HomeMy WebLinkAboutA4 ITEM# 2
DATE: 05-08-13
CITY OF AMES
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND HOUSING
REPORT TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
DATE PREPARED: April 29, 2013
CASE FILE NO.: ZBA-13-05
MEETING DATE: May 8, 2013
REQUESTED EXCEPTION: To allow a reduction of the front setback from 25 feet to
23 feet on the east side of a single family detached residence.
PROPERTY OWNER: Jonathan and Julie Sturm
APPLICANT: Jonathan and Julie Sturm
LOCATION: 535 Hayward Avenue (See Attachment A)
ZONING: RL (Residential Low Density)
BACKGROUND:
The subject property has a two story single family residence with detached garage. The
property is a rectangular shape approximately 60 feet wide by 140 feet deep. The front
of the existing house is set back approximately 30'-10" from the front property line, with
the front porch encroaching 2 feet into the required front setback. The existing front
porch is approximately 7'-10" deep and 24'-6" wide.
The minimum required front setback in the Residential Low Density zone is 25 feet as
measured from the property line abutting Hayward, with a minimum side setback of 15
feet from the property line abutting Storm. Per Section 29.402(2)(a)(iii), a porch may
project into the required front yard not more than 8 feet, the required side yard not more
than 3 feet, and the required rear yard not more than 8 feet, provided that the portion of
the porch extending into the required yards is fully open except for support columns and
balustrades. The existing front porch encroaches 2 feet into the required front setback
and therefore, meets the allowed encroachment for the property. The front stairs to the
home are allowed as a full projection of the setback without limitation within the current
code.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The new homeowners, Jonathan and Julie Sturm, wish to construct an addition to their
home in the area of the existing front porch. They have applied for an "Exception of
Minor Area Modification" to construct the addition on the east side (front) of the existing
house. The dimensions of the proposed addition are 7' 10" by 18'. The addition is
proposed to extend into the required front setback 2 feet. (See attached site plan and
application showing existing conditions and proposed addition.) As shown, the proposed
1
construction would lie within the footprint of the existing front porch and would not
extend any further into the required front setback than the existing structure.
APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS:
Ames Municipal Code Section 29.1506(4)(c)(ii) states the following:
(iii) Exceptions for minor area modifications. The Board is authorized to grant
exceptions from the requirements of the zoning ordinance to allow minor area
modifications for single-family attached and detached dwellings that exist in
developed areas, but not in cases of new construction. These are authorized for
the following situations:
(ii) Reduction of required residential front and rear yard setbacks for principal
structures by no more than five feet;
BASIS OF REQUEST: See the "Supporting Information" prepared by the applicant and
included as part of this packet.
FINDINGS OF FACT: Section 29.1506(4)(c) of the Zoning Ordinance describes the
criteria that must be met for an Exception for Minor Area Modification. Below are the
criteria followed by staff's analysis of each:
1. Special circumstances or practical difficulties apply to the property such
that the terms of the ordinance cannot be satisfied.
As built, the existing front porch is encroaching within the front setback but is
within the allowed encroachment limits of the code. The proposed addition is
matching the existing encroachment. However, being the addition is not an open
porch and is an extension of the principal structure, it must either meet the
minimum front setback of 25' or else receive approval of an exception.
The existing front setback for this home is in line with many of the other
structures within the neighborhood, and many of the other homes in the
neighborhood have front porches as well. The homeowner identifies that the
addition will allow for an increased living area without increasing the exterior
dimension of the home. If the Zoning Board feels that the expansion of the living
area of the home is a practical difficulty, the exception could be approved for the
property.
2. The minor area modification will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or general welfare.
The exception, if approved, would allow the proposed addition to lie within the
existing footprint of the front porch and would maintain the existing setback into
the required front yard.
2
3. The minor area modification will not have a substantial negative impact
upon neighboring properties.
The proposed addition will not change the low density residential use of the
property and would maintain the existing front yard dimension of the property.
4. The minor area modification does not exceed the reduction limits
established in the listing of minor area modification in Section
29.1506(4)(c)(i), (ii), or (iii) whether the limits are reached by a single
exception or serial exceptions.
Section 29.1506(4)(c)(ii) allows for a reduction of a required minimum front yard
setback by no more than five feet. The requested reduction of 2 feet is less than
the 5 feet exception allowed for the required 25-foot front setback.
5. The minor area modification does not authorize a use or activity not
otherwise expressly authorized by the regulations within the zoning district
in which the property is located.
The addition to the house is an extension of the living space of the house and
maintains the existing use of single family residential. Other than the reduced
front yard setback, the proposed improvements are consistent with the zoning
regulations.
6. The minor area modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of
the zoning ordinance and the general plan of the community.
The proposed addition maintains an existing 2 foot encroachment into the
required minimum front yard setback and does not change the existing single
family residential use of the subject property.
The maintained reduction of the front setback for the subject property does not
significantly impact the intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance and has no
effect on the general plan of the community for this established neighborhood of
single family structures. Many of the homes within the current block, some with
front porches and others without, maintain a similar front setback as proposed.
7. The minor area modification is the minimum necessary to achieve the
desired result.
The applicant has submitted a site plan (received by the City on 04/19/13)
showing the layout of the proposed addition in relation to the existing porch it will
replace.
In the application, the applicant states the proposed addition extending the living
quarters is intended to be used as a place to put their piano in the living room. To
accommodate the piano, any addition smaller than the one proposed would not
3
allow enough space and render the project abandoned. The proposed addition
would be within the existing footprint of the front porch, which already extends 2
feet into the required minimum front yard setback of 25 feet and is less than the 5
feet encroachment that could be requested for the property.
8. The minor area modification does not alter the applicant's obligation to
comply with other applicable laws or regulations.
The requested Exception for Minor Area Modification for 535 Hayward Avenue
maintains the existing footprints of the existing porch and does not enlarge or
intensify the use of the structure. All other obligations to comply with applicable
laws or regulations are not affected by this modification and are not being
considered through this application.
CONCLUSIONS:
With the above findings based upon the application as described herein, the ZBA may
conclude that the application meets all applicable criteria of Ames Municipal Code.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The Zoning Board of Adjustment can approve this request for an Exception for
Minor Area Modification to reduce the front setback from the minimum required
25' to 23' for the proposed addition at 535 Hayward Avenue, based on the above
findings of facts and conclusions.
2. The Zoning Board of Adjustment can deny this request for an Exception for Minor
Area Modification to reduce the front setback from the minimum required 25' to
23' for the proposed addition at 535 Hayward Avenue, based on the above or
other findings of facts and conclusions.
3. The Zoning Board of Adjustment can refer this request back to staff and/or the
applicant for further information.
DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
The City's Zoning Ordinance allows for an exception to front setbacks to be granted by
the Zoning Board of Adjustment as long as the proposed exception is in compliance
with the criteria outlined in the ordinance. If the Zoning Board determines that the
needed expansion of the living area meets the criteria as a practical difficulty, it can then
be concluded that the application meets all criteria for approval of an exception for
minor area modification.
Therefore, it is recommended that the Zoning Board of Adjustment approve Alternative
#1 based on the above findings of facts and conclusions. This will approve the request
for an Exception for Minor Area Modification to reduce the front setback of the existing
porch from the minimum required 25' to 23' for the proposed addition at 535 Hayward
Avenue.
S:\PLAN_SHR\Council Boards Commissions\ZBA\Misc\535_Hayward-Front Addition Exception for Minor Area Modification-04-19-
13.doc
4
Attachment A
Vicinity Map — 535 Hayward Avenue
T
' - TO waw
LITTLE ST LITTLE 4T �,a, .a
S d
a f r
a AN
T JYt _
f
W-le
r
Subject Site q
ILA
STORM STD
iORM STIV—
;
e,
� v
Location Map
535 Hayward Avenue
i — N
70 35 0 70 140
Feet '1
5
Attachment B
Aerial Photo of Site — 535 Hayward Avenue
g.�
b 4 =ti
S � M
a
�3 n^
7 ._
a �
._ ..
6
Attachment C
Assessor's Office Photo of House — 535 Hayward Avenue
ROW—
v �
e
t
14 h
8
a
P 9w
ars
j
7