Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA001 - Commission Action Form dated May 1, 2024 i i ITEM #: 10 DATE: 05-01-24 COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: A HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION AND RECCOMENDATION ON WHETHER TO ALLOW AN ADMINISTRATIVE ALTERNATIVE DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS OF UP TO 20% OF CERTAIN IDENTIFIED ZONE AND SITE DESIGN NUMERIC REQUIREMENTS BACKGROUND: City Council initially referred to staff a review of permitting processes and history of zoning text amendments, A staff report describing review authority, permitting processes, and zoning text amendments, and zoning standards was presented on November 14, 2023. The requirements of zoning are primarily defined locally, but once established state law governs how to amend standards or to grant variances and exceptions. Zoning by its nature is typically not flexible in its application and requires ordinance changes to modify requirements. Because of this, the City has amended the zoning ordinance 42 times in response to developer-initiated issues since 2015. In recent months the City Council has set a goal of providing more flexibility and options for development. Part of the focus of the goal of flexibility is to allow for some variations of standards to help development projects move forward when it does not conflict with j other City standards or improves conditions for the site. Council directed staff to solicit developer feedback on development issues and report back on options for changes to zoning. City staff reported back findings from developer outreach efforts on March 18th regarding specific development standards and potential value of a 20% alternative design option. At the March 18th City Council meeting the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance for allowing an Administrative exception process that permits up to a 0 20/o allowance to deviate from the numeric standards of Base Zones, certain other Special Purpose and Overlay zones and the Article 4 development standards. (See Attached Summary Chart Below). Development Standards Under state law, a variance is a process of providing relief for a hardship to a specific property and it is a responsibility of the Zoning Board of Adjustment to approve or deny such an application based upon formal criteria. However, zoning for "use" can be distinguished from development standards within in a zoning ordinance, and a separate exception or alternative approval process can be utilized differentiated from a true variance. Currently, the City has some minor exceptions (parking dimensions, setbacks encroachments, etc.) that are reviewed by the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Staff has minimal discretion to vary from any development standards. The City's zoning ordinance identifies uses and development standards by both zoning district and of general applicability for all sites. Generally, the City uses Base Zones for the majority of the City and uses specialized overlays and special purpose districts for unique areas to address more specific or unique issues. A large part of development review process is guided by the tables in the base zone standards for setbacks, design standards, lot coverage, storage area, etc. The general development standards of Article 4 address issues that apply citywide, generally independent of individual zoning district. These issues relate to fences, screening, parking, landscaping, accessory buildings, and other individual requirements. See Attachments B & C for a summary of the numeric design items in both the Base Zones and Article 4 General Development Guidelines. The Base Zones and Article 5 of the code often end up determining the majority of site layout as well as the restrictions that guide how elements of the site are developed. As part of background research, city staff reviewed other cities in Iowa to see what options the offered for flexibility. Cities such as Des Moines Cedar Rapids and Iowa City have Y Y � p Y I� allowances for deviations or waivers of a given amount to be issued Administratively by jstaff. Des Moines has the greatest built-in exception flexibility due to their recently 'I adopted development code. Options I With Council direction to focus on administrative relief, rather than through a public hearing process, staff focused on the basic issue of applying criteria or expectations to granting the exceptions. The intent is to have language that supports development goals and can generally be approved without a strict finding of a hardship as traditionally has been the approach. This sets up discussion of general criteria and the breadth of the applicability of a 20% alternative design process as primary issues for review of the proposed ordinance language. With all options, there is no variability of uses allowed. Staff proposes the exception process apply to all base zones and certain Special Purpose and Overlay districts are included on the eligible list of zones below. Overlays and Special Purpose Districts not included as eligible are seen as having their own unique standards with specific purposes that are not compatible with a 20% rule. Zoning Designation Zone Type, District Type All Article 6 Agricultural Zones Agricultural Base Zones All Article 7 Residential Zones Residential (RL, UCRM, Base Zones RM,RH All Article 8 Commercial Commercial (HOC, CSC, Base Zones Zones NC, DSC, CVCN, CGS 2 All Article 9 Industrial Zones Industrial (IG, PI, II, Ri Base Zones South Lincoln Sub Area Mixed Use Special Purpose District Mixed Use District Southeast Entryway Gateway Commercial Overlay Zone Overlay Southwest Gateway Overlay Commercial Overlay Zone FS Suburban Residential Residential (FS-RL, FS- Floating Suburban Zone RM) Residential Base Zone and General Standards Article 4 Development Covers All i Standards i Option 1 The proposed language below tries to balance expectations of flexibility with criteria for the Planning Director to evaluate if the proposed alternative of up to 20% can accomplish the following: A. Whether the requested exception, in combination and totality of exceptions j proposed, are consistent with all relevant purpose and intent statements of this ordinance. B. Whether there is an operational need or desirable benefit to the project. C. Whether the requested alternative offsets the effect of the request by providing something of equal or better consistency of intent of the requirement or zoning district D. Whether the requested exception will have a substantial or undue adverse effect upon adjacent property, the character of the surrounding area or the public health, safety and general welfare; E. Other factors determined relevant by the planning director, planning and zoning commission, or city council as applicable. This language is intended to be broadly applied to many circumstances and standards. The intent is that there is some basis of evaluating impracticable or undesirable outcomes of strict adherence to zoning standards and that an exception to the standard as an alternative design can still meet the intent. Generally, the preference would not be a justification on its own, some operational issue or betterment of conditions would guide the Planning Director's decision. Option 2 Rather than apply general criteria as described above, an alternative approach would be to narrow down the types of standards allowed for an alternative approach and remove criteria for balancing need with design intent. This type of language would likely be more permissive with less discretionary assessment of project merits and only situations that cause clear conflicts or create unworkable conditions would be denied. No trade-off or alternative benefit would be required or allowed. 3 Alternative design exceptions are permitted for up to 20% of the following standards, when such design does conflict with health and safety standards or functionality of a site. - Architectural Design requirements for building proportions - Setbacks Minimum or Maximum - Minimum Lot area - Lot coverage - Open Space/Landscape Area Requirements - Building Height/Stories Minimum or Maximum - Parking ratios only I - Screening Requirements - FAR (FloorArea Ratio) Minimum or Maximum j - Landscape area requirements (not direct change to planting ratios) Other Options i Within the context of either option above there are different approaches that could be applied. Examples would be to limit applicability to previously developed sites and not new vacant development sites, limit to specific uses or situation, establish a mandatory substitution or trade off requirement could be applied to the project, or create more objective criteria with minimal discretion and flexibility. Implementation Staff is proposing that whenever a request for a 20% Alternative Design is granted, any remainder of a whole numeric number would be rounded to the nearest whole number to the benefit of the applicant. For example, a 0,3 reduction of parking spaces would mean 1 space reduction. The final approved language will primarily be administered through staff approvals. If a project requires a hearing, the same 20% allowance will be available for approval by the respective approval authority, i.e. ZBA or City Council. As noted above, certain zoning districts and standards will not include the 20% option. As a result of staff review of other sections, we do propose to move a drive thru landscape standard to Article 4 from Article 13 to allow it to be part of the alternative exception process. Final language will likely be added to Article 3 for administration of development standards and the review process with Article 15. Changes to ZBA exceptions that overlap may also be removed. 4 Ultimately, nothing in these new standards will change the authority of the Zoning Board of Adjustment with regard to Exceptions, Variances, Minor Area Modifications or Special Use Permits. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Recommend that City Council approve Option #1 draft ordinance language (Attachment A) which establish criteria for considering 20% alternative design for specified base zone development standards and numeric development standards of Article 4, 2. Recommend that City Council approve Option #2 draft ordinance language focused on limited discretion and specified list of standards. 3. Recommend alternative standards or language for City Council to approve. 4. Recommend that City Council take no action to create 20% flexibility of alternative design exceptions. i E PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: i In staffs view, Option #1 provides the best way to provide developers with a fair set of criteria by which to ask for a maximum of 20% Alternative Design to adjust a numeric elements of the identified zones and Article 4 numeric development standards. Option #1 provides criteria to balance not being overly prescriptive, nor being so broad that the standards for review are unclear or subject to an exhaustive time-consuming case-by- case analysis. This processes allows staff to assess the merits or the request and balance it with other expectations. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the Planning & Housing Director that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend to City Council approval of Alternative #1 . i 5 Attachment A- Draft Ordinance Based on Option #1 Section 29.1502(7) (New Sub Section) 7. Any Numeric Standard or Site Design Standard with the identified zoning districts in the list provided in this Section may be adjusted up to 20% by approval of the Planning Director if the following criteria are met: (i) Whether the requested exception, and combination and totality of exceptions, are consistent with all relevant purpose and intent statements of this ordinance, (ii) Whether there is an operational need or desirable benefit to the project. (iii) Whether the requested alternative offsets the effect of the request by providing something of equal or better consistency of intent of the requirement or zoning district (iv) Whether the requested exception will have a substantial or undue adverse effect upon adjacent property, the character of the surrounding area or the public health, safety and general welfare; j (v) Other factors determined relevant by the planning director, planning i and zoning commission, or city council as applicable. (vi) Density, maneuvering area, minimum lot frontage, Campustown rock size, lighting output, wireless tower standards, fence height, adult business standards, ADU standards and stories of a building are not eligible. (vii) Adjustment requests must be applied for and issued as a permit process. (viii) All numeric remainders after a 20% adjustment is calculated will be rounded to the nearest whole number. (ix) Eligible Zoning Districts and Development Standards: a. All Article 6 Agricultural Zones b. All Article 7 Residential Zones c. All Article 8 Commercial Zones d. All Article 9 Industrial Zones e. South Lincoln Sub Area Mixed Use District f. Southeast Entryway Gateway Overlay g. Southwest Gateway Overlay h. FS Suburban Residential Zones i, Article 4 Development Standards j. F-VR Village Residential Development Standards Section 29.414 (Creates New Sub Section as 29.414.) -Section 29.1303- Drive-Through Facilities- Move to 29.414 6 Attachment B-Article 4 General Development Standards- Eligible Landscaping Standards- Front Yard, Parking Lots, buffers. Includes quantities of Trees, Shrubs and Grasses, Planter depths, Island, Front Yard Diversity Requirements, Tree separation requirements • Parking Ratios i • Parking and Access Standards- Front yard and dimensions, space dimensions, driveway design requirements • Outdoor Display • Outdoor Storage • Garages and Other Accessory buildings, excluding ADU's, maximum sizes and setbacks • Accessory Dwelling unit and Duplex design requirements Billboard Size, Location, Setbacks • Trash Enclosures • Other setback encroachments. Attachment C- Base Zones Articles 6-9 Base Zone Development Standards- Eligible • Minimum Open Space Percentage Front, Side and Rear Yard Setbacks • Building Height FAR (Floor Area Ratio) Lot Frontage • Lot Area • Building coverage/Impervious coverage • Parking locations • Building materials • Other Architectural Standards Landscaping buffers abutting dissimilar use zone. • Other general requirements of building orientation. 8