HomeMy WebLinkAboutA005 - Staff Report dated December 29, 2019 ITEM #: 3
DATE: 01-22-20
CITY OF AMES
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND HOUSING
REPORT TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
DATE PREPARED: December 29, 2019
CASE FILE NO. SUP-000834
REQUEST Amendment to an existing Special Use Permit to remove the upper
portion of the stealth tower and replace with larger diameter stealth
canisters including new antenna and equipment on the existing US
Cellular tower located at 106 South Dakota Avenue.
PROPERTY
OWNER: Ames Women s Club. Constance L. Vaclav
CONTACT: Mike Balistreri, Project Manager for U.S. Cellular
LOCATION: 106 South Dakota Avenue
ZONING: "RH" Residential High Density
BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant. U.S. Cellular, is requesting approval of an amended Special Use Permit to install
interior mounted antennas and substantially larger stealth canisters on an existing "stealth"
monopole at 106 South Dakota Avenue, which is the location of the Ames Woman's Club (See
Attachment A. Location Map) The height of the existing tower would remain the same
Stealth monopole cellular towers are a standard request of the City in order to minimize the
visual impact of cellular towers in or near residential areas. A Special Use Permit for the
construction of the existing tower was approved in 2003, and included approval of a 120-foot
stealth monopole with interior mounted cellular antennas on the east side of the Woman's Club
building. north of the parking lot. There are four locations for cellular equipment on the interior
of the existing monopole. U.S. Cellular occupies the top three cellular equipment locations (115',
105', and 95') and Verizon occupies the lowest location (85) on the monopole. Iowa Wireless is
located on the exterior of the tower at an elevation of 75 feet and has antenna on the current
tower that extend outward approximately 25 inches. This installation, approved in 2014 was an
amendment to the original SUP.
The monopole and existing ground equipment by US Cellular are located in an area lease that
measures 50' feet by 50' feet. The existing monopole is located in accordance with required
setbacks of the zoning code. Any change to the design that would modify the stealth elements
originally approved, requires an amendment to the Special Use Permit.
U.S. Cellular is proposing to remove existing antennas and 28" stealth canisters on the top one-
third (40 feet) of the 120' tower and replace with larger antennas and 48" stealth canisters.
Sabre Industries has submitted a structural analysis to staff and indicates that the tower and
1
base can structurally support the request. The applicant notes that the area will not be affected
by safety issues such as ice or other falling debris, because the tower meets the setbacks
standards of the code and the proposed antennas are interior mounted.
An existing eight-foot tall wood board fence at the boundaries of the lease area encloses,
screens, and secures the equipment shelter and the base of the existing monopole. Columnar
Arborvitae, spaced at approximately eight feet on-center, were planted outside the lease area
next to the fence previously. No change to the existing fencing is proposed, and all new
equipment will be located within the existing enclosure.
The Zoning Board of Adjustment must determine if the previously approved monopole
would continue to meet the Special Use Permit criteria with the proposed external
changes that create a large diameter sheath for the antennas.
PUBLIC NOTICING:
Notification was made to all owners of property within 200 feet. A notice of public hearing was
placed on the property and published in the newspaper.
APPLICABLE LAW:
Chapter 29, Section 29.1307(8) of the Municipal Code includes "Cell Site Standards" stated as
follows:
(8) Cell Site Standards. The following standards and procedures, in addition to those
contained in Section 29.1503, shall apply to the issuance of a Wireless Permit and issuance of a
Special Use Permit for a cell site with antenna. (The standards are listed in this report below.)
(12) Changes. There shall be no change in the exterior appearance of a cell site, including
any change in the profile of the tower, that is a departure from what was shown or
represented in the approved Special Use Permit except as allowed by this ordinance.
In addition, Section 29.1503(4)(a),(b), and (e) of the Zoning Ordinance states the following:
(4) Review Criteria. Before a Special Use Permit application can be approved, the Zoning
Board of Adjustment shall establish that the following general standards, as well as the
specific standards outlined in subsection (c) below, where applicable, have been or shall
be satisfied. The Board's action shall be based on stated findings of fact. The conditions
imposed shall be construed as limitations on the power of the Board to act. A mere
finding that a use conforms to those conditions or a recitation of those conditions,
unaccompanied by specific findings of fact, shall not be considered findings of fact for
the purpose of complying with this Ordinance.
(a) General Standards. The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall review each application
for the purpose of determining that each proposed use meets the following
standards, and in addition, shall find adequate evidence that each use in its
proposed location will. (The standards are listed in this report below.)
(b) Residential Zone Standards. The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall review each
application for the purpose of determining that each proposed use in a residential
zone meets the following standards... (The standards are listed in this report below.)
2
(e) Conditions. The Board may impose such additional conditions it deems necessary
for the general welfare, for the protection of individual property rights, and for
ensuring that the intent and objectives of this Ordinance will be observed.
Any development in the City is also subject to the Development Standards of Article 4.
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS:
Based upon the submitted information and site plan provided in the application, the following
findings of fact and conclusions may be made regarding the standards of approval.
Cell Site Standards.
(a) Tower Height. The applicant shall demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of
the Zoning Board of Adjustment that the antenna is the minimum height required
to function satisfactorily. No antenna or tower shall be constructed, altered, or
maintained so as to project above any of the imaginary airspace surfaces
described in FAR Part 77 of the FAA guidance on airspace protection.
Findings of Fact: The existing 120-foot structure previously received FAA approval. No
change to the height is proposed and therefore the proposed changes will pose no risk
to aviation traffic.
Conclusions Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site Standard
(a) for a Special Use Permit.
(b) Setbacks from Base of Tower. The minimum distance between the base of the
support or any guy anchors and any property line shall be equal to 50% of the
antenna height.
Findings of Fact: The existing tower location meets the required setback which is 50% of
the height of the tower (60 feet). The tower is situated on the parcel 147' from the north
property line, 168' from the south property line. 137' from the west property line and 60'
from the east property line.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site Standard
(b) for a Special Use Permit.
(c) Antenna Support Structure Safety. The applicant shall demonstrate, to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Zoning Board of Adjustment that the proposed
antenna and support structure are safe and the surrounding areas will not be
negatively affected by support structure failure, falling ice or other debris, or radio
frequency interference. All support structures shall be fitted with anti-climbing
devises, as approved by the manufacturers.
Findings of Fact: Sabre Industries has performed an analysis to determine the structural
integrity of the tower and foundation and its ability to support the proposed equipment.
The analysis concluded that the structure and foundation has sufficient capacity to
support the existing and proposed equipment. The analysis was performed in
accordance with the ANSI/TIA-222-G standard.
The changes to the tower do not include adding any external antennas. so ice and falling
debris would not be an issue. All radio frequencies are licensed and owned by the
3
applicant which eliminates RF interference. The tower structure is a featureless pole with
no provision to climb. Anti-climbing devices are not applicable, as there is no way to
climb the tower. The compound is also fenced and locked to deter unauthorized access
to the tower.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site Standard
(c) for a Special Use Permit.
(d) Screening. Appropriate screening shall be installed composed of wood, masonry
material or other substantial materials. Landscaping may also be required.
Findings of Fact: The facility has an existing 8-foot tall wood fence surrounding the
lease area. Mature trees and shrubs screen the facility from view. No additional
landscaping is trigger by the proposed changes at the top of the pole.
Conclusions Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site Standard
(d) for a Special Use Permit.
(e) Painting and Visual Aesthetics. The design of towers, antennas and base stations
should minimize the visual impact of the facility through siting, landscape
screening, and stealth techniques.
(a) Towers shall either maintain a galvanized steel finish (dull gray or white) or,
subject to any applicable standards of the FAA, be painted a neutral color so
as to reduce visual obtrusiveness to the maximum extent possible.
Findings of Fact: The new canisters are a special white plastic "RF friendly" material
allowing the antenna signal to penetrate to the outside. Except for the size of the
canisters, the material is the same as what is already in place for the upper portion of
the tower. If the canisters were the same material as the tower. the signal would be
blocked. The resulting color scheme is a two toned colored tower.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site
Standard (i) for a Special Use Permit.
(ii) The design of the base station and related structures shall, to the maximum
extent possible, use materials, colors, textures, screening, and landscaping
that will blend them into the natural setting and surrounding buildings.
Findings of Fact: The existing equipment area is surrounded by an eight-foot
tall wood board fence at the boundaries of the lease area. The fence
encloses, screens. and secures the equipment and the base of the existing
monopole. Columnar Arborvitae, spaced at approximately eight feet on-
center, was planted outside the lease area next to the fence many years ago.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site
Standard (ii) for a Special Use Permit.
(iii)The wireless facility shall be designed to complement the physical landscape
in which they are intended to be located. Examples of stealth techniques that
may be compatible include but are not limited to faux trees, unipoles/"slick
sticks", bell towers, etc. New stealth towers shall be configured and located in
4
a manner that shall minimize adverse effects including visual impacts on the
landscape and adjacent properties. New freestanding structures shall be
designed to be compatible with adjacent structures and landscapes with
specific design considerations such as architectural designs, scale, color and
texture.
Findings of Fact: The existing facility adheres to all of the required concealment
standards with the use of a slick pole, equipment located behind stealth canisters,
light colored appearance, and wood compound fence with mature trees and shrubs
to conceal ground buildings.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site
Standard (iii) for a Special Use Permit.
(iv)Conduit or cable must be concealed on towers with externally mounted
equipment.
Findings of Fact: The cable for the tower will be mounted internally and concealed
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site
Standard (iv) for a Special Use Permit.
(v) The use of internally mounted or flush mounted technology is encouraged
when adjacent to residential areas, prominent commercial areas and
prominent entryways to the city.
Findings of Fact: New antenna will be installed internally and concealed with stealth
canisters. However. in order to conceal the antennas, the canisters are required to
be 48" which is substantially larger than the existing tapered tower.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site
Standard (v) for a Special Use Permit.
(f) Air Safety. Support structures 200 feet in height or taller, or those near airports,
shall meet all Federal Aviation Administration regulations
Findings of Fact: The existing structure is less than 200 feet and was approved by the
FAA in 2003 to be "no hazard to air navigation".
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site Standard
(f).
(g) Separation Requirements. Towers exceeding 50 feet in height, except those
incorporation stealth techniques, shall be place at minimum one-quarter mile
apart. Wireless facilities in right-of-way are not subject to separation
requirements.
Findings of Fact: There are no wireless towers within a quarter mile of this structure.
Conclusions Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site Standard
(g)•
5
(h) Access. All access to wireless communications sites must be hard surface (PCC
or HMA) unless approved otherwise subject to a special use permit by the Zoning
Board of Adjustment. Placement of a tower shall not affect the use or access to
required parking of a principal use on site.
Findings of Fact: The existing access to the tower is off of a paved drive and parking lot.
An existing short gravel access drive (approximately 8' wide by 12' deep) is located on
the north side of the parking lot and leads through a gate to the fenced-in equipment
compound area. The existing gravel drive was part of the prior approval.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Cell Site Standard
(h)•
Special Use Permit - General Standards.
(i) Be harmonious with and in accordance with the general principles and proposals
of the Land Use Policy Plan (LUPP) of the City.
Findings of Fact: The exiting tower has an approved Special Use Permit and was found
to be in accordance with the general principles of the LUPP and the City at the time of
initial approval.
Conclusions Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets General Standard
(i) for a Special Use Permit.
(ii) Be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be harmonious and
appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general
vicinity and that such a use will not change the essential character of the area in
which it is proposed.
Findings of Fact: The proposed revisions to the tower will include wider (48-inch
diameter) stealth canisters to conceal the new antennas. Rather than tapering at the top,
the tower will have the appearance of a "cap'' over the top 40 feet. The existing
compound area is fenced with an 8-foot wood fence and screened by landscaping. New
equipment will be located within the existing fence enclosure or in the interior of the
stealth tower.
Conclusions Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets General Standard
(ii) for a Special Use Permit.
(iii) Not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future uses in the same general
vicinity.
Findings of Fact: There are no hazardous materials kept on site and this is an unmanned
facility so there is minimal activity at this location. The monopole meets recognized
engineering standards and wind and ice loading criteria. This property will be maintained
on a regular basis. The operation of the equipment is licensed by the FCC to meet
federal regulations.
Conclusions. Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets General Standard
(iii) for a Special Use Permit.
(iv) Be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways,
streets, police, fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and
sewage facilities, and/or schools.
6
Findings of Fact: The tower does not generate waste and no water or sewer service is
required. The majority of the leased area consists of permeable materials; therefore
drainage is unaffected by the improvements.
Conclusions Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets General Standard
(iv) for a Special Use Permit.
(v) Not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities or
services.
Findings of Fact: There will be no additional public costs for public facilities or services to
accommodate the proposed renovation of the tower. The proposed changes will improve
cellular coverage for the public.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets General Standard
(v) for a Special Use Permit.
(v i) Not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, and equipment or conditions of
operation that will be detrimental to any person, property, or general welfare by
reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors.
Findings of Fact: There are no activities or materials within this leased area that pose
any public threat. This facility is a RF transmit tower and emits no noise, smoke. fumes.
glare, or odor. The operation of the equipment is licensed by the FCC to meet federal
regulations. This is an unmanned facility that will not generate any additional traffic in the
area.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets General Standard
(vi) for a Special Use Permit.
(vii) Be consistent with the intent and purpose of the Zone in which it is proposed to
locate such use.
Findings of Fact: A cell tower is an allowable use in the Residential High Density zone
and the existing tower was approved for a Special Use Permit by the Zoning Board of
Adjustment. The ground equipment is concealed with fencing and landscaping. Allowing
modifications that maintain its compatibility with the surroundings is consistent with state
and local cell site standards.
Conclusions Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets General Standard
(vii) for a Special Use Permit.
Special Use Permit - Residential Zone Standards.
(i) Not create excessively higher levels of traffic than the predominant pattern in the
area and not create additional traffic from the proposed use that would change the
street classification and such traffic shall not lower the level of service at area
intersections.
Findings of Fact: Infrequent visits to the site for regular maintenance would be the only
traffic and will have no effect on the level of service at intersections in the area.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Residential
Standard (i) for a Special Use Permit.
(i i) Not create a noticeably different travel pattern than the predominant pattern in the
area. Special attention must be shown to deliveries or service trips in a residential
7
zone that are different than the normal to and from work travel pattern in the
residential area.
Findings of Fact: The proposed renovation of the tower to larger stealth canisters and
new internal mounted antennas would not change the travel pattern in the area. Service
technicians visiting the site would continue to use the driveway from Todd Drive to
access the site.
Conclusions Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Residential
Standard (ii) for a Special Use Permit.
(iii) Not generate truck trips by trucks over 26,000 g.v.w. (gross vehicle weight) to and
from the site except for waste collection vehicles, food delivery vehicles, and
moving vans.
Findings of Fact: Trucks that would visit this site would not have a gross vehicle weight
of 26,000 pounds. or above.
Conclusions Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Residential
Standard (iii) for a Special Use Permit.
(iv) Not have noticeably different and disruptive hours of operation.
Findings of Fact: Infrequent visits to the site for regular maintenance would not be
disruptive and would occur during regular business hours.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Residential
Standard (iv) for a Special Use Permit.
(v) Be sufficiently desirable for the entire community that the loss of residential land
is justifiable in relation to the benefit.
Findings of Fact: The proposed renovation will occur on an existing cell tower. All
proposed equipment will be located within the existing mechanical enclosure or within
the tower.
Conclusions Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Residential
Standard (v) for a Special Use Permit.
(vi) Be compatible in terms of structure placement, height, orientation, or scale with
the predominate building pattern in the area.
Findings of Fact: This is a renovation of an existing 120' tower. The renovation would
change the upper elevation of the tower from the appearance of a tapered tower to more
of a tower with a 40' cap. The new stealth canisters would replace the upper one-third
(40 feet) of the existing tower with substantially wider canisters, resulting in the
appearance of a "cap'. New antennas would be mounted on the interior of the tower.
The appearance and proportions other tower would change with the expanded canisters,
but the general appearance of stealth design would be maintained.
Conclusions. Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Residential
Standard (vi) for a Special Use Permit.
(vii) Be located on the lot with a greater setback or with landscape buffering to
minimize the impact of the use on adjacent property.
8
Findings of Fact: The tower met all the minimum setback requirements and the existing
enclosure is surrounded by an opaque fence and plant material to sufficiently screen the
equipment from public view.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Residential
Standard (vii) for a Special Use Permit.
(viii) Be consistent with all other applicable standards in the zone.
Findings of Fact: The proposed cell tower site is consistent with all other applicable
standards in the zone.
Conclusions: Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets Residential
Standard (viii) for a Special Use Permit.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 The Zoning Board of Adjustment may approve the Amended Special Use Permit for a Cell
Tower with Antennas to allow for replacement by U S. Cellular of 40 feet of existing 28'
stealth canisters with new 48" stealth canisters and the addition of new interior mounted
antennas and associated equipment, located at 106 South Dakota Avenue based on the
findings of fact and conclusions stated herein. as detailed on the submitted Site Plan and
Elevations.
2. The Zoning Board of Adjustment may approve with conditions the Amended Special Use
Permit for a Cell Tower with Antennas to allow for replacement by U.S. Cellular of 40 feet of
existing 28" stealth canisters with new 48" stealth canisters and the addition of new interior
mounted antennas and associated equipment, located at 106 South Dakota Avenue based
on the findings of fact and conclusions stated, as detailed on the submitted Site Plan and
Elevations.
3. The Zoning Board of Adjustment may deny the Amended Special Use Permit for Cell Site
with Antenna at 106 South Dakota Avenue if the Board finds and concludes that the
proposed amendment to the Special Use Permit is not consistent with adopted policies and
regulations, or that the amendment will impose impacts that cannot be reasonably mitigated.
4. The Zoning Board of Adjustment may continue this request to a future meeting of the ZBA to
allow the applicant to provide additional information.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff concludes that the proposed Amended Special Use Permit for a Cell Tower with Antennas
to allow replacement by U.S. Cellular of 40 feet of existing 28' stealth canisters with new 48'
stealth canisters and the addition of new interior mounted antennas and associated equipment,
located at 106 South Dakota Avenue is consistent with the requirements for a Special Use
Permit for a Cell Tower with Antennas and with the general and specific residential standards
required for granting a Special Use Permit. The cellular tower use will operate in manner that is
compatible with the surrounding uses and not cause a nuisance to adjacent neighbors.
Therefore, based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, it is the
recommendation of the Department of Planning and Housing that the Zoning Board of
Adjustment act in accordance with Alternative #1.
9
Attachment A
Location & Zoning Map
RL
INCO LN WAY
LIN'O LN WAY I I NCO,N
HOC
O
4
F
106 SOUTH DAKOTA °
AVENUE
R H
F .t;
x
M
�,C vQSJf
TODD DR
Q _
t
�RL
LOCATION & ZONING MAP
504 Stanton Avenue
Legend
N
0 62.5 125 250 Feet Q Parcel Selechon
Parcels
10
Attachment B
Photo Simulation
y.
® w..t Lrlcan amen N106 S D*kO r A"
rw ra..0 r..... 1 O6 5 DakoM Ara
106s DWwbLA5DAo.e �Moo..a..
A A—acoon liSCeHular
a l m...Ason US.(t:IlUl.tr "��+Ni°n' ocow W D. Sls m C—
® a-oaoro ae'CwanaM 6r.ro,Car.1v U5C-760559 ® 18- a-79 E,.,*N 120 kft—ol. Anr USC-M559
taOa-�b�a on E=WV 12Q MIXUOCM-60b.
11
Attachment B
Existing & Proposed Site Plan
If 909-0'0'JY110D SLN3M400 AlO',61 6l Zl Y L dvr�AB IDIH0 M6 dB OMO 9f-99-90-91- rCW
OM EMS _INNOd/018A WWI-I f M
3AV IMYN NAHB-M OTVS ® SONMV60 NOILVZINM00M - l 3AYM
VOd 0 AbOIS
Mi
rujnn M3AN 1N3f0161 9l Ol 0 •OS tlMOI 'S3WV '1332ll5 ONVNS N100Ni'BIYt 8
M3N3>d 1VN131NJ-8V91/OI 8 NIOONII 193M-699ML
r
Gs _
-
- -----——————————————————--
'
r r �
r 4'
up
- - u--------- ------------- ----
---
XJVfli 35
n
F
/ 1
Fa F FVr a wl l
6
'-- - w< 1\ -P L__ _ _ __ -___ _ ______ __
/ \ a
L-------------------------------- -- ----�
3�YYlO.Yhi7S _— QI$
LLJ
a�
w
W
m o >
o 0
>
y
12
I �
I
I
rT ; Es
'K LASTINC LP TANK, I
PROTECT DURING 3
CONSTRUCTION Q�
LASTING U S,CELLULAR li d
aQp
FASTING FENCE,PROTECT OMPOUND FENCED 3 W
` DURING CONSTRUCTION C n�
ASi1NC TE1C0 PEDESTAL
N^
m
SUS CELLULAR COAX ENTRY PORI �•
suL .wI
} �p
LASTING FIRER YAULf,
PROTECT DURING 90
CONSTRUCTION
Q 2
I ASnNG GENERATOR LAR GPS 5 s O D
1%CONCRETE SLAB AMVMNA MWN70 TO , He<g a C
EIDSTHD ICE RRIDGE.
SEE SHEET C-&S '
I u
O p a a p a N 3
FASTING UTIUTV RACK g I EASTING U S.CELLULAR C
W P OTECT OURINC - —5 o a n n r a
!� CONSTRUCTION Ncj
O.
` I ASTING STEALHN 0 0 0 0
40NOPOLE m C""�' O 1'�'!•
H PROTECT DURING PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION N'I CAI LE
�Rarm a 3 W
8111110C ICE elm!
4. mtAwoG tiV-C LG.
MONOPOLFStFAUM PROTEtT OIMMc < m O
U.S. CELLULAR ICE BRIDGE RAY TO DE VTR-4.01 3 C
B �vK RE1fF0itfID AS sMET C-4.0 Z o a
PROPOSED UNDERw a
SAM wUSTREs
O�I TOVIER MOCATK71 `�o m
DRATNGS DATED w a
11/13/19 7�777
FASTING ACCESS GATE i
LASnNG U.S.CELLULAR a z N
EQUIPMENT SMELTER !Q
PROTECT DURING t7bS '
CONSTRUCTION, r
SEE SHEET C-0.0 '
Z, 3 g
EA5n1C Fly VAULT, n
PROTECT DIMING
,. CONSTRUCTION + -'
ff
N COApoum RAN
SUS.CELLULAR CABLE ENTRY PORT o TOWER COMPOUND PLAN SHEET Nu4aEft
YN
U d
PROPOSED U.S.CELL"
„c Q
ANTDMAS TO BE
NSTALLID ON D➢SINGTown WK U
INSTALL NEW� ➢Z m"
CAMSTERS.THR SC gg"S) _ TOP OF TOWER
L-SO TNRU C-S➢FOR ELEV.=r 17D-0-t
DETAILS f OF U.i tf1L1➢.M N(1DNA4 w
E1FY.�+it --o 3
f W lLs lAA AP(TEW5 w
4 OF U.S.MUL AAR ANTDIlAS 6
ETEV.-+105 t
h
f OF U.S.CELLULAR
PROPOSED US CF111M.AR EOUP1(NT POD ;
EQIPMENT,SEE SHEET(S) DEV.�+0.S t
C-SO T/RU C-S➢FOR O
DETAILS �" �n 'o
< 0
EXISTING OTHER CARRIER ANTENNAS, I PROJECT SCOPE LEGEND <¢o C¢ D _D
PROTECT WRING CONSTRUCTION W o Q
NEW ITEN/SCOPE FOR THIS
PROJECT Z C7 Ir`us NB G o
EXISTING OTHER CARRIER ANTENNAS, ---__ DMSTW a a a a a a O
PROTECT WRING CONSTRUCTION AX1M�ENT TO e e N n a
0 0 0 0
PROPOSED U.S.Uf1llILM DN157NG TIEY TO RENNIN � O
CABLES ROUTED NSOE m o-ry n. =
D➢STMIO STEALTH MONOPOLE m
MAANUF/HOMW GRIPS I� GENERAL NOTES co
SPECFXATMS o < W
1. INFORMATION SHOWN ON TOWER WAS OBTNNE-
FROM 41E MAP INC. .G,SEE T-1 FOR ADOI170N
LXISTiNG STEALTH MONOPOLE. INFORMATION. 3 r-h
PROTECT DURING o Y
CONSTRUCTION 2. FOR PROPOSED CABLE LENGTHS,PROPOSED J a O
ANTENNAS,AND EQUIPMENT BEING INSTALLED - I^
R o
REFERENCE SHEET(S)C-S.D 1HRU C-5.9.
J MORN DONE TO ETOSTING TONER SHALL BE
J .z F N
FXISDNC U S CELLULAR COIXtgNATEO r/4IX1N7 ANALT515 A U W O N m
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS BY OTHERS.SEPARATE W��z
QUIP
SHELTER, FRW PBM ENGINEERED DOCUMENTS. 3 w�
�"ROIECT DURING k
CONSTRUCTION - A TOWER MODIFICATION REQUIRED AS PROPOSED Im Zya
UNDER SABRE INDUSTRIES TOWER MODIFCATION N n
E70STINC FENCE,PROTECT DRAWINGS DATED 11/13/19. Z
DURING CONSTRUCTION I�of
< $
FINISHED GRADE I
ELEV.- t0'-0'
F11YA710N
TOWER ELEVATION r EXISTING TOWER ELEVATION sH`E^FT Nn/EMI,.O
k
ScAz 1pe.ro A sVl[:MTE V-L
LEI1M T,
OR MS PROJECT ■ 70 BE REMOY D�
■ EXISTNtC ITEM 70 ■ EASING EOUIPMEN'. � � -
REMAIN TO BE MODIFIED ^-
'> �. PCSATE 3
EQUPwENT LEGEND
ANTENN LTE O 13E I TO BE R LTEMO ANTENNA PROPOSED REPLACEMENT••
EbSDNG�, a1 ANTENNA T1P. TO DE REMOVED STEALTH CANISTERS
( PROPOSED RRU TO BE PROPOSED U.S_CELLULAR
STEALTH CA14STURS J 1 PER SECTOR) ® PROPOSED
�$ ANTENNA,(IYP.1 PER
RE SE REPLACED.
t 7 011E r C SECTOR),SEE SHEET
REPLA®.(TT'P.3) ' 7BIU1H c= C-S7
A1PIM r 7 PROPOSED ANTENNA TO BE
1INSTALLEDe
PROPOSED RRU TO BE N
INSTALLED N O
PROPOSED RAYCAP J-BOX i
TO BE INSTALLED
!I �,PROPOSED ANTENNA ORIENTATION (TOP VIEW) 105'
N T cn
1J
rcI WIF
EXISTING ANTENNA ORIENTATION(TOP VIEW)1w ® f1 D
��4L4,
ANTENNA TO BE c�4 �J� P a P A e e CD �
(� DOSTRN:2rO ZPE]IOrED.(TW; �E.1E� o e ��e
STEALTH CANISTERS os
TO BE _ 7 '4' CO" � � 00oo5. CD
REPLACED,(TIP.3) 'a NpHA 12'AAA m n n r N
' ALPHA 12 PREPLACEEMENT• ADWIM 60. O rrT►tt
STEALTH CANISTERS NpHA H a nt �, w
PROPOSED U.S.CELLULAR
/:RL NZ Xi ANTENNA.(h➢.1 PER 3 i c r••�
Y
SECTOR),SEE STtFf Z
IN Q U
N o m
z a..
EXISTING ANTENNA ORIENTATION(TOP VIEW)116 ® 4 PROPOSED ANTENNA ORIENTATION(TOP VIEW)116 2:2 It
__ PROPOSED LOADING-AX7aL[AMA£//BTVBY/B2B4 7f/2R B&S O 3 u o n
6 B71/1n2 � Iv/et � ■ 6 Tw 6 f N �
m1a ! f y � TIIOL tYBRIACRImI t F ax.1v BAno wm g RI�s! p Rlm R m
10L IYI�Ma RNA Mtn OM9 ii OHO Ov'9 i Itma WE! • E�+I c1w1 3 Ou4 3 0189 i 1AD o -
AlA1A A' Al%U at a tWMgR110006-t 1
MA11�-!�IlIR I w r II - - - - - - 1 7 IlIR ! ALANA A2 A 1e1B711LB000-r I I16� tV d 9L� `-_ - �N - IBdn 1 _ _
ALPHA
A2 RA11d-�01l11! 1 r A - - - - - - - - 7 COAx 2 ALPHA A3 - 7 1:0A% 2
ALPHA U _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ALPHA M lM MA I 111•d W d NMIBD _ ffi! _ IYAE! _
ALPHA M _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BC1A it /CB IE 111lN5911BBti-T 1 1m' d 1 AMB 1 !BQ 1 - T 1
o'
- — _ _ IRRI I - - 1NA1m - ff
BETA In LZ RANI-Amm m I W_r w t - - - - - - - / 7 1 ! tIC1A e2 A111 TE Tr116tLmBC-T I it"2Bo'C.aIAIo - - a>w
IRA Bt Rb�l-OIOB! 1 w B - - - - - - - 7 cnAA 2 BRA B] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 COAT 2
A Bl _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AETA N IAA AAA t 11/'-d 7Nd d tlMl® - - - - - - !mB - -
BRA & _ _ - - MA L, RSLLiF 11pIBRllm00-T 1 d LIAR! 4W t W I - _ _ _ -t XYIRD 1 AN7EMU18
w CI La Rpm-w� 1 war w I - - - - - - I 7 ! ANMA G2 ARB IrRBBJABBt3-T 1 1IB-?]!d O 1 _ _ rL} - MBN1 1 - _ r
MA C7 wA RN11101-OIBTr 1 w • - - - - - - - - COAX 2 ALA
GS - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 7 N4� I LAYOVf
7
MA C.I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - GAHHA�r.4 i iii'-V]®' _ III INIA - SHEET NUMBER
- - C-5.0
Attachment B
Proposed Section View at Antennas
[f909'Q'ODYJ)'13J 51107'IDO uq a 8l Zl f d1T:l,13 OHNO WO;le 0M0 9C-Or-90-01 I'Oad g
001 au116 IMM31vole e ► ll C r
"3AV U&YK NAUG AA 011" ® uvadn OY us evwot L SONVAYNO NOILYZORDOON - t 31YtA
_miniia3 'S 1 1 M3AW IN3no a el Ol 0 uNf OO A2f015 S w
♦100S VM01 'S3AY '133e11S SNVAS Nl0ON11 91" 5 w
M3N3N IVN&UNl 8 Ol Ol a ►looNn 183M-som
51
01 o $(*� m`F K� � n� eIN,,
z
---- -- — --- — --------
a
'T5
A At .0-At .0-,01MR
A-A1
MAP
o vs o Zr -
IT1 �o
.0-101 .0-A1
w
R!_
= z =� >
�
� F
gg
16