HomeMy WebLinkAboutA009 - Council Action Form dated March 13, 1984 ITEM #: v�
DATE: 3-13-84
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: Request for approval of the revised CDP/PUD for Stone Brooke
Subdivision
BACKGROUND:
The Stone Brooke Development consists of 207 residential lots located on 72
acres on the north side of Bloomington Road approximately 1/4 mile west of the
Hoover Avenue/Top-0-Hollow Road intersection.
On March 18, 1980,the Ames City Council approved Phase I of the Stone Brooke
Development. The CDP/PUD for Phase I is attached as is the proposed revision to
Phase I. A copy of the letter from Ken Janssen is attached and explains the
proposed changes.
Briefly those changes are the following:
1. An increase in the number of lots in Phase I. The approved CDP/PUD includes
66 lots and the revision includes 73 lots. The primary reason for this
increase in lots in the first phase is the change in the utility plan for
the sanitary sewer system. The approved plan anticipated the sanitary
sewer being extended from Bloomington Road/Top-O-Hollow Road, however, the
final design brought the sanitary sewer line in from the primary service
line that is located along the south edge of Hallett°s Pit which will
enable seven additional lots to be served. (See attached maps)
2. The developer has chosen to reorient 15 lots to allow for the construction
of a different type of residential unit. This lot configuration is
referred to as Z-lots and an example of the ,Z-lot development is attached
for Council review. This approach will allow for creative design in the
location of structures which should enhance the appearance of the
neighborhood.
Appropriate City departments have reviewed this request. All reviewing
departments are satisfied with the revised plan. No comments were received
except from the Water Department. Because the water service lines have been
stubbed into the lots, the proposed lot reorientation will result in some of the
service lines stub-ins being located on a different lot than originally planned.
The developer has two options: 1) The stub-in service lines can be moved; or 2)
easements can be provided so that the stub-ins can serve a different lot, other
than the lot on which it is located. (In effect some lots have two stub-ins,
some have one stub-in, and other lots have no stub-ins. )
The 'Water Department has asked that the easements be submitted for review and
approval by the City as part of the Final Plat submittal process,
-2- E
This request was before the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 7, 1984,
at which time the Commission took- the following action:
Motion: (Manatt/Soper) Move we approve the staff recommendation.
Motion carried 4 - 0 with 1 abstention.
The staff recommendation was to approve the revised CDP/PUD for Stone Brooke
Subdivision with the stipulation that the submittal of water service easements
be a,-part of the Final Plat process.
The Stone Brooke Subdivision is located in the Environmental Sensitivity Area
Overlay District. Revision of this CDP/PUD will not impact the zone beyond
the impacts identified 'in the original Environmental Review Record compiled in
1980.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Concur with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission to
approve the revised CDP/PUD for .Stone Brooke Subdivision with
the following stipulation:
That the submittal- of water service easements be a part
of the Final Plat process.
2. Approve the revised .CDP/PUD for Stone Brooke Subdivision with
modifications. -
3. Deny the request for approval of the revised' CDP/PUD for Stone Brooke
Subdivision.
MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The City Manager recommends that the City Council accept the recommendation of
the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the revised CDP/PUD for Stone
Brooke Subdivision with the stipulation that the submittal of water service
easements be a part of the Final Plat process. Submittal of the water service
easements as a part of the Final Plat should adequately protect each lot owner
and the reorientation of a portion of the lots will provide an opportunity for
the developers to introduce an innovative development technique to the Ames
Community.
,i !:i•'J1.'M�'t,•ia;:.'1'`.�y,,',C,1:•IJ'jlT.,r.I,�i4,11,r�,,4��' .•.Q' �41h'y'':��.�1�:��' 11�'t��,I'�'•rlh• :y,y� tali�,l�r
"1• �.`'1 t•r1 rirJ;11 1l y, j'} .,' {i1.;,.• , �:: �a A �.;`... ,�•.t 1 '41iEw'''':. % 1'�;:, lY
1, �. .t•, 1•,� r ;� d '1;'A., 5' r �( rl. I }, r•, 'a .I• J1�
•: 1i� i �.• .T • r,t',�. tj•�•11 ,`!"�., ,.:•.�
V.
?-,. 71r^!�4►/' h :.1:,'T.r:,. ti•.:..�I.i!r• M!r�4 !'i!'1.'
Pro).ot 01
' �` r t r' r r 1•B '..� ` „ 'p011d,� J"�If-. tth •
''. .Illy'
1 ;•/ w V,,�� i I yleWtyMap. I '
was 11116"1
1 I
MI Y•r IY / 'li I
+? r/
1.' w' II I
7.
NEW$Aril ARY
7.
49
• 'i ��r � •.L1 b.leq.r.r ..,
Total Site Proposed �� . w .• l' �l;il I 1
• � ,n w n r1. a r• ,. �
Zoning R-1 /P.U.D.;
existing Toning A-1- ' ,w n r•• wi ,w " � 1• N
existing zoning R-14
O I _. r rw raw ...I /G '• �� 1 . 1••' I. �
' •'i•I,I��- \T ' .— \' I I D.Mt► Oe...ii IWtl7M.. r.d..I tiIW1' I �
- 1„----':w�•-. LE ._.ELT ` -_
LEGEND—._.. _
a, .&WIWI r R-i •--� i 1 R-Z i
ORIGINAL C,D.�.. 1.980; '_.._ - - 1- ,
C onte tual ®evelo flan ment � REVEV " ,
.: •,-�•: .
SE ISED FEB gB0 t
CAP.-/•P.U.D. APPLICATION,_
for ,".STONE,BR.00KE".:...• ,R; EVO'ENOI-NyEER•W O.OI TE9TIN0-COMPANYAM
its tC one 2 .-......... ..n.
.'.
tC a a int.am.nt. AII! S IDvIj i
FIRST-ADDITIOW t)TON6 DHOGR6 6YDDIVID10";,...r i4•;.i,: "
fM•I•'•r1! 1 1 I Mono '
.YM•N•r.•r•N•r Ab. • r
lot
a i a s DEw1=T FM I is 14lfoatT,I's
jNrN•rw I► lY .•,1 �
.ce..n
too® amp" e/••
•'LM_.— IrN• a /.0 I,p
If
Es YL_Z { N• ` wr r•/•
Np k ( �c l,r m• t frr•o-H •I•M•IM'1 r/-I•r
t
N••l. { 5T of
r.,
{ tlb { aTONB b ' t)R0015E ydse—r� i ./...w.. .
APL
As Ag
• � r.vl.vr �
p'
49 46 49
O
t 8 7 ••�� WOODHAVIiW CIRCLti
• o tom_ .�__ � Q Y �• j
` or ''► r
9 9 &{ a
G7 G4 6D G4 G5 04 • °I
1 4 ••w eo- •e oe eee .f w •r•�••n1
or
t A •a. o�
,Itl 1 LOT AREAS
Odd. �— o lei •• •.L• .o...w•o
g D O I FLETCHER I L t Z `.aL
M
n
CIRCLfi • . d a
ga -
o.
{ .-Is j 74 �� ? •wu•rm .c•N
w.,m.. ••, u• •n:e.• u.nr
_ a .e .•... r, { .p u'.+o1.. wue,r.fu f••,n1 •a•
•/.•ntl•Y Y •' ■ •o,.. dO,T•e•uN ,1.,•l. r•r'
• wTaele•.•
{ ISLOOMIMGTOW ROAD R � tlgrr ---CooWoo
PROPOSED
•/.•I N/l./-/t rr 1/••1 M O,I Mr•.•Y•M I.YrI N/r11�•n'INr•/r•r N•
•'"'•"'" "`"'r'••""`''��'�'"• I"""'-""• STONE BROOKE .SUBDIVISION
'tr.�.r••..tl wr 1�I1 N tl•'q•M.-r Fwl.:r�1///rr.n
A.IMYI.M/.NW l�.M/••,r M/NNI.tlry Oswl..hM/•VW/lrWYr•w
•.,m I.•I••••I IM•rM/w.N.•1.MYI.N//I/rIIIw N.tl/A"/.N•f b/wn.,•I •Ml•.•e•I•
IM•.Ym•M'fe•I.•ODOO MI M7.r•r/r•/4/�,f•,r NN%••. /M.Nvr( ,
fnwrr NI„Ord/. •tl-.,.I•M.•/_../-./rl•.N fM.M.M•NfM YYrI 1984
NW- oft
" •N Ir.•I. .e•/•r/ I Ir•./>m OD MI r•11 NfW.•em M
fM l
'
4 fa•.•N fdr YYII•WN N/1•N'f/•M,•/.,e/11 .M.Y.
!WIT lO•N,/b.e MII l+Yp YI/•rr•I•Y,/f/n•IIr1l M•M Y/I•b•M•.l.
b01 MI i fM....Y/••N•N•Y,eo•.•W I •'IY•I'r I/r•.•I/•Y,!••..,/I.11 '
I /M[• •f,•!1'Ir V•f/Y y1/ fMm l YIl•!•'IrY.Meb M/1 M•••. 1.20P
,O•Y,la/o qa: r is II'o 4 fr N.I••q A.11 e/....!m•v/rw•/do..M
MI•4•.N.Y-//...✓.v.w..lr., Nw/Na.'Ol'flY r•mo.n pr1 Ir.M C.D.P. / P.U.D. -
1 .
(Phase t
REVISION ♦2 -
r n.•r••..4 r,r rM/oV to n rrr+a•_M r/••••1'•.r M.r.t,r.1�
lw�•.�/' w+.f ottt ._.r•I M Arn.•./•MII N rM/M,r rW w.•wYW.
MI .IY•••rtl.Nw./..nr 1!N/•••r/I I.•I•,r•I wnN nr,Mr./rn N r Il'!•/•a1 d1
Yr.1e..M••1'IiII f•••Y.//ww..w. f.nlnY.•r•re•.Y Y/tl I•rn/••! .
,••N�,tiN MI•I/M/•//.l•rr//f.•,.•,N/IIw/•I•�•///h1 MNA•M
.r•I•.H•/I N Ntl/Ow.rry ,.ytlfr./IlM MNIr•/•I•�Y•r••r.Nrlr -.wM•
O
MMM'f►► 6/ �1/1i (1••1
ENGINEERING PLUS 3116 s anus • Ames, Iowa 50010 • (515)232-8553
Engineers
Kenneth D. Janssen, P.E.,L.S.
Randy D.-Lueth,A.S.L.A. ' !// F� �t Planners
Craig L.Nelson,P.E. ��.:. i Land Surveyors
UJ FEL �.f .` ' , f
Landscape Architects
February 14, 1984
TO: Honorable Mayor & Council Members 11
Planning &. Zoning Commission-
City Clerk-& City Staff Members .`
FROM: Stone Brooke Partnership � � /S� ifFY
803 24th St .
Ames, IA 50010 �'�—• (;ItY (Lcf+K
pTl OF AsdF�IOWA
RE: CDP/PUD (Phase I)
Revision February; 1984
EP-File #79501
We are submitting for your consideration 20 copies of a revised
CDP/PUD, for Phase I of the Stone Brooke Subdivision. At your
meeting on -March 18, 1980, resolution #80-111 was passed approving
a Phase I development area within the overall "concept of Stone
Brooke Subdivision. We wish to revise the limits of that Phase I.
as .approved at that .t'ime. We also wish you to consider some reorien-
tation of some of the lots. We wish to make these revisions for
the following reasons:
1. In the Phase I approval of March, 1980 , 66 lots were
shown within a Phase I boundary. We will bring to the
March 7th meeting a copy of the document that was
presented to the Council at that time. The request herein,
is for 73 dwelling lots and 5 out-lots. We- feel that this
number of lots allows for the complete''development of
those unit groupings along the streets that are currently
under construction in the First Addition. The reason
that the original 66 lots were grouped as shown, was
because of the intent to bring sanitary sewer service
into those 66 lots from Top-O-Hollow . and Bloomington
Road. In the final utility design , this consideration
was dropped and a 24 inch sanitary sewer extension from
the Hallet pit area, was brought into the development
And now has been extended to .serve all of these 73 lots.
The other deviation in the boundary for Phase I , is
North of the Stone Brooke Circle area, East across
Stone Brooke Road and around the East end of Woodhaven
CDP/PUD (Phase I)
February 14 , 1984
Page -2-
Circle. - The intent of this boundary is to allow initial
development of the walkways as shown on the CDP previously
approved. This allows some open space to the rear of
the majority of lots within this First Addition (Phase I) .
2. We .propose a reorientation of the lots numbered 38
through 43 and 44 through 52 as shown on the plan.
By rotating these lots, to a •position that is 600 to
the street we can present greater variety in the
appearance of the garages and front entrances of the
units. This will produce a more attractive streetscape
and better field of vision from the rear of the units.
These lots would still be arranged for possible attachment
. or detachment of the units with sideyards ranging from
0-5 feet .
We feel that this adjustment to the lots does not change
the intent of the original CDP/PUD presented four years
ago. Rather, this is part of the fine tuning that takes
place between conceptualization and the final built
project . However, the staff felt it should be.:presented
at this time.
We emphasize again that these revisions to the .approved CDP/PUD are
very minor. .in nature and we feel that they create a better First
Addition of the Stone Brooke Subdivision. We feel these revisions
should be approved immediately so that we can proceed with the
Administrative plat.
Respectively submitted,
ENGINEERING-PLUS
1 nneth -D: . Jan s.en..P.E. , L.S.
Project Engin r & Land Surveyor
KDJ/tt
cc Erb Hunziker
cc Bill Allen
0 Lot ine
_
The O-Lot Line home is an efficient, elegant, and
exciting solution to single family detached living -
on smaller lots and/or at higher densities. Benefits - -
include maximum utilization of outdoor spaces,
privacy, dramatic indoor-outdoor relationships that
expand small square footage. RNM has pioneered r.,•.
the O-Lot Line design for 15 years and today
is taking the concept in innovative new direc-
tions, producing quality single family detached
neighborhoods up to 9 DU/AC.
Seacliff Garden Homes
35' Wide 0 -Lot Line Lots
Carlsbad, CA
i ym4 8 Qf4&W,)Wd�A
,�
70 f7
1 '
/k
The RNM Diagonal Z -Lot
"ale
;ill. If t+ ,�•.t3 1: 1 eU ` ut. ..°'• • D/ r `� �•�„�
151
AMP
,- •• '° t it: .,n lil� ! t I•I••�'.4I•� ..•r' ``�, �L
lie
—� � • � �i' LI � _ I Wr:, III v. �•'' � i!S® Yr'�'d ;.'V 7a`,• _ .,
Streetscape ��� rot
. 9 � �'oau-ter ��r►r�ozcr Cof�����.
Design
i
rp
Q J
Ir.x — t a Sa
VIP
rt
� / 1
1
'�+'�;;+.��t?��@�i�"�4"fad.'t'?��te�'�r`«�'��� �?��°�ar���'�t": ��.z` "' �n •