HomeMy WebLinkAbout~Master - December 21, 2021, Special Meeting of the Ames City CouncilAGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE AMES CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS - CITY HALL
515 CLARK AVENUE
DECEMBER 21, 2021
CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m.
CONSENT:
1. Resolution approving Restrictive Covenants and Regulations for Single-Family Homes in
Baker Subdivision (321 State)
ORDINANCES:
2. Ordinance adopting map establishing new wards and precincts:
a. First passage of Ordinance (second and third readings and adoption requested)
b. Resolution approving Memorandum of Agreement between the City and Story County
regarding federal census block information
WORKSHOP ON CLIMATE ACTION PLAN:
DISPOSITION OF COMMUNICATIONS TO COUNCIL:
COUNCIL COMMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT:
Please note that this agenda may be changed up to 24 hours before the meeting time as
provided by Section 21.4(2), Code of Iowa.
ITEM #___1___
DATE:12-21-21
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: MODIFIED RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND REGULATIONS FOR
BAKER SUBDIVISION SINGLE FAMILY HOMES (321 STATE AVENUE)
BACKGROUND:
The City owns a 10.86-acre site located at 321 State Avenue known as the Baker
Subdivision. This property is being developed to support the affordable housing goals of
the City as a mixed income development with a minimum of 51% of the homes affordable
to low- and moderate-income households.
The final plat for the subdivision (Attachment A) includes the development of 27 lots and
was adopted at the May 26, 2020, City Council meeting. Of the 27 lots, 26 are for the
construction of single-family homes. At the August 25, 2020, City Council meeting, the
City Council awarded a contract for the installation of the public improvements to Con-
Struct of Ames. Project improvements began in late September 2020 and to date
approximately 90% percent of the project has completed (including the geothermal wells).
The next step before lots and construction of homes should begin is the adoption of
Restrictive Covenants and Regulations for the 26 single-family lots (Attachment B). In
working with the Legal staff, the proposed covenants address both the initial construction
of homes on the affordable and market rate single-family lots and ongoing requirements.
Many of the terms are based upon common language seen within market rate subdivision
covenants across Ames.
Approval of the covenants will allow for staff to proceed with construction of housing and
the sale of lots. Some highlights of the covenants are:
1. The following lots are designated as Affordable Housing: Lots 1 through 8, 10-13,
15, 24, and 25.
2. The following lots are designated as Market Rate Housing: Lots 9,14, 16 through
23 and 26.
3. All lots are residential, and shall not be improved, used, or occupied for other than
single-family residential purposes, this includes a prohibition against rental of
homes.
4. Timeframe of 18 months to start and complete the construction of homes upon
deed conveyance.
5. Affordable housing developer minimum experience of constructing 3 homes within
the past 7 years.
6. Market rate housing developer minimum experience of constructing 3 homes
within 3 years of the past 5 years.
7. Minimum size for affordable housing homes for a one-story is 1,100 sq. ft. and 1-
1/2 story, two story and split/bi-level is 1,150 sq. ft.
8. Minimum size for market rate housing homes for a one-story is 1,200 sq. ft. and 1-
1/2 story, two story and split/bi-level is 1,250 sq. ft.
9. All homes are required to have at least one garage parking space and a basement.
Lot 27, which is planned for future Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) multi-family
buildings, is not subject to these covenants.
At the December 14, 2021, City Council meeting staff reviewed revised language
with the City Council and also directed staff to modify the Baker Subdivision
Covenants to include the following additional language:
• Under item 7p., “chickens” were added as acceptable as pets and “an underground,
invisible fence” was deleted in order to clarify that any type of fencing was okay to
meet the standards.
In response to the request to investigate the creation of a Homeowners Association
(HOA) for the Baker Subdivision, the City Attorney as prepare a response (see
Attachment C).
In addition to the above added language, staff is restating the revisions that were
presented at the December 14th meeting:
Under item 4d., For the Affordable lots, “all residences shall include basements
with at least one egress window” was added.
Under item 6., “side yard” was added.
Under item 7i, “which shall not be granted if the tonnage exceeds 3.25 tons”, was
deleted, thereby a builder is referred to Ames Electric for required calculations.
Under item 7l, “or street” was deleted.
Under item 7o, “annoyance” was deleted.
Under item 7q. shall be sodded within “six months” was added
Under item 7r. shall be constructed within twelve (12) months was replaced with
“eighteen (18) months”.
Under item 7u, Christmas was replaced with “Holiday”
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the attached modified restrictive covenants and regulations for single-
family homes in the Baker Subdivision (321 State Avenue).
2. Approve the restrictive covenants and regulations for single-family homes in the
Baker Subdivision (321 State Avenue) with additional modifications.
3. Do not approve the proposed restrictive covenants and regulations and refer
back to staff for additional information.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Adoption of Restrictive Covenants and Regulations for the Baker Subdivision (321 State
Avenue) is the final step before the sale of lots and construction of homes should begin.
Once covenants are adopted, staff can continue to proceed with soliciting and qualifying
potential first time homebuyer applicants, finalize the required housing counseling
services, finalize a partner lender(s), and solicit partnership with a modular housing
company(ies) to be in position to construct housing structures by spring/summer 2022.
Market Rate lot sales can also begin next year and must be coordinated with the timing
of affordable housing construction to maintain consistency with CDBG requirements for
housing production.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council approve
Alternative #1, as described above.
Attachment A-Baker Subdivision Final Plat
Attachment ‘B’
[ R E C O R D E R ’ S C O V E R P A G E T O B E I N S E R T E D H E R E ]
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND REGULATIONS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
IN BAKER SUBDIVISION, AMES, STORY COUNTY, IOWA
WHEREAS, the undersigned, the City of Ames, an Iowa municipal corporation (the herein
after the “City”), is the owner of Lots One (1) through Twenty-seven (27), contained in Baker
Subdivision (the “Subdivision”); and
WHEREAS, Lots One (1) through Twenty-six (26) (hereinafter “Lots”) will be developed
as Single Family Homes and governed by these restrictive covenants and regulations; and
WHEREAS, Lots One (1) through Eight, Ten (10) through Thirteen (13), Fifteen (15),
Twenty-four (24) and Twenty-five (25) shall be designated Affordable Housing Lots (hereinafter
“AR Lots”), and Lots Nine (9), Fourteen (14), Sixteen (16) through (23) and Twenty-six (26) shall
be designated Market Rate Lots (hereinafter “MR Lots”).
WHEREAS, for their own protection and for the benefit of subsequent owners of said Lots
within said Subdivision, the said owner desires to restrict the use thereof in certain particulars.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the covenants and
agreements contained herein, by these presents, covenant, bargain and agree for themselves for
their successors and assigns, as follows:
1. The covenants contained herein shall not apply to Lot 27, unless otherwise stated.
2. All Lots shall be known and described as residential lots and shall not be improved,
used, or occupied for other than private single-family residential purposes. All Lots
shall be occupied and used as the primary residence of the then-current title holders.
No Lots shall be used and occupied as property for which rental income is received.
3. The residences to be constructed or to be permitted to remain on the MR Lots shall
meet the following requirements:
a. One (1) story residences shall have a ground floor finished area of not less than
one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet.
b. One and one-half (1½) story residences, two (2) story residences, and split-level
residences shall have a total finished area on the ground floor and second floor
or split-level of not less than one thousand two hundred fifty (1,250) square
feet.
c. The computation of the total finished area shall not include porches,
breezeways, or garages.
d. All residences shall include basements with at least one (1) egress window.
4. The residences to be constructed or to be permitted to remain on the AR Lots shall meet
the following requirements:
2
a. One (1) story residences shall have a minimum ground floor finished area of
not less than one thousand one hundred (1,100) square feet.
b. One and one-half (1½) story residences, two (2) story residences, and split/bi-
level residences shall have a minimum total finished area on the ground floor
and second floor or split-level of not less than one thousand one hundred fifty
(1,150) square feet.
c. The computation of the total finished area shall not include porches,
breezeways, or garages.
d. All residences shall include basements with at least one (1) egress window.
5. No Lot shall be subdivided for the purpose of constructing more than one (1) residence
per Lot.
6. All Lots may have fences in the rear and side yard only. Chain link fences shall be
permitted, except no chain link fences with galvanized finish shall be allowed on any
Lot.
7. The following restrictions shall also constitute covenants:
a. There shall be no mobile homes placed or erected on any Lot.
b. No pre-erected dwelling shall be moved to any Lot, except modular housing
approved by the City of Ames Planning & Housing Department.
c. All dwellings must have, at a minimum, a single car attached garage, a double
car attached garage, or a double car detached garage.
d. No more than twelve (12”) inches of concrete block, poured concrete, or wood
foundation shall be exposed on any building unless the exposed material is
covered with brick, stone veneer, or siding. Exposed foundations must be
painted to blend with exterior wall finishes.
e. All building structures or improvements of any kind must be completed within
twelve (12) months of the commencement date of the construction.
Commencement of construction upon any Lot shall occur no later than six (6)
months of the date on the deed from the City. IF CONSTRUCTION HAS
NOT BEGUN ON AN MR LOT WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS OF THE
DATE ON THE DEED FROM THE CITY, THEN THE OWNER OF
RECORD, AT THE CITY’S REQUEST, AGREES TO CONVEY THE
PROPERTY BACK TO THE CITY IN FEE SIMPLE FOR ONE
HUNDRED PERCENT (100%) OF THE ORIGINAL PURCHASE
PRICE WITH NO ADJUSTMENT FOR TAXES, CLOSING COSTS OR
INTEREST AT THE TIME THE DEED IS CONVEYED TO THE CITY.
THE CITY WILL PAY ONLY FOR DEED PREPARATION,
RECORDING FEES, AND TRANSFER TAXES. ON ISSUANCE OF AN
3
OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR A RESIDENCE, THIS RIGHT TO
REPURCHASE SHALL TERMINATE AS TO THAT LOT.
f. All homes must be built by an experienced homebuilder. An experienced
homebuilder shall be defined as a person, or entity who has built and completed
at least three (3) new homes per year within three (3) of the past seven (7) years.
Notwithstanding the forgoing, a nonprofit entity organized under Iowa law or
possessing a valid certificate of authority to transact business in Iowa under
Iowa Code 490.105 shall constitute an experienced homebuilder if they have
started and completed three (3) homes in the past seven (7) years.
g. All finished Lots and house grades shall conform to the City’s grading plan
which shall be obtained from the City prior to the commencement of
construction. All excess dirt from the excavation shall be used as a part of the
final landscape plan. Any excess dirt, concrete, or other debris may not be
placed on other land within the Subdivision. Topsoil shall not be removed
from any of the Lots or the Site generally and shall be reused to respread
around the house and lot once the home is completed.
h. All homes must utilize and connect to the geothermal system installed within
the reserved public utility easements located in the rear yards of each Lot.
i. Prior to construction upon any Lot, the builder must submit to the Electric
Department an HVAC sizing calculation for review and approval.
j. All mailboxes shall be placed in accordance with United States Postal Service
regulations. Individual mailboxes will not be permitted. Cluster mailboxes will
be provided by the United States Postal Service.
k. No building, structure of a temporary character, trailer, tent, garage, or
outbuilding shall be used at any time as a residential dwelling on any Lot.
l. No tent, trailer, recreational vehicle, camper, boat, truck rated larger than three
quarters (3/4) of a ton, or other movable or temporary structure, shall be
maintained or parked on a Lot within public view for a period exceeding forty-
eight (48) consecutive hours or for more than thirty (30) total days in any
calendar year.
m. No rubbish containers shall be visible from the street except on pickup day and
one (1) day before and one (1) day after pickup day. Construction waste
containers shall be exempt from this provision; however, the builder or Lot
owner shall be responsible for keeping the construction debris contained on the
Lot and in the construction waste containers.
n. No extension towers or antennas of any kind shall be constructed, modified, or
permitted on any Lot, except television or radio antennas of less than ten (10’)
feet in height. Satellite dishes or parabolic devices more than thirty-six (36”)
4
inches in diameter used to receive television or other signals from satellites shall
not be permitted. The satellite dishes or parabolic devices shall be mounted on
the rear elevation or the rear half of the side elevation only. In no event shall a
satellite dish or parabolic device be mounted on the front elevation or the front
half of a side elevation.
o. No noxious or offensive activities or odors shall be permitted on or to escape
from any Lot, nor shall anything be done on any Lot which is or may become a
nuisance, either temporarily or permanently.
p. No animals, livestock, or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred, or kept on
any Lot, except that dogs, cats, chickens, and other common household pets
may be kept so long as they are not kept, bred, or maintained for commercial
purposes. Dogs, cats and chickens must be tied, controlled, or contained within
the Lot or on a leash at all times.
q. Following construction of the residential dwelling on any Lot, the front, side,
and rear yards shall be sodded within six months. The requirement for sod shall
be waived where a permanent underground irrigation system is installed on the
Lot. In addition to sodding, the builder or Lot owner shall install a minimum of
ten (10): (i) 3-gallon shrubs, (ii) 1-gallon perennials, or (iii) a combination of
3-gallon shrubs and 1-gallon perennials, with either mulch or rock ground
cover. The shrubs and/or perennials shall be in the front yard of a Lot.
Foundational plantings shall be required to screen the base of the primary and
secondary facade of any new building. In addition, ground-mounted mechanical
units shall be screened from public view with plantings.
r. Where the City of Ames, Iowa, requires the construction of public sidewalks,
the sidewalks shall be constructed within eighteen (18) months following the
sale of any Lot from the City or at the time of occupancy of any dwelling on a
Lot, whichever occurs first. The City shall withhold the issuance of an
Occupancy Permit for a dwelling until such time as a public sidewalk has been
constructed.
s. All retaining walls shall be constructed of stone or masonry product. No wood
landscaping timbers shall be used to construct retaining walls, except that
window well retaining walls that are not visible above grade may be constructed
using wood landscaping timbers.
t. Roof materials should be slate, tile, cedar shakes, or composite shingles.
Composite shingles shall be architectural grade, minimum thirty (30) year
warranty. Shingle colors shall be compatible with and complimentary to the
exterior materials and colors. White or white blend roof materials are not
acceptable.
5
u. All outdoor light fixtures shall be designed, installed, and maintained to prevent
light trespass beyond the boundaries of the Lot. “Full cutoff” outdoor light
fixtures which emit no light at or above the horizonal plane of the fixture shall
be utilized for all dusk to dawn light fixtures exceeding three hundred (300)
lumens and for all manually switched or occupancy sensor switched fixtures
exceeding one thousand (1,000) lumens. Holiday lighting or other temporary
outdoor lighting shall be exempt from this provision but shall remain in place
no longer than six (6) weeks annually.
v. Each Lot owner shall keep the Lot free of weeds and debris and shall take all
necessary steps to control erosion from the lot. All Lot owners shall implement
appropriate erosion control measures before, during, and after construction.
These measures may include silt fences, ground cover, and seeding over
exposed areas.
w. Any construction or earth moving on any Lot shall follow all laws relating to
storm water discharge permitting. The owner of any Lot shall be the solely
responsible permittee for the lot with respect to compliance with all terms,
provisions, and requirements of any NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit No.
2 and any storm water pollution prevention plan which includes the Lot. During
the ownership of the Lot, the Lot owner shall protect, defend, indemnify, and
hold the City and the other Lot owners harmless from any and all damages,
claims, liabilities, fines, penalties, cleanup costs, and/or attorneys and
consultant fees caused by, or in any manner related to: (1) any discharges of
soil, silt, sediment, petroleum product, hazardous substances, or solid waste
from the Lot; and/or (2) any alleged violation of any NPDES or storm water
discharge rule or regulation.
x. No driveway shall be permitted to terminate onto State Avenue, Tripp Street or
the North Alley. Driveway access shall be permitted only on Wilmoth Avenue
or Latimer Lane.
8. All these restrictions shall be deemed to be covenants running with the land and shall
endure and be binding upon all parties hereto, their successors and assigns, for a period
of twenty-one (21) years from the date of the recording of these covenants, unless
claims to continue any interest in the covenants are filed as provided by law.
9. In case of violation of any of the covenants, any person then owning a Lot in said
Subdivision is authorized to resort to an action of law or equity for relief, either by
injunction or in damages, against the person so violating said covenants.
10. Invalidation of any of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect
the validity of any of the other provisions, but they shall remain in full force and effect.
6
11. None of the provisions herein shall be construed to waive any requirement of the Ames
Municipal Code or otherwise exempt a Lot or Lot Owner from provisions of the Ames
Municipal Code.
12. This instrument may be amended upon the recording of a written instrument executed
and approved by the City of Ames until such time as the City no longer owns a Lot
within this subdivision. After the City no longer owns a Lot within this subdivision,
this instrument may be amended upon the recording of a written instrument executed
by the owners of at least two-thirds (i.e., no fewer than 18 consenting owners) of the
Lots. Any amendment to this instrument must be filed for record in the office of the
Recorder of Story County, Iowa.
13. The provisions of this instrument and any amendments hereto may be extended for an
additional period by filing a verified claim in the office of the Recorder of Story
County, Iowa, within the initial twenty-one (21) year period. The City shall have the
right to file a verified claim to extend these covenants.
[R E S E R V E D F O R S I G N A T U R E B L A N K S ]
Caring People Quality Programs Exceptional Service
515.239.5146 main
fax
Legal Department
To: Mayor Haila, Ames City Council
From: Mark O. Lambert, City Attorney
Date: December 17, 2021
Subject: Ordinance for new wards and precincts
On December 14, 2021, the Ames City Council decided to proceed with the ward and
precinct maps that had been prepared by the Story County Auditor’s office.
Those maps have now been turned into an ordinance for your consideration.
The ordinance writing process was intense in the short time frame available and
involved myself and Assistant City Attorney Jane Chang working long hours to
complete it. We were aided significantly by the City’s GIS Coordinator Ben
McConville, and City planners Julie Gould and Justin Moore.
We are doing a final review of the ordinance before sending it out to you and sending it
to the County Auditor’s office for review. There are hundreds of little details that need
to be double checked. Therefore, we will provide the ordinance to you on Monday
morning, December 20, which will give us the weekend to do a final review.
The ordinance is being submitted sometime this evening to the Story County Auditor’s
office for their review, as required by Iowa law. It is within the realm of possibility that
the Auditor’s office might suggest changes. If they do, our plan is to incorporate their
suggested changes into the ordinance and get a new version of the ordinance to you
before the City Council meeting on Tuesday, December 21, 2021.
Along with the ordinance, there will be a Memorandum of Agreement with Story County
regarding a few items. State law requires that precincts follow Census blocks. The
Census designated incorrectly some census blocks as unincorporated, when they are
actually within the City limits. Therefore, we will have an agreement on the agenda
assigning those census blocks to precincts. Also, several unincorporated Census
blocks are not contiguous with and/or are in a separate legislative district from their
rural townships, and these unincorporated Census blocks will be added to an Ames
precinct. Note that this does not mean that they will be eligible to vote in City
elections, it only means that they will be assigned to an Ames precinct for voting
purposes. The Auditor’s office will have separate “township ballots” for the few
individuals who reside in these areas. This is a common practice in the
redistricting/reprecincting process and such an agreement has been in place since the
last redistricting in 2011. The City and County independently came up with differing
numbering systems for the precincts, so you may get a new version of this agreement
prior to the Council meeting with different precincts numbers noted, but the census
blocks will remain the same.
In summary, 1) the ordinance will be sent to you on the morning of Monday, Dec. 20,
2021. The County Auditor will be reviewing it, and so please keep in mind that we
might have a revised ordinance before the Council meeting, after the County Auditor
comments upon it; and 2) attached is the draft agreement with the County (bearing in
mind that we might have a new version with different precinct numbers for the meeting,
but that will be the only change to it).
Staff is requesting a suspension of the rules to do all three readings on December
21st, because of the tight time frame. Iowa law requires such ordinances to be adopted
by January 3, 2022 at the latest.
#
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF
AMES, IOWA, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING AND DESCRIBING
WARDS AND PRECINCTS FOLLOWING THE 2020 DECENNIAL CENSUS
AND AFTER REDISTRICTING OF CONGRESSIONAL AND LEGISLATIVE
DISTRICTS, BY REPEALING SECTIONS 6.4 THROUGH 6.11 AND 6.14 AND
ENACTING NEW SECTIONS 6.4 THROUGH 6.11 THEREOF, REPEALING
ANY AND ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT
TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; AND ESTABLISHING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ENACTED, by the City Council for the City of Ames, Iowa, that:
Section One. The Municipal Code of the City of Ames, Iowa shall be and the same is
hereby amended by repealing Sections 6.4 through 6.11 and 6.14. Enacting New Sections 6.4
through 6.11 as follows:
Sec. 6.4 FIRST WARD DESCRIBED.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of Lincoln Way and Ash Avenue;
Thence east along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of N. University Boulevard;
Thence north along the centerline of N. University Boulevard to the centerline of 6th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 6th Street to the centerline of Brookridge Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Brookridge Avenue to the centerline of 9th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 9th Street to the centerline of Northwestern Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Northwestern Avenue to the centerline of 10th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 10th Street to the centerline of Grand Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Grand Avenue to the centerline of 16th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 16th Street to the centerline of Burnett Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Burnett Avenue to the centerline of 13th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 13th Street to its intersection with the city corporate limits at
the west lot line of Lot 1 of Walter Family Campus Subdivision;
Thence along the city corporate limits to their intersection with 570th Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of 570th Avenue to the centerline of E.13 th Street/220th Street;
Thence along the city corporate limits to their intersection with Potter Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Potter Avenue to the centerline of East Lincoln Way;
Thence west along the centerline of East Lincoln Way to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits in a southerly and westerly direction to their intersection
with S. Riverside Drive;
Thence continuing along city corporate limits in a northerly and westerly direction to the north
right-of-way with US Highway 30 in Section 16, Washington Township;
Thence east along the north right-of-way of US Highway 30 to the centerline of University
Boulevard;
Thence north along the centerline of University Boulevard to the centerline of Mortensen
Parkway;
Thence west along the centerline of Mortensen Parkway to the centerline of Beach Ave;
Thence north along the center line of Beach Ave to the centerline of Ashmore Drive;
Thence west and north along the centerline of Ashmore Drive to the centerline of Ash Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Ash Avenue to the centerline of Lincoln Way and the point
of beginning.
Sec. 6.5 SECOND WARD DESCRIBED.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Kellogg Avenue and 13th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of Kellogg Avenue to the centerline of Burnett Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Burnett Avenue to the centerline of 16th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 16th Street to the centerline of Grand Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Grand Avenue to the centerline of 13th Street;
The west along the centerline of 13th Street to its intersection with Ioway Creek;
Thence northwest along the channel of Ioway Creek to its intersection with the west line of
Section 34, Franklin Township;
Thence north along said section line to the centerline of 24th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 24th Street to the centerline of Stange Road;
Thence south along the centerline of Stange Road to the southern boundary of the north half of
Section 33, Franklin Township;
Thence west along said southern boundary to its intersection with Ioway Creek;
Thence following the channel of Ioway Creek west and north to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits northerly, easterly, and southerly to their intersection with
the centerline of East 13th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of East 13th Street and 13th Street to Kellogg Avenue and the
point of beginning.
Sec. 6.6 THIRD WARD DESCRIBED.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lincoln Way and State Avenue;
Thence east along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Lynn Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Lynn Avenue to the centerline of Knapp Street;
Thence east along the centerline of Knapp Street to the centerline of Ash Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Ash Avenue to the centerline of Ashmore Drive;
Thence easterly along Ashmore Avenue to the centerline of Beach Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Beach Avenue to the centerline of Mortensen Parkway;
Thence east along the centerline of Mortensen Parkway to the centerline of University
Boulevard;
Thence south on University Boulevard to the north right-of-way of US Highway 30;
Thence west along the north right-of-way of US Highway 30 to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits to the west boundary of Story County;
Thence continuing along the city corporate limits to the west line of Lot 10 of Barr & Kelley
Subdivision;
Thence south along said west line of Lot 10 to the centerline of Lincoln Way;
Thence east along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Hickory Drive;
Thence north along the centerline of Hickory Drive to the centerline of Woodland Street;
Thence east along the centerline of Woodland Street to the centerline of Franklin Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Franklin to the centerline of Lincoln Way;
Thence east along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of State Avenue and the point
of beginning.
Sec. 6.7 FOURTH WARD DESCRIBED.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lincoln Way and N. University
Boulevard/University Boulevard;
Thence west along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Ash Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Ash Avenue to the centerline of Knapp Street;
Thence west along the centerline of Knapp Street to the centerline of Lynn Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Lynn Avenue to the centerline of Lincoln Way;
Thence west along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Franklin Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Franklin Avenue to the centerline of Woodland Street;
Thence west along the centerline of Woodland Street to the centerline of Hickory Drive;
Thence southwest along the centerline of Hickory Drive to the centerline of Lincoln Way;
Thence west along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the west line of Lot 10 of Barr & Kelley
Subdivision;
Thence north along said west edge of said Lot 10 to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits to their intersection with Ioway Creek;
Thence following the channel of Ioway Creek south to its intersection with the southern
boundary of the north half of Section 33, Franklin Township;
Thence following said southern boundary line to its intersection with the centerline of Stange
Road;
Thence north along the centerline of Stange Road to the centerline of 24th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 24th Street to its intersection with the west line of Section 34,
Franklin Township;
Thence south along the section line to its intersection with Ioway Creek;
Thence southeast along the channel of Ioway Creek to its intersection with 13th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 13th Street to the centerline of Grand Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Grand Avenue to the centerline of 10 th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 10th Street to the centerline of Northwestern Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Northwestern Avenue to the centerline of 9th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 9th Street to the centerline of Brookridge Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Brookridge Avenue to the centerline of 6th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 6th Street to the centerline of N. University Boulevard;
Thence south along the centerline of N. University Boulevard to the centerline of Lincoln Way
and the point of beginning.
Sec. 6.8 FIRST WARD VOTING PRECINCTS
The First Ward is divided into the voting precincts as follows:
(1) The First Ward, Precinct 1 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lincoln Way and Ash Avenue;
Thence east along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of University Boulevard;
Thence south along the centerline of University Boulevard to the centerline of Mortenson
Parkway;
Thence west along the centerline of Mortenson to the centerline of Beach Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Beach Avenue to the centerline of Ashmore Drive;
Thence west and north along the centerline of Ashmore Drive to the centerline of Ash Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Ash Avenue to the centerline of Lincoln Way and the point
of beginning.
(2) The First Ward, Precinct 2 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lincoln Way and N. University
Boulevard/University Boulevard;
Thence north along the centerline of N. University Boulevard to the centerline of 6th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 6th Street to the centerline of Brookridge Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Brookridge Avenue to the centerline of 9th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 9th Street to the centerline of Northwestern Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Northwestern Avenue to the centerline of 10 th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 10th Street to the centerline of Grand Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Grand Avenue to the centerline of 16 th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 16th Street to the centerline of Burnett Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Burnett Avenue to the centerline of 13 th Street.
Thence east along the centerline of 13th Street to the centerline of Kellogg Avenue.
Thence south along the centerline of Kellogg Avenue to the centerline of S. 3rd Street;
Thence west along the centerline of S. 3rd Street to its intersection with the centerline of S. 4th
Street;
Thence west along the centerline of S. 4th Street to the centerline of University Boulevard;
Thence north along the centerline of University Boulevard to the centerline of Lincoln Way and
the point of beginning.
(3) Ward One, Precinct Three described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Kellogg Avenue and 13th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 13th Street/E. 13th Street to its intersection with the city
corporate limits at the west lot line of Lot 1 of Walter Family Campus Subdivision;
Thence along the city corporate limits to their intersection with 570th Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of 570th Avenue to the centerline of E.13th Street/220th Street;
Thence along the city corporate limits to their intersection with Potter Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Potter Avenue to the centerline of East Lincoln Way;
Thence west along the centerline of East Lincoln Way to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits in a southerly and westerly direction to their intersection
with S. Dayton Place and the north right-of-way of US Highway 30;
Thence west along the north right-of-way of US Highway 30to the centerline of S. Duff Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of S. Duff Avenue to the northern boundary of the S. 5th Street
right-of-way;
Thence west along the northern boundary of the S. 5th Street right-of-way to the centerline of S.
Walnut Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of S. Walnut Avenue to the centerline of S. 3rd Street;
Thence east along the centerline of S. 3rd Street to the centerline of Kellogg Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Kellogg Avenue to the centerline of 13th Street and the point
of beginning.
(4) Ward One, Precinct Four described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of University Boulevard and S. 16th Street;
Thence south and east along the centerline of S. 16th Street to the centerline of Creekside Drive;
Thence south on Creekside Drive extended to the north right-of-way of US Highway 30;
Thence east along the north right-of-way of US Highway 30 to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits in a southerly and westerly direction to their intersection
with the centerline of University Boulevard/S. 530th Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of University Boulevard to the centerline of S. 16th Street and
the point of beginning.
(5) Ward One, Precinct Five described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of University Boulevard/S. 530th Avenue and the
city corporate limits;
Thence continuing along the city corporate limits in a westerly and northerly direction to the
north right-of-way with US Highway 30 in Section 16, Washington Township;
Thence east along the north right-of-way of US Highway 30 to the centerline of University
Boulevard;
Thence south on the centerline of University Boulevard to the city corporate limits and the point
of beginning.
(6) Ward One, Precinct Six described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection the centerlines of University Boulevard and S. 4th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of S. 4th Street to the centerline of S. 3rd Street;
Thence east along the centerline of S. 3rd Street to the centerline of S. Walnut Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of S. Walnut Avenue to the northern border of the S. 5th Street
right-of-way;
Thence east along the northern border of the S. 5th Street right-of-way to the centerline of S. Duff
Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of S. Duff Avenue to the north right-of-way of US Highway
30;
Thence west along the north right-of-way of US Highway 30 to the centerline of Creekside Drive
extended;
Thence north along the centerline of Creekside Drive to the centerline of S. 16th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of S. 16th Street to the centerline of University Boulevard;
Thence north along the centerline of University Boulevard to the centerline of S. 4th Street and
the beginning point.
6.9 SECOND WARD VOTING PRECINCTS
(1) Ward Two, Precinct Seven Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Grand Avenue and Top O’Hollow Road;
Thence west along the centerline of Top O’Hollow Road to the centerline of Bloomington Road;
Thence west along the centerline of Bloomington Road to the eastern boundary of the Union
Pacific Railroad right-of-way;
Thence along the eastern boundary of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way in a northwesterly
direction to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits in a northerly and easterly direction to the centerline of
Grand Avenue/US Highway 69;
Thence south on the centerline of Grand Avenue to the centerline of Top O’Hollow Road and the
point of beginning.
(2) Ward Two, Precinct Eight Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
From the intersection of the centerlines of 13th Street and Burnett Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Burnett Avenue to the centerline of 16th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 16th Street to the centerline of Grand Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Grand Avenue to the centerline of 24th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 24th Street to the centerline of Jensen Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Jensen Avenue to the centerline of Luther Drive;
Thence west and north along the centerline of Luther Drive to the centerline of 28th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 28th Street to the centerline of Grand Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Grand Avenue to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits in an easterly and southerly direction to the centerline of E.
13th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of E. 13th Street/13th Street to Burnett Avenue and the point of
beginning.
(3) Ward Two, Precinct Nine Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Jensen Avenue and 24th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 24th Street to the eastern boundary of the Union Pacific
Railroad right-of-way;
Thence along the eastern boundary of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way in a northwesterly
direction to the centerline of Bloomington Road;
Thence east along the centerline of Bloomington Road to the centerline of Top O’Hollow Road;
Thence east along the centerline of Top O’Hollow Road to the centerline of Grand Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Grand Avenue to the centerline of 28th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 28th Street to the centerline of Luther Drive;
Thence south and east along the centerline of Luther Drive to the centerline of Jensen Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Jensen Avenue to the centerline of 24th Street and the point
of beginning.
(4) Ward Two, Precinct Ten Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of 24th Street and Grand Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Grand Avenue to the centerline of 13 th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 13th Street to its intersection with Ioway Creek;
Thence northwest along the channel of Ioway Creek to its intersection with the west line of
Section 34, Franklin Township;
Thence north along said section line to the centerline of 24th Street;
Thence east along 24th Street to the centerline of Grand Avenue and the point of beginning.
(5) Ward Two, Precinct Eleven Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the eastern boundary of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way
and the centerline of 24th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 24th Street to the centerline of Stange Road;
Thence south along the centerline of Stange Road to the southern boundary of the north half of
Section 33, Franklin Township;
Thence west along said southern boundary to its intersection with Ioway Creek;
Thence following the channel of Ioway Creek northwest to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits to their intersection with the centerline of George
Washington Carver Avenue;
Thence east along the centerline of George Washington Carver Avenue to the centerline of
Valley View Road;
Thence south along the centerline of Valley View Road to the centerline of Ridgetop Road;
Thence west along the centerline of Ridgetop Road to Bayberry Road;
Thence east along the centerline of Bayberry Road to the centerline of George Washington
Carver Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of George Washington Carver Avenue to the centerline of
Aspen Road;
Thence east along the centerline of Aspen Road to the centerline of Clayton Drive;
Thence north and east along the centerline of Clayton Drive to the centerline of Sheffield
Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Sheffield Avenue to the centerline of Kingston Drive;
Thence east along the centerline of Kingston Drive to the centerline of Stange Road;
Thence north along the centerline of Stange Road to the centerline of Bloomington Road;
Thence east along the centerline of Bloomington Road to the western boundary of the Union
Pacific Railroad right-of-way;
Thence along the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way in a southeasterly direction to the
centerline of 24th Street and the point of beginning.
(6) Ward Two, Precinct Twelve Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Bloomington Road and Stange Road;
Thence south along the centerline of Stange Road to the centerline of Kingston Drive;
Thence west along the centerline of Kingston Drive to the centerline of Sheffield Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Sheffield Avenue to the centerline of Clayton Drive;
Thence west and south along the centerline of Clayton Road to the centerline of Aspen Road;
Thence west along the centerline of Aspen Road to the centerline of George Washington Carver
Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of George Washington Carver Avenue to the centerline of
Bayberry Road;
Thence west along the centerline of Bayberry Road to the centerline of Ridgetop Road;
Thence east along the centerline of Ridgetop Road to the centerline of Valleyview Road;
Thence north along the centerline of Valleyview Road to the centerline of George Washington
Carver Avenue;
Thence west along the centerline of George Washing Carver Avenue to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits in a northerly and easterly direction to the western
boundary of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way;
Thence along the western boundary of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way and the city
corporate limits in a southeasterly direction to the point where said corporate limits go east to the
east boundary of said railroad right-of-way;
Thence east along said corporate limits to the east of the railroad right-of-way;
Thence southeast along said railroad right-of-way to the centerline of Bloomington Road;
Thence west along the centerline of Bloomington Road to the centerline of Stange Road and the
point of beginning.
Sec. 6.10 THIRD WARD VOTING PRECINCTS.
The Third Ward is divided into voting precincts as follows:
(1) Third Ward, Precinct No. 13 Described
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lincoln Way and Hayward Avenue;
Thence east along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Lynn Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Lynn Avenue to the centerline of Knapp Street;
Thence east along the centerline of Knapp Street to the centerline of Ash Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Ash Avenue to the southern boundary of the north half of
Section 9, Washington Township;
Thence following said southern boundary line to its intersection with the centerline of Welch
Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Welch Avenue to the centerline of Storm Street;
Thence west along the centerline of Storm Street to the centerline of Welch Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Welch Avenue to the centerline of Hunt Street;
Thence west along the centerline of Hunt Street to the centerline of Hayward Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Hayward Avenue to the centerline of Lincoln Way and the
point of beginning.
(2) Third Ward, Precinct No. 14 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lincoln Way and State Avenue;
Thence east along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Hayward Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Hayward Avenue to the centerline of Hunt Street;
Thence east along the centerline of Hunt Street to the centerline of Welch Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Welch Avenue to the centerline of Storm Street;
Thence east along the centerline of Storm Street to the centerline of Welch Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Welch Avenue to the southern boundary of the north half of
Section 9, Washington Township
Thence following said southern boundary line east to the centerline of Ash Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Ash Avenue to the centerline of Ashmore Drive;
Thence easterly along Ashmore Drive to the centerline of Beach Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Beach Avenue to the centerline of Mortensen Parkway;
Thence east along the centerline of Mortensen Parkway to the centerline of University
Boulevard;
Thence south on University Boulevard to the north right-of-way of US Highway 30;
Thence west along the north right-of-way of US Highway 30 to the city corporate limits;
Thence southerly and easterly along the city corporate limits to the centerline of South Dakota
Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of South Dakota Avenue to the centerline of Mortensen Road;
Thence east along the centerline of Mortensen Road to the centerline of Coconino Road;
Thence south along the centerline of Coconino Road to the centerline of Maricopa Drive;
Thence east along the centerline of Maricopa Drive to the centerline of Walton Drive;
Thence north and west along the centerline of Walton Drive to the centerline of Seagrave
Boulevard;
Thence north along the centerline of Seagrave Boulevard to the centerline of Mortensen Road;
Thence east along the centerline of Mortensen Road to the centerline of State Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of State Avenue to the centerline of Lincoln Way and the point
of beginning.
(3) Third Ward, Precinct No. 15 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Steinbeck Street and South Dakota Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of South Dakota Avenue to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits to their intersection with Thackery Drive;
Thence east along the centerline of Thackery Drive to the centerline of Cervantes Drive;
Thence south and east along the centerline of Cervantes Drive to the centerline of Wilder
Boulevard;
Thence southeast along the centerline of Wilder Boulevard to the centerline of Clemens
Boulevard;
Thence east along the centerline of Clemens Boulevard to the centerline of Poe Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Poe Avenue to the centerline of Steinbeck Street;
Thence east along the centerline of Steinbeck Street to the centerline of South Dakota Avenue
and the point of beginning.
(4) Third Ward, Precinct No. 16 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Steinbeck Street and South Dakota Avenue;
Thence west along the centerline of Steinbeck Street to the centerline of Poe Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Poe Avenue to the centerline of Clemens Boulevard;
Thence west along the centerline of Clemens Boulevard to the centerline of Wilder Boulevard;
Thence northwest along the centerline of Wilder Boulevard to the centerline of Cervantes Drive;
Thence west and north along the centerline of Cervantes Drive to the centerline of Thackery
Drive;
Thence west along the centerline of Thackery Drive to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits to the west line of Lot 10 of Barr & Kelley Subdivision;
Thence south along said west edge of said Lot 10 to the centerlines of Lincoln Way and Thackery
Avenue;
Thence south and west along the centerline of Thackery Avenue to its intersection with College
Creek;
Thence following the channel of College Creek to its intersection with South Dakota Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of South Dakota Avenue to the centerline of Steinbeck Street
and the point of beginning.
(5) Third Ward, Precinct No. 17 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Woodland Street and Franklin Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Franklin Avenue and S. Franklin Avenue to the centerline of
Tripp Street;
Thence west along the centerline of Tripp Street to the centerline of Dotson Drive;
Thence west from said intersection along the centerline of Aplin Road to the centerline of Beedle
Drive;
Thence south along the centerline of Beedle Drive to the centerline of Cochrane Parkway;
Thence west along the centerline of Cochrane Parkway to the centerline of South Dakota
Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of South Dakota Avenue to its intersection with College Creek;
Thence following the channel of College Creek to its intersection with Thackery Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Thackery Avenue to the centerline of Lincoln Way;
Thence east along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Hickory Drive;
Thence northeast along the centerline of Hickory Drive to the centerline of Woodland Street;
Thence east along the centerline of Woodland Street to the centerline of Franklin Avenue and the
point of beginning.
(6) Third Ward, Precinct No. 18 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lincoln Way and State Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of State Avenue to the centerline of Mortensen Road;
Thence west along the centerline of Mortensen Road to the centerline of Seagrave Boulevard;
Thence south along the centerline of Seagrave Boulevard to the centerline of Walton Drive;
Thence east and south along the centerline of Walton Drive to the centerline of Maricopa Drive;
Thence west along the centerline of Maricopa Drive to the centerline of Coconino Road;
Thence north along the centerline of Coconino Road to the centerline of Mortensen Road;
Thence west along the centerline of Mortensen Road to the centerline of South Dakota Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of South Dakota Avenue to the centerline of Cochrane
Parkway;
Thence east along the centerline of Cochrane Parkway to the centerline of Beedle Drive;
Thence north along the centerline of Beedle Drive to the centerline of Aplin Road;
Thence east along the centerline of Aplin Road to the centerline of Dotson Drive;
Thence east from said intersection along the centerline of Tripp Street to the centerline of S.
Franklin Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of S. Franklin Avenue to the centerline of Lincoln Way;
Thence east along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of State Avenue and the point
of beginning.
Sec. 6.11. FOURTH WARD VOTING PRECINCTS.
The Fourth Ward is divided into voting precincts as follows:
(1) Fourth Ward, Precinct No. 19 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lincoln Way and N. University
Boulevard/University Boulevard;
Thence west along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Union Drive.
Thence north along the centerline of Union Drive to the channel of College Creek;
Thence west along the channel of College Creek to the centerline of N. University Boulevard;
Thence south along the centerline of N. University Boulevard to the centerline of Lincoln Way
and the point of beginning.
(2) Fourth Ward, Precinct No. 20 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of N. University Boulevard and the channel of
College Creek;
Thence west along the channel of College Creek to the centerline of Union Drive;
Thence south along the centerline of Union Drive to the centerline of Lincoln Way;
Thence west along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Ash Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Ash Avenue to the centerline of Knapp Street;
Thence west along the centerline Knapp Street to the centerline of Lynn Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Lynn Avenue to the centerline of Lincoln Way;
Thence west along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Sheldon Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline Sheldon Avenue to the centerline of Union Drive;
Thence east along the centerline of Union Drive to the centerline of Bissell Road;
Thence north along the centerline of Bissell Road to the centerline of Pammel Drive;
Thence east along the centerline of Pammel Drive to the centerline of Stange Road;
Thence north along the centerline of Stange Road to the southern boundary of the Union Pacific
Railroad right-of-way;
Thence along the southern boundary of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way in a
southeasterly direction to the centerline of 6th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 6th Street to the centerline of N. University Boulevard;
Thence south along N. University Boulevard to its intersection with College Creek and the point
of beginning.
(3) Fourth Ward, Precinct No. 21 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of centerlines of Stange Road and 13th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 13th Street to the centerline of Grand Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Grand Avenue to the centerline of 10th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 10th Street to the centerline of Northwestern Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Northwestern Avenue to the centerline of 9th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 9th Street to the centerline of Brookridge Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Brookridge Avenue to the centerline of 6th Street;
Thence west along the centerline of 6th Street to the southern boundary of the Union Pacific
Railroad right-of-way;
Thence along the southern boundary of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way in a
northwesterly direction to the centerline of Stange Road;
Thence north along the centerline of Stange Road to the centerline of 13th Street and the point of
beginning.
(4) Fourth Ward, Precinct No. 22 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of 13th Street and its intersection with Ioway Creek;
Thence west long the centerline of 13th Street to the centerline of Hyland Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Hyland Avenue to the centerline of Ross Road;
Thence west along Ross Road to the centerline of Garfield Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Garfield Avenue to the centerline of Phoenix Street;
Thence west along the centerline of Phoenix Street to the centerline of North Dakota Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of North Dakota Avenue to its intersection with the city
corporate limits;
Thence following the city corporate limits east and north to their intersection with Ioway Creek;
Thence following the channel of Ioway Creek southeast to its intersection with the southern
boundary of the north half of Section 33, Franklin Township;
Thence following said southern boundary east to its intersection with the centerline of Stange
Road;
Thence north along the centerline of Stange Road to the centerline of 24th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 24th Street to its intersection with the west line of Section 34,
Franklin Township;
Thence south along said section line to its intersection with Ioway Creek;
Thence southeast along the channel of Ioway Creek to its intersection with 13th Street and the
point of beginning;
(5) Fourth Ward, Precinct No. 23 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lincoln Way and North Dakota Avenue;
Thence west along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the west line of Lot 10 of Barr & Kelley
Subdivision;
Thence north along said west edge of said Lot 10 to the city corporate limits;
Thence along the city corporate limits to their intersection with North Dakota Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of North Dakota Avenue to the centerline of Lincoln Way and
the point of beginning.
(6) Fourth Ward, Precinct No. 24 Described.
The area bounded by the following points, proceeding generally in a clockwise manner:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lincoln Way and Sheldon Avenues;
Thence west along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of Franklin Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Franklin Avenue to the centerline of Woodland Street;
Thence west along the centerline of Woodland Street to the centerline of Hickory Drive;
Thence southwest along the centerline of Hickory Drive to the centerline of Lincoln Way;
Thence west along the centerline of Lincoln Way to the centerline of North Dakota Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of North Dakota Avenue to the centerline of Phoenix Street;
Thence east and north along the centerline of Phoenix Street to the centerline of Garfield Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Garfield Avenue to the centerline of Ross Road;
Thence east along the centerline of Ross Road to the centerline of Hyland Avenue;
Thence north along the centerline of Hyland Avenue to the centerline of 13th Street;
Thence east along the centerline of 13th Street to the centerline of Stange Road;
Thence south along the centerline of Stange Road to the centerline of Pammel Drive;
Thence west along the centerline of Pammel Drive to the centerline of Bissell Road;
Thence south along the centerline of Bissell Road to the centerline of Union Drive;
Thence west along the centerline of Union Drive to the centerline of Sheldon Avenue;
Thence south along the centerline of Sheldon Avenue to the centerline of Lincoln Way and the
point of beginning.
Section Two. All ordinances, or parts of ordinances, in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict, if any.
Section Three. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect for city elections
occurring after January 15, 2022, after its final passage, approval, and publication as provided by
law.
Passed this day of , .
___________________________________ _______________________________________
Diane R. Voss, City Clerk John A. Haila, Mayor
Memorandum of Agreement
The parties to this agreement are the City of Ames, Iowa (“City”), and Story County, Iowa (“County”).
This agreement is entered into as of December ______, 2021.
WHEREAS:
Following the federal decennial census, and after the redistricting of congressional and legislative
districts, city councils and county boards of supervisors are required to complete any changes in precinct
and ward boundaries.
Cities and counties are required to use federal census block information when defining precincts and
wards for the purposes of redistricting.
A portion of two federal census blocks within the City’s corporate limits was designated by the census as
unincorporated, one in Grant Township territory and one in Franklin Township territory.
The City and the County agree that a portion of both federal census blocks 191690001012085 and
191690001023002 are designated as unincorporated in error.
The City and the County agree to combine said incorporated portion of federal census block
191690001012085, as shown on the official County map, with the contiguous Ames Precinct 3, as
defined by City of Ames, Ordinance No. _______, into one voting precinct.
The City and the County agree to combine said incorporated portion of federal census block
191690001023002, as shown on the official County map, with the contiguous Ames Precinct 7, as
defined by City of Ames, Ordinance No. _______, into one voting precinct.
Furthermore, the following unincorporated federal census blocks are not contiguous with and/or are in
a separate legislative district from their rural townships:
• Blocks 191690001012063, 191690001012147, 191690001012056, 191690001012057,
191690001012058, 191690001012062 in Grant Township to be combined with Ames
Precinct 3
• Block 191690013021049 in Washington Township to be combined with Ames Precinct 5
• Blocks 191690013031005, 191690006005021, and 191690006005022 in Washington
Township to be combined with Ames Precinct 16
• Blocks 191690006005014 and 191690006005013 in Washington Township to be combined
with Ames Precinct 23
• Block 191690001023007 and the unincorporated portion of Block 191690001023002 in
Franklin Township to be combined with Ames Precinct 7
The City and the County agree to combine census blocks 191690001012063, 191690001012147,
191690001012056, 191690001012057, 191690001012058, 191690001012062 and the incorporated
portion of 191690001012085 and Ames Precinct 3 as defined by City of Ames Municipal Code,
Ordinance No. _______ into one precinct, namely Ames Precinct 3 in Ward 1.
The City and the County agree to combine census block 191690013021049 and Ames Precinct 5 as
defined by City of Ames Municipal Code, Ordinance No. _______ into one precinct, namely Ames
Precinct 5 in Ward 1.
The City and the County agree to combine census blocks 191690013031005, 191690006005021, and
191690006005022 and Ames Precinct 16 as defined by City of Ames Municipal Code, Ordinance No.
_______ into one precinct, namely Ames Precinct 16 in Ward 3.
The City and the County agree to combine census blocks 191690006005014 and 191690006005013 and
Ames Precinct 23 as defined by City of Ames Municipal Code, Ordinance No. ______ into one precinct,
namely Ames 23 in Ward 4.
The City and the County agree to combine census blocks 191690001023007 and 191690001023002 and
Ames Precinct 7 as defined in City of Ames Municipal Code, Ordinance No. ____________ into one
precinct, namely Ames Precinct 7 in Ward 2.
Dated this ____ of December, 2021. Dated this ____ of December, 2021.
City of Ames, Iowa County of Story, Iowa
By___________________________ By___________________________
John Haila, Mayor Lisa K. Heddens, Chair
Mayor Board of Supervisors
Attest: Attest:
______________________________ _____________________________
Diane Voss, City Clerk Lucy Martin, Auditor
Caring People Quality Programs Exceptional Service
515.239.5101 main
fax
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Deb Schildroth, Assistant City Manager
Date: December 17, 2021
Subject: Objectives for the Third Climate Action Plan Steering Committee Meeting
To ensure the next meeting of the Climate Action Plan (CAP) Steering Committee, planned
for Tuesday, Dec. 21, is as productive as possible, staff is providing this summary of CAP
work-to-date, a review of the project objectives and proposed timeline, and a summary of
potential actions and pathways. Options for the Steering Committee to consider are
included in the Power Point presentation (slide 37).
Our CAP process was kicked off this spring when the City Council approved hiring
consultants Sustainability Solutions Group (SSG). SSG was selected to guide the City of
Ames through the development of community greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals
and the creation of a Climate Action Plan (CAP) to achieve them.
CAP work-to-date:
• The existing Greenhouse Gas Inventory and additional data was used to model
current emission levels and the expected future emissions without intentional
climate action.
• The City Council, which serves as the project Steering Committee, held meetings
with SSG on Aug. 31 and Nov. 16.
• A volunteer, Mayor-appointed Supplemental Input Committee (SIC) was
established to represent 12 community sectors and gather public feedback.
Supplemental Input Committee meetings were held with SSG on Oct. 6 and Dec.
1.
• The CAP Town Hall meeting was held on Oct. 25 and facilitated by SSG.
• A project website, online survey, and various marketing materials have been
created to assist in public outreach.
Following the completion of the GHG inventory and presentation of the Business As
Usual/baseline scenario, the next task for the Steering Committee is establishing a
relevant, achievable, and cost-effective emissions reduction goal with assistance from
SSG and considering feedback from the SIC and citizens. Once the Steering Committee
establishes a target reduction goal, SSG will begin developing a customized CAP to
engage and empower residents, businesses, and institutions toward ownership and
responsibility in ensuring a resilient and sustainable future. Determining the most
effective strategies for Ames will require robust community input and feedback and
Steering Committee direction. The process is anticipated to be complete by fall of 2022.
Selecting an emissions reduction target for Ames has engaged many citizens with strong
feelings about the appropriate goal for this community. The need to balance the
perspectives of those who want to take aggressive action in conjunction with others who
are concerned about financial impact remains challenging. It is important to hear from
many voices and understand the issues.
The costs of becoming a carbon-neutral community are substantial. While many costs
around reducing emissions are decreasing as technology improves, the investment will still
be significant. However, many of the strategies for decarbonization offer co-benefits and
result in savings, sometimes greater than the initial investment.
There is also a cost associated with foregoing strategies to mitigate and adapt to climate
change. In our own community, we have experienced extreme weather and witnessed
damage caused by massive floods, drought, and weather phenomenon like the 2020
derecho. We know these costs disproportionately affect lower income residents.
It is important to note that our Ames CAP should be viewed as an indicator for staff and
potential project partners of the desired direction of the City in climate action. The CAP
will not contain detailed project plans for every action to be taken; such a level of detail
would not be feasible given the long timeline (9-30+ years) and wide scope of the plan
(affecting all carbon-emitting processes in the community). Instead, Council should expect
detailed project plans to be developed by staff and other project partners over the coming
years. The CAP will structure and inform such projects by sketching a roadmap indicating
the type and scale of projects that are likely to be the most effective, provide the most co-
benefits to the community, and result in the desired carbon reduction.
The CAP should provide a high-level strategy for decision-making that supports a low
carbon future for the entire community. Not only will the City be required to make changes
to its own operations, the CAP will explore the City’s role in assisting and supporting
community transition. The CAP will serve as an additional filter when determining
building, transportation, energy production, infrastructure decisions, and more. It is a
difficult first step, but an important one.
SSG has presented the four following target approaches. Also included is a summary of
actions and pathways that illustrate how reduction strategies might impact citizens.
Science-Based Target (General)
Target: 45% minimum reduction in greenhouse emissions from 2005 levels by
2030, and net-zero emissions by 2050.
Target Source: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in their
2018 report Global Warming of 1.5°C, “an IPCC Special Report on the impacts of
global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global GHG
emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the
threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate
poverty 1.”
Benefits:
● Aligned with the UNFCCC Paris Agreement
● Aligned with the 2018 IPCC recommendations
● Similar target to many other jurisdictions (local and national) which may
create synergies, peer exchange, and reduce legislative issues and
resistance
● Avoids some costly infrastructure lock-in
● Has potential to realize co-benefits at a local level- clean air, connected
community
Challenges:
● Does not address global equity concerns
● Does not align with the most recent evidence for requirements for staying
within the 1.5°C threshold
● Challenging systems-level changes required
● Extensive behavior changes required
● Ongoing political will required
● Some costly infrastructure lock-in will occur
● Significant up-front capital costs
1 IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-
industrial levels and related global GHG emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change,
sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W.
Moufouma-Okia,
Science-Based Target: Carbon Budget & Fair Share Approach
Target: 83% reduction in greenhouse emissions from 2018 levels by 2030, and
net-zero emissions by 2050.
Target Source: The C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, made up of 97 cities
around the world that represents one-twelfth of the world's population and one-
quarter of the global economy and focused on addressing climate change
through urban action 2.
Benefits:
● Aligned with the UNFCCC Paris Agreement
● Aligned with the 2018 IPCC recommendations for limiting warming to
1.5 °C
● Aligns with the Science-Based Target Network’s recommendations for
cities
● Avoids costly infrastructure lock-in
● Maximizes co-benefits - equity, cleaner air, more connected communities
● Has potential to realize co-benefits at a local level sooner
Challenges:
● Significant up-front capital costs
● Challenging systems-level changes required
● Extensive behavior changes required
● Ongoing political will required
● Potential for resistance due to quick, transformative changes
● Assets such as vehicles may need to be retired early which may cause
financial, equity, and resource-use concerns
2 C40
Alignment with Federal Target
Target: 50-52% reduction in greenhouse emissions from 2005 levels by 2030,
and net-zero emissions by 2050.
Target Source: This target is in line with the United States’ federal emissions
reduction target announced in April 2021. The target is based on the United
States’ Nationally Determined Contribution in line with Article 4 of the Paris
Agreement.
Benefits:
● Aligned with the UNFCCC Paris Agreement
● Aligned with the 2018 IPCC recommendations
● Similar target to many other jurisdictions (local and national) which may
create synergies, peer exchange opportunities, and reduce legislative
issues and resistance
● Avoids some costly infrastructure lock-in
Challenges:
● Does not address global equity concerns
● Does not align with the most recent evidence for requirements for staying
within the 1.5°C threshold
● Challenging systems-level changes required
● Extensive behavior changes required
● Ongoing political will required
● Some costly infrastructure lock-in will occur
● Significant up-front capital costs
Evidence-Based Target
Target: Greenhouse emissions reductions by 2030 to be determined through
modeling using a bottom-up approach, and net-zero emissions by 2050.
Target Source: This is a bottom-up approach to identifying a target that
identifies local actions and constraints first with the target being an outcome of
the identified actions.
Benefits:
● Provides the local government with the ability to focus on what it controls
rather than spending time and energy on levers it cannot control
● The plan may be viewed as more localized and decrease resistance or
skepticism
Challenges:
● May not meet the threshold for the UNFCCC Paris agreement
● May not be science-aligned
● May not address global equity concerns
● May not align with the most recent evidence for requirements for staying
within the 1.5°C threshold
● Challenging systems-level changes required
● Extensive behavior changes required
● Ongoing political will required
● Some costly infrastructure lock-in will occur
● Can create a discourse of changes being someone else’s problem
Actions & Pathways
The actions recommended for Ames will remain largely the same regardless of
the target selected. The primary difference will be the timeline in which the
actions occur. Based on what we know about Ames’ energy and emissions profile
right now, the point at which Ames achieves net-zero, and what the pathway to
that looks like is heavily influenced by:
● how soon transportation is decarbonized (linked closely with the adoption
rate of electric vehicles);
● how quickly heating in buildings is electrified; and
● how quickly the electricity grid is decarbonized.
While these are the big three many other actions can enable these three to
happen more quickly or slowly and increase or decrease the financial benefit.
Sample action:
● Retrofit all existing residential buildings to achieve 50% thermal savings.
Thermal savings result from improving the building envelope - more
insulation, high-performance windows, doors.
Sample Schedule:
● All buildings constructed pre-1981 complete by 2035
● All buildings constructed in or after 1981 complete by 2040
Note that shifting these timelines so the actions are completed sooner or later
will have an impact on GHG emissions, upfront capital expenditures per year, and
payback period.
Low carbon Modeling:
● Model the GHG impact of this action in a sequence that complements
other actions, such as adding heat pumps and renewable energy.
● In the case of retrofits, they would be completed before heat pumps and
renewables to ensure that the buildings can:
○ be heated and cooled by a heat pump (an inefficient and/or drafty
building is more difficult to heat with a heat pump) and
○ require less renewable energy for operation (a lot more renewable
energy is required to satisfy the energy needs of inefficient
buildings and then can be costly and problematic from capacity and
space perspectives)
Financial Modeling:
● Model the financial impact of this action in sequence with other actions
(e.g. completing efficiency actions means the community will need to have
a smaller amount of renewable energy to meet its needs and target than if
renewable energy was installed first)
● Financial modeling identifies the capital expenditure completing these
retrofits based on cost assumptions and the number of buildings
● Financial modeling identifies the net benefit (savings, revenue) once the
retrofits are complete (e.g. utility expenditures decreased from increased
efficiency)
Implementation Mechanism Example:
Implementation mechanisms can help determine the City’s role and contribution
to achieving each action. Examples:
Program: Create a split incentive program that creates value for landlords and
tenants to participate in energy efficiency programs
Initiative: Pilot a bulk retrofit program in a neighborhood to retrofit multiple
buildings and/or units at one time
Leading by example: Retrofit municipal buildings
The implementation mechanisms are the ‘hows’ of the actions. They are also the
vehicle for City intervention and action, or when we start to identify together
what part of the how (programs, incentives, policies, etc.) that the City can and
should take on, who the appropriate partners are, and what needs to be left up to
other sectors and stakeholders.
City of Ames
Climate Action Plan +
Target Setting
City Steering Committee:
Target Setting, Part Two
December 21, 2021
6:00 -8:00 PM
Meeting Objectives
●To inform Steering Committee members about:
○target setting -a deeper dive on what it means and how it
connects to low -carbon action planning;
○target options developed by SSG (review); and
○engagement outputs regarding target setting.
●To involve Steering Committee members in learning about:
○target -setting; and
○their target preferences.
Meeting Agenda
●Introduction
●Process review + Q&A
●Target review + Q&A
●Engagement Update + Q&A
●Recommended approach
●Open discussion on target -setting
●Next steps
Process Review
The Climate Action Planning Process
Analyzing the Low Carbon Pathway for Ames
Where are
the major
sources of
emissions
and
opportunities
to create
change?
How do we
decrease
emissions in
that sector?
How do we fit
the actions
together in the
right order for
Ames?
What are the
capital
expenditures
and
operational
expenditures/
savings?
1 2 3 4
Which partner
implements
the actions?
5
Next, we are going to explore what a target is and is not.
Target Setting Review
What is a Target?
What a target is not
:
A target does not guarantee success or a pathway forward
Examples:
●The Kyoto Protocol
●The United States’ first NDC and federal commitment
●100% of Canada’s climate targets
What enables a target?
●A common understanding of the target
●A pathway to get there
●A way to align decision -making with the pathway
●Allocation of resources
●Adaptive mindset and response
Next, we are going to look at an example of a target -setting
process.
What questions do you have for us before we do that?
Target Setting and Low Carbon Planning Example
Two Low Carbon Scenarios Examples: Target & No
Target (evidence-based)
Let’s look at this example community
Creating a Pathway: Low Carbon Assumptions (Buildings)
BAU Emissions
LC Emissions
How does this example differ from a preset target example?
●Not a lot
●We would work to the target if one was set
○Provide recommendations and advice if the target did
not seem feasible or desired in the community
●Actions do not necessarily change but the timeline of the
actions might
●We would still gather feedback on the actions, the
aggressiveness of the timeline, and work to understand the
communities insights and concerns and share the
information back to council
What questions do you have about this example?
Engagement Update
A Reminder About
Engagement
Engagement Summary since November
●Community Survey
●Supplemental Input Committee
outreach and workshop
Survey Results
22
23
When considering target selection should Council, at
a minimum, commit to net -zero emissions by 2050?
24
Target Preference
25
What we Heard
“It is more desirable to aim for greater GHG emissions and perhaps not meet the goal than to pick a less
ambitious goal to promote chance of success.”
“Please treat this like an emergency.”
“I am zero percent in favor of any of this garbage.”
“Worrying about the economy today is pointless if its protection causes the economy to be eliminated in the
future.”
“It's hard to imagine exactly what the impact of these targets look like, but we have to start somewhere to
make changes.”
“I worry for those who can't afford to upgrade to these more energy friendly things.”
“Let's just do something and take it seriously. Climate change is happening. Every human has a role in this.”
“With prices increase every day , you continue to put a burden on poor population who are leaving [sic]pay
check to pay check.”
“We must reduce emissions as quickly as possible, which will, ultimately, create better economic growth,
equity, and sustainability for the Ames community. These goals are not in conflict.”
Supplemental Input Committee
Engagement
26
Supplemental Input Committee Outreach &
Workshop
●SIC members were asked to reach out
to their sectors
○Outreach toolkit
○Questions to ask
○Instructions on how to report
back
○Opportunity to discuss in small
groups at an SIC workshop
Outreach Questions
What is important to consider
when setting a greenhouse gas
emissions reduction target for the
community?
What are your desired outcomes
from the CAP plan and what does
Ames look like when the plan is
implemented?
29
Emergent Themes
Feedback also received on the how:
Addressing waste & recycling
Home energy use
Transportation
30
What we Heard
“B+ decision now is better than an A+ decision later on. Ames needs to catch up so we can
get in line to access grants and programs that are increasingly available.”
“Costs can be investments that are economic drivers.
“An Ames CAP would be good for recruiting and retaining high -tech industry and
professionals.”
“If Ames has a CAP, with goals, action steps, and needs assessments then we can translate
that into proposals and requests for money for CAP projects.”
“We desire an aggressive reduction target that results in Ames demonstrating leadership in
low -carbon energy.”
“Ames has an opportunity to reduce harm to others from GHG increases by supporting low
carbon energy in our renewable energy abundant region.”
What are your questions about the engagement process and
results?
Recommended Approach
33
Recommendation on target -setting
We lead a process to develop a bottom -up pathway for the city to
inform a target that reflects local circumstances in Ames and the
effort required to address climate change.
34
What does that mean?
Emergent Target
Where are
the major
sources of
emissions
and
opportunities
to create
change?
How do we
decrease
emissions in
that sector?
How do we fit
the actions
together in the
right order for
Ames?
What are the
capital
expenditures
and
operational
expenditures/
savings?
1 2 3 4
Which partner
implements
the actions?
5
Let’s Discuss.
37
Options for the Steering Committee to Consider
1 .Approve recommendation to adopt the Evidence Based approach as
the City’s carbon emissions reduction target .
2. Select an alternative carbon emissions reduction target.
3. Take no action and refer back to City staff and SSG with direction on
additional information needed for future consideration.
Wrap Up + Next Steps
Thank You!
Survey Results Summary
City of Ames Community Target Survey for the Climate
Action Plan
Prepared by SSG
December 16, 2021
Survey Overview 3
Results - Target-related Questions 3
Question One 3
Question Two 4
Question Three 5
Question Four:6
Results - Demographic 8
Age 9
Gender 10
Race and Ethnicity 10
Raw Comments 11
Survey Overview
The City of Ames conducted a community survey on greenhouse gas emissions reductions
targets to understand interested and affected community members’ target preferences
and their priority considerations when selecting a target.
The survey was open from November 17th, 2021 until December 11th, 2021. It was hosted
on the Ames Climate Action Plan website. The project website is linked to the City website.
It was promoted via the City’s social media channels. Supplemental Input Committee
members also promoted the survey to their sectors via several outreach techniques. Paper
copies of the survey were made available on several dates at the library. City staff members
were on-site to encourage community members to fill it out.
A total of 902 responses were received. Demographic intake information shows that
respondents do not fully represent the same demographic makeup as the overall
community and additional effort will need to be made to encourage participation from a
cross-section of the community in future Climate Action Plan engagement opportunities.
It was noted that there were individuals who participated in the survey that answered that
they were not residents of Ames and more still whose IP addresses originated from outside
Iowa. Therefore, survey results were analyzed three times. Once with all respondents
(n=902), once with respondents from those who identified as non-residents filtered out
(n=792), and once with respondents with IP addresses outside Iowa and with respondents
from those who identified as non-residents filtered out (n=708). The results were not
materially different between the three groups of responses but some comparisons are
shown in this summary as evidence.
Results - Target-related Questions
This section will present and analyze the survey results. Each question posed in the survey
will be presented as it was in the survey and then the results will be presented and
discussed.
Question One
When considering target selection should Council,at a minimum, commit to net-zero
emissions by 2050? (Net-zero emissions means as many emissions as possible are
eliminated, and remaining emissions are offset by the same amount elsewhere).Please
select one.
Approximately 80% of respondents agreed with a minimum net-zero by 2050 target.
15-17%, depending on the filter applied, disagreed with this minimum target. Two percent
of respondents were unsure.
Question Two
When considering the pathway to 2050 (Where should we be on our emissions reduction
journey by 2030? 2040?), what do you believe the City should prioritize?Rank 1-6.
The number one priority for respondents, based on the options provided was “reducing the
most emissions as quickly as possible.” The lowest priority was “having a target that aligns
with global best practice”. Note that not every respondent ranked all six choices, which
could suggest that some of the options are not priorities at all for some respondents. Also,
note that over one-quarter of respondents did not answer this question at all.
Question Three
What other impacts would you like Council to consider when choosing a target?Rank 1-6.
The number one impact respondents wanted to Council to consider, based on the options
provided for this question was “the resulting design and aesthetics in the community.”
“Ensuring the creation of new local jobs and economic activity…”, “maximizing the
community co-benefits…” and “minimizing the changes or impacts to everyday life for
citizens” were also ranked high. The lowest priority was “having a target that accounts for
global equity concerns.” All other choices had similar ratings aside from “ensuring the
creating of new local jobs and economic activity…” Note again that not every respondent
ranked all six choices, which could suggest that some of the options are not priorities at all
for some respondents. Also, note that over one-quarter of respondents did not answer this
question at all.
Question Four:
The City of Ames City Council was presented with four potential targets for greenhouse
gas emissions reductions. Each target proposes a net-zero by 2050 goal, and an interim
goal for 2030. What 2030 goal do you think is best for the City of Ames?
Results show that regardless of filtering, the most popular target amongst respondents was
a science-based fair share target. This was the most aggressive target proposed with an
83% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from 2018 levels by 2030. The least popular
target from the options presented was the general science-based target, which was the
least aggressive target presented. Barely more popular than this was the evidence-based
target, which is designed to identify the target through a bottom-up identification of low
carbon actions specific to Ames. Notably, these options were both less popular than the
indication that all the targets presented were too aggressive.
The target question was filtered by age, which showed that the most aggressive target was
the most popular target across all age categories, other than the “prefer not to disclose”
category. The majority (54%) who chose this option supported the idea that all the targets
presented were too aggressive.
Results - Demographic
This section details the demographic information received from survey respondents.
Demographic questions were asked to better understand if respondents were coming from
a broad cross-section of the community. Note that although these results are being
compared with Census data, the results should not be viewed as statistically significantly.
The responses to the survey only represent the views of the respondents and cannot be
projected to represent the broader community, or subsects of it.
Age
Based on the stated age of respondents and Ames’ demographics1,the 17 and under age
group, and the 75-84-year-old age group are underrepresented in responses, while the
35-74-year-old age groups are overrepresented. 18-34-year-old age groups and 85+ age
group respondents are in line with Ames’ demographics. Note that some respondents
chose not to disclose their age group.
1 U.S.Census Bureau,American Community Survey,S0101,AGE AND SEX,2019: ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables
Gender
Individuals identifying as male are slightly underrepresented in results compared to the
actual demographics in Ames2. The U.S. Census Bureau data does not include data on
non-binary individuals. Note that some respondents chose not to disclose their gender.
Race and Ethnicity
2U.S.Census Bureau,American Community Survey,S0101,AGE AND SEX,2019: ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables
Based on the race and ethnic identification question in the survey, and Ames’
demographics, white/caucasian respondents are on par with actual demographic while
other races and ethnicities are underrepresented3.Note that some respondents chose not
to disclose their race or ethnicity.
Raw Comments
Survey participants were provided with an opportunity to share additional information via
the survey based on this prompt:What other thoughts,insights, or concerns do you want to
share with us about setting a target to reduce community greenhouse gas emissions?The
results of this question are provided below. The comments have not been edited.
3 U.S.Census Bureau,Decennial Census P1 RACE 2020:DEC Redistricting Data (PL 94-171)
I think the amount of education needed in our community is massive. If this is t an
extremely high priority, the effort will not do nearly as well as it could.
This is ridiculous. Keep these Communist agendas out of Ames. You are killing this city.
I feel like the schedule for taking meaningful action is moving too slowly. This Climate
Change Action project has taken way too many years to get started - and now the meetings
and deadlines that have been set are all too far apart. The citizens and officials in Ames
really need to take climate change and the future impacts of it seriously and act faster.
Our farming industry is very important but we still need to address the unsustainable
farming practices that are poorly regulated. Propose incremental steps and educate the
republican farming community to help understand the importance of climate change and
how sustainable practices can benefit business and future farmers of America.
Include native landscaping and green infrastructure design in addition to renewable
energy/emissions reduction.
We should aim for a goal that is consistent with the IPCC assessment of 2018. It is
important that we do our part, at a minimum, to limit warming to 1.5 degrees C. Otherwise
we do not communicate the urgency of the task, and may postpone serious effort at
reducing our GHG footprint to zero. If need be, once we are, say 5 years into the plan, we
can adjust our goal to take into account those changes that are most difficult to make, or
cost the most. If we do not put ourselves on a "wartime" footing soon, the multiple tipping
points may overwhelm us, and the costs will soar.
When looking to cut emissions, group everything by sector and look to cut emissions from
a systems perspective : Power source (moving to clean energy), residential (incentives to
install all-electric devices), industrial (emission reductions and regulation), transportation
(electric vehicles, charging stations, etc)
Why don’t we wait until China actually signs on. Without that we are only harming
ourselves without any positive impact.
It is more desirable to aim for greater GHG emissions and perhaps not meet the goal than
to pick a less ambitious goal to promote chance of success.
"Net-zero needs to be attained mainly, if not entirely, through emission reduction, not
emission balancing. i.e. it should be achieved using the least amount of offsets and RECs
possible, if any, because RECs do not reduce any physical emissions. For industries that
inherently are difficult to make net-zero given our current processes, balancing emissions
can be a stepping-stone solution, but should not be left as the end goal. These processes
should continue to be innovated with an extreme sense of urgency.
Many other countries, universities, and cities are revising their previous CAPs to be more
ambitious and attain net-zero by 2040 or sooner instead of 2050 because we know that
2050 isn’t good enough to limit warming to 1.5. Therefore, Ames should make our first plan
match what everyone is transitioning to, or to be better, but definitely not worse.
Any and all reduction goals need to be a “Science-based target with a carbon budget and
equity component”. Whatever transition we make must be a just one; the people in the
fossil fuel industry can’t be punished by losing their jobs and communities that have been
historically marginalized need to be uplifted."
The City employees in charge of the actions needed to meet goals should be supportive of
the objectives and agree that these actions are necessary.
Increasing access to solar energy more quickly appears to be one important tool, and I
think the solar array already existing in Ames is a good first step.
Worrying about the economy today is pointless if its protection causes the economy to be
eliminated in the future.
For question #4, "Science-based target with a carbon budget and equity component: 83%
reduction in emissions by 2030 and net-zero by 2050 (most ambitious target proposed)" is
the best answer, but this is not ambitious enough. We need Carbon-neutrality in Ames by
2030.
In Ames, multiple waste management companies collect garages. This causes multiple
garages trucks making trips to the same neighborhood multiple times a week as houses
are served by different companies. Is there any way we can consolidate the waste
management effort while keeping market competitiveness intact for the city? The excessive
trips to collect garages are destroying the city roads and creating additional emissions.
N/A
There has been a lot of discussion and seems to be a push for people to ride bikes, have
less space for parking - assuming people won’t drive. That isn’t feasible for those unable to
ride bikes. We need to have an even larger and more accessible bus system so those that
can’t ride bikes, can get a ride to where they need to go and not use a car. Cy ride is good,
but not enough pick ups and times. They are also expensive. I love the hybrid buses.
One great idea is that you can tax products based on the environmental impact of
manufacturing and delivering the product. At the end of the half year/month the taxed
money would be given out equally to all residents. In effect, people who spend more
money than average will be taxed at the same rate but will receive less money than they
were taxed back. While people who don't or cannot spend as much money will receive
more money than they lost to these taxes. The weight of the tax can be scaled up to
increase the effect. This method provides a passive incentive to reduce consumption of
products that produce greenhouse gasses and harm our environment. It also has an equity
component that people who are poorer will receive more money in return compared to
their spending.
It's hard to imagine exactly what the impact of these targets look like, but we have to start
somewhere to make changes, so thank you for your work in preparing the briefing
documents.
none
We need to shift our business incentives to ONLY those businesses that are shifting to the
updated climate priorities. Support those businesses that are providing this important
community service and taking risks for us all.
carbon-neutrality by 2030 with strong incentives to support home energy retrofits
This is not science based. This agenda does not benefit people and has its basis in
population reduction. Dumbest survey I have ever taken. I am zero percent in favor of any
of this garbage.
What about charging stations for electric vehicles? Shifting from fossil fuels to electricity
will not be easy and will need to be done in incremental steps in order to avoid disrupting
the economy.
If we as a society continue to use the resources of future generations for our own comfort
today, our species is doomed to a painful, early end.
Get going!
Peer reviewed research has demonstrated that ice core gas samplings reveal that carbon
dioxide increases hundreds of years AFTER global temperatures rise, indicating that solar
activity warms the world's oceans FIRST which causes a release of the gas from the ocean.
No green house effect as is theoretically used to usher in this agenda. Climate change is
similarly occurring in the other planets in our solar system as well because the driving force
is predominately solar activity. This is well understand and document. Obviously, Mars
doesn't have combustion engines so the parallels between our planet and our Martian
neighbor cannot be understood by human activity. I can give a PowerPoint presentation on
the subject if your department would like to understand the issue as opposed to simply
abide by the political assumptions that supports the globalist agenda.
"With prices increase every day , you continue to put a burden on poor population who are
leaving pay check to pay check. The only possible outcome . Tomorrow you will increase
prices on gas and prohibit to use wood in a fire place, because it is not a green energy .
That is just fine, let us to freeze those people, as long as we set up more ambition goals
than other Urban community!!! We can report our numbers how we safe the planet!!! One
should stop and think , why we are promote ideas that Humans are a “virus” for the planet
? Our children today coming from school with ideas of personal gilt of their own existence!!!
We have 5 suicides in 2 years in Ames High and Gilbert school district!!! Why no one talking
about mental health in our community? Why kids killing themselves ? Is it partially because
they don feel a value of their existence? The less of us the better the Planet?
Ask yourself, how many children die from Covid 19 , considering the same population?
NONE!
Oh , I forgot it was about the zero carbon emissions .
I got it.
Remember, the only possible outcome from pushing people to the edge of the poverty is
a REVOLUTION !
Just before you will be successfully achieving a zero carbon footprint, it will come!!!
Unexpected, from nowhere!
Good Luck !"
Green house gases should be considered, but the more government involvement we have,
the less freedom individuals have.
"Looking back at the first 4 questions, here are a few comments and questions I have about
them:
#1: For the last year and a half, as a member of a small sub-group of the Ames Climate
Action Team (ACAT) I have been privileged to listen to many Ames and Story County
community leaders discuss their perspectives about fossil fuel reduction. From that
experience I have gained a greater appreciation how the City of Ames, Story County, the
Dept. of Transportation, and other sectors of the city community are doing a lot to meet
the challenge of the climate crisis. For instance, the City is utilizing many methods such as
new electric chargers, biodiesel snow plows, rebate programs, geothermal at the old
Middle School in Ames, and much more. Architects are looking at new codes and
standards, the DOT appears to be investigating new ways of reducing the carbon concrete
and cement footprint.
One thing that makes me especially optimistic the City of Ames and the community at
large can substantially further reduce fossil fuel emissions, reduce waste, and increase
efficiencies is how excited and positive so many people are in Ames about the real
possibility major additional improvements can be made. Given so many people I have
talked to have a can-do spirit, have a willingness to persevere and find ingenious solutions,
I am fully in favor of striving for Zero emissions by 2050 as outlined in question #1.
Questions #2 and #3: The prioritization which includes competition with other nearby
communities that have established Climate Action goals gives me pause. It's as if the
emphasis is on competition though the crux of the problem is essentially a global concern.
Rather than competition with other local communities I am in favor of collaboration to find
common strategies and solutions that are most effective and efficient. Isn't it for the better
good of all concerned for Ames to share resources, ingenuity, new best practice discoveries
and other communications most beneficial to emissions reductions?
There are also, on a personal note, priority interests that come out of my own
experiences growing up and later on working as a social worker that are not clearly
apparent in the list of six priorities. For example, lots of people who live in trailers, rooms,
and apartments do not generally have the same opportunities of choice nor are they as
able in practical terms or interested to aim for the same targets as people in some other
living circumstances. In Ames, as in most every larger community, there are a people who
live in large congregate settings, people who migrate frequently from place to place, folks
who have difficulty because of health issues or other circumstances managing their
housing environment, and some people who are homeless. As the Climate Action Planners
move toward proposing interim goals for the community of Ames and analyze in more
detail areas of greenhouse gas uses such as transit, heating systems in different housing
situations, efficiencies of buildings to reduce construction costs, recycling and restoration
improvements, and the like, I hope pilot projects will be considered for the various needs of
people in the community and innovative programs will be suggested for diverse
populations in a way that equitably benefits people with different lifestyles, cultures, and
resources.
Also, with respect to diversity, would designing a new citywide ""diversity management
model"" specifically aiming at formal Climate Action Planning action initiatives be possible
for reduction of emissions interim goals? I imagine the CAP process being distributed
across the diversity of people in Ames and include institutional and organizational
programs such as housing and rental agencies, agencies that set housing codes for
individual and corporate landlords, social service agencies, Cy-Ride transit, community and
private schools, and Area Agency on Aging-- just to name a few.
Question # 4: Perhaps because I do not have any professional or technical experience
informing me about how the Ames community as a whole is going to meet the greenhouse
gas reduction goal of 83% by 2030, I just continue to struggle with setting interim goals or
objectives before knowing there is some general plan of some kind that shows how to get
there. I am also skeptical of offsets to greenhouse gas emissions, particularly if they
involve theoretical computations and/or buying credits to remote environments from
Ames. I also would like to have some idea about how to recycle older or discarded devices
such as windmill blades, older cars, and inefficient heating equipment. Admitting these
limitations to my own understanding of how to systemically think about these technical
matters, does not mean I do not fully support making immediate changes as soon as
possible. For example, the City of Ames Vehicle Department appears to be ready for quick
transition to electric and bio-diesel vehicles as soon as enough charging stations are
built--why not focus on building those power stations now? Neither does it mean I do not
support a very ambitious 2030 goal. I am convinced the time is right for Ames to develop a
robust Climate Action Plan.
The city of Ames actually has the capability through diversity, education, and
perseverance to be a leader in Iowa and the nation in developing steps toward a
transparent, sound Climate Action Plan. Whenever the Sustainability Solutions planners,
with the additional guidance of the Supplementary Advisory Committee, complete a project
outline for a 2030 plan with more specific measures about how to accomplish gas emission
reduction goals for the city of Ames, I truly hope the City Council will formally approve the
Climate Action Plan proposal.
By 2050 I will no longer be a newcomer with less than four years residency in Ames, but
rather an ""outgoer"" well settled in whom my grand-kids someday in the future may stop
by to visit. I envision them seeing a community that stood out early as showing other cities
and neighborhoods a model pathway toward restoring a cleaner, greener environment."
Let's just do something and take it seriously. Climate change is happening. Every human
has a role in this.
"Watch “Planet of the Humans”.
This agenda will feed the rich and bury the poor."
That we will decide to do nothing. Which is not an option.
I would like the city of Ames to share the specifics of their plans and publicize more how
Ames residents and ISU college students can help the council reach its goals throughout
the year.
I feel that most plan that look at carbon emissions reductions only focus on what benefits
themselves locally. A lot of the technology to reduce emissions is focused on alternative
energy generation. While this technology is great and solves local problems, however a lot
of the manufacturing practices that are utilized to manufacture the alternative energy
generation have equal or worse by-products than the emissions reduction they solve. This
is largly due to manufacturing happens in countries with little to no governmental
mandates on waste disposal and/or emission standards.
I support the Ames Climate Action Team goal of carbon neutrality by 2030
I think as a wealthy community, Ames has to take the lead on issues like this. Our rural,
less-wealthy neighbors need us to make investments to decrease our GHG emissions.
I believe we should what is scientifically best for ames.
Be smart, consider the science and apply it to Ames carefully.
I am so glad to see this initiative.
We must expect to pay up-front costs now to avoid disasterous costs down the road.
From our apartment, we can see the swarm of fans' cars looking for sports events parking.
The emissions from all those engines befouls the air: The need for automobile to attend
sports gathers is so damaging to the environment it must be stopped immediately. Have
you tried Zoom? It...or something like it...is the answer. Any shortcomings it may have are
irrelevant to the climate disaster ahead!
"Make sure the solutions don't cause more carbon than now.
Adopt solutions that don't raise taxes."
I am a physical scientist and I think the science is v;ear = we must act!
All of these goals are ambitious. How can we get people to believe they are important
enough to change our habits? (Sorry, no ideas?)
To me, this is the singular most important issue for our times. Nothing else matters if we
don't have a planet with a climate that allows us to survive.
Start recycling and stop burning garbage.
The swifter we bring about reductions the less total emissions we have. Net zero pledges
are most likely toothless if they do not rapidly reduce emissions and instead aim to reduce
a little bit in the interim and make sweeping cuts at the very end. Our planet, wildlife, and
children deserve better than our selfish tendencioso and impulses. Please choose well.
Only rely on consultants who will have no personal financial gains, no matter what they
recommend. Too many are setting themselves up for a big payday.
You can release more carbon while making car go electricity.
In my response, I represent 3M Ames as the site Sustainability Leader.
Making sure that Iowa State University will be able to fully cooperate with the City of Ames'
plans for carbon reduction is a concern of mine, the University should not be exempt from
the city's goals/actions. Additionally, making sure that messaging about Ames' plans and
actions is communicated broadly and clearly through many channels and to multiple
different age demographics to make sure all residents understand the mission and how to
achieve it. As these climate plans are put into motion, regular updates on the city's
progress towards reaching those goals, and resources on the science of our goals and of
the reduction strategies chosen would be great. I'm not sure this is fully within the scope of
this survey, but some messaging about recycling in Ames and how to do it properly
(especially targeted at University students, our recycling dumpsters all just have general
trash in them) would be great.
"Address garbage collection, to reduce wear & tear on streets, emission of too many
unnecessary collection trucks, add collection of separate kinds of waste on different
days/different containers.
Work with grocery stores, convenience stores, and other entities, to stop using single-use
plastics."
I would like to put solar panels on my home, but in Iowa this will not increase the home's
value and might even decrease it.
"We need to have better community recycling system to remove materials for waste stream
to city power plant and to landfill. Or at least better information to explain how that works
in relation to energy and environmental endpoints.
A process to allow city power plant to utilize wood and branches if that is energy efficient.
More utilization of wind and solar by the city."
Ensure whatever plan is decided upon will be actionable, and that the community will get
behind it. Even a small improvement will begin to improve the community's greenhouse
emissions, so avoid a plan that will only create division and no action.
The only concerns I have would be about the community, it is important to make sure that
everyone's opinions are heard.
Please treat this like an emergency.
We must reduce emissions as quickly as possible, which will, ultimately, create better
economic growth, equity, and sustainability for the Ames community. These goals are not
in conflict. The city should avoid, in its data collection and community engagement, the
perception that a robust and aggressive climate action plan will negatively affect Ames'
economic future.
Reducing emissions as quickly as possible is necessary for working towards local and global
equity and improved long-term economic health.
Reducing emissions as fast as possible makes the most sense equitable and financial wise.
Reducing carbon emissions and prioritizing economic equity are not mutually exclusive.
None
In order to preserve the quality of life we live currently, we need to be aggressive about
reducing our emissions. The time for diluted plans has passed.
Ames is a university city of ISU, a world-class university of science and technology. Ames
earlier pioneered its garbage burning technology that reduced costs of electricity
generation and prevalence of land fill. Most recently, we have the solar energy collectors
further reducing costs through clean energy. Ames has an energy-conservation tradition to
build upon.
I think minimization of economic impact is the wrong mindset. We should be open to
transformations. The impact might be big and positive!
I did not answer most of the demographic questions, because I see no relevance to policy
formulation. What does a person’s race, gender or sexual orientation have on that person’s
ability to assess the City’s carbon reduction goals? The questions are extremely offensive.
Do you plan to put less weight on answers provided by persons over 50? Also, regarding
your presentation on 11/16: Words have meaning. Describing the projection of Ames’
energy efforts to date as “business as usual” fails to recognize recent efforts of the City and
residents alike. It was certainly not “business as usual” for me to plunk down $300.00 to
support the Ames solar smart energy initiative. Please find another phrase.
Increase safe bike paths and bike sharing, increase subsidies for energy and water efficient
buildings and renovations, improve water conservation measures, promote xeriscape
landscaping and decreased green - chemically feed and water soaked - lawns. Please move
ahead quickly on closing the waste to energy power plant and build a energy efficient and
low emission plant as recommended in the LWV study.
"As the home of Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, should be a world-wide leader in this.
We’ve settled for less. We didn’t use to be so passive.
In all we do to address climate change, we should be nothing less than aggressive. Once
the polar caps are gone, we’re all doomed. There’s no time to waste."
1. We need to look at the whole world as our community and set aggressive targets for
Ames in order to balance and support cities with fewer resources around the world in
setting/achieving their targets. 2. How we market this to Ames residents is essential -- we
need to show that when the world benefits, we in Ames will benefit, too. Spouting facts and
appealing to common sense/reason doesn't convince people. To change naysayers'
opinions and actions, we need strategies that will affect people in their guts. 3. The UUFA's
example from the 1950s might be inspiring. Members met with the idea of disbanding
because our membership situation was bleak. Members left the meeting with a super
ambitious (some might have said unattainable!) financial goal to invest in the future of the
UU in Ames. The results speak for themselves in benefits to UUs and to the community at
large.
We need to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety - east Ross Road needs a sidewalk,
Ontario St needs bike lanes, and the pedestrian paths needs names/signs.
I would like to see the city of Ames reach net zero by 2030.
As someone who has followed climate change for as long as I can remember, one feeling I
always associate with the topic is frustration. If you can provide the citizens of Ames with a
widely distributed plan breakdown with small steps everyone can take, I think that would
help allow people to become more hopeful that they can help without making drastic
lifestyle changes at first.
"The target can't be too aggressive. Ames should be a lighthouse example for the nation.
But please, let's start with the incredibly low hanging fruit in the implementation, starting
immediately.
We desperately need a safe and organized cycling network and police actively policing
unsafe motor vehicle operations. Not only in Ames, but throughout the nation. Poor
infrastructure compounds the failures of motorists to safely share the road with cyclists.
Cycling as a means of commuting must be made MORE comfortable, convenient, and safer
than driving on order to compete and reduce emissions, among other benefits."
I'd also support making aggressive changes immediately to achieve carbon-neutrality by
2030.
Hoping we can be a leader on this front and set an example for other American cities
"Accelerated installation of charge stations for electric vehicles and pass a city ordinance
that all newsiness/ commercial any New and major (renovation) construction shall include
as part of construction design installation of E-vehicle charge stations: number of charge
stations based as a ratio of the parking spaces. This would include parking spaces already
in existence as an example main street or north grand mall designate a ration of Epoer to
ICE(internal combustion Engine
Charge a CO2 tax on fossil derived power/cooking/heating-cooling sources and provide tax
incentives for conversion to electric (""green source"" derived) and other green sources of
power. Example: for non commercial(private) as more electric vehicles enter system taxes
shall be based on miles driven and size(weight) of vehicle. For commercial vehicles other
criteria can be used to determine tax
Construct wind turbines, more solar farm sites and offer residents option to purchase
panels or wind power generation pairs"
"2050 is too late to be net zero. I do not see why we can't put ourselves in a emergency
situation footing and fix the situation as soon as possible. Governments have responded to
emergencies in an ASAP fashion before, such as with wars, natural disasters, and the
COVID-19 pandemic. Why should the climate crisis be any different? We need net zero by
2030. We need to stop worshipping the ""almighty"" economy and pretending that we take
a moderate approach to this.
Normally I am a big fan of science education, but I often question how much good it can do
at this point with the climate crisis. Scientists have been educating the public on climate
change, global warming, pollution, etc. for many years, and not enough was done because
many people did not care or did not believe it. Is it time to just fix the problem without the
help of those that refuse to believe evidence?"
Move forward as quickly as possible to reduce community greenhouse gas emissions.
"Follow the science AND foster innovative technology and business efforts to achieve the
ambitious goals.
Lead in a positive way. Try to inspire and provide hope.
Seek ways to incentivize employers to incentivize their employees to make the behavior
changes that can help us reach the target goals."
Affordable housing must be a component of reducing our greenhouse gasses. People
must expend carbon to commute from outlying communities if the cannot afford to live in
Ames.
Given the ongoing political polarization, it's fundamental to ensure bipartisan support and
factor that into the program's communication plan. Misinformation campaigns have proven
effective and easy to run on social media.
"Education component for community members of the why and how
Opportunities for all to participate and see impact
Connection to students for education and participation"
Consider local food and energy production.
Working agriculture and community gardens into landscape designs could help absorb
emissions, it would give beautiful landscape and architecture to Ames community, and
product/ produce could be grown to help feed our lower income communities. Singapore is
working in agriculture into every building design to reduce carbon emissions and bring
nature back into cities.
I have served on ISU sustainability committees over the last 4 years and chaired the Faculty
Senate Task Group that developed the Resolution on Climate Change. As a retired
emeritus I continue to sit on the University Sustainability Committee. I see this as two
pronged: the city needs to act on governmental policy related to utilizing renewable energy
resources in electric utilities. The continued conversion of non-recyclable garbage is good
although it does involve some release of GHG. Accessing all available renewable energy
available on the grid is important and subsidizing companies to create more wind farms,
geothermal plants, solar farms, water based power, etc. is important. We need to expand
our current solar array and continue to increase the percentage of our energy usage from
fossil fuel generation. The second is to give help to local residents in acquiring renewable
energy sources that can be installed at their homes, including solar panels, geothermal
installations, passive solar applications with consultations supported by local government
in order to bring down the initial outlay for applying these technologies to our homes. This
should include helping with the "buy back" of excess energy to the Ames grid. This is a
start. James Tener
Make our city clean.
The changes that we make as a community to reduce greenhouse emissions can also
improve our health, community wellbeing, economic viability, and beauty. For example,
more biking, walking, cooperating, sharing of resources, gardening, green spaces, green
energy jobs, and supporting local ecological farming practices as part of carbon offsets. We
have an opportunity to be leaders, and an inspiration in our state. Also, we all have a moral
obligation to our planet, all the species, and people everywhere who aren't as able as we
are to have such an impact, but whose lives are much more affected by climate change.
Also, climate change is already affecting our economy in dire ways - especially in farming
and in the destruction caused by weather events like the derecho. People are strong,
amazing, and willing and able to make changes and sacrifices if we can do it together, with
belief in creating a more promising hopeful future. Climate change is causing great harm
and will get worse. We can change and it can be exciting, beautiful, equitable, and thriving.
I worry for those who can't afford to upgrade to these more energy friendly things.
"Create more native plant “gardens” or spaces within the city instead of the typical grass.
Bike share system or other form of transportation that isn’t bus or car that can be shared."
I am concerned about both leadership and community buy in to turn these targets into
policies/action items. This is an important bridge.
Commonly, people are very stuck in their lifestyle and it will be hard for them to adapt to
living a way that is beyond them and for the greater good. I think making policy is going to
be hard to implement the lifestyle changes that have to occur, but it has to be done and I
think there should be a representative on the ground explaining to the angry/confused
people why they can't get a certain vegetable in the winter anymore or why they have to
remember to bring a bag to grocery shop with them. Convenience is no longer sustainable,
and this is something everyone needs to understand.
I urge you to publicly post emissions regularly (quarterly or annually) so that everyone is
aware of progress or lack of progress.
There are currently spaces in Ames that could potentially make for good solar farms. The
south end of Delaware has a large stretch of grass with next to no shade. If solar could be
set up in positions like that it would be unbothered by shade, relatively out of the way, and
yet still in a place where it can be seen by passersby. Hopefully, visible solar infrastructure
will inspire hope and confidence.
I think we should be realistic for the community. Look at all options and investigate their
feasibility.
I am concerned about the climate-regressive future land use plan in the Ames2040
comprehensive city plan that was recently passed, and the extra difficulty that fighting
additional sprawl will create for these climate initiatives. I am concerned with how city
planning at its core can help or hinder this plan, as it pertains to infill and effective
densification, and how much the consultants will be able to influence change in those
areas.
Quit wasting money on out of country consultants for a carbon problem that does not
exist. Instead spend our money making our lives better.
Switch to nuclear if you can, cheaper, more energy, no emissions
Affordability, working to access all federal, state, grant funding that may be available.
Educating the public, the information provided on your website so far has been very
informative, working to market the information to not only City of Ames residents but
residents outside of Ames.
I believe reduction of emissions should be a priority over buying offsets. Offsets at some
point will just move the emissions problem around instead of solving it. I hope
transportation is an area in which Ames can work to actually reduce emissions. For car
owners it is safer, cheaper, and more efficient to hop in the car to go even a mile than it is
to use other forms of transportation. The bus system is good, but service is not frequent
enough to make it practical in many parts of Ames. A one-way trip on the bus costs about
three times as much as the gas needed to drive a few miles. If several errands are
combined then each stop adds another dollar of bus fare. Ames is only somewhat bicycle
friendly. The major intersections are very difficult and dangerous to cross. Friends and
family on bicycles have been hit by cars at the intersection of 13th and Stange, even when
the cyclists are carefully observing the traffic rules. Many of the major intersections have
crosswalk buttons that require that the cyclist hop off of the bike, dash over off of the bike
path a number of yards onto the grass, and hop dash back to the bike hoping to get on it in
time to get across before the light changes against them. The subdivisions are developed
so that pedestrians and cyclists as well as cars have to follow main roads a long way around
to get in and onto the less heavily traveled roads. An opportunity was missed in the
development of the Somerset subdivision: a short bike path spur from the Bloomington
Road path right next to the railroad tracks onto Kent would have given bike access to
places like the cafe without taking the cyclist across Stange twice. There is plenty of room
for improvement in making alternatives to private cars a viable option in Ames.
None
Follow California's example. Make plastic grocery bags buy-only. Less plastic straws.
Increased fines for littering. Recycle everywhere for everyone. Switch to solar as much as
possible. More funding for research into greener energy/manufacturing of things that
create greener energy.
Reducing carbon emissions and ensuring a healthy, sustainable future is extremely
important; however many of these plans are speculative and can drastically change the
lives of people in Ames. I think it is important to take action on these issues, but to have the
exact same level of concern on how any plan could negatively impact the residents of
Ames. There are many issues that people face today and for some their 1998 Honda
dumping carbon into the air is far less important than their mortgage, food budget, and
family expenses. Any time the government does anything there are usually unforeseen
consequences, so I would say act more conservatively in the initial stages of reducing
greenhouse emissions and ensure the choices made are truly the most intelligent,
effective, and beneficial to the Ames community.
Electric vehicles
focus on the university
I think that we need to start as soon as possible, but it is also important to make sure that
our economy is not affected too drastically, as the world needs to function still.
I would like to see attention to generational, long-term vision and a view of city systems as
contributing to the health of natural systems.
I have worries about the light pollution that wind turbines have. And how they will effect
airport air traffic in ames.
Maybe consider investing in alternative fuel stations for cars that have a smaller or no
impact on carbon though it's use. Hydrogen or electric like California has done in many
places.
Many people don't understand recycling properly and everything that needs to be done to
properly recycle something (like washing out plastic containers, not including greasy
cardboard, no soft plastics, etc) so providing better resources and education on how to
improve/increase the amount of potentially recyclable plastic that is actually recycled
successfully. Also generally encouraging the idea that the most sustainable thing is using
what one already has rather than buying new stuff constantly. Repairing things that are
damaged/broken when possible is also more sustainable than just throwing it away and
buying a new one.
n/a
Making recycling available for everyone in the city of Ames. Iowa State University has
limited recycling and I believe it should be easier for people living in the city to recycle.
"Consider VPPAs as a substantial part of the net-zero goal; there is a significant amount of
wind farming in Iowa but these may not be local to ames.
Budget constraints aside, VPPAs may technically allow net-zero MUCH much sooner than
2050."
In all honesty I would do anything to reach net-zero emissions as soon as possible but I
know as a whole community that is very difficult. If there is anything else I can do to further
the cause I want to help.
N/A
Ames needs to be more walkable, bike friendly and also must extend and electrify cyride (
not via batteries but trolley buses, buses that get power from an overhead line that can be
powered with renewables). Cars are loud, isolating dangerous, inefficient means of
transportation. the best part of ames ISU campus and down town is pedestrian friendly the
rest of the city must follow. Making use of walkable bike and human only areas with easy
and rapid ( 15 minute maximum wait) public transit is the best way to reduce carbon
emission other than running the city on solar wind grid and battery storage. Cars must be
restricted greatly but also the city must provide a better means of transit so that people
don't want to use them.
Please be realistic and just do SOMETHING. I'm a college student and it's very frustrating
because it seems like nothing ever happens because everyone is so extreme (either being
too aggressive with changes or thinking that nothing needs to happen) and then it seems
like we fight so long that nothing happens. Big changes can be intimidating. A lot of us
WANT to do something, but it's overwhelming when too much is thrown at us. Also, coming
from a girl who is very passionate about sustainable agriculture, DON'T OVERLOOK
WORKING WITH FARMERS!!! Don't neglect the power of utilizing our wonderful Iowa soil as
a way to fight greenhouse gas emissions (I will spare the nerdy, sciency details... but I could
rant about this forever and I'm not even a agriculture major). I am a graphic design major
though, and I do think whatever you do, COMMUNICATION IS KEY. I am still confused about
Ames trash/ recycling system and have been frustrated that that hasn't been
communicated - from the little i know, it sounds like it's AMAZING... but why is it so hard to
find information on it? I feel like it should be something that Ames highlights and clearly
communicates to incoming college students - who are LITERALLY the FUTURE! Thank you
for the opportunity to express my thoughts :)
While this survey is asking primarily about emissions, it should be noted that fossil fuel
extraction causes numerous other environmental damages. Fracking causing worsen
earthquakes, oil spills, and the polluting of peoples water supplies. These damages on top
of the dangers of greenhouse gases call for a very unstable future if we keep things how
they are going both in health and financial ways. What more is that our planets natural
resources are dwindling. Zero emissions should be the goal for everyone asap, but there
are other environmental actions needed to be done. (A big one is plastic waste, which is
killing our oceans.) Ames and her sister cities need to work together not only to reduce
emissions but minimize the other ecological impacts they have.
Make Cyride free across Ames to promote communal transportation. Deters gas emissions
and benefits everyone - even leading to less traffic.
I don’t like cars and I want more public transit because it’s safer and cheaper
It is important to begin the process the transition process as quickly as possible and as
aggressively as possible so we don't saddle future generations with the burden of our
mistakes
I think it is awesome that the city is looking to make these changes and taking input from
the community!
NA
While I would love to shoot for the most ambitious goal, I think that that may be biting off
more than we can chew. I think completing this in moderation will scare less people away.
If the goals are too ambitious, people are more likely to push against it, as the unknown is
scary.
I feel like a major issue with trying to reduce carbon emissions and energy use has to do a
lot with lifestyle. We can design the most efficient buildings and transportation plans, but if
people aren't using efficient transportation methods, or reducing their carbon footprint
and energy use, then it is kind of redundant to have all these efficient things. There has to
be a way to get people to make these lifestyle changes in order for there to be REAL
environmental change.
There should be an emphasis on wastage of resources like food, water, electricity, fuel, and
the like. Education of individuals and reduction through less carbon intensive alternatives.
This issue needs to be addressed ASAP.
Drag and drop doesnt work. More local stores and fewer online purchases, keep commerce
local.
Get people out of cars
Use common sense and don't expect to increase taxes for someones pipe dream. Solar
powered street lights can be cost saving but turning lights off to save costs impacts safety.
Stop students from ordering a bunch of goods and have 2nd hand stores spread out in the
city, goods and services ties into emissions.
Clean electric busses and other transportation and energy that is clean to power them.
Community input is at best unimportant and, realistically, usually counterproductive to
higher-order goals like climate change and equity. Community input overweights the
opinions and oppositional power of cranky reactionaries and is fundamentally
undemocratic in this format.
N/A
I would love to see Ames lead the way on discovering and inventing new ways to develop
our local food supply, and producing enough locally to meet a lot of the needs of our
residents. Iowa State University could surely help in this endeavor. Microgeneration grants
could also be hugely beneficial to the community writ-large, especially for landlords with
larger apartment complexes. with lots of empty space on top of their buildings.
We gotta do this. Pain now or more pain later.
Bring recycling back
Climate change is unquestionably a major challenge ~ how best to approach it is
questionable and will necessitate major changes in existing patterns. The economy of
Ames is driven heavily by ISU ~ if this institution were to turn its focus to effectively
addressing climate change on all levels it would greatly advance progress for Ames and
beyond.
Talk with farmers. Your regulations will affect them and they are part of the backbone to
this community.
If possible, reducing emissions while enhancing the local workforce through renewable
energy (sun,wind,geothermal)
The university needs to be considered as it is a large part of Ames. On-campus, there are
many opportunities for climate change mitigation and clean, sustainable practices (e.g.
recycling). However, there are many students living in off-campus housing, meaning that a
significant portion of Ames is rented. I think the landlord dynamic needs to be considered -
most students cannot afford to pay for green measures themselves, or it doesn't make
sense to invest in green infrastructure for a 1-year rental contract.
Ames local climate actions plans, which entail a GHGs emission inventory and the
establishment of reduction targets, reduction strategies, and monitoring efforts is a
wonderful undertaking that will transform Ames towards a low carbon resilient city. This
bottom-up and participatory climate actions will definitely add up to a powerful and
effective approach in tackling climate change.
Investment in infrastructure
Consider the implementation of greater mobility options of both people and freight. This
can be done by having more bike and pedestrian infrastructure around the city that is
separated from the road to increase safety and make people more welcome to bike and
walk. Add better lighting around this bike and pedestrian infrastructure. And extend transit.
My concerns are that the Ames City Council lacks to create policies that identify how
climate change more heavily affects vulnerable communities such as low-income regions,
minority communities, and elderly communities
Please make sure not to raise utilities fees, implement taxes or surcharges, or any other
kind of charges that causes me to pay more.
Have a system where the society can pitch in and help, but with a benefit. Like recycling,
Each can you recycle, you earn 50 cents. This could be a way that people can be motivated
on making a change so it can benefit the both parties. Also provide information on what if
we do not take care of the climate. Not just a paper or book but on TV, which will catch
people's attention. Have it where it is on a interrupted or live broadcast so people know the
mount of seriousness the situation is. Sometimes people do not have the time or interest
to seek research on the climate conflict. That's why it is best to put it in a platform where
most people have like a TV.
I would love to see a zero- net greenhouse gas emission but a major concern for me is, one:
the people of Ames won't align with it., and two, the cost of house will continue to increase.
Since I am a college student out of state, I am spending a lot of money and I am already
very much in debt, so thinking that the housing cost will be even greater makes me feel
weary. Iowa State and Ames both preach about being student friendly and a major impact
of being student friendly would be to keep housing as low as possible. Another comment I
would like to mention is that there possibly be more in-depth inspections of the quality of
the apartments and homes, such us banning popcorn ceilings or having testing and the
management providing documentation that the popcorn ceiling contains no asbestos at all.
We are already starting so late that we have to be willing to accept rapid changes and
possibly rapid impacts on our cost of living. Inaction is far more expensive.
Since reducing GHG will need cooperation from all citizens, I would appreciate guidance
and ideas for how even small individual actions can contribute to the city's goals. Such as -
walking, bicycling or taking public transportation a certain number of days/week, sharing
rides, always doing multiple errands when taking the car out of the garage, converting gas
appliances to electric - etc etc. I may not be alone in awaiting direction!
"Make plans that fix the problem not create new ones such as wind turbines which only
work at certain wind speeds, have been known to kill birds and energy can't be stored well.
Solar panels are similar, they last at most 10 years, need rare materials to make, fry any
animals that touch them and only work very sunny points and you need a lot of them to get
anywhere in energy. These solutions sound nice and great but only work a portion of the
time and cause problems.
People will rebel against large changes in their lives."
I chose science-based target with a carbon budget and equity component: 83% reduction
because if it is the most aggressive but realistic option I want to support that but would
prefer net-zero by 2030
We have to be ambitious and believe we can achieve it. Anything else is a bandaid over a
fatal wound just to give ourselves the illusion of helping.
There needs to be a movement for community wide participation for general lifestyle
changes that lead to lower environment footprints, including but not limited to emissions.
Iowa State University is a big part of Ames and should be considered a good place to begin
implementing ideas.
It is important to think about what a lack of ambition would mean for our community. Not
starting these improvements as soon as possible is ONLY at a detriment to our
communities as they face problems caused by climate change. This should be a priotity.
To make a significant improvement the community has to make changes in larger ways not
just rely on individuals to make small changes on an individual level.
I believe that moving towards a lower-emission community is essential to the future of the
Ames community. Whether people like it or not, the world will be switching to a
carbon-neutral system eventually, so either go along with it or get left behind.
Setting a target to reduce community greenhouse gas emissions should be tied to EVERY
decision made by the City of Ames rather than conceived as a separate item. How will new
development incorporate the goals? How does zoning impact the goals? Parks and
Recreation? The Ames Community School District buildings, campuses, etc.
I think too many older people are concerned with the ways these changes will impact their
lives, but forgetting how detrimental emissions are to the planet and the future
generations. The goal should be as ambitious as possible and we will deal with the
adjustments later. We don’t have the time to approach this slowly.
In order to reduce the cumulative effect of carbon emissions, it's more important to me to
be very aggressive as soon as possible (i.e. the majority of the reduction should be
completed by 2030). I don't believe the US Federal Government or most countries are
aggressive enough in their targets. It's up to communities like Ames to be leaders and take
responsibility to set bold targets and work hard to meet them.
I believe we should do what is best scientifically, for the community of Ames and the state
of Iowa.
How to help other communities do the same
The city and university should work together to maximize local funding efforts to purchase
zero emission electric buses for CyRide in order to greatly reduce greenhouse gas
emissions within the community.
I hope the conversation turns to specific actions: e.g., 2-cycle engines; private jets; ending
ethanol production; encouraging citizens to accept responsibility.
I think that target has to be realistic and it should be presented to the impacted
communities in a way that everyone will some how benefit from these changes.
People are most likely to get on board if it benefits them in some way. Consider rebates or
other promotional incentives to get people to invest personally in the process. (It's sad that
it takes bribery but we have seen it work with vaccines, etc.)
I believe that the City of Ames' Resource Recovery Plant contributes to a large portion of
the most damaging environmental change we are doing as a community. Only 30% of the
trash processed is being used to power our city, and almost all the rest goes in a landfill!
LET US RECYCLE.
Setting targets is meaningless, it is just an aspiration.
Shouldn’t happen.
Do whatever you gotta do to get carbon neutral
Creating a recycling program in the city of Ames would be lovely! A recycling center in Ames
would also be awesome for students at ISU to work at and potentially get materials from
for projects! This would be far more sustainable and create a good job and community
network.
Ames is a growing community so I think it's important to keep the population happy and
have minimal change. So still having a reduction in greenhouse gas, but provide benefits
for the community. (jobs)
I believe that reducing gas emissions will benefit the health of the Ames community and set
a good precedent for future generations.
Don't get hung up on a specific year. 80% might be possible by 2030, but given lead times
for key initiatives, at target year of 2032 might make achieving that goal more realistic.
In what ways will you persuade corporations located in Ames to participate with the
population of Ames?
As a Natural Resource Major at Iowa State University I am knowledgeable in the climate
crisis going on, there needs to be change. Unfortunately we have waited too long to
address this crisis. Therefore the change may have to be abrupt, and it may come at an
inconvenience to others. But this is our future, everyone’s future. Addressing the climate
crisis is the most important issue not only in America, but the world. Let’s get it done.
As long as the target is able to be followed sustainably and is cost effective for all people.
I believe Ames' Climate Action Plan should set the highest standards for themselves, as
huge risk comes huge reward and it's now or never! The real challenge lies within the fact
that Ames residents are going to have to partake in such a cultural shift to reduce
community ghg emissions, so I hope they're educated and informed before and during this
planning process. Thanks for all your efforts!
"I think it is best to lead with example and to show people hope in the face of a huge
danger. If we start moving according to what the experts say, then other people may follow
the example. Also, as far as I know, the economy will be more ruined if we don't do
anything rather than if do something. Check the IPCC Sixth Assesment Report for the most
up-to-date information on this."
I want our community to take the most ambitious measures that will be reasonable and
take equity into account. I think U.S. governments at different levels have tended to
seriously underestimate and under-react to climate change and that many will continue to
do so, making it especially important for Ames to take ambitious action.
In some things such as climate legislation, we must think about doing what is best for the
greater good. If that means students and residents not driving gas cars much or at all
around Ames, that is what will need to happen. If it is all left up to popular vote I fear not
enough will get done as many people are not very educated on this issue, and may vote for
their short term self interest. This will be massively expensive if we make enough change,
but not doing so will be even more expensive and change our way of life in unimaginable
and dangerous ways. Residents of Ames, myself included, are lucky to live in such a
prosperous city, state, and nation, and are called to use our privilege in the interest of our
neighbor.
Avoid increases in energy prices at all costs, as it disproportionately negatively effects the
poor.
I'd suggest solar for several of the open sky places in town, this would help reduce electrical
needs and reduce the burning of fossil fuels. I would also suggest not pouring tons of
money into one strategy but rather tackling multiple methods in order to solve the problem
from all sides.
This is a waste of time without a transition to nuclear energy. You’re just going to destroy
another part of the earth to benefit your local area.
N/A
Reducing GHG in Ames should start with the simplest things first, i.e. improved urban
planning to guarantee sustainable mixed modes of transportation, mixed zoning, and
intuitive streets designed for people first, not cars.
There is no emergency here if goals are 2035 to 2050...stop using inappropriate terms and
scare tactics in describing this. I see no indication this should be prioritized over many
other long overdue expenditures with infrastructure. This transition will ultimately include
addressing electrical vehicles and there is simply not enough demand for these types of
vehicles or infrastructure in every home to support them. There are far better means to
traverse this land at this point in time and UNTIL it is proven, we shouldn't waste time and
effort to move forward for the sake of moving. This is too costly now and if it is proven...the
cost will become more affordable at that time. I suggest dropping this issue for 5 to 10
years.
This is stupid
Replace existing coal power plant for Ames with a green power plant.
The sooner we can act on reducing emissions, the better chance we will have at a
sustainable planet. It is incredibly important to start as soon as possible because if we wait
too long or don't make enough progress in time, the effects may be irreversible.
We should be very ambitious in Ames' Climate action. Don't wait on state or federal law,
take initiative and set the example for the surrounding area to follow. Finally consult with
the community constantly. Ames has some very intelligent residents that could benefit
towards this action.
none
N/A
Installation of recycling at all apartment buildings and campus dorms.
nonekbkjbnlkn kbyg ytg
I would like to see some form of recycling plant open as well.
Make sure Iowa State has to adhere to strict environmental standards and not get away
with what they are now.
Climate change is not an emergency. Stop trying to scare people into giving more power to
the government, spending obscene amounts of money, and wrecking the economy. The
climate will change naturally over time, and people will adapt as necessary to these
changes.
I am worried about increased living costs including rent, utilities, gas, and inflation.
N/A
Federal incentives are likely to be clear in about one month. From these incentives, it is
possible that Ames could attract manufacturing lines for wind turbine construction, or
possibly waste anaerobic digester components. Or, it could engage in a pilot-scale project
for renewable natural gas generation feeding into the natural gas boilers. Or, if Ames
energy were to become net zero carbon, it could attract electricity intense data warehouses
for ever expanding cloud services, like the fast growing metaverse. I want these ideas
voiced so the Steering Committee can consider looking for an expert assessment as to how
these could made into job creating realities.
give tenants more rights over their landlords. Remove all laws or ordinances preventing the
cultivation of unused land within city limits. Outlaw or incentivize local restaurants from
unethically discarding food waste.
There has to be a committee that ensures this actually happens. Setting a goal is one thing,
but we need to make sure that change is actually happening and being enforced. People
should be very aware of this as well so that they can help. Polls like this are a great
example.
Please don’t spend our tax dollars on this stuff. There’s are so many other things this
community could actually use.
I'd love to see radical changes to the 2040 plan to align fully with the Climate Action Plan
goals.
Make sure that the effect on the community is not drastic and gives the community time to
evolve with the target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
I recognize that a dramatic reduction may be met with reluctance by the community.
However, I believe that the reduction will benefit the whole community and set an example
for other Iowa cities (and university towns across America). That said, it will backfire if the
changes end up raising tuition prices, which may drive students away from Ames. It's
already hard enough to pay for college.
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is very important for the future of our community and
world as a whole. The economy may be slightly effected now but in the long run by
reducing greenhouse gas emissions we are setting out encoding up for success as well as
our health. We need to prioritize sustaining a suitable and safe earth to live on, it is of
utmost importance for the health of I’ve community and the world.
I would like to see volunteering opportunities made known to the public to help with
whatever target we decide on.
Work alongside ISU students and university with this project, they are a good resource.
Be open to creative solutions; embrace technology and innovation; identify and promote
community co-benefits not just wellness but economic i.e. opportunities to incentivize
energy efficiency efforts in older homes and downtown area.
Local action is the best action — and remarkably critical in the larger fight against
human-caused climate crises.
Those who force others to live differently often ignore unintended consequences. The
economy is too complex to be controlled and its participants are too numerous and varied
to be modeled predictively. The only lasting benefits which will be achieved will be the
result of individuals believing in something and changing their own behaviors.
The biggest polluters are corporations, not individuals, so everyone should be
appropriately targeted according to the percentage of their greenhouse gas contribution.
I am more concerned with doing what is best for the community rather than making
climate action a competition.
I think emphasizing the positive economic growth that can come from changes to a
carbon-neutral economy is crucial in generating support.
I would also promote the FWD Composting Program for Ames residents so they can get
involved!
I chose the Science-based target with equity component, but I also believe our target needs
to be more aggressive than the presented targets. We need a minimum target to avoid the
*worst* of climate change's consequences, but I'd rather not cut to too close. Better to go
as far above and beyond as we are able....likely farther than we currently think is possible.
Leave everybody alone. Nothing you can do will change the climate. You are not gods.
Anything you do will overall hurt the community economically.
none
set a target that is achievable so that you are successful and overshoot
Community involvement and education would grow support. Iowa State student
connections to build support. Some type of incentive, such as tax incentives when people
install renewable energy sources or farmers use certain farming practices. Community
compost that anyone can contribute to, and anyone can also reap from.
Some of it should be up to the city council to create the impact however the community
itself needs to be responsible for helping with the change.
Incorporating more ways to get across the city with means other than cars by improving
biking and walking infrastructure. For example, look more into ways to create walkable
communities that are safer for pedestrians and ways that a car is not necessary to live with
(looking toward European country examples like the Netherlands). Also looking into seeing
if it is possible to make areas in the city where cars are prohibited (making the streets
pedestrian-friendly). Reducing urban sprawl would also be a benefit to reduce the
dependency on cars and the emissions that come from the maintenance of cars.
Use nuclear power, see above explanation.
Lowering emissions will be an ongoing concern for the foreseeable future, similar to
improving healthcare. Getting and staying ahead of the curve will reflect favorably not just
on our reputation but also our quality of life.
Obviously Ames will not be directly impacted by sea level rise, but increased likelihood of
drought, intensified storm systems and northern spread of insect pests will cause a
deteriorated quality of life here if we don't do the very most we can to hold down
greenhouse gases.
Stop cutting down 100 year old mature trees that will take thirty years to replace. Stop
okaying building in flood areas and let them return to natural flow.
I think focusing on how much our lives will be improved with a change in how we assign
value - that may support a positive willingness to adopt rather that a culture of "w/o". We
have so much to gain by redefining "more".
Please work harder to plant more trees on, and remove less vegetation from, city land.
More bikes. Less cars. Maybe a train service to and from Des Moines. Polluting our planet
for 150 years and absurd weather events. Only one planet. Need to clean and keep clean.
Some problems: farmers chemicals, research chem-trails, muffen from air-planes.
Involving the poor/disadvantage people, too.
Bike access on all streets; de-incentivize car driving. Community compost campaign;
compost toilets.
Are we getting rid of gas cars?
"I think it is important to acknowledge why gas emissions are used in certain cases, how
many people are in the area, and how large decreases in gas emissions would affect the
community. I would like to see less Carbon emissions in transportation, by using bicycles
and other green ways of transportation, rather than cars, and vehicles that let out exhaust.
This is one of the leading factors for high Carbon levels, and reducing exhaust would
greatly reduce air pollution."
2050 is past projected changes in environment.
"In regards to question 2, if it is the case, it will make people more resistant against this
plan. In regards to question 5, education, practice, education practice to let people realize
why his is/ Help our life and have long-term benefit to everyone especially to our
decedents." Please look at our waste stream. It might be better than landfilling, but the
Resource Recovery Plant can't be the justification of our single-use lifestyles. We shouldn't
be ok with making trash if "it gets turned into electricity."
Good luck getting reelected if you try to pass this. There is a reason why so many people
leave Ames. Terrible leadership, the extreme progressive stance in schools. The city council
is a joke. Do better.
I really just want to see the world get better. I feel that every change can help. Eliminating
single-use plastics I think is an awesome way to get the ball rolling.
The earth has banked many resources over millions of years. It is our selfishness and short
sidedness that cause us to burn up this saving account. Conservation should always be a
part of these goals. Rewards and Incentives should be offered to those who are able and
choose to do the right things.
I am against anything with the name CLIMATE in it. CLIMATE screams a liberal agenda and I
don't want to participate in any fashion. I would be more inclined to fight it. I would be for
something like "Ames Sustainability" that addresses energy use and conservation. That
addresses the fact that that not just big business is the problem, that we are all wasting
energy. That the first 25% of energy reduction for every building in Ames, including homes
is the easiest to achieve, through insulation, modern furnaces and air conditioners, modern
appliances, etc. I will be for anything that addresses energy useage that does not have
CLIMATE in the title.
We owe it to our children and grandchildren to set a very ambitious goal and work very
hard to meet that goal.
Do not take any over-ambitious target, rather put the realistic target which is achievable
and without disrupting the business and local economy.
Please do not sign on to preemptively damaging the economy in pursuit of a theoretical
benefit far in the future. Instead, allow the private sector to operate with a minimum of
restrictions. If/when climate change becomes an issue, a healthy private sector will
address it more quickly, thoroughly, and nimbly than government mandates will. Examples
of this are plentiful in American history.
I want no part of this if taxes go up significantly.
I believe the City has more important issues to focus on.
These steps are decades past due. Let's get on with it already.What other thoughts,
insights, or concerns do you want to share with us about setting a target to reduce
community greenhouse gas emissions?
GFYS
All changes to the community should be made accessible to all of our residents
Have special help available for single young mothers. There are a lot in Ames and they
worry when the price of gas and food goes up.
"We (Ames average GHGs) look bad compared to Iowa City and other peer communities.
CAP is good for recruiting and retaining high-tech industries and professionals.
Costs can be viewed as investments that are economic drivers.
Major public investments are essential in making good things happen.
ISU’s success is going to require being part of a green economy
There is a high cost of doing nothing to address climate change...It is a situation of pay me
now or pay me later, and later is always more expensive. If Ames and ISU does not lead on
climate action, then who will?
Public money is essential to help leverage the private sector to address the climate crisis
The private sector, with public support, can do a lot to help do new things"
Appreciate that this serious issue is being addressed. Generally we are behind the curve so
ambitious targets will help with catch up and ensure that the situation doesn't get even
worse. Doing our part in within the global whole
“Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions” is the wrong goal. Fossil fuels are a limited resource
that will run out in time and is getting exceedingly expensive to produce. The sun and wind
are free. Ames needs to align itself with Tesla which provides excellent quality products for
the best value including solar energy, roofs, storage, batteries. Manufacturing robots and
the most developed artificial intelligence. Affordable EV fleet cars/taxis/police cars/trucks
and supercharging stations (less expensive and better quality than the one the city has
installed, btw). Free city-wide internet powered by satellites and the sun. Tesla also
partners with local businesses on solar roofs, tunnels, etc. The idea is to give residents a
way to actually use energy production as a means to make money, eliminating electrical
bills and providing storage that keeps the lights on in the event of bad weather. Stop
pandering to consultants and elected officials who are just trying to sell the city products
their “friends” sell or produce. For once, do what is best for the people. Work with Tesla.
Any measures that will result in increasing our taxes or overall cost of living in Ames MUST
be fairly presented to residents for a vote. Our property taxes are already outrageous, and
back-door approaches like this to spending more of our money will kill this town. If you're
trying to find new ways to encourage people moving away, initiatives like this will be a
factor.
I know this will be politically challenging - appreciate the city taking on this very important
issue.
"In the above question, there is reference to ""people living in poverty who cannot afford
home upgrades."" Most people who own a home are not ""living in poverty,"" but they may
not have the cash flow to invest in renovation projects. Most of those individuals would
probably be quite insulted to be referred to as ""living in poverty.""
Tech note: The ""Terms and conditions"" button does not lead to any explanation of the
actual terms and conditions."
I don't want GHG reduction targets to be too aggressive so that it puts too great of burden
on lower income individuals and a burden on the econmomy.
Convenience is the biggest threat to any climate plan. The community needs to be involved
and learn that a healthy environment is good for all and that climate action can create jobs
and reduce the risk for diseases and illness. There is too much misinformation and some of
the points above are fostering that bias, i.e. “ensuring the economy is impacted minimally”,
which is the wrong approach, the economy should be impacted positively by creating
better paid and healthier jobs. Many people do not understand the triple bottom line as
something that benefits ALL. Meaningful education will play a crucial role in the success of
the climate action plan, which needs to be very ambitious or it won’t matter anyway. The
messaging and community involvement need to be sensitive, informative and meaningful.
"I'd like to see one single trash hauler in town, rather than multiple companies running
down my street on multiple days.
I'd like a ban on gas-powered leaf blowers.
I'd like to have the city offer classes and one-on-one home visits to educate people about
how they can improve, upgrade their structures, and perhaps add solar. I find the
information too daunting to tackle on my own.
I'd like the city to offer a rebate or refund on each household utility bill for meeting some
targeted level of reduction in that home. If we had small, individual goals to work toward
within each household and some incentive to do it (other than the obvious,
""save-the-planet""), it might have a more immediate impact in changing behaviors and
saving energy within our homes."
"There needs to be a big push to get people out of their cars and on to public
transportation.
Maybe an all day bus pass for people who need to make several stops.
Possibly subsidizing a shuttle to the DSM airport several times a day."
Reducing GHG should be sought with eye on a simultaneous reduction in costs for
residents. Do not increase costs for residents.
Be sure to not set plans that ignore subsequent advances in technology that occur after the
target is set.
Please do not effect average peoples lives. We can’t afford increases in cost of living.
I'm supportive of efforts to do things as environmentally friendly as possible but we need
to have balance.
Cost to taxpayers (both businesses and individuals). Where this actually stacks up in
citizens concerns (for example, is it behind inflation, adequate housing, clean water, cost of
energy, access to health care, access to services, and a number of other things that effects
ones daily living).
Blue collar workers can not afford to have their cost of living rise as we are going to be
dealing with inflation already.
Unfortunately, we have put ourselves in a position with no choice but to act aggressively to
address climate change. I believe the cost of not acting aggressively far exceeds the costs of
aggressive action.
All of the current GHG reduction plans come with high costs that do not exceed the
benefits and there is not enough evidence that man made GHGs are driving any climate
problems.
I greatly appreciate the City is soliciting feedback from community members. I see a lot of
"low-hanging" fruit around town and waste. I would assume those are great places to start
to reduce emissions. For example, Iowa State University has lights on in many buildings at
all hours of the day. Just drive by or walk on campus at midnight. The buildings are closed,
but many of them have extensive lighting on. What's disappointing, is that concerned
citizens cannot even turn the lights off in certain buildings and the new "green" buildings
will have substantial lights on with nobody in the building. That is wasteful and people need
to make the connection that wasting electricity is equivalent to more coal or oil or other
fossil fuels (albeit we have some garbage and trash incineration in our community creating
power) being burned and more emissions and pollution going out the smoke stack for no
good purpose. In addition, I see extensive parking lot lights in public or quasi-public parking
lots like at the Iowa State Center with no students or cars (or very few) in the parking lot at
night. Those could easily be halved. Those are just so simple starting places and I would ask
our city leaders and Iowa State University leaders to think about these simple changes that
could be made. The same goes with conducting a street lamp audit. Ames is exceptionally
bright in some neighborhoods and some streets and I would assume we could reduce
some lighting as well. I really appreciate this effort though and think it can help make Ames
a more liveable, beautiful, verdant and attractive community.
What is China and India doing to reduce green house gases. This should not be one side !!!
It is unfortunate that this is taking the time and resources that could be better utilized on
problems that actually matter... the questions about demographics below are completely
unnecessary
It seems that most of the possible answers in this survey are still pushing us to conform
with what the rest of the world is doing without much thought towards the uniqueness of
Ames. I ask Ames leaders to consider all the impacts of these decisions and not just be
blinded to the aggressive stance on removing carbon. Without consideration of all impacts,
we could easily put our community in a very difficult position, forcing a number of citizens
to pay more in local taxes or utility bills to pay for drastic projects. This may put a
economical hardship on the community overall and cause people to not want to live in
Ames.
"Understanding the cost/benefit of this.
Ensure we aren't just making commitments to feel like we are apart of an exclusive club of
progressive cities.
Don't underestimate what we are already doing.
We need population growth to remain viable. Ensure the adopted practices promote
expansion and growth of the economy."
I think this is a reach overall. And not a critical issue for our community. We can make
progress without being so aggressive. I am concerned about the impact on businesses I
am concerned about rising house prices if home owners r required to make added
benefits. I don’t get this initiative. How much is this all costing? Seriously? We have
people without food. People without education. Issues in our schools of significance. Is
this someone’s pet project? It makes me wonder.
The pathetically slow pace of the city government and ISU on addressing climate change is
deplorable. Don't you understand that this is a crucial existential crisis that threatens the
world?! You are not doing anywhere near enough fast enough. I have no confidence that
you are up to the task ahead.
Please think long-term and not just about economics of now. When making infrastructure
upgrades that are needed anyway (i.e. trash burning power plant), we have the opportunity
to address environmental health, greenhouse gas emissions, and sustainability. Those
added benefits help to justify the costs, and we should make sure a replacement is going to
take us 100 years, not just 10 or 20. Also make use of potential partnerships with Iowa
State University. Not every town has the advantage of a lot of researchers with many ideas
and ability to tap into e.g. federal grant programs. That is a huge asset. Please do the work
to explore creative possibilities and partnerships to achieve climate goals.
The number one greenhouse gas is water vapor (at least 90% of greenhouse warming is
due to water vapor and clouds). Additional increments of CO2 will cause relatively less
direct warming (or climate change) as it increases. The apparent reason that many
countries (and cities now apparently) are talking about becoming carbon neutral is that it is
a way to increase taxes and create inflation from more regulations to industry resulting in
higher prices.
In order for it to be effective, I hope the city is collaborating with the university and getting
student input on how to make sure all of Ames, including our variable student population,
can be part of these efforts.
You can set all the targets you want but unless you achieve agreement and consensus of
the general public, I am doubtful that goals can be met.
Consider the actual cost of implementation, including increased electric rates.
Plan should be practical, actionable and measurable. Not just a “feel good” statement.
"incentives for home energy efficiency upgrades are needed.
stop the construction of subdivisions."
Will the City take action to stop the temporary residents, Stu dents and such, from bringing
carbon burning gas vehicles. Will the City put restrictions on ISU in general to get the
school and those who work and attend there to meet the City’s gosls
I do not know how these emissions can be reduced with constant radon fans,
dehumidifiers, computers on, air conditioning, heaters. A lot to deal with! Too many people
don’t reduce even 10%. Give public praise to those who do by recognizing them, thereby
leading through example?
I have a working knowledge of wind & solar energy sources. They are NOT capable of
providing reliable, sustainable energy. Mining, within the US, for resources has been limited
due to environmental concerns. Wind & Solar source have limited life cycles. Net 0
emissions is just a buzz word, there is no technology that will allow that to be truly
meaningful. I believe we all need to learn to do less consuming of energy. The
infrastructure for an electric car in every 3rd home in Ames doesn't exist. The costs
associate with what is being asked here will be another house payment for most people.
How can you commit to any goals without the technology existing to get you there? That is
not sound logic.
This needs to be done without raising costs to citizens or impacting quality of life in the
community.
Eliminate the solid waste plant
WE are killing the Earth, we need to stop that as quickly as possible. Adding more bike and
walking paths to downtown and other shopping areas would be nice start.
Question number 3 seems to indicate that global and local equity might be in opposition to
strong emission reductions. I don't believe this is true at all. Research has shown that
strong climate action is critical to move toward global and local equity -- environmentally,
socially, and economically. Many community members in this community alone have
suggested ideas for how to cut emissions drastically in the next few years (to prioritize
global equity) while also prioritizing local equity and widespread ability to participate in
these important changes (for instance, providing loan programs to participate in
community renewable energy efforts such as SunSmart; ensuring that people have safe,
clean modes of transportation, including accessible and free public transport, biking, and
walking; prioritizing affordable housing and access to necessities within walking distance
(grocery stores, etc.); really evaluating spending priorities within the city itself and how to
prioritize equity -- which includes strong climate action -- in our budget choices). Similarly,
there has been a lot of discussion in the climate action planning meetings about the costs. I
appreciate, however, Bronwyn's comment in the last workshop about how we need to
carefully consider the costs of inaction and adequate action that we will pay and that we
(and people worldwide) are paying now. Our costs are investments, and I think it is
important to frame them in this way. Research and policy action taken in other cities have
shown that climate action investments in areas such as renewable energy will be paid back
quickly in savings for communities who choose to invest in these options. This is the way
the entire state, country, and globe are going to have to move in the coming years, and we
will benefit in the long-run if we choose to be a leader in climate action right now, reducing
emissions as quickly as possible in the next couple of decades and seeing how we can
prioritize equity in tandem with this goal. There are many of us in this community who are
so excited and relieved that we are developing a climate action plan, and I urge the city to
pursue as ambitious a goal as we can with global and local equity within our ecosystems as
the driving reason for doing so. Thank you!
A mandatory residential recycling program. Free recycling drop bins for paper, plastics,
mental etc, similar to the current drop bins for glasses.
In my opinion the city council has more pressing issues than to spend time and money on
this issue. Taxes and assessments are already too high!
I would broader discussion around reduction solution possibilities. Electric continues to be
brought up. It is only one reduction solution. We must consider other forms of technology,
carbon capture, incentive models, behavioral changes, etc., to make significant impact. The
recurring mention of electric limits people's creative thinking and unintentionally stakes
mindsets on a single-source solution. This is too narrow and fool-hardy an approach.
While cost must be considered at some level, we can pay a modest cost now or pay dearly
in many ways in the coming years. We need to think of those who come after us and make
changes now while we can!
In the report please comment on city programs that align with, and those that are counter
to, reducing emissions. For example, there is a city initiative to encourage native plantings
in the parking to improve stormwater. This also reduces CO2 and NOx emissions by
decreasing lawn mowing, decreasing nitrogen fertilizer application rates, and improving
carbon sequestration into the soil by active microbes. Contrast that with the City's building
inspection department's push to require everyone to keep grass in the boulevard and mow
it instead of allowing native plantings, pushing a policy that is supposedly safety-based but
has no supporting data, and will which will go against climate and stormwater protection
initiatives. Basically let's be data-driven and not stub our own toes.
Can the city purchase its own wind turbines?
Low income residents can be helped by taxpayer support. Arguments against high targets
due to impact on the poor can be easily rebutted by city aid.
We need a recycling program - available to all residents in the county - so we are burning
less waste. Need to encourage composting at the household level.
I'd like some attention to be given to solar energy! I think Ames could benefit from
expanding the current SunSmart community solar farm and maybe even more tax
breaks/funding for city residents to install solar panels. I think the biggest obstacle in
installing solar panels is that it takes ~15-20 years to break even in costs, so including
financial incentives would be a great push for more residents to install solar panels. I
understand the money has to come from somewhere but it's just something to consider.
Let's move aggressively and see how many tangible changes (direct emissions reduction
solutions) we can get done by 2030. Then let's clean up the rest of Ames using local carbon
offsets, renewable natural gas, power purchase agreements, and some of the other
imperfect tools at our disposal. Let's get carbon neutral by 2030, and then aim for true
carbon neutrality (with minimal use of offsets and other transition tools) by 2040. We can
easily be carbon neutral on paper by 2030 and we should be.
I admire setting a target, but it needs to be really bold! the signal from the top makes a
HUGE difference in what follows. It signals strength, and support, and optimism. Designing
a city where how we live draws down carbon and ghg is a huge economic and social win!
We have no idea of the amazing innovation and creativity that could arise if we were willing
to set the community forward on the task. it's not just about tech fixes -- it's about social
engagement.
Some of us have been living low-energy life styles for a long time (decades for my wife and
me) with smaller houses, energy-efficient vehicles. Energy conservation begins with the
individual, not the 'community'. These projects will likely become another way to coerce
people into making 'politically correct' decisions approved by the Nomenclatura, without
looking at more basic day-to-day solutions. For example, the City has very few stoplights
synchronized for more efficient passage, especially early in the morning, and has buses
running mostly empty most of the time; transportation logistics as a discipline has been
around a long time. You'll likely attempt to force people to drive less, focus on solar and
wind, without seriously looking at ways to significantly impact long-term energy use
(nuclear, with a 2-3 decade planning cycle). All of those solar panels and wind turbine
blades will need to be replaced eventually. How will the City manage that without
significantly increasing land fill volume and potential rare-earth element ground water
contamination?
I read the long report, it tells me nothing about Ames and the impact of targets on the local
community. I've been following this closely and I feel we are no further ahead. Honestly, I
will not be onboard until the leaders on top take some action. I.E UN Climate Rep. John
Kerry owns multiple houses, a large ocean yacht, a private jet, etc. No indication by his
actions he believes what he says. Same for most members of our community, but at a
much lessor extent.
"Native prairie plantings to sequester carbon - more effective than trees.
https://www.fws.gov/news/blog/index.cfm/2011/6/27/iowa-the-power-of-prairies#:~:text=M
ost%20of%20the%20prairie's%20carbon,Cynthia%20A.
Expand greenspaces and parks"
Climate change is perhaps the most serious threat to life in the 21st century. Thank you for
making an ambitious plan to address this issue in Ames.
Ensuring community and student input is gathered extensively so an accurate decision can
be made
We must be willing to accept radical change. "To preserve the American way of life will
require curbing it excesses. The countless decisions, large and small, made over the course
of a century or more that define freedom in terms of indulging our appetite for more
consumption, mobility, and unlimited choice have created threats more dangerous than
any faraway nation-state. We have become our own worst enemy." Andrew Bacevich,
"After the Apocalypse," p. 102
Ames should focus more on reducing emissions responsibly than taking iresponsible
actions just to meet a goal by a deadline.
There should be no increase in any kind of taxes to pay for these goals. It is not the role of
government to increase regulations.
We definitely need to act NOW
Be fully transparent on the costs of both action and inaction.
I think it makes sense to prioritize carbon reduction strategies based on a "return on
investment" type metric (most carbon reduced for least cost).
How are we currently being harmed by greenhouse gases? Hope this isn’t a money grab to
make people feel good.
Other "impacts" Council should consider include: how much will this cost Ames taxpayers?
Will the Council do a cost-benefit analysis on the identified items to lower emissions? In
addition to the financial implications - what will be the impacts to my daily life? Will my
family have to walk versus drive the car, etc. In addition to financial impacts - quality of life
must be taken into consideration too. This survey should have included questions related
to "how much are you willing to have your taxes increased or utility rates go up to lower
emissions?" It is way too easy for people to want to lower emissions but not when they
have to pay more to accomplish it.
"Thank you for taking time to seek community input on this strategy for facing an
impending worldwide calamity. However, popular opinion will not quickly align with the
extreme adaptations needed to prevent a significant rise in average global temperatures.
I'm confident the earth will recover from the taints of the Anthropocene Epoch, the
question is, will humans also? We rely on our elected representatives as at every level to
make the tough choices to ensure the long-term well-being of humanity."
Your number one priority should be to protect the tax payer. Don’t get carried away with
“pie in the sky” ideas.
Stop being weak ineffectual leaders. Be bold instead of Iowa nice status quo
Imagine how beautiful Ames would be without a power plant belching fumes into the air at
the end of Main Street.
Our community is small and has a relatively low impact on global greenhouse gas
emissions. Acting too aggressively could hurt established industries and discourage new
industry from investing in our community. I would like to see an action plan that continues
to move in the direction of reduced greenhouse gasses with economically feasible and
common-sense action items that will not hinder the growth of the City of Ames and central
Iowa.
While these projects seem overwhelmingly expensive now, think of what our children and
grandchildren will have to deal with in terms of health costs, sustainability, and expense to
undo (if possible) the decades of careless ecological practices that are/were based on
profitability for a few, convenience for many. It's time to take responsibility.
Residents need to understand the associated costs. No questions in this survey asked for
feedback on paying for this. We also need to understand how changes (needed to meet
these target dates) would impact our quality of life. As an example, I'm not willing to ride
public transit (CyRide) multiple times per week because I'm told I can't drive my car.
We must act forcefully and thoughtfully. For example, we need to quit talking so much
about our obsolete garbage plant and start thinking about our future.
Good design encompasses aesthetics, it's weird that these are treated as two different
things.
Do practical things as offsets such as planting trees.
The goal is for all people to live sustainably of the planet with a near zero carbon foot. Big
tech is trying to become carbon neutral or carbon negative by 2030. Ames and other
communities also need to become carbon neutral by 2030.
Not recognizing that efforts for climate change goal changes are most likely more
dangerous and destructive for our great nation and world than the increased availability of
fossil fuels and atomic energy would be!
Too much emphasis on climate change issues instead of recognizing the disaster of loss of
the more important needs of inexpensive and excellent energy provision of natural gas, oil,
and atomic energy as first choices!!
Do it in a way that maximizes biodiversity concerns (if you have a choice to build mitigation
in point A or B pick the site that has less biodiversity value)
We are looking at huge reductions and big changes before looking at some basic changes.
Transportation is the biggest producer and we have high cost of housing that leads to long
commutes, anytime in town you will see dozens and dozens of vehicles idling in drive thru
lanes. There is likely a solution that may mean more CO2 produced in Ames with a more
concentrated population center that will result in an overall reduction. I think looking at
this as a single community (other than what City government itself can/should do) is the
wrong approach and could very well be counter productive, driving people to build and live
outside Ames. We declare victory with reduced CO2 but in total it is increased.
I believe that we should focus on our emissions, but not at the expense of other initiatives.
This survey didn't include any questions regarding how these improvements will be paid
for. My number one question is: how will all of this be paid for and how much will it
collectively cost by 2030 and 2050? I would appreciate the City assessing and making it
known what each action would cost Ames residents and how it would be specifically paid
for (general fund - property tax increase and or utility rate increase, etc.). Lastly - for any
improvements - should more of the costs be placed upon business/industry then
residents? As an example, could a formula be established based on the amount of our
respective emissions? Thank you.
I would like to see the city do more to encourage use of public transportation/bicycle
infrastructure to commute locally to work. This would include considering using commute
time by public transportation/bicycle toward workday hours. City subsidies to businesses
that buy vehicles/materials that are sustainable and will work toward emission neutrality.
Of course we are going to say that the most ambitious option is the ideal. However, this is
where there needs to be some sort of costs associated with the plans brought into the mix.
If the plan is not fiscally possible, what is the next best option for right now? How might we
be able to achieve the ambitious goals? Are there other grants or block funds available and
could be accessed or allocated? How will our choices now affect the most vulnerable
segments of our populations? This might include increases in housing costs to upgrade
heating and cooling systems or taxes and could even extend to everyday items as
businesses work to cover their costs. If transportation is a large part of the emissions, how
do we make it affordable, attainable and desirable to all segments of the population. There
are plenty of people driving a 20 year old car that they don't have to make payments on.
Having to move to a new vehicle may be out of reach for them. Coming from a non-profit
perspective, increases in operational costs will need to be met with additional funding or
there could be a loss/reduction in services to the community.
There is no time to delay and wring hands. We must make an ambitious goal now.
While the ambitious target (Science-based target with a carbon budget and equity
component) is going to be the most effective, I'm not sure Ames can adjust and implement
sweeping changes so quickly; lots of people and businesses will likely be against such rapid
reforms, unfortunately, which is why it feels unrealistic to me.
The goal needs to be less about the cost for change in emission reductions and more about
better environmental and social outcome improvements. More than carbon reduction is
needed. How about methane and other climate impact?
I am concerned Ames will not do enough to mitigate their carbon footprint. I am concerned
the effects of climate change will no be adequately explained. I am concerned Iowa State is
committing to more fossil fuels instead of looking into how to heat & power campus
without fossil fuels.
N/A
"What policies or regulations will be placed in order to achieve proposed reduction? Ames
is comprised of a younger populace most of the year due to students; how does that factor
into the overall outlook? A lot of students aren't going to be able to afford Electric Vehicles
or make energy efficient renovations to their dwellings. Does that mean all of that burden
is placed upon Property Managers? Who and where are things incentivized when
attempting to effectively place these plans.
Besides solar and wind, other cost effective solutions may be worth looking into. Many
technologies required for net-zero emissions by 2050 are still within a prototype phase. It
may be worth allotting extra programs within the ISU departments to focus on such
research or even on local and community emissions; where and what can be addressed at
cost effective solutions."
Setting targets is one thing, figuring out the "how" is the challenge. In pondering day-to-day
behavior of people and companies in Ames, I have seen little to no change in behavior even
as the urgency of climate change becomes more evident. It is very difficult to convince
people to change. Also, care should be taken to consider the full impact of measures taken
as the construction and/or disposal of, say, electric vehicles and batteries is part of the
equation.
Thank you for taking this seriously!
Significant restrictions will drive up the already high cost of living in Ames, and with this
possibly wages. As Ames continues to grow the workforce is likely to commute in from
areas with lower cost and less restrictions, negating any reductions made by Ames.
I like to know th City plans to control the impact of an ever changing population. Will the
City restrict the types of vehicles students and new residents can bring into Ames. Will the
City force conversation of all properties sold, or all rentals when contracts are renewed or
entered?
Rationalize garbage pick up by franchising certain areas to a single company to end the
environmentally destructive practice of having garbage trucks from different companies
picking up at a few houses: we don’t need garbage trucks from five or six companies driving
through every Ames neighborhood Monday through Friday
Make sure there is support for those living in Ames for the target selected. I don't want
something that will cost alot!
Let’s also increase reliance on wind and solar energy and work aggressively to stop using
coal.
We also need to reduce local herbicide and pesticide use on public property
Our city needs to restore net metering for electrical customers generating electricity from
solar panels.
"The right to life, perhaps the most fundamental of human rights, is referenced several
human rights instruments and clearly articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (article 3) and in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (article 6).
The right to life imposes an affirmative obligation on State, City, and County governments
to protect citizens from conditions that pose and imminent threat to their lives. When these
governments permit circumstances that entail a threat to life, as climate change does, they
have failed to protect that right. Weather related disasters such as heavy storms,
hurricanes, heat waves, severe cold, and flooding already kill many thousands of people
each year, and climate change increases both the number and severity of these events.
Changing climatic conditions can introduce new pathogens, new vectors, and new
conditions favorable to the spread of epidemic disease, which can bring increased
mortality. When governments fail to take measures to moderate or inhibit climate change,
or to help citizens to adapt to it, they are failing to meet their human rights obligations.
Climate change also affects the right to food, the right to clean water, and other necessities
essential for life. The city should consider adopting the Declaration on Human Rights and
Climate Change and making its standards and provisions part of public policy."
City leaders are to be commended for undertaking such improvements to life quality and
responsible citizenry in Ames. Thank you.
Think about laying the information rather that compelling people to do something. Propose
a plan that is focused and makes a solid argument. People will automatically be persuaded
I don't want our local economy and jobs affected by over aggressive targets based on
equity, whatever that is.
Community education and buy-in is needed, so please start the process of educating. For
example, why buying a hybrid or EV, and why they are needed and even more economical
than their current gas guzzlers. Practical advice and reasons why we need to change to get
more people engaged are part of our goal.
Make sure that both CyRide and HIRTA are able to be part of this plan so improvements
can be made to help reduce the number of people driving alone and increase the use of
buses for all residents
Reconfigure driving options to transition to less vehicle usage, such as pedestrian and
bicycle only streets
I think reduction should be emphasized over offsetting emissions.
The earth's climate has fluctuated for its entire existence and carbon dioxide is food for
plants. Current plant leaf pore distribution concentrations are higher than average,
indicating less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than at previous other times in earth's
history. Plants need more pores on their leaf surfaces in order to breathe. Prosecuting the
transgressions (poisoning, polluting, erosion issues) of industrial farmers along with
removing tiling and restoring area wetlands (channelizing Squaw Creek is a step in the
wrong direction) would improve our environment rather than wasting effort curbing
carbon dioxide emissions.
Continue to burn Story county trash so that minimal waste is sent out of the county to
landfills, and so that Story county doesn't need to build its own landfill. Continue to burn
fossil fuels to generate electricity and continue to scrub emissions to minimize particulate
matter going to the atmosphere. Finally, come to your senses and realize that Carbon
Dioxide is not the enemy. Carbon Dioxide emissions are absorbed by plants (Corn,
Soybeans) in the photosynthesis cycle and it is converted into vegetable matter. This in
turn generates Oxygen for us to breathe. In short, if you remove Carbon Dioxide from our
Atmosphere, plants will starve and die. This will hinder all life. As a farmer, this is very bad.
What exactly is causing greenhouse gases in Ames. If we know this then we can address
how to reduce them.
So glad Ames is working on this. Be brave snd bold!
Ames 2040 Plan needs to be put on hold so it is aligned with the greenhouse gas emissions
targets.
The city has to be more aggressive with developing alternative and public transportation. In
particular, we need a much better infrastructure for bikes: more and more secure bike
lines, traffic light sensors for bikes, covered racks to store bikes, etc. We should discourage
the use of cars in the city center. We should also fight against the urban sprawl and new
developments outside the current city limits."
Concern about the result of inflation as existing product are forcibly diminished and the
economy unable to provide economical replacement products. People on fixed incomes
are squeezed economically. Those are my concerns.
I hope that "green house gas reduction" doesn't become an obsession, and that it remains
understood that there are many other aspects to a sustainable human relationship with
the biosphere. Some other things to be worked on are: carbon sequestration, public food
forests / edible landscaping / just more biodiversity instead of grass lawns, education on
sensible behaviors (biking vs. driving, water conservation, composting, seeing your
environment as an extension of yourself, etc), how university students can get plugged into
initiatives to use their skills to contribute towards achieving ecological balance, and more.
also prohibit stores from using disposable plastic bags
Based on the BAU path analysis presented by the consultant, we are currently among the
worst of our peers, so there should be some low hanging fruit to help drive later
percentage improvements quickly. I'd like since sense on the cost differential between the
moderate and aggressive paths though…
I would do more if I knew what to do. I would do more if someone helped me to do it and if
I could afford it (for example solar power)
Government Keep Out.
Net zero is a farce. The goal needs to be zero. Don't use offsets to compensate for our
pollution. We need to front load our reductions to get the most impact on climate.
We must be the most aggressive to ensure a safe and livable planet for our future
generations so need to do whatever it takes to make that happen. We all will have to get on
board!
Make sure the Ames 2040 plan aligns with the goals that are set in this plan.
Please focus on an equitable approach; especially geared towards students
I believe the positive impacts will generally outweigh any issues that could arise, depending
on the costs associated with the change. If the cost of change is too high, I would lean
toward a less aggressive approach
I appreciate the ambition that is going into the Climate Action Plan. With that said,
sometimes we get so focused on the big picture we forget about the small details. These
small details are often what matters most. How can we jump into reducing emissions by
83% while the Ames community fails to have composting and recycling more accessible to
residents, or an organized garbage collection system, or a reusable bag incentive program
(charging $.10 per plastic bag and $0.15 per paper bag at local businesses), or a truly
pedestrian/bike friendly community (I live 2.9 miles from my place of employment and I do
NOT have a route to bike to work that wouldn't include riding a mile on a gravel shoulder of
a 45mph paved road). Our City needs to focus on the smaller scale problems/solutions to
favorably set the community up to drastically reduce emissions and, by taking the time to
do this, Ames residents will express more willingness to actively participate in the
necessary behavior changes that come with reducing emissions. I would appreciate seeing
the Ames City Council and City staff create short term action goals before committing to a
long term projection goal.
I think the United States needs to be a leader in greenhouse gas emissions while
considering the effects on manufacturing. Take for example if the US reaches net zero by
2050 and China is still washing their clothes down stream where they dump mercury this
isn't doing anything for the planet except giving China yet another manufacturing
advantage to take American jobs. If we want to save the planet we need to do so by being a
leader and making sure all countries we trade with are following the same climate action
plan and if they don't they face sanctions to offset our costs for doing so.
Trust in God not man to take care of the climate. Little Ames, Iowa is not capable of making
a global impact. The cost of big goals and projects is not worth it. If everyone is not 100%
vested in the project, then it's not fair for everyone to have to pay for it.
Who gives a shit. Until China and India reduce emissions, you’re pissing in the wind so you
can feel good about yourself. Meanwhile, you screw over those who are trying to make a
living. In other words, piss off.
Aggressive goals and objectives are great, but the plan needs to be actionable. Some
smaller goals to show progress do more to boost community support and morale than a
few huge goals that take exceptionally long periods of time to implement and see results.
Also consider how the plan will impact cost of living for college students who are already
financially squeezed by rising tuition costs and limited financial aid.
We have to get emissions down asap.
I don't think this is a big concern. The net result can be canceled out by China and Russia
not doing anything. The entire US accounts for 11% of greenhouse gases. Lets spend our
money on tangible things that will improve peoples lives.
I would like goals set that we can strive to maintain but aren't so ambitious we quit before
they are met
There is no bigger need in this world than limiting the damage being caused by climate
change. All other struggles we are facing as humans will be exacerbated if this is not
handled. I understand this is expensive, inconvenient, and unpopular, but this is an
existential threat. We need carbon reduction now no matter the cost.
We shouldn't pay for credits ever. Reduce what is economically responsible by 2030, and
then reevaluate next steps. Can't possibly predict all advances and innovations that might
be available by then from current prospective
I'd like to see more sustainable transport options, such as dedicated cycle paths to enable
residents to not always have to drive to get around town. There are many good examples
of other cities who have been forward thinking in this way eg Delft, Netherlands. I'd like the
City of Ames to set a positive example by promoting and enacting the notion of considering
the environmental impact of every decision that it makes, before that decision is made.
"Current plans to reduce global GHG are too little too late. If we are to keep warming
below 1.5 degrees, waiting until 2050 to go net-zero is not enough. We must achieve a
net-zero society much sooner. It is better to set ambitious goals that we have to really
strive to meet, rather than to set moderate goals that are easily achieved but have little
impact on slowing climate change. Even if we occasionally, fall short of our goals, the
overall outcome will be much more positive if we push ourselves.
We have historically always taken a reactive approach to environmental issues. Now is the
time when we need to start being proactive. The evidence is clear. We need to face the
issue of climate change head-on, before it is too late."
Reducing unsustainable farming practices that also produce toxic emissions.
It would be helpful to incorporate certain patents from less well-known companies that
would be equally beneficial as lowering greenhouse gas emissions (ex;: biodegradable
plastics).
The target should 100% be net zero by 2050 with moderate goals in 2030 and 2040. As long
as we reach the target by 2050 it should play out well.
Prove that the leftest climate claims are real. Many are not.
Offering financial incentives (rebates, grants, etc.) will boost community involvement. Be
sure to collate and offer clear guidance to the public of what will have the greatest impact -
list specific actions ranked by impact - such as adding insulation to the home, switching to
an electric car, replacing gas appliances with electric, etc. To encourage action to meet the
deadline, maybe have financial incentive amounts change over time (but don't announce
it), meaning, have smaller incentives initially, then increase them as the deadline draws
near.