HomeMy WebLinkAbout~Master - Packet of Communications to Council dated October 24, 2025
City Manager’s Office 515.239.5105 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
515.239.5142 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jeramy Neefus, Principal Clerk, City Manager’s Office
Date: October 24, 2025
Subject: Packet of Communications to Council
Listed below are the communications to the City Council known to staff as of October
24, 2025:
1. Martin Laird, Ames Resident – October 15, 2025
RE: Request for “No Bicycles” Signs on 6th Street Sidewalks
2. Tim Ashley, Ames Resident – October 23, 2025
RE: Request for Zoning Text Amendment for Stairway Enclosure
3. Kelly Diekmann, Planning and Housing Director – October 24, 2025
RE: JT Logistics Warehouse Landscaping Request
Caring People Quality Programs Exceptional Service
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kelly Diekmann, Planning & Housing Director
Date: October 23, 2025
Subject: JT Logistics Warehouse Landscaping Request
City Council recently received a letter (see attached) from the developer of the JT Logistics
warehouse that is under construction on E. 13th Street. The letter described their interest in
adjustments to landscaping for phasing of front yard landscaping and for a substantial reduction
in tree plantings to the rear of the site. City Council referred the letter to staff on October 14th.
Staff reached out to a representative of the development group to understand the context of the
letter. The issue of phasing landscaping has already been resolved with the recent subdivision
of the property into two sites. Landscaping on the vacant lot will not be required with the
development of warehouse building on its own separate lot.
The second issue in the letter was a request to eliminate 34 overstory trees at the rear of the
site that were required in relation to their parking and maneuvering area landscaping
requirements. Staff understands that the developer made the request with the belief that
the City is undertaking a landscape ordinance revision and that their site could have any
approved ordinance changes applied to it. However, staff indicated that no landscaping
ordinance changes to planting requirements had been initiated by the Council at this
time and the parking lot trees were part of the current required landscaping.
Staff did reassess the approved site plan and the grading for the site, which includes some
severe slopes related to stormwater detention in the southwest corner. Staff believes that if
there are slope stability issues that some of the trees could be reduced in that area as part of
the 20% alternative design process without any ordinance changes by Council. However, most
of the trees in the rear of the site are in relatively large and stable planting areas that can
accommodate the typical overstory tree planting requirements of the City’s ordinance and would
not justify full reduction of all trees in that area.
LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE REVISIONS:
City Council has not directed any specific ordinance amendments related to overall landscaping
planting requirements for either front yard landscaping or parking lot tree requirement. Staff
indicated in April 2025 that based upon some developer feedback, some changes to the
landscape standards would be included with the overall Zoning Ordinance rewrite, which has
not yet begun.
Staff has received feedback in some cases that overall quantities of plantings exceed
developer’s expectations. They also dislike the tree dispersion requirements throughout parking
lots. No specifics were discussed in April about changes and no separate update was
directed by Council at that time.
Staff brought up the issue in April thinking a wholesale rewrite of the 2017 landscaping
standards was not needed as they have generally been successful in improving the
appearance of the community, but that some reduction in planting ratios for front yards
could be accommodated. However, generally staff believes the separate parking lot tree
requirement, does not need an adjustment in planting ratios and believes it is one of the
more valuable landscape standards as the overstory tree requirement best implements
sustainability goals related to site design.
OPTIONS:
The JT Logistics request is focused on a substantial reduction of parking lot tree requirements,
which was not an issue that staff had previously considered for a major change. With the
Zoning Ordinance rewrite, some changes would occur to landscaping standards. These future
changes have not yet been defined. The rewrite has not yet begun and is expected to take 18-
24 months to complete in its entirety. This timing would not benefit any project under
construction in 2025 or 2026.
Option 1-Interim Text Amendment Front Yard and Parking Lot Landscaping
City Council could direct staff to propose some minor changes to landscaping requirements for
front yards and parking lot trees as an interim adjustment to landscaping requirements while
awaiting a Zoning Ordinance rewrite. This process would take three months to complete. This
may partially reduce landscape requirements as applied to JT warehouse site as part of citywide
zoning standards change.
Option 2-Interim Text Amendment Front Yard Landscaping Only
City Council could direct staff to propose some minor changes to landscaping requirements for
front yards as originally contemplated by staff in April. These would be an interim adjustment to
landscaping requirements while awaiting a Zoning Ordinance rewrite. This process would take
three months to complete as a focused reduction in planting ratios. This process would not
change JT’s rear planting requirements, but could reduce the front yard landscaping.
Option 3-No Change At This Time
If Council is generally satisfied with the City’s standards no changes are required to zoning.
The developer will be able to make some minor changes under the Alternative Design process,
but will retain a significant number of trees on the site. Changes to landscaping standards
would be addressed with the rewrite and reviewed comprehensively at that time.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff believes a small, targeted change to planting ratios could be addressed now if desired by
the Council. However, a substantial change to the ordinance would be time consuming and not
warranted outside of rewrite process. If a targeted change was initiated, staff would continue to
recommend our parking lot tree plantings as a valuable standard for the community, and that it
should not be reduced substantially.
1
Hall, Renee
From:Hall, Renee
Sent:Thursday, September 25, 2025 8:28 AM
To:Hall, Renee
Subject:FW: JT Logistics - Ames Construction Project
Attachments:JT Logistics - Ames Construction Project.pdf
From: Minerva Cord <minerva.cord@jtlogistics.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2025 3:08 PM
To: Haila, John <john.haila@cityofames.org>; City Council and Mayor <mayorcouncil@amescitycouncil.org>
Cc: Jamie Cord <jamie@jtlogistics.com>
Subject: JT Logistics - Ames Construction Project
[External Email]
Dear Mayor Haila,
I wanted to extend my sincere thanks for attending the groundbreaking event for JT Logistics. Your
support and presence meant a lot to our team, and it was fantastic to share this special moment with
you.
We are very excited about the future of this project and the great opportunity to work closely with the City
of Ames. We greatly value our partnership and look forward to strengthening our relationship as we move
forward.
Dear City Council Members,
I have attached a letter for your review and consideration. Please feel free to share any feedback or
suggestions you might have. We're always eager to hear your thoughts and make any necessary
improvements.
Thanks once again for your support and for being such an important part of this journey with us.
Best regards,
Minerva Cord
2
Minerva Cord
Chief Innovation Officer
3811 Dixon St
Des Moines, IA 50313
Mobile: (515) 339-5658
minerva.cord@jtlogistics.com
www.jtlogistics.com