HomeMy WebLinkAboutA013 - Council Action Form dated September 28, 2010 ITEM # 32
DATE 09-28-10
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: MINOR SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT FOR ROSE PRAIRIE
SUBDIVISION
BACKGROUND:
Story County Land, LC is requesting approval of a final plat within the two mile fringe area
in the County for the Rose Prairie property. The property was the subject of an Urban
Fringe Plan map change (April 13, 2010) and approval of the Pre-Annexation Agreement
(July 20, 2010). The developer's intent is to annex the property without the inclusion of the
Canterbrooke Stable site. In order to accomplish this goal, approval of this final plat is
required. After annexation into the City,the developer will be required to submit a new final
plat for Council approval reflecting his desired ultimate build out of the site. Review of this
proposed plat reveals three issues for Council consideration:
Outlot Designation
In anticipation of the current plat proposal, the City Council approved a waiver of
subdivision improvements on May 11, 2010. That waiver allowed the division of the
property without requiring the installation of City infrastructure and utilities. The resolution
approving the waiver is attached. It is useful to note that while the resolution anticipated
that the horse stables at Canterbrooke would be within a newly-created lot, it stated that
"the remainder of the Story County Land property would become an outlot precluding any
development until further subdivision. . . ." Outlots, by definition, are not developable lots.
The designation of an outlot as previously reviewed by the Council is not included on the
proposed plat; rather it is designated as Lot 2, a buildable lot. Changing the labeling of the
large lot to "Lot 2" rather than "Outlot" is inconsistent with the waiver that was requested
and granted in May. The implication of this change is that the property could be developed
without further review and without annexation in any manner allowed under County
standards. More importantly, the property would be platted in a manner that does not meet
the City's Urban Fringe Plan density requirement. Within the Urban Residential area of the
Fringe Plan, development shall be at urban densities—a minimum of 3.75 units per acre.
The proposed Lot 2 would have a density of 0.0059 units per acre. Under current county
zoning, no new home could be built on the lot as it already has an existing home.
In addition, approving the plat with Lot 2 as a buildable lot rather than an outlot, preserves
the possibility of developing the lot in accordance with the previously recorded horizontal
property regime should the property not be annexed into the City, for whatever reason.
While the horizontal property regime will technically would meet density requirements,the
Council might not want to facilitate this type of development with the approval of this plat.
It should be emphasized that there is no indication the developer does not intend to
1
request annexation into the City and forgo the horizontal property regime. He has signed
the Pre-Annexation Agreement which states that it is his intent to "apply to the City for
voluntary annexation and rezoning of [Rose Prairie]." Nonetheless, approving the plat
without the outlot designation would not be consistent with adopted policy, and would not
be consistent with how the same issue was addressed on recent plat approvals.
Specifically,the outlot designation was required on the Fieldstone plat to allow the splitting
off of the farmstead while ensuring compliance with adopted density requirements.
A means for addressing the density issue under this current proposal, would be to
include a notation of the plat stating that Lot 2 must be developed according to City
density standards. The developer has indicated a willingness to include such
notation.
Major Subdivsion Requirements
Another change to the proposed subdivision that makes the plat non-compliant with
adopted standards is the number of proposed lots. The proposed plat would create five
new lots, as follows:
• Proposed Lot 1 represents and separates off the Canterbrooke horse stable so
that it can avoid annexation along with Rose Prairie. This division was
anticipated when the City Council amended the Urban Fringe Plan map to
designate Canterbrooke as Priority Transitional Residential last spring.
• Proposed Lot 2 is the largest of the lots, comprising the bulk of the Story County
Land, LC property. It is the lot that will support the actual site development, but
is also the lot that the resolution approving the waiver stated would become an
outlot precluding any development until further subdivision. The outlot
designation is not included in the proposed plat.
• Proposed Outlot X is a narrow strip abutting the south side of the Sturges
property. This division was anticipated in the pre-annexation agreement signed
by the developer and the City this past summer.
• Proposed Street Lots A and B were required as a condition of approval by the
County. These lots were not anticipated by the City for this current platting
process, but will eventually be required when the Rose Prairie development is
further platted.
When this proposal was reviewed by staff during sketch plan review, and also when it was
reviewed by Council during the request for waiver of infrastructure requirements, the plat
included only two lots. It now includes five lots, as described above. The application is for
minor subdivision, but a minor subdivision process is for divisions creating no more than
three lots. Accordingly,the five-lot subdivision should be reviewed as a major subdivision.
Reviewing this as a minor subdivision would therefore require that Council approve a
waiver of major subdivision requirements for this proposal. To grant a waiver, the Council
would have to find that the requirement for a major subdivision would result in extraordinary
hardship to the applicant or prove inconsistent with the purpose of the regulations because
of unusual topography or other conditions. In this case the unusual condition may be that
the County has imposed a requirement for platted lots for the road,which is something that
2
has not previously been required. This creates a hardship for the applicant because of the
lateness of this requirement in the process and the fact that there was no precedent by
previous County actions to make the applicant aware that this may be required in this
instance.
In this case, a waiver may be prudent because the two street lots (which trigger
major subdivision review)were something that Story County required for purposes
of right-of-way designation. This is a change from past practice where the County
allowed right-of-way designation by easement. Practically speaking, however,there
would only be three developable lots, so the complexity of review, anticipated
impacts, and infrastructure requirements are no greater than they would be for a
minor subdivision.
Easement Documents
A final issue is that public utility easements are being noted on the plat only; they are not
accompanied by the typical grant of easement documents. The bike path/pedestrian
easements and utility easements are only being shown for reference only. They will be
formally created with all legal documents at the time the Rose Prairie development is
platted. The City Attorney has advised that this may be preferable in this case
because the easement documents would place some responsibilities on the City,
which would not be advisable while the property is outside City limits.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The City Council can grant a waiver of the Major Subdivision requirements of Section
23.302, thereby allowing the proposed plat to be processed as a minor subdivision, and
approve the Final Plat for Rose Prairie subject to the condition that a note be placed on
the plat that read, "Lot 2 may only be developed according to the City of Ames density
requirements of the Ames Urban Fringe Plan".
2. The City Council can deny the waiver of the Major Subdivision requirements and
require that the applicant submit an application for Preliminary Plat, per Section 23.302
of the Ames Municipal Code.
3. The City Council can deny the Final Plat for Rose Prairie if it finds that the
development creates a burden on existing public improvements or creates a need for
new public improvements that have not yet been installed. The Council can also deny
the plat if it finds that the creation of Lot 2 (rather than as an outlot) is incompatible with
the terms of the grant of the waiver of infrastructure standards and that such
incompatibility harms the interest of the City. The Council can also deny the plat if it
finds that the creation of Lot 2 defies the density requirements of the Ames Urban
Fringe Plan.
4. The City Council can refer this request back to staff or the applicant for additional
information.
3
MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This proposed subdivision is intended to divide Canterbrooke from the remainder of the
Story County Land, LC property, as anticipated by the Urban Fringe Plan map change
approved in April. The City Council approved a waiver of the subdivision improvement
standards in May. However, the plat as submitted for approval differs from that presented
to the City Council at the time of the waiver request. The City Council will need to
determine if the changes differ enough to warrant a revision to the subdivision plat prior to
approval.
As the staff report notes, this change of the designation from an outlot to Lot 2 retains the
ability to develop Rose Prairie under the recorded horizontal property regime in the County.
This may be contrary to the City's interests. However, it should be noted that Rose Prairie,
at this time, can build as a horizontal property regime in the County. The City and Story
County Land have entered into an agreement that, when fulfilled, will result in the
annexation, rezoning, and development of Rose Prairie as a subdivision within the City of
Ames. The Council will have to determine if a note on the plat restricting Lot 2 to required
density standards is sufficient, or if the Council is more comfortable requiring the outlot
designation that would prevent development of the lot until such time as a plan or plat for
the lot's development was submitted to the City for review and approval.
Finally, the Council will have to determine if the requirement for Major Subdivision due to
the additional street lots required by Story County results in an extraordinary hardship for
the applicant.
Considering the fact that the developer has signed the pre-annexation agreement, has
demonstrated his intent to develop the lot according to City density standards, and that the
developer is agreeable to a note on the plat the requires proposed Lot 2 to comply with all
density standards, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the Council act in
accordance with Alternative #1, which would (1) grant a waiver of the Major Subdivision
requirements of Section 23.302, thereby allowing the proposed plat to be processed as a
minor subdivision, and (2) approve the Final Plat for Rose Prairie subject to the condition
that a note be placed on the plat that read, "Lot 2 may only be developed according to the
City of Ames density requirements of the Ames Urban Fringe Plan".
4
ATTACHMENT 1: GENERAL LOCATION
o
a b
/ 2
W 190TH ST
04Ui
ff
t
W
It
AM7 �31�SCHOOL RD d - AR MITH T L
IN,06
r ,
Subject Site
r: 1 i3I
r ESTONOR k.
/ 0
to d.
> ADAMS ST
RO EORO
BL(}OM GTON RO i TO(y O NOLLOW f2D
pIX ; JEFEERSON ST:
7 �.
'XQ W
�> WHEELER ST
u.r
n
y Z �
��Oa Apt �—.. — DTH STD UFF AVER,
JACtSCQ DR '. 2 H ST'
GE P�WY 11; wF
HRID L�:' r' €28TH SI >q >
4RISTOIL DR F�:•� a 4 >{ to
25T ST
24TH ST �- z a' `w
p. E
z
q p p 20TH ST
s p a
Qa ,
f �
,i p €- n' I URRAAAAA
O O
_J
O pMH�RSt,.: m I' 3
General Location Map
Miles K,
N 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 '
5
ATTACHMENT 2: FINAL PLAT
�F to
j F
FS
- «
.0 Lii°I JL � !L'9:43'Y .3:J4fSk (Ya y�py� �n�db 1 {{ix•�
s a ♦ `tea .
nu
g
girl (f�]}'
sE I 4Al
I
1
I_ I . 4 t F
? Y SRil3'F .'i
a !� +�
} : 14' I
$ L
F� 'J}
i S Y!S , � \ ti x R
� »,YS4s'i.iP1IG1ik:S"Ys?
0
3tA.`Vfi _...... .....
y}. ��"� 54•i Ft'Slti'a"T�tl:k:Y °Brl'EM'�Y`k:sA13P.i:%y#1 H �
� I}
€ �
tFi
gill "--ml M111 ;
till
it I
I �> 111
i ROSE PRAIRIE
w ' +*E k7�xz SK3sK++ h i1� g.µlU
h � FINAL PLAT
# t *sxG1,r:.wv�r..tsh.. r.F411[J��h�l�'+'Ih+(TAC•f �,£Rsb{'^kr,.. EC*sa.:..
6
ATTACHMENT 3: APPLICABLE LAW
The laws applicable to this case file are as follows:
Code of Iowa Chapter 354.8 states in part:
A proposed subdivision plat lying within the jurisdiction of a governing body shall be
submitted to that governing body for review and approval prior to recording.
Governing bodies shall apply reasonable standards and conditions in accordance
with applicable statutes and ordinances for the review and approval of subdivisions.
The governing body, within sixty days of application for final approval of the
subdivision plat, shall determine whether the subdivision conforms to its
comprehensive plan and shall give consideration to the possible burden on public
improvements and to a balance of interests between the proprietor, future
purchasers, and the public interest in the subdivision when reviewing the proposed
subdivision and when requiring the installation of public improvements in
conjunction with approval of a subdivision. The governing body shall not issue final
approval of a subdivision plat unless the subdivision plat conforms to sections
354.6, 354.11, and 355.8.
Ames Municipal Code Section 23.303(3) states as follows:
(3) City Council Action on Final Plat for Minor Subdivision:
(a) All proposed subdivision plats shall be submitted to the City Council for review
and approval in accordance with Section 354.8 of the Iowa Code, as amended or
superseded. Upon receipt of any Final Plat forwarded to it for review and approval,
the City Council shall examine the Application Form, the Final Plat, any comments,
recommendations or reports examined or made by the Department of Planning and
Housing, and such other information as it deems necessary or reasonable to
consider.
(b) Based upon such examination,the City Council shall ascertain whether the Final
Plat conforms to relevant and applicable design and improvement standards in
these Regulations, to other City ordinances and standards, to the City's Land Use
Policy Plan and to the City's other duly adopted plans. If the City Council determines
that the proposed subdivision will require the installation or upgrade of any public
improvements to provide adequate facilities and services to any lot in the proposed
subdivision or to maintain adequate facilities and services to any other lot, parcel or
tract, the City Council shall deny the Application for Final Plat Approval of a Minor
Subdivision and require the Applicant to file a Preliminary Plat for Major Subdivision.
Ames Urban Fringe Plan, Pg. 37, UR Policy 1 for the Urban Residential Land use states, in
part:
UR Policy 1: This land use designation includes . . . conventional single-family-
suburban residential development with a minimum average net residential densities
of 3.75 units per acre and conventional suburban/medium density residential
development with minimum average net residential densities of 10 units per acre. . .
,t
7
ATTACHMENT 4: RESOLUTION 10-205
RESOLUTION NO. 10-203
RESOLUTION APPROVING WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
FOR STORY COUNTY LAND,T,C(ROSE PRA(RIE)
FOR THE CITY OF ANIr.,8
�VIJEREAS,at the April.27,2010,meethg,the City Council refeired to staffa letter from the tepxet entative
of Slori County Land, LC,requestiag waiver of subdivision!itandards;and,
W1,11J,tEAS,the developer is proposing a subdivision of land towparale Canterbiooke from the balance of
the 4tc,,ry Courify Land,LC,propeny west of Ada I iaydrn lieritage Park;arid,
'IN'HEREAS, these parock are wj,6in tmm miles of the corporate limits of Ames and arc subject to the
provisions of the Ajrc-s subdivision tegulations;and,
WHEREAS, this proposed subdivision does not create any,new developable lots apart from the pri,.)posed
Canterbrd okt!lot, wwhics could be,redeveloped;and,
WI IF.-:REAS,the horse stable-s at Caiiierbrooke would be within newly-created lot.,and the ternainder of the
Story County Land property would beconie anoutiot,precluding any development until further subdivision:arid,
WH FREA S,sine that area is designated Urban Residential,m)devel upable lov;can be created until the tand
is armentd into Arrics,and at the Council's clLrection,the staff has been negatiating with the property owners north
of town who desire to develop their la dl to facilitate that wincxatiori-and,
NVHEREAS, the proposed subdivision cortains fewer than throe [(it%, but lacks the required public
impmvem C015.however,the Cin,Ce-xic allows the Council to waive or modify the.requirentents;of the subdivision
regulations,and,.
NWIP-R-EAS, if the Council were to wwive the infra structure requiremeitts, the owner would not need to
prepare a prchminary plat for consideration htcause the division will then be classified as a minor subdivi%ion,and
tht applicant woulr!be allowed u)prepaie and subinit a fnial plat;and,
WIffiMFAS, along with the submittal of a final plat, the applicant would also submit the three standard
covenants which bind the L)wners and.succcssurs,to, 1) irce to an nexation At the time thr. City requests;2)waive
ohjections to assessments that may be iftipostd, in the fature if public irriproveinerWs are 11rought to the site is an
asse.-,ssniejit project;aitd,.3)pay any fees associated with buy-out of rural water,
NTOW,THEREI;0RE,BE IT-RESOLVED by the City Council of ilie City of Arnes, Iowa,thatthe waiver of
the City's design and in-frastrtiewre standar&forsuhdivisions for the proposed iwo-lot,I 98-acre subdivision tan Gran`.
Avenue and 190"' Street is hereby approved, subl"t to within six months of this date, signed covemmts and an
appli catio n for the final plat are,submitted to the City.
ADOlrl'ED`lam"IS I)e'day of May,201 O.
——-------------
Ann H.Campbell,Mayor
IntrodUCed by; Davis
S,cc onded by: Orazcm
Voting aye! Davis, Goodman,Larson,Clem,Wachi
Voting nay; None Absent: Mahayni
Re,.soluiion declared adop-cd and signed bly the Mayor this 116 day of May,2010
8