HomeMy WebLinkAboutA014 - Letter from Holly Fuchs, questions about Design Guidelines and Standards V
Holly Fuchs
806 Brookridge Ave.
Ames, IA 50010-5835
515/233-2140
515/231-8996 cell
fuchs@iastate.edu
Dec. 14, 2004
Ames Mayor and City Council Members
Ted Tedesco tedjoanie@aol.com
Russ Cross russcross@financial.wellsfargo.com
crosswind@mchsi.com
Steve Goodhue st.goodhue@fabg.net
st.goodhue @ isunet.net
Matthew Goodman matthew@smilesandgyros.com
matthewgoodman@mmchsi.com
Riad G. Mahayni rmahayni@isunet.net
Daryle Vegge dvegge@sauer-danfoss.com
Sharon Wirth sharonwirth@yahoo.com
Ames City Hall
515 Clark Ave.
Ames, IA 50010 Re: Design Standards for the Northeast Gateway (O-GNE)
Zoning District
Dear Mayor and Members of the Ames City Council:
I have some questions about a few of the Design Guidelines and Design Standards
proposed for the Northeast Gateway (O-GNE) Zoning District which I would like
answered and a few editing suggestions.
1. Regarding Standards for Overall Design, the Ketelsen Marsh, section (8) (e) (i) c,
a. what guarantees the storm water management plans will be implemented?
b. what guarantees that problems other than pollutants draining into the marsh
will be addressed, e.g. the marsh runs dry after the regional commercial area is built?
2. Regarding Standards for Signage and Lighting, Section (18) (i), why are "lighting
fixtures to be of a type (such as halogen or metal halide) to ensure true-color at night
and ensure visual comfort for pedestrians" rather than low-pressure sodium which is
preferred lighting near astronomical facilities? See the 2002 Lighting Handbook on
www.darksky.org. *
3. Regarding Standards for Signage and Lighting, Section (18) n, why are "Light
levels ...limited to 150, 000 lumens per acre..." with exceptions for entrances, etc. when
Flagstaff has a limit of 100,000 lumens per acre? I would recommend replacing
150,000 lumens with 100,000 lumens, the same as Flagstaff's. Even with the same
standard as Flagstaff's, Ames will have more light than Flagstaff for it is about 6,000
041214 p. 2
feet lower which means a denser atmomsphere and more scattering of light. Also our
observatory is at the same height as the proposed mall rather than at least 260 feet
higher as at Flagstaff. ** www.darksky.org says 50,000 lumens/acre is comparable to
IESNA recommended practice for low activity level general parking facilities
(IESNA=Illumination Engineering Society of North America).
4. Re (16) Standards for Building Design, is there not some way to encourage Energy
Conservation when the buildings are built? This was an important issue in the Focus
Groups and was reflected in the Steering Committee's Shared Interest #7.
There are a few editing changes I recommend:
(5) capitalize "master"
(10) (a) -- reword so the antecedent to "these" is clear ("pathways, roadways, and
pedestrian areas", I think, but maybe it is "buildings, open space and plantings"); clarify
"nuisances".
(17) include a phrase that was included in the immediately preceding version but was
left out of this one, "but not dominant over its architectural features". Otherwise (18) (a)
does not follow.
(17) last paragraph: put the colon after "will" rather than after "that", in order to make
the person correct for "reinforce", "provide" and "enhance".
Sincerely yours,
Holly Fuchs
*The Steering Committee's Shared Interest #4 B stated in part "The best technical
knowledge and most protective accepted standards will be employed to protect the
night sky and the biology of the Ketelsen Marsh..." The proposed standard was not in
the Steering Committee's Guidelines nor was it in the first draft by Ames City Planners.
It first occurred in their second draft, the Oct. 20, 2004 version. I would suggest
replacing (18) (i) by "Exterior lighting fixtures are to be low-pressure sodium to protect
the night sky and the biology of Ketelsen Marsh."
**The web site www.darksky.org recommends in their Table. 4.2 Maximum Total
Outdoor Light Output Standards, a cap of 200,000 lumens/acre for commercial and
industrial urban zones with both residential and commercial use, and high levels of
nighttime activity. Their recommended cap for Dark Sky Preserves, areas close to
major active astronomical research facilities, where preservation of the darkest night
time environment is a priority, is 12, 500 lumens/acre. 100,000 lumens/acre is a
compromise between the two.