EASEMENT VACATION AT 1411 S GRAND AVE
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
During approval of the final plat for Grand Aspen 3rd Subdivision in 2009, an electrical
easement was established at 1411 S. Grand Avenue for an electric service line.
In 2012, a new electrical easement was created at 1411 S. Grand Avenue and the electrical
service line was relocated to this new easement. This change was made to accommodate a
change in the building location on the site. During the creation and recording of this new
electrical easement, the original easement from 2009 was intended to be vacated once
the service line was relocated.
The purpose of this Council action is to complete the vacation of the 2009 easement. No
electric service is located within the easement area.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve vacating of the electrical easement.
2. Direct staff to make further changes to the easement area.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The easement to be vacated does not follow the current alignment of the electrical line
on the property. The electrical line was relocated on the property, and a new easement
was created for the relocated line. The easement to be vacated contains no electric
utility. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1, as described above.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Easement to be Vacated - Exhibit A.pdf
Grand Aspen 3rd Final Plat.pdf
462
46
3
464
To:Mayor & City Council
From:Kelly Diekmann, Planning & Housing Director
Date:November 18, 2025
Subject:Zoning Text Amendment
Item No. 45
MEMO
The ordinance relating to a Zoning Text Amendment to amend material
standards for off-street parking areas and driveways for agricultural equipment in
the Research Park Innovation District is attached for the City Council's review
and consideration for second reading.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Ordinance__Surface_Material_Standards_.pdf
City Clerk's Office 515.239.5105 main
515.239.5142 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
465
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF
THE CITY OF AMES, IOWA, BY AMENDING TABLE 29.903(3)
THEREOF, FOR THE PURPOSE OF AMENDING
REQUIREMENTS OF SURFACE MATERIAL STANARDS IN
RESEARCH PARK INNOVATION DISTRICT (RI) ZONE
REPEALING ANY AND ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH
CONFLICT; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ENACTED, by the City Council for the City of Ames, Iowa, that:
Section One. The Municipal Code of the City of Ames, Iowa shall be and the same is hereby
amended by amending Table 29.903(3) as follows:
Table 29.903(3)
Development Standards
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RI ZONE
* * *
Surface Material Standards The Planning and Housing Director may approve an
exception from paving requirements for vehicular parking
and maneuvering areas when used for agricultural equipment
accessory to a principal permitted use and located behind a
principal building.
The Director at their sole discretion shall determine the areas
where the exception applies. Rock maneuvering area is
subject to all other zoning standards for loading areas,
including landscaping. The Director may require additional
screening or buffering of unpaved areas as condition of the
exception.
The approved alternative surface material specification shall
be acceptable to the Municipal Engineer for the purpose of
creating a stabilized surface.
Section Two. All ordinances, or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the
extent of such conflict, if any.
Section Three. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law.
Passed this day of , 2025.
_____________________________________________________________________________
John A. Haila, Mayor
466
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Third Reading:
Passed on:
I, Renee Hall, City Clerk of the City of Ames, Iowa, hereby certify that the above and
foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. ______________, passed by the City Council of said City at the
meeting held on ______________________and signed by the Mayor on ___________________________,
and published in the Ames Tribune on ___________________________.
___________________________________________
Renee Hall, City Clerk
467