Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA004 - Council Action Form dated May 10, 2016 ITEM # 42 DATE: 05-10-16 COUNCIL ACTION FORM REQUEST: REZONE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 3535 S. 530TH AVENUE FROM A (AGRICULTURAL) TO FS-RM (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY) AND RH (RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY) WITH A MASTER PLAN BACKGROUND: The owner/developer of this property, Hunziker Development Company LLC, is requesting rezoning of five parcels of land totaling approximately 20 acres located at 3535 S. 530th Avenue (to be renamed as University Boulevard). This land is west of the ISU Research Park and south of the Wessex apartment development. (See Attachment A: Location Map) The developer is seeking rezoning to develop the site with medium- density apartments along the west and north boundaries of the site and high-density apartments in the central portion of the site. The rezoning request is for two separate zoning districts. Suburban Residential Medium Density (FS-RM) zoning is proposed for 13.36 acres along the perimeters of the site, and Residential High Density (RH) zoning is proposed for 6.48 acres on the interior of the site and extending to the south property line. (See Attachment C: Existing Zoning; Attachment D: Proposed Zoning; Attachment E: Master Plan; and Attachment F: Rezoning Plat) It is anticipated that the number of units constructed in the FS-RM portion of the development will be within a range of a minimum of 100 units and a maximum of 120 units. A combination of two-story 8-unit buildings and two- and three-story 12-unit buildings are planned. The RH portion of the development is projected to include a range of 135 to 155 units in three-story buildings. Although not shown on the Master Plan, the developer has indicated that a variety of bedroom configurations will be provided with an emphasis on smaller units of 1 and 2 bedrooms. A note on the Master Plan states that "Buildings in RH will be limited to 3 stories and 36 units per building." Following approval of the rezoning with a master plan, the developer will seek approval of a Preliminary Plat to divide the site into individual lots, and to extend Cottonwood Road through the site to connect with S. 530th Avenue (University Boulevard). Approval of the construction of apartment units in the FS-RM zone will require City Council approval of a Major Site Development Plan with a public hearing. Approval of apartment units in the RH zone requires approval by City staff without a public hearing. This land was annexed by the City on July 14, 2015. Before annexation, the Ames Urban Fringe Plan identified these parcels as properties within the "Southwest II Allowable Growth Area." Upon annexation, the parcels were designated as "Village/Suburban Residential." On January 12, 2016, the City Council amended the Future Land Use Map, of the Land Use Policy Plan (LUPP) to designate approximately 50 percent of the property as High-Density Residential, with 50 percent of the property 1 remaining as "Village/Suburban Residential." (See Attachment B: Land Use Policy Plan Map) The Zoning Ordinance requires that a Master Plan be submitted as part of a rezoning petition for property with the FS zoning designations (See Attachment E: Master Plan). A Master Plan provides a broad view of the development concept by describing the intended uses, building types, access points, and protected areas. Approval of rezoning with a Master Plan binds subsequent development to the details included within the Master Plan. The proposed Master Plan includes: 1. FS-RM zoning for approximately 7.2 net acres located along the west and north property lines of the site for development of 100 to 120 apartment units. Total development density calculated within the FS-RM zone is approximately 13 to 17 units per net acre. This meets the minimum density requirement of 10 dwelling units per net acre while not exceeding 22.32 dwelling units per net acre. 2. RH zoning for approximately 5.5 net acres located on the interior of the site and extending to the southern property boundary. The developer proposes 135 to 155 units at a development density of approximately 25 to 28 units per net acre. This meets the minimum density requirement of 11.2 dwelling units and will not exceed the maximum density of 38.56 units per net acre. The Master Plan includes a note that buildings in RH will be limited to 3 stories and 36 units per building. The 36 unit building size would be the largest size of building that could be approved on the site. 3. The Master Plan identifies four areas on the site for open space and storm water management, the largest of which is along the eastern property line. The 10% open space requirement for FS-RM has been applied as a requirement for an overall development and has not been applied on a site specific basis for each apartment building. The percentage of open space will be documented during subdivision review to conform to the 10% open space requirement of FS zoning and to meet the City's storm water control requirements. 4. A street connection is shown on the Master Plan to the east, west and south. The east/west connection will be an extension of Cottonwood Road through the site to connect with S. 530t" Avenue (University Boulevard). A north/south public street right-of-way will be included as part of the new subdivision to connect Cottonwood Road and the southern boundary of the site. 5. A shared use path will follow the north side of Cottonwood Road as an extension of the trail system to be constructed in the Iowa State University Research Park, then south through the FS-RM open space to the south boundary of the site. Future extension of the trail south of Ames is planned to connect with the Heart of Iowa regional bike trail system. The developer intends for location for the shared use path through this open space to be separated from the former railroad right-of-way along the east boundary of the site by a storm water detention pond for the development. The developer has proposed this alignment in response to property owner concerns to the east of the site. A trail connection to Christofferson Park, north of the subject property, is also planned. 2 The attached addendum includes a full description of the Master Plan and analysis of the rezoning proposal, including conformance to the LUPP policies for "New Lands." Additionally, the Apartment Development "RH" Checklist is attached for review of the proposed RH and FS-RM components of the project. Conclusions from the staff review of infrastructure demands are that adequate facilities are in place to serve the development. Staff concludes that the Master Plan identifies developable and undeveloped areas, range of uses and residential unit types consistent with the proposed FS- RM and RH zoning districts. Staff believes the rezoning proposal is consistent with the objectives and LUPP Future Land Use Map. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation. At its public hearing on April 20, 2016, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval (6-0) of the proposed rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Suburban Residential Medium Density (FS- RM), and Residential High Density (RH), as proposed by the rezoning request, including the Master Plan. Members of the public spoke concerning the arrangement and density of use, with specific comments about the trail location on the east side of the site and their desire for it to not be along the former railroad right-of-way. The Commission discussed what rezoning would allow to be built, including the types of units, density and building height. There was also discussion concerning the option of developing the entire site as FS-RM, instead of a combination of FS-RM and RH zoning. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The City Council can approve the request for rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Suburban Residential Medium Density (FS-RM), and Residential High Density (RH), as proposed by the rezoning request, including the Master Plan, with the signed Zoning Agreement. 2. The City Council can deny the request for rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Suburban Residential Medium Density (FS-RM) and Residential High Density (RH), including the Master Plan, if the Council finds that the City's regulations and policies are not met. 3. The Council can defer action on this request and refer it back to City staff and/or the applicant for additional information. MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION: At the time of the LUPP Amendment, staff focused on the discussion of housing variety, building types, and transitions to adjacent properties during the evaluation of the site. Staff believes the proposed rezoning and its master plan have met the interest of establishing the housing types that are intended for development on the site, the desired transportation connections, and planned open spaces and transitions. Staff believes supporting rezoning of the site is appropriate based upon the Land Use Policy Plan goals, objectives and policies, and land use designations. The rezoning will allow 3 for needed multi-family housing options to be developed near large employment areas of the City in the nearby Research Park and the College of Veterinary Medicine Campus. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Manager that the City Council accept Alternative #1, thereby approving the request for rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Suburban Residential Medium Density (FS-RM), and Residential High Density (RH), including the Master Plan, with the signed Zoning Agreement. 4 ADDENDUM Existing Land Use Policy Plan. Prior to annexation of the property, the Land Use Policy Plan (LUPP) identified these parcels within the "Southwest II Allowable Growth Area" and designated as Urban Residential. Upon annexation, which was approved by City Council on July 14, 2015, the property was designated as "Village/Suburban Residential", allowing for a broad range of residential development types. Areas annexed to the City are also categorized as New Lands within the LUPP. Existing Uses of Land. Land uses that occupy the subject property and other surrounding properties are described in the following table: Direction from Existing Land Uses Subject Property Subject Property Vacant Land and Farmland North Apartment Complex (Wessex)/Christofferson Park East Single-Family Homes(outside the city) South Farmland/Rural Residential(outside the city) West Farmland/Rural Residential(outside the city) Existing/Proposed Zoning. The land was automatically zoned as Agricultural upon annexation. The land is located west of S. 530th Avenue (University Boulevard) and the ISU Research Park, and south of the Wessex apartment development (See Attachment A: Location Map). Property to the north of the subject property is zoned as "Government/Airport District (S-GA), and "Planned Residence District" (F-PRD). Property to the east is zoned as "Research Innovation District" (RI), and "Planned Industrial" (PI). (See Attachment C: Existing Zoning) The developer is seeking rezoning to "Suburban Residential Medium Density" (FS-RM), which is a residential zoning district consistent with the Village/Suburban Residential land use designation, and "Residential High Density" (RH), which is consistent with the "High Density Residential. The proposed area for rezoning is reflected in Attachment D. Proposed "FS" (Floating Suburban Residential) Zoning. The developer has requested "FS" (Suburban Residential) zoning as an alternative to Village Residential Zoning, as described within the LUPP. "FS" (Suburban Residential) zoning is an option that may be selected by an applicant to create a more homogenous development type as compared to the heterogeneous development pattern of Village Residential. With "FS" (Suburban Residential) zoning there is an option for "Residential Low" or "Residential Medium" density zoning. Suburban Residential Medium Density (FS-RM) zoning allows for apartment dwellings with 12, or less dwelling units. The developer proposes to construct a combination of 8-unit and 12-unit buildings in the area of the site proposed for zoning as FS-RM. Development within FS-RM zoning must reach a minimum density of 10 units per net acre, and shall not exceed 22.31 units per net acre. FS-RM zoning allows for 5 multi-family housing types at a medium-density range. Allowed uses include apartments buildings (12 units or less), attached single-family homes and independent senior living. Development within the FS-RM zoning district must achieve a minimum density of 10 units per net acre and shall not exceed 22.31 units per net acre. The 12 unit building size limit of FS-RM is a key design component and distinction between High Density Residential zoning districts. Additionally, blending of net density between the "FS" (Suburban Residential) zoning districts is not permitted as each "FS" (Suburban Residential) type must stand on its own. When considering the needs for multi-family dwelling types there are a number of factors to consider. The City has adopted a policy to evaluate all apartment development requests with the RH matrix (See Attachment H: RH Matrix Checklist), which addresses service levels and compatibility of the higher density uses with their surroundings. The RH Matrix Checklist was also provided to the Commission and City Council as part of the consideration of the LUPP Future Land Use Map Amendment for this property. Another question to consider is the market need for multi-family and how does a request compare to the housing policies of the City and distribution of opportunities across the City. The LUPP describes apartment housing in New Lands as being accommodated through smaller building types at lower densities than the developments found within the core of the City and in RH developments. FS-RM zoning standards embody this vision through the site design standards and building size limits. Additionally, the LUPP under Chapter 2, New Lands Policy Options, identifies an expected mix of land area as 80% single-family and 20% medium density for areas designated as New Lands. No one project must meet this mix, but continued evaluation of growth and development trends by the City is needed to track our growth and meet our targeted mix. As a whole, the City has achieved the targeted mix with approximately 13% (approx. 74 of 580 acres) to date, if the figures are updated to reflect the proposed Crane Rezoning in west Ames and this site, then approximately 17.5% (114 of 650) of "New Lands/Near Term Lands" will be developed with apartment uses. While there has been a significant increase in apartments across the City in the past 15 years, this has mostly occurred as RH development outside of the New Lands areas. 6 Spring 2016 Apartment Project Estimate Unit Estimates & Year Open 2017 2018 2019 Pending Rezoning Requests 1 Crane Property on Mortenson 180 88 84 (proposed FS-RM 23 acres-352 units) 2 Village Park Cottonwood/S. 530,nAvenue 110 70 70 (proposed RH/FS-RM 20 acres- 250 units) 3 Rose Prairie (proposed FS-RM 13 acres) ? ? Pending LUPP Amendment Re uests 4 S. Duff LUPP Amendment Brick Towne 150 250 300 (proposed 40 acres- 700 units) 5 Sheldon/Hyland Campustown LUPP (proposed 160 1.5 acres-160 units) Site Plan Approvals 6 Stadium View (approved 198 units total) 80 7 122 Hayward Campustown) 45 8 Aspen Heights (205 Wilmoth 10 acres) 135 Vacant Zoned Land 9 S. 17 (12 vacant RH acres, limited 525 beds) ? ? ? 10 Quarry Estates (10 acres FS-RM, 80-100 units) ? ? 11 North Dakota/Lincoln Way (3 acres RH, est. 50 ? ? units) Estimated Total 700 558 454 *Does not include all projects that will be complete in 2016, e.g. The Edge, ISU Dorm, Campus Avenue, Walnut Ridge, 1st Phase Stadium View, etc. Staff presented the above table to City Council in a memo dated April 8t". The table is to be regarded as the best estimate available for the number of apartments that may be approved and constructed in the near term. The annual projections of units are quite high and above recent market absorption. Included in the projected estimates of apartment construction is development of the property proposed for rezoning, known as "Village Park". Estimated totals from Village Park for the years 2017, 2018 and 2019 are 110, 88 and 84 units, respectively. Recent development trends of the past 6 years have yielded an average of building permits issued for 295 units and 725 bedrooms per year. The highest single year of construction was 2014 with building permits for 416 units and 1190 bedrooms. When considering our apartment construction it is important to note that student housing generally has a much higher ratio of bedrooms to units compared the standard multi- family housing that is built with mostly one and two-bedroom units. Building more typical apartment units would then increase the number of units built to yield the same number of bedrooms as compared to prior years. This is the case with this project as the developer indicates that there will be a substantial number of 1 and 2 bedroom units, rather than larger units with more bedrooms as commonly configured for student housing. Based upon staff's prior assessment of apartment development trends; vacancy rates; 7 economic development; and university enrollment increases, there appears to be a sustainable near term demand for multi-family housing options at levels similar to recent years. Staff specifically believes that multi-family housing targeted to the workforce or the general housing needs of community, beyond student specific housing, has lagged in the past few years and that these types of multi-family housing are needed within the community. The proposed rezoning and development meets these identified interest in how the buildings are planned and its location oriented towards access to employment areas. While there is continued demand for single family homes that could be developed within the alternative zoning district of FS-RL, staff believes this location is well suited to meeting multi-family housing needs. Staff reiterates that in their assessment of the remaining area to the west and south of this site, the expectation should be for FS-RL to meet our housing interests beyond providing for apartments. Master Plan. A Master Plan is intended to provide a general description of the intended development of a property. A Master Plan must address natural areas, buildable areas, building types, range of uses and basic access points, as described in zoning requirements of Section 29.1507(4) (see Attachment F— Applicable Regulations). The property has been in agricultural use, and is the location of a single-family home, which also served as a "Bed and Breakfast" for many years in Story County, outside the City limits. The submitted Master Plan proposes areas for residential development on 12.7 acres of the property. The remaining 7.14 acres of the site is planned to accommodate open space, including storm water detention areas, and the east/west extension of Cottonwood Road through the site to University Boulevard, as well as the construction of a north/south public street intersecting with Cottonwood Road and extending to the southern boundary of the site. Open space is required under the FS (Suburban Residential) zoning regulations to meet a minimum of 10% of the gross area of the site, and will need to be accommodated at the time of subdivision approval. The Master Plan proposes a development pattern with distinct areas of apartment housing to include 8-unit and 12-unit structures, for a total of 100 to 120 units, in the FS- RM portion of the development, and structures with no more than 36 units per building, for a total of 135 to 155 units, in the RH portion of the site The minimum density for the area to be rezoned as FS-RM, is 10 dwelling units per net acre. The Master Plan proposes a net density for the FS-RM area of approximately 17.6 dwelling units per net acre. The minimum density standard for the area to be rezoned to RH 11.2 is 10 dwelling units per net acre. The Master Plan proposes a net density for the RH area of approximately 26.2 dwelling units per net acre. Full review of net acreage will occur with the subsequent preliminary plat subdivision review. The Master Plan identifies three small and one larger area of open space for the development on the Master Plan. The larger area will be the location of a storm water detention area that separates the larger apartment buildings from the single-family homes abutting the east property line of the development. Suburban Residential (FS) 8 zoning requires a minimum of 10 percent of the gross area of the development be devoted to common open space. While this is not a requirement of the Master Plan, such open space areas will be required to meet the minimum standard at the time of subdivision of the property. The apartment buildings in the RH zone will require an administrative site development plan review, with approval by City staff; whereas apartments in the FS-RM zone will require a Major Site Development Plan review, with approval by the City Council, following approval of the Final Plat. Based on discussions with the applicant, it is anticipated that full build out of the development would take place over multiple phases. The developer intends to subdivide the site into lots for each of the FS-RM apartment buildings and allow for separate site development and building construction by individual interests. Staff believes it would take approximately 2 to 3 years to fully build out the site. Access. The Master Plan includes three access points to the site. An extension of Cottonwood Road through the site will provide access to existing and future single- family development to the west, and University Boulevard to the east, through a roundabout constructed in 2015, adjacent to the ISU Research Park. No permanent access is planned to the existing Wessex apartment development to the north; however, future access to the south is proposed through the construction of a north/south street that intersects with the Cottonwood Road extension through the site. A shared use path will follow the north side of Cottonwood Road as an extension of the trail system to be constructed in the Iowa State University Research Park, then south through the FS-RM open space continuing to the south boundary of the site. This location for the shared use path would allow for the path to be located adjacent to the RH apartments and away from the eastern property line along the former railroad right- of-way adjacent to a property owner to the east. Final trail designs would be part of a preliminary plat or Major Site Development Plan review. Future extension of the trail south of Ames is planned to connect with the High Trestle Trail, a regional bike trail system. A trail connection to Christofferson Park, north of the subject property at 2130 Oakwood Road, is also planned. Internal site circulation for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians will be reviewed at the time of subdivision and site development plan approvals. Infrastructure. Paving of University Boulevard street extension, and the installation of water and sanitary sewer mains to serve the annexation of this development site, as well as the expansion of the ISU Research Park, are in place. CyRide. CyRide currently circulates a route to the south terminus of Wessex Drive located approximately 1,000 feet to the north of the residential development area of the site. CyRide does not plan to continue the route further south at this time. Public Notice. Notice was mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject site and a sign was posted on the subject property. As of this writing, no comments have been received. 9 Attachment A Location Map BURR.OAKCiR � ' Ll t aegisOAKt'ICt� u ; `'m � r'� ►s. ��, �. � > ,gym v d' �y�� �� �� �Zkx`��"iP t' '�y�93 �" lF"•'��.,.}� ��s I�' 3�g^�,a .�. I Ilk, ra x+K � ,k m T £xf ~ G tv I,II i Subject Properties �P J� WR I t g{ (gyj�p $ �a`� �� � �1�'N �' � h Location Map . 3535 S. 530th Avenue A 10 Attachment B Land Use Policy Plan Map rJ} i Planned Vill el6fibufban- - Industrial Redential71 34*0 G a T k �" ` f� 511t>ieet Properties Planned Industrial .m t. // /// ///�•f/f/'t/•�f'/ / ,r. � as ✓n � y+ Q i h° �7 �E r Current LUPP Map 3535 S. 530th Avenue 11 Attachment C Existing Zoning 4�r�s�a.. r r � S-GA F-PR© { J e r R n i 'Wt xl ✓"( e r l a r �t p titJ� n a " * �as NI Ypi 00 k i." n � n ' Q a � 1 R Agricultural Zone "A"(sec 29 600) �" 000P� � Co�� O I Planned Industrial Zone "PI"(sec 29.902) Research Park Innovation District"RI"(sec 29.903) � _ m �p Government/Airport District"S-GA"(sec 29,1002) Planned Residence District"F-PRD" (sec 29.1203) a N Existing Zoning Map 3535 S. 530th Avenue Ak 0 100 200 400 600 Feet I 12 Attachment D Proposed Zoning Tj O �� 'fV�, a n p Z a4m S-GA ??p P-PRE A . L � 4l i a yn FS-RM �. q >p� Rk' 9 WA q Residential High Density Zone"RH"(sec 29,704) ry a % Planned Industrial Zone"PI"(sec 29.902) o a° �taN Research Park Innovation District"RI"(sec 29.903) GovernmentlAirport District"S-GA"(sec 29.1002) m Suburban Residential Zone Residential Medium Density"FS-RM" (sec 29 1202(4)-2) W �� '-Planned Residence District"F-PRD" (sec 29.1203) Future Zoning Map 1 3535 S. 530th Avenue ra 0 100 200 400 600 Feet 13 Attachment E Master Plan n n 2 v I to I ! fE II A m d 1 Z it II 2 I I Ir ------------�--------�� [?ry( �..._--- e rv: tip 5 E C Vo a Ar - % � I lob, NY 4 wAft Z a 0� 2 UNIVER51 rY BLVD y yy 9 ^V Op 2pFm 041 e11�NK y F eL. o z o0 wm �3 703 70 °cmiyy °� �im< =on 9 fi iW . 3y IA `�mo m N! s g n� a Amy r9 O rC. Y� V1 oiaz aE.R ai ego 7C HZ 1v z z m ivy N tDipo y ., v x Nz o < a p ;" V1 O D T >F N m H 1� m g C9 yl rz z to r, r P m VI O V�i x a HS N t« my 0 O �z 5 x z MASTER e..o�s,a« 0". 14 Attachment F Rezoning Plat RECEIVED MAR 2 5 ZA CITY OF AMES.IOWA OFPT.OF PLANNING&HOUSMi6 R. BRADLEY STUMBO P.O. BOX 1564 AMES. IOWA 50010 515-233-3689 REZONING PLAT NE coafEp PARCEL C 0n ti0 � b eJ N N 11�n try f N 1gWky1D --Ntl CORNER PARCEL B N V ti SW CORNER- ^� NEf/4, NE1/4 PARCEL C = 1 SEC. 21-83-24 S89'46'49"E 1145.16' 1 AREA TO BE CURRENT ZONING: REZONED FS_RM Al (AGA CLRTUAk) 237.16' 581801.37 S.F. pROPO5ED ZONING: ,? S89'45'31"W 13.36 ACRES FS-RN (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY) o SE CORNERr (vo PARCEL N o0 N90'00'00'W 514.00' 1 w - —SW CORNER PARCEL G c oo$ to oo 4 z =1 Z AREA TO BE N3B'38'15`E- W REZONED RH 12813'. a 2112060.37 S.F. 6.48 ACRES N89'55'33"E P _ w 160,73' 1 F- r 2� O r a � m x CURRENT ZONING: ? in o At (AGPICULTUHAU PROPOSED ZONING: N hl o RH (FSIDENTIAL m o HI DENSITY) x ti v i �i N O i PROPRIETORS: i ' PARCELS B C G, W 6 N HUNZIKER bEV LOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 1 SE CORNER 1 PARCEL B - 223.01' - B GRAPHIC SCALE 1"-150' S89'24'43`W N89'24'43'E 276.78' 1 SW CORNER- ' PARCEL B ...,. i 0 150 300 450 Serveyy Description-Area to be Rezoned Northeast WW. yy North.y g ofnseftlf Pear of rcof e]AB@stnenceyN 0�'25T36IW 846B%peat; thance,QNB9rt 1'r 3ar I uE,r160a73c fee thence 1N38of the Northeast Quar or of Section 21, Township 338 f5�Ekit Rf20.13 at hfeetuSatt thancetorner ft�nence N89�24243'E�. fe 276L7Btfeet hence alo�ng seftl linefto thespointhofc Dag nning 0contefning 6 48 ecreae South ]fne of said Parcel e; Surveyy Description-Area to be Rezoned FS-RM: Parce] C in the Southeast Quarter 01 the Southeast Quarter of Section 1fi, part of Parcel B and 811 of Parcel! G, M and N. s1] In the Northeast quarter of the Noriheeat Quarter of Section 21. all 1n Townn ip 83 North. Range 24 Weat o} the 5tn P,M., City of Ames, Story Countyy Iowa, all tohother being more particularly described ae follows: BeglnnfnQ of the Nortnlast Corner of said Section 21; thence S00'23'38'E. 100.00 }eat to the Sputheast Corner of seftl Parcel N; thence 589.45 31"X, 237,16 feet to the Southwest Corner of seta Parcel N: tnence 532'37'3S"N, 137.09 feet to the Southwest Corner o1 said Parcel G: tnence S32'35'12'W. 921.64 feet 4o the Southeast Corner of said Parcel B: thence N00'25'3I"N, 468.54 }set; thence NB9'56'33'E, 160.73 feet: thence N3B'3B'15`E• 12fi.l3 feet: tnen .r 6f said Parcel ce N09'00'00-E, 204.90 feet: thence N90'00'00'W, 514.00 feet; thence S00'00'00'X, 776.51 feet to the South ]fne al aaltl Parcel B; thence 589'24'43'W. 223.01 feet to the Southwest Corner thereof; tnence N00'24'30`N, 542.73 feet: thence N00'45'SB'N, 460.51 feet to She Northwesto theeNortheast Corner®Iroreuf�sthenSG9ce6S00'04'224M,1289e33 feet e to tnto3theh Point OofnDegfnnlnq. containing t l3�38 acreag f2 E, Certification: I hereby certify that this land surveying PNOLEY Sp document was prepared and the related survey work was performed 5TUMB0 4 A550CIATES du l ye]SCensedr Land Surveyor under then laws j Of the State that lofm Iowa. Cr 0�LC161 �O LAND 5ORVEYINCa s�ssi 510 S.FITH STREET,5UITE e10Z 1�.. ,..G,�..... Date: AIDS IOWA 50010 red ey tumQ License I1 17�i1 IAA PH.515.233-565q •PAX 515-233-4403 Hy license rene n] tlate Is December 31. 2017 l LAiA .Job #'16604RZ Date: 3/24/i6 Pee f of 1 15 Attachment G Applicable Regulations • Land Use Policy Plan (LUPP) Goals, Policies and the Future Land Use Map: The Land Use Policy Plan (LUPP) Future Land Use Map identifies the land use designations for the property proposed for rezoning. • Ames Municipal Code Chapter 29, Section 1507, Zoning Text and Map Amendments, includes requirements for owners of land to submit a petition for amendment, a provision to allow the City Council to impose conditions on map amendments, provisions for notice to the public, and time limits for the processing of rezoning proposals. • Ames Municipal Code Chapter 29, Section 1200, Floating Zones, includes a list of uses that are permitted in the Village Residential, Suburban Residential and Planned Residential zoning districts and the zone development standards that apply to properties in those zones. Per Section 29 1507(4)• Master Plan Submittal Requirements: a. Name of the applicant and the name of the owner of record. b. Legal description of the property. c. North arrow, graphic scale, and date. d. Existing conditions within the proposed zoning boundary and within 200 feet of the proposed zoning boundary: Project boundary; all internal property boundaries; public rights-of-way on and adjacent to the site, utilities; easements; existing structures; topography (contours at two-foot intervals); areas of different vegetation types; designated wetlands; flood plain and floodway boundaries; areas designated by the Ames Land Use Policy Plan as Greenways and Environmentally Sensitive Areas e. Proposed zoning boundary lines. f. Outline and size in acres of areas to be protected from impacts of development g. Outline and size in acres of areas proposed of each separate land use and for each residential unit type h. Pattern of arterial streets and trails and off-site transportation connections i. For proposed residential development provide the number of unit type for each area, expressed in a range of the minimum to maximum number to be developed in each area j. For proposed residential development provide a summary table describing all uses of the total site area, including the number of units per net acre for each unit type and each zoning area. 16 Attachment H RH and FS-RM Matrix Checklist ,. „ M , ; .; � Project Consistency RH Site Evaluation Matrix High Average Low Loc tion/ u rrou nd inns Integrates into an existing neighborhood with appropriate interfaces and transitions High=part of a neighborhood, no significant physical barriers, includes transitions; X Average=adjacent to neighborhood, some physical barriers, minor transitions; Low=separated from an residential existing area, physical barriers, no transitions available Located near daily services and amenities (school, park,variety of commercial) High=Walk 10 minutes to range of service; Average=10 to 20 minutes to range of service; X Low= Walk in excess of 20 minutes to range of service. *Parks and Recreation has specific service objectives for park proximity to residential Creates new neighborhood, not an isolated project (If not part of neighborhood, Does it create a critical mass or identifiable place, support to provide more X services?) Located near employment centers or ISU Campus (High=10 minute bike/walk or 5 minute drive; Average is 20 minute walk or 15 minute drive; Low= exceeds 15 X minute drive or no walkability) Site Contains no substantial natural features on the site (woodlands, wetlands, X waterways) Located outside of the Floodway Fringe X Separated adequately from adjacent noise, business operations, air quality(trains, X highways, industrial uses, airport approach) Ability to preserve or sustain natural features X Housing Types and Design Needed housing or building type or variety of housing types X X Architectural interest and character X Site design for landscape buffering Includes affordable housing (Low and Moderate Income)) X T r nY�port - .ior 17 Attachment H RH and FS-RM Matrix Checklist Adjacent to CyRide line to employment/campus High=majority of site is 1/8 miles walk from bus stop; X Average= majority of site 1/4 mile walk from bus stop; Low= majority of site exceeds 1/4 miles walk from bus stop. CyRide service has adequate schedule and capacity High=seating capacity at peak times with schedule for full service X Average=seating capacity at peak times with limited schedule Low=either no capacity for peak trips or schedule does not provide reliable service Pedestrian and Bike path or lanes with connectivity to neighborhood or commute X Roadway capacity and intersection operations (existing and planned at LOS C) X X Site access and safety Public Itilitics/S rvi es Adequate storm, water, sewer capacity for intensification High=infrastructure in place with high capacity Average=infrastructure located nearby, developer obligation to extend and serve X Low=system capacity is low, major extension needed or requires unplanned city participation in cost. Consistent with emergency response goals High=Fire average response time less than 3 minutes Average=Fire average response time within 3-5 minutes X Low=Fire average response time exceeds 5 minutes, or projected substantial increase in service calls Investment/catalyst Support prior City sponsored neighborhood/district investments or sub-area X planning X Creates character/identity/sense of place Encourages economic development or diversification of retail commercial (Mixed X Use Development) 18 Attachment I Applicant's Narrative— Page 1 Suburban Residential (F-S) Development Supporting Information for Property Developed According to the F-S Requirements (This form must be filled out completely before your application will be accepted.) Property that is developed according to the F-S requirements shall create a development pattern that adheres to the following development principles, as set forth in Section 29.1202(2) of the Zoning Ordinance, which are listed below: (Note: The applicant's explanation of how the request meets each development principle may be attached on a separate sheet if sufficient space is not provided.) 1. Development Principles. (a) A development pattern that contains generally distinct and homogeneous land uses to occur in the remaining in-fill areas and the targeted growth areas where Village Residential development is not selected by the property owner. Explain how the proposal meets this Development Principle. ✓ a t via Uf- 0. $1wAJAJ o I\ oil 0 0 JL a P»4t'S�t t�1�Th MT Q%.>A. 9L ettarc C, ,r � `� *rwC , S d A�+ uz� Path'+ 'C"' (b) An economic and efficient subdivision design with respect to the provision of streets, utilities, and community facilities with limited focus on building and development design integration and a greater emphasis on vehicular mobility. Explain how the proposal meets this Development Principle. r d ' S a— J rpp o+cc, -twit q ro%.)IL C els, -•a� J..SaLlr 4a. 19 Attachment I Applicant's Narrative - Page 2 (c) Effective landscaped buffers between distinctly different land uses. Explain how the (proposal meets this Development Principle, C4fc 0 41d cat'.J t,.W 14 ! Alt tJ, 'f tom- .t ,rc,. Aelc CLec C2 r I � yy 4'-% h (d) The provision of common open space in residential areas where the maintenance of the open space is the responsibility of those directly benefiting. Explain how the proposal meets this Development Principle. G 44440 1111 A L�% ! be 4a�..^�t b r— tM4 3 to caw¢ � D� 4 G+pnA w*as !A A It o f tMt (e) A development pattern that ensures compatibility in the design of buildings with respect to placement along the street, spacing and height of buildings, and provides for spaciousness and effective vehicular pedestrian circulation. Explain how the proposal meets this Development iPrinciple. r.le.sc.c 4C cC IOvtI�C ,�• t � � a�.:4re. �� P�s. 5 uSc tJt b t•. < .rt L . s.l404 410 ht ,,t4 t cS�rt+c+•- 20 Attachment I Applicant's Narrative— Page 3 A development pattern that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Land Use Policy Plan. Explain how the proposal meets this Development Principle. Lzo L � Ivf S)�% 4s - v 11 C LCL Ile 4L 1110 VU V-1 21 Attachment I Applicant's Narrative— Page 4 Suburban Residential (F-S) Development Supporting Information for Rezoning (This form must be filled out completely before your application will be accepted.) As part of the process of rezoning property to F-S, the City Council must make the following findings. Please explain how the rezoning proposal meets each of the items listed below. (Note: The applicant's explanation of how the rezoning request meets each of the items listed below may be attached on a separate sheet if sufficient space is not provided.) 1. The designation is consistent with the Land Use Policy Plan (LUPP). Explain how the proposal meets this requirement for rezoning. tore'aos*, I :s C®+,.srf h.,4- -FL L Pry, 411D c., C�Stzedl Z 4t. Oct�t� � 2. The development complies with the requirements of Section 29.1202, "F-S"Suburban Residential Zone. Explain how the proposal meets this requirement for rezoning. imp our ha'cc a C�) 1�+0 K a �L1L. r^ we : tcS 22 Attachment I Applicant's Narrative— Page 5 3. The existing infrastructure system to be utilized by the land proposed to be zoned F-S has the capacity to support the development contemplated. Explain how the proposal meets this requirement for rezoning. 1 �vl� tia✓i " P(40s' 40.Je- 44Y,3rd U'5 our 15L4-K 1 [/ v t tP J Le 1 ) 1 Y€tt 1G!C Ma %4.q J 01 1!4C C Q�.Ot GtPyeLe4t Qt 4L +-aLt 4L eDt4 o � �tt tv�+ (c rlLar l}wY.lwfl xX-U- t .r,r f wtiar TT— JGwSGr t t n Ow "M^� IC14( `f+(D� A / " t 04.1 � {&. ti mlLfO w�RAr* � w t—s �4�G Jet( e4 v{+LOI lof The following additional information must be submitted with a Request for Rezoning to Suburban Residential (F-S): ll 1. Current zoning of the subject property: a ace t 2. The land area (measured in square feet and/or acres) proposed for rezoning: 19• S`{ ee.s 3. A map (Please attach.) that includes the following: & Drawn to scale; CDate of submittal; Q' orth arrow; E3 Boundaries of the property proposed for rezoning. 0"Label the areas of the proposed development to be rezoned as Suburban Residential Low Density (FS-RL), and as Suburban Residential Medium Density (FS-RM). 23 DO NOT WRITE IN THE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE,RESERVED FOR RECORDER Prepared by:Judy K.Parks,Ames City Attorney,515 Clark Avenue,Ames,IA 50010 Phone:515-239-5146 Return to:Ames City Clerk,P.O.Box 811,Ames,IA 50010 Phone:515-239-5105 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF AMES,IOWA,AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 29.301 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF AMES,IOWA,BY CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED AND SHOWN ON SAID MAP AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 29.1507 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF AMES, IOWA; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Ames, Iowa; Section 1: The Official Zoning Map of the City of Ames, Iowa, as provided for in Section 29.301 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ames, Iowa, is amended by changing the boundaries of the districts established and shown on said Map in the manner authorized by Section 29.1507 of the Municipal Code of the City of Ames, Iowa, as follows: That the real estate, generally located at 3535 South 5301h Avenue, is rezoned, with Master Plan, from Agricultural (A) to Suburban Residential Medium Density (FS-RM) and Residential High Density (RH). Real Estate Description: To be Rezoned FS-RM: Parcel C in the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, part of Parcel B and all of Parcels G, M and N, all in the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, all in Township 83 North Range 24 West of the 5th P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, all together being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of said Section 21; thence S00'23'38"E, 100.00 feet to the Southeast Corner of said Parcel N; thence S89-45-31"W, 237.16 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Parcel M; thence S32°37'35"W, 137.09 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Parcel G; thence S32°35'12"W, 921.64 feet to the Southeast Corner of said Parcel B; thence N00°25'36"W, 468.54 feet; thence N89°56'33"E 160.73 feet; thence N38°38'15"E 128.13 feet; thence N00°00'00"E, 204.90 feet; thence N90°00'00"W, 514.00 feet; thence S00°00'00"W, 776.51 feet to the South line of said Parcel B; thence S89°24'43"W, 223.01 feet to the Southwest Corner thereof; thence N00°24'30"W, 542.73 feet; thence N00°4558"W,460.51 feet to the Northwest Corner of said Parcel B; thence S89°46'49"E, 1145.16 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Parcel C; thence N32°35'12"E, 318.87 feet to the Northeast Corner thereof, thence S00°04'22"W, 269.33 feet to the point of beginning, containing 13.36 acres. To be Rezoned RH: A part of Parcel B in the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 21. Township 83 North, Range 24 West of the 5`h P.M., City of Ames, Story County, Iowa, said part being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast Corner of said Parcel B; thence N00°25'36°W, 468.54 feet; thence N89°56'33"E, 160.73 feet; thence N38°38'15"E, 128.13 feet; thence N00°00'00"E, 204.90 feet; thence N90°00'00", 514.00 feet; thence S00°00'00"W, 776 .51 feet to the south line of said Parcel B; thence N89°24'43"E, 276.78 feet along said line to the point of beginning, containing 6.48 acres. Section 2: All other ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 3: This ordinance is in full force and effect from and after its adoption and publication as provided by law. ADOPTED THIS day of Diane R. Voss, City Clerk Ann H. Campbell, Mayor 2