HomeMy WebLinkAbout~Master - Special Meeting of the Ames Conference Board 08/09/2005MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE AMES CONFERENCE BOARD,
JOINT MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL AND AMES SCHOOL BOARD,
AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL
AMES, IOWA AUGUST 9, 2005
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE AMES CONFERENCE BOARD
The special meeting of the Ames Conference Board was called to order by Chairperson Ted Tedesco
at 5:00 p.m. on August 9, 2005. Present from the Ames City Council were Cross, Goodhue,
Goodman, Mahayni, Vegge, and Wirth. Ex officio Member Borich was also present. Story County
Board of Supervisors present were Clinton, Halliburton, and Toms. Representing the Ames School
Board were Brown, Cakerice, Johnston, and Symons. Gilbert and United School Districts were not
represented.
Chairperson Tedesco explained that City Assessor Richard Horn had submitted his resignation,
effective August 15, 2005.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Clinton, to accept the letter of resignation from City Assessor
Richard Horn.
Vote on Motion: 3-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Mr. Horn reviewed the timeline and procedure for filling the position of City Assessor. Mayor
Tedesco requested that Mr. Horn send a memo to the Conference Board regarding the balance of his
unused sick leave and vacation.
Discussion ensued on combining the City and County Assessor offices. Regarding consolidation,
Mr. Horn pointed out that the City has a Board of Review consisting of five Ames’ residents to
adjudicate assessment appeals; Story County has a three-member Board. He is concerned that City
influence would be reduced on the Conference Board and the Board of Review. It is Mr. Horn’s
belief that no money would be saved if the offices were consolidated. Since over 60% of the
population of Story County resides in Ames, the consolidated office would operate more efficiently
by having an Ames branch, and this would negate most potential savings. Additionally, appraisers
would incur travel time between Nevada and Ames daily. He pointed out that having both a City
and a County Assessor is not duplication; there is no overlap of jurisdiction or duties. Mr. Horn
advised that Ames’ residents now pay property taxes for assessment services at the rate of
$.3199/1,000 of taxable value. The rest of the County pays at the rate of nearly $.6/1,000 of taxable
value. Consolidating the offices would result in Ames’ residents paying more property taxes to
subsidize the County assessment expenses. A savings of at least $265,000 would be needed to justify
combining the offices.
Council Member Cross explained that whenever a vacancy occurs, it is financially responsible for
the entities involved to explore the options. Supervisor Clinton explained that there is the potential
for cost savings due to consistency of applications, improved technology, etc., and over time,
reduced costs should result. Council Member Goodhue asked Mr. Horn if a cost analysis had been
done. Mr. Horn stated that it had not been done; however, levies in counties that have combined the
City/County Assessor are not lower than current City Assessor levies.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Vegge, to set 6:30 p.m. on August 16, 2005, as the date of a
Special Conference Board meeting.
Vote on Motion: 3-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
JOINT MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL AND AMES SCHOOL BOARD
The joint meeting of the Ames City Council and Ames School Board was called to order by Mayor
Ted Tedesco at 5:40 p.m. on August 9, 2005, in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, 515 Clark
Avenue. Present from the Ames City Council were Cross, Goodhue, Goodman, Mahayni, Vegge,
and Wirth. Also present was Ex officio Member Borich. Present on behalf of the Ames School
Board were Brown, Cakerice, Johnston, and Symons. City Manager Steve Schainker, Housing
Coordinator Vanessa Baker Latimer, and Superintendent of Ames School District Ray Richardson
were also present.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING
SUBDIVISION: City Manager Steve Schainker reviewed the changes that had been made to the
RFP as a result of the previous joint meeting held on July 25, 2005. He specifically pointed out
that Section C.1.2 of the RFP should read as follows: “Of the 71% total lots/homes, 10% must
be donated or sold to non-profit builders.”
Ms. Baker Latimer advised that the definition of spouse was researched through the Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); it means “a married couple.” She further explained
that changes had been made to the “First-Time Homebuyer” clause, so as not to preclude now-
single parents and homemakers from qualifying for the program.
Mr. Schainker explained that City staff is requesting that the RFP be approved at this meeting;
it is imperative that the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program funds be
expended in a timely manner on projects that meet the criteria for Grant funds. He clarified that
the City had approached the School Board about this potential project. It is the City Council’s
goal to increase affordable housing opportunities in Ames. Such a project was approved for
funding through the Grant, and because they desire that these housing opportunities be located
in the Ames School District, the Council pursued the partnership with the School Board.
Board Member Symons asked if there were a clause in the Agreement to require that the homes
in this program be built prior to others and that the project be completed. Ms. Baker Latimer
advised that the terms of the Grant dictate that the project be completed by 2008.
Council Member Cross asked if the pro-forma statement, which is mandatory to be submitted,
was a public document. Mr. Schainker explained that it would be, and that is why there is some
hesitation to place that stipulation in the RFP. Council Member Goodman indicated that he did
not think developers would be comfortable with submitting a pro-forma statement. City Attorney
John Klaus indicated that some documents could be kept confidential, although the City is not
in the habit of doing so. Mr. Schainker indicated that there were other ways for developers to
indicate financial strength. Mr. Cross asked for the language pertaining to the pro-forma and also
that relating to the developer’s financial statement be revised. Council Member Goodman asked
that City staff meet with area developers to discuss the submittal requirements contained in the
RFP.
Board Member Cakerice asked how Ms. Latimer had calculated the mean income for Story
County. Ms. Baker Latimer explained that HUD had set that number. Mr. Schainker also
advised that grant administration fees are not being deducted from the School District’s potential
share of funds.
Council Member Vegge pointed out that the developer’s requirement to have built three homes
per year for the last four years in an urban setting might preclude non-profit agencies from
participating in this program. It was agreed that staff would discuss this requirement with the
developers.
Catherine Scott, 1510 Roosevelt, Ames, advised that she had reviewed the letter from Scott
Renaud, Fox Engineering, which was submitted at the July 25, 2005, meeting. Ms. Scott
concurred with Mr. Renaud in that the City did not need to be so restrictive in the design
2
requirements, i.e., there was no reason that the homes had to be single-family detached. Ms.
Scott was not opposed to the proposed affordable-housing subdivision being built using the
village concept.
Ted Huiatt, 3025 Evergreen Circle, Ames, spoke as President of the Board of the Story County
Community Land Trust. He said that the Land Trust had the following concerns with the RFP:
(1) A starter home concept is needed to entice families with children to live there. The
development standards in the present RFP are more elaborate than starter homes. (2) The homes
could be made more affordable. The extra parking space and the sod in the back yard could be
eliminated. (3) Regarding the minimum affordability standards, Mr. Huiatt would like to see
Item C.a.1. read, “At least 71% of the total homes must meet the standards for affordability for
households with incomes at 80% or less of the Story County median...” He would also like Item
C.a.3. changed to read, “No more than 29% of the total lots/homes in the subdivision must meet
the standards for affordability for households with incomes between 81% and 110% of the Story
County median income limits, as established by HUD.”
Don Lambert, 2818 Somerset Drive, Ames, asked how the School Board knows that a
subdivision such as this would generate more “new” children for the School District. Mike
Murray, 2016 Friley Road, Ames, stated that numbers were previously presented that indicated
that, in the Bentwood Subdivision, for every four houses, there were four children, and in the
Somerset and Northridge Subdivisions, for every four houses, there were three children.
Jim Black, 3416 Valley View Road, Ames, speaking on behalf of Story County Habitat for
Humanity, indicated that his agency would not qualify as a developer for this project because
it had not built the requisite number of homes in the time period specified.
Moved by Cross, seconded by Goodman, to direct staff to work on the logistical issues raised
at this meeting that centered around developer financial reporting requirements and financial
strength of developers and place this item on the City Council Agenda for their special meeting
to be held on August 16.
Moved by Vegge, seconded by Cross, to amend the motion to direct staff to revise the RFP at
Item C.a.1. to add the words, “At least 71%...”, and Item C.a.3. to read, “No more than 29%...”.
Vote on Amendment: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
It was the concurrence of the City Council that staff should re-word Items under Section C.a.1,
2, and 3, to clarify the requirements.
Motion and amendment were withdrawn.
The City Council also agreed that staff should review Sections D.6., D.7, and D.9 prior to the
special meeting on August 16.
Moved by Wirth, seconded by Goodman, to direct staff to pursue an alternate project to meet
HUD requirements if the joint venture with the Ames School Board does not come to fruition.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
The proposed Land Transfer Agreement was summarized by Mr. Schainker.
The meeting adjourned at 7:22 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL
The Ames City Council reconvened in regular session at 7:35 p.m. on the 9th day of August, 2005,
in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, 515 Clark Avenue, pursuant to law with Mayor Tedesco
3
presiding and the following Council members present: Cross, Goodhue, Goodman, Mahayni, Vegge,
and Wirth. Tony Borich, ex officio member, was also present.
CONSENT AGENDA: Council Member Mahayni requested to pull Item No. 11, which pertained
to the funding agreement for the 2005/06 Annual Action Plan Project with HUD. Council
Member Vegge requested to pull Item No. 15, the agreement with the Iowa Department of
Economic Development for Advanced Analytical Technologies.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Cross, to approve the following items on the Consent
Agenda:
1. Motion approving payment of claims
2. Motion approving minutes of the special meeting of July 25, 2005, and of the regular meeting
of July 26, 2005
3. Motion approving certification of civil service applicants
4. Motion approving renewal of the following beer permits and liquor licenses:
a. Class C Liquor - Club 8, 216 Stanton Avenue
b. Class C Liquor - Cy's Roost, 121 Welch Avenue
c. Class C Liquor - Olde Main Brewing Company, 316 Main
d. Class C Liquor & Outdoor Service Privilege - Mickey's Irish Pub, 109 Welch Avenue
e. Class C Liquor - People's Bar & Grill/Lumpy's UnderWhere?, 2430 Lincoln Way
f. Class C Liquor - CY Stephens Auditorium, Iowa State Center
g. Class C Liquor & Outdoor Service Privilege - Hilton Coliseum, Iowa State Center
h. Class C Liquor - Scheman Building, Iowa State Center
i. Special Class C Liquor - Fisher Theater, Iowa State Center
5. Motion approving application for new Special Class C Liquor License for Pizza Kitchens,
120 Hayward Avenue, pending final inspections
6. Motion authorizing the City Manager to negotiate terms and modify the Revolving Loan Fund
Agreement with Demonstratives, Inc.
7. Motion approving amendment to Street Banner Policy
8. RESOLUTION NO. 05-326 approving Ames Historical Society funding Agreement
9. RESOLUTION NO. 05-327 approving correction to 2005/06 Pay Plan
10. RESOLUTION NO. 05-328 approving Engineering Services Agreement for Design of Water
& Pollution Control Plant Supervisory Controls And Data Acquisition (SCADA) System
11. RESOLUTION NO. 05-330 approving contract with Story County Decategorization &
Empowerment Program for grant monies to fund police enforcement of underage drinking
laws
12. RESOLUTION NO. 05-331 approving Temporary Easement Purchase Agreement with IDOT
for U.S. 69 Widening at Ada Hayden Park
13. RESOLUTION NO. 05-332 approving temporary waiver of golf cart prohibition in Ada
Hayden Park to transport mobility-impaired individuals on a tour
14. RESOLUTION NO. 05-334 approving preliminary plans and specifications for Miscellaneous
Materials for Substation Projects for Electric Services Department; setting August 30, 2005,
as bid due date and September 13, 2005, as date of public hearing
15. RESOLUTION NO. 05-335 approving preliminary plans and specifications for Installation of
Communication Hardware for Wide Area Network (WAN) Project; setting August 31, 2005,
as the bid due date and September 13, 2005, as the date of public hearing and award of
contract
16. RESOLUTION NO. 05-336 approving contract and bond for Diesel Fire Pump Installation at
Power Plant
17. RESOLUTION NO. 05-337 accepting completion of 2004/05 Asphalt Resurfacing Program;
2004/05 Seal Coat Removal/Asphalt Reconstruction Program; and the 2004/05 Park
Road/Parking Lot Improvements Projects
4
18. RESOLUTION NO. 05-338 approving Major Final Plat for East Hickory Park Subdivision
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR THE 2005/06 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN PROJECT WITH
THE HUD: Vanessa Baker Latimer clarified that 20% of the funds will be used for program
administration.
Moved by Mahayni, seconded by Cross, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-329 approving
funding agreement for the 2005/06 Annual Action Plan Project with the Department of
Housing and Urban Development
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
AGREEMENT WITH THE IOWA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
(IDED) FOR ADVANCED ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (AATI): David Maahs,
1007 Vermont Court, Ames, speaking as Executive Director of the Ames Economic
Development Commission, advised that in 1999, AATI was granted a CEBA forgivable loan
in the amount of $250,000. The local match was provided by a $50,000 revolving loan fund
rate at ½ prime by the City. AATI repaid the loan in full and on time, but did not meet the job
creation target of 60 jobs. Since the company was short of the job target, they owe a penalty
of $48,333.14 per the terms of the agreement.
Steve Laske, CEO for AATI, explained that the company is now on stable ground, wants to
stay in Ames, and has a bright future.
Moved by Vegge, seconded by Goodhue, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-333 authorizing the
Mayor to enter into an agreement with the IDED as the sponsoring agency for AATI CEBA
economic development assistance; authorizing the City Manager to proceed with developing
an agreement with AATI for the local match of a $50,000 Revolving Loan Fund rate at ½
prime and a $25,000 Community Investment Fund forgivable loan; and, reducing the penalty
on the 1999 Revolving Loan Fund loan with AATI from $48,333.14 to $5,081.16.
Roll Call Vote: 5-1. Voting aye: Cross, Goodhue, Mahayni, Vegge, Wirth. Voting nay:
Goodman. Resolution declared adopted, signed by the Mayor, and hereby made a portion of
these minutes.
PUBLIC FORUM: Catherine Scott, 1510 Roosevelt Ames, suggested that tentative times
be placed on the Agenda so that the public would know when to come to the meeting,
especially when there are special meetings preceding the regular meeting.
EAST 13TH STREET ZONING AGREEMENT WITH WOLFORD DEVELOPMENT: Jo
Etzel, 2912 Wood Street, Ames, spoke on her own behalf and also as a representative of Ames
Smart Growth. Ms. Etzel is concerned about the Zoning Agreement due to the project being
significantly different from when the City voted on the change to the Land Use Policy Plan
(LUPP), specifically, the size of the project has been minimized and the south-side Power
Center is now optional. She pointed out that the sales projections would be vastly different
since the project has changed. Ms. Etzel urged the City Council to require a new marketing
study be performed by Wolford Development.
Kay Berger, 4121 Dawes Drive, Ames, advised that she was a member of Ames Smart
Growth. She indicated concern over the gradual down-sizing of Wolford’s development
proposal and that the LUPP set aside the land in question for industrial development. Ms.
Berger gave historical accounts from the Ames Tribune on statements made by Wolford
Development pertaining to the number of anchor stores and a south-side Power Center. She
5
wants the city Council to adhere to the recommendations contained in the LUPP to keep the
land on E. 13th Street zoned Industrial.
Holly Fuchs, 806 Brookridge, Ames, questioned whether the proposed Zoning Agreement
would improve the quality of life in Ames. She pointed out that the proposed mall had now
been reduced in size and the Power Center might not be built at all. Ms. Fuchs also wanted
to know the value of the infrastructure that the developer is required to install. Because she
has unanswered questions, Ms. Fuchs opposes the Zoning Agreement.
Catherine Scott, 1510 Roosevelt, Ames, indicated that she was a member of Ames Smart
Growth. She spoke on the changes in timing being requested by Mr. Wolford. Also, Ms. Scott
was unsure if the amount of new retail being proposed by Wolford Development would satisfy
the citizens of this community. She does not support extending the deadlines for Mr. Wolford.
Jim Murdock, 1510 Roosevelt Avenue, Ames, a member of Ames Smart Growth, pointed out
that the City of Ames is committed to accessibility, yet Mr. Wolford is not agreeable to build
a bike path to the proposed new mall. He believes that Wolford Development is asking for
Ames citizens to be taxed to provide transportation to the proposed mall. The size of the
development and the amount of revenue and sales tax proceeds have changed; these numbers
are yet unknown. Mr. Murdock indicated that Ames Smart Growth would provide a statement
of their position prior to the final vote on this issue.
Mary Sand, 245 Todd Circle, Ames, indicated her opposition to sprawl. She believes that the
proposed mall is clearly “sprawl.” Ms. Sand thinks that the proposed mall is such poor
planning that many have wondered how it had gotten to this point.
David Metzler, 1205 Michigan Avenue, Ames, stated that he had been a resident of Ames for
52 years. He does not believe that the City Council or Wolford Development had presented
factual information or analyses on this proposal. Mr. Metzler accused the Mayor and City
Council members of receiving paybacks from Wolford Development.
Jack Troeger, 1009 - 16th Street, Ames, told the City Council that “changes are coming.” He
alluded to the closing of Central Junior High in 1985 and his disappointment that he did not
fight it at the time. Mr. Troeger stated that “smart growth” is coming, and the City Council
can’t stop it.
Pam Sargent, 2129 Stevenson Drive, Ames, indicated that there are resources, i.e., Dr. Ken
Stone and Sue Ravenscroft, who have indicated that the sales revenues were inaccurate. She
trusts the “local experts” more than she trusts Wolford Development. Ms. Sargent admitted
that she shops outside Ames, but it is because of the poor customer service in Ames. She
asked that the E. 13th Street remain industrially zoned so businesses “that pay more than
minimum wage” could locate there.
Erwin Klaas, 1405 Grand Avenue, Ames, stated that in January 2004, the Ames Smart Growth
submitted a series of questions pertaining to the proposed mall, which was referred to City
staff for response. Smart Growth representatives were told that many of the questions would
be answered throughout the process; however, they have not been. Ames Smart Growth asked
for a comprehensive study on economic, social, and environment impact on the City of Ames;
this has not been done. He pointed out that the North Grand Mall had now been sold and is
being renovated. Mr. Klaas believes that “this whole deal stinks.” He said that most damaging
of all is the fact that the city would cripple its own economic development by removing prime
industrial land.
6
Jeri Neal, 916 Ridgewood Avenue, indicated her opposition to the East I-35 development,
preferring that Ames not grow in that direction. She indicated that she is a cyclist and
addressed the transportation design if the proposed mall has to happen. Ms. Neal defined the
“Complete Streets” movement, which ensures that the entire right-of-way is designed to
provide safe access to all users. She said that this type of design does not cost a lot, but
provides a great benefit for many citizens.
Eugene E. Robinson, 1326 Lincoln Way, Ames, advised that he had lived in Ames for nearly
40 years. He asked that the City Council think through this issue very carefully as what may
sound like a good idea at the time sometimes turns out to be bad.
Jeff Johnson, 3037 Evergreen Circle, Ames, gave his personal support of the proposed mall.
He pointed out that discussion tonight was to be germane to the Zoning Agreement, not the
design of the mall. He encouraged the City Council not to rehash old issues, but to focus on
the future and what will be needed as Ames grows. Mr. Johnson pointed out that public input
had created many of the delays that have been brought out tonight. He felt that there had been
reasonable compromise. According to Mr. Johnson, Iowa is changing, and change is not all
bad. Delays, threats, and negative comments do not define change in Iowa. Mr. Johnson
asked the Council to consider this proposal as a beginning to redefine what Ames wants to be
in the future.
Barry Nadler, 3226 Oakland, Ames, spoke in support of the Development Agreement. He
advised that he had looked at a lot of communities that have developed over the years, and the
management and staff of the City of Ames are some of the most professional he had ever seen.
He commended the staff for negotiating this Agreement in good faith with Mr. Wolford. Mr.
Nadler said that Mr. Wolford had been incredibly patient with the small community of Ames,
listened to public input, changed his plan according to their requests, but now is being accused
of causing delays and down-sizing the project. Mr. Nadler pointed out that the changes were
the result of the public input previously given by the citizens of Ames; Mr. Wolford has
accommodated those persons. Mr. Nadler believes that confidence should be placed in the
staff of the City. The reason this came about is because no one is stopping in Ames to shop;
this is Ames’ opportunity to gain those dollars for the School District and the community.
Jim Bloedel, 3001 Hemlock Circle, Ames, cited his background in economic development and
stated that he felt very comfortable with this proposed development. Mr. Bloedel pointed out
that there had been a great deal of negativism expressed over this proposal; however, there are
also many who feel very positive about the prospect of a new mall. According to Mr. Bloedel,
extending bus service to E. 13th Street is very much wanted by businesses in that area. A new
mall at the proposed location would also help stop economic drain as shoppers now drive past
Ames to Ankeny and Des Moines. Mr. Bloedel said that it was important to point out that the
proposed project does not require the destruction of any of the community’s neighborhoods
and will bring in needed revenue for the community and Ames schools. He believed that it
was important for Ames to send the message that Ames is not only “open for business,” but
“open to business.”
Nancy Storck, 608 Onyx, Ames, indicated her support for the proposed new mall. She said
she likes to shop; give her the opportunity, she’ll shop there.
Gerald Johnson, 21473 - 570th, Ames, said that he was an adjacent land owner to the proposed
development. He is concerned that there is no protection for land owners to the north from the
cost of having to pave the road. Mr. Johnson referred to the City assessing adjacent land
owners for such an improvement and would like assurances that adjacent property owners
would not have to pay for the cost of paving the road due to the development of the land in
question.
7
Andy Bock, 916 Kellogg, Ames, advised that he was a member of the Steering Committee.
He said he is not aware that the Committee delayed this project. Mr. Bock stated that the
project, as now proposed, is not the same project as discussed by the Steering Committee; it
does not put into effect what was agreed to by the Committee. Mr. Bock pointed out that the
south-side Power Center was to be a gateway, and now that might not even be built. He
opposes the project as it now stands as it is so different than what was recommended by the
Steering Committee.
John Shelness, 701 Lynn Street, Slater, Iowa, believed that the mall would be a good idea if
Ames moved to the east.
Brian Heithoff, 302 N. Fourth Street, Marshalltown, spoke as the CEO of Consumers Energy.
He urged the City to move forward with this project as he believes that it represents managed
growth.
Planning and Housing Director Matt Flynn advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission
will consider rezoning of the property in question at its meeting to be held on August 17, 2005.
Mr. Schainker described the next steps in the process.
“WELCOME TO AMES” EVENT: Deputy Fire Chief Paul Sandoval described activities
planned to welcome students to Ames on August 25 and 26. The proposed location is near
Fire Station 2 in Campustown where City representatives will provide information regarding
the Ames community and services offered by the City, as well as information on job
opportunities for students within City government.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Mahayni, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-339 approving
the expenditure of $1,700 from the Contingency Fund (a portion of which will be a
reallocation of unspent pancake breakfast funds) for the “Welcome to Ames” event for new
ISU students.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Mahayni, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-340 approving
closure of the street and metered parking spaces on Chamberlain Avenue between Welch and
Stanton from 3 to 9 PM on August 25 and 26, 2005.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Mahayni, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-341 approving
the waiver of electricity during the above-named event.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS: Chief Clint Petersen presented a staff report
summarizing the City’s current approach to abating dangerous buildings within the
community. He described what actions had been taken regarding a building located at 3520
South Duff. The City was notified that the building had been sold, and the new owner had
requested that the Fire Department help with demolition by burning the building. At that time,
the Fire Department received a request to assist the State Fire Marshal’s Office in conducting
a fire investigation class this fall.
8
Mr. Petersen further advised that there have been complaints filed on additional properties and
preliminary evidence supports further investigation. He gave a presentation showing properties
that are being worked on by the Inspections Division.
Moved by Wirth, seconded by Mahayni, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-342 approving the
agreement between the property owner(s) of 3520 South Duff Avenue and the City, which
authorizes the City to conduct fire training and assisting in the demolition of that structure
during the week of September 19 – 23, 2005.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
Moved by Mahayni, seconded by Wirth, to direct staff to investigate what other cities are
going with regard to property maintenance.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
PLUMBING CODE AMENDMENTS: Douglas Sick, 2001 Prairie View West, Ames, spoke as
the Chairperson of the Plumbing and Mechanical Board. He explained that the proposed
changes direct the Building Official to conduct the registration and licensing of apprentice
plumbers and direct appellants of the Plumbing Inspector’s decisions to the Building Official.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Cross, to pass on first reading an ordinance making revisions
to the plumbing regulations addressing clarification of roles for Pluming Inspector, Building
Official, Plumbing Board of Appeals, and the appeals process and supervision of apprentice
plumbers.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
FIRE SUPPRESSION MEASURES AT THE POWER PLANT: Moved by Goodhue,
seconded by Wirth, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-343 waiving formal bidding requirements
and authorizing a contract with Brown Engineering to continue design work on fire
suppression measures at the Power Plant.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
PRESENTATION FROM THE IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION ON THE
CENTRAL IOWA COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA PLAN: Public Works Director John Joiner
explained that this project is the development of a comprehensive trail signage and
communication plan for the region. He introduced Lisa Hein, Project Facilitator for the Iowa
Natural Heritage Foundation. Ms. Hein advised that the development of a communications
master plan is a critical component of existing trail systems, future trail construction, and the
pursuit of grant funding.
Moved by Mahayni, seconded by Goodhue, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-344 approving
the allocation of $6,000 project share cost from unobligated balance of Local Option Sales Tax
funds from the 2004/05 Asphalt Resurfacing Program.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
URBAN REVITALIZATION AREA (URA) FOR 4509 AND 4512 TWAIN CIRCLE: Council
Member Vegge asked to have brick on the South Dakota side of the building instead of just
on the front, which is on a circle, and not easily seen. He would like the brick to be on the
South Dakota side as it is one entryway to the City. Mr. Schainker clarified that Council
Member Vegge wants 100% of the brick on the street-face.
Moved by Cross, seconded by Goodhue, to approve the application.
9
Keith Arneson, owner of the property in question, indicated that he would meet the
requirement for a certain percentage of the building being brick, but didn’t want to have to
figure out what the City Council considered the face of the building or the street-side of the
building. Mr. Schainker clarified that the requirement for brick was 100% on the street-face
and 50% on the sides. He pointed out that if 50% were put on each side, it would actually be
less brick. Mr. Arneson said that he would include brick on the back side of the building,
which at this point, doesn’t have any.
Moved by Cross, seconded by Vegge, to amend the motion to require at least 50% of the
exterior of the building to be brick, stipulating that a portion of each side will consist of brick.
Vote on Amendment: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Vote on Motion, as Amended: 5-1. Voting aye: Cross, Goodhue, Mahayni, Vegge, Wirth.
Voting nay: Goodman. Motion declared carried.
Moved by Cross, seconded by Goodhue, to direct City staff to prepare the Urban
Revitalization Plan.
Vote on Motion: 5-1. Voting aye: Cross, Goodhue, Mahayni, Vegge, Wirth. Voting nay:
Goodman. Motion declared carried.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Vegge, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-345 setting the date
of public hearing for September 27, 2005.
Roll Call Vote: 5-1. Voting aye: Cross, Goodhue, Mahayni, Vegge, Wirth. Voting nay:
Goodman. Resolution declared adopted, signed by the Mayor, and hereby made a portion of
these minutes.
URBAN REVITALIZATION TAX ABATEMENT FOR 217 WELCH AVENUE: John Klaus
indicated that pre-approval is a feature in the law, and the developers have requested it. He
advised that if the developers follow the provisions of the approved plan, they would receive
the abatement even if the City Council did not pre-approve it. Pre-approval gives the
developers a sense of comfort before moving ahead with the project.
The Urban Revitalization Campustown Criteria Matrix was reviewed. Council Member
Goodman asked when the developer requested this abatement. Mr. Flynn advised that they
have had longstanding discussions with the developer for approximately one year.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Cross, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-346 granting pre-
approval of Urban Revitalization Tax Abatement for property located at 217 Welch Avenue
under the Campustown Urban Revitalization Plan.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
HEARING ON TEXT AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE TO REQUIRE POSTING
NOTICE ON PROPERTIES FOR WHICH VARIANCES HAVE BEEN APPLIED: The
Mayor opened the public hearing. No one wished to speak, and the hearing was closed.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Cross, to pass on first reading an ordinance making a text
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to require posting notice on properties for which
variances have been applied.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
HEARING ON ESSENTIAL CORPORATE PURPOSE AND REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES
2005a: The public hearing was opened by the Mayor and closed after no one requested to speak.
10
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Wirth, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 05-347 approving the
issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,600,000.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
ORDINANCE ASSIGNING ANNEXED LAND TO WARD 3, PRECINCT 5, AND WARD 2,
PRECINCT 3: Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Wirth, to pass on first reading an ordinance
assigning annexed land to Ward 3, Precinct 5, and Ward 2, Precinct 3.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Cross, seconded by Goodhue, to suspend the rules necessary for the adoption of an
ordinance.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Cross, seconded by Goodman, to pass on second and third readings and adopt
ORDINANCE NO. 3847 assigning annexed land to Ward 3, Precinct 5, and Ward 2, Precinct
3.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
ORDINANCE REVISING REGULATIONS ON DOOR-TO-DOOR SOLICITATION: Jon
Shelness, 701 Lynn Street, Slater, asked if religious groups or campaigners could go door-to-
door to solicit funds. John Klaus explained that the ordinance would require those people to
inform the City who they are and what they are doing. People going door-to-door soliciting
funds would be required to register with the City.
Moved by Cross, seconded by Goodhue, to pass on first reading an ordinance revising
regulations on door-to-door solicitation.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Mahayni, seconded by Goodhue, to suspend the rules necessary for the adoption
of an ordinance.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Cross, seconded by Goodhue, to pass on second and third readings and adopt
ORDINANCE NO. 3848 revising regulations on door-to-door solicitation.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
ORDINANCE REVISING PARKING REGULATIONS ON WELCH AVENUE: Moved by
Cross, seconded by Goodman, to pass on second reading an ordinance revising parking
regulations on Welch Avenue between Storm Street and Little Street.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF PARKING IN MUNICIPAL
PARKS: Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Vegge, to pass on third reading and adopt ORDINANCE
NO. 3842 pertaining to the regulation of parking in municipal parks.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
ORDINANCE REVISING PARKING REGULATIONS ON WILDER STREET, DURANT
STREET, AND HARTFORD DRIVE: Moved by Goodman, seconded by Vegge, to pass on third
reading and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 3843 revising parking regulations on Wilder Street,
Durant Street, and Hartford Drive.
11
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
ORDINANCE REVISING PARKING REGULATIONS ON PRAIRIE VIEW EAST: Moved
by Goodman, seconded by Cross, to pass on third reading and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 3844
revising parking regulations on Prairie View East.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
ORDINANCE REVISING PARKING REGULATIONS ON NORTHRIDGE PARKWAY
WEST OF STANGE ROAD: Moved by Goodman, seconded by Goodhue, to pass on third
reading and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 3845 revising parking regulations on Northridge
Parkway west of Stange Road.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF CEDAR LANE AND OAKWOOD ROAD: Moved by Goodman, seconded by
Cross, to pass on third reading and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 3846 rezoning property generally
located at the southwest corner of Cedar Lane and Oakwood Road from “A” (Agricultural) to
“FS-RM” (Suburban Residential Medium Density).
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and
hereby made a portion of these minutes.
COMMENTS: Moved by Wirth, seconded by Cross, to direct the Mayor to review applications
to fill the vacancy on the Planning & Zoning Commission, giving preference to improving
diversity, pertaining specifically to gender, geographical, race, and ethnicity balance, and place
this item on the City Council’s Agenda for September 13, 2005.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Goodhue, seconded by Cross, to reconsider the appointment of Scott Dockstader
to fill the vacancy on the Planning & Zoning Commission as a part of that overall review, on
September 13, of applicants to the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Council Member Goodhue explained that the motion to appoint Scott Dockstader to the
Planning & Zoning Commission failed, and he would like to bring back that application as a
part of the application pool on September 13.
Vote on Motion: 4-2. Voting aye: Cross, Goodhue, Mahayni, Vegge. Voting nay: Goodman,
Wirth. Motion declared carried.
Council Member Vegge announced that the Ames Citizens Academy will meet for the first
time on September 1, 2005, at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
Council Member Cross pointed out that one of the goals set by the Council was to meet with
the Government of the Student Body in the fall. Tony Borich will inform the City Council of
the date of the meeting.
ADJOURNMENT: 10:14 p.m.
___________________________________ ____________________________________
Diane R. Voss, City Clerk Ted Tedesco, Mayor
12
13