Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutA003 - Memo from Finance Director dated February 20, 1997 M E M O FINANCE DEPARTMENT CITY OF AMES TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Alice Carroll, Director of Finance DATE: February 20, 1996 SUBJECT: Sewer Revenue Bonds Refunding At their meeting May 31, 1995, the City Council approved Resolution 95-226 setting the date of hearing for the issuance of not to exceed $4,500,000 Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, and authorizing the City Manager and the City Finance Director to set the terms and the date for the sale of such bonds. Resolution 95-254, passed June 13, 1995, determined that the refunding bonds may be issued. Subsequent to the City Council authorization, the bond market became less attractive and the projected savings decreased to less than acceptable. The City's financial consultants have continued to monitor the market and have advised us that this would be a favorable time to proceed with the refunding issue. A sale date of March 5, 1996, has been established. The bids will be received until 11 :00 a.m. on that date and the results will be presented to the City Council for consideration at the meeting scheduled for 7 p.m. March 5, 1996. The refunding bond will current refund the City's outstanding $4,230,000 Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1987A dated May 1 , 1987, and $2,375,000 Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1987B, dated December 1 , 1987. A schedule of projected net debt service savings is attached. The scenario is based on the market of February 8, 1996. A portion of the existing reserve fund will be liquidated resulting in a loss of earnings which is offset against the total savings. The balance of the reserve fund will be transferred to the refunding bonds. Present value savings is projected to equal $229,423.25 or 5.96% of the refunded bond's par amount. cc: Steve Schainker CD 0000000 v 0 L p L b L p c_ O p O p O p 0 O CD C CD O (D C � i � i � � CD CD n o m o cn C? Dc b L O L O L Q w NNNNNNN0 C 0 D CD D 0 � c00000061 1 1 1 1 1 0000000000 (000000 m cn CD WNN OOCO (0MM -I �la) CD (D cn C CD CC) : cn O COn O O O 0 O (D o o o o o o o n 0. Cn O O O O O O O CD 0 0 O O 0 0 O Co n CD � C7 N) J�- -r�- A W W W w C EA O to W N cD 11 CJl �. W OD O 0 O Ci 0 0 O CA n U cD (n o O Oo \' Oo \ O O O O N 23, O _ _ n O KO a) cy) mm00 . . . . 00m CDCCD -i�I CD c0 CD CD�I 1! M M CD -n 0 CD NNNNNNCbCoW W MM — CD 0 4 -4 -4 -4U1cncnCnUiU7OOO Cl) CD u 0Cn66cno0o0006oN O cD O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 N -"' Co <CD rt O Z Coif M CD m O O� !:Yl (0 °�) � °iw0 -4cnvrnw n. cD cfl - � a) cococno — --.& " 000) o 0 CAD - �4 0 (0(0 CO 11-4 a)0) (D - CD 'D O NNNNNN CC) CbCA) W 0) M -- Cr O "'BCD O o 4 -4 -4 -1Cn Cn (Xi Cn (.nM000 �+ 6C-n cn6 *n00000000N Cn � a - 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 00 0 0 0 o N CD O CD w mCD n• CD � � CD cn �' m `D rt o c oo -4 -4 -4 -4 -4vv -4 -4v -to ?. Z) w Cn N o000000000000 �' � CD M A) a n rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn a o o 5 o y O O W W W W W W W W W W W W O N N 'Tl- '+ O OD co 0:) 0o co 0:) OD (b OD Cb OD it1 p g O N CND O M M w W W M w w M M W M O C1 O N C .�• co CD Q CA CD to Cn — 0 CD Cn Cn Cn CT a) � 0') — 00 WAA AA W W 0) O (D0) 0) cocoCDCOa) a) cnCrco (ND CCZD OWWWW W (ANNV -lWWW _ O OW WO) a) � _. � � � � .� .� OD 0 O 0 (b W W W W W W W W W W N CD �i Q W oUl CD b. " 4N, A,— M4 4MW " Cr CO CD -1NOo CA)AANi ) ODaDODWw •� ZO i W U1-! -4OO W W nCn -411W CD � � W o -A --LOOOOOD (b -1 -10 CD '� O- II. 0 ." M00OD00MM -4 - Z, Z, M CD 0NN -I -INNNN .A .A000D --L n O' O CD a) 0) 0) C3) .A. (D V �U1 0 CD CD Fas:)� ::3 �I 0 o O U1 W "" O IO tv Cn (D V 11 -4 N V d) EVENSEN DODGE INC February 9, 1996 Mr. Steve Schainker, City Manager Ms. Alice Carroll, Finance Director City of Ames 515 Clark Avenue Ames, IA 50010 Re: Summary of Proposed Refunding Transaction Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1996 Dear Alice and Steve: The purpose of this letter is to explain the purpose of the bonds, summarize the results of the proposed refunding structure and estimated savings, identify important accounting, refunding and tax issues and provide a list of assumptions regarding the attached refunding schedules [see Exhibit A]. Based upon previous conversation and consistent with those discussions, we recommend the City proceed with the proposed refunding program. Purpose of Refunding Bonds The Refunding Bonds are issued to current refund the City's outstanding $4,230,000 Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1987, dated May 1, 1987 maturing from December 1, 1996 to 2002 and $2,375,000 Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1987B, dated December 1, 1987 maturing from December 1, 1996 through 2002 (together, the "1987 Bonds"). Both issues of 1987 Bonds are callable on June 1, 1996 at par. The refunding provides reduced uniform debt service from fiscal years 1997 to 2003. The Refunding Bond proceeds will be used to defease the 1987 Bonds on the next optional redemption date of June 1, 1996. Summary of Refunding Structure The current structure of the Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1996 provides for uniform annual savings. The timing of the annual savings is on a bond year basis as the Refunding Bonds must have a December 1 payment date based upon indenture requirements. The savings are resented annually beginning in FY 1997 and projected to exceed $30,000 each year on a net" debt service basis. The structure of the Refunding Bonds will also require the partial liquidation of the existing reserve fund from the 1987 Bonds to assist in the payment of the 1987 Bonds on June 1, 1996. The balance of the reserve fund will be transferred to the Refunding Bonds. The City can maintain the current investments for that portion transferred to the Refunding Bonds. Savings Summary The results shown below are based upon present market conditions and are subject to change. The savings are shown net of all issuance costs, and underwriter's discount. The sources and uses of funds and savings report for each scenario are attached as exhibits. The savings are summarized below: 001 Second \�onu(� Smith, Suite i10O. .`Minneapolis, :'1N 31402 371099 61 -1'i38-3i4i 8O0r328-8200 FAX hl-2rii4-7204 February 9, 1996 Page Savings Summan• Current Market Par Amount of Refunding Bonds $3,510,000 Estimated Costs of Issuance $ 40,000 Underwriter's Discount ($4.50/1,000) $ 15.795 Total Debt Service Savings $ 267,852 Total Savings as a % of Refunded Par 6.96% Present Value of Debt Service Savings $ 229,423 PV Savings as a% of Refunded Par 5.96% Important Accounting Issues and Assumptions The callable maturities of the 1987 Bonds will be legally defeased upon the redemption date of the 1987 Bonds and will be replaced on the City's balance sheet by the Refunding Bonds. The City will continue to make the scheduled June 1, 1996 interest payments on the 1987 Bonds. Beginning December 1, 1996, the City will make the principal and interest payments on the Refunding Bonds. We have attached the list of assumptions used in preparing this analysis as Exhibit A. The list of assumptions represents our best estimates pursuant to conversations with the concerned parties involved. The resolution for the 1987 Bonds has an additional bonds test of 1.25 times coverage if the proposed refunding issue was an advance refunding. However, because the proposed transaction is a current refunding and will close within three months of the redemption date of the 1987 Bonds. Therefore, no additional bonds test is necessary. Procedural Matters A number of additional steps are required for a refunding transaction. They typically include hiring, if desired by the City or bond counsel, a certified public accountant and escrow agent to verify the escrow account cash flow and manage the escrow account. For a current refunding, an escrow account is optional. Typically, we assist the City in the selection and hiring process for verification and escrow agents. Whereas the above professionals are required for advance refundings, it is not unusual for them to be utilized for a current refunding. Their fees are generally less than for an advance refunding. The dynamics of a refunding bond issue require the ability of the City to change the par amount and individual maturity amounts based upon market conditions at the time of sale and the final issuance costs. This sensitivity analysis is prepared just before the preliminary official statement is mailed to prospective bidders. Because the Refunding bonds will need to be resized and restructured as a result of the actual interest rates received from the winning bidder, it is necessary to have at least three hours between the time of sale and time of award. The City has the option to purchase or to authorize Evensen Dodge to purchase the escrow securities on its behalf; if necessary. The escrow securities are purchased after the bids have been received for the bonds, the final issue structure has been determined and the City has been presented up-to-the-moment summary of the savings. 371099 February 9, 1996 Page 3 Tax Consequences Similar to the refunding of the City's Electric Revenue Bonds. the City will need to transfer the existing reserve fund monies to its unrestricted retained earnings where those monies are not subject to Federal tax requirements. The City has the option of funding the 1996 Bond's reserve fund from either existing unrestricted retained earnings or bond proceeds. In either case, the 1996 Bond's reserve fund will be unrestricted to yield; but subjject to arbitrage rebate. This means investment earnings in excess of the bond yield will be rebated to the Internal Revenue Service. All savings presented are net of any potential loss on investment earnings related to the reserve fiord. Sale Date Activities The sale date requires a number of activities which must be performed to determine the final savings and bond size. The sale date activities include: ♦ Finalize issuance costs; ♦ Receive bids; ♦ Verify bids; ♦ Prepare refunding results; ♦ Present value savings results to the City; ♦ Purchase escrow securities; ♦ Receive verbal verification of escrow cash flow and bond yields by CPA (if necessary); and ♦ Award refunding bonds to low bidder. If you have any questions or comments on this analysis, please feel free to call Dave Dirks or myself. Sincerely, EVENSEN DODGE, INC. Brian T. McQuillan Vice President Enclosure cc: Bob Helmick Dave Dirks Wayne Burggraaff Chuck Uperaft 371099