HomeMy WebLinkAboutA029 - Council Action Form dated October 11, 2016 ITEM # 32
DATE: 10-11-16
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT FOR RINGGENBERG PARK
SUBDIVISON 4T" ADDITION OUTLOT "A" (BOBCAT DRIVE
APARTMENTS)
BACKGROUND:
The Ringgenberg Subdivision included a component of medium density development
that was zoned Suburban Residential Floating Zone Medium Density (FS-RM) July 12,
2005. The design and layout of the approximate 16.14 acre site has been the subject of
a number of proposals for apartment development in response to neighborhood
concerns regarding density, access, buffering, and the appearance of the buildings. The
current Master Plan was approved on November 26, 2013. Development of the site
consistent with the 2013 plan was recently completed. Development included 8 two-
story apartment buildings totaling 96 two-bedroom units, 3 single-family detached
homes along Suncrest, and a 50 unit senior living facility (Village Cooperative) at corner
of Cedar Lane and Oakwood Drive (See Location Map and Master Plan Attachments).
Each of the buildings was approved on an individual lot with frontage on a public street,
but the access to each lot was provided via a shared cross-access easement through
the center of the site, now named Bobcat Drive.
The proposed amendment to the Master Plan is focused on the 1.45 acres of
Outlot A at the center of the site. The proposed project requests approval of an
amended Master Plan to allow for the subsequent platting of Outlot A as a
buildable lot, reallocation of open space, and a Major Site Development Plan for
the construction of 13 three-bedroom single-family attached houses accessed
from Bobcat Drive. As part of the 2013 Master Plan, 1.8 acres of "greenspace" as
outlots (Outlot A 1.45 acres and Outlot B .43 acres) were part of the original project
approval to meet the 10% open space requirement. However, Outlot A was also noted
that it may be used for future development with an amendment to the plan. It was
believed in 2013 that the outlot could at some point in the future be developed in
combination with the remnant Ringgenberg homestead abutting the site to the north
along Oakwood Drive. The Ringgenberg homestead is approximately two acres in size
and zoned RL.
The Master Plan Amendment addresses the appropriateness of use and general layout.
The associated application for a subdivision is necessary to review the lotting and
improvement standards and the Major Site Development Plan addresses the details of
building and site design. With the Master Plan Amendment, development of the site
must be looked at within the context of its already developed surroundings and on its
own as a proposed developable site. The two primary policy issues related to the
Master Plan are the request to meet open space requirements with the off-site
1
common open space of the Ringgenberg Subdivision to the south and to allow
for development internal to a site along a proposed private street within the
current FS-RM zoning that was not originally approved as a street. Additionally,
the proposed Master Plan must be found to be consistent with Design Principles of F-S
zoning.
The current Master Plan was approved at a net density of 11.5 dwelling units per acre
and included 12% of the overall site as open space, relying upon Outlots A and B as
meeting the minimum 10% open space requirement. No specific amenities or features
were required in the current Outlot A and Outlot B. The developer's proposal would
leave a small open space area of Outlot B to meet the open space definition for the site
and total fewer than 3% of the site as common open space. The remaining on-site open
spaces are vegetated with no specific improvements or amenities that make them
usable open spaces or beneficial amenities to the residents of the Bobcat apartment
area.
The developer proposes that that with approved participation in the Ringgenberg
Planned Residential Development Homeowner's Association to the south, the residents
of the Bobcat site have access to additional open space that would exceed the FS
zoning standard of 10%. The developer asks that the 10% requirement be applied
as a requirement to the original overall Ringgenberg area rather than as an
individual Floating Suburban (FS) zoning district requirement. The Floating Zone
section of Zoning Ordinance identifies Suburban Low and Medium density (FS-RL and
FS-RM) as Suburban designations and the Planned Residential Development (F-PRD)
as a separate zoning district because it can be applied to any zoning district type as an
alternative to other zoning districts. F-PRD zoning does not rely upon the same
development standards of the FS zoning districts because of the flexible nature of the
PRD zoning and its own design objectives.
The open space requirement is different between the current FS-RIVI zoning of the
Bobcat Apartment area and the single-family home area to the south that is zoned F-
PRD. The F-PRD area must achieve a 40% open space area requirement. The F-PRD
was approved with a combination of private rear yard areas for each lot and common
open spaces for bike paths, stormwater, and a playground along Cedar Lane. The
Ringgenberg PRD was approved in May of 2012 with 11.24 acres of open space on
private lots and 17.74 acres of common open space for a total of approximately 53% of
the overall 53 acre site as open space. If 10% of the Bobcat Apartment area, 1.6 acres,
was subtracted from common space in the PRD as an allocation to the FS-RM area, the
remaining open space percentage would be 50.4% for the PRD. The combination of
the Bobcat Apartment area with the PRD gross area would have an overall open space
of 42% (including private rear yards) and 25% of the overall area as common open
space.
For the outlot to be developable it must meet the City's street frontage requirements,
typically 35 feet, as well as other access and dimensional requirements. At the time of
platting of Outlot A, it was made an outlot because it did not meet lot standards as a
2
buildable lot and needed to qualify as common open space. Outlot A was platted with
20 feet of frontage along Oakwood Road and the same shared access easement over
its south property line as the other properties in the Bobcat development. Bobcat Drive
is an easement over 20 feet of property of each lot. It is built as a 26-foot wide paved
driveway with 13 feet of its pavement on each lot within the 20-foot easement. As a
driveway, it was not built with curbs, street lights, and sidewalks, etc. that would be part
of a street. This is the case because the minimum lot size and frontage requirements
for the current lots were met in relation to the public streets of Oakwood and Suncrest
and not in relation to Bobcat Drive. In this case the developer does not have 35 feet
of frontage along a public street and proposes that Bobcat Drive become a
recognized private street for the purpose of meeting lot frontage requirements.
The formal approval process of the private street would be through granting of a Waiver
to street improvement requirements within the subdivision process as a substitute for
the public street. Private streets do not have a recognized standard by the City and are
considered on a case-by-case basis; however, they are typically approved only within
PRD zoning rather than standard zoning districts due to the flexibility of lot requirements
afforded to PRD developments. However, the subject site is not large enough for zoning
as a PRD because it is less than 2 acres in size and intends to pursue the subdivision
waiver process rather than rezoning.
The attached addendum provides additional background and analysis of the proposal.
Public notice was mailed to all property owners within 200 feet of the original Master
Plan boundary for the Bobcat Drive Apartments. Public hearing signs were posted along
Oakwood Drive and Cedar Lane as well.
The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed a master plan amendment proposal at its
September 21st meeting. The master plan proposal that was reviewed at that time had
up to 18 units as apartments and single-family attached homes, with the apartments at
3 stories. The Commission recommended approval of the Master Plan Amendment on
a 6-0 vote with a condition that the structures not exceed 2 stories. The developer has
since amended the plan to only single-family attached homes across the entirety of the
site totaling 13 units and fulfilling the 2-story height condition.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The City Council can approve the Master Plan Amendment for Ringgenberg Park
Subdivision Bobcat Drive Apartments Outlot A.
2. The City Council can approve the Master Plan Amendment with alternate
conditions or modifications.
3. The City Council can deny of the Master Plan Amendment if it finds that the
proposal is not consistent with City standards or policies.
4. Action on this request can be postponed and referred back to City staff and/or
3
the applicant for additional information.
MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The developer proposes thirteen single-family attached homes which they believe are
compatible with the surroundings and create additional needed housing opportunities.
The tradeoffs for allowing development on Outlot A at this time is the transfer of open
space off-site from the Bobcat Drive area and the configuration of site with an internal
orientation to Bobcat Drive as a private street.
The overall intensity of development for 13 additional homes does not impact the
stormwater facilities that are already in place or the public infrastructure that is in place
to serve the area. In terms of appearance, the buildings are generally compatible with
their two-story building heights and configurations for each home that is consistent with
the surrounding uses. The buildings are situated internally to the site and are unlikely to
be visible from the abutting single-family home neighborhoods that were concerned
about the design of the site previously. The site does line the south boundary of the Ray
Ringgenberg homestead that is zoned RL. A formal review of the building design and
layout will be part of a subsequent Major Site Development Plan and Preliminary Plat.
The primary decision needed for this project to move forward is if to allow for the
site to utilize the common open space of the Ringgenberg PRD, if the developer is
able to secure an interest with the current HOA. The main common space feature
would be accessed via Cedar Lane and is just over a % of a mile from Outlot A. The
developer understands the need for an agreement for this proposal to proceed, but has
not yet secured permission from the HOA. This agreement will need to be secured
prior to the final platting of Outlot A to a developable lot. The location of common
space is still a zoning issue, regardless of a HOA agreement, to be approved by the
City. Functionally, the larger amenity space of the Ringgenberg PRD is more desirable
than the small unplanned areas of the Bobcat Apartments. However, the change of
Outlot A from open space does affect the openness and feel of the internal area of the
project that is intended to be a suburban medium intensity design. The remaining
landscaped areas will all appear as yard areas around buildings and do not provide a
"usable space" component for the overall site as much of the area was originally
designed as perimeter buffering.
The second issue is orientation of the project as an internal site. Staff believes that
because of the orientation and location in the center of multi-family site, the proposed
homes will in all likelihood not be owner occupied for a majority of units and should be
considered more as investment properties for rental housing with the proposed
configuration.
The primary concern with the layout is the lack of public street frontage and reliance on
an easement for access. The easement provides for a right of ingress and egress and
there are covenants for participation in its maintenance by the property owners.
However, the drive does not include the features normally associated with a street. In
4
the context of the multi-family surroundings it does function very much like a private
drive suited to the purpose of providing vehicle access as is the case with multi-family
apartment complexes, more as an alley than a formal street. For Bobcat Drive to be
acceptable as a private street, at a minimum it would need to have issues of
maintenance and pedestrian circulation addressed upon development of this site.
The arrangement of the 13 homes appears to fit the minimum standards for zoning with
resolution of the issues of open space and street type described above. Approval of the
Master Plan would allow the developer to pursue the development concept and address
the deficiencies of the site through platting and site plan approval process. Ultimately,
development of the property could not occur without the platting of the outlot as a
buildable lot and approval of the Major Site Development Plan for the multi-family
housing.
Developing Outlot A at this time could be a lost opportunity for the site to be combined
with the 2-acre Ringgenberg homestead site in the future as was originally
contemplated. The combined Ringgenberg homestead site would be approximately 3.5
acres and would allow for a different layout of the site that could feature single-family
attached or detach homes and create more home ownership opportunities than are part
of this proposal. However, there is no obligation for the Ringgenberg site to be
developed in connection with the current Outlot A site and it is unclear in what
timeframe the property could potentially be available for purchase.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council
approve Alternative #1, thereby recommending approval of the Master Plan
Amendment for 13 single-family attached homes with a recommended condition
of a two-story height limitation.
5
ADDENDUM
Public Improvements. The City and Developer have made various Development
Agreements as the entire Ringgenberg Park Subdivision has been implemented
regarding responsibilities for providing public improvements in and around the project.
Current agreements related to the development of the subject site include the following
provisions.
• City of Ames will construct the bike path along the west side of Cedar Lane.
• Developer will construct the bike path along the south side of Oakwood Road from
the northeast corner of the site to the northwest corner of the site, including the
frontage of the Ringgenberg farmstead. This path will be constructed during the first
phase of the development of this site.
• As traffic in this southwest part of Ames increases, a turn lane on Oakwood Road
may be needed, for which Developer will deposit $80,000 into an escrow account.
The deposit will be made on a pro-rated basis as the dwelling units on the north side
of the subject property are completed.
These requirements are already binding on the City and Developer through these
existing agreements. These obligations would not change with the amendment to the
Master Plan. If the private street was approved as proposed, no additional public
improvements are needed to serve the development.
Density Information. The gross area of the subject site is 16.14 acres. Common open
space designated on the Plan of 1.89 acres and storm water detention areas of 1.31
acres can be deducted for a net site area of 12.94 acres. The proposed plan increase
development from 149 dwelling units to a 162 units with a net set area of 14.34 for a net
density of 11.29 dwelling units per acre. This exceeds the 10 units per acre required
minimum net density for the FS-RM zoning designation AMC Table 29.1202(6) and is
below the maximum development of 22.31 units per acre. It should be noted that the
current Master Plan has a net density of 11.5 units per acre.
FS Zoning. Property that is developed according to the Suburban Residential
requirements shall create a development pattern that adheres to the following
development principles (AMC Section 29.1202(2)). Reference is made here to the FS-
RM (Suburban Medium Density Residential) zoning standards (AMC Section
29.1202(6)), which are also attached. The approved Master Plan was found to meet
these principles.
(a) A development pattern that contains generally distinct and homogeneous
land uses. This development is to occur in the remaining in-fill areas and the
targeted growth areas where the property owner does not select Village
Residential development.
Property to the north, east and south of the Bobcat Apartments is developed with
single family detached residences, and a church is located directly to the east of
6
the Bobcat Apartments. The property to the west is used for row crops and
pastures. The current zoning of surrounding properties is shown on an attached
map (Attachment D).
The developer desires to add 13 additional housing units to the site with access
from the existing Bobcat Driveway. It is an internal location to existing multi-family
development area and will provide similar housing to that which is around it. It
does not change the interface of the site overall with its distinct boundaries to
single-family subdivisions. The overall site achieves this principle.
(b) An economic and efficient subdivision design with respect to the provision
of streets, utilities, and community facilities with limited focus on building
and development design integration and greater emphasis on vehicular
mobility.
The developer has submitted a Master Plan that represents an economic and
efficient design, using private infrastructure, including an existing cross access
easement over a private driveway. Due to the internal location within the multi-
family development the plan allows for small living units configured off of the same
vehicular drive as the other sites and meets minimum setbacks expectations.
Review of the design details on compatibility would be part of a Major Site
Development Plan review.
(c) Effective landscape buffers between distinctly different land uses.
The FS-RM zoning standards require a landscape buffer of at least 10 feet width
in the setback area of a lot where it is adjacent to a lot zoned FS-RL. In this case
the site abuts an RL lot to the north and the developer will provide the same 10
foot buffer and meet the required rear yard setbacks that provide a 29 foot
building separation to the abutting RL lot. The original perimeter buffer of the
Bobcat Apartments is not affected by the proposed amendment.
(d) The provision of common open space in residential areas, where the
maintenance of the open space is the responsibility of those directly
benefiting.
The zoning standards for the FS zoning district require common open space to
comprise a minimum of 10% of the gross area of the property. This common
open space may not include land within required setback areas. Outlots A and B
are designated as common open space and comprised 12% of the gross area of
the original current Master Plan and original property.
Outlot A has been designated an outlot to serve intermediately as open space,
however no specific improvements was required other than for it to be graded
and to have grasses. The Outlot A was also contemplated as available
potentially for future development in a scenario where the abutting Ringgenberg
7
homestead was to redevelop. The Master Plan Amendment would be needed in
either scenario of the site being developed with the Ringgenberg property or as
proposed as in individual site.
The developer proposes to secure a common interest in the Ringgenberg
Subdivision to the south as a replacement for the 1.6 acres required of the
Bobcat Apartment site. If this was approved and accepted the site's residents
would have access to amenities that directly serve their interests.
(e) A development pattern that ensures compatibility in the design of buildings
with respect to placement along the street, spacing, and building height,
and provides for spaciousness and effective vehicular and pedestrian
circulation.
The internal location of the site is set well away from all the multi-family structure
on the site and abuts one RL zoned home to the north. The Master Plan
indicates setback and separation from the north lot that is consistent with rear
yard setbacks and buffering requirements. The homes would be 2 stories each.
Staff concludes that building designs, heights and placement establish a project
that is compatible with its surroundings and therefore consistent with this
Suburban Residential Development Principle.
However, the circulation and access to the site relies upon approvals of Bobcat
Drive as a private street to meet frontage requirements and for sidewalk
extensions to be constructed with the project that connect the internal site to the
public street system. As an FS site the long block structure exceeding 660 feet
necessitates pedestrian walkways connections through the block.
(f) A development pattern that is compatible with the surrounding
neighborhoods and is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Land
Use Policy Plan.
■ As mentioned previously, the surrounding neighborhood is comprised of a
variety of housing/building types, including a church, multi-family buildings,
agricultural buildings, and one and two-story single-family residential homes.
This site is set internal to a Multi-family development and does not have a
direct relationship to the surrounding neighborhoods. The increased intensity
of development with 13 homes will not affect infrastructure that serves the
site.
■ The goals and objectives of the Land Use Policy Plan (LUPP) that are
relevant to this proposal are attached.
8
Goals and Objectives of the Land Use Policy Plan
Relevant to Proposed Master Plan
Goal No. 1. Recognizing that additional population and economic growth is likely, it is
the goal of Ames to plan for and manage growth within the context of the community's
capacity and preferences. It is the further goal of the community to manage its growth
so that it is more sustainable, predictable and assures quality of life.
Objectives. In managing growth, Ames seeks the following objectives.
1.0 Ames seeks to manage a population and employment base that can be
supported by the community's capacity for growth. A population base of 61,000-
73,000 and an employment base of up to 34,000 is targeted within the City.
Additionally, it is estimated that the population in the combined City and
unincorporated Planning Area could be as much as 67,000 and the employment
base could be as much as 38,000 by the year 2030.
Goal No. 2. In preparing for the target population and employment growth, it is the goal
of Ames to assure the adequate provision and availability of developable land. It is the
further goal of the community to guide the character, location and compatibility of
growth with the area's natural resources and rural areas.
Objectives. In assuring and guiding areas for growth, Ames seeks the following
objectives.
2.B. Ames seeks to assure the availability of sufficient suitable land resources to
accommodate the range of land uses that are planned to meet growth. Sufficient
land resources shall be sought to eliminate market constraints.
2.D. Ames seeks a development process that achieves greater conservation of natural
resources and compatibility between development and the environment.
Goal No. 3. It is the goal of Ames to assure that it is an "environmentally-friendly"
community and that all goals and objectives are integrated with this common goal. In
continuing to serve as a concentrated area for human habitat and economic activity,
Ames seeks to be compatible with its ecological systems in creating an environmentally
sustainable community.
Objectives. In assuring the community's "environmental-friendliness", Ames seeks the
following objectives.
9
3.B. Ames seeks to maintain and enhance the value of its stream corridors as
drainage ways and flood management areas, plant and animal habitats,
recreational and scenic areas and pathways for linking the overall community.
3.C. Ames seeks to protect and conserve its water resources for the following
purposes: aquifer protection; water quality protection; user conservation
management; plant and animal life support; water-borne recreation; scenic open
space; and, provision of a long-term/reliable/safe source of water for human
consumption and economic activities.
Goal No. 4. It is the goal of Ames to create a greater sense of place and connectivity,
physically and psychologically, in building a neighborhood and overall community
identity and spirit. It is the further goal of the community to assure a more healthy, safe
and attractive environment.
Objectives. In achieving an integrated community and more desirable environment,
Ames seeks'the following objectives.
4.A. Ames seeks to establish more integrated and compact living/activity areas (i.e.
neighborhoods, villages) wherein daily living requirements and amenities are
provided in a readily identifiable and accessible area. Greater emphasis is
placed on the pedestrian and related activities.
4.B. Ames seeks to physically connect existing and new residential and commercial
areas through the association of related land uses and provision of an intermodal
transportation system.
4.C. Ames seeks to psychologically connect the various living/activity areas through
closer proximity of residential areas and supporting commercial uses, common
design elements and inclusion of community amenities such as parks and
schools. The connections should promote community identity.
Goal No. 5. It is the goal of Ames to establish a cost-effective and efficient growth
pattern for development in new areas and in a limited number of existing areas for
intensification. It is a further goal of the community to link the timing of development
with the installation of public infrastructure including utilities, multi-modal transportation
system, parks and open space.
Objectives. In defining the growth pattern and timing of development, Ames seeks the
following objectives.
5.C. Ames seeks the continuance of development in emerging and infill areas where
there is existing public infrastructure and where capacity permits.
5.D. Ames seeks to have the real costs of development borne by the initiating agent
10
when it occurs outside of priority areas for growth and areas served by existing
infrastructure.
Goal No. 6. It is the goal of Ames to increase the supply of housing and to provide a
wider range of housing choices.
Objectives. In increasing housing opportunities, Ames seeks the following objectives.
11
Attachment A-Location Map
J
vd p
NO
OAKIIVOOD RD OAKWOUD°RD
�Q �r OAKWOOD RD O &
OOD-RO
'
r ,� Y�v Subject Sde �* +,,.,.- A*=r �•` ���w � A� t �t����
NCRES
Oft"
c WUA
� t�t
ti 4 L f$
O z ^- SUNDOWNjDR
d
°,WtI��. �'
, B
a PSG
_ LL Riggenberg PRD
s� �a
Central Common Space
a
#apg %� �i <`"'" ,; t O l ,7Y, p`lF,D►2,-�^" ` w Jam' _-"�,�' ''' ` "'-
a1tC #. u,'.�.
it..
7,69 Location Map
h
�14J 69,
12
I
o r6 e
OAKNK100 ROAD
I �
{- SO.HINT H LANDSCAPE
^. ji —__—_ to
POND 9 �� j -.,•_,«.r• i ,DRY POND 11
1 __ U FER
I 1 �•HINIHU - >
V MR
Z rF
to
HHO DEVELOPMENT
SPACE AND F RE DEVELOPMENT77
r _ ■ a !
CD
t
{� 1, (p *' r' i y I JU UIT COMMON OPEN SP f I 5
LOT
1 'G I 1 -
�� 111�Ta I
g� t
CL
r tssre#
�� r tUe LOTSil1l1 m
gi
i,LOT
_
�LOTio �: yy
� ,, ��, �-. ,.�.. � ,• a- L11Vpu1f G�..��,�� 1 ��.�.v s ,.�.�,,�20•�! �FFER, I` — 'S
,
' I � \ 1�~'^-�-.. SUNCREST DR. � �• ���a�
411,
BiKM[M/o¢I[xfyEQ tlItVYT[O¢S KOIIR IMmIGTION wi GBxLLLifYDID[KpOEMMxfO¢IMWfEGGITSD' VpOKpT1¢DDi[E9: i[9DpDY W! as
Mi%xl/dT
wTpplpaTm10/¢f. BWIIDiNB9 MOK¢TT ONx[¢: nllDud GpD mKl0i11[M
KKMNTv iSi,STE SF, vltlifi wrz tJ Wp.D01p54l TTOETD¢T I3 U¢IIWxD0S lmuDlxEtlTv[a uxln/[-S)EDlSv NUx[IE/ETu •rin:w¢TMD¢Id
EIDlW¢Gv U.iA Af. e2EY NITNimfKN•4LixDiElD¢ODMUpIIE 10DEU il¢[R
11xlS.G 90p10
WIIDIxWv lS¢ElE 6.f, vIT.M BYbI1D STE¢o4¢Ov IA 6TYl4 Hp1 i[DIODM UxIf
BETOTY UpTIE 26r11GE Mliplpl100M UNR Wil[Mr LO1QW: i8-UI
TOuI IxnmauE.i¢iit/ar..uaa i Mpit¢w s oep¢DDN uMr
ImwDlMm awxmis.upo[a.B.[E uxrropal[ uuiotsaumwl imK
IUIIMDEIiVl WK[BBpu ro Ol[MTELLEO NtIx WrWlND!¢D WDDMSION 509469A
lmeB•11 EII¢llm WwESEINpIl nxlLT wn Wl1H E[IISB OfalKxRmTNI Ki6i¢lSIDIMGI uplls. n.sr pDDR10N
¢lEntpilD TO W¢O[M D¢M O¢LB Oen
lx[6xg11!¢NGmpi lEd WLLDW6 EING/Kf ltlxG
OYINOOp loxD op f UMR DILLK
1 OF i
����� L1TJ/"DIDfLY.6LICIMe/LIIai1N•A119(M YOLWH'I tal Cn11[1Lr1 �
uGt iGLle)PBalrall amaemmvin nrtmnamann wnG�s� Ne sw umm�Glsn ans.•n nLYa.nresn
Me•" IGmp2i111"N tOI/"IYII GY•LIOrG'I/L160tT•ausnaroar NG tDilal T OLLL•Y1LG•LLS•LMWI
TL"llnllll"LYII1Ln1 LnY0Na0Y0h LaMrtt•N]n L0 \ OTG• 'n us'"i•1
ofoosn•uNr iwmaiaramoNmamrunammseiumltrssa!mm anoruraTOYnlallnpmafnmxsroar xGn•1um Sxua s061mlbe1n 1na1LGLLm'SJIQaWI•'OarNUTi wn "I UPL. •n 0[Lts e
lnelfwml vv'�(1 acn. •n uLttl
alaam/tw aulr uNNNwmneeumruL Lmr GINNin•Limes/weaK•aLLUaroarxUtiloi "[i'n anarueamYt anvasn p b
uuoaNn NmatGn vemYoulorow n}aI NOOeaG2ntLl1YG[ Laltta1111Ya9WtInaNL U N+un+srN
11aa N00mlL ieY LIIrGA•WmntlGaNmu 1nuN WN.os
slnesant"c v"aeaaraumow unNlerar auiwsnmunLoausmvuGTmNSY2emxs roarxutiim .1—roll" on •n 2Ksu•
svoIIil�in� I
i M
I39N�N'U VMO d
UNl()I•S3WtldOALOX11J 1
910?L Z d33
A
Ii
I f ��I�� .•I. � � L• ,a�+taxleo � ,a
�ygp2 Vainin
I � ���I T[107 I v�•on i• I vmran 1 - wssei� � zot� � 4 �. � ���' t rabrl d
1
1 •107
�, "- 8101 s ;I ms•I-sass �' >rexatlsr,a 4101 -�
AiifI�Il�Iil" -� Ilf�lllI a. i t
r.
.N
" PIlI -
Q � �.:xllllbl IIIII tr t W111'� ' 1 r[
cc
EL
•=• ..r e I NlS d�Nlf I:lam 1/Ol lOtl T I E' • aY �f LNG •L !m 1
amnia ISNmis .. L- I I I; I I I C-
�_�_ 'o al n nau�n�asL • \\� I Lulf<aof .I; ���I�Imo!•• '' �.� t �-
�••L I b � '.eixtsY�S � x+s - vLssstic �� v�m�et si .,Z
i
[F-
Ip
13
1
I Tit —
f I ONOd An0 r .1• "am Od A 0 .I IIII -
1 RI
I ,•.., ,k'q - _ --- Msesoaos= LSN 4rM�i °
....... _ maaY�2tlx ._
,.S ... t
--- - OYOn000Nmo i I
I
i
520TH•AVE STATEAVE'. $TATF��F- 3tl3 A 1 WSJ
" "\WS
! 't O
x ,
t
s
_ o
n ,O
580.TH AVE m p
`O r
Off!XOd'. v RED FOX RD RED' RED a
C ,TI O 0" AA EOfl
p
�
0
0 I
N - j
Aa N 1 COTTONTAIL A
�Itl1NO110D LN y O
-�-
ON.ONtllH awl
lyi`, 00
CE NAR OOW
CEDAR L C LN R CEDAR LN `CED'AR'LN" bEDAR L•N o I _
�WOODVIEW_DR
.}� n f�N n rn c I �yOD I
V !
N
o �
n Z
114'\ p. WHITE A--WHITE—'' 'do')'d0 WHITE 4 =_WHITE
311 OAK DR OAK DR �Y v�
3 U3 OAK DR OAK DR
� -0
v o o x R a
d :
OAK�R 2i ',
I
1
I