HomeMy WebLinkAboutA002 - Council Action Form dated February 28, 2023 ITEM #: 25
DATE: 02-28-23
DEPT: P&H
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: TEXT AMENDMENT TO STANDARDS FOR GENERAL ZONING
REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO LOTS
BACKGROUND:
i
On December 20, 2022, City Council referred to staff a letter from Jerry Nelson regarding
zoning standards related to minimum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for a property with a
nonconforming building he owns at 412 Burnett Avenue. FAR is the ratio of floor area to
lot area. On January 24, City Council considered the issues related to Mr. Nelson's
request regarding the merger of lots and the remodeling of nonconforming buildings. The
Council directed staff to initiate a zoning text amendment for minimum FAR
standards related to changes in lot configurations. Council did not direct staff to
I alter the minimum FAR requirement related to buildings.
Mr. Nelson's property was three parcels before it was merged into one parcel with a plat
of survey on September 6. The parcel combination was done to enable a building addition
and a remodeling of the buildings as a single structure rather than multiple buildings,
Before platting, the three separate properties each had a single building; one of the
buildings was demolished to make way for a larger addition. A site plan for the two existing
j structures and the addition was also approved administratively on September 6, 2022.
The plat and the site plan approval were contingent upon one another: neither
could be approved alone and comply with zoning standards. The plat could not be
approved on its own as it would create a property without the required minimum
FAR of 1.0 for the Downtown Service Center Zoning District (DSC). No change in lot
lines is allowed that would not maintain conformance to zoning standards or worsen the
consistency of the property with zoning standards. The site plan could not be approved
for the addition and the remodeling on its own because the building would cross
property lines, which is also prohibited.
After the site plan and plat were approved, Mr. Nelson decided to renovate the
existing buildings, combining them into one, but without constructing the addition
that would bring the property into compliance with the minimum FAR and height
requirements in DSC. The building plans cannot be approved, and a certificate of
occupancy cannot be issued, for a property that is not in compliance with the site plan
and is not in compliance with the zoning.
1
DOWNTOWN SERVICE CENTER (DSC) — CURRENT ZONING:
DSC zoning has two key design standards to support a traditional two-story historic
commercial fagade, typical of Main Street buildings constructed a century ago, and to
i efficiently use centrally located land with higher intensity uses. The first standard is the
requirement that all buildings have a minimum floor area ratio of 1.0. The second standard
is a requirement for two-story buildings. Buildings that do not meet these requirements
are considered nonconforming. Lots cannot be created or modified that do not result
in a conforming configuration or maintain conformance to a standard related to lot
dimensions.
The DSC FAR and height standards have been discussed in the past, with City Council
choosing to retain these requirements for the core of the Downtown area. Due to the
importance of these two standards reinforcing the character of the historic
downtown, staff does not support removing the requirements in their entirety as a
text amendment.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE:
On January 24t", City Council directed staff to proceed with changing lot merger
requirements to allow for properties to be combined regardless of the resulting
floor area ratio. However, the allowance for lot mergers would not relieve an owner
of the obligation to comply with zoning requirements as a nonconforming building
with future changes.
Below is the proposed code change:
Sec. 29.303 2 Lots.
(a) Change in Lot Size or Shape Regulated.
(i) No lot shall be reduced in size or changed in shape so that the total area,
minimum frontage, setbacks, lot area per dwelling unit, or other
development standards required by this Ordinance are not maintained.
Maintaining minimum Floor Area Ratio requirements is excluded for
Bounda Line Ad'ustments and Lot Mergers only. Any building on a lot that
results from such a lot merger will be considered nonconforming and subject
to the limitations of Sec. 29.307, All remaining development standards and
nonconformity requirements related to buildings and site. improvements
shall still apply.
(ii) No lot shall be divided so as to create an additional lot that is not in
conformity with this Ordinance unless such lot is deeded, dedicated and
accepted for public use.
During the discussion on changes related to minimum FAR, staff identified concerns
about how FAR is described within the Zoning Ordinance and that the requirement to
construct conforming buildings was not clear for all property owners. Therefore, staff also
examined other parts of the Zoning Ordinance as they relate to minimum FAR generally.
2
i
Staff is recommending that the following section should also be amended to ensure that
the minimum FAR requirements of DSC and CSC are preserved. The intent of this
proposed change is to make clear that developing a lot requires a building in order
to conform with the Zoning Ordinance standards; a parking lot or other non-
building-related improvement is not acceptable on its own in regards to minimum
intensity requirements.
Sec. 29.401
(3) n4-axi ,urn Fle-n-r nro, Patiors (FARE . Development Intensity, Floor Area Ratio
(FAR), and Density. Intensity of development for all Use Categories except
residential uses in the Residential Base Zones is set by the establishment of
minimum and/or maximum Floor Area Ratios (FARs). The maximum FAR allowed
in each zone is listed in the applicable Zone Development Standards Table. Where
a minimum FAR is required by the applicable Zone Development Standards Table,
construction of a building is required for use of a lot in compliance with this
ordinance. In Residential Zones, intensity of development is based on the
Residential 4Ddensity requirements of the Base Zone, Floating Zone, Special
Purpose District, or Overlay. desGribed ;n SeGtieR 29.700(3).
The proposed language also cleans up the title of the section to match its relationship to
density and FAR. Additionally, "density" is a defined term that applies to more zoning
districts and referenced in 29.700 (3).
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission met on February 1, 2023, to consider the proposed
text amendment. The Commission voted 6-0-0 to recommend that the City Council amend
the Zoning Ordinance to allow lot mergers with nonconforming buildings and to modify
the FAR and density section as well.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve on first reading a text amendment regarding the General Zoning
Regulations related to minimum FAR for lot mergers and minimum intensity, Sec,
29.303(2)(a) and Sec. 29.401(3), as presented above, (Note that the changes
apply to all zoning districts with a minimum FAR standard, i.e. DSC and CSC
zoning districts.)
2. Direct staff to prepare modifications to the proposed text amendment and return
for Council consideration at a later date.
3. Do not approve the proposed text amendment.
3
I
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The DSC and CSC zoning districts require a minimum FAR of 1.0, a minimum height of
two stories, and that new development comply fully with the standards (there is no
incremental compliance spread out over time for new development). These standards are
designed to reinforce the historic development character of the commercial district and
ensure an efficient use of land occurs at a higher intensity of development than is common
in other areas.
Staff supports maintaining the minimum FAR and the minimum height related to DSC,
Removingthese zoning requirements may undermine goals for Downtown to be a dense
g q Y
and walkable, vibrant commercial center.
At issue with this request is a focus on whether lot mergers that indirectly relate to the
FAR of existing buildings should be modified. Merging of lots does not change how an
existing building is built or configured, but it changes the calculation of floor area and
creates requirements for use of a site. The City already has standards regarding
nonconformities and limitations on remodeling and changing the lot standards does not
alter these limitations.
Allowing for the lot mergers without complying with FAR will indirectly support
extending the useful life of a nonconforming building as it may allow for
renovations of existing buildings due to additional space for utilities and
modifications to fagades. Staff believes it is important that if lot mergers are
allowed, a situation is not created that promotes or allows for outdoor
improvements, such as parking lots and outdoor activity areas, that do not meet
the City's building intensity goals.
The proposed alterations to the Zoning Ordinance will maintain the DSC
requirements for minimum FAR applied to buildings, while allowing for Mr.
Nelson's remodeling project to proceed. Although the change may extend the
useful life of some nonconforming buildings, staff finds the change to be a better
alternative than to have a project abandoned and the existing buildings left vacant.
The proposed change maintains the requirements that any proposed structural
changes to a nonconforming building or the construction of a new building must
fully comply with the zoning standards. A nonconforming building will not be
permitted to build an addition if it does not reach full conformance with the FAR
and height requirements of the zoning standards. Therefore, it is the
recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council approve Alternative #1.
4
Attachment A
Request to Council
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
Our project at 51h and Burnett has encountered a complex issue with the zoning code relating to non-
conforming structures that is preventing us from completing the renovation of the existing building,We
still consider this project to be something that will be an asset to the Downtown area and respectfully
ask that you direct staff to provide options to Council that would fix the issue and reasonably allow us to
finish the project, provide flexlbilityto future projects in Downtown,and continue to support making
the area more energetic and vibrant. Time is of the essence as this was surprise and we have leases in
place and contractors ready to begin work for the space In the existing building.We appreciate your
commitment to Downtown and your consideration.
Thank you,
Jerry Nelson
Onondaga investments
5
Attachment B
Proposed Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF
THE CITY OF AMES, IOWA, BY AMENDING SECTIONS
29.303(2)(a) AND 29.401(3) THEREOF, FOR THE
PURPOSE OF AMENDING LOT SIZE REGULATIONS AND
FLOOR AREA RATIOS, REPEALING ANY AND ALL
ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ENACTED, by the City Council for the City of Ames, Iowa, that:
Section One, The Municipal Code of the City of Ames Iowa shall be and the same
p Y
is hereby amended by amending Sections 29.303(2)(a) and 29.401(3) as follows:
"Sec. 29.303. GENERAL ZONING REGULATIONS
I� (2) Lots.
i (a) Change in Lot Size or Shape Regulated.
(i) No lot shall be reduced in size or changed in shape so that the total area,
minimum frontage, setbacks, lot area per dwelling unit, or other development
standards required by this Ordinance are not maintained. .Maintaining minimum
Floor Area Ratio requirements is excluded for Boundary Line Adjustments and
Lot Mercers only. AnV building on a lot that results from such a lot merger will
be considered nonconforming and subject to the limitations of Sec. 29.307. All
remaining development standards and nonconformity requirements related to
buildings and site improvements shall still apply.
(ii) No lot shall be divided so as to create an additional lot that is not in
conformity with this Ordinance unless such lot is deeded, dedicated and
accepted for public use.
p
Sec. 29.401. LOT CONFIGURATION, BUILDING COVERATE, FLOOR AREA RATIOS,
AND HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS
(3) Maximum Floor Area Racier (FA De1 Development Intensity, Floor Area
Ratio (FAR), and Density. Intensity of development for all Use Categories except
residential uses in the Residential Base Zones is set by the establishment of
minimum and/or maximum Floor Area Ratios (FARs). The maximum FAR allowed
in each zone is listed in the applicable Zone Development Standards Table, Where
6
a_minimum FAR is required by the applicable Zone Development Standards Table,
construction of a building is required for use of a lot in compliance with this
ordinance. In Residential Zones, intensity of development is based on the
Residential ^density requirements of the Base _Zone, Floating Zone, Special
Purpose District, or Overlay.
Section Two. Violation of the provisions of this ordinance shall constitute a municipal
infraction punishable as set out by law,
Section Three. All ordinances, or parts of ordinances, in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict, if any.
Section Four. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and publication as required by law.
Passed this day of , 2023
Renee Hall, City Clerk John A. Haila, Mayor
i
7