HomeMy WebLinkAbout~Master - January 28, 2020, Regular Meeting of the Ames City CouncilAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMES CONFERENCE BOARD
AND REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - CITY HALL
JANUARY 28, 2020
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: The Mayor and City Council welcome comments from the public
during discussion. If you wish to speak, please complete an orange card and hand it to the City
Clerk. When your name is called, please step to the microphone, state your name for the
record, and limit the time used to present your remarks in order that others may be given the
opportunity to speak. The normal process on any particular agenda item is that the motion is placed
on the floor, input is received from the audience, the Council is given an opportunity to comment on
the issue or respond to the audience concerns, and the vote is taken. On ordinances, there is time
provided for public input at the time of the first reading. In consideration of all, if you have a cell
phone, please turn it off or put it on silent ring.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMES CONFERENCE BOARD
CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 p.m.
1. Roll Call
2. Motion approving Minutes of February 26, 2019
3. Resolution approving re-appointment of Jami Larson to Board of Review
4. Discussion of City Assessor’s budget proposals:
a. Motion approving recommendations of Assessor’s report
b. Motion to receive proposed budget (adoption of budget will occur after hearing is held)
c. Motion to set 6:00 p.m. on February 25, 2020, as date of public hearing on proposed FY
2020/21 City Assessor’s budget
5. Resolution approving reappointment of Greg Lynch as City Assessor
CONFERENCE BOARD COMMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT:
REGULAR MEETING OF AMES CITY COUNCIL*
*The Regular Meeting of the Ames City Council will immediately follow the Regular Meeting of the
Ames Conference Board.
CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the consent agenda will be enacted by one motion.
There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a request is made prior to the time the
Council members vote on the motion.
1. Motion approving payment of claims
2. Motion approving Minutes of Regular Meeting held January 14, 2020, Special Meetings held
January 7, 11, and 18, 2020
3. Motion approving Report of Change Orders for January 1 - 15, 2020
4. Motion approving certification of Civil Service applicants
5. Motion approving new 5-day Class C Liquor License (February 12 - 16, 2020) - Booze Cruzer
Cocktail Co., LLC - 2508 Mortensen Road
6. Motion approving new 5-day Special Class C Liquor License (February 28 - March 3, 2020) -
The Whimsical Wine Trailer, 1407 S University Blvd
7. Motion approving new 12-month Special Class C Liquor License - Clouds, 119 Stanton Avenue
8. Motion approving ownership change for Class C Beer Permit with Class B Wine Permit and
Sunday Sales - Hy-Vee Gas #5013, 4018 West Lincoln Way
9. Motion approving ownership change for Class C Beer Permit with Class B Wine Permit and
Sunday Sales - Hy-Vee Gas #5018, 636 Lincoln Way
10. Motion approving ownership change for Class C Liquor License with Catering and Sunday Sales
- Hy-Vee #1 Clubroom, 3800 West Lincoln Way
11. Motion approving ownership change for Class E Liquor License with Class B Wine, Class C
Beer, and Sunday Sales - Hy-Vee Food Store #1, 3800 W Lincoln Way
12. Motion approving ownership change for Class E Liquor License with Class B Wine, Class C
Beer, and Sunday Sales - Hy-Vee Food & Drugstore #2, 640 Lincoln Way
13. Motion approving ownership change for Class E Liquor License with Class B Wine, Class C
Beer, and Sunday Sales - Hy-Vee Drugstore, 500 Main Street
14. Motion approving renewal of the following Beer Permits, Wine Permits, and Liquor Licenses:
a. Class C Liquor License with Outdoor Service and Sunday Sales - Blue Owl Bar, 223 Welch
Avenue
b. Class E Liquor License with Class B Wine Permit and Class C Beer Permit (Carryout Beer)
- Fareway Stores, Inc. #093, 3619 Stange Road
c. Class E Liquor License with Class B Wine Permit and Class C Beer Permit (Carryout Beer)
- Fareway Stores, Inc. #386, 619 Burnett Avenue
d. Special Class C Liquor License with Outdoor Service and Sunday Sales - Blaze Pizza, 2320
Lincoln Way
e. Class C Liquor License with Catering Privilege and Sunday Sales - Ge' Angelo's, 823 Wheeler
St Suite #9
15. Resolution approving Quarterly Investment Report for Period Ending December 31, 2019
16. Resolution approving Agreement with Iowa Aviation Promotion Group, Inc., for Fly Iowa 2020
Event
17. Resolution approving Pole Attachment Agreement and Underground Utility Locate Letter
Agreement with Metro FiberNet, LLC (Tabled from 1/14/2020)
18. Resolution accepting easement at 23959-580th Avenue (former Caremoli property) for “AMES”
sign
19. Requests for ECO Fair on Saturday, April 25, 2020:
a. Motion approving blanket Temporary Obstruction Permit
b. Motion approving blanket Vending License
c. Resolution approving closure of 5th Street from east of Parking Lot M (City Hall Parking Lot)
entrance to Clark Avenue from 4:00 p.m. on Friday, April 24, to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, April
25
d. Resolution approving closure of 35 metered spaces along 5th Street from 4:00 p.m. on Friday,
April 24, to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, April 25
2
e. Resolution approving continued use of three metered parking spaces along 5th Street to hold
the Iowa DNR mobile trailer until its removal on the morning of Monday, April 27
20. Resolution approving preliminary plans and specifications for South Grand Avenue Extension
from S. 16th Street to new 5th Street Extension; setting February 18, 2020 as bid due date and
February 25, 2020 as date of public hearing
21. Resolution approving preliminary plans and specifications for East Industrial Utility Extension
Project; setting March 4, 2020 as bid due date and March 10, 2020 as date of public hearing
22. Resolution approving preliminary plans and specifications for Fuel Pump House Fire Protection
Upgrade; setting February 26, 2020 as bid due date and March 10, 2020 as date of public hearing
23. Resolutions approving revised preliminary plans and specifications for CyRide 2020 HVAC
Improvements Project; setting February 26, 2020 as bid due date and March 10, 2020 as date of
public hearing
24. Resolution awarding contract for the purchase and installation of furniture for City Hall, Water
Pollution Control, and City Maintenance Facility to Storey Kenworthy of Ames, Iowa, in the
amount of $84,102.37
25. Resolution awarding contract to Western Waterproofing Company, Inc., d/b/a Western Specialty
Contractors of West Des Moines, Iowa for the Chemical Storage Floor Repair in the amount of
$75,000
26. Resolution approving contract and bond for Durham Bandshell Electrical Renovations
27. Resolution approving Change Order No. 1 to Nutri-Ject Systems, Inc., for an increased amount
of biosolids disposal for Water Pollution Control Facility the amount of $32,826.10
28. Resolution accepting completion of 2017/18 Storm Water Erosion Control Program (Kinyon-
Clark)
PUBLIC FORUM: This is a time set aside for comments from the public on topics of City business
other than those listed on this agenda. Please understand that the Council will not take any action on
your comments at this meeting due to requirements of the Open Meetings Law, but may do so at a
future meeting. The Mayor and City Council welcome comments from the public; however, at no
time is it appropriate to use profane, obscene, or slanderous language. The Mayor may limit each
speaker to three minutes.
PLANNING & HOUSING:
29. Ames Comprehensive Plan 2040 Preferred Land Use Scenarios (Tabled from 1/14/2020)
a. Motion directing staff on Preferred Growth Areas for a Draft Preferred Land Use Map
FINANCE:
30. 2020-2025 Capital Improvements Plan:
a. Receive public input
ADMINISTRATION:
31. Discussion on Policy regarding Waiver of Downtown Parking Meter Fees for Special Events
32. Discussion regarding renaming of Squaw Creek
3
HEARINGS:
33. Hearing on Amendment to 2019-2020 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual
Action Plan:
a. Resolution approving Amendment
34. Hearing on rezoning 2800 E. 13th Street from Agricultural “A” to General Industrial “GI:”
a. First passage of Ordinance
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
DISPOSITION OF COMMUNICATIONS TO COUNCIL:
CLOSED SESSION:
35. Motion to hold Closed Session as provided by Section 20.17(3), Code of Iowa, to discuss
collective bargaining:
a. Resolution ratifying contract with IBEW, Local 55 (Electrical Workers)
CLOSED SESSION:
36. Motion to hold Closed Session as provided by Section 21.5(1)c, Code of Iowa, to discuss matters
presently in or threatened to be in litigation
a. Motion providing direction to staff
ADJOURNMENT:
4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
AMES CONFERENCE BOARD
AMES, IOWA FEBRUARY 26, 2019
REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMES CONFERENCE BOARD
The Regular Meeting of the Ames Conference Board was called to order by Chairman John Haila
at 6:01 p.m. on February 26, 2019. Present from the Ames City Council were Bronwyn Beatty-
Hansen, Gloria Betcher, Amber Corrieri, Tim Gartin, David Martin, and Chris Nelson. Story County
Board of Supervisors was represented by Linda Murken and Lauris Olson. Supervisor Lauris Olson
was brought into the meeting telephonically as it was impractical for her to attend in person. Ames
Community School Board, Nevada Community School Board, Gilbert Community School District,
and United Community School District were not represented.
MINUTES OF JANUARY 22, 2019: Moved by Nelson, seconded by Murken, to approve the
Minutes of the January 22, 2019, meeting of the Ames Conference Board.
Vote on Motion: 3-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
APPOINTMENT OF GAIL JOHNSTON TO BOARD OF REVIEW: Moved by Betcher,
seconded by Murken, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 19-058 appointing Gail Johnston to the Board
of Review.
Vote on Motion: 3-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED FY 2019/20 BUDGET FOR CITY ASSESSOR’S
OFFICE: The public hearing was opened by Mayor Haila. After no one came forward to speak, the
Mayor closed the hearing.
Moved by Corrieri, seconded by Murken, to approve the FY 2019/20 Budget for the City Assessor’s
Office.
Roll Call Vote: 3-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
CONFERENCE BOARD COMMENTS: No one had any comments at this time.
ADJOURNMENT: Moved by Murken to adjourn the Ames Conference Board at 6:04 p.m.
___________________________________________________________________
Amy L. Colwell, Deputy City Clerk John A. Haila, Mayor
Caring People Quality Programs Exceptional Service
515.239.5105 main
5142 fax
Ave.
MEMO
CB Item# 3
TO: Members of the Conference Boards
FROM: John A. Haila, Mayor
DATE: January 28, 2020
SUBJECT: Appointment to Board of Review
Jami Larson’s term of office on the Board of Review expired December 31,
2019. Jami has indicated that he would like to serve another term.
It is my recommendation that the Conference Board re-appoint Mr. Larson to
serve a six-year term on the Board of Review.
JAH/alc
Mini Conference Board
Minutes for Monday, January 6, 2020 (UNAPPROVED)
Room 135, Ames City Hall, 515 Clark Avenue, Ames, IA
Members Present:
Amber Corrieri, Ames City Council, Chairperson
Lisa Heddens, Story County Board of Supervisors
Jamet Colson, Ames School Board of Directors
Joe Anderson, Nevada School Board of Directors
Greg Lynch, Ames City Assessor’s Office, Assessor
Also Present:
Brenda Swaim, Ames City Assessor’s Office, Deputy Assessor
Dawn Tank, Ames City Assessor’s Office, Administrative Assistant
Call to Order: 3:35 p.m. by Greg Lynch
Discussion of City Assessor’s 2020 – 2021 Budget Proposal:
Lynch discussed the purpose of the Mini Board and then walked through the report. He
pointed out the following highlights:
o For 2019, 2,184 assessment notices were sent out, which were mainly commercial
and multi-residential.
o The appeal process and timeline were summarized.
o For 2020, assessment notices will be sent for new construction, remodels, building
permits and revaluation of cooperatives and condominiums.
o The PAAB and District Court cases from 2019 were briefly discussed.
Lynch then proceeded to explain specific line items in the budget.
o The office tries to mirror the city when it comes to salary increases.
o As a side conversation, he went over some of the details and advantages of how the
Board of Review operates in Ames.
o Briefly discussed line items for interns, the Board of Review stipend, mileage rates
and fleet vehicle usage.
o Talked about the 2017 residential model and involving Bob Gloudemans in
updating it for the 2021 assessments.
o Explained the need to hire outside counsel to represent the Board of Review in
District Court. At issue is whether the independent living units at Northcrest should
be taxed or exempt.
Heddens asked about longevity. Lynch explained why it was broken out as a separate
expense. Tank explained what longevity is and when it is paid.
Heddens then questioned the monthly cell phone allowance amount. She pointed out that
Story County was looking at that expense in relation to county employees.
Colson inquired about the intern/extra help line item. She noticed that what had been spent
the last two years was noticeably less than what had been budgeted. Tank pointed out that
in April 2019 the office had lost their long term intern due to her finding permanent
employment in her field. It was also mentioned that in order to compete in the current
market the office will need to offer a higher starting wage than $8.50 per hour. The group
then discussed the number that are usually hired and how many hours are typically
worked.
M i n i C o n f e r e n c e B o a r d
2
Tank stated that the office expenses mainly increased due to the costs associated with
updating the residential model for the 2021 assessment.
Colson asked for clarification on whether the current PAAB and District Court cases would
need additional funding next fiscal year like Northcrest does. Lynch and Tank stated that
the current fiscal year’s funds would be covering those.
Corrieri spoke to the other elected officials that if they, or their colleagues, have any
concerns or questions about the finer points of the budget, or other issues, that they contact
the Assessor’s office in advance of the full Conference Board meeting so that the meeting
stays on track.
Heddens pointed out that all of the supervisors had a conflict with the Conference Board
meeting on January 14 at 5:30 p.m. They would all be attending a meeting in McCallsburg.
The group tentatively decided that the meeting would be moved to January 28 at 5:30 p.m.
Once the change has been approved by the City Clerk’s office, the assessor’s office will send
out an email to all Mini Board members confirming the date and time.
Colson asked for a clarification on what the Utilities line item covered.
Other Business: None
Adjourn: 4:18 p.m. by Greg Lynch
Minutes prepared January 23, 2020
Dawn Tank, Administrative Assistant, Ames City Assessor’s Office
M i n i C o n f e r e n c e B o a r d
3
City Assessor’s 2020-2021 Annual Report
To the Ames City Conference Board
CHAIRPERSON:
Ames Mayor John Haila
MEMBERS:
Ames City Council
Story County Board of Supervisors
School Boards of Directors for Ames, Gilbert, Nevada and United
1875 Bird's Eye view drawing of Ames from Andreas Atlas looking northwest. (From Ames History Museum Website)
Ames City Assessor’s Budget Proposal for the 2020-2021 Fiscal
Year For the Conference Board meeting at 5:30 p.m. on January 28, 2020
Page 1 of 10
The following report outlines the structure, programs, duties and activities of the Ames City
Assessor’s Office.
The Mini Conference Board met January 6, 2020, to review the Assessor’s budget proposal.
Members present were Amber Corrieri, Ames City Council; Lisa Heddens, Story County Board of
Supervisors; Jamet Colton, Ames School Board of Directors; Joe Anderson, Nevada School Board of
Directors; and Greg Lynch, Ames City Assessor. Also present were Brenda Swaim (City Assessor)
and Dawn Tank (City Assessor).
CONFERENCE BOARD
Iowa assessment laws can be found in Chapter 441 of the Iowa Code. Other chapters affect the
process, and there are numerous administrative rules. The Code creates a Conference Board for each
county. City Assessors are optional for cities with populations over 10,000. City Assessors are
created by ordinance and a Conference Board is automatically created. The City Conference Board
includes the City Council, School Boards of Directors (Ames, Gilbert, Nevada and United
Community) and County Board of Supervisors. The Mayor is chairperson. The Conference Board
votes as three voting units, with a majority of the members present for each unit determining the
unit’s vote. At least two members of a voting unit must be present in order to vote. A quorum is
reached when at least two members from two units are present.
The Conference Board must meet annually to propose a budget for publication. The Board must
meet again to hold a budget hearing and approve a budget. The Ames City Conference Board has
used a subcommittee called the Mini Conference Board to facilitate the budget discussion. Each of
the three voting bodies appoints one member to the Mini Board to conduct a preliminary meeting to
discuss budget proposals with the Assessor and report back to their full body. The Mini Board has
also been used to draft a personnel policy handbook and advise the Assessor on policy issues.
The Conference Board appoints the Assessor, Examining Board and Board of Review. The
Examining Board is activated when the Assessor position is vacant, or in the unlikely event of a
Deputy Assessor appealing a termination or disciplinary action.
BOARD OF REVIEW
The Ames Board of Review has five members. Members are appointed for staggered six-year terms.
The Code requires members to have different occupations, and that at least one is experienced in real
estate or construction. The Board of Review meets annually in a limited time frame to hear appeals.
Most decisions from the Assessor can be appealed (e.g. value, classification, exemption).
There is one vacant seat, which needs to be filled. The expiration date for each current board member
is as follows:
Thomas Jackson 12/31/2020 Gail Johnston 12/31/2024
Ron Murphy 12/31/2022 Vacant 12/31/2025
Bill Whitman 12/31/2023
Ames City Assessor
2020 Budget Proposal and Conference Board Report
Page 2 of 10
ASSESSOR
The Conference Board appoints, or reappoints, an assessor for a six-year term. Iowa assessors are
required to pass a comprehensive examination before being eligible to be appointed. In order to be
reappointed, 150 hours of state-approved continuing education, of which at least 90 hours must be
tested courses, are required during the six-year term.
The main duties of the Assessor are to classify and value all taxable property in the assessment
jurisdiction. Iowa law requires reassessment in odd-numbered years and notification of changes of
value in even-numbered years. Even-numbered year changes are typically new construction or
renovation of existing structures. In odd-numbered years, the Ames office recalculates values and
sends notices to property owners.
In addition, the Assessor administers multiple credit and exemption programs. The most common are
the homestead credit and military service exemption. Less common, but more problematic, are
exemption claims for religious and charitable organizations and business property tax credits.
In the course of classifying and valuing property in Ames, extensive property-related information is
acquired. Public information laws require, and common sense dictates, that most of this information
be readily available for review. This often involves considerable time and effort, but it is an essential
part of the operation.
It is also important for the Conference Board members to fully understand what the Assessor does
not do:
Does not calculate or collect taxes.
Does not set the level of value – the Assessor measures the level of value, as indicated by
sales of real property in Ames.
Does not make the laws and rules for assessments.
The most visible function of the office tends to be providing information to the public via the
Internet or through requests in the office. However, the first priority and the primary effort of the
office is discovering changes in real property, such as new construction, and maintaining the
classification and values for the entire tax base of Ames.
In summary, the Assessor has a variety of duties and functions and is an integral component of local
government operations.
Ames City Assessor
2020 Budget Proposal and Conference Board Report
Page 3 of 10
ASSESSED AND TAXABLE VALUES
The tax base changes for assessed and taxable values from 2018 to 2019 are shown in the following
two tables:
Table 1. Assessed Values by Class
Source: Iowa Department of Management Reports for Story County as of January 1, 2020.
Table 2. Taxable Values by Class
Source: Iowa Department of Management Reports for Story County as of January 1, 2020.
Ames City Assessor
2020 Budget Proposal and Conference Board Report
Page 4 of 10
Categorical changes of the 2019 taxable values are illustrated in the following table:
Table 3. Taxable Value by Class: Reasons for Value Changes
Source: 2019 Reconciliation Report.
Agricultural assessed values (Table 1) decreased 24.6% from 2018 to 2019. This was due
primarily to revaluation.
Agricultural taxable values (Tables 2 & 3) increased 9.0% from 2018 to 2019. This was due
primarily to annexation and a decrease in the roll back.
Residential assessed values (Table 1) increased 1.5% from 2018 to 2019. This was a result of an
increase in new construction.
Residential taxable values (Tables 2 & 3) experienced a decrease of 1.8% from 2018 to 2019. The
largest contributing factors for the decrease was due to class transfers and a roll back decrease.
Multi-Residential assessed values (Table 1) experienced an increase of 21.7% from 2018 to 2019.
The largest contributing factors for the increase was revaluation, class transfers and new
construction.
Multi-Residential taxable values (Tables 2 & 3) increased 15.6% from 2018 to 2019. This was
mostly the result of revaluation, class transfers and new construction. The increase was offset
because of a decrease of the rollback and an increase in abatements.
Commercial assessed values (Table 1) experienced an increase of 6.2% from 2018 to 2019. This is
primarily the result of revaluation and new construction.
Commercial taxable values (Tables 2 & 3) experienced an increase of 6.1% from 2018 to 2019.
The increase caused by revaluation and new construction was slightly offset by the loss caused by
transfers and exemptions.
Industrial assessed values (Table 1) experienced a negligible decrease of 0.6% from 2018 to 2019.
This is due to primarily to revaluation.
Industrial taxable values (Tables 2 & 3) experienced a slight decrease from 2018 to 2019 of 1.8%.
Categorically it increased due to transfers and new construction, while decreasing because of
revaluation and abatements.
Ames City Assessor
2020 Budget Proposal and Conference Board Report
Page 5 of 10
The overall change for the upcoming fiscal year is 1.1% more taxable value, as shown in Table 2.
STAFF
The permanent employees of the City Assessor's Office and their starting dates with this office are as
follows:
Gregory P. Lynch, City Assessor February 2006
Brenda M. Swaim, Chief Deputy Assessor December 1996
Judy K. Heimerman, Appraisal Technician January 1990
Dawn M. Tank, Administrative Assistant January 2015
Scott A. Harvey, Residential Appraiser April 2016
Christopher W. Bilslend, Residential Appraiser II January 2017
Daniel A. Boberg, Appraisal Technician August 2017
Lisa M. Henschel, Database Manager December 2017
DEPARTMENT ACTIVITIES
Revaluation of existing properties is continuous. Staff has been busy this fall and winter measuring,
listing and valuing new construction and remodeled properties. The staff is constantly engaged in
acquiring information about building changes, construction costs, selling prices and terms, and
numerous other items that affect market value. Sales information is reviewed and investigated
through phone calls, letters and inspections. Due to the efforts of the entire staff, the assessed
property values assigned by the Ames City Assessor’s Office consistently rank among the most
uniform and equitable assessments in the state.
There is ongoing development of our Beacon website (www.AmesAssessor.org) to better serve the
needs of our customers. The site continues to be our most active method of communication with
them. The data files created for the website are the backbone of real property information for several
city and county departments. Map files are uploaded regularly from the Story County Auditor’s files,
and data files are uploaded nightly from the county’s real estate system and both assessors’ offices.
In addition, map layers for Ames zoning are updated by the city’s GIS staff as Planning makes
zoning changes.
Digital photos for most properties are available on our website, but continue to require ongoing
maintenance.
RESIDENTIAL SALES FOR 2019
The table on Attachment C shows the quarterly activity of sales that are good for analysis (arms-
length sales). The number of new homes built in 2019 that sold increased to 45, up a significant 29%
from the 35 that were constructed in 2018.
New Construction Sales: The price per square foot is the most reliable indication of price increase.
Annual percentage changes and cumulative changes since 1995 are the right two columns. The report
shows that the sales price for new homes decreased slightly by 2.6%. (This is shown in the row
heading “New construction sales” for 2019.) Price per square foot was $250.88 in 2018 and $244.41
in 2019. The median sales price also showed a decrease of 17.8% from $452,000 in 2018 to
$371,575 in 2019 (shown under the column heading “Median Price”).
Existing House Sales: The total number of sales increased by 10.4% from 635 in 2018 to 701 in
2019. The average sale price per square foot remained basically unchanged. It was $158.35 in 2018
and $158.48 in 2018. (This is shown in the row heading “Existing houses”.) The median sales price
Ames City Assessor
2020 Budget Proposal and Conference Board Report
Page 6 of 10
showed an increase of 4.5% from $210,500 in 2018 to $220,000 in 2019 (shown in the column
heading “Median Price”).
ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR 2019
We mailed out a total of 2,184 assessment rolls for January 1, 2019. The following table breaks them
down by property class:
2019 Assessment Rolls by Property Class
Class Number of Assessment Rolls
Ag 143
Ag with Ag Dwelling 6
Commercial 930
Dual Class 40
Exempt 5
Industrial 5
Multi-Residential 221
Residential 834
Total 2,184
* Both Commercial & Multi-Residential
ASSESSMENT APPEALS
Informal Hearings: It was the fourth year for informal hearings. Prior to this, after April 1, our
office could not change assessments, only the Board of Review, Property Assessment Appeal Board
or District Court had that authority. The Iowa Code was amended and now we can have an informal
hearing, and change a value until April 25, provided we have a written agreement with the property
owner.
This new process now usurps the month of April that we previously used for Board of Review
preparation. In essence, what this law change did was to lengthen the appeal process time and
compress the time we have to get ready for it.
We had 66 property owners contact us about informal hearings. We completed 15 commercial, 37
residential and 2 multi-residential informal agreements. Of the 37 residential agreements, 16 of them
were for the condominium units at 2355 Hamilton Circle.
*
Ames City Assessor
2020 Budget Proposal and Conference Board Report
Page 7 of 10
2019 Informal Hearings: Number of Signed Agreements by Class
Class Number of Signed Agreements
Agricultural 0
Residential Dwelling on Agricultural Realty 0
Residential "outside incorporated cities" 0
Residential "within incorporated cities" 37
Commercial 15
Industrial 0
Multi-Residential 2
Total 54
Board of Review: Below are the number of protests filed with the Board of Review and the results
of the appeals:
* Note: 941 of the residential protests were condominium units.
I want to publicly thank the Board members for their hard work in resolving the often-difficult
differences of opinions on assessed values
**
Multi
Ames City Assessor
2020 Budget Proposal and Conference Board Report
Page 8 of 10
PAAB and District Court: For 2019, we had nine cases filed with the Property Assessment Appeal
Board and four cases filed with District Court. These are shown in the following table:
Property ID
or
MAP ID
Type / Use Address Assessed
Value
Appellant PAAB
or
District
Court
Notes
05-27-476-020 Property ID Walmart
(North Ames) 3105 Grand Ave $ 18,731,000
Walmart, Inc. and
Wal-mart Real Estate
Business Trust
District
05-34-150-010 Property ID Multi-Residential
(Apartments) 2001 Prairie View West $ 2,275,000 Prairie West Ames
LLC PAAB
05-34-151-270 Property ID Multi-Residential
(Apartments) 2212 Prairie View West $ 2,376,300 Prairie West Ames
LLC PAAB
05-34-153-010 Property ID
Multi-Residential
(Retirement
Community)
1801 20th St $ 17,969,900 Northcrest, Inc District
05-34-227-120 Property ID Walgreen's 2719 Grand Ave $ 3,424,600 Walgreen Co.
(#12108) District
09-10-251-040 Property ID Multi-Residential
(Apartments) 439 S Maple Avenue $ 805,000 His Properties LLC
Her Properties LLC PAAB
Settled
12-18-2019
$ 665,000
09-10-477-010 Map ID Condominiums 1407 - 1525 S Grand Ave $ 23,501,600 Campus Crest at
Ames LLC PAAB Withdrew
10-11-2019
09-11-175-240
Property IDs Multi-Residential
(Apartments)
301 S 5th St $ 4,695,000
321 South 5th Street
LLC PAAB Withdrew
10-31-2019
09-11-175-250 321 S 5th St $ 2,641,000
09-11-175-260 407 S 5th St $ 2,660,000
09-11-175-270 420 S Walnut Ave 428 $ 1,590,000
09-11-176-048 Property ID Restaurant 519 S Duff Ave $ 2,030,200 Texas Roadhouse PAAB
09-11-251-300 Property ID Walmart
(South Ames) 534 S Duff Ave $ 18,000,000 Walmart, Inc. and
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. District
09-13-100-250 Property ID Car Dealership 1700 SE 16th St $ 6,350,400 Deery & Deery, LLC PAAB
09-15-225-025 Map ID Condominiums
709 - 810 Bay Dr
1715 - 1917 Copper
Beech
805 Coral Dr
711 - 812 Cove Dr
1717 S Grand Ave
713 - 814 Sandcastle Dr
703 - 804 Shore Dr
715 - 815 Wave Dr
$ 31,885,500 CB At Ames LLC PAAB Withdrew
10-11-2019
10-07-175-010 Property ID Office 416 S Bell Ave $ 6,750,000 REG Capital LLC PAAB
Ames City Assessor
2020 Budget Proposal and Conference Board Report
Page 9 of 10
BUDGET PROPOSAL
Attachment A is the budget expense proposal. Explanations for various line item expenses follow:
Salaries: The expense items for the Assessor and all other staff are budgeted with a 3% cost of
living increase and a 2% merit pool, for a total of 5%. (As always, exact salaries for staff will be
based upon individual evaluations.)
Board of Review salaries are $17.50 per hour. There is also a clerk to take the minutes. For
budgeting purposes, we estimate that the clerk will need to put in 1.5 times the hours of the Board.
The clerk is paid at a rate of $15.00 per hour. Due to 2021 being a revaluation year, we budgeted the
line item at $6,000.
For extra help and interns we have budgeted $40,000, which is the same amount we had for the
current fiscal year. For FY 2019-2020 we are projecting the use of only $9,000 of the $40,000 by the
end of June. Aside from our usual workload this fiscal year, the office has been busy trying to
implement two new programs (Mobile Assessor and Enterprise Content Management), so we have
not had the time to hire and train extra help. During 2020-2021, we would like to employ extra help
to assist us with various projects.
Taxable Fringe Benefits: This line includes mileage allowance for four of the full-time employees
who use their private auto for work purposes. Employees must provide a copy of their insurance card
and driver’s license annually. In return for maintaining liability insurance and a dependable vehicle
that is available to the employee during working hours, each full-time employee is paid monthly as
follows (less mileage reimbursement*):
Assessor $100
Deputy $90
Appraisers (2) $90
Also included in the amount is a monthly cell phone allowance of $40.00 a month for the five full-
time staff that have regular duties outside the office. The allowance is paid if the employee has a cell
phone available for office use during work hours as well as for on-call availability for IT staff.
Additionally, it also includes a $100 stipend to reimburse Board of Review members for the use of
their laptops during sessions.
Health Insurance: The amount budgeted last year was based on our current and projected staffing
and use levels. I received notice that we could expect a 3.9% increase in health insurance costs for
the upcoming fiscal year.
This also includes a pro-rated amount of the group workers’ compensation insurance for the fiscal
year.
Health Insurance: The amount budgeted last year was based on our current and projected staffing
and use levels. I received notice that we could expect a 3.9% increase in health insurance costs for
the upcoming fiscal year.
This also includes a pro-rated amount of the group workers’ compensation insurance for the fiscal
year.
Life and Disability Insurance: This line represents life and disability insurance from the city for all
benefited employees.
Board of Review Expenses: This line represents payment of the Board’s mileage, postage and
supplies. The cost comes to $1,900.
Supplies, Telephone, Etc.: These amounts are mostly self-explanatory. Most are based on past
experience and the city’s estimate of charges for next year.
Ames City Assessor
2020 Budget Proposal and Conference Board Report
Page 10 of 10
* Mileage: This line represents reimbursement to employees who use their personal auto for work
purposes. It is paid at the current IRS rate. (As of December 30, the rate was $0.58 per mile.)
We have access to a pool vehicle provided by the city whenever possible. The rate for it is currently
$0.45 per mile.
Special Projects:
Consulting for Updated Residential Model: We have allocated $16,000 to have Robert
Gloudemans consult and develop a multiple regression model for the 2021 revaluation of our
residential properties. Mr. Gloudemans developed the current model we are using.
District Court Case Concerning Northcrest Exemption: The property at 1801 20th Street
has gone to District Court over the taxable portion ($381,900) of the total assessed value
($17,969,900). At question is whether the independent living units on the property qualify
for the charitable and/or benevolent exemption. We have budgeted $25,000 to help cover
trial costs.
________________________________________________________________________________
Submitted January 16, 2020, by Gregory P. Lynch, Ames City Assessor.
Item FY 18-19
Actual
Expenses
FY 19-20
Actual
Expenses
for the
First 13
Requisitions
FY 19-20
Projected
Expenses
for the
Year
FY 19-20
Budget
FY 20-21
Proposed
Budget
% of
Change
Between
Proposed
& Current
Budget
Assessor 142,946$ 74,964$ 150,065$ 150,202$ 157,716$ 5.0%
Deputy 114,368 59,976 120,062 120,172 126,178 5.0%
Staff 335,011 175,972 351,687 365,430 383,682 5.0%
Longevity 1,300 670 1,360 1,410 1,520 7.8%
Overtime Pay 383 - 1,000 5,000 5,000 0.0%
Extra Help / Interns 22,620 2,458 9,000 40,000 40,000 0.0%
Board of Review 1,772 - 2,000 2,000 6,000 200.0%
Taxable Fringe Benefits 5,433 2,543 5,500 5,500 5,800 5.5%
F.I.C.A. @ 7.65% 45,745 22,771 48,245 52,904 55,100 4.2%
I.P.E.R.S. @ 9.44% 58,675 29,858 59,110 64,590 68,950 6.8%
Health Insurance & Workers' Comp 118,141 61,203 120,630 122,800 127,300 3.7%
Unemployment Compensation - - - 500 500 0.0%
Life & Disability Insurance 3,888 2,071 4,154 4,100 4,500 9.8%
Total Payroll & Related Expenses 850,282$ 432,486$ 872,813$ 934,608$ 982,246$ 5.1%
Board of Review Expenses 743$ 167$ 800$ 1,500$ 1,900$ 26.7%
Office Supplies 2,243 2,362 5,000 6,000 7,000 16.7%
Postage & Mailing 1,251 249 1,500 4,000 6,000 50.0%
Employee Mileage & Expenses 2,370 1,118 3,000 5,640 4,500 -20.2%
Communication Services 5,794 2,984 6,270 6,900 6,900 0.0%
MAPS & GIS Project 14,200 9,750 14,200 14,200 14,710 3.6%
Data Processing Services / Major Software 129,548 29,790 97,500 106,429 111,413 4.7%
Education & Training 21,201 16,399 22,000 25,000 25,000 0.0%
Utilities (City Hall Expenses) 18,347 1,015 18,300 18,563 18,600 0.2%
Equipment Rental & Maintenance 5,769 1,093 3,100 4,200 6,610 57.4%
Equipment & Machinery (Purchases) 17,478 - 1,930 12,930 14,500 12.1%
Assessment Appeals / Court Costs 14,700 28,296 66,000 66,000 66,000 0.0%
Management Services / Contingency 998 360 1,000 1,000 1,000 0.0%
Total Office Expenses 234,642$ 93,583$ 240,600$ 272,362$ 284,133$ 4.3%
Total Payroll & Office Expenses 1,084,924$ 526,069$ 1,113,413$ 1,206,970$ 1,266,379$ 4.9%
Consulting for Updated Residential Model
(Data Processing)-$ -$ -$ -$ 16,000$ N/A
District Court Case Concerning Northcrest Exemption
(Assessment Appeals / Court Costs)- - - - 25,000 N/A
Revaluation Project - - - - - N/A
Total Special Projects -$ -$ -$ -$ 41,000$ N/A
Total Expenses 1,084,924$ 526,069$ 1,113,413$ 1,206,970$ 1,307,379$ 8.3%
32,318$
3,600
11,373
15,350
6,456
6,487
11,399
12,070
500
11,860
111,413$
Consulting on Miscellaneous Data Processing Issues
Miscellaneous Expenses
Total Proposed Budget
Oxen Technology (Monthly Managed Services, Etc.)
Harris Computer Systems (ProVal)
Tyler Technologies (Incode & Eagle Recorder)
Data Cloud Solutions (Mobile Assessor)
Pictometry Aerial Photography
OPG-3 (Document Management)
City of Ames (Network, Email, Microsoft Office 365, GIS, EnerGov)
Story County (Fiber Connectivity)
AMES CITY ASSESSOR
2020–2021 BUDGET PROPOSAL
DATA PROCESSING SERVICES / MAJOR SOFTWARE
2020 – 2021 PROPOSED BUDGET
Attachment "A"1/13/2020
Attachment “B” 1/13/2020
Residential Sales Summary by Quarter for Ames, Iowa
As of January 15, 2020
Attachment “C”
Sales Period: # Sold Average
Price
Average
Hse Size
Price per
SF
Average
Year Built
Median
Price
Annual %
Change per SF
Cumulative %
Change $/SF
1995 base
1st Quarter 1995 74 $113,790 1,517 $75.00 1961.1
2nd Quarter 1995 147 $120,453 1,411 $85.38 1965.5
3rd Quarter 1995 171 $107,542 1,362 $78.95 1962.3
4th Quarter 1995 123 $123,608 1,480 $83.51 1963.1
1995 Total Year 515 $115,962 1,427 $81.29 1963.2 $97,750 n/a n/a
1995 Sales Detail - Existing & New:
Existing houses 452 $106,322 1,355 $78.47 1959 $92,000 n/a n/a
New construction sales 63 $185,129 1,940 $95.43 1994 $172,676 n/a n/a
1st Quarter 2016 138 $213,692 1,493 $143.13 1972.1
2nd Quarter 2016 245 $220,832 1,443 $153.04 1976.2
3rd Quarter 2016 188 $238,469 1,497 $159.30 1975.6
4th Quarter 2016 150 $225,579 1,461 $154.40 1976.9
2016 Total 721 $225,052 1,470 $153.06 1975.4 $195,000 10.2% 88.3%
2016 Sales Detail - Existing & New processed to date:
Existing houses 688 $217,570 1,458 $149.22 1973 $195,000 10.7% 90.2%
Single-Family Detached 563 $224,367 1,516 $148.00 1970 $199,000
Townhouses/Condos 125 $186,953 1,196 $156.32 1990 $167,500
New construction sales 33 $381,044 1,724 $221.02 2015 $365,500 8.3% 131.6%
Single-Family Detached 26 $401,525 1,828 $219.65 2016 $377,990
Townhouses/Condos 7 $304,972 1,339 $227.76 2015 $320,000
1st Quarter 2017 71 $234,114 1,511 $154.94 1976.5
2nd Quarter 2017 261 $256,752 1,584 $162.09 1977.2
3rd Quarter 2017 223 $242,145 1,485 $163.06 1979.4
4th Quarter 2017 154 $237,740 1,530 $155.39 1974.9
2017 Total 709 $245,761 1,534 $160.23 1977.3 $225,000 4.7% 97.1%
2017 Sales Detail - Existing & New processed to date:
Existing houses 653 $234,007 1,514 $154.56 1974 $215,000 3.6% 97.0%
Single-Family Detached 524 $242,540 1,574 $154.09 1969 $221,750
Townhouses/Condos 129 $199,349 1,273 $156.60 1993 $174,900
New construction sales 56 $382,819 1,763 $217.14 2017 $348,662 -1.8% 127.5%
Single-Family Detached 42 $424,715 1,912 $222.13 2017 $389,750
Townhouses/Condos 14 $257,128 1,315 $195.53 2017 $237,355
1st Quarter 2018 120 $227,403 1,481 $153.55 1976.8
2nd Quarter 2018 202 $257,350 1,518 $169.58 1980.0
3rd Quarter 2018 214 $244,806 1,468 $166.79 1975.9
4th Quarter 2018 134 $235,622 1,447 $162.88 1974.7
2018 Total 670 $243,634 1,481 $164.51 1977.1 $215,000 7.5% 102.4%
2018 Sales Detail - Existing & New processed to date:
Existing houses 635 $231,039 1,459 $158.35 1975 $210,500 2.5% 101.8%
Single-Family Detached 499 $239,958 1,521 $157.76 1970 $214,000
Townhouses/Condos 136 $198,311 1,231 $161.10 1992 $193,000
New construction sales 35 $472,152 1,882 $250.88 2017 $452,000 15.5% 162.9%
Single-Family Detached 30 $473,831 1,909 $248.21 2017 $441,991
Townhouses/Condos 5 $462,079 1,722 $268.34 2017 $452,604
1st Quarter 2019 123 $221,558 1,417 $156.36 1974.3
2nd Quarter 2019 275 $243,377 1,491 $163.23 1975.7
3rd Quarter 2019 192 $258,663 1,524 $169.73 1978.2
4th Quarter 2019 156 $248,859 1,517 $164.05 1975.2
2019 Total 746 $244,860 1,493 $164.04 1976.0 $226,000 -0.3% 101.8%
2019 Sales Detail - Existing & New processed to date:
Existing houses 701 $235,177 1,484 $158.48 1973 $220,000 0.1% 102.0%
Single-Family Detached 562 $242,490 1,544 $157.05 1969 $225,000
Townhouses/Condos 139 $205,608 1,242 $165.55 1993 $190,000
New construction sales 45 $395,701 1,619 $244.41 2018 $371,575 -2.6% 156.1%
Single-Family Detached 25 $466,355 1,861 $250.59 2018 $450,067
Townhouses/Condos 20 $307,382 1,317 $233.40 2018 $289,000
NOTE 4: Recent sales may not be included. New houses are not included until after they have been inspected.
NOTE 3: Recent quarters may include unverified sales information; all sales are subject to correction.
NOTE 2: 1-family houses include townhouses, condominiums, detached houses, and attached houses.
NOTE 1: Sales are assigned to quarters according to the month and year the deed was executed.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL
AMES, IOWA JANUARY 14, 2020
The Regular Meeting of the Ames City Council was called to order by Mayor John Haila at 6:02 p.m.
on January 14, 2020, in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, 515 Clark Avenue, pursuant to law.
Present were Council Members Gloria Betcher, Bronwyn Beatty-Hansen, Amber Corrieri, Tim
Gartin, Rachel Junck, and David Martin. Ex officio Member Devyn Leeson was also in attendance.
PROCLAMATION FOR SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING PREVENTION AND
AWARENESS WEEK, JANUARY 12-18, 2020: Mayor Haila proclaimed January 12-18, 2020,
to be “Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention and Awareness Week.” Accepting the
Proclamation was Dr. George Belitsos, Chair of the Iowa Network Against Human Trafficking and
Slavery. Dr. Belitsos noted that with him were representatives from ISU Students Against Human
Trafficking, ACCESS, and Youth and Shelter Service. Dr. Belitsos stated that there have been 12
traffickers convicted, within the past year, and about two dozen women had been set free.
CONSENT AGENDA: City Council Member Martin requested to pull for separate discussion Item
No. 16: Requests from Ames Main Street for January Dollar Days, Item No. 17, Requests from
Ames Main Street for Summer Sidewalk Sales, and Item No. 22: Pole Attachment Agreement and
Underground Utility Locate Letter Agreement with Metro FiberNet, LLC. Council Member Betcher
requested to pull Item No.13: Requests from Ames Main Street for Music Walk and Item No. 14:
Requests from Ames Main Street for Art Walk, for further discussion.
Moved by Corrieri, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to approve the following items on the Consent
Agenda:
1.Motion approving payment of claims
2.Motion approving Minutes of Regular Meeting held December 17, 2019, and Special
Meeting held December 19, 2019
3.Motion approving Reports of Contract Change Orders for December 1 - 15, 2019, and
December 16 - 31, 2019
4.Motion approving certification of Civil Service applicants
5.Motion approving new 5-day Class C Liquor License (January 23 - 27, 2020) - Dublinbay
Pub, 123 Airport Road
6.Motion approving new 5-day Class C Liquor License (January 23 - 27, 2020) - Mucky Duck
Pub, LLC, Reiman Gardens - Pending Dram Shop
7.Motion approving new 5-day Class C Liquor License (January 25 - 29, 2020) - Gateway
Hotel and Conference Center, 2508 Mortensen Road
8.Motion approving new 12-month Class C Liquor License with Sunday Sales - Fuji Japanese
Steakhouse, 1614 S Kellogg Avenue - Pending Satisfactory Background Check
9.Motion approving new 12-month Class C Liquor License with Class B Native Wine,
Outdoor Service, and Sunday Sales - Mickey’s Irish Pub, 109 Welch Avenue - Pending Dram
Shop
10.Motion approving Permanent Transfer of Class E Liquor License with Class B Wine Permit
and Class C Beer Permit from the old Fareway Store, 619 Burnett, to the new Fareway Store,
619 Burnett, to be effective January 14, 2020
11.Motion approving renewal of the following Beer Permits, Wine Permits, and Liquor
Licenses:
a.Class C Liquor License with Outdoor Service and Sunday Sales - Chipotle Mexican
Grill, 435 S. Duff Avenue
b.Class E Liquor License with Class B Wine, Class C Beer and Sunday Sales - JW
Liquor, 4518 Mortensen Rd. Suite #109
c.Class A Liquor License with Sunday Sales - American Legion Post #37, 225 Main
d.Class C Liquor License with Catering Privilege, Outdoor Service, and Sunday Sales
- West Towne Pub, 4518 Mortensen Rd. Suite 101
e.Class C Liquor License with Catering Privilege, Outdoor Service, and Sunday Sales
- Dublin Bay, 320 S 16th
f.Class E Liquor License with Class B Wine Permit, Class C Beer Permit (Carry-out
Beer), and Sunday Sales - The Filling Station, 2400 University Blvd.
g.Class C Liquor License with Outdoor Service and Sunday Sales - The Angry
Irishmen, 119 Main Street
h.Class C Liquor License with Catering Privilege and Sunday Sales - Hy-Vee Market
Café, 3800 Lincoln Way
i.Class C Liquor License with Outdoor Service and Sunday Sales - Cy's Roost, 121
Welch Avenue - PENDING DRAM SHOP
12.Requests from Ames Main Street for 4th of July activities on July 4, 2020:
a.Motion approving blanket Temporary Obstruction Permit and blanket Vending
License in Central Business District
b.RESOLUTION NO. 20-005 approving usage and waiver of electrical fees and waiver
of fee for blanket Vending License
c.RESOLUTION NO. 20-006 approving closure of portions of Main Street,
Northwestern Avenue, Fifth Street, Douglas Avenue, Burnett Avenue, Kellogg
Avenue, Clark Avenue, Allan Drive, and Pearle Avenue from 6:00 a.m. until end of
parade
d.RESOLUTION NO. 20-007 approving closure of Parking Lot MM, south portion of
Lot M, Depot Lots V and TT from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
13.RESOLUTION NO. 20-011 approving and adopting Supplement No. 2020-1 to Municipal
Code
14.RESOLUTION NO. 20-012 approving appointment of Council Member Amber Corrieri to
the Squaw Creek Watershed Management Authority
15.RESOLUTION NO. 20-013 approving application for procurement card for Council Member
Rachel Junck and setting transaction limits
16.RESOLUTION NO. 20-014 waiving enforcement of prohibition of motorized carts on trails
in Ada Hayden Heritage Park for the Ames Triathlon
2
17.RESOLUTION NO. 20-015 approving the Iowa Clean Air Attainment Program (ICAAP)
Funding Agreement with Iowa Department of Transportation for Grand Avenue Extension
project in the amount of $1,800,000
18.2018/19 Shared Use Path System Expansion - Trail Connection South of Lincoln Way:
a.RESOLUTION NO. 20-016 approving the purchase of easement on 202 Dotson
Drive in the amount of $6,090
b.RESOLUTION NO. 20-017 approving the purchase of easement on 3709 Tripp
Street in the amount of $42,700
19.RESOLUTION NO. 20-018 approving preliminary plans and specifications for Homewood
Clubhouse Project; setting February 13, 2020, as bid due date and February 25, 2020, as date
of public hearing
20.RESOLUTION NO. 20-019 approving preliminary plans and specifications for 2019/2020
Traffic Signal Program (Lincoln Way & Beach); setting February 5, 2020 as bid due date and
February 11, 2020 as date of public hearing
21.RESOLUTION NO. 20-020 approving preliminary plans and specifications for Campustown
Public Improvements (Welch Avenue); setting February 12, 2020, as bid due date and
February 25, 2020, as date of public hearing
22.RESOLUTION NO. 20-021 approving preliminary plans and specifications for Iowa State
University Research Park Phase IV Road and Utility Improvements Project; setting February
12, 2020, as bid due date and February 25, 2020, as date of public hearing
23.RESOLUTION NO. 20-022 awarding Contract for Supplying Gases and Cylinders to the
Power Plant to Airgas USA, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $29,726.82
24.RESOLUTION NO. 20-023 approving contract and bond for the Water Treatment Plant
Maintenance & Storage Building
25.RESOLUTION NO. 20-024 approving contract and bond for 2019-20 Pavement Restoration
Program (Slurry Seal)
26.RESOLUTION NO. 20-025 approving Change Order No. 2 to HTH Companies, Inc., for
additional non-asbestos insulation and related services in the amount of $65,000
27.RESOLUTION NO. 20-026 approving partial completion of public improvements and
reducing security for Sunset Ridge Subdivision, 8th Addition
28.RESOLUTION NO. 20-027 approving partial completion of public improvements and
reducing security for Sunset Ridge Subdivision, 9th Addition
29.RESOLUTION NO. 20-028 approving Plat of Survey for 2810 & 2824 Wakefield Circle
30.RESOLUTION NO. 20-029 approving Final Plat for West End Center Subdivision (1114
South Dakota Avenue)
31.RESOLUTION NO. 20-030 accepting completion of Campustown Public Improvements -
Water Service Replacement (Lincoln Way from Hayward Avenue to Welch Avenue)
32.RESOLUTION NO. 20-031 accepting completion of contract for Furnishing 15kV Outdoor
Metalclad Switchgear and 69kV Control Panels for Top-O-Hollow Substation Expansion and
Breaker Addition
33.RESOLUTION NO. 20-032 accepting completion of contract for Power Plant Steam Turbine
#7 Parts
3
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolutions/Motions declared adopted/approved unanimously, signed by the
Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes.
REQUESTS FROM AMES MAIN STREET (AMS) FOR MUSIC WALK ON THURSDAY,
APRIL 23, 2020, & ART WALK ON THURSDAY, JUNE 4, 2020: Council Member Betcher
stated she pulled these two items because the Council had previously stated that they needed to have
a discussion about waiving Downtown parking fees and a discussion had not happened yet. Ms.
Betcher mentioned that since these events were not until April and June respectively, there would
be enough time to have the policy discussion and then put the items back on a future agenda.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Martin, to table the discussion on Items 13 and 14 until the first
meeting in February after the Council has had the policy discussion on waiving downtown parking
meter fees.
Council Member Corrieri inquired if the recommendation is to approve Ames Main Street’s other
requests that have to do with waivers of parking meter fees. Council Member Betcher explained that
she is pulling the entire items. Council Member Corrieri mentioned that the Council has had
discussions in the past about Downtown not being able to market its events until they are approved
by Council. Ms. Corrieri recommended that Council approve what is not related to waivers of
parking meter fees and to allow AMS to appropriately market its events.
Motion withdrawn.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Martin, to table 13crelated to waivers of parking meter fees and
enforcement, electrical fees, and blanket Vending License fee for Ames Main Street Music Walk and
14c related to waivers of parking meter fees and enforcement, electrical fees, and blanket Vending
License fee for Ames Main Street Art Walk to the first meeting in February 2020.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Corrieri, to approve: 13a: Motion approving blanket Temporary
Obstruction Permit and blanket Vending License in Central Business District and 13b:
RESOLUTION NO. 20-001 approving closure of ten metered parking spaces for food trucks and
musicians from 3:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. related to AMS Music Walk on April 23, 2020, and 14a:
Motion approving blanket Temporary Obstruction Permit and blanket Vending License in Central
Business District, 14b: RESOLUTION NO. 20-002 approving closure of ten metered parking spaces
for vendors from 3:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., 14d: RESOLUTION NO. 20-003 approving closure of
Kellogg Avenue, from Main Street to Fifth Street from 3:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., and 14e:
RESOLUTION NO. 20-004 approving usage of Tom Evans Plaza related to AMS Art Walk on June
4, 2020.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolutions/Motions declared adopted/approved unanimously, signed by the
Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes.
4
AMES MAIN STREET (AMS) FOR JANUARY DOLLAR DAYS EVENT ON THURSDAY,
JANUARY 23 THROUGH SUNDAY, JANUARY 26, 2020: Council Member Martin noted that
this item and the next item are similar in regards to the ones Council Member Betcher pulled. He
explained that back in May 2019, the Council voted to not approve a parking waiver for a nonprofit
community strengthening event and they had earlier in the year approved a waiver for a shopping
event. This lead to the request for a policy discussion and until that discussion is had, he will
continue to vote against approving any waiver of parking fees.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to approve the request in all aspects except the
waiver of fees for parking.
Mayor Haila pointed out that this event is scheduled to happen on January 23-26, 2020, which would
be before the next City Council meeting. City Council Member Betcher mentioned that she would
have concerns about changing the policy on this request and would rather have the Council approve
this request in full while waiting on the policy discussion. Council Member Beatty-Hansen stated
she seconded the motion in order to have a discussion, but would rather let this one go through as
well as it is occurring before a policy discussion can be placed on a Council Agenda.
Vote on Motion: 2-4. Voting Aye: Junck, Martin. Voting Nay: Betcher, Gartin, Corrieri, Beatty-
Hansen. Motion failed.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Corrieri, to approve all of the requests from Ames Main Street
(AMS) for the January Dollar Days event on Thursday, January 23 through Sunday, January 26,
2020, which includes:
a.Motion approving blanket Temporary Obstruction Permit and blanket Vending
License
b.RESOLUTION NO. 20-008 approving the waiver of parking meter fees and
enforcement in the Downtown District on Saturday, January 25
Roll Call Vote: 5-1. Voting Aye: Betcher, Gartin, Junck, Corrieri, Beatty-Hansen. Voting Nay:
Martin.
Resolutions/Motions declared adopted/approved unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
c.RESOLUTION NO. 20-009 approving the waiver of fee for blanket Vending License
Roll Call Vote: 5-1. Voting Aye: Betcher, Gartin, Junck, Corrieri, Beatty-Hansen. Voting Nay:
Martin.
Resolutions/Motions declared adopted/approved unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
REQUESTS FROM AMES MAIN STREET (AMS) FOR SUMMER SIDEWALK SALES ON
SATURDAY, JULY 25, 2020: Council Member Martin mentioned he pulled this item for the same
reason as the previous item. Mayor Haila pointed out that this event is not until July 25, 2020, and
the Council should be able to table the item.
5
Moved by Corrieri, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to approve 17a: Motion approving blanket
Temporary Obstruction Permit and blanket Vending License; 17c: RESOLUTION NO. 20-010
approving the waiver of fee for blanket Vending License, and to table item 17b: Resolution
approving suspension of parking regulations and enforcement for the Downtown from 8:00 a.m. to
8:00 p.m.; until the first meeting in February.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolutions/Motions declared adopted/approved unanimously, signed by the
Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes.
POLE ATTACHMENT AGREEMENT AND UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATE
LETTER AGREEMENT WITH METRO FIBERNET, LLC: Council Member Martin
mentioned that he was looking at the proposed contract and noticed that in an unfortunate and
unlikely event of termination of the attachment of fibers to the City’s poles, the contract does not
provide for an alternative for the City to take possession of the fiber if MetroNet fails to remove the
fiber within 180 days. He noted that he hopes this doesn’t happen, but that it would protect the City
if there was an option in the contract that would allow the City to take possession of the fibers if
something goes wrong and is left hanging on the poles. Council Member Martin asked Assistant City
Manager Brian Phillips if this would be something the Council could pursue. Mr. Phillips stated that
if the contract expired, for whatever reason, MetroNet is required after the 80 days to remove the
fiber from the entire system, and under the current draft, if MetroNet fails to remove the fiber within
the 180 days, the fiber can be removed by the City, if it chooses, and bill the cost to MetroNet.
Assistant City Manager Phillips stated that if the Council wanted to explore Council Member
Martin’s recommendation, they could make a motion to direct staff to go back to MetroNet and see
if they would be agreeable to the recommended amendment of the Pole Attachment Agreement.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Junck, directing staff to approach MetroNet with a proposal to add
a clause allowing the City to take possession if MetroNet fails to remove the fiber after termination.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Corrieri, to table this item until the City Council meeting on January
28, 2020. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
PUBLIC FORUM: Richard Deyo, 505-8th Street, #2, Ames, commented that he would like to say
something about the Oath of Office as he believes the Council should swear to support people’s
happiness. He also stated that he is very much a nudist and he would like to speak at the end of the
meeting.
Public forum was closed after no one else came forward.
HEARING ON SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY AT 1420 LINCOLN WAY: Assistant
City Manager Brian Phillips explained that the property at 1420 Lincoln Way has been owned by the
City since 1924 and was formerly used by the City as a water booster pump station, which became
obsolete in the 1990s. A number of water mains on the property have been abandoned. The Water
6
and Pollution Control Department anticipates demolishing the structure and the abandoned mains
in 2024 at a cost of up to $125,000. MetroNet is an internet provider that plans to construct a fiber
optic network throughout Ames in 2020. MetroNet’s network will be arranged in three fiber “rings”
in the community to which individual neighborhoods will be connected. The fiber rings must all
converge at one point to connect to switching equipment, housing in a small building referred to as
a “hut.” Because the fiber rings reach different parts of the City, the area where they converge must
ideally be close to the center of the community. City staff and MetroNet have discussed a number
of issues related to MetroNet’s deployment over the past ten months. This project involves a lot of
City departments and a variety of City processes, in addition to the location of the “hut.” Mr. Phillips
mentioned that MetroNet was initially interested in a commercial area east of South Duff Avenue,
however; the area had been identified for potential future redevelopment as part of the Ames Plan
2040 process. Another private site was considered, but that property had recently been sold to
another owner for potential development.
MetroNet had submitted a letter of interest to City Council to purchase the property at a1420 Lincoln
Way and on September 24, 2019, the Council referred the request to staff for a background memo.
At the October 22, 2019, City Council meeting, the Council directed City staff to negotiate with
MetroNet regarding the acquisition of the property. City staff had instructed MetroNet to obtain an
appraisal for the property.
Assistant City Manager Phillips mentioned that another component of the project is that MetroNet
intends to also offer television service and to accomplish this, an aerial antenna would need to be put
up. The initial conversations were that MetroNet would put up the antenna next to the “hut” site.
MetroNet went through the process of obtaining a Special Use Permit. All Special Use Permits are
reviewed for approval by the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA). ZBA’s review of the overall
project is limited to the proposed tower. On January 8, 2020, ZBA considered MetroNet’s
application and received a substantial number of comments from the neighborhood in opposition for
the antenna. MetroNet had indicated that it will find another location for the antenna.
Mr. Phillips noted that the City had received another proposal from Kathranne Knight to purchase
the property for the purpose of an Art Studio. Ms. Knight had offered to purchase the property for
$21,700, and would grant the easements and right-of-way proposed by the City. He noted that the
property is encumbered by a lot of constraints, and a little more than 75% of the property would need
to be maintained by easements or right-of-ways. Mr. Phillips stated that with the proposal from
MetroNet, there would not be any changes to the site, only the addition of landscaping and a fence.
Council Member Martin noted that he read in the staff report that competitive bidding is not required
for the property and asked for further explanation. Mr. Phillips explained that there are certain
circumstances where the City is required by State law to take competitive bids for properties they
wish to sell that are typically in an Urban Revitalization Area (URA). The property at 1420 Lincoln
Way is not in a URA so the only requirement of the City is to have a public hearing. Except for this
basic requirement, the City Council has broad discretion regarding the decision to sell real property.
There is no requirement in state or local law to sell property to the highest bidder. The Council may
7
determine to whom the property may be sold and for what amount (as long as the sale price to a
private party is reasonably within the range of fair market value and does not constitute a gift).
Council Member Betcher mentioned that in many of the emails that the Council had received
regarding this property, the Lincoln Way Corridor Plan was referenced. She mentioned that she
thought the intent of the City was to return this property to a clean and green state at a cost to the
City. Ms. Betcher questioned if the Lincoln Way Corridor Plan ever specified what could happen to
the site or was it anticipated that the building would be gone and just stay green. Planning and
Housing Director Kelly Diekmann stated that it wasn’t really about the site, but the neighborhood
was a focus area of the Plan. He noted that not all the properties in the neighborhoods and the site
were discussed in any meaningful way.
Mayor Haila asked Director Diekmann to speak about the zoning of the site. Director Diekmann
noted that the current zoning is Urban Core Residential Medium (UCRM), but the way the
regulations are written for this zone. Principally the only new use that can be added is a single-family
home as the plan accommodates existing duplexes and apartments, but the intent is not to allow for
intensification. The site is a legal lot and has a small amount of buildable area, essentially where the
building already is, and the property does have access to Lincoln Way. There is already an easement
that must be maintained to the benefit of the property to the east. Mayor Haila asked if the current
zoning could be used for MetroNet’s purposes. Mr. Diekmann stated the City allows for major
utilities in most zones, and MetroNet, as a provider of internet, fits into the description of a “utility”
as defined in the zoning ordinance. Mayor Haila inquired if Ms. Knight would be able to use the
property as it is currently zoned. Director Diekmann answered that from Ms. Knight’s brief
description of using the property, as an art studio that is not directly an allowed use in the zone.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to add a restrictive covenant to the property in case
the sale is negotiated with MetroNet stipulating that no tower or structure above the existing roof line
may be constructed and the City is an interested party for purposes of filing a verified claim to extend
the covenant for longer than 21 years.
Council Member Gartin wanted to clarify whether the motion meant if there was a limit to how tall
the building may be or a structure being built that is higher than the current one as trying to verify
if a height limitation. Mr. Martin stated it would restrict anything taller than the existing roof line
that would preclude building any tower and any structure that is mounted on or above the roof line.
Council Member Betcher stated that for expansion of the building, it can only be done by building
outward and not upward. Council Member Beatty-Hansen mentioned that she understands that
MetroNet likes the building the way it is and doesn’t have any plans to change it.
Vote on Motion: 5-1. Voting Aye: Betcher, Gartin, Junck, Martin, Beatty-Hansen. Voting Nay:
Corrieri. Motion declared carried.
8
Mayor Haila opened the public hearing and mentioned to the audience that the rest of the
conversation and input would be about the sale of the property to MetroNet with the understanding
that there will not be a tower allowed to be built on the site.
Dan Casciato, 3601 Communication Way, Evansville, Indiana, explained that he works for MetroNet
and that he had indicated last week that MetroNet is fine with removing the option for a tower on
the property and that is now off the table. He noted that the building is very secure and is already
designed for the fiber rings that need to be stored. Mr. Casciato mentioned that MetroNet does not
intend to build another structure, but may put up a security camera that is small and above the door.
Council Member Martin asked Mr. Casciato if the motion that just passed would interfere with
MetroNet’s needs. Mr. Casciato stated it would not.
Mayor Haila stated that there was an inquiry from a citizen wondering how the fiber would be
brought into the building. Mr. Casciato explained that MetroNet follows the current easements and
rights-of-way and that is what they would do, with the City’s permission. Mayor Haila inquired
about the size of the fiber that is being put in. It was mentioned that the tubes would be about the
size of a nickel.
Council Member Martin questioned what the neighbors could expect from the ongoing use of the
building, i.e., how loud will it be, how frequently will employees be visiting the site. Mr. Casciato
explained that the building is a secure site for MetroNet’s equipment. Occasionally a technician will
enter to make sure everything is correct. Director Diekmann noted that what Mr. Casciato stated is
correct for any ongoing activity, but during start-up, there will definitely be more traffic as the fibers
are getting set up.
Kathranne Knight, 123 S Riverside Drive, Ames, mentioned that she is still concerned about how
much fiber optic cable would converge on 1420 Lincoln Way. She read a sentence from the staff
report stating “Since the hut site would have significant amounts of fiber infrastructure associated
with it, it would not be feasible to move the hut in the future, making the proposed location
undesirable.” Ms. Knight commented that if the City sold the property to MetroNet, even without
approval of the tower, it has been established that a fiber infrastructure would be significant and not
feasible to move in the future. The people of Ames, the ecology of the stream corridor, the Oak-
Riverside neighborhood, and the vision of the Lincoln Way Corridor Plan will be stuck with the
infrastructure for the foreseeable future. She asked if the City had obtained any photographs of other
MetroNet hut sites, both inside and out; this way the citizens would be able to see what is really
going on inside the building. Ms. Knight questioned if the fiber would cause a lot of heat to the
building and that there should be an environmental assessment on how this will affect the Stream
corridor and all it supports ecologically to the City and the Squaw Creek Watershed. She stated that
potential sites for MetroNet may be limited, but questioned whether they had been exhausted. Ms.
Knight asked why there was such a rush. Ms. Knight mentioned that MetroNet feels that the deal has
been made. It was stated at the ZBA meeting that “they have manufactured their mechanical gear
specifically for 1420 Lincoln Way” and MetroNet still wants the building even with the tower not
being allowed. She felt that the deal is already done with MetroNet and the public hearing is just
9
a formality. Ms. Knight respectfully asked that the City Council not convey the property to
MetroNet.
Mayor Haila stated he wanted to clarify a few items from Ms. Knight’s statement to make sure the
citizens have all the correct answers. The first question was about the site itself due to all the fiber
that needs to be put in. Ms. Knight commented that she is concerned about all the additional cables
being put underground and that she doesn’t fully understand the operations of the hut. She is
concerned about the heat and vibrations of the facility and because of the environmental overlay site
being so close, they would want to do an environmental assessment. Ms. Knight stated she had
looked over the Lincoln Corridor Plan and was excited about the possibilities for the site as she
envisioned the site being used for the community. Mayor Haila inquired if Ms. Knight was still open
to purchasing the property. She commented that she was. Ms. Knight also mentioned that she finds
the zoning bazaar, because it won’t allow her to purchase the building, clean it up, and put a drawing
table in, but it will allow for MetroNet’s intense infrastructure. She also noted that she believed
Prairie Rivers of Iowa has gear in the building and would be interested in keeping the gear there and
having a partnership with them. Mayor Haila commented that they will try to get all her questions
answered tonight; that way the Council has all the information to make a decision.
Mayor Haila asked staff to address the concern about the Watershed, sensitivity, or the
environmental assessment that Ms. Knight talked about. Director Diekmann stated in regards to that
the measurement of the flood levels, WPC staff is aware of the equipment on is on top of what is
being proposed. The environmental overlay only applies to the floodway portion of the property.
The environmental assessment (EA) overlay was put in place about four years ago, to deal with
disturbances in floodways. If a disturbance was done, you would have to go through the
environmental assessment process. Mr. Diekmann explained that nothing is being proposed in the
floodway or in the floodway fringe, and from a zoning compliance standpoint, there is no
requirement. Council Member Beatty-Hansen inquired if the property had ever flooded. Mr.
Diekmann stated that he is not aware of anyone making that statement, but he doesn’t recall going
through a detailed conversation on the history of the property. Mr. Phillips stated that he was in the
area during the 2010 flood and the water went into the large fields to the west and came up a little
way on the eastern portion of the bridge, but doesn’t think this site was impacted.
Council Member Betcher asked staff to address the question of impervious surfaces that are required
by a communication facility. Mr. Diekmann stated that the driveway paving was in response to the
communication tower proposal. Staff also wanted to condition the sale on the driveway approach
to be upgraded to a modern approach.
Mayor Haila inquired about the inability to move the “hut” and how that may impact the Lincoln
Way Corridor Plan. Director Diekmann stated that one of the goals of Corridor was to improve the
Corridor regardless if any redevelopment happened. Staff talked a lot about the street configuration
of Lincoln Way, but doesn’t see any impediments for the sale of the property. The building is set far
enough back and adding front yard landscaping can shield the building.
10
Council Member Beatty-Hansen asked if there would be any requirements to add any vegetation and
make improvements to the property. Mr. Diekmann noted there would not be. Mr. Phillips stated that
MetroNet representatives had indicated they would be interested in adding landscaping anyway.
Council Member Gartin commented that his greatest concern from Ms. Knight’s comments was the
questioning of staff doing its due diligence in finding a location for MetroNet. Director Diekmann
stated that he approached it from the perspective of the Planning Department and the Development
Review Committee. When MetroNet first came to the City, staff wasn’t trying to find a site for
MetroNet, but they came to the Planning & Housing Department for the normal review process and
suggested a site. Mr. Diekmann and Mr. Phillips looked at several different sites in the area from
Squaw Creek over to the Resource Recovery building area as this was the area that MetroNet was
looking for properties. Staff looked at what other vacant City properties or what vacant commercial
buildings were available and identified that 1420 Lincoln Way was a surplus property and the City
did not have a vested interest in maintaining in the long-term. Mr. Phillip stated that staff did an
analysis of about four or five potential locations and one of them was the initial site on East Lincoln
Way near Hyde Avenue; another piece of property that is used by the Electric company, but it is still
actively in use and when the tower was a component of the discussion there was no where to put a
tower; a property on north 4th, but couldn’t accommodate the proposal without a variance and staff
was not sure if the property was for sale. The property at 1420 Lincoln Way was zoned appropriately,
had the correct sizing, and the property was one that the City of Ames would have to spend a lot of
money on to demolish. Director Diekmann stated that he wanted to be clear that staff did not look
for properties to help MetroNet. Mr. Phillips mentioned that after they identified 1420 Lincoln Way
as an option, staff did spend a lot of time looking to see if there were any other sites available, but
there were not.
Dan Casciato from MetroNet introduced John Sawyer, who will be the Project Manager during the
construction of the project. Mayor Haila asked them to address the concerns of the citizens regarding
the noise and the amount of heat in the building. Mr. Sawyer stated there will be air conditioning
to help keep the building cool. There will be a lot of fiber; there are about 288 strands, about the size
of a nickel, there will three of the pipes going in and three going out. Mayor Haila noted that would
be about a 2-to 3-inch diameter pipes. Mr. Sawyer commented that once the fiber gets inside the hut,
they need to break those cables out into an individual plug. There are three racks of 288 fibers that
have an “A” and a “B” size, so if something happens they can switch out the fibers. Ms. Sawyer
stated there will be some batteries for back-up along with some generators to charge the batteries.
He noted the size of the building is perfect as they could fit two huts within the one building where
in most cities they have two huts because the building is not big enough. Mr. Casciato commented
that the generator is used as an emergency back up and will not be running all the time, only when
the power goes out. Mayor Haila inquired if the property would change at all. Mr. Casciato stated
that the outside of the building will not change, but they will work with City staff to landscape the
property. Mr. Sawyer commented that MetroNet will need to come into the building three different
ways as the fibers can’t overlap or it will create a fault line. There will be someone in the building
daily at the beginning who will be activating customer’s service. Council Member Beatty-Hansen
asked if the Council added a covenant to come up-to-code with landscaping whether MetroNet
11
would have any problems with the covenant. Mr. Casciato stated MetroNet would not as they are
already planning to update the landscaping and put in a fence, as they want the property to look nice.
Barbara Blakely, 112 Riverside Drive, Ames, Iowa stated she is relieved that the tower is out of the
picture, but she is still picturing the hut as a loud and vibrating building. Ms. Blakely commented
that, after hearing more from MetroNet, she sees it will not be that way.
F.A. Faridi, 2821 Wood Street, Ames explained that he has looked into the assessment of the
property and others in the area. He noted that the area is Residential and one-to-two story houses
that are occupied by the owners or are used as Rentals. He obtained a copy of the assessment from
the City Assessor’s office. Mr. Faridi noted that the value of a property is assessed by two things:
the building and the land. He compared the property at 101 Riverside Drive and 1420 Lincoln Way.
The property at 101 Riverside is assessed at $151,000, and calculated that it costs roughly $87.38
per 1,000 square feet for the building and the land cost about $4.79 per square feet. Mayor Haila
inquired if Mr. Faridi was trying to point out that the offer is a lot less than what the property is
worth and if the City sells the property to MetroNet they are practically giving the property away.
Mr. Faridi felt that the property at 1420 Lincoln Way could be converted to a family home that could
be given away for a nominal price.
Mayor Haila asked Assistant City Manager Phillips to explain how the value of the property was
determined. Mr. Phillips stated that MetroNet used an appraisal company out of Des Moines, who
evaluated the structure and the land. The appraiser came to the conclusion that the property has a
value of $90,000-$100,000 if there was nothing on the property, but green space. The appraiser then
did some comparables and found that the building was worth about $20.00 a square foot.
Darrall Reeves, 3108 Northwood Drive, Ames, explained that he is not opposed to MetroNet’s
project, as he feels they need better internet service in Ames; however, he has questions about how
the City arrived at the decision to sell to MetroNet. He stated he was at the Zoning Board of
Adjustment meeting and the MetroNet representative stated that the City reached out to them about
this property, but they would not tell him which City staff member; this conflicts with what the City
is stating. Mr. Reeves mentioned that back in October 2019, city staff was charged with having a
feasibility study done and doesn’t know if this was ever done. Council Member Corrieri stated that
the feasibility study is in process. Mr. Reeves noted that he thought it was odd that the purchaser
gets to do their own appraisal on a property they want to purchase. He thought the process had been
rushed and would like to see the City of Ames provide its own internet service.
Manager Phillips stated that this property came up during several conversations about how MetroNet
was going to connect to poles, underground locates etc. and during the discussion of the initial
property that MetroNet recommended. Mr. Phillips noted that City staff cannot sell a property
without the Council’s approval. It was recommended that if MetroNet was interested in the property,
they would need to write a letter to the City Council and follow the process.
12
Mayor Haila asked about the status of the feasibility study. Mr. Phillips stated there had been
discussions about the City having its own internet service; that is independent from this request. The
Council had directed staff to look for a consultant to handle a feasibility study, and that will be
brought to the City Council at a later time. Mayor Haila stated that whether the City pursues their
own internet service or not, it is a free market, and MetroNet is welcome to come to town and set
up their own service.
Mayor Haila inquired about the question of the appraisal. Mr. Phillips stated that appraisals are
expensive, and this is not the City’s project, and that is why MetroNet received their own.
Joe Leisz, 114 S Riverside Drive, Ames, stated that his house is across the street from the property.
He noted that a lot of his concerns had been addressed during previous discussions tonight. He noted
that he is still concerned about proposed landscaping, high water, and flooding. Mr. Leisz explained
that while he has lived in this neighborhood since 2005, and had experienced three floods, all three
have been isolated to the bridge along Lincoln Way. He commented that MetroNet mentioned
putting a fence along the property, and if the fence was put up, it would have been impacted by at
least two of the three flood events. Mr. Leisz is OK with MetroNet coming to Ames, but thought that
Ms. Knight’s proposal would be the best for the neighborhood and unify the community. He
commented there are other people in the neighborhood that would love to get a property for $0.11
on the dollar.
Jackie DeLay, 129 S Russell Avenue, Ames, said she felt that the City was rushing into the sale of
the property and not fully thinking about the implications for the future. She urged the Council to
slow down. Ms. DeLay commented that she agrees that the goal of having fast, efficient internet
service in Ames is a very important goal and why the City isn’t looking at the property for the City
of Ames own use for internet service. If there are limited properties, it might be a good idea to wait
and see what the City of Ames feasibility study says. She noted that the citizens are feeling that there
hasn’t been enough time to consider the feasibility study and the Lincoln Way Corridor Plan. She
questioned why MetroNet is getting such a prime deal.
Joe Muench, 304 N. Riverside Street, Ames, mentioned that the site is not a generic isolated
industrial site situated outside the City. It is in a prominent and strategically important Ames
location. The site overlooks Squaw Creek, Iowa State, and sits directly on a historic and prominent
crossroads between Old Town Ames and Campustown. Mr. Muench noted that the property is a
valuable asset for those reasons. He noted that if the site is to be sold at a bargain rate to a for-profit
outside company, the citizens of Ames should benefit and not just the business. Mr. Muench
mentioned that the property should be leased instead of sold. He noted that Ms. Knight had made
some good points with the citizens feeling the sale is a done deal and the price of the property is
questionable. Mr. Muench commented that Ms. Knight’s vision does have some strong goals,
coordinates with the City, the Lincoln Way Corridor Plan, and engages the neighborhood and
community in ways the MetroNet will not. He thought that the zoning should be examined for this
property and further discussed. Mr. Muench’s last concern was the signage for the property and
would ask that MetroNet find a site elsewhere.
13
Mayor Haila closed the public hearing.
Council Member Gartin asked if the Council did speculate and the City of Ames did want to move
forward with a municipal internet would the City of Ames benefit from the location. Mr. Phillips
stated that would be difficult to answer; the location works for MetroNet’s infrastructure, but not
sure if the property would fit for what the City of Ames would want to do as they don’t have any
plans. It is impossible to answer at this time. Council Member Gartin wanted to know if they could
lease the property instead of selling it. Mr. Phillips explained that leasing the property had not been
discussed as the letter from MetroNet was to purchase the property. Mr. Gartin then questioned the
signage and if there would be any limitations. Director Diekmann stated that the sign code is based
is the zoning district; this property is zoned UCRM. The UCRM district has very limited signage,
and the general allowance is two square feet.
Ex Officio Leeson wanted to know if flooding in the area would cause damage to the fiber. Mr.
Diekmann stated that per the Code, the building itself is not within the 100-year flood plain. The
base flood for Squaw Creek is at 899-907 and the elevation for this property is 903. If in the flood
zone, the City would expect the property to be at least three-feet higher than the base flood elevation,
which is 890, and the property is already above that.
Mayor Haila mentioned that it keeps coming up that this address is prime reality. Director Diekmann
stated that the City already has a number of easements on the property. The property that MetroNet
is getting that is usable is the building and the front yard. He stated that anyone who wanted to
purchase the property, the building is 62 feet from the sidewalk and the building is roughly 1,000
square feet. Mayor Haila stated that the actual usable buildable area is about 2,000 square feet; there
is not a lot of developable land.
Motion by Beatty-Hansen, seconded by Corrieri, to add a covenant to the sale that requires MetroNet
to come up to Code on the landscaping for this property.
Motion withdrawn.
Moved by Corrieri, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to direct staff to bring back to Council a Sales
Agreement on the property at 1420 Lincoln Way to Metro FiberNet, LLC, for $21,600 contingent
upon front-yard landscaping, additional screening to the west, and including the previous motion
made by Council Member Martin about the tower.
Council Member Betcher inquired if the motion was different from all of the alternatives that staff
provided about approving the sale. It was noted that it is different as the sale is not going to be
approved tonight. Ms. Betcher stated she is concerned about how it appears, and she would like to
be clear about whether the Council is interested in selling the property or not. Council Member
Corrieri stated if the Council votes for the motion, then it would be interested in selling. Ms. Betcher
stated she may be interested in having the items in the motion applied to the Sales Agreement if the
14
property is going to be sold, but Council hasn’t decided if going to be sold or not. She doesn’t
support the sale because she doesn’t think it is in the spirit of the Lincoln Corridor Plan.
Roll Call Vote: 5-1. Voting Aye: Corrieri, Beatty-Hansen, Martin, Gartin, Junck. Voting Nay:
Betcher. Motion declared carried.
HEARING ON SALE OF 1417 DOUGLAS AVENUE: The public hearing was opened by Mayor
Haila.
Chris Conmy, 1321 Douglas Avenue, Ames, stated he lives about five houses south of the property,
and he wanted to state his support for the sale of the property to Mainstream Living, as it would be
a good thing to add to the neighborhood.
The public hearing was closed after no one else asked to speak.
Moved by Gartin, second by Betcher, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 20-033 approving the
conveyance of property at 1417 Douglas Avenue to Mainstream Living, Inc., in the amount of
$36,012 with stipulations, as follows:
1.Mainstream Living must construct a five-bedroom wheelchair accessible facility on
or before December 31, 2020;
2.The City of Ames will retain ownership of the property until the specified structure
is constructed;
3.For a period of twenty-one (21) years, the facility must be utilized for affordable
housing for very low and low income adults with intellectual disabilities;
4.The facility cannot be sold, assigned or any interest transferred prior to December 31,
2041, without the written consent of the City.
Roll Call Vote: 5-0-1. Voting Aye: Betcher, Gartin, Junck, Martin, Beatty-Hansen. Voting Nay:
None. Abstaining due to conflict of interest: Corrieri. Resolution declared adopted, signed by the
Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes.
HEARING ON DURHAM BANDSHELL LIGHTING & ELECTRICAL UPGRADES: The
Mayor opened the public hearing. He closed it after there was no one wishing to speak.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Corrieri, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 20-034 approving the final
plans and specifications and awarding a contract to Jaspering Electric, Inc., in the amount of
$136,500.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
HEARING ON HVAC PROJECT FOR CYRIDE: The public hearing was opened by Mayor
Haila and closed after no one came forward to speak.
15
Moved by Beatty-Hansen, seconded by Corrieri, to reject all bids and direct staff to rebid the HVAC
Project for Cy-Ride.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Mayor Haila declared a recess at 8:13 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:27 p.m.
Mayor Haila asked to make an adjustment to the Agenda and stated Item No. 45 will be addressed
before Item No 44, in order to save the public’s time.
INITIATION OF ANNEXATION OF CHAMPLIN/LLOYD PROPERTY: Planner Eloise
Sahlstrom explained that staff had received an Annexation Petition from Lynn Champlin Lloyd
representing Champlin Lloyd Farm, LLC, seeking voluntary annexation of a portion of the Champlin
Lloyd Farm LLC property equaling 145.03 acres of the approximately 1710 acres of family land
holdings in the area. Although most of the southwest area has growth limitations due to not having
access to a sanitary sewer, the Champlin property does not have that limitation. It has both sanitary
sewer and water connections available at its southeastern board. The site does not have paved access
and would require street improvements at the time of development. The applicant is interested in
selling their property, but no buyer has been identified. The applicant requests that the City Council
authorize the requested annexation area, which includes a 50-foot-wide strip of land to remain in the
County along the north boundary of the property. The strip is considered the minimum allowed by
the State to maintain connectivity of county lands to an existing peninsula, such as the Meadow Glen
area. Ms. Sahlstrom stated staff did reach out to surrounding properties as a courtesy to make sure
they were aware of the request. The applicant is requesting a 100% voluntary annexation; three
additional parcels (Johnson, State of Iowa, and Coy) would be required to be included in the
annexation to avoid creating an island of unincorporated land. Owners of two of those parcels would
be consenting due to previous covenants accepting future annexation.
Council Member Martin stated that if the annexation moves forward, there would be three public
hearings and asked Ms. Sahlstrom to provide further information. Ms. Sahlstrom stated that the first
step would be for staff to meet with the County Board of Supervisors, then after that notices for a
public hearing are sent for a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, then followed by a public
hearing with the City Council, and the final step would be a public hearing before the City
Development Board.
Mr. Martin wanted to know what would happen to a property owner if there was a fire or another
emergency if the Council decided to annex the property with no new infrastructure being planned.
Director Diekmann stated that the City of Ames would respond for medical and fire response, and
if the fire is big, mutual aid will be asked for. Council Member Martin asked if the City has the same
equipment as the mutual aid responders. Director Diekmann stated he is not 100% sure, as this is
outside of his scope of work, but from conversations with the Fire Chief, the first response would
be to get the people out of the structure on fire and control the fire.
16
Council Member Gartin asked if the Council proceeded with the annexation would it foreclose the
possibility to bring in Meadow Glen. Director Diekmann added that about a year ago there was a
developer interested in the McCay property to the west, and at that time the Champlins approached
the City indicating they were interested in pursuing development. The Council indicated at that time
for the Champlins to wait because if the McCay property was viable, the Council might be interested
in combining everything together. Director Diekmann stated that staff’s estimation is if they
proceeded with the Champlin/Lloyd annexation, it would be very difficult to predict that large of an
acreage coming in, and necessitating the annexation of Meadow Glen would be a substantial amount
of acreage. Mr. Gartin asked if there had been any discussion about trying to do a project with the
McCay farm and Champlin/Lloyd to force in Meadow Glen. Mr. Diekmann stated that in early June
the developer for McCay decided they would not be able to pursue the project at the time. Mr.
Gartin asked if anyone had reached out to the McCay property owners. Director Diekmann stated
they have not within the past two weeks. Mayor Haila inquired if the McCay property could be
annexed. Mr. Diekmann explained that the McCay land could be annexed as independently.
Council Member Betcher questioned the island as the City Development Board had approved its
existence. Mr. Diekmann stated that the City Development Board may have accepted the existence,
but not approved it. Ms. Betcher stated that if the City Development Board said at one point that
island doesn’t need to go into the City would that decision stand for all of time or could a different
Board change the decision. City Attorney Mark Lambert stated that the Board is now different and
the Board could change the previous decision. He had read through the City Development section
in the Iowa Code and there is no actual statement that “you shall not have an island.” Ms. Betcher
stated it was her understanding that it was the responsibility of the County Development Board to
identify the islands and make sure they were annexed.
Council Member Junck asked how this item would play into the 2040 Plan and why the Council
would make a decision on an annexation before proceeding with a growth scenario. Director
Diekmann stated this area in the current LUPP is designated for urban expansion. As the current
adopted policy of the City, staff is supporting it based on the adapted policy. When staff discussed
scenarios over the past month, this area was not discussed, as it was not an area where 15,000 people
could be served.
Council Member Betcher wanted to know if the Council made a decision about whether they are
interested in annexing the property would it reshape the direction of growth to the City. Director
Diekmann stated that it was an exercise to analyze the impact of 15,000 people and it was not
predicting a growth of the City. Council Member Junck wanted to know if anything else should be
considered about the proximity of this property to agriculture land. Director Diekmann stated, from
an annexation perspective, there is not.
Mayor Haila asked if Zumwha Station Road would become City property. Director Diekmann stated
that upon annexation the City is required to take full possession of County right-of-way easements;
the full 66 feet would become City right-of-way. Mayor Haila explained that currently the road is
gravel. He asked if there would be a long-term Capital Improvements Project (CIP) to pave the road.
17
Mr. Diekmann stated he is not sure as that would probably be thrown into a Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) project.
Council Member Gartin wanted to know if there is a timing issue as he is looking to table this item
to see about increasing the amount of annexation and check on the McCay farm. It was indicated by
Director Diekmann that he was not sure.
Council Member Martin asked if the County Board would have a public hearing. Mr. Diekmann
stated the County Board meeting is not a public hearing and the first public hearing would be at the
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting.
Mayor Haila opened public comment.
Paul Livingston, Hunziker Realtor & Associates, 105 S. 16th Street, Ames, stated he represents the
Champlin/Lloyd farm and can’t add a lot more than what was already presented. He noted they have
been working on this for a long time and had tried to couple this with the McCay property ten
months ago, but was told to wait. Mr. Livingston stated that the City boundaries are a mess, but it
is not the fault of the Champlin/Lloyd farm. Mr. Livingston stated that the Champlin’s have been
waiting for a long time to proceed with their property. The property is not primary agriculture land
and is more residential land. He noted that the Champlin/Lloyd farm would be fine with either option
that staff presented in the Staff Report. Council Member Gartin asked Mr. Livingston if he had
reached out to the McCay property after the developer withdrew and the McCays indicated they did
not have any current interest in being annexed.
Lynn Lloyd, 3818 Phoenix Street, Ames, commented that they have already waited 30 years and she
and her brother are not getting any younger. Council Member Gartin asked if there would be any
issues if they waited a little longer to reach out to the McCay farm to see about annexation. Ms.
Lloyd stated they have had the property for sale for three years and developers don’t want to
purchase the property without the annexation. She stated that anyone who has not been to the area
wouldn’t realize how close this property is to Iowa State University. Ms. Lloyd stated the property
has beautiful land for a housing development to go in.
Kim Christiansen, 2985 South Dakota Avenue, Ames, handed a Washington Plat map, to be
displayed overhead, of properties shaded in red that are controlled by the State of Iowa, Iowa State
University, or other Associated Entities. He stated he is a heavy proponent to having a buffer
between the Iowa State University property and the heavy use of agriculture, which both include the
Champlin/Lloyd and McCay properties. Mr. Christiansen noted that he doesn’t disagree that the land
needs to be developed, but believes it should be as rural subdivisions, which would provide a special
type of housing for people that like to live out in the country. Mr. Christiansen stated that the
important reason for the buffer is because of the use of the land. He pointed out that manure is being
spread, a feed mill is located on State Street, and there is a new swine development. He believes that
RDG left this property out for a reason and it didn’t make sense for any development down the road
18
with the 2040 Plan. He stated that Lynn Lloyd and Douglas McCay would have developed their
properties a long time ago, if the area hadn’t been shackled with the Fringe Plan in 2005.
Emil Polashek, 2615 Meadow Glen Road, Ames, explained that he is conflicted. If the annexation
would free up Meadow Glen Road from involuntarily annexation, he would appreciate it as they like
the area as it is. The development of the property would have proceeded in the past if it was feasible
to do so in smaller parcels. Mr. Polashek mentioned that if the area is annexed, there are still issues
that would need to be addressed like, gravel roads, the new feed-mill traffic, and agricultural area.
He would like to know if whatever proposal comes forward would be appropriate for the area.
David Carter-Lewis, 3400 Dartmoor Road, Ames, mentioned that he is on the map as the Carlton-
Appleton. He explained that he lives on the edge of the property of the Champlin/Lloyd Farm
property. Mr. Carter-Lewis stated that the area is magical, anyone that visits the area is amazed by
the area. The area also has beautiful farm land and trails. He noted that he lived in England for
several years where there are cities, forests, etc. and there are footpaths. Mr. Carter-Lewis supports
Meadow Glen as staying rural and agricultural. He noted that national forest and parks are under
attack and the wildness is great. In his opinion growth is neither good nor bad, but needs
stewardship. He urged the Council to consider the wilderness etc., when making their decision.
Phil Iasevoli, 3108 South Dakota, Ames, stated that the issue with fire hydrants is a problem. The
Johnson property doesn’t have any fire protection other than the Kelly Fire Department as there are
no fire hydrants in the area. He explained that fire hydrants would need to be put in. Mr. Iasevoli
mentioned that the ISU property is going to be a problem. He stated that the McCay property has
issues due to having no sewer or water there, and it isn’t going to be developed. Mr. Iasevoli stated
that the feed mill will have about 20-30 trucks going in and out daily. He would like the City Council
to come out and take a tour of the area before making a decision. Mr. Iasevoli stated that the amount
of buildable ground on the Champlin/Lloyd farm is very limited.
Christine Hausner, 3505 245th Street, Ames, explained that no one knows more about the property
than she as her family has been in the area for five generations. She noted that she is a little
concerned as all they are talking about are boundaries, but not talking about the real issues. The
ecosystem is the most important and she indicated that the area is surrounded in 4,000 acres of
private land and Iowa State property. She asked the Council if they lived in the county or in the city
as the change seems small, but will drastically change your life. Ms. Hausner stated that their
property taxes would go up 25%, may or may not get utilities, and will change their way of life. Ms.
Hausner then read an email that she sent earlier in the day to the Mayor and the City Council. She
noted that the American Society of Agriculture Engineers recommends that a housing development
should not be within one mile of a swine facility. She looked at the Urban Fringe Plan and saw what
the objectives are especially regarding the Agricultural buffer and noted if the property is annexed
the City would not be following their own rules. Ms. Hausner explained that the area where sewer
and water were put in the creek nearby is eroding due to the construction and there have also been
landslides. She noted that if the property is not turned over to conservation, there is only one other
solution that makes sense and that is to update the LUPP and Urban Fringe Plan, as it needs to be
19
redesigned with the 2040 Plan guiding it. Ms. Hausner pointed out that when the Urban Fringe Plan
went into effect for their area, not one single person was notified. She noted that the property owner
has even noted environmental issues. She requested that the Council table this request until the
completion of the 2040 Plan.
Evan Sivesind, 2724 Meadow Glen Road, Ames, encouraged the Council to respect private property
rights as soon as possible. He noted that if the Champlin/Lloyd Farm wants to be annexed he has
no problem with that, but asked to keep the forced annexation of non-consenting land owners to a
minimum. He explained that he does not wish to be annexed and was dismayed by some of the
Council comments made earlier tonight. He would passively support the annexation of
Champlin/Lloyd Farm LLC annexation
Mayor Haila closed public input.
Mr. Leeson stated that there were a couple people who had called the land “undesirable” and asking
why RDG didn’t put this property in their recommendations. Director Diekmann stated that the
property didn’t fit the task. ISU land was to the south and you can’t put 15,000 people on 140 acres
and that was the end of the conversation. Council Member Beatty-Hansen commented that there
may be other areas of town that are not necessarily in a growth area. Mr. Diekmann commented that
those policies have yet to be determined by City Council. The area is currently designated Urban
Service Area and that is the only reason this has been brought up. If the area was not in the Fringe
Plan as an area currently intended for City development, the Council would not have staff’s
recommendation to proceed as that is something the Comp Plan would decide.
Council Member Junck asked if the Urban Fringe Plan would be changed after the 2040 Plan as she
would be skeptical to agree to the annexation if changes were made later. Director Diekmann
explained that the Urban Fringe Plan designates places for City expansion, for rural development
with co-review from Story County, and areas that will never be annexed. He stated he would have
no idea what any changes would look like for at least a year after they go through the urbanizing
discussion of the City.
Council Member Gartin stated he wanted to explore the concept about the limitation of City
development as that should be a factor that the Council should consider. Director Diekmann
explained that the property already has water and sewer touching the property and the developer
would be obligated to extend those into development. He commented that the road improvements
are an open question as to how much the developer would be responsible for and how much the City
or MPO would spend. The City will not have to spend any money to proceed with development on
day one.
Mayor Haila told Council there were four alternatives that staff had provided and asked for feedback
from the Council.
20
Council Member Martin asked to be reminded of what the permissible uses were for the
Champlin/Lloyd property. Mr. Diekmann stated they have some version of agricultural zoning
however; the property is not allowed to subdivide.
Council Member Gartin stated that many people addressed the stewardship and environmental issues
and inquired how the Council should factor these into their analysis. Mr. Diekmann stated that staff
does not want to add in land to the City that can’t be developed at urban densities to support urban
services. There are some areas that should not and would not be touched during development. The
normal development processes should result in development that meets all the interests. Council
Member Gartin asked if it would be possible if the annexation is approved, and questioned if the
Council could give additional requests for additional buffering for Ag and Conservation. Director
Diekmann stated he is not sure on the Ag side, but that can be explored. If the property comes into
the city as an Ag Zoning designation, no one can proceed with development under Ag. Council
Member Gartin asked if ISU had given any input. Mr. Diekmann stated that they have not been
notified as a hearing has not happened yet.
Council Member Gartin stated that since there is no timing problem, he feels that it would be
beneficial to speak with the McCay property owners. Mr. Diekmann explained that in order for that
to happen that would also necessitate that ISU provide written authorization to participate in the
annexation.
Council Member Junck mentioned that she had timing concerns, and if this is a direction that the
City wants to go with growth, the area doesn’t seem substantial enough before moving forward with
the 2040 Plan.
Council Member Betcher stated that the City is operating under a Fringe Plan that could be changing,
operating in an area that is constrained, and she doesn’t like the idea of creating a 50-foot flag that
the City would have to maintain without addressing something that the State would be looking at.
She is not comfortable pursuing the annexation at this time and felt that the Council needs to get
through the 2040 Plan first.
Council Member Beatty-Hansen commented that the biggest part with the 2040 Plan is the future
Fringe Plan, as she doesn’t know what it will look like. It could be transitional for this property; what
the Council does with the Fringe Plan may change the outcome of this property.
Council Member Martin asked if the applicants could withdrawal their annexation at any time. Mr.
Diekmann stated that under State Code they could, but staff asks the applicant to waive that right as
staff will spend a significant amount of time to get to the hearing.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Junck, to approve Alternative 4, which states that the City Council
declines to initiate the annexation process at this time.
21
Council Member Martin asked if the intent of Ms. Betcher’s comments were to perhaps reconsider
the request after the Comprehensive Plan discussion. Council Member Betcher stated she is
concerned about the Fringe Plan, as the owners have had previously problems selling the property
due to the Fringe Plan. She would be happy to reconsider the annexation further down the road. A
discussion about the 2040 Plan and the Fringe Plan needs to happen first.
Council Member Martin asked if the Council agreed with what would be the indicator to bring this
item back for discussion. Mr. Diekmann stated it may be more appropriate to table the item to a date
unknown instead of declining.
Council Member Junck stated that the idea would be for the Council to look at the 2040 Plan first
and then revisit the Urban Fringe Plan, and then talk about this annexation. Ex Officio Leeson
agreed that time line seemed reasonable.
Vote on Motion: 4-2. Voting Aye: Betcher, Junck, Beatty-Hansen, Martin. Voting Nay: Gartin,
Corrieri. Motion declared carried.
AMES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040 PREFERRED LAND USE SCENARIOS: Mayor
Haila stated that the City Council Meeting had already lasted four hours, and there are still many
items on the Agenda left to discuss. He recommended that the Council table this item to the next
meeting.
Moved by Beatty-Hansen, seconded by Martin, to table this item until the City Council meeting on
January 28, 2020.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
321 STATE AVENUE: Housing Coordinator Vanessa Baker-Latimer stated that City Council gave
direction on December 17, 2019, to proceed with creating a development concept plan for affordable
single-family homes and affordable multi-family housing at 321 State Avenue. Staff had indicated
that prior to moving forward on a multi-family housing option, it would provide information on the
Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) process. Staff had looked into the LIHTC process and
found out that there is only one application period per year, and the deadline for this year would be
March 11, 2020. Ms. Baker-Latimer stated the Staff Report gave the Council two options and the
first one would be to proceed with preparing a Request for Proposals for the March 11, 2020
application period. She noted that this option has a very tight deadline that would not allow them
time for a lot of public input. The other option is to look at the application process for March 2021.
City Manager Steve Schainker pointed out that whichever option the Council chooses, it would not
preclude the Council from continuing with single-family housing.
Mayor Haila mentioned that there may be a few people who are confused with what is going on with
this area. Ms. Baker-Latimer stated that they are planning a meeting with the entire neighborhood
on January 23, 2020, at Ames Middle School, to talk about this project and other City projects that
are occurring in the neighborhood.
22
Mayor Haila asked if staff could describe what is happening on the north and south side of Tripp
Street. Mr. Diekmann stated that the next item on the Agenda is to hire Civil Design Advantage,
LLC, (CDA), and one of their tasks is to pick an area to reserve for multi-family housing. Staff is
suggesting the north side be set aside for multi-family housing and the south side for single-family.
Director Diekmann stated that to the best of their knowledge, which things change every year with
the Iowa Finance Authority (IFA), at least 50 units would be necessary to have the attention of an
affordable housing developer.
Council Member Betcher stated that in the staff comments for Option 1, it states that the time frame
and steps allow for very little public participation in the shaping of the concept. She asked if that
would imply if the Council went with Option 2, there would be public participation. Mr. Diekmann
stated that there would be before an RFP is sent out and when staff makes a recommendation on a
proposal.
Moved by Gartin, seconded by Corrieri, to approve Option 2: to Prepare a Request for Proposals
(RFP) for the 2021 Application Period as well as a reasonable time frame to complete the steps in
the application process:
1.Prepare an RFP to solicit an affordable housing developer interest and project proposal for
the site. (Issue RFP by June 2020)
2.Proposals’ due July 2020
3.Review proposals and interview qualified candidates as needed. (August 2020)
4.City Council selection of a preferred developer. (September 2020)
5.Refine project concept and complete development agreement (December 2020)
6.Submit IFA application March 2021 (anticipated)
7.Notice of an award by IFA, August 2021.
8.Proceed with construction late 2021 or spring 2022.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Mayor Haila opened the public hearing and closed it when no one came forward to speak.
Moved by Corrieri seconded by Beatty-Hansen, approving RESOLUTION NO. 20-035 awarding
a contract to Civil Design Advantage, LLC, of Grimes, Iowa, for engineering services in an amount
not to exceed $49,600.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolution declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
Mayor Haila asked for further explanation about what the neighborhoods can expect for public input
going forward. The open house on January 23, 2020, will request feedback from attendees and then
will come back to the Council in either February or March where more public information will be
accepted.
23
REQUEST FROM SIGLER COMPANIES TO PURCHASE AIRPORT PROPERTY FOR
3100 S. RIVERSIDE DRIVE: Traffic Engineer Damion Pregitzer explained that they received a
formal request from Sigler Companies to purchase the property at 3100 S. Riverside Drive. Mr.
Pregitzer displayed a map overhead that showed the draft Airport Master Plan and pointed out the
parcel in question. Staff determined the value of the property to the City for the buyout of the lease,
the reversion of the improvements on the property, and the land itself. Mr. Pregitzer stated that staff
has given the Council three alternatives to choose from. Under Option 1, using a conservative cash
flow estimate, the City would reinvest the total estimated payment amount of $2,838,250 and then
pay the Airport operating budget and annual amount equal to the remaining lease payment schedule.
At the end of the current lease term on June 30, 2047, it is estimated that there will be a significant
amount of the original principal remaining.
Council Member Gartin mentioned that this item came before the Council in September 2019, and
he had voted against it. He questioned why it would be in the best interest of the City, with not
knowing the future of the Airport, to sell the property. Mr. Pregitzer stated he can offer two
perspectives. The first one being the Airport Master Plan. Even before the current Plan that was
adopted in 2008, it identified this segment of road and property essentially being non-aeronautical.
He stated that if Sigler came today and wanted to build a new building the FAA would not allow
them; this is being allowed because originally VisionAire was allowed to sublet the building to build
single-engine jet aircraft. Once VisionAire left, the Airport was stuck with this property and
something needed to be done with it, and the Airport Master Plan already pulled this property out.
He pointed out that if Mulmac, LLC, or Sigler Companies, Inc., ever defaults on the lease, the City
would be stuck trying to find a tenant. The Airport is not in the business of trying to find a
manufacturing tenant. Mr. Pregitzer stated that since the building is on Airport property, the building
is bound completely by the Federal rules for the use of Airport revenue, and would have to charge
Fair-Market Value to the Airport. The property is heavily regulated. Staff is trying to find an option
that works for a business, here in town, while trying to minimize the risk to the Airport. Council
Member Gartin stated he appreciates the information Mr. Pregitzer provided, but it did not address
what the Airport Master Plan would be 40 years down the road. He wanted to be cautious about
moving into something because there is a short-term solution in front of the Council.
Council Member Betcher commented that she is not sure she understood the difference between this
property and the short-term and longer-term projects that are identified on the draft Airport Master
Plan. Mr. Pregitzer stated that what is presented in front of the Council is a draft and staff will be
coming back to present the draft Airport Master Plan to the Council, but there is still more work to
be done. He mentioned what is being shown is just a small preview of what will be coming back
to the Council later; he was just using this to show the layout of the Airport in reference to the Sigler
building. Council Member Betcher noted that if the City expanded in the area, the Sigler property
is right in the middle of the Airport. Mr. Pregitzer stated that the way to look at it is no different than
Bricktowne. He noted that the City would not be completely unprotected, as they would not sell the
property, without putting a navigation easement on the property. If Sigler wanted to sell the property
down the road, the Airport itself would always be protected by a covenant.
24
Council Member Martin wanted to know if there were other uses for the property that are not a
benefit to the Airport. Mr. Pregitzer stated that he has been working with the FAA and the property
does not have to generate revenue, but has to support the Airport. The property itself is not
unencumbered; it has improvements on it. In order for the City to convert the property for usage, the
building would have to be demolished. Staff is not trying to have a decision tonight to sell the
property, but to see about moving forward. Mayor Haila asked if the property could be used as an
alternate hangar. Traffic Engineer Pregitzer stated the property was used to build airplanes, but the
planes were small and the planes at the Airport now are bigger.
City Manager Schainker stated it is up to the Council to make a decision about this property, but it
wouldn’t be an asset to the City until 2047 as the lease is valid until then. Mayor Haila asked if this
was a sale or just a prepayment of the lease. Public Works Director John Joiner explained that the
payment of the lease was included in the sales price. Mr. Schainker noted that the amount of the sale
is a combination of the land, value of the lease, and the value of the building.
Mayor Haila opened public comment.
Chris Eggert, 5317 Valley Road, Ames, stated he has worked for Sigler Companies for 31 years and
the company has been in Ames around 62 years. He noted that the company would like to stay in
Ames, and in order for the company to continue to grow, they would like to purchase this property.
Mayor Haila asked about what the plans would be for expansion. Mr. Eggert stated they don’t have
plans at this time, but will be having discussions in the future to potentially expand the area.
Mayor Haila closed public comment when no one else came forward to speak.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to approve Alternative 1, which states that the City
is willing to sell the land and buildings (includes the depreciated value of a new 15,000 SF hangar)
to Mulmac, LLC, for $2,838,250, and direct staff to work with the City Attorney to:
a.Draft an amendment to the Development Agreement
b.Draft an amendment to the Land Lease (setting an end date)
c.Draft an agreement to purchase the property
d.Conduct the third party review of the two appraisals
e.Work with the FAA to obtain approval of the sale
Mr. Schainker stated the Agreement would come back to City Council for final approval and further
public comment.
Vote on Motion: 5-1. Voting Aye: Betcher, Junck, Corrieri, Martin, Beatty-Hansen. Voting Nay:
Gartin. Motion declared carried.
ORDINANCE REGARDING STACKED DRIVEWAY PARKING FOR SINGLE-FAMILY
AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS: Moved by Corrieri, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to adopt
25
ORDINANCE NO. 4405 regarding stacked driveway parking for single-family and two-family
dwellings.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
ORDINANCE REZONING 808 E. LINCOLN WAY FROM AGRICULTURAL “A” AND
HIGHWAY-ORIENTED COMMERCIAL (HOC) TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI): Moved
by Corrieri, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 4406 rezoning 808 E. Lincoln
Way from Agricultural “A” and Highway-Oriented Commercial (HOC) to General Industrial (GI).
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Ordinance declared adopted unanimously, signed by the Mayor, and hereby
made a portion of these Minutes.
COUNCIL COMMENTS: Moved by Betcher, seconded by Gartin, to have staff bring back the
information for the policy discussion on the waiver of Downtown parking meter fees to the January
28, 2020, meeting.
City Manager Schainker asked if the Council didn’t need anything more from staff, they will resend
out the previous memo that was done.
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
Council Member Martin advised that he has been appointed to the National League of Cities (NLC)
Information Technology and Communications federal advocacy committee. The committee has the
lead responsibility for developing NLC’s federal policy positions on issues involving
telecommunications and information systems (and public access to these systems), privacy concerns,
cable TV, phone services, spectrum issues, communications tower siting, universal service,
broadcasting, and defense of city rights-of-way from degradation caused by installation of
communications facilities.
Mayor Haila stated that the Story County Supervisors is planning to make some recommendations
on the re-naming of Squaw Creek that will be on the January 28 agenda. Mayor Haila and Mr.
Schainker to work on a memo for the Council.
DISPOSITION OF COMMUNICATIONS TO COUNCIL: City Manager Schainker stated the
first item was an email from Clapsaddle-Garber Associates (CGA) requesting to rezone the property
at 23959-580th Avenue from Industrial Reserve/Research Park to Planned Industrial. Mr. Schainker
recommended obtaining a memo from the Planning & Housing Director.
Moved by Gartin, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to get a memo from staff on Clapsaddle-Garber
Associates request to rezone the property at 23959-580th Avenue. Vote on Motion. 6-0. Motion
declared carried unanimously.
26
Mr. Schainker mentioned that the next item is a letter from the Building Board of Appeals requesting
to look into the options that would provide a more equitable sign allowance so that “flag” properties
are not negatively affected.
Moved by Betcher, seconded by Corrieri, to incorporate the request from the Building Board of
Appeals into the ongoing staff analysis of the Sign Ordinance. Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared
carried unanimously.
City Manager Schainker stated that the letter from Ames Main Street requesting to consider making
improvements to the Downtown and Campustown Facade Grant Program refers to two items: one
is a budget issue and the other is about prioritizing tasks. Mr. Schainker recommended waiting until
after the Council’s goal setting meeting on Saturday. The Council agreed to wait.
Mr. Schainker noted that the next item was from Justin Dodge requesting to initiate a land use
amendment with rezoning pertaining to the property at 802 Delaware Avenue. He recommended
the Council obtain a memo from staff.
Moved by Corrieri, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to ask staff for a memo on the request from Justin
Dodge to rezone the property at 802 Delaware Avenue .
Vote on Motion: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
The last email was about Brookridge Parking. That had been addressed a couple of times already.
Council Member Corrieri stated that she had a couple of people from the neighborhood follow-up
with her. She forwarded them information from the Traffic Engineer and that answered their
questions and no further action was needed.
CLOSED SESSION: Council Member Gartin asked City Attorney Mark Lambert if there was a
legal reason to go into Closed Session. Mr. Lambert replied in the affirmative, citing Section
21.5(1)c, Code of Iowa, to discuss matters presently in or threatened to be in litigation.
Moved by Gartin, seconded by Corrieri, to go into Closed Session under Section 21.5(1)c, Code of
Iowa, to discuss matters presently in or threatened to be in litigation.
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
The Council entered into Closed Session at 10:53 p.m. and reconvened in Regular Session at 11:00
p.m.
Moved by Martin, seconded by Beatty-Hansen, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 20-036 authorizing
authorizes the settlement and payment of $47,701.82 from the Risk Fund to the property owner at
1901 Polk Drive.
27
Roll Call Vote: 6-0. Resolutions/Motions declared adopted/approved unanimously, signed by the
Mayor, and hereby made a portion of these Minutes.
ADJOURNMENT: Moved by Beatty-Hansen to adjourn the meeting at 11:01 p.m.
________________________________________________________________
Amy L. Colwell, Deputy City Clerk John A. Haila, Mayor
28
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL
AMES, IOWA JANUARY 7, 2020
The Special Meeting of the Ames City Council was called to order by Mayor John Haila at 7:00 p.m.
on the 7th day of January, 2020, in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, 515 Clark Avenue.
Council Members Bronwyn Beatty-Hansen, Gloria Betcher, Amber Corrieri, Tim Gartin, and Rachel
Junck were present. Council Member David Martin and ex officio Member Devyn Leeson were
absent.
Moved by Beatty-Hansen, seconded by Betcher, to change the date of the Regular Meeting of the
Ames Conference Board from January 14, 2020, at 5:30 p.m. to January 28, 2020, at 5:30 p.m.
Motion declared carried unanimously.
AMES PLAN 2040 - REVIEW OF GROWTH SCENARIOS
Public Input: Mayor Haila welcomed members of the public and said Council is looking forward
to input on the proposed scenarios. Planning and Housing Director Kelly Diekmann explained an
overview of scenarios was provided to City Council on December 19, 2019, and the information is
on the City website for review by the public. He further explained that on January 14, 2020, Council
will give direction on the proposed scenarios, and then staff and RDG will prepare a future land use
map to reflect designations.
Timothy Morgan, 3416 Clinton Court, Ames, said he owns a family farm north of Ames that is
included in the North Growth Area. He said Ames and Gilbert have long histories of being strong
and independent communities. Mr. Morgan asked Council to make decisions ethically and not to
annex land without a landowner’s consent.
Jonathan Bunge, 226 S. Maple Avenue, Ames, said landowners unwilling to sell land in any area
could derail the plan. He also said a Fleet Farm store may be coming to Ames and wondered how
the addition of that store could change the cost of developing the East Growth Area.
Council Member Gartin expressed concern that all questions from members of the public may not
get answered during the meeting and said emails to the Mayor and Council members are always
welcome.
Mary Richards, 720 Kellogg Avenue, #201, Ames, said she doesn’t have a recommendation on
expansion scenarios, but wanted to express environmental concerns. She urged the Council to be
proactive in making the climate crisis a central background as the scenarios are considered.
Gaylord Victora, 4002 Edgewater Drive, Ames, said he is concerned about the projected revenue
sources and said fees, taxes, and permits can be a detriment to bringing in new residents. Mr. Victora
said he believes community input is very important to this process.
Kent Vickre, 2625 Meadow Glen Road, Ames, said he has safety and environmental concerns about
the Southwest Growth Area. Mr. Vickre discussed the importance of a buffer between residents and
agriculture, noting residents in that area already complain about the odor.
Phil Iasevoli, 3108 South Dakota Avenue, Ames, discussed the impact of development on rural and
agricultural activities and expressed concern about the effects of development on soil, groundwater,
rivers, and wetland areas. He referenced the 2005 Worle Creek Sanitary Sewer Extension Study and
requested Council review it and use it as a tool in future considerations of developing the Southwest
Growth Area.
Paul Livingston, 105 S. 16th Street, Ames, represented the Champlin-Lloyd property, and said the
property should be considered in the growth scenarios as a tier one opportunity. He noted half of the
property is within the Ames Community School District. Mr. Livingston said he hopes this property
will be considered as part of the conversation because of its proximity to the City, emergency
services, and Iowa State University (ISU). He said the property is ready to go, and it would be a
voluntary annexation.
Hector Arbuckle, 519 Oliver Circle, Ames, said he is disappointed in the plan because it doesn’t
account for the changes in lifestyle that will be needed. He said all new development should be
carbon neutral and made from sustainable materials, and public transportation and walkability
should be promoted.
Kim Christiansen, 2985 South Dakota Avenue, Ames, said ISU controls 3,500 acres south of
Highway 30 between University Boulevard and County Line Road. He said the properties are
intensively agricultural and a buffer is needed between heavy agricultural use and intense urban
development. He said the remaining developable land should be left for rural development, which
is more compatible to the rural lifestyle that already exists in the area.
Lynn Champlin-Lloyd, 3818 Pheonix Street, Ames, said she and her family want to sell their farm,
and that there is already City water and sewer down Dartmoor Road and through the valley. She said
the farm is ready to be annexed and noted the area that cannot be developed will contribute to
making the area a beautiful place to live.
Peter Hallock, 114 8th Street, Ames, said the capacity for infill hasn’t fully been considered, and he
has concerns about fringe development to the east and south of Ames. Mr. Hallock urged Council
to place as much growth as possible within existing Ames, look at contiguous development, and
consider the cost of transit.
Brent Pringnitz, 2377 240th Street, Ames, said he lives just across County Line Road in Boone
County and his farm is in the Southwest Growth Area. He said the Ames Fringe Plan from 2007
involves communities working together to protect rural lands to preserve rural lifestyle and
agriculture. Mr. Pringnitz expressed concern that the scenarios don’t mention agriculture and
encroach on university properties.
Erv Klaas, 2200 Hamilton Drive #508, Ames, said he has concerns about all scenarios, but mostly
the North Growth Area. He said population density and geographic area would be the largest to the
north. Mr. Klaas noted Riverside Drive is the primary arterial to the east and Grand Avenue is the
only route to downtown Ames. He said the South Growth Area has direct access to the interstate.
2
Mr. Klaas said nature is being pushed beyond its limits, and a new paradigm is needed for
civilization that’s in respect for natural cycles of renewal in nature.
Jeri Neal, 916 Ridgewood Avenue, Ames, said she represents the Ames Bicycle Coalition and
supports making a community where transportation equity exists for cyclists, pedestrians, and
transit. She urged Council to consider barriers to walking, cycling, or transit that might be implicated
in the growth scenarios.
Jodi Chittick, 3830 Hyde Avenue, Ames, said traffic has doubled and the speeding has increased in
the Bloomington Heights neighborhood. She expressed concern for the children in the area, and said
if the North Growth Area is chosen she recommends the City add stop signs along Hyde Avenue,
add a flashing light and crosswalk near the park, and continue to allow street parking.
Council Member Gartin encouraged members of the public to sign up for Ames Plan 2040 updates
on the City website.
Dhrvv Raturi, 2026 Hawthorne Court, Ames, said some new residents are fleeing environmental
conditions elsewhere. He said walkability, equitable transportation, and shopping local should be
considered.
Linda Murken, 17185 George Washington Carver Avenue, Gilbert, said she knows Ames will
continue to grow, but is concerned because agricultural land cannot be replaced. She asked the
Council to do as much as it can to encourage infill. She said the Urban Fringe Plan needs to be
strengthened and updated, and more players need to be involved.
Justin Dodge, 105 S. 16th Street, Ames, said the options and tiered approaches show flexibility. He
said it’s important to remind everyone that costs include developer investments and the taxpayer is
not on the hook for many of the costs that are shown. He said the estimates have been conservative,
and he believes the development community would respond and adapt to whatever option(s) the
Council chooses.
Chuck Winkleblack, 105 S. 16th Street, Ames, said he was a part of this process 20 years ago, and
this time he appreciates the time and process. He said it was never thought that Ames would go
beyond certain points. Mr. Winkleblack said standards have changed immensely regarding impacts
on the environment over the years, and that stormwater is dealt with in radically different ways than
years ago.
Mark Harmison, 2042 S. 500th Avenue, Ames, said most of the options involve annexation. He said
there would be large tax increases without any services being received. He said when considering
annexing land, Council should annex in proportion to services that can be offered immediately. He
told the Council his property has Worle Creek running through it, and he is unclear on what more
development would do to the creek.
3
Lauris Olson, 1705 Buchanan Drive, Ames, said with any expansion to the north or northwest the
traffic flow should be considered. She said the North Dakota Avenue traffic count is over 1,000
vehicles per day and cannot be widened because of the steep ditches. Ms. Olson also noted that
Ketelsen Marsh is within the East Growth Area.
Mayor Haila closed public input.
Council Discussion: Director Diekmann told the Council that a voluntary annexation petition has
been submitted for the Champlin-Lloyd property. He explained that Council will consider the
request on January 14, 2020, and will determine whether or not to begin the public hearing process.
Mr. Diekmann reviewed the development tiers for growth, explaining that the tiers represent access
to infrastructure and ease of service. He said the tiers are not meant to signify a sequence.
Ms. Beatty-Hansen said it’s not Council’s goal to annex unwilling landowners. Council Member
Betcher said she is hesitant to say that when the plan goes out 20 years and will involve many future
City Councils.
Ms. Beatty-Hansen asked if more will be seen on infill. Mr. Diekmann concurred, saying the only
time it has been discussed was the Council workshop where some areas were identified as options.
He said infill is difficult to predict, costly, and time consuming which makes it hard to predict how
much population growth can be accommodated.
Council Member Betcher said she knows what it’s like to live near various agriculture uses and said
she has not thought about those negative impacts to development. She appreciated members of the
public bringing those thoughts forward. Mr. Diekmann said ISU has been clear the agriculture/
science corridor will remain.
Mayor Haila said it seems very difficult to meet a lot of needs with infill. Member Diekmann
showed the map including potential infill areas and said the City will have to make an investment
to provide services either way. Member Gartin said two out of three Iowa counties have declining
populations but Story County is increasing. He said not planning for growth would increase
environmental challenges. Mr. Gartin worried that putting a “ring” around Ames would encourage
the population to live in other communities that want to grow, and encourage rural subdivisions.
Member Beatty-Hansen said sustainability must be considered, and there is value in considering
infill even if it will be harder. Mr. Gartin said a large increase in population cannot be assumed, but
he wants a substantial part of the plan to be infill. Mayor Haila said infill depends heavily on the
property owner. Member Gartin said he used to presume more development means increased
potential for flooding, but there are areas where development and water improvements have
provided a benefit, such as the Southdale area.
Mayor Haila asked Council if there’s anything else needed from staff to assist in decision making.
Ms. Corrieri said it’s important to take the public comments received, as well as the public input
4
collected by RDG into consideration. Mr. Diekmann said staff didn’t consider any floodplain areas
for development and reported to Council in March on existing conditions that included a vacant
lands inventory.
Council Member Gartin said a number of people raised the issues of climate and transportation. He
said the City went through a robust Complete Streets program that was adopted unanimously, and
those priorities will be included in new developments. Mr. Gartin said a realistic conversation should
take place with CyRide. Mr. Diekmann said a preliminary meeting with CyRide took place to
discuss the scenarios, and when preferred land uses are determined it will be easier to make service
cost estimates.
Council Member Gartin referenced climate change. Mr. Diekmann said the City is committed to
obtaining a Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventory, which may lead to a Climate Action Plan. He said
if a goal is established in the Climate Action Plan regarding land use it would need to be part of
Ames Plan 2040. Mr. Diekmann said if a climate threshold is going to be made a priority, that has
to be known in January because that will change the information needed from staff.
Member Betcher said it seems that Council will need to give appropriate weights to the issues raised.
Mayor Haila said if a decision is going to be made on January 14, 2020, he believes the public
should have another opportunity for comment. Mayor Haila encouraged members of the public to
continue submitting comments by email.
Public Comment and Follow-Up Questions: None.
Other: None.
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
Council Member Gartin said he was very impressed with the attendance and public comment.
Council Member Junck said she would make herself available to hear from constituents.
Council Member Corrieri said community feedback is so important, and that Council doesn’t receive
enough email regarding critically important issues that affect the future.
DISPOSITION OF COMMUNICATIONS TO COUNCIL: None.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:18 p.m.
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Diane R. Voss, City Clerk John A. Haila, Mayor
5
____________________________________
Erin Thompson, Recording Secretary
6
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL RETREAT
AMES, IOWA JANUARY 11, 2020
The Ames City Council was called to order by Mayor John Haila at 8:03 a.m. on the 11th day of
January, 2020 in the Parks and Recreation Office, 1500 Gateway Hills Park Drive. City Council
Members present were Bronwyn Beatty-Hansen, Gloria Betcher, Amber Corrieri, Tim Gartin,
and Rachel Junck. Ex officio Council Member Devyn Leeson was also present. City Manager
Steven Schainker, City Attorney Mark Lambert, Assistant City Manager Brian Phillips, Assistant
City Manager Deb Schildroth, and Management Analyst Tasheik Kerr were also present. Council
Member David Martin was not present.
COUNCIL GOAL UPDATE:
Facilitator Donna Gilligan welcomed the group and facilitated an ice-breaking exercise. She then
reviewed the Agenda.
Ms. Gilligan reviewed the ground rules that had been adopted at a prior goal-setting retreat. The
Council reflected on positives and challenges from the prior two years.
The meeting recessed at 9:10 a.m. and reconvened at 9:18 a.m.
Ms. Gilligan led the group through a discussion about being an effective decision-making body.
The group then evaluated how well they have done in accomplishing the aspects of being an
effective decision-making body.
Discussion then turned to proposed initiatives submitted by Council Members. Each Council
Member answered clarifying questions as to what their intent was for each initiative.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 12:08 p.m.
__________________________________ ___________________________________
Brian Phillips, Assistant City Manager John A. Haila, Mayor
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL RETREAT
AMES, IOWA JANUARY 18, 2020
The Ames City Council was called to order by Mayor John Haila at 8:19 a.m. on the 18th day of
January, 2020, in the Parks and Recreation Office, 1500 Gateway Hills Park Drive. City Council
Members present were Bronwyn Beatty-Hansen, Gloria Betcher, Amber Corrieri, Tim Gartin,
Rachel Junck, and David Martin. Ex officio Council Member Devyn Leeson was also present.
City Manager Steven Schainker, City Attorney Mark Lambert, Assistant City Manager Brian
Phillips, and Assistant City Manager Deb Schildroth were also present.
COUNCIL GOAL UPDATE:
Ms. Gilligan outlined the objectives for the day. She then invited Mr. Schainker to discuss what
the staff can do to help the City Council become a more effective decision-making body.
The meeting recessed at 9:00 a.m. and reconvened at 9:05 a.m.
Ms. Gilligan introduced the process to prioritize the Council Members’ individual initiatives. She
reviewed the list of items that were already underway or that could be directed to begin at a
Council meeting. These items were set aside. The Council Members reviewed the remaining
initiatives and placed stickers to indicate their priorities. Ms. Gilligan reviewed the initiatives
that had apparent consensus to move forward.
The meeting recessed for lunch at 11:57 a.m. and reconvened at 12:25 p.m.
Ms. Gilligan reviewed the next steps. Two Council Members were assigned to each value area to
refine the initiatives that were identified as priorities. The groups reported out and the entire
Council made suggestions regarding the wording.
The Values and Goals identified were as follows:
• We value communication and engagement with the public
o Adopt an attractive, single civic app by the end of 2020
o Use the best communication engagement techniques and modern technologies to
engage the community by reaching people in geographic areas using multiple
channels.
• We value diverse housing options for the community
o Increase the stock of diverse housing types for a variety of income levels through
zoning, including adjusting minimum lot area, multiple dwelling units on a lot,
and accessory dwelling units
• We value a fun, vibrant community that attracts and retains people
o Begin construction on a downtown community space by 2021
o Obtain referendum approval to construct an indoor aquatic facility by summer
2021
o Create a Beautification Master Plan for community entryways and thoroughfares
by spring 2021
• We value a diverse, equitable, and inclusive community
o Develop a shared understanding of diversity, equity, and bias as they relate to
Council decisions and the policy-making process.
o Through local ordinances, expand protections for Ames citizens beyond the Code
of Iowa floor protections by 2021
o Identify, by the end of 2020, the ways the City can assist the Ames Community
School District in its efforts to close the achievement gap
• We value environmental sustainability
o Initiate and complete a Climate Action Plan by the end of 2021
Mr. Schainker noted that the staff will develop proposed tasks for each initiative the Council has
identified. The entire list of values, goals, and tasks will be returned to the City Council for
review and approval. Mr. Schainker noted there can be a goal update over the summer, with
status reports in the spring and fall.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 3:08 p.m.
_____________________________________ ____________________________________
Brian Phillips, Assistant City Manager John A. Haila, Mayor
REPORT OF
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS
General Description Change Original Contract Total of Prior Amount this Change Contact
Electric
Services Overhaul Project
Services and Related Services and
Supply Contract
Improvements
Improvements
Pavement Improvements
(Hickory Drive)
Program Service Transfer
(10th & 12th Street, Gray
Excavating, Inc.
Period:
Item No. 3
MINUTES OF THE AMES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
AMES, IOWA JANUARY 23, 2020
The Regular Session of the Ames Civil Service Commission was called to order by Vice-Chairman
Harold Pike at 8:16 a.m. on January 23, 2020. As it was impractical for the Commission members to
attend in person, Commission Members Harold Pike and Charlie Ricketts were brought in
telephonically. Commission Chairman Mike Crum was absent.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF DECEMBER 19, 2019, REGULAR MEETING: Moved by
Ricketts, seconded by Pike, to approve the Minutes of the December 19, 2019, Regular Civil Service
Commission meeting, as written.
Vote on Motion: 3-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
CERTIFICATION OF ENTRY-LEVEL APPLICANTS: Moved by Pike, seconded by Ricketts, to
certify the following individuals to the Ames City Council as Entry-Level Applicants:
Maintenance Worker
Streets Jeff Engelman Carryover from exhausted list
Cory Golly Carryover from exhausted list
Brent Randolph Carryover from exhausted list
Bryon Anderson 80
Rocke Rahfeldt 78
Anton Redling 78
Matt Gruhn 77*
Quentin Silberstein 77
Shadow Altiz 76
Jamie Cleveland 76
William Harrison 70
*includes preference points
Utilities Jeff Engelman Carryover from exhausted list
Cory Golly Carryover from exhausted list
Brent Randolph Carryover from exhausted list
Rick Breault, Jr. 81
Rocke Rahfeldt 78
Anton Redling 78
Matt Gruhn 77*
Quentin Silberstein 77
Jamie Cleveland 76
James Hamblin 70
*includes preference points
Vote on Motion: 3-0. Motion declared carried unanimously.
COMMENTS: The next Regular Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2020, at 8:15 a.m.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:19 a.m.
__________________________________ _______________________________________
Harold Pike, Vice-Chairman Diane R. Voss, City Clerk
License Application (Applicant
Name of Applicant:Booze Cruzer Cocktail Co., LLC
Name of Business (DBA):Booze Cruzer Cocktail Co., LLC
Address of Premises:2508 Mortensen Rd
City
:
Ames Zip:50011
State
:
IA
County:Story
Business
Phone:
(515) 238-3063
Mailing
Address:
6216 Gordon Ave
City
:
Des Moines Zip:50312
)
Contact Person
Name
:
Lucas Smith
Phone:(515) 238-3063 Email
Address:
boozecruzerdsm@gmail.com
Status of Business
BusinessType:Limited Liability Company
Corporate ID Number:XXXXXXXXX Federal Employer ID
#:
XXXXXXXXX
Insurance Company Information
Policy Effective Date:02/12/2020 Policy Expiration Date 02/17/2020
Insurance Company:Illinois Union Insurance Company
Effective Date:02/12/2020
Expiration Date:01/01/1900
Classification
:
Class C Liquor License (LC) (Commercial)
Term:5 days
Privileges:
Ownership
Class C Liquor License (LC) (Commercial)
Sunday Sales
Lucas Smith
First Name:Lucas Last Name:Smith
City:Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50312
Position:Owner
% of Ownership:50.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Easton Smith
First Name:Easton Last Name:Smith
City:Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50312
Position:Owner
% of Ownership:50.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Item No. 5
Policy Effective Date:02/12/2020 Policy Expiration
Date:
02/17/2020
Dram Cancel Date:
Outdoor Service Effective
Date:
Outdoor Service Expiration
Date:
Temp Transfer Effective
Date:
Temp Transfer Expiration Date:
Bond Effective
Continuously:
License Application (Applicant
Name of Applicant:Nicole Schneider
Name of Business (DBA):The Whimsical Wine Trailer
Address of Premises: 1407 S University Blvd
City
:
Ames Zip:50011
State
:
IA
County:Story
Business
Phone:
(515) 291-8834
Mailing
Address:
710 2nd ave.
City
:
Collins Zip:50055
)
Contact Person
Name
:
Nikki Schneider
Phone:(515) 291-8834 Email
Address:
thewhimsicalwinetrailer@gmail.com
Status of Business
BusinessType:Sole Proprietorship
Corporate ID Number:XXXXXXXXX Federal Employer ID
#:
XXXXXXXXX
Insurance Company Information
Policy Effective Date:02/28/2020 Policy Expiration Date 03/04/2020
Insurance Company:Illinois Union Insurance Company
Effective Date:02/28/2020
Expiration Date:01/01/1900
Classification
:
Special Class C Liquor License (BW) (Beer/Wine)
Term:5 days
Privileges:
Ownership
Class B Native Wine Permit
Special Class C Liquor License (BW) (Beer/Wine)
Nicole Schneider
First Name:Nicole Last Name:Schneider
City:State:Iowa Zip:50055
Position:Owner
% of Ownership:100.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Benjamin Schneider
First Name:Benjamin Last Name:Schneider
City:State:Iowa Zip:50055
Position:Husband
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Item No. 6
Policy Effective Date:02/28/2020 Policy Expiration
Date:
03/04/2020
Dram Cancel Date:
Outdoor Service Effective
Date:
Outdoor Service Expiration
Date:
Temp Transfer Effective
Date:
Temp Transfer Expiration Date:
Bond Effective
Continuously:
License Application (Applicant
Name of Applicant:Clouds Coffee LLC
Name of Business (DBA):Clouds
Address of Premises:119 STANTON AVE
City
:
Ames Zip:50014
State
:
IA
County:Iowa
Business
Phone:
(515) 290-9652
Mailing
Address:
119 STANTON AVE
City
:
Ames Zip:50014253
)
Contact Person
Name
:
Catherine Daily
Phone:(641) 344-9669 Email
Address:
cloudscorporate@gmail.com
Status of Business
BusinessType:Limited Liability Company
Corporate ID Number:XXXXXXXXX Federal Employer ID
#:
XXXXXXXXX
Insurance Company Information
Policy Effective Date:Policy Expiration
Date:
Insurance Company:MOUNT VERNON FIRE INS CO
Effective Date:01/14/2020
Expiration Date:01/01/1900
Classification
:
Special Class C Liquor License (BW) (Beer/Wine)
Term:12 months
Privileges:
Ownership
Special Class C Liquor License (BW) (Beer/Wine)
Ted Frandson
First Name:Ted Last Name:Frandson
City:Story City State:Iowa Zip:50248
Position:Owner
% of Ownership:50.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Yann Queckenstedt
First Name:Yann Last Name:Queckenstedt
City:Ames State:Iowa Zip:50014
Position:Owned
% of Ownership:50.00%U.S. Citizen: No
Item No. 7
Dram Cancel Date:
Outdoor Service Effective
Date:
Outdoor Service Expiration
Date:
Temp Transfer Effective
Date:
Temp Transfer Expiration Date:
Bond Effective
Continuously:
License Application (Applicant
Name of Applicant:Hy-Vee, Inc.
Name of Business (DBA):Hy-Vee Gas #5013
Address of Premises:4018 West Lincoln Way
City
:
Ames Zip:50014
State
:
IA
County:Story
Business
Phone:
(515) 292-5580
Mailing
Address:
5820 Westown Pkwy
City
:
West Des Moines Zip:50266
)
Contact Person
Name
:
Kelly Palmer
Phone:(515) 267-2949 Email
Address:
kpalmer@hy-vee.com
Status of Business
BusinessType:Privately Held Corporation
Corporate ID Number:XXXXXXXXX Federal Employer ID
#:
XXXXXXXXX
Effective Date:09/01/2020
Expiration Date:
Classification
:
Class C Beer Permit (BC)
Term:12 months
Privileges:
Ownership
Class C Beer Permit (BC)
Randy Edeker
First Name:Randy Last Name:Edeker
City:Urbandale State:Iowa Zip:50322
Position:CEO, President
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Jeffrey Pierce
First Name:Jeffrey Last Name:Pierce
City:West Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50265
Position:Ass't Treasurer, Financial
Reporting% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Michael Skokan
First Name:Michael Last Name:Skokan
City:Waukee State:Iowa Zip:50263
Position:CFO, Treasurer
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
BC0029616 Item No. 8
Insurance Company Information
Policy Effective Date:Policy Expiration
Date:
Dram Cancel Date:
Outdoor Service Effective
Date:
Outdoor Service Expiration
Date:
Temp Transfer Effective
Date:
Temp Transfer Expiration Date:
Bond Effective
Continuously:
Insurance Company:
Michael Jurgens
First Name:Michael Last Name:Jurgens
City:Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50312
Position:Vice President, Secretary
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
License Application (Applicant
Name of Applicant:Hy-Vee, Inc.
Name of Business (DBA):Hy-Vee Gas #5018
Address of Premises:636 Lincoln Way
City
:
Ames Zip:50010
State
:
IA
County:Story
Business
Phone:
(515) 232-1961
Mailing
Address:
5820 Westown Pkwy
City
:
West Des Moines Zip:50266
)
Contact Person
Name
:
Kelly Palmer
Phone:(515) 267-2949 Email
Address:
kpalmer@Hy-vee.com
Status of Business
BusinessType:Privately Held Corporation
Corporate ID Number:XXXXXXXXX Federal Employer ID
#:
XXXXXXXXX
Effective Date:10/13/2020
Expiration Date:
Classification
:
Class C Beer Permit (BC)
Term:12 months
Privileges:
Ownership
Class C Beer Permit (BC)
Randy Edeker
First Name:Randy Last Name:Edeker
City:Urbandale State:Iowa Zip:50322
Position:CEO, President
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Jeffrey Pierce
First Name:Jeffrey Last Name:Pierce
City:West Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50265
Position:Ass't Treasurer, Financial
Reporting% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Michael Skokan
First Name:Michael Last Name:Skokan
City:Waukee State:Iowa Zip:50263
Position:CFO, Treasurer
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
BC0029640 Item No. 9
Insurance Company Information
Policy Effective Date:Policy Expiration
Date:
Dram Cancel Date:
Outdoor Service Effective
Date:
Outdoor Service Expiration
Date:
Temp Transfer Effective
Date:
Temp Transfer Expiration Date:
Bond Effective
Continuously:
Insurance Company:
Michael Jurgens
First Name:Michael Last Name:Jurgens
City:Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50312
Position:Vice President, Secretary
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Andrew Schroeder
First Name:Andrew Last Name:Schroeder
City:Johnston State:Iowa Zip:50131
Position:AVP, Assistant Controller
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
License Application (Applicant
Name of Applicant:Hy-Vee, Inc.
Name of Business (DBA):Hy-Vee #1 Clubroom
Address of Premises:3800 West Lincoln Way
City
:
Ames Zip:50014
State
:
IA
County:Story
Business
Phone:
(515) 292-5580
Mailing
Address:
5820 Westown Pkwy
City
:
West Des Moines Zip:50266
)
Contact Person
Name
:
Kelly Palmer
Phone:(515) 267-2949 Email
Address:
kpalmer@hy-vee.com
Status of Business
BusinessType:Privately Held Corporation
Corporate ID Number:XXXXXXXXX Federal Employer ID
#:
XXXXXXXXX
Effective Date:10/09/2020
Expiration Date:
Classification
:
Class C Liquor License (LC) (Commercial)
Term:12 months
Privileges:
Ownership
Class C Liquor License (LC) (Commercial)
Randy Edeker
First Name:Randy Last Name:Edeker
City:Urbandale State:Iowa Zip:50322
Position:CEO, President
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Michael Skokan
First Name:Michael Last Name:Skokan
City:Waukee State:Iowa Zip:50263
Position:CFO, Treasurer
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Jeffrey Pierce
First Name:Jeffrey Last Name:Pierce
City:West Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50265
Position:Ass't Treasurer, Financial
Reporting% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
LC0040412 Item No. 10
Insurance Company Information
Policy Effective Date:10/09/2019 Policy Expiration
Date:
10/09/2020
Dram Cancel Date:
Outdoor Service Effective
Date:
Outdoor Service Expiration
Date:
Temp Transfer Effective
Date:
Temp Transfer Expiration Date:
Bond Effective
Continuously:
Insurance Company:DAKOTA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Michael Jurgens
First Name:Michael Last Name:Jurgens
City:Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50312
Position:Vice President, Secretary
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Andrew Schroeder
First Name:Andrew Last Name:Schroeder
City:Johnston State:Iowa Zip:50131
Position:AVP, Assistant Controller
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
License Application (Applicant
Name of Applicant:Hy-Vee, Inc.
Name of Business (DBA):Hy-Vee Food Store #1
Address of Premises:3800 W Lincoln Way
City
:
Ames Zip:5001400
00
State
:
IA
County:Story
Business
Phone:
(515) 292-5580
Mailing
Address:
5820 Westown Parkway
City
:
West Des Moines Zip:50266
)
Contact Person
Name
:
Kelly Palmer
Phone:(515) 267-2949 Email
Address:
kpalmer@hy-vee.com
Status of Business
BusinessType:Privately Held Corporation
Corporate ID Number:XXXXXXXXX Federal Employer ID
#:
XXXXXXXXX
Effective Date:10/20/2020
Expiration Date:
Classification
:
Class E Liquor License (LE)
Term:12 months
Privileges:
Ownership
Class E Liquor License (LE)
Stephen Meyer
First Name:Stephen Last Name:Meyer
City:Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50309
Position:Executive VP, Secretary
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Randy Edeker
First Name:Randy Last Name:Edeker
City:Urbandale State:Iowa Zip:50322
Position:CEO, President
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Michael Skokan
First Name:Michael Last Name:Skokan
City:Waukee State:Iowa Zip:50263
Position:CFO, Treasurer
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
LE0000085 Item No. 11
Insurance Company Information
Policy Effective Date:10/20/2019 Policy Expiration
Date:
01/01/1900
Dram Cancel Date:
Outdoor Service Effective
Date:
Outdoor Service Expiration
Date:
Temp Transfer Effective
Date:
Temp Transfer Expiration Date:
Bond Effective
Continuously:
2
Insurance Company:EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Jeffrey Pierce
First Name:Jeffrey Last Name:Pierce
City:West Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50265
Position:Asst. Treasurer, Financial
Reporting% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Andrew Schroeder
First Name:Andrew Last Name:Schroeder
City:Johnston State:Iowa Zip:50131
Position:AVP, Assistant Controller
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
License Application (Applicant
Name of Applicant:Hy-Vee, Inc.
Name of Business (DBA):Hy-Vee Food & Drugstore #2
Address of Premises:640 Lincolnway
City
:
Ames Zip:5001000
00
State
:
IA
County:Story
Business
Phone:
(515) 232-1961
Mailing
Address:
5820 Westown Parkway
City
:
West Des Moines Zip:502660000
)
Contact Person
Name
:
Kelly Palmer
Phone:(515) 267-2949 Email
Address:
kpalmer@Hy-vee.com
Status of Business
BusinessType:Privately Held Corporation
Corporate ID Number:XXXXXXXXX Federal Employer ID
#:
XXXXXXXXX
Effective Date:10/20/2020
Expiration Date:
Classification
:
Class E Liquor License (LE)
Term:12 months
Privileges:
Ownership
Class E Liquor License (LE)
Randy Edeker
First Name:Randy Last Name:Edeker
City:Urbandale State:Iowa Zip:50322
Position:CEO, President
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Michael Skokan
First Name:Michael Last Name:Skokan
City:Waukee State:Iowa Zip:50263
Position:CFO, Treasurer
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Jeffrey Pierce
First Name:Jeffrey Last Name:Pierce
City:West Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50265
Position:Asst. Treasurer, Financial
Reporting% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
LE0000095 Item No. 12
Insurance Company Information
Policy Effective Date:10/20/2019 Policy Expiration
Date:
01/01/1900
Dram Cancel Date:
Outdoor Service Effective
Date:
Outdoor Service Expiration
Date:
Temp Transfer Effective
Date:
Temp Transfer Expiration Date:
Bond Effective
Continuously:
2
Insurance Company:EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Michael Jurgens
First Name:Michael Last Name:Jurgens
City:Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50312
Position:Vice President, Secretary
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Andrew Schroeder
First Name:Andrew Last Name:Schroeder
City:Johnston State:Iowa Zip:50131
Position:AVP, Assistant Controller
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
License Application (Applicant
Name of Applicant:Hy-Vee Inc
Name of Business (DBA):Hy-Vee Drugstore
Address of Premises:500 Main St
City
:
Ames Zip:5001000
00
State
:
IA
County:Story
Business
Phone:
(515) 233-9855
Mailing
Address:
5820 Westown Pkwy
City
:
West Des Moines Zip:502660000
)
Contact Person
Name
:
Kelly Palmer
Phone:(515) 267-2949 Email
Address:
kpalmer@hy-vee.com
Status of Business
BusinessType:Privately Held Corporation
Corporate ID Number:XXXXXXXXX Federal Employer ID
#:
XXXXXXXXX
Effective Date:09/14/2020
Expiration Date:
Classification
:
Class E Liquor License (LE)
Term:12 months
Privileges:
Ownership
Class E Liquor License (LE)
Randy Edeker
First Name:Randy Last Name:Edeker
City:Urbandale State:Iowa Zip:50322
Position:CEO, President
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Michael Skokan
First Name:Michael Last Name:Skokan
City:Waukee State:Iowa Zip:50263
Position:CFO, Treasurer
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Jeffrey Pierce
First Name:Jeffrey Last Name:Pierce
City:West Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50265
Position:Asst. Treasurer, Financial
Reporting% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
LE0000810 Item No. 13
Insurance Company Information
Policy Effective Date:09/14/2019 Policy Expiration
Date:
01/01/1900
Dram Cancel Date:
Outdoor Service Effective
Date:
Outdoor Service Expiration
Date:
Temp Transfer Effective
Date:
Temp Transfer Expiration Date:
Bond Effective
Continuously:
2
Insurance Company:EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Michael Jurgens
First Name:Michael Last Name:Jurgens
City:Des Moines State:Iowa Zip:50312
Position:Vice President, Secretary
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Andrew Schroeder
First Name:Andrew Last Name:Schroeder
City:Johnston State:Iowa Zip:50131
Position:AVP, Assistant Controller
% of Ownership:0.00%U.S. Citizen: Yes
Smart Choice
515.239.5133 non-emergency
515.239.5130 Administration
515.239.5429 fax
515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
Police Department
MEMO
To: Mayor John Haila and Ames City Council Members
From: Lieutenant Tom Shelton, Ames Police Department
Date: January 11, 2020
Subject: Beer Permits & Liquor License Renewal Reference City Council Agenda
The Council agenda for January 28, 2020 includes beer permits and liquor license
renewals for:
Class E Liquor License with Class B Wine Permit and Class C Beer Permit
(Carryout Beer) - Fareway Stores, Inc. #093, 3619 Stange Road
Class E Liquor License with Class B Wine Permit and Class C Beer Permit
(Carryout Beer) - Fareway Stores, Inc. #386, 619 Burnett Avenue
Special Class C Liquor License with Outdoor Service and Sunday Sales - Blaze
Pizza, 2320 Lincoln Way
Class C Liquor License with Catering Privilege and Sunday Sales - Ge' Angelo's,
823 Wheeler St Suite #9
A review of police records for the past 12 months found no liquor law violations for any
of the above locations. The Ames Police Department recommends renewal of licenses
for all the above businesses.
Class C Liquor License with Outdoor Service and Sunday Sales - Blue Owl Bar,
223 Welch Avenue
A review of police records for the past 12 months found 3 liquor law violations for the
above location. A review of the cases found two individuals under the age of 21 who
admitted they got into the bar using fake ID’s and one individual who got into the bar
alleging no one checked for an ID.
Records indicate Blue Owl Bar attended the 2018 and 2019 bar meeting.
The Police Department will continue to monitor the above locations by conducting bar
checks and by educating the bar staff through trainings and yearly bar meetings. The
Ames Police Department recommends renewal of licenses for the above business.
Item No. 14
Caring People Quality Programs Exceptional Service
515.239.5119 main
-5320 fax
City Treasurer
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Roger Wisecup, CPA
City Treasurer
Date: January 6, 2020
Subject: Investment Report for Quarter Ending December 31, 2019
Introduction
The purpose of this memorandum is to present a report summarizing the performance
of the City of Ames investment portfolio for the quarter ending December 31, 2019.
Discussion
This report covers the period ending December 31, 2019, and presents a summary of
the investments on hand at the end of December 2019. The investments are valued at
amortized cost; this reflects the same basis that the assets are carried on the financial
records of the City. All investments are in compliance with the current Investment
Policy.
Comments
The Federal Reserve lowered the federal fund rate from 1.75-2.00 percent to 1.50-1.75
percent in the last quarter. The yield curve is flat, making shorter maturities pay the
same rates as longer maturities. Future investments will be made at the lower interest
rates and future interest income will decrease. The current outlook has the Federal
Reserve keeping rates steady for 2020. W e will continue to evaluate our current
investment strategy, remaining flexible to future investments while the Federal Reserve
evaluates the target rate.
Item No. 15
BOOK MARKET UN-REALIZED
DESCRIPTION VALUE VALUE GAIN/(LOSS)
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 40,000,000 40,000,000 0
FEDERAL AGENCY DISCOUNTS 1,975,729 1,983,880 8,151
FEDERAL AGENCY SECURITIES 66,396,208 66,453,043 56,835
COMMERCIAL PAPER 7,959,882 7,959,243 (639)
MISC COUPON SECURITIES 1,000,689 999,694 (995)
PASS THRU SECURITIES PAC/CMO
MONEY FUND SAVINGS ACCOUNTS 292,320 292,320 0
PASSBOOK/CHECKING ACCOUNTS 133,031 133,031 0
US TREASURY DISCOUNTS
US TREASURY SECURITIES 42,604,955 42,847,885 242,930
INVESTMENTS 160,362,813 160,669,096 306,283
CASH ACCOUNTS 26,139,046 26,139,046
ACCRUAL BASIS INVESTMENT EARNINGS YR-TO-DATE
GROSS EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS:1,717,385
INTEREST EARNED ON CASH:238,714
AND THE ACCUMULATED YEAR-TO-DATE
CITY OF AMES, IOWA
CASH AND INVESTMENTS SUMMARY
AND SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT EARNINGS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
YTM
365
Page 1
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
December 31, 2019
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investments FY 2019-2020
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360CUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Certificates of Deposit
2.710Bankers Trust12049434 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 04/30/20202.71009/10/2018 1,000,000.00 2.67312049434 120
2.700Bankers Trust12278608 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 04/15/20202.70009/10/2018 1,000,000.00 2.66312278608 105
2.700Bankers Trust12445234 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 05/15/20202.70009/10/2018 1,000,000.00 2.66312445234 135
2.710Bankers Trust12783856 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 05/29/20202.71009/10/2018 1,000,000.00 2.67312783856 149
2.720Bankers Trust12882805 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 06/19/20202.72009/10/2018 2,000,000.00 2.68312882805 170
2.490Bankers Trust13017497 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 02/15/20212.49004/16/2019 1,000,000.00 2.45613017497 411
2.490Bankers Trust13444568 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 02/26/20212.49004/16/2019 1,000,000.00 2.45613444568 422
1.670Bankers Trust13487203 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 07/30/20211.67010/15/2019 1,000,000.00 1.64713487203 576
1.730Bankers Trust13518474 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 12/15/20201.73010/15/2019 1,000,000.00 1.70613518474 349
1.690Bankers Trust13716374 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 06/01/20211.69010/15/2019 2,500,000.00 1.66713716374 517
1.720Bankers Trust13945546 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 01/29/20211.72010/15/2019 1,000,000.00 1.69613945546 394
1.690First National Bank50941 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 08/13/20211.69010/16/2019 1,000,000.00 1.66750941 590
1.690First National Bank50942 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 12/15/20211.69010/16/2019 1,500,000.00 1.66750942 714
1.590First National Bank50971 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 01/30/20211.59011/21/2019 1,000,000.00 1.56850971 395
1.590First National Bank50972 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 07/30/20211.59011/21/2019 1,000,000.00 1.56850972 576
2.660Great Western Bank144303455 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 06/01/20222.66004/16/2019 4,000,000.00 2.624144303455 882
2.700US Bank433071437 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 06/01/20212.70004/24/2018 4,000,000.00 2.663433071437 517
2.990US Bank433071659 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 06/01/20222.99005/24/2018 6,000,000.00 2.949433071659 882
1.710US Bank795014295 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 06/01/20221.71010/16/2019 3,000,000.00 1.687795014295 882
1.780US Bank795014296 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 06/01/20231.78010/16/2019 5,000,000.00 1.756795014296 1,247
40,000,000.00 2.25440,000,000.0040,000,000.0041,870,967.74Subtotal and Average 2.285 667
Money Market
0.300Great Western Bank4531558874B 292,319.99 292,319.99 0.300292,319.99 0.296SYS4531558874B 1
292,319.99 0.296292,319.99292,319.99292,306.51Subtotal and Average 0.300 1
Passbook/Checking Accounts
0.150Wells Fargo6952311634B 133,030.98 133,030.98 0.150133,030.98 0.148SYS6952311634B 1
133,030.98 0.148133,030.98133,030.98133,026.22Subtotal and Average 0.150 1
Commercial Paper Disc. -Amortizing
2.072Santander Bank0879-19 1,000,000.00 999,548.89 01/09/20202.03009/13/2019 999,701.00 2.04405971RA95 8
1.994Bank Tokyo Mitsubishi0890-19A 1,500,000.00 1,494,150.00 03/13/20201.95010/04/2019 1,494,150.00 1.96762479LCD5 72
1.994Bank Tokyo Mitsubishi0890-19B 1,500,000.00 1,494,150.00 03/13/20201.95010/04/2019 1,494,150.00 1.96762479LCD5 72
1.823Bank Tokyo Mitsubishi0894-19 1,000,000.00 997,812.22 02/14/20201.79011/15/2019 997,810.00 1.79862479LBE4 44
1.919Bank Tokyo Mitsubishi0896-19A 1,000,000.00 991,263.89 06/19/20201.85011/21/2019 991,260.00 1.89262479LFK6 170
Portfolio 2020
AC
Run Date: 01/17/2020 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
YTM
365
Page 2
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
December 31, 2019
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investments FY 2019-2020
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360CUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Commercial Paper Disc. -Amortizing
1.919Bank Tokyo Mitsubishi0896-19B 500,000.00 495,631.94 06/19/20201.85011/21/2019 495,630.00 1.89262479LFK6 170
1.866LMA Americas0897-19A 1,000,000.00 991,550.00 06/18/20201.80011/21/2019 991,028.00 1.84153944QFJ4 169
1.866LMA Americas0897-19B 500,000.00 495,775.00 06/18/20201.80011/21/2019 495,514.00 1.84153944QFJ4 169
7,959,881.94 1.9187,959,243.008,000,000.009,903,819.90Subtotal and Average 1.945 97
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
1.635Federal Farm Credit0732-16 940,000.00 939,711.00 02/10/20221.62008/15/2016 938,490.36 1.6133133EGQM0 771
1.317Federal Farm Credit0743-16 8,000,000.00 7,999,501.78 05/15/20201.30010/14/2016 7,988,952.00 1.2993133EGQQ1 135
1.341Federal Farm Credit0746-16 5,000,000.00 4,999,650.00 05/07/20201.32011/07/2016 4,993,885.00 1.3223133EGD69 127
1.864Federal Farm Credit0789-17 2,000,000.00 1,998,361.25 11/23/20201.77010/13/2017 1,999,750.00 1.8393133EHKF9 327
2.532Federal Farm Credit0816-18 1,000,000.00 999,858.24 01/10/20201.95005/24/2018 1,000,073.00 2.4973133EH6L2 9
1.902Federal Farm Credit0869-19A 1,500,000.00 1,504,672.19 11/30/20202.25007/03/2019 1,508,010.00 1.8763133EKNQ5 334
1.902Federal Farm Credit0869-19B 1,000,000.00 1,003,114.79 11/30/20202.25007/03/2019 1,005,340.00 1.8763133EKNQ5 334
1.590Federal Farm Credit0874-19 1,000,000.00 1,010,565.91 04/29/20212.40008/16/2019 1,010,054.00 1.5683133EKJP2 484
2.229Federal Farm Credit0878-19 5,000,000.00 4,998,144.04 05/13/20242.22008/29/2019 5,000,330.00 2.1993133EKZR0 1,594
1.721Federal Farm Credit0886-19 1,500,000.00 1,513,275.51 04/29/20212.40009/13/2019 1,515,081.00 1.6973133EKJP2 484
1.941Federal Farm Credit0891-19 1,500,000.00 1,498,735.22 10/15/20211.89010/16/2019 1,499,714.25 1.9153133EK2C9 653
1.694Federal Farm Credit0895-17 1,000,000.00 999,772.71 05/13/20211.67011/15/2019 999,127.78 1.6713133EK6Y7 498
1.880Federal Home Loan Bank0778-17 3,250,000.00 3,249,751.87 06/01/20211.87509/15/2017 3,249,879.75 1.8553130ABHF6 517
1.856Federal Home Loan Bank0791-17 1,135,000.00 1,135,394.12 11/29/20211.87510/13/2017 1,140,227.81 1.8303130AABG2 698
2.620Federal Home Loan Bank0817-18 2,000,000.00 2,000,040.61 05/28/20202.62505/24/2018 2,008,048.00 2.5843130AECJ7 148
2.646Federal Home Loan Bank0823-18 1,000,000.00 998,985.79 03/13/20202.12508/03/2018 1,000,976.00 2.6093130A12B3 72
2.635Federal Home Loan Bank0824-18 1,000,000.00 999,370.89 03/30/20202.37508/03/2018 1,001,818.00 2.5993130ADUJ9 89
2.700Federal Home Loan Bank0828-18 1,000,000.00 1,002,921.95 06/12/20203.37509/10/2018 1,007,721.00 2.663313370E38 163
2.970Federal Home Loan Bank0838-18 1,000,000.00 998,795.75 08/13/20202.77011/07/2018 1,006,458.00 2.9303132X04G3 225
2.911Federal Home Loan Bank0840-18 1,000,000.00 999,748.48 09/11/20202.87511/15/2018 1,008,402.00 2.871313370US5 254
2.515Federal Home Loan Bank0854-19 1,500,000.00 1,499,956.25 03/11/20202.50003/11/2019 1,502,491.50 2.4813130AG2D6 70
2.523Federal Home Loan Bank0859-19 1,000,000.00 994,712.41 01/15/20212.00003/08/2019 1,003,485.00 2.4893132X0MT5 380
1.620Federal Home Loan Bank0871-19A 1,000,000.00 1,001,522.97 03/12/20211.75008/16/2019 1,001,652.00 1.598313382K69 436
1.620Federal Home Loan Bank0871-19B 1,000,000.00 1,001,522.97 03/12/20211.75008/16/2019 1,001,652.00 1.598313382K69 436
1.544Federal Home Loan Bank0877-19 1,000,000.00 1,004,683.97 06/11/20211.87508/16/2019 1,003,486.00 1.523313379RB7 527
1.734Federal Home Loan Bank0884-19 2,000,000.00 2,014,601.04 06/11/20212.25009/13/2019 2,017,614.00 1.7103130A1W95 527
1.750Federal Home Loan Bank0892-19 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 10/28/20221.75010/28/2019 1,996,772.00 1.7263130AHEN9 1,031
1.604Federal Home Loan Bank0901-19 1,000,000.00 1,017,483.35 09/10/20212.37511/21/2019 1,017,217.03 1.582313378JP7 618
1.601Federal Home Loan Bank0905-19 1,500,000.00 1,529,213.28 12/10/20212.62511/21/2019 1,528,404.00 1.579313376C94 709
1.500Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co.0720-16 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 05/26/20201.50005/26/2016 999,290.00 1.4793134G9MN4 146
Portfolio 2020
AC
Run Date: 01/17/2020 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
YTM
365
Page 3
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
December 31, 2019
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investments FY 2019-2020
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360CUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
2.677Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co.0850-18 1,000,000.00 993,178.63 11/17/20201.87512/20/2018 1,001,885.00 2.6403137EAEK1 321
1.571Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co.0876-19 1,000,000.00 1,003,158.88 05/28/20211.80008/16/2019 1,002,360.00 1.5503134G45K0 513
1.500Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc.0733-16 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 05/28/20211.50008/30/2016 3,988,876.00 1.4803136G33W3 513
1.512Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc.0744-16 1,550,000.00 1,549,779.19 04/12/20211.50010/14/2016 1,546,342.00 1.4913136G4FL2 467
1.500Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc.0745-16 450,000.00 450,000.00 05/25/20211.50010/14/2016 448,748.55 1.4793136G3MW2 510
2.571Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc.0820-18 1,000,000.00 999,487.50 01/21/20201.62508/03/2018 1,000,003.00 2.5353135G0A78 20
2.616Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc.0822-18 1,000,000.00 998,279.91 02/28/20201.50008/03/2018 999,803.00 2.5803135G0T29 58
2.927Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc.0841-18 1,500,000.00 1,486,800.76 09/28/20201.70011/15/2018 1,500,576.00 2.8873136G1H28 271
2.693Federal Nat'l Mtg. Assoc.0848-18 1,000,000.00 1,001,454.84 10/30/20202.87512/20/2018 1,010,048.00 2.6563135G0U84 303
66,396,208.05 1.87566,453,043.0366,325,000.0067,374,278.23Subtotal and Average 1.901 447
Federal Agency Disc. -Amortizing
1.878Freddie Discount0880-19 1,000,000.00 996,430.28 03/12/20201.81009/13/2019 997,092.00 1.852313396UE1 71
2.749Resolution Funding Corp0847-18 1,000,000.00 979,298.65 10/15/20202.58812/20/2018 986,788.00 2.71176116FAE7 288
1,975,728.93 2.2781,983,880.002,000,000.001,973,896.56Subtotal and Average 2.310 179
Treasury Coupon Securities
1.627U.S. Treasury0769-17 2,000,000.00 1,993,129.16 05/31/20211.37504/20/2017 1,993,438.00 1.605912828R77 516
2.725U.S. Treasury0831-18 1,000,000.00 998,914.00 06/30/20202.50009/14/2018 1,004,219.00 2.688912828XY1 181
2.733U.S. Treasury0832-18 1,000,000.00 993,586.12 07/15/20201.50009/14/2018 999,219.00 2.6969128282J8 196
2.963U.S. Treasury0835-18 2,500,000.00 2,438,183.61 05/31/20221.87510/15/2018 2,516,407.50 2.923912828XD7 881
2.964U.S. Treasury0836-18 2,500,000.00 2,431,038.55 05/31/20221.75010/15/2018 2,508,985.00 2.923912828XR6 881
2.900U.S. Treasury0837-18 1,000,000.00 992,824.87 07/31/20201.62511/07/2018 1,000,000.00 2.860912828XM7 212
2.653U.S. Treasury0845-18 1,500,000.00 1,499,279.85 01/15/20201.37512/20/2018 1,499,532.00 2.617912828V31 14
2.653U.S. Treasury0846-18 1,500,000.00 1,498,307.25 01/31/20201.25012/20/2018 1,499,296.50 2.617912828H52 30
2.517U.S. Treasury0855-19 1,500,000.00 1,499,031.75 03/31/20202.25003/08/2019 1,502,109.00 2.4829128284C1 90
2.502U.S. Treasury0856-19 1,000,000.00 1,000,793.56 08/31/20202.62503/08/2019 1,006,406.00 2.4689128284Y3 243
2.488U.S. Treasury0858-19 1,000,000.00 1,000,107.19 12/31/20202.50003/08/2019 1,008,125.00 2.4549128285S5 365
2.459U.S. Treasury0860-19 3,000,000.00 2,919,336.62 05/31/20231.62503/08/2019 2,998,593.00 2.426912828R69 1,246
1.615U.S. Treasury0870-19 1,000,000.00 1,005,663.84 01/15/20212.00008/16/2019 1,005,333.13 1.5939128283Q1 380
1.600U.S. Treasury0872-19A 1,500,000.00 1,493,566.32 03/31/20211.25008/16/2019 1,492,969.50 1.578912828Q37 455
1.600U.S. Treasury0872-19B 1,000,000.00 995,710.88 03/31/20211.25008/16/2019 995,313.00 1.578912828Q37 455
1.580U.S. Treasury0873-19 1,000,000.00 1,010,049.34 04/15/20212.37508/16/2019 1,009,531.00 1.5589128284G2 470
1.816U.S. Treasury0881-19 2,000,000.00 2,006,680.21 06/30/20202.50009/13/2019 2,008,438.00 1.791912828XY1 181
1.771U.S. Treasury0882-19 1,000,000.00 997,084.67 09/30/20201.37509/13/2019 997,813.00 1.747912828L65 273
1.772U.S. Treasury0883-19 1,000,000.00 997,425.27 01/31/20211.37509/13/2019 998,675.02 1.747912828N89 396
Portfolio 2020
AC
Run Date: 01/17/2020 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
YTM
365
Page 4
Par Value Book Value
Maturity
Date
Stated
RateMarket Value
December 31, 2019
Portfolio Details - Investments
Average
BalanceIssuer
Portfolio Management
Investments FY 2019-2020
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360CUSIPInvestment #
Purchase
Date
Treasury Coupon Securities
1.719U.S. Treasury0887-19 1,000,000.00 991,286.68 06/30/20211.12509/13/2019 992,969.00 1.695912828S27 546
1.711U.S. Treasury0888-19 1,000,000.00 1,018,029.25 07/15/20212.62509/13/2019 1,009,592.89 1.688912828Y20 561
1.540U.S. Treasury0893-19 6,000,000.00 6,240,046.10 05/31/20232.75011/04/2019 6,217,500.00 1.5199128284S6 1,246
1.607U.S. Treasury0898-19 1,000,000.00 1,002,523.54 12/15/20201.87511/21/2019 1,002,188.00 1.5859128283L2 349
1.600U.S. Treasury0899-19 1,000,000.00 1,025,635.16 08/15/20212.75011/21/2019 1,025,292.37 1.5789128284W7 592
1.602U.S. Treasury0900-19 1,000,000.00 1,001,702.20 08/31/20211.50011/21/2019 1,001,660.12 1.580912828YC8 608
1.594U.S. Treasury0902-19 1,000,000.00 993,564.63 09/30/20211.12511/21/2019 993,317.36 1.572912828T34 638
1.600U.S. Treasury0903-19 1,000,000.00 1,025,253.32 10/15/20212.87511/21/2019 1,025,094.42 1.5789128285F3 653
1.586U.S. Treasury0904-19 1,500,000.00 1,536,200.72 11/15/20212.87511/21/2019 1,535,867.85 1.5649128285L0 684
42,604,954.66 2.03342,847,884.6642,500,000.0042,622,055.28Subtotal and Average 2.062 614
Miscellaneous Coupon Securities
2.178Federal Farm Credit0849-18 1,000,000.00 1,000,688.54 11/12/20201.65612/20/2018 999,694.00 2.1493133EH2K8 316
1,000,688.54 2.149999,694.001,000,000.001,000,721.23Subtotal and Average 2.178 316
2.016165,171,071.66 160,250,350.97 2.044 524160,669,095.66 160,362,813.09Total and Average
Portfolio 2020
AC
Run Date: 01/17/2020 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Page 1
Par Value
Stated
Rate
December 31, 2019
Investment Status Report - Investments
Portfolio Management
Book Value
Maturity
Date
Current
Principal
Investments FY 2019-2020
YTM
365
YTM
360
Payment
DatesCUSIPInvestment #Issuer
Purchase
Date
Accrued Interest
At Purchase
Certificates of Deposit
BT12049434 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.002.710 04/30/202012049434 04/30 - At Maturity09/10/2018 1,000,000.002.7102.673
BT12278608 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.002.700 04/15/202012278608 04/15 - At Maturity09/10/2018 1,000,000.002.7002.663
BT12445234 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.002.700 05/15/202012445234 05/15 - At Maturity09/10/2018 1,000,000.002.7002.663
BT12783856 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.002.710 05/29/202012783856 05/29 - At Maturity09/10/2018 1,000,000.002.7102.673
BT12882805 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.002.720 06/19/202012882805 06/19 - At Maturity09/10/2018 2,000,000.002.7202.683
BT13017497 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.002.490 02/15/202113017497 02/15 - At Maturity04/16/2019 1,000,000.002.4902.456
BT13444568 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.002.490 02/26/202113444568 02/26 - At Maturity04/16/2019 1,000,000.002.4902.456
BT13487203 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.001.670 07/30/202113487203 07/30 - At Maturity10/15/2019 1,000,000.001.6701.647
BT13518474 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.001.730 12/15/202013518474 12/15 - At Maturity10/15/2019 1,000,000.001.7301.706
BT13716374 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.001.690 06/01/202113716374 06/01 - At Maturity10/15/2019 2,500,000.001.6901.667
BT13945546 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.001.720 01/29/202113945546 01/29 - At Maturity10/15/2019 1,000,000.001.7201.696
FN50941 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.001.690 08/13/202150941 08/13 - At Maturity10/16/2019 1,000,000.001.6901.667
FN50942 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.001.690 12/15/202150942 12/15 - At Maturity10/16/2019 1,500,000.001.6901.667
FN50971 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.001.590 01/30/202150971 01/30 - At Maturity11/21/2019 1,000,000.001.5901.568
FN50972 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.001.590 07/30/202150972 07/30 - At Maturity11/21/2019 1,000,000.001.5901.568
GWB144303455 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.002.660 06/01/2022144303455 06/01 - At Maturity04/16/2019 4,000,000.002.6602.624
USB433071437 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.002.700 06/01/2021433071437 06/01 - 12/0104/24/2018 4,000,000.002.7002.663
USB433071659 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.002.990 06/01/2022433071659 06/01 - 12/0105/24/2018 6,000,000.002.9902.949
USB795014295 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.001.710 06/01/2022795014295 12/01 - 06/0110/16/2019 3,000,000.001.7101.687
USB795014296 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.001.780 06/01/2023795014296 12/01 - 06/0110/16/2019 5,000,000.001.7801.756
40,000,000.00Certificates of Deposit Totals 40,000,000.000.002.25440,000,000.00 2.285
Money Market
GWB4531558874B 292,319.99 292,319.990.300SYS4531558874B 07/01 - Monthly 292,319.990.3000.296
292,319.99Money Market Totals 292,319.990.000.296292,319.99 0.300
Passbook/Checking Accounts
WF6952311634B 133,030.98 133,030.980.150SYS6952311634B 07/01 - Monthly 133,030.980.1500.148
133,030.98Passbook/Checking Accounts Totals 133,030.980.000.148133,030.98 0.150
Commercial Paper Disc. -Amortizing
BANSDA0879-19 1,000,000.00 999,548.892.030 01/09/202005971RA95 01/09 - At Maturity09/13/2019 993,346.112.0722.044
BTMUFJ0890-19A 1,500,000.00 1,494,150.001.950 03/13/202062479LCD5 03/13 - At Maturity10/04/2019 1,486,918.751.9941.967
BTMUFJ0890-19B 1,500,000.00 1,494,150.001.950 03/13/202062479LCD5 03/13 - At Maturity10/04/2019 1,486,918.751.9941.967
BTMUFJ0894-19 1,000,000.00 997,812.221.790 02/14/202062479LBE4 02/14 - At Maturity11/15/2019 995,475.281.8231.798
Portfolio 2020
AC
Run Date: 01/17/2020 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PMS) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Page 2
Par Value
Stated
Rate
December 31, 2019
Investment Status Report - Investments
Portfolio Management
Book Value
Maturity
Date
Current
Principal
Investments FY 2019-2020
YTM
365
YTM
360
Payment
DatesCUSIPInvestment #Issuer
Purchase
Date
Accrued Interest
At Purchase
Commercial Paper Disc. -Amortizing
BTMUFJ0896-19A 1,000,000.00 991,263.891.850 06/19/202062479LFK6 06/19 - At Maturity11/21/2019 989,156.951.9191.892
BTMUFJ0896-19B 500,000.00 495,631.941.850 06/19/202062479LFK6 06/19 - At Maturity11/21/2019 494,578.471.9191.892
LMAUS0897-19A 1,000,000.00 991,550.001.800 06/18/202053944QFJ4 06/18 - At Maturity11/21/2019 989,500.001.8661.841
LMAUS0897-19B 500,000.00 495,775.001.800 06/18/202053944QFJ4 06/18 - At Maturity11/21/2019 494,750.001.8661.841
7,959,881.94Commercial Paper Disc. -Amortizing Totals 7,930,644.310.001.9188,000,000.00 1.945
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
FFCB0732-16 940,000.00 939,711.001.620 02/10/20223133EGQM0 02/10 - 08/10 Received08/15/2016 939,248.001.6351.613
FFCB0743-16 8,000,000.00 7,999,501.781.300 05/15/20203133EGQQ1 11/15 - 05/15 Received10/14/2016 7,995,200.001.3171.299
FFCB0746-16 5,000,000.00 4,999,650.001.320 05/07/20203133EGD69 05/07 - 11/0711/07/2016 4,996,500.001.3411.322
FFCB0789-17 2,000,000.00 1,998,361.251.770 11/23/20203133EHKF9 11/23 - 05/23 Received10/13/2017 1,994,300.001.8641.839
FFCB0816-18 1,000,000.00 999,858.241.950 01/10/20203133EH6L2 07/10 - 01/10 Received05/24/2018 990,770.002.5322.497
FFCB0869-19A 1,500,000.00 1,504,672.192.250 11/30/20203133EKNQ5 11/30 - 05/30 Received07/03/2019 1,507,200.001.9021.876
FFCB0869-19B 1,000,000.00 1,003,114.792.250 11/30/20203133EKNQ5 11/30 - 05/30 Received07/03/2019 1,004,800.001.9021.876
FFCB0874-19 1,000,000.00 1,010,565.912.400 04/29/20213133EKJP2 10/29 - 04/29 Received08/16/2019 1,013,550.001.5901.568
FFCB0878-19 5,000,000.00 4,998,144.042.220 05/13/20243133EKZR0 11/13 - 05/13 Received08/29/2019 4,998,000.002.2292.199
FFCB0886-19 1,500,000.00 1,513,275.512.400 04/29/20213133EKJP2 10/29 - 04/29 Received09/13/2019 1,516,275.001.7211.697
FFCB0891-19 1,500,000.00 1,498,735.221.890 10/15/20213133EK2C9 04/15 - 10/15 78.7510/16/2019 1,498,500.001.9411.915
FFCB0895-17 1,000,000.00 999,772.711.670 05/13/20213133EK6Y7 05/13 - 11/13 92.7811/15/2019 999,650.001.6941.671
FHLB0778-17 3,250,000.00 3,249,751.871.875 06/01/20213130ABHF6 12/01 - 06/01 Received09/15/2017 3,249,350.001.8801.855
FHLB0791-17 1,135,000.00 1,135,394.121.875 11/29/20213130AABG2 11/29 - 05/29 Received10/13/2017 1,135,851.251.8561.830
FHLB0817-18 2,000,000.00 2,000,040.612.625 05/28/20203130AECJ7 11/28 - 05/28 Received05/24/2018 2,000,200.002.6202.584
FHLB0823-18 1,000,000.00 998,985.792.125 03/13/20203130A12B3 09/13 - 03/13 Received08/03/2018 991,830.002.6462.609
FHLB0824-18 1,000,000.00 999,370.892.375 03/30/20203130ADUJ9 09/30 - 03/30 Received08/03/2018 995,780.002.6352.599
FHLB0828-18 1,000,000.00 1,002,921.953.375 06/12/2020313370E38 12/12 - 06/12 Received09/10/2018 1,011,470.002.7002.663
FHLB0838-18 1,000,000.00 998,795.752.770 08/13/20203132X04G3 02/13 - 08/13 Received11/07/2018 996,550.002.9702.930
FHLB0840-18 1,000,000.00 999,748.482.875 09/11/2020313370US5 03/11 - 09/11 Received11/15/2018 999,340.002.9112.871
FHLB0854-19 1,500,000.00 1,499,956.252.500 03/11/20203130AG2D6 09/11 - 03/1103/11/2019 1,499,775.002.5152.481
FHLB0859-19 1,000,000.00 994,712.412.000 01/15/20213132X0MT5 07/15 - 01/15 Received03/08/2019 990,570.002.5232.489
FHLB0871-19A 1,000,000.00 1,001,522.971.750 03/12/2021313382K69 09/12 - 03/12 Received08/16/2019 1,002,000.001.6201.598
FHLB0871-19B 1,000,000.00 1,001,522.971.750 03/12/2021313382K69 09/12 - 03/12 Received08/16/2019 1,002,000.001.6201.598
FHLB0877-19 1,000,000.00 1,004,683.971.875 06/11/2021313379RB7 12/11 - 06/11 Received08/16/2019 1,005,900.001.5441.523
FHLB0884-19 2,000,000.00 2,014,601.042.250 06/11/20213130A1W95 12/11 - 06/11 Received09/13/2019 2,017,633.561.7341.710
FHLB0892-19 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.001.750 10/28/20223130AHEN9 04/28 - 10/2810/28/2019 2,000,000.001.7501.726
FHLB0901-19 1,000,000.00 1,017,483.352.375 09/10/2021313378JP7 03/10 - 09/10 4,684.0311/21/2019 1,013,640.001.6041.582
Portfolio 2020
AC
Run Date: 01/17/2020 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PMS) 7.3.0
Page 3
Par Value
Stated
Rate
December 31, 2019
Investment Status Report - Investments
Portfolio Management
Book Value
Maturity
Date
Current
Principal
Investments FY 2019-2020
YTM
365
YTM
360
Payment
DatesCUSIPInvestment #Issuer
Purchase
Date
Accrued Interest
At Purchase
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
FHLB0905-19 1,500,000.00 1,529,213.282.625 12/10/2021313376C94 12/10 - 06/10 Received11/21/2019 1,530,885.001.6011.579
FHLMC0720-16 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.001.500 05/26/20203134G9MN4 11/26 - 05/2605/26/2016 1,000,000.001.5001.479
FHLMC0850-18 1,000,000.00 993,178.631.875 11/17/20203137EAEK1 05/17 - 11/17 Received12/20/2018 985,170.002.6772.640
FHLMC0876-19 1,000,000.00 1,003,158.881.800 05/28/20213134G45K0 11/28 - 05/28 Received08/16/2019 1,004,000.001.5711.550
FNMA0733-16 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.001.500 05/28/20213136G33W3 11/28 - 05/2808/30/2016 4,000,000.001.5001.480
FNMA0744-16 1,550,000.00 1,549,779.191.500 04/12/20213136G4FL2 04/12 - 10/12 Received10/14/2016 1,549,225.001.5121.491
FNMA0745-16 450,000.00 450,000.001.500 05/25/20213136G3MW2 11/25 - 05/25 Received10/14/2016 450,000.001.5001.479
FNMA0820-18 1,000,000.00 999,487.501.625 01/21/20203135G0A78 01/21 - 07/21 Received08/03/2018 986,470.002.5712.535
FNMA0822-18 1,000,000.00 998,279.911.500 02/28/20203135G0T29 08/28 - 02/28 Received08/03/2018 982,950.002.6162.580
FNMA0841-18 1,500,000.00 1,486,800.761.700 09/28/20203136G1H28 03/28 - 09/28 Received11/15/2018 1,466,730.002.9272.887
FNMA0848-18 1,000,000.00 1,001,454.842.875 10/30/20203135G0U84 04/30 - 10/30 Received12/20/2018 1,003,260.002.6932.656
66,396,208.05Federal Agency Coupon Securities Totals 66,324,572.814,855.561.87566,325,000.00 1.901
Federal Agency Disc. -Amortizing
FMCDN0880-19 1,000,000.00 996,430.281.810 03/12/2020313396UE1 03/12 - At Maturity09/13/2019 990,899.721.8781.852
RFCSP0847-18 1,000,000.00 979,298.652.588 10/15/202076116FAE7 10/15 - At Maturity12/20/2018 952,200.002.7492.711
1,975,728.93Federal Agency Disc. -Amortizing Totals 1,943,099.720.002.2782,000,000.00 2.310
Treasury Coupon Securities
US TRE0769-17 2,000,000.00 1,993,129.161.375 05/31/2021912828R77 05/31 - 11/30 Received04/20/2017 1,980,000.001.6271.605
US TRE0831-18 1,000,000.00 998,914.002.500 06/30/2020912828XY1 12/31 - 06/30 Received09/14/2018 996,070.002.7252.688
US TRE0832-18 1,000,000.00 993,586.121.500 07/15/20209128282J8 01/15 - 07/15 Received09/14/2018 978,075.002.7332.696
US TRE0835-18 2,500,000.00 2,438,183.611.875 05/31/2022912828XD7 11/30 - 05/31 Received10/15/2018 2,407,100.002.9632.923
US TRE0836-18 2,500,000.00 2,431,038.551.750 05/31/2022912828XR6 11/30 - 05/31 Received10/15/2018 2,396,362.132.9642.923
US TRE0837-18 1,000,000.00 992,824.871.625 07/31/2020912828XM7 01/31 - 07/31 Received11/07/2018 978,610.002.9002.860
US TRE0845-18 1,500,000.00 1,499,279.851.375 01/15/2020912828V31 01/15 - 07/15 Received12/20/2018 1,479,887.272.6532.617
US TRE0846-18 1,500,000.00 1,498,307.251.250 01/31/2020912828H52 01/31 - 07/31 Received12/20/2018 1,477,035.032.6532.617
US TRE0855-19 1,500,000.00 1,499,031.752.250 03/31/20209128284C1 03/31 - 09/30 Received03/08/2019 1,495,815.002.5172.482
US TRE0856-19 1,000,000.00 1,000,793.562.625 08/31/20209128284Y3 08/31 - 02/29 Received03/08/2019 1,001,770.002.5022.468
US TRE0858-19 1,000,000.00 1,000,107.192.500 12/31/20209128285S5 06/30 - 12/31 Received03/08/2019 1,000,195.002.4882.454
US TRE0860-19 3,000,000.00 2,919,336.621.625 05/31/2023912828R69 05/31 - 11/30 Received03/08/2019 2,899,980.002.4592.426
US TRE0870-19 1,000,000.00 1,005,663.842.000 01/15/20219128283Q1 01/15 - 07/15 1,739.1308/16/2019 1,005,350.001.6151.593
US TRE0872-19A 1,500,000.00 1,493,566.321.250 03/31/2021912828Q37 09/30 - 03/31 Received08/16/2019 1,491,615.001.6001.578
US TRE0872-19B 1,000,000.00 995,710.881.250 03/31/2021912828Q37 09/30 - 03/31 Received08/16/2019 994,410.001.6001.578
US TRE0873-19 1,000,000.00 1,010,049.342.375 04/15/20219128284G2 10/15 - 04/15 Received08/16/2019 1,013,000.001.5801.558
Portfolio 2020
AC
Run Date: 01/17/2020 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PMS) 7.3.0
Page 4
Par Value
Stated
Rate
December 31, 2019
Investment Status Report - Investments
Portfolio Management
Book Value
Maturity
Date
Current
Principal
Investments FY 2019-2020
YTM
365
YTM
360
Payment
DatesCUSIPInvestment #Issuer
Purchase
Date
Accrued Interest
At Purchase
Treasury Coupon Securities
US TRE0881-19 2,000,000.00 2,006,680.212.500 06/30/2020912828XY1 12/31 - 06/30 Received09/13/2019 2,010,740.001.8161.791
US TRE0882-19 1,000,000.00 997,084.671.375 09/30/2020912828L65 09/30 - 03/31 Received09/13/2019 995,910.001.7711.747
US TRE0883-19 1,000,000.00 997,425.271.375 01/31/2021912828N89 01/31 - 07/31 1,644.0209/13/2019 994,609.381.7721.747
US TRE0887-19 1,000,000.00 991,286.681.125 06/30/2021912828S27 12/31 - 06/30 Received09/13/2019 989,531.251.7191.695
US TRE0888-19 1,000,000.00 1,018,029.252.625 07/15/2021912828Y20 01/15 - 07/15 4,279.8909/13/2019 1,016,445.311.7111.688
US TRE0893-19 6,000,000.00 6,240,046.102.750 05/31/20239128284S6 11/30 - 05/31 Received11/04/2019 6,251,220.001.5401.519
US TRE0898-19 1,000,000.00 1,002,523.541.875 12/15/20209128283L2 12/15 - 06/15 Received11/21/2019 1,002,820.001.6071.585
US TRE0899-19 1,000,000.00 1,025,635.162.750 08/15/20219128284W7 02/15 - 08/15 7,323.3711/21/2019 1,019,580.001.6001.578
US TRE0900-19 1,000,000.00 1,001,702.201.500 08/31/2021912828YC8 02/29 - 08/31 3,379.1211/21/2019 998,210.001.6021.580
US TRE0902-19 1,000,000.00 993,564.631.125 09/30/2021912828T34 03/31 - 09/30 1,598.3611/21/2019 991,450.001.5941.572
US TRE0903-19 1,000,000.00 1,025,253.322.875 10/15/20219128285F3 04/15 - 10/15 2,906.4211/21/2019 1,023,750.001.6001.578
US TRE0904-19 1,500,000.00 1,536,200.722.875 11/15/20219128285L0 05/15 - 11/15 710.8511/21/2019 1,537,617.191.5861.564
42,604,954.66Treasury Coupon Securities Totals 42,427,157.5623,581.162.03342,500,000.00 2.062
Miscellaneous Coupon Securities
FFCB0849-18 1,000,000.00 1,000,688.541.656 11/12/20203133EH2K8 02/12 - Quarterly Received12/20/2018 1,001,510.002.1782.149
1,000,688.54Miscellaneous Coupon Securities Totals 1,001,510.000.002.1491,000,000.00 2.178
160,362,813.09Investment Totals 160,052,335.3728,436.72160,250,350.97 2.016 2.044
Portfolio 2020
AC
Run Date: 01/17/2020 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PMS) 7.3.0
For Quarter Ending December 31, 2019
0.27%
59.80%
39.94%
Portfolio by Asset Class
Cash and Equivalents
Long Term
Short Term
For Quarter Ending December 31, 2019
0.62%
8.42%
3.43%
2.81%
19.00%
14.59%
2.50%6.55%
2.68%
0.94%
0.62%
26.52%
11.23%
0.08%
Par Value by Issuer Graph
BANSDA
BT
BTMSB
FNB
FFCB
FHLB
FHLMC
FNMA
GWB
LMAA
RESFUND
UST
USB
WF
For Quarter Ending December 31, 2019
0.18%0.08%
24.94%
4.96%
41.40%
1.23%
0.62%
26.57%
Book Value By Investment Type
Money Market
Passbook/Checking Accounts
Certificate of Deposit
Commercial Paper
Federal Agency Coupon Securities
Federal Agency Disc.-Amortizing
Misc Coupon Securities
Treasury Coupon Securities
For Quarter Ending December 31, 2019
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
Investment Yield by Type
ITEM#: 16
DATE: 01-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT FOR FLY IOWA 2020 EVENT
BACKGROUND:
The City was contacted by its airport Fixed Base Operator (FBO), Central Iowa Air Service
(CIAS), regarding the possibility of hosting an airshow at the Ames Municipal Airport. The
airshow is planned for August 8, 2020, with a potential rain date of August 9, 2020. The
event is co-sponsored through an agreement that includes the Ames Municipal Airport
(the City), the Fly Iowa 2020 Committee, and Iowa Aviation Promotion Group, Inc. (IAPG).
This is a free event open to the public and is expected to attract 5,000 to 7,000 people.
There will be food and drink available for purchase as well as other fundraising activities.
Any proceeds of the event will be donated to a local charity; the Fly Iowa 2020 Committee
has indicated that the Boys & Girls Club of Ames is the beneficiary of the event.
The event requires an agreement (see attached) with IAPG and Fly Iowa 2020 to specify
the obligations of the three parties. All funds raised by the Fly Iowa 2020 Committee will
be matched by the IAPG, up to $5,000. The agreement also requires that a $5 million
insurance policy be purchased for the event listing the City and IAPG as additional
insured. The event coordinators will work with Police, Fire, and Emergency services to
develop an Emergency Response Plan (Safety Plan) to submit to the FAA for review and
approval. If the emergency services plan and the insurance coverage is not obtained for
any reason and/or if the emergency services plan is not approved by the FAA for any
reason, the agreement will terminate immediately upon written notice.
The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee has committed to covering all costs associated with the
event, which are anticipated to be paid through the fundraising efforts (see attached
letter).
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve an agreement for the Fly Iowa 2020 Event at the Ames Municipal Airport.
2. Do not approve the agreement, and decline to allow the airshow to be held.
MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Fly Iowa 2020 event will be the first airshow held at the Ames Municipal Airport since
the 1920s. The agreement provides for reimbursement to the City for the costs associated
with providing services for the airshow. Therefore, it is recommendation of the City
Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, approving the attached
agreement.
(Standard Fly Iowa Agreement)
FLY IOWA 2020 EVENT OPERATING AGREEMENT
This Agreement made and entered into this _____ day of _________, 20___, by
and between Iowa Aviation Promotion Group, Inc., an Iowa nonprofit corporation
(hereinafter referred to as “IAPG”) and The Ames Municipal Airport/City of Ames
(herein after referred to as “Ames Municipal Airport”) and the Fly Iowa 2020
Committee.
I. RECITALS
1.1 IAPG is the statewide sponsor of the annual Fly Iowa Statewide Aviation
Fair (sometimes referred to hereafter as the “Event”).
1.2 The Ames Municipal Airport agrees to host the annual Fly Iowa Statewide
Aviation Fair at the Ames Municipal Airport on August 7, 8, and 9, 2020
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
Now, therefore, the parties for good and valuable consideration and promises and
covenants contained herein do agree as follows:
II. TERM AND SUBJECT MATTER
2.1 The term of this Agreement shall commence on the day and year first above
written and shall continue, unless otherwise terminated as provided hereafter,
until completion of the Event at the Municipal Airport on August 7, 8 and 9,
2020 and shall continue thereafter for a reasonable wind-down period.
2.2 The Event shall consist of an aviation fair to be held at the Ames
Municipal Airport. The fair shall be called “Fly Iowa 2020” and use of the
name Fly Iowa 2020 for this Event. The fair is a statewide event intended to
showcase aviation in Iowa and will be open to the public free of any
admission charge. Ames Municipal Airport will arrange the Event in
accordance with the guidelines described in the attached Addendum to this
Fly Iowa Operating Agreement and incorporated herein by reference.
2.3 Ames Municipal Airport shall provide adequate facilities for the Event, which
shall include the customary emergency services, security, and crowd control
measures. Fly Iowa 2020 Committee will be responsible for organizing the
local effort including all local logistics, fundraising, and promotion. Fly Iowa
2020 Committee shall also reimburse the City of Ames for the costs of the
City providing emergency services, ambulance, police and fire, security, and
crowd control with monies raised by Fly Iowa 2020 for the Event. IAPG will
assist in obtaining the support and participation of the statewide aviation
2
community and will assist in promoting the Event on a statewide basis. IAPG
will provide a logo for the Event. IAPG including its Benefactor Members
shall be named as sponsors on all promotional literature and any website
under control of Ames Municipal Airport and Fly Iowa 2020 Committee.
IAPG agrees to permit the use of one-half page of the principal event
brochure at no charge.
2.4 The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee will appoint an event chair to oversee the
planning of the Event. Whenever possible, a representative of IAPG will
attend Fly Iowa 2020 planning committee meetings and provide counsel and
assistance as requested.
2.5 The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee will prepare and provide a summary report to
the IAPG within 90 days following the Event. The summary report will
minimally include:
- Financial summary
- Committee structure
- List of static display aircraft
- List of aerial activities including fly-bys
- List of exhibitors
- Number of attendees and fly-ins
2.6 The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee will provide IAPG a booth free of charge at
the Event to be staffed by IAPG members and volunteers.
2.7 IAPG agrees to furnish Ames Municipal Airport and the Fly Iowa 2020
Committee with a Fly Iowa guidelines manual and Ames MAP and the
Fly Iowa Committee agrees to comply with these guidelines within reason
and as circumstances permit. IAPG will also conduct a workshop for the
committee, if requested.
2.8 The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee shall maintain a separate accounting of
financial activity for the event and shall keep and maintain adequate books
and records of all financial matters pertaining to the Event.
2.9 All books and records and bank accounts and statements shall be subject to
inspection by IAPG upon reasonable request.
III. FINANCIAL SUPPORT
3.1 IAPG shall commit up to $5000 to match funds, dollar for dollar, to those
funds raised by the Fly Iowa 2020 Committee for the development,
marketing, and operation of the Event. IAPG shall pay the Fly Iowa 2020
Committee the $5000 upon receipt of evidence that committee had raised at
least $5000 in fund to underwrite the expenses of the Event.
3
3.2 If the revenue from the Event exceeds the expenses of the Event, leaving a
net revenue surplus, then the Fly Iowa 2020 Committee and IAPG agree to
equally divide the net revenue surplus between them, and agrees to remit to
IAPG its share of the net revenue surplus but not greater than $5000 within
90 days of the end of the Event.
3.3 The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee agrees that it shall not operate the Event in
any manner that would jeopardize the tax-exempt status of IAPG as a 501(c)
(3) organization. Donors may directly contribute to IAPG for the benefit of
the Event as a tax-exempt organization. IAPG will immediately remit to the
Fly Iowa 2020 Committee all such contributions.
3.4 The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee shall obtain all necessary permits and licenses
for the Event. The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee shall also be responsible for any
and all state and federal taxes related to the Event, if any, and shall pay the
same in a timely fashion.
3.5 In no event shall IAPG be deemed liable for any of the debts or claims arising
out of the Event unless the claiming party has obtained the prior approval of
the debt or claim by the Board of Directors of IAPG as reflected in the
minutes of an IAPG Board meeting.
3.6 In no event shall the Ames Municipal Airport be deemed liable for any of the
debts or claims arising out of the Event unless the claiming party has obtained
the prior approval of the debt or claim by the City of Ames as reflected in the
minutes of City of Ames City Council meeting.
IV. INSURANCE
4.1 The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee shall provide proof of insurance of a
minimum of 5 million dollars of liability coverage and IAPG, its Directors
and Officers, and the Ames Municipal Airport/City of Ames shall be listed as
additional insureds. The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee shall pay the full cost of
the insurance premium.
4.2 The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee shall require that each exhibitor, performer, or
other Event participant or vendor either provide its own liability insurance
coverage or be named as an additional insured on the policy acquired by the
Fly Iowa 2020 Committee.
4.3 To the extent permitted by law, each party, shall indemnify and hold the other
harmless from and against any and all occurrences, claims, demands, causes
of action liability and loss of any kind and nature whatsoever and which is
brought by any party and arises from whatever source of law, together with
related costs and expenses, relating to or arising, either from the Event, its
4
planning, promotion, and operation. This indemnity shall include
reimbursement for all reasonable costs and attorney fees and shall survive the
Event.
V. TERMINATION
5.1 Any party may terminate this Agreement for any reason by giving the other
party 180 days prior written notice.
5.2 If any party is in material default of any of the terms of this Agreement, the
non-breaching party shall give the breaching party a 10-day written notice in
which to cure the default. In the event the default is not cured within 10 days
of receipt of notice of the default, then the non-breaching party shall be
entitled to seek all remedies available under Iowa law. The fact that the
alleged breaching party does cure default shall not be deemed an admission
by such party that a default did in fact occur. The purpose of the notice of
default is to allow the parties to have the opportunity to cure defaults without
resorting to legal remedies.
5.3 The Fly Iowa 2020 Committee is responsible for obtaining Federal Aviation
Authority (FAA) approval of an emergency-services plan. FAA approval of
the emergency-services plan and the liability coverage referenced in section
4.1 above, are both essential prerequisites to the Event occurring. If the
insurance coverage is not obtained for any reason, and/or if the emergency-
services plan is not approved by the FAA for any reason, this agreement will
terminate immediately upon written notice to the other parties.
5.4 In the event of termination, the Fly Iowa 2020 Committee shall return any
and all advancements of money made by IAPG to the Fly Iowa 2020
Committee.
VI. MISCELLANEOUS
6.1 This Agreement is not intended by the parties to be a partnership or joint
venture of any kind. Neither does this Agreement create any form of an
agency relationship between the parties. Neither party shall have the
authority to represent or speak for the other, without the express written prior
consent of the other, which shall be approved by the governing board and
reflected in the minutes thereof. Neither party shall assume any of the debts
or liabilities of the other and nothing in this Agreement or otherwise shall
constitute any such agreement or be construed as an obligation on the part of
either party to pay the debts or other obligations of the other.
6.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties and
shall not be considered modified, altered, changed, or amended in any respect
unless in writing and signed by the parties.
5
6.3 This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Iowa.
6.4 If for any reason any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed
ineffective, the validity and effect of all other provisions shall not be
changed.
6.5 This Agreement is subject and subordinate to the provisions of any
agreements heretofore or here after made between parties and the United
States and/or the State of Iowa relative to the operation, maintenance,
development, or administration of the Airport, the execution of which has
been required as a condition precedent to the transfer of federal rights or
property to Ames Municipal Airport for Airport purposes or the expenditure
of Federal or State of Iowa funds for the improvement of development of the
of the Airport, including the expenditure of Federal Funds for the
development of the Airport in accordance with the provisions of the Federal
Aviation Act of 1958, and as said act shall be amended from time to time.
Iowa Aviation Promotion Group, Inc.
By________________________________
Michael Vogt, President
Date: ___________
Fly Iowa 2020 Committee
By_________________________________
Chairperson
Date: ____________
City of Ames/Ames Municipal Airport
By_________________________________
John A. Haila, Mayor
Date: ___________
ATTEST:
_____________________
Diane Voss, City Clerk
Date: _________________
ADDENDUM TO FLY IOWA 2020 AGREEMENT
The Board of Directors of the Iowa Aviation Promotion Group, Inc. has adopted the
following guidelines for the conduct of the aviation event known as Fly Iowa. The
guidelines set forth the expectations of IAPGI and Ames Municipal Airport and Fly Iowa
2020 with respect to the conduct of the event. Some of the expectations are mandatory
and others are recommended.
1. Admission to Fly Iowa shall be free. There shall be no parking fee as well.
However, if a volunteer group handling parking for Fly Iowa wishes to request
donations in exchange for parking services that shall be acceptable.
2. There shall be an air show and static displays of various kinds of civilian and
military aircraft. The air show must have aerobatic performances. Aerial
entertainment is a key feature of Fly Iowa.
3. A fly-in or flight breakfast is encouraged when parking and other available
facilities permit.
4. Youth education activities related to aviation and space are integral to Fly Iowa.
The host airport shall host an Aviation Youth Camp as part of the event. Aviation
projects involving local schools are another example.
5. Aviation organizations including trade association flight schools, FAA, CAP,
EAA, AOPA and aviation equipment manufacturers should be represented. At
least three should be present at the event.
6. Aircraft static displays shall include representation from the categories of
commercial aviation, military aviation, antique and experimental aircraft. At least
three categories should be on hand with at least three aircraft from each category.
7. Pilot education and safety seminars are encouraged. This could include FAA
safety seminars, presentations by aviation authorities or writers, travelogues, etc.
Seminars on promotion of your airport and getting community involvement at
the airport are encouraged. Fly Iowa should seed future airport and aviation
promotional activity in the community and not just be a terminal event.
8. Commercial or service club food and beverage vendors shall be available. Water,
beverages, and food must be available for purchase.
9. Facilities for handling a crowd of several thousand people shall be provided. This
would include first aid, security, restroom facilities or porta-potties, and the like.
2
10. An event announcer is required for logistical announcements, description of
events, exhibits, and aerial activities such as fly-bys and arrival and departure of
interesting aircraft. However, continuous announcing is not required.
11. Iowa Aviation Promotion Group and its Fly Iowa Benefactor and Charter
Members shall get prominent mention in all materials and communications
associated with the event. This includes mention by the event announcer.
12. If the FAA can support a temporary control tower, it should be requested. It is not
essential, however. A qualified Air Boss shall be appointed and placed in charge
of the flying activity, especially the air show, if applicable.
OTHER FLY IOWA MATTERS
WEB SITE: Fly Iowa is a registered trademark. A web site has been established by the
Iowa Aviation Promotion Group: www.FlyIowa.org. This web site shall be the official
web site for Fly Iowa and use of other web addresses for Fly Iowa without the express
written consent of the Iowa Aviation Promotion Group, Inc. is forbidden.
TIMELINES FOR FLY IOWA PLANNING AND TASK COMPLETION
1. The Fly Iowa Agreement shall be signed NLT 9 months before the event.
2. The date for Fly Iowa shall set 9 months before the event and should be
publicized immediately afterwards.
3. Arrangements/requests for military participation shall be requested through the
Department of Defense channels NLT Dec 30, 2019 the year preceding the event.
4. Civilian performers shall be booked NLT March 30 in the year of the event.
5. Volunteer committee chair people shall be appointed and in place NLT five
months prior to the event.
6. An FAA Airspace Waiver form 7711 shall be filed with the Des Moines Flight
Standards District Office NLT 120 days prior to the event.
12/6/2019
Caring People Quality Programs Exceptional Service
515.239.5101 main
fax
MEMO
Item No. 17
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Brian Phillips, Assistant City Manager
Date: January 28, 2020
Subject: MetroNet Pole Attachment Agreement and Locate Letter
At the January 14, 2020, City Council meeting, the City Council considered approval
of a pole attachment agreement and a utility locate letter agreement with Metro
Fibernet, LLC (MetroNet). The Council requested that the pole attachment agreement
be amended to incorporate a clause that if the contract terminated and the fiber
infrastructure remained on the poles, the City could have the option to take possession
of the fiber. The original contract only provided that the City could take the fiber
down and bill MetroNet for the cost at the conclusion of the contract.
MetroNet has agreed to a modification of the contract (see third paragraph of Section
13 “Term.” in the attached agreement). At the termination of the agreement by either
party, the City may choose to take down any fiber remaining after 180 days and bill
MetroNet the cost. If MetroNet terminates the agreement or if the City terminates the
agreement because of a breach and failure to cure by MetroNet, the City may elect to
retain the fiber remaining upon termination.
With this modification, the City can evaluate whether the fiber has any value or if it is
a liability it wishes MetroNet to be responsible for. The provision also protects
MetroNet against losing its fiber if the City chose not to renew the agreement at one of
the early renewal periods.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Original Council Action Form dated January 14, 2020
2. Revised pole attachment agreement
3. Original locate letter agreement
1
ITEM # ____22___
DATE 01-14-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: POLE ATTACHMENT AND LOCATE AGREEMENTS WITH METRO
FIBERNET, LLC
BACKGROUND:
Metro Fibernet, LLC (MetroNet) is an internet provider that plans to construct its fiber-
optic network throughout Ames in 2020. As part of its buildout, MetroNet intends to
place its infrastructure overhead on City utility poles where poles exist and underground
in rights-of-way and easements. Approximately 1.2 million feet of cable will be installed
during this process. To accommodate this, two agreements are necessary: a pole
attachment agreement and an underground utility locate agreement. MetroNet has
signed and returned both agreements to the City.
POLE ATTACHMENT AGREEMENT:
The City’s Electric utility maintains several thousand distribution and transmission poles.
Other utilities and telecommunications providers routinely attach their cabling to these
poles to deploy their infrastructure throughout the City. No new providers have made
attachments to these poles for several decades. In a typical year, the existing attachees
submit only a handful of requests to attach to poles. Applications are evaluated by the
Electric Services Engineering Division, and poles are inspected before and after the
attachment is made. City staff recently obtained new pole loading standards from a
contractor, which will assist in evaluating proposed attachments.
MetroNet has indicated it will attach to approximately 4,000 electric poles in the
span of approximately 10 months. Additionally, because of vacancies within the
Electric Engineering Division, it will be difficult or impossible for City staff to
scrutinize proposed attachments at the pace they will be submitted. Therefore,
City staff and MetroNet have worked to negotiate a new pole attachment
agreement that will accommodate MetroNet’s planned pace of construction.
The pole attachment agreement provides that during the initial network buildout,
MetroNet will have professional engineers licensed in the state of Iowa submit the
attachment applications. The applications will be reviewed by a contract engineering
firm (hired by MetroNet and approved by the City) to ensure they meet the City’s
adopted standards. The contracted firm will also verify pole integrity through field
inspections and spot check the completed attachments to ensure they were made in
accordance with the submitted plans.
2
The initial buildout period provides longer timeframes for the evaluation and approval of
proposed attachments. Once the initial buildout is complete, any proposed pole
attachments will be reviewed by City staff rather than the outside firm, and the expected
timeframes for approval will shorten.
Provisions exist for the Utility to require MetroNet to remove its attachments in the event
that the City re-routes poles, or converts overhead infrastructure to underground. If the
City receives complaints from the public regarding the condition of MetroNet’s fiber on
the poles, MetroNet must make repairs within ten days or provide information to the City
regarding when the repairs are to be made.
In exchange for attaching to the City’s Electric poles, MetroNet will pay the utility
attachment fees as provided in the Municipal Code. This fee is currently $13.05 per
pole, per year.
UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING AGREEMENT:
In Ames subdivisions constructed after the mid-1970s, electric service is provided
underground. In these areas, MetroNet will put also its infrastructure underground.
MetroNet has indicated that at the peak of its initial buildout, it may have as many as ten
crews installing underground conduit. Underground installation will require underground
utility locates to be performed through the Iowa One Call System.
The City has utility locating staff in Electric Services and in Public Works. However,
these locators generally stay busy with the typical summer construction demand. City
staff has expressed doubts to MetroNet about the City’s ability to locate
infrastructure for MetroNet in a timely manner, in addition to keeping up with the
typical locating work that will be requested by other customers. Therefore, to
keep up with MetroNet’s initial buildout pace, MetroNet has agreed to an
underground locating agreement.
Through this agreement, the City will hire an outside utility locating firm, which will
complete utility locates requested solely for MetroNet and its subcontractors. MetroNet
would reimburse the City for the cost of the contractor. Therefore, the City’s locating
staff can remain focused on responding to other customers’ locating requests. City staff
would retain complete control over the locating contractor’s performance and address
any concerns that may arise with the quality of the work.
City staff has initiated the process to obtain cost proposals from outside locating
contractors and expects to have a contractor selected in February. A separate contract
will be awarded through that selection process.
3
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the Pole Attachment Agreement and Underground Locating Letter of
Agreement with Metro Fibernet, LLC.
2. Do not approve the agreements.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
A pole attachment agreement is an important component of accommodating MetroNet’s
proposed deployment in the community. Such agreements exist with other
telecommunications utilities in the City. The proposed agreement includes provisions
that will allow MetroNet’s proposed buildout pace to be accommodated without
compromising the quality of the review process or causing increased cost to the utility.
The proposed underground locate letter of agreement allows the City to hire an outside
utility locates firm during MetroNet’s construction process. MetroNet will reimburse the
City for the cost of these services. This proposal allows the City’s existing locate
employees to continue providing locate services for other contractors and residents
doing work in the community.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1 as described above.
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into this ____ day of ____________ 2020, by and between
METRO FIBERNET, LLC (“LICENSEE”), a limited liability company organized under the
laws of the State of Nevada, and operating under a valid certificate of authority within the State
of Iowa, and CITY OF AMES, IOWA (“LICENSOR”), a municipal corporation organized and
existing pursuant to the laws of the State of Iowa.
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, LICENSEE intends to expand its fiber optic network by developing,
constructing, installing and operating one or more fiber optic routes in LICENSOR’S service
area; and LICENSEE desires to use certain of LICENSOR’s structures in furtherance of same;
WHEREAS, LICENSOR desires to permit LICENSEE to use its structures in
consideration of the covenants and agreements of LICENSEE set forth in this Agreement and
upon and subject to the terms and conditions provided herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and terms and
conditions contained herein, the parties hereto do mutually covenant and agree as follows:
I. DEFINITIONS
“Agreement” means this Agreement and all extensions and modifications hereof, together
with all attachments, exhibits, appendices and schedules.
“Applicable Law” means any applicable law, rule, regulation, ordinance, order, code,
decree, injunction, decision, or interpretation of any federal, state, or local governmental
authority, agency, court, or other governmental body having jurisdiction over the matter in
question.
“Fiber” means fiber cable and related fiber strands, splices, terminations and associated
apparatus to be installed on and between Structures along the Route pursuant to this Agreement.
“Initial Network Buildout” means the initial phase of construction during the one year
period of time following the date of this Agreement in which Fiber is being newly installed along
the Route. The Initial Network Buildout does not include subsequent alterations to Fiber after it
has been installed on Structures.
“NEC” means National Electrical Code, as amended.
“NESC” means National Electrical Safety Code, as amended.
“Overlashing” means the practice whereby an entity, whether the LICENSEE or a third
party, physically ties or otherwise connects or attaches new wiring or facilities to wiring or to
support strands or hardware that already has been affixed to a Structure.
“Plans” means general design and construction plans for the Fiber to be installed along
the Route.
“Route” means the specific route(s) described in an Exhibit A hereto upon which the
Fiber will be located.
“Service Drop” means cables (including fiber optic), strands, wires, facilities, and associated
apparatus installed to extend service from a Structure to an individual customer(s).
“Structure” means wood or metal pole or any combination thereof and steel lattice
transmission towers and any other related facilities owned and/or controlled by LICENSOR.
II. GRANT OF SPECIFIC RIGHTS
1. Grant of License to LICENSEE. In consideration of the pole attachment fee described
in paragraph 2 below and the other covenants, terms and conditions contained in this
Agreement, LICENSOR, throughout the Term, hereby grants to LICENSEE a royalty-
free, non-exclusive license to install, construct, monitor, repair, maintain and operate
Fiber on the Structures located along the Route. LICENSOR shall have the right to grant,
by contract or otherwise, to others not parties to this Agreement, rights or privileges to
use any of the Structures covered by this Agreement provided such rights and privileges
granted do not interfere with the rights and privileges granted by LICENSOR to
LICENSEE, and LICENSOR shall have the right to continue and extend any such rights
or privileges heretofore granted.
a. This Agreement shall not affect any existing rights or privileges previously
conferred by LICENSOR, by contract or otherwise, to others, not parties to this
Agreement, to use any poles covered by this Agreement; and LICENSOR shall
have the right to continue and extend such rights or privileges. The attachment
privileges herein granted shall at all times be subject to such existing contracts or
arrangements.
2. Pole Attachment Fee. In consideration of the license described in paragraph 1 above and
the other covenants, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, LICENSEE
agrees to pay an annual pole attachment fee to LICENSOR for each Structure utilized by
LICENSEE along the Route as identified in an Exhibit A. LICENSEE may, at any time,
remove its attachments from any Structure of LICENSOR, but no refund of any current
year rental will be due LICENSEE on account of such removal. The annual per pole fee
will be as established in Ames Municipal Code and shall be paid by LICENSEE within
thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from LICENSOR. Failure to pay the annual per
pole fee timely shall be cause for termination as set forth herein.
3. (a) Ownership of LICENSEE Facilities. LICENSEE will retain ownership of the Fiber
to be installed along the Route, and LICENSOR shall acquire no right, title or interest in
or to the Fiber except as set forth in Section III(13).
(b) Ownership of the Structures. All Structures covered by this Agreement shall be
and remain the property of LICENSOR, and LICENSEE shall, except for the rights
provided in this Agreement, acquire no right, title or interest in or to the Structures.
III. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
4. Construction and Installation During Initial Network Buildout. For Fiber installation
during the Initial Network Buildout:
(a)LICENSEE shall submit pole attachment applications to LICENSOR prior to
construction and installation of the attachments along the Route. Each application shall
include Plans for each proposed pole attachment, which shall be signed and stamped by a
professional engineer licensed in the state of Iowa. Each application shall be accompanied
by the application fee set by LICENSOR. The actual application fee charged per pole will
be based on the actual costs to perform such review and inspections.
(b) LICENSOR shall review the Plans within thirty (30) calendar days of LICENSEE’s
submission and will inform LICENSEE within the thirty (30) calendar days of
LICENSEE’s submission if the Plans are approved, rejected or LICENSOR needs
additional time to conduct its review. In the event LICENSOR needs additional time to
conduct its review, LICENSEE and LICENSOR will work together to determine an
extension of time reasonably acceptable to both parties. LICENSOR may reject the Plans
only if the said Plans (i) fail to comply with reasonable and customary design and
construction practices or (ii) fail to comply with the minimum requirements of applicable
governmental regulations and codes including the NEC and NESC. Unless otherwise
agreed by the parties, LICENSEE will conduct make ready of Structures for use by
LICENSEE using contractors that are approved by LICENSOR, which approval shall not
be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. LICENSEE shall pay for all such make
ready work. If LICENSOR and LICENSEE agree that make ready work will be
performed by LICENSOR, LICENSOR shall complete the make-ready work within thirty
(30) days of approval of the Plans or as the parties may mutually agree. In the event
LICENSOR has failed to perform the make-ready work within the thirty (30) day period,
LICENSEE may perform such work at LICENSEE’s expense using contractors that are
approved by LICENSOR; provided however, if LICENSEE has paid LICENSOR make
ready fees for such work, LICENSOR shall provide a refund of such make ready fees to
LICENSEE within thirty (30) days of LICENSEE notifying LICENSOR that LICENSEE
has performed the work. On completion of make ready work, the construction and
installation of the Fiber upon the Structures along the Route may begin.
(c) The Parties agree that LICENSEE, at its sole cost and expense, will engage a
contractor approved by LICENSOR to perform the following tasks of LICENSOR: (i)
review of LICENSEE’s pole attachment applications, (ii) evaluation of LICENSEE’s
applications through on site reviews, and (iii) visual inspection of LICENSEE’s facilities
post attachment. To the extent that work is performed by the approved contractor,
LICENSEE shall not be required to pay LICENSOR fees or costs for the such type of
work.
5. Construction and Installation After Initial Network Buildout. For Fiber installation
after the completion of the Initial Network Buildout:
(a) LICENSEE shall submit pole attachment applications to LICENSOR prior to
construction and installation of the Structures along the Route. Each application shall
include Plans for each proposed pole attachment, which shall be signed and stamped by a
professional engineer licensed in the state of Iowa. Each application shall be accompanied
by an application fee, which shall not exceed the amount charged to other utilities
requesting to attach to LICENSOR’s poles.
(b) LICENSOR shall review the Plans within ten (10) business days of LICENSEE’s
submission and will inform LICENSEE within the ten (10) business days if the Plans are
approved, rejected or LICENSOR needs additional time to conduct its review. In the
event LICENSOR needs additional time to conduct its review, LICENSEE and
LICENSOR will work together to determine an extension of time reasonably acceptable
to both parties. LICENSOR may reject the Plans only if the said Plans (i) fail to comply
with reasonable and customary design and construction practices or (ii) fail to comply
with the minimum requirements of applicable governmental regulations and codes
including the NEC and NESC. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, LICENSEE will
conduct make ready of Structures for use by LICENSEE using qualified contractors that
are approved by LICENSOR, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed. LICENSEE shall pay for all such make ready work. If
LICENSOR and LICENSEE agree that make ready work will be performed by
LICENSOR, within thirty (30) days of approval of the Plans, LICENSOR shall complete
the make-ready work. In the event LICENSOR has failed to perform the make-ready
work within the thirty (30) day period, LICENSEE may perform such work at
LICENSEE’s expense using contractors that are approved by LICENSOR; provided
however, if LICENSEE has paid LICENSOR make ready fees for such work, LICENSOR
shall provide a refund of such make ready fees to LICENSEE within thirty (30) days of
LICENSEE notifying LICENSOR that LICENSEE has performed the work. On
completion of make ready work, the construction and installation of the Fiber upon the
Structures along the Route may begin.
6. Construction Standards. All Fiber shall be constructed in accordance with the
approved Plans and installed in a manner, which is reasonable and customary in the
industry. All such Fiber shall be constructed, installed and at all times maintained by
LICENSEE so as to comply at least with the minimum requirements of all applicable
governmental regulations and codes including, without limitation, the NEC and NESC.
7. Overlashing and Service Drops. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Agreement, LICENSEE may Overlash and attach Service Drops to Structures without
prior submission of Plans or approval of LICENSOR (1) provided that within sixty (60)
calendar days from the date of Overlashing or affixing such Service Drops, LICENSEE
submits a written notification of such Overlash or Service Drop; and (2) provided that,
any such overlashing was modeled for pole loading and clearances in the original
attachment application submittal.
8. Removal of Structures. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent LICENSOR from
removing Structures from service from time to time for reasons such as maintenance,
reconfiguration of LICENSOR’s transmission and distribution routes, or conversion of
overhead infrastructure to underground. In the event LICENSOR desires to remove a
Structure from service, LICENSEE will remove its Fiber within thirty (30) calendar days
of receipt of notice to do so (or such shorter period reasonable under the circumstances in
the case of emergency or such longer period reasonable under the circumstances approved
by LICENSOR, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed). Any Fiber remaining after thirty (30) calendar days (or other period if
applicable) may be removed by LICENSOR, and LICENSEE shall be responsible for
payment of LICENSOR’s costs in removing said Fiber, upon receipt of an invoice from
LICENSOR. No refund of any current year rental will be due LICENSEE upon the
removal of Structures from service.
9. Audit. An audit of attachments to LICENSORS poles shall be made once every three
years, and LICENSEE shall have a representative present and participating for the
duration of the audit. Any unauthorized attachments found during an audit will be billed
at a the rate set by LICENSOR for each year for the three years prior to the date of the
most recent audit. Unauthorized attachments shall constitute a default of this Agreement,
and shall be subject to removal in a reasonable time frame, unless permission for such
attachments is granted by LICENSOR and the unauthorized attachments are brought into
compliance with the most recent edition of the National Electric Safety Code to the extent
consistent with the current regulations of the Utilities Division of the Iowa Department of
Commerce, at LICENSEE’s sole expense.
10. Qualified personnel. LICENSEE shall not permit any person to work on LICENSOR’s
facilities, or in the area of LICENSOR’s facilities, who are not aware of the dangerous
nature of electricity or who are not qualified to work in the vicinity of electric facilities.
LICENSEE shall provide workers with adequate equipment and training for working in
the vicinity of electric facilities and shall provide adequate supervision of such workers so
as to avoid accidental contact with hazardous electric facilities.
11. Forbearance Not Waiver. Failure of LICENSOR to enforce or insist upon compliance
with any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, or to give notice or declare this
Agreement or the attachment rights hereunder terminated shall not constitute a general
waiver or relinquishment of any of the terms or conditions herein contained, but the same
shall be and remain at all times in full force and effect.
12. Maintenance of Facilities. LICENSEE shall, at its own expense, at all times maintain
all of the Fiber in a safe condition in thorough repair and in accordance with NESC
requirements and any other applicable standards or requirements. LICENSOR shall notify
in writing LICENSEE of any Fiber that fails to meet acceptable standards, including
reports of complaints LICENSOR receives from the public regarding the condition of the
Fiber. LICENSEE shall, within ten (10) business days of receipt of such notification,
make or commence repairs to the Fiber or provide LICENSOR a statement indicating
when repairs are anticipated to be commenced or completed. If LICENSEE fails to
respond to the notification to the reasonable satisfaction of the LICENSOR or fails to
make or commence repairs within the ten (10) business day time frame, LICENSOR may
make repairs or remove Fiber at its expense and invoice LICENSEE for costs incurred.
13. Term. This Agreement shall become effective upon its execution and shall continue in
effect for a term of five (5) years. Thereafter, the Agreement shall automatically renew
from year to year. The Agreement may be terminated by either party at the end of the
initial term or then current renewal term by providing eighteen (18) months’ notice of
termination to the other party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, LICENSOR may terminate
this Agreement upon LICENSEE’S failure to pay pole fees due within 30 calendar days
of receiving an invoice from LICENSOR, following LICENSOR’s written notice to
LICENSEE of such failure and LICENSEE’s failure to cure within ten (10) business days
of receipt of such notice.
Upon termination of this Agreement by either party, LICENSEE shall remove all Fiber,
as defined by this Agreement, at LICENSEE’S sole expense. No refund of any current
year rental will be due LICENSEE upon termination. Any Fiber installed by LICENSEE
during the term of this Agreement shall be removed by LICENSEE within 180 calendar
days of termination, at LICENSEE’S sole expense. Notwithstanding the provisions of
Section II(3)(a) herein, any Fiber remaining on LICENSOR’S Structures more than 180
calendar days after termination due to a failure of LICENSEE to remove said Fiber may,
at LICENSOR’S sole option, be removed by LICENSOR and LICENSOR may bill the
cost of removal to LICENSEE. LICENSEE shall have an obligation to pay the cost of
removal to LICENSOR, which shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, after this Agreement is terminated by LICENSEE for any
reason or by LICENSOR due to a material breach of this Agreement by LICENSEE and
LICENSEE’s failure to cure such breach in the allotted time frame, if LICENSEE fails to
remove its Fiber within such one hundred eighty (180) days, LICENSOR may elect to
retain LICENSEE’S Fiber upon termination, and all right, title and interest in and to
LICENSEE’S Fiber attached to LICENSOR’S Structures will automatically transfer to
LICENSOR without further action of and at no cost to LICENSOR and will become the
property of LICENSOR “as is/where is” and LICENSEE hereby irrevocably waives all
right to any further notice from LICENSOR prior to the disposition of LICENSEE’S
Fiber. LICENSEE shall have no responsibility or liability to LICENSOR with respect to
the transferred Fibers arising after the date of the transfer.
14. Insurance. LICENSEE shall, at its sole expense, cause to be issued and maintained
during the Term of this Agreement insurance coverages of the types and in the amounts
set forth below, as applicable:
Type of Insurance Limit
General Liability (including General Aggregate $2,000,000
contractual liability) written Prod./Comp. Op. Agg. $1,000,000
on an occurrence basis Personal & Adv. Injury $1,000,000
Each Occurrence $1,000,000
Automobile Liability, including Combined Single Limit $1,000,000
any auto, hired auto and non-
owned autos
Excess Liability, Umbrella Form Each Occurrence $2,000,000
Aggregate $2,000,000
Workers’ Compensation Each Accident $ 500,000
15. Liens. In the event any construction lien or other encumbrance shall be placed on the
Structures because of the actions of LICENSEE, LICENSEE shall promptly discharge the
lien or release the encumbrance without cost or expense to LICENSOR, and hereby
agrees to indemnify and hold harmless LICENSOR for any and all damages that may be
suffered or incurred by LICENSOR as a result of the lien, discharging the lien or
releasing the encumbrance. In the event any construction lien or other encumbrance shall
be placed on the Fiber because of the actions of LICENSOR, LICENSOR shall promptly
discharge the lien or release the encumbrance without cost or expense to LICENSEE and
hereby agrees to indemnify LICENSEE to the extent allowable by Iowa law for any and
all damages that may be suffered or incurred by LICENSEE as a result of the lien,
discharging the lien, or releasing the encumbrance.
16. Relationship of Parties and Independent Contractor Status. Neither LICENSOR nor
LICENSEE shall be deemed to be a partner, agent or joint venturer with or of the other by
reason of this Agreement or the consummation of the transaction contemplated hereby.
All parties shall perform their duties under this Agreement as independent contractors,
and at their own risk. Neither LICENSOR nor LICENSEE shall at any time hold itself
out as being a partner, co-venturer or agent of the other.
17. Successors and Assigns.
(a) Generally. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of
and be enforceable by, the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted
assigns. Unless otherwise set forth herein, neither of the parties may assign this
Agreement to any other person or entity without the prior written consent of the other
party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.
(b) Exceptions. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
(i) and provided that the proposed Assignee may lawfully transact business in the
State of Iowa, the parties may assign this Agreement without the consent of the
other party to any affiliate of such party, to the surviving entity into which such
party may merge or consolidate, or to any entity to which the party transfers all,
or substantially all, of its business and assets; and
(ii) LICENSEE shall also have the right, without the consent of LICENSOR, to
assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement as collateral to any lender to
LICENSEE (or lender to any successor or assign of LICENSEE); provided that
the assignee or transferee in any such circumstance shall continue to be subject
to all of the provisions of this Agreement, except that any lender shall not incur
any obligations under this Agreement, nor shall it be restricted from exercising
any right of enforcement or foreclosure with respect to any related security
interest or lien, so long as the purchaser in foreclosure is subject to the
provisions of this Agreement.
(iii) LICENSEE agrees that it will not grant, sell, rent, loan or lease to others the
use of all or any part of its assigned space on LICENSOR’s poles.
18. Notices. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all notices, requests, demands and
other communications required or permitted to be given or made under this Agreement shall
be in writing, and shall be deemed to have been duly given (a) on the date of personal
delivery, (b) on the date of delivery to a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or
(c) on the date of deposit in the U. S. mails, postage prepaid, by certified mail, return receipt
requested, in each case addressed as follows, or to such other addresses as shall be designated
from time-to-time by the parties:
If to LICENSEE to: If to LICENSOR to:
Metro Fibernet, LLC City of Ames, Iowa
3701 Communications Way 515 Clark Avenue
Evansville, IN 47715 Ames, IA 50010
Attention: President Attention: Electric Services Director
With copy to: With a copy to:
Metro Fibernet, LLC City of Ames, Iowa
8837 Bond Street 515 Clark Avenue
Overland Park, KS 66214 Ames, IA 50010
Attention: Legal Department Attention: Legal Department
19. Force Majeure. In the event LICENSEE or LICENSOR is delayed in or prevented from
performing any of its respective obligations under this Agreement due to acts of God, war,
riots, civil insurrection, acts of the public enemy, strikes, lockouts, acts of insurrection, acts
of civil or military authority, fires, floods or earthquakes beyond the reasonable control of
the party delayed, then such delay or nonperformance shall be excused. If any such delay or
nonperformance due to the foregoing causes or events occurs or is anticipated, the party
affected shall promptly notify the other party in writing of such event or expected event and
the cause and estimated duration of such event. The party affected by such event shall, at no
cost to the other party, exercise due diligence to shorten or avoid the delay or
nonperformance and shall keep the other party advised as to the continuance of the delay and
steps taken to shorten or terminate the delay or nonperformance.
20. Concurrent Obligation. “Concurrent Obligation” means the obligaton of LICENSEE to
pay for the cost of a Locate Contractor as may be necessary in the judgment of the City
during the Initial Network Buildout. This Concurrent Obligation is evidenced by a letter
dated December 20, 2019, from John Greenbank, Executive Vice President of Metro
Fibernet LLC, agreed to and accepted by the City, and attached to this Agreement as Exhibit
‘B’. Because of the relationship of this Agreement to the Concurrent Obligation, Licensor
and Licensee agree that a breach of any terms or conditions of the Concurrent Obligation
shall constitute a breach of this Agreement.
21. Limitation of Liability. NEITHER PARTY SHALL HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY,
LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION TO THE OTHER OR THE OTHER’S AFFILIATES,
DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES,
SUCCESSORS OR PERMITTED ASSIGNS FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
LOSS OF PROFITS, COST OF REPLACEMENT SERVICES, LOSS OF CUSTOMERS
OR AGENTS, LOSS OF USE, OR PENALTIES IMPOSED BY OTHERS, REGARDLESS
OF ANY ACT OF OMISSION OR COMMISSION IN CONNECTION WITH OR UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THIS PARAGRAPH
IS NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF DIRECT DAMAGES CAUSED
BY THE NEGLIGENCE OF A PARTY.
22. Disclaimer. THERE ARE NO AGREEMENTS, WARRANTIES OR
REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, EITHER IN FACT OR BY
OPERATION OF LAW, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING WARRANTIES
OR MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE,
EXCEPT THOSE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH HEREIN.
23. Counterparts; Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in several
counterparts, each of which shall be regarded as an original and all of which together shall
constitute one and the same document. In the event that any signature is delivered by
facsimile or by email of a “.pdf” format data file, such signature shall create a valid and
binding obligation of such party with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or “.pdf”
signature page were an original thereof.
24. Expenses. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein or therein, each party shall bear
the costs and expenses incurred by it in negotiating, entering into and performing any of its
obligations under this Agreement.
25. Headings. The headings of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not
be deemed to be a part hereof.
26. Governing Law & Venue. In the event of any matter or dispute arising out of or related to
this Agreement, it is agreed between the parties that the law of the State of Iowa will be
given the interpretation, validity and effect of this Agreement without regard to the place of
execution or place of performance thereof, or any conflicts of law provisions. Venue for any
disputes between the parties shall be in Story County, Iowa, or the federal district court for
the Southern District of Iowa.
27. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be
invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining
provisions hereof or thereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. If any
provision or portion of this Agreement is deemed illegal or unenforceable for any reason by
an arbitrator, court or other authority of competent jurisdiction, there shall be deemed to be
made such minimum change in such provision or portion as is necessary to make it valid and
enforceable as so modified. If this Agreement shall be held to be unenforceable against
either party, the enforceability of such agreement against the other party hereto shall not in
any way be affected or impaired thereby.
28. Binding Agreement. This Agreement, including the attachments, embodies the entire
agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous oral or
written agreements between the parties, and once this Agreement has been executed, any
amendments hereto must be made in writing and signed by both parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed and to become effective as of the date first written above.
LICENSEE: LICENSOR:
METRO FIBERNET, LLC CITY OF AMES, IOWA
By:_________________________ By:___________________________
Name: John Greenbank Name: ________________________
Title: Executive Vice President Title: _________________________
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A – PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
LICENSEE PROJECT DESCRIPTION #___
1. Project Defined.
Fiber: LICENSEE, at its cost, to install one (1) fiber optic cable and related fiber
strands, splices, terminations and associated apparatus.
Route: ____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
__________. (___ Structures).
Upon completion of any necessary make-ready work, LICENSEE may install its Fiber along
the above Route.
2. Basic Agreement. This Project Description is hereby incorporated in its entirety into the
Agreement between Metro Fibernet, LLC (“LICENSEE”) and _____________________
(“LICENSOR”), and is hereby executed by the respective parties hereto as of the ____ day of
_______________ 201_
LICENSEE: LICENSOR:
METRO FIBERNET, LLC ______________________________
By:_________________________ By:___________________________
Name: ______________________ Name: ________________________
Title: _______________________ Title: _________________________
EXHIBIT B
LETTER AGREEMENT
John Greenbank
Executive Vice President
Direct phone: 812.456.1205
John.Greenbank@metronetinc.com
December 20, 2019
VIA E-MAIL to bphillips@city.ames.ia.us
Mr. Brian Phillips
Assistant City Manager
515 Clark Avenue
Ames, Iowa 50010
Re: Locates of City’s Underground Facilities
Dear Mr. Phillips:
This is to memorialize the understanding between the City and Metro Fibernet, LLC regarding payment of
certain locating costs.
Metronet is pursuing the installation of fiber optic cables in the City in order to provide cable, internet and
phone services to the City’s residents and businesses. Metronet has proposed a schedule for installation
that may require the City to engage an independent contractor to perform some of the City’s Iowa One Call
locates (the “Locate Contractor”). If, during the Initial Network Buildout (as defined in the pole attachment
agreement between the parties), the City reasonably determines it is necessary to engage a Locate
Contractor in order to perform locates in connection with the installation of Metronet’s facilities, Metronet
will reimburse the City for any fees paid by the City to the Locate Contractor for such work. The parties
will agree to the fee to be paid to the Locate Contractor in advance of any work being performed.
The City will issue invoices to Metronet for the Locate Contractor’s fees at reasonable intervals and
Metronet shall pay such invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt. The City will provide appropriate
documentation supporting its invoices. All invoices unpaid as of the due date and not disputed in good
faith shall accrue interest at the rate of nine percent (9%) per annum.
Please indicate the City’s agreement to this arrangement by signing below. Of course, if you have any
questions or concerns, please let me know.
Sincerely,
John Greenbank,
Executive Vice President
Metro Fibernet, LLC
AGREED AND ACCEPTED
BY THE CITY OF AMES:
_______________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: ________________________
1
ITEM # ____18__
DATE 01-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT AT 23959 580TH AVENUE (FORMER
CAREMOLI PROPERTY) FOR “AMES” SIGN
BACKGROUND:
In 2017, the City provided $15,000 in funds for a Leadership Ames class project to
construct two “Ames” signs along U.S. Highway 30 near entrances to Ames. These
signs were designed to appear similar to an existing sign on the Danfoss property along
E. 13th Street, except the new signs were to be made from concrete instead of the
original limestone. These signs were placed on private property through negotiations
between the Leadership Ames class and the property owners. No easements were
obtained for them.
One of the signs was constructed on the north side of U.S. 30 at 23959 580th Avenue
(Caremoli property). This property has been foreclosed upon by Banker’s Trust, which
now intends to sell the property. Before the property is sold, Banker’s Trust is willing to
grant the City an easement for the sign. Banker’s Trust does not expect compensation
in exchange for the easement.
After the sign was constructed in 2017, the property owner continued to mow the area
around the sign. Staff will confer with the new property owner once the sale has been
completed to discuss future maintenance of the area around the sign.
Without an easement for the sign, a new property owner may choose to remove it.
Normally, City Council approval is not required when easements are granted to the City.
However, the Council’s approval is requested in this situation because the City’s
initial involvement in this project did not come with an expectation for the City to
have an ongoing role in this sign.
The City typically requires other parties to sign documents such as this before they are
approved by the City Council; however it is City staff’s understanding that Banker’s
Trust would like to sell this property quickly. Therefore, the easement document has
been prepared, but as of Friday it had not yet been reviewed or signed by Banker’s
Trust. City staff will report to the Council on Tuesday if the easement is not signed prior
to the Council meeting.
2
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Accept the easement for the “Ames” sign located at 23959 580th Avenue.
2. Do not accept the easement.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The “Ames” sign located on the former Caremoli property was only placed on that
property because the owner was willing to allow its construction. Without an easement,
there is no guarantee that a future property owner would keep the sign. Accepting this
easement does not obligate the City to maintain or repair the sign, but allows the City to
do so if it chooses.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1 as described above.
Easement for Sign
Know All Persons: The undersigned, Bankers Trust Company, (hereinafter referred to as the
“Grantor”), for valuable consideration, does hereby grant unto the City of Ames, Iowa, a municipal
corporation, (hereinafter referred to as the “Grantee”), upon the conditions hereinafter recited, the
perpetual right to enter upon the land hereinafter described as the Easement Area for the uses set forth
hereinafter over, upon, across and under the Easement Area together with a perpetual right of ingress and
egress between said Easement Area from adjacent public rights‐of‐way. The Easement Area is a strip of land
situated in Story County, Iowa, as shown on the attached Easement Exhibit, and described as follows:
For the use and placement of a monument sign and all appurtenant utilities, fixtures and
facilities appurtenant thereto.
The real property shown on Schedule “A” attached hereto and by this reference
made a part hereof.
Grantees shall have the right within the Easement Area to place a monument sign and to construct,
reconstruct, cover over, clean up, enlarge, remove or reduce in size or scope, operate, use, maintain, and
repair said monument sign within the Easement Area. The foregoing rights are granted by the Grantor and
shall be accepted and exercised by the Grantee, if at all, subject to the following terms and conditions:
1 Obstructions Prohibited. The Grantor, as the fee simple owner of the underlying real estate, and the
Grantors’ successors and assigns, shall not erect or place within the Easement Area any building or
other structure or landscaping feature that obstructs the monument sign, in the judgment of the
Grantee, except with the prior written consent of the Grantee. The Grantee shall have the right to trim
or remove trees and shrubs within the Easement Area to prevent damage to or otherwise maintain the
monument sign located within the Easement Area.
2 Maintenance. Nothing herein shall be construed so as to require the Grantee to maintain or repair the
monument sign placed within the Easement Area, or to require the Grantee to mow, landscape, provide
snow removal upon, or otherwise maintain the Easement Area.
3 Nonexclusive Easement. The easement rights granted under this instrument to the Grantee are
nonexclusive. This instrument shall not preclude the Grantor from granting similar easement rights to
third parties upon terms and conditions that do not impair or diminish the rights granted under this
instrument to the Grantee.
4 Title Warranty. The Grantor warrants to the Grantee that the Grantor holds the Easement Area by
title in fee simple; that the Grantor has good and lawful authority to grant the easement rights herein
provided for; and that the Easement Area is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances.
S P A C E A B O V E R E S E R V E D F O R O F F I C I A L U S E
Return document to: City Clerk, 515 Clark Avenue, Ames IA 50010
Document prepared by: Victoria A. Feilmeyer. City of Ames Legal Department, 515 Clark Ave., Ames, IA 50010 – 515-239-5146
2
5 Successors and Assigns. This Easement shall be binding upon successors and/or assigns of both
Grantee and Grantor.
6 Interpretation. Words and phrases used in this instrument shall be construed as in the single or
plural number, and as masculine, feminine or neuter gender, according to the context. This instrument
shall be governed exclusively by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Iowa. The
paragraph headings in this instrument are for convenience only and in no way define or limit the scope
or intent of any provisions of this instrument.
In Witness Whereof the undersigned has executed this instrument on __________________, 2020.
BANKERS TRUST COMPANY
By:
John Russell, Market President
STATE OF IOWA, COUNTY OF STORY, SS.:
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2020, by John Russell, as
Market President of Bankers Trust Company.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Schedule ‘A’
[Survey Description-Sign Easement]
A part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 83 North,
Range 23 West of the 5th P.M., Story County, Iowa, being described as follows: Beginning at
the intersection of the West line of said Southeast Quarter with the North right of way line of
U.S. Highway #30; thence N00°17'39"E, 45.00 feet along the West line of said Southeast
Quarter; thence N89°51'20"E, 75.00 feet; thence S00°17'39"W, 45.00 feet to the North right of
way line of U.S. Highway #30; thence S89°51'20"W, 75.00 feet along said line to the point of
beginning.
[Containing 3374.90 s.f., more or less].
3
Accepted on ________________________. 2020, by Resolution No. 20-________ adopted by the City
Council of the City of Ames, Iowa.
CITY OF AMES, IOWA
By:
John A. Haila, Mayor
Attest:
Diane R. Voss, City Clerk
STATE OF IOWA, COUNTY OF STORY, SS.:
This instrument was acknowledged before me on _______________________, 2020, by John A. Haila
and Diane R. Voss, as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Ames, Iowa.
NOTARY PUBLIC
ITEM # ___19___
DATE: 01-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: ECO FAIR APPROVALS
BACKGROUND:
The annual City of Ames EcoFair is being expanded this year to recognize two
significant milestones: the 10th anniversary of the EcoFair and the 50th anniversary of
Earth Day (April 22). While Ames Electric Services had hosted an annual Energy Fair
for years, the expanded EcoFair began in 2010 with nearly all City departments
participating. The goal of the EcoFair was expanded to reflect a range of
sustainability issues and a mission of connecting residents with resources to
conserve natural resources and reduce their carbon footprint.
As in previous years, the EcoFair will be held at the Community Center Gymnasium
from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturday, April 25. In addition to the traditional arrangements
for EcoFair, staff plans to grow the event by using Fifth Street to exhibit the Iowa DNR’s
Mobile Education Trailer, the City’s alternative fuel equipment, and an electric car
display. Staff is also planning to extend an invitation to food trucks.
To facilitate this event, City staff has requested the following:
• Closure of Fifth Street from east of the Lot M (City Hall parking lot) entrance to
Clark Avenue from 4:00 p.m. on Friday, April 24th to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, April
25th
• A blanket Temporary Obstruction Permit
• A blanket Vending License
• Closure of 35 metered parking spaces along Fifth Street from 4:00 p.m. on
Friday, April 24th to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, April 25th ($70 to the Parking Fund to
be covered by the event.)
• Continued use of three metered parking spaces to hold the Iowa DNR mobile
trailer until its removal the morning of Monday, April 27. ($4.50 to the Parking
Fund to be covered by the event.)
Staff plans to notify affected properties along Fifth Street by distributing the event details
via postcards. There is one residential property, and local traffic would be allowed in
and out.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the requests for EcoFair on Saturday, April 25th, as outlined above,
contingent upon reimbursement for lost parking revenue and vending License
2
2. Do not approve the requests.
MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
EcoFair is an annual event that connects the Ames community with City staff and
sustainability experts who provide a range of resources focused on reducing energy
consumption and water, land, and resource conservation. The EcoFair furthers the City
Council’s Goal to expand Sustainability Efforts.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1, thereby approving the requests for EcoFair on Saturday, April 25th, as
outlined above, contingent upon reimbursement for lost parking revenue and Vending
License.
3
1
ITEM # ___20__
DATE 01-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: SOUTH GRAND AVENUE EXTENSION – 0.1 MILES NORTH OF
SOUTH 16TH STREET NORTH 0.54 MILES TO SOUTH 5TH STREET
BACKGROUND:
This project is part of the extension of South Grand Avenue from S 3rd Street to S 16th
Street and associated projects to extend S 5th Street and for intersection improvements
at S 16th Street/S Duff Avenue. The projects have been broken into three phases to allow
for potential flexibility in timing of construction and funding. The phases are:
1) S. 5th St extension and the portion of S. Grand Ave from Squaw Creek Drive (the
existing dead end) to S. 5th St.
2) S Grand Ave South of S. 5th Street (this portion includes two bridges to
accommodate Squaw Creek under the roadway).
3) Reconstruction and widening additional turn lanes at S. Duff Ave and S. 16th St.
This project includes extension of South Grand Avenue from the new South 5th
Street to 0.1 North of South 16th Street (Phase 2 described above).
A summary of revenues and projected expenses is shown below.
Activity Expenses Revenue
Construction (This project) $12,200,000.00
TOTAL $19,859,304.15 $19,871,485
This project will have a February 18, 2020 letting conducted through the Iowa
Department of Transportation (DOT), which is a requirement of using the
MPO/Federal/State funding. The work has a late start date of April 6, 2020 but could
start earlier, if the contractor chooses. This will provide more flexibility for the
contractors and hopefully result in lower bid prices.
2
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve plans and specifications for the South Grand Avenue Extension – 0.1
Miles North of South 16th Street North 0.54 Miles to South 5th Street and establish
February 18, 2020, as the date of letting and February 25, 2020, as the date for
report of bids.
2. Do not approve this project.
MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approval of the plans and specifications will continue to keep this project on the Iowa
DOT’s February 18, 2020, letting schedule. Delay or rejection of these plans and
specifications will delay this project, and possibly jeopardize the funding.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1, as described above.
So
u
t
h
5
t
h
S
t
.
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
(
A
w
a
r
d
e
d
)
So
u
t
h
G
r
a
n
d
A
v
e
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
(
F
e
b
1
8
,
2
0
D
O
T
L
e
t
t
i
n
g
)
So
u
t
h
1
6
t
h
&
S
o
u
t
h
D
u
f
f
(
F
u
t
u
r
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
ITEM # __21___
DATE: 01-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: EAST INDUSTRIAL AREA UTILITY EXTENSION PROJECT
BACKGROUND:
The East Industrial Area Utility Extension Project consists of the extension of water and
sanitary sewer to the recently annexed area east of Interstate 35 (I-35). More specifically,
it involves the installation of water main and gravity sewer between I-35 and Potter
Avenue (formerly 590th), force sewer from Teller Ave (formerly 580th) to west of Freel
Drive, and construction of a sanitary sewer lift station. This area east of I-35 has been
certified by the Iowa Economic Development Authority as the Prairie View Industrial
Center.
Stanley Consultants Inc. has completed plans and specifications for this project with total
estimated construction costs of $4,518,440. Engineering, construction administration,
and land acquisition expenses are estimated at $771,000, bringing the total estimated
cost to $5,289,440.
This project is shown in the 2016/17 Capital Improvement Plan with $5,300,000 in G.O.
bond funding (Water and Sewer Utility revenue abated).
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the plans and specifications for the East Industrial Area Utility Extension
Project and establish March 4, 2020 as the date of letting and March 10, 2020 as
the date for the report of bids.
2. Do not approve the project.
3. Approve the project with modifications.
MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The extension of water and sanitary sewer service to this area is necessary to the
development of the Iowa Economic Development Authority-certified Prairie View
Industrial Center. It is anticipated that this Center will attract large-scale industrial
development and promote economic growth in and around the City of Ames.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternate No. 1, as noted above.
1
ITEM # ___22__
DATE: 01-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: FUEL FORWARDING PUMP HOUSE FIRE PROTECTION UPGRADE
REPORT OF NO BIDS AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECS FOR
REBID
BACKGROUND:
On November 26, 2019, City Council approved preliminary plans and specifications for
an upgrade of the fire protection system at the Combustion Turbine (CT) site located on
Pullman Avenue. The current system uses pressurized Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and
needs to be upgraded to a dry pipe sprinkler system to meet current insurance
standards.
The current system’s use of pressurized CO2 has the potential to create an oxygen-
depleted environment, which could cause injury to human habitants. Additionally, the
current system has limited operability and can be operated only for a fixed amount of
time due to the limited supply of on-site CO2. Upgrading the system to a dry pipe
sprinkler system removes the possibility of creating an oxygen-depleted environment
and makes it safe for human habitants. Additionally, the upgraded system would not be
dependent on the amount of fire extinguisher retardant available onsite as the system
would be tapped in to the on-site water line for an “unlimited” supply of fire protection.
Bid documents were issued to thirty-one firms and one plan room. The bid was
advertised on the Current Bid Opportunities section of the Purchasing webpage and a
Legal Notice was published on the websites of a contractor plan room service with
statewide circulation and the Iowa League of Cities.
No bids were received prior to the bid due date of January 15, 2020. Follow-up
with contractors who attended the required onsite pre-bid meeting indicated that
that they were having difficulties finding local sub-contractor availability.
Contractors have indicated the desire to submit a bid, if given another
opportunity, even if a trenching contractor is from outside the vicinity of Ames.
The engineer’s estimate to upgrade the CT fuel forwarding building fire protection
system is $149,000. The approved FY 2019/20 Capital Improvements Plan includes a
funding carryover of $782,005 for the Power Plant Fire Protection system.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve preliminary plans and specifications for rebidding Fuel Forwarding
Pump House Fire Protection Upgrade, establishing February 26, 2020, as the bid
due date and March 10, 2020, as the date of hearing and award of contract.
2. Delay the Fuel Forwarding Pump House Fire Protection Upgrade project.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This work is necessary to upgrade the fire protection system to increase site safety
precautions and to meet a recommendation from the insurance company. Staff believes
there would be interest from contractors if the project is re-bid.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1 as stated above.
1
ITEM # ____23___
DATE: 01/28/2020
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: REVISED CYRIDE 2020 HVAC PROJECT PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS
BACKGROUND:
On January 14, 2020, the City Council rejected bids for the CyRide 2020 HVAC Project
due to an overly restrictive controls specification in the bid documents. Plans and
specifications have now been revised to allow for more competition and are ready to be
released.
CyRide was awarded $521,098 in grant money from the State of Iowa to replace
heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment in the facility. The project is
listed in the FY 2019-24 CIP. The HVAC equipment in this project received the highest
priority for replacement in CyRide’s Transit Asset Management (TAM) plan. A TAM plan
is required by the Federal Transit Administration, and its purpose is to ensure that
facility and rolling stock assets are maintained in a state of good repair.
The project budget remains unchanged even though the plans and specifications have
been revised. To accomplish the HVAC project, CyRide has accumulated local
matching funds and has the following budget reserved for the project:
Architectural drawings and specifications are now on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
The bid letting date is January 29, with bids due on February 26, 2020. Bid results will
be reported to Council on March 10, 2020.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve plans and specifications for the Revised CyRide 2020 HVAC Project
and establish February 26, 2020 as the bid due date. Establish March 10, 2020
as the date to report bid results to Council.
2. Direct staff to continue to work with the A&E consultant to refine the project
plans.
2
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approval of the plans and specifications will allow CyRide to move forward with an
important facility improvement project.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1, thereby approving plans and specifications for construction of the
CyRide 2020 HVAC Project, and establish February 26, 2020, as the bid due date, and
March 10, 2020 as the date to report bid results to Council.
1
ITEM # 24
DATE: 01-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF
FURNITURE FOR CITY HALL, WATER POLLUTION CONTROL, AND
CITY MAINTENANCE FACILITY
BACKGROUND:
Multiple departments planned various projects to replace outdated and inefficient office
workspaces and a number of the departments looked to increased efficiency and health
benefit with sit-to-stand options. Based on the quantity of office furniture needed to
furnish these locations, the City was able to realize cost savings for our furniture needs
through volume discounts.
City Hall
Departments included in City Hall are Finance Customer Service, Public Works
Engineering, Police Administration, and Human Resources. Customer Service is
replacing two workstations for Meter Readers. Public Works Engineering is replacing
five workstations and adding sit-to-stand functions. Police Administration is replacing
the one workstation and adding a sit-to-stand function. Human Resources is modifying
one workstation to add sit-to-stand function.
Water Pollution Control Plant
All of the office spaces in the Water Pollution Control Plant are being replaced with new
equipment. The WP&C office furniture is over 30 years old and is in need of
replacement. This includes furniture in the waiting area, reception area, Superintendent,
Assistant Superintendent, Engineer, and the Maintenance Offices.
City Maintenance Facility
Departments included in City Maintenance Facility are Public Works Traffic Signal and
Sign Shop, and Fleet Services. Public Works Traffic Signal is replacing four
workstations, replacing conference room table and chairs, and adding storage cabinets.
Public Works Traffic Sign is replacing two workstations. Fleet Services is replacing one
workstation and adding the sit-to-stand function.
Other items include tables and a cabinet for the Water Plant and four task chairs for the
Power Plant. The task chairs for the Power Plant include 7% sales tax.
On December 9, 2019, an Invitation to Bid (ITB) was issued to 11 vendors. The ITB was
advertised on the Current Bid Opportunities section of the Purchasing webpage.
On January 7, 2020, two bids were received. The bid tabulation is shown below:
2
Firms Bid
Breakdown by Location Storey Kenworthy All Makes Office Interiors
TOTAL $84,102.37 $94,390.88
Staff reviewed the bids and had concluded that the apparent low bid from Storey
Kenworthy, Ames, Iowa, in the amount of $84,102.37 is acceptable and meets the
needs of each project for furniture.
The funding for the Human Resources along with a miscellaneous chair and storage
cabinets for City Manager’s Office, comes from budgeted money in the City Hall Space
Needs fund, which currently has $46,500 available. Funding for the areas at Water
Plant comes from CIP with $38,000 available. Funding for the following spaces comes
from FY 19/20 operating budget for departments: Finance Customer Service, Fleet
Services, Public Works Engineering, Public Works Traffic, Police, Water Pollution
Control Plant, and Electric.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Award contract to purchase and installation of furniture for various locations in City
Hall, Water Pollution Control, and City Maintenance Facility to Storey Kenworthy,
Ames, Iowa in the amount of $84,102.37.
2. Award a contract to the other company.
3. Reject all bids and rebid the furniture.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This competitively bid purchase will provide furniture and installation for various
locations in City Hall, Water Pollution Control, and City Maintenance Facility.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1 as stated above.
1
ITEM # ___25__
DATE: 01-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR POWER PLANT CHEMICAL STORAGE
FLOOR REPAIR
BACKGROUND:
As part of the electric production cycle, water is treated by reverse osmosis to provide
filtered water to the boiler. The room that houses the equipment for this process is in
need of repair. Due to its age, contact with chemicals, and with water, the floor is falling
apart. Equipment in the room include water filtrations skids and water/chemical storage
tanks.
Bid documents were issued to twenty-five companies and were sent out to three plan
rooms. The bid was also advertised on the Current Bid Opportunities section of the
Purchasing webpage.
On January 14, 2020, three bids were received as shown on the attached report.
Contractor
Story Construction Company $90,000.00 $380.00
Western Waterproofing Company $75,000.00 $588.00
Staff reviewed the bids received and determined that lowest responsive, responsible
bidder is Western Waterproofing Company, Inc. d/b/a Western Specialty Contractors of
West Des Moines, Iowa. This firm is qualified to perform the necessary work and has
the capacity to complete the project within the timeframe required. This vendor is
licensed to collect taxes for the State of Iowa.
The approved FY 2019/20 operating budget for Miscellaneous Operations contains
$317,000 in available funding for this project. The Engineer’s Estimate for this repair
is $50,000. City staff has consulted with the engineering firm to determine why
bids are higher than the estimate. The low number of bidders, combined with the
difficulty of accessing the area due to the industrial nature of the Power Plant
structure, contribute to the higher bids.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Award a contract to Western Waterproofing Company, Inc. d/b/a Western
Specialty Contractors of West Des Moines, Iowa for the Chemical Storage Floor
Repair in the amount of $75,000.
2. Reject all bids and direct staff to rebid the project.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This repair is crucial to maintain the safety and integrity of the Power Plant. This floor
houses equipment that is vital in purifying the water that is used while the plant in online
producing power. Further degradation of this floor could result in damage to equipment
on top of and underneath the floor. Damage to this equipment would likely result in
unplanned plant outages and maintenance costs. Additionally, this room is regularly
accessed (daily) by plant personnel for equipment monitoring and chemical staging;
further degradation could result in a severe plant safety hazard.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1 as stated above.
Smart Choice
MEMO
515.239.5105 main
fax
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: City Clerk’s Office
Date: January 28, 2020
Subject: Contract and Bond Approval
There is/are no Council Action Form(s) for Item No(s). 26. Council approval of the
contract and bond for this/these project(s) is simply fulfilling a State Code requirement.
/alc
1
ITEM # ___27_
DATE: 1-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER - WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY
BIOSOLIDS DISPOSAL OPERATIONS (YEAR 1)
BACKGROUND:
On May 14, 2019, the City Council awarded a contract to Nutri-Ject Systems, Inc. of
Hudson, Iowa, to complete the first year of a contract for biosolids disposal at the Water
Pollution Control Facility.
As the work progressed, it was discovered that estimated quantities of biosolids were
higher than originally budgeted, due in large part to cleaning of digesters for the Digester
Improvements Phase II CIP Project.
Once started, the biosolids application process needs to continue without stopping for
several reasons:
• The mobilization and set-up for the application process is exceptionally lengthy,
and having the contractor demobilize and remobilize would have added an
additional $2,000 to the cost of the change order.
• Stopping work would have resulted in thousands of feet of frozen hoses, further
increasing the cost implications.
• The time window between the end of harvest and the onset of frozen ground can
be short and highly unpredictable. If the contractor were to demobilize, it would
move on to another client, raising the potential that it might not be able to return
before winter weather shut down the operation for the season. If storage space is
not freed up by removing and applying the stored solids, it is possible that sufficient
storage space would not be available prior to the farmland becoming available
again in the spring. In that event, substantial additional costs would be incurred to
avoid a permit violation.
For these reasons, the application of the material continued until completed, even though
the quantities exceeded the original contract amount. A change order is appropriate to
pay for additional work performed by Nutri-Ject. A summary of the contract and change
order cost is included below. A copy of the change order cost proposal is attached.
2
Original Contract Amount $83,480.00
Change Order #1 $32,826.10
Revised Contract Amount $116,306.10
The adopted FY 2019/20 Operating Budget includes $100,000 for Biosolids Disposal. In
anticipation of additional quantities, the amended budget that will be approved by Council
in March added an additional $60,000, bringing the total dollar amount available to
$160,000.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve Change Order #1 in the amount of $32,826.10 to Nutri-Ject Systems, Inc.
of Hudson, IA.
2. Do not approve a change order.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The disposal of biosolids at the Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) has been
identified as an essential service in the Operating Budget. The proposed change order
would allow for the completion of the necessary work. Adequate funding is included in
the FY 2019/20 amended budget to cover the change order. Therefore, it is the
recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt Alternative No. 1, as
stated above.
1
ITEM # 28
DATE: 01-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: 2017/18 STORM WATER EROSION CONTROL (KINYON – CLARK
SUBDIVISION)
BACKGROUND:
This annual program provides for stabilization of areas that have become eroded in
streams, channels, swales, gullies, or drainage ways that are part of the storm water
system. The improvements provide a more permanent control of erosion and will reduce
recurring maintenance costs in these areas.
This project included the following improvements and benefits in the Kinyon-Clark
Subdivision area, north of Bloomington Road:
• Stabilized existing stream bank to protect the property of homeowners
• Incorporated resiliency in construction to prevent further erosion of the streambank
• Reduced long-range costs with a self-maintaining channel while avoiding adverse
effects on residential property
• Enhanced natural aesthetics and native vegetation in the affected reach
On April 10, 2019, City Council awarded this project to Keller Excavating, Inc. of Boone,
Iowa, in the amount of $186,578.10. One balancing change order was administratively
approved by staff to reflect the actual measured quantities completed during construction.
Construction was completed in the amount of $193,379.79.
Revenues and expenses for the project are summarized below:
Available
Revenue
Estimated
Expenses
Remaining funds will be returned to Storm Sewer Utility Fund.
2
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Accept the 2017/18 Storm Water Erosion Control (Kinyon – Clark Subdivision)
project as completed by Keller Excavating Inc, of Boone, Iowa, in the amount of
$193,379.79.
2. Direct staff to pursue modification to the project.
MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This project was completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative No. 1, as described above.
Planning and Housing Department 515.239.5400 main 515 Clark Ave. P.O. Box 811
515.239.5404 fax Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kelly Diekmann, Planning & Housing Director;
Cory Scott and Marty Shukert, RDG
DATE: December 17, 2019
SUBJECT: Ames Plan 2040 Scenario Selection
City Council directed RDG to prepare four independent directional growth scenarios that
could accommodate a population of approximately 15,000 additional people within the
City of Ames. RDG presented initial concepts to the City Council at a workshop on July
16th. The scenarios were geographically located to the west, north, east, and south. The
scenarios included different land use patterns and highlights of growth opportunities and
potential constraints. City Council tasked the Ames Plan 2040 Team to work on refining
the scenarios and preparing detailed analysis of infrastructure and service issues for the
areas. Additionally, Council asked for the team to look at flexibility of growth areas and
identify readily developable areas and other “tiers” of growth that could be supported.
The complete evaluation of the growth scenarios and “tiers” will be the topic of
discussion for the City Council’s next workshop on December 19th.
In preparation for this upcoming meeting, City Council asked for general feedback on
what issues or priorities may help the Council evaluate the merits of the individual
scenarios. The following is a list reflects considerations that RDG and staff have
incorporated into our evaluation of the scenarios. City Council could utilize these same
consideration in its evaluation of scenarios and options for the Ames Plan 2040 preferred
land use discussion. The following list is in no particular order.
Caring People
Quality Programs
Exceptional Service
Item No. 44
OLD CAF
Scenario Considerations
• Infrastructure capacity and public service costs
o Up-front investment costs by City
o Long term total investment costs by the City
o Is there overall value and desirability, not just a low cost to serve?
• Does development cause significant negative externalities to existing areas
within the City, such as traffic patterns, sewer capacity utilization, etc.
• Would an area have comparatively fewer environmental impacts or have higher
preforming sustainability attributes, for example:
o Lower vehicle miles travelled (VMT) per person
o Natural area buffering/protection
o Flood plain risk/protection
• Does the planned level of growth create a complete neighborhood or district?
o Can it accommodate public facilities, such as a school or parks,
commercial development, housing variety?
• Would developing a growth area facilitate community improvements or
additional amenities that otherwise may not be realized, for example:
o Open Space/Recreation Areas
o Expanded or commercial opportunities
o Upgraded roadways
• Does an area identified for growth support a diverse development pattern and
compliment the character of Ames?
• Does the transportation system support both automobiles and alternative modes
of transportation?
o Future transit service
o Bicycling and walking connections
• Market interest and demand
o How does an area fit into or serve regional needs and job locations?
o Will the planned housing make Ames competitive in attracting new
workforce households?
o Does it support or reinforce economic development goals for expansion
of private industry and business within the City?
o Is an area marketable for developers for the identified uses?
• Future Expansion and Planning
o Can an area be expanded in the future and build upon initial investments;
does it support long-term growth to 2050 and 2075?
o Preserve future expansion areas that are not initially developed
City Council Workshop #7
December 19, 2019
Ames Comprehensive Plan
page 1
Agenda
1.Directional Scenario Evaluation
a.North Growth
b.East Growth
c.South Growth
d.West & Southwest Growth
2.Tiers Testing
a.Review combinations of growth for many areas
3.Discussion and Next Steps for Selecting Preferred Land Use
Plan Draft
a.Directional or Tiered approach
b.Prepare land use designations in selected area(s) and
existing city for Draft Future Land Use Map, including
housing and commercial development categories, uses,
densities page 2
Scenario Evaluation Task
1.Directional Scenario Evaluation
a.Presented development concepts in July
for 15,000+/-people in four areas
i.Initial concepts intended to reflect
various housing, environmental, and
commercial interests
b.Used City models to evaluate
serviceability issues related to the
direction of growth for specific needs:
a.Water
b.Sanitary Sewer
c.Public Safety (Fire)
d.Transportation page 3
Scenario Development Concepts
page 4
Concept Refinement
page 5
Scenario Evaluation Task
2. Tiers of Development Within Scenarios
a.Due to major infrastructure needs, divided
areas into readily serviceable “Tiers”
b.Provided estimates of needed
infrastructure for buildout of the Tiers in
total
c.No revisions to the initial land use
concepts were made to address Tiers at
this time
1
page 6
Infill sites
surrounded by
existing urban
development
New development
areas served by
existing
infrastructure or
relatively low -cost
incremental
extensions
New development
areas within urban
services area
requiring new
infrastructure or
substantial
extensions
Guiding Principles: Development Sequencing
page 7
Development Tiers
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 8
Guiding Principles: Development Tiers
TIER 1
•Infrastructure is immediately available or
achievable with short, incremental extensions.
•Street and trail connections are immediately
available.
•Market precedents are clearly established and
demonstrated.
•Job centers and commercial support are
immediately accessible.
TIER 2
•Infrastructure is available with extensions of
existing lines under ½ mile.
•Existing street network or spine trails are
accessible, but require substantial extensions.
•Job centers and commercial support are
reasonably accessible, but not directly
adjacent.
•Market support is demonstrable but some
“pioneering” element is required.
TIER 3
•Within urban services area, but requires significant
pioneer infrastructure.
•New street corridors are necessary to provide adequate
service.
•Regional arterial and interstate routes are available, but
require a major facility investment (e.g. interchange)
•Currently, relatively remote and not contiguous to existing
urban development.
•Requires significant reach into a new geographic market.
•Consistency with long-term urban development goals.
•New community and commercial service centers are
required.
TIER 4
•Ultimate very long-term development but outside of
current urban services area.
•Requires major redirection of local land use or ownership
patterns.
•New community and commercial service centers are
required.page 9
Tier Analysis
Road Classifications
page 10
Tier Analysis
Existing Water Distribution
page 11
Tier Analysis
Existing Sanitary Sewer
page 12
Tier Analysis
Existing Storm Sewer
page 13
Notes For Scenario Tiers:
•Analysis and projects identified here are key components needed to serve identified
growth areas.
•These projects are likely in addition to other necessary infrastructure or transportation
system improvements that provide benefits to both existing areas and proposed new
development areas.
•Growth in these areas may have impacts on the existing developed city, creating a need
for other projects within the currently built-up area of Ames.
•The projected costs do not indicate that the City of Ames would be responsible
for identified costs. The City has certain policies in place regarding development
and infrastructure costs that are not addressed as part of this evaluation of
service needs.
page 14
Notes For Scenario Tiers:
Technical Assumptions for modeling
o Assumed Industrial growth as a “background” condition, meaning scenario outcomes
are on top of growth related to the industrial areas and other general growth in the area
o The traffic analysis relied upon the 2040 transportation model used for the current Long
Range Transportation Plan by adding in modified growth assumptions for the identified
scenarios, and deleting growth in the Northwest Area along North Dakota
o Water and Sewer models based on current conditions and growth was added or loaded
into the model
o Fire response modeling assumed relocation of Station 2 to the west would occur
regardless of growth direction per previous discussions, response time standard applied
was for 85% of citywide calls as a Fire Department performance goal
o Projected costs are in 2019 dollars
page 15
Tier Analysis-Transportation Map with Population Estimates Served
Notes-highlighted
segments indicate
road improvements
associated with a
Tier
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 16
North Growth Area Summary
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3
Water Distribution
mains
throughout Tier
1. ($1.0M)
Distribution mains
throughout Tier 3.
($1.5M)
Distribution mains throughout
Tier 3. ($4.3M)
May require pressure boost to
support higher service
elevations. Does not have
negative impact on existing
distribution system. ($4.0M for
water tower)
Sanitary Collection
mains
throughout Tier
1.
($2.1M)
Collection mains
throughout Tier 2.
($2.5M)
Collection mains throughout
Tier 3. ($7.3M)
Reduces available capacity
in 36” trunk line on “Access
to City Wells” between
Lincoln Way and Hwy 30*.
The future growth with East
and North will have a
compounding effect on this
area.
Note: Green dash lined shown as proposed alternative, not needed to support projected growth
* Will discuss implications more in presentation
page 17
North Growth Area Summary
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3
Storm New storm along GW
Carver extension
New storm for
transportation
improvements
New storm for
transportation
improvements
Transportation Traffic Calming on Hyde
Ave Corridor ($1M)
Extend 3-lane GW
Carver through growth
area ($6M)
Extend 4-lane urban
widening on Grand / US
69 through growth area
($12M)
3-lane widening:
•190th St ($15M)
•Riverside (Grand to
Dayton) ($15M)
•Dayton (Riverside to
Lincoln Way) ($18M)
Alternate route to Hyde
(neighborhood impacts)
($6M)
Public Safety Need Fire Station to meet citywide goals
$6 million for constructing and equipping
station, plus personnel
page 18
East Growth Area
Tier 1 Tiers 3 and 4
Water Distribution mains
throughout Tier 1.
($0.5M)
Distribution mains throughout Tiers 3 and 4.
($4.0M)
Observed head-loss in transmission lines to
new growth area. May require new water tower
or pressure boost to support new service
elevations. Filling tank in off peak hours may
alleviate observed head-loss concerns in
existing system. ($4.0M for water tower)
Sanitary Collection mains
throughout Tier 1.
($2.1M)
Collection mains throughout Tiers 3 and 4.
($9.0M)
Reduces available capacity in 36” trunk line on
“Access to City Wells” between Lincoln Way
and Hwy 30. Full build out (depending on
industry loading) may require new trunkline
south to the treatment plant. ($21.0M)
page 19
East Growth Area
Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 4
Storm Extend storm
sewer along 13th
Street
Extend storm sewer
along 13th Street
Maintain drainage way
as flowage easement
Transportation Extend 4-lane 13th
Street to Tier 1
growth area ($8M)
Extend 4-lane 13th
Street farther east to
Tier 3 growth area
($16M)
Reconstruct I-35 / 13th
Street interchange
($18M)
Widen 13th Street to 6-
lane divided from
Dayton to east of I-35
interchange ($8M)
Consider new
Riverside / 200th Street
corridor and overpass
of I-35 ($9M)
Public Safety No station directly required to meet overall city
goals. However, most if not all of the area is
outside of 5 min. 30 sec. response time
page 20
South Growth Area
Tier 1 Tiers 2 and 3
Water Distribution mains
throughout Tier 1.
($1.1M)
Distribution mains throughout Tier 2. ($3.8M)
Distribution mains throughout Tier 3. ($1.9M)
Full build out creates velocity concerns in the 14”
main along S Duff avenue from Airport Rd to the
connection point for the future growth area. Larger
diameter transmission or redundant connection
points would alleviate stress on existing distribution
system.
Sanitary Collection mains
throughout Tier 1.
New connection
point to existing
trunkline. ($3.2M)
Collection mains throughout Tier 2. ($2.3M)
Collection mains throughout Tier 3. ($3.3M)
page 21
South Growth Area
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3
Storm New storm sewer with
street extensions
Maintain drainage
way between US 69
and 550th Ave.
New storm sewer with
street extensions
New storm sewer with
street extensions
Transportation Extend 4-lane divided
Duff Avenue to Tier 1
Growth area ($16M)
Widen Duff Ave to 6-
lanes from S 16th
Street to Airport Road
($6M)
Reconstruct US 30 /
Duff Ave Interchange
($18M)
Consider extension of
Grand Avenue to
Airport Road to
relieve Duff Avenue
congestion between
Airport Road and
South 16th St ($16M)
Extend 6-lane Duff
Ave to approximately
Jewel Drive (~1 mile of
6-lane) ($12M)
Widen County E57 as
3-lane roadway and
extend to 260th Street
($18M)
Add I-35 / E57 (260th
Street) Interchange
Ramps ($4M)
Public Safety Good coverage due to existing Station 3
page 22
Southwest Growth Area
Tier 2 Tier 3
Water Distribution mains
throughout Tier 2. ($2.6M)
Distribution mains
throughout Tier 3. ($1.8M)
Great pressure and service
due to proximity to MAC
Tank.
Sanitary Requires 7,400’ sewer
extension into Tier 2 to
connect to existing system
along Worle Creek. ($2.8M)
Collection mains throughout
Tier 2. ($6.3M)
Collection mains throughout
Tier 3. ($4.8M)
Does not create capacity
concerns.
page 23
Southwest Growth Area
Tier 2 Tier 3
Storm Maintain Worle Creek
drainage way
New storm sewers for
street conversions
Maintain Worle Creek
drainage way
New storm sewers for street
conversions
Transportation 3-lane urban conversion of
Y Avenue and 240th Street
in Tier 2, maintaining
existing Highway 30
overpass ($9M)
Turn lanes and improved
intersection control at US
30/Lincoln Way/X Ave
intersections ($3M)
3-lane urban conversion of
X Avenue and 240th Street in
Tier 3 ($15M)
Reconstruct US 30 / Lincoln
Way and US 30 / X Ave
interchanges ($20M)
Public Safety No additional station needed with relocation of Station 2
page 24
West Growth Area
Tier 1 Tiers 2 and 3
Water Distribution mains
throughout Tier 1.
($1.0M)
Distribution mains throughout Tier 2.
($2.1M)
Distribution mains throughout Tier 3.
($2.6M)
Great pressure and service due to
proximity to MAC Tank.
Sanitary Collection mains
throughout Tier 1.
($4.5M)
Current project to
address existing I/I
concerns in
downstream of Munn
Woods.
Collection mains throughout Tier 2.
($3.4M)
Collection mains throughout Tier 3.
($5.4M)
Downstream Capacity Concerns with
Tier 3 growth. Could require collection
main connection to Southwest growth
area and lift station at additional cost
not yet included.
page 25
West Growth Area
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3
Storm Maintain drainage
way and wetlands
east of Y Avenue
New storm sewer
with street
extensions
Maintain drainage way
between Y Avenue and
X Avenue
New storm sewer for
street widening and
extensions
Maintain drainage way
north of Ontario Street
New storm sewer for
street widening and
extensions
Transportation Extend 4-lane
divided Lincoln
Way west to Tier 1
Growth area ($8M)
Extend 3-lane
Ontario west to Tier
1 Growth area
($6M)
Widen Y Avenue to 3-
lanes from Ontario to
Tier 2 Growth area
south boundary (south
of 240th St) ($12M)
Widen 240th Street to
3-lanes through Tier 2
Growth Area (~1.5
miles) ($9M)
Extend 4-lane divided
Lincoln Way west to
Tier 2 Growth area
($16M)
Extend 4-lane divided
Lincoln Way west to
Tier 3 Growth area
($2M)
Widen X Avenue to 4-
lanes through Tier 3
Growth Area ($12M)
Reconstruct US 30 /
Lincoln Way and US 30
/ X Ave interchanges
($20M)
Public Safety No additional station needed with relocation of
Station 2 page 26
For Comparison: All 2040 Growth in One Center
$101.7m
$99.6m
$105.6m
$65.3m
$104.0m
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 27
Infrastructure Cost Comparison of Scenarios by Infrastructure
North East South Southwest West
Water $10.8 $8.5 $6.8 $4.4 $5.7
Sanitary $11.9 $32.1 $8.8 $13.9 $13.3
Transportation $73.0 $59.0 $90.0 $47.0 $85.0
Fire Station $6.0
Total $101.7 $99.6 $105.6 $65.3 $104.0
Note: Costs in millions 2019.
page 28
Infrastructure Cost Comparison by Tier
Note: Costs in millions 2019.
Area Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 TOTAL
North $ 16.1 $ 4.0 $ 81.6 $ 101.7
East $ 10.6 $ 72.0 $ 17.0 $ 99.6
South $ 20.3 $ 46.1 $ 39.2 $ 105.6
Southwest $ 23.7 $ 41.6 $ 65.3
West $ 19.5 $ 42.5 $ 42.0 $ 104.0
TOTAL $ 66.5 $ 116.3 $ 276.4 $ 17.00 $ 476.2
page 29
Traffic Modeling Outcomes
Note: Addresses travel on primary streets that are part of the Transportation Model network,
does not include local streets
Scenario 4 is a compilation of West and Southwest as one scenario
Area
North
East
South
West
page 30
Public Feedback-Online Commenting Tool
East
•Comments for and
against growth in this
area.
•Too far away from
existing city
•Like the village concept.
Also heard that it was too
suburban.
•Good access to
interstate.
•Concern about
environmental impacts.
West
•Generally favorable
responses.
•Concern about crossing
over to Boone County.
•Good access to highway.
Southwest
•Comments for and
against growth in this
area.
•Concern about proximity
to ISU farms.
•Concern about crossing
over to Boone County.
•Good access to
highway.
North
•Concern about traffic
congestion and access
to highways.
•Already growing towards
the north.
•Like greenway
connections.
•Concern on influence to
watersheds/ wetlands/
erosion/ farmland/
prairie.
•Not Ames School
District
South
•Mostly favorable
responses.
•Positioned well to
commute to Des
Moines and Ankeny.
•Concern about
parallel road to Duff
and adjacency to
greenspace.
•Desire to retain
nursery.
•Concern about
proximity to airport.
•Concern about
connection to
interstate and
environment.
page 31
Tier Options
1.Review different combinations of Tiers
a.Based upon modeling analysis of each scenario
b.Calculated population served based upon original land
use scenarios
page 32
Tier Combination Options
Population Yield: 15,673 Population Yield: 15,629 Population Yield: 14,796
Population Yield: 15,796 Population Yield: 16,773 Population Yield: 16,254
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 33
Scenario Evaluation. S1: Multi-Directional Tier 1
North (T1)
Dist Mains
San Collection Mains
Hyde Corridor Calming
3-lane GW Carver
Subtotal
East (T1)
Dist Mains
San Collection Mains
13th St extension
Subtotal
South (T1)
Water dist mains $ 1.1
San connection mains a nd connection
point $ 3.2
Duff 4-lane extension $16.0
Subtotal $28.3
West
Water dist mains $ 1.0
San collection mains $ 4.5
4-lane Lincolnway $ 8.0
3 lane ontario $ 6.0
Subtotal $19.5
Additional Fire Station $ 6.0
TotalPopulation Yield: 15,673
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 34
Scenario Evaluation. S1: Multi-Directional Tier 1 with Potential Infill Areas
North (T1)
Dist Mains
San Collection Mains
Hyde Corridor Calming
3-lane GW Carver
Subtotal
East (T1)
Dist Mains
San Collection Mains
13th St extension
Subtotal
South (T1)
Water dist mains $ 1.1
San connection mains a nd connection
point $ 3.2
Duff 4-lane extension $16.0
Subtotal $28.3
West
Water dist mains $ 1.0
San collection mains $ 4.5
4-lane Lincolnway $ 8.0
3 lane ontario $ 6.0
Subtotal $19.5
Additional Fire Station $ 6.0
TotalPopulation Yield: 15,673
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 35
Scenario Evaluation. S2: North + West
Population Yield: 15,673Population Yield: 15,629
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 36
North (T1)
Dist Mains $ 1.0
San Collection Mains $ 2.1
Hyde Corridor Calming $ 1.0
3-lane GW Carver $ 6.0
Subtotal $10.1
West (T1+T2)
Dist Mains $ 3.1
San Collection Mains $ 7.9
Lincolnway T1 ext $ 8.0
Ontario $ 6.0
Y Ave $12.0
240th widening $ 9.0
Lincolnway T2 extension $16.0
Subtotal $62.0
North T2
Dist mains $ 1.5
Water tower $ 4.0
San Collection Mains $ 2.5
Subtotal $ 8.0
Additional Fire $ 6.0
Total $ 86.1
Scenario Evaluation. S3: North + West + East
Population Yield: 14,796
North (T1)
Dist Mains $
San Collection Mains $
Hyde Corridor Calming $
3-lane GW Carver $
Subtotal $10.1
West (T1)
Water dist mains $
San collection mains $
4-lane Lincolnway $
3 lane ontario $
Subtotal $19.5
North T2
Dist mains $
Water tower $
San Collection Mains $
Subtotal
East
Dist Mains $
San Collection Mains $
13th St extension $
Subtotal $10.6
Additional Fire $6.0
Total $ 54.2
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 37
Scenario Evaluation. S4: North + West + South
Population Yield: 15,796
North (T1)
Dist Mains
San Collection Mains
Hyde Corridor Calming
3-lane GW Carver
Subtotal $10.1
West (T1)
Water dist mains
San collection mains
4-lane Lincolnway
3 lane ontario
Subtotal $19.5
North T2
Dist mains
Water tower
San Collection Mains
Subtotal
South
Water dist mains $ 1.1
San connection mains and connection point $ 3.2
Duff 4-lane extension $16.0
Subtotal $20.3
Additional Fire Station $ 6.0
Total
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 38
Scenario Evaluation. S5: North + Southwest
Population Yield: 16,773
North (T1)
Dist Mains $ 1.0
San Collection Mains $ 2.1
Hyde Corridor Calming $ 1.0
3-lane GW Carver $ 6.0
Subtotal $ 10.1
West (T1)
Water dist mains $ 1.0
San collection mains $ 4.5
4-lane Lincolnway $ 8.0
3 lane ontario $ 6.0
Subtotal $ 19.5
Southwest T2
Dist Mains $ 2.6
Worle Crk San ext $ 2.8
Collection mains $ 6.3
Y Ave conversion $ 15.0
US 30 intersections $ 3.0
Subtotal $ 29.7
Additional Fire Station $ 6.0
Total $65.3
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 39
Scenario Evaluation. S6: North + South
Population Yield: 16,254
North (T1)
Dist Mains $
San Collection Mains $
Hyde Corridor Calming $
3-lane GW Carver $
Subtotal
North T2
Dist mains $
Water tower $
San Collection Mains $
Subtotal
South (T1)
Water dist mains $
San connection mains /connection
point $
Duff 4-lane extension $ 16.0
Subtotal $ 20.3
South (T2)
Water dist mains $
San collection mains $
6-lane Duff $
Interchange $ 18.0
Subtotal $ 30.1
Additional Fire Station $ 6.0
Total
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 40
Recap of Tiers
$ 74.5m $ 86.1m $ 54.2m
$ 63.9m $ 65.3m $ 74.5m
15,673 15,629 14,796
15,796 16,773 16,254
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
page 41
Discussion and Next Steps
1.Ames has more than one direction to grow.
2.Include strategies that plan for both short-and long-
term growth, including preserving future growth
areas that are not selected initially.
3.The lowest cost option may not be the best option for
the City’s vision overall.
4.Preferences for individual areas, include regional
access, marketability, sustainability, cost to serve,
provision for long term growth solutions, infill, etc.
5.Updating the future land use map concept may need
to occur to address the balance of housing and
commercial needs with selected area.
Summary
page 42
Discussion and Next Steps
•Public Input Session with City Council-January 7, 2020
•Feedback on growth concepts for drafting a Preferred
Land Use Map
•Land Use/Transportation Principles Feedback
(Comments to staff, January 10th)
•Determination of Scenario Direction by City Council-
January 14, 2020
•Next Discussion Issues:
•Future Land Use Map and designations
•Housing, Neighborhoods, Sub-Areas-Vision and
Principles
Next Steps
page 43
City Council Workshop
December 19, 2019
page 44
APPENDIX A:
PUBLIC INPUT
D E C E M B E R < < 2 0 1 9
CONTENTS
4 Planning Process
6 Initial Themes Input
22 Engagement Data: In-Person Activities
43 Engagement Data: Online Activities
95 Direct Correspondence
PLANNING PROCESS
5 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
PLANNING PROCESS
January
2019
February 5th
May 28th
April
Public Kick-off Meeting Ames Public Library
Draft Elements
Public Kick-off Meeting ISU Research Park
Design Studio
Neighborhood Association Event
ISU Campus Student Engagement Event
Campus Pop-ups (4)
Online Questionaire | 500+ Participants
July September
August 22nd
186
March 7th
#
June
Concepts
Concepts Online Mapping Tool
Scenario Open House
and Subarea Studios
October
December
January
February
Draft Refined Scenarios
November
City Completing Infrastructure Models
Infrastructure Testing
City Council Forum
May
2020
6
17
February 21st
February 25th
56
February 26th - 28th35
10
~50
~50
March 13th
March April
Mapping ToolParticipants Discussion GroupsPublic Events
DISCOVER
CONCEPTS
PLAN DOCUMENT
6 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
INITIAL THEMES INPUT
7 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
ORGANIZATION
Prior to the launch of Ames Plan 2040, initial themes were defined by City Council and
incorporated into the city’s Request for Proposals. While these initial themes provided
guidance to the public and consulting team at the project’s inception, they should not be
confused with the plan’s organization or principles. Early input from the community was
organized into these themes to frame the future direction for the comprehensive plan. As
the process diagram shows, input and feedback relied on the following activities:
k City Council Workshops
k Open House Kick-off
k Discussion Groups
k Pop-up Stations (ISU Campus)
k Open House Growth Concepts
k City Council forums
k Online Questionnaires
INITIAL THEMES
The initial themes for Ames Plan 2040 are the starting point for its ideas, policies, and recommendations. These initial themes reflect the topics that need to be
considered to frame the Vision Statements and Principles within each of the plan’s elements. The material in this section was prepared from the early months of
input and shared with City Council in Spring 2019.
INITIAL THEMES FOR STUDY
k Expansion of the City
k Opportunities for infill development
k Future demand for housing and commercial use
k Sustaining neighborhoods
k Support of social and cultural connections
k Transportation choices
k Sustainability
k Well-being and healthy living
k Subarea planning
k Urban fringe management
8 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
THEME: EXPANSION OF THE CITY
Discussions about city expansions fell into three topics:
k Growth Strategies. Participants generally agree that growth comes in many forms and is not negative. However, resources in terms of available land, infrastructure, and public services
are limited. Growth in all directions is seen as more favorable over growth in one direction. Also, infill development and redevelopment are considered ways to alleviate growth pressure.
Growth to the north aligns with growth already occurring within the county, while growth to the south is closer to Highway 30 and convenient for households with commuters. The plan
needs to identify locations for growth, density, and ability to sustain itself as a neighborhood.
k Proactive Infrastructure Investment. People feel that Ames is prime to grow and has the tools to do so. To meet the needs of the future and grow responsibly, participants feel that
public investments in infrastructure need to be proactive, not reactive. Infrastructure improvements ahead of development is perceived to help manage the cost of housing, reduce the risk
for development, and help direct growth.
k Grow Partnerships. Participants acknowledge that many organizations in Ames will contribute to the city’s growth, and encouraged the planning team to consider these partnerships
when developing growth scenarios for the future. Key partnerships with the City and planning team include the University, Story County, and school districts.
Survey Excerpts:
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Land Use and the Environment?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Location of new growth and expansion of the City 14%19%30%29%4%5%
Locations of new growth and rural subdivisions, near the City (within 2 miles)11%18%31%25%4%11%
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Economic Development?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Prospects for future growth 1%10%19%38%17%15%
9 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
What make you excited about the future of Ames?
“Continued growth of city and redevelopment along Lincoln Way”
“City Council and leadership has provided clear direction to better plan for growth and development over the past several years...”
“With private sector job growth and available land for housing growth, Ames has a bright future ahead of itself”
What challenges do you see for the future of Ames?
“Being a thriving community without relying on the “economic growth at any cost” model of development....”
“...With the university owning so many large plots of land all over, it makes a balanced approach to growth difficult...”
“Thoughtful growth within budget”
“Growth. The city was not designed for the growth it has had.”
“Some in our community are afraid of change and fear growth which is necessary for a thriving community in today’s world”
SURVEY: Do you have an area of the City that you believe would be desirable for new development in the next 20 years?
STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
DISAGREE
West Ames (HWY 30, Lincoln Way to Union Pacific railroad), including into Boone County 14%32%40%9%5%
Southwest Ames (south of HWY 30, South Dakota Avenue)13%34%35%10%9%
Northwest Ames (Union Pacific railroad north to Cameron School Road)10%33%36%14%7%
North Ames (GW Carver Avenue and 190th Street)10%31%35%17%7%
East of I-35, along 13th Street 12%30%34%16%8%
East of I- 35, south of Highway 30 7%23%39%19%12%
South Ames, along HWY 69 and south of the airport 11%33%34%17%5%
Focus on infill/redevelopment options 40%29%24%4%2%
Survey Excerpt:
10 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
SURVEY: What do you believe would enhance the quality of life and the community of Ames over the next 20 years?
VERY
IMPORTANT IMPORTANT NO
OPINION
SOMEWHAT
IMPORTANT NOT IMPORTANT
Additional housing option 32%35%15%10%8%
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Housing?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Housing quality and desirability of single-family homes 6%15%26%41%7%4%
Housing quality and desirability of apartment housing 5%10%23%38%15%8%
Affordability of housing 24%30%29%12%2%3%
Supply of ownership housing 9%25%27%17%3%19%
Supply of workforce and market-based rental housing 11%17%23%17%5%27%
Supply of student-marketed housing (off-campus)2%6%14%31%31%16%
Supply of affordable (low-income) housing 29%22%16%6%2%25%
Supply of senior housing 8%13%18%22%7%32%
THEME: OPPORTUNITIES FOR INFILL DEVELOPMENT
People perceive that growth and infill development are important to create a vibrant community. Both can happen simultaneously to improve the community,
provide opportunities for new housing types, and create quality neighborhoods. Participants have a strong desire to see development for the North Grand Mall
area and Downtown Gateway area.
Survey Excerpts:
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Land Use and the Environment?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Integrating infill and redevelopment projects 11%23%29%17%3%16%
SURVEY: Do you have an area of the City that you believe would be desirable for new development in the next 20 years?
STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
DISAGREE
Focus on infill/redevelopment options 40%29%24%4%2%
11 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Commercial Needs
Stakeholders indicate that the existing model for commercial uses is changing as consumers increasingly shop online. While additional commercial space will be needed in Ames as growth
occurs, less may be needed than projected under old models. Additionally, the 1997 plan has a disconnect between the intended commercial areas and the areas where the market supports
commercial uses. Participants want to see a future in Ames where existing commercial spaces are at full occupancy and new commercial opportunities develop where ad how they can be
most successful. Some comments suggested that public policies need to support legitimate market forces, and when appropriate, incentivize vibrant and high character developments.
Survey Excerpts:
SURVEY: Are there existing developed areas of the City that you envision positively changing or redeveloping in the next 20 years?
STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
DISAGREE
West Lincoln Way, west of Campus 19%42%32%5%2%
East Lincoln Way, east of South Duff 20%38%35%7%-
Central Ames 19%33%40%7%2%
North Grand Mall 31%42%20%5%2%
Campustown 24%38%29%9%1%
Downtown, north of Union Pacific Railroad 22%32%34%9%2%
Downtown Gateway Area, south of Union Pacific Railroad 26%38%29%6%2%
Commercial areas along South Duff and Southeast 16th Street 14%40%37%8%1%
Industrial areas along Dayton Avenue 13%35%42%9%1%
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Economic Development?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Retail quality and variety 9%22%28%35%6%1%
Sample Comments:
What make you excited about the future of Ames? (sample comments)
“I feel like we’ve escaped an overabundance of big box stores. Online shopping is reducing the need for them here. Smaller, local retail is thriving.”
What challenges do you see for the future of Ames? (sample comments)
“We’re losing our retail options. We need retail or it’s all going to be Ankeny, Des Moines, and online. We need to attract retail other than big box.”
“Too much retail space. Some is attributed to mixed-use requirement of ground floor commercial.”
12 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
SURVEY: The City needs more of the following types of commercial establishments. (agree or disagree)
STRONGLY
AGREE AGREE NEUTRAL DISAGREE STRONGLY
DISAGREE
Furniture 15%40%32%10%2%
Home goods/furnishings 19%39%30%11%1%
Convenience stores and gas stations 2%12%40%40%7%
Sit down national and regional restaurants 12%32%26%24%6%
Quick service national and regional restaurants/cafes 5%17%31%39%8%
Local restaurants/cafes 45%46%8%1%-
Entertainment and sporting facilities 18%36%33%10%2%
Bars/brewery/distillery/winery 18%30%33%15%3%
Apparel/shoes 15%31%38%14%2%
Sporting goods 19%30%36%13%2%
Local/boutique/specialty retail 15%41%36%7%1%
General Merchandise/warehouse/big box 7%17%36%32%9%
Automotive service and repair 2%14%52%25%7%
Pharmacy and convenience commercial 1%12%54%28%4%
Grocery 6%18%41%32%3%
Coffee shops 11%27%42%19%1%
Party supplies 2%7%55%27%7%
Electronics/technology 5%25%45%21%3%
SURVEY: Select up to four of the most important aspects of choosing to live in Ames. If you
do not live in Ames currently, why would you live in Ames?
Bottom Three Responses %
Availability of shopping, dining, and retail services 16%
Neighborhood and social ties 13%
Housing choices 11%
SURVEY: As the City grows and changes over the next 20 years, please indicate which
changes you view as advantages to improve the quality of life? (select up to three)
Top Three Responses %
Additional retail/shopping/dining options 36%
Increased employment and economic options 31%
Environmental protection of sensitive areas 30%
13 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
THEME: FUTURE DEMAND FOR HOUSING & COMMERCIAL USES
Participants perceive that there will be increased demand for future residential uses and decreased demand for commercial uses. Participants perceive that consumer spending
patterns will continue to change and influence the current model for commercial development. Additionally, participants acknowledge Ames’ strong employment base and see it as an
asset for the future success of the community. As the employment base and population grow, there will be a logical need to support this growth with commercial uses.
SURVEY: As the City grows and changes over the next 20 years, please indicate which
changes you view as advantages to improve the quality of life? (select up to three)
%
Additional retail/shopping/dining options 37%
Increased employment and economic options 32%
New and more diverse housing choices 29%
Support of the school systems 29%
Reduced cost of living 28%
Environmental protection of sensitive areas 28%
Sample Comments:
What make you excited about the future of Ames?
“New housing developments.”
“With private sector job growth and available land for housing growth, Ames has a
bright future ahead of itself.”
“Redevelopment is a great opportunity to leverage some of the current infrastructure
while upgrading or modernizing the facilities and dwellings. Ames has to be open
to knocking down buildings and going vertical if it wants to support the economic
growth and limit the urban sprawl.”
What challenges do you see for the future of Ames?
“ I feel it is a difficult challenge to provide affordable owner-occupied or even rental
housing for families....”
“Affordable housing will also be a challenge to allow workers in Ames to live in Ames.
Housing to accommodate all - students, workers & families - affordably & in harmony
will continue to be a challenge.”
“Enough housing to keep up with the job growth and enough retail to keep people in
Ames....”
“Balance of infill and expansion of city boundaries. If we are going to protect
farmland, we need consensus on how to integrate new development into the existing
community. Current residents need to feel secure that infill development will receive
adequate design and integration scrutiny.”
k More Housing Options. Housing was consistently discussed as a top priority in all
public input forums. People perceive that most housing in Ames is unaffordable and
lacks variety of options. Because of the lack of choices and higher costs, people perceive
that new residents to Ames are choosing to live in Des Moines or Ankeny where they
also have more transportation options and more workforce support services, like
daycare.
Survey Excerpt:
14 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
THEME: SUSTAINING NEIGHBORHOODS
This theme of Sustaining Neighborhoods has some overlap with other themes, including “Future Demand for Housing” and “Infill Development”. The drafting of the comprehensive plan will
eventual combine some of these themes and may alter the content altogether.
Survey Excerpts:
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Community Image and Values?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Quality of Neighborhoods 0%6%23%53%17%2%
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Housing?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Housing quality and desirability of single-family homes 6%15%26%41%7%4%
Housing quality and desirability of apartment housing 5%10%23%38%15%8%
Affordability of housing 24%30%29%12%2%3%
Supply of ownership housing 9%25%27%17%3%19%
Supply of workforce and market-based rental housing 11%17%23%17%5%27%
Supply of student-marketed housing (off-campus)2%6%14%31%31%16%
Supply of affordable (low-income) housing 28%22%16%6%2%25%
Supply of senior housing 8%13%18%22%7%32%
Sample Comments:
What make you excited about the future of Ames?
“The opportunity for growing a compact city that has neighborhoods with amenities near by (walking distance).”
What challenges do you see for the future of Ames?
“Maintaining older housing stock and thus the attractiveness of long-term neighborhoods.”
“We’re not putting enough thought toward the sociological aspects of community in our urban planning/design. For example, the proliferation of these high-rise apartments on previous
vacant lots -- they do nothing to enhance the aesthetic of the surrounding neighborhoods....”
15 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
THEME: SUPPORT OF SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CONNECTIONS
The social and cultural connections in Ames make the community unique. Participants perceive that Ames’ current recreational/entertainment amenities contribute significantly to the
City’s quality of life. However, these amenities tend to be clustered around the University and Downtown. Residents want to see future amenities placed within walking distance of homes.
Additionally, participants want Ames to be a leader in new ideas, practices, and policies that enhance the quality of life and enforce sustainable growth.
Survey Excerpts:
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Parks, Recreation, and Culture?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Supporting art in public places -5%19%46%27%3%
Opportunities to attend art, music, theater, dance, etc. events, exhibitions, or productions 1%6%16%45%29%2%
SURVEY: Select up to four of the most important aspects of choosing to live in Ames. If you do not live in Ames currently, why would you live in Ames? (top 4 responses only)
%
Proximity to work/employment 53%
Quality of schools 44%
Affiliation with Iowa State University 41%
Cultural, sporting, and recreational opportunities 36%
Sample Comments:
What make you excited about the future of Ames?
“Keep improving and modernizing downtown, build the HLC, and focus on building culture. I like this town and am generally happy with what is done”
“Support of the arts and culture, investment in education at all levels,...”
“The Research Park and the ability to attract quality employers, the variety and accessibility of parks, the availability of cultural activities, a safe and welcoming environment make me
excited about the future of Ames”
What challenges do you see for the future of Ames?
“Ability to leverage existing resources and assets like the university, social and physical resources...”
16 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
THEME: TRANSPORTATION CHOICES
Transportation was one of the most discussed elements by participants. Comments stressed the impact that transportation systems have on quality of life and community character.
Three frequent topics include:
Sample Comments:
What make you excited about the future of Ames?
“A transformation of our transportation grid to be eminently, safely, and conveniently
walkable and bikable...”
“...I am encouraged by the continued improvement of non-car transportation
systems...”
What challenges do you see for the future of Ames?
“Improvements in north south transportation routes on the east side of Ames
particularly improve and reduce traffic on Duff.”
“... A more comprehensive plan should include reliable public transportation transit
that connects the surrounding counties.”
“... Including more transportation outlets to the interstate...”
“Transportation. While I understand that local business people are focused on
growth, growth, growth--transportation can cut off the future of a city like Ames
within a generation.”
k Safety. Participants identify many specific locations in Ames where
safety can be improved for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Notable
improvements include Duff Avenue and everywhere in the City where
travelers use active transportation.
k Efficiency & Connectivity. Responses indicate that in Ames more
people walk and bike as a choice for transportation compared to other
communities in the region. People view the ability to walk and bike as a
positive feature of the City’s quality of life. The city should complete critical
gaps in the active transportation system. Also, participants want to see
more convenient cross-town routes in both north/south and east/west
directions, making movements more efficient, purposeful, and safer.
k Equality. People envision a transportation system in Ames that supports
all age groups, abilities, and mode choice. Streets should connect
destinations, and some streets should be transformed into vibrant
corridors that accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, public transit riders,
and motorists.
17 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Transportation?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Ames' overall transportation system 2%7%17%49%24%1%
Access to employment centers 3%6%21%32%13%25%
Condition of streets 4%11%37%41%8%-
Access to Highway 30 2%6%19%51%20%2%
North-to-South street connections 12%21%27%32%6%2%
East-to-West street connections 8%17%28%37%8%2%
Sidewalks and pedestrian paths 4%14%31%40%10%1%
Pedestrian friendliness 7%14%31%36%11%1%
Bicycle friendliness 10%16%28%32%10%4%
Connectivity of trails 8%15%28%29%9%11%
Adequacy of railroad crossings 9%14%36%29%6%5%
Truck routing 4%8%26%27%4%31%
Traffic speeds and safety 5%11%28%42%14%1%
Awareness of transit 2%8%28%42%11%10%
Signage and directional information 5%6%29%45%13%2%
Survey Excerpt
18 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
THEME: SUSTAINABILITY
Sustainability is a part of all themes and does not stand alone. However, in the context of the Ames Plan 2040, the sustainability theme focuses on the
uncertain future of climate and its potential impact on economic development, infrastructure, transportation, and quality of life.
The environment was one of the most frequent topics shared by participants from a recreational, aesthetic, and hazard standpoint. Many expressed the need to preserve existing natural
areas, not expand development into potential hazard areas, and plan for an unpredictable environmental future. Many question the preparedness of Ames, or any community, to address
climate change and its impact on quality of life.
Two significant topics emerged from the input process:
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Land Use and the Environment?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Incorporating environmental/sustainability principles in planning decisions 12%15%25%27%5%15%
Incorporating stormwater management in planning decisions 7%17%23%23%5%25%
SURVEY: As the City grows and changes over the next 20 years, please indicate which changes you view as advantages to improve the quality of life? (select up to three)
Top Three Responses %
Additional retail/shopping/dining options 36%
Increased employment and economic options 31%
Environmental protection of sensitive areas 30%
k Adaptation. Many participants recognized the uncertain future of natural
disasters and changes in weather patterns. Incorporating environmental
adaptation into all growth strategies is important and was reiterated
consistently in all input forums.
Survey Excerpts:
k Natural Features. Participants recognize the natural features in Ames
and feel they increase the quality of life Ames. Finding ways to incorporate
greenspace and environmental preservation into all developments is
beneficial to the character and sustainability of the community. Ames
should continue to preserve natural greenways, using them to connect
parks and trails and not allow development in sensitive areas such as
floodplains.
19 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
SURVEY: What do you identify as environmental priorities for the City of Ames?
Topic VERY
IMPORTANT IMPORTANT NO OPINION SOMEWHAT
IMPORTANT
NOT
IMPORTANT
Watershed management 52%29%11%6%1%
Managing the flood plain 64%25%5%5%1%
Managing stormwater runoff/water quality from development 56%29%7%6%1%
Protection of the Ames water/drinking supply 73%23%4%--
Preservation of natural habitat 53%32%8%5%3%
Reducing solid waste/trash and diverting from landfills 54%31%7%6%3%
Minimizing vehicle miles travel 34%29%18%6%12%
Supporting renewable energy initiatives 52%28%8%9%3%
Resiliency related to natural events 48%36%11%3%2%
Survey Excerpts
What make you excited about the future of Ames?
“...forward-thinking leaders who prioritize sustainability, resilience, quality of life,
diversity, equity, principled community planning and development, and green
energy and jobs...”
“Focus on sustainability and becoming a leader in sustainability and environmental
initiatives....”
What challenges do you see for the future of Ames?
“...We have very serious climate change and resource over-exploitation occurring
in the world and there is a need to integrate resource sustainability into all of our
planning and thinking at every level of society, but I see very little of that reflected in
the plans or actions of my city.”
“Ames should have a climate action plan and be working on ways to reduce waste
and emissions. I also think the resource recovery center poses a major challenge for
sustainability.”
20 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
THEME: WELL-BEING AND HEALTHY LIVING
Participants perceive that the City has a strong parks and recreation system, and that it is a signature feature for the community. Feedback suggests that the City should build on its strengths,
complete gaps, and ensure that growth areas are well-connected to the rest of the City. Also, participants suggest that the City pursue new infrastructure opportunities that are otherwise not
in the community, such as increased active transportation initiatives.
Survey Excerpts:
SURVEY: What do you believe would enhance the quality of life and the community of Ames over the next 20 years?
VERY
IMPORTANT IMPORTANT NO OPINION SOMEWHAT
IMPORTANT
NOT
IMPORTANT
Additional/New active outdoor recreation and park facilities 21%52%11%12%4%
Additional/New indoor recreational facilities 33%36%12%14%5%
Additional natural and passive open spaces 28%43%15%11%3%
Additional walking and biking trails and paths 43%37%9%9%2%
Expansion of transportation facilities for bicyclists and pedestrians 37%30%16%12%5%
SURVEY: Do you support planning for initiatives that support a healthy lifestyle and enhanced personal well-being?
VERY
IMPORTANT IMPORTANT NO OPINION SOMEWHAT
IMPORTANT
NOT
IMPORTANT
Walkable neighborhoods with sidewalks and connections to trails 60%32%4%2%2%
Access to parks or open space within a 10-minute walk.51%36%7%4%2%
Support of transportation options in addition to personal automobiles 48%31%9%8%3%
Knowing your neighbors and having a sense of belonging 44%42%10%4%-
Providing indoor recreation facilities 38%35%14%9%4%
Access to food and groceries within one mile of home 27%36%17%14%6%
Access to social services during times of need 43%37%13%4%3%
Quality and safety of housing 59%33%6%1%-
Access to high quality medical care 70%28%1%1%-
Events supporting getting outside and being active 42%40%13%4%1%
21 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
SURVEY: On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Parks, Recreation, and Culture?
1 POOR 2 FAIR 3 AVERAGE 4 GOOD 5 EXCELLENT DON’T KNOW
Providing for Parks and Open Spaces overall 2%3%12%43%39%1%
Providing for indoor recreation opportunities 12%20%33%24%7%3%
Providing for outdoor active recreation (play fields, courts, playgrounds, etc.)
opportunities 1%4%19%49%27%-
Providing for pedestrian and bicycle paths and connections 7%12%28%34%16%2%
THEMES: SUBAREA PLANNING, AND URBAN FRINGE MANAGEMENT
Participants are concerned about how Ames will balance urban and rural growth. Also, they agree that Ames needs to set priorities for where to grow and to what density. New development
should incorporate higher density development models in both existing neighborhoods and growth areas. Development regulation should support smaller lot sizes, infill for compact mixed-
use neighborhoods, and redevelopment of obsolete or future obsolete non-residential sites. Low-density housing options are generally not desired for the subareas or urban fringe.
Survey Excerpts:
SURVEY: How do you view planning for growth of the City within its 2-miles fringe?
Necessary for orderly development and provision of services to meet the needs of growing Ames, without the impediments of existing development.35%
No opinion 27%
Rural development allows for a different lifestyle choice appropriate for areas abutting Ames despite their limits on future expansion of the City.23%
Rural development allows a different lifestyle choice that is typically appropriate for areas outside of the 2-mile fringe planning area of the City.15%
Sample Comments:
What make you excited about the future of Ames?
“... More parks, trails, and shared outdoor spaces in general. When thinking about
purchasing a long-term home in Ames my #1 priority is having walkable access to
nature trails to enjoy throughout all 4 seasons.”
“...We have some great parks.”
“The growth of the Research Park”
What challenges do you see for the future of Ames?
“As our population ages, keeping seniors healthy and happy here is a key...”
“Updating whats already here. The side walks, streets, parks, and our infrastructure
needs so serious tlc.”
“Maintaining older housing stock and thus the attractiveness of long-term
neighborhoods.”
“Rural vs. urban tensions regarding land use expansion in fringe areas”
ENGAGEMENT DATA
IN-PERSON ACTIVITIES
23 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
COUNCIL WORKSHOP #1: KICK OFF
The City Council met on December 18, 2018 to kick-off the planning process. The discussion included two parts. The first part included an open discussion for council to respond to
prompting questions. The second part included an independent exercise for council members to report their perceived strengths and challenges laid out by topic area. The topic areas
were modeled from the city’s Request for Proposals to prepare a Comprehensvie Plan. Below is a summary of responses from the meeting.
k Poll – ½ way through the process – has the
community heard of it?
k A document that does not need multiple
changes immediately
k The process results in a document that is
flexible – not a burden, but a blessing
k How many neighborhoods do we reach out
to and would like to have more than one
contact or meeting available with them
k Outreach to high school and youth – must be
a part of this
k Focus groups – People who work, but don’t
live in Ames – we need to talk with them too
k Need to capture input
2. What is the number one priority you would
like to see this process accomplish?
k We aren’t doing this just to have fun, a
document that gives certainty for future
community leaders and representatives –
actually helpful for the future
k One mindedness around a common vision
for the community – consensus, agreement
k Will help future councils move Ames forward
k Not just about saying Yes. Document can also
allow us to say No.
k Internal consistency. Chapters all build and
contribute to the same vision.
k A document that creates a vision and
strategy that keeps Ames - Ames.
k Don’t want people to be intimidated by the
process. Want them to feel they can approach
and give their input and have an impact.
k People to feel free to speak for themselves.
k Resulting document needs to be
interpretable and accessible.
k Actionable.
k Legal basis we need to have to carry out
ordinances.
k Do not want LUPP type document – needing
modifications immediately.
k Casual disregard is an issue with a future
document is a problem. Changes might be
okay when for the right reasons.
k Efficient development of the plan – timeline.
k Completing plan in under 2 years.
k Priority might be establishing priorities?
PART 1: OPEN DISCUSSION
1. How will we know that the process was
successful? What are the indicators?
k The process happens in a timely fashion
k Demonstrated input from a broad base of
community organizations
k Tailored to Ames, we’re not Minneapolis
k Needs to be realistic
k Can’t please everyone, generally community
embraces it, not driven by or the reflection of
a specific group
k Reflects the community at-large and our
values
k Incorporates under-represented populations
k Students and all other understand each stage
of the process, its transparent, they can follow
along and know when their input is needed
k Most of the people in Ames know that it is
happening and can be a part of the decision
making
k A response for those who say “we weren’t
notified or involved”
24 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
3. What concerns do you have about the
planning process?
k Time: Council, Staff, Community Engagement
may fall as it gets drawn out
k Micro managing of the process.
k Council may slow process – hold us
accountable.
k Make sure we get all of the input that wants
to be given. People should be heard.
k Do not want to go too far down a path only to
realize it is the wrong one. Process should not
have this happen.
k Community members might not understand
the difference between what we currently
have and what we are trying to create.
k One particular group, or more, having an
outsized influence on the process.
k Value RDG Team experience, but don’t want
bias. Let Ames be Ames. Help us flourish as a
community in total instead of areas.
k Don’t want, “You should look like this.”
PART 2: STRENGTHS/CHALLENGES
Theme #1: Expansion of the City
STRENGTHS
k Available Land
k Land owners willing to annex (esp. in SW
recently)
k Have locations to consider
k Lots of momentum for growth
k New East connection development
k An economy that supports expansion
k Other
k Continued anticipated growth in jobs and
employers
CHALLENGES
k Growth Limitations
k Impediments to growth in certain
directions (geographically (valleys, rivers,
etc.), land ownership, railroad tracks, etc.)
k Topographic & other growth limits (ISU
property, etc.)
k ISU owns a lot of potential growth land
k Limited amount of land available to grow
k Heavily weighted to the north
k Infrastructure
k Challenge of providing infrastructure
k All development costs shifted to developer/
future owners
k Cost of extending infrastructure
k Other
k Artificial development boundaries
k More commercial needed
k No affordable housing being built
k Loss of residents to other communities
k Public disagreement
Theme #2: Opportunities for Infill Dev’t
STRENGTHS
k Developer Enthusiasm
k Developers do want to come to Ames to
develop infill projects
k Developers interested in doing infill
development
k Infill Opportunities
k Do have some underutilized areas
k Dilapidated Properties
k Other
k Opportunities to take advantage of CyRide
k The East Lincoln Way and Library Corridor
k New Zoning encourages infill (Downtown
gateway, for example)
CHALLENGES
k Land Availability
k Limited land and much land owned by ISU
& other government agencies
k Limited large pieces of land
k Limited opportunities for infill
25 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
k Tension
k Pushback from neighborhoods
k Tension between new infill and existing
building stock (potential to encourage
demolition)
k Other
k Expensive
k Few candidates that don’t reduces
affordable housing
Theme #3: Future Demand for Housing and
Commercial Uses
STRENGTHS
k Population and Job Growth
k Population growth continues, is stable
k Currently have robust private sector job
growth should translate to growth in both
areas
k High demand
k Housing Options
k Thriving market for rentals
k There is demand for variety of housing.
People want to live in Ames.
k Building tax base
CHALLENGES
k Housing
k Housing that will accommodate those who
can afford only to rent at or below market
rate, houses in low to mid $100,000
k Affordable housing including in the
$150,000 range and $200-$250,000 range,
rental for those who are in 30-50%
k Challenge to accommodate the right
mix of housing and/or commercial at an
affordable price
k How to address increasing rent? Especially
for ISU students and faculty
k Need to incentivize conversion of rental
housing to owner-occupied
k Other
k Few local builders – is there capacity?
k Declining enrollment (unstable)
k More commercial needed
Theme #4: Sustaining Neighborhoods
STRENGTHS
k Involved citizens
k Robust neighborhood groups
k Good neighborhood associations
k Many strong neighborhood organizations
k Strong neighborhood associations
k Have a number of good neighborhood
associations. Build upon that for
community conservation
CHALLENGES
k Rental vs. Owner-Occupied Housing
k Balancing student housing (rentals) in near
campus neighborhoods – reclassifying
or clarifying student vs. “family”
neighborhoods
k Growth in rentals, Airbnb/Short term rentals
displace owner occupied housing
k Neighborhood Locations
k Recognizing that near-campus
neighborhoods face very different
challenges from outliers
k Automobile oriented outlying
neighborhoods
k Other
k Do we really have a vision for what
healthy neighborhoods look like, and their
functions and features
k How to balance permanent residents needs
with the large population that is more
temporary
26 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
k Requires constant outreach & education for
new residents
k Risk of gentrification
Theme #5: Support of Social and Cultural
Connections
STRENGTHS
k Diverse (for Iowa)
k Strong human service network
k Strong community groups
k Reasonable support for the arts and culture
CHALLENGES
k Communication
k How to communicate with citizens in the
modern age
k Social media and shift in culture
k Need to improve communications,
acceptance and relationships with all Ames
residents
k Understanding what “connections” means
for Ames
k Other
k High turnover in residents
k Help integrate students into community
Theme #6: Transportation Choices
STRENGTHS
k Alternative Modes of Transportation
k New Complete Streets plan
k Have options (Transit, expanding trail & bike
route network)
k Build more bike infrastructure
k Developed systems for transit infrastructure
that are well-utilized
k Other
k Ames Electric Utility
CHALLENGES
k Multimodal Options
k Weather makes year-round walking/biking
difficult
k Limited capacity for CyRide expansion
k Gaps in network (missing sidewalks, bus
coverage, etc.)
k Shifting from automobile orientation to
complete streets way of thinking/operating
k Other
k Creeks & railroad
k Mitigating our lack of direct routes through
town
k Cost
Theme #7: Sustainability
STRENGTHS
k Citizen Awareness
k Passionate/knowledgeable citizens &
resources nearby (ISU, etc.)
k Engaged community
k Community groups who are concerned and
active
k Other
k Ames water, sewer, and electric utilities
CHALLENGES
k Pollution
k RDF issues increasing with conversion to
Natural Gas
k Reduce carbon footprint
k CO2
k Other
k Mitigating need for parking in downtown
with facing environmental challenges, like
need for less cars
k Money
k Need to take a holistic view of our policies
so they don’t contradict each other
k Need to see historic preservation as part of
sustainability
27 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Theme #8: Well-being and Healthy Living
STRENGTHS
k Community Interest
k Broad interest in wellness
k Community interest in improvement
k Other
k Many recreational opportunities
CHALLENGES
k Limited facilities for program expansion
k Prioritization and attention given demands
at modern life
Theme #9 Subareas
STRENGTHS
k Recognized Subareas
k Easily defined subareas, strong identities
k Have subarea plans for a few targeted areas
k We recognize that subareas exist and know
what they are
CHALLENGES
k Lack defined vision
k We don’t plan with a vision – we react and
lose sight of the larger picture
Theme #10: Urban Fringe Management
STRENGTHS
k Maintains city standards for future growth
k Good relationships with a number of
nearby jurisdictions
k Existing 28E
CHALLENGES
k 28E
k Requires 28E compliance
k 28E agreement has challenges and
cooperation
k City Limits
k Bumping up against 1 or 2 towns in the
timeframe of this plan
k Artificial limits
k Bumping into each other
PART 3: WHAT EFFECT COULD OR
SHOULD THIS PLAN HAVE FOR THE
PEOPLE OF AMES?
COUNCIL RESPONSES:
k Ownership
k Inclusivity
k Predictability
k Equity
k Inspiration
k Positive Impact on Quality of Life
k Direction for growth
PART 4: WHAT DO WE WANT THE
EFFECT OF THIS PLAN TO BE ON THE
COMMUNITY OF AMES?
COUNCIL RESPONSES:
k Direction for growth
k Strengthening our image
k Most people don’t know we have this…Be
realistic
k An increase in participation for this type of
effort
k Be involved…
k Maintain their passion for Ames
k Channel their passion for Ames –Vision
makes it clear what they can do with it
28 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
STAKEHOLDER DISCUSSIONS
Stakeholder discussions held during the early stages of the planning process helped the authors of this plan understand the perceived issues and opportunities
for the City of Ames. Additional discussions were held throughout the planning process. Below are highlighted notes from the discussions.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPERS
1997 PLAN PROBLEMS...
k Error in the likelihood of development in
certain areas. Perception that growth could
occur to the southwest. This is all land owned
by ISU. In fact, ISU is keeping land. Net usable
land from a terrain standpoint is limited.
RESIDENTIAL MARKETS...
k Something smaller than the 6,000 sf minimum
lot size unless there is a PRD. But there is a
40% open space requirement
k MF zone needs to be looked at.
k Density requirements are out of place,
minimums. Densities stand alone in a project.
k The village concept is good
WHAT TO GET OUT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN...
k Lots will have to get smaller to meet the new
need - residential ordinances.
k Also, allowing estate residential in certain areas
so they do not happen right at the 2-mile
fringe where it is allowed and city does not
have jurisdiction.
k Path of least resistance is north.
k SF carriage housing along the prime
area along Lincoln Way was a bad
recommendation in that plan.
k Residential TIF options.
k Need to align plan with what the city will
actually do. For example, where will the city
accept high density residential?
k Need a front end financing mechanism for
housing development to help developers
ISU FACILITIES STAFF
COMMENTS...
k Current plan is to reinvest in the housing that
is already existing
k Campus cannot work without CyRide
k City/Campus relationship is good
k Student housing is starting to be discounted,
supply satisfied
k Campustown is used mostly by students from
a convenience standpoint…
k Beef program on the north that the city
is willing to sell if they can relocate the
operations to the south
k Land holdings west of the city are plants
based, land south is viewed as animal based
operations.
k Trade employees do not live in the community,
cheaper housing in rural Iowa for them.
Housing in close commute is an advantage for
the University
k Student and employment base are not
projected or planned to grow for the
University.
DESIGN PROFESSIONALS
CONCEPTS FOR THE FUTURE...
k City to interact with the railroad like Wheaton,
Illinois
k Some transportation issues with north/south
connectivity - no arterials actually go all the
way through
k Would the city rethink their policies on
investing in development - transportation
overpasses, etc
WHAT TO GET OUT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN...
k Need a dispersion of amenities, not just along
Duff
k Smaller development is difficult right now in
Ames
k Continual park expansion
k Proactive planning to let businesses and
developers know what is happening
k The plan needs to be revisited on a regular
basis
29 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
STORY COUNTY
WHAT TO GET OUT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN...
k Following the Ames Urban Fringe Plan
k Need the plan to constitute orderly
development
k Will need transportation improvements north
toward Gilbert.
k Transition for emergency services between
Ames and Gilbert, when and how is it funded.
k A lot of work needed for trails…north and south
segment from Ada Hayden to 190th. East/west
connection there really is nothing
k Need to be consistent with Gilbert and all
working together
REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS
STATE OF THE MARKET...
k Some adaptive elementary school
redevelopment
k Young and old are interested in walkability and
amenities….a lot based on where people are
coming from
MISSING PRODUCTS...
k Servicing the aging population is an issue -
South Campus area is an area where people
would like to move out of, but there are not
options.
k 45-60 age ranges are served pretty well, but
not the other age groups
k Currently too much supply of apartment,
which could last for some time with stable ISU
enrollment
k Condos would do well in Ames
k Loosing people to Ankeny and DT Des Moines
because of the variety
k Some people are looking for more rural
residential options. Need an intentional plan to
include some larger lots
k Too much retail space. Some is attributed
to mixed-use requirement of ground floor
commercial
k There is a tolerance for townhomes, one or two
stories.
k Few recreational facilities - indoor activities
k Cannot pick only one area for growth. Need to
expand everywhere
k The Health Center is in a poor location for
additional development. If the city is going to
spend money, they need to position projects
to spin off other opportunities for private
investment
k Seeing some people wanting to move because
they want to change their lifestyle.
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS
BIG IDEA FOR AMES...
k Residential downtown - 2nd floors and infill
k More low income & affordable
k Transit oriented development
COMMUNITY POLICY TOP PRIORITIES...
k Rental conversions
k Environmental issues
k Mobility…getting in and out
k Neighborhood density – owner occupied
k Own housing
30 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
PUBLIC KICK-OFF EVENT
The public kick-off event was held on February 5th and February 25th, 2019. The open house allowed people to talk informally with staff and the project team
about the future of Ames. Attendees were encouraged to post their comments on a series of boards related to various planning elements in Ames. Attendees
were prompted to post their “big idea” and “concerns” for the future of Ames. Below are the board topics and the comments received. Comments were
transcribed with minor editing.
k Significantly reduce the gray space of flat
surface parking lots and encourage/promote
so-called parking structures
k Focus on reutilizing inadequate sectors of
the city. See Lincoln Center, the North Grand
Mall, for example – and bringing in Career
jobs there or removing business property
located in the flood plains – see South Duff
– and transplanting those businesses in the
presently inadequate sector
k Focus on mixed-use developments & in-fill
k More mixed use on Duff (housing, parks, local
businesses)
k Do not concentrate industrial all out east
k I would like to see regenerative grazing of
lawns instead of mowing. Use contract grazers
to manage with temporary fence & water
infrastructure. Entrepreneurs & beginning
farmers are willing to manage this.
k No developing in flood plain. Skunk River
north of 13th St. (No extension of Bloomington
Road)
k Limit growth of city limits. No increase in
present boundaries
k Think walkable and bikeable! Not 3 car
garages and big parking lots
k More affordable housing east of the university
k Creating more future land use designations for
creative housing options (mixed use) Do more
to encourage native-plant landscaping on as
much land as possible to help water quality
and wildlife, also CO2 sequestration and soil
health. Big lawns don’t help!
k More neighborhoods
k More smaller business, less big stores
k No more industrial
k Utilize the flood plain for the natural marvel
& economic boost. The can be – see the
economic benefits the High Trestle Trail has
brought to it
k Please no more development in flood plains.
Please see prairie & native long-rooted species
instead of turf. Use pervious pavers instead of
concrete where possible.
k Decrease medium-high density residential.
Enough apartments.
k Decrease single-family homes use for multi-
family rentals – we have affordable housing
but need single families to buy them
k Keep hospital medical zone as is to encourage
community health sites
k Ames needs to expand more to south,
southwest, west, & northwest. Growth directly
to north is enough with current areas. No ISU.
k Consider the future of the mall – future
housing? Park? Mixed use?
FUTURE LAND USE STATION
Concerns:
k Allow for increasing density – limit sprawl
k Revitalize and redevelop downtown
k Allow for accessory dwelling units & triplexes
k West Ames need more infrastructure (coffee
shops, markets, or parks)
k Innovative, resilient & leading efforts to reduce
greenhouse gases
k R 38/30 interchange overused + somewhat
dangerous due to crossing traffic going south
from 30 eastbound + north from east bound
k No annexation forced on property owners
k No annexation of state street property
k Remove Southwest II area from growth plan.
Save trees, creek, & wildlife
k ISU reduction in enrollment
k Move away from southwest
k County residents were not consulted on fringe
plans. No representation. We need to be heard.
City controls everything
k Move East & Southeast due to new industrial
park
k Commit to continuous development, not
leapfrog
k I’d like to see some kind of “growth boundary”
from Ames and a commitment to interior or
central Ames that is designed & redesigned
around density, walkable neighborhoods, &
services
31 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Big Ideas:
k Build sewer/annex north to Gilbert
k True student long-term parking. Take a look at
University of Iowa. On bus route at 30 min or
longer, discourage drive to class syndrome
k Expand Ames boundary west into Boone
County.
k Plan for neighborhood needs
k No annexation, no development, protect
environment, no paved roads south & west of
Worle Creek
k Attention to walkability and safe, easy access
to services, recreation, parks, and schools.
k Avoiding sprawling development that
stretches city resources and regular
automotive transport.
k Stop building huge, expensive apartments!
Need more affordable housing & amenities
around them
k Respect the floodplain
k Can we look to future and use land
surrounding Ames for energy (solar & wind)
and food productions? We can! Will we
consider it??
k Past plan did not respect ISU research farms
or acreage living. ISU farms need to maintain
close proximity to campus
k Please consider residential growth to
southwest
k Continue mixed use & infrastructure in SW
k Plan for mixed uses
k Expansion of commercial and residential north
& east of I-35 & 13th would be ideal area for
expansion of commercial
k Convert fringe area to growing food for people.
Construct a ring of wind turbines and solar
farms. Pay farmers to sequester carb (organic
matter)
k Important to keep Ames “compact” – walkable
& bikeable
k Infill & allow more multi-family homes & less
parking
k Annexation of area in Washington would
negatively impact revenue for the (something)
which would affect safety, road maintenance,
and other use of the revenue
32 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES STATION
Concerns:
k Consider hosting a workshop or presentation
on what the climate will look like in Ames in
2040 + beyond by Gene Takle, ISU Professor
k Use the best science possible to plan for
climate change vulnerabilities + impacts +
flooding
k More incentives for developers to create
permeable paved areas – some features of the
system right now leave fees that don’t scale
according to the amount of paved area
k Favor community gardens and food
production in town: more accessible fresh food
grown by and for citizens!
k We should put in food forests – not just
community garden plots. Focus on perennial
agriculture
k More sustainability (compost city-wide,
recycling city-wide more access to public
transportation)
k More green spaces everywhere
k More community gardens
k Preserve grasslands & nature areas while we
still can!
k Protect our green spaces and our drinking
water aquifer
k Need to protect natural/sensitive areas as
Ames expands
k Encourage/allow homeowners to have
driveways that are not exclusively concrete.
Allow new housing to use gravel & grass
driveways to decrease runoff
Big Ideas:
k Determine sources of E. Coli, and other
bacterial pollution of Squaw Creek and Skunk
River
k I would like to see Ames be more forward
thinking in flood plain management. Large
rain events are becoming more frequent. We
need to look at how to incorporate more
k Keep green spaces in city while growing
k I would like to see Ames commit to being
100% renewable energy powered
k I would like to see Ames have better electric
vehicle charging infrastructure including
buses
k Keep the Greenway as undeveloped – wild as
possible. Urban parks can’t replicate this.
k More support for community solar panels
k Increase the density of our urban forest
k When new housing developments go in, they
absolutely should not remove top soil before
building. This will create future flood & drought
issues – soil is our answer with roots in the
ground.
k Prioritizing wildlife/biological “corridors” in
infrastructure development
k We need to be intentional about holding
water in place. Put hard money into Squaw
Creek Action Plan recommendations
k Consider flood plains, slowing development in
already flooding areas and keeping wetlands
undeveloped and ready to absorb storms
k Support for solar panel farms
k City compost
k Reduce our impact on the climate and use
part of the flood plain to grow good. We could
use a large part of the land to produce large
amounts of free food for the public
k Make climate action a central principle. How
do all aspects of Ames 2040 address fossil fuel
use reduction and resilience enhancement?
k A carbon-neutral, pedestrian-centered city
with trees and community gardens
k Plans for parking if self-driving cars happen
k Tiny houses and micro-apartments
k Need to address infill
k Consider where employment will be in looking
at residential development. Stop forcing
extended communities
33 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
PARKS AND RECREATION STATION
Concerns:
k Has the city done a needs suitability study
of recreational offerings to determine
unmet needs? (universal playgrounds, trail
connectivity to parks, complex for baseball/
softball)
k Use floodplain areas as environmental type/rec
spaces and don’t allow development
k If P&R group sports are added at Emma
McCarthy be sure to look at traffic concerns
on Ross Road. Large amount use this road for
walking & biking – no sidewalks
k New developments should be required to have
green space, if not already
k Support for community gardens – have food,
not just flowers
k Grow the parks & nature areas along with the
city’s growth! Let’s help Ames be an extra
attractive place to live, work, & be well!
k More green space areas
k More open spaces
k Update parks
k Connect Moore & Reactor. Connect bike trails.
Plant trees and hire an urban forester to help
reduce greenhouse gases & water pollution
k Ada Hayden HP follow the recommendations
in the Klaas-Pease Land Management Plan
k Increase city support with Somerset Parks
(addition of equipment or support)
k Access concern – not a bike path or point of
access at a controlled intersection on north
side of Bloomington to get to Cloya Kartz or
Ada Hayden
k West Ames needs a park!
k Pave the bike trail and install lights and maybe
a 911 box
k Bike paths need to be interconnected. Dead
ends are not helpful for in-town recreational
bicyclists
k Connect to [ISU] land – [Moore Memorial Park
to Reactor Woods].
k And more open space
k No to play equipment at Ada Hayden. Keep it
natural!
k Add outdoor fitness equipment. Add play
equipment at Ada Hayden
k Where a bike trail crosses a street – need a sign
for cars/drivers that this is a bike trail crossing
k More neighborhood parks and green space
k Healthy Life Center – make it happen.
k Watershed management north of Ada Hayden
k Extend greenway to west Ames [Daley Park]
k Improve Community Garden (safety concerns,
fence)
k The quarry at southwest corner of I-35 & 30
could eventually be a park
k I would love to have greater bike path access
from north Ames to Ada Hayden
k I am an international student and I was
impressed by the green in Ames when I came.
I want Ames to keep and improve this beauty
and power!
k Camping facilities in town – use Carr Pool,
building/restrooms
k Push button yield at crossing of bike lane at
south 16th street – vet med trail
k There is an area with no access to parks just
south of the North Grand Mall
k Parks for aging!
k Food forests
k Couple with oak savanna reconstruction
k Water quality
k Bring more attention to the [Tedesco
Environmental Learning Corridor] Park. It will
be the “Ada Hayden” of South Ames
k Manage brush in the woodland understory
with contract grazers
k Add bat houses to parks to control mosquitos
k I love to ride my bike but I have to ride on
the streets. I’d love more shared use path
connections
k Connect to the High Trestle Trail
Big ideas:
k Build a large new park outside of floodplains
k More connected bike trails
k More walking trails
k More natural parks like Ada Hayden
k Trails/bikes as transportation
k Add community gardens
k Community needs more gathering spaces with
indoors and outdoors
k We need an indoor community pool for all –
not shared with public schools – needs to be
accessible during all times
k Support for a life center – classes, community
space, pool, exercise rooms
k Yes to Healthy Lifestyle Center
k Bond $20-25 million for Healthy Life Center
k Ames has some of the best parks in quality
& area per person. Would like to see it
maintained
k More connected bike trails
k More native prairie & woodland preserved/
restored
k Add signage to trails. Create a “trail system”
feel.
k Rethink what outdoor environments are
needed for children – playgrounds are not the
best option. Trails to walk, run, & ride bikes,
wading pools, places to explore nature
k Ames water park for boating? Thank you
k A need to expand park to corner (referring to
western edge of Tedesco Learning Corridor
extending to existing roundabout)
k I’m in favor! (Healthy Life Center)
k Support this big idea! (Healthy Life Center)
k Yes! (Healthy Life Center)
34 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
POPULATION CHANGE STATION
Concerns:
k Do we have enough low-income housing?
k Many new apartment buildings have been
constructed, most rental rates are high – can
Ames plan for low to median range rental
properties?
k Is growth always good?
k Provide additional financial support for police
force to keep up with population growth
k Is expansion realistic when student population
is expected to shrink in the next 20 years?
k Is 85,000 enough? Look at Peer Big 12 & other
institutional cities. Is 120,000 too much?
k Huge increase in vacant housing 2000-2017
k Not as significant of an increase when you
account for student growth!
k Story County has the highest rate of food
insecurity in the State of Iowa (15.9%) – see
feed America, Map the Meal – how is that
affected by the large percentage of ISU
students in Ames?
Big Ideas
k Include median household income
comparable
k 5 year snapshot of age demographics broken
down
k Include school enrollment data
k Population group to be included are those
over the age of 65!
SOCIAL AND CULTURAL STATION
Concerns:
k I want Ames to be a welcoming place for all
people. Right now that’s not the experience
of people of color, international folks, Muslim
people…improving this MUST be part of Ames’
growth plan!
k No Jewel Park/Kate Mitchell association?
(listed on map) When there is a neighborhood
meeting such as an IDOT meeting on S. Duff
construction, 100-200 people show up
Big Ideas:
k Expand Old Town Neighborhood to Grand?
k So proud of our Ames Public Library
k Foster more neighborhood associations
k Need a real museum to recognize Ames
History
k Someone to help regulate race relations. Since
2016, I have been the target of 3 separate
racially motivated confrontation. I no longer
feel safe as a black person in Ames – A
concerned college student
k Someone to reach out & assist neighborhoods
in organizing associations & helping them to
stay active
YEAR BUILT STATION
Concerns:
k I’ve seen so many prairie remnants and
woodlands destroyed by Ames growth in
the past forty years. It needs to stop. Protect
surviving natural areas!
k Yes, preservation of at least some strategic
natural areas is a must for Ames. Growth
without preservation of nature would make
Ames an unappealing, unhealthy place.
k Sprawl is now, sprawl is real
k In the interest of combatting sprawl, make a
20-year expansion that preserves green spaces
k Save wildlife and trees on State Street. Stop
sprawl
k Integrate historic preservation
Big Ideas
k Preserve Campustown aesthetics – low
buildings, brick fronts, small businesses
35 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
SUB AREAS STATION
Concerns:
k Downtown commercial /residential
development mixed use
k Genuine concern for preservation of affordable
housing is needed in this city.
k Must have more affordable housing in Ames!
Otherwise Ames becomes more “elite” and not
inclusive, diverse, or healthy
k Hate road diets. Need to improve traffic flow
on primary roads, Duff, Lincoln Way, University.
k I live on South Dakota Ave and just south of
Worle Creek. All I can envision being annexed
into the City of Ames, my home becoming a
money pit. I am not in favor of annexation.
k Please do not put Lincoln Way on a road diet
east of Hilton Coliseum.
Big Ideas:
k Cultural Institutions need to grow! New history
& art museums in downtown
k Urban core & downtown need to strive for
revitalization, dense redevelopment, triplexes,
in-law additions, affordable housing, &
resiliency to stresses of climate change
k Affordable housing
k More green areas
k Improve downtown’s walkability
k Add history museum to downtown
k Make downtown a destination for families –
restaurants, stores, ped mall, farmers market
k I like the Lincoln Way road diet!
k Yes to Rail Corridor Buffer and Trail! (Lincoln &
Grand)
k Yes to small lot single family housing
k Carriage house units, more! More multifamily
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STATION
Concerns:
k Respect flood plain when building
k South Duff is a nightmare. Why have we made
the same mistakes as every city?
k Respect ag land. It’s not a limitless resource
k Preserve/foster local businesses, especially in
Campustown area
k Food & renewable energy (production
processing) (Ames imports what, 90% of our
food from outside Iowa? That stat is just a
guess.) New commercial regional uses
k SW Ames commercial residential (McCay)
k Innovative, resilient, & leading efforts to reduce
greenhouse gases, as much as possible, as
soon as possible
k Quality, affordable childcare in highway
oriented commercial areas
k Public transport in some areas
k Stop building in the floodplains. Climate
change is causing higher rainfall events
k We have a hidden homeless issue. Actually,
it’s non-recognition that Ames could have a
homeless problem
k Make sure businesses here (Prairie View
Industrial Center) actually use railroad
k Find a strategy to link new economic growth
with housing that is affordable for the new
employees
k Housing & rental costs are too high for people
to afford to live, work & play here. (many noted
agreeing with this)
Big Ideas:
k Expand exhibition/meeting space & hotel
development at Iowa State Center
k No more large commercial building projects in
the flood plains!
k Convert this to a food hub to serve region.
Greenhouses, food processing of local foods,
distribution to local stores (pointing to area
east of I-35 marked as “regional commercial”)
k More outdoor space for restaurants, patios,
tables, etc. esp. downtown
k Food delivery services in winters for internal
students new in ISU
k Better online services
k Facilitate more centrally located commercial
for reducing transportation distances.
k More bike lanes
k Zone Lincoln Way east of Squaw Creek to
Grand Commercial
k Tax increment financing for suburban/
residential development
k Employer subsidized childcare centers in
commercial areas
k It would be interesting to see bike facilities/
paths/lanes on a map with commercial. Can
everyone get to these areas?
k We need more roundabouts
k Providing ready access and recognition of
results-based code compliance could assist
commercial development, especially in city
with technical knowledge
k Need more restaurants in the research park
area!
k Progressive green sustainable modern
landscaping uses native plants, not massive
lawns. The businesses in the research
park may be progressive but much of the
landscaping is not. We can do much better!
36 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
TRANSPORTATION STATION #1
Concerns:
k Promote public transit that could be
within the city itself or among the city and
surrounding rural community in Des Moines
k Improve sidewalks
k Improve sidewalk on Grand
k Improve pedestrian street crossing on west
Mortenson beyond Kum & Go
k We need better sidewalks so people aren’t
walking on dirt or side roads when there isn’t a
sidewalk in some areas
k 1/3 bike/ped, 1/3 car, 1/3 public transit
k Incorporate more divided or separate bike
lanes and/or transit that connect with each
other and main route of the city (complete
streets)
k Bicycle trails that connect!
k Improve snow removal, especially for Lincoln
Way beyond Campustown
k Improve signage on Greeley Street, as it is very
confusing for new people
k Pulling onto Stange from US development is a
nightmare
k 25 seconds to cross 4 lane streets is too short
for families, children and seniors
k Current signals and ‘flow’ at certain
intersections are very frustrating and unsafe
at time of the day. Improvements to alleviate
these issues would be greatly appreciated
k Connectivity
k Dayton Rd access to HYSC
k Separation of south Ames from Mary Greeley
by train tracks on S. Duff is a continuity
concern
k Planning on S. Duff seems a bit short-sighted –
how long after 3 lanes to city limit will we need
4 lanes?
k South Duff turning into HYSC backs up and
is a high congestion point. Accidents happen
weekly during soccer season. Only one point in
and out.
k 16th St. near Duff need[s] more lanes and
better access to businesses
k End of day rush hour at Mortensen & State and
Stange & 13th is a problem
k Exiting left out of Middle School onto
Mortenson (from East entrance/exit) is
problematic
k Need better access from south Ames (Grand
Ave extension is welcome and critical)
k Lincoln Way traffic is to heavy going east/west
from Hilton [coliseum] to North/South Dakota.
More ideas to improve traffic.
k Hayes Avenue is super busy on school
mornings. Can take 10-15 minutes to make it
through intersection.
k Would like to see more connectivity of major
routes. Currently lacking many options for N/S,
E/W circulation across town without using I-35
or Hwy 30
k Plan arterial & collector in advance, not per
development. Same for trunk sewer & water
k Needs traffic control at State & Mortensen.
Awful there – roundabout or light?
k Grand needs to be extended south to relieve
Duff congestion
k Hughes & 24th St. add right turn lane from
west bound to north bound to reduce queuing
and congestion
k Extend University Drive north to 24th.
k Extend 20th St. west to new University Drive.
k New N. Dakota arterial roadways from UP
Railroad tracks to Cameron School Rd.
k Rear-end crashes SB Duff just south of US30
PM peak hour entering soccer fields
Big Ideas:
k Light rail to link Ames to Ankeny & Des Moines
k Light rail to Des Moines
k Rapid Transit on Cultivation Corridor
k Connectivity, especially for walker, cyclists, etc.
Connectivity needs to be respectful of all kind
of mobility & accessibility
k Need Grand Ave connection to Airport Rd
k Consider a roundabout at Mortenson & State
to manage traffic
k WB US30 traffic backup during PM peak (4-6)
on main line, at S. Dakota Ave
k New US 30 interchange @ County Line Rd
k Need better N-S connectivity between Stange
and Grand Ave
k Need another N/S street. Stange gets more &
more congested. Very slow.
k Southern interstate access
k Develop Ames to the south!
k Plan major roads with long term goals in
mind…not reactive
k Need a future focus – let’s not limit on 2040 –
provide for future growth
k Need more nature/bicycling trails that connect
existing county/state trails
37 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
TRANSPORTATION STATION #2
Concerns:
k Extend 190th St. west to R38 and East to I-35
k Love the plan for Bloomington to extend to
I-35! We REALLY need this!
k Ames invest in more bus services especially for
low-income on holidays
k More bike paths! More connected bike paths
and trails
k Mortenson & State roundabout
k It would be cool if we had more bike paths
like Ankeny, Slater, or Des Moines and walking
areas
k Bike/pedestrian trails need to have more
connections
k North Dakota to 24th connection in North
Ames
k Improved walkability – sidewalks and trails
k If we continue to expand east with industrial
park, need more CyRide for employees of
industrial park use
k More parking near campustown & downtown
areas with businesses
k More trails! More connections. Bridge from
Moore [Memorial] Park to Reactor Woods
k Improve the State & Mortenson Intersection
k State & Mortenson intersection – how will
handle feed mill semi traffic
k CyRide is amazing! Keep up the good work!
k Get rid of bike paths on S. 3rd. Traffic backs
up – can’t turn right on red – bus stops in bike
lane.
k Work for transit between Ames, Ankeny, Des
Moines
k More places to walk in the woods like Emma
McCarthy or east of Skunk River
k Separated bike lanes near campus
k Slow Lincoln Way down – feels like it should be
45 with a divided street
k Implement long term out of the way parking
for students to reduce the desire to drive to
class – thus reducing traffic on Lincoln Way
k Address pedestrian crossing near West HyVee
on Lincoln
k There are very few safe intersections for cyclists
to cross Lincoln Way. Intersections need to be
improved to allow for safe crossing.
k Connection to I-35 exit 116 from North Ames
Big Ideas:
k Hyde/Grant Street; major road to Gilbert but
outlets to Ames residential area just north of
Bloomington. Need to divert traffic around
residential.
k Commuter train to Ankeny and DSM.
k More turn lanes on Lincoln Way
k Reduce Congestion on Lincoln Way
k Main Street – reinvent the Dinky – from one of
to other. Hop on hop off.
k Commuter bus/rail to Des Moines would be
amazing!
k Recommend no grade separated on N. Dakota
Street w/ UPRR, instead use existing viaduct at
Countyline Road.
k CyRide is an amazing resource for Ames. How
do we expand service & routes?
k Roundabout at State and Mortensen and
Hayward and Mortensen
k If we are thinking of future, we must think
about once a week/twice a week connections
to DSM (especially for international students)
k Cyride is amazing and functioning very well.
However, if there can be buses schedule on
selected times to Des Moines or nearest cities
will be useful (apart from ISU shuttle)
38 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
linked together
k Complete sidewalk by railroad track on north
side of 24th
k Continue to focus on E/W and N/S connections
k More connected separated from traffic bike
lanes/paths
k Invest in sidewalks. Ames’ core is not safe
for aging in place due to deterioration of
sidewalks
Big Ideas:
k Ames express bus
k Signs at trails to local establishments (like
Cedar Falls)
k More natural bike routes than Clark (Easier
crossing @ 13th)
k Tell ISU to renovate and expand the Memorial
Union parking garage. We’ll need more
parking in general
k Making Intermodal facility friendlier & cheaper
to use
k Need a complete bike trail loop for families
sooner
k Lincoln Way is not a trail. Make distinction
between trail vs. just sidewalk
k It’s very difficult for high school students who
don’t drive to get to school. Why is north
Ames not on a bus route that goes to the high
school?
k Full priority to pedestrians at intersections
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION STATION
Concerns:
k Sidewalk connectivity in industrial area if not
connecting to something
k Innovative, resilient, & leading efforts to reduce
greenhouse gases as much as possible, as soon
as possible
k Lots of transit options.
k Zip cars
k Sidewalks & crosswalks that are narrow
k Have yet to read the Complete Streets Plan,
but one concern is the off-road/on-street
and the extreme mixed message on what is
expected of patron of each, and motorists
confronting these patrons?
k Prioritize trails & connections. Good for public
health & climate
k There is a complete lack of connectivity
between current bike infrastructure or a lack
of forward thinking when bike infrastructure is
put in.
k Improved sidewalks on Lincoln Way…wide
paths to accommodate bikes and peds
k Electric car infrastructure, solar panel charging
covered parking
k Why does it say Grand Ave is a part of an
existing trail? There are sign that say no bikes
on that street!
k We need to take on wayfinding Y signage.
k Better education outreach for auto-ped-cyclist
interactions
k Improve crosstown and intertown bicycle trails
k Sidewalk along Ross Road @ Emma McCarthy
Lee Park. Very busy street, nowhere to walk
k Existing roads must become more bicycle
& pedestrian inclusive & welcoming! And all
new road must have this as part of their plan/
infrastructure. For healthy, inclusivity, and an
ideal place to live!
k More connections for bike trails. Get these
INFRASTRUCTURE STATION
Concerns:
k Better collaboration with internet service
providers in new development areas
k Older pipes in Campustown lead to a lot of
funky smells. Update size & double check
venting in houses & businesses
k South neighborhoods such as Jewel Park/
Kate Mitchell can be cut off during flooding
including access to hospital
k Age of water mains – where do we need to
update?
k Storm sewer concerns regarding flash flooding
k Don’t forget the importance of upgrading
infrastructure to maintain & improve quality of
life in Ames
k Good Ames Water loses quality after flowing
through 4” water mains
39 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
COMMENT CARD STATION
Below are the comments submitted on cards .
k Make sure the wording [in the survey] makes it
so anyone in the Ames area should answer the
questions. Not just those who live in city limits.
k Create solar power plant
k More trees & wildlife
k Preserve existing trees & stop developing these
areas
k Remove southwest from development plan,
save water creek, old oak trees & wildlife.
Please do not annex.
k More development of retail and commercial
(professional space). Less apartments along
major traffic areas (Lincoln Way). Commercial
development without apartments on top.
Make Ames attractive enough that we quit
hearing about Ankeny/Des Moines.
k More support for cultural organizations –
Reiman, History Center, Octagon. Arts, history,
& culture give an important sense of place to
the community!
k Would like this plan to be interactive, allowing
a resident to overlay multiple layers (similar
to maps around room at open house) to
determine different suitabilities (or evaluate)
these proposed improvements in terms
of different (and sometimes conflicting)
improvements.
k Look for and execute catalytic projects that
unlock additional investment.
k Rural acreages for Champlian ground 1-5 acre
lots, horse farms, hobby farms. Ames needs
more beauty! The apartment buildings take
away from the natural beauty.
k Tiny house villages centered around a
community garden, community bathing
facilities, solar-powered.
k Creative solutions to homelessness: boarding
house concept, ease parking requirements
on low-income housing to allow for denser
development
k Thank you for investing your time and energy
into our community! I would like to see our
waterways protected w/ a diverse ray of plants
(reconstructed oak Savanna with agroforestry
products e.g. fruits and nut tree crops) that
could be used in our schools and food banks.
These buffers would also have a perennial
understory (think silvopasture).
k A recycling facility would be nice and students
really want it and it would be heavily utilized.
Plus it would create jobs and add another
sustainable aspect to Ames.
k Recognize true boundaries of Old Town
Neighborhood Association
PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
Below are the comments made at the Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting.
k Flexibility to allow things in the future that
were not in place or a concern when the plan
was adopted
k Flexibility and ability to respond quickly; the
cycle of change is accelerating
k More flexibility when looking at some of the
uses that come up; A matrix that would help
the P&Z determine if there is a need for a
certain type of land use or if amendments to
the Comp Plan are warranted
k Efficient, effective and responsive to the
community’s needs
k Consideration for urban design
k More urban design and transportation
planning
k Focused development- not willy-nilly across
the City
k Role of transportation and what it is going to
look like in the future; Integrate this into the
broader framework of the comprehensive plan
k Support for stable neighborhoods and small,
local businesses
k Green space in the City
k More affordable housing
40 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
ISU ON-CAMPUS EVENTS
Members of Iowa State University’s CRP (Community & Regional Planning) Club hosted four pop-up events in Spring 2019 at the following ISU locations: College
of Design, Memorial Union, Gerdin Business Building, and Parks Library. While sign-in sheets were not available, reportedly 50 participants contributed the
following input.
k Increased public transportation, better road
maintenance in winter
k Roads/sidewalks—potholes/ice
k More historic preservation in Campustown
area
k New bike lanes
k Mom & Pop Shops in Central Campus. More
parking available.
k Loosening of small businesses regulations,
make Ames more friendly to startups
k More walking and bike paths are a great idea!
k More walking paths and less stoplights!
k More hiking paths.
k Traffic (illegible word) both east to west and
north to south. Lincoln sucks, 13 is not zoned
well and Duff also sucks.
k Better rain or water drainage. I have tennis
shoes on days where it suddenly rains/snows
and there’s lots of excess water in certain
public sidewalks.
k Understanding on late rents, not kick me out
(I’m a broke college student). Plow the snow.
k Plow the roads!
k Overuse of Lincoln Way
k The road conditions
k Ice on walks
k Expansion/increased options
k More Nerd Stores
k Salt the roads
k Snow removal and use salt!!!
k Plow your roads and salt them!
k Flooding
k Accessibility
k Repair Lincoln Way please and thank you
k More bike lanes!!
k Want more diverse food restaurants (African,
German, Thai, etc.)
k What Ames is going to do with the mall when
it has no more stores
k Less and less affordable housing for students
k Issues moving into Nevada, going across city
lines. New infrastructure for ISU.
k Build a Lincoln Way pedestrian bridge
k Train to Des Moines and Chicago
k Diverse food options!
k More mixed-use in high density residential
areas
k Redevelop Campustown west of Welch Ave
and Welch Ave south of fire station
k More biking lanes
k I would like more diverse options for things to
do in Ames especially closer to Campus!
k Creating a sense of place for Campustown
k Better quality of restaurants, easier to afford
units, more single bedroom housing (so many
3-4 bedroom units!), more pet friendly units
k The primary focus of the plan should be the
students—for parks/CyRide, etc.
k Decreasing/managing urban sprawl
k More affordable housing near campus, more
local businesses in student housing
k Accessibility for students without cars
Excited For
k The growth of ISU and the Welch Avenue
Redevelopment Project
k Redrawn flood plain lines/areas
k Excited to see more student engagement in
city decisions!
k Remodeling
k Road construction/repair, perhaps more trees
in our future?
k Continuing sustainability initiatives
k Ames has everything that a big city would
have, while remaining a very tight-knit
community
Concerns/Challenges/Interests
k Apartments are expensive
k More bike paths would be awesome
k Growth of ISU/Student community
k Changing Campustown to bring more growth
and life
k Ice Skating
k I would like to see road expansion—always
busy
k Increase CyRide buses, bike lanes, better
preparation for heavy snow
k More late night food
k More renewable energy
k More Mexican Food
k Bike lanes!
41 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
k Outdoor space for activities, too many
buildings going up
k Recycling/sustainable initiatives
k Not enough housing and poor roads
k Parking, more trees, better prep for floods
k Better flow of traffic (main roadways are
already congested)
k I want the city to support the university/
students
k More open areas and parks
k Lighting
k More bus shelters, heat lamps at bus shelters
k Art exhibit in front of the unsightly power
plant
k Apartment/rented housing surplus and pricing
k Salt the road; hang out spaces—local areas,
shops; hiking paths
k Accessibility—zoning/separation of services
k More free parking
k East Lincoln Way needs to be redeveloped
smart (between Grand and Duff)
k Walkability and major roads
k Outdoor workout proper equipment and shed
Listed below are the responses CRP Club received from
the student open house event in the Memorial Union on
March 13, 2019.
What makes you excited about the
future of Ames?
k I like the idea of the community health/fitness
center (can be very difficult to use the pool
at ISU during allotted ‘family’ swim times) +
winters require a place for fitness
k Remodeling Campustown
k New parks
k Solar and movement toward being a green
city
k Great university
k Climate change plan!!
k Full commitment to reduced waste &
renewable energy (reward businesses who
participate)
k We’re small enough & wealthy enough to be a
leader for cutting edge city design
k Complete Streets!
k A Climate Action Plan that gets us to net-zero
carbon emissions
k New green spaces like the park planned by
west HyVee
k New Comprehensive plan! (I am a planner,
these things make me excited)
k More green space & recycling efforts!
k Expansion of CyRide stops
k Cutting edge green city
k Community greenhouses, gardens,
composting, food forest, tiny houses,
ecovillage
What challenges do you see for the
future of Ames?
k Continued “sprawl” (large edge of city
mcmansions!)
k Poor quality construction (apartments mostly)
k ·Unsafe streets for anyone not in a car
k Expensive services
k I feel that much of the recent growth has
been for the benefit of a few construction,
real estate developers, and chain corporations
rather than focusing on the needs of the poor
of Ames and the needs of the environment
k Climate change
k Becoming a carbon-neutral city
k Fresh water availability
k Outgrowing current emergency service
coverage area
k Fix drainage on the sidewalks
k North Ames emergency Services area
stretched thin
k Flood!
k Better rain sucker distribution
k I am afraid that new growth will follow the old
model of expansive, car-focused pavement-
heavy development instead of being
integrated into natural systems
k Too much development in flood plain, present
but hopefully not future.
k Need to get away from car-centric culture.
k Addressing climate change
k Affordable housing
k Controlling sprawl
k Unfettered growth and development
(residential, large McMansions and sprawling
commercial) that takes over green space
k Build a larger mall
k Too much construction of commercial spaces
42 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
& not enough businesses coming in to fill
them
k Loss of cultural amenities
k We need more public space in Campustown
k Lack of viable recycling options
k Increased development in already congested
areas (like Duff)
k Lack of continuous bike trails
What is the best kept secret in Ames?
Cross-country skiing trails in Carr pool-North
River Valley Park
k Ice Cream out in Jewell, Iowa
k Great tasting water
k Cyclone Cinema
k Applied science hiking trails
k Morning Bell Coffee
k Great nonprofits
k Cyclone Cinema
k Fuzzy’s Trivia Nights
k Vinyl Café
k Wheatsfield Co-op
k Cross country skiing on ISU’s cross country
grounds
k The beautiful mixed use path that will be
destroyed by South Grand expansion
k Pammel Grocery
k Akira Karaoke
k Outdoor ice rinks
k Bike lanes on South Dakota Ave
k Ada Hayden & Skunk River Water Trail
ENGAGEMENT DATA
ONLINE ACTIVITIES
44 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
ONLINE ENGAGEMENT RESULTS
The City of Ames used PublicInput.com as a platform for gathering public input and feedback. Users contributed their responses at stations at public events
and remotely (home, office, or other).
PART 1: Questionnaire
Open/Close: Feb-March 2019
Participants: 525
Comments: 427
PART 2: Mapping
Open/Close: Oct-Dec 2019
Participants: 119
Comments: 347
PART 3: Feedback
Forum
Open/Close: TBD
Participants:
Comments:
45 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
PART 1: QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
Below are results from a community questionnaire administered in February and March 2019.
2.If you live in Ames, how long have you been a resident?(461 respondents)
39%
23%
23%
11%
5%
Greater than 20 years
1-5 years
11-20 years
6-10 years
Less than 1 year
3.Do you currently Rent or Own your home?(485 respondents)
76% Own
24% Rent
4.Does your household have school-age or younger children?(484 respondents)
66% No
34% Yes
5.Where do you work?(485 respondents)
70%
17%
6%
4%
4%
Ames
Not Applicable
Other
Des Moines/Metro
Story County
6.Are you currently enrolled as a full time student at a college or university?
87% No
13% Yes
7.What is your age range?(489 respondents)
29%
27%
22%
12%
10%
1%
25-39
40-54
55-69
18-24
Over 69
Under 18
(483 respondents)
46 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
8.How would you describe your annual income range?
23%
18%
16%
14%
14%
14%
Greater than $124,999
$50,000 to $74,999
Less than $25,000
$75,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $124,999
$25,000 to $49,999
8a. On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to
Community Image and Values?
1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Average 4 Good 5 Excellent Don't Know
Image of the downtown 1%
1 Poor
7%
2 Fair
18%
3 Average
60%
4 Good
14%
5 Excellent
-
Don't Know
Satisfaction with community direction 4%
1 Poor
13%
2 Fair
31%
3 Average
42%
4 Good
8%
5 Excellent
3%
Don't Know
Your overall happiness with living in Ames 1%
1 Poor
5%
2 Fair
13%
3 Average
44%
4 Good
34%
5 Excellent
3%
Don't Know
Quality and satisfaction with community services 2%
1 Poor
4%
2 Fair
19%
3 Average
48%
4 Good
26%
5 Excellent
2%
Don't Know
Civic involvement and volunteerism 1%
1 Poor
3%
2 Fair
25%
3 Average
40%
4 Good
24%
5 Excellent
7%
Don't Know
Strengths of community institutions 1%
1 Poor
2%
2 Fair
18%
3 Average
51%
4 Good
23%
5 Excellent
5%
Don't Know
Ability to attract and retain new residents 5%
1 Poor
12%
2 Fair
26%
3 Average
40%
4 Good
10%
5 Excellent
6%
Don't Know
Welcoming attitude to new arrivals 4%
1 Poor
10%
2 Fair
28%
3 Average
38%
4 Good
13%
5 Excellent
7%
Don't Know
Attractiveness to visitors 3%
1 Poor
13%
2 Fair
28%
3 Average
41%
4 Good
12%
5 Excellent
2%
Don't Know
Quality of Neighborhoods -
1 Poor
5%
2 Fair
22%
3 Average
53%
4 Good
17%
5 Excellent
2%
Don't Know
Image of the city 1%
1 Poor
5%
2 Fair
22%
3 Average
54%
4 Good
17%
5 Excellent
1%
Don't Know
(465 respondents)
(473 respondents)8b. Do you agree with the statement Ames is a unique city?(455 respondents)
52%
29%
9%
8%
2%
Agree
Neutral
Strongly agree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
8c. Do you agree that, overall, Ames provides for a high quality of life?(454 respondents)
61%
20%
14%
5%
0%
Agree
Strongly agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
47 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
12.On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent) how would your rate Ames in regard to
Transportation?
1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Average 4 Good 5 Excellent Don't Know
Ames' overall transportation system 2%
1 Poor
7%
2 Fair
18%
3 Average
47%
4 Good
24%
5 Excellent
2%
Don't Know
Access to employment centers 3%
1 Poor
6%
2 Fair
22%
3 Average
33%
4 Good
12%
5 Excellent
24%
Don't Know
Condition of streets 4%
1 Poor
12%
2 Fair
37%
3 Average
39%
4 Good
7%
5 Excellent
-
Don't Know
Access to Highway 30 3%
1 Poor
6%
2 Fair
21%
3 Average
50%
4 Good
19%
5 Excellent
1%
Don't Know
North-to-South street connections 12%
1 Poor
21%
2 Fair
28%
3 Average
31%
4 Good
6%
5 Excellent
2%
Don't Know
East-to-West street connections 7%
1 Poor
16%
2 Fair
29%
3 Average
38%
4 Good
8%
5 Excellent
2%
Don't Know
Sidewalks and pedestrian paths 5%
1 Poor
13%
2 Fair
32%
3 Average
39%
4 Good
10%
5 Excellent
1%
Don't Know
Pedestrian friendliness 7%
1 Poor
13%
2 Fair
31%
3 Average
37%
4 Good
11%
5 Excellent
2%
Don't Know
Bicycle friendliness 10%
1 Poor
14%
2 Fair
28%
3 Average
33%
4 Good
10%
5 Excellent
5%
Don't Know
Connectivity of trails 9%
1 Poor
14%
2 Fair
27%
3 Average
29%
4 Good
8%
5 Excellent
13%
Don't Know
Adequacy of railroad crossings 9%
1 Poor
14%
2 Fair
37%
3 Average
30%
4 Good
5%
5 Excellent
4%
Don't Know
Truck routing 5%
1 Poor
7%
2 Fair
27%
3 Average
26%
4 Good
4%
5 Excellent
30%
Don't Know
Traffic speeds and safety 4%
1 Poor
11%
2 Fair
29%
3 Average
42%
4 Good
13%
5 Excellent
1%
Don't Know
Awareness of transit 2%
1 Poor
8%
2 Fair
29%
3 Average
40%
4 Good
10%
5 Excellent
11%
Don't Know
Signage and directional information 4%
1 Poor
7%
2 Fair
29%
3 Average
47%
4 Good
11%
5 Excellent
2%
Don't Know
4%
1 Poor
4%
2 Fair
29%
3 Average
14%
4 Good
3%
5 Excellent
47%
Don't Know
(439 respondents)
9.On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to
Land Use and the Environment?
1
Poor
2
Fair
3
Average
4
Good
5
Excellent
Don't
Know
Location of new growth and expansion of the City 14%
1
Poor
21%
2
Fair
31%
3
Average
27%
4
Good
3%
5
Excellent
5%
Don't
Know
Integrating infill and redevelopment projects 11%
1
Poor
21%
2
Fair
31%
3
Average
16%
4
Good
3%
5
Excellent
18%
Don't
Know
Locations of new growth and rural subdivisions, near the City (within
2 miles)
11%
1
Poor
18%
2
Fair
34%
3
Average
22%
4
Good
3%
5
Excellent
11%
Don't
Know
Management of land use conflicts with zoning and design standards 13%
1
Poor
18%
2
Fair
27%
3
Average
15%
4
Good
2%
5
Excellent
24%
Don't
Know
Incorporating environmental/sustainability principles in planning
decisions
12%
1
Poor
16%
2
Fair
26%
3
Average
24%
4
Good
6%
5
Excellent
15%
Don't
Know
Incorporating stormwater management in planning decisions 9%
1
Poor
17%
2
Fair
25%
3
Average
21%
4
Good
5%
5
Excellent
23%
Don't
Know
Visual quality and aesthetics of the City 6%
1
Poor
15%
2
Fair
36%
3
Average
34%
4
Good
6%
5
Excellent
2%
Don't
Know
10.On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to Parks,
and Culture?
1
Poor
2
Fair
3
Average
4
Good
5
Excellent
Don't
Know
Providing for Parks and Open Spaces overall 2%
1
Poor
3%
2
Fair
13%
3
Average
44%
4
Good
36%
5
Excellent
1%
Don't
Know
Providing for indoor recreation opportunities 12%
1
Poor
19%
2
Fair
32%
3
Average
27%
4
Good
6%
5
Excellent
4%
Don't
Know
Providing for outdoor active recreation (play fields, courts, playgrounds,
etc.) opportunities
1%
1
Poor
3%
2
Fair
20%
3
Average
49%
4
Good
27%
5
Excellent
1%
Don't
Know
Providing for pedestrian and bicycle paths and connections 8%
1
Poor
12%
2
Fair
26%
3
Average
36%
4
Good
16%
5
Excellent
3%
Don't
Know
Supporting art in public places -
1
Poor
5%
2
Fair
19%
3
Average
46%
4
Good
27%
5
Excellent
3%
Don't
Know
Opportunities to attend art, music, theater, dance, etc. events, exhibitions,
or productions
1%
1
6%
2
16%
3
44%
4
30%
5
2%
Don't
(418 respondents)
(429 respondents)
48 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
13.On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being poor and 5 being excellent), how would you rate Ames in regard to
Housing?
1 Poor 2 Fair 3 Average 4 Good 5 Excellent Don't Know
Housing quality and desirability of single-family homes 5%
1 Poor
16%
2 Fair
28%
3 Average
40%
4 Good
7%
5 Excellent
4%
Don't Know
Housing quality and desirability of apartment housing 5%
1 Poor
10%
2 Fair
23%
3 Average
38%
4 Good
13%
5 Excellent
10%
Don't Know
Affordability of housing 24%
1 Poor
30%
2 Fair
31%
3 Average
11%
4 Good
2%
5 Excellent
3%
Don't Know
Supply of ownership housing 9%
1 Poor
26%
2 Fair
28%
3 Average
17%
4 Good
2%
5 Excellent
18%
Don't Know
Supply of workforce and market-based rental housing 10%
1 Poor
18%
2 Fair
23%
3 Average
17%
4 Good
5%
5 Excellent
26%
Don't Know
Supply of student-marketed housing (off-campus)2%
1 Poor
6%
2 Fair
15%
3 Average
33%
4 Good
27%
5 Excellent
17%
Don't Know
Supply of affordable (low-income) housing 28%
1 Poor
23%
2 Fair
15%
3 Average
6%
4 Good
2%
5 Excellent
25%
Don't Know
Supply of senior housing 7%
1 Poor
15%
2 Fair
19%
3 Average
23%
4 Good
6%
5 Excellent
29%
Don't Know
(417 respondents)
49 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
14.What makes you excited about the future of Ames?
Downtown renewal projects; new water system; parks upkeep
Knowing that there is a vested interest in the future of the City and a growing cohesive relationship between the city
and the University.
That we can be more inclusive than we are and have housing for all levels of income. That we allow tiny homes next to
homes which means changing several regulations to provide affordable housing for single people.
It is still possible to preserve enough of Ames' green spaces that it may remain a place with an above average quality
of life. Despite recent development projects being sited in green spaces (track for people with disabilities slated for
north Duff Avenue and Wellness Center along Ontario) there yet remain green areas that people can enjoy. If the
council were listening to residents, they would know that developing in green spaces is not supported. Projects like
Ada Hayden Park and restoring the creek along Airport Road are in line with Ames values, while looking to channelize
Squaw Creek and build the aforementioned projects is certainly not.
As long as Iowa State continues to succeed in attracting and growing research funds, the future of Ames remains
bright. Growing student numbers beyond the current level does NOT have the same positive effect. Research funds
attract innovators and entrepreneurs and with that come start-up companies and established companies locating a
research lab in Ames (see recent growth of ISU Research Park). This pattern of growth will continue to grow the local
economy and tax base.
That you are making the effort to update the comprehensive plan.
Entertainment and recreational opportunities, opportunities of meeting and becoming friends with new neighbors,
community, church, and other volunteers. Possibilities of innovation that can have an impact on whole community
such as solar energy farms, new schools, possible new recreational center
We have leaders with progressive ideas. It’s hard to get them implemented, however. It would be nice if there was a
way to cut down the distance to travel from residential neighborhoods to commercial. Why are all the residential
part of Ames where people could walk to shopping without crossing a busy road? Do the student apartments in
campustown have to be so tall? Is there cost share to redo a long stretch of sidewalks along an entire street (such as
Northwestern)? Thanks for asking for input.
The current mayor and city council are as pro-growth as I've seen in my time in Ames. They seem eager to find
solutions for growing this city in many ways while remaining fiscally responsible.
The growth and development of the local schools.
Ames has been a vibrant community with secure employment opportunities with a reasonable expectation of
continued growth.
the university. I hope they can continue to develop their biking trails and parks.
of those differing groups. We are well-positioned for long term success!
That we are constantly expanding and growing.
50 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
I am really excited about the Crawford project and integrating residents of different ages and economic means in the
same neighborhood. I am hoping that this project and its residents will help move the redevelopment of Campus
Town forward.
Ames continues to grow offerings in art and music.
Support of the arts and involvement of the community.
The growth of the town. Like the new businesses coming to town particularly restaurants and shopping though I do
worry about Duff Ave flooding and congestion. Hope the Grand Ave extension to S. 16th can help (getting to Airport
Rd would be awesome too).
New growth and development, opportunities for young entrepreneurs and businesses
I am excited for the potential Healthy Life Center. The ideas I've seen surrounding it would be a great asset to the
city.
The positive energy of the people of Ames.
Ames residents like who they are and have pride in their community. I think that can allow for the necessary growth
to make Ames great if they are willing to embrace change.
Diversity and culture
I gave up on Ames a long time ago. My only hope is that as Ames grows the effect of the horrible 1950s era
"planning" will get so bad something will actually be done to solve the problems instead of just kick them down
the road. A real city has a grand vision - here it is how many crappy fast food places you can get on one street and
how much land you can gobble in single-zoned residential subdivisions and making sure there is oceans of asphalt
at the retail destinations this type development demands. I have studied planning and community for over 35
years and the method of making decisions is conspicuous at best. The city's taxpayers subsidize the developments
- no one would come here on vacation to enjoy the city - they go to Europe where the cities are planned for
people. A quick analysis if existing data would show what types of development are best for the city (and personal
health too for that matter) -that study will never happen and little meaningful change will ever occur here. More
greasy burger joints,parking lots and unhealthy people. No need for a healthy lifestyle center in a city that is
conducive to good health - like Euro cities planned for people.
I like the expansion that has been occurring as well as business development. We are doing a good job of
attracting companies. I like the discussion (although it happens every 15 years or so) of closing welch. I believe that
things may actually happen this time. I am tired of parking meter discussions every ten years. Make a plan for
parking and stop revisiting the same issues. If we think proactively we will move in that direction even a little bit at
a time. Vision creates this. I would like the bike paths to be connected to the high trestle trail network system and
would like to see a progressive approach to living here. Also consolidate the Ames and Holbert School Districts
please and thank you. :)
I love the parks and trails throughout the city. I'm excited to see the existing parks and trails expanded and
maintained. The city does a great job on this end.
Addition of more businesses so do not have to go to Des Moines for all shopping
Leadership is planning for the future
51 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
There are more retail amenities (restaurants, shopping) coming to Ames. Having a vibrant downtown with
events like Pridefest and other more niche cultural events adds vitally to the city.
Support of the arts and culture, investment in education at all levels, forward-thinking leaders who prioritize
sustainability, resilience, quality of life, diversity, equity, principled community planning and development,
and green energy and jobs.
Focus on sustainability and becoming a leader in sustainability and environmental initiatives. Expanding
community initiatives that welcome diverse populations and opinions in community conversations and
collaborations.
Though unaware of specifics, the future of Ames seems bright as long as we work on improving it.
The university and many other large employers in the community are on a long-term trend in growth. I
believe this points to a healthy economy and diverse employment opportunities.
I think that the city listens to its residents and tries its best to respond to them. I know it often does respond
the way some people want, but generally I feel the city tries
Economic growth that will help local businesses and the potential to bring in additional options for
restaurants, stores, entertainment, etc.
I'm excited about the unique opportunity Ames has to become a great city to work and live. It's unique
because of the University and the sprouting of a tech culture here.
Growth and employment opportunities.
Can't exactly say I'm excited about the future of Ames. It seems like we've been removing much of why Ames
was so attractive in the first place. I've lived here all my life and due the move of the city to bring in more
"affordable" housing the overall safeness and desirability of Ames has suffered. Crime rates are steadily rising
and if you know the things that are actually happening in the city you just don't feel as safe as you once did.
People used to talk about how they wanted to live here because there was so little low income poverty type
issues and that's not so much the case now due to the direction of city planning. We'll just be another Ankeny
soon, which has suffered in the "hometown" feel also. It's too bad that it's going this way.
As long as we continue to have so many international students, faculty, and visitors - and the food and cultural
diversity that they bring - I will be excited about living in Ames. We MUST be able to offer a food court or other
inexpensive multi-establishment locale where small or new vendors can sell us the ethnic foods of the world,
such as west Lincolnway and Campustown used to (before the nightmare occurring there in the last few years
eliminated many of the wonderful non-chain eating spots, such as "The Scallion"
(Korean) and "Chinese Home Cooking").
Not too much. I feel our City Council and Planning Board have lost sight of the appropriate needs of long term
community members in favor of Iowa State and Student needs. We feel the City has pretty much thrown our
neighborhood away. We have no way to recover and our life investment is going to be lost as we attempt to sell
our house and move to a senior living situation. I also feel there should be more accommodations for seniors
who aren't comfortable participating with college students, for example in the gym.
That thought is going into planning and the potential to adapt.
As Iowa State grows in size and prestige, people from more diverse backgrounds will be drawn to Ames.
Showing leadership and example in transition to being a community-oriented, culturally vibrant, and
environmentally-friendly city
52 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
New housing developments. More parks, trails, and shared outdoor spaces in general. When thinking about
purchasing a long-term home in Ames my #1 priority is having walkable access to nature trails to enjoy
throughout all 4 seasons.
Well designed and sustainable
This is my home for the foreseeable future. I obviously want to be happy where I live and want my
community to grow and prosper.
A transformation of our transportation grid to be eminently, safely, and conveniently walkable and bike-able.
Integrating all of our development with nature. More green space, much less concrete.
Campustown redevelopment and Lincoln way apartment and entertainment complex.
Incorporating more sustainable development into the city!
Potential growth and attracting young workers, though I don't think we do a good job on this.
GROWTH!
Ames Mall has really improved and it seems like it is improving. Getting Menards is an asset.
Ames continues to be a strong community with engaged citizens, fantastic job market, and plenty of housing
options at a range of prices. The university and everything it brings to the town- that relationship is so important
and a big part of what made Ames so attractive to us when we moved here 12 years ago. There have been a lot of
investments in sprucing up downtown Ames, for individual businesses as well as the new(ish) library. I think the
plans for Lincoln and improving its function and aesthetics is exciting. Same for Campustown- lots of effort by the
city and ISU to improve that area and I think it is working well. The City seems to be interested in what the ENTIRE
community values and open to input from all its citizens.
Continued growth of city and redevelopment along Lincoln Way
Hard to say, but some discouraging aspects. ie, downtown/Lincolnway corridor
City Council and leadership has provided clear direction to better plan for growth and development over the past
several years. Previously, an attitude of status quo and maintenance pervaded. Relationships between City and ISU
leadership is also better than its been in years which has already resulted in some amazing community projects
such as the Ames Airport Terminal Building. With a willingness to move forward with smart growth principles, and
with planned efforts with identified partners, the sky's the limit for Ames.
Improvements to the ISU campus and athletic facilities
Nothing because I didn't move back here to live in a town where it takes me a half hour to get from one side to the
other and I don't want to live in a town of 80,000 people with an apartment building on every corner.
Ames seeks the input of the residents. That's fantastic if residents educate themselves about the plans and effects
and then express their views.
53 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Many opportunities in all stages of life.
City council have a broad representation of stakeholders for Ames quality of life, policy implementation,
and land use regulation
The growth of the Research Park
The community has a solid foundation - attractive schools, a variety of activity options, attention to park
space and trail network, a transit system, employment opportunities, and community members that are
positive about the community and wanting to be engaged.
The innovation and modernization of south Ames makes me excited!
More people living here. Glad we are looking at infrastructure and other updates. Schools are good
boundaries.
Continued low crime
We are an amazing community with the amenities of a larger city with the feel of a smaller community.
With private sector job growth and available land for housing growth, Ames has a bright future ahead of
itself
With crowded coasts and an increased focus on sustainable lifestyles, our central, ag-encircled and
university-enriched location is poised to welcome thousands of workers ready to embrace a more
harmonious pace of life--where communities build for the long term.
It's amazing to me that the city does not have a more robust working relationship with the university on urban
planning and design. Because of Iowa State, Ames could be a state and even national leader in sustainable
initiatives, responsive design, renewable energy, etc. It seems like we do a lot of either small-ball stuff, or we
give a lot of taxpayer dollars/incentives to developers, who are only looking at growth through their lens.
Healthy Life Center would be awesome. I live very close to the City Hall gym but it is poor quality and not
enough court space to provide for this size of town. I would consider moving closer to the HLC once it is built. I
grew up in Huxley and went the to the 3c's almost every day from my pre-teen years all the way into high
school.
I feel like we've escaped an overabundance of big box stores. Online shopping is reducing the need for them
here. Smaller, local retail is thriving. I am encouraged by the continued improvement of non-car transportation
systems. I'm also impressed at the resources for aging in place in Ames. The university is providing vitality for
incoming industry as well.
I love the access to all sorts of things that Ames offers!
Ames is unique. Ames has made the lists for great small towns or greatest places to live because IT IS. I would
like to see future planning focus on what makes Ames different rather than trying to make it "every other urban
revitalization project".
Turn railroad track beds - if we can get the RR system out of inner Ames - into trail system
The Research Park and the ability to attract quality employers, the variety and accessibility of parks, the
availability of cultural activities, a safe and welcoming environment make me excited about the future of Ames
54 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
I operate a local business, and I am proud to do so in Ames. There is so much potential for a small business in a
growing town. I am excited for the opportunity to grow along with the city.
The possibility of providing high quality jobs to keep graduates of Iowa State in Ames.
I believe the research park and spin-offs from ISU has made our future job growth better but we need to keep
striving for more industry like those
Plans for downtown development. There is so much potential to make a good main street great, but we have to
re-develop! We need more bike paths that are truly connected so bikes have to cross major roads less. I am not
concerned as much about "bike to work" options, but more about biking in Ames a recreational activity for
families. I think need more branding when it comes to directional signs designating areas in the community and
use that branding in with street signs and trail signs. For example, recognizable signs for Downtown, Campustown,
Somerset, Research Park, etc. On trails, signs stating x number of miles to Downtown. A fully connected bike trail
system is an amenity that families of all ages would use and value.
Ames has a lot of potential. It is not a small town that people are moving away from like many other towns in
Iowa. It is a destination that I hope people who are leaving rural towns would see as an option for relocation.
The new high school and new pool
An indoor facility (more bb courts especially, indoor running track, etc.) that is funded with much greater
contributions from Iowa State University
Combining Gilbert into Ames Community School District;
Connecting the I-35 corridor - establishment of light rail between Minneapolis and Des Moines with Ames as a
major stop Elimination of the railroads within downtown - both N/S and E/W routes move to E or W of town and S
or N of town
I like the idea of Ames as a city that may not be quite as big as Des Moines but still has things to do, restaurants to
go to, and is easy to get around in, especially without a car. Lots of local businesses, street art, unique buildings,
and public "hangout" spaces.
Expanding the diversity of our population and the creation of systems and structures to support high quality
housing and jobs for a wide-range of people.
High quality of living : quality public education, good paying jobs, great family life, low crime rate, quality health
care, and a vibrant place for all walks of life including people in their retirement years!
Growth. Ames has the capability of adapting to the individuals that live within the community.
The economic opportunities in the private sector is amazing, but is going to require the community to realize that
if it does not embrace changes that these opportunities are likely going to evaporate and relocate. The city of
ames is going to have to embrace changes and allow for non traditional use of land and redevelopment zones to
occur. The city is also going to have to get out its checkbook and make investments in infrastructure and amenities
that it has historically avoided paying for or tried to push to the private sector. Without these amenities in place
the private sector opportunities for growth won't occur. "you don't wait to build an airport until the planes are
circling overhead."
Having more local, regional and national businesses make Ames their home.
55 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
We are a vibrant community with great potential to do big things.
Potential redevelopment in downtown Ames, expansion of industrial opportunities in east Ames, and the
expansion of the ISU Research Park.
I hope Ames can be a leader in Iowa and join with other cities across Iowa and the country to prioritize reducing
greenhouse gases in the most impactful ways possible. I hope Ames will prepare for and plan to adapt to the
challenges of climate change with the best available science.
The symbiotic relationship between ISU and the city, along with excellent medical facilities, excellent services, an
active volunteer community working at service oriented entities, noteworthy high quality local business and
industrial/white collar (ie Research Park, Swine Research, DanFoss) are positive aspects of the Ames area that
need to be reinforced and can continue to position Ames as a destination for a high quality of life.
I'm excited about the work our local workforce development teams are doing. Clearly they have been able to raise
the profile of doing business in Story County, and I believe we have leadership that will maintain good working
relationships between entities and continue to make Ames an attractive and viable community to do business.
I'm also very excited about the communities continued investment in our schools. The quality of our schools has a
direct impact on our communities ability to recruit into the workforce and raise excellent global citizens.
Meeting with individuals who work for the city always energizes me about the future of Ames. It's great to talk to
people who are passionate about the work they do. I also know a few students who are excited to keep improving
Ames, and I'll enjoy seeing their work in the future.
Comments Submitted Privately:
I hope to see more defined and vibrant campus town, Somerset, and downtown. I also hope for more bike-ability
and pedestrian friendly spaces. More cohesiveness overall would be nice
The institutional employer base in Ames gives it an advantage in stability during economic cycles, particularly
downturns.
There is potential, if all stakeholders are included effectively
The opportunity for growing a compact city that has neighborhoods with amenities near by (walking distance).
That is walking to the park, school, grocery store, coffee shop, etc.
Ongoing improvements to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure.
A plan that invites people to stay for longer than just school. School are great but more family oriented
opportunities would be great!
The main improvement I am hoping for is a N-S route between S. Duff and University Boulevard for those of us
who live in SE Ames and would like to go to Main street or N. Ames without getting stuck in the heavy traffic of
the Duff commercial area.
The prospect of a new comprehensive plan to guide more sustainable and pedestrian-oriented development, as
well as the potential for a more robust vision for Campustown that puts student needs and desires first.
56 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
15.What challenges do you see for the future of Ames?
Propensity for floods is only going to increase with more and more rapid runoff, more upstream farmland
being tiled, and climate change. Cannot rely on federal government flood maps, as they don't get updated
often and are wildly optimistic. Adding fill to floodplain just moves the problem around. Time to dig out all
the fill that has been added in the last 50 years and restore the rivers and creeks.
Figuring out how to keep retail dollars within the city. Whether that is through the mall or the growth of
small communities within the larger city. Keeping downtown vibrant and using the existing land correctly, we
don't need a ton of new apartment buildings.
I’m concerned about the 13th street expansion and the empty stores in west ames
We have a need affordable housing for lower to middle income earners. The over-build of apartments has a
short-term solution but is not quality living habitats for families. Also, it has hurt the rental economy for
some of us who own quality rentals.
The city council has paved and is paving the way for too many apartment complex developments, and big
box apartment/retail spaces in the heart of our commercial districts. These projects are out of line with
Ames values and contribute negatively to traffic patterns as well as aesthetically. Small businesses have been
pushed out of Campustown significantly and I worry about Main Street if their Lincoln Way corridor plan is
realized. We stand to lose the low-slung, distinctive (and with mature pine trees surrounding) building of The
Mandarin restaurant on Lincoln Way and will instead be stuck with characterless glassy buildings rising from
the sidewalks and blocking out the sun. We are losing our history and its accompanying continuity (The
Mandarin, brick buildings in Campustown) and our sense of place. The portion of the Lincoln Way corridor
plan that refers to standardizing the quirky housing near Riverside really bothers me since tiny houses and
uniqueness are considered very desirable and special by most of us. It is not the city council's business to
change/standardize us or make this into a Soviet bloc wonderland. Ames has been a great place, and that
needs to be respected.
Build the roads first and also parking garages for efficient land use.
Ames community planning needs to take place in coordination with Story and Boone counties.
I am concerned that there seem to be an awful lot of people who find housing unaffordable or who have
difficulty making a living in Ames. Having grown up in Nevada, I am also a bit nostalgic about the days when
one could see the beautiful fields outside of Ames. Today it seems the northern part of Ames
(outside of the magnificent Ada Hayden area is being gobbled up in development. If the population keeps
increasing and areas of rural enjoyment are taken over with housing or other construction, where will people
go in the future to enjoy the beauty of nature? It seems to me it's fair to ask if there is some sort of option to
continuously paving over the best land in the county.
Too many cars. Focus on apartments or big houses and nothing in between.
Maintaining a quality environment while still expanding. Ames is large enough as it is and I understand the
importance of growth but eventually it will become too big. The amount of murders and crime has been
steadily increasing and will only get worse as the city continues to grow. We need to focus on areas that are
more important than expansion such as the public schools.
Ames desperately needs more north-south auto routes, and at least one more connection to the interstate
system. Why nobody has a vision for future traffic solutions is a real shame. Instead of making everyone go
through one overloaded intersection at 13th and Grand, why not explore the possibility of extending and
widening existing N-S streets to alleviate traffic congestion. Why not hire a real traffic engineer with workable
ideas instead of making 13th and Grand into a "super interchange"? Making one intersection carry all the
traffic is both short-sighted and dangerous. Heaven forbid any need of emergency vehicles needing that one
intersection when it is clogged with everyday traffic. One simple and inexpensive modification would be to
wire the E-W traffic lights to alternate, but that seems just way too simple and cheap for anyone to have ever
thought of it. Too bad. Traffic is one thing that needs to be worked on pretty much continually. Get somebody
who knows what they're doing.
The housing market is so tight and cost of living (housing prices and property taxes) that we almost bought a
house in Ankeny even though we really wanted to live in Ames.
57 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
I think Ames needs to be cognizant of the risks associated with fundamental changes in universities and the risk
for major enrollment change.
City puts to many roadblocks up for luring new business! Example: Olive Garden. Way too many apartment-
developers dictate to city.
My concern is that we'll just keep doing more of the same, which is turning us into an Ordinary city. Limit student
housing "franchises", encourage innovative housing developments (they all look the same), rethink all that lower
level retail space requirement, and do not encourage more South Duff development! I agree with the statement
below about our potential, but it will be hard work to maintain community character.
Having more affordable housing for first time home owners, young families, and residents who are not associated
with the university.
Urban sprawl clogging roadways, over-development exacerbating flooding by removing water-absorbing plants.
Managing to temper growth in a way that benefits Residents and Business Owners as much or more than
Developers.
Keeping thriving businesses and work in Ames, instead of the Ankeny and Des Moines Metro, things for families to
do, lack of opportunity for entertainment that pushes people to the metro
Growing congestion of roads though it isn't too bad yet. Connecting the town better since things are fairly spread
out. For example, it is sometimes challenging to get to or from Somerset to other parts of town very efficiently.
Same for North Grand Mall; may be a bit easier if 30th St was connected to Dayton Ave or at least Stagecoach Rd.
Would also be nice to have ramps at State Ave off of highway 30 and a connection from Bloomington to North
Dakota.
Keeping thriving businesses and work in Ames, instead of the Ankeny and Des Moines metro, things for families to
do, lack of opportunity for entertainment that pushes people to the metro
Preventing the development of overpriced rental slums caused my the conversion of affordable housing to rentals.
Ames residents tend to fear change. Des Moines is moving north and in 10 years, Ames will be north Des Moines.
It is time to be part of that metro and encourage businesses to invest here - Costco, additional shopping, Trader
Joe's. These are places that will need a home on the north and east side of Des Moines and can definitely be
successful here. If Ames continues to let Ankeny take up that flag, it will be left behind as a sleepy, lost community
that will not be able to recruit young people to both start their careers here or stay here. Ames does not have to
lose it's identity, but it will be trapped in the past if it does not adjust it's vision
Too over priced for normal working class to afford. With all the development going up it's skyrocketing the
monthly rent prices even in old apt buildings. They are raising rent prices because they can. Not because they're
making development changes to these buildings
Lack of objectivity - too much vested-interest policy. Rigid orthodoxy relative to planning and development with
little incentive for community building. Ames has all the social density of a golf course.
Flooding events- making sure the storm sewer system can handle large rainfall without it backing up and flooding
roads and houses
58 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Everything has a cycle including this planning. We seldom see action steps from community visioning and I find it a
waste of time. I also thing every organization asks for funds from the private sector and the city does that as well for
fundraising for the animal shelter, pool facilities etc. it makes it seem like the tax base cannot provide amenities that
other cities do provide. It makes me want to say if you find it a priority then put tax money towards it. Narrow the
focus and don't be everything to every citizen with a concern or opportunity but allow growth of tax base and support
the businesses that exist in this community with both the city bid process and the choices made. Focus on impact and
not making every idea possible and be honest about this. I get sad that we have long, inefficient council meetings and
that individuals do not stay on task. Some people monopolize time and that is not respectful even if what being said is
not controversial. We also do a great job of making all decisions controversial. Lets lead in this city and accept that
half the population will always have a problem with some initiative. But also avoid pet projects and stay focused on
the direction. Don't be afraid of putting in things that make us stand out (allow funky artwork or things not everyone
likes. Think if the DOT corner Indian head would be applied to be put in now.). Iconic design is not a bunch of money
spent on some light columns. A good entryway is so much more. Lets have some personality in our aesthetics.
Attracting larger businesses to take root in the city in order to grow the community.
Inclusivity and ensuring that there are things of interest for all Ames residents. I hope there is improved support to
new businesses (funding, resources).
Homeownership for families and affordable housing for working adults. Lack of collaboration between City of Ames,
Iowa State, and School District. Need for more activities for families with young children. Too much focus on Iowa
State and not on the working families in Ames
1. Planned changes for Inis Grove Park ignored detrimental environmental effect; i.e., loss of one acre of topsoil from
a plot of four acres.
2. Zoning requirement that apartment developments include portions of devoted to retail space seem to be ill-timed,
considering national trends of increasing empty retail facilities.
3. Large apartment developments do not appear to be compatible with their surrounding neighborhoods, but, rather,
they transform them into higher density housing and parking areas. Is the review process for permits adequate?
1. Attracting and retaining a diverse population. Often, many families of color find Ames to be unwelcoming and
unsustainable for a variety of ethnic foods restaurants and shopping, ethnic cosmetics, lack of diversity of faith
community and worship spaces.
2. Not enough affordable housing for single-family non-students.
3. The social climate of schools is also challenging for children of color.
4. Need more nightlife and social amenities for adults and non-students.
5. Greater retail options for clothing and apparel to make it more attractive to shop in Ames as opposed to driving to
Des Moines, Minneapolis, Kansas City, or ordering online.
Lack of affordable one story townhomes with laundry on the main level.
Inadequate stock of professional office space, e.g. what could be used for small/solo practices, which are located on
bus routes and with handicapped accessibility. Lack of affordable housing and wheelchair-accessible housing. Lack of
affordable senior citizen housing. Very high property taxes. Traffic congestion. Inadequate shopping; I still have to go
to Ankeny for a lot of my shopping. Getting the city to understand that snow removal on city streets really ISN'T very
good, relative to other cities and towns--the city cannot seem to grasp this.
Appropriate planning for sustainability and resilience, offering affordable housing and reasonable property taxes,
flood and erosion control, protection of parks and green spaces, openness to alternative and progressive
educational opportunities, taking care of our children, preventing poverty, promoting walking, biking, and public
transit.
Traffic controls and walk ability mainly near South Duff.
Expansion of a north Ames and movement toward Gilbert instead of all around Ames.
How will the City of Ames plan for the risks and hazards of climate change when
planning for the next 20 years? How is Ames preparing to address aspects of life in Ames
that will be the most vulnerable to the risks and impacts of climate change?
Prioritize equity, diversity and inclusion in Ames in all development sectors.
59 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
We do really need to do something about more shelter and more affordable options as well as working to stop climate
change.
The city appears to be in conflict about growth. Many of its residents know the city from when it was smaller and
appreciate a small town environment. I also appreciate a small town environment but recognize that there is strong
momentum for the growth of Ames and the surrounding communities. Ames has to be the central city, due to its
existing university and industry. The only question is how will the city grow. My concern is that a general resistance to
acknowledging the inevitable growth is leading to piecemeal tactics and frequent revisioning of plans that were
supposed to better serve the long-term outlook of the city.
We're losing our retail options. We need retail or it's all going to be Ankeny, Des Moines, and online. We need to
attract retail other than big box.
Decline in single family living desirability and safety issues.
That our city cannot rally the needed participation in the SunSmart solar project after more than 2 years really
troubles me. While it has not been sold well - such as telling people right up front that they will get some financial
benefits back from it and that they can pass those on to others - which are important but not well-known. This
indicates to me how non-community-minded and/or transient most of the people of Ames are and it troubles me
greatly. We have very serious climate change and resource over-exploitation occurring in the world and there is a
need to integrate resource sustainability into all of our planning and thinking at every level of society, but I see very
little of that reflected in the plans or actions of my city.
Again, I feel it is a difficult challenge to provide affordable owner-occupied or even rental housing for families. All the
affordable houses have been chopped up and filled with students so there are no single family houses that are
affordable for families.
Addressing housing and climate issues regarding the next twenty years of projected growth and changes.
There is no child care and the cost of living is high for young families.
•The City of Ames should include a Climate Change Vulnerability Study in its Comprehensive Planning process.
•Promote a vision and goals for Ames to be resilient and prepared to adapt to the challenges and opportunities of
climate change.
•Plan and design to minimize future impacts of climate change, such as heat waves and flooding.
•Prioritize equity, diversity and inclusion in Ames in all development sectors.
•Promote emergency preparedness and safety for all people.
There is too much rental housing that is neglected and in bad shape and the price of most apartments, as well as just
the sheer number of them, has gotten to be outrageous. Most new residential development is happening at the
extreme far north and far west parts of town. With the university owning so many large plots of land all over, it makes
a balanced approach to growth difficult. Squaw Creek and Skunk River also present challenges for orderly
development. The street network in this town is getting better but is still very bad, made worse by a lack of signal
timing and coordination. There is a large population in this town, mainly students but others too, that only stay for a
few years and then leave- it's a transient community that brings its own complexities. Adding biking facilities is difficult-
I think a lot of people would like to see more but there isn't room on the streets to accommodate it so that is definitely
a challenge. There is no assessment of environmental impacts with the comp plan or at an individual development
project level which is standard for Iowa but unfortunate. Stormwater planning and water quality get some attention at
least so that's good.
Thoughtful growth within budget
The Iowa State student body seems to be growing faster than the City of Ames can support. Housing is, of course, vital
to Iowa State's growth, but it's a little discouraging to see apartment buildings/complexes erected in every available
location.
Being a thriving community without relying on the "economic growth at any cost" model of development. Switching
to renewable energy and recycled natural resources. Minimizing the impact of climate change on people and
environment.
60 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Ames has a number of amenities contributing to an overall high quality of life for most residents. Identifying
limitations in and adjacent to these amenities to strengthen key areas and provide more opportunities for
residents, with consideration of future needs will be a challenge; particularly when coordinating with other major
community partners like Iowa State.
Improvements in north south transportation routes on the east side of Ames particularly improve and reduce
traffic on Duff.
Overbuilding and having empty apartments, building too many new houses and not being able to sell the older
ones, forcing people into annexation, destroying farmland and environment in the name of "progress."
Will there be sufficient economic opportunities for all residents? Transportation challenges for those not affiliated
with Iowa State. Ames should plan to be a part of a regional development that includes the surrounding counties.
A more comprehensive plan should include reliable public transportation transit that connects the surrounding
counties.
climate change, changes to the structure of higher education
Old Town Historic District. There are beautiful homes and it would be nice to live there for the walking proximity to
downtown. However, I am extremely hesitant to purchase a home there. With many of the homes nearing 100
years in age, I fear the neighborhood may change dramatically. Many people may not find the homes worth the
expense in upkeep and updates which may lead to many of the homes deteriorating without repair or
maintenance efforts. I would imagine many people would opt to invest in new developments in the outskirts of
town.
should attract more people
Growth. The city was not designed for the growth it has had.
The affordability of housing is only increasing every year, at an exponential amount. Rent shouldn’t go up $200+ dollars
a month after one year and no changes where made. Houses are being built in Ames, but nothing first time home
buyers (like myself) can afford. If you want to attract young adults to stay, housing has to be affordable. I also see that
the development of West Ames is poor. We need a Walmart or a Target or an Aldi to compete with prices of Hy-Vee.
There are so many apartments and people living in West Ames, but not much to do, places to shop, or places to eat.
Future commercial growth and traffic planning will be critical to maintain quality of life. South duff area as a main entry
to the city, IMO is a debacle - unattractive, disorganized & traffic/access poorly handled. Ames can & must do better.
N/S travel through Ames is far more of a challenge than E/W. Future development in the vicinity of RR tracks, esp.
residential, needs to be carefully planned, both for safety and tenant/owner satisfaction. Affordable housing will also
be a challenge to allow workers in Ames to live in Ames. Housing to accommodate all - students, workers & families -
affordable & in harmony will continue to be a challenge.
Environment is a big issue now and I would like to see Ames implement a climate action plan and use more sustainable
environmental ideas in the future
"Growth" as it has been happening so far has been hostile to pedestrians and nature, and I am concerned that much of
the "growth" conversation is being driven by the wealthy and business community while the culture, health, and
environmental needs of the population are unmet. A city which is un-walkable is unhealthy.
I also see poverty and homelessness as severe issues. This challenge should be tackled by empowering communities
rather than simply "fixing" the obvious problems.
Ames should have a climate action plan and be working on ways to reduce waste and emissions. I also think the
resource recovery center poses a major challenge for sustainability.
Redevelopment of core areas, entertainment and recreation opportunities for active people.
61 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
An overall scarcity mindset. This is the most conservative college town I've ever lived in, there are a good
number of curmudgeons that control the lions share of election votes, and therefore they take up too much
intellectual space in our economic development.
Since living here for 9 + years I see lots of negative attitude towards growth. People complaining all the time
about Duff Ave is silly. (let them move to a place that has real traffic). I have a son who is an Asian
American and he thinks Ames is prejudice toward Asians and Blacks. I can not speak to this because I am
white but, I thought I would mention his concerns.
Not enough meeting space to host events.
Rural vs. urban tensions regarding land use expansion in fringe areas
Increasing population density without losing green spaces or aesthetic
Geography will continue to be a challenge. Urban areas are more attractive to young people. The winter
climate is a challenge for older people. Declining enrollment at Iowa State University is inevitable. Our housing
stock is skewed toward student housing. We will be challenged to convert suitability of this student-focused
housing to suitability for other types of residents. Maintaining older housing stock and thus the attractiveness
of long-term neighborhoods. Balance of infill and expansion of city boundaries. If we are going to protect
farmland, we need consensus on how to integrate new development into the existing community. Current
residents need to feel secure that infill development will receive adequate design and integration scrutiny.
Providing adequate income to enable residents to afford housing and needed services.
I would like to see our community diversify our housing and commercial options beyond university-age
individuals and to expand options to meet the needs and interests of 'senior citizens'.
A challenge would be modernizing the off campus housing and other areas that are not included in south
Boundaries. We were short sited when north Ames was developing not to make part of the schools. We need
to also not just look at high income areas. We desperately need moderate priced and sized homes. Rent is
really high. Way too many student apartments and other apartments that were put up quickly and poorly
done from having been in some and talking to students. Home rental codes are strong and good. It seems like
some apartments don’t have to comply.
We need more inside activity places in the downtown/central east side of town.
Availability of affordable single family town homes and homes especially those not wanting own. Ridiculous
poor planning of sticking everything on Duff. West and North Ames need retail etc. Especially need a "mall" not
everyone can afford to shop downtown. Also a YMCA or affordable (not 40-50$ a month) fitness center
Some in our community are afraid of change and fear growth which is necessary for a thriving community in
today's world
Mixed commercial / residential buildings often have little/no businesses in them
Balancing the influence of large developers and lower-quality, quick-growth buildings with the reality that
revitalizing our character-rich downtown and older buildings is what will make people want to invest and stay
in Ames. We need to articulate and commit to a sustainability- and art- focused middle ground that will require
initial investments to serve character to our community for decades to come.
Getting developers to build small less expensive homes so we can be more inclusive.
We're not putting enough thought toward the sociological aspects of community in our urban planning/
design. For example, the proliferation of these high-rise apartments on previous vacant lots -- they do nothing
to enhance the aesthetic of the surrounding neighborhoods. They and other construction along L-way are
visual clutter and don't invite people to linger there.
62 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
I think the lack of affordable housing for young families is going to choke off the long-term growth of the area.
I'm also concerned that we maintain outdated traffic rules like unrestricted intersections in the Roosevelt
neighborhood and high speeds of 35-45 mph on residential streets like 24th and 13th. Oxford has instituted a
"20 is plenty" speed limit around the university to prevent pedestrian deaths. I think folks are too quick to rule
out more "radical" approaches to managing vehicle traffic.
Affordable housing! That seems to be the biggest issue that I see! Some college students cannot afford some of
the prices that these apartments demand!
The cold weather
With the recent zoning changes along Lincoln Way and it's focus of attracting more chain style businesses to
Ames, I believe the biggest challenge will be finding the work force to fill those types of "minimum wage" jobs.
Slow development in Ames - hard to add new amenities without lots of red tape. Ankeny is quick, Ames is slow
Enough housing to keep up with the job growth and enough retail to keep people in Ames. Don't understand
paid parking meters downtown if the city wants to encourage people to come to east Ames, Make it free and
people will be more willing to come and spend. Retailers and city will make more revenue in the long term!
Maintaining the quality of life we currently have as the community grows.
Needs more economic and ethnic diversity including food options and entertainment options
Ageing areas of both commercial and residential properties that cause the city to appear rundown or unkept.
Affordable housing for low to moderate income, seniors and veterans; traffic patterns in this city, particularly the
south duff area, are horrific; the Lincolnway renovations around the downtown area are unnecessary; our zoning
department is slow to act for existing businesses wanting to renovate or add to their current location;
As our population ages, keeping seniors healthy and happy here is a key. The challenges are keeping Ames safe
while growing smartly.
I see housing as a challenge. We live in Story City but my husband and I both work in Ames. It has been hard to
find an affordable house in Ames. In addition, my husband and I are skeptical about the Ames public school
district.
As it grows larger, keeping it friendly
Campustown needs a massive overhaul ... even with new development, still is hair salons and bars ... could use a
better vision there. Cross town travel ... need some sort of reliable, environmental-friendly light rail system
Traffic
Any downsizing of ISU and/or Government facilities (National Animal Disease Labs, etc.) would be a hard hit for
Ames
We do need to find a way to better incorporate and support locally-owned and operated businesses. We bring a
lot of character and opportunity to our community but can be overlooked as both the Chamber and Ames City
Council talk about redevelopment. Especially as we operate on Duff Ave and continue to see large businesses take
over spots once operated by local owners. Redevelopment doesn't need to be a scary word, but when it
consistently seems to be synonymous with higher rents and national chains, it will continue to bring opposition
from local businesses.
63 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Keeping people here after they graduate university (or attracting them from another university), this can make or
break economic growth as well as foster (or hurt!) a culture that values trying out new ideas.
Ames is a very white, affluent, educated community and touts this. Much of the community conversation supports
the concept of racism and white supremacy. When residents talk about Ames expanding many are afraid of
becoming a more "urban" place or bringing in high paying jobs which result in a certain level of education - these
exclusive thoughts are not helpful to making Ames a more accessible place to live for folks who are not white,
affluent, and educated. This will only allow for a specific type of growth.
Running out of space for anyone that is trying to come into Ames.
Biggest challenge I see is the split views in the community between those who want Ames to be a small college
town without urban sprawl or modern development and those who see the needs of future residents changing and
wanting to drive the change to meet these needs. Community leaders have to figure out how to lead, make the
hard decision and stop waiting for consensus before making the decision. The community needs to figure out how
to unite and prioritize. Do we really need to get distracted on an issue a minority of residents raise? Do we really
need to do another study to make a decision?
Ames needs to embrace growth and make investments towards growth.
Lack of diversity in housing types which leads to young professionals and families living elsewhere even though they
work in Ames
City's willingness to significantly invest in quality of life amenities.
I think that extreme weather events with flooding, extreme rain events, and heat waves will be challenges. I think
people will move from the coasts to the Midwest. I think that Ames needs to develop 100% renewable energy
and energy efficiency plans and goals.
Certainly affordable housing needs to be at the forefront of our community's long-term planning. I also believe the
road system, and pedestrian/bicycle access will need to be addressed.
Challenges include building while still acknowledging the flood plains, caring for the homeless population, attempt
of further extension of roads such as duff will increase congestion
High housing costs are a limitation to the ability of the community to increase diversity as it grows.
Ability to leverage existing resources and assets like the university, social and physical resources. We have some
great parks.
Subsidizing economic development too much (e.g. east industrial area). If we give everything away
(infrastructure) to create jobs (we already have lowest unemployment in the nation) and get little tax revenue; we
then can not afford to create the good things like indoor pools, library services, etc.
I think its difficult to own a small business here and afford to rent space for that business. New buildings in campus
and potentially on Lincolnway near downtown may make that worse. We need to encourage unique restaurants
and businesses.
Lack of rental options for working professionals and concentration of new housing on the edges of Ames without
good CyRide access.Perhaps maintaining affordable housing options for low-income citizens within reasonable distance to their
site of employment and schools.
A lack of affordable rental units, a lack of locally owned businesses in the face of new chain developments, a
lack of vision-based decision-making.
64 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
16. Describe what you believe should be the top focus for the City in the Plan?
Need to stop AND REVERSE floodplain development. New Menards and dealerships along Skunk river should
not have been built. Promises were made years ago to stop this development, but it continues. Also improve
bike trail connectivity
Improved policies: Policy for the City of Ames of $15 minimum wage for large corporations. Promotion of public
not-for-profit dental and vision care, ideally a stronger promotion of NFP healthcare. We must MUST improve
our climate control initiatives on the local level, and recycling should be a greater concern. The library should
be supported. WiFi infrastructure and transportation supports for the elderly and for low income families
beyond traditional busing.
Rental housing for adults that aren't college students and don't want to live in apartments would be a
beneficial project. Definitely affordable housing as that is key in all cities right now. Smart growth on Lincoln
Way, don't let it lose personality.
Focus on renewal not just building new areas on outskirts of town
Infrastructure improvements. Get Grand connected to South 16th so there are more expedient North/South
options
To proceed with the Ames Promise as a compass. If Ames is really for "Those who want the charms and
convenience of a small town with the opportunities and amenities that come from a major University.", this
means that the city should concentrate on not getting in the way of the charm and convenience, while the
University does what it does. This does not mean promoting growth (and the accompanying increases in
expenses, requirements, and pressure), urbanization, big city ways - building, programs, parking systems, etc.
as the council has been. Ames has been a great place to live and I see changes to this and the heart of Ames
not being respected.
To proceed with the Ames Promise as a compass. https://www.cityofames.org/government/mayor-and-city-
council/vision
If Ames is really for "Those who want the charms and convenience of a small town with the opportunities and
amenities that come from a major University.", this means that the city should concentrate on not getting in the
way of the charm and convenience, while the University does what it does. This does not mean promoting
growth (and the accompanying increases in expenses, requirements, and pressure), urbanization, big city ways -
building, programs, parking systems, etc. as the council has been. Ames has been a great place to live and I see
changes to this and the heart of Ames not being respected.
To maintain the strengths of Ames and what Ames residents value as in the Ames Promise.
https://www.cityofames.org/government/mayor-and-city-council/vision
If Ames is really for "Those who want the charms and convenience of a small town with the opportunities and
amenities that come from a major University.", then that means that the council needs to focus on not getting in
the way of the small town charms and convenience, while the University does what it does. The Ames Promise
does not include urbanizing, big city-style development, or perpetual growth. It is not the city's place to choose
winners and losers, much less in favor of winners who do not fit with the Ames Promise and Ames values. Any
development of city property certainly should be in alignment with the Ames Promise. Let's respect and care for
what we have and not promote messing it up. While Ames has been a great place to live, I see unwanted
changes and this being jeopardized.
Utilizing existing space and land Ames already has and utilizing it more effectively and efficiently instead of
sprawling out of the current boundaries like a number of other college towns have done. We have among the
best soils in the world and need to continue to utilize for ag production instead of concreting and asphalting
over it like Ankeny is doing.
Maintain environment and don't developed in these areas
Designing a city that is Climate smart. Natural resource protection. Walk ability and bike ability. More electric
charging stations.
65 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Getting traffic off the north south streets and roads by adding roads out of town from the
north
Building better schools & funding for emergency responders.
Stay on top of the traffic issues because it will just get worse over time.
Encouraging small business and lowering taxes.
Better traffic flow! Big city with small town mentally on how to effectively move traffic. Ontario and13th should be 4
lane all across town from I35 to R38.
Affordable housing as well as walkable streets and SIDEWALKS and improved bike trails.
Careful management balancing progressive building with environmental factors, keeping Ames's character unique
charm from morphing into a bland city.
Parking and keeping businesses in town. Also need better flow of traffic when leaving town at commute times and
more north south roads that people who live in Ankeny, Slater, Huxley can use to get out of town.
Combating sprawl.
-Side road relate like Clark ave-high traffic side street
-Not allowing the high school to let these kids fall through the cracks. A lot of kids are getting left behind. One
dept doesn't talk to the other dept about their mutual student. We need more diversity in staff so our students
can relate and feel inspired.
-Make housing more affordable for the people that live here. Please stop raking up rates to new development
housing for all these students
Housing management to prevent inner city decay. Public Transportation and high speed access north and west of
Ames.
As suggested above, the next 20 years will see major changes in our physical environment, impacted dramatically
by global warming. The Plan needs to be exceptionally forward looking in making adaptations for situations which
we never have had to deal with before: i.e. dramatic weather events; flooding (it's almost beyond belief how little
attention has been given to the inevitability of "100 year floods" becoming commonplace in the near future);
economic decline due to loss of/damage to production facilities;
need for adaptable energy sources due to dramatic rise in cost and availability of traditional energy solutions;
education of the populace in regard to changing life style expectations related to these and other changes in the
physical and social environment.
Events and development near Main Street. This seems to be a great place for the university and general
citizenship to unite in location. Keeping dollars inside the community and focused on unity. Providing
entertainment and things to do that keep families and young people staying in the area and spending money.
I think promoting and recruiting expansion type businesses to Ames that will not only provide jobs but also
provide additional quality of living to the area - from a work-life balance standpoint. I understand why research
and industrial options seem appealing but if you are hoping for net migration to Ames for jobs alone, my
experience has been that is a tough sell to potential young professionals.
66 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
People first - cars second. The healthy life style renderings shows he entrance surrounded by parking and
paving - the parking should go in back and bike wracks in front. Parking is ugly and the placement sends the
wrong message - drive to the work out place. The plan is cliche - big windows into a pool area the least
appropriate place they could be for example - so Mid West design - I don't want the chill from the glass and I
can't see out the windows while I"m swimming anyway. Chlorine and bromine have been linked to all manner
of respiratory problems as well. Why can't I swim at Aida Hayden(?) - every reason they tell me it is bad I
consider good -under used resources via preconception and group think bureaucratic ineptitude. Mixed use as
the norm. Density for the purpose of enhanced experience and lower city infrastructure maintenance costs
which is conducive to healthy people and lowered health care costs.
1.Supporting local businesses. Be proactive and not slow the process for new business develooment. Hire
good city staff that is trained so there are not surprises late in the orocess that cost time and money.
2.Amenities for citizens. Specifically a path system and fire service and coordination on community asthetics.
3.Finish Grand already
4.Water sewer issues and localized street and neighborhood flooding. Solve this with true engineers and new
infrastructure.
Taking time to consider environmental and financial impacts on citizens within the community as well as
community involvement.
Ensuring that the city has the what it needs to be attractive in ways that will sustain and help it grow -
attractive spaces, plenty of small shops to frequent, intellectual and cultural opportunities, et.
Afforable Housing and Business Support for the mall
1. Transportation and parking in the campus area is a worsening problem.
2. North-south transportation: a. Grand (north of Lincoln Way) Duff (north and south) appear to be at
capacity at the busy times. b. extension of Grand going south has been discussed but not completed. c. Going
further north, we continue to bus many Ames students to Gilbert ten miles or so per day, which is expensive
(in money and time) and unsafe. This archaic arrangement should be publicly reviewed.
-The City of Ames should include a Climate Change Vulnerability Study in its Comprehensive Planning process.
Prioritize equity, diversity and inclusion in Ames in all development sectors.
Sustainability, green energy, resilience, and robust, inclusive community that values all its citizens and promotes
and ensures their welfare.
Promote a vision and goals for Ames to be resilient and prepared to adapt to the
challenges and opportunities of climate change.
Prioritize equity, diversity and inclusion in Ames in all development sectors.
Support schools, libraries, arts, cultural events, diverse learning and educational
opportunities.
Encourage Ames to limit further geographic sprawl. Longer distances make cycling
harder and less viable. Sprawl causes longer distances that increases cost for services
such as school buses, ambulances, city water services, and travel in general.
Work more on transportation so that those who don't drive don't have to walk so far in the winter or pay a bundle
for an Uber. Also climate change and more affordable housing. Students are having to work 20 hours
(the max at ISU) just to be able to afford apartments.
Improving the feeling of welcome, diversity, and inclusion within the broader community. The perception is that
Ames is a great place to live if you are middle class and Caucasian.
Grand Avenue extension to South 16th Street.
67 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Stop building apartments! Stop making it so that neighborhoods must include things like apartments and multi
occupant dwellings. Neighborhoods should be just that, neighborhoods. They shouldn't be mixed with a bunch of
student housing/apartments where people who don't have a long term vested interest in Ames upset actual long
term residential peace, quiet and safety. We also need more police for the size of our city and ambulance shouldn't
be serving the county before those in the city itself.
Sustainable development is most important to me. This means thinking seriously about the generations who will live
here after we are all dead and acting with that in mind. There are too many aspects to discuss here, but they easily
can be found in libraries an online. We need more trees and shrubs and diversity of plants and incentives for planting
and maintaining them. In my neighborhood, several owners have taken out most of their shrubs, good, non-ash trees
and ornamental plantings to make maintenance "easy." Most people in Ames put herbicide (and probably
insecticide) sprays on their yards, without thinking much about it. We are constantly getting the drift and it damages
our garden plants. We need help to have less flooding in our basements now that there seem to be more big rain
events and more floods in our future.
The design of the Somerset neighborhood seems to be a good model (that I know little about), but it has a mix of
commercial space and denser housing, unlike most of Ames and like Asian and European cities and towns that are
much more livable than Ames because of this kind of planning.
Sustainability
Better traffic flow on Duff, South Dakota, and University exits and more incentives for daycares and locally owned
businesses.
Environmental planning. Iowa State and the City of Ames have a unique opportunity to incorporate environmentally-
friendly aspects into their growth and plan for the future of the city. Of particular importance in my opinion is
maintaining wildlife corridors throughout the city (green spaces, parks, trails, forests, etc.) to allow safe wildlife
dispersal (limit car accidents involving deer or other animals) and residents to enjoy.
Becoming a carbon-neutral city by investing in/encouraging wind/solar power generation and carbon-offset projects .
City-wide recycling program.
Scale and accelerate progress to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as much as possible, in all development sectors.
I would probably pick housing for the top focus. The student enrollment at ISU has been leveling off and I think
housing needs should reflect that. The city can't keep adding apartment units like they have for the last 10 years. And
mixed use with 1st floor reserved for commercial has not worked real well, in my opinion- it seems there is a lot of
empty commercial space in the mixed use buildings near Mortensen and South Dakota as well as the one on the
south side of Lincoln, between Wilmouth and Franklin Avenue. I believe it is still worth it to the developers to pursue
these mixed use buildings because the rent from apartments is so high that the empty commercial space doesn't
hurt their investment but it looks bad with so much vacant storefront space. I think there is a good range of single
family housing at a wide range of price points but there is a lack of affordable rental units in this town.
more independently owned new restaurants and shopping, less chains
Environmental sustainability
Unfortunately, continued expansion into surrounding areas
Reduce continued development in the flood plan along the Skunk River. Reduce the development/construction of
apartment buildings built for student housing.
68 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
You think progress is always a good thing and it isn't. Along with more population comes everything that goes
along with it including crime and gang activity. I truly do not believe that you can have 15,000 more people in this
town in 20 years and keep the same small town feel. It just isn't possible. I was born and raised here and I've lived
in two other states and in cities of hundreds of thousands of people. I moved back here for a reason. I love the
small town feel and the campus atmosphere. You keep getting bigger and that feeling will start to fade. It isn't just
my opinion; it is fact. We all live here for a reason. If we wanted to live in Ankeny, we would live in Ankeny. There
are houses in this town in good neighborhoods that are on the market for years and you want to build more
houses?There are people going bankrupt with apartment buildings because they can't fill them and you want to
build more? This city is a joke to outsiders because it looks like an Army barracks with all of the apartments. There
are more signs for rent on lawns in this town in the last two years than I have EVER seen before because landlords
are freaking out they can't get them filled. And you want to build more? What happens if ISU starts requiring
freshmen and sophomores to stay in the dorms like they do at U of I? What happens if the government starts
paying for people to go to school at community colleges which is a possibility because kids don't want to graduate
and owe 70,000 in loans when they get paid 30,000 a year. My cousin is a scientist at the USDA and is the only one
with her job in the state. She has 70,000 in student loans from ISU and makes less than I did 15 years ago with no
Bachelor's degree. I heard tuition is going up and enrollment went down by a thousand this year yet you want to
build more? You are going to turn this town into something that it is not and shouldn't be. And in this plan, stay
away from areas where people WANT the area to stay as it is. If people want to stay rural, then LEAVE THEM
ALONE! Progress isn't a good thing if no one wants to live here anymore. I've never talked to anyone in this town
who has ever said, YAY we have another apartment building going up like that monstrosity on N. Dakota and LW!
Or YAY the city wants to bring 15,000 more people in and destroy more farmland and environment. No one says
that...EVER...except for the city of Ames and developers because money is the only thing that matters. What is so
wrong with keeping it the way it is? Why do you have to try to keep turning us into Des Moines?
Managing growth to include the more affordable surrounding areas ((the surrounding counties)
Make more walkable through traffic calming, planting street trees, increasing density. Jeff Speck is a great source
of info on this. Make public policy/development decisions with an eye to financial resilience. Joe Minicozzi at
Urban 3 is a good source for this. Also the StrongTowns organization.
State of the art education facilities - this seems to be underway already which is fantastic to see. Improving
existing neighborhoods and investing in new neighborhoods. A switch to renewable energy - a solar city would be
great. More parks & rec green spaces and trail systems - this really is huge for quality of life in my opinion.
Connecting trail systems to the Heart of Iowa Nature Trail and High Trestle Trail without having to dravel on roads/
highways would be incredible.
Should attract more people
Truly affordable housing for the average Ames resident. We can’t work full time at a decent hourly job and
afford a 1 or 2 bedroom home. Don’t expect surrounding towns to be an acceptable alternative to living in
Zane’s.
Affordability of housing should be a top priority if the City wants to continue to grow. Second would be city
development (ie shopping, places to eat)
Thoughtful growth and sustainability that maintains the character of the city.
More bike lanes and a climate action plan and also perhaps better highlights of parks near Main Street to
increase foot traffic there
Environmental, sustainable design, walkability, and integrating our community into nature. (More trees, less
concrete.)
I think that our overarching goal should be a community in which cars and parking lots are not necessary. This
means improving public transport, as well as remaking our streets to be pedestrian-centered, not just
pedestrian-friendly.
Urbanization, become a better planned and pedestrian friendly city.
Climate action!
69 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Increase housing, build and connect bike trails already planned. More allowance for entertainment.
GROWING the community in a sustainable way and in the right way. Including more transportation outlets to
the interstate, incentivizing those who create the good opportunities versus making it a hard place to do
business with and thinking outside of the box in terms of housing for the millennials.
Creating congruency between the idea of growth and what actually needs to occur in order for that to happen:
it would seem the community/leadership wants the research park to continue to bring in 100K jobs and then to
just let those people live in Des Moines. This is not sustainable, smart, or good for Ames. We need to keep
these people here or Ankeny/Waukee/whomever will just steal our model and put a beachhead here.
Affordable housing... and not just more and more apartments.
Create a better convention/meeting space than Scheman or revamp it to attract outside events and visitors
(which will increase revenue for hotels, restaurants, attractions and more).
Attracting new residents with affordable, healthy lifestyles
Increasing the satisfaction of current city residents - improved transportation flow and increased transportation
options, increased community engagement with decisions regarding new construction - both infill and
expansion of city boundaries, increased housing options for range of incomes.
The top focus should be drawing residents and retaining them after college by modernizing the town.
We need to focus on where and how the city can/will grow
Affordable housing and increased recreation opportunities
Rerouting city infrastructure and culture away from prioritizing single-rider cars. Though this directive may seem
simple or anti-car, it's not: This focus will improve our city for everyone, even vehicle-based commuters, so our
city develops an updated feel with lots of visible outdoor activity and handsome natural areas integrated into
our infrastructure. Simply catering *less* to the needs of cars will allow space (and focus and funds) for
attractive broader sidewalks; up-to-date bike paths that put us back in the competition for national rankings (we
used to be #6 nationally, but plummeted when we failed to adapt like other cities did); ped-malls that transform
our downtown and/or campus town into a local-business-supporting, cultural destination; and walking the talk
that Ames truly cares about residents' physical vitality. With our amazing transportation system, CyRide, more
people should be leaving their cars in the garage, and they won't if we keep adding lanes and parking spots;
rather, let's learn from the famous Iowa-set film and "build it" (i.e., pedestrian- and bike- friendly infrastructure)
so "they will come."
Creating a sense of true community through walkable streets and neighborhoods, engaging outdoor plazas and
spaces, etc.
Focus on downtown and Lincolnway. AS part of that, the requirement for housing doesn’t really make sense
unless you have things for people to do. I also wouldn’t want to live on Lincolway, too much noise from traffic. I
can see some housing in the area especially for seniors. Young people only have bars to do downtown. Let’s
have another affordable place like perfect games, bowling etc. Downtown stores need to be open longer in the
evening. Who can shop from 9-5? Not most people as they are working.
Streets, rain/water drainage and systems need updating. Flood waters in homes are too frequent with
inadequate size.
70 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Transportation. While I understand that local business people are focused on growth, growth, growth--
transportation can cut off the future of a city like Ames within a generation.
Affordable housing! There are much bigger areas such as Des Moines that have just as nice of apartment
living, that people not just students can afford! Not everyone has a parent that will write a check! And it
pains me to see, kids not only taking full-time credits at college but working full-time as well! And still not
being able to make ends meet! Not everyone has a silver spoon
Be more pet friendly
Growth that will encourage growth with out steamrolling over businesses who have spent generations
making Ames the great city it has become. Finding room to grow and planning for affordable individual
family housing
(not apartments) as well as additional commercial areas should be the focus. I would like to see the city
staff and council find ways to encourage local entrepreneurs and current employers to continue to keep
that uniqueness in Ames rather than engaging in marketing that focuses on giving away our tax dollars to
out of state developers. In all planning, there should be balance. While Ames does have a wonderful
transportation system and has focused recently on the pedestrian and bicycle paths...there needs to be a
little more focus put back to accommodating vehicle traffic. The majority of Ames residents still rely on
vehicle transportation. Zoning standards that set buildings closer to the street and minimize the site
distance of a vehicle put pedestrians and bicyclists at greater risk. It does not encourage their safety.
Finding ways to accommodate parking in all commercial areas should also be a focus. Ames should invest
in those investing in Ames.
Ames needs another sheet of indoor ice
Making sure that the plan allows for the City to grow as desired by those people that live here... in
other words... market driven.
Affordable housing; building Grand through to 16th street to alleviate traffic congestion on S. Duff;
Health and Wellness center is a key, along with facilitating new industry to come to Ames with Ames
Economic Development advice on priorities
Keeping stars visible every night. Not joking - this was an attractive feature of Ames 20+ years ago - is
disappearing.
Increased access to affordable housing, while keeping outdoor amenities at the forefront of the plan.
How can we continue to provide best services while keeping expenses, staffing, etc. low?
Expand social services, transportation, and green spaces. Also, City owned broadband/fiber internet
service.
I think a very important focus should be a variety of housing options for all who want to come here. We
should try to have available housing for all who work in Ames and wish to live here. Especially critical is
having affordable housing. We need to be creative about options and ways to accomplish this.
economic and ethnic diversity also infill and walkability
Affordable and low-income housing options is one ofvthe city's biggest problems
71 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Provide opportunities for owner occupied residential growth. We have enough rental housing for the present.
North-South traffic flow is challenging going around the ISU campus and also getting to and away from the Ames
High School facilities (only two lane streets available).
The top priority for the plan should be how we are going to build a more socially just Ames - an Ames that
prioritizes human rights, environmental rights, and expands the ability for all people to see themselves here. An
expansion in cultural opportunities like a inter-cultural center in the downtown district that brings folks from all
backgrounds together.
Keeping the neighborhoods and the individuals living there a part of that plan.
Figure out how to unite the community.
Wise, strategic, sustainable, optimistic growth.
Development of cultural hubs.
Amenities. Expand park space, connect Ames trails to central Iowa and Story County trails, attract more nightlife
and entertainment options for people of all ages.
I think dense core downtown redevelopment and denser housing land-use with connectivity for bikes is
important. I think it is important to not develop areas that are at risk for flooding. Parks and trails are better
suited to areas that will flood. How will the plan consider the increased risks/hazards/vulnerabilities related to
climate change to prepare for the future?
Ideas about how to address #15.
I'm not sure it should be the top focus, but I think an important point would be getting recycling for the city.
Students want it and it would be a worthy investment for Ames.
Top focus should be on livability so things such as housing costs and public services and bikability walkability.
Things that affect lifestyle of those in Ames
Citizen input in plan formation and a successful strategy for post planning implementation.
Develop character, create a sense of place , tasteful, sustainable, compact new development. Ensure match
between demand and supply for all new development.
Efficient growth (no leap frogging). We need to acknowledge the fact of climate change. The plan should both
adapt to climate change and produce a zero carbon future.
Updating whats already here. The side walks, streets, parks, and our infrastructure needs so serious tlc.
Sustainable and environmentally responsible growth
Developing character and a sense of place, preserving and allowing for local businesses, environmentally
sustainable development, better bike infrastructure.
I'm not sure it should be the top focus, but I think an important point would be getting recycling for the city.
Students want it and it would be a worthy investment for Ames.
72 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
17. Do you agree with the statement that Ames is a thriving community with great potential to expand
and grow while maintaining its community character and high quality of life? (393 respondants)
50%
24%
19%
6%
2%
Agree
Strongly agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
18. Select up to four of the most important aspects of choosing to live in Ames. If you do not live in
Ames currently, why would you live in Ames? (329 respondants)
14%
12%
11%
10%
9%
8%
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
4%
3%
Proximity to work/employment
Quality of schools
Safety
Cultural, sporting, and recreational
opportunities
Diverse people and cultures
Family and child friendly
Neighborhood and social ties
Housing choices
19. As the City grows and changes over the next 20 years, please indicate which changes you view
as advantages to improve the quality of life? (Select up to three) (347 respondents)
13%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
7%
7%
7%
7%
6%
3%
Additional retail/shopping/dining
options
Support of the school systems
Environmental protection of sensitive
areas
Increased employment and economic
options
New and more diverse housing choices
Reduced cost of living
Increased transportation options,
including transit
Increased diversity of people and
cultures
Support for additional public amenities
Improvement to the character of the
community
Others
20. The current Plan describes preferences for integrated, compact, walkable neighborhood
developments with a mix of housing types and small commercial opportunities labeled as villages.
With what you know about villages and neighborhoods, what is your impression on the importance
of this type of preference for new development for future planning? (374 respondents)
28%
27%
24%
16%
6%
Neutral on having a preference, needs of
the community can be met in multiple
ways
Desirable option to have new compact
and diverse neighborhoods
Limits options; the market can respond
to demand
Have no opinion
21. Please identify whether you agree that the City needs more of any of these specific types of housing. (379 respondents)
Strongly
agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Single-family traditional lots 29%
Strongly
agree
37%
Agree
24%
Neutral
7%
Disagree
3%
Strongly
disagree
Single-family small lots or attached townhomes 23%
Strongly
agree
38%
Agree
26%
Neutral
10%
Disagree
3%
Strongly
disagree
Urban condominiums dwellings (ownership)15%
Strongly
agree
33%
Agree
33%
Neutral
16%
Disagree
4%
Strongly
disagree
Student rental housing (multiple suites, rent by bedroom) (off-campus)4%
Strongly
agree
5%
Agree
26%
Neutral
36%
Disagree
28%
Strongly
disagree
General rental apartment housing (1 -3 bedroom dwellings)6%
Strongly
agree
21%
Agree
35%
Neutral
22%
Disagree
16%
Strongly
disagree
Small rental housing buildings (duplex, four-plex, etc.)10%
Strongly
agree
30%
Agree
38%
Neutral
14%
Disagree
8%
Strongly
disagree
Manufactured home parks 4%
Strongly
agree
11%
Agree
37%
Neutral
30%
Disagree
19%
Strongly
disagree
Low income rental housing (households earning less than 60% of
median income)
23%
Strongly
agree
39%
Agree
22%
Neutral
9%
Disagree
7%
Strongly
disagree
Senior housing or age restricted communities 11%
Strongly
agree
42%
Agree
37%
Neutral
8%
Disagree
2%
Strongly
disagree
379 respondents
73 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
22.Do you have an area of the City that you believe would be desirable for new development in the next 20
years? (372 respondents)
Strongly
agree Agree Neutral Disagree
Strongly
disagree
West Ames (HWY 30, Lincoln Way to Union Pacific railroad), including into
Boone County
14%
Strongly
agree
31%
Agree
39%
Neutral
10%
Disagree
7%
Strongly
disagree
Southwest Ames (south of HWY 30, South Dakota Avenue)14%
Strongly
agree
32%
Agree
34%
Neutral
9%
Disagree
11%
Strongly
disagree
Northwest Ames (Union Pacific railroad north to Cameron School Road)9%
Strongly
agree
32%
Agree
36%
Neutral
16%
Disagree
7%
Strongly
disagree
North Ames (GW Carver Avenue and 190th Street)9%
Strongly
agree
30%
Agree
35%
Neutral
18%
Disagree
7%
Strongly
disagree
East of I-35, along 13th Street 13%
Strongly
agree
31%
Agree
32%
Neutral
17%
Disagree
7%
Strongly
disagree
East of I- 35, south of Highway 30 9%
Strongly
agree
26%
Agree
37%
Neutral
19%
Disagree
10%
Strongly
disagree
South Ames, along HWY 69 and south of the airport 10%
Strongly
agree
34%
Agree
34%
Neutral
16%
Disagree
6%
Strongly
disagree
Focus on infill/redevelopment options 42%
Strongly
agree
28%
Agree
23%
Neutral
4%
Disagree
2%
Strongly
disagree
23.Are there existing developed areas of the City that you envision positively changing or
redeveloping in the next 20 years? (361 respondents)
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
West Lincoln Way, west of Campus 40%
Agree
35%
Neutral
6%
Disagree
2%
Strongly disagree
East Lincoln Way, east of South Duff 41%
Agree
33%
Neutral
7%
Disagree
1%
Strongly disagree
Central Ames 32%
Agree
38%
Neutral
8%
Disagree
2%
Strongly disagree
North Grand Mall 42%
Agree
22%
Neutral
4%
Disagree
1%
Strongly disagree
Campustown 37%
Agree
31%
Neutral
9%
Disagree
1%
Strongly disagree
Downtown, north of Union Pacific Railroad 34%
Agree
33%
Neutral
9%
Disagree
2%
Strongly disagree
Downtown Gateway Area, south of Union Pacific Railroad 40%
Agree
29%
Neutral
5%
Disagree
2%
Strongly disagree
Commercial areas along South Duff and Southeast 16th Street 37%
Agree
37%
Neutral
9%
Disagree
3%
Strongly disagree
Industrial areas along Dayton Avenue 35%
Agree
44%
Neutral
8%
Disagree
1%
Strongly disagree
24. How do you view planning for growth of the City within its 2-miles fringe? (359 respondents)
35%
25%
23%
17%
Necessary for orderly development and provision of
services to meet the needs of growing Ames, without
the impediments of existing development.
No opinion
Rural development allows for a different lifestyle
choice appropriate for areas abutting Ames despite
their limits on future expansion of the City.
Rural development allows a different lifestyle choice
that is typically appropriate for areas outside of the 2-
mile fringe planning area of the City.
74 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
25.What do you believe would enhance the quality of life and the community of Ames over the next 20
years? (361 respondents)
Very
important Important
No
opinion
Somewhat
important
Not
important
Additional/New active outdoor recreation and park facilities 23%
Very
important
48%
Important
12%
No
opinion
13%
Somewhat
important
4%
Not
important
Additional/New indoor recreational facilities 33%
Very
important
36%
Important
12%
No
opinion
13%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
Additional natural and passive open spaces 27%
Very
important
43%
Important
17%
No
opinion
10%
Somewhat
important
3%
Not
important
Additional walking and biking trails and paths 41%
Very
important
36%
Important
10%
No
opinion
10%
Somewhat
important
2%
Not
important
New senior center facility 19%
Very
important
30%
Important
34%
No
opinion
9%
Somewhat
important
7%
Not
important
Additional housing options 31%
Very
important
33%
Important
18%
No
opinion
10%
Somewhat
important
9%
Not
important
Expansion of transportation facilities for bicyclists and pedestrians 36%
Very
important
30%
Important
17%
No
opinion
12%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
Expansion of transit services to new development areas 28%
Very
important
41%
Important
18%
No
opinion
10%
Somewhat
important
3%
Not
important
Expansion of roadways 28%
Very
important
32%
Important
20%
No
opinion
11%
Somewhat
important
8%
Not
important
Improvements to the visual identity of the City (such as signage,
gateways, streetscape, public art, etc.)
20%
Very
important
35%
Important
20%
No
opinion
17%
Somewhat
important
8%
Not
important
Maintenance and upkeep of existing properties 44%
Very
important
45%
Important
7%
No
opinion
4%
Somewhat
important
-
Not
important
New shopping and dining opportunities in major retail areas 27%
Very
important
35%
Important
15%
No
opinion
16%
Somewhat
important
6%
Not
important
More business opportunities or mix of opportunities within existing
neighborhoods
20%
Very
important
40%
Important
23%
No
opinion
12%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
New destination regional attraction 18%
Very
important
21%
Important
30%
No
opinion
11%
Somewhat
important
21%
Not
important
More local and independent retail and dining opportunities 37%
Very
important
40%
Important
12%
No
opinion
9%
Somewhat
important
2%
Not
important
Vibrant local commercial districts, including Downtown,
Campustown, Somerset
47%
Very
important
36%
Important
9%
No
opinion
6%
Somewhat
important
2%
Not
important
25.What do you believe would enhance the quality of life and the community of Ames over the next 20
years? (361 respondents)
Very
important Important
No
opinion
Somewhat
important
Not
important
Additional/New active outdoor recreation and park facilities 23%
Very
important
48%
Important
12%
No
opinion
13%
Somewhat
important
4%
Not
important
Additional/New indoor recreational facilities 33%
Very
important
36%
Important
12%
No
opinion
13%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
Additional natural and passive open spaces 27%
Very
important
43%
Important
17%
No
opinion
10%
Somewhat
important
3%
Not
important
Additional walking and biking trails and paths 41%
Very
important
36%
Important
10%
No
opinion
10%
Somewhat
important
2%
Not
important
New senior center facility 19%
Very
important
30%
Important
34%
No
opinion
9%
Somewhat
important
7%
Not
important
Additional housing options 31%
Very
important
33%
Important
18%
No
opinion
10%
Somewhat
important
9%
Not
important
Expansion of transportation facilities for bicyclists and pedestrians 36%
Very
important
30%
Important
17%
No
opinion
12%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
Expansion of transit services to new development areas 28%
Very
important
41%
Important
18%
No
opinion
10%
Somewhat
important
3%
Not
important
Expansion of roadways 28%
Very
important
32%
Important
20%
No
opinion
11%
Somewhat
important
8%
Not
important
Improvements to the visual identity of the City (such as signage,
gateways, streetscape, public art, etc.)
20%
Very
important
35%
Important
20%
No
opinion
17%
Somewhat
important
8%
Not
important
Maintenance and upkeep of existing properties 44%
Very
important
45%
Important
7%
No
opinion
4%
Somewhat
important
-
Not
important
New shopping and dining opportunities in major retail areas 27%
Very
important
35%
Important
15%
No
opinion
16%
Somewhat
important
6%
Not
important
More business opportunities or mix of opportunities within existing
neighborhoods
20%
Very
important
40%
Important
23%
No
opinion
12%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
New destination regional attraction 18%
Very
important
21%
Important
30%
No
opinion
11%
Somewhat
important
21%
Not
important
More local and independent retail and dining opportunities 37%
Very
important
40%
Important
12%
No
opinion
9%
Somewhat
important
2%
Not
important
Vibrant local commercial districts, including Downtown,
Campustown, Somerset
47%
Very
important
36%
Important
9%
No
opinion
6%
Somewhat
important
2%
Not
important
75 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Very
important Important
No
opinion
Somewhat
important
Not
important
Additional professional office development opportunities 13%
Very
important
31%
Important
38%
No
opinion
12%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
Additional general industrial/manufacturing opportunities 12%
Very
important
32%
Important
38%
No
opinion
13%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
Continued expansion of the ISU Research Park 27%
Very
important
36%
Important
24%
No
opinion
8%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
Other 16%
Very
important
8%
Important
69%
No
opinion
3%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
26. The City needs more of the following types of commercial establishments. (agree or disagree) (357 respondents)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Furniture 16%
Strongly agree
41%
Agree
30%
Neutral
11%
Disagree
2%
Strongly agree
Home goods/furnishings 18%
Strongly agree
39%
Agree
31%
Neutral
11%
Disagree
1%
Strongly agree
Convenience stores and gas stations 2%
Strongly agree
11%
Agree
37%
Neutral
43%
Disagree
8%
Strongly agree
Sit down national and regional restaurants 11%
Strongly agree
31%
Agree
26%
Neutral
25%
Disagree
7%
Strongly agree
Quick service national and regional restaurants/cafes 5%
Strongly agree
16%
Agree
30%
Neutral
39%
Disagree
10%
Strongly agree
Local restaurants/cafes 44%
Strongly agree
45%
Agree
10%
Neutral
1%
Disagree
-
Strongly agree
Entertainment and sporting facilities 17%
Strongly agree
36%
Agree
32%
Neutral
12%
Disagree
2%
Strongly agree
Bars/brewery/distillery/winery 14%
Strongly agree
29%
Agree
34%
Neutral
18%
Disagree
4%
Strongly agree
Apparel/shoes 15%
Strongly agree
31%
Agree
37%
Neutral
15%
Disagree
2%
Strongly agree
Sporting goods 17%
Strongly agree
31%
Agree
36%
Neutral
12%
Disagree
3%
Strongly agree
Local/boutique/specialty retail 15%
Strongly agree
39%
Agree
37%
Neutral
7%
Disagree
1%
Strongly agree
General Merchandise/warehouse/big box 6%
Strongly agree
16%
Agree
35%
Neutral
34%
Disagree
9%
Strongly agree
Automotive service and repair 1%
Strongly agree
14%
Agree
53%
Neutral
26%
Disagree
6%
Strongly agree
Pharmacy and convenience commercial 1%
Strongly agree
11%
Agree
55%
Neutral
28%
Disagree
5%
Strongly agree
Grocery 5%
Strongly agree
17%
Agree
43%
Neutral
32%
Disagree
4%
Strongly agree
Coffee shops 10%
Strongly agree
27%
Agree
43%
Neutral
18%
Disagree
2%
Strongly agree
Party supplies 3%
Strongly agree
9%
Agree
52%
Neutral
29%
Disagree
7%
Strongly agree
Electronics/technology 6%
Strongly agree
28%
Agree
43%
Neutral
20%
Disagree
3%
Strongly agree
76 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
27.Do you support planning for initiatives that support a healthy lifestyle and enhanced personal well-
being? (361 respondents)
Very
important Important
No
opinion
Somewhat
important
Not
important
Walkable neighborhoods with sidewalks and connections
to trails
59%
Very
important
32%
Important
4%
No
opinion
3%
Somewhat
important
2%
Not
important
Access to parks or open space within a 10-minute walk.51%
Very
important
34%
Important
9%
No
opinion
4%
Somewhat
important
2%
Not
important
Support of transportation options in addition to personal
automobiles
48%
Very
important
31%
Important
10%
No
opinion
7%
Somewhat
important
4%
Not
important
Knowing your neighbors and having a sense of belonging 43%
Very
important
41%
Important
10%
No
opinion
4%
Somewhat
important
1%
Not
important
Providing indoor recreation facilities 36%
Very
important
37%
Important
13%
No
opinion
10%
Somewhat
important
5%
Not
important
Access to food and groceries within one mile of home 26%
Very
important
36%
Important
16%
No
opinion
13%
Somewhat
important
8%
Not
important
Access to social services during times of need 43%
Very
important
38%
Important
12%
No
opinion
4%
Somewhat
important
3%
Not
important
Quality and safety of housing 58%
Very
important
34%
Important
7%
No
opinion
1%
Somewhat
important
-
Not
important
Access to high quality medical care 70%
Very
important
26%
Important
3%
No
opinion
1%
Somewhat
important
-
Not
important
Events supporting getting outside and being active 41%
Very
important
41%
Important
13%
No
opinion
4%
Somewhat
important
1%
Not
important
28.What do you identify as environmental priorities for the City of Ames? (360 respondents)
Very
important Important
No
opinion
Somewhat
important
Not
important
Watershed management 53%
Very
important
31%
Important
10%
No
opinion
5%
Somewhat
important
1%
Not
important
Managing the flood plain 65%
Very
important
26%
Important
5%
No
opinion
4%
Somewhat
important
1%
Not
important
Managing stormwater runoff/water quality from
development
57%
Very
important
30%
Important
7%
No
opinion
6%
Somewhat
important
1%
Not
important
Protection of the Ames water/drinking supply 73%
Very
important
23%
Important
3%
No
opinion
1%
Somewhat
important
-
Not
important
Preservation of natural habitat 53%
Very
important
32%
Important
9%
No
opinion
4%
Somewhat
important
2%
Not
important
Reducing solid waste/trash and diverting from landfills 55%
Very
important
30%
Important
7%
No
opinion
5%
Somewhat
important
3%
Not
important
Minimizing vehicle miles travel 35%
Very
important
29%
Important
19%
No
opinion
6%
Somewhat
important
12%
Not
important
Supporting renewable energy initiatives 53%
Very
important
26%
Important
9%
No
opinion
8%
Somewhat
important
4%
Not
important
Resiliency related to natural events 51%
Very
important
35%
Important
11%
No
opinion
2%
Somewhat
important
1%
Not
important
The city has allowed new development on our floodplains (Stadium View apartments), Wal-Mart on South Duff Avenue, Thiesen's, Deery, and Menard's
to name a few. Unconscionably, the city then applied for FEMA grant funding to channelize Squaw Creek to prevent flooding. Far better to prevent
flooding by not building on the flood plains. I was pleased to see ball diamonds and other amenities located on the plains instead of development that
needs protection. If it is desired to build on the floodplains, the buildings should be on stilts or there should be some other provision made by the
property developer (permeable pavement?) to stay true to Ames values and not negatively impact the watershed or imperil their new development.
Wouldn't it be attractive and unique to patronize a restaurant built on stilts overlooking the green space behind the former Happy Joe's Pizza and
Century Theaters? Nature should be worked with instead of against and Ames is being part of the problem rather than a leader in solutions.
2 months ago
The encouragement of bigger buildings and big box stores is reducing the ability of the land to "bounce back" from heavy rains/snow and flooding. Take
in point Wal-Mart's parking lot, they built it and then it immediately flooded because it's so close to a flood plain. Now the surrounding developments
are building on ground they've raised up, which just makes the water flow faster into flood zones.
2 months ago
E-scooters that are taking over southern/western cities. Need to have a plan for those. Amazed at how many were just lying around San Antonio.
2 months ago
The health of our whole environment--land, air, water, and citizens--should be our most important priority and should guide all decisions.
77 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Specific questions that were asked include:
1. What areas of Ames needs reinvestment? This can be a street, neighborhood,
district, or other feature.
2A. We need your feedback for the emerging concept for growth in the East
area. What do you like or want to be reconsidered?
2B. We need your feedback for the emerging concept for growth in the West
area. What do you like or want to be reconsidered?
2C. We need your feedback for the emerging concept for growth in the North
area. What do you like or want to be reconsidered?
2D. We need your feedback for the emerging concept for growth in the South
area. What do you like or want to be reconsidered?
PART 2: INTERACTIVE MAPPING
The future land use scenarios were shared at a public open house meeting and posted online in an interactive mapping tool, PublicInput.com. The open house
engaged ~50 participants, while the online tool engaged [ ] participants, for a total of [ ] participants. Most responses to the online mapping tool originated
from people within the City of Ames. Comments from the open house were incorporated into the online tool and included in this section.
78 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
79 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
QUESTION 1. WHAT AREA OF AMES NEEDS REINVESTMENT?
State are a mess....long waits.
k Lots of good space here that could be
redeveloped to office commercial.; Area from
LW to Storm and Ash to Sheldon should be
re-focused to house the core of students
in the community. Closer to ISU enhances
the student experience and might provide
better workforce housing in other currently
developed med-hi res areas. A campus core
makes sense for our community and for our
students. Holding out hope for this to return
back to non-student residential is a lost
cause.; I wonder how this residential space
might benefit from strategic reinvestment -
an overlay granting funds for rehab of older
homes?
k University thru traffic backs up because turn
lanes fill up.
k Area north of Lincoln way and west of grand ;
Lincoln way
k North Grand Mall should be prioritized.
Maintain it, keep it beautiful, keep businesses
here and attract more. Ada Hayden will be an
increasingly important area to preserve and
maintain as well, as Ames grows. Keep and
respect the historic nature of the Lincolnway
Highway. Stop building in the flood plane
area. We will need even more places to
hold water as environmental conditions
deteriorate due to climate change.
k It may be time to think about helping people
who own these older homes keep them in
great condition. Tax incentives perhaps or
some other low interest loan program.
k The city needs to invest more in developing
the south corridor of Ames. We need better
lighting, sidewalks, and I would like to see
them reduce the speed of those coming into
Ames from south 69. There needs to be more
school signage.
k Build the Ames PD a dedicated police
department and expand the city cardio and
weight facilities into that space.; Turn Old
Main into community/educational kitchens
that were meant to be part of the Healthy Life
Center with a publicly rentable city banquet
hall. Lease the brewing space to Alluvial.;
Build lap pools and heated indoor pools that
were supposed to be part of the Healthy Life
Center here, adjacent to Furman Aquatic
Center duh. ; Build an open air amphitheatre
like red rocks.
k Secure canoe and kayak storage areas that
can be paid for monthly or annually
k The area to the south as part of the Research
Park continued development should be
a priority both housing and services that
employees desire
k Neighborhood north of Ontario need some
work. Streets / sidewalks are in poor shape.
After a storm occurs, it is one of the last
neighborhoods to get attention.
k feels like a throwaway area, very hardscrabble.
it doesn’t have to be an ugly passthrough.
could be another “entrance” to Ames,
celebrate Lincoln hgwy history, perhaps, be
more welcoming for multi-users. ; this part of
Ames, south of 30, seems cutoff from the rest
k This is a highway that goes through the city
and it looks terrible with all the random fast
food places and assorted car stuff. It needs a
huge face lift.
k Downtown
k Poorly planned, cul-de-sacs and non-linear
streets are bad for pedestrians and cyclists.
Most of N of Ames is impossible to navigate
w/o a car.
k As a complete entity Ames needs to
consider ways to reduce its carbon footprint:
community-wide reduce/reuse/recycle efforts
including composting, more rapid steps to
reduce use of fossil fuels for energy, including
re-thinking our current system of waste
disposal; more investment in fossil-free fuels;
changing zoning regulations so that more
individual building owners can invest directly
in solar panels; invest in more city-sponsored
charging stations for electric vehicles; etc.
k This has been an underdeveloped section
of Ames for far too long. There keep being
houses and apartments added, but nothing
in the way of support for them. Making an
effort for adding grocery stores, drug stores,
restaurants, and better public transportation
would improve the quality of life in South
Ames.
k Flood mitigation. Dedicated, non developed
areas that can better absorb rain and runoff.
k Streets are deteriorating and S.Duff should be
a 4-lane road
k Howay 30 & Dakota as well as Mortenson &
80 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
of the community.
k This dangerous intersection needs a flashing
LED Pedestrian Crossing Signal for better
protection of the many students who are
walking to and from the CyRide Bus Stop
there. Maybe Mortensen Road could be
changed to a three-lane street with a center
turning lane and bike lanes near the curbs
between State Avenue and Welch Road/
Gateway Hills Park Drive. ; This dangerous
intersection needs a left turn arrow for
westbound traffic on Lincoln Way. Maybe
Lincoln Way should be three lanes (with
a center turning lane) between Wilmoth
Avenue and Hayward Avenue. ; This busy
intersection needs a roundabout.
k Ames has three main access points to
highways (I-35 and 13th, 1-30 and Duff, 1-30
and S. Dakota). South Duff is cramped and
poorly designed. South Duff is really a series
of patches to make the best of what is there.
The other highway interfaces should be
future growth for business like the ones on
South Duff but better planned.; The lack of a
sidewalk here is a tragedy waiting to happen.
Because the development on the south
side of Lincoln Way faces away from Lincoln
Way, no sidewalk was installed. Technically,
‘development’ has not occurred and will
likely not occur soon on the north side.
People living west of this location regularly
walk and bike along this stretch, which is
a dangerous mix with traffic that tends to
go over the 45 mph speed limit. The city
map of bike paths even shows the path to
the west and east and this noticeable gap.
The city’s policy for sidewalk installation by
developers makes sense, but there has to be
exceptions. Or somebody let this slip through
the cracks when the south side Lincoln Way
was developed.; Too much development
pressure has been on South Duff. Businesses
need some motivation to build in other,
easily navigable areas. West Ames seems
to be a case where land is repeatedly set
aside for business development, then after
waiting five years for businesses to come
the developer tires of sitting on unused
land and then requests the city to rezone
to residential. Clearly the environment in
west Ames is not enticing to businesses, so
either incentives need to be put in place to
make the area enticing or we should skip this
cycle of wishing businesses will come in the
original planning and then having to fall back
to a hastily assembled plan B.; Area prime
for redevelopment. Seems like it just needs a
nudge.
k Lots of great work has been done in Ames,
and its very nice to see it grow. The student-
dominated areas of Campustown obviously
have higher pedestrian/multi modal traffic;
with growing enrollment, this will only
continue. There are very few green spaces/
open spaces for students to gather in during
the day and at night, which increases the
amount of students walking through streets
not in crosswalks or loitering. This can be
curbed by lengthening sidewalks. Also, the
Firestation on Welch is in a great location to
serve the University, but the thriving Welch
Ave corridor has changed the community
fabric of the area. To increase response time
for fire emergency services as well as increase
safety of pedestrians on/around Welch, the
firestation should be moved. Thank you for
updating your comp plan, I look forward to
seeing what Ames will do to better serve
ALL of its residents!; blvd in poor condition;
could be turned into a gathering space with
tables, benches etc.; Updated sidewalks and
multimodal transportation options needed
k Downtown and central Ames. Internet and
cellular in downtown availability and level
of service don’t help attract business. Also,
the neighborhoods between downtown
and Mary Greeley need street and sidewalk
improvements those areas could be
improved and upgraded to rebuild from the
inside out - instead of continued sprawl.
k Investment of planting of native vegetation
for storm-water management/flood
prevention.; Investment of planting of native
vegetation for storm water management/
flood prevention.; Need of Investment for
installation of wetland for storm-water
management/flood prevention.; Need
of Investment for planting wetland for
stormwater management. ; Investment in
these properties and this block to ensure
density aka use of available land space.; Sale
of lease for DG’s Taphouse & Corner Pocket
property to ensure density/ use of available
property.; Sale of lease for the Old Main
property.
k Just south of Lincoln Highway, on Welch ave.,
there are many bars, restaurants and local
businesses. This area is highly congested
with students and pedestrians at most hours
of the day. Closing off the beginning half
of this road will allow for safer travel for the
patrons of the businesses and allow for a
central communal area for the community.
Many protest that this will hurt businesses
because it prevents the cliental access by
car. I think that if you redesign the streets
surrounding the area, you can allow for
81 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
public parking lot in places where building
should be condemned. Look to example
of the pedestrian mall in Iowa City. This
was a complete success and increased the
community vitality in their own campustown.
k This route has evolved into a major connector
due to short sited planning. On street parking
should be eliminated; Traffic always backs up
at this intersection; improvements would be
greatly appreciated by many; This area has
significant traffic and should be upgraded to
4 lanes as it is East of this location
k This is a busy street with A LOT of foot traffic
because of the library. It would be nice to
make it more pedestrian friendly and add
more handicap spots,,,maybe free parking?
We want people to have access to the library!
k Along Lincoln between Grand and Dayton
has become rundown strip commercial -
ugly, largely decrepit and underutilized
k Ames has the potential that West Des Moines
did in the 1970s, and that Ankeny had in the
early 2000s. Pushing TIF funding and other
government assistance programs can bring
the city into the 21st Century and give our
children and grandchildren a bright future
here.; This area has huge potential as a
commercial and residential corridor, and it
should be another priority.; Grand Avenue
MUST be made a priority to continue it as an
arterial road through the city. The city already
owns the golf course, so it should not be as
difficult as some other potential routes.
k If Healthy Life Center goes through, how is
this street ever going to handle the traffic
generated??? Think traffic and street
management; All of Lincoln Way. Add trees!!!;
Traffic management, especially pedestrian
crossings to and from bus stop to HyVee.
; Traffic management. Peak hour stacking
extends on highway 30. Accident prone; BIG
need for traffic management. Peak hour
stacking extends half-1 mile; Duff Ave needs
to be more than the street long strip center
that it is. Slow down traffic, make it more
inviting, bring store fronts closer to the street,
or make a service road. Traffic there sucks;
North Grand mall area. Needs to be thought
through politically with a master plan, and
not as a strip center. It has the potential to
become a hub of active (indoor & outdoor)
spaces, restaurants, some stores and maybe
even form a community gathering space
especially when seen in conjunction with Ada
Hayden. Think of it as a corridor/sub area. So
much potential that is currently not being
taken into account; Lincoln Way east of Duff
Ave
k More retail
k Main street should start near wheatsfield and
end on kellogg... investment in buildings infill;
Main st investment in mixeduse retail
k The former bar The District and the
surrounding buildings are currently torn
down and make this stretch of Lincoln Way
unappealing. I know there was a plan shut
down for this vacant lot. But I am interested
to see what this 2040 Comp Plan will provide
for this lot.
k Can we do something to integrate the area
east of here with the rest of the city? Feels
very separate at the moment; Neighborhood
of rundown houses
k Create growth boundaries for west Ames,
stop creating sprawl development (even if it
is medium density sprawl); North Grand Mall
needs work as a transit hub and residential
area for North Ames; Maintain naturally
affordable housing and expand the mixed
use nature of the neighborhood; Increased
pedestrian access and transit priority on
Duff; Increased density and commercial
directly West of campus; Downtown needs
additional housing, expanded density
k Throughout Ames, safe bike and pedestrian
routes that are usable in all seasons.
k Throughout Ames, safe bicycle and
pedestrian ways that are usable in all seasons.
k The nearly ubiquitous belief among our
elected officials is that addressing the climate
crisis must come second to economic
growth. This is wrongheaded--both because
it underestimates the severity of the climate
crisis, and because it presupposes that the
old economic “normal” of robust growth can
be revived. It can’t. We should be planning
for resilience in the coming catastrophe.
k Needs connected sidewalk on this side.
k What happened to the proposal for mixed
use buildings downtown, south of the railroad
tracks? I would like to see infrastructure here
that encourages a village like setting, drawing
people downtown to local businesses, not
just to dine but to live--and no chains allowed
(unlike in west Ames, where chains like which
wich, erbert and herbert’s, etc. makes it feel
like you could be in any city).
k The area around the old Edwards Elementary
school site.
82 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
k Lincoln Way corridor is a bit of an eyesore
k Downtown needs constant attention and
upgrades to keep it alive and vibrant. It is
very easy for a growing community to forget
about downtown and it becomes neglected
quickly.
k The South Campus neighborhood,
particularly west of Ash Ave., is the most
walkable and sustainable neighborhood
in Ames given its proximity to the area’s
largest employer and economic driver.
Yet the benefits of South Campus aren’t
highlighted. The city should do what it can to
work with the university to encourage more
faculty and staff to live there. The Crawford
School project is a step in the right direction.
ADUs for homeowner-occupied properties
should also be seriously investigated.; The
South Campus neighborhood, particularly
west of Ash Ave., is the most walkable and
sustainable neighborhood in Ames given its
proximity to the area’s largest employer and
economic driver. Yet the benefits of South
Campus aren’t highlighted. The city should
do what it can to work with the university
to encourage more faculty and staff to live
there. The Crawford School project is a step
in the right direction. ADUs for homeowner-
occupied properties should also be seriously
investigated.
k I’m filling this out as representative of our
downtown church.; Ames UCC
k Need drivethru coffee shop or fast food
establishment
k Trails along Riverside and Dayton to connect
Ada Hayden with McFarland Park and 13th
Street would greatly enhance options for
recreation and improve safety for those who
already try to use those routes. Would require
collaboration with Story County.; Dayton
Ave to the north of 13th St needs to have a
bike path. Bikers and runners are often seen
risking their lives on this road with minimal
shoulder and no bike path. A beautiful option
(that would require some collaboration with
Story County) would be to add a bike path all
along Dayton Ave up to McFarland Park and
along Riverside Ave, connecting Ada Hayden
to Dayton Ave and McFarland Park.
k If you live in west Ames it is FASTER to go
to BOONE than it is to get to Duff and deal
with its traffic. Thousands live in west Ames
and there is next to nothing for goods and
services.; With few exceptions Lincoln way
from Squaw Creek to Duff is lined with
decrepit old buildings that should have been
torn down and redeveloped decades ago.
; A stop light should have been installed
here circa 2010. The entire exit ramp can be
packed with cars and it is amazing that there
hasn’t been a 50-car accident with multiple
fatalities...yet. ; During peak commute
times there are typically over a hundred cars
backed up at this four-way stop sign. It is
inexcusable that this intersection was not
upgraded many years ago.
k Lincoln Way between Grand and Duff looks
terrible.
k Old town district has need of sidewalk and
street renovations.
k The biggest concern for the North area is
better access to I-35. That would open up
more possibilities.
k West Lincoln Way has a nice variety of
food establishments, but more retail
options would be nice in this area. ; I am
continually surprised that there seems
to be no enforcement for removal of
weeds/maintenance of landscaping. Most
businesses appear to have rather extensive
landscaping with an interesting variety
of plantings. I assume this is a result of
development standards, however when beds
become overgrown with weeds, businesses
simply look unkempt.;
k It would be nice to see more business
development in west Ames, along
Lincolnway, not small spaces underneath
apartments, but actual buildings devoted to a
business. Also I would like to see the mall area
developed. Both of these would be preferable
to continuing to build in the flood plain
surrounding Duff.
k The Lincoln Way Corridor between Grand and
Duff needs some serious help.
k RDG’s presentation indicated the south/
east area near Jewel drive as the most
cost effective and most likely to offer the
most potential growth for the city. The
approximate 1000 acres could be developed
in several different styles from single family
to townhouses. It can be tied directly with
the north east area which can provide
a commercial corridor along I 35. The
infrastructure needed can benefit both
areas. The south east would be entirely in
the Ames School district . The SE would
be most attractive to developers and
offer an alternative route north besides
Duff Ave.; RDG’s presentation indicated
the south/east area near Jewel drive as
the most cost effective and most likely to
83 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
offer the most potential growth for the
city. The approximate 1000 acres could be
developed in several different styles from
single family to townhouses. It can be tied
directly with the north east area which can
provide a commercial corridor along I 35.
The infrastructure needed can benefit both
areas. The south east would be entirely in
the Ames School district . The SE would be
most attractive to developers and offer an
alternative route north besides Duff Ave.
k A number of areas in town could use
reinvestment. We’re a growing community.
That’s what I would expect, and continue to
expect. Added pressure from development
taxes existing infrastructure. Available
funding has us stretching dollars beyond
what they should. Available routes have
increased pressure on the same roads:
Ontario/13th, Lincoln Way, Mortensen/S 16th,
Grand, Dakota, Dayton and Duff. All other
roads feed into that system but don’t go all
the way through the community.; Another
intersection where the extra lane stops after
the light - cars speed to get around and in
front. ; The north lane of the west traffic
between Highland and Stange might as well
not exist. Since the extra lane ceases at the
intersection, everyone speeds to try and leap
ahead of traffic and goes out of their way to
cause accidents at the light. ; Traffic signal
timing always ‘traps’ vehicles in this section.
It happens so often I assume its intentional.;
This intersection has been an issue for years;
back when I was attending ISU in late 90s.
High traffic, no space. Congestion during
peak commutes; especially when someone
who doesn’t realize there is no turn arrow
ques behind a vehicle in the wrong lane.;
Intersection needs work. Potholes have been
patched over the years but are breaking
down. The excessive hump added along
Lincoln Way for stormwater has become too
abrupt to cross traffic where I’ve seen them
veer over to avoid the actual intersection
when crossing.; This intersection; extending
to the ramps to Highway 30 and the drives to
Kum & Go and Theisens can quickly become
congested.; Surface condition on a portion
of this roadway is showing signs of wear and
could use an overlay. This will be even more
needed once Grand extends to S 16th.; This
road backs up after a game/practice at the
Hunziker Youth Sports Complex; especially
since its the only outlet.; This section of
Lincoln Way through campus sees a lot of
pedestrian traffic; both at and not at actual
crossings. Medians are unsightly and not
very welcoming to Ames or the ISU campus.;
Can’t see potential cyclists/pedestrians on
the new trail because of the retaining wall
blocking line of sight from vehicles trying
to enter Airport Road from the driveway;
without being on the trail.; Shrubs in median
obscure east bound traffic from the turn.
With no dedicated turn lane and the speeds
of the road it could be an issue; High volume
of traffic, speed and multiple offset ingress/
egress makes this section extremely volatile. I
time trips to Lowes to try and miss peak times
- and even then I feel like I’m taking my life
in my hands to navigate in and out.; Rough
intersection, especially with more pressure
from recent and adjacent subdivisions.; This
intersection has needed improvement since
this became my commuting route 8 years
ago. Potholes and reflexive cracking are
chronic issues; made worse during winter
months. Numerous patches have been
placed, but have not addressed the issue.;
Realize that this is a shared City/ISU portion of
roadway but the surface condition is in need
of a facelift. This section has been overlayed
numerous times so the curbs are relatively
shallow respective to adjacent trail and there
are always multiple deep potholes during the
winter and spring months.
k This comment applies to both reinvestment
and to growth in any of the areas: I have
felt for some time that people can adjust to
various levels of intensity of development...the
critical aspect is the design and functionality
of the buildings and associated infrastructure.
I believe that cheaply designed and
constructed apartment buildings, poor
parking lot designs, inadequate landscaping,
and failing to provide roads and traffic control
to manage increased traffic all cause public
distaste and distrust when higher density
land use is proposed. Any reinvestment
incentives or growth plans need to provide
insurance for quality design and adequate
infrastructure support. ; Opportunities
for modernization and infill of commercial
properties.; South Duff corridor may be
beyond repair. Improving appearance
would be nice, but not certain it will make
much difference when drivers need to focus
on heavy traffic. But...it would be nice to
see some reduction in intensity of use. ;
Opportunity to make Duff/Lincoln Way
intersection more attractive.; Is there any
potential to assist development of a small
commercial area in this neighborhood for
convenience and to provide a neighborhood
locus?; This area needs assistance to develop
a ‘soul’. It has become a major residential
area, with no clear identity.; Is there any way
to recover this area from the mis-guided
application of the ground floor commercial/
84 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
upper residential buildings in a sea of parking
lots?; Infill opportunities and updates to old
commercial corridor from Marshall Avenue to
the west along Lincoln Way.; Update old-style
highway oriented commercial look and feel.
k It looks old. Unused buildings look trashy.
k Run down apartments and homes in this
neighborhood
k West ames between Franklin & Indian
delights seems to have many families with
children needing additional support and
services. Improve park, do the donuts with
police events out there, so many vacant or
closing businesses in area, the city seems to
forget the families on this side of town ever
since old Edward’s closed; Old kmart could
be city owned location or service; ; Area
needs attention
k This area seems to be an eye-sore. Wish it
displayed more of a college town/family
oriented feel. This area really needs some
updating to become more modern.
k Newer development here could use more
retail options nearby; This intersection is
always overflowing and difficult to navigate
for nearby residents. ; ; These broken
buildings need revamped
k Roundabout needed; Roundabout
k I think the mall area could be improved
and could definitely have more restaurants
nearby.
k We need a quick way to reach the west with a
high way
k Lincoln Way Corridor in Downtown Area has
much potential: No floodplain and walking
distance to downtown
k West Ames needs some help attracting
quality of life in this area. Right now it is only
a section of town that offers living. To build
a small neighborhood community here so
people can walk to the store or a nearby bar
would help sell this area of town as a place to
live, work, and play. ; There is very little draw
or reason to come to this side of town. I would
love to see some great attraction help pull
the community here. ; I would love to see
the Campustown area develop into a town
attraction. Right now very little draws us to
that area of town, it’s only bars for students,
and we have mediocre parking. To see it
develop into a pedestrian mall or something
cool, would help sell the amenities we boast
about being able to offer for being a college
town.
k This area is a planning and zoning mess.
Boone county doesn’t seem to know how
to fix it. They have Ames addresses and
phone numbers - but volunteer fire service.
Commercial, Industrial and Residential areas
next to each other with little thought. Please
intervene and fix this!
k Entrance to Ames
k New private and public developments need
to incorporate wide paths or lanes for cycling
when they are being built to accommodate
the growing population. It cost too much to
do it after the fact.
k More bars
k This is such a waste of potential land.
Kum&go needs to sell this plot or utilize it
k Some emphasis on increasing density in
areas already existing would help with some
of the urban sprawl Also a priority should be
improving north/south and east/west traffic
flow. ; This area needs redevelopment along
the line of Campus town. More density for
residential and commercial spaces. If taller
buildings with apartments and housing for
lower income familys and not just students
would be constructed it would draw more
people into the center of Ames and allow for
some of the growth of the city of Ames in the
future to me more vertical instead of always
outwards. The taller the buildings built in the
area the better. Its Ames best area for a more
dense vertical growth for it population.
k Playground/park; More restaurants/
businesses.
k Ames needs a CAP on expanding
k Lincoln Way corridor east of Duff and west
of Hayward needs to be cleaned up and
revitalized.
k Additional items not pinpointed:
trail signage on bike trails with mileage to
downtown, campustown, Jack Trice Stadium,
Hunziker Sports Complex, .........
Repair the dangerous bike trails: trail behind
Ames High, airport road, S. 16th
Pedestrian bridge somewhere in campustown
crossing Lincoln Way
Connect trail all the way to the HTT. Most
Ames families do not want to ride on the
current roadside trail.; Assist in relocating
Conley Trucking to spur redevelopment of this
entryway into Ames as a small strip mall. With
85 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
East Growth Area
. What do you like or want to be reconsidered?
2B. We need your feedback for the emerging
concept for growth in the West area. What do
you like or want to be reconsidered?
2C. We need your feedback for the emerging
concept for growth in the North area. What do
you like or want to be reconsidered?
2D. We need your feedback for the emerging
concept for growth in the South area. What do
you like or want to be reconsidered?
QUESTION 2. WE NEED YOUR FEEDBACK FOR THE EMERGING CONCEPT
FOR GROWTH IN THE [______] AREA. WHAT DO YOU LIKE OR WANT TO BE
RECONSIDERED?
86 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
EAST GROWTH AREA COMMENTS
1. This new interchange and road is great. It
would better server any growth to the east any
new growth to the north of Ames.
2. Due to the extent of distance and the nature
of the industrial neighborhood, this feels like it is
far away, even though it isn’t.
3. Multiple Comments:
k The area between the east edge of town,
or in fact, even from east side of duff to
the proposed development needs to be
developed, atleast as a solid corridor, for
the east development to work. Otherwise
it is going to feel too far removed with no
connection. Needs better connectivity.
k That area is part of a large greenbelt
including several parks and preserves, and
a great deal of it is low-lying floodplain not
suitable for development.
4. Kettleson Marsh? Is this enough buffer? If
the zones around it have similar zoning to areas
around Ada Hayden, the marsh should have
good buffers to protect it.
5. Multiple comments:
k Like the lay out of this new proposed
development. Nice mix of the different
zoning. The commercial and Office are
situated nicely to capitalize on the area being
by the interstate. Also the natural areas in the
area are being protected and preserved.
k Very sorry to have to disagree, but an
existing thirty-five-acre wetland-prairie
natural area, a sizable resource that provides
important wildlife habitat and serves to
cleanse water, is NOT being protected or
preserved. The map shows that natural area
being destroyed and turned into “Mixed Use”
and “Urban Family Residential,”, which is a
terrible idea.
6. The mixed use seems a bit remote from
HI and MI, as well as commercial and office
perspectives; at least in being able to serve
as a service center for these different uses. I
generally applaud the effort to retain natural
corridors surrounding what I presume to be
existing waterways or natural systems. These
would make welcome additions to residential;
especially by providing green space and respite
adjacent to MI and HI development.
7. Far away from planned and existing schools
while lacking one of its own, and poor transit
options to the rest of Ames w/o investment into
better cycling/walking infrastructure.
8. Growing towards the East makes sense
because of access to 30/35. Need access to
Lincoln Way.
87 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Additional Comments for East Concept:
k Too far away. Feels like your living in a
separate town. Requires too much driving for
residents. Not desirable for most people who
wish to live in Ames.
k This growth plan feels car-centric and
suburban in the network of roads. What can
be done to secure easements and rework
street networks to ultimately allow for more
walkable and bikeable neighborhoods?
How can this be included in the substantial
greenspaces just on the other side of 35? Is a
greenbelt possible for this neighborhood?
k Far and away the most costly option in terms
of overall infrastructure, raises significant
natural resource impacts and is clearly
separated from Ames by 35.
k Choosing this area for growth would
bring some advantages, as noted in other
comments. But there would also be
challenges. According to the information at
the Ames 2040 open house, the East option
would require a new 36-inch-diameter
sewage line that would need to be built
through several miles of mostly-private rural
land in order to reach the Ames sewage
treatment plant. That would require a lot
of money, and even though landowners
would presumably be paid, some might be
unwilling, A new water tower would also be
needed to ensure adequate water pressure,
and that would also be costly. The current
map also shows housing being built right
on top of a beautiful thirty-five-acre prairie/
wetland complex that has a lot of native plant
diversity and varied wildlife. The destruction
of that complex would not fit with Ames
sustainability goals. Also, the nature and size
of the Ketelsen Greenwing Marsh buffers
would be a concern. Housing close to public
conservation areas can bring a variety of
problems, including stormwater runoff,
blowing litter, and roaming pets
k This area can be challenging for non-drivers
to access
k I would like to see Ames focus on Urban
High Intensity as a way to move forward to
sustainability.
k If growth is going east, there will need to be
better east-west roads and more choices for
retail, particularly restaurants
k This area would a good option area because
of the transportation benefits. The village
concept would work well here.
k Lots of potential for current and future
growth. This offer a lot of benefits.
k I think an east expansion in this area (village
concept) could be a great kickstart for
this area. I think that what others view as
challenges regarding being cut off- could
actually be a benefit and some may want to
live in a more village type setting while still
being a part of the City of Ames.
k Needs to be developed for the survival of the
city. Nevada, by 2040, may have grown large
enough to decide to annex parts of this area.
k If it is possible, I’d love to see a road to
between e 13th and east riverside connecting
to Dayton.
k No
k I think growing to the east is a good option.
The proposed access to I-35 would be good
for households who have folks working in
Ankeny/Des Moines; however, the interstate
may also function as a barrier making this
area feel separate, or removed, from the rest
of the community.
k I like this option and the access to the
interstate.
k Overpass? Trains stop here a lot it seems.
k Growth to the East is great area to encourage.
It will capitalize on the commercial and
industrial areas already there. Providing more
residential areas out there only encourages
more of the commercial areas already zoned
as such to develop. Its also Ames best options
for more commercial areas in regards to ease
of access and visibility.
88 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
WEST GROWTH AREA COMMENTS
1. I understand the community’s reluctance to
address an upgraded railroad crossing at North
Dakota - but with the land north of this already
for sale to be redeveloped - what is the city’s
plan for this area long term?
2. This area is a mess - fix this!
3. This interchange and all major routes will
continue to see increased commuting pressure
should development proceed similar to this
model. To keep pace with this, please ensure that
the Comp Plan includes appropriate response
with infrastructure investment as as to service
these new areas without a determent to the
existing community.
4. County line? So this goes 1 1/2 miles into Boone
County. United Community schools and rural fire
service, or need new fire station?
5. A lot of water sits in this area after raining.
6. Much of the Open Space in this is reasonably
connected to stream corridors, but the sections
along 30 and rail are not going to be public OS
and should not be indicated as if they are all the
same.
7. Not enough access across the highway.
8. Would an additional on/off ramp in this
locaion better serve the mixed use/commercial/
high-res spaces?
9. This is the second best option after south
ames proposed development. Easy access to
30 and 35 makes it very attractive. Considerable
traffic and infrastructure issues must be
addressed
Additional Comments for West Concept:
k This area is in heavy use by ISU and will
continue the be used by ISU for traditional
and experimental agricultural research both
plant and animal. ISU already has expressed
interest in several farms which may come on
the market soon. There is limited land with
in Story county available for development
in this area The area south of 30 would be
best left as a buffer between ISU ag uses and
residential areas. Providing city utilities to the
area south of 30 would serve a very limited
number of develop-able acres for the dollars
invested. Most of the develop-able acres are
in United Community school district. Best to
leave this area to ISU future use.
k I would like to see Ames focus more on Urban
High Intensity Mixed-Use Growth as a way
forward toward sustainability.
89 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
k I don’t like the idea of crossing into Boone
county or the pedestrian bridges over
Highway 30. There are also a lot of ISU farms
and land south of 30 and it should remain a
rural area.
k Would like to see on/off ramps at 30th and
State to support population density and
growth closer to the city center if possible.
k I would second the comments about ISU
research farms and operations in this area.
k Most logical choice. Already have lots of
services out that way. Easy connections to 30.
k This comment applies to all the growth
options. Cost estimates for all the growth
areas need to realistically consider the costs
for maintenance of the new proposed open
space areas so those areas will retain their
value for outdoor recreation, water quality,
wildlife, etc. There is a common assumption
that most kinds of infrastructure (streets,
water lines, etc.) will require ongoing funding
for maintenance, but that green space will
somehow take care of itself. Not true.
k It doesn’t seem realistic for Ames to try
to grow into Boone County. It is doubtful
they would be receptive to this idea. All
of the Boone County land is in the United
Community School District. It is time to
recognize that the area south of Ames
is filled with ISU research farms and will
continue to be that way because of the close
proximity to campus. There is not enough
development land in the West that is in Story
County and would not a good area for city
residential dwellings. The idea of walkways
across Highway 30 is not a practical use of
taxpayer funds. The area south of Highway 30
would be better suited for acreages and rural
development as a gateway to the existing
working farms.
k The least costly for infrastructure, reasonable
balance of development types and proximity
to ISU as well as recognizing natural resource
protection as an issue.
k The development in this area south of Hwy
30 is limited by the ISU research Farms and
land owned by ISU. Also the new ISU feed
mill to the south of Hwy 30 will increase semi
traffic and there fan noise. I don’t think any
additional development can be justified
with limitation and cost to run sewer/utilities
under 30.
k Transportation across town is really the major
issue. Most of these proposed developments
benefit from connecting to one of the major
highways. However, the increased population
from the is going to put increased pressure
on arterial streets. Nobody wants the street
they live on to become an arterial street
but they have to be somewhere. Good pre-
planning is the only way around frustration
from homeowners. Going between west
Ames and north Ames is too inefficient
and has too much interface with areas that
people are expecting to be residential.
k The western development is certainly
important to the university, but the city
should only support more growth to the West
morally, not financially.
k Similar to North Ames, it seems like this area
is already growing well as it is. With that said,
there seems to be a need for additional retail
development.
k The far majority if this option is in Boone
County and the United School District.
k Our family has been wanting the land south
of 30 in West Ames to be developed into
Urban Low Intensity lots for years. We’d be
the first to move out there if this happens!
k The east side of Y Ave. from Cameron School
Rd. to L. Way might be a great location for
a good strip of business and retail to service
the west side of Ames along with Boone.
That road is already a main artery and gets
a lot of traffic and has an opportunity for
expansion that could set it up to be some
prime retail space going forward. We need
to take advantage of some of these heavily
traveled existing roads that could be widened
to handle large retail and business as Duff is
completely overloaded and a growing Ames
will need to have business and retail in the
north and west areas too.
k I like this growth scenario. Expanding to the
south of 30 in this area seems like a great area
for new residential area. I’ve read that this
area would have pedestrian bridges across
30, I think that would be a great and unique
feature for this area of development. Also
makes a great connection to the rest of Ames,
that doesn’t necessarily relied on driving.
90 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
NORTH GROWTH AREA COMMENTS
1. North Ames needs more commercial anything,
really.
2. There is currently no Mixed Use and this is the
best type of development for creating walkable,
sustainable neighborhoods. Suburbia has been
shown time and again to have negative social,
economic, and environmental effects.
3. Nice to see the grid coming back, but the lack
of less-expensive housing concerns me. Also this
area far from existing bus routes will need transit
connections.
4. This so-called open space follows the rail and
while it would be nice to think that would lend
itself to public OS, that is not the case.
5. I am concern with the redevelopment plan
being so far away from the main highways. This
will cause more traffic congestion on roads that
are already experience and not equip to handle
such traffic congestion. How will you attract
new businesses to this area with such a low
population that actually serves a purpose in this
area?
6. Like the inclusion of parks and places for
future schools in the plan.
7. If this is north of Bloomington, would this
school be in the Gilbert School District?
8. New on-ramps and road improvements would
need to be made with I-35 to accommodate the
traffic in this area.
9. Substantial improvements needed to allow
pedestrian/bicycle access North/South along
Grand
10. The area north and NW of the PLEX have
serious drainage issues and development
would likely exacerbate these issues into the
surrounding landscape; these areas would be
ideal for re-establishment of prairie and wetland.
11. I appreciate the inclusion of a parkway system
in North Ames - why not include connections to
Ada Hayden and subsequently Grand?
12. Nice plan for the North growth area. Down
side to this area is that it further disconnected
from any arterial streets. Ideally would be
better if the proposed new interchange on I 35
at Riverside Rd materializes as it would allow
the nothern side of Ames better access to the
interstate which would allow more options for
commercial businesses to flourish in the north
as well.
13. This is a fairly busy roadway. Not sure how LI
will work unless there are fairly large setbacks.
Otherwise, a higher density or a mixed use
may be more appropriate here - especially with
it being fairly close to Gilbert and somewhat
remote for amenities readily available from
Ames.
14. No Comment Added
91 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
15. Potential negative impacts on the Ada
Hayden watershed and wetland.
16/17. No Comment Added
18. Will there be any space left to do anything
here, or is this just acknowledging the existing
railroad?
19. How will negative impacts to the wetland be
mitigated?
20. As you round this curve, this is a beautiful use
of the retention pond, with the homes backing
up to the water.
21. NO do not develop this space! Ada Hayden
is some of our precious little green space
remaining. Its peace and tranquility should
be respected. Retail/restaurant would not be
welcome or wanted here in any way. We don’t
want the activity, the fluorescent lights, or more
importantly, any changes to this area. Reject.
Additional Comments for North Concept:
k The original Northridge development (area
of Bayberry Rd and Ridgetop Rd) resulted
in the loss and degradation of rare original
prairie areas and seeps, almost destroyed
a rare Indian burial mound (resulting in a
court case), caused significant erosion issues,
and created challenging expensive drainage
problems that continued for years. Giving
permission for that development on that site
was a mistake on the part of the City. Some
fragile natural areas should not be developed,
no matter how hard some people lobby for
development. I hope the City of Ames has
learned that lesson and will demonstrate that
as this plan moves forward.
I would agree with this. We have a
responsibility to future generations to guard
our natural areas.
k This is sprawl in new urbanist clothing. Focus
on infill.
k Much of this north expansion area isn’t in
the existing Ames School District. It would
be nice to plan for growth in areas that could
also serve as a tax base for our school system
rather than a neighboring community’s.
Agreed. Ames residents, Ames children,
and Ames property taxes should go back to
the city of Ames. Not Gilbert.
k North Ames seems to be growing fine and
the area isn’t low-income. I would like to
see more attention given to areas in town
where families in need are the focus & the
population that would benefit most.
k I don’t think the North area needs to be
developed further. We already have way too
much sprawl in Ames as it is. The demand
for housing is not all in MacMansions to the
North.
k This plan makes Hyde Ave a major
throughway for North Ames (In par with
Grand Ave). It is a residential street and not
designed for this level of traffic!
k A local restaurant, focusing on high quality
foods with local and sustainable ingredients
(suggestion: model after the New Scenic Cafe
north of Duluth, Minnesota) would benefit
our community and be a nice place for active
people to share a meal before or after a stroll
around Ada Hayden. It would also draw more
people north and thus showcase our lovely
heritage park.
k In the last two years we have lived here in
Ames, I have noticed what appears to me
to be a steady increase in vehicle traffic
on that street. I have seen one accident
on Bloomington already. If there is a lot of
additional development on the North side of
town how safe will Bloomington be for the
people who live on either side of the street,
for motorists, for bikers, etc.?
k When will people realize that the loss of so
much quality farmland every year will be a
major problem for future generations. So
much of the new housing in Ames changes
farmland into lawns that require considerable
water, herbicides and mowing. The large
single family houses need a huge amount of
energy to keep the residents comfortable.
100% agree. Our farmland is precious. We
should not treat it as if it were “empty”. The
same goes for our precious natural areas.
k I would like to see Ames focus on Urban-
High Intensity growth as a way forward for
sustainability.
k Our beautiful city should focus on infill,
rather than the interests of the developers
and real estate corporations. For the sake of
sustainability, we should insist that all new
development be completely carbon-neutral.
k North Ames is becoming over developed, and
could stand to be curbed for a bit. Plus, yes,
as another comment points out, the cost to
the environment is not worth it. How many
retirement homes and mega churches can
we deal with?
k The open spaces are what distinguishes
Ames from other large towns. I’m glad
Sqaw Creek has forced Ames to include
92 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
lots of natural areas. When I heard about
the destruction of a burial mound for
development, I was disgusted. Iowa’s native
heritage should be showcased, not bulldozed
over for development.
k The City of Ames has an excellent engineer
who is an experienced water expert, and I
hope her views will carry huge weight when
assessing various development scenarios
and their potential impacts on erosion,
water quality, and flooding. As the City of
Ankeny has been learning the (expensive)
hard way, it’s a lot smarter to plan ahead to
avoid those problems, even if that means
some restrictions on development, than try
to figure out what to do about major soil
and water problems after bad development
decisions have already been made and
implemented.
k Residents living in the North part of Ames
should be in an Ames school district, not
Gilbert. Children and taxes in those areas
should be going to Ames schools, not Gilbert.
k North option is one of the more costly in
terms of required infrastructure and would
have potential for considerable impacts
on local streets (incl. Hyde/Grant) as well as
flooding/water quality in Ada Hayden and So.
Skunk.
k This is all within the Gilbert School district.
How does Gilbert Community Schools view
expansion that will impact their district?
k Too far north. Will require too much
infrastructure improvement.
k Several intersections in this area are being
strained by development that has already
taken place, and the recent traffic study
contains recommendations for improvement.
If further development to the north is to be
considered, there will be a need to re-visit this
study and possibly ramp up the proposed
solutions.
k If growth is going north, there will need to be
better north - south roads and more choices
for retail
k As is easily apparent, growth West of Grand
Avenue is progressing well, but East of Grand
should be considered for new development
similar to the West side.
k The north seems to be growing adequately
as it is albeit with a lack of variety in housing
stock. I think encouraging growth in other
areas would be more appropriate.
k What’s the plan for that gray area west of
GW Carver and north of 190th? The map
shows new roads but not what kind(s) of
development the roads would service.
k I think that 190th would be an ideal location
for expanding business for the north end
of Ames, especially the north side of 190th.
Gilbert is already almost a part of Ames
and the road structure there right now has
the opportunity to be a major artery that
could allow for retail expansion to service
the growing need for retail services in the
northern Ames area.
k Not a bad design for potential growth to
the north. I think ideally growth of the
community in other areas than north should
be encouraged over directly to the north.
93 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
South Growth Area Comments:
1. Any way to get Grand under 30?
2. Leave the tree nursery alone. It adds a lot to
the city just by being what it is
3. No Comment Added.
4. I don’t like the idea of the state nursery being
redeveloped.
5. Extending the shared use path south to the
new road by the new interchange?
6. Shouldn’t be afraid to go closer to Ken Maril
Road.
7. This actually makes more sense in terms
of location and access to both Highway 30
and 35. It needs to create a better sense of
place and connectivity to the rest of the town.
This side feels too disconnected already. Duff
Avenue development sucks. If the corridor is
strengthened and made more welcoming and
attractive, this proposed area could actually
make more sense
8. Why nothing planned for this area directly
south of Ken Maril Rd. Is this where the ISU
research plots are?
9. 24 hr. gas station
10. Really? Going to put an interchange near
junction of So Skunk and what must be a not
insignificant creek coming from the west as well
as about a mile and a half north of the water
treatment plant?
94 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
Additional Comments for South Concept:
k As pointed out by others, there would be
pluses to this option. However, the current
map shows a big new road being built right
through a Story County public park. That
would lower the value of the park for outdoor
recreation as well as wildlife. And Story
County does not have a lot of public parkland.
The State Forest Nursery, in addition, provides
outdoor space and good bird habitat.
Turning it into housing would be another
conservation loss.
Green space needs to be prioritized now
more than ever. Do not sacrifice green space
and important wildlife habitat for human
housing.
k This seems like the best option to serve
households with workers split between Ames
and Ankeny/Des Moines. The access to I-35
would be convenient as well. It would also
benefit the Research Park, particular if a
range of housing options are executed. Much
of the proposed development also appears to
be in the existing Ames School District.
k Traffic is a concern in this area. What would
happen to the nursery?
k Has anyone considered the K-Mart building
for the Healthy Life Center? Excellent parking
there!
k For the most part I really like this plan for
growth to the south of Ames. The new roads
on the map connecting the area to other
roads in Ames make a lot of sense. This would
help ease some of the traffic on S. Duff Ave
and allow some of the people in South Ames
fairly quick access to the interstate. Although
I don’t understand why is a gap on this map
between new proposed areas and Ken Maril
Rd. The state nursery being redeveloped
in this plan seems a shame. Hopefully that
wouldn’t be encouraged unless it the Nursery
permanently closes.
k I would like to see Ames focused on Urban
High Intensity Mixed-Use as a way forward
toward sustainability.
k I would like to see Ames focused on Urban
High Intensity Mixed-Use as a way forward
toward sustainability.
k There are several positives for the South area,
including the possibility of future easy access
to I-35 and better access for commuters
to Ankeny and DesMoines. The South Duff
fire station is already in place to service this
area. Another plus is the fact that most of
the land is in the Ames School District and
there appear to be many acres of cropland
in the area and not so many working farms.
It seems there would be more potential for
growth over time.
k I feel that south is the best option because
so many people commute from Des Moines/
Ankeny for work. However, I would be
concerned with more traffic needs being
placed on S. Duff.
k The commercial development happening
around I35 and Hwy 30 needs residential
and community retail to support it, and to
keep it expanding. This is a needed area of
development to provide a beautiful new
entrance to our city from the South.
k This looks like a great option that could give
another access point to I35 and solve some
traffic congestion on Duff.
k Something needs to be done with the old
Kmart building! I could see a roller rink going
in if it’s not going to be a store.
k A housing development under Ames Airport
traffic seems ill advised.
k Too small an area and high density for most
people.
k This could work well with the growth of
Huxley and Ankeny.
95 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE
96 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
97 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
98 A M E S C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N
1
ITEM: __38__
Staff Report
PARKING METER WAIVERS
August 13, 2019
BACKGROUND:
At the May 14, 2019, City Council Meeting, Council directed staff to place on a future
agenda a discussion regarding parking meter waiver policy and to investigate what other
communities are doing with respect to this issue.
CURRENT POLICY AND PRACTICE
Typically, closure of metered parking spaces requires the user to reimburse the City for
lost parking meter revenue. It is important to note that the Parking Fund receives revenues
from two primary sources: 1) Parking fees, collected mainly at the meters, and 2) citations
for illegal and overtime parking. When an event is held that prevents the payment of fees
into the meters, the costs to maintain the meter system still exists. Therefore, event
organizers are typically asked to reimburse the fund for the lost revenue so the parking
system can be maintained.
The City Council receives formal written requests for parking meter fee waiver when a
special event comes before the City Council for approval. The Council may or may not
grant a waiver depending on the circumstances of the event. City staff has historically
recommended approval of parking waivers if the Council has approved waiving
fees in the past to the same extent for the same event. City staff generally does not
recommend waiving parking fees for a for-profit event. The vast majority of
requests and the largest dollar amount of waivers granted have come from
organizations that hold district-wide events (Ames Main Street and Campustown
Action Association).
The Municipal Code empowers the City Council to suspend parking regulations in two
separate locations:
1)Section 18.24 empowers the City Council to suspend parking restrictions or
regulations for the purpose of accommodating the parking needs associated with
a special public or private event or occurrence for a period not to exceed 72 hours
2)Section 18.32 empowers the City Council to grant specific exceptions to parking
regulations for a period not to exceed 30 days to encourage or accommodate an
event or activity that is reasonably deemed by the Council to be a significant
contribution to the economic or cultural enhancement of the community of Ames;
provided, however, that the Council may stipulate, for any such special exception,
OLD CAF
such conditions and terms as it reasonably deems necessary to mitigate or prevent
financial cost or loss to the City, and to protect the public welfare, safety and
convenience.
A summary of the number of waivers the City Council has granted from Calendar Year
2016 to Calendar Year 2019, along with the estimated number of meter hours suspended
and the corresponding amount lost to the Parking Fund, is contained in Table 1 below.
Table 1
Date # Of Events
Requesting
Parking
Meter Fee
Waiver
Events held
by
Ames Main
Street or
Campustown
Meter Fee
Waiver
Granted
Hours
Suspended
to the Parking
Fund
Calendar Year 20161
2
3
9 7 9* 40,857 $ 12,005.00
1 January Dollar Days was not held in 2016. Assuming all the meters were fed, the City saved $3,223 in 2016 in
comparison to 2017.
2 Some events had expanded or had reduced their days, hours, and/or event location. Farmers’ market, for example,
extended its days of operation from 24 days in 2016 to 26 days in 2017.
3 AMS requested that only one day be waived for Snow Magic in 2018. In previous years, they had requested a waiver
for 7 days. The City saved $7,813 (assuming all the meters were fed) in 2018 in comparison to 2017.
4 Except for two events, beginning in January 2019, the amount lost to the parking fund has been calculated under the
new rate (50 cents/ hour) assuming 50% of the meters were fed. It should be noted that City staff anticipates 9 events
totaling $2,953.50 of additional lost meter revenue (if approved) during the remainder of this calendar year.
* This includes the request from Ames Pride for Pridefest. Although it is indicated the request was granted, the City
Council reduced the number of meters to be waived from 613, as requested by the organizers, to 75.
It should be noted that a request from Iowa Workforce Development was received in the
September 11, 2018 Council packets to waive fees for 100 meters adjacent to the Library
for an employment event. The City Council did not refer the item for further consideration.
This request is not included in the table above.
The figures in Table 1 do not include events where the organizers elected not to request
a waiver of parking fees. The special events application intentionally does not include
space for a request of waivers for parking, electric, or permitting fees. Instead, City staff
directs organizers that, if they wish to request a waiver, they should draft a letter to the
City Council, which is included with the application materials.
In FY 2017/18, the Parking Operations Fund showed total revenues of $833,974. Using
the calendar year data, City staff estimates an average amount of lost parking meter
revenue during that period to be $12,871 per year, which is approximately 1.5% of total
Fund revenues.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES IN OTHER COMMUNITIES
City staff contacted fourteen other communities (10 in Iowa, 4 in other states) to learn
about their policies and practices regarding waiving parking meter fees. A summary of the
responses received is below (Table 2).
Table 2
Council Bluffs Under the Municipal Code, fees may be waived by the Mayor or by
resolution of the City Council if it is determined to be in the best
interests of the City of Council Bluffs.
occasionally waives parking meter f
Downtown.
for a reduced amount for special events. Special events will be
charged $4/meter/day Monday -
application, and $2 meter hooding fee if the event is on a Saturday,
Sunday or holiday. The difference is the meter rate; all other special
applicable meter rate (varies $0.25 to $1.25/hr) x 12 hours for each
day Monday – Saturday.
special events.
meter).
meters for $6 per day per parking meter.
it is currently, it was handled on a case-by-case basis.
West Des
Moines
No parking meters
Urbandale No parking meters
Waterloo Parking services are contracted out (ParkWaterloo). Occasionally
receive requests to waive fees, but most organizers are willing to pay
the fee. Offers meter hood rentals
ever waive fees for special events. Only waived fees for meter
hooding or placarding in the downtown area for
projects or other projects initiated by the City of Cedar Rapids. All
meter / day) and placard for e
parades, food trucks ($2.00 / meter limit 2-4 hours) where meters are
limited only for a period throughout the day.
event meets our Meter Bag Issuing Guidelines and is organized by a
non-
component, the DDA (Downtown Development Authority) may
choose to waive the associated meter bag fees.
events, including parking charges. One of the issues they are going
to try to address is how to more consistently handle parking charges
when events close a street that has parking meters.
There is a section (e) of the current ordinance that allows for waiver
of the fees, but it is somewhat vague:
(e)"The city manager shall have the authority to issue parking hoods
to not-for-profit organizations, without charge, when the city manager
determines that waiver of the rental fee is in the public interest and
that doing so would contribute to the public awareness of, accessibility
to, participation in, and support for the artistic, cultural or charitable
development in the city and is not primarily in the commercial interest
sidewalk, or traffic lane closures. We do have fees associated with
these permits, though they are sometimes waived when the event is
sponsored by the City of Corvallis.
OPTIONS:
1. Continue to handle requests for meter waivers on a case-by-case basis.
2. Adopt a policy to charge for all parking meters used for special events.
If this option is selected, the Council should provide clarification to staff whether
waivers can be requested from the City Council for other special event fees, such
as the cost for Road Race Permits, Vending Licenses, or electricity costs.
3. Adopt a policy to charge reduced or no parking fees for special events.
If the option to charge a reduced rate is selected, Council would need to decide the
percentage to reduce the rate by. Council should note that staff’s calculation of lost
revenue to the Parking Fund for special events assumes the meters will be
occupied only 50% of the time. Therefore, if an applicant was charged for meter
closures, the charges would already be reduced from the maximum possible
revenue loss.
4. Charge all applicable fees for special events, but provide additional funding
through the Outside Funding Request Process for organizations that wish
to reduce their costs to host events.
Currently, the City is providing revenues for several organizations to host public
events, then later reducing their expenses for the same events in the form of
parking meter waivers. Charging the full fees for parking meter closures, but
providing additional funds for agencies that host events would simply shift City
funding from one source to another.
Item No. 32
Staff Report
RENAMING OF SQUAW CREEK
January 28, 2020
BACKGROUND:
In response to an Ames resident who initiated a request to change the name of Squaw
Creek, the United States Board of Geographic Names (BGN) contacted the Ames City
Council requesting feedback.
On November 26, 2019, the City Council expressed a desire to support a name change
from Squaw Creek with the understanding that it not be renamed Story Creek. Rather,
there appears to be support for an alternative with Native American (NA) heritage "roots".
In addition, The City Council directed the Mayor to work with Story County Board of
Supervisors to recommend some names for Squaw Creek, and return to the Council with
options from which to select.
While the Mayor and Supervisor Murken were in discussions regarding this issue,
Dr. Reg Stewart emailed the Mayor to recommend that he contact Dr. Sebastian Braun,
an ISU faculty member who is an expert in Native American history. As a result, Dr. Braun
provided the attached information suggesting two names - Ioway or Sauk, both Native
American tribes that lived in this geographic area. He ultimately “recommended" Sauk for
reasons indicated in his email.
At the same time, Supervisor Murken reached out to the Hamilton County Board of
Supervisors to determine their position on this issue. She found from her conversations
that the Hamilton County Board of Supervisors and several townships trustee boards
(presumably through which Squaw Creek flows) do not support changing the name of
Squaw Creek. Furthermore, a number of their local residents have voiced objections to
renaming the creek. Apparently, the Hamilton County Board of Supervisors have not
received any communications supporting the name change. Supervisor Murken was
informed that the Hamilton County Board of Supervisors will not take an official position
regarding the name change. (See attached email from BGN which references and
includes email from Hamilton County.)
The Story County Board of Supervisors voted earlier this month to recommend
changing the name of Squaw Creek to either their first choice of Ioway Creek or to
their second choice, Sauk Creek. The Board of Geographic Names responded by
explaining that they will only accept their first name choice, Ioway Creek. (See email
relative to this communication.)
OPTIONS:
Option 1 - No name change - leave as Squaw Creek
Option 2 - Change name to Story Creek (resident recommended name)
Option 3 - Suggest a different name (Ioway, Sauk, or ?)
Option 4 - Defer making any recommendation at this time.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The Board of Geographic Names is now looking to the City of Ames for feedback. It is
important to note that the City Council does not have to agree with the recommendation
of the Story County Board of Supervisors. In addition, the City is only making a
recommendation which will be considered along with other feedback before the Board of
Geographic Names makes the final decision regarding a name change.
Assuming the City Council remains in support of changing the name of Squaw
Creek, it seems appropriate to follow Dr. Braun’s guidance to change the name to
Sauk Creek based on his expertise and well-reasoned recommendation.
.
From: "O'Donnell, Matthew (Contractor) J" <mjodonnell@contractor.usgs.gov>
Date: Wednesday, January 08, 2020 09:29AM
Subject: Re: Renaming Squaw Creek in Central Iowa
History:This message has been replied to.
Dear Ms. Murken,
Happy New Year! And thank you for sending the Supervisors' recommenda on about the proposal to change
the name of Squaw Creek to Story Creek. Were both of these names (Ioway Creek and Sauk Creek) agreed to
by the other jurisdic ons or is this only the recommenda on of the Story County Supervisors?
The BGN will only accept one proposed name for a feature from any single interested party. If acceptable to
the Supervisors, we will take the first op on of Ioway Creek only. We are about to post our quarterly review
list this week and I'd like to include your counter proposal for Ioway Creek on it so the review process can
keep moving. Could you conform by tomorrow or Friday if Ioway Creek is the preferred proposed name from
Story County and if that name is agreed to by the City of Ames, Hamilton County, and Boone County?
Sincerely,
Ma O'Donnell
Ma O'Donnell | Xcellent Technology Solu ons, Inc.
Contractor in support of U.S. Board on Geographic Names | Domes c Names Commi ee
Phone: 703-648-4553
Email: mjodonnell@contractor.usgs.gov
Room 2B101
From: Linda S. Murken <LMurken@storycountyiowa.gov>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2019 7:48 AM
To: O'Donnell, Ma hew (Contractor) J <mjodonnell@contractor.usgs.gov>
Cc: Lauris A. Olson <LOlson@storycountyiowa.gov>; Lisa K. Heddens <LHeddens@storycountyiowa.gov>; John Haila
<jhaila@city.ames.ia.us>; Tom Hacke <thacke afd@gmail.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Renaming Squaw Creek in Central Iowa
Hello, Ma hew,
The Story County (Iowa) board of supervisors is con nuing to receive input from residents and tribal
communi es regarding the proposed renaming. We are also a emp ng to coordinate with the city of Ames,
Boone and Hamilton Coun es, and Franklin Township. Due to the upcoming holidays and other ma ers, we
have had to postpone making a final determina on on our recommenda on un l January 7, 2020. We hope
you will s ll be able to accept our recommenda on then.
Thank you for all the informa on and assistance you have given us.
Linda
Linda Murken
Chair, Story County Supervisors
515/382-7202
From: "O'Donnell, Matthew (Contractor) J" <mjodonnell@contractor.usgs.gov>
Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 09:58AM
Subject: Fw: [EXTERNAL] SQUAW CREEK RESPONSE FROM HAMILTON COUNTY
Dear Ms. Murken and Mr. Haila,
Forwarded here is the response from Hamilton County Supervisor Rick Young. There is no support for
changing the name of Squaw Creek to Story Creek. It is unclear if there would be any support for changing
the name at all.
I'm wai ng to see if there are any other counter proposals before reaching back out to the county
governments (including Boone County, which has not responded at all). The BGN tries to avoid situa ons
where there is local disagreement, but that does happen some mes. But BGN members dislike being forced
to make a decision where both op ons would go against strong local opinion. Is there a way that you could
include Hamilton County and Boone County in your discussions or work to find an op on that everyone
might accept?
I'll con nue to keep you informed about any other developments about the proposed name change.
Sincerely,
Ma O'Donnell
Ma O'Donnell | Xcellent Technology Solu ons, Inc.
Contractor in support of U.S. Board on Geographic Names | Domes c Names Commi ee
Phone: 703-648-4553
Email: mjodonnell@contractor.usgs.gov
Room 2B101
From: Rick Young <youngrick1@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 11:49 AM
To: O'Donnell, Ma hew (Contractor) J <mjodonnell@contractor.usgs.gov>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] SQUAW CREEK RESPONSE FROM HAMILTON COUNTY
Hi Matt,
Here is where we are.
As Hamilton County Supervisor serving the Squaw Creek watershed I have sought and
received the following input.
All of the following have voiced opinion against the name change.
- Rick Young, Hamilton County Supervisor District 3
*Hamilton Township Trustees in the Squaw Creek watershed
- Steven Carlson
- Deb Bockwoldt
- Mark Bockwoldt
- Duane Hendrickson Clerk
* Clear Lake Township Trustees in the Squaw Creek watershed
- Marvin Ness
- Richard Heeren
- Carlton Ness
- Staci Olthoff Clerk
* Marion Township Trustees in the Squaw Creek watershed
- Terrianne Larson
- Erik Wibholm
- Brad Westrum
- Larry Runyan Clerk
* Webster Township Trustees in the Squaw Creek watershed
- Jenny Roe
- Davis Eide
- Carrie Eide
- Dawn Kesler Clerk
* The following Hamilton County residents are also against the name change.
- Leland Carlson
- Dan Sonksen
- John Heeren
- Jay Heeren
- Lynn Arnold
- Lee Carlson
- Marylin Carlson
- Lance Hammen
- Paul Olson
- Junior Ubben
* I received no correspondence in favor of changing the name
* Hamilton County Supervisors will not issue a statement on behalf of the Board.
RICK YOUNG
District 3
Hamilton County Supervisor
515-460-0952
From: "Braun, Sebastian F [WLC]" <sfbraun@iastate.edu>
Date: Tuesday, December 03, 2019 07:52AM
Subject: Re: Connection
History:This message has been forwarded.
Dear Mayor Haila,
Thank you for this background on the issue.
I can just give you some thoughts from my perspective.
Central Iowa was indeed home to the Ioway or Iowa tribe from their origins as a known nation to about
1800. After that, the Sauk and the Meskwaki came to occupy this land. The Ioway, once a very strong
nation, had suffered from epidemics and wars, and the Sauk and Meskwaki pushed them to the
southwest, into northwestern Missouri. They then sold central Iowa to the United States in the treaty of
1842. Those, then, are the three tribes most appropriate to lend a name to anything in central Iowa.
Before the Ioway became their own nation, they were part of a prehistoric culture in this area usually
called the Oneota - the Ioway, the Oto, the Missouria, the Omaha, and the Winnebago or HoChunk all are
thought to have descended from these Oneota people (although we do not know what they called
themselves, if anything).
Your question on honoring and respectful is a very good one, and unfortunately a very complex question
- I used to work at the University of North Dakota for eleven years, and dealt with their nickname (the
Fighting Sioux), which the university, the state, and the city all insisted was meant to honor the
Dakota/Lakota, and many Native people insisted was an insult. In those conflicts, nobody wins, because
honoring and showing respect depends on all involved feeling that way. In my experience, it is a function
not so much of the intent of the name givers, but a function of continued relations. I think the current
name, Squaw Creek, is a good example. The term has become to be seen as an insult only over the past
forty or fifty years; I am sure it was not meant as such when the creek was named, and most people
using the name do not mean it as an insult, yet for some now, that is what it signifies... I think any name
can be honoring and respectful, but more important than the name is the inclusion and continued good
relations between people. I think the city of Ames, especially with the university, has good opportunities
for that, and perhaps the renaming is one event that can start such relations with the tribes.
If I followed Linda Murken's participation in the City Council meeting, she did contact the THPOs (Tribal
Historic Preservation Officers), and those are the people who should be consulted. I have good relations
with Lance Foster of the Ioway Tribne of Kansas and Nebraska and with Johnathan Buffalo of the
Meskwaki Nation, and there are others - at some point, I think they should be included, but as you saw, I
do not necessarily think that it is fruitful avenue to find a name. I think more that once a name is found,
they should be consulted and given the opportunity to speak to that name. I can also run something by
them informally to get some input, if you wish, before the different councils involved make a decision.
As for names - I think you are right, Inage would be mispronounced very quickly (and simply the spelling
is already an issue), and most people would not know what it means - if people do not know what a
name means, it is not honoring the people it is meant to honor. The Ioway already have a river named
after them (and a state), although most people do not realize that this is so. The Meskwaki are on most
people's mind because of the Settlement. Also, I think sometimes by choosing between the two more
prominent names, one is always seen as put aside.
Honestly, also taking into account the current name, I would propose to rename Squaw Creek into Sauk
Creek. It would avoid any competition between Iowa and Meskwaki, it would honor a nation that lived
here but is often forgotten, and it is close enough to the old name in sound. There is Sac City and Sac
County, but those are spelled differently, so that confusion would be avoided.
Whatever name is chosen, I hope that the city, the county, and the university can take the opportunity to
turn an eventual renaming event into an opportunity to bolster good relations with the tribes (especially
the different Ioway, Sauk, and Meskwaki tribes) - there used to be a village in what is today Moore
Memorial Park / Northridge if I am not mistaken, and while I would need to have a refresher on
affiliation, because of its closeness to the creek this could be something of an angle to invite people
here, to educate the public, and so on.
I hope all of this makes sense and perhaps helps. Renaming is always a difficult decision, because
whatever name is chosen, there will be people who disagree.
If you have more or other questions, or you would like to discuss in eprson, please do not hesitate to call
on me.
Sincerely,
Sebastian
-------------------------------------
Dr. Sebas an Braun
Director, American Indian Studies
Iowa State University
(515) 294-9021
"Somos dis ntos. Somos iguales." - Celtas Cortos
From: John Haila <jhaila@city.ames.ia.us>
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2019 5:21 PM
To: Braun, Sebas an F [WLC] <s raun@iastate.edu>
Cc: Stewart, Reginald C [VPDI] <rstewart@iastate.edu>; Linda S. Murken <LMurken@storycountyiowa.gov>
Subject: Re: Connec on
Dr. Braun,
Thank you for your willingness to be of assistance.
Not sure if you are aware of the back story on this name change. This has been initiated by a private local individual, via
the federal government (USGS) who in turn has asked local entities to weigh in on changing the name of Squaw Creek.
The individual/USGS suggested Story Creek after the man who Story County is named after.
Our City Council (as well as the Story County Board of Supervisors) supports renaming Squaw Creek, and prefer that a
suggested name honor Native Americans that lived here previously (they do not support remaining it Story Creek). We
have heard that the Ioway Native American tribe lived in the Ames/Story County/Hamilton County/Boone County area, so
one option might be Ioway Creek.
Another is to use a Native American name for woman - we have learned from a tribal representative that Hinage (ee-NAH-
jay, means woman in Ioway tribe’s language) might be used. Our only concern is it being mispronounced, thus dishonoring the new
name.
Other renaming op ons include:
Meskwaki
Li le Deer
So we would respec ully ask the following:
1. Would any of the above be appropriate, honoring and respec ul?
2. Do you have any other name sugges ons that we might consider, including local tribes who lived in this vicinity?
3. Are there any tribal representa ves we should contact and ask for their input? Linda Murken, Chair of the Story County Board of
Supervisors, sent out emails to 60 tribe contacts she was given and heard back from about 20 of them. All supported renaming the
Creek, but there were limited name sugges ons to use, or they deferred to others.
I am tasked by Council with working with Supervisor Murken and returning to council with 2-4 name op ons to consider. These in
turn will be forwarded to USGS with an ordered priority and defer to them to select the final name.
Please feel free to call me if you would prefer to discuss this by phone. I can be reached at 515-290-5436.
With apprecia on,
John A. Haila
Mayor
515.239.5105 main
jhaila@city.ames.ia.us| City Hall, 515 Clark Avenue | Ames, IA 50010
www.CityofAmes.org | ~ Caring People ~ Quality Programs ~ Excep onal Service ~
From: "Braun, Sebastian F [WLC]" <sfbraun@iastate.edu>
To: "Stewart, Reginald C [VPDI]" <rstewart@iastate.edu>, "John Haila" <jhaila@city.ames.ia.us>
Date: 12/01/2019 04:04 PM
Subject: Re: Connection
Dear Mayor Haila,
I wanted to thank Dr. Stewart for the introduction, and just say that if you need any input from me,
please do not hesitate to ask.
I have deliberatly stayed out of the public discussion on Squaw Creek, but if you or the Council would like
to have any information on histories or cultures, feel free to contact me. I can always make time.
Sincerely,
Sebastian
-------------------------------------
Dr. Sebas an Braun
Director, American Indian Studies
Iowa State University
(515) 294-9021
"Somos dis ntos. Somos iguales." - Celtas Cortos
From: Stewart, Reginald C [VPDI] <rstewart@iastate.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 6:19 PM
To: John Haila <jhaila@city.ames.ia.us>; Braun, Sebas an F [WLC] <s raun@iastate.edu>
Cc: Stewart, Reginald C [VPDI] <rstewart@iastate.edu>
Subject: Connec on
Mayor Haila, allow me to introduce you to my colleague Dr. Sebastian Braun. He has
been a valuable resource to me on a number of occasions and holds expertise related
to American Indian history and socio-cultural experiences.
Given the Council’s discussion on the renaming of Squaw Creek, I believe we are
fortunate to have a local scholar who can lend expert opinion.
Let me know if I can be of further assistance, otherwise I will step out and let the two
of you facilitate a conversation.
Respectfully,
Reg
Sent from Dr. Stewart's iPhone
Attachments:
ATT00001.gif
ITEM # 33
DATE: 1-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON THE AMENDMENT TO 2019-20 ANNUAL
ACTION PLAN PROJECTS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM (CDBG).
BACKGROUND:
At the December 17, 2020 meeting, City Council directed staff to prepare a substantial
amendment to the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan to reallocate $400,000 from the
Acquisition/Reuse for Affordable Housing activity to a Public Improvement
Acquisition/Reuse activity. This activity will support the installation of a Shared Use
Path from Franklin Park to S. Wilmoth and would be part of additional
improvements being planned in the area by both Public Works and Parks and
Recreation. Public Works will be installing a bike path to the west side of Franklin
Park from Beedle Drive and Parks and Recreation will be installing additional
recreational features in Franklin Park.
CDBG funds for this Shared Use Path project will involve the acquisition and
demolition of a two-story single-family rental on S. Franklin. The house is located
in the pathway where the bike path would need to be installed to connect directly
to other segments. The single-family unit is currently being rented; therefore, pursuing
this project would also involve the relocation of occupants at a future date.
As outlined at the December 17, 2019 meeting, in order to pursue this new project
activity, the current Annual Action Plan would need to be amended. The current
2019-20 Program year projects, listed in Attachment 1, were submitted and approved by
the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and are ready for
implementation for both the CDBG and HOME programs. Attachment 2 depicts the
planned Shared Use Path facility and Attachment 3 is a concept plan for Franklin Park.
An amendment the Action Plan requires a 30-day comment period for the public and a
public hearing at City Council before it can be submitted as an additional activity to the
Field Office. The 30-day substantial amendment to the Action Plan comment period
was from December 18, 2019 through January 19, 2020. No comments were received
during this time.
Attachment 1 also shows the proposed amended program budget for 2019-20 Action Plan
program activities. The activities being recommended are the same as in the adopted
Action Plan; however, the budget for the Shared Use Path activity is being substituted for
the Acquisition/Reuse for Affordable Housing activity. The overall budget has been
adjusted down due to the reduction in the amount of “roll over” funds available.
Staff’s rationale for adding the Bike Path as new project activity is as follows:
• The proposed project is located in the City’s approved Neighborhood Revitalization
Strategy Area (NRSA) and therefore is consistent with the goals and priorities in
our 2019-23 Consolidated Plan to positively benefit low-income residents in the
area.
• This activity will enhance improvements to the area along with current the mixed-
income subdivision development of the 321 State Avenue parcel, and the
acquisition of Franklin Park.
• The activity will continue to meets the City Council’s goals of strengthening our
neighborhoods.
• Continues the investment of improving both the housing stock and the
infrastructure needs vital core neighborhoods.
• The proposed project would result in the City’s ability to meet HUD’s 2019-20
timely expenditure requirements.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt a resolution approving the submittal of a substantial amendment to the
2019-20 CDBG Annual Action Plan to reallocate funds ($400,000) from the
Acquisition/Reuse for Affordable Housing activity to a Public Improvement activity
to install a Shared Use Path from Franklin Park to S. Wilmoth.
2. Adopt a resolution approving the submittal of a substantial amendment to the
2019-20 CDBG Annual Action to reallocate funds ($400,000) from the
Acquisition/Reuse for Affordable Housing activity to a Public Improvement activity
to install a Shared Use Path from Franklin Park to S. Wilmoth with modifications.
3. Do not amend the 2019-20 CDBG Annual Action, and refer this item back to staff
for further information.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The addition of the recommended Shared Use Path activity is part of a larger
enhancement to the neighborhood, which will eventually connect with the Shared Use
Path that will be installed as part of the development of the 321 State Avenue parcel. The
acquisition of the property would assist in meeting the City’s timeliness test for the 2019-
20 fiscal year. This action does not affect the budget and activity adopted for the
HOME funds. Allocating funding to acquire the home site now does not affect the
necessary funding for the 321 State Avenue project.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative #1, as described above.
ATTACHMENT 1
Submitted 2019-20 Action Plan Expenditure Budget: PROPOSED AMENDED 2019-20 Action Plan Expenditure Budget:
Programs Budget Programs Budget
Acquisition/ Reuse Program for Affordable Housing $400,000
Homebuyer Assistance Program $300,813 Acquisition/Reuse Program for Affordable Housing $10,000
Homebuyer Assistance Program $300,813
Public Infrastructure Improvements Program for
State Avenue NRSA (including Engineering costs) $889,000
Public Infrastructure Improvements Program for
State Avenue NRSA (including Engineering costs+ $763,745
General Administration for CDBG & HOME General Administration for CDBG & HOME
Total $2,755,635
Total
$2,696,792
Current 2019-20 Action Plan Revenue Budget: PROPOSED AMENDED 2019-20 Action Plan Revenue Budget:
Grand Total CDBG & HOME $2,755,635 Grand Total CDBG & HOME $2,696,792
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 3
ITEM #: 34
DATE: 01-28-20
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: REZONE TWO TRACTS AT 2800 E. 13th STREET FROM “A”
(AGRICULTURAL) TO “GI” (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) ZONING
DISTRICT
BACKGROUND:
This is a request to rezone property at 2800 E. 13th Street from Agricultural to General
Industrial. The subject properties consist of two tracts equaling 2.95 acres. In 2004, at the
time of annexation, the subject property was assigned an “A” Agricultural zoning
classification. The properties have retained the “A” zoning since that time.
When the properties were purchased by the current owner, they were two separate
parcels; however recently, the two parcels have been combined with the larger original
parcel into a single 56-acre parcel. The original parcel area of the site is zoned “GI”
General Industrial. Combining the parcels did not change the zoning designation of the
two smaller parcels per the Zoning Ordinance regulations and are currently still ”A.”
Rezoning these former parcels (now described below as "tracts") to “GI” General
Industrial will provide one consistent zone for the entire property and will allow
their use as part of the larger Danfoss manufacturing facility. A map illustrating the
zoning of the subject property and adjacent properties is included as Attachment A.
The LUPP Future Land Use Map designates the subject property, and the surrounding
properties, as “General Industrial”. See Attachment B. Rezoning of the subject property
to “GI” (General Industrial) is compliant with the LUPP.
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this request on January 15, 2020 and
voted 7-0 to recommend the City Council change the zoning for the property at 2800 E.
13th Street to “GI” General Industrial.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve on first reading the request to rezone the two tracts totaling 2.95 acres
located at 2800 E. 13th Street from “A” Agricultural to “GI” General Industrial.
2. Deny the request to rezone the two tracts totaling 2.95 acres located at 2800 E.
13th Street from “A” Agricultural to “GI” General Industrial.
3. Defer action on this request and refer it back to City staff and/or the applicant for
additional information.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The request for rezoning is consistent with the Land Use Policy Plan Future Land Use
Map as described in the addendum. Impacts on infrastructure and City services for this
parcel are consistent with what has previously been developed in this location and what
may be anticipated for redevelopment.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council adopt
Alternative #1, which is to approve the request to rezone two separate tracts totaling
2.95 acres located at 2800 E. 13th Street from “A” Agricultural to “GI” General
Industrial.
ADDENDUM
REZONING BACKGROUND:
The Danfoss Manufacturing Facility, a heavy manufacturing facility, developed at this
location in 1971, under the “I-1” zoning that was in place at the time. The area was
annexed in 1967 and at the time was the northeastern edge of the City.
Subsequently, properties to the north and east were annexed. However, the two subject
properties remained in the County until 2004, when they were brought into the City along
with the larger “mall property” located northeast of E. 13th and I-35. At the time of
annexation, all of the annexed properties were assigned an “A” Agricultural zoning. The
two subject properties have remained with an “A” Agricultural zoning since that time.
When the current owner acquired the properties, they were separate parcels. They
remained so until just recently when the two parcels were combined with the larger
Danfoss "parent parcel" creating one 56-acre parcel. This entire area of the City, which
includes lands to the south and east has been designated “GI” General Industrial, since
2000, when the “GI” zoning district was implemented.
Immediately to the east is the I-35 corridor with “PRC” zoning beyond. To the north, a
strip of “HOC” zoning occurs along E. 13th Street with “S-GA” zoning beyond. South and
west of the subject properties is a large area zoned “GI.” The subject properties are the
only remaining “A” Agricultural zoned property in this area.
Land Use Policy Plan Future Land Use Map. The Land Use Policy Plan (LUPP) Future
Land Use Map designates this area as “General Industrial.” See Attachment B.
The LUPP text indicates, “An expansion area adjacent to the City’s current industrial area
is recommended for General Industrial.” The subject properties although limited in
acreage, would be considered an expansion area for the existing “GI” General Industrial
zoning district.
Proposed Zoning. The subject properties are currently undeveloped. A request to “GI”
(General Industrial) is consistent with the use of the “parent parcel.” Rezoning is not
mandatory to continue the site’s existing use; however, rezoning the property to “GI”
(General Industrial) would allow the full use of the subject properties without limitations of
a nonconforming designation.
Existing Uses of Land. Land uses that occupy the subject property and other
surrounding properties are described in the following table:
Direction from Subject Property Existing Land Uses
South Heavy Manufacturing
West Strip Commercial
Infrastructure
Impacts on infrastructure and City services for this parcel are consistent with what is
already anticipated for the Danfoss property, should redevelopment occur.
Findings of Fact. Based upon an analysis of the proposed rezoning and laws pertinent
to the proposed map amendment, staff makes the following findings of fact:
1. The subject property is owned by SUSA Holding of Story County Inc. dba Danfoss.
The rezoning request and statement of justification is included as Attachment C.
2. Ames Municipal Code Section 29.1507(1) allows the property owner to initiate an
amendment to the Official Zoning Map.
3. The subject properties are consistent with the designation of “General Industrial”
identified on the Land Use Policy Plan (LUPP) Future Land Use Map.
4. Development in the GI zoning district requires a site plan review process to assure
that such development and intensity of use assures a safe, functional, efficient, and
environmentally sound operation.
5. Impacts on infrastructure and City services for this parcel is consistent with what is
already anticipated for the existing Danfoss development and the “GI” General
Industrial area.
Public Notice. The City provided mailed notice to all property owners within 200 feet of
the subject property in accordance with the notification requirements of Chapter 29.
ATTACHMENT A
Location & Zoning Map
ATTACHMENT B
LUPP Land Use Map
ATTACHMENT CApplicant’s Statement