HomeMy WebLinkAboutA016 - October 28, 2025, Regular Meeting of the Ames City CouncilITEM #:19
DATE:10-28-25
DEPT:P&H
SUBJECT:APPROVAL OF MAJOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 3200
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
BACKGROUND:
The subject property, 3200 University Boulevard (Attachment A), is owned by Hunziker
Construction Services, Inc. The owner is proposing to develop the undeveloped, 6-acre lot into
a mix of 74 dwelling configured as 60 total apartment units in four buildings and 14 dwelling
units in seven duplex buildings. Two of the apartment buildings will have 12 units and the other
two will have 18 units.
The proposed PUD Site Development Plan is required to fulfill the requirements of the
PUD Master Plan that was approved for the site in 2024. The Site Plan also includes
construction of a shared driveway with the County park property to the south. A preliminary
plat accompanies this request in order to create individual lots for the duplex units and for
each apartment building with one outlot.
The 3200 University property, along with 3300 University Boulevard to the south, was recently
rezoned to Floating Suburban – Residential Medium Density (FS-RM) with a Planned Unit
Development Overlay (O-PUD) (Attachment B). A small portion of this property (3200) falls
within the Environmentally Sensitive Overlay (O-E), indicative of a floodway for a small stream.
The PUD Overlay zoning and review process was originally required with the approval of the
Land Use Map change to residential because of the sensitivity of the site in terms of
compatibility with the abutting Story County park, the Tedesco Environmental Learning
Corridor. The Master Plan established the maximum density for the site but left individual site
and building design features until now.
The PUD allows the developer to take advantage of design flexibility for the proposed platting
of the site and for setback and landscaping variations in support of diverse housing options.
This flexibility is subject to achieving other design principles of the PUD for high quality design
and compatibility with the surroundings.
The majority of the site is not visible from University Boulevard; however, the site is visible
from multiple trails and features within the abutting County park. Two informal trail loops are
within 120-150 feet. These include the low water crossing to the east and the main paved trail,
which is as close as 150 feet from the east property line to the south. The nest, a staired
access to the main pond, is 330 feet away to the east. One grove of trees exists near the
southeast corner of the site.
The County is in agreement, as communicated to City staff, to have a shared access
easement to facilitate the private street extension for the site. A formal easement will be
required to start development. The County hopes to eventually construct a parking lot within
the park that also utilizes the private drive.
1
The applicant is proposing to have 74 residential units on the subject site. The property is a
flag lot, and the ‘pole’ of the site extending from University Boulevard will be lined with seven
duplexes (14 units). The ‘flag’ part of the lot will have four apartment buildings: two three-
story12-unit buildings on the west side and two three-story 18-unit buildings on the east side ,
totaling 60 apartments. Covered garages are provided to serve the apartments.
The duplexes will be three stories tall with attached, two-car garages. In the pole part of the lot,
the drive to the apartments will overlap the south property line into the park. On the north side
of the drive, the duplexes will be in a row, with direct vehicular access onto the shared drive. A
Workiva parking lot is to the north of the duplexes. The park is to the south.
In the flag of the lot, the four apartment buildings will be placed around the edge of the lot with
a mix of garage buildings and parking lot spaces interspersed between the residential
structures. All apartment buildings will be three stories tall. To the west of the flag is the
Workiva parking lot and to the north is primarily vacant industrial land and parking lots. There
is a stream along the north property line. To the east and the south of the flag is the park.
The buildings in the development are in a contemporary style that matches the architecture at
neighboring 3300 and that compliments the other architecture of the Research Park. The
design incorporates brick and siding with shed roofs (Attachment C). The apartment buildings
contain a mix of one- and two-bedroom units. The townhome apartments are a mix of two-
and three-bedroom units.
PUD OVERLAY STANDARDS:
The PUD standards require setbacks around the perimeter of the site to reflect those of the
base zoning, FS-RM. The standard FS-RM building setbacks are 20 feet in the front, 6 or 8
feet on the side (depending on the height), and 20 feet in the rear. All buildings are at least 20
feet from the exterior property lines, which complies with the FS-RM base zone.
The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing lot to place the individual duplex units and
the individual apartment buildings in separate lots. This arrangement will require deviations
from the base zoning requirements, which is allowed within a PUD. Deviations include
internal side yard setbacks reduction, lots without frontage on a public street, parking off-site
or apartment buildings in an outlot.
Staff reviewed the park interface with the applicant to refine the architecture and landscaping
transition as is currently proposed. The interface will be an access drive along the shared
property line of 3200 and Tedesco Park. At the southeast edge of 3200, there will be a future
driveway connection into the park where there is intended to be a small parking lot with access
to a shelter.
FS-RM commonly requires a 10-foot planter buffer with trees as a transition between low
density residential and higher density. However, in this case, it was not specifically required in
relation to the park since it is not residential. For the park interface, the developer included
native prairie planting/grasses rather than lawn areas along the parking interface. There is a
minimum of 20 feet of prairie planting materials between the eastern apartment buildings and
the park. Trees as buffers have not been proposed by the developer, assuming the trees in
the park support the compatibility of the park environment with the proposed structure
2
locations along the east side of the flag area.
The provision of garages with the apartments is viewed as a benefit of the PUD process to
diversify housing options. Typically garages are not provided with large apartment projects.
The parking lot will be planted with trees for shading. The parking lot landscaping does get
more complicated to meet planting requirements due to building placements and utility
easements compared to open parking lots. Staff has worked with the developer to address the
required tree plantings in the parking lot.
There will be front yard landscaping along the small portion of the lot on the traffic circle near
University Boulevard. Within the site, trees will be dispersed to give shade to the parking. The
newly extended drive includes small street trees with the townhomes on the north side of the
drive. No additional landscaping is part of the drive extension on the County property.
The lot was platted with a 75-foot stream bank stabilization easement along the north of the
property. Within this easement is a small stream that is within a floodplain. This easement
area will not be improved with buildings or parking, though some grading will be done. This
area remains as a sloped open space.
A PUD includes expectations for amenities as trade off for flexibility. Sites over 50 units have
a specific requirement for an on-site amenity. The PUD Overlay does not specify specific
amenities and allows for the developer to propose an improvement that addresses the PUD
principles. Staff provided options to the developer for active and passive amenities such as
recreational space, a tot lot, gathering spaces, etc. The developer was required to be address
the amenity requirement as a condition of the Planning and Zoning Commission review. The
developer has since responded with a covered shelter within their internal green space area
serving the apartments.
SITE ACCESS:
Staff worked with the applicant to refine the entrance to the property off the traffic circle where
University Boulevard and Cottonwood Road meet for both vehicles and pedestrians and
bicyclists entering the park. The entrance will be shared for both lots and will also serve as an
access to a planned parking lot for the park. The County’s bike trail also crosses through this
area. The park path is also proposed to be reconfigured to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle
movement. The Story County Conservation Board representatives support an easement along
the park property for the shared entrance to cross the three properties.
The property will have a driveway that is partly on the park property, which has been planned
in conjunction with Story County.
The site plan depicts a future driveway extension and potential park improvement for a parking
lot in Tedesco Park. No park improvements are included in the approval of this major site
development plan.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Major Site Development Plan reviews have no formal notice requirement. A courtesy notice
was mailed to the adjacent property owners.
3
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION:
The Major Site Development Plan was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission on
October 15, 2025. No one from the public was present at the meeting. The Commission
discussed the park proximity and storm water treatment measures for the project. The
Commission voted 5-0-0 to recommend approval of the Major Site Development Plan to the
Council with the following conditions, as recommended by staff:
1. Include required amenity details prior to City Council approval.
2. Include updated parking and tree landscaping plan details prior to City Council approval.
The above conditions have since been met with updates provided by the applicant.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the Major Site Development Plan for 3200 University Boulevard.
2. Approve the Major Site Development Plan for 3200 University Boulevard with
conditions.
3. Deny the Major Site Development Plan for 3200 University Boulevard.
4. Defer action on this request and refer it back to City staff and/or the applicant for
additional information.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The proposed housing types are allowed in the zoning and the PUD Overlay facilitates
creation of individual lots. The proposed density achieves the required minimum density of 10
units per acre.
The PUD Overlay is intended to address two issues for the site. The first is design
compatibility with the surroundings with sensitivity to the adjacent park open space. The
second is to promote diverse housing types with high quality design features.
The proposed development at 3200 will contain a mix of housing types that will help to serve a
growing Research Park. The PUD enables desirable duplex units that may be owned or rented
and rental apartments with garages that would likely otherwise be difficult to accommodate on
the site.
The compatibility is a unique issue with the park. The shared driveway is a partnership with
the County. The design of the site places its most prominent 18-unit buildings in the closest
proximity to the park, which with the open nature of a prairie style park makes the
development features quite visible. The structures are readily visible from numerous features
in the park but do have some physical separation. The developer agreed to native plantings to
blend with the park in an effort to be compatible with the park. The County has provided no
specific critique of the development to staff in terms of compatibility.
With the County facilitating the proposed development along the park boundary, the
4
proposed project can be found to be compatible with the surroundings. Therefore, it is
the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council act in accordance with
Alternative #1.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Addendum.pdf
Attachment A.pdf
Attachment B.pdf
Attachment C.pdf
Attachment D.pdf
5
1
ADDENDUM
PUD MASTER PLAN AND SITE DEVELOPEMNT PLAN. Approval of the PUD
requires the findings of conformance to the Principles of the PUD Overlay inclusive of
the Site Plan or Master Plan that accompanies the request (See PUD Purpose in
Attachment D). The PUD requires a site plan approval for development, which is
typically a Major Site Development Plan. However, it also allows for Master Plan
approval of conceptual uses when a precise site plan is not yet ready for consideration.
Both plan types set building types, site development features, and deviation allowances.
The submitted Major Site Development Plan for 3200 University proposes housing
types and supportive site improvements for:
- 7 duplexes, each with 2 units for a total of 14 units; the townhomes 2 or 3
bedrooms
- 2 apartment buildings containing 12 units; each building has 4 one-bedroom and
8 two-bedroom units
- 2 apartment buildings containing 18 units; each building has 6 one -bedroom and
12 two-bedroom units
- Site access is shared between 3300 and 3200 University Boulevard and the
County parcel
Deviations
The PUD permits certain design flexibility. The site at 3200 University Boulevard
will have the following deviations:
- There will be lots along a private street.
- Required parking for the apartment buildings is located off-site on the
outlot.
- The outlot between the apartment buildings will be used for accessory
garage structures to the individual apartment buildings.
- The internal lots for the individual duplexes and apartment buildings do not
have frontage on a public street.
- The duplex setbacks for interior lot lines (all setbacks for the perimeter of
the project are at least 20 feet):
o Side setbacks are approximately 7 feet on the side where 8 are
required for 3-story structures
o Front setbacks are 20 feet for garages where 25 feet are required
o Front setbacks for the individual units is 13 feet where 20 feet are
required
Infrastructure. During the review, an analysis of the necessary infrastructure to
accommodate residential development was undertaken.
Water
The development is currently served by City of Ames water. The 3200 site will require
extension of a water main and looping to the north on the Workiva property to
interconnect the system and avoid a long dead end.
6
2
Sewer
The development is currently served by City of Ames sewers. Extension of mains and
services into the sites will be accomplished with development.
Electric
The development is within the Ames Electric service territory. (The adjoining
development at 3300 is in the Alliant Energy service territory.)
Stormwater and Drainage
The site complies with the requirements for on-site retention/detention. The 3200
property will construct a pond in the northeast of the site for drainage.
Shared Use Paths and Trails
The development abuts the Tedesco Environmental Learning Corridor. An existing trail
connection that leads from University Boulevard into the park will be disrupted during
construction but will be replaced. The driveway into 3200 does lie partially in the park,
with the permission of Story County. The driveway into the development will also give
access to a small parking lot within Tedesco Park that will be public.
Streets
No new public streets will be required. Both lots will use a shared access point off the
traffic circle at University Boulevard and Cottonwood Road.
An interior driveway will be given a street name for addressing and emergency
response purposes. This driveway will straddle the line between the subject property
and the park property with the permission and coordination of Story County. This
driveway will be designed as a private street and will meet minimum SUDAS standards.
This drive will have a sidewalk on the north side that will give access to the rest of the
development.
The driveway will be 26 feet wide, which complies with the design requirements for
public streets. The pavement thickness will comply with SUDAS requirements.
Parking
The applicant is providing parking in compliance with the minimum parking standards in
the Zoning Ordinance. There will be large garage buildings for the apartment buildings
(one indoor garage space per unit) in addition to outside parking.
The townhomes will have two-car garages and space between the garage and the back
of the sidewalk for two additional cars. Additional guest parking for the townhomes will
be situated at the top of the ‘pole’, in the southeast part of the property.
PUD OVERLAY Purpose. Sec. 29.1114(1) outlines the intent of a Planned Unit
Development. Staff find that the proposed development complies with the standards:
(a) Provide for innovative and imaginative development through flexibility in
the design, placement of buildings, clustering of housing types, use of
open space, and related site and architectural design considerations;
7
3
The proposed design of the north lot (3200) provides two housing types: four
apartment buildings (two with 12 units, two with 18 units) and seven duplexes (14
units). The developer is proposing to place the townhomes in the “pole” of the
flag lot where they will face Tedesco Environmental Learning Corridor to the
south. The developer believes they have met this with creating different lotting
patterns for housing types and providing higher level amenities for the
apartments with garage parking. The shared driveway with the county facilitates
the development. They believe the 20-foot setback to the east and south for the
18-unit buildings exceeds minimum requirements and within native grass planting
makes the site compatible.
(b) Increase the stock of diverse housing types for a variety of income levels;
The range of apartment sizes (one- and two-bedrooms) and the two- and three-
bedroom duplexes will provide a diversity of housing price points. Adding
covered garage parking is not always common with apartment projects.
(c) Promote efficient land use and infrastructure construction, while
maintaining high-quality living environments for privacy, architectural
interest, streetscape, walkability, and open spaces for private and common
use;
The applicant will incorporate drainage into the project with a drainage pond in
the northeast corner. The architecture of the development complements the
architecture in the nearby buildings in the Research Park and in the nearby 3300
University Boulevard project. The development will provide internal path
connections and will extend the sidewalk along University Boulevard.
The lot has a short frontage on University Boulevard. An existing shared-use
path is along the frontage, with a short bike trail that extends into the bike land on
University Boulevard. The Public Works Department does not require an
extension of the path to the north. There is no shared use path on the Workiva
property to the north, and an existing drainage ditch makes extending a path on
the east side of the street unfeasible currently. The west side of the street has a
shared use path that extends from Collaboration Place to the south up to the ISU
campus several miles to the north.
Although the park acts as a neighborhood amenity for the area as public
resource, the PUD requires on site amenities as well. The applicant is providing a
picnic shelter surrounded by trees for use by the residents.
(d) Provide for a variety of private and common open space areas
corresponding to smaller lot sizes along with additional amenities for
larger developments;
Each duplex unit will have private space at the rear. There are internal private
spaces for the apartments, and the development provides pedestrian
8
4
connections to the adjacent Tedesco Environmental Learning Corridor.
A condition is in place for a specific amenity for the apartments. There is open
space to the north of the site, but it is graded with a significant slope and is
unlikely to provide any specific usable open space value.
(e) Encourage and preserve opportunities for energy efficient development;
and
The development will meet the minimum density of 10 units per acre and will
make sidewalk and trail connections to surrounding amenities. The design of the
townhomes with shed roof sloping to the north does not permit for future solar
installations, the apartment buildings could accommodate solar.
(f) Encourage context-sensitive infill development.
The development buildings are designed in a style that will complement the
nearby Research Park architecture. The site is not readily visible from a public
street. There will be landscaping along the park border that will blend this site
with the public space.
Findings of Fact. Based upon an analysis of the proposed rezoning and laws pertinent
to the applicant’s request, staff makes the following findings of fact related to the PUD
Overlay and Major Site Development Plan/Master Plan request.
1. Ames Municipal Code Section 29.1507(2) allows owners of 50 percent or more of
the area of the lots in any district desired for rezoning to file an application
requesting that the City Council rezone the property. The property represented by
the applicant is entirely under one ownership representing 100 percent of the
property requested for rezoning.
2. The subject property is requesting a Future Land Use Map designation of RN-3.
This supports a “FS-RM” zoning designation, including apartments with densities
above 10 units per acre.
4. Infrastructure is adequate to serve the site. New sidewalks will be constructed
along University Boulevard.
5. The Master Plan identifies developable areas and range of uses consistent with
the proposed FS-RM zoning district. Densities can be achieved consistent with
the FS-RM minimum of 10 units per acre. Open spaces are identified within the
project site, and the project complements the adjacent County park.
Public Notice. Notice was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the subject site,
and a sign was posted on the subject property.
Conclusions. Based upon the analysis in this report, staff conclude that the proposed
major site development plan of the subject property is consistent with the Ames Plan
9
5
2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with the allowances of the
proposed PUD Overlay Master Plan requirements.
10
1
Attachment A
Location Map
11
1
Attachment B
Existing Zoning
12
1
Attachment C - Site Plan
13
2
14
3
15
4
16
5
17
6
18
7
19
8
20
9
21
10
22
11
23
12
Apartments
24
13
25
14
Townhomes
Facing Tedesco Park
26
15
Garages
27
16
28
1
Attachment D
Applicable Regulations
• Ames Plan 2040 Goals, Policies, and the Future Land Use Map:
The Ames Plan 2040 identifies the land use designations for the property proposed
for rezoning.
• Ames Municipal Code Chapter 29, Section 1507, Zoning Text and Map Amendments,
includes requirements for owners of land to submit a petition for amendment, a
provision to allow the City Council to impose conditions on map amendments,
provisions for notice to the public, and time limits for the processing of rezoning
proposals.
• Ames Municipal Code Chapter 29, Section 1200, Floating Zones, includes a list of
uses that are permitted in the Village Residential, Suburban Residential and Planned
Residential zoning districts and the zone development standards that apply to
properties in those zones.
Sec. 29.1114 “PUD” PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
(1) Purpose. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay zone is intended to allow
flexibility in Zoning District and General Standards where design flexibility helps
further the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with its
surroundings. The PUD zone is intended to:
(a) Provide for innovative and imaginative development through flexibility in the
design, placement of buildings, clustering of housing types, use of open
space, and related site and architectural design considerations;
(b) Increase the stock of diverse housing types for a variety of income levels;
(c) Promote efficient land use and infrastructure construction, while maintaining
high-quality living environments for privacy, architectural interest, streetscape,
walkability, and open spaces for private and common use;
(d) Provide for a variety of private and common open space areas corresponding
to smaller lot sizes along with additional amenities for larger developments;
(e) Encourage and preserve opportunities for energy efficient development; and
(f) Encourage context-sensitive infill development.
(3) Establishment. The PUD Overlay zone applies to all lands that are zoned PUD on
the Zoning Map. A Zoning Map Amendment may be approved provided the City
Council makes the following findings:
(a) The Zoning District and Overlay are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
(b) The property on which the PUD is requested has a residential zoning of RL,
RM, UCRM, RH, FS-RL, FS-RM, S-SMD, or is concurrently proposed to be
changed to one of these Zoning Districts.
29
2
(c) The existing and proposed infrastructure is sufficient in design and capacity to
support the project with water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, streets and
other transportation related facilities.
(d) The PUD Master Plan includes interconnected pedestrian and bicycle
circulation routes to the surrounding areas and within the development.
(e) The proposed PUD Master Plan is consistent with the requirements of this
ordinance and all deviations, exceptions, and limitations stated on the Master
Plan are clear, identifiable, and necessary in support of the design concept
and the purpose statements of the overlay.
(f) The proposed PUD Master Plan is in harmony with the purpose of the
overlay.
(g) Findings for approval of a Master Plan with a PUD Overlay rezoning may be
deferred, when the City Council initiates a property rezoning.
30