HomeMy WebLinkAboutA005 - Council Action Form dated November 28, 2017 io
v
ITEM #: 17b&c
DATE: 11-28-17
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: LAND USE POLICY PLAN AMENDMENT OF FUTURE LAND USE MAP
AND REZONING FROM S-GA (GOVERNMENT/AIRPORT DISTRICT)
TO RH (RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY) FOR 415 STANTON AVENUE.
BACKGROUND:
On September 26, 2017, the City Council referred to staff the letter from Luke
Jensen, representing the developers, RES Development and R. Friedrich & Sons,
asking to initiate a Minor Amendment to the Land Use Policy Plan for 415 Stanton
Avenue (See Attachment A — Location Map) and associated rezoning needed for
the redevelopment of the property to an Independent Senior Living Facility.
A Senior Living Facility is a residential use that allows for only individual that are 55
years of age or older to reside in the facility. City Council determined on October 10,
2017 that the developer could proceed with a Minor LUPP Map Amendment and
associated changes needed to pursue their development concept. The initiated
amendments are specifically to allow for a Senior Living development and for no other
use.
The site is made up of six platted lots and other parts of properties for a total of
approximately 1.6 acres. The property is the site of a former elementary school, most
recently used as the Ames Community School District Offices. The designation of the
property is currently Low Density Residential/Government Lands. (see Attachment B —
Existing Land. Use Designation). Current land use designations adjacent to the site are
Low Density Residential to the south and east, and High Density Residential to the
north and west. The owner, The Crawford Ames, LLC, is requesting a change in the
land use designation of the properties from Low Density Residential to High-
Density Residential (see Attachment C — Proposed Land Use Designation) in
order to ultimately rezone the site to Residential High Density (RH). for
construction of an Independent Senior Living Facility. The rezoning is to be
accompanied by a contract rezoning agreement to restrict the use to Senior
Living.
The requested LUPP Amendment and rezoning are the first step in a series of actions
for realizing the developer's goals that include a request for designation of an Urban
Revitalization Area (URA), and a Site Development Plan, and a plat of survey to
combine parcels.
LAND USE ANALYSIS AND CAPACITY:
Staff's analysis for the LUPP change contemplates the suitability of the site for the
proposed senior living use and conformance to the Goals and Policies of the LUPP
1
'(Attachment E). The suitability of the particular site has been evaluated through use of
the RH Evaluation Tool Checklist as directed by the City Council on January 27, 2015
when apartment uses are part of a project. The request is for a residential zoning district
and the use is intended to be strictly limited to Independent Senior Living. The primary
justification for the change is the retention of the existing building and the
exclusive use of the site as Senior Living. Although conceptual plans have been
made available in public meetings, a specific project design is not part of the review of
the LUPP Amendment or rezoning.
The RH Evaluation Tool is an evaluation of a specific site's attributes based upon the
principles of the Goals and Objectives of the LUPP. With this request there are minimal
details available to complete the checklist regarding design of the project. However,
location/surroundings, transportation, housing types and opportunity for mixed use
would rank high for this project based on location of the project near university facilities
and commercial development areas and the site being located within blocks of major
transit routes. If the City Council believes that potentially adding a new and unique
housing type is desirable and support redeveloping a site with a long important history
to the surrounding established neighborhood, the preliminary results of the RH matrix
indicates this could be a good site.
In any proposed change to the Land Use Policy Plan Future Land Use Map, the City
examines the suitability of infrastructure, such as sewer and water capacity, storm
drainage, and general circulation needs. The review is based on overall system
capacities. Staff generally finds that infrastructure for water, sanitary sewer,
storm drainage, and traffic access is acceptable to plan for the redevelopment of
this site.
With this site, the most relevant concerns for the future development are integration of
the project into an infill area with an existing neighborhood rather than overall land use
goals for growth which are applied to the whole of the City. Staff highlights Goal 4, Goal
5, and Goal 6 with their objectives as an issue of balancing future growth needs and
neighborhood compatibility (Attachment E). The proposed site is designated as Low
Density Residential as the area surrounding the site to the south and east is developed
and as single family residential even though the site has been historically used as an
elementary school and administrative offices. Due to the proposed use of the site and
design of the project, appropriate transitions appear to be able to be incorporated into
the design of the project to make it compatible with the surrounding residential
properties.
REZONING:
The applicant has submitted a rezoning request to rezone the site from
Government/Airport Lands (S-GA) to Residential High Density (RH). The developer is
proposing an Independent Senior Living Facility with 30 to 50 units. The most recent
concept included a design with approximately 32 units. The number of units has
decreased since the City Council approved the request to move forward. Even with the
decrease in unit numbers, the density still falls within the RH described densities. RH is
2
anything with more than 11.2 dwelling units per acre. This proposal, with 32 units, has a
density of 20 dwelling units per acre.
A master plan has not been submitted. However, the developer is amenable to a
contract rezoning restricting the use of the site to Independent Senior Living only. The
City's Zoning Ordinance defines "Independent Senior Living Facility" as a residential
use limited to residents of the age of 55 or greater. The developer proposes to keep the
existing building and construct an additional building attached to it with an atrium. Prior
to the approval of the third reading of an ordinance to rezone the property, a
signed rezoning agreement must be submitted to the City.
The attached addendum includes a full description analysis of the rezoning proposal.
The analysis assumes the approval of the LUPP amendment. The analysis also
includes the RH checklist as Attachment F and includes evaluation of a number of
issues related to consistency with the LUPP. In general, the site was rated mainly as
average to high based upon the proposed details of the project.
The applicant has been in contact with SCAN representatives during the development
of the concept over the past 9 months. Staff held a joint public meeting with the
applicant on October 30th for neighborhood input. The meeting was sparsely attended
and no concerns for the project were brought up at the meeting. There was strong
support for retaining the building and supporting its adaptive reuse with senior
housing.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning
Commission considered this request at its November 15, 2017 meeting. There was a
question regarding how it would be legally age restricted. Staff explained that the Fair
Housing Act has an "older person" exemption and a project can be legally restricted by
age as long as at least one person is 55 years or older in no less than 80 percent of the
units. The Ames Zoning Ordinance is more restrictive in the definition of "Senior Living"
by requiring all residents of the building to be 55 or older. This proposal will apply the
age restricting to 100 percent of the units. This will be regulated through the
condition of rezoning and through the HOA documents. The Planning and Zoning
Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of an amendment to the Land Use
Policy Plan for 415 Stanton Avenue and associated rezoning needed for the
redevelopment of the property to an Independent Senior Living Facility.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. That City Council can approve:
A) an amendment to the LUPP Future Land Use Map to change the land use
designation of approximately 1.6 acres of land as depicted in Attachment C from
Low Density Residential/Government Lands to High Density Residential; and
3
B) the rezoning of 415 Stanton Avenue from Government/Airport District (S-GA) to
Residential High Density (RH) subject to a contract rezoning agreement with the
following conditions:
i. Use of the site is restricted to Senior Living for individuals 55
years or older.
ii. The existing Crawford School building will be retained and
adapted to residential use.
iii. New development is restricted to a maximum of three stories
and 50 feet.
iv. Prior to the approval of the third reading of an ordinance to
rezone the property, a signed rezoning agreement must be
submitted to the City.
2. That City Council deny an amendment to the LUPP Future Land Use Map to
change the land use designation of approximately 1.6 acres of land as depicted
in Attachment C and located at 415 Stanton Avenue from Low Density
Residential/Government Lands to High Density Residential and deny the
rezoning from Government/Airport District (S-GA) to Residential High Density
(RH).
3. That City Council refer this request back to staff or the applicant for more
information.
CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff believes the proposed change to accommodate adapative reuse of the site for
senior living can be found to be consistent with the goals of the Land Use Policy Plan.
The contract rezoning is a supportive element of the request and provides assurance of
a specfiic use that is of interest to the neighborhood. There are no outstanding issues of
utilities, traffic, or access that would preclude the use of this site for uses allowed in the
district. Any specific impacts of the proposed development would be examined during
site plan review. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the
City Council accepts Alternative #1, thereby approving an amendment to the
LUPP Future Land Use Map and support a contract rezoning to RH for the site
with the conditions shown above.
4
ADDENDUM
The LUPP designation of the property is currently Low Density Residential/Government
Lands. There is no current use of the property. The property was developed as
Crawford Elementary School and was used as the Ames Community School District
until relocation of its administrative offices in 2016. The Low Density Residential
designation allows for the site to be developed with only single-family residential uses to
a maximum density of 7.26 dwellings units per net acre. Government Lands designation
are uses limited to public owned facilities for administration and services.
The LUPP designation request for the subject site is to High Density Residential. The
High Density Residential designation allows for the site to be developed with any mutli-
family use that has as density of more than 11.2 dwellings units per net acre. The LUPP
amendment of the site to the High Density Residential designation would allow for the
rezoning of the site to the Residential High Density (RH) zoning district. This zoning
designation applies to properties located to the north and west of the site. A proposed
LUPP Map and an Existing Zoning Map of the proposed amendment area can be found
in Attachment B and Attachment C.
The proposed use at up to 35 units could be consistent with the density of a Medium
Density designation, but design of the structure would exceed building size limitations
and therefore necessitates High Density standards to accommodate the request.
Existing Uses of Land. Land uses that occupy the subject property and other
surrounding properties are described in the following table:
Direction from Existing Land Uses
Subject Property
Subject Property Unused elementary school
North Residential
East Single Family
South Single Family
West Multiple Family Residential
Existing Zoning. The current zoning of this property is S-GA. See Attachment D for a
zoning map. S-GA only permits use related to government activities.
Infrastructure:
Access to existing sewer and water infrastructure is available to the site along Stanton
Avenue. Public Works has received general information from the developer regarding
sewer loading information for the development. The assessment of capacity in west
Ames found there to be no projected deficiencies in the main trunk line along Lincoln
Way when accounting for this proposed development. Sidewalks already exist in the
area and would need to be repaired/replaced if damaged during construction. Access
will be taken from Stanton Avenue. Driveway locations may adjust, but likely reduced to
one access drive.
5
A storm water management plan will be required to meet minimum city standards for
storm water quantity and quality. At this time detailed storm water plans have not been
development. Public Works will review and approve such requirements prior to approval
of the site plan for the project.
As part of the City Council initiation of the Land Use policy Plan Amendment process,
council agreed to a minor amendment with the understanding that the developer would
meet with the surrounding neighborhood to discuss the project even though such
meetings are not required as part of the Minor Amendment process. The developer has
held prior meetings with some neighbors associated with SCAN. On October 30, 2017
Staff held an open house with the developers. The surrounding neighborhood was
invited. No specific concerns about the project concept were expressed at the open
house.
The Developer has provided an analysis of how the proposed change in the LUPP
Future Land, Use Map is consistent with LUPP Goals (see Attachment G). Based
on that analysis, the proposed amendment could reasonably be considered consistent
with the applicable goals of the LUPP.
RH Site Evaluation Matrix. City Council directed that proposals for apartment
development be evaluated with the RH matrix. The matrix language was designed to
articulate the goals and objectives of the LUPP into specific statements relevant to
individual sites and to help establish a common context for evaluation of proposals on a
case by case basis. The purpose of the matrix is to evaluate if a specific site is
suitable for multi-family development, the matrix does not set a minimum scoring
requirement nor does it evaluate if alternative uses are also suitable for the site
proposed as residential. Staff has "rated" the proposed development, which can be
found in Attachment F. Overall, the site received mainly high and average ratings. While
there will be more detail with a Site Development Plan than there was at the time of the
LUPP amendment and rezoning application were submitted, certain details are not
included which would impact the scoring, specifically the Housing Type and Design
category. Staff did rank it high for the proposed use as Senior Living because of the
commitment to contract rezoning.
Overall the proposed project is likely to integrate well into the area with its modest
density within RH zoning. It is surrounded by existing residential development from
single-family to multiple-family units. This is a redevelopment of a site in a long standing
healthy neighborhood. It is within walking distance to a commercial area, Campustown,
and to the University. Reusing the existing building and construction of an addition will
be positive element as a transition from high to low density development in the area.
Public Notice. Notice was mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject site
and a sign was posted on the subject property. As of this writing, no comments have
been received.
6
Attachment A
Location Map
s
r
t°
x
9 �
�� Y �� k�r' y .1� Jam., �"-....•
r
Location Flap
415 Stanton Avenue
Attachment B
Existing Land Use Designation
s P �+x
MY
I wall,
12
RA
`� �
T r a y -� � �g T �.�� T �. -•
U
pP Q
x z
64,
* ,
W, ��
77,
BIIKERST"
� u
v
m � v
x
� �;
Y
I -Density Resift tial .
LU
� ra
, vu F ��'�ui 1 dv ��d4 Q
OONAwti
i
IS
E�
Existing LUPP Map
415 Stanton Avenue
8
Attachment C
Proposed LUPP Map
a `
A Op s' ,,I 4 x 4��
..t �,,,lb�nv Y a 3� � �."a @�x�a [Y,�,y p'ST� �i&�+ta�� ^�'«��•;.;r .:±�, ski
�S� P� ���!,qq' ° �
,E x
�w f
IJI
A ggp�
al�` lN
t
v a
Y -
O!,;.
13AKEFZST
Wfl
' Ia h i ' & �� -
3
al
Proposed:
High Density Residential
Igg
00
iRF
-
F �
ML13
62,
t m e E R Z
O
E
` Proposed LUPP Map
Q
415 Stanton Avenue
9
Attachment D
Existing Zoning Designation
s
m m' w° a� ' � ��s
NO
zntp
PA
41
, � o" 't
il
UK
AN
a x r rvgwm5 ,�RE
`� � '�,�, ..�,.�• � v 7` ,�x �p
RL3 g IT
{
�4ii'0 LIP
D
Mill
s.
Bill
I 1p,x,�
3 � �
YeC
q oor+nto sr�
oo
_ Existing Zoning Map
FE
415 Stanton Avenue
10
ATTACHMENT E
Pertinent LUPP Goals & Objectives
Goal No. 4. It is the goal of Ames to create a greater sense of place and connectivity,
physically and psychologically, in building a neighborhood and overall community
identity and spirit. It is the further goal of the community to assure a more healthy, safe,
and attractive environment.
Objectives. In achieving an integrated community and more desirable environment,
Ames seeks the following objectives.
4.A. Ames seeks to establish more integrated and compact living/activity areas
(i.e. neighborhoods, villages) wherein daily living requirements and
amenities are provided in a readily identifiable and accessible area.
Greater emphasis is placed on the pedestrian and related activities.
4.B. Ames seeks to physically connect existing and new residential and
commercial areas through the association of related land uses and
provision of an intermodal transportation system.
4.C. Ames seeks to psychologically connect the various living/activity areas
through closer proximity of residential areas and supporting commercial
uses, common design elements, and inclusion of community amenities
such as parks and schools. The connections should promote community
identity.
Goal No. 5. It is the goal of Ames to establish a cost-effective and efficient growth
pattern for development in new areas and in a limited number of existing areas for
intensification. It is a further goal of the community to link the timing of development with
the installation of public infrastructure including utilities, multi-modal transportation
system, parks and open space.
Goal No. 6. It is the goal of Ames to increase the supply of housing and to provide a
wider range of housing choices.
6.C. Ames seeks to establish higher densities in existing areas where residential intensification is
designated with the further objective that there shall be use and appearance compatibility among
existing and new development.
11
Attachment F
RH Site Evaluation Tool
s RHkSliteEvalua�lion Matrix
High gverageLow
Location/Surroundings
Integrates into an existing neighborhood with appropriate interfaces and
transitions
High=part of a neighborhood, no significant physical barriers, includes transitions; X
Average=adjacent to neighborhood, some physical barriers, minor transitions;
Low=separated from an residential existing area, physical barriers, no transitions
available
Located near daily services and amenities (school, park,variety of commercial)
High=Walk 10 minutes to range of service;
Average=10 to 20 minutes to range of service; X
Low=Walk in excess of 20 minutes to range of service.
*Parks and Recreation has specific service objectives for park proximity to
residential
Creates new neighborhood, not an isolated project(If not part of neighborhood,
Does it create a critical mass or identifiable place, support to provide more X
services?)
Located near employment centers or ISU Campus (High=10 minute bike/walk or 5
minute drive; Average is 20 minute walk or 15 minute drive; Low=exceeds 15 X
minute drive or no walkability)
Site
Contains no substantial natural features on the site (woodlands,wetlands, X
waterways)
Located outside of the Floodway Fringe X
Separated adequately from adjacent noise, business operations, air quality(trains, X
highways, industrial uses, airport approach)
Ability to preserve or sustain natural features X
Housing Types and Design
Needed housing or building type or variety of housing types X
**Architectural interest and character** X X
Site design for landscape buffering X
Includes affordable housing (Low and Moderate Income)) X
"Note, contract rezoning include retention of Crawford School building, no other plans are
available for review.
12
Transportation
Adjacent to CyRide line to employment/campus
High=majority of site is 1/8 miles walk from bus stop; X
Average= majority of site 1/4 mile walk from bus stop;
Low= majority of site exceeds 1/4 miles walk from bus stop.
CyRide service has adequate schedule and capacity
High=seating capacity at peak times with schedule for full service X
Average=seating capacity at peak times with limited schedule
Low=either no capacity for peak trips or schedule does not provide reliable service
Pedestrian and Bike path or lanes with connectivity to neighborhood or commute X
Roadway capacity and intersection operations (existing and planned at LOS C) X
Site access and safety X
Public Utilities/Services
Adequate storm,water, sewer capacity for intensification
High=infrastructure in place with high capacity
Ave rage=infrastructure located nearby, developer obligation to extend and serve X
Low=system capacity is low, major extension needed or requires unplanned city
participation in cost.
Consistent with emergency response goals
High=Fire average response time less than 3 minutes
Average=Fire average response time within 3-5 minutes X
Low=Fire average response time exceeds 5 minutes, or projected substantial
increase in service calls
ine estrnent/Catalyst
Support prior City sponsored neighborhood/district investments or sub-area X
planning
Creates character/identity/sense of place X
Encourages economic development or diversification of retail commercial (Mixed X
Use Development)
13
Attachment G
Developer's LUPP Amendment Narrative
1
ff
Land Use Policy Plan Map Change Narrative
The Crawford School Redevelopment
s-GA to contract RH
City of Ames
October 24,2017
Explanation of Map Area to be.changed:
The area requested for change consists of approximately 1.66 acres of land designated as 5-GA.
The requested change is for the LUPP to be amended to reflect High Density Residential with a
contract rezone for an independent senior facility,rather than the existing S-GA land use.
Attached is a map showing the portion of the Land Use Map that needs to be changed.
NARRATIVE EXPLAINING THE PROPOSED CHANGE
Explain the consistency of this proposal with the goals and policies set forth in the Land Use
Policy Plan
Goal No. 1—Recognising that additional population and economic growth is likely,it is the
goal of Ames to plan for and manage growth within the context of the community's capacity
and preferences. It is the further goal of the community to manage its growth so that It Is
more sustainable,predictable and assures the quality of life.
This area has been previously used as a school and administrative building.The proposed LUPP
Map change will Introduce RH land use with a 55+independent living facility use condition.
There is an underserved housing need for our aging population. This would be an excellent
location for specialized RH housing that provides a smart solution to stated Goal No.1.
Goal No.2—In preparing for the target population and employment growth,It Is the goal of
Ames to assure the adequate provision and availability of developable land. iris the further I
goal of the community to guide the character,location and compatibility of growth with the
area's natural resources and rural areas.
Nothing in this request is contrary to the goal.
Goal No..3—It Is the goal of Ames to assure that It Is an"environmentally-friendly"community
and that all goals and objectives are integrated with this common goal. In continuing to serve
as a concentrated area for human habitat and economic activity,Ames seeks to be compatible
with its ecological systems in creating an environmentally sustainable community.
The proposed land use change presents no adverse ecological impacts to this site..Nor would
any agricultural or environmentally sensitive lands be affected by this change. All City
regulations pertaining to storm water pollution prevention policy,construction site erosion,and.
sediment control will be followed. Reusing the existing structure is a smart and sustainable
building practice.
Goal No.4-It is the goal of Ames to create a greater sense of place and connectivity,
physically and psychologically,In building a neighborhood and overall community identity and
14
j
spirit. It is the further goal of community to assure a more healthy,safe and attractive
environment,
The area proposed will create a complimentary Identity and is quite compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood.
Goal No.5-it is the goal of Ames to establish a cost-effective and efficient growth patter for
development In new areas and In a limited number of existing areas for intensification. It is a
further goal of community to link the timing of development with the Installation of public
Infrastructure Including utilities,multi-model transportation system,parks and open space. I
This project is within the City limits and has access to the existing transportation system. The
site Is adjacent to the paved street system and municipal utilities. No Infrastructure
modifications will be required.
Goal No. 6. -It is the goal of Ames to increase the supply of housing and to provide a wider
range of housing choices.
This map change increases the supply of housing.
Goal No.7-it is the goal of Ames to provide greater mobility through more eff dent use of
personal automobiles and enhanced availability of an integrated system Including alternative
modes of transportation.
The project is located near campustown and the university.This.infill location adapts well to
multimodal:transportation such as bikes,walking,Cy-Ride.
Goal No. 8-It is the goal of Ames to enhance the role of downtown as a community focal
point.
This change Is not contrary to that goal.
Goal No.9-It is the goal of Ames to promote expansion and diversification of the economy in
creating a base that is more self-sufficient and that is more sustainable with regard to the
environment.
This change is not contrary to that goal. It compliments the goal.
Goal No.10-It is the goal of Ames to maintain and enhance Its cultural heritage.
Nothing in the change is contrary to that goal. By preserving the existing structure,memories of
the school and its cultural heritage will continue on,
i
i
15
s
Demonstrate why the LUPP Map designation for this property should be changed. Explain
why the site cannot be reasonably developed under the.current designation.
This site is onlysuitable for governmental type use. Private ownership cannot develop the site
g
and the LUPP must be changed.
Determine If there is a lack of developable property in the City,which has the same
designation as that proposed. If not,explain the need for the expanding the amount of land
included in the designation proposed for this property.
There is no high-density residential property available in town. The supply has been exhausted
and areas that are currently zoned RH are being renovated,expanded and revitalized.
As a result of this action,will there be an adverse Impact upon other undeveloped property in
the designation proposed for this
There will be no adverse impact. There is no undeveloped property available in residential high
density.
As a result of this action,will there be an adverse impact upon other developed property in
the designation proposed for this site,which may be subject to redevelopment/rehabilitation.
There is no adverse impact.
Demonstrate that the new designation of the site would be in the public Interest. What is the
public need or community benefit?
Development of this area for residential high density does not present any conflicts with
neighbors or surrounding properties. An additional area is created for a different market
segment active adults and retirees. Preservation and reuse of the existing building benefits the
community by providing a certain outcome for Its use and appearance.
What impact will.the proposed change have upon the following?
Transportation
The change from S-GA to RH is neutral for this site. No expected Increase in total traffic
volume.
Sanitary'Sewer
Sanitary sewer is adjacent to the site and available for use.
Water
Thesite is served by the City of Ames,
16
Storm•Sewer
The site Is served by storm sewer installed previously. City of Ames ordinance 58 will
apply to the development of this area and all storm sewer Issues will be contained
within the development.
Housing and Employment
The number of units proposed is approximately 32 units. Employment will Include.
services to the buildings and residents.
I
• I
E
17
Attachment H
Developer's Rezoning Narrative
Rezone Narrative
The Crawford School Redevelopment
S•GA to RH(with contract)
City of Ames
October 24,2017
Reason for Rezoning
The Crawford Ames,LLC has purchased the former Crawford School Building,located at 415 Stanton Ave,
Ames,Iowa. The building is currently zoned S-GA has It was used as a school building and administrative
building since its Inception. Our Crawford Re-Imagined project proposes+/-32 apartment dwellings that
cannot be developed without a residential zoning designation.
Land Use Policy Plan Consistency
Once the LUPP is amended,the requested zoning designation is consistent. {,
Current Zoning
The Crawford School Building is zoned S-GA.
Proposed Zoning
We are proposing a contract rezone(independent living facility,55+)to allow conversion of a former
school building for use as apartment dwellings in RH zone.
Proposed Use
Through the contract rezone to RH,we intend to convert the building into+/-32 apartment dwellings.
Legal Description
• Current Legal Description;
Lot Seven(7),except the South Five(5)Feet and the West Fifteen(15)Feet thereof;
also the South Five(5)Feet of Lot Six(6);except the West Fifteen(15)Feet thereof,all In W.T.
Smith's Addition to Ames,Iowa (to be confirmed by abstract).
• Proposed Legal Description
Same as current
Land area
+/-1.67 acres
18
e
DO NOT WRITE IN THE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE,RESERVED FOR RECORDER
Prepared by:City Clerk's Office,515 Clark Avenue,Ames,IA 50010 Phone:515-239-5105
Return to:Ames City Clerk,P.O.Box 811,Ames,IA 50010
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE
CITY OF AMES,IOWA,AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 29.301 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF AMES,IOWA,BY CHANGING THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED AND SHOWN ON
SAID MAP AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 29.1507 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE OF THE CITY OF AMES,IOWA; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES
AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Ames, Iowa;
Section 1: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ames, Iowa, as provided for in
Section 29.301 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ames, Iowa, is amended by changing the
boundaries of the districts established and shown on said Map in the manner authorized by
Section 29.1507 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ames, Iowa, as follows: That the real estate,
generally located at 415 Stanton Avenue, is rezoned from Government/Airport Zoning District(S-
GA) to Residential High-Density Zoning District(RH).
Real Estate Description: Lots 2 - 7 (ex. S. 5' Lot 7) W. T. Smith's Addition &the E. 15' Lots 3 -
8 (ex. S. 15',E. 15'Lot 8)Lee&Little's Addition,City of Ames, Story County,Iowa,All Together
Containing 1.67 Acres
Section 2: All other ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict.
Section 3: This ordinance is in full force and effect from and after its adoption and
publication as provided by law.
ADOPTED THIS day of ,
Diane R. Voss, City Clerk Ann H. Campbell, Mayor