Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA8 ITEM #: DATE: 01-13-16 CITY OF AMES DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND HOUSING REPORT TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE PREPARED: January 8, 2016 CASE FILE NO.: ZBA-15-25 REQUEST: A Special Use Permit to allow a child care facility in a home at 2003 Hunziker Drive PROPERTY Jeffery and Joni King OWNER: LOCATION: 2003 Hunziker Drive ZONING: Low-Density Residential (RL) BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Joni King has been operating a day care out of her home at 2003 Hunziker Drive (see Location Map in Attachment A) for several years. She was recently made aware of the need to obtain approval from the City for her day care. Ms. King's operation is licensed by the Iowa Department of Human Services as a C1 category, which allows up to 8 children of any age. Ms. King cares for 8 children at her home. She employs no other people on a regular basis, although her husband and daughter sometimes assist. Table 29.701(2) describes the permitted uses in the RL zoning district and the methods needed for approval. Child Day Care Facilities are allowed and need either a Special Use Permit or a Special Home Occupation permit, depending on the number of children. Ms. King's operation is larger than allowed as a Special Home Occupation, which limits the number of children to 6 preschool and 5 school age children. Since she serves 8 children, in compliance with her state registration, she would need to obtain a Special Use Permit as a child day care facility. Her current enrollment is 7 pre-school and 1 school age (kindergarten and above). APPLICABLE LAW: Chapter 29, Section 29.1503(4)(a), (b), and (e) of the Municipal Code states the following: (4) Review Criteria. Before a Special Use Permit application can be approved, the Zoning Board of Adjustment shall establish that the following general standards, as well as the specific standards outlined in subsection (b) below, where applicable, have been or shall be satisfied. The Board's action shall be based on stated findings of fact. The conditions imposed shall be construed as limitations on the power of the Board to act. A mere finding that a use conforms to those conditions or a recitation of those conditions; 1 unaccompanied by specific findings of fact, shall not be considered findings of fact for the purpose of complying with this Ordinance. (a) General Standards. The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall review each application for the purpose of determining that each proposed use meets the following standards, and in addition, shall find adequate evidence that each use in its proposed location will: (The standards are listed in this report below.) (b) Residential Zone Standards. The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall review each application for the purpose of determining that each proposed use in a residential zone meets the following standards..."(The standards are listed in this report below.) (e) Conditions. The Board may impose such additional conditions it deems necessary for the general welfare, for the protection of individual property rights, and for ensuring that the intent and objectives of this Ordinance will be observed." STATEMENT OF APPLICANT IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSAL: The applicant has provided the attached application including statements as to how the proposed child care facility meets the requirements for a Special Use Permit. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS: Based upon the submitted site plan and in addition to the facts provided in the application, the following findings of fact and conclusions may be made regarding the standards of approval. General Standards. (i) Be harmonious with and in accordance with the general principles and proposals of the Land Use Policy Plan of the City. Findings of Fact: Goals 4 of the Land Use Policy Plan (LUPP) encourages "...more integrated and compact living/activity areas...wherein daily living requirements and amenities are provided...." Goal 9 advocates "...economic activities that are compatible and sustainable with its environment." Conclusions: A child care facility in a residential neighborhood allows nearby residents to have a close and convenient service, necessary for working parents. The demand for child care services has been well-established by the frequent request for Special Home Occupations from Ames homeowners. It can be concluded that the use meets General Standard (i) for a Special Use Permit. (i i) Be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity and that such a use will not change the essential character of the area in which it is proposed. Findings of Fact: The child care center operates out of an existing single-family home. No external changes are needed to allow the continued use. There is a play area to the rear, 2 consisting of play equipment, teeter-totter, riding toys, and a grass play area. It is fenced and also bordered by a tall hedge. Conclusions: The back yard contains a number of items for children's play—probably more than would be found in a home without a day care facility. However, there is no evidence that it is inappropriate or changes the essential character of the neighborhood. Therefore, it can be concluded that the use meets General Standard (ii) for a Special Use Permit. (iii) Not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future uses in the same general vicinity. Findings of Fact: The neighborhood is predominantly single-family homes. Fellows Elementary School is one block to the west. The city has no history of child care activities being hazardous or uses in this area that would be hazardous to the child care facility. Conclusions: The use of the home as a child care center as described would not be disturbing or hazardous to existing and future uses in the area. It can be concluded that the use meets General Standard (iii) for a Special Use Permit. (iv) Be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police, fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewage facilities, and/or schools. Findings of Fact: The site is directly served by a collector street (20th Street). All City services are available to the site. Conclusions: This property is adequately served by essential public facilities and services. It can be concluded that the use meets General Standard (iv) for a Special Use Permit. (v) Not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities or services. Findings of Fact: The child care facility will not require additional infrastructure in the future. Neither is additional fire or police resources anticipated to serve this use. Conclusions: This use will not create additional requirements at public cost. It can be concluded that the use meets General Standard (v) for a Special Use Permit. (vi) Not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, and equipment or conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any person, property, or general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. Findings of Fact: Child care facilities traditionally are not accompanied by excessive smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. A facility with 8 children should add no more than 16 vehicular trips to 20th Street, which had an average daily traffic count of 2,270 in 2011 . 3 r Conclusions: The child care facility will not add a significant amount of traffic to the street network. Eight children outside for an extended play time may produce additional noise but is not anticipated to be disruptive or detrimental. It can be concluded that the use meets General Standard (vi) for a Special Use Permit. (vii) Be consistent with the intent and purpose of the Zone in which it is proposed to locate such use. Findings of Fact: A child care facility is allowed by Special Use Permit in the RL zoning district provided there are no impacts that cannot be readily ameliorated. RL zoning allows for those uses that support a residential environment. A child care facility is one of those. Conclusions: The City Council, through the zoning ordinance, has determined that this use is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Low Density Residential zoning district upon specific review. A child care facility can be found to be compatible in how it operates with the surrounding residential uses. It can be concluded that the use meets General Standard (vii) for a Special Use Permit. Residential Zone Standards. (i) Not create excessively higher levels of traffic than the predominant pattern in the area and not create additional traffic from the proposed use that would change the street classification and such traffic shall not lower the level of service at area intersections. Findings of Fact: The house at 2003 Hunziker Drive is a single-family, owner-occupied home. It would generate traffic similar to that of other homes in the neighborhood. The addition of eight children for the day care would result in an additional 16 vehicular trips per day. Conclusions: This increase is relatively minor and would be insignificant, especially with staggered drop-off and pick-up times. The street network will be able to maintain the current street classification and level of service with this additional traffic generator. It can be concluded that the use meets Residential Zone Standard (i) for a Special Use Permit. (ii) Not create a noticeably different travel pattern than the predominant pattern in the area. Special attention must be shown to deliveries or service trips in a residential zone that are different than the normal to and from work travel pattern in the residential area. Findings of Fact: Except for the drop-off and pick-up of the children, there will be no additional deliveries or trip generation due to the use. Conclusions: The proposed use will not create a noticeably different travel pattern off-site than the predominant pattern in the area. It can be concluded that the use meets Residential Zone Standard (ii) for a Special Use Permit. 4 Not generate truck trips by trucks over 26,000 g.v.w. (gross vehicle weight) to and from the site except for waste collection vehicles, food delivery vehicles, and moving vans. Findings of Fact: No truck deliveries will occur. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the use meets Residential Zone Standard (iii) for a Special Use Permit. (iv) Not have noticeably different and disruptive hours of operation. Findings of Fact: The applicant notes the hours of operation are limited from 7:30 am to 5:15 pm to accommodate working parents.. Conclusions: These daytime hours should not be disruptive to the neighborhood. It can be concluded that the use meets Residential Zone Standard (iv) for a Special Use Permit. (v) Be sufficiently desirable for the entire community that the loss of residential land is justifiable in relation to the benefit. Findings of Fact: The use of 2003 Hunziker Drive will remain a single-family home. The child care facility will be accessory to that use. Therefore it will result in no loss of residential land. Conclusions: There will be no loss of residential land with the approval of this use. It can be concluded that the use meets Residential Zone Standard (v) for a Special Use Permit. (vi) Be compatible in terms of structure placement, height, orientation, or scale with the predominate building pattern in the area. Findings of Fact: The single-family home is not significantly different from other homes in the neighborhood. It is a single-story home with a single detached garage. The neighborhood is predominately single story homes, with a mix of attached and detached garages for one or two vehicles. Conclusions: The placement, height, scale, and massing of the home is no different from others in the neighborhood. It can be concluded that the use meets Residential Zone Standard (vi) for a Special Use Permit. (vii) Be located on the lot with a greater setback or with landscape buffering to minimize the impact of the use on adjacent property. Findings of Fact: It appears that the home met all the zoning standards when it was built in 1960. The rear yard is fenced and has significant landscape provided by a tall hedge. 5 Conclusions: The existing yard is well screened visually. Noise, however, may have an impact although staff has received no complaints of such. It can be concluded that the use meets Residential Zone Standard (vii) for a Special Use Permit. (viii) Be consistent with all other applicable standards in the zone. Findings of Fact: There is no evidence that the existing house complies with all the Low- Density Residential zoning standards, except for the operation of the child care facility without proper approvals. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the use meets Residential Zone Standard (viii) for a Special Use Permit. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Notification was made to all owners of property within 200 feet. A notice of public hearing was placed on the property and published in the newspaper. Neighbors Joyce and Richard Heggen wrote to support the request. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Zoning Board of Adjustment can approve this request for a Special Use Permit to allow the residence at 2003 Hunziker Drive to include, as an accessory use, a child day care facility by adopting the findings and conclusions noted above, and with the following conditions: a. That the day care facility be limited to no more than 8 children of any combination of full-time, part-time, or school-age (the standard allowed as a C1 home registered by the Department of Human Services). 2. The Zoning Board of Adjustment can approve this request for a Special Use Permit to allow the residence at 2003 Hunziker Drive to include, as an accessory use, a child day care facility by adopting the findings and conclusions noted above, and with other conditions in addition to or in lieu of those noted above. 3. The Zoning Board of Adjustment can deny this request for a Special Use Permit to allow the residence at 2003 Hunziker Drive to include, as an accessory use, a child day care facility by finding that the project does not meet the criteria of Section 29.1503(4). 4. The Zoning Board of Adjustment can refer this request back to the applicant or to City staff for additional information. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff concludes that the child care facility as an accessory use to the single-family home at 2003 Hunziker Drive is consistent with the general and specific residential standards required for granting a Special Use Permit. The proposed condition limiting enrollment to no more than 8 children without further review by the City is to ensure compatibility with the residential neighborhood. Therefore, based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, it is 6 a the recommendation of the Department of Planning and Housing that the Zoning Board of Adjustment act in accordance with Alternative #1. SAPLAN SHMCouncil Boards Commissions\ZBA\Special Use Permits\2003_Hunziker_Day_Care-01-13-16.docx 7 3 Attachment A: Location Map r� j. gamel MINIM r.� �n I .gs 'a `. 2003 Hurthker Wive am "'g 4 5 g � L �r � � `a �• awl a =E r t: , ti> 3 2flTH ST '. _...._� _..W. ....... . i ail, �a q a; 9 i+ A is01- -07 �'ZORt � � 9 r fk 40 Feet ONWI 8