HomeMy WebLinkAboutA004 - Letters from residents opposing and supporting rezoning 823 Carroll Avenue
Ames. Iowa 0010-6327
May 20 , 1 ?'7
City of Ames
P. O. Box 8,11
Ames. Iot:,ia. 50010
Gentle People :
I would 1 i i':e to lend my voice to those 'upr:-or t i ne the creation of :-k
district Clrotec ted from demol i t ion +or six mon tll=• i n order to o i ve the
c i t-y counc i 1 members time to de=-i cin an effect i ve protective str.a.teq>
for the de ign•a.ted
Isincere - hope thatthe t ;:.h city i cl.-jtlrtC i i iti i 1 t G-rotec t not only the
hou8i no in this a.rea but housing a. R 1 over the c i t We •3.r'e just
beg i nn i nci to learn that this kind of hou'_• i ng is safe housing• in uj i nd
storm=• . The suC=ti tute_. .a'.: .a. i 1 able iSuch as tr.ai 1er'_• , can be death
trap_ at th - e time'_ .
I ho !e the council will c in'_•i ,der ex ten i n g th i = kind of r-c-tec t i on to
-_.1 1 Ames ne i ahbor.j-,00d'_- where there is good rlou ? r;i. stock .
Thr.nk: •ou for -.'our -a.ttention ,
i r,cer'e t ,
PFM. - ?e�r� rdock:
REMNED
rm 2 ?, 1996
CITY OF AMES,IOWA
OEPT.OF PLANNING&HOUSING
M E M O PLANNING & HOUSING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF AMES
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning & Housing Department
DATE: May 20, 1996
SUBJECT: A Proposed Amendment to the Municipal Code for the Purpose of Adding
to the Zoning Regulations a Demolition Moratorium Overlay District; and a
Proposed Amendment to the Official Zoning Map.
Jamie Byer, 917 Carroll Avenue, Ames, Iowa, called the office today to say that he is in
support of the above-described request. He said he appreciates the effort the City is
taking in this matter.
\clh
h\bpo\n\beyer.520
213 14th St.
Ames, IA 50010
May 23, 1996
Dept. of Planning and Housing
City Hall
P. U. Box 8 1 1
Ames, IA 50010
Dear City Planners:
Thank you for your letter informing us of the meeting May 23. We cannot
attend because of graduation but we would like you to know we support the
demolition moratorium. We would like to keep the area as duplexes and
single family homes instead of large structures that do not fit the
neighborhood. We would like homes to be repaired and well maintained
rather than torn down.
Sincerely,
Len & Bernadette Siebert
Owners of property at
921 Burnett
RECEIVED
P,9AY 2
CITY OF AMES,IOWA
DEPT.OF PLANNING&HOUSING
May 23, 19V6
De em.� o� l.Lcmn,&7.g S Houz ing
l
. U. Box 811
Alme.4, .9W 50010
(�en;Uemen:
,9n rce4pvn4ev vcuz l�Jarg 17 Le ,ten; ,9 am .� izvno,L .cn. �ccvva
o� Zfre �pvjed amemdmen ,-v 4he lIlwuci pa, Code & add
,io -he Lon.in , eguLczJ-LorW a demo.Ci�n mort oai-tm ovea.Lou
dL4iA.Lc�; an°d a pnopv-jed amenadmem� -io x'he OAI-i_ci_a.L Zoning
Map.
Fort vve.z 40 AveajtA 9 have Vz:?/,,LCG-
ed L i ving .in. .6,e ( '.Co %vun
neirld'onrr.00a_ cru C-M vertu trz
"�.uaaLi a v .Ci.;-'e" in die ne.i,cI,,6orthoocd.
n
r.e���ec;tru,L.La �cvuas,
64V
May 23, 1996
Department of Planning and Housing
City Hall
P. O. Box 811
Ames, Iowa 50010
Ref. Proposed demolition moratorium overlay District in letter of May 17, 1996.
We own the duplex at 918 - 920 Duff; this unit was built new and put in service in
February 1993. This unit is inside the proposed demolition moratorium_
Why is 918-920 Duff in a moratorium overlay? We strongly oppose this!
Is the real agenda to place the proposed overlay moratorium area under the
jurisdiction of the Ames Historic Preservation Commission? Old Town is a fine
looking area and is great for those who want to participate, but as an existing
property owner outside of Old Town, in no way do we want any part of these
restrictions .
R pectfully,
Ed and Jean Stout
May 23, 1996
To: City of Ames
Planning & Zoning Commission Members
Paula Weidner
Stacy Joiner
Charles DeKovic
Murray Blackwelder
Emil Peterson
Steiner Silence
Riad Mahayni
Re: Legal Notice - City of Ames
Demolition Moratorium - Overlay District
Dear Members:
With reference to the zoning regulation for the demolition moratorium overlay district
and legal notice from Sandra L. Ryan, City Clerk, please be advised that as property
owners in this area we are against any moratorium on demolition for the following
reasons:
1. This overlay exceeds the historical district area which already
has very strict regulations.
2. It takes away the right of individuals outside this historical district
that are operating under the present rules & regulations.
(continued on Page 2)
Page 2 of letter to
City of Ames
Planning & Zoning Committee Members
May 23, 1996
3. This moratorium could be setting a precedence for other areas in the city of
Ames which could have an impact in the disruption of running the city.
In summary, I hope your recommendation is to get rid of this moratorium as soon as
possible and preserve the rights of others until the laws and rules or regulations
are changed through the proper channels and through the proper processes of
changing rules and regulations.
Thank you
Sincerely
Harold Pike
2715 Valley View Road
Ames, Iowa 50014
MAY 2 8 1996
CITY CLERK
CITY OF AMES,IONlA �
May 24, 1996
City of Ames
515 Clark
Ames, Iowa 50010
Att: Sandra L. Ryan
City Clerk
Re: Legal Notice - City of Ames
Demolition Moratorium - Overlay District
Dear Ms. Ryan:
With reference to your public notice we received today concerning proposed
zoning regulations for the demolition moratorium, please be advised that
as property owners in the area in question, we are against this proposal.
A few months ago, an issue came up in this area between the residents and the
landlords and the issue was resolved by the City Council to wait for the LUPP to be
developed and put into place. This to date has not been done.
There already is an historic district in place. We don't believe this historic districts
zoning requirements need to be expanded into the surrounding area currently being
discussed.
I appreciate certain individuals concerns, but no one person or group of persons should
be able to change zoning regulations in a short period of time because they
feel it is in their best interest.
(Continued on Page 2)
Page 2 of letter to
City of Ames
May 24, 1996
In summary, let the LUPP be set up and used as a guide line so that issues like
this do not have to be brought up every 6 months to a year.
Thank you
Sincerely
�l
Harold Pike
2715 Valley View Road
Ames, Iowa 50014
Q � r
May 23, 1996
MAY 2 81996 G
Ames City Council CITY CLERK
CITY OF AMES,IOWA
Dear Council,
We are writing to express our support for the R2 resolution that is being
considered.
We recently bought and renovated an older home near the Old Town area.
We did this partly because we value and want to preserve beautiful, old
homes. As we're getting to know others who have children in the Roosevelt
district we hear many of them express a similar motivation for living in
this area of town. They also express their fear about the apartment homes
that are moving onto their streets. People who are preserving Ames'
heritage should not have to live with this uncertainty!
The letter to the editor in a recent .Ames Ti-i&unewas right on target. How
crazy it would be to pour many resources into developing a village concept
on the Taylor farm subdivision at the same time that the original village of
Ames is not allowed to remain the lovely, convenient neighborhood it is.
By protecting the Old Town area, you will preserve affordable housing for
families and help prevent urban sprawl.
We hope that the Council will take our views seriously. Thank you for your
time and consideration,
Sincerely,
Dr. Tom and Allison Greenwald
839 Brookridge
Ames, I 50010
Ph. 232-0178