Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA016 - Letter dated October 12, 2009 from C. Stassis C. Stassis Professor of Physics and Senior Physicist,Ames Laboratory(retired) 3970 North Dakota Avenue Ames, Iowa 50014 r 12-October 2009 Dear Honorable Mayor and members of the Ames City Council Chairman, and members of the Story CountyBoard of Supervisors, In my October 7,2009°letter I-urged you to decisively reject this application and not allow,any-development on this-parcel of land until the developer improves the roads to meet at least the County°minimum requirements:and-addresses the discharge of large-quantities-of contaminated water onto the adjacent properties, into my pond, and through a ravine-into-the Squaw Creek. Furthermore, it is in my opinion well-established-now that any violation of the restrictions on the recorded replat of the Vd Addition, in.particular,-Note 11, prohibiting the further subdivision of lots 1 and 2—is simply illegal. Only on October-8, 2009,the determination regarding the legality of this application(Condition F of the City Planning and Zoning Commission)became available(Please,see Attachment).. Careful reading of this opinion reveals, however,that it is not based on actual facts,:but on the-ever changing statements -of-the developer,which,in my opinion,are to say the least confusing, misleading, absurd,-and in many cases false. In-2005,when-the 3'"Addition was platted, all three-lots, lots 1 and 2 and outiot A,were owned by Mr.and Ms.Gelina. Hunziker Land Development bought all three lots on July 21,2006(recorded August 1,2006)and subsequently deeded outlot A to the Northwood Heights -Subdivision,2"d Addition on October 2,2006(recorded on October 16,2006). These are_actual`facts,which'can be checked by simply calling the Story County recorder's office and are in direct contradiction-with the assumption on which the determination was based. Please, it is very important to notice that the•original determination by Ms. Parks, an extremely gifted and invaluable assistant city-attomey,was correct. The note on the official replat of-the 3'-Addition-is legally binding-and cannot be removed. This is in agreement with the statement i.made,in my, letter to-Mr..-Dissell,County planner,-based on the opinions of two quite-prestigious Des-Moines lawyers,who . fortunately offer one-hourfiee consultations. Page 2 12 October 2009 The-key issue of-the legality of the proposal was also brought up in the June'1, 2009 meeting of the County Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr.Gast, chaimtan,:'and several members of the County Planning and Zoning Commission clearly understood the importance of establishing who owned lots 1,2,and outlot A in 2005,When the 3`d Addition was platted. They asked the relevant.questions (see"Commission Comments'in the minutes), but they were.side-tracked by the evasive and misleading statements of the developer. Most importantly, please note the following exchange between Mr. Merfeld and the developer(page 22 of the minutes): Mr. Merfeld asked whether Hunziker was co-owner of the property in 2005. Mr.Wnkleblack affirmed. This statement by the developer is simply false. I deduce from his answer that this developer was aware that his application-for subdivision of lots 1 and 2 had no legal foundation-whatsoever. In conclusion, I again urge you to reject the developer's application. Respectfully submitted, C.Stassis Attachment