Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA18 ' Fw: Comments for ZBA adjustment hearing for 1204 S.4th St. Charles Kuester to: Erin Cain 12/10/2014 02:44 PM Cc: Mark Lambert,Kelly Diekmann Erin,Here's another. I will also have copies. CITY OF t-10 imia. * P IV-ni S ,.. Charlie Kuester Planner 515.239.5400 main 1515.239.5445 direct 1515.239.5404 fax ckuester@city.ames.ia.us I City Hall, 515 Clark Avenue I Ames, IA 50010 www.CitVofAmes.org I -Caring People-Quality Programs-Exceptional Service -----Forwarded by Charles Kuester/COA on 12/10/2014 02:44 PM----- From: Chris Anderson<sky.doc@gmail.com> To: ckuester@city.ames.ia.us Cc: Chris Anderson<sky.doc@gmail.com> Date: 12/10/2014 02:41 PM Subject: Comments for ZBA adjustment hearing for 1204 S.4th St. Hi Charlie, I have attached public comments for the ZBA adjustors meeting tonight regarding 1204 4th St. parcel subdivision and high density development. Please let me know if you need anything else from me to enter these into the public record. Chris Comments.1204S.pdf Comments on the 1204 S.411, Development Christopher J.Anderson 2603 Kingston Dr (2) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or down stream to the injury of others. A parking lot is designed west of the facility within the flood plain fringe. The parking lot is west of the flood wall, and it is nearer to the Squaw Creek floodway than the apartment buildings. Cars swept from this parking lot could be moved onto other lands and may cause flow restriction anywhere from the S 4th St.bridge to the bridge at S. Duff Avenue. A restriction could impact Iowa State University, Cold Water Links and nearby apartments,the neighborhood north of S 4th St(should the restriction occur at the S 4th St.bridge), and businesses along S. Duff Avenue (should the restriction occur at the S Duff Avenue bridge). The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or down stream is increased by this design. (4) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage to the individual owner. In the 2010 flood,the primary damage to this facility did not come from Squaw Creek. Instead, it was flash flood flow along 3rd St and 4th St east of the facility. This plan does not decrease flash flood risk from 3rd St.and 41h St., and the owner has already taken action to reduce the impact of flash flood on the facility and its residents. It hasn't been clearly shown that the residents of 1204 S 41h are at risk to the base flood elevation of 895 ft. (5) The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community. High density housing is needed in Ames. (7) The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. There are several other locations in Ames for which high density housing can be built. This project is not needed to provide affordable housing in Ames. (10) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. This project does not improve access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. The primary hindrance to emergency vehicles is flash flood from 3rd St.and 4th St.This project does not address flash flood mitigation for 3rd St. and 4th St. (12) Such other factors which are relevant to the purpose of the ordinance. This facility will put additional pressure on emergency responders. Should a flash flood from 3rd St. and 4th St. occur, a higher population will be at danger and will require emergency services. Historically, flash flood at this facility has occurred during times of extreme floods,when emergency services are needed broadly around the city. From the perspective of suitability,this parcel of land is unsuitable for high-density development because it creates risk to timely emergency services elsewhere in the community.