HomeMy WebLinkAboutA003 - Council Action Form dated January 28, 2003 ITEM # F 1�
DATE 01/28/03
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
SUBJECT: MOTION TO APPROVE A TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING
ORDINANCE TO ALLOW REMOTE PARKING IN THE RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY
(RH) DISTRICT, WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY-IMPACTED OVERLAY (O-UI) DISTRICT,
WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE DOWNTOWN/CAMPUSTOWN SERVICE CENTER (DCSC)
DISTRICT.
BACKGROUND:
The Land Use Policy Plan indicates that it is the goal (Goal 8, page 29) of the City to
enhance the role of the Downtown and Campustown area through intensification and
diversification. The plan establishes land use policy that envisions these areas to be the
most intensely developed areas of the City (page 47).
The purpose statement in the zoning ordinance indicates that the Downtown/Campustown
Service Center (DCSC) District is intended to be the most densely developed area within
the City. [Section 29.803(1)]
Furthermore, the University-Impacted Overlay(O-UI) District is also intended as an area of
intensification. [Section 29.1105(1)]
Because the areas zoned DCSC are intended to be higher density commercial centers,the
parking requirements within the DCSC District are greatly reduced in comparison to the
other zoning districts in the city. For example, retail uses are not required to provide any
off-street parking in the DCSC District. Generally, retail uses are required to provide
parking at a rate of one parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area of use in
other zoning districts in the city. Additionally, residential uses, which are allowed in
structures within the DCSC District above the first floor, are required to provide off-street
parking at a rate of one parking space per each unit. Generally, multifamily uses in most
other zoning districts must provide parking at a rate of one space per bedroom.
The reason for the reduced parking standards in the DCSC District is to encourage less
dependence on the automobile and more pedestrian activity, and also to maximize the land
area devoted to commercial building space and minimize the land area devoted to parking.
To date, the reduced parking standard for most uses, such as retail and office, are
promoting a more pedestrian-scale development and has had little, if any, negative impact
on the surrounding area. To date, the reduced parking standards for residential uses in
the DCSC District are most likely encouraging some pedestrian-scale activity by reducing
automobile reliance and ownership. However, the reality is that most people own
automobiles and most people have their own bedroom when leasing an apartment unit.
Therefore, while the Zoning Ordinance does not require parking for residential uses in the
DCSC District based on the number of bedrooms, the demand for parking is generally
based on the number of bedrooms. Consequently, the people who live in dwelling units in
the DCSC district are creating a demand for more parking than what the district regulation
requires.
The Zoning Ordinance allows for off-street parking for uses within the DCSC District (as
well as three other zoning districts)to be provided on another lot within 300 feet of the use.
[Section 29.406(18)]
This provision allows for uses within the DCSC District to provide parking on another lot
within 300 feet of the principal use as long as the lot is zoned DCSC, HOC, CCN, or
S-HM. It does not, however, allow for residential uses in the DCSC District to provide
parking on a lot within 300 feet that is not zoned DCSC, HOC, CCN, or S-HM.
As the larger scale residential development have begun to occur in Campustown,
developers have indicated a willingness to provide additional structured parking on
adjacent property within the Residential High Density (RH) District to help alleviate
the parking demand. However, even if a developer wanted to provide additional off-
street parking on a lot zoned RH, for residential uses located in the DCSC District,
the developer would not be able to do so because the RH District regulations
prohibit that use of property.
It is staff's belief that the zoning ordinance, as it is currently written, creates an
unintended conflict between the Land Use Policy Plan objectives of intensification
and provisions of the Zoning Ordinance that do not accomplish the stated objectives
because remote parking must be located in the DCSC District. Parking by its very
nature contributes to a lessening of land use and commercial intensity. For this
reason, staff believes there is a need to propose revisions to the Zoning Ordinance
related to remote parking requirements that are designed to support land uses in the
DCSC District.
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS.
Staff believes that text changes to several related provisions of the Zoning Ordinance is
needed to accomplish the following objectives:
• Allow remote parking on property within the RH District that is also
located in the University Impacted Overlay District and within a
specified distance from the DCSC District.
• This remote parking is limited to only residential uses located in the
DCSC District.
[A copy of the proposed ordinance amendments is attached to this Action Form.]
RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION:
The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed text amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance regarding remote parking regulations for Residential High Density(RH)
District properties within the University Overlay (O-UI) District at their meeting of January
15, 2003 and approval was recommended.
2
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The City Council can approve the attached text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
regarding remote parking regulations for Residential High Density (RH) District
properties within the University Overlay (O-UI) District that are within 300 feet of the
DCSC.
2. The City Council can deny the attached text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
regarding remote parking regulations for Residential High Density (RH) District
properties within the University Overlay (O-UI) District that are within 300 feet of the
DCSC.
3. The City Council can refer the attached text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
regarding remote parking regulations for Residential High Density (RH) District
properties within the University Overlay (O-UI) District back to staff for further review
and comment.
MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is recommended that Alternative #1 be adopted. Alternative #1 is approval of the
attached text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding remote parking regulations
for Residential High Density (RH) District properties within the University Overlay District
(O-UI) that are within 300 feet of the DCSC.
Attachment
3
:ate �\ \\\`�,�♦ '=��
VV
• r—:---�� `
Ell
--
�' I'MElm Ellaw 9
���;
all
ce,
IRNSM WIN ON
el
01
INS
�.�• Mal _
MINIlk
_ •, „r _
INr Q' .►.
41L Ak "
MR1 MR
mm
NN � � . �� MIM: �